WEBVTT - Surveillance: Vaccines & Variants With JHU

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownowitz Jay Lee, we bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance, an Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg Terminal. Let's

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>bringing Eric Friedman us Band Cassett Management, Chief Investment Officer. Eric.

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's start right here and not with Ted Lasso. I'll

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>save you. Don't worry. You've asked the important question. Is

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>this just a little correction or is this a transition

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>into something bigger? Which one is it? Jonathan, We think

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it is a just a pause as opposed to a

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>phase transition. Really two reasons behind that. Number one is

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we think there's this portcoll between or we're calling Horizon

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>one and Horizon to Horizon one is the reopening investment

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Horizon the gra usual mobility increases, more flights and and

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>more mobility across cities. Horizon too, is what happens once

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we're already there, once that reopening occurred. And so we

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>do think that the fits and starts that we're seeing

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in Horizon one will have corrections like this, And we

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>also think that probably a little nuance here is the

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>bond market is likely already pricing in horizon to the

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>eternal value of FED funds likely lower, as well as

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>general productivity and demographics weaker. So we think this this

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 1>push pull continue, but we're still bullish. We're still sticking

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>with that that that growth mentality. Eric, you're write an

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely sober adult note. We don't see enough of those.

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It's from a button down banker with belt and suspenders.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it. When there's a phase transition, how do

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you know when to make that transition to a different

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>portfolio allocation. The biggest thing that we're focused on early

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>three variables. Number one is the dollar, and what we're

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>looking at the dollar is a is a rise above

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety for ninety four and a half the d X

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Y or one twelve in the trade WAD Dollar Index.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Number two would be the tenure. We think a test

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of let's call it one tin down to one percent,

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that would signify that the bond market is pricing and

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>really worse rising to by our parlance. And I think

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the final is going to be our viewpoint, and earnings

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is mentioned earlier, and Toto does a great job of

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>this talking about rate of change. We are in a

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>very delicate position right now with in terms of both

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>revenue forecasts as well as earnings forecast. If we see

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>some deterioration there as we get deeper into this recording season,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that was signified to us that we need to come

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>off that growth mindset, that that pro risk mindset in

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the more of a of a neutral position. That's where

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>our biases right now. Eric, you have bond guys like

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Gunlock of Double Line saying that stocks are attractive

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on a relative basis because a one on the tenure

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense. How are you thinking about relative value? Yeah,

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question, Taylor. Basically two things we're looking at.

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Number one is if you look at the risk premium,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>so wonkish term and basically shore there's a difference between

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the dividend yield of global equities versus UH

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>tenure or even global global rates. It's really attractive. Stocks

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>look very attractive versus fixed income versus their own history.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Stocks are is certainly in the top quartile of expensive,

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So we think fair value for the tenure, Taylor is

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>likely around one sixty one. Doesn't mean we have to

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>get there immediately, but our viewpoint is a gradual re retracing,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>if you will. Upward in bondyls suggest that that stocks

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>probably had a little more value here, but you have

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at them on both an absolute basis, from

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a relative value standpoint, on a risk premium basis as

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>well versus their own history. So relative values certainly favors

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>equities that were fixed incoming. Eric, what on earth is

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>fair value in a bond market with a huge monster

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sized and sensitive by a price in sensitive buy? What's

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>fair value in the treasury market these days? How do

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we even come up with that? They're almost are three

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>waves of buyers, Jonathan. You have you have the general

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>speculations of people making making bets on where ten years ago.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You have hedgers in terms of mortgage as well as

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as pension pension bars, and you have i'd say, just

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a steady drumbeat of FED participation. So tough to have

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>an edge on speculators. But if you look at what's

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>happening in the mortgage market, if you know what's happening

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with with respect to pension funds, those liabilities are getting

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, So that's almost like that that short gamma

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>position continues to grow. That means people are stepping back

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>into the bond market. So again we think that position

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>gets cleaned up and a gradual retracement up to that

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one sixty level is more likely. But again it will

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>happen on a on a very phased, very gradual basis.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we've gotta naven that it's gonna catch up

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>set right now in the pandemic. It has been a

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>joy to speak to Buck then Sadi with Johns Hopkins

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>or expertise and emergency medicine. I want to go there

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>today back the instead of the geography that you are

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>expert at in emergency rooms at the Johns Hopkins Hospital,

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>there's gotta be a certain percentage of people working there

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>who are unvaccinated. There's got to be a certain percentage

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of people coming into the emergency room unvaccinated. What do

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you do the regarding employees of John's Hopkins Hospital. We

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>are vaccinated. We all do show our vaccine status um

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>that is now documented and recorded regarding unvaccinated patients, that

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we have that knowledge on who's vaccinated and who's not.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>My practice is to gown up and be ready if

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm unsure of their vaccine status or their COVID status. Doctor.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I was very surprised to read the following state in

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times that around six workers in the

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>city's public hospital system of vaccinated. Given what's happened in

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the last year, I would have expected that number to

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be far, far higher. Where is that resistance coming from, doctor,

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>So we feel like a lot of that resistance is

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>coming from our ancillary services. UM. There are still individuals who,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>despite working in public health hospitals UM, have misconceptions or

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>concerns around But the medical systems have vaccine hesitancy, have UM,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, victims of misinformation, and so it is really

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>difficult to prove a counter factual. And that is something

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we're still struggling with in all sectors of society, not

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just public health hospitals. Don't to many people are characterizing

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a political party issue. Do you think that's helpful?

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>It is not. This is not a political party issue.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not a national issue. This is a global

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>issue that affects every single one of us. Until we

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>reduce the amount of circulating virus and we get vaccinated,

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't get to return back to normal. And it's

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>as simple as that, doctor. Are the vaccines effective against delta?

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Vaccines are effectivigates delta. It is very common to see

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>individuals who still get sick despite having vaccines. We see

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>this every year with the flu um the fator vaccines

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>that they show a scent effectiveness two we after getting

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>your second dose. But that does mean that twelve out

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred people will potentially still get the illness.

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But we know that it's the disease faring vaccines. They're

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>less likely to be sivilial, less likely tendive, and the

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I see, less likely to die. What do you think

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take to see if schools can reopen

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or not. In the fall, we were having a conversation

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>here that the markets perhaps might actually believe that something

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is wrong if schools don't reopen. If that is the catalyst,

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you think it takes for us to get there?

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think we've learned a lot about how

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to reopen school safety. In the spring of this year,

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>my daughter's school open. They used pods that they you know,

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>stegreg They created pods of play um classrooms didn't interact

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>those temperature checks yes, you know, it's a bit strange

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>taking your child into a temperature check every morning. But

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I felt perfectly safe that my child was in school

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with the precautions that were put in place. But I

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to you about the too alogy and

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>microbiology because I just don't buy this for a minute.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>We cured ourselves from the horrific child killer diphtheria. I

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was on the back end of polio, Taylor, I believe

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>her amery mentioned earlier Senator McConnell's battle personally with polio.

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't buy it for a minute that we haven't

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>done this before from bacteria. We got vaccinated. From VERA viruses,

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>we got vaccinated. What's different this time on? There's nothing different.

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Vaccine innovations of it ahead of the curve um. Luckily,

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we had the mr and A vaccine studies that we're

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>done for cancer drugs, which allowed us to find a

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>suitable vector um for all the vaccine and implement it rapidly.

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We also do have viral back to vaccines as well,

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>which are extremely innovative UM, so nothing is different. We

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>have actually used all of our lessons learned and applied

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>them to the COVID N pandemic the challenges therapeutics. So

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>with bacteria, we have to biotics that affects the ability

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of the bacteria to reproduce and stop infection. Viruses have

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>always been more trippy, tricky due to the way that

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 1>they replicate. How do we incentivize these people? I mean

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>people are saying, give them money, do this, do this,

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>do this. How do we get this fixed in a

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden speed? So there is two groups. There is

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the hardcore conspiracy theories vaccines. They're you cannot change right,

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I got it, I got it. But the majority of

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.479
<v Speaker 1>the people are people that have a underestimated their vulnerability

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to getting sick, second, overestimated the side effects of the vaccine,

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and because they're kind of just lost, they have just

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>do nothing. Now that is a group that we target.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We to promote positive messaging around the vaccine. We need

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to educate people with clear, concise facts about the true

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>risks of vaccination and stop over inflating the few side

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>effects that have been seen all the ice later cases

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>in social media. Do you think full authorization would have

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>pushed this issue forward and move away from just emergency

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>youth authorization of these vaccines. Unfortunately, yes, right. So I

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think for the lay public, the difference between full authorization

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and emergency youth authorization is one of the big sticking

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>points in their vaccine confidence. The truth of the matter

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is the way that these studies were conducted was rigorous,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>just as we would have conducted any other new drug

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>intervention study. UM. Due to the national reporting software, the

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>v A R EER software from CDC, we have national

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>reporting on vaccine side effects, which is phenomenal, and the

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>use case here is in the millions. And so I

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think that having that sticky label that says this is

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>fully authorized, I think will improve people's confidence, although scientifically

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it is unnecessary. Don't We appreciate your effort, that's for sure.

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for being with us this morning.

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bacti, Han Sarti. There, John's Hopkins Universe, the Associate

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Emergency Medicine, on some of the issues time,

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and those issues are always far more complex than some

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>people might want to debate. Right now, we go to

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>your content where content is king Michael Nathanson with Craig Moffatt.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>Moffatt Nathanson has just been spectacular on all of this

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we watch at home. And is there really

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to make money at it? Michael Nathanson, where's

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the profit? Magnan Decide ellsse E says, it's all about profit.

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's all about getting out there and making money. Is

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there an identifiable profit in the streaming business at this point?

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.599
<v Speaker 1>There isn't how the profit is going back to the

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer given all the discount it's being done. The consumer

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is grabbing the profit and companies to subsidize from consumers

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>content habits. At this point, Comcast was able to make

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that shift in cable TV to get the real profit

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to real cash flow. Do you model an equivalency year

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>to what comcasted in cable TV or is this time different?

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>This time is different, Tom, We Netflix a goiling company.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>The next three or four years, every people will make

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>money money to define this free cash flow, we just

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>see big black holes everywhere, right, And that's why you

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>had Discovery Warners Merge. That's why Comcast by comes rumored

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:24.599
<v Speaker 1>to get together. These businesses are really capital intensive. I

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's the same dynamics as the linear businesses

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that we all do pring years. And Michael, this seems

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to be abroad sectical and That's what gets my attention here.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>This is neutral Netflix, neutral Weald Disney Company, neutral road coude.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You see this across the board, head, Jonathan. The problem is,

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's to your previous guest stuff the

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>cost of money. You've got to look out five ten

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>years to see evaluation here be supportive to me. It's

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just a long way to go, and everyone's so confident

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>about their data points that I just think the other

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>side of this trade, right, I mean, we know streaming

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>is the future, but the market has overpriced these assets

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just gonna wait for a better entry points

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time. Let's talk about that. What

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>would it take for you to say I'm wrong? Always

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a good exercise, Michael. What would it take in the

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>coming year? Is there anything? Well? I would say a

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. One is our view is that the

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>US is a very competitive market and it's hard to

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>eat profits out in the U s streaming business. I

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>think you need to see more people move into the sidelines, right.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>You would see more consolidation. You would see Apple on Amazon,

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of step back and you would start

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>to see you need Netflix to start growing more quickly

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the US, which would point to a higher upside

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, penetration case, right, So I think here you

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>need competition to lessen and you need um you know,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>growth actually starts re accelerating against That's one. And then secondly,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I think internationally, you really need to see some of

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the developing markets where there's very low were pricing really

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>start to show science of pricing power. So those are

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>to me the two things. Because you know, the profits

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>right now are in the US potentially, and the growth

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is coming from low market places like India, low price

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>pricing markets, they just don't have great returns on invested capital.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And Michael, I've heard this a lot. The US customer

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>is more profitable than an international customer. How do we

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>get them to be even? How long does that take? Well,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it goes to you know, a big part of the

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>chaction story is developing markets, right, So you have Latin

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>America and age specific as the drivers of growth. But

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>those price points are really low, right. The rest of

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the world price point outside Europe could be one half

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to one third price of American customers. So it's just

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>can get a long time tailor for pricing to start elevating, right,

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's and before the pricing can elevate, you need to

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>give consumers a ton of content to make the product sticky, right,

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So you need to an invest and this is the

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge. You to invest tons of dollions of dollars,

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars to make the content except you sticky

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>enough so hold on to customers and then too drive

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>pricing right, So it takes years investment to get to

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that place which you start raising pricing again. The other

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>point that you made pretty well is about consolidation. I

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>was reading another of your colleagues notes talking about Amazon

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>purchasing MGM for about eight and a half billion dollars.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Why is it Netflix making more purchases should they be

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>What does consolidation in the industry look like to you? Yeah,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot they can do. I mean, the biggest,

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest reason why you make a better on MGM

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is for franchises. Right. The speed of which Disney built

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>out the director consumer business is due to the speed

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>tied to their ability to really lift Marble Pixar, Star

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Wars Universe in streaming. So but there's just not a

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of franchises like that still available MGM has a

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>few you Netflix w are going to do this? Uh,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>MGM is really not a lot that that I see.

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Now what's we bought? Um? I worry, you know, as

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the analysts covering the industry, that you're gonna see Apple

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon for even more money to work in streaming

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>because you know they have other reasons to do it

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>besides trying to make a profit. Michael, just a bit

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of a tricky line this morning, so we're gonna have

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to cut it short. But you know, we always enjoy

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>catching up with the sir, and we enjoy your work too.

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Send up regards to the team that was Michael Nathans

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and Muffin Nathans and senior research analysts. This is a

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>joy because he has done public service for America across

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so many areas, including ambassadors to Japan and now Senator

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>from his very much his Tennessee, Bill Haggerty joins us

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the Republican from Tennessee. This morning, Senator Haggerty, I have

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to go to the stunning Washington Post analysis this morning

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the unvaccinated. You are eating spokesman on this. How

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>are you going to convince the unvaccinated of your Tennessee

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to get it together and get vaccinated. I think we're

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>off to incredibly a good start thanks to Operation Warp Speed.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's enough credit given to the progress

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that we made here at an imprecedented level here in America.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>In Tennessee. I've been very clear. I've taken the vaccine.

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>My mother, who is eighty nine years old, is taking

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine. I lead by example. Uh. We continue to

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to make its personal choice for folks, of course,

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but I've certainly been clear that I've looked at the data,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and I think the right decision, certainly for me and

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>my family was to do just that. How do you sell?

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>And we talked to french Hill a little rock the

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>other day with the same challenges. I would suggest Arkansas

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>frankly a grimmer story than any Tennessee. But what's the

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>prescription you have with your knowledge of Nashville media and

0:17:55.840 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee business, what's the prescription. What's the plan to jump

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>start this? As we hear from President Biden, I think

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>that you know, as we look at where we're headed

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>right now, Uh, the numbers continue to look much better spitality,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and we just need to continue to talk about that

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>positive outcome, that positive result, and encourage people to continue

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to get behind it. As school reopens, things get back

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>into the swing of things, will probably see another pick

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up in inoculation. One final question on the Senator, because

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I know Taylor Riggs has some important questions as well.

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Senator Haggerty, what do you need from former President Trump

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to send a message to the unvaccinated? President Trump is

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>having a hard time sending any messages thanks to the

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>censorship of a big tech His normal means of communication

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>has been incredibly stifled. I think that's incredibly troubling. Um

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of his message to people, he was no

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>one worked harder than President Trump to put a vaccine

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in place. I think people know that. I think he

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>can convey that, but he put it from innocent amount

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of work in place, with operation work speed to make

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this fact seem possible, not only for America but for

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. I think that's an incredible example.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He should talk about that when he can. Senator A

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>pivot with me, if you will please to infrastructure. What

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is the past to a bipartisan five hundred and seventy

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>nine billion dollar infrastructure deal? Very hard to say, uh,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chuck Schumer today is planning to put a

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>procedural vote in place to start the process on this.

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Yet we haven't seen any text. We don't know the

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>content of it. I haven't seen anything. You know, this

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds remarkably similar to something that we've all seen before.

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>You remember, you have to pass the bill before you

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>can see what's in it. Obamacare two point oh, that

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out well for America. So we have a lot,

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot to see in a lot more work that

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done before I can comment on exactly

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what's in the bill and how we should

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>proceed on it. Is this two path approach still the

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 1>right way to go? Well, certainly not the path that

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I would take. You know, I'm a businessman my entire career.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I step back and look at this and say,

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here. You've got a two path process, one

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know, a lot of effort has gone into play.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I respect my colleagues who have worked hard

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to put a bipartisan plan in place. But as you know,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>when you negotiate a deal, often what's even more important

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is what you negotiate out of a deal. Yet, we've

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>got the Biden administration, We've got Nancy Pelosi and Chuck

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Schumer talking about pushing everything that was negotiated out of

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the deal right alongside. In fact, Nancy Pelosia said that

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>she's not going to even look at the bipartisan deal

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>unless the not, you know, completely partisan reconciliation package is

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>put forward to I wouldn't call it a reconciliation package.

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Is just another reckless tax and spending program that they're

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to show through a massive program, something that we've

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>never seen before, and I think it's going to have

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>devastating effects in the economy. So I'm very concerned about

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>enabling this partisan package to go through. Under the guise

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of a partisan infrastructure package, it's far smaller. Senator Hackety,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I am fascinated what your prescription is for your Republican party.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So many of the interviews we have with Republicans and

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with Democrats, is a liberal trunch of the Democratic Party

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>really troubling for moderate Democrats. Do the Republicans respond to

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that by being more staunchly conservative or by moving to

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a Lamar Alexander like middle. I think what we need

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to do is continue to convey what's actually happening here.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>We need more business people like me in Washington. I

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's the that's the point. We have a hard

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>time conveying the essence of what's occurring here, but right

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>now what we're doing. Because we've already seen at one

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>point nine trillion dollar package moved through a holy partisan

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>basis back in March of this year. That's roughly ten

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>percent of our GDP. They're talking now about dumping more

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of our GDP into this so called infrastructure package. It's

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be massively inflationary. We need to convey that

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>when you hear we hear moderate Democrats like Joe Manchin

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>say he doesn't want to put something through that isn't

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>paid for, he doesn't want to increase the debt. These

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are things that we need to push back on and say, well,

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna pay for itself. You've got to look at

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>how they're talking about paying for it, and they're talking

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>about crushing taxes on job creators. They're talking about killing

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>capital formation by putting capital gains taxes in place. Those

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>types of policies are going to be devastating to our economy.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>The American public is smart enough to understand this. We

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>need more business people talking about this in a way

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that's rational and easy to understand. Senator Haggerty, I wasnt

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna bring this up, but you mentioned private business in Washington.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I need you to comment this morning on the jelling

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of the private equity Gentleman from Los Angeles, Tom Barrick,

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what were your thoughts when you've heard of these actions

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>by Justice? Well, I've only seen a headline or two,

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know you know anything about the specifics

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>of the content of this case or what it has

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with private equity. Well, it doesn't have to

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>do with private equity, but certainly it is of note

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>here as well. Senator Haggerty, thank you so much for

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us today. Bill Haggerty, he is of Tennessee, greatly

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. John. I got to Thomas Kostall, go to

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Costard right out, pick Day to save me as well. Uh,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy ealism might your boundaries toime boundaries? Thomas Costard pick

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Day wealth joining us right now and within his within

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>his research, I'm gonna are you within his research note

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>is a really really important observation on America's savings pile

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he's optimistic we're going to spend a little bit of

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that savings pile over the next year to advance the

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>American economy. But Thomas cost is what happens in a

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years to that still massive savings pile. Right

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So the savings pile right now is around two point

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>five trillion dollars, and so the question for the economy

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is how much will be spent within the next year

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and within the next few years. Actually, I think, you know,

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>a small amount of that will be spent by about

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a small amount, which I think will be around ten

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>to with the next year, But ten to pcent of

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a big savings it's still a big amount of consumer

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>spending which will be uh, you know, flowing into the

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>economy in the next few months. And that's why I'm

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>quite cautiously optimistic about the US consumer and therefore US

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>GDP in the coming month, even though we're going to

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>see it this oleation in growth, that's for sure, but

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the US consumer will stay quite quite resilience.

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe that our savings pile, as you call it,

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>has a permanent feature to it, that it's a permanent

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>fixture of how we believe and think, well, I do

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>think that. Yes, indeed, I think some of that, you know,

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the savings went into the equity market, went

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>into long term savings and will probably not go back

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>into the economy, but I think, you know, part of

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>it will be spent point number one. And also I

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>do believe in credit card lending. I think credit card

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>lending has also some upside potential in the coming weeks

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>and months, and that will also support consumer spending. If

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we get you know, say fifty to wander billing more

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in credit card lending, that would be very helpful for growth.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Because you're right, and we we have, you know, a

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of tail winds are going to fade in the

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year, including the reopening um, the

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.239
<v Speaker 1>fiscal support, so things like that. We also have some

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>headwinds from the delta variant, but I think the US

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer will be able to be a resilient. It's almost

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to what a great you think you four is going

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to shake the outlook for the whole cycle, not just

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the following year, the year after, but the whole cycle,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right right. So the thing with the US cycle is

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're going back to potential growth, right, So we're

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>going back to the trajectory before the pandemic, and that

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that matters because that's usually a signal that we're mid cycle.

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>And we know that when we're mid cycle, growth is

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>getting harder to get and the situation becomes more fragile,

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>more difficult, more you know, they're more risks. So it

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is true that two could see more risks. However, again,

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, the US consumer can propel growth.

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I also think we could have more lending in the economy,

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>very commony, defencial conditions despite the FED, the FED stap ring,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and so that could help sustain growth going forward, even

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>though from a pure metric perspective we're already mid cycle

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and we have more risks. So Thomas, potential, what is

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>potential in the US economy? What is it now? Two

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>sub too? Yeah, I don't think potential growth has changed

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that much. I think it's still around two percent. The

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>problem is again that we have you know, weak demographics. Um.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, birthrate is especially a concern. I think we

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough babies uh in the US, but also

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think in Europe as well, and that's definitely an

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>impedimental growth. And with regards to innovation. Innovation is there,

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually even more prevalent in the US than

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. But still I think innovation is still failing

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to really broaden out and to spread through the economy.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's the problem. So productivity growth may

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>pick up, but it won't be a massive pickup going forward.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you confident that peak inflation is also behind us? Right?

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So regarding inflation, it's a bit complicated. Um. Right now

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we have the bottleneck inflation, so we have you know, Scott,

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>you have some products. But next year we'll have the

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>cyclical inflation because usually inflation comes with a lag, so

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you have the recovering growth and then one year later

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the bounds in inflation. And so twenty two

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>may still see inflation above two percent for for cyclical reasons.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 1>The real question is about three and then I think

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that the jury is out. I think some deflationary forces

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>still apply, but I keep an open mind because you know,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>two forces them watching our globalization and especially the US

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>China tention, which could lead to potentially in erosion in

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>globalization and more inflation in the US. And also, um,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the the share of labor in the economy and whether

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>wages are go up more. But I think that's that's

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a topic for another day. I know I'm simplifying this,

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so so bear with me. You've had a few senators

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>come out and saying that this inflation is effectively attacks

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so you've taken away all of those wage gains that

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you describe because of that inflation. How do you think

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>about that? Right? I don't think wages are a threat

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to inflation until we get to say around five ish

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or or more on on on on wage growth. And

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know we're not there. We're at three point two

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>on the Atlanta Fed medium wage growth numbers, so we're

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>still well below levels that could be dangerous for inflation

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that they will lead to a self

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>perpetuation of inflation above two percent. So you know, we're

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>not in the danger zone for in terms of wage growth.

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And actually I think wage growth still has room to

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>go up without threatening inflation. How is how do you

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>get wage You get back to a constructive and positive

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>real wage and it does not affect inflation, right. I

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>think the correlation between wages and inflation is actually much

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>more fragile and much more uh, you know, tenuous and

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>slim than widely appreciated. I think the real danger comes

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>above five percent on wage growth, and especially in the

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Fed medium wage You have to look at medium wages.

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Really it's how you know someone staying in the labor

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>force and was staying in the same job, how he

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is or heard wage compares through time. I think that

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that that's the key indicator. And so to me,

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the condicator is the Atlanta Fed medium wage growth number,

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and again it's we are at three point two percent

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>right now year on year, and it's still very quite soft.

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So I would not wear until we reach say five

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>five percent. We're not there yet, and Johnna run right

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Atlantic, but I totally agree with Thomas on

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this on the median aspect of wage growth, We're not

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>We got to get back to three point six percent,

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>John Ferro, to really get there. We're not there yet.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometime I'm smiling because only economists called five percent wage growth,

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks us. Will you find anyone else that calls five

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>percent dangerous? Thomas? Just let's finish there for a lot

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of people who might have accidentally tuned in this morning

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to find something else, maybe some sports. I don't know,

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and stumbled across some economists talking about the labor market.

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>What's dangerous about a five wage hike? Right, because then

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>it starts to affect inflation expectations and you have also,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, wage gains starting to outpaces productivity. So this

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is based I mean, this reasoning that I have is

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>also based on historical relationships. You know, we have to

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>go back, you know, in time to see wage growth

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>above you know, five percent, I think in the early nineties. Uh,

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you had inflation sustainably above two percent, and

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a time when actually central banks were struggling

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring down inflation. I think right now the problem

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.719
<v Speaker 1>is that they're trying to move it up. Uh. And

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so I think those days of the early ninety nineties

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are probably gone and they're unlikely to go back. But

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I might be wrong, but so far I don't see them.

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It's almost a picked wealth management sing Us economist's Thomas

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>got to catch up, said, thank you. This is the

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>from seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television each day from six to nine am

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg.