WEBVTT - Global outlook, Iran Oil Tanker Attack, Market Volatility

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul swing you.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahmas. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. It's time to read the tarot cards

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of the global economy for and look into the stars

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and figure out what the world will bring. Joining us now,

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Bart van Arc, executive vice president and chief economist for

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the Conference Board, Bart, thank you so much for joining us.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I just but you did put together a outlook for

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the world economy, and you have some perhaps better than

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>expected news. Mainly we'll avoid a recession. Is that right?

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>That's right? I think I'm perhaps we picked a right

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>day for this, given you know, pretty positive news on

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the trade disputes as well as on Brexit. Right, so

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so this might be the days maybe we can actually

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>avoid the global recession. But you know, again, things may

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>change next week. Let's hope it won't. But more seriously,

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>we we do think that there is reason to believe

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is a very plausible scenario that we're really

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>hitting the low point in the global economy right now,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and that really has to do with the very rapid

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>decline that we've been seeing in adust production around the world,

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's probably going to continue even into quarter four,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but we think it will eventually bottom out, particularly because

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>China is taking out a lot of excessive overcapacity, but

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>also begins to stimulate the economy a little bit, not

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to drop off further. But then, you know, perhaps even

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>more important, the consumers and the labor markets pretty much

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world are still so strong that we believe

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that I will really pull the economy along in two

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty. So part, you're exactly right. The consumer has

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>been the strong part of this economy relative to manufacturing

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and business investment. But we have seen some signs that

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>employment growth is slowing. Um is that a concern of

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>yours now? Of course it is, And and you know again,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean the gap between consumer confidence and business confidence

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is usually large at the moment. So you know, why

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>is the consumer hanging in there well? Because this job

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>market has been so strong that have been seeing their

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>wages increasing and the incomes improving, and frankly that's true

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>around the world, um, and we see that reflected in

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>consumer confidence. We we just released earlier this week our

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Global Consumer Confidence Index at the Conference Board, and you

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>know there there we actually are showing the pretty much

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>around the world, we still see very high levels of

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of consumer confidence. Now, employment is a very important leading

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>economic indicator underlying this, and we do see some leveling

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>off here, but again, unemployment rates are very low in

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the US and Europe, in Japan, in many emerging markets,

0:02:49.760 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>demand for labor is still very strong. So so we

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>can really see at the moment this is still very

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.679
<v Speaker 1>much in positive territory and you would expect, i think

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing else at this point that the rapid girl of

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that we've been seen in employment over the past couple

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>of quarters is beginning to slow down a little bit.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.239
<v Speaker 1>So now we're not we don't have a major concern

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>about the numbers we're seen right now. Another interesting production

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have here is that the decline and industrial

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>production will ease and eventually bottom out. How far away

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>are we from that. Yeah, it's very important that we

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>have the diagnosis around this clear. We think that a

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of this decline industrial production started already early in

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen in China, and China, as I referred

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to earlier, had the huge amount of overcapacity, and China

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially stopped continuing to support it, particularly in the state

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>or the enterprises. And you know in the first pace

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't feel that in two thousand and eighteen

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>because it happens sort of upstream and supply chains. But

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>then later on in the year, you know, multinationals started

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to feel this, and certainly into two thousand and nineteen,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the countries that are most exposed, like you know, Japan

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and Germany, really started to feel the pain. As this

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>worked itself with the global supply chain, a lot of

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>excessive overcapacity has been taken out. China doesn't doesn't want

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to make a transition towards a more higher value added

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing sector, you know, go back to the to the

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>trade disputes and discrestions that we're currently having. They're beginning

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to see some results of that. So so you know,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>even the latest numbers for China are giving us a

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit more comfort that this may begin to to

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>do bottom out a little on top of that, you know,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>provided that the trade disputes indeed go a little bit

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to the background and the fact that technology and innovation

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are creating some more productivity growth. That's all good signs

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>for for industrial production. That's why we believe it will

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>begin to bottom out over the next couple of months.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So part if the U s economy does manage to

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>avoid recession in your forecasting is there how do you

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>view the concern that maybe this economy is just going

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to be uh lower for longer, slower growth for longer

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>one and a half to two percent for the foreseeable futures.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That's something you think is is possible likely. Yeah, that's

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a great point, Paul, because you know, we should be

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>careful not to mix up the fact that we'll see

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>some recovering in two thousand twenty. We have the fact

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that in the longer term we are looking at the

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>slowing economy and most of the mature economy is including

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States, so that this sort of long term

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>growth rate underlying the economy in the US is probably

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>around two percent, and that's quite a bit weaker than

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>what we had in the previous decades. A lot of

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with gradually lowing, gradually slowing supply

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of labor. There's just more people retiring and fewer people

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>entering the labor force. We're not really making that up

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>rapidly enough by things like immigration or speeding up participation

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in some segments of the population. So so that slowing

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>labor supply is a major driver of that. Now you

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>can make up for that by productivity growth, but that

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>has been dismal for a long time. Now we see

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we see some good signs as I just mentioned earlier,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that productivity is beginning to pick up a little bit.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>Some of that may just have been cyclical related to

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the strong growth in two thousands, seventeen and eighteen, but

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it might be that indeed, you know, technology digital transformation

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is beginning to results in companies, and that would help

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>us to keep growth in the United States still at

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 1>you know ABUF to pent in the longer term, and

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that would probably be good enough to support and sustain

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>growth going forward. Part Van Ark, thank you so much

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>for joining us bart as executive vice president and chief

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>economists for the conference board. Oil is up today once again,

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Brent crude up about one point three five cents per

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>barrel at some response to some news that I Rand

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>said that missile struck one of its tankers in the

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Red Sea, which is would be the latest in a

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>series of attacks on oil infrastructure in the region that

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have royal energy markets of late. To get a sense

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of what is going on, we welcome Will Kennedy. Will,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>as a managing editor covering all things energy and commodities

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg, joins us from London. So, well, what's the

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>latest on this tanker attack in the Red Sea. So,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>an Irvanian tanker with about one million bottels of crude

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>oil was sailing north through the Red Sea um it

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.679
<v Speaker 1>was attacked in the earlier this morning. The National Avanian

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Tanker Company, which owns the ship, says two missiles hit it.

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They're not saying exactly where they came from, although they

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>one said one stage said they probably came from Saudi Abia,

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>although later they decided to walk that back. As we

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>understand it, the tanker shared a little bit of crude

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>oil into the Red Sea, but that situation is now

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>under control and the tanker has turned around and is

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>sailing back towards the Persian Gulf. The fact that these

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>attacks keep happening is a bit concerning and sort of

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>points to the escalating tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Are you at all surprised that oil prices aren't up more?

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this takes us back, I think to the

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>attack we saw miss a month ago on the Abcate

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>crude processing plant in so the Arabia, at the very

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>heart of the Saudi oil industry, five million dollars a day,

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and when that got hit by some missile strikes, possibly

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sponsored by Iran, we saw oil react as you'd expect,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it rose in one day. But what's been really interesting

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>about the event is that we've grown up all those

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>gains and more. I there is no that that attack

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>has produced no risk premium in the market, and I

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think what it really speaks to is the over riding

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>inncern of the oil market is that there's just too

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>much oil around and that situation is only going to

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>get worse next year, where most analysts see a mismatch

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>between supply and demand. The International Energy Agency says early

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>next year they expect global inventories to build more than

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars a day, and I think the market

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is much more focused on that and the same concerns

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of everyone else about the trade war and the slowing

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>US economy than they are on geopolitics so well. One

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of the things I think these series of attacks in

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East oil infrastructure have shown those of us

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>who don't follow the supply side in the Middle East

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>oil supply that closely is just maybe how vulnerable the

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>supply chain is. What is the thinking within energy circles

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>about can anything be done to make it more secure?

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very difficult. I mean, tankers are not armed, there's

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 1>no real way to protect them. They have to sail

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>close to coastlines at times, so you know, they are

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>easily targeted. But this is not the first time that

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this. In the Avan of Ark War in

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the nineties there was a so called tanker war where

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>tankers would repeatedly attacked as they sailed through the Persian Gulf.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you know we've seen tankers attacked more recently

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>or for Yemen by al qada um in in you know,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago or so. So it has something that

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>becomes a problem every now and again. Um and though

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:50.559
<v Speaker 1>there's very little you can do. The only thing you

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can do is to try and make sure that no

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>one's no one wants to attack them from the shore

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to to to the you know, de escalate the issue

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>behind the attacks. Here's here's one thing that I'm struggling

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand today. Not only do we have this attack

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on supply, but also there is better than expected trade development.

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So why isn't that giving people a little bit more

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>hope when it comes to demand for oil and they're

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sending prices even higher. Well, that's true, and you might

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>have expected to see a better day. But we also

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>had a report this morning from the International Energy Agency

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>that again locked a little bit off its demand forecast

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for next year. And you know, just to go back

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to this idea that at the moment, the supply demand

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 1>bances next year don't look good. And that's going to

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of focus as we go towards the

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the year on OPEX politic to reaction. Will

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia have to cut more production? Isn't OPAQ in

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a position to do that or not? And you know,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>until we get some really firm uh policy clarity from

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>OPEC plus that they're going to do what it takes

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring the market into what they call balance. I

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>support prices up above six seals about I think the

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the oil market may struggle to really get a lot higher. Well, Kennedy,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Will Kennedy,

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Managing editor for Energy and Commodities. Talking about

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that attack on the Iranian oil tanker, it just is

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>uh an interesting idea that even as we have those

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>tensions rising, people don't really care that much. Not only

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>are we getting positive discussion out of Washington, but Boris

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and the European Union evidently are working well together.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>They have entered the tunnel, the cone of secrecy as

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they try to hash out a Brexit deal, and evidently

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>things are going pretty well. That lack of d tell

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is sending the pound to its biggest two day rally

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>on a percentage basis since December two thousand and eight.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>This has been a just incredibly slow process, but a

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of light at the end of the tunnel

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps here as we get down to that, you know,

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>October thirty one date, which is really the hard, hard data.

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I think. Meanwhile, we are seeing the more happy the

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>talk yets, the less there is a bid for gold.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>We have gold today down sharply at one point two

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>percent lower, joining us now Frank Holmes, chief executive officer

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment officer of US Global Investors. Gold had

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>been in the sweet spot, a lot of investors saying

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it was headed straight to sixteen hundred dollars. Currently is

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>at one thousand, four hundred and seventy five dollars and

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>some change. I'm wondering what it will take to prop

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the prices back up, given the fact that we are

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>not done with the uncertainties and yet people still seeing

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a time to sell. Well, there's two big drivers for

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the demand for gold, and I've characterized as the fear

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>trade and the love trade. And what's interesting is the

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>love trade is of all demand for gold and really

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is highly correlated the use of Bloomberg functions to the

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>GDP per capita of Chindia affectually known as China and India,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>which is the world's population. So what they're rising g

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>D people income to consumption of gold cold jewelry has

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>been in stellar. The fear training is what's really been

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>driving gold this year, and that's negative real interest rates

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I'm precedent around the globe slowed down with

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>p m s. It'll take a while before you get

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>get those to turn and be sustainable. So I think

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're living in an era where governments still have

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>not got with the program that we need fiscal stimulus

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>by extremelining all the regulations. Uh, it's all now by

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>negative real interest rates and printing money. So this makes

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>gold a very attractive asset class. And there's actually peak

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>golds coming from minds. There's been no major discoveries and

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's gold is in a very served

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>unique secular trend. Again. So Frankie, we're in the month

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>of October that's historically been a very volatile month for

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets. Is that an argument to maybe increase

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>allocations to gold here, No, I don't think so. I

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think that you have to take the thought process of

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the largest head spot in the world, Bridge Water, Brade, Dalios,

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Pilosity having said six to ten percent and gold, and

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you rebalance it and it has the volti of the

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>stock markets only one sort of component to it. I

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important is real is what's called real

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates and uh, and I think that the world

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to try to stimulate with negative

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>real interest rates and this is bullets for gold. Now,

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, of spectacular run. It was up three standard deviations.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>We like to look at it over sixty trade days.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Is now back to almost at par now with this

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>correction today, we're just back to where it's a very

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>healthy way to take a look of entering into gold.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>So you like gold, where do you think it goes

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>by the end of say the next six months? Um.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, the DNA of altally of gold is now

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>over a ten day or in period, the SMP is

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>three percent, and that means severy percent of the time

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's non event for goal to go up, but down

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>two percent was the SMPS three percent? So I think

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know, asked by year end, I think that

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the goal could easily be seventeen hundred dollars. I think that,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and it could also correct the hundred dollars from here.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of the normal trading range. It's going to

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>be much more important is what Europe is doing in

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Japan is doing on this negative real interest rate scenario.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see anything of fiscal policy changes and

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>regulations to say we're going to have a complete sea

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 1>change and what we how we're going to try to

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>grow our economy. I want to shaft gears a little bit.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that not only do you focus on precious metals,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but you also focus on the airline industry with your

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>e t F that trades as jets on the New

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange and Delta shares have been doing pretty

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>poorly after they said that they're seeing rising costs and

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>slowing revenue growth. Do you think that the outlook has

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>materially deteriorated for the airline industry. No, I don't. You

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>know so much of this sentiment just recently, just prior

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to this conversation we're having, we talked about the Pound

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>having one of the biggest rallies so much as sentiment

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>driven right now, and so they say costs of risings

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>or sentiment and meeting sells off. But there's it's very

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to build an airport. The baris to entry are

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>extremely high. And uh. And when you take a look

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at global travel and tourism, one of the things I

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just noted when I was in New York Stock Exchanged

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday tours or Chinese tourists. I was in Salzburg last

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>week and the same thing there. So I think that

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a global tourism is growing much faster out

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of the middle class of China and India in particular China. UH,

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it was always led by America, and now there's three

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>entities that are dominating it. And there's just difficult to

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>get the building of these new airports and and UH,

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is a very boyish scenario. And the incillary

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>fees ten years ago with three big in dollars a

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>year with a charge for a bag or change your ticket,

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I can go out the whole list of them. They're

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>now pushing. They're going to push through a hundred day

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in next year, so the cost of fuel is not

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>as significant because they're making so much money from these

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>incillary fees. And Delta, yes, they talked about their Amics

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Matter Express contract. Well that and that was almost fourth

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>big in the revue last year, and I think could

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>be seven big in dollars over the next year. So

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we look at American airlines what they're making for their

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>credit card um so I think that the airline's industry

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is buying the tips. Do I buy et f R.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I just go out and buy a basket of these

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>airlines stocks, global stocks. You go out and buy his ets,

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>not the football team. You buy jets because it diversified

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>your risk. And we also have airports in there. Did

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, um, the airport for Bangkok is public. Uh.

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of the airports in Mexico or public h istern bowls,

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>public Beijing is public. So you get these airports as

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a mixture, but they have to have a quant model

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>of very high returns to investor capital and make to

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the jets etf So I I mean very very bullish,

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think that Bowling will in the next next

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>year with the worst behind this quarter and uh, and

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that will then turn around also help Southwest

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Airlines and American Airlines uh increase their uh, their their

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>their routes. Right. Frank Colins, thanks so much for joining us.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate your thoughts on both the gold sector as

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>well as the global airlines business. Frank Colmins is the

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO and she investment officer for us A Global Investors.

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>They're based in San Antonio, Texas well. It is certainly

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a risk on day today A great way to end

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the week for equity bulls. All took was a little

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of positive news on the geopolitical front to help

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>us get a sense of kind of how to think

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about this market going forward. We welcome and Witty Bahuguna

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>and widy as a senior portfolio manager and head of

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.239
<v Speaker 1>multi asset strategy for Columbia Threadneedle Investments, joining us on

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Boston. And Witty, thanks so much for

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>joining us. What do you make of today's action in

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the market. Um, it's certainly optimist, Sick Paul. Sounds like

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>progress on several funds on the trade front on the Brexit,

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>but I will say that I haven't seen details yet

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of either. It's really just optimistic sounds a missing sounds

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>good enough for a lot of people out there, evidently

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to cash in. I mean, given the fact

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've got zero details or at least to give

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you any tangible sense that this is actually going to

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>go through, would you be selling this rally? We are

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>actually underweight in our portfolios, so yes, it's definitely not

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>something that I would trade client money on rumors alone.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.479
<v Speaker 1>At this point, we need to see what is actually

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon, whether it's temporary or another one of those

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>ten or so head fakes we have seen in the

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>last one year. Lisa, so on when when when you

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think about your positioning again, you mentioned your underweight global equities.

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it give us a sense of kind of how

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you weight that or what drives that? Is it evaluation?

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Is it slowing global economic growth? Or is it you know,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the global macro uncertainty, trade and so

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So it's several of those factors. Evaluation

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is one component. Fundamentals is really the driving component of

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.719
<v Speaker 1>how we think about the world. And on that front,

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we have seen nothing but downgrades to global growth outlook

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>this entire year. Whether you look at what the bond

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>market has done, whether you look at how equity markets

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>have performed outside of the US, we have seen nothing

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 1>but downgrades to growth for the entire year. Now, it's

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>better priced in in some markets than others. But what

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I would what would what would really matter to us

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is how does the growth outlook change going forward? And

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>trade and b exit our component of that. Um We

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>will wait to see the details of all those, but

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it won't be just a day's sentiment change. For example,

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at at some of your calls. You

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>also are saying that it's a good time to maintain

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>treasury allocations just because of some of the bearishness in

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the economic outlook going forward. I guess what would it

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>take for you to reverse that call? Right? So that

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is important on the multi asset portfolios, since we take

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>risks in equities commodities to have some hedges, and treasuries

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have been excellent hedge this entire yearly, sir, The thing

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>that would matter to me on the treasury front is

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>beginning of what you're seeing now a little bit in

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the bond market. I would like to see the front

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the curve stabilize a little. So the front

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>end of the curve's been signaling this entire year downgrades

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to growth expectations. And if that stabilizes, and I don't

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>expect a whole lot of movement up in the front end,

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit, that would be a sign that

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe markets beginning to price out the recession here. The

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>back end is very much driven by premium. PA's driven

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>by so many factors other than just the US economy.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.239
<v Speaker 1>But it will be very good to see this, you know,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>one day of this inversion that we have seen in

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the curve become a little more permanent. So and with

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the stories at least and I've been following

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this morning, is this news from the Federal Reserve that

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>will begin buying about sixty billion dollars of treasury bills

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>per month. How do you view that move? Is this

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>a stealth quee on your from your perspective, or is

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it in fact kind of what they're suggesting, which is,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, something to just kind of stabilize the short

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the curve. So I I agree with such

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>description of this. I think it's very much a plumbing

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>mechanism to stabilize the funding on the short end. I

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely don't view it as stealth QUEUEI um remember, Paul,

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this was a very standard operation for the Fed before

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the crisis. It's simply helping and aiding movement of efforts

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in the ranking system, very much a function of the fit,

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>which is the lender of the last resort. One other

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>call that you have is underweight emerging market stocks in particular,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering what it would take for you to

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>reverse that call, given the fact that you do have

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>central bank easing around the world, which typically is positive

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for emerging market assets. Right, So that was very much

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>driven by this manufacturing slowdown, or I would even go

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as far as to call it a manufacturing procession. We

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have seen in the last nine months or so, we

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are beginning to see some signs of improvement there, Lisa.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>We've seen in the month of September the UH manufacturing

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>p m I s for emerging market stabilize plus very

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>central bank easing, as you pointed out, Um, that would

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>be a driver for us. Continuous movement in that direction

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>would be a driver for us to change our view

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>on emerging markets. How about Western Europe? We you know,

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking at Germany with his negative rates and

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>slowing economy in Western Europe uncertainly continues with Brexit. Is

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it just too risky for you to or for anyone

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to really maybe increase an allocation to Europe. Well, we

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>are actually over it Europe and have been for a while. Um.

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Europe has that central bank support that Lisa spoke about,

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and there is UM. Europe is the one market where

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for the past few years a lot of pessimism have

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>been priced in, so our valuation component had come in

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>handy to look at your connectuity markets, and we are

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>over it Europe. Just going forward, do you have a

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>sense of how far away from the bottom we are

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in this manufacturing downturn. Um, it's early days. Yes, I

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>am um, you know, mildly optimistic, Lisa. It looks like

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>things are stabilizing, you know, very watch a function of

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment driven down draft that we saw the last

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>two months. I would say so last two months has

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>been particularly volatile as uh. There have been movement driven

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>very much more by sentiments other than data. So data

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>had been weakening all year around, but last two months

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>have been constant bombardment of markets whipping around in one

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>direction or the other by the trade news worsening, the

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>brekfit news worsening than maybe going back and getting better

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. We would love to see some stabilization

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>on that front. And wet by Hugana. Thank you so

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>much for being with a senior portfolio manager and head

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of multi asset strategy at Columbia Threat Needle Investments, joining

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>us from Boston, Massachusetts. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt sweet. I'm Lisa

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>abram Woods. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo WOOS one

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio