Speaker 1: See that Biden walking over signing is COVID nineteen response
Speaker 1: executive orders. Joe, it's not that hard. You got all
Speaker 1: the vaccines from Donald Trump. Just figure out how to
Speaker 1: get them out faster. And talk to your Democratic liberal
Speaker 1: governor friends and tell them to now organize who it's
Speaker 1: going to and quickly, and do it expeditiously, and prioritize
Speaker 1: health workers, the elderly. Those were pre existing conditions. Neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: Neighborhoods hit particularly hard. It's not that hard, man, you know,
Speaker 1: before I get to a lot of issues, New York
Speaker 1: is just a mess. Yesterday, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo
Speaker 1: literally said that if Biden doesn't give fifteen billion dollars
Speaker 1: to New York, by the way, that'll be coming from
Speaker 1: red states that actually elect politicians that are fiscally responsible
Speaker 1: and don't raid the pension funds anyway, that he's gonna
Speaker 1: raise tax fifteen percent for New York and New York City.
Speaker 1: Tax the rich, tax the rich, tax the rich. We
Speaker 1: do this now, God forbid the rich. Leave. Come on, man,
Speaker 1: come on, man, He's got to tax the rich, tax
Speaker 1: the rich, tax the rich even more. The rich pretty
Speaker 1: much is anybody that makes money your tax for everything
Speaker 1: in New York? Um, what is that? Does he not?
Speaker 1: Has he not figured out? Being number one in terms
Speaker 1: of people leaving the state is a wee bit of
Speaker 1: a problem. Now, I know they're talking about, all right,
Speaker 1: well we'll start selling, we'll getting the marijuana business. Already
Speaker 1: in the gambling business, but we'll expand that too. We'll
Speaker 1: allow online betting and sports betting. And this is whatever
Speaker 1: they're they're doing that as well, something I think New
Speaker 1: Jersey did something I don't participate in anyway. Now he's
Speaker 1: saying today he's got one hundred and three one hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety three billion dollars budget plan and saying that
Speaker 1: New York State's employment is not going to reach pre
Speaker 1: pandemic peak until twenty twenty five. Wow, now that probably
Speaker 1: means twenty thirty. Just I'm my interpretation now of years
Speaker 1: of reading government speak, just lowering the bar so low
Speaker 1: that you, huh, we get better by twenty twenty eight,
Speaker 1: will be happy anyway, it's slow of twelve point two
Speaker 1: percent below pre pandemic employment. Well, they shut the city down,
Speaker 1: and what's happened is his restaurants are shut down. You
Speaker 1: can't even eat inside in a restaurant in New York.
Speaker 1: It's just just like California. Newsom same thing. They already
Speaker 1: taxed people. He's gonna be number one, the most tax
Speaker 1: state in the country and fifteen billion, is Joe gonna
Speaker 1: do it? If not, Joe's gonna get sued by Andrew Cuomo.
Speaker 1: The sought to get interesting. Anyway, a lot of news
Speaker 1: to to today. I thought that we're going to see
Speaker 1: an end to the there's going to be peace and prosperity.
Speaker 1: By the way, Cuomo apparently ditched the inaugural to defend
Speaker 1: Albany from massive pro Trump protests. Problem was only one
Speaker 1: person showed up protesting one anyway, There's why there's so
Speaker 1: many predictions there's going to be an explosion of right
Speaker 1: wing violence on inauguration Day. It never happened. There was
Speaker 1: no explosion, but there was let's see Antifa apparently according
Speaker 1: to some reports. We haven't confirmed that, but leftist let's
Speaker 1: put it that way once again, they're back at it
Speaker 1: in Denver, Portland, and Seattle. Media predictions so it's gonna
Speaker 1: be Trump supporters violence. Well, because they want to run
Speaker 1: with their narrative that the vast majority of people that
Speaker 1: went to Washington for the rally on January sixth were
Speaker 1: were insurrectionists incited by President and Trump that said, well
Speaker 1: you will, many of you will now peacefully and patriotically
Speaker 1: marched to the capital to let your voices be heard.
Speaker 1: And of course we discovered after the snap impeachment. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the problem is that, yeah, only a tiny percentage of
Speaker 1: people from the rally actually involved themselves in this, which
Speaker 1: was dumb. But there were people that we now know,
Speaker 1: there were warnings and we had we had intelligence that
Speaker 1: showed that people were planning and plotting and scheming, and
Speaker 1: they didn't do anything. And all the requests for reinforcements,
Speaker 1: national Guard, etc. That you normally have one hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands of people that you know in advance are coming
Speaker 1: to Washington, DC, they didn't do a single thing, which
Speaker 1: is unbelievable. Anyway, now we were watching last night they
Speaker 1: have leftist protesters. What are they protesting now? Anyway, in
Speaker 1: the streets of West coast cities Seattle, property damage, hurld
Speaker 1: objects at cars, protesters demonstrating against Biden, law enforcement and ice.
Speaker 1: He just opened the borders and gave an invitation from
Speaker 1: the world and there's no more vettying of people that
Speaker 1: come from countries with radical ties. And I doubt there's
Speaker 1: going to be any masked mandate and social distancing or
Speaker 1: COVID testing of anybody that crosses the border illegally, which
Speaker 1: they're now encouraging. Anyway, a bunch of people arrested in
Speaker 1: Portland and elsewhere charged with rioting, possession of destructive devices,
Speaker 1: and reckless. Oh, I didn't hear any of that in
Speaker 1: any of the mobs fawning coverage of all things Biden yesterday.
Speaker 1: Very predictable, isn't it anyway? So let's you know, I
Speaker 1: want to go to this one issue, and I want
Speaker 1: to spend a little bit of time on this, talk
Speaker 1: to a lot of people, especially constitutional lawyers. Overwhelming consensus
Speaker 1: about this latest shift show. My sources in Washington say
Speaker 1: it's dead on arrival. Democrats know it's dead on arrival,
Speaker 1: this impeachment trial, which hunt the latest one against Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But with that said, it's still going to be sent
Speaker 1: over at some point from the House, and I will
Speaker 1: get a pretty good idea of where this is headed,
Speaker 1: and that is Republicans are are going to, at least
Speaker 1: in this instance listen to the Constitution, because the Constitution
Speaker 1: is clear. And it was a great piece written. I'm
Speaker 1: trying to remember worse. I think it was Western Journal.
Speaker 1: It was Wall Street Journal, Wall Street Journal by Alan Dershowitz. No,
Speaker 1: you can't try and impeach former president. And that the
Speaker 1: Senate erroneously asserted jurisdiction once, but dissenting members forced an acquittal.
Speaker 1: And he said now that Donald Trump is a private citizen,
Speaker 1: because this is a constitutional issue that has to be
Speaker 1: dealt with. And by the way, defense number one is
Speaker 1: the constitution. Defense number two is really let's look at
Speaker 1: the insurrectionist language of the left, because you're not applying
Speaker 1: the same standards to all of you that never open
Speaker 1: your mouth when Pelosi and Schumer and Kamala, Joe and
Speaker 1: the squad and others said these outrageous and reckless and
Speaker 1: dangerous things, never opened them out. Donald Trump never said that.
Speaker 1: So the actual evidence will also lead to acquittal. But anyway,
Speaker 1: the Senate it's going to have to dismiss it. My
Speaker 1: sources on the ground saying Republicans want no part of it.
Speaker 1: They see the constitutional issues in play. They also see
Speaker 1: the logic arguments involved. The duplicity and hypocrisy of it all.
Speaker 1: And the Constitution says the president shall be removed from
Speaker 1: office on impeachment and conviction, not by the expiration of
Speaker 1: his term, before the impeachment process is complete. It also
Speaker 1: mandates that judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend
Speaker 1: further than to removal and disqualification, not or disqualifications. This
Speaker 1: is key. Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend
Speaker 1: further to removal and disqualification, not or disqualification. In other words,
Speaker 1: it's not an option there when the Constitution and Dershowitz's right,
Speaker 1: Levina's right, it says Wheelhouse, all these other former judges
Speaker 1: that have spoken out about this, the case couldn't be
Speaker 1: anymore clear. If you look at our constitution. States are
Speaker 1: allowed in impeachment. Several states allowed the impeachment of former officials.
Speaker 1: The framers could have easily included that provision. This is
Speaker 1: a historical fact. They did not. They explicitly chose to
Speaker 1: prohibit what was a practice in Great Britain of trial
Speaker 1: by legislature, accepting only impeachment, a bill of a tainder
Speaker 1: and any punitive legislative act against such a person. The
Speaker 1: courts have held as legal precedent. It's called that the
Speaker 1: punishments prohibited by the Bill of Attainer clause include disqualification
Speaker 1: from holding office. Moreover, the Constitution requires the Chief Justice
Speaker 1: to preside when the President of the United States has tried.
Speaker 1: No former official has ever been convicted by the Senate.
Speaker 1: Only one has been impeached, Secretary of War William Belcamp
Speaker 1: w Belcamp as his name, was apparently guilty of impeachable
Speaker 1: offenses to which he confessed, and he resigned his office
Speaker 1: hours before the House unanimously impeached them. This was going
Speaker 1: back to eighteen seventy six. The Senate voted in favor
Speaker 1: of a procedural motion affirming its jurisdiction to try the impeachment,
Speaker 1: but two dozen senators who believed he is guilty voted
Speaker 1: to acquit because jurisdiction grounds and a close vote a
Speaker 1: half nearly a century and a half ago doesn't establish
Speaker 1: any biden e precedent any way anyway, So the more
Speaker 1: compelling precedent, if you're looking for it, I know there's
Speaker 1: a little in the weeds, but you're gonna hear it
Speaker 1: is when the effort or the House's decision not to
Speaker 1: impeach Richard Nixon after he left office in nineteen seventy four,
Speaker 1: to avoid what was certain impeachment and conviction. At the time,
Speaker 1: there was not a movement to continue the process, and
Speaker 1: beyond the constitution, strong policy, historical reasons, and incoming administration
Speaker 1: should not seek recriminations against their predecessors. I thought mister
Speaker 1: Unity Joe Biden would probably step up by now. Apparently
Speaker 1: he's oh, they can, they can follow their constitutional duty,
Speaker 1: and we can turn American into a socialist hellhole all
Speaker 1: at once. Anyway, America has lived more in accordance with
Speaker 1: Lincoln's message to the soon to be defeated Confederacy quote
Speaker 1: with malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness
Speaker 1: in the right as God gives us to see the right,
Speaker 1: let us strive to finish the work we are in
Speaker 1: to bind up the nation's wounds. Apparently mister Unity was
Speaker 1: all talk, no action is coming. He'll support this latest
Speaker 1: shift show. But the problem is now Democrats are They're
Speaker 1: getting scared, and Republicans are even more scared because you
Speaker 1: got a lot of Republican senators more than Democrats up
Speaker 1: in two years for the US Senate. So it's it's
Speaker 1: very clear how this is going to go. If you're interested,
Speaker 1: i'll give you a quick synopsis. It's going to be
Speaker 1: argued on the constitutional merits, on the double standards. The
Speaker 1: rhetoric of the left is gonna be brought up at
Speaker 1: this trial. And yes, they can sit there and watch
Speaker 1: that evidence introduced and the country might actually get a
Speaker 1: different taste of what they're hearing on fake news media. Anyway,
Speaker 1: the President, they'll file the articles, they'll send them over
Speaker 1: to the Senate. President's team will respond, they'll convene a court.
Speaker 1: Probably a motion to dismiss would be my guest, And
Speaker 1: the longest this thing would go on, I imagine would
Speaker 1: be a week and then they acquit and it's over.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be that simple. I think most people will
Speaker 1: actually vote to dismiss. It could be out on that
Speaker 1: basis as well. In other words, a motion to dismiss
Speaker 1: are higher the tasty where the US is right now.
Speaker 1: When I announced that, you all said it's not possible.
Speaker 1: Come on, give me a break, man. Oh we got
Speaker 1: our first. Come on, give me a break man in
Speaker 1: the Oval office, man, this is I don't think even
Speaker 1: those he does it just my guess. Uh, mister Unity.
Speaker 1: By the way, let me make one of the point
Speaker 1: on us. Federal investigators now are discovering, and our sources
Speaker 1: confirmed their discovering that the insurrection, the mob and the
Speaker 1: media and Democrat's favorite new word was in fact fully
Speaker 1: planned out. A lot of this was planned. Now, did
Speaker 1: some people that had been part of the rally allow
Speaker 1: themselves to get caught up in it? Yep? They did.
Speaker 1: That was pretty dumb. But federal invested. More that they do.
Speaker 1: The more that this this whole thing, you begin to
Speaker 1: see why you don't have snap impeachments. You begin to
Speaker 1: see it all, you know, And it's kind of funny
Speaker 1: because you know, the Press secretary, I guess is her position.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure. A spokesperson for Biden, Jensaki, telling uh,
Speaker 1: Savannah Guthrie. Biden served thirty six years in the Senate.
Speaker 1: In other words, is mister unity, President Unity gonna stop this,
Speaker 1: you know, canceled divisive Trump impeachment trial that's unconstitutional post
Speaker 1: presidency impeachment anyways, and he's gonna leave leave it to
Speaker 1: this on it we're old leaders. No, he doesn't want
Speaker 1: to piss off his radical base. That's the only reason
Speaker 1: he wouldn't stand up for it, and he probably wants
Speaker 1: it to happen. And the same day you got Pelosi
Speaker 1: says Trump is an accessory to murder, instigating insurrection. Oh,
Speaker 1: we've played Nancy's remarks and Maxie Walter's remarks, and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's remarks, and Chuck Schumer's remarks and Kamal Awris's remarks.
Speaker 1: If that's their standard, they all have a lot of
Speaker 1: explaining to do. Although AOC has gotten on board congratulating
Speaker 1: Biden and Harris, we've got to begin to heal the planet. Okay,
Speaker 1: creating justice, healing our planet? What does that even mean?
Speaker 1: Bernie's I think between Bill Clinton falling asleep. I mean
Speaker 1: there's literally photos that showing Biden's speech put put Clinton
Speaker 1: to sleep, which I'm sure it just wasn't very excited
Speaker 1: about it. Didn't take a little snooze. During the inauguration speech,
Speaker 1: Bernie sandered wearing his Parker and his mittens. I he
Speaker 1: thought he was in Vermont. I don't know. Um, now
Speaker 1: here we go again, the Churchill bust member. President Trump
Speaker 1: brought it back at Winston Churchill, one of the one
Speaker 1: of the most courageous historic figures that literally in the
Speaker 1: middle of the bombing of Britain, was out amongst people
Speaker 1: every single day, risking his life and literally shoring up
Speaker 1: an entire nation with courage they never thought they had
Speaker 1: and etc. So Biden removes the Churchill bust from the
Speaker 1: Oval office. Did anybody know tile, tess and sweat? And
Speaker 1: I said to those who have joined the government, I
Speaker 1: have nothing. You offer a blood toil, good and strick.
Speaker 1: You aren't right it up. On the day I will
Speaker 1: say he did the way by gee landing there with
Speaker 1: all our might, with all the strength that Jod can
Speaker 1: give us, to wage war against a monstrous tyranny never
Speaker 1: surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalog of human crime.
Speaker 1: You are quite our, aim I can an train one
Speaker 1: word victory, victory all costs, victory in spite of old terra,
Speaker 1: victory of a long and hard the road may be.
Speaker 1: But without victory, there ain't no survival. Without victory, there
Speaker 1: is no survival. Now, he didn't just speak words, because
Speaker 1: as the Nazis were bombing a great Britain, he went
Speaker 1: out pretty much daily among the people of Britain and
Speaker 1: summon the strength and the courage in the might of
Speaker 1: a nation to fight back against evil and tyranny. In
Speaker 1: his time the war, my father spent four years in
Speaker 1: the pacificate. I know a lot about it. One of
Speaker 1: the one of the one of the most one of
Speaker 1: the bravest historian figures. Now, interestingly, after the war side note,
Speaker 1: he was thrown out of office, but then he got back.
Speaker 1: In a long story, all right, we'll talk about another day.
Speaker 1: But you know, symbolic, you're gonna watch Biden to spend
Speaker 1: more than either Clinton or Obama to aid the economy
Speaker 1: by by a long shot. Um, they're talking about two
Speaker 1: trillion dollars as the down payment. Looking at this green
Speaker 1: new deal. Then of course, now for all the people
Speaker 1: that are still out of work, you know, think about
Speaker 1: what they're going through. You know, all the people that
Speaker 1: are still out of work. Now we're gonna have more
Speaker 1: competition from illegal immigrants. Now now we're not gonna have
Speaker 1: They said, well, we're canceling the Muslim travel ben They
Speaker 1: never was a Muslim travel band. There was a travel
Speaker 1: band from countries that had associations with people of known
Speaker 1: terrorist groups. Plenty of Muslim countries not included in that list.
Speaker 1: So it's just an outright lie in propaganda. Now what
Speaker 1: does this all mean then? Of course, well, if you're
Speaker 1: in the caravan, just now is not the best time.
Speaker 1: We're just starting out. We need a little time. And
Speaker 1: then of course a path to amnesty, open borders, not
Speaker 1: building any more border wall, and Biden's knew mandate that
Speaker 1: be nice to others, or I will fire you on
Speaker 1: the spot. Okay, there's gonna be a hundred day pause
Speaker 1: on deportations, limitations on ice, etc. Etc. Now, one of
Speaker 1: the worst things I read, haven't spent a lot of
Speaker 1: time talking about it is And this is very interesting.
Speaker 1: I think it was John McLaughlin Land, that's correct me
Speaker 1: if I'm wrong, that said. I think the Jewish American
Speaker 1: vote for Donald Trump only went up about a point
Speaker 1: in this last election. Never been a president that has
Speaker 1: been more pro religious freedom than Donald Trump ever in history.
Speaker 1: Never been a president that has been more supportive of
Speaker 1: the State of Israel than Donald Trump. Recognizing Golan heights
Speaker 1: in Gaza, etc. West Bank as Israeli territory, moving the
Speaker 1: embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, something so many other
Speaker 1: past presidents said had promise but never in fact followed.
Speaker 1: Through on I mean day one the new Biden administration
Speaker 1: signaling you back to the bad old relationship days of
Speaker 1: the Obama administration and a shift in policy towards Israel,
Speaker 1: and literally right after he sworn into office. On that list,
Speaker 1: the first things to do changing the name of the
Speaker 1: US Ambassador to Israel's Twitter account to state the official
Speaker 1: Twitter account of the US Ambassador to Israel the West
Speaker 1: Bank and Gaza Now. The change in title, as the
Speaker 1: Washington pree Beacon reported, that is a pretty significant shift
Speaker 1: in policy in that case, considering the history of the
Speaker 1: Biden Obama administration, it means something the US has for decades.
Speaker 1: They never took a position, a policy position on West
Speaker 1: Bank Gaza. The only person to do that was Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: maintaining that the israelis the Palestinians. They've got to decide
Speaker 1: and negotiations how the areas will be split up. By
Speaker 1: the way, Benjamin Netanyah has saw this coming and acted
Speaker 1: early before Biden was ever sworn in. Anyway, the change
Speaker 1: does mark a significant shift, and the incoming administration's move
Speaker 1: does signal it's going to elevate the new ambassador's the
Speaker 1: next ambassador's role to include conducting direct diplomacy with Palestinian leaders,
Speaker 1: including the Gaza Strip, etc. Etc. Rick Scott responded Senator Florida,
Speaker 1: the Biden administration titled Change for the US Ambassador to
Speaker 1: Israel shows Democrats hostility towards Israel. And then the question
Speaker 1: is if it's only twenty six or twenty seven percent
Speaker 1: of the electorate in the country, in the Jewish American
Speaker 1: community that votes for Donald Trump, why, I mean, okay,
Speaker 1: you voted for a guy who's you know, as vice
Speaker 1: president as ministration was more hostile to Israel than anyone
Speaker 1: in our lifetime. By the way, former HHS Secretary Alex
Speaker 1: Asar rightly pointing out that if Biden actually made good
Speaker 1: on his pledge to deliver one hundred million COVID shots
Speaker 1: on one hundred days, well that's actually less than half
Speaker 1: the vaccinations that the Trump administration already had on target
Speaker 1: to deliver. Azar said it earlier this week, and he
Speaker 1: said that nine hundred thousand vaccinations a day were already
Speaker 1: being administered and the number increasing every week, and we'll
Speaker 1: have distributed two hundred fifty million doses of vaccine in
Speaker 1: the next hundred days. So I mean, why don't we
Speaker 1: just stick to that plan then, and make sure that
Speaker 1: these governors do their job when they get I mean,
Speaker 1: I can't believe they're actually there's one story about I
Speaker 1: guess somebody was in a pharmacy and ask people, do
Speaker 1: you guys want to get the vaccine? Otherwise I'm gonna
Speaker 1: have to throw it out after midnight, It's sure, and
Speaker 1: they went and they got it. Well, why don't we
Speaker 1: have people online and people prepared and some type of
Speaker 1: they've known this is coming now for a long time.
Speaker 1: This just in the parlor. Judge refused to make Amazon
Speaker 1: resume hosting the website. Okay, there's got to be an
Speaker 1: antitrust issue in here somewhere, that's my guess. I'll tell
Speaker 1: you one thing. And there are companies out there that
Speaker 1: are now laying off people that work in the energy sector.
Speaker 1: One of the things I always always drew me to
Speaker 1: the energy sector. Number One, we had the lowest gas
Speaker 1: prices ever. We're now energy and depend weren't weren't importing
Speaker 1: a drop of oil in November from the Middle East?
Speaker 1: Not a drop um. And you know, now we're going
Speaker 1: to end the Keystone XL pipeline and then we're gonna
Speaker 1: go after the rest of the energy and gas and
Speaker 1: oil industry, in the coal industry, well, it's incalculable the
Speaker 1: damage that's going to be done to the economy and
Speaker 1: the wreckage of human lives here because imagine if your
Speaker 1: family was part of the Keystone XL pipeline and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden now on day one, we're gonna stop that today.
Speaker 1: What do you think happens next everybody that's been working
Speaker 1: on it again, which is for the benefit of the
Speaker 1: American people. The free flow of oil at market prices
Speaker 1: no longer dependent on other nations that hate our guts
Speaker 1: like Russia, countries in the Middle East, etc. And more importantly,
Speaker 1: we have hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of high
Speaker 1: paying career jobs that are going to be lost and
Speaker 1: pe are what are these people supposed to do now
Speaker 1: in a day and age where unemployment has never been
Speaker 1: higher because democratic governors aren't as smart as guys like
Speaker 1: Ron de Santis down in Florida. So now you're fellow Americans,
Speaker 1: Maybe they had a good career track job paying them
Speaker 1: one hundred grand a year. Even truck drivers, you know,
Speaker 1: or we're making you know, you get trained to drive
Speaker 1: the truck they give your place to live while you're
Speaker 1: being trained, and then all the overtime you can have.
Speaker 1: They're making one hundred grand a year. That's that's a
Speaker 1: that's a pretty good career job with a career track
Speaker 1: if you want to pursue other avenues in the future. Anyway,
Speaker 1: So they suspended oil and gas leasing and permitting on
Speaker 1: federal lands on top of everything else. Evaluating the legal implications,
Speaker 1: that means it's all going away. That that counts to
Speaker 1: close to twenty five percent of our nation's crude oil output,
Speaker 1: meaning they are a big contributed to our oil supply.
Speaker 1: A good piece and Reuters about this, oil and gas
Speaker 1: industry trade groups, American Petroleum Institute, Western Energy Alliance. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're all issuing statements condemning it. Yeah. With this move,
Speaker 1: they're leading us now towards more reliance on foreign energy
Speaker 1: from countries with lower environmental standards and risk to hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of jobs and billions in government revenue. Great move, Joe.
Speaker 1: By the way, we told you so. We tried to
Speaker 1: warn the country, We tried our best. We knew this
Speaker 1: would happen. None of it's good for the country. You know,
Speaker 1: there's back to this talk of a political party. Now
Speaker 1: that it seems like seems and I'm keeping my eye
Speaker 1: on it, trust me very closely, now that it kind
Speaker 1: of seems like the Republicans understand the constitutional issues and
Speaker 1: the impact on their own political careers as it relates
Speaker 1: to a post unconstitutional, post impeachment trial shift show. If
Speaker 1: the Republicans are stupid enough to do that, there's no
Speaker 1: way you don't. I really believe ram Paul's right that
Speaker 1: you don't fracture the Republican Party forever. There are people
Speaker 1: already that have been talking about one name. There's one
Speaker 1: report of a Patriot Party. I don't know. I'd like
Speaker 1: a freedom party. I like freedom or Constitution party. After
Speaker 1: we slowed down with the Constitution of States, Mark Levin
Speaker 1: have been a big advocate of all of this. Probably
Speaker 1: gonna have to get back to that discussion and maybe
Speaker 1: start really embracing that as an opportunity to bypass where
Speaker 1: the Left has taken this country what they want to do,
Speaker 1: and pack the courts and then the legislative filibuster and
Speaker 1: statehood here, there and everywhere. So they have a Senate
Speaker 1: Democratic majority in perpetuity. But you know the famous lines
Speaker 1: it was a setpack speech. I think the other day
Speaker 1: I misspoken said time for choosing, But it was Reagan
Speaker 1: at Seapack saying is it a He asked the question rhetorically,
Speaker 1: is it a third party we need? And he answers
Speaker 1: his own question, it goes, no, we need a revitalized
Speaker 1: second party. Well, Trump was the revitalization of the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: It's amazing how quickly you know, rather than learn that
Speaker 1: principled courage to fight for the promises you make to
Speaker 1: your constituents usually ends up with people supporting you in crowds,
Speaker 1: perhaps even showing up that you never dreamed of. But
Speaker 1: Reagan continued with no pale pastels, but bold colored differences. Problem,
Speaker 1: biggest problem with the Republican Party. I'm not a Republican
Speaker 1: And the biggest problem for them is that, you know,
Speaker 1: there is a swamp, there is a sewer in Washington,
Speaker 1: and you know, Republicans tend to get weak, and they
Speaker 1: don't have vision, they don't have backbone, they don't have
Speaker 1: political courage. They're always thinking about their next election. And
Speaker 1: rather than just go and fulfill the promises you were,
Speaker 1: you were the honor you were given by your constituents
Speaker 1: to serve them. They just they all seem to whatever
Speaker 1: party they're from, just getting trenched into the bureaucracy, and
Speaker 1: they like being called senator and congressmen or congresswoman or
Speaker 1: governor or whatever it happens to be. You know. But
Speaker 1: if they do it, I mean, they ever would go
Speaker 1: ahead stupidly on this this unconstitutional post impeachment shift show,
Speaker 1: witch hunt, latest Tolkes, that's where it's going to end
Speaker 1: up amazing, and investigators keep saying, oh yeah, this is
Speaker 1: more and more evidence showing that this was planned. Unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden and these associates and family members were connected
Speaker 1: to Chinese national and Chinese companies linked with the Communist
Speaker 1: Party and the People's Liberation Armor. This includes a CEFC
Speaker 1: China Energy Company Limited and also that company's subsidiaries. Records
Speaker 1: show that a company linked to the communist regime, Saint
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden Law firm, millions of dollars. China is going
Speaker 1: to eat our lunch. Come on, man, they can't even
Speaker 1: figure out how to deal with the fact that they
Speaker 1: have this great division between the China Sea and the
Speaker 1: mountains in the east, I mean, in the west. They
Speaker 1: can't figure out how they're going to deal with the
Speaker 1: corruption that exists within the system. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: they're not bad folks. Folks, but guess what they're not.
Speaker 1: They're not the competition for us. A more prosperous China
Speaker 1: will mean more demand for American made good and services
Speaker 1: and more jobs back home in the United States of America.
Speaker 1: So our desire for your prosperity is not born out
Speaker 1: of some nobility. It is in our self interest that
Speaker 1: China continue to prosper. When I've spent a lot of
Speaker 1: time with President she even he acknowledges that the growth
Speaker 1: and progress in China has been a direct relationship of
Speaker 1: the stability that has been encouraged by US presidents. We're
Speaker 1: not trying to contain China. We're not trying to slow
Speaker 1: down Chinese growth. The growth of China is overwhelmingly in
Speaker 1: our interest. We've recognized that the United States China relations
Speaker 1: generate global economic benefit, not just to both our countries,
Speaker 1: but global benefit. Last year, our trade would try to
Speaker 1: support it over five hundred thousand jobs here in the
Speaker 1: United States. There was a debate here in the United
Speaker 1: States and quite frankly throughout most of the West is
Speaker 1: whether arising China was in the interest of the United
Speaker 1: States in the wider world. As a young member of
Speaker 1: the Foreign Relations Committee, I wrote, and I said, and
Speaker 1: I believe then what I believe now that a rising
Speaker 1: China is a positive, positive development not only for China
Speaker 1: but for America and the world written large, I guess
Speaker 1: I want to ask you, do you think that this
Speaker 1: is going to in fact be a major issue? And
Speaker 1: are you vulnerable on this issue at all because of
Speaker 1: your son's business dealings in China. No, I don't believe
Speaker 1: so at all, my son's business dealings or not anything
Speaker 1: whored everybody that he's talking about, not even remotely. All right,
Speaker 1: there it is, Yes, Joe Biden's many moments of praising China.
Speaker 1: So tonight on Hannity. The guy that owns the laptop
Speaker 1: or pair shop that actually patriotically turned over the information
Speaker 1: of the FBI after reaching out to Hunter Biden again
Speaker 1: and again and again and again and again to come
Speaker 1: and take the laptop, which they didn't take. They have
Speaker 1: since asked that it be returned a little late. That
Speaker 1: kind of makes it more authentic. Oh, they didn't say
Speaker 1: it's not true or any of those things. Then it
Speaker 1: gets into the whole big tech canceled culture misinformation flow
Speaker 1: of the mob because they protected Joe Biden and wouldn't
Speaker 1: allow the contents that implicated Joe Biden himself and contradict
Speaker 1: the statement that he didn't know about zero experience hunters
Speaker 1: many business dealings, including with China and Ukraine and Russia
Speaker 1: and Kazakhstan. Anyway, Peter Schweitzer, he's the one that got
Speaker 1: it all. This started back in January twenty eighteen, he
Speaker 1: joins US. Now, Secret Empires was the best selling book
Speaker 1: at the time, and now this is coming front and center.
Speaker 1: Where do you think it goes? Oh, it's a great question, Sean,
Speaker 1: And I'm looking forward to the interview tonight. I think
Speaker 1: that's going to be very enlightening. I think we are
Speaker 1: going to continue to see the Bidens do what they've done. Look,
Speaker 1: I mean, Joe Biden has said that he is not
Speaker 1: going to do there's not going to be any illegitimate
Speaker 1: foreign deals involving his family. But on the other hand,
Speaker 1: he's never said and denies that the Ukraine dealings and
Speaker 1: the China dealings were illegitimate. So I think we can
Speaker 1: expect them to keep doing what they're doing. We know
Speaker 1: that Hunter has this equity stake in a Chinese company,
Speaker 1: and there's these other entanglements. So that's going to continue.
Speaker 1: And I think what we're going to see from the
Speaker 1: Biden administration is, you know, talk about we need to
Speaker 1: maintain some of Trump's policies of being chough on China.
Speaker 1: But you know, Sean, I've been following politics in Washington
Speaker 1: a long time as you have, and what I've learned
Speaker 1: is that that talk is cheap and the real question
Speaker 1: is are they going to back that up with policy?
Speaker 1: And the answer I think is a definite. They know
Speaker 1: that a lot of people are watching them because of
Speaker 1: the commercial ties of Family has with Beijing, and they're
Speaker 1: going to say some of the right things. But in
Speaker 1: terms of policies, it's going to be a very very
Speaker 1: positive development for Beijing because this administration is not going
Speaker 1: to be tough with them the way that we need
Speaker 1: to be. Well, I mean, you know, it's like, okay,
Speaker 1: what the family foreign financial syndicate continues. Is that where
Speaker 1: we're now headed. I mean, I see Hunter there now.
Speaker 1: The thing is is I'm just wondering you've been briefed
Speaker 1: on the contents of the laptop. We're gonna maybe know
Speaker 1: hopefully no more by tonight with the laptop repair shop
Speaker 1: owner joining us. We've heard from Bob Olynskys on with Tucker,
Speaker 1: You've spoken with him yourself. You've independently corroborated the emails
Speaker 1: that implicate Joe Biden in that family business, some of
Speaker 1: they denied having any knowledge about. And my question is
Speaker 1: where does this go? Because is based on the standards
Speaker 1: Democrats have now set in terms of impeachment that would
Speaker 1: render all of these issues, including the billion dollars to
Speaker 1: get a prosecutor in Ukraine fired to help out zero experience,
Speaker 1: all of it now can be applied to Joe Biden
Speaker 1: almost frankly today, it could be applied absolutely. And Sean,
Speaker 1: let's be clear. The reason that you have an independent
Speaker 1: prosecutor and independent council is, and this has written into
Speaker 1: the statute, if there is a conflict of interest, meaning
Speaker 1: that the alleged criminal activity or investigation involves a senior
Speaker 1: administration official that could be the attorney general, that could
Speaker 1: be the vice president, that could be the president, and
Speaker 1: because it involves that individual or their family, it is
Speaker 1: not possible for there to be a fair and perceived
Speaker 1: to be a fair investigation by the DOJ, and so
Speaker 1: the statute calls for an independent council. In those instances,
Speaker 1: you cannot find a Taylor case that is better than
Speaker 1: the one involving Hunter Biden and these Chinese deals and
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian deals. So it is really up to the
Speaker 1: new Attorney General, assuming he gets confirmed, to enact the
Speaker 1: independent Council statute. A lot of people wanted William Barr
Speaker 1: to do that. In the case of Bar, it was
Speaker 1: a little bit awkward because at the time he was
Speaker 1: still Attorney General. Donald J. Trump was still the president.
Speaker 1: The investigation was going on happily the way that it should,
Speaker 1: but that has now changed with the change of administrations.
Speaker 1: So we need to have an independent council. And what
Speaker 1: we need, Sean is people on Capitol Hill Republicans making clear,
Speaker 1: as the Democrats did in twenty seventeen, that this is
Speaker 1: a non negotiable thing. We all now know that the
Speaker 1: Russia illusion thing was based on nothing. It was based
Speaker 1: on this fake dossier that was made up by a
Speaker 1: corrupted source who was paid by the Clinton campaign. Nothing
Speaker 1: like that applies here. We have the flow of money,
Speaker 1: we have the Treasury Department reports that Senator Johnson's committee released.
Speaker 1: We've got Tony bob Olinsky's communications, We've got the laptop.
Speaker 1: So this is not a politically motivated, you know, made
Speaker 1: up dossier that's uncorroborated. This is this is the very foundational,
Speaker 1: forensic evidence that should be the basis of an investigation.
Speaker 1: And it's only going to happen if Republicans on Capitol
Speaker 1: Hill say nothing's going to get done unless this happens.
Speaker 1: That's the only way we get I don't see them
Speaker 1: stopping all business to make that happen. And I think
Speaker 1: what we're going to see is what Democrats can't get
Speaker 1: done legislatively. First, they'll change the process. My full anticipate
Speaker 1: that Schumer and company and Mansion says he won't go
Speaker 1: along with it, but maybe Mitt Romney would. I don't
Speaker 1: know in this divided political environment we have, but uh,
Speaker 1: they probably want to eliminate the legislative filibuster. Uh. Committee
Speaker 1: chairmanships are going to be in the hands of Democrats.
Speaker 1: My guess is they will live in the past and
Speaker 1: they'll be out there pushing to, you know, forever investigate
Speaker 1: all things Donald Trump. Uh, you know, to the day
Speaker 1: this poor guy dies and his family as well, and
Speaker 1: it just seems like it's it's I don't think that's
Speaker 1: going to happen. I don't. I just don't believe it.
Speaker 1: But I think the evidence couldn't be more overwhelming now,
Speaker 1: the stuff that I'm hearing on the laptop short of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's knowledge, that would prove Joe Biden's knowledge of
Speaker 1: Hunter's business dealings, which contradicts his statements publicly, are are
Speaker 1: these personal issues with Hunter? You know, we saw the
Speaker 1: picture of the crack pipe in Hunter's mouth with him
Speaker 1: asleep on the front cover of the New York Post,
Speaker 1: but of course Big Tech censored that. My question is,
Speaker 1: you've heard about what else is on that laptop. It's
Speaker 1: beyond disturbing. Let's put it this way. If all of
Speaker 1: that panned out to be true, I don't see how
Speaker 1: anyone would be able to avoid gel. Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: I think that's a huge issue. Look, what we were
Speaker 1: advised as we were arranging to get access to emails
Speaker 1: and the laptop was that. And this is again not
Speaker 1: based on direct knowledge, but we're based on what I've
Speaker 1: been told that some of the images on that laptop
Speaker 1: are of such that you do not want to be
Speaker 1: in possession of them because simply by possessing them you
Speaker 1: could be violating certain laws as it relates to let's
Speaker 1: just say, you know, certain imagery. I'll leave it that way.
Speaker 1: I don't know if that's true or not, but we
Speaker 1: were very clear we didn't want that. We wanted the emails.
Speaker 1: But I agree. I mean, it's it's it's all very
Speaker 1: very disturbing. And what we know is is that, you know,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has talked about how close he is to Hunter.
Speaker 1: They have been close for a very long time. Some
Speaker 1: of the emails in the laptop indicate very directly that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was, you know, paying bills for his father.
Speaker 1: He even in one communication complained, I believe it was
Speaker 1: to his daughter that he was paying some of his
Speaker 1: moms and dad's bills. So that means that that, you know,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden initially said he had no knowledge of Hunter's deals.
Speaker 1: Now that it's been revealed that he did and that
Speaker 1: Tony Bobolynski met with them, the argument has shifted that
Speaker 1: he didn't benefit from any of the deals, and now
Speaker 1: it appears that the laptop speaks to the fact that Sean,
Speaker 1: they actually did financially benefit because Hunter was getting paid
Speaker 1: and Hunter was paying part of his parents' bills. That
Speaker 1: makes them direct beneficiaries. And I agree with you on
Speaker 1: as far as Capitol Hill's concern. There's not a whole
Speaker 1: lot of profiles and courage up there on our side.
Speaker 1: But look, that's the only way this is going to happen.
Speaker 1: That's the only way this is going to be investigated.
Speaker 1: And if we don't have people there with backbones saying look,
Speaker 1: all we're asking for is an independent investigation to look
Speaker 1: into this. If they don't do that, this story will
Speaker 1: be buried its It tends to be likely now if
Speaker 1: the contents, I think too many people and you might
Speaker 1: agree with this, don't too many people now know the
Speaker 1: contents of the laptop. In other words, I don't think
Speaker 1: it's going to be possible for people to bury that story.
Speaker 1: I just don't see it. Yeah, they can't bury the story,
Speaker 1: I agree. But but you know, some of the great
Speaker 1: progress that we've made in the story. You and I
Speaker 1: started talking about this in January of twenty eighteen. You
Speaker 1: were the first one to pick this up, and then
Speaker 1: in Profiles and Corruption, we expanded it, and then Senator
Speaker 1: Johnson's committee sort of followed in the wake. And what
Speaker 1: they had was subpoena power. They had the ability to
Speaker 1: actually look at some financial transactions in others. We don't
Speaker 1: have that capability. You don't have that cape of ability.
Speaker 1: No news outlet does. So you have to have some
Speaker 1: official government body that has subpoena power, whether it's an
Speaker 1: independent council, whether it's the Senate committee looking into this. Otherwise,
Speaker 1: they are going to continue to deny what is most
Speaker 1: certainly true, and it's going to be very very hard,
Speaker 1: I think too, in the sense explain and lay out
Speaker 1: how there was very real, I believe criminal conduct that
Speaker 1: was taking place here. So to me, it's a it's
Speaker 1: a it's a key ingredient. You right, The story is
Speaker 1: not going away, Sean. We are going through the emails
Speaker 1: on the Hunter laptop, we are looking at the other
Speaker 1: deals that were discussed, We're looking at the terms of
Speaker 1: those deals, who they involved. So we will be doing
Speaker 1: much more reporting on that. I hope I can come
Speaker 1: on your show and talk about that. But without that
Speaker 1: official arm of subpoena power, we're never going to know
Speaker 1: the full story and the American people need to know
Speaker 1: the full story of the First family and how they
Speaker 1: have become wealthy. I think all of that, and I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you something better. We better get to the truth.
Speaker 1: And you know what, if we do our job, I'm
Speaker 1: convinced the American people will see it, they'll be disgusted
Speaker 1: by it, and they'll make the decisions moving forward accordingly
Speaker 1: as a result of it. I think, you know, light
Speaker 1: the best disinfectant, right, all right, A lot more crowned
Speaker 1: to cover when we come back. All right, So as
Speaker 1: part of the new open borders, no more wall building,
Speaker 1: expediting a path to citizenship for people that didn't respect
Speaker 1: our laws and our sovereignty and just came into the
Speaker 1: country illegally. What does the impact? What does it mean?
Speaker 1: What are the key takeaways in all of this? We'll
Speaker 1: get to that. We have Ami Harowitz, documentarian. He might
Speaker 1: have more crazy tape available, you never know with him,
Speaker 1: Miranda divine and much more in your calls eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one Sean as we continue this Thursday, glad
Speaker 1: you are with us, all right? Twenty five to the
Speaker 1: top of the hour, eight hundred and nine four one Sean.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program, has
Speaker 1: promised open borders, a path to amnesty, and dhaka and
Speaker 1: everything in between, stopping the building of the border wall,
Speaker 1: all in one twenty four hour a day. I warned you,
Speaker 1: try to warn you. Some of you listen, many of
Speaker 1: you listen, some of you didn't. What is going to
Speaker 1: be the impact of all of this? Well, a path
Speaker 1: to citizenship now means well, we're going to give you
Speaker 1: something of great value. I hope you'll always vote Democrat.
Speaker 1: And of course they've always been establishment Republicans that they
Speaker 1: want labor for as cheap as they can get it.
Speaker 1: How's that going to impact American workers? It's not going
Speaker 1: to be good for them anyway. Here's Joe Biden on
Speaker 1: all things immigration. I'll be President United States, not Vice
Speaker 1: President United States. And the fact is I've made it
Speaker 1: very clear within one hundred days, and I'm going to
Speaker 1: send to United States Congress a pathway to citizenship for
Speaker 1: over eleven million undocumented people and all of those so
Speaker 1: called dreamers, those doctor kids, They're going to be immediately
Speaker 1: certified again to be able to stay in this country
Speaker 1: and put on a path to citizenship. I'm going to
Speaker 1: from day one we're going to have a fundament I'm
Speaker 1: going to send to the United States Congress an immigration
Speaker 1: plan to provide a pathway for legalization for eleven million
Speaker 1: undocumented people. On day one, I'm going to send legislation,
Speaker 1: immigration legislation we form to the Congress to provide a
Speaker 1: roadmap to citizenship for eleven million undocumented immigrants and so
Speaker 1: much that make up so much of our communities and
Speaker 1: make us so strong. Should someone who is here without
Speaker 1: documents and that is his only offense, should that person
Speaker 1: be deported? That person should not be the focus of deportation.
Speaker 1: We should fundamentally change the way we deal with them.
Speaker 1: How exactly would you detain immigrants if at all, in
Speaker 1: a Biden administration the way we did when we reform
Speaker 1: the system with a doctor, I would not retain them
Speaker 1: behind bars, Just like I've argued all along, any woman
Speaker 1: who crosses the border or is here and being beaten
Speaker 1: by her husband, but she's an undocumented she cannot be
Speaker 1: deported because she reports. There are certain things you can
Speaker 1: not deport an undocumented alien four an undocumented person four,
Speaker 1: and that would be one of them. What exact changes
Speaker 1: would you bring to ICE as an agency I would
Speaker 1: hold ICE agents accountable if in fact they stepped over
Speaker 1: my executive orders, which is no arrest of anyone outside
Speaker 1: of their school. So how you change the change the
Speaker 1: culture by saying you're going to get fired. You're fired
Speaker 1: if in fact you do that. You only arrest for
Speaker 1: the purpose of dealing with a felony that's committed, and
Speaker 1: I don't count drunk and driving as a felony. Should
Speaker 1: undocumented immigrants also be able to get subsidized healthcare If
Speaker 1: they are working in the United States America and they
Speaker 1: are paying taxes, they should have access to healthcare. They
Speaker 1: should have access to every what else has has access to.
Speaker 1: We are a nation of immigrants, and one of the
Speaker 1: reasons why we are so powerful and we've been so
Speaker 1: successful is because we're a nation of immigrants. And the
Speaker 1: way we're acting, both domestically and internationally is a crying shame.
Speaker 1: It's not who we are. Guess what they're the reason
Speaker 1: why from legal as well as undocumented, and the reason
Speaker 1: why our society is functioning, the reason why our economy
Speaker 1: is growing. We don't talk about that. We stand up
Speaker 1: and act like it's a burden. It is not a burden.
Speaker 1: It's a gift, all right. That's Joe Biden over the
Speaker 1: years joining us. Now, Laura rees, she's a senior research
Speaker 1: fellow Homeland Security Heritage Foundation. A recent article on immigration
Speaker 1: clearly outlines the troubles ahead with undocumented a people from
Speaker 1: around the globe entering the US. Biden makes a big
Speaker 1: deal too yesterday about we're going to get rid of
Speaker 1: the Muslim travel band. There never was a Muslim travel band.
Speaker 1: There was a band for country in a vetting process
Speaker 1: for people from countries that have known ties to radical extremists.
Speaker 1: Certain countries that are predominantly Muslim. We're not on the
Speaker 1: list because they don't have that problem anyway. She joins us. Also,
Speaker 1: John Daniel Davidson, senior fellow for the Texas Public Policy
Speaker 1: Foundation and political editor for The Federalist, thank you both
Speaker 1: for being with us. Laura start with you, Look, this
Speaker 1: is everything that he promised, everything that we tried to
Speaker 1: warn people about it in ahead of the election. Now
Speaker 1: you know he's doing what he said he would do,
Speaker 1: which is what I kept saying everybody. This is the
Speaker 1: most radical agenda ever stated and run on by any
Speaker 1: major political party. Yes, Son, thank you for having me
Speaker 1: on and you're right, he has been very busy just
Speaker 1: in day one, and that includes sending proposed legislation to Congress.
Speaker 1: And if the left the Democrats roll back the Senate delabuster,
Speaker 1: which has protected against mass amnesty bills for the past
Speaker 1: twenty years, they will be able to push through a
Speaker 1: very radical immigration agenda. Well, I think we're seeing it
Speaker 1: before our eyes, you know, John Daniel Davidson. Look, it's
Speaker 1: been known for over the years. One of the reasons
Speaker 1: that the left, the right, Conservatives, liberals, or really Republicans
Speaker 1: and Democrats would always try and negotiate their Gang of eight,
Speaker 1: Gang of ten, Gang of twelve, Gang of this, Gang
Speaker 1: of that is because Republicans, for their constituency, they seem
Speaker 1: to always want inexpensive labor or cheap labor as we
Speaker 1: call it. Well, that impacts Americans and their ability to
Speaker 1: get high paying jobs. And on the other side of it,
Speaker 1: you have liberal Democrats that have always wanted it because
Speaker 1: I think they see that a majority of new immigrants
Speaker 1: would likely vote for the Democratic Party. So everyone's got
Speaker 1: their own motives here, don't they. Yeah, that's one of
Speaker 1: the reasons our immigration system dates from about nineteen sixty five.
Speaker 1: We haven't had any major shifts or fundamental reform to
Speaker 1: our immigration system since then. Our immigration system does not
Speaker 1: serve the economy, it doesn't serve the American people, and
Speaker 1: it does need reform. But this isn't what needs This
Speaker 1: isn't how to reform it. This is just opening up
Speaker 1: the floodgates to everyone in Mexico and Central America and
Speaker 1: sending them a message saying, if you can get here,
Speaker 1: you can stay. And we're already seeing that. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I mean then that's that's the point. So what is
Speaker 1: the impact of this. There's really nothing, Laura, that I
Speaker 1: see that Republicans can do to stop it. Do you
Speaker 1: see anything? The one hope is that President Biden does
Speaker 1: not want to be responsible for the next Southwest border crisis. Now, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: he has already terminated the emergency declaration that President Trump
Speaker 1: put in place, but he has said, look, this is
Speaker 1: going to take months, not just one day, because we
Speaker 1: don't want two million illegal immigrants on the border. Nevertheless,
Speaker 1: the executive orders that President Biden has signed and the
Speaker 1: legislation he seems to have sent to Congress point in
Speaker 1: the other direction. So he himself lived through a border
Speaker 1: crisis when he was vice president in twenty fourteen. He
Speaker 1: seems to forget that. But he's going to have his
Speaker 1: hintful because clearly he's ringing the bell for more caravans
Speaker 1: and more mass immigration illegally, and I see, I don't
Speaker 1: see the way to stop it, and I don't see
Speaker 1: anything Republicans can do stopping building the border wall. One
Speaker 1: are the things I'm thinking, John, is that this is oh,
Speaker 1: come to America, because not only you're going to be
Speaker 1: able to cross, but you'll be able to cross and
Speaker 1: then we'll give you a path to citizenship. So now
Speaker 1: the latest caravan is building, I guess this one. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure. Honduras, I think they try to stop him
Speaker 1: in Guatemala, and Mexico is now preparing for the caravan.
Speaker 1: I guess hitting there. And then you know, and then
Speaker 1: Biden Administration's responses, Yeah, don't come just yet, it's not
Speaker 1: a good time today, and okay, well come next week,
Speaker 1: could come a month from now, Yeah, it's too late.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter what Biden says, It doesn't matter what
Speaker 1: anybody says. The Democrats have made clear over the years,
Speaker 1: and especially over the past year with the election, what
Speaker 1: their position is on immigration and what they'll do when
Speaker 1: they get in power, and now they're going about doing it.
Speaker 1: So don't expect anyone in Honduras or Guatemala or El Salvador.
Speaker 1: And by the way, these are countries that have been
Speaker 1: devastated by two hurricanes late last year and the coronavirus pandemic.
Speaker 1: People are there are desperate and they want opportunity. These
Speaker 1: caravans that are forming are largely of men who are
Speaker 1: leaving their families to come north to work and find jobs,
Speaker 1: and they are coming. In fact, there was a news
Speaker 1: through the interviewed a member of the caravan the day
Speaker 1: who said, point blank to the camera, Biden is going
Speaker 1: to take care of us. The message is already out there.
Speaker 1: You can't unring the bell, as you said, and it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what they say and do. At this point,
Speaker 1: we are going to have caravans in the first one
Speaker 1: is on its way well, and I think it'll be
Speaker 1: the first of many. Now we have a problem in
Speaker 1: terms of you know, with all the state shutdowns, are
Speaker 1: covid Americans now filed nine hundred thousand applications for unemployment
Speaker 1: in the last week, A signal Obviously, layoffs are still
Speaker 1: going strong as this now is impacting businesses, especially in
Speaker 1: blue states like California and New York and elsewhere. You know,
Speaker 1: Colombo is now talking about a city state income tax
Speaker 1: of fifteen percent. All that'll accelerate people leaving the state.
Speaker 1: And even a greater degree being number one wasn't enough.
Speaker 1: They want to be a super number one in terms
Speaker 1: of people deciding that they're going to leave New York State.
Speaker 1: And California now is a mess and you can't even
Speaker 1: eat outdoors now in California. So what about the people
Speaker 1: in the country that had already been displaced. It's just
Speaker 1: going to be more displacement, and it's going to be
Speaker 1: more government handouts, more government bailouts, and I won't even
Speaker 1: call him handouts. There are people that in real need
Speaker 1: right now. But if that kind of pressure, Laura is
Speaker 1: only gonna spiral the economy, put so much pressure on
Speaker 1: it that people looking for work are gonna have a
Speaker 1: hard time find the gate now competing with the illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants in cheap labor, that those high paying jobs are
Speaker 1: going away and we're losing the jobs because of the
Speaker 1: Keystone XL pipeline and pulling back and dialing back on
Speaker 1: energy production. Well, that's right. And not only is he
Speaker 1: advocating for amnesty for the illegal immigrants who are already here,
Speaker 1: but he also would increase the numbers of illegal immigration,
Speaker 1: which would even further put pressure on the American economy
Speaker 1: and America trying to get back to work. And it
Speaker 1: is just not the time to do that. So he
Speaker 1: is pushing on all and all directions. Is going up
Speaker 1: or illegal immigration and more legal immigration. All right, last word,
Speaker 1: John on this topic, what impact does it have on
Speaker 1: people that need jobs right now? Well, I think a
Speaker 1: lot of people will take any job they can get
Speaker 1: right now, especially if they're allowed to work. So you know,
Speaker 1: as we just mentioned, this isn't the wrong time to
Speaker 1: do this. It's never the right time to throw open
Speaker 1: the borders and to send a message to the world
Speaker 1: that if you can get in by hook or by crook,
Speaker 1: then you can stay. But that's the message that Democrats
Speaker 1: have been peddling for years. Now people are listening and
Speaker 1: they're arranging their affairs accordingly. I'll tell you what, if
Speaker 1: I lived in Honduras, I'd be on my way north
Speaker 1: right now too. Honestly, I would too. You basically got
Speaker 1: an open invitation. All right, John Daniel Davidson, thank you.
Speaker 1: Laura Reese, thank you as well. Eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one sewn our number. You want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, We'll get to your calls. Let's
Speaker 1: set our busy phones here, many of you patients. Let's
Speaker 1: say hi from Scott Arizona. Scott, Hi, how are you
Speaker 1: glad you called? Hi? Sean, thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 1: I need a basic Hannity sanity check. As Maxine Waters,
Speaker 1: who has become now our moral teacher, has demonstrated for
Speaker 1: a shortly after President Trump was inaugurated, we should be
Speaker 1: starting to chant in peach forty six right now, correct?
Speaker 1: I mean, am I wrong? I mean well, if we're
Speaker 1: going to apply the same standards they did with Ukraine,
Speaker 1: Joe would have already you know, been impeached as of yesterday.
Speaker 1: If we use their standards, and I'm not even calling
Speaker 1: for it, the mob isn't gonna let it happen. Republicans
Speaker 1: don't have the power to let it happen. And you
Speaker 1: know what, we have serious problems at this point. You know,
Speaker 1: it's just as they wasted four years of this country's
Speaker 1: time with rancor and bitterness and hatred, and they don't
Speaker 1: even see it. So if you say and take a
Speaker 1: page in Peach forty six and Peach forty six, I
Speaker 1: don't think so. I think they're going to be significant
Speaker 1: areas that will point out of glaring hypocrisy and everything.
Speaker 1: They said that they would apply every standard they'd apply
Speaker 1: to Trump, they're not going to apply to Biden. I
Speaker 1: can assure you that. Well, thank you, Sean. I wanted
Speaker 1: that sanity check because I was thinking of getting a wig,
Speaker 1: trying to look like her and just start to go
Speaker 1: out on the side of the street and saying Peach
Speaker 1: forty six. It's like the violent rhetoric of the left
Speaker 1: that we've been playing. I'm telling you, don't, Well, that's
Speaker 1: not who we are. It's just not We're not the anarchists.
Speaker 1: We don't believe, we respect law enforcement, we believe in
Speaker 1: law and order, we believe in our constitution, you know,
Speaker 1: And I mean it's just it's nobody needs to go there,
Speaker 1: you know, the the rally. We're not insurrectionists. You're going
Speaker 1: to peacefully, patriotically march to the Capitol so your voices
Speaker 1: will be heard. But the president said, we can play Kamala, Joe,
Speaker 1: Maxie and Nancy Chuck and pretty much every Democrat and
Speaker 1: they would be take their words as given. Oh it
Speaker 1: sounds like they're inciting violence, insurrection, Well those standards ever
Speaker 1: be applied to them, No, because that's the environment we live,
Speaker 1: the medium mob. If we treated Joe Biden a way
Speaker 1: they treated Trump with lies, conspiracy theories, one hoax after another,
Speaker 1: I mean yeah, I mean we could cause off. I
Speaker 1: just I don't have that ability to be them. They
Speaker 1: think we're them, but we're not. They have a caricature
Speaker 1: that they paint of us that is inaccurate. So let
Speaker 1: you're gonna be okay, Scott, Let not your heart be trouble. Yes, yes, yes,
Speaker 1: I'm going to be fine. I just from a sarcasm perspective.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to put that out there so the
Speaker 1: liberals didn't think I was inciting violence and that I
Speaker 1: could be none of that. Never run for president anybody
Speaker 1: that if you find yourself at a protest at a
Speaker 1: rally and you see craziness unfolding, get the hell out
Speaker 1: of there. I don't want to be associated with crazy people.
Speaker 1: It's not who we are. And that's the ninety nine
Speaker 1: percent of us. We believe, you know, in the legislative process.
Speaker 1: Hopefully the constitution work, the legislative branch, that judicial brands
Speaker 1: hopefully will work. We'll see, all right, eight hundred ninety
Speaker 1: four one sewn toll free number. News round Up, Information overload,
Speaker 1: our next Hey right here for our final news round
Speaker 1: up and information overload. All right, News round up, Information
Speaker 1: overload our Sean Hannity Show. Last time, we played a montage,
Speaker 1: you know, the Biden It's so unremarkable, so easily forgotten,
Speaker 1: will be forgotten, probably is already forgotten, except for the
Speaker 1: repetition of unity, unity, unity, unity, you know, by Biden. Meanwhile, yeah, no, no,
Speaker 1: we can go ahead with impeachment, you know. And Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi's comments and his comments, and Schumer's comments and Commala's comments. Well,
Speaker 1: we're going to ignore all liberal Democrats and the raids
Speaker 1: that they have expressed over these last four years. But
Speaker 1: we're going to talk about unity. All right. Well, let's
Speaker 1: interspersed unity talk of Biden with this fellow liberal Democrats,
Speaker 1: social Democrats. To restore the soul and secure the future
Speaker 1: of America requires so much more than words. It requires
Speaker 1: the most elusive of all things in a democracy. Unity.
Speaker 1: This is a bunch of scumbacks, that's what they are.
Speaker 1: Those are very strong organize around making money. My whole
Speaker 1: soul is into this bringing America together. You're nine in
Speaker 1: our people, You're nine in our nation. You cannot be
Speaker 1: civil with a political party that wants to destroy what
Speaker 1: you stand for, what you care about. With unity, we
Speaker 1: can do great things, important things. The president is a
Speaker 1: racist and he is a demagogue. That is just a fact.
Speaker 1: For without unity, there is no peace, only bitterness and fury.
Speaker 1: This administration is behaving like a bunch of thugs and gangsters.
Speaker 1: We must end this uncivil war. And sadly, the domestic
Speaker 1: enemies to our voting system and are honoring our constitution
Speaker 1: are right at sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue with their allies
Speaker 1: in the Congress of the United States. We can do
Speaker 1: this if we open our souls instead of hardening our hearts.
Speaker 1: The question is, how are we going to really almost
Speaker 1: deep program these people who have signed up for the
Speaker 1: cult of Trump. The cult of Trump deep programming. Take
Speaker 1: the children away from Trump supporters and send them the
Speaker 1: re education camps. According to the lawyer for PBS and
Speaker 1: we'll re educate that they could watch PBS all day.
Speaker 1: That's like torture anyway. Nancy Pelosi losing it yesterday, yesterday
Speaker 1: saying Trump is an accessory to murder after instigating insurrection,
Speaker 1: and she goes off. Nancy says the US could not
Speaker 1: have survived two terms of Donald Trump. You have Jensaki,
Speaker 1: the I guess spokesperson, went House, communications director, or whatever
Speaker 1: the position is is now, Biden's push for unity will
Speaker 1: not include canceling the impeachment, which Hunt trial the latest one,
Speaker 1: and he's saying that Biden will let Congress decide. Of course,
Speaker 1: I would Biden take a stand and piss off a
Speaker 1: very angry bass that now controlled him in every aspect. AOC, though,
Speaker 1: did congratulate Biden and Harris. We must begin healing our planet,
Speaker 1: as Bernie Sanders was wearing a Parker and Mittens to
Speaker 1: the inauguration and Bill Clinton was noticed nodding off apparently anyway.
Speaker 1: Our friend Miranda Divine joins us from the New York Post.
Speaker 1: Ammy Horowitz, documentarian, here to talk about this and so
Speaker 1: much more. I read your column. Biden put on a
Speaker 1: show of unity, Will he stick to it? Well? Don't
Speaker 1: you think, Miranda, that yesterday's comments by Nancy Pelosi kind
Speaker 1: of tell us the real direction it's going and the
Speaker 1: fact that he's not going to weigh in on this
Speaker 1: sham that's not going to work anyway, it kind of
Speaker 1: tells us what he really means. Yes, of course it does.
Speaker 1: And it's pretty obvious that any talk of unity is
Speaker 1: completely bliged by what is going on with the impeachment
Speaker 1: to impeach a president who has already left, who as
Speaker 1: a civilian is pointless. It's spiteful, it's vengeful, and it
Speaker 1: is exactly the way Nancy Pelosi has conducted herself throughout
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency. She is the most destructive force in
Speaker 1: this country, and I think we can lay at her
Speaker 1: feet every problem that we have had in terms of divisiveness,
Speaker 1: including the Capital riot, which she has capitalized on in
Speaker 1: the most egregious way, calling in all this overkill of
Speaker 1: national guards to send a message to the world about
Speaker 1: just how dangerous the Trump movement is. The nationalist populist movement.
Speaker 1: It's theater and that's all it's about. And that is
Speaker 1: exactly why she's pursuing this impeachment. And Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: showing himself to be completely spineless and two faced that
Speaker 1: he doesn't say a word against it. You know you
Speaker 1: wrote in your column, which I thought was extraordinarily well written.
Speaker 1: Biden's inauguration speech sounded as if it had been written
Speaker 1: by a good angel on one shoulder and a bad
Speaker 1: angel on the other. The good angel calling for unity
Speaker 1: and truth, all things a battered nation longed to hear.
Speaker 1: The bad angel said the precise opposite, whipping a patriot
Speaker 1: for the mythical new boogeyman of white supremacy and domestic terrorism. Yes, well,
Speaker 1: you know, it's all very well for him to call
Speaker 1: for unity, but then he talks about how he's going
Speaker 1: to crush supposed white supremacyism, you know, political extremism, domestic terrorism.
Speaker 1: We know that is code for Trump supporters. You have
Speaker 1: to define what you're talking about. There is a tiny,
Speaker 1: tiny minority of Americans who would believe in white supremacy
Speaker 1: or would be klansman. That's poisonous, Republicans a poor that
Speaker 1: conservatives apoor that. You know that that is not the
Speaker 1: biggest problem in this country faces Obviously it's the pandemic. Obviously,
Speaker 1: it's the economic crisis. But Joe Biden is putting, you know,
Speaker 1: white supremacy, this bogieman of the left, which is just
Speaker 1: a weapon to beat over the head and malign dissenters.
Speaker 1: And I think his speech yesterday, you know, if you
Speaker 1: cherry picket, you can take out nice bits like unity,
Speaker 1: which we all agree with, but unfortunately it is counted
Speaker 1: by the opposite. And I think it's exactly the way
Speaker 1: that he conducted his campaign where he would say two
Speaker 1: contrary things at the same time. You know, he was
Speaker 1: poor defunding the police and he was against a funding
Speaker 1: the police. He's trying to speak out both sides of
Speaker 1: his mouth or it really is set right? Is it
Speaker 1: doing it for him? Um? Pretty pretty well written and
Speaker 1: great observations. Ammy Horowitz. Now look, you we had you
Speaker 1: on you hit the streets of New York. You have
Speaker 1: other videos where you've exposed about what's going on in
Speaker 1: college campuses, liberal cities around the country. You throw yourself
Speaker 1: into any massive controversy, sometimes a great personal risk. And okay,
Speaker 1: let's talk about what you see and what you hear.
Speaker 1: Is you go out on the streets all over the world,
Speaker 1: even asking people what they think. Well, I think Okay,
Speaker 1: to go back to this whole white supremacist comment that
Speaker 1: Biden said, I think it's worth repeating because, like I said,
Speaker 1: what exactly the white supremacists. If you ask me as
Speaker 1: a Jew, what am I more fearful of the hard right,
Speaker 1: the extreme right, the kicker cane and and the white
Speaker 1: supremacists or the hard left. Well, I'm telling you what
Speaker 1: keeps you up a night is a hard left. And
Speaker 1: an entire speech he did not mention one the anarchist,
Speaker 1: the leftists, the BLM radicals who are burning down our
Speaker 1: country for six months, and for that six months hang on,
Speaker 1: they were in Portland and the Seattle again yesterday, say yes,
Speaker 1: now one word about that. Do you remember the days
Speaker 1: where they said descent was patriotic? You remember that was
Speaker 1: like last week. Now, descent will probably put you in
Speaker 1: jail at some point. Okay, this is we're talking about
Speaker 1: the most The left is censorious. They always have been,
Speaker 1: they always will be because they can't win in the
Speaker 1: battlefield of ideas because they're wrong. So they have to
Speaker 1: use violence and thuggery and force or keep people like
Speaker 1: me and Miranda and yourself down and quiet. They won't win.
Speaker 1: So if you ask me where where I'm afraid of?
Speaker 1: What I'm afraid of. I'm afraid of the hard left,
Speaker 1: No question about the hard right, the white supremacies. Like
Speaker 1: he's talk these people number in the thousands, maybe ten
Speaker 1: thousand people. You have millions, gives several million people on
Speaker 1: the hard left who are who are either burning down
Speaker 1: our cities or cheering the people burning down our cities.
Speaker 1: And not one second was given to that. So if
Speaker 1: you're talking, if that, if that's unity, if you consider
Speaker 1: that unity, you know, and Miranda you do would make
Speaker 1: a great point, and that is everybody condemns white supremacy
Speaker 1: and domestic terrorism and what happened, and every conservative I
Speaker 1: know condemns that and what happened at the capitol. You know,
Speaker 1: where we're consistent as conservatives, law abiding, peace loving Americans
Speaker 1: that don't really have a problem with the scent either
Speaker 1: even if they're attacking me, Amy or you. It goes
Speaker 1: with the territory of your a public figure. But it
Speaker 1: gets even worse than that, because we watched all summer
Speaker 1: as city blocks were taken over for weeks on end,
Speaker 1: and police stations were burned to the ground, and looting
Speaker 1: and arson and the destruction of business and two thousand
Speaker 1: plus cops injured and dozens killed as a result of
Speaker 1: the writing. Barely a word out of any leader of
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party. They didn't want to acknowledge it, I
Speaker 1: assume because they didn't want to alienate that part of
Speaker 1: their radical base. It's incredible that hypocrisy and the double standards.
Speaker 1: You know, Democrats just they normalized violence. They encouraged it
Speaker 1: when it was their's people, when it was the BLM
Speaker 1: anti farm mobs which were rampaging through the cities. They
Speaker 1: liked it because it was adding to a feeling of
Speaker 1: chaos under Donald Trump, and so they could sheet every
Speaker 1: problem in the country. They cheated every single COVID death
Speaker 1: to him. And you know, it's such projection that they
Speaker 1: cheated the mob violence on the streets by left wing mobs.
Speaker 1: They cheated that back to Donald Trump. And then when
Speaker 1: Donald Trump wanted to bring in the National Guard to
Speaker 1: quell the violence, they called him a fascist. Remember days
Speaker 1: and days of carry on and screeching about a bit
Speaker 1: of tear gas in front of the Ye House to
Speaker 1: stop those thugs from actually tearing down and getting into
Speaker 1: the White House. And you know, they disempowered the police.
Speaker 1: They demoralized police. They demonize them for men. Now that
Speaker 1: they want the police, they love them. They love the
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill police, Nancy Pelosi eulogizing them. They call in
Speaker 1: a bigger contingent of the National Guard to protect themselves.
Speaker 1: Now they love it. That's not fascism. They are such hypocrites.
Speaker 1: They love borders when it's protecting their own skin. They
Speaker 1: love guns when it's defending their peace of mind. They
Speaker 1: are such hypocrites. They will turn on a dime and
Speaker 1: they get away with it because the media is in
Speaker 1: their pocket. And it's that old adage. If a tree
Speaker 1: falls in a forest and no one is there to
Speaker 1: hear it fall, did it really fall? And that's the
Speaker 1: situation with the media, which is why it is so
Speaker 1: important to get honesty and truth back into the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break, we'll come back more with Miranda
Speaker 1: Divine and Ammy Harrowitz on the other side. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one sean is our number. New tactic
Speaker 1: for stealing your credit card personal information has recently been discovered.
Speaker 1: Now the new web skimming attack e skimming they call it.
Speaker 1: It literally injects malicious code into a compromised e commerce
Speaker 1: websites checkout process and that pulls your order information to
Speaker 1: display all of it on a fake checkout page. This
Speaker 1: is how sophisticated they are at stealing identities and your money,
Speaker 1: and it steals all your information. Now, look, every single
Speaker 1: day we put information at the risk on the Internet,
Speaker 1: and look, LifeLock is gonna catch all the threats you'd
Speaker 1: miss on your own, or all you do is monitor
Speaker 1: your credit. LifeLock dot com the leader in identity theft protection.
Speaker 1: They detect a wide range of identity threats. They'll check
Speaker 1: the dark web to see if your information is for sale.
Speaker 1: If you're compromised, they have restoration specialists that will work
Speaker 1: to protect it for you and restore it for you.
Speaker 1: LifeLock dot com one eight hundred LifeLock a low annual
Speaker 1: fee just got even cheaper today. It's twenty five percent
Speaker 1: discount off your first year. Just go to LifeLock dot
Speaker 1: com one eight hundred LifeLock to save an additional twenty
Speaker 1: five percent. Use the promo code Hannity. Protect your name,
Speaker 1: your finances, your reputation, your credit score. LifeLock dot Com
Speaker 1: promo code Hannity Alyrical listens to Sean Hannity, and he's
Speaker 1: on right now, all right, as we continue, Miranda Divine,
Speaker 1: columnist New York Post, Ammy Harrow, it's documentarian extraordinary. Why
Speaker 1: do you say, um me? Now, it's interesting because you
Speaker 1: put yourself in the middle of any shift show, wherever
Speaker 1: it happens to be around the world. And you know,
Speaker 1: you've been in the middle of the rioting. You you
Speaker 1: went among the migrants at different points, and and you know,
Speaker 1: put yourself in danger at different points. You've been confronted,
Speaker 1: You've had some hostile moments in your career because you
Speaker 1: throw yourself into these environments. And what was the worst
Speaker 1: for you? I mean the worst moment for me? Yeah. Look,
Speaker 1: you know I gotta say, I like I as you're
Speaker 1: fond of saying. I spend time on the raft with
Speaker 1: with the refugees going from from from from Turkey to Greece,
Speaker 1: and I gotta say, the place I felt most uncomfortable,
Speaker 1: the place I felt most in danger, was when I
Speaker 1: was the middle of those riots in Minneapolis and in Portland,
Speaker 1: and in Seattle and in Kenosha. That's where in America,
Speaker 1: right in the United And I remember I was beating
Speaker 1: up by guys in Sweden, by by Islamic radicals. But
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you this is so sad, sickening and
Speaker 1: sad for me to save the place I felt most uncomfortable,
Speaker 1: The place where I felt my life was most in danger,
Speaker 1: was in these great American cities that were burning up
Speaker 1: by these anarchist BLM radical leftists. And these guys would
Speaker 1: have no problem whatsoever taking my life. They knew exactly
Speaker 1: who I was when I was in their midst asking
Speaker 1: those questions. And by the way, the only time I
Speaker 1: felt good about wearing a mask was when I was
Speaker 1: masked up talking to these people outside, because otherwise who
Speaker 1: knows what have happened. But again it goes back to
Speaker 1: my original point is that in America, in the US,
Speaker 1: you could be put in a situation where you are
Speaker 1: in absolute physical danger, as American cities are burning to
Speaker 1: the ground, yet the left will not say a word
Speaker 1: about In fact, they will in fact encourage it and
Speaker 1: make excuses for it. Oh, it's a couple of people. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's no big deal. Right, But then then of course
Speaker 1: when we have when we have what happened at the Capitol,
Speaker 1: they use that as as their as their rant as
Speaker 1: their air, their ranting board in order to push through
Speaker 1: these censorious agendas that they had. The censorious agenda they
Speaker 1: want to push through to make sure that people like
Speaker 1: us can't speak up. So yeah, it's it's it's sad,
Speaker 1: it's sickening, and this is happening in our country in
Speaker 1: front of our eyes. Guys. Remember, if you tease the
Speaker 1: the US's garbage, then they have no fidelity to our
Speaker 1: founding ideals. That's why I was just last year. I
Speaker 1: released a video last week or I went to Yale
Speaker 1: hidden camera and I asked students at the on the
Speaker 1: Yale campus, should we repeal the Constitution of the United States?
Speaker 1: Sixty five percent of every Yale student who stopped said
Speaker 1: that we should. It's a racist, typical document, and that's
Speaker 1: because to take away, they don't want anybody that ever
Speaker 1: worked for Trump to be hired. And Harvard wants to
Speaker 1: take back degrees that people earned and that they have
Speaker 1: because you don't think the right way. Add that big
Speaker 1: tech problem to it as well, and a corrupt media mob.
Speaker 1: I mean, we have a real information crisis, Ammy Harrowitz,
Speaker 1: We do. And it's people like the three of us
Speaker 1: and and like minded people who are in the middle
Speaker 1: of it, because this is what this is what the
Speaker 1: it is, it really is. It's a battlefield, the battlefield ideas,
Speaker 1: and that's really what it comes down to you. All Right,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Ammy Horowitz, and thank you Miranda Divine. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one, Shaun is a number. We'll
Speaker 1: get to your calls at a minute twenty five to
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one Seawn our number. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program, all right. George is in New York
Speaker 1: and George, you're a governor. Andrew Cuomo is proposed if one,
Speaker 1: he's promised Joe Biden a lawsuit if he gets anything
Speaker 1: less than fifteen billion dollars from the federal government and
Speaker 1: if he doesn't get it, he's also going to raise
Speaker 1: taxes in New York State eight and city. Well you
Speaker 1: will raise it to fifteen percent, the highest in the
Speaker 1: entire country. Well that's great news. That ought to drive
Speaker 1: another million people out of New York and the next year. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I can't listen to anything Pamo says anymore. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's it's just, uh, well you better listen because I
Speaker 1: don't think he's kidding. I mean, I think he means it,
Speaker 1: and why wouldn't he follow in Gavin Newsom step. Of
Speaker 1: course he means it. He's got to figure out a
Speaker 1: way to fix his mismanagement. But we've gotten down some
Speaker 1: crazy rabbit hole in New York. I can't explain it,
Speaker 1: but uh, you know, thank you for taking my call.
Speaker 1: I've been listening to you for years. Thank you. I
Speaker 1: know you, I know your stance on boycotting, but you
Speaker 1: got to hear me out here. Okay. I've noticed the
Speaker 1: only thing that gets the other side's attention is when
Speaker 1: we use their tactics against them. Then they cry foul,
Speaker 1: they cry you know, no fear. Hey, you can't do
Speaker 1: that because we do everything better than as Anyway, I
Speaker 1: think it's time to rethink your stance about boycotting. I
Speaker 1: understand your your martial arts mentality about you know, turning
Speaker 1: the other cheek the same training you do. But sometimes
Speaker 1: I didn't say I turned the cheek us. I'll try
Speaker 1: to walk away from any physical confrontation. I'll do my
Speaker 1: very best to walk away. I don't want to get
Speaker 1: engaged in a physical confrontation with anybody. Me too, But
Speaker 1: sometimes when you keep getting bullied, keep getting bullied. Sometimes
Speaker 1: you gotta take a stance against the bully. I mean
Speaker 1: you understand that too. Uh, listen, it's it's it's let's say,
Speaker 1: a good skill to have in a dangerous world. Yes,
Speaker 1: let me ask you a question. Did you grow up
Speaker 1: in New York? All right? Did you grow up in
Speaker 1: New York? New York? Okay? How old are you? How
Speaker 1: old are you? Six fifty six? Okay? Did you grow up?
Speaker 1: Did you listen to Howard Stern? Did you listen to
Speaker 1: Don Imus? Did you listen to talk radio? Back in
Speaker 1: the seventies and eighties, I listened to them. I can't
Speaker 1: listen to Howard anymore for years now I can probably
Speaker 1: for the same reasons. All right, put that aside for
Speaker 1: a step. But you did, and you know, remember it
Speaker 1: all started there, and they were even conservatives that supported
Speaker 1: this idea of Boycott's at the time. I always knew, Jorg.
Speaker 1: Once you open the Pandora's box, there's no end to it.
Speaker 1: Cancel silence, cancel culture. Boycott's and what it's really all
Speaker 1: about is if you don't like somebody's point of view,
Speaker 1: you don't like what they're saying. Instead, of doing well,
Speaker 1: the easy thing, which would be turned the dial. I
Speaker 1: don't want anyone ever turn the dial. But we do
Speaker 1: have choices, and liberty and freedom gives us the choice
Speaker 1: to listen and watch whatever we want to listen to,
Speaker 1: whatever we want to watch. Now, the problem is I
Speaker 1: was proven right because pretty much throughout my entire career,
Speaker 1: twenty five years on Fox, thirty plus years on radio,
Speaker 1: there's been a lot of attempts to silence my voice
Speaker 1: and this show, and I'm not going to give into them.
Speaker 1: But it said never it a millions, and not even
Speaker 1: millions at this point, tens and tens of millions of
Speaker 1: dollars spent to silence every conservative voice. Now you're saying
Speaker 1: we adopt the same tactics as a left on this
Speaker 1: number when it goes against a core principle I have,
Speaker 1: which is I believe in freedom of speech and if
Speaker 1: you don't like something, don't listen to it. Now, of
Speaker 1: course there's limits to that if and even by the way,
Speaker 1: on social media sites, I think that these sites ought
Speaker 1: to monitor and get rid of physical threats, threats of violence,
Speaker 1: organizing any type of violence of it whatever. I don't
Speaker 1: want any part of that nor to Americans. That's a
Speaker 1: reasonable thing. Racism, virulent anti semitism, same thing. There's got
Speaker 1: to be some standard, but I want to minimize it
Speaker 1: as much as possible, because you don't have to read
Speaker 1: what's on Twitter or parlor or any of these social
Speaker 1: media sites, so again you have the option. There's got
Speaker 1: to be some standards, but I wouldn't make them extraordinarily high,
Speaker 1: like for example, Dam Bonginos owns a piece of parlor.
Speaker 1: I love Dan, and Dan gets slaughtered on parlor. People
Speaker 1: attack them. All these years being led about attacks, smeared
Speaker 1: and slandered. I've never once thought, George, that I want
Speaker 1: those people to shut up, or I'm gonna shut them up,
Speaker 1: or I'm gonna boycott them. It's just not in my DNA.
Speaker 1: It's better that we have more speech, not less speech,
Speaker 1: and with with reasonable standards. But you know, how do
Speaker 1: you define reasonable? I mean, silencing every conservative voice is
Speaker 1: not exactly reasonable. I get it. But do you feel
Speaker 1: we're gaining ground or do you feel we're losing ground? Oh,
Speaker 1: it's so we're getting we're getting crushed. I mean, Big
Speaker 1: Tech wouldn't even let we do a limited a limited
Speaker 1: boycott just to show them, you know how where we stand.
Speaker 1: You know, pick one target for three months, six months,
Speaker 1: twelve months, and I'll never forget. During one of these
Speaker 1: boycott attempts against me, unbeknownst to me, you know, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, people that support me in this show,
Speaker 1: on their own, they started destroying their Carrig machines. And
Speaker 1: and by the way, that helped end that boycott. It
Speaker 1: really was effective. I didn't organize it. I didn't orchestrate
Speaker 1: it. It It was organic. It shocked the hell out of me.
Speaker 1: People shooting their carrog machine, people golfing the head off
Speaker 1: the cart machine, baseball bats dropping in from high distances
Speaker 1: is crazy funny stuff. And ultimately it really did help
Speaker 1: stop that effort to silence me, because that's what it is.
Speaker 1: And in the end, what I did is we made
Speaker 1: we created a pathway, and I hope we got to
Speaker 1: everybody that deserved it. Linda, how many Carrig coffee machines
Speaker 1: did I end up buying out of my own pocket? Okay?
Speaker 1: And did they ever, by the way, give me a discount? Yeah,
Speaker 1: they gave me like a group discount. Oh they didn't, Okay, Yeah,
Speaker 1: they were nice because I was thankful to be honest, George,
Speaker 1: and you know that those can be pretty expensive items
Speaker 1: for people. So I said, you know what, let me
Speaker 1: say thank you. I get it. I love what you're doing,
Speaker 1: but we don't think about it running out of ideas. Nah.
Speaker 1: Look I'm just giving you my reasons. I know you
Speaker 1: maybe thought you could convince me. Yeah, we're going to
Speaker 1: be better with more speech, not less. We will, I
Speaker 1: promise you. And it's ultimately they want to silence conservatives.
Speaker 1: Look what they did in the campaign. Look at how
Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden laptop story. I have the repair shop
Speaker 1: owner on Hannity tonight. I mean, it's it's unbelievable the
Speaker 1: times we're living. And look what they did to parlor.
Speaker 1: Look what they're doing big tech, organizing, silencing, shutting down, canceling.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's sad. It's remarkably sad. And the left
Speaker 1: is not pro freedom of speech. You know, they always
Speaker 1: say they have a monopoly of compassion for minorities, et cetera, etc.
Speaker 1: They don't. Their policies are negatively impacting prominently uh neighborhoods
Speaker 1: that are prominently minority neighborhoods. Donald Trump's policy East we
Speaker 1: set record low unemployment levels. They've screwed up every Democratic
Speaker 1: run city in state. They've screwed up the schools, they've
Speaker 1: screwed they can't keep law in order. There's no peace,
Speaker 1: you know, for people to even leave their house some days.
Speaker 1: It's terrible. Now Obamacare more government promises that failed, and
Speaker 1: it's it's unbelievable. Scott, Florida, what's up, Scott? A lot
Speaker 1: of people headed down your way here. Real estate prices
Speaker 1: are skyrocketing. Yeah, they're going up. Sean, thank you for
Speaker 1: taking my cold than we can still he to stake
Speaker 1: in the restaurant film What's Yeah? By the way, in Florida,
Speaker 1: look at look at California versus Florida, De Santis versus Newsome.
Speaker 1: It's so dramatically different. We're very lucky to have the santist.
Speaker 1: My comment, well, my comments is, Okay, Biden's been talking
Speaker 1: about unifying the country. I think he's starting already. And
Speaker 1: I really do think he's starting. I mean, look at
Speaker 1: what he's done with Mitch McConnell already. I mean Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell jumped for it, on on board with them. You know, listen,
Speaker 1: I've talked to enough people I've made enough calls. My
Speaker 1: take is on this, look, it's not constitutional. I've gone through,
Speaker 1: you know, the arguments of guys like the great one,
Speaker 1: Mark Levine and Alan Dershowitz and so many others snap impeachments.
Speaker 1: Jonathan Turley's been so outspoken about this is not It's
Speaker 1: not going to result in a conviction. I can tell
Speaker 1: you that. You know, if you want to if if
Speaker 1: you want to guess if some Republicans ultimately are going
Speaker 1: to be peeled away, Yeah, probably rom top guesses would
Speaker 1: be Romney Murkowski, Ben Sas. That's start there. But they're
Speaker 1: not going to get seventeen. It's gonna waste at least
Speaker 1: a week of this country's time. And once the Republicans
Speaker 1: put up their defense and the president puts up his defense,
Speaker 1: which would be to me, exhibit A, would be all
Speaker 1: the insightful rhetoric of the left. It should be a
Speaker 1: pretty cut and dry case and over quickly. Right, Yes,
Speaker 1: and another job an want to say, you didn't be
Speaker 1: talking about Hunter Biden. I wonder how long it's going
Speaker 1: to take for him to be pardoned. You know, it's funny,
Speaker 1: right because everyone was saying he doesn't have the right
Speaker 1: to pardon himself or his children. They didn't pardon himself
Speaker 1: and his children. They didn't do anything wrong. No. You
Speaker 1: know one thing I learned in that process. You know,
Speaker 1: if you take the pardon and then like congressional committees
Speaker 1: call you up to testify, you know, you lose your
Speaker 1: ability to plead the fifth Well, that's all. That's a
Speaker 1: constitutional right, separate and apart from the power of the pardon,
Speaker 1: which is absolute. It'll be interesting, Scott, thank you appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Speaking of crazy California, Marie is standing by. Hey, Marie,
Speaker 1: you're on the Sean Hannity Show. Hushan. Yeah, I'm living
Speaker 1: the nightmare you've been talking about in California. And I'm
Speaker 1: really disgusted right now with Republicans. McConnell and Cheney are turncoats.
Speaker 1: And what disgusts me is that Pelosi is a pitbull.
Speaker 1: When she goes after something, she doesn't let it go.
Speaker 1: Republicans always want to take the high ground. This is
Speaker 1: why I like and voted for Trump and would only
Speaker 1: vote for Trump in twenty twenty four or someone that
Speaker 1: he says to vote for. I don't like the Republicans anymore.
Speaker 1: I'm no longer a Republican. I'm going to register as
Speaker 1: an independent. I think that the Republicans need to do
Speaker 1: what the Democrats have done, and that's to follow through.
Speaker 1: In other words, they're going to follow through on impeachment.
Speaker 1: We need to follow through on an audit of the votes.
Speaker 1: Why is everybody talking about four years from now? I
Speaker 1: live in California. The Democrats have owned this state for
Speaker 1: god knows how long. We're unsuccessfully trying to put through
Speaker 1: a Newsom recall. Newsom is Pelosi's nephew. Everybody knows what's
Speaker 1: going on. The state is ruined. Our schools are ruined,
Speaker 1: our streets are ruined, our communities, the immigration, the sanctuary cities,
Speaker 1: all of this crap, and the Republicans don't do anything.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, why would we even say
Speaker 1: word want about anything wrong that the repbo can do
Speaker 1: With all of the cheating that's gone on, Why are
Speaker 1: we not auditing these votes? Why is this stopping? Why
Speaker 1: are we not following through? Don't they owe that to
Speaker 1: everybody who voted in this election. That's a Republican to
Speaker 1: follow through on the audit. Why are they just scooting
Speaker 1: that aside? And they just want to make good in
Speaker 1: McConnell one. Listen, they tried Ted Cruz and in fairness
Speaker 1: to Ted Cruz and Josh Holly, and they've been so
Speaker 1: demonized by the way. Finally people are speaking out on
Speaker 1: their behalf. Even Senator Feinstein did. It's ridiculous. They were
Speaker 1: asking for a ten day audit, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: liberal Democrats had asked for in past elections. So putting
Speaker 1: all that aside, it's again another effort to silence anybody
Speaker 1: that they disagree with. Look, there's there's no way that. Look,
Speaker 1: I don't like Republican establishment types most of them. There's
Speaker 1: a few that are stupid, but most of them are
Speaker 1: not gonna be stupid. And in other words, they're going
Speaker 1: to look at their own self preservation and own self
Speaker 1: interest in this, and that will cause them to follow
Speaker 1: the constitution because it's unconstitutional to impeach a former president.
Speaker 1: He's not in office. And we've laid out that case
Speaker 1: over and over again, and it's going to be a
Speaker 1: fairly quick trial and there will be at an acquittal
Speaker 1: at the end of it. And then their attempt permanently
Speaker 1: canceled Donald Trump and take away any hope he would
Speaker 1: have to run in the future should he so desire,
Speaker 1: that threat's going to be removed. It'll be done in
Speaker 1: a few weeks. It was my prediction. I'm beginning to
Speaker 1: see Democrats now getting more afraid of this as well.
Speaker 1: And they know, Oh, I thought you were the Unity Party.
Speaker 1: Oh I thought you were focused on solving problems. Oh.
Speaker 1: I mean, it just writes itself. And there are many
Speaker 1: Senate Republicans up in two years. They're not going to
Speaker 1: want to primary from somebody that supports Donald Trump. So
Speaker 1: I think they understand some of overplayed their hand, even
Speaker 1: with their rhetoric. And you watch, it's going to slow down,
Speaker 1: and I don't think there's gonna be one Republican. They'll
Speaker 1: say things just to kind of thread the needle, will
Speaker 1: be annoying as hell and just show that they're pathetically weak.
Speaker 1: And I'm not understanding of things, but it is what
Speaker 1: it is. And look, if the one thing I would
Speaker 1: urge people right now more than anything, Marie, is to
Speaker 1: pressure your state legislators and tell them they need to
Speaker 1: do their job. And that would be like Florida had
Speaker 1: election problems. Okay, Florida fixed them two thousand two sixteen.
Speaker 1: They round to Santis solve the problem and we can
Speaker 1: have faith and confidence in the integrity of elections moving forward.
Speaker 1: But don't try to do it two years from now.
Speaker 1: You better start on this now because it takes time,
Speaker 1: and then they'll probably be legal challenges all along the way,
Speaker 1: just like how it happened in Georgia. You got to anticipate,
Speaker 1: you know that that's where their heads are at a right,
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine one, Shawn is our number. Thank you
Speaker 1: for the call. Appreciate it all right, Hannity Tonight, nine
Speaker 1: Eastern Fox News. The owner of that computer repair shop
Speaker 1: where Hunter Biden's laptop was found, we'll join us. This
Speaker 1: is going to get very interesting here. New Gang Rich
Speaker 1: Lindsay Graham, Dan Mongino, Dave Ruben. We'll have the latest
Speaker 1: out of Seattle and Portland, and there's more chaos, violence
Speaker 1: erupts in those cities. News you won't hear from the mob.
Speaker 1: Nine Eastern Say DVR, Hannity Fox, thanks for being with us.
Speaker 1: We'll see you back here tomorrow after tonight