WEBVTT - Bloomberg’s Elon Musk Interview

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm David Gera and this is the big take from

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Today.

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 2>On the show, we're bringing you a special conversation in full.

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk spoke with Mishaal Hussein, editor at Large for

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Weekend at the Cutter Economic Forum. Musk joined remote

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Lea from Austin, wearing his signature dark jacket with a

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>fur collar. The interview covered a lot of ground, from

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 2>the billionaire's future at Tesla to his ongoing feud with

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>open Ai CEO Sam Altman and the possibility of Starlink

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 2>going public. At times, the conversation grew heated, particularly when

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Michall asked about Starlink operating in South Africa, Musk's country

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 2>of birth, and about reports of his communication with Russian

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 2>President Vladimir Putin.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone and Elon Musk, Welcome to cut Their Economic Forum.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>How are you?

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me. I'm fine, How are you?

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Very well? Thank you and very pleased to have you

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>with us. You know, among those here in the audience

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in Doha are some you will know people who have

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>backed to you financially over the years since you last

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>spoke here in twenty twenty two, A lot has changed

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in your life. You're not only running multiple companies. You

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>were doing that then, but now you also have a

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>role in government. So, first of all, I hope you

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>don't mind it. From time to time I have to

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>move you from one topic to another because we have

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot to cover in the time we have. That

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>will be all right, Okay, Well, let's start then with

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly the fact that you now have this combination of

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>being a CEO and having a role as a government advisor.

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about your week. How does it work? What's

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the split of your time?

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, I travel a lot. So I was in Silicon

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Valley yesterday morning. I was in Lasa evening, I mean

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Austin right now. I'll be in DC tomorrow. I'll be

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 4>there having dinner with Presidence tomorrow night, I believe, and

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 4>then a much of cabinet secrety meetings and then back

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 4>to Sloton Valley on Thursday night.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, the balance of your time is it? Well,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's a lot. But is it still the case

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>as you said a while ago, that it's about one

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to two days a week on your government work. Yeah,

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that's correct, And what does that mean for your corporate life?

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Because if we start with Tesla, the company has suffered

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in recent months what you've called blowback. So what is

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>your plan for turning that around? The declining sales picture?

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And by what stage do you think you're going to

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to turn it around?

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's already to turn around.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Give me some evidence for that. I've just been looking

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 1>at the sales figures for Europe in April, which show

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>very significant declines in the big markets.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Europe is our weakest market.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>We're stronger everywhere else, so our sales are doing doing

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 4>well at this point.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 3>We don't anticipate any any meaningful sales shortfall.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 4>And the you know, the obviously the stock market recognizes

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 4>that since we're now back over a trillion dollars in

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 4>market cap, so really the market is aware of the situation.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 3>So it's it's already turned around.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>But sales still down compared to this time last year.

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>In Europe.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>In Europe, okay, and.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, but that's that's true of all manufacturers, there's no exceptions.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that you're not going to be able?

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Does that mean you're it's quite weak?

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but you would acknowledge. Woudn't you that what you

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>are facing. Okay, let's just take it as Europe what

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you are facing is a significant problem. This Tesla is

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly aspirational brand. People identified with it. It saw it,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They saw it it being at the forefront of the climate.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And now people are driving around with stickers in their

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>cars saying I bought this before we knew Elon was crazy.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 4>And there are also people who are by buying it

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 4>because Elon's crazy, or however they may view it. So, yes,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 4>we've lost some sales, perhaps on the left, but we've

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 4>gained them on the right. The sales numbers at this

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 4>point are strong and we've seen no problem with them

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 4>had so what I mean? You can just look at

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 4>the stock price if you want the best inside information.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 4>The stock market analysts have that, and our stock wouldn't

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 4>be trading near all time ice if it was not.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 3>If things weren't in good shape. They're fine, don't worry

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I was citing sales figures rather than share price. Well,

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>tell me then, how committed you are to Tesla. Do

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you see yourself and now you committed to still being

0:04:55.640 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of Tesla in five years time. Yes,

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that at all.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, I might die.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, sure to that.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Let me see you if I'm dead. So the slighter mode.

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that the value of your pay doesn't

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>have any bearing on your decision?

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's not really subject discussion in this forum. The

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 4>I think, obviously there should be a conversation for if

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 4>there's something incredible is done, that compensation should match.

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>That something incredible was done.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 4>But I'm confident that whatever the whatever some activists posing

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 4>as a judge in Delaware happens to do will not

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 4>affect the future compensation.

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the judge you twice struck down the fifty

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>six billion a pay package that was that was awarded

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>to you. I think the value on the basis on

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the current value of stock options.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not a judge, not a judge.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 4>The activist who is cars playing a judge in a

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Halloween costume.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's your characterization. I think the value on the

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>current value of stock options.

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I think the actual justice according to the law, on the.

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Current value of stock options. I think the value of

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that pay package stands at about one hundred billion dollars.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying you are relaxed about the value of

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>your future pay package. Your decision to be committed to

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla for the next five years as long as you

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>are still with us on this planet is completely independent

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of pay. No, it's not independent, So pay is a

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>relevant factor then to your commitment to Tesla.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 4>A sufficient voting control such that I cannot be ousted

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 4>by activists investors is what matter to me. And I've

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>said this publicly many times, but let's not have this

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 4>whole thing be a discussion of my list pay.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 3>It's not a money thing. It's a reasonable.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Control thing over the future of the company, especially for

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 4>building millions, potentially billions of humanoid robots. I can't be

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 4>sitting there and weren't going.

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>To get tossed out by for political reasons by activists.

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 4>That will be unacceptable. That's all that matters. Now, let's

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 4>move on.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, just one question, well one question before we

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>move on to other companies, which is that I wonder

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>if some of what you've has happened to Tesla in

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the last few months, did you take it personally?

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>And did it make you regret any of you all

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>think twice about your political endeavors because it is I.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 4>Did what needed to be done, the violent antibody reaction,

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 4>and I'm not someone who's ever committed violence, and yet

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 4>massive violence was committed against my companies, massive violence was

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 4>threatened against me.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Who are these people? Why would they do that? How

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 3>wrong can they be?

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.239
<v Speaker 4>They're on the wrong on the wrong side of history,

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 4>and that's an evil thing to do to go and

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 4>damage some point intocent person's car, to threaten to kill me.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 4>What's wrong with these people? I have not harmed anyone,

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 4>So something needs to be done about them, and a

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 4>number of them are going to prison and they deserve it.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>You're well, you're referring to the attacks on Tesla's showrooms,

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's into showrooms and burning down cause unacceptable. Those

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 4>people will go to prison, and the people that funded

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 4>them and organized them will also go to prison.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry, wouldn't you wouldn't you wouldn't wouldn't you acknowledge

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that some of the people who turned against Tesla in

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Europe were were upset at your politics, and very few

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of them would have been violent in any way. They

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just objected to what they saw you say or do politically.

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's certainly fine to object to political things, but

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 4>it's not it's not fine to resort to violence and

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 4>hanging someone in effigy and death threats. That's obviously not okay.

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's absurd. That is in no way justifiable

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 4>at all in any way, shape or form. And some

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 4>of the the legacy media and nonetheless have sort of

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 4>justified which is unconscionable. Shame on them.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 2>After the break, my colleague Michelle Hussein's interview with Elon

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Musk continues. He talks about his long standing feud with

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Open AI and its CEO Sam Altman, and his track

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 2>record on calling for more AI regulation. You're listening to

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Michelle Hussein interview Elon Musk at the Qatar Economic Forum.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your other companies, then another business area, SpaceX.

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw that you said in a speech at the

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>West Point Military Academy recently that the future of warfare

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is AI and drones, and obviously defense is an increasingly

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>booming sector with the state of the world at the moment.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you see SpaceX moving into weaponized drones?

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so, as they ask interesting questions that are impossible

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 4>to answer, so SpaceX is is.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 3>The space launch leader. So SpaceX doesn't do drones.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX builds rockets, satellites, and Internet terminals, so SpaceX has

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 4>a very dominant position in space launch. So of the

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 4>mass launch to orbit this year, SpaceX will probably do,

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 4>China will do the remain half of the remaining amounts

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 4>of five percent, and the rest of the world, including

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the US, will do about five percent.

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 3>So SpaceX will do about ten times as much as.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 4>The rest of the world combined, or twenty times as

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 4>much as China, which is in China is doing actually

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 4>a very impressive job. The reason for this is that

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 4>we're putting it into orbit the largest satellite constellation the

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 4>world has ever seen by far, so I think at

0:11:56.160 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 4>this point about maybe approaching eighty stable active satellites in

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 4>orbit our SpaceX and they're providing high high vand with

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 4>global connectivity throughout the world. In fact, this connection is

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 4>on a SpaceX connection. So I think this is a

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 4>very good thing because it means that we can provide

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 4>low cost my bandwidth Internet to parts of the world.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>That don't have it or it's very expensive.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 4>And I think the single biggest thing you can do

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 4>to lift people out of poverty and help them is

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 4>giving them an Internet connection, because once you have the

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 4>internet connection, you can.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 3>Learn anything for free on the Internet, and you.

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 4>Can also sell your goods and services to the global market.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 4>And once you have knowledge by the Internet and the

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 4>ability to engage in commerce, that this is going to

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 4>greatly improve quality of life for people throughout the world.

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 3>And it has.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 4>And I'd just like to think anyone in the audience

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 4>who may have been helpful, and you know, we're starlink

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 4>and getting it to approved in the country, and I

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 4>think it's doing a lot of good in the countries

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 4>that have approved, which is I think this point one

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 4>hundred and thirty countries are very happy with it. I

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>don't currently into spate space actually getting into the weapons business.

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 4>That's certainly that's not an aspiration. We're frequent we're frequently

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 4>asked to do to do weapons programs, but we have

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 4>dost part a client.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you envisage SpaceX or indeed starlink as a separate

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>entity publicly listing in the near future or at all.

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 4>It's possible that starlink may go public at some point

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 4>in the future, and what would be.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The what would be the time frame, what kind of

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>time frame you consider it.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean no rush, I mean no rush to your public.

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 4>The public is I guess a way to you know,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 4>potentially make more money, but at the expense of a

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of public company overhead and inevitably.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 3>A whole bunch of lawsuits which are very annoying.

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So there's really something needs to be done about the

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 4>share shareholder shareholder derivative lawsuits in the US because it

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 4>allows plaintiffs law firms who don't represent the shareholders to

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 4>pretend that they represent the shareholders by getting a puppet

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 4>plaintiff for a few shares to initiate a massive lawsuit

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 4>against the company, and the irony being that extreme irony

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 4>that even if the class they purport to represent were

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 4>to vote that they don't want the lawsuit, the lawsuit

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 4>will still continue.

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>So how can it be.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 4>A class action representing a class if the class were

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 4>against it? And that's the bizarre situation we've got in

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 4>the US that needs a dire ney to reform. As

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 4>anyone's running a public company, you've experienced this, It's an

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 4>absurd situation that needs to change.

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, do you think Donald Trump might change it. You've

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly got his ear. I imagine that you've put this

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to him. Is this something you're trying to change before

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>any starlink.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 3>IPO, Well, we need a law to be passed.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 4>The trouble being that Judeen sixty Senate Senate votes and

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 4>the Democrats will vote against it. The plaintiffs bar is

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 4>I believe, the second largest contributor to the Democratic Party.

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 4>That's the that's the issue. At the state level, this

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 4>can be solved, and I should say Texas recently passed

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 4>a law which at least the state level made a

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 4>class action lawsuits much more reasonable because you have to

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 4>get at least one in thirty three shareholders to agree

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 4>that they are part of a class of shareholders three percent.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 4>This is will be really helped with privileged lawsuits.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 3>OK.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about AI, which is in so many of

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you businesses and in all our worlds in different ways.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the big changes the development of generative AI.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Since you last spoke to this forum three years ago,

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're in this space of course with GROP which almost

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone will know. You co founded open ai and then left,

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and you've obviously got a legal battle with open ai

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Altman. I wonder if you could say something

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>about the status of that, because you were together in

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia with the president last week with Sam Altman

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>in the same place at the same.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Time in the neighborhood.

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So does that mean you are pushing ahead with

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit against open Ai.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes. So I came up with the name open ai

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 3>as an open source and as a nonprofit, and I

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 3>founded ai opening app for the first roughly fifty million dollars,

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and it was intended to be a nonprofit, open source company,

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 3>and now is they're trying to change that for their

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 3>own financial benefit into a for profit company that is

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 3>closed source. So this would be like, let's.

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Say you you finded a nonprofit to help preserve the

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Amazon rainforest, but instead of doing that, they became a

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 4>lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the word.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 3>You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I founded.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>That's opening Eye.

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 1>They've made some changes to their corporate instructure, though, haven't

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they since in recognition of of what you've said.

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 3>And now that's just what they told the media.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, part they have part they have partly walked back

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>their plan to restructure the business. I guess that's made

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>no difference to how you feel about it. So you

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>determined to see.

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Them in court of course.

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well that's said going to be one to watch.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to ask you about AI and regulation

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>because when you were here last talking to John Mickelfwait,

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you had some pretty strong words about the risk that

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>AI poses and you said that you really felt what

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the US was missing was a federal AI regulator that

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, something along lines of the Food and Drug

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Administration or the Federal Aviation Administration. Now you're clearly now

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in a zone where you're more you're more on the

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>cutting regulation side than wanting new regulators. So has your

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>view changed on the need for an AI regulator.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 4>Well that I don't think there should be regulators. You

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 4>can think of regulators like referees on the on the

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 4>field in sports, there should be some number of referees,

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 4>but that you shouldn't have so many referees that you

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 4>can't kick the ball without hitting one.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 3>So in many in most.

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Fields in the US, the regulatory burden has grown over

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 4>time to the point where it's like having more referees

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 4>than players on the field. So and This is a

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 4>natural consequence of an extended period of prosperity.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>It's very important to apro appreciate this. This has happened

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>throughout history.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 4>When you have an extended period of prosperity with no

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 4>existential war, there's no there's no cleansing function for the

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 4>for unnecessary laws and regulations. So what happens is that

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 4>every year more laws and more regulations are pasted, because

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, legislators are going to legislate, regulators are going

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 4>to regulate, and you will get the steady pile of

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 4>more and more laws and regulations of a time until

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 4>everything is illegal. And let me give you an example

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 4>of a truly absurd situation. Under the Biden administration, SpaceX

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 4>was sued for not hiring asylum seekers in the US. Now,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 4>the problem is, it's actually illegal for SpaceX under itart

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 4>in National Traffic and Arms Regulations to hire anyone who

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 4>is not a permanent resident of the United States, because

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 4>the premise being that they will take advanced rocket technology

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 4>and return to their home country if they're not a

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 4>permanent resident.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 3>So we're simultaneously.

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 4>In a situation where it's illegal to hire slams used

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 4>and is also illegal to hire asylum seekers, and the

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.439
<v Speaker 4>Partner of Justice chose to prosecute us despite both paths

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 4>being illegal.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Down if you do, down if you don't.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But my question was specifically about a regulator for AI,

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>which you said three years ago was needed, and you

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>said we need to be proactive on the regulation of

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>AI rather than reactive. Have you changed your mind on that?

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 3>No, of course not. What No, of course not. What

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying is that there should be some referees on

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>the field, a few referees, but you shouldn't have a

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 3>field jam packed with referees such so you could not

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 3>kick a ball in any direction without hitting one. So

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the the fields that have been around for a long time,

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 3>such as automotive, so aerospace, you know if the sort

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of food and drug industries are overregulated, but the new

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 3>fields like artificial intelligence are underregulated. In fact, there is

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 3>no regulator at all.

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So they should be. Do you still think that.

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'm simply saying, which I think is just basic

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 3>common sense that you that you want to have at

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 3>least you want to have a few referees in the field.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 3>You don't want to have an army of referees. But

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 3>you want to have a few referees on any given field,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 3>in any given sport, or even any given arena, industrial arena,

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 3>to ensure help that public safety is taken care of.

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>But you don't have so there's an't, there's an't, there's

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 3>a proper number of referees. Like I said, it's actually

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 3>very easy to visualize this when compared to sports. If

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the whole field is packed with referees, that would look absurd.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 3>But if there were no referees at all, your game

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 3>is not going to be as good.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So let's then talk about your new world, your

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>role advising government. You are in this unique and unprecedented

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>position of having billions of dollars worth of contracts with

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the federal government yourself, mostly through SpaceX, and also now

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an insider's knowledge of it because of dose. Can you

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>see that there is a conflict of interest or a

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>potential conflict of interest in broad terms just through that

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>very fact?

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Actually, there have been many advisors throughout history and the

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 4>US government and others who have had economic interests, and

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 4>I absolutely an advisor. I don't have a formal power,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's a president can choose.

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 3>To accept my advice or not. And that's that's how

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 3>it goes.

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 4>If there's a single contract that of my companies that

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 4>have received that people think is somehow not was awarded improperly,

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 4>it would immediately be front page news, to say the least.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 4>And if I hadn't mentioned it, certainly my competitors would.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 4>So if you're not seeing that, then the clill is

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 4>not a complex to interest.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>The Yeah, there's another way though to look at it.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>That For example, you have many competitors, whether it's companies

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like Boeing or companies would like to do more of

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the kind of work you do for NASA Blue Origin

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Rocket Lab. And because DOGE is in every federal government department,

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you or people who work for DOGE and you are

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the driving force behind it, have an insight into those companies'

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>affairs and those companies' relationships with the federal government.

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, all we do as we review the organization to

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 3>see if the organization has.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 4>Departments that are no longer relevant and and then are

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 4>the contracts that that are being awarded good value for money?

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 4>In fact, frankly, the bar is not particularly high. Is

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 4>there any value money in a contract? And if there's

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 4>if there isn't, then we make recommendations to the secretary.

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 4>The Secretary can choose to take those actions or not

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 4>take those actions, and that's it. And then any action

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 4>that that that is as a function of DOGE is

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 4>posted to the DOGE website and to the DOGE dog

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Govt at DOGE handle on the x platform. So it's

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 4>it's complete transparency. And I have not seen any case

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 4>where the best min not has even been an accusation

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 4>of conflict because it is.

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 3>It is completely and utterly transparent. That's it.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And what about the international dimension, Now, let's think about style.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Stalink is obviously a very very good internet service. It's

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>sought after all over the world. It's critical to the

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>frontline in Ukraine. It has also had more contracts coming

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>its way, and there is some evidence that companies are

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing access to it because they want to be close

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Trump administration and send the right signal. So

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg broke news today that the South African government is

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>working around their rules on black ownership in order to

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>allow starlinkin and that is being done on the eve

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of the visit the President Ramaposa is going to make

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>to the White house. Do you recognize that as a

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>conflict of interest?

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Now, of course not.

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 4>First of all, you should be questioning why is there

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 4>why the racist laws in South Africa. That's the first

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 4>pt problem. That's what you should be attacking. It's improper

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 4>for they be racist laws in South Africa. The whole

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 4>idea with what Nelson Madelo, who is a great man, proposed,

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 4>was that or races should be on an equal footing

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 4>in South Africa. That's the right thing to do, not

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 4>to replace one set of racist laws with another set

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 4>of racist laws, which is utterly wrong and improper. So

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 4>the that's that's the deal, that all races.

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Should be tweat equally and there should be no preference

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 3>given to one or the other, whereas there are now

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and forty laws in South Africa that give

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 3>a pre that basically give strong preference to to if

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.719
<v Speaker 3>you if you're black South African and not otherwise. And

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 3>so now I'm in the subsurd situation where I was

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 3>born in South Africa but cannot get a license to

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 3>operates in starlink because I'm not black.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, it looks like that's about It looks looks like that, right,

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>looks like that's about to change.

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 4>I just asked you a question, Please answer. Does that

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 4>seem right to you?

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, those rules were designed to bring Those rules were

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>designed to bring about an era of more economic equality

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa, and it looks like the government has

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>found a way around those rules for you.

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 3>Ask your question.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>This is this is your ento. Everyone wants to hear

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>from you.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 3>As your question yes or no, not.

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>For me to answer. I have got a question for

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you about about your government works and the amount of savings.

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Why do you like raceless lots?

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.239
<v Speaker 1>This is not for me to answer. Come on, now,

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't be trying to dodge a question.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 3>You have to answer question. Answer now, you answer mine.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>I say, I think if you I'm sure you can

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>have that conversation directly with the South African government if

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to. I want to ask you about the

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>total believe it, that's not good. I want to ask

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you about the total around. I want to ask you

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>about the total amount that you're planning to save through

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Doge's work. Before the election, you said it was going

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to be at least two trillion. The number currently on

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>doze dog gov is one hundred and seventy billion dollars.

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a big change. What happened to the two trillion?

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Or do you expect it to happen immediately?

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Well? Is it going to happen because dose is supposed

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to run till next July.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, your question is absurd in this fundamental premise.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Are you assuming that on day you know, within a

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 4>few months this an instant two trillion saved?

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not sure. I'm just asking you, is that

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>still your aim?

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Then? Is it still your aim to get the amount

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>of time? Have we not made good progress given the

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 3>amount of time?

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I'm asking. So, is it's still your

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>aim to go from one hundred and seventy billion to

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>two trillion?

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 3>The ability of those to operate is this function of

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 3>whether the government.

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 4>And this includes the Congress, is willing to take our advice.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 4>We're not the dictators of the government. We are the advisors,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 4>and so we can advise. And the progress who made

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 4>thus far I think is incredible. Those team has done

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 4>incredible work. But the magnitude of.

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 3>The savings is proportionate to the support we get from

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Congress and from the yeah executive branch of the government.

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 3>In general. So we're not the dictators. We are the advisors.

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 4>But thus far, for advisors with the DOGE team, to

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 4>their credit, has made incredible progress.

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You've talked about four billion dollars a day being saved,

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but that that won't get which is an and I

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>think everyone can agree that combating waste and inefficiency in

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>government is a very good thing. But if you add

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:34.959
<v Speaker 1>that up, it's not going to get to two trillion

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>over the lifetime of DOGE.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>The four billion, the four billion a day, if dose

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to run till next July, is not going

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to get you to two trillion dollars. But you still

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>say it's your aim, so we'll take that as read.

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 3>There's there's, there's there's what DOGE I mean? I feel

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 3>you are somewhat trapped.

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 4>In the NPC dialogue tree of a traditional journalist. So

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 4>it's difficult when I'm conversing with someone who's trapped in

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 4>the dialog of a conventional journalist because it's like talking

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 4>to a computer.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 3>So doges an advisory.

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 4>Group, we are doing the best we can as an

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 4>advisory group. The progress made thus far as an advisory

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 4>group is excellent. I don't think any advisory group has

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 4>done better in the history of advisory groups of the government. Now,

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 4>we do not make the laws, nor do we control

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 4>the judiciary, nor do we control the executive branch. We

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 4>are simply advisors. In that context, we are doing very well.

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Beyond that, we cannot we cannot take action beyond that

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 4>because we are not some sort of imperial dictator of

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 4>the government.

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.959
<v Speaker 3>There are three branches of the government that that art

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>some degree opposed to that level. Cost savings, no or less.

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Let's let's let's not criticize whether there's a four trillion

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 4>and instead look at the fact that that out sixty

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 4>billion has been saved and more will we saved two And.

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>As I said, I think everyone can agree that cutting

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 1>waste and indeed fraud in any government and being responsible

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>with taxpayers money is a very good thing. So yes,

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I can see, I can see that you're proud of

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that work.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>After the break, Michelle asks Elon Musk about US AID

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 2>funding cuts, whether he's in communication with Russian President Vladimir

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Putin and the steepest challenges facing the multi hyphenit CEO.

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.719
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg's Michelle Hussein interview Elon Musk at

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cutter Economic Forum.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I do want to ask you about USAID and the

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>comments that Bill Gates made the other day, which and

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that you called him. I know you've said

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that already.

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 3>I wanted.

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 4>And I'm just who does Bill Gates think he is

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 4>to make comments about the welfare of children, given that

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 4>he is before quented Jeffrey.

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Fstein, Okay, well.

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>He's he's he said he regrets those and he's spent.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>He spent. He spent a lot. He spent a lot

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of his own money on on philanthropy around the world

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>over the years. My question to you is have you

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>looked at the data to check if he might be

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>right that the cuts to U S A I D

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>might cost millions of lives.

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I'd like him to shore us any any evidence

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 4>whatsoever that that is true.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 3>It's false.

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 4>The what we're found with US A D cuts and

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 4>by the way, they have an open cut. The parts

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 4>of the U S A D that were found to

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 4>be even slightly useful, we're transferred to the stage department.

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 4>So they've not been deleted, they've soerly been transferred to

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the stage department. But many many times over with USA

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 4>D and other organizations. When we've when they said, oh,

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 4>well this is going to help you know, children, or

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 4>it's going to help some UH disease eradication or something

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 4>like that. And then when we ask for any evidence whatsoever,

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 4>I say, well, please connect us with this group of

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.959
<v Speaker 4>children so we can talk to them and understand more

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 4>about their issue.

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 3>We get nothing. We don't they don't even try to

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 3>prevent show. We should come up with a with a

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 3>show orphan meaning like it's sort of like, well, can

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 3>we at least see a few kids, like where are

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 3>they if they're in trouble, we'd like to talk to

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 3>them and talk to their caregivers. And then we get

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 3>a thing as a.

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Response because it's what we find is an enormous amount

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 4>of fraud and graft.

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I put this example.

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Very little actually gets to the kids, if anything at all.

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me put this example to you because you

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>grew up in South Africa, so you will know the

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>impact of HIV AIDS well. And this is why I

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>asked about the data the US led on international efforts

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to combat HIV AIDS treatment prevention. And there's an initiative

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>called pepfile, which is credited with saving twenty six million

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>lives in the last twenty years. It was part of

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the foreign aid freeze. Then there was a limited waiver.

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Its services are disrupted, and unaid says if permanly discontinued,

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>there will be another four million AIDS related deaths by

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty nine. So if you look at that example,

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>which is backed up by data. In twenty twenty three,

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and thirty thousand people died of AIDS related illnesses,

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>then perhaps Bill Gates's figures are not wrong. Millions of

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>lives could be lost.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 3>First of all, the program, the AIDS Medication program, is continuing,

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 3>so your fun moree premise is wrong. It is continuing. Now,

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 3>do you have another example, not in.

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Its entire not in its entirety the program there's a

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>limited waiver, and UNAIDS have said that not all of

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the services that were previously funded by USA IDEA continuing.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's why, that's why I put that example

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to you.

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, which ones aren't being funded? I'll fix it.

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now for okay. Well, actually they're all on the

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>un unaid's website, so you'll be able to see them,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>but mostly they are to deal with Mostly they are

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with prevention, and for example, the rollout of

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a drug called Lennard kappavir, which was hailed as one

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest breakthroughs against AIDS for many years, which

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>came out last year. So if you are perhaps, I'm

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>sure UNAIDS would be delighted if you're able to look

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>at that again.

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, if in fact this is true, which I

0:35:58.680 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 3>doubt it is, then we'll fix it.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fine, So finally, political, your political influence. I wondered

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>whether you have decided yet how much you're going to

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>spend on the upcoming midterms. Is it you spent a

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more money on the last US election than you

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 1>envisaged when you were speaking here three years ago. Are

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you going to continue to spend at that kind of

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>level on future elections?

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 3>I think in terms of political spending, I'm going to

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 3>do a lot less in the future.

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And why is that?

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I think I've done enough?

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Is it because of blowback?

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Well? If I see a reason to do political spending

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 3>in the future, I will do it. An I currently serieson.

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>What about political influence beyond the US? How often do

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you speak to President Putin.

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't speak to President Putin.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>You've never spoken to President Putin.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:13.479
<v Speaker 3>I was on a video caller with him once about

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 3>five years ago. That's the only that's the speaks President Putin.

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh you must I get it.

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually, i've heard you. I've heard you speak about it.

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>For example, in your West Point speech, you said, oh,

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I challenged President Putin to to was it an arm wrestle?

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And I know the Wall Street Journalist reported your reported conversations.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.919
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you're saying they haven't happened other than once,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that as read.

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 3>Is there a worse publication on the face of the

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 3>earth than the Wall Street Journal I wouldn't use that

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 3>to lign up my cage for paragraphics that that that

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 3>newspaper is the worst newspaper in the world. And there's

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 3>and you know, if there's one newspaper that should be

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 3>pro capitalist, it's the one with Wall Street in the name.

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:00.240
<v Speaker 3>But it isn't.

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 4>So I have the very lowest opinion of the Wall

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 4>Street Journal. Absolute answers.

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 3>And you clearly have believed the tripe that you've written,

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 3>that you've read in those papers.

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I read, I read very widely, and I'm putting these

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>questions to you so that you have an opportunity to

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>respond to them, which you are and for which we're

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>all grateful to hear. Your response is, okay, we are.

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>We are out of time.

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 4>So you mentioned challenging. I did so on the X platform.

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 4>I challenged Vladimir Putin to single over the I didn't

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 4>talk to him.

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 3>That was a post on the X platform.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>That's why. That's why I asked you, and you've and

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you've clarified and explained, thank you. That's that's why I

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>was asking whether you have had reported conversations and and

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you've said you have a dot of videos.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, legacy media lize.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, listen. I actually thought I might give Grock the

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.760
<v Speaker 1>last word, because when I asked Rock what your hardest

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>challenge is, it said the strain of managing multiple high

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>stake ventures and made financial, regulatory and public relations crises.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>And I wondered whether you recognize that characterization and whether

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you do think that this is a pivotal year in

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>your life.

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, every year has been somewhat pivotal, and this one's

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 3>no different.

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, in terms of interesting things that probably

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 4>our accomplish this year the getting Starship to be fully reusable,

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 4>so that we catch both the booster and the ship,

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 4>which will be the first fully reusable orbital rocket ever

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 4>in history, which will be a profound breakthrough as the

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 4>essential breakthrough necessarily to make life multiplanetary and ultimately become

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 4>a space faring civilization. We've got neural link which is

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 4>now helped by patients restore capability using the te lefty

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 4>implant where they're able to control the computer simply by thinking.

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 4>We'll be doing our first patient to restore bland, just

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:17.919
<v Speaker 4>to restore restore site with our blind site implant, which

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 4>is the the end of this year early next. In fact,

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 4>that that first patient might be in the U a E.

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 4>Since we have a relationship with you AE and the

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Cleveland clinic clinic there.

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 3>The I think what's.

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Running on the AI front, we are close to what

0:40:34.600 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 4>you might call a g I or or digital superintelligence,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.280
<v Speaker 4>and I think we'll see we are seeing an explosion

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 4>in digital super intelligence here. And then we've got at Tesla,

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 4>the what we'll be launching ancuvised autonomy basically self driving

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 4>cars with no one.

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 3>In them in Austin next month. So It's a big

0:40:56.320 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 3>year for sure.

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 4>Many other things on the in the works too.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm technologists first and foremost Elon Musk.

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for joining us here at Cutter

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Economic Forum. Thank you.

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.479
<v Speaker 2>This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. I'm David Gera.

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 2>This conversation was part of the Bloomberg Weekend Interview, where

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 2>host Michelle Hussain will talk to influential voices in politics,

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 2>business and culture from around the globe. You'll be able

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.280
<v Speaker 2>to find Michelle's new Weekend interview series at Bloomberg dot com,

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 2>slash Weekend, or in the Bloomberg Gap. The Government of

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 2>the State of Cutter is the underwriter of the Cutter

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Economic Forum, powered by Bloomberg Special thanks to Jessica bec

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and Timothy Green. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.