WEBVTT - Matt Wallaert Is on a 'Chief Behavioral Officer' Mission

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>This week. On the podcast, I have Matt Wallert and

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>he is uh former director at Microsoft Ventures. Has done

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of startups, but his background is really in

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>behavioral psychology, which makes for an interesting and eclectic mix.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Regular listeners know of my interest in behavioral psychology, so

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this is right in my sweet spot. We actually did

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>not get to talk about how we met. I go

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to lots of conferences as a speaker, and so I'm

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>always terribly reluctant to go as an attendee. It's sort

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of once you've seen behind the curtain, it's like, oh,

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>now I know how the magic is done. It ruins

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, it ruins the special effects. Once you

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>know how the you mean, he's really not sawing a

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>woman in half, it ruins the show for you what.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>On occasion, I'll go to um some specific conference where

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a few people I want to see your specific

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>individual And it was in the t I A. Kreft

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>Building conference facility, which is on like third and fifty one.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's on the thirtieth floor. It's a really interesting facility,

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>having a conference center not in the basement, but in

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the sky, surrounded by buildings, and I was there to

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>see somebody else, and Matt, Matt was right before, right

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>after the person I had come to see, and he

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>just takes the stage and you know, choose up the

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>scenery destroys the place. And it was really a fascinating concept,

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating speech about here's what behavioral psychology is, and

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>why aren't we applying this in the real world. We

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>know this works, We know we can affect people's behavior

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and have them either make better decisions or end up

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>doing things that brings them more satisfaction, more happiness. At

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a corporate level, if you're selling widgets, you don't want

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>people just to buy your widgets. You want them to

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>buy your widgets and have a higher level of satisfaction

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and become a repeat customer. And behavior and psychology can

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really lead companies to finding that right mix that really

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>generates not just sales, but sales with happy customers, and

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>happy customers become repeat buyers. And I thought it was

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so obvious and so ridiculously. Wait, we're not doing this,

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>And you stop and think about it, and suddenly it's wow,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing this. You're you. You look at all

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the things in the news recently about some horribly embarrassing

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>corporate behavior, and it's pretty clear that most of these

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>companies could desperately use a chief behavioral officer and they

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have one. And so I thought his conversation was

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. I said, hey, let's get him into the

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>studio and have a conversation. I think that was like

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>eight months ago. It took us a long time to

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>find a date that worked. He's a busy guy. But

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you will find this to be a fascinating conversation.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're all interested in startups, ventures, or behavioral psychology,

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to really enjoy this conversation. So, with no

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>further ado, my interview with Matt Wallert. My special guest

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>today is Matt Wallert. He is a behavioral psychologist and entrepreneur.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>He has built a number and sold a number of startups.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>He went to Microsoft to work on products that he

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>could build at larger scale, eventually becoming a director at

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Ventures. Matt Wallert, Welcome to Bloomberg Verry. Thanks for

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>having me. Man. So let's talk a little bit about

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>your background, which is very eclectic. You studied both science

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and psychology. You you work in the tech field, but

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you're also a behaviorist, which came first. I was definitely

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>so Ion's kid and not a psychology kid. I'm from

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>very rural Oregon and had, if anything, I was anti psychology. Right.

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm a true like mill and Nowhere kid where well,

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And your impression of psychologist is like, these are people

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>who tell you what to do right, like or tell

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you what you think right? You have this impression from television.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there was a psychologist in sixty miles

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>of where I was. Right, It's not like New York

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where you grew up. Everybody's got a therapist, everybody knows

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>what this is like. It was a totally unknown quantity.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I actually it was really anti psych um.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And then when I went to Swarthmore, I took uh

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>intro Psychic and it was taught by a wonderful, wonderful

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>professor who's a great research professor, rible teacher, like you

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>couldn't even get up and leave the room kind of

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>teacher because you would throw them off. But then I

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>took another side class with arguably the best teaching professor.

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It's worthmore and I had this amazing experience where they

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reviewed a study and I sort of said to him,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't I don't really agree with their

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of the results. Not that I disagree with the date,

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think they're interpreting right. And he said, well,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>this is the most the important thing any teacher could do.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He said, Look, the rest of the field agrees with

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this interpretation, but this is science, and so there's an

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>orderly way for you to argue. You do an experiment

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that proves your side right, you provide countervailing and like

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you can like a scientific method that allows you to

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>challenge the prevailing belief. And I was cooked at that moment.

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the moment where I went from you know,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>so turned off by well we just debate things and

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>whoever is a better order or kind of wins, to like, no,

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>we can go and you know you don't disagree with somebody,

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you think they're interpreting it wrong. Great, go run a study.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So you get your undergraduate degree it's uh Swarthmore UM

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in psychology and education, and then you apply to the

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>PhD program at Cornell for psychology, Yeah, social psychology, So

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I um, it's actually funny. I was sort of getting

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>recruited by Stanford, Cornell, and the University of Colorado, and

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a chose University of Colorado, and then my advisor calls

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>me says, hey, I'm moving to Cornell. So either you

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can come to Colorado but I won't be here, or

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you can go with me to Cornell. So I went

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to Cornell. And you're a startup guy, why not Stanford?

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>You would think that's a natural fit. But I'm not

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a startup guy, right, I'm a first generation college kid.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I've never The way I got into startups was was

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>ab Carnanni's fault, right, like I'm I was in in

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the PC program at Cornell, and he uh sort of

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>uh called me up and he said, look, we're running

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the startup. We think you could give us some advice.

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And I said, literally, I don't know anything about startups.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about tech. I don't know anything

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>about finance. And his personal finance was min dot Com.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:37.799
<v Speaker 1>So with his competitor called Thrive, we sold the landing

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>tree and I said, I don't know anything about any this.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>He said, don't worry, We'll figure out how to get

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the value out of you and then a year later

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>I was there head a product. His name what was

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.679
<v Speaker 1>his name? So that's Av Carnanni. He was the CEO

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>of Thrive and and he was the founder. He was

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the he was the co founder with with Orage Knaps.

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>He was the tech guy. And he brought you in

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in what role? Uh as so as the lead scientists

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and sort of had a product. They had they had

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>built some thing. It wasn't They had this inkling that

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>it might not really be the right thing, and so

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I sort of came in and said, yep, not sort

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of behavior from able science perspective, this is probably not

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're a little bit like Mitt. You're probably not going

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to move the needle. How do we go and build

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>something that cam? And then we built it? So let's

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>back up a few steps. You're in the PhD program

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>at Cornell. This is before Twitter, before Facebook, before social media.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that old. Facebook existed sort of not broadly,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>not the way it did today. And by the way,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>when I say it's before all these things, I'm not

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about the nineteen twenties. This is a decade ago.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And how do they find you? I had bugglish on

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>papers they actually called Dick Taylor. That's what I love

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>about academics, right, like they listen there for now sailor

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is is Charlie at Chicago, but he was at one

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>point in time, he was in California. He was at

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Chicago at the time. He still because it doesn't that long.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>He was a previous guest. I find his work fascinating

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's an endlessly entertaining guy. He is, and and look, Dick,

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, has in some really amazing work. And what

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I love about academics is like, you know, they just

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>put their phone number and you know, and so they

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>called him up and he answered the phone, and he

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>gave him like an hour's worth of advice and then

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they yeah, for free. And then because this is before

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the days of startup mania, right, this is before everybody's

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be an advisor of something, right, they just

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he was just sort of like sure, And that's I

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>actually think. You know, one of the things I talked

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about often is, you know, if you need advice, go

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>find a grad Students like that, you know, they don't

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>charge very much, like they don't know, you know, they

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know the true value of their information, and they're

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>so passionate and happy to talk to you about it.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So they called it Taylor. They got to the end

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of the hour and they were sort of like, would

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be advisor, and he was like, no, you gotta be

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>kidding me. Man, like I'm too busy, but go find

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a grad student. And so I was the grad student.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>They sort of came up. So how do they approach

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you about this? I mean, so we just got on

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a call and they said, he sort of, here's what

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we're building. This is after the dot com collapse, but

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of in the recovery before the financial before

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the before the financial collapse, which was which was key

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for us, right because here we are in this sort

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of personal finance space and we can acquire by lending

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to read just as the sort of financial collapses. What

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>was that publicly announced? What the dollar amount was? No,

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a like so breaks and was

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>what was the Yeah? Good try Like once again you're

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>talking to the science guy, right, Like I paid no

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>attention to the cap table. As a matter of fact,

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.959
<v Speaker 1>I actually so when they sent me, I remember walking

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>through the West Village and nobody should ever do this,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, like you should know what you're signing

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>before you sign it. But I had to talk to

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>a V. Carnani about, like, what's a basis point You've

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>written me this offica letter with these it's fantastic, but

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>like one of these things we'll give you at least

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>five of them. We're walking through the West Village and

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>he's like explaining, like I knew nothing. He was a

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred basis points fantastic lot, you know. So I actually

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>remember running around when I got my offer letter from them,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>running around being so happy about the salary because again,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>first generation college kid, like even startup money seemed like

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to me. And so then they

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>came to me then there was this equity part, and

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I literally was like, I have no idea what this

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>means actually, And years later, um I went on to

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>build a feminist tool called salary or equity dot com,

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>because women are less likely to accept start up offers

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>because they want salary, not because they want salary, or

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't know what equity means, or it seems riskier

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>than it is, and so we actually built a little

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>calculator where you put in your offer letter and it

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>basically says like that's kind of about so let's let's

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about behavioral science and how it

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>fits into these various UM startup roles that you've had.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>What is the job of chief behavioral officer? So this

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is something I've actually written about and proposed sort of lately,

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying really to resolve this um you know,

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>this fundamental gap. If you go to any sort of

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>C level exec, they'll say, oh, I love behavioral science.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I love Dana RELI, I love you know,

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>thinking fast and slow, I love nudging, I love all

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And then I say, okay, well where's your team?

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, what team? Right is? So's implementing these

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ideas in your actual business? That's right? Whose job is this?

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And and because we know if it's not somebody's job,

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't get done right and so and there are

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 1>a smattering people who have not taken that title but

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>are doing interesting things. So Steve went on morning side, Um,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>you know there are people who are doing sort of this.

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So what I sort of said was I actually don't

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is business is fault. I think this is

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>psychology's fault. Right. This is something actually we were just

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about a minute ago. You know, in the break.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we haven't done a good job of explaining

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>how do you go put it into an organization, in

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>part because we stayed in academia, right, we didn't come

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>out into business. And so I think a chep April

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>officer really has three jobs. One of them is the

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>application of behavioral science internally, right, So take it for meaning,

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>how do we get our employees to do what we

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>think is in their own best interests and invest in

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the country of people say they're disengaged at their jobs.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Who's addressing that? Right? Like hr, yeah, good luck? Right?

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Like women massive attrition. We know that like companies that

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>have senior women much much better return profile. They do

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>better on Wall Street, but women to treat a lot.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>HRS had fifty years to solve this problem and has

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>done nothing. Like maybe we should let behavioral science take

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a crack, Like how do we go change those behavioral things?

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So internal stuff, motivation, retention, recruitment, all, you know, work

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>life balance, all of these pieces external stuff. Um, you know,

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>actually revamping product and depends what your product is. One

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of the example who runs their behavioral science lab is

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, people spend you know, let's call it ninety

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>minutes a session in a Walmart, they're in line for

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, but if you survey them afterwards, that five

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>minutes loom super large. There six forever recent the effect.

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the last thing they experienced, one that has the

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest impact. That's right. You actually wrote about the checkout

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>experience in hotels. Why you giving me water when I exit?

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Give it when I arrive, give it to me when

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I leave, And I'm left with, oh, isn't that nice?

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>As you as you head out? That's right. It's a

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>peak end theory, right, I want those endpoints to really matter.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>And instead, you know, I actually was on the road

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>this week. It feels like you're like a thief. You're

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>like stealing out of your hotel. You don't even go

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to the desk anymore because you right out. You're just like,

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like dying and dash exactly. You're like

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a bag and run out. I feel like I'm doing

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>something wrong when I like sneak out of my hotel

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to go to the airport. Um, so those sorts of things,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>so external stuff, and then now let me interrupt, do

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you say that this isn't all that well developed externally?

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But when I read about the science behind supermarkets and

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>what's eye level and and what is how the whole

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>circumference of the store, of the fresh foods and the

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>interior of the store all the package goods and what's here,

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and how they make you go to the far opposite

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>corner of the store to get milk, which is the

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>number one item people come in. And the it just

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>works out. The longer you're in the supermarket, the more

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff you're gonna buy. So if you're there for one

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>item and you have to go as far as humanly

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>possible from the entrance, you're gonna end up doing more

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>than just buy milk. Yes, And there have been like

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that has become a whole science, right, There have been

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>isolated pockets of sort of applied behavioral science, you know,

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in health, for example, they're starting to do some really

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>good health decision making work. There are these pockets where

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of seen stuff. And I think the problem

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is too often companies are like, well, that's great for them,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and they don't see how it applies to their product, Right,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's great for those people over there. Right at this point,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>even I think you know, we talked earlier about you know,

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about behavior economics and people sort of paying

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>attention on the stock market. Like, I think, actually finance

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>has done a better job. But the problem with finance

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>doing a good job is like CpG has gone and said, well,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that's great for finance, but it's a finance thing, right,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Behavioral economics totally applies in finance, But what could they

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly be doing for us. It's basically figuring out how

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to have lead people to the right decision and then

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>giving them all the tools and pathways to get there.

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>That's it doesn't matter what the field is. It's it's

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>not about the widget, you know, the I think the

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Hitchcock movie used to call it the McGuinty or

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the mcguffin. Whatever they were chasing was irrelevant. It was

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the chase that mattered. So if the mcguffin was a

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>multese falcon or something completely different, it didn't matter. It

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was the chase that h well, and and I think

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that's actually a really good sort of summation of why

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>behavioral science matters. Right, It's a process be hero scientists

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are trained interventionists. Right. Let's take the Walmart line example.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>If you ask engineers, you say to the engineers while

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the lines are too long, they're like, well, let's rejigger

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the POS system so people move through faster. Right, And

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if you ask like the store ops people, they'll tell you, well,

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>let's put in more checkout counter so they're shorter, and

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>those kind of things work. But the raw truth is

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>people are in line for five minutes. It's not that

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>they're in line for too long. It feels too long.

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So why don't you behavior some with ways to either

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>entertain them or keep them otherwise, engage distracted involved so

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like it's a long process. Exactly, Like

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>let's do what we did in the New York subway system.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So New York Subway, you know, we put in these

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>signs that tell people when the subways are coming. People

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to think the subways are running way faster. That absolutely.

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I just took a subway here, and the first thing

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you notice, the express is one minute, the local is

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>three minutes. But I don't want to walk up that

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>giant set of stairs, so I'll take the extra three minutes.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>And you can make a decision, right, and and it's

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>three minutes and not like you know, let's say you

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>were running late to this thing. You know, you're looking

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>at your watch going is it now? Is it now?

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it now? Should I run up stairshow over the Yeah,

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>like the edge of the subway? When is that train

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>coming and you're looking at a screen, O, it's two

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>minutes away? That's right. And the nice thing about that

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is it removes ambiguity, and two minutes just doesn't sound

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>very long, right, so it contextualizes it really isn't that long.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So imagine doing that in line. What if we don't

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>change the pos and add new lines, we just say, hey,

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be out of here in two minutes. That's interesting.

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>You you call scientists train interventionists. Are these interventionists working

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>companies or are they still in academic? I think they're

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>largely still in academia. And I think that's because we

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't gone to two companies and helped explain why this happens. Right,

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you go to Walmart example, Right, if you

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the engineers, they'll have an engineering solution. If

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you go to the marketers, they'll have a marketing solution.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>There's nobody who's solution agnostic and his problem focused, right,

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's what science really is, right, when you think

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about any scientists, when you're running a bunch of experience ements, right,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you're essentially running an intervention seeing if it works, running

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>an intervention seeing if it works. It's not the experiment

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that matters. It's the outcome that you care about. So

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the pivot, the fixed point is the outcome,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you pivot around experiments that help you test

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>around that outcome. And so scientists almost accidentally become really

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>good product people because what they're doing is, you know,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I know what I'm trying to test. I know what

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to test. I know what I'm trying to test,

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'll just test until I sort of I'm able

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to get my hands around the edges. I don't have

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a predefined sort of you know, this is the way

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that I operate against that. Let's talk a little bit

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>about startups and culture, and I have to begin by

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>asking you. I love the show Silicon Valley. It just

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>started the new season. Do you watch it? I don't don't.

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Was how accurate is it? Here's why there's a reason

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't watch it. I've seen episodes. There's you know, I

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't watch it. And it actually was challenging for

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>me to watch the first season of Girls for the

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.959
<v Speaker 1>same reason, which is it's it's clearly farcical, but if

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you're in if you're in that part of the world,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just a little too close to home for me. Right,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I don't like uncomfortable comedy. Right, I'm like,

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not a Larry David fat, Yeah, I don't. I

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>don't do well with uncomfortable comedy. And and it is

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a little uncomfortable with me. And it's why, you know,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I help a lot of startups, but I try to

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>make you know, I try to spend as much time

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>outside of that world as I can, because I think

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's where, you know, if you want to be a

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>good product person, you've got to be exposed to the problems.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the problems of Silicon Valley

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is has so insulated itself from problem sets. You know,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>it's just solving its own problems at this point. You know,

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>there's two things that I have to share with you. First,

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not the target demographic for Girls. Watch the first show,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and basically, you know, sorry tapping tapping out really early

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on that one. But the fascinating thing about Mike Judge,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>who is behind Silicon Valley. He started out doing the

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>broadest idiocracy, the broadest dumbest comedy, and then narrowed it down,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>narrowed it down. I think he did Office Office Space,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>which was a little ridiculous, but not quite as ridiculous.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the one that you know, it's clearly parody,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but it seems to venture into cinema verity quite often,

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and it it to someone who's not out there, it

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>really rings true. Yeah, I mean and it is, and

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's hilarious, and it was really funny and really well acted,

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think, uh, they've done it. Yeah, they've done it.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think casting really was what made that show right there.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>They're believable characters that are able to carry it off

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to like, um uh, what's the other skiky

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>science show that's more slapstick Big Bang? Right? That is

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>clear sort of laugh track comedy, right, you know, the

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>characters are so over the top, so unbelief. Well you're

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to feel like you know those people, um

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley. I really do know of those people.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So so let's let me ask the same question differently,

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>how does start up culture get unfairly mischaracterized in general,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not just HBO, but in general. What do we misunderstand

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about startup culture educate the listening public if you can. Uh. So,

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting and hard question. I think it's not

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>uh And I want to sort of caveat this carefully, right, So,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it it. People really do think of Silicon Valley.

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>They think of young white males doing these things, and

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>in reality, there are you know, we know lots of

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>people of color. That's right, Old, older entrepreneurs with families

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to have sort of better exits, right, Like,

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we actually know there's a bunch of other variable there's

0:20:58.240 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really interesting start ups in the middle

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of the kind entree, you know. There there are a

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of things. Now, there's not as many people of

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.959
<v Speaker 1>color as we'd want. There's not as many women as

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we'd want. That's a serious issue that we're I spent

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of my time working on. And that's

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's a little bit of a see it be

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it problem, right, if we see it be it problems, yeah,

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>CB A problem is like, well, if I never see

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>a female scientist as a little girl, how do I

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>ever have the opportunity to think, oh, I might be

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's a cycle that that has to be broke,

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And so we need to be fiercely critical

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the homogeney of startups while at the same time

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>recognizing all of the people that are outside of that

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>homogeny that you know, and we need to hold those

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>ups so that we get more of them. Right. That

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that's really uh, that's really interesting. UM. So let's talk

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit about the gender bias sets out in Silicon Valley.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>There's been a couple of high profile lawsuits. We've seen

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the turmoil at uber because of it. Um even a

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>big venture capital firm like Climate Perkins had had a litigation.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Is there a gender bias issue? And I mean there's no,

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no. To me, that's a that's like saying, is

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>they're global warming? Right of economists will tell you that

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a gender wage gap, right like you know,

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, denying the science, it's amazing to me the

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>people that deny the science of it, that they think

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem of opinion. I did this research actually

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>with with pay Scale, where they said, hey, do you

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>want to put anything in our service? Said ya, I

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>wanna ask two questions, Um, do you think men women

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>have equal opportunities in the workplace in general? And do

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>you think men and women have equal opportunities? Um in

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>your workplace? And if you look at men, only one

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>in five men see sexism both near them and in

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the world. Right, So only one in five men something

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that we know is scientifically true, like actually are able

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>to see that. Another one in five see it in

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the world but not near them, And three or five

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>men just don't think it exists out there or in here,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>three and five. My special guest today is Matt Wallert.

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>He is an entrepreneur behavioral psychologist, and previously he was

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a director at Microsoft Ventures, where he did a variety

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of work, including some behavioral psychology at Bing. Is that correct?

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So that was actually prior to joining Ventures. I joined

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Ventures when I came back to New York. Um, I

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>have a lovely eighteen month old and my wife said,

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were out in Seattle, said I want

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to co back to New York. My family is. I

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>said to Microsoft, hey, I'm gonna go back, and they

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>said Ventures. I said okay, and uh, And so I

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>spent a good time there. But previous to that had

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>done a bunch of products. What did you do with

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>BING and and how does behavioral psychology apply to being?

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>My favorite thing about BING has been the three dimensional

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Bird's eye View. Was the first mapping software that had that.

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>And when you're looking for a house, you're like, oh

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>my god, I could see the park, I could see

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the house, I could see the water, I could It's

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>amazing the level of detail that you could zoom in

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on with that product. I was fascinated by that. Yeah,

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean mapping in general has always been fascinating to me, since,

0:23:58.400 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming from a rural place, I didn't have

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>expose you know, I think you didn't get to go

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>as many places as you do when you're on these

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>coast teas. You travel around and things, and uh so

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it was a fun, really fun way to you know.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I looked at a lot of maps as a kid

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>as a way of like sort of visualizing the rest

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Um so, so I really when I

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>first came to Microsoft, they sort of said, look, you know,

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>our our product process of very engineering driven, um which

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes means that we make things that people aren't actually

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>interested in using. So we want to sort of reverse that.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.239
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about what people want to use.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>And so the first thing I actually ever worked on

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>at Microsoft was putting cling On into the Bing translator.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, and it was It was actually a really

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hard project because Klingon is actually a uh you know,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a created language, and the linguist that created at

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Mark okrand Um, you know, basically want to break all

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the earthly rules. So like all Trio terrestrial languages, real

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>languages have a way of saying hello, the Clingon way

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of saying hello is just what do you want? Right?

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And so when you try and do that in a translator,

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>what what do you want from me? It's not that

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>far off. Yeah, And so it was very it was

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 1>very funny, I mean, hard to make a translator. But

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the point was how do we make something that takes

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a an audience that normally wouldn't engage with our translation

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>and sort of start to look at it in a

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>different way. And so that was the kind of thing

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that I did at Microsoft. So, you know, I created

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>our what's now known as our Being in the Classroom program,

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and so they what is being in the class well?

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>So so so they started with a key data insight,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>which was we're not seeing as much church traffick from

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>schools as we would think we do. And so they

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>had these plans. The marketing department decided, well, kids aren't

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>currying us enough, and so we're gonna have these plans

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>go run a campaign around like encouraging curiosity and kids.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And I said, look, I had a dasy degree, Like,

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>let's just go look at some stuff. And you know,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>kids are plenty curious. You go out to a classroom,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you could see kids are curious. Like, that's transparently not

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the problem. So when you go out and look, right,

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the tenants of behavior science, go look at

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>how people are behaving. You know, it was really teacher driven,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was actually less about they wanted to search.

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It was what we call inhibiting pressures. So it was

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>concerns about advertising, right, you know, schools are advertising free zones,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>search engines or not. Privacy. I don't really know what

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Google is doing with my data, but I have concerns

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>about it, right, have concerns about them taking my kids data.

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And then um, even classroom searches. I mean, of all

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the things, well, that's the problem, right, It's all identifiable, right,

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>And if they were using particularly if you're using Google

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in the classroom, So signing into Gmail and those sorts

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of things then you're searching are getting identified that profile, right,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's all getting sucked into some profile and I

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they're doing with it. And then the

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>third concern was adult content. So what we did was

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>roll out a version of being being in the classroom

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that's free for schools to sign up for. And then

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>when you search from schools, it's ad free. Um, not tracked, yeah,

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>not tracked, and and safe search is locked on and

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>so um. And then Google eventually did the same thing,

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of following on to us UM and so but

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>again you saw massive behavioral change increases in school searches.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a giant number. But that's the thing, Like, it's

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>so often people think that the problem is what we

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>call a promoting pressure like curiosity. People don't They're like, oh,

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 1>why aren't people searching? Well, they don't want to, right,

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and so we're gonna encourage them to want to. So

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not the problem. Why are you working for United Airlines? Don't?

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Don't they need a chief behavioral psychologist, especially for their

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>own people's decision making? Is this is The goal of

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>my CBO sort of crusade that I'm on is I

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>do think airlines. I've actually done work with Southwest like,

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a totally different experience. And it's funny. Actually

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I got kicked off the United flight. Oh for what? Um?

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>So I this was? Actually this was that was a

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>puddle jumper. I heard you mentioned this. Yeah, so I

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>got I got kicked off of a puddle jumper years ago.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Um because the stewardess was abusing the guy in front

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of me, and I said, excuse me, what's your name?

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And she knew in that moment he's gonna report me,

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and she said, I want you guys off my plane.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out a stewardess can kick whoever they

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>want off the gate agent kid for any reason. Gate

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>agent can't do anything about it. Uh, and so so

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they kicked me off. And it's funny because did you

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>get her name? I? Did you know? I? I? She

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>say her name and then she can be off the plane.

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny. United was not. They basically think if

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you get kicked off a plane, it's your own fault, right,

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But they and and interestingly they've not been very apologized.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're sort of like this guy deserve what

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>he got, you know. Uh, they're this whole thing has

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>been so bungled, you know from a from dot Galilee

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at n y U has just reamed United for there

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>are three rules of this. You not only violated each

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of the rules. And I'm doing this from memory, admit

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>your error, offered to accept responsibility, offered to repair it

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>each step along the way. You just made it worse.

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>It's it's astonishing, and it really, I mean, I have

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to say I could drag back up their old their

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>old like apology letter to me, but it really was

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of thing that we're like, it's the

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>corporate culture there. Yeah, and it was and and that's

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>where culture really matters. And it's funny. Actually a friend

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of mine, dance Storms, great product guy here in the

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>city tweeted at me today he said, oh, it looks

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like United was listening, because I had tweeted at Alaska

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and virgin and said, hey, you know, you should put

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>into your employee app a way that makes it much

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>easier for them to make decisions like giving somebody free

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>food or free entertainment or miles on the spot when

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>something bad happens, and United today said hey, we're going

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Oh really, that's that's part of it,

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the their announcement. I think this morning, where

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>yesterday was, we put it in our app I think

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to use from now this will have blown over. But

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a giant drag on them for

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>god knows how long. And it's the thing that's amazing

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is it's so avoidable. It's such a self inflicted wounds.

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 1>And this is the thing I think, you know, this

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm on this sort of CBO sort of

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>question Chief Behavioral Office, here's g P A officer, because

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there are so many things that we see

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>as FATA company that that really are actually avoidable. Right.

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, we were going back to

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the gender issue, right, like we think, oh, women get

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>pregnant and they leave the workplace and they don't want

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to come back. That's not true at all, Right, Like

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there are all these systematic structural things. We don't have

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to accept these things as true. Right, everything is on

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the table for change. So I've tried to bring a

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of women onto the show, and they're is a

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>chicken and egg issue in that I want to bring

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>senior women with experience and and expertise, and there are

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>plenty of them, but they're now in such demands that

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>either they don't respond or I've had ten or fifteen

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of the hundred and fifty or so guests are women.

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's no a near half. And I

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>don't even think it's proportionate to how the industry is structured.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But you're still starting out with an industry that at

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the senior level, forget fifty fifty. I don't even think

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we're in finance and and some other related fields. It's astonishing.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And so your example of having a woman a kid,

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>see a female scientist, there is this sort of which

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>comes from Yeah, there's the problem, and and you know,

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I this is this is why it is so frusting.

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>The three and five men don't think sexism exists, like

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I think people don't draw things to their natural conclusion. Right.

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're saying is there's no sexism, there's no systematic

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>sum in the world. Yet yet we only have sort

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of like ten percent female CEOs. You're telling me that

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there is some genetic, gendered reason that women can't run companies.

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And if that's a statement, making you just I can't

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>say things on there like you're just wrong, right, like

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that you The natural conclusion of those two facts is

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that we are genetically born to be a CEO. Something

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about the genetics that makes you a man also makes

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you CEO worthy, Right, that's what you're saying if you're

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>saying sexism doesn't exist, and the status quo that we

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have is is less less women. So let's talk about

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the startups that you've done that are geared

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>towards making the world a better place. Tell us about

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>salary or equity? So I, uh have a like the

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>product guy in me. Every time I build something, I

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>recognize how I screwed it up, and then I have

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to build something to sort of correct my screwing cure.

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and so, um, you know, salary or equity

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is a really a reaction to that conversation we were

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>talking earlier, right where I got my first offer and

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know anything about equity, right, And so there

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>are whole underrepresented groups who when we bring them into

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the startup environment because they didn't, you know, grow with

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>an engineer parent, they didn't grow up with a Silicon

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Valley parent. They didn't grow up with these things. I

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what equity is, right, And so we've actually

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>created a little tool where you come in and you

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of put in some of the variabs from your

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>offer letter and it will give you a risk adjusted

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of. Yeah. It's kind of like twenty year in salary, right,

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so that you can start to compare offers um in

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>better ways. You know, we built get Raised, which is

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>helping different different startup than startup equity. But yeah, we're

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>working in a sort of an adjacent space, right, and

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>so this is the you know, uh, we've held women

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>are two point three billion dollars in raises um by

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of um creating a structure where they can come

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in and tell me what you do, where you work,

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>how much you make. We'll tell you if you're underpaid,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you so you're comparing this against a database

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>of that that job. That's yeah exactly. We use bureaulabor

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>statistics data, we use our own data, we use public

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>market data. And then you answer a few more and

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it generates a letter that you can give to your boss,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>basically laying out a like here's market here, open job

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>postings in the area. Here's what I've done. Here's what

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do, Like, here's how I provide business value.

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's been incredibly effective at getting women raises. Um

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and so two or three billion dollars so far. And

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys take of that is it's all free. We

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking with Matt Walert, formally of Microsoft Ventures

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and a variety of other enterprises. Check out my daily

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>column at Bloomberg dot com, slash View, or follow me

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at rid Halts. I'm Barry rid Halts. You're

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. Matt. Thank you so much for for doing this.

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank thanks for having me. It's been fun. Uh. We

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>were talking during the break about the various names you

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have for startups get raised, salary or equity churn less, Thrive.

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Who creates these? You know? Uh so some of them.

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I remember exactly where it came from. Thrive was before

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>my time. Um uh, Turnless. I actually was the CMO

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of Thrive. We were I remember having to treat with him.

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Any Drive was what was sold to lending treaty Mint.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. How is that the opposite? Because if you

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>go to Mint, you can't find a thrive tab. Is

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it just integrated and and mean I stand alone? Yeah,

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So they renamed it money right, and then I think

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>shuttered it in one of their sort of is that

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the natural end game for all these acquisitions or are

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they really just aquahiers they want the engineering town. No.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I think there was real product there. But I think

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what happened at a time, you know, when

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>when the collapse came along, and I think, you know,

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>business had to reorient the they built. They built it,

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>bought it primarily because we could show that we could

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.720
<v Speaker 1>raise people's credit scores substantially in a fairly short amount

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 1>of times. So you get, yeah, you get credit score

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 1>increases on the twenty to fifty point range in six months.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>And so their idea was, look, you know, a six

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred mortgage lead isn't worth nearly as much as a

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 1>six fifty. Let's send our people who are not really

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ready to you. You'll turn them around, get them ready,

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and then bring them back when they're when they're that's fascinating.

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>What is churnalists? So journalists? This was so I actually

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the few names I actually really like.

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and it was and everybody knows what churn is.

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It's you go to Netflix. They added so many subscribers,

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>but they lost so many. And so I was having

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a drink with the CMO of Thrive after the acquisition.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>He had left to Thrive, and he and I were

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>just talking, and you know, we were talking about what

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.439
<v Speaker 1>makes a good company good, and you know, I said,

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>good companies their churnless, right, like, you know, no one

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ever has to leave because it meets their needs, right.

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, and that's how you employees that

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>could be customers. I was like, you know that because

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm a behavior guy, right, and so you know, churn

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>is the ultimate sort of like measure of behavior, right,

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's literally am I gonna do it? Or not

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>do it? And so I sort of was like, oh, really,

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>good companies don't have turn and he was like, you

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>should call your next company turnless. And I was like,

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, And we did and didn't have anything to

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>do with reducing churning company. And so we were while

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we were building, you know, we built sort of behavioral

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 1>interventions for lots of people. We built the AIRPS retirement tools,

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>we built um um some various interventions around sort of

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>choice in in food and exercise and other things. And

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it was always about behavior, and so the idea really

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>was to build interesting, sticky, behavior modifying things for the world.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>That's where get Raised. You know, we built that on

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the side while we were there, Right, it was building

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of things, and um, salary equity you went

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 1>over that. So get Raised generates a letter which individual

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.479
<v Speaker 1>takes their boss sally equity is really just informational. Yeah,

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there's the value of the offer you've gotten. Yeah. So

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>then the net result of salary equity is basically taking

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the equity portion of your offer, and it gives you

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a sentence that says you should think you sort of

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think of this as like x number of dollars per year, right,

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So it'said. It basically takes into account investing um and

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of risk adjusted return and sort of breaks that

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>into a yearly salary, so that if you're comparing, for example,

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>a startup offer and a Microsoft offer, you can say

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the equity component is worth blank. So here's the question

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you. And I found this fascinating

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>um in your bio. So you you keep saying I'm

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a behavior guy, I'm a psychologist. I'm behavioral psychology guy.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>But all the speeches I've seen you've given, most of

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the writings I've seen you've made, they invariably have a

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>focus or at least an element of this, technology, this, startup, this.

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And you said when I left Microsoft, I got far

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 1>more recruiter inbound based on my background in startups and

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>ventures than I did in behavioral science, despite being considerably

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>better the ladder. So why is that, you know? I

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>think it goes back to this. I don't think companies

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>are are There's a few companies out there looking for

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>behavioral scientists, UM, but most of them I don't think

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I've woken up to the fact that they don't have

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>teams and they need to write that this is going

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the sort of next way they're going to

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>generate value in their business, both internally and externally. Uh.

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that's, you know, a part of

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>what's behind that. I think I leaned towards um technology.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, technology when I meet with people, I built

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of things in the world that are not technology focused.

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>They just you know, often their integrations into other programs, right,

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>technology often build standalone things, and so they're easier to

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>point to UM, and I know how to build them

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>fast and cheap and come from that world, and so

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's natural that I gravitate there. But I

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think it has to be technology. Right, We're talking

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier about the subway signs, Right, you know, I think

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>putting up a sign in a Walmart line is not

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a you know, there's nothing tech about that. UM, it's

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>just a you know, it's just it's a good behavioral intervention. Right,

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It's good behave real interventions. So there was something fascinating

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that I read that I have to ask you. You.

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I know, you do a lot of speaking gigs, but

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>you refuse to accept speaking fees. And just in the

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:17.800
<v Speaker 1>news was Obama being criticized for taking a four hundred

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar speaking fee from a Wall Street firm. The

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of us, who are either in academia, authors, writing books,

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:31.959
<v Speaker 1>or just otherwise public figures, it's a lucrative side gig.

0:39:32.480 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the greatest thing I could do during lunch

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>is walk out of my office, walk three blocks, walk

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>into a conference room, go blah blah blah for forty

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, pick up a check for grand and go

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>back to lunch. Why have you decided I'm not interested

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in taking speaking fees. I mean, I think what you

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>choose to get paid for is really an important way

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of of how your approach life, right like you know,

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we are almost I don't disagree with you. Almost every

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 1>everything that you could do is is potentially monetize herble

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 1>right like almost you know? Okay, I mean listen, I

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.439
<v Speaker 1>speak it at nonprofits all the time. I don't charge them.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I speak at universities. I've spoken at n y U,

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>at m I t at Harvard at Columbia. I never tried,

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>even though Harvard is richer than you know, crotious. I

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>never charge them a speaking fee because it's an educational thing.

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>But if it's a conference where they're selling tickets and

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>people are doing it for more than a break, even

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>what why wouldn't you? And and by the way, there

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>are things that other people get paid for that I've

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>elected not to get paid for. Plus it allows me

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to stay objective and neutral and except to reject what

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I want because it's what I want as opposed to

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>going and earning a buck and to enjoy it, right,

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and to enjoy it, and I want to enjoy the

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>spread of information. I think spreading information is incredibly important

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think you know, uh, the places that do

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that do Um, there's some places to sort of say,

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we want to pay you a speaker fee, and that's

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>just part of how we work. So I asked them

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to donate to a domestic violence shelter. So actually just

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>came back from a passo yesterday where an agency had

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>a fee structure and they donated to a domestic violence

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>shelter on my behalf. Um, so so there are you know,

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it happens, but generally speaking, like, I think people

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>should get paid for doing right unless unless the unless

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>sharing knowledge is your job. Right Like if my job

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>is a journalist, yeah, I get paid for that. Right.

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>If your job is to be a speaker, get paid

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for that. I just don't want my job to be

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.359
<v Speaker 1>being a speaker. I always want my job to be

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 1>building things. So actually saying that changes what you will

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>or won't accept, because now it's like, who do I

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to. I don't care about the salary.

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about this. It's oh, that's an audience

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to address wherever, and you know, and so

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I do you know, speak eternally. A lot of speaking

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 1>engagements send them off to other people that that I

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>think would be better or more interesting. You know, I'll

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:57.799
<v Speaker 1>actually correct something you said earlier, refer to me as

0:41:57.800 --> 0:41:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a cold and so I don't consult either, right, No,

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I only what is I believe in, you know, coming

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to get to change your mind, to how to get

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you to think differently about behavioral science. He's part of

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what's important to me in the world, and I think

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it generates a better world. And I want to do

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>it for as many people as I can. What I

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>charge money for is coming in actually doing it, right.

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to get charged for the doing. I want

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to get paid on the things that I build, the implementation,

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the execution, because that's what matters. Because here's the thing

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>about science, right, none of my ideas are original. They

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>come from a long lineage of people before me. You're

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>standing on the shoulders of giants, and many people will

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>stand on my shoulders after me. Right, there's this long

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and and if every one of those people like again,

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I like taking these to their sort of extremes because

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes me think of, you know, sort of thing

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>differently about them. If all of those people before me

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.120
<v Speaker 1>had refused to share their information unless it was monetized,

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I could never be where I am. There's a fascinating

0:42:56.200 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>priceonmics article that talks about how hand and full of

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>people have bought up the publishers of all the scientific

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>journals and university UM peer reviewed things and they're charging

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 1>absurd money for subscriptions and it's really crimping the exchange

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of ideas. That's something that should not be a for

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>profit entity. Somebody should have had the forethought of buying

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it and putting it in the public sphere public domain, right.

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that that, you know, that's the kind of

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>like Mike Bloomberg sort of philanthropy kind of thing is

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>buying up those rights. And I think sciencests responded appropriately,

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:33.439
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, we don't. We're gonna care less

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about those journals than we used to. We're gonna start

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>doing open science. There's a replicability product right like project like,

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to do these things that say no science

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>should take place in public both because people draw conclusions

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:47.760
<v Speaker 1>from its stuff and it should be replicable and important,

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and because everyone should have access to those insights. I

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>couldn't agree more. Um, you did a ted talk that

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought was really interesting about motivating people to do

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>work worth doing. Yeah, explain. So there's this quote I

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>love from Teddy Roosevelt. Far and away, the best prize

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:07.839
<v Speaker 1>that life has to offer is the chance to work

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>hard at work worth doing. Um And I think you know,

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I like money is meaningful, and I don't you know

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 1>for anyone without it, they'll tell you how meaningful it.

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a tool that helps you achieve things that are

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 1>useful in life. But there is certain but from a

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>motivational perspective, what we see is meaning. Actually, you know,

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>once you sort of surpass a certain level of money,

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>meaning is far more important. You know. One of the

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 1>things I actually bring up in this talk that you know,

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think illustrates this well is if you ask seniors

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>in college you know what's important about your first job,

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that all say salaries, Like, salary is the most important feature.

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>If you survey them a mere year into the job market,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>meaning has become the lead experience, meaning what they've learned.

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right, those things become the far more important piece. Right.

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>People get this very quickly. Um And I actually think

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the crisises of mental health in the

0:44:51.880 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>United States is just how many people go to work

0:44:54.160 --> 0:44:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and are miserable, disengaged, you know, sort of don't find

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>meaning in their work. Um. This idea of meaning management,

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I actually think is really important. How do you go

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know? And I actually think there are

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting tech tools you could build. So imagine something like

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>let's pretend you were a coder and you're far far

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>removed from the end user. Right, You're working at Microsoft,

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's not a small startup or something. You're

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:16.479
<v Speaker 1>far removed from the end user. What if I said

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to you, hey, did you know seven million people touched

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 1>your code today? Right? What a powerful like you know,

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of motivating investment. And it's true, right, there's almost

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost everything that people do in the world,

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Like for me, even the lowliest janitor. Like imagine if

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I could say, after you clean this hall, hey, did

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know like ten thousand people walked this hall today? Right?

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that's an amazing just allowing people to see the

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 1>echoes of what they do. Um, you know, and it

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>goes into so many things. I mean, I think one

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of the points I make in this thing about sort

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of college students is we sell college to people as

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>as a financial thing. Right, we say the reason to

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 1>go to college is to make more money, that's right,

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And it is to get a job. But what it's

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>really about is to get a meaningful job. Right. What

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 1>college allows you to do is to is to have

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the privilege of picking something that is important to you, right. Um,

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that that I love science fiction. Um,

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not just sort of on a personal entertainment level. But

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you know when I when product people come and tell me, like,

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 1>what do you I I habitually don't read nonfiction. I

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 1>talk to people to learn things, and I read to

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>learn about the world that emotionally, and so I read

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 1>almost a totally fiction and I love and I love

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>science fiction because science fiction is this clever thought of

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>experiment of the world with limits removed, and it starts

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:41.800
<v Speaker 1>to get you thinking an interesting product direction you mentioned earlier. Um,

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh idiocracy, right, which I think is a

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>particular kind of vision of the world. But I think

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there's also a vision of the world that's very star

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Trek Like think about star Trek. The exist in a

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:53.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of post need world. We've been able we can

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>synthesize matter out of energy, right, and so we've sort

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of surpassed basic human needs. And what do they do?

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Like do they sit on their couch and watch travel,

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>travel the universe and explore That's right, Then they do

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>amazing science and they build amazing art, and like, I

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>actually think that's the real thing. I think if you

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the big change of a post need world, there's a

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people scared about what happens as as robots

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>displaced jobs. What I think the really amazing part of

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that is that it frees up people to do other things.

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.400
<v Speaker 1>And the real dominant question is not how do we

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>replace those jobs with with you know, so there other

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:30.879
<v Speaker 1>meaningless jobs, it's what do we do with the sheer

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>amount of human potential that has now been unlocked? Right? Like,

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>how do we incorporate those people into science? How do

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 1>we incorporate them into design? How do we incorporate them

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 1>into other things that computers don't do well? Not just

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of employ them, but because this is our

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>shot at the future, right, how do we take the

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand people that got displaced by you know, sort

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of closing a factory and get them started thinking about

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>greening the world. That that's interesting. Something else that came

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>up in one of your public speeches. Stayed with me.

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>What do Eminem's tell us about human psychology? So people? Uh,

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I love this example, although I will tell you that

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to find something different because the Mars

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>people are like refused to give me free M and

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>m's for life, which I think, after having mentioned it

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>so many times, I ought to be able to get

0:48:15.480 --> 0:48:17.479
<v Speaker 1>at least a package. Have you taken a speaking fee?

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I know by my own right. So, so, the really

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>powerful thing I think about Eminem's as a as a

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of metaphor for behavior change is that it shows

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how people focus on the wrong thing, right, you know,

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of people really go think about creating new flavors,

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>how delicious they are, etcetera. But the dominant thing that

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>keeps me from eating M and m's all the time

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>is availability. Right, they're Eminem's right here. I'd be eating

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>them right now, right, and so would you, right Like,

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's that availability factor that is so interesting, And so

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, what people forget is mostly motivating reasons already exist. Right,

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:57.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to Let's use another kind of related

0:48:57.320 --> 0:49:00.239
<v Speaker 1>example that the asking for a raised piece. Right, It's

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not like women don't want to get paid fairly. It's

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>not like I don't that Eminem's aren't delicious. The reason

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>women don't ask is because it's hard, and there are

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>systematic pressures that keep them from asking. The reason I

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 1>don't eat eminem is because they're not here. There are

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>systematic inhibiting pressures, and I think people don't. They're eminem's upstairs.

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>We can pick we can pick them up on the way.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>This could happen and I might take some to go.

0:49:22.640 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 1>So the question is why do people eat more eminem's

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>when they're multi colored than if you would have just

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 1>put one color in a bowl. People actually less eminem's. Yeah,

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we love those that. We love that diversity of colors.

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, even though I don't think blindfold did anyone

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>could tell the difference. There is no difference there. They'll

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:39.120
<v Speaker 1>tell you there's no there's no taste difference. It's actually

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I always you know, when I

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>try and jog people's mind with this, you know, I'm like,

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think about the fact that you have a favorite color

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of eminem. Any kid on earth will tell you what

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>his favorite color color is, right, He's gonna She's gonna

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you, he's gonna tell you, I save the green

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>ones for last because they're the best. Why the hell

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>is the best? They don't taste any different than the

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>other ones, but they have a favorite color. And I

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think part of beaver science, the part of reason that

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>beavirol science is so important in organizations, is because it

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>embraces that irrational part of ourselves. The part that says

0:50:06.719 --> 0:50:08.959
<v Speaker 1>it's not about how long in line I am in line,

0:50:08.960 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's about how being in line feels right. The part

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that says it's not about the fact that the Eminem's

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>don't taste different. I still have a favorite color. I'm

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to be familiar with the brown Eminem's and

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the Van Halen Rider. Of course, I love the idea

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 1>that that's a built in verifier of have have these

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>persons actually gone through a full rider and done the

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>full technology requirements that I want out of this and

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and brown Eminem's are relevant, but it's an instant check

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have they done it or not? Yes, it's a It's

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a great behavioral hack, and I think there's all sorts

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of those interesting kinds of behavioral hacks in the world.

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually remember when I was a kid, you know

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:46.280
<v Speaker 1>how many people actually remember like lessons from sixth grade,

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:50.359
<v Speaker 1>like not many people. And I remember science class day one.

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Mr Mars I think was his name, was the science teacher,

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and he gave us our first set of experimental directions.

0:50:57.400 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And the first the first instruction was read these experiments

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>these instructions completely before doing anything. And there were about

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ten steps and they was don't do anything at all.

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And I had an exam like that, and I love that.

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love it is stuck with me forever, right,

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and we'll stick with me forever. And I think that,

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And everybody gets to work my step, and most people

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>don't follow the instructions. I think the last step was

0:51:25.520 --> 0:51:28.520
<v Speaker 1>if you've done this step, quietly, fold your paper in half,

0:51:28.800 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing up to the classroom, and then you can leave

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>or or something like that. So all these people are

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.400
<v Speaker 1>working away that's right, And two or three people have

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 1>walked out of the class and nobody understands it, right.

0:51:37.400 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Everybody looks them and thinks they're crazy. And I actually

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's I've never thought about it this way, but

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a good metaphor for why I think behavioral science

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is so important because it's outcome focused right. It doesn't

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:51.399
<v Speaker 1>just try and apply whatever the tool is righteologically through

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:54.640
<v Speaker 1>these steps. It says, what happens if we break the rules,

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>What happened if we get outside of these tools? What

0:51:56.640 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 1>happens if we start with the outcome and then backwards? Huh,

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that's quite interesting. So let me get to some of

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite questions. I'm gonna call you out for some

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 1>bs that you said earlier. I'm gonna challenge you on

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 1>some good challenge me. But let's let's let's plow this

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 1>uh through us. So you told us about your background.

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>You're working in in academic studying for your PhD. You

0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>go to work at a startup before Microsoft. Give us

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a run off of your background quickly? What was your

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:27.920
<v Speaker 1>your path? So it was was thrived, We got acquired

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:29.880
<v Speaker 1>by lending Tree, then it was at landing Tree for

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a while, we broke out. We did uh churn lists,

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>built a bunch of things sold that. UM came to Microsoft,

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>did product at Microsoft, then ventures at Microsoft, and now

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm chief Dad. So that's your dad, officer. UM, tell

0:52:44.640 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 1>us about some of your early mentors. You strike me

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 1>at somebody as somebody who has benefited greatly. Oh yeah,

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would not. I am a strong believer

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in mentorship. You know. I I think I'm a boy Scout,

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>an Eagle Scout, and I think that boy Scouts had

0:53:00.120 --> 0:53:01.959
<v Speaker 1>a profound effect on me, as having a Scout master

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>had a profound effect on me. Um. You know I couldn't.

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I would be remissing. You know, Andrew warden Berry Schwartz

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 1>both professors. It's worthmore. Barry obviously very famous for this

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:12.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of choice reduction stuff and all the Ted talks

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and things. Um. Andrew Ward was the professor that I

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier that said there's an orderly way to

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of approach disagreement in science, which is doing an

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>experiment like that's your chance to disagree is to run

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to prove it, right. Um. And I think that that

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has had a profound impact on the rest of my life. Um.

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think my parents were amazing role models. Um.

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>In part, so my mom is a nurse and my

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:41.399
<v Speaker 1>dad works in durable medical quipment basically, um, wheelchairs. Mom

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>got her college agree right after I got mine. Um,

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:47.919
<v Speaker 1>so she she graduated. She was a foreign nurse forever. Uh.

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:51.319
<v Speaker 1>And and you know Dad didn't go to college. But

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 1>they both are, you know, so smart and inquisitive, and

0:53:56.920 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and my house was a place where you know, I'll

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>give a great example. The Oregans a ballot measure state. Right,

0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>So every year we get the ballot measures, and my

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.840
<v Speaker 1>parents would, from as far back as I can remember,

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 1>five or six, we would have a family discussion about

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what we all thought about the ballot measures. Really, and

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I was disagree, Like we were free to disagree. We

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:17.239
<v Speaker 1>were free to like sort of like they gave us

0:54:17.480 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the pamphlet and we were how many siblings in the house,

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just one brother eighteen months older, So the two of

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.239
<v Speaker 1>you and the parents debating Oregon ballot measures. Yeah, just

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.759
<v Speaker 1>talking about I just wrote a column on on Canada's

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>marijuana initiative and trace the history of legal weed in America.

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And everybody thinks it's California, but actually it's Oregon. It's

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>like nineteen seventies six decriminalized medical marijuana, long before California

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 1>did it. Yeah, sometime in the seventies, I don't remember

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the exacts. A fascinating sort of state, right in somewhat

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything east of the mountains is high desert,

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of kinds of people. It's both strangely sort

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of like a hippie mecca but also very religious. Do

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you interesting you don't watch Silicon val I do watch Portlandia.

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 1>So my joke, My joke is, you know, I thought

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a sitcom, but then I've been to Portland

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>a few times and I learned it was a documentary.

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right, I mean it is. It is sort of

0:55:13.080 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>eerily like home sometimes, and that's good and fascinating and interesting,

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and I like that. Um. And the thing I really

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 1>love about Oregon is you could sign in some ways,

0:55:26.160 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>like Friday Night Lights is also a documentary Oregon absolutely right,

0:55:29.560 --> 0:55:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it's about Texas, but you know, in many ways

0:55:31.200 --> 0:55:32.959
<v Speaker 1>it's about Oregon, right, Like I came from a small

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>town with the championship football team and they're a whole

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:38.400
<v Speaker 1>town shout up for games, and Origan is a microcos

0:55:38.560 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>him up all sorts of different things, and and yet

0:55:41.440 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they've managed to live in relative sort of piece and harmony.

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>There's not a ton of acrimony. Um, it's a it's

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:50.799
<v Speaker 1>a very changing hasn't even though I know most of

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the people who have who are in like Portland's are

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:59.360
<v Speaker 1>relatively newcomers. Like everybody seems to be an immigrant. And

0:55:59.440 --> 0:56:01.840
<v Speaker 1>what I find fascinating is Portland as a town that

0:56:01.920 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 1>used to be a mill in mining town, and all

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:08.800
<v Speaker 1>these old buildings and factories have been wonderfully converted to

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:13.400
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and theaters and and you could see the rough hewn,

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:19.400
<v Speaker 1>original exposed timbers. It's it's it's really fascinating. But isn't

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>there now starting to be a little chafing about the gentrification?

0:56:22.560 --> 0:56:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, Look, I think anytime in the crowds and

0:56:24.880 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and you guys are starting to get traffic out there,

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there's always going to be some chafing, right, Um, any

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 1>time in a city that grows like I think that's inevitable,

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 1>but grows like a weed. Like they are one of

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing cities in the country. I think Austin

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:40.720
<v Speaker 1>is first, and they might be second, a Seattle's second.

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>They're up there, yeah, and and we don't have the

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure to support it. Um. But I think the thing

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that I love about Oregon, the thing I loved about

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 1>growing up country is the chafing is like you can

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 1>vehemently disagree with people and still come together for like

0:56:56.600 --> 0:56:59.439
<v Speaker 1>dinner on Friday night. You know, it was that it's

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that spirit of of disagreement but still respect. Yeah, neighborly compassion, right, Um,

0:57:08.600 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that, particularly at this era in

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 1>American culture, that is so important. How do we disagree

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and still like love each other in an emotive and

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>important way. Mayer Stateman at Santa Clara said he comes

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>from Hebrew University of Jerusalem said the difference between Americans

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and Europeans and Israelis. In Europe they can disc they

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:39.760
<v Speaker 1>can have the political disagreement, but then put it aside

0:57:39.760 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and go to dinner. The same in Israel. In the

0:57:42.200 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>United States, people don't want to talk about the disagreement.

0:57:45.320 --> 0:57:49.520
<v Speaker 1>They'd rather not have the debate and and then go

0:57:49.560 --> 0:57:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to dinner. If they have the debate, it seems hackles

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 1>gets raised and people get offended. But I I derailed

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you from mentors. Were there any other mentors I wanted?

0:57:58.280 --> 0:57:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, they were tons of you know, I

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 1>close out on really saying, you know, my parents were

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:04.479
<v Speaker 1>a key shaper for me. Um. You know, my father

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was fond of saying that my brother and I were

0:58:06.160 --> 0:58:07.920
<v Speaker 1>his chance to change the world. He's sort of like, look,

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go to college. I don't have this sort

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of background. You guys are it, so you need to

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:16.040
<v Speaker 1>go be who you can be. And then that was company.

0:58:16.080 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So it was a strong sense of purpose coupled with

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a and whatever you end up being is okay, my mom,

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:25.240
<v Speaker 1>my mom. I think only a few years ago finally

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>stopped trying to convince me to come a nurse. You

0:58:26.880 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 1>know here I have I'm an exited startup to done

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this thing. And she's like, you'd be a great nurse.

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Come back to Oregon, be a nurse. I'm like, I

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm on that path, right They they part

0:58:35.680 --> 0:58:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the reason, you know, I don't charge for speaking

0:58:37.840 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, take some of my income and build

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:41.680
<v Speaker 1>these pro social side projects and do all these things

0:58:41.760 --> 0:58:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is because I had these parents who sort of said,

0:58:44.160 --> 0:58:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the stuff that matters. But that's really interesting. Tell

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>us about some academics or others who influenced your approach

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to behavioral psychology. So you know, look, I I the

0:58:57.040 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>nice thing about nice thing, the the interesting thing about

0:58:59.840 --> 0:59:01.720
<v Speaker 1>being a real science and sort of the not modern

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of application of behavior economics and some

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>parts of judgment decision making. You know, we have the

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 1>condiment Introversey. You know, we have these these iconic figures

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who really have advanced the work. Um, you know Danna Rellie,

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>who I'm lucky enough to sort of count as a friend.

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Like Predictably Irrational was one of my favorite books. I

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:28.400
<v Speaker 1>mean it's just Dan so full of insight and personal um,

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 1>just the trauma with the burn Unite amazing. Yeah, I

0:59:31.800 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 1>means so visceral. When you read it, it's like, oh,

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff really matters. Yeah, it matters to him and

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it matters to think about how we

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:41.680
<v Speaker 1>just these little changes, what it means to someone going

0:59:41.720 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 1>through the burn Unit process. You could take someone in

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>miserable pain and make their life appreciably better with a

0:59:48.880 --> 0:59:53.360
<v Speaker 1>series of rational decisions. That's right shocking you and I.

0:59:53.440 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I talked earlier about like why do I

0:59:55.400 --> 0:59:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think GP Abril Officer is so important? And I sort

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of said, you know, I think it's about making all

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the rules. Everything is possible, any out we can reach,

1:00:03.160 --> 1:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>any outcome if we are willing to sort of take

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a step back and say every behavior is motivatable, if

1:00:09.040 --> 1:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>we are willing to pull all of the levers. And

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think what I love about Dan um is that.

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, he was one of those people that came

1:00:16.840 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the lab and said, no, there's an application

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for this. You know, we talked earlier about Tom Gilovich,

1:00:21.320 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Um who I think how we know it isn't so yeah,

1:00:24.480 --> 1:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>great hoth hand. You know, he's just a run in

1:00:26.680 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of amazing research. Um, he's sort of presage.

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's sort of way ahead of everybody else.

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And and I think he's sort of pressage that I

1:00:35.720 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to leave academia. I ravividly remember him calling

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>me and saying, Hey, we love you at Cornell. We'd

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>love to offer you this this interesting fellowship. We'd love

1:00:42.960 --> 1:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>for you to come. But you know, you keep saying

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>applied psychology, and you know we're researchers, and you know,

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>if what you care about in the world is applying psychology,

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you might not want to come into a graduate program.

1:00:54.240 --> 1:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately he was right. I got frustrated

1:00:56.400 --> 1:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>with just writing research papers because it wasn't moving the

1:00:59.440 --> 1:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>needle that I on it. And and I think Tom

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>was really right, And I wish I had had known

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>better how to listen to him at the time about Hey,

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I really needed to get out of the lab and

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that I was never going to be able to just

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>do that, and and and so I think there's all

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>these people. You know, that's one phone call from Tom Gillich,

1:01:18.760 --> 1:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's given me lots of things. You know, by

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the time I was a Cornelli's a great guy. But

1:01:24.760 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>these little moments have big ripple effects. And so a

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of what what I think is important in mentorship

1:01:29.200 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is he's creating those moments, right taking the fifteen minutes

1:01:33.320 --> 1:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk to somebody that you wouldn't normally talk to

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as an equal in an emotionally compassionate way, not to

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>lecture them, but to to really engage with whatever is

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>very important to them. You know. I think at the

1:01:45.000 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>temptation of many mentors is well, I have my stick,

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I have what I believe, and I'm just going to

1:01:49.200 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>enforce that on other people. I think so much of

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>what's important about mentorship, particularly in in our given the

1:01:57.040 --> 1:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>challenges that America faces right now, he's about saying, what

1:02:00.600 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want to accomplish? And then how can I

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>help you get there. It's not about me judging your goals,

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are saying your goals are the right, goals are the wrong? Goals.

1:02:07.480 --> 1:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It's me saying whatever is important to you, I'm going

1:02:10.840 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to get behind helping you get there. Quite quite interesting. Um,

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I only have you for another ten or fifteen minutes.

1:02:18.600 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Let me get to some of my favorite questions. Tell

1:02:23.000 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>us about failure, tell us about a time you failed

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and what you learned from the experience. Well, so you know,

1:02:28.280 --> 1:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>as I start pointed out to you earlier, everything I

1:02:30.200 --> 1:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>build as a failure, and that even when it's successful,

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't I recognize the thing I need to go

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>do next. Right, So get raised is really a reaction

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to thrive. So at thrive for example, successful company. But

1:02:45.360 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>when I was looking at the data, so one of

1:02:48.160 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the components that really changed behavior there is we had

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a very clear, clear behavioral score and it had sub components.

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>One of some components, for example, with savings, and I

1:02:55.720 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't want rich people to get a high score and

1:02:57.120 --> 1:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>poor people to get a low score. So I said, well,

1:02:58.800 --> 1:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do this is We're gonna remitting it's income.

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So basically like savings. Yeah, percentage of your income that

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you save for ninety days, that's right, and so um,

1:03:10.480 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>when you look at at saving as a percentage of income,

1:03:12.960 --> 1:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>women are actually significantly better savers than men. But the

1:03:16.520 --> 1:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but the moment I took out the the income on

1:03:19.240 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a raw dollar basis, all of the men were doing

1:03:21.320 --> 1:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>much better at Thrive. Why because they were getting paid better, right,

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:28.439
<v Speaker 1>And so here I was, we built this exitable, successful thing,

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and I felt like an idiot because I had only

1:03:31.080 --> 1:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>looked at what happened post paycheck, and that's really how

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to relative to the dollar amount. And so that's where

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I sort of got to get raised. Idea was we

1:03:40.240 --> 1:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>only did interventions post paycheck. What if we did something

1:03:42.640 --> 1:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that it directly affected your paycheck? And so that's why

1:03:44.440 --> 1:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we built get Raised. At the next company, it was that,

1:03:46.520 --> 1:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>oh I screwed it up last time. Get Raised fantastic tool,

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>two point three billion dollars and raises very successful. But

1:03:54.200 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there's many ways and things which I think I screwed

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it up. One of the important ones is it puts

1:03:58.560 --> 1:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the burden on the disadvantaged. Right. It says to women, hey,

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you live in a world that is unfair to you.

1:04:04.680 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to go do something about that, when really

1:04:07.080 --> 1:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the onus is on men, right, Like, but you can

1:04:09.960 --> 1:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>get women to go to a site, fill out a

1:04:11.960 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of forms printed out and give it to their boss.

1:04:14.920 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't get their boss to go to a site

1:04:16.840 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and say, here's why you you are sexist in your

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>pay practices. This is where I'm gonna challenge you. Okay,

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>everything is changeable. I want to live in Some things

1:04:27.880 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are more changeable than others. Yes, so there is there's

1:04:30.600 --> 1:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly low hanging fruit that I am VMA agreement. There's

1:04:33.920 --> 1:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>get raised might have been the low hanging fruit. Here

1:04:36.080 --> 1:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>might have been the low hanging fruit. But I think

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>what behavioral I think the whole point of behaviorl scientists

1:04:40.120 --> 1:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, used to consider that as a thought question,

1:04:42.560 --> 1:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what could I do to get a boss to be

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>motivated to pay you fairly? Right? And we're going and

1:04:48.400 --> 1:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about those things like, for example, give you a

1:04:50.440 --> 1:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>short answer to that. You now have a huge move

1:04:54.720 --> 1:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>towards e s G investing, environmental sustainable governance, and companies

1:04:59.200 --> 1:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are now being ranked on what sort of diversification they

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>have at their highest levels at their board, if their

1:05:04.720 --> 1:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>senior management. And it's an objective goal that hey, you're

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not meeting this, what do you what? You're here's a

1:05:11.480 --> 1:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>plan just as you could get raised. Here's how to

1:05:14.320 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>get diversified or whatever it is, get retained right retentions,

1:05:19.160 --> 1:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and I like, let's do economic motivators. Forget the triple

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>bottom line, will use your single bottom line. If you

1:05:24.440 --> 1:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>retain women, you make more money period period like turnover

1:05:29.880 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>reduced high diversity. Like we know this, we can prove

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it empirically. So hey, if I can get you to

1:05:36.760 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>regularly evaluate women's salaries to make sure that they are

1:05:40.440 --> 1:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>comparative so that they don't leave you, Like, that's a

1:05:44.000 --> 1:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>good thing, and we can go build The next generation

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of tools that I'm building is actually, you know, I

1:05:49.400 --> 1:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sold you every everything I build as a failure, and

1:05:51.960 --> 1:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>then that pumps the next It's an interesting life perspective.

1:05:56.120 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's not I'm going to change the language on you.

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much a fail you're as it is

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a provisional step waiting the next hypothesis. It is incomplete.

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Science is perpetually incomplete. What's one of the things I

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>love about it? And so the next set of tools

1:06:11.760 --> 1:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that I'm building are actually focused on man. So here's

1:06:14.120 --> 1:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>where I'm gonna call BS on you. You said you

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>read almost exclusively fiction, and yet I go to your

1:06:21.200 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>website and there is Dan Arrowley's Predictably Irrational, Thinking Fast

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and Slow by Danny Kahneman, Stumbling on hop Happiness by

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Gilbert paraps of Choice by Barry Shortz. Essentially all of

1:06:33.640 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the things that you recommend are explicitly nonfiction. Actually, if

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you go to the recommendation page, you will notice that

1:06:42.880 --> 1:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a section for fiction, and I didn't. If

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you scroll down, I am recommending fiction books as well.

1:06:48.440 --> 1:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about some of your favorite fiction books. So, so, I, uh,

1:06:55.360 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it's funny the things that I are my favorites are

1:06:57.600 --> 1:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily things I read often. Right, I sort of

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>said I read all of science fiction and things because

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes me a better product person. I

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>love Blindness jose Saramago. Oh yeah, beautiful sad book. I

1:07:11.160 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>will love a lot of Hemingway. You know what. I

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just read The Old Man in the City on a flight,

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and I was just I come back to, you know,

1:07:19.120 --> 1:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to reread. I'm a big rereader of fiction, so I

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>tried because I'm what are you reading? Uh So, so

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>what I've done over the last couple of years, Actually,

1:07:28.000 --> 1:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what I've done over the last couple years actually is

1:07:29.800 --> 1:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is I'll pick an author and read everything they've written, um,

1:07:33.240 --> 1:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>regardless of the quality. That regardless of the quality, because

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there are certain authors that, hey, you should read these

1:07:38.160 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>three books. You don't want to read those three books,

1:07:40.880 --> 1:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right. But but what's interesting is even bad fiction

1:07:44.080 --> 1:07:47.439
<v Speaker 1>teaches you something, right, Like, so I recently I would

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>read through everything Stephen King had written, and there's some

1:07:50.320 --> 1:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>good stuff and some bad stuff some of his some

1:07:53.520 --> 1:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff is bad. So the let me give you an example.

1:07:56.480 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna get nasty letters from people on this,

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and I, by the way, I know he's an immensely

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>talented guy. Misery is just astonishing. But I remember reading

1:08:06.480 --> 1:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>The Stand, which is like eight hundred pages, and then

1:08:11.040 --> 1:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>suddenly it's like he put the papers down for six

1:08:14.640 --> 1:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>months and then picked it up and just pivoted in

1:08:16.880 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a totally different direction. And I was like, oh, what

1:08:20.240 --> 1:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a terrible thing to do to your readers. We were

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>with you for eight hundred pages, and now it's like

1:08:25.760 --> 1:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a different ending just slapped on. And I was kind

1:08:28.960 --> 1:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last Stephen King book I read. And so

1:08:31.400 --> 1:08:35.479
<v Speaker 1>so I think that he certainly has a range of

1:08:35.600 --> 1:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>books from from what I think i've as probably even terrible, right,

1:08:39.400 --> 1:08:43.679
<v Speaker 1>two very very good classics, amazing literature and and and

1:08:44.080 --> 1:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>even better movies very often. That's right. And and so

1:08:47.400 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>reading the whole thing actually, like he's been writing for

1:08:51.240 --> 1:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>so long, you know, he stopped so good and so

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>his prose is fantastic, his voice is unique. He's no

1:09:00.160 --> 1:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for writing horror, but some of his non horror stuff

1:09:02.360 --> 1:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. Some of the movies stand by me. Other things. Yeah,

1:09:05.320 --> 1:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's just one of I read that

1:09:08.720 --> 1:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>book so long ago and it was just you forget

1:09:12.200 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Stephen King's right, I think green Mile. I mean,

1:09:15.280 --> 1:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a bunch of things that people forget

1:09:18.360 --> 1:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>or Stephen King, but because they're because they don't get

1:09:21.240 --> 1:09:23.519
<v Speaker 1>as much attention, they don't sell as much. Yeah, exactly,

1:09:23.600 --> 1:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>as you know all his horror stuff, that's right. Christine

1:09:26.080 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>was like it was a huge seller, that's right. And

1:09:29.200 --> 1:09:31.519
<v Speaker 1>so and I think he even talks about that sort

1:09:31.560 --> 1:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of commerciality and so reading so much of somebody, uh,

1:09:35.800 --> 1:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you get to see like you know, when he got

1:09:38.040 --> 1:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in a he got hit by a car very severely,

1:09:39.880 --> 1:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>almost died, um and which is what led to misery,

1:09:42.360 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>and it just ship it was actually I think this

1:09:44.560 --> 1:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is far after misery he sort of presaged his own

1:09:46.800 --> 1:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>life and sort of why am I thinking that? I

1:09:49.439 --> 1:09:51.479
<v Speaker 1>think missuries long before this. This is quite late in

1:09:51.479 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 1>his career actually, um, and he stops writing for a

1:09:53.560 --> 1:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>while because it's very painful for him to write. And

1:09:55.800 --> 1:09:58.519
<v Speaker 1>the stuff he produces then is dark. It's not horror,

1:09:58.640 --> 1:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is just dark. He's clearly depressed. It is clearly bad

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and scary. And uh, I mean getting that sort of

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that that long history is great, the old. I will

1:10:08.800 --> 1:10:11.479
<v Speaker 1>admit that I broke my rule once, which was I

1:10:11.520 --> 1:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>started reading everything Cormick McCarthy has ever written, and I

1:10:14.160 --> 1:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>had to stop in the middle and take a break,

1:10:15.600 --> 1:10:18.519
<v Speaker 1>because I will tell you, reading everything corm McCarthy has

1:10:18.520 --> 1:10:21.479
<v Speaker 1>ever written with no breaks it tough. It makes you

1:10:21.479 --> 1:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>want to kill yourself. Every book is basically like, oh

1:10:24.200 --> 1:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you care. He is like the he is the presage

1:10:26.560 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to get Game of Thrones. He's like, oh you care

1:10:28.200 --> 1:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>about this? Great? Let me kill it, like, let me

1:10:30.240 --> 1:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>like just destroy it. From from from Cormac McCarthy. Uh,

1:10:36.400 --> 1:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I think All the White Horses is pretty amazing. I mean,

1:10:39.160 --> 1:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the road is obviously amazing. You mentioned you were a

1:10:42.040 --> 1:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>sci fi buff. You haven't talked really about any sci

1:10:44.479 --> 1:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>fi and that's what I I sort of said, like,

1:10:46.240 --> 1:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>none of the sci fi stuff really makes my favorite

1:10:48.280 --> 1:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>book list. Really, yeah, it's it's so interesting. My favorite

1:10:52.600 --> 1:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>book list is very typecast. They're all very sad um right,

1:10:56.479 --> 1:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like blindness is that they're just tragic and either something

1:11:00.560 --> 1:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the tragedy stick with me. I guess really, I could

1:11:02.960 --> 1:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>give you a list to sci fi that's as good

1:11:04.840 --> 1:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>as anything else in there. And it's not that I

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:08.599
<v Speaker 1>got to cook for you that I bet you've never

1:11:08.640 --> 1:11:12.519
<v Speaker 1>even read. It's a little esoteric call it out. So

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the other people read it too. I love it

1:11:14.040 --> 1:11:18.519
<v Speaker 1>dying inside. So the premise of the book is he's

1:11:19.160 --> 1:11:22.679
<v Speaker 1>got a fairly robust set of e sp powers and

1:11:23.000 --> 1:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>as a kid he discovers this and he gets to

1:11:25.800 --> 1:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>reach out and do all these things with his ability

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to read minds and shells. It's not Shell Silverstein. It's

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:36.599
<v Speaker 1>something dance. So the name will come to me. And

1:11:36.760 --> 1:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>as he gets older, as he goes through colleges, the

1:11:39.680 --> 1:11:43.599
<v Speaker 1>ability fades and loses it. And it's a giant metaphor,

1:11:43.600 --> 1:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of course. But it's a wonderful book, and you, of

1:11:46.160 --> 1:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>all people would really appreciate it. I'm going to do it.

1:11:48.560 --> 1:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely gonna recommend that we're running out of time.

1:11:51.040 --> 1:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I got to get to my last two questions, my

1:11:53.479 --> 1:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions. First, you work with a lot of young

1:11:57.880 --> 1:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>tech people, a lot of millennials college do. What sort

1:12:01.080 --> 1:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of advice would you give someone who came to you

1:12:03.080 --> 1:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, I'm starting my career. I'm interested in

1:12:05.840 --> 1:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>either behavioral, behavioral psychology or technology startups. I mean, the

1:12:13.040 --> 1:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>device I always give people is you want to think

1:12:14.800 --> 1:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>into your chunks. I think people are very bad year chunk. Yeah,

1:12:18.479 --> 1:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I think people are very bad. So so

1:12:20.960 --> 1:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the metaphor I always use is orienteering. Are you familiar

1:12:23.040 --> 1:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>with It's like longteering support is a weird country person sport.

1:12:25.640 --> 1:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a race, but it's a race from nowhere to nowhere.

1:12:27.880 --> 1:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>So you like, go out in the woods. You dropped

1:12:29.720 --> 1:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>off at point A, and they're like, here's a map

1:12:31.200 --> 1:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in a compass, get to point B. But there's no path, right,

1:12:34.160 --> 1:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's our course you rise on. And

1:12:36.360 --> 1:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of what we teach people today metaphorically

1:12:39.600 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is to sort of take out the map and compass

1:12:41.040 --> 1:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and then walk to point B right in the most

1:12:43.160 --> 1:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>efficient possible way. And I think the right answer, and

1:12:45.880 --> 1:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the way you actually win at orienteering is to say,

1:12:48.479 --> 1:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I know B is over there. I'm gonna run in

1:12:51.200 --> 1:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that direction until I'm no longer sure I'm going in

1:12:53.120 --> 1:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the right direction, and then I'm gonna stop and take

1:12:54.680 --> 1:12:57.639
<v Speaker 1>on my map and compass, take a point run, take

1:12:57.680 --> 1:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a point run, and actually think careers work best this way.

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, if you look at my career right, I've

1:13:01.960 --> 1:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>done all sorts of very different stuff, and yet when

1:13:05.400 --> 1:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you look back at it, all sounds like a story

1:13:07.479 --> 1:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's all been united by common values. I know

1:13:10.439 --> 1:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to change things for large groups of people.

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:14.519
<v Speaker 1>I know that it's about empowering people at the bottom

1:13:14.520 --> 1:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of the pyramid, not the top. And and so because

1:13:17.000 --> 1:13:18.599
<v Speaker 1>I have those values, that's my point B. And every

1:13:18.600 --> 1:13:20.519
<v Speaker 1>two years I basically look up and say, am I

1:13:20.600 --> 1:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>still honoring those values? And then I pivot based on

1:13:24.479 --> 1:13:28.479
<v Speaker 1>how do I question our last question? What is it

1:13:28.520 --> 1:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that you know about startup venture behavioral psychology today that

1:13:33.360 --> 1:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you wish you knew fifteen years or so ago when

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you were coming out of school. I will go back

1:13:38.960 --> 1:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to what I've said a couple of times through this program.

1:13:41.120 --> 1:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Everything is on the table right the sooner you get

1:13:43.960 --> 1:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>to the place and you say, there's nothing I can't challenge.

1:13:46.680 --> 1:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>There's no rules that we can't reconfigure, like start from

1:13:50.400 --> 1:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the design from the world as you want it to be,

1:13:52.760 --> 1:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and then work backwards. That's quite fascinating. We have been

1:13:56.880 --> 1:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Matt Wallert, formally director at Microsoft Ventures and

1:14:02.240 --> 1:14:05.519
<v Speaker 1>a a co founder or CEO of a number of

1:14:05.560 --> 1:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>successful startups. If you have enjoyed this conversation, be sure

1:14:09.960 --> 1:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and look upward down a few inches on iTunes, SoundCloud

1:14:14.000 --> 1:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com and you could see any of

1:14:16.880 --> 1:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the other hundred and fifty or so such conversations that

1:14:21.040 --> 1:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we've put together over the past three years. I would

1:14:24.120 --> 1:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be remiss if I did not remind you that we

1:14:27.320 --> 1:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>love your comments, feedback and suggestions right to us at

1:14:32.200 --> 1:14:35.759
<v Speaker 1>m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I must thank

1:14:36.080 --> 1:14:39.519
<v Speaker 1>my head of research, Michael bat Nick. Taylor Riggs is

1:14:39.600 --> 1:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>my booker producer, and Medina Parwana is my ACE recording engineer.

1:14:45.800 --> 1:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Hults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

1:14:49.479 --> 1:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.