WEBVTT - NFL Training Camp: Patrick Mahomes LOOKS GREAT, buying Bears hype? + NBA Schedule reaction

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What Draven the Great? Episode four eighty nine.

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:08.159
<v Speaker 1>This episode of What Draven the Great, as always, is

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>presented to you by our dear friends at boost Mobile

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we Alsow for the first time in a while, get

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>to welcome back demands fresh from the final days of

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>paternity leave. And you really did time this paternity leave perfectly.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>As your final your first day back at work was

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>also your newly nine month old daughters first day trying

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>out a little daycare with other little babies, as that

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>one milestone was hit yesterday. Great to see you. How

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>are you good?

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 2>To see you? Bops, I'm amazing. I'm amazing. Right it

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>talks about basketball football seasons here, but yeah, I'm ready, fool.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it is. This is kind of perfect timing

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 1>as a few scheduling notes for you guys. So we're

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the shows this week. Then I made a

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>quick pivot instead of going dark for two weeks while

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm out of town before football gets going, instead of

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>re racking old episodes, and we still might do some

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>end of week like best ofs you know from the summer.

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe bring back a couple of the fifty greatest players

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the last fifty years, have some of those episodes drop

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in your feed something like that. I kind of made

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it a bit of an executive decision and hit up

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Ty Butler and Damon Bruce, one guy on the East Coast,

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>one guy on the West Coast. Two great radio hosts,

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>one from San Francisco, one from New York who both

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>have their own YouTube shows, and for the first time

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>ever in the five YEARSSH this show is run, we're

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna have live episodes of What's Right with Nick Wright

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that Nick Wright is not a part of. So we

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>will have next week in your feed and on YouTube

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and on Spotify and iTunes anywhere you get your podcasts.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>As always, like rate Subscribe Review, we will have live episodes,

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>but I won't be on them. It'll be Ty Butler

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and Damon Bruce. So those will be coming your way

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end of August, and then I will come

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>back refreshed from Europe with my wife to get us

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>rolling in football season. And the timing of today is

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>also quite well, quite good because we there are some

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>football stories and we're ramping up as we're four weeks

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and a day away from opening kick. But the only

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>real big stories this time of year are usually injury

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>related Telaramie Tunsell went down in training camp or this,

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Micah Parson's rehab. I'm not saying it's behind schedule,

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but he's targeting like week six to come back. They're

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of bummers stories usually, And so the NBA gave

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>us a bit of a gift by announcing their opening

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Night and Christmas Day games, which is where we will

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>start the show. But before we do that, straight the

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>voicemail brought to you by Boost Mobile, Quinn Williams gets

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a very nice extension with the Cowboys three years up

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred and six million dollars Panthon Niakos in Greece.

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>The owner seems to really believe that he might be

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>able to get Nikolejokic next offseason with any other NBA superstar,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say that is an impossibility with Joker and

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he has yet to sign an extension.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Earmuff's buddy, I'm not putting it at zero percent.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think.

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It is in his character too.

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>On the board, Wow, Daniel, what an evolved take by Daniel.

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Daniel puts in the dock. As long as he doesn't

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>NBA teams. Dude deserves to be happy. He's given me everything.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>So Joker's like, you know what, America, it's been cool, Deuces.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to grease to play basketball. Daniel's gonna wish

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>him well. Good for you, Daniel. I respect that. I

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Also, Ben Simmons allegedly eyeing a comeback and

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Bill Simmons. Listen, Bill Simmons is my friend. I consider

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>him my friend. He did a podcast with my dear

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>friend and Coast Kevin Wilds where Bill just casually dropped

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the take that he's not a seat belt guy, that

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>he just drives his car, waits for the card the

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to stop beeping after him minute, and just doesn't

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>wear a seat belt. It was one of the more

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>wild takes I've ever heard. Also, just a total missed

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunity by kW on that Demons. I don't you might

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>not get this reference, but the listeners will. kW should

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have just just absolutely just slid in there when Bill

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is just being like, yeah, I know it's bad, but

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't wear a seatbelt. All. He was sitting right

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>there for him For kW to be like, con didn't

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>make you buckle up, it would have been great, it

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>would he really missed, he really missed the opportunity. If so,

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>if I'll explain the joke now to people who aren't

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Bill Simmons lower. Bill Simmons did a podcast

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with Conk Nipple, who is you know just finished his

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>rookie season in the NBA and was a long time

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Simmons fan, and is you know nineteen years old.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill's studio like my studio is at his house and

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill and Bill. It was actually on I was on

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the pod with him when he said kind of in

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>passing and then when I was driving con home blah

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>blah bah, and then people picked up on it. It's like,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, you drove him home. He didn't like

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>send a car, and and so they asked men. Bill's like, yeah,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I drove him home. He's nineteen years old. I didn't

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>want to put him in an uver. It was its

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>very adorable, but so Wild's missed an easy joke there.

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly, Bill, you gotta wear your seat belt, man,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>This isn't nineteen sixty five, like you just gotta wear

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>your seat belt now. I I I This podcast from

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Bill made me do some introspection on my own seat

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>belt wearing because I realized something that makes no sense whatsoever.

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I wear a seatbelt one hundred percent of the time

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that I am driving. I wear a seat belt one

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of the time that I am riding in

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the front seat and my wife is driving, which is

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>really only Daniel's only driving. If I've been drinking Jesus

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>passenger Princess all the way, I wear a seat But

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>then I thought about it. I was like, but in ubers,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm at like eighty percent, and in taxis are I

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>might be at like, yeah, eighty percent, I maybe seventy five,

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, And in taxis I might be at

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like twenty five percent, which makes no sense because those

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, they're far and away the most aggressive, reckless

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>drivers of the cab drivers. And so I you know,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm using Bill Simmons pod as a turning point for me.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna be one hundred percent seat all guy,

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>all the time, whether I'm driving or not. I already

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>was while I was driving, but it was a wild

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>take hearing someone just be like, yeah, I don't I

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and I even in the producer saying do you sit

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in the front of maneuver. No I sit in the

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>back seat of vaneuver, but I'm saying that that's what

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. If I'm in the front seat of a

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>car driving or passenger, I always wear it, but for

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>something and I only ever sit in the back seat

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of ride shares or cabs. For some reason, it doesn't

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know why. It's not like it's safer.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think of it.

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's it's seat noise isn't going off.

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what I see.

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I also did try to think of like the circumstances

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>under which I was like, I suppose if you had

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>like a classic convertible like from the sixties, and we're

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>driving down like an ocean front highway, maybe you would

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like maybe under that specific picture in my brain, you

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>want to just feel like totally unrestricted. But other than that,

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like just bill for me, you know, longtime

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>listeners and readers, friends, people that grew up watching you

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>listening to you wear your seatbelt bro like, and I

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we can put this out on social

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will get momentum. This is I

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>want to lead the charge of folks in media that

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Simmons has done something for us, either by writing

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>columns when we were in high school or college or

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>by paving the way in a lot of ways. Because

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>k W did not push back nearly enough, that was

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a moment. I would be, I honest to God, think

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's if we do the math on it, like not

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>much less reckless than if he just dropped like on

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the pod, like yeah, the first of every month, I

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>do a little cocaine. Like that's just my thing, like

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>just like Jesh's my thing, Like I and I feel

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like that he said that. kW would have been like, WHOA,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. So like Bill, wear your seatbelt, Bro,

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you're driving a lot. You're in California, where your seatbelt's

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>going to these Clipper games and into it dome.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 2>That's a farhad the amount of driving. Does that matter? No,

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's a short trip down the street to the

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>grocery store. Do you need to have a seatbull on?

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I mean the thing is like it's it's I'm

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a gambler, right, And so there's a lot of there's

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>risk versus reward that we have to always incorporate. And

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I would say there is literally zero reward from not

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>wearing your seatbelt, just none, Like there's just you get

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the That's why I tried to create the scenario. I'm like,

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, maybe you're in like a nineteen sixty two

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Stingray convertible, the winds in your hair driving like maybe,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but no, in general, guys, just driving an escalade down

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the p like throw a throw a seat. Just go

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead and buckle up, man, buckle up. You know what.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's buckle up, guys. That's the that's the lesson of

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>today's show, Scott and Bucklow. All right, let's talk NBA

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Opening Night. Go ahead.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>So the full NBA schedule releases Thursday, but they've already

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 2>announced some big days. So Opening Day we've got Pistons

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 2>at Celtics, Sixers at Knicks, Thunders at Spurs, and then

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Christmas Day you've got Spurs at Nicks, Heats at Celtics,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Sixers at Lakers, Thunders at Timberwolves, Nuggets at Warriors. Which

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 2>of these games are you eyeing or looking forward to?

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, so massive takeaways all over the spot. First of all,

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna jump right to you know what. We'll get

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to the snubs later. Let's talk about the positives. Five

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>teams got both Marquee Days, thunder Spurs, Sixers, Knicks, Celtics.

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Those are the five teams that are playing Opening Day

0:11:54.720 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and Christmas. The only I guess somewhat prize there is

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics' brand equity being that strong. I mean again,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>like I I wouldn't think the Celtics would be left out.

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And the Celtics are one of the greatest franchises in

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>the history not just of the NBA of sports, and

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>they've got a superstar in Jason Tatum, and they're supposed

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to be good, really good. But it it surprised me

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit that the Celtics were. Let me put

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it like this, of the five teams that got double dips,

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics were the most surprising, even if it's not

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that surprising at all, so that you know, that jumped

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>out to me. The five other teams that got a

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>single game were the Pistons more on them in a moment,

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the heat more on them as well, then Timberwolves, Nuggets, Warriors. Okay,

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>so in no particular order. My immediate first takeaway is

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a bunch four years face of the league

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>conversations and then every single year, the NBA tells us, yeah,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Bron, Yeah, it's just Bron. In fact, we can't

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>even do the schedule until Lebron signs. And then when

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>he does sign, we're gonna give his team the premier

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>spot on Christmas Day, the three pm Chris or five

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pm the third game on Christmas, the the Marquee Christmas

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Day game. Hey, are we gonna do rematch of the finals? No,

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll put that in the morning. All right? Are we

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? What are other options here? We're gonna how

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>about how about Lebron with you know, with his one

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>game back in Los Angeles? How about that's the Marquee game? Okay,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that's Christmas?

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>What about Opening night? Opening Night? What are we doing?

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Are we doing the rematch of the finals?

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 2>There?

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>No, we're not gonna do that there. Oh, okay. Are

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we gonna do Jail and Brown Jason Tatum that you

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>know that? No, we'll find another spot for that. How

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about Lebron against the defending champs? How about the defending

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>champs when they get to open their drop their banner?

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's there? Sound good for everyone? Think people will watch?

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Good for ratings? Good for business. Cool? What are we

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>doing with Wimby? We'll put them on after what about?

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>What about? What about? On Christmas Day? We'll put them

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on in the morning when Beal are opening their presence.

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>We gotta make like Again, I'm not even saying this

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is not an evaluation of whether or not this is

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what they should do. This is an evaluation of what

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they will do. And what they're telling you is the

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>NBA universe still revolves around Lebron James, right or wrong,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're scheduling it accordingly. So that's first take away.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Second takeaway, Steph Curry's star power is real because of

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen teams, not fifteen ten teams pardon me, that

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have games Opening Day or Christmas. The worst team by

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a mile is Golden State and they're you know they are.

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>They're they were never going to be left out. Like

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>every other team listed there should be somewhere from really

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>good to excellent. And then there's the Warriors in a

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>game that nobody even thinks Jimmy Butler will be back

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for and they are the final game on Christmas Day,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>so shout out to them on that to step on

0:15:50.040 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that front. Couple other small takeaways surprising to me. Demands

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna have a Christmas Day and Opening Day,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but focus on Christmas. For there's five

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>games with no Durant, like I can't the I can't

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the last time Durant's team with the Suns. Maybe

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, though, because those seems were like

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and Durant's on a good team. The Rockets are Rockets

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are a good team. To have no Durant on Christmas

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Day is noteworthy to me. I'm not I and again

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they're the only I don't know that there were snubs.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the Caves are a little annoyed, and I

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>bet the Rockets are a little annoyed. But that's really

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>all that jumps out to me. Let me ask you,

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>h I am. Also, I'm a little surprised that the

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Pistons got invited to the party, even though it's the

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>three pm, middle of the day opening day game. That

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they didn't work. It's a little surprising the

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Pistons are there. I would have thought maybe the heat

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with Giannis would have gotten both, you know, Opening Day

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and Christmas Day. But I guess if heat at Celtics's Christmas,

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna have Celtics heat opening night. So that's

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 1>where they mix in the Pistons. But it is surprising

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to me even that the Pistons got that slot over

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland or hell over Houston, like that is.

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Land.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>No, I the NBA clearly agrees with you. Like the

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>NBA clearly agrees with you. So here are my other,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, general takeaways. I do think for Opening Night,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>six Ers next thunder Spurs is awesome strategically by the

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>league because for most people and by the Vegas odds,

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>those are the projected conference finals. So an opportunity for

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the NBA season to start with those four teams basically

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and end with those four teams. I like that. I

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>also would be remiss if I didn't recognize who wasn't

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>playing on Opening Day that we haven't mentioned. So demons

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, because you have a fun little fact here

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in stat here.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>So the Lakers have played on Opening Night every year

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 2>since twenty nineteen. How do you think that they missed

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the cut this year?

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So what happened in twenty nineteen? This kind of goes

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>back to my original point. Bron signed there, Bron left,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Lakers all of a sudden like, sorry, guys,

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a spot for you. Like Lakers at

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Celtics is sitting right there for anybody that wants it

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.719
<v Speaker 1>instead of Pistons at Celtics. And you guys know how

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>much I the Oh yeah, Lebron got there in twenty eighteen,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>signed in twenty eighteen. Pardon me, you guys know how

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>much I how much I like Luca. But the fact

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that the the Lakers have been supplanted in the Western

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Conference by the two small market juggernauts thunder Spurs, and

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that they just for the first time in eight years

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>or seven years, they're not an Opening Night is I

0:19:54.400 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>guess somewhat noteworthy to me. Well, listen, I I think

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it is. I'm really interested in what Luca can do

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 1>this year. I they also, you know, they they looked

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>at the team that Luca took to the NBA Finals

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>with Dallas a few years ago and said, how can

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we best remake that? And that's what they tried to do.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I you know, it's been I spent a lot of

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>time while you were on paternity to leave talking about

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>how I thought the Lakers could have handled the final

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>year of Lebron better to where maybe he would have

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>signed with them for the minimum rather than signing with

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers for the minimum. But that that's water under

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the bridge at this point. But the the league is

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>making very very clear to you through this schedule, at

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>least in my eyes that they view right now, they're

0:20:52.720 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>three biggest attractions as the Sixers, the Spurs, and the Knicks.

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>That's the metal stand with also receiving votes being the

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Thunder and the Celtics, and they I'm I'm very I'm

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in i am very interested in how the Thunder, what

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the Thunders coverage is like in national TV games, and

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>all those things are like this year because they were

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>never an overwhelmingly popular team outside of their own fan

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>base to begin with. But when it's like, yeah, but

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they're the champs, they're the best. They're the juggernaut that

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, gives you a cachet that gets removed a

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>bit when you don't win the title again, when you

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>don't make the finals again. And now it feels like

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the Spurs having beaten them and being a team on

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the upswing, while the Thunder it feels like lost some

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, semi valuable parts and some pieces are a

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>team that is potentially at least not on the down swing,

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but just a not quite as good as they were

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. So that's interesting. And then

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, the teams we haven't really discussed here. I

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the Heat that I thought maybe they could have

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten the double dip opening day on Christmas aunt LaMelo

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Timberwolves. They host the Thunder on Christmas Night

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and then Joker against Steph as the nightcap, with two

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>teams that I don't think either one really thinks they

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>have a real shot at winning the championship, despite having

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>in Joker's case, maybe the best player in the world

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and in the Warriors case, with Steph, one of the

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>greatest players ever. Before we get to these other questions,

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>did you demonte did you have anything that jumped out

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>to you or that or you want it about your Celtics.

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I am anything about the opening a few nights h. No.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised that they got added to both to

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 2>both of those days considering how the last couple of

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>years has went. But I am really looking forward to

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>seeing how the Timberwolves look this year. I'm very high

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>on them. But uh but yeah, no, I mean, oh yeah.

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Because so, I mean, that'll be that seeing Aunt LaMelo

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a show, that's for sure.

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Do we not.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Have any details on the first six or Celtics games.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the other thing.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 2>That to me is, yeah, the fact that Jaylen Brown's

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to guard Jason Tatum all year

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>over there and yeah.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Back and forth exactly. And so now, listen, they're gonna

0:23:52.680 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>play each other four times, but if they it that

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that is the other so that you know what I

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>just stumbled upon. My other big takeaway that the league

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>decided instead of having if they wanted to have Bron

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and the Sixers as the premiere Christmas game, the third

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Christmas game, the five PM slot, that they didn't make

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that Sixer Celtics, that they they they prioritized Lebron's one

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>game back in LA over what could have been Jalen

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Brown's first game back in Boston.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know what I mean.

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, yeah, I mean that's definitely true, but

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it is, but it also feels like there's more. I

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>don't think I don't think it's fair to call it

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>bad blood between the Lakers and Lebron. It might not

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>be great blood, but I don't think it's like it.

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 2>You know, they you don't think that's pretty either. There

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been the Jalen Brown situation with the Celtics and

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Lebron with the Lakers, like just feeling like the team

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:11.919
<v Speaker 2>has not done well by you, you know, like I

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 2>feel like they both didn't have like crazy bad I

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't Jalen.

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Brown feel yeah, I mean yeah, I think Jalen Brown

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>feels done dirty and has like and there has been little,

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, semi public sniping between the sides Lakers and

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and Luke and all that publicly has all been

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>super positive. You know, thank you for a great run.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. Through he did, he didn't get traded away,

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>so you know it just even if below the surface

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there is you know, carping about the other side to people,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not as obvious as I think the Celtics Jalen

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown thing. And I'm really interested. So that's the game

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that isn't listed here that I am. I'm most interested

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in singing Jalen Brown's first game, not against Boston, necessarily

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>first game in Boston, like he obviously should get a

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>standing ovation from the crowd. I imagine he will, but

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing him and Tatum go head to head, I think

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>will be you know, really fun and really interesting. And

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I think the you know, shout out to

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. Also the what are the other opening week

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>games that we know about, demanse.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>So we got Lebron versus Cleveland, Denver at OKAC, and

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Knicks at Celtics. Do you think that any of those

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 2>should have made Opening Night?

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>H No, I think these are all exactly you know,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>we've listen, Lebron's been playing against the Calves without being

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on the Calves for almost a decade now, so like

0:26:54.119 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't need that one. Denver at OKC, I mean

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that was I mean that is a good matchup in

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a good series. Uh historically has been a good series potentially,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>But no, so oh you know what the game that

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So this one does jump out to me now that

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I think about it. We have Thunder at Timberwolves and

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets at Warriors. Nuggets at Timberwolves seems like, you know,

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the one of the prime rivalries right now, and you

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>know they've played in the playoffs a bunch of times,

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think that one you maybe could have done

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Thunder against the Warriors, But They probably wanted to give

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the thunder up make that more likely to be a

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>good game, and they think the Timberwolves will be better

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>than the Warriors. But it does feel like Nuggets Timberwolves

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is the more heated rivalry and we're not. I don't

0:27:54.720 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>know when we're getting that. And oh, one other note,

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the only team with top ten title odds to not

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>be in one of these games is the Raptors. Now,

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's twofold. One is I think it is

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because the way television ratings work, anytime you do a

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Canadian team, it kind of it's not great for the

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>rating because you get such a boost from the home market,

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>but the home market when you do a Canadian team's

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not measured because it's not the US. So I think

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a small piece of it. But the other piece

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of it is whatever's going on with Kawhi. I think

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that if they put the Raptors on Opening Night, or

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>if they featured the Raptors in any of this, Adam

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Silver would be accused of either putting his finger on

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the scale or tipping his hand like about what penalty

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is or isn't coming. So I think they felt it

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was easier just leave the Raptors out of it. Plus again,

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>like the Raptors aren't great for television ratings purely because

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they're a Canadian market. All right, I think we covered

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>NBA Opening night really well. I still we've been on

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the show for a half hour. I think probably the

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>best thing we did was the Bill Simmons seatbelt stuff.

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if we can top that with our football discussion.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>But first support for today's episode comes from Square, the

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.239
<v Speaker 1>system powering around half the places I go. If you've

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>ever tapped to pay and thought, WHOA, that was fast fast,

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it was probably Square. Whether you're selling lattes, cutting hair,

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>running a back game, day spot, or managing a design studio,

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Square helps you run your business without running yourself into

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the ground. And right now, listeners can get up to

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollars off Square hardware when you sign up

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>at Square dot com, slash go, slash right that's s

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>q U A r E dot com slash g O,

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>slash WRI I g h T. Visit Square to get

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>started because the right tools make a all the difference.

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>There's just something about businesses that use Square. They feel

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a little more put together. Quick checkout, easy, receipts. Sometimes

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you can get loyalty points. People love that Squares the

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>platform behind the scenes of so many businesses you already love,

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and gives them one connected system to take payments, manage inventory,

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>run payrolls, send invoices, and track it all from one place.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Squaresn't just fast, It's smart, transparent, and built for the

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>way people actually run their businesses. No contracts, no hidden fees,

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>no complicated installs. Just tools that accept every major payment

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>method Tap, Chip, Apple pay, and Online. Let you see

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>sales and inventory in real time across every channel, and

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>help you access your earnings immediately with Square Banking. Want

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:53.719
<v Speaker 1>some real proof business Businesses using Square Online earn thirty

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>six percent more revenue on average. If you're starting a

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>business or running one that deserves better tools, Square helps

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you sell, manage, and grow without slowing down. Right now,

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you can get up to two hundred dollars off Square

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>hardware at Square dot com, slash go, slash right, that's

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>squ a r E dot com, slash Go, slash w

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>r I g HD. Run your business smarter with Square.

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Get started today, All right, de Monte, Let's talk a

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>little NFL training camp.

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh we are a couple weeks in the Chiefs training

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 2>camp and seen some pretty good things. Patrick Mahomes, a

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 2>full participant, says that he sometimes forgets about his knee

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 2>injury and just plays football. He seems to be connecting

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 2>very well with Cyrus Allen, the rookie wide receiver. There's

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 2>also been a couple of fights out of training camp.

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Kenneth Walker shot a takedown apparently. So what's been catching

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 2>your eye? Chiefs training camp?

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, So a few things. One is, listen, Patrick's

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna play as if he never got hurt. And there

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is I think because Patrick doesn't have He doesn't have

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the speed of Lamar, or the size of Josh Allen,

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or just the obvious crazy athleticism that we see from

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>certain NFL and NBA guys. People have underrated in their

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>head what just a sick, raw athletic specimen he is

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>because the dad bought or whatever. But this is a

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>player who his second year as a starter, got his

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>kneecap dislocated on the field and missed two games in

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a year they went on to win their first Super Bowl.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And then a player who in his fifty year as

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a starter, suffered a brutal high ankle sprain during the

0:32:54.440 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>first during his first playoff game, the Divisional round that

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>usually would keep guys out a month. He not only

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>missed zero games, but in the AFC Championship Game and

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl, you could argue the two biggest

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>plays of the game were Mahomes scrambles. And it's a

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>player who blew out his knee in December, and I

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like I can say this, I don't think he'd

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be upset with me. By March was texting me videos

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of him working out and making throws on the practice

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>field or on the training field, whatever.

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 2>It is.

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>The combination of the fact that he got the surgery

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the day after the injury, his insane work ethic, and

0:33:53.880 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>his wild natural athleticism is going to lend itself to

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>as fast as an ACL recovery as we've seen. And

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're in the midst of seeing. And so

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I my concerns for the Chiefs are not about Patrick.

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Now that is not to say the Chiefs doesn't the

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs do not have concerns. Obviously, for the fourth consecutive year,

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the entire wide receiver room is uh yeah, maybe yeah,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe Rashid Rice can play himself into shape after having

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>an offseason that was slightly derailed by having a knee

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 1>cleanup procedure and then a couple days later being sent

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to jail for thirty days. That was an ideal. A

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>first round pick. And Xavier Worthy, who got hurt the

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>first game, one of the first plays of the first

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>game last year and then this year in camp already

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>reaggravated that shoulder a little bit again or rec I

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if it's the same shoulder. Reaggravated a shoulder.

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>That's not ideal. Uh, this, as Demonse said, the breakout

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>guy of camp is fifth round rookie Cyrus Allen. Listen,

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's Pooka Nakua. We'll see. There's you know, there's

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a mid round wide receiver almost every year. They don't

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>always turned into Pooka. But that is a legitimate contributor immediately.

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's him. The Chiefs think it can be him.

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens think it can be Jakobe Lane. Like you know,

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the mid round wide receiver that looks great in training

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>camp is not an unprecedented thing. Seeing that player turn

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>into a real contributor as a rookie. That's a bit different,

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so the receiving room's a question mark. They spent the

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>sixth overall pick and trade it up to get mansword

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:59.919
<v Speaker 1>de Lane. He has been, you know, not in full

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>contact ever since a shoulder blade injury back in OTAs.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not as worried about him as others. I think

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll be back in the next couple of weeks. He

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>should be there for week one. But the secondary as

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>a whole is new and will be a work in progress.

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>What I think the Chiefs have going for them on

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that front as far as the secondary, because it's young guys,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it's guys who haven't played together, is they don't play

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what I would consider be a top flight quarterback until

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>mid October. Their first five weeks of the season are

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>bow Knicks, Daniel Jones, Malik Willis, and then whoever's starting

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>for the Raiders at that point Mendoz are Cousins. Then

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they have a bye. The good quarterbacks on their schedule

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>are after that and so I and again, bo Nicks

0:36:57.880 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>has proven to be a gamer and his clutch and

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>his and the Chiefs, but I just don't think he's

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be whipping the ball all over the field. So

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the secondary will have time to gel the question. The

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.919
<v Speaker 1>only other major question I have, then I'll talk about

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the things I have confidence in, is what is the

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>pass rush going to look like. They did not address

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>edge in the offseason much at all. They did draft

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>are Mason Thomas, so they hope he can be good there.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:35.919
<v Speaker 1>They just signed Emmanuel Agba, who's been in the league

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>ten years. He's a journeyman at this point. He did

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>win a Super Bowl with the Chiefs. But where they

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 1>are hoping they are going to generate the pass rush

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is Chris Jones. Alongside him Peter Woods, who sixteen months

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>ago people thought could be the number one overall pick

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of last year's draft after a pretty lackadaisical year at Clemson.

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 1>He fell all the way to the end of Round one.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs grabbed him and he has looked sensational sensational

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in camp, so they hope they can get the pass

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>rush there. And then on the other side of the ball,

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>where my confidence for the Chiefs this year really comes

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>from is I believe they have right now the best

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive line Mahomes has had in four years, maybe five.

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You add that to the fact that for the first

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>time since Mahomes' first ten games as a starter. They

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have a legitimate plus player at running back in Kenneth Walker.

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think they are going to Teams are gonna have

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to respect the run. They're gonna be able to stay

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the chains, and they're not going to be

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>asking Mahomes to do everything. The most important thing for

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.760
<v Speaker 1>any Patrick Mahomes team is having a solid offensive line,

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and the second most important thing is having a defense

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that can get off the field on third down. We'll

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>see if they have that defense, if they have enough

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>pass rush. I truly believe they have that offensive line,

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think Mahomes is gonna be a man on

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>fire this year, even if he doesn't have the receivers

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>necessary to be able to put up crazy numbers. But

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.439
<v Speaker 1>we saw him win a League MVP with his number

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>one receiver being Marquez Valdez, Scantling, number two being McCall

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>or Juju, number three being McColl the number four being

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Justin Watson, So I wouldn't put it past him. But

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to be more of a run

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>centric team and I'm fine with that. And then Eric

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 1>b Enemy after the True Family tragedy that he had

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago is back with the team, and

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he makes a real difference with this team. So for

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>all those reasons I am, plus the fact that I

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in the Chargers, and even though I have

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 1>grown to begrudgingly respect what Sean Payton is built in Denver,

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think Denver is gonna repeat fourteen wins.

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm bullish for Kansas City. But you win

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>six games, you miss the playoffs, you lose obviously the

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>air of invincibility, and you lose some of the bravado.

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You gotta go back out and earn it again. Schedule too, well,

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the schedule is light early and gets tough late. Yeah,

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so starting in week so, I'll just go through the

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>schedule quickly. Here I told you the first four weeks

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>home Denver, home Indy, at Miami at Vegas, then the bye,

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>then a tough three game stretch, and then a little

0:40:56.080 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>break home for the Chargers at Seattle, at Denver for

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 1>home for the Jets, at Atlanta, home for Arizona. Okay,

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's the first ten games, and then the final

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>seven games at Buffalo, at the Rams, at the Bengals

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>home for New England home for San Francisco at the

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Chargers home for the Raiders. Should we do a little

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:30.919
<v Speaker 1>win loss Chiefs way too early, win loss, go through

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the schedule.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you like that?

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, I'll do We can both do it,

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see what record will come up with.

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Home for Denver, Week one, Monday Night Football, Arrowhead on fire,

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>my homes back Chiefs. Remind Denver the division still goes

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>through them. I'll take the Chiefs there. They're one and h.

0:41:55.520 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 1>You're with me against your guy Daniel Jones. Home against

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the Colt Sunday Night Football. We're two and oh chalking up.

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, two and oh.

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Week three at Miami, Week four at Vegas. Holy shit,

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are four and oh going into the bye. Okay,

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Week five, out of the bye home Andy Reid off

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a bye against the Chargers. We're five and oh.

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll give that.

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Weeks that's Week six, actually not Week five. Game games

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>game five though, five and oh going into Seattle Sunday

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Night Football, Super Bowl Champs. First loss of the year.

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Yea five and one. We're five and one. Following Sunday

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Afternoon with Jim Nance and maybe Tony Romo on the

0:42:56.000 --> 0:43:03.280
<v Speaker 1>call uh in Denver after having beaten Denver in Week one.

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>We lose. We're five and two. We're five and two

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>home for the Jets. Week nine, easy work at Atlanta.

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>They're trailing in the fourth quarter. It looks stupid. Find

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a way to win. Get that win home for Arizona.

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Win through ten games. We're eight and two. Short week

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in Buffalo, Thursday night football on Thanksgiving. That is a loss.

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>That is an absolute lockstock loss. Loss at Buffalo. The

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>following Thursday at Los Angeles, that's the Rams. That's a

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>loss too, that's a loss to We're now yeah, we're

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>eight and four, little extra rest at Cincinnati, the Bengals

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>at that point, who knows what their team looks like,

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>who their coach is. That's a when. We haven't lost

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to Cincinnati since they claimed it was Burrowhead. We're nine

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and four home New England, maybe with some seating on

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the line. Monday Night football. That's a when.

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Take the Chiefs there.

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:44.280
<v Speaker 1>We're ten and four the home San Francisco. The Chiefs

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>have not lost to the Niners in Mahomes' career. It's

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>also now it's late December. God knows how many players

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the substation has eaten by then. That's a when they're

0:44:55.239 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>eleven and four. Week seventeen at the Chargers, the Chiefs

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 1>are eleven and four. The Chargers probably need the game

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to keep their wild card hopes alive. Gritty win, the

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Chargers win, the Chiefs go to eleven and five, and

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.240
<v Speaker 1>then the final game of the year against the Raiders

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>at home. The Chiefs win. They're twelve and five, twelve

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and five, four and two in the division. They are

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>undefeated at home. They are four and five, or they

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have five? Yeah, I think four and five do the

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Is this the year they have the extra Yeah, four

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and five on the road, twelve and five season, the

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:49.320
<v Speaker 1>two seed in the AFC. Yeah, again, it's in pencil,

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>not been. That doesn't sound unreasonable, right, That's not like

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:56.799
<v Speaker 1>a crazy Chiefs homer. Take those I.

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Could see them. I could see them winning one of

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 2>those tough ones in there, like that Chargers game there

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 2>at the end, and sneaky like losing.

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>To the Racers and the last absolutely right, I was

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna say they could. Certainly. I don't have any shock

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>shocking wins and I don't have any stupid losses.

0:46:15.600 --> 0:46:16.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know what I mean.

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Like they they they might have a dumb loss in them.

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But twelve and five, which.

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:27.640
<v Speaker 2>If Mahomes is healthy the whole year, what's the flour.

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes is healthy the whole year, the floor. This year's

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>ten wins again, I get it. Last year they won

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>six games. They even before Mahomes got hurt, they were

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in big trouble. I get that. There was a they

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:49.839
<v Speaker 1>went from you know, the year before last. They were

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>probably too lucky on those close games. Last year they

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>lost every single close game they played. They they were

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>beat up from the three straight Super Bowl trips. Like

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it was it was too much. All right, there's a

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football question here to month I do want to

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>address real quick.

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh so you're not a fantasy football guy, but would

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 2>you draft? Would you draft Josh Allen?

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I are they? Is this about Josh Allen or Cyrus?

0:47:17.040 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Allen Cyrus? Yeah, potentially. But here's I've got some intriguing news. I,

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 1>as you guys know, I'm known to play in a

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:39.240
<v Speaker 1>few high stakes poker games every now and again. Most

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of them I tell you guys about. Some of them,

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't because it's with I don't know, it's with

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a group of people that I know. It's not loan,

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's just it's just just people I don't

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>know if they're you know, publicly playing in these games always.

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I was in one of those games about a month ago,

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and somebody at the game just casually was like, and again,

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I know this might surprise you guys, but as well,

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes at these games people drink, so we're have you know,

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a few cocktails. And one of the guys at the

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:20.360
<v Speaker 1>games like, hey, Nick, you play fantasy football, don't you?

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:23.759
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, well, not, you know, believe it or not,

0:48:23.760 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not really. I bet the games. I root for the Chiefs,

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 1>like it's I haven't played in a while. And he's like,

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's like, oh, well, we have like a high stakes league,

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but we also have like a more fun, you know,

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>mid stakes league. Somebody dropped out you want in, and

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of in passed it. I was like, sure, yeah,

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>no problem. Smash cut to four days later, I vaguely

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>remember the conversation. I'm in a WhatsApp group chat. I'm

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I've now been sent the buy in details. I don't

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>know what their high stakes league is, but what they're

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>considering a mid stakes league. I would not consider a

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>mid stakes league, and I'm and I'm in. They've already

0:49:12.480 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>run their draft order, and so I'm going to for

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the first time in a decade, have to study up

0:49:21.280 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on fantasy. I'm gonna I'm not gonna talk about it

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on the pod because I don't think it's good content.

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh content, Yeah, Blue Duck brain Trust is here. I

0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the man so I, So I am

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be I. I have to be in on fantasy

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at least to a degree this year, So keep that

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>in mind. Speaking of fantasy stuff. By the way, just

0:49:43.440 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a little note because Demonte doesn't know this because he

0:49:46.200 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't here. I'm back on Cameo and the number one

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.400
<v Speaker 1>thing people are requesting on Cameo is for like me

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to announce their draft order. I also was so bad

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on Cameo when I signed up for eight years ago

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that the platform only allows like I can only have

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:09.720
<v Speaker 1>three requests in the queue before they turned me off

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like before, because they're worried I'm going to disapport people

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the way and the last time because last time, I yeah,

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>well last time I signed up for it, and like

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the second person who asked for a cameo was a

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 1>young lady who's like my boyfriend's in like a high

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:28.399
<v Speaker 1>school or college student, and he wants to do what

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you do. Can you send him some inspiration? And it

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:33.959
<v Speaker 1>was so no, it's going the other way that you think.

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I just I just messaged the lady back. I'm like,

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 1>just give me the kid's number. And instead of doing

0:50:39.239 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a threty five second cameo, I did a forty five

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>minute phone call with him and I was like this,

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't have the bandwidth for this. But

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to deactivate. So then requests just kept, you know,

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>coming in over the years, and I never responded to him.

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So but I'm back on there. The announcing the fantasy

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>football drafts is a big thing. I also do think

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that I'm at let me just look real quick. I'm

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>opening it up. Uh all right, yeah, we're I have

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>three open requests and one of them expires tomorrow, so

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I need to get I need to do one right now.

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they would like that? I don't know.

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Some of these are private. I the let me just

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>see what this is. Hold on now, the customers requests

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:36.520
<v Speaker 1>don't share them publicly. I'm not gonna, oh, wait, hold

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on a second. Uh No, I'm gonna do the I'm

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do them on the air. I that kind of ruin.

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Then then the person might be like, why not even

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 1>pay for it? I could have just gotten it. I'm

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna right, but people, the big thing on there

0:51:52.239 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is like announcing fantasy draft orders. That's why I was

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking of it all right. Before we get to the bills,

0:51:57.600 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile is proving that you don't have to over

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:02.879
<v Speaker 1>pay for great wireless. Unlock the savings with twenty five

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:06.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month Forever Unlimited Plan. It's a permanent price

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:09.319
<v Speaker 1>with no contracts and no priceikes. You can keep your

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:11.839
<v Speaker 1>phone and your number, but you save up to six

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars a year compared to the major carriers. Stop

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 1>overpaying and switch to a fair price at boostmobile dot

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:21.880
<v Speaker 1>com today based on average annual single line payment of

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 1>AT and T Verizon and T Mobile customers compared to

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:28.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve months on the boost Mobile Unlimited plan as of

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>January twenty twenty six. For full off. For details, visit

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>boost mobile dot com. All right, demante, let's talk bills.

0:52:38.239 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So the bills open their new stadium and got new jerseys,

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:43.919
<v Speaker 2>and it seems that the fans are not fans, saying

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 2>that the scoreboard is too small and the few as obstructed.

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen also threw four picks in front of all

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 2>the fans at training camp. Are the vibes already off

0:52:54.320 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to a bad start in Buffalo?

0:52:56.960 --> 0:52:59.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I think, listen, I think the new stadium's fine.

0:53:00.200 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I think the huge video boards can

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:10.439
<v Speaker 1>be overrated at times. And now, granted, I've never been

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to Jerry World, so I've never seen the inverse of

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:16.239
<v Speaker 1>that of what like the huge video board is, but

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a Western New York stadium. Also, on the obstructed

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>views thing, sometimes they don't actually even though there's a

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:30.720
<v Speaker 1>seat there, Sometimes the teams don't actually sell that seat.

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 1>So I do before I kill them for it. Like,

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if that's like a seat people actually

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:45.359
<v Speaker 1>are buying. I can't imagine that you're gonna charge you know,

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a PSL in the season ticket price for an obstructive

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:52.600
<v Speaker 1>view seat. But people are also some people are complaining

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>about the you know that it's not that covered. Listen.

0:53:56.440 --> 0:53:59.719
<v Speaker 1>They wanted an open air stadium, and they should. They're

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in that should be a part of their home field

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>advantage is that they are used to playing in the

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.000
<v Speaker 1>elements and other teams aren't, so I will support them

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 1>on that. It's you guys know how I feel about

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>that the Chiefs are no longer going to be in

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>an open air stadium, and so that part to me

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is uh. I don't want to say a non story,

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>but I actually think it is a story, and I

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's good that it's an open air stadium. I'm

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:28.759
<v Speaker 1>not as much of a Jersey zealot as other people are.

0:54:28.880 --> 0:54:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't get super excited about alternate jerseys or the

0:54:33.480 --> 0:54:36.719
<v Speaker 1>color rush jerseys or so I didn't actually have as

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:39.240
<v Speaker 1>big of a problem as some people did with these

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Bill's gray uniforms. But I'm also not really a Jersey guy.

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:47.200
<v Speaker 1>My and I talked to this on the TV show yesterday,

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so I don't have to spend a ton of time

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on it here. But Josh Allen, when he says, you know,

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he still hasn't fully gotten over basically his role in

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:09.800
<v Speaker 1>McDermott being fired once again was evidence that Josh Allen

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is more comfortable with Josh Allen taking accountability than so

0:55:16.760 --> 0:55:20.280
<v Speaker 1>many people in the media are comfortable with Josh Allen

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>taking accountability. It is so difficult for many of my

0:55:25.719 --> 0:55:31.800
<v Speaker 1>colleagues in the media to balance both of these objective truths.

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen is one of the best players in the

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL right now. Josh Allen at his best, at his

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>best is about as dangerous and about as good as

0:55:49.040 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>any quarterback who's ever played. Josh Allen is building, not

0:55:54.760 --> 0:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>has built, but is building a Hall of fame resume.

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen will likely likely one day get to and

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>win a Super Bowl. Balancing all of those objective truths

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with this objective truth. Every single playoff loss he's had

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:22.360
<v Speaker 1>since the thirteen Seconds Game, he played beneath his standard.

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:26.759
<v Speaker 1>And every single one of those playoff losses he had

0:56:26.920 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>ample opportunity, and many people thought going into those games

0:56:32.120 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a better team than his opponent, and he was not

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:42.840
<v Speaker 1>good enough. Both of those facts are true. Thirteen Seconds

0:56:42.880 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 1>game he played close to perfect football. It was just

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a bummer for him that the quarterback on the other

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>side actually did play perfect football. Or you can say

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:55.799
<v Speaker 1>they both played perfect football and somebody had to lose,

0:56:55.880 --> 0:56:56.640
<v Speaker 1>just got unlucky.

0:56:56.680 --> 0:56:58.319
<v Speaker 2>Fine.

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>The next year, he was a home favorite in the

0:57:02.600 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>snow against Joe Burrow and the Bengals, and they got

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>blown out and he didn't play well. The next year,

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he was a home favorite against what was supposed to

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be the weakest, most vulnerable Chiefs team of any you

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 1>know of the Mahomes era got the ball back down

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>three points in a game that he did not light

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 1>up the stat sheet prior to it. But that's okay.

0:57:38.160 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Have an opportunity to go, ball in your hands, and

0:57:44.640 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs or beat him in a

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>game where again he had one hundred and eighty yards

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:56.640
<v Speaker 1>passing in an eighty six passer rating, gets the Bills,

0:57:56.840 --> 0:58:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, right around decent field goal range, not in

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the end zone. Doesn't put a stake in the Chief's heart.

0:58:04.040 --> 0:58:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Even if they had. If Bass had made that field goal,

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 1>for the record, what would have happened in that spot

0:58:12.320 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 1>would have been Patrick would have gotten the ball back

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with a minute forty left in a tie game. But

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he misses the kick and they lose. The next year,

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's in his building. The next year, in a

0:58:29.440 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 1>game that he actually played pretty well in to his credit,

0:58:34.520 --> 0:58:39.560
<v Speaker 1>once again have the ball in his hands three and

0:58:39.600 --> 0:58:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a half minutes left, down three points field goal, forces

0:58:43.800 --> 0:58:50.480
<v Speaker 1>overtime touchdown, wins it, they get seventeen total yards and

0:58:50.520 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they lose. And then last year, after having three turnovers

0:58:55.280 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in regulation to go along with one of the worst

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:03.080
<v Speaker 1>turnover or anyone's ever seen at the end of the

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 1>first half, your defense in overtime gets a stop ball

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in your hand, go get three points and win, and

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he throws a pick and they lose the game for

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:33.920
<v Speaker 1>his fourth turnover of the game. So yes, it's true

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the defenses could have been better in these playoff losses.

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:47.120
<v Speaker 1>It is also true that, aside from the thirteen seconds game,

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen's in his playoff losses since the thirteen second game,

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I should say Josh has a passer rating in his

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>four playoff losses of eight five. In one of the

1:00:03.200 --> 1:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>games he was at home, they scored ten points and

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>got blown out. In the next game, he was at

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>home with the ball in his hands for a chance

1:00:11.720 --> 1:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to go keep Mahomes off the field win the game,

1:00:14.080 --> 1:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>they got zero points. The next game he had the

1:00:17.120 --> 1:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>ball in his hands with a chance to send Mahomes home,

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>he got zero points. And the next game he had

1:00:25.720 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball in his hands in Denver with a chance

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to move on to the AFC Championship game. He got

1:00:31.160 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>zero points, So all of those things can be true.

1:00:37.320 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh is way more comfortable excepting that the latter is

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>true along with the former, the media as a whole

1:00:50.320 --> 1:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is not. And I get a little vexed at the

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the commentary where they take Josh's overall playoff numbers,

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>which are exceptional, and conflate them with the fact that

1:01:21.440 --> 1:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>he is six and one with sixteen touchdowns and two

1:01:30.240 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>picks with a one fourteen passer rating in the wild

1:01:33.760 --> 1:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>card round and two and six with a ninety passer

1:01:43.120 --> 1:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>rating in the divisional and conference championship round. And again

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those games he was the thirteen second game

1:01:55.240 --> 1:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>where he was out of this world. So I I

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's the second best player in the league, and

1:02:03.640 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think one day he likely gets through. But some

1:02:08.280 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff, and this is where a lot of

1:02:10.080 --> 1:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the Josh Allen criticism is actually a media criticism. It

1:02:13.680 --> 1:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>has to do with like and I had a long

1:02:15.640 --> 1:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with Bill about this over the weekend,

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with like Bill Barnwell saying he'd that if the All

1:02:22.640 --> 1:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Decade team were released today, he'd be the quarterback on

1:02:26.000 --> 1:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the All Decade team. What what Like I I think

1:02:35.920 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he has a very strong argument. I think he has

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a strong argument that he would be second team All Decade.

1:02:43.640 --> 1:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's the physicals if you if you take out

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:50.400
<v Speaker 2>like all right, he hasn't won a Super Bowl, his

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>playoff success hasn't been great, but he is no but it's.

1:02:55.280 --> 1:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what all decade is. But but I

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the thing is like again, if I were doing

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>an All decade quarterback, there an All decade team right now,

1:03:04.960 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes is obviously the All decade quarterback and then second

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>team because they have first team second team. There's an argument,

1:03:13.440 --> 1:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I would argue Josh over Lamar for the

1:03:16.320 --> 1:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>second team. I would, but there's certainly a strong argument

1:03:21.240 --> 1:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for Lamar for second team, and some could argue if

1:03:25.000 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there were a third team, there's an argument for Stafford

1:03:28.040 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>there or Stafford for second team Lamar. It is easier,

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>far easier to make the argument that Josh Allen of

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenties has been the fourth best quarterback than

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the best. Again, I think he's been the second best probably,

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but for the All Decade thing, again, Mahomes doesn't even

1:03:49.280 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>get his first MVP or his first super Bowl or

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>his first time beating Josh in the playoffs. But just

1:03:56.880 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty twenties, Mahomes has one MVP, four trips

1:04:03.720 --> 1:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to the super Bowl, two Super Bowl wins, two Super

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Bowl MVPs, one first Team All Pro. Stafford has one MVP,

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>one first Team All Pro, one trip to the super Bowl,

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:23.439
<v Speaker 1>no Super Bowl MVPs. Lamar has one MVP, two first

1:04:23.520 --> 1:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Team All pros, no trips to the super Bowl. Josh

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>has one MVP, zero first Team All Pro, zero trips

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to the super Bowl. Just very hard to like and

1:04:34.480 --> 1:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>his Yeah, he doesn't have far like of the decade,

1:04:40.720 --> 1:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Lamar actually has the best passing stats, believe it or not.

1:04:45.720 --> 1:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>So I just I don't some of that stuff. I

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't totally follow, to be honest, I don't understand

1:04:53.120 --> 1:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the logic for some people. All Right, let's do Caleb

1:04:58.200 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Bears for a moment.

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Caleb and Benn are entering year two coming off a

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>very promising year, but you could say that that took

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>some lucky bounces for them to get there. Do you

1:05:07.440 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>think that Caleb Williams and Ben Johnson are legit or

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>is their luck involved?

1:05:14.640 --> 1:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, there's a lot of you know, the reasons

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>people thought Demon's the Commanders might regress last year because

1:05:22.760 --> 1:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of the way they won games in Year one certainly

1:05:26.280 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>can apply to the Bears, where there were so many games,

1:05:29.280 --> 1:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>including their playoff win against the Packers, where they just

1:05:32.320 --> 1:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>pulled it out of the fire or Caleb made some

1:05:35.120 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>magic and then you saw the Commanders they did regress. Now,

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>part of that was the Commander's dealt with brutal injury

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff with Jaden only playing seven games and an older

1:05:45.640 --> 1:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>team got hurt. Excuse me, sorry. So I do think

1:05:53.440 --> 1:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that the Bears won't be quite as good at the

1:05:57.200 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>end of games, and I do think think that the

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>defense won't force quite as many turnovers. I totally anticipate

1:06:08.680 --> 1:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that to be offset by the fact that I think

1:06:11.920 --> 1:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Caleb is going to make another huge leap, Like when

1:06:16.880 --> 1:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you saw Caleb go from being one of the most

1:06:20.720 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>sacked players in history to being one of you know,

1:06:26.640 --> 1:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>having lack of sacks, be one of the better spots

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on his resume from last year. That level of improvement

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>after year one of Ben Johnson, it just feels to

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>me like, Okay, what does he need to do it what's

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>his biggest thing he needs to improve on now? Not

1:06:43.800 --> 1:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>missing the layups, you know, improving the completion percentage from

1:06:49.080 --> 1:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it was sixty two as a rookie, it was fifty

1:06:52.040 --> 1:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>eight last year. Getting that up to sixty three sixty four,

1:06:56.480 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>which is a tenable number. That's the number one thing

1:07:00.000 --> 1:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gotta work on. I just believe you. I believe

1:07:01.960 --> 1:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you will. I think he is a superstar talent. I

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think he now has a head coach who could be elite,

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the Bears. I think that improvement

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>will be enough to offset the obvious regression that's coming

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on the turnover side and the end of game stuff.

1:07:27.120 --> 1:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>But I also think some of that end of game

1:07:29.360 --> 1:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff demons is the guy is dynamic, clutch and a playmaker.

1:07:34.520 --> 1:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Like he's going to be better in two minutes and

1:07:38.840 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>end of game situations than just your average good quarterback

1:07:42.600 --> 1:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because of his athleticism and escapability and creativity. He just

1:07:47.080 --> 1:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to be in fewer of those situations by playing

1:07:50.480 --> 1:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>better earlier in the games. He did.

1:07:56.560 --> 1:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Colin, I should reported that he lost some He

1:07:59.440 --> 1:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>lost some way. Uh do you think that's good or

1:08:01.760 --> 1:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>bad for him? I think it's great for him, I

1:08:03.280 --> 1:08:07.160
<v Speaker 2>don't see him getting injured. It's that much faster. But

1:08:07.200 --> 1:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that is a lot of weight.

1:08:08.400 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I got to see how he looks. Thirteen pounds is

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But we've seen you remember Lamarge weight fluctuating. Yeah,

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like he lost weight intentionally one year.

1:08:19.160 --> 1:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Then gained it back.

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't. I didn't thirteen pounds a lot of

1:08:24.840 --> 1:08:28.559
<v Speaker 1>weight to lose. I didn't think, like, I don't mind

1:08:28.680 --> 1:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>my quarterbacks having a little extra I will, yeah, I mean,

1:08:34.640 --> 1:08:39.519
<v Speaker 1>I will trade a fraction of a second of speed

1:08:40.520 --> 1:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for more durability. Now, maybe you know the losing the

1:08:44.960 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>weight can make you more durable in a different way.

1:08:47.640 --> 1:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>But I don't always look at NFL guys losing weight

1:08:50.720 --> 1:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>as a good thing. And so I I that was

1:08:55.280 --> 1:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see that in the rundown. I hadn't seen

1:08:57.280 --> 1:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>that news. So that actually was noteworthy to me, so

1:09:01.640 --> 1:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to speak. All right, I think I think that covers

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>it for today. I've got to go do Colin. You've

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>got to go do Colin. We've got work to do again.

1:09:16.439 --> 1:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>A few scheduling notes. We'll be back on Thursday as always,

1:09:21.880 --> 1:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the next couple of weeks when Demons and

1:09:24.000 --> 1:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I are off. Ty Butler and Damon Bruce are gonna

1:09:27.880 --> 1:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>be in hosting live shows, So the Blue Duck and

1:09:30.960 --> 1:09:33.799
<v Speaker 1>the Volume team are gonna be taking care of you guys.

1:09:35.479 --> 1:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna do great. I have no idea what they're

1:09:37.439 --> 1:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about. The only pointer I gave them was

1:09:41.920 --> 1:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that pointing out things they think I'm dead wrong about

1:09:47.439 --> 1:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is always good content. So I would imagine if you've

1:09:50.280 --> 1:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for some real chief skepticism on the show,

1:09:55.120 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know those, the last couple weeks of August should

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>be good. Subscribe to the channel. Helps us out on iTunes,

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify. Demansey, you look great. It's great to have

1:10:04.120 --> 1:10:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you back. Enjoy everybody enjoying the rest of their day.

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll see you guys on Colin in a little over

1:10:11.080 --> 1:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>an hour. Thank you to Boost, thank you to Square,

1:10:14.560 --> 1:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Volume, thank you to Blue Duck. Talk

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:17.639
<v Speaker 1>to you guys soon. What's right