1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,759 Speaker 1: Well in the world of media. Major piece of news 2 00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:05,320 Speaker 1: coming out this morning. Rupert Murdoch is stepping down as 3 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:08,960 Speaker 1: chairman of the boards of Fox and News Corp. Following 4 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:12,360 Speaker 1: a nearly seven decade career, and will become chairman emeritus 5 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:15,160 Speaker 1: of each company. His son, Lachlan Murdoch will become sole 6 00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:18,200 Speaker 1: chairman of News Corp and continue as executive chair and 7 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:21,639 Speaker 1: chief executive officer of Fox the company. So succession, big, big, 8 00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:24,600 Speaker 1: big time succession. In the real world, you need perspective 9 00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:26,320 Speaker 1: on a story like this. There's only one person to 10 00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:29,000 Speaker 1: go to in my opinion, and that is Brian Stelter. 11 00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:33,800 Speaker 1: He is a Walter Schorenstein Fellow at Harvard University. Most 12 00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:35,520 Speaker 1: of our audience knows him as a former chief media 13 00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 1: correspondent at CNN. I also know him as a former 14 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:40,199 Speaker 1: media reporter at The New York Times. So he is 15 00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:44,720 Speaker 1: the voice to go to. Brian. Rupert Murdoch defines media mogul, 16 00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:46,760 Speaker 1: So a pretty big move here today. 17 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:50,520 Speaker 2: It is, and in some ways it is surprising because 18 00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:53,800 Speaker 2: Ruper Murdoch always said that he would never retire. That's 19 00:00:53,840 --> 00:00:56,960 Speaker 2: what son Lachlin said about a decade ago as well. 20 00:00:57,040 --> 00:01:00,240 Speaker 2: Lachlan was clearly being groomed to be the success sir 21 00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:02,760 Speaker 2: that's been in place for a few years. Today just 22 00:01:03,120 --> 00:01:06,840 Speaker 2: affirms and confirms that Lachlan is the chosen son. But 23 00:01:06,959 --> 00:01:09,680 Speaker 2: all along Lachlan had to share power with his father, 24 00:01:10,080 --> 00:01:13,200 Speaker 2: and the idea was that Rupert would never retire. Well, 25 00:01:13,240 --> 00:01:15,319 Speaker 2: today is the closest thing to a retirement that we're 26 00:01:15,319 --> 00:01:17,880 Speaker 2: ever going to see from Rupert. His allies are calling 27 00:01:17,959 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 2: it more of a semi retirement. He is saying he'll 28 00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:24,679 Speaker 2: be very involved, watching, reading, responding and giving feedback. But 29 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 2: this is clearly a turning point moment for both News 30 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:33,240 Speaker 2: Corporation and Fox Corporation to have Rupert moving off the 31 00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:36,839 Speaker 2: board as a chairman, moving into an emeris emeritus role. 32 00:01:37,760 --> 00:01:40,319 Speaker 2: There is obviously no coming, no turning back from this. 33 00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 2: And now this cements Lachlan as the leader of both companies, 34 00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:46,560 Speaker 2: for better or worse. And I think there's a grand 35 00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 2: debate to be had about Lachlan's leadership, the pros and 36 00:01:50,280 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 2: cons and what it means for shareholders. 37 00:01:52,520 --> 00:01:54,280 Speaker 3: You know, there are a lot of businesses in which 38 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:57,279 Speaker 3: it doesn't really matter who's the CEO or the chairman. 39 00:01:57,360 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 3: If you've got somebody holding a big stake in the company. 40 00:02:00,600 --> 00:02:04,040 Speaker 3: He's still the boss or she's still the boss. Is 41 00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:06,520 Speaker 3: that the case here? Does Rupert Murdoch have to be 42 00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:10,000 Speaker 3: chairman and CEO to run the business or is he 43 00:02:10,080 --> 00:02:11,240 Speaker 3: still in charge of the family. 44 00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:13,560 Speaker 2: He's still in charge of the family, and he still 45 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:15,800 Speaker 2: controls the trust. And that is the part of this 46 00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:20,239 Speaker 2: that is very much like HBO's succession. The storyline on 47 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 2: succession is very much how it works in the Murdoch family. 48 00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:25,600 Speaker 2: There are a bunch of votes of the trust. The 49 00:02:25,639 --> 00:02:28,440 Speaker 2: trust controls both Fox and News Corps, and in the 50 00:02:28,480 --> 00:02:30,880 Speaker 2: event of Ruper Murdoch's death, there will be a battle 51 00:02:30,919 --> 00:02:34,799 Speaker 2: for control of both companies. Within the Murdoch family. People 52 00:02:34,840 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 2: who may know that the outlines of this for adult children, 53 00:02:38,960 --> 00:02:42,280 Speaker 2: two of whom Ruper James and Lachlan have been worrying, 54 00:02:42,320 --> 00:02:46,280 Speaker 2: have been battling for years. Also to women, Elizabeth and Prudence. 55 00:02:46,680 --> 00:02:48,919 Speaker 2: In the event of Rupert's death, they each get one 56 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:52,080 Speaker 2: vote and so there is no tiebreaker. There will be 57 00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 2: some sort of reorganization of the companies in the event 58 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:56,600 Speaker 2: of Rupert's death. But it's important to note in the 59 00:02:56,639 --> 00:02:59,400 Speaker 2: memo this morning he says he is in robust health, 60 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:01,800 Speaker 2: and he's been around the Fox studio a lot in 61 00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 2: Los Angeles this week, according to my sources. So I 62 00:03:04,760 --> 00:03:07,639 Speaker 2: think what we're seeing today is a sort of confirmation 63 00:03:08,080 --> 00:03:11,080 Speaker 2: that Lachlin is the chosen one of the father. But 64 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:14,200 Speaker 2: that does not mean that there could not be any 65 00:03:14,280 --> 00:03:16,000 Speaker 2: number of changes in the years to come. 66 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:20,240 Speaker 1: Brian, is there any reason to believe that with this 67 00:03:20,360 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 1: news today that there could be any change in editorial 68 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:27,119 Speaker 1: view strategy at Fox Right. 69 00:03:27,160 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 2: I think that's one of the most interesting questions. And 70 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:32,960 Speaker 2: the initial answer is no. Because Lochlan Murdoch is as 71 00:03:33,040 --> 00:03:36,000 Speaker 2: conservative and in some ways more conservative than his father. 72 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:39,000 Speaker 2: They have many of the same political views. They both 73 00:03:39,040 --> 00:03:42,280 Speaker 2: have some distaste for Donald Trump. Rupert Murdoch much more 74 00:03:42,360 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 2: critical of Trump than Lachlan has been, at least as 75 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,720 Speaker 2: far as we know, but both men, although critical of Trump, 76 00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 2: are definitely and defiantly conservative. I don't think we're going 77 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:55,640 Speaker 2: to see the brands change direction in a dramatic way, 78 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 2: but we might see And this is the question mark, 79 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:00,840 Speaker 2: and what I'm really curious about is what will Lachlan 80 00:04:00,920 --> 00:04:04,680 Speaker 2: Murdoch may be more free, not entirely freed of his father, 81 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:07,360 Speaker 2: but perhaps more free than he has been. Does he 82 00:04:07,480 --> 00:04:09,400 Speaker 2: have plans he liked to put in place, Does he 83 00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:13,320 Speaker 2: have business ventures or strategic shifts that he's not been 84 00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:15,880 Speaker 2: able to pull off because of his dad? You know, 85 00:04:16,080 --> 00:04:19,480 Speaker 2: we know the general direction is the same, right towards streaming, 86 00:04:19,760 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 2: toward getting Google and Facebook to pay for news corps properties. 87 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:25,480 Speaker 2: You know, all of that will continue, but you know 88 00:04:25,560 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 2: I will I guess are we going to see Lachlan 89 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:29,240 Speaker 2: emerge from his dad's shadow? 90 00:04:29,320 --> 00:04:29,480 Speaker 1: Now? 91 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 2: I think is an open question. 92 00:04:31,160 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 1: How do you think when we look back on this, Brian, 93 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:35,960 Speaker 1: I know you've got so much history and experience with 94 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:39,200 Speaker 1: the Murdoch family in the news corporation. How do you 95 00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:42,640 Speaker 1: think Rippert goes down in history? Certainly when I think 96 00:04:42,680 --> 00:04:45,600 Speaker 1: about you know, the media moguls, some to Redstone, Ted Turner, 97 00:04:46,040 --> 00:04:49,080 Speaker 1: you know a couple of others. John Malone, he's right 98 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:50,200 Speaker 1: there at the top of the mountain. 99 00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:53,840 Speaker 2: Yes. In moving us from a broadcast to a cable 100 00:04:53,839 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 2: and then a digital world. Absolutely, there are some accomplishments. 101 00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:59,200 Speaker 2: You have to give credit for the creation of the 102 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,120 Speaker 2: Fox broadcast network. You know, we wouldn't have the Simpsons. 103 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:04,480 Speaker 2: You know, in Family Guy, there's there's a lot that 104 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:07,440 Speaker 2: is so much that has Ruper Murdock's fingerprints. Of course, 105 00:05:07,440 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 2: that's all all right, Fox Bryan. 106 00:05:08,960 --> 00:05:11,800 Speaker 3: I mean, he's created an entire political movement. Doesn't it 107 00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:12,280 Speaker 3: feel like that? 108 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:14,479 Speaker 2: It does. We would not have a hat of Donald 109 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:18,320 Speaker 2: Trump presidency without Ruper Murdoch and Fox News. The polarization 110 00:05:18,440 --> 00:05:20,840 Speaker 2: of Fox News, but also the diversity of voices. You know, 111 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:23,200 Speaker 2: we could argue it any number of directions, but the 112 00:05:23,240 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 2: impact is very clear and spread out all around the world, 113 00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:29,480 Speaker 2: including in Australia, in the UK and other markets. You know, 114 00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:32,200 Speaker 2: there's a satellite network, a lot of that is a 115 00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:34,720 Speaker 2: part of Ruper Murdock's legacy. Now, I would say on 116 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:37,680 Speaker 2: the business front, he had impeccable timing selling most of 117 00:05:37,760 --> 00:05:41,280 Speaker 2: Fox to Disney about five years ago, you know, providing 118 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:43,720 Speaker 2: more firepower for Disney and the streaming wars, but also 119 00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:46,360 Speaker 2: getting out of some declining businesses. If you look at 120 00:05:46,360 --> 00:05:48,760 Speaker 2: the stock for Fox Corporation in the five years since 121 00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:50,680 Speaker 2: it was spun out, you know, it's down twenty three 122 00:05:50,760 --> 00:05:54,159 Speaker 2: twenty four percent over five years. News Corporation has fared 123 00:05:54,200 --> 00:05:56,760 Speaker 2: somewhat better, But if you're an investor in these companies, 124 00:05:56,920 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 2: you are not altogether pleased. By Ruper Murdock's performance in 125 00:06:00,320 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 2: recent years as these companies have faced headwinds of the 126 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:06,760 Speaker 2: Apples and the Disney's and the Googles, these much bigger 127 00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:10,000 Speaker 2: giants than now control the media and tech landscape. 128 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 1: And Brian that kind of calls into question again. A 129 00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:14,240 Speaker 1: lot of folks say, maybe Rupert was the smartest person 130 00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:16,600 Speaker 1: in the room selling to Bob Biger when he did. 131 00:06:16,839 --> 00:06:19,960 Speaker 1: What does Bob Biger and Disney do now? Because they've said, 132 00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 1: unlike Rupert, we're staying We're going to try to evolve 133 00:06:23,920 --> 00:06:25,640 Speaker 1: and compete in this new media world. How do you 134 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 1: think that plays out for Bob Biger? 135 00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:29,800 Speaker 2: Right? And to me, I think about it as a consumer. 136 00:06:29,839 --> 00:06:32,560 Speaker 2: How attached am I to Disney as a consumer? How 137 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:35,040 Speaker 2: invested am I? How much do I have to spend 138 00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:37,360 Speaker 2: to go to Disney World, Disneyland? How much do I 139 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:40,080 Speaker 2: have to pay for Disney Plus? And I think Disney 140 00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:42,920 Speaker 2: has its hooks in consumers better than any of these 141 00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 2: other media companies. That's why when I look at this landscape, 142 00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:49,640 Speaker 2: it's Disney and of course Netflix that would be the 143 00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:51,640 Speaker 2: ones that I would be wanting to bet on. That said, 144 00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:55,440 Speaker 2: the challenges are enormous he is saddled by assets like 145 00:06:55,480 --> 00:06:59,040 Speaker 2: the ABC television network that are no longer deemed desirable, 146 00:06:59,279 --> 00:07:01,719 Speaker 2: and how going to navigate out of that? You know, 147 00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:04,400 Speaker 2: to me, it's a very treacherous one two years ahead. 148 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:06,960 Speaker 2: To me, in ten years, I'd still rather be Disney 149 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 2: because they're still going to have their hooks in so 150 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:12,040 Speaker 2: many families that have to go meet Mickey Mouse. But 151 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 2: in that short term, that short term is so so murky. 152 00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:17,600 Speaker 1: Is there a future? What is the future for cable news? 153 00:07:17,600 --> 00:07:19,920 Speaker 2: Do you think for cable news? Well, Fox News is 154 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 2: the strongest of the pack. All of these companies are 155 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:26,280 Speaker 2: facing secular challenges. We know about the headwinds, but you know, 156 00:07:26,360 --> 00:07:28,840 Speaker 2: Fox News, for all of its faults, and I believe 157 00:07:28,880 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 2: there are many, it has a captive and loyal audience, 158 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:34,880 Speaker 2: almost like anything else in television or in media, and 159 00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:38,280 Speaker 2: I do see some challenges around the edges. Tucker Carlson's 160 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:40,880 Speaker 2: firing did calls a ratings drop, but most of those 161 00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:44,560 Speaker 2: viewers actually come back to Fox News. So if you 162 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:47,360 Speaker 2: were betting on a cable channel out there, you'd probably 163 00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:49,880 Speaker 2: be betting on Fox News again, for better or worse. 164 00:07:50,320 --> 00:07:52,800 Speaker 2: Right now, they're getting ready for their next GOP debate. 165 00:07:53,160 --> 00:07:57,320 Speaker 2: The Republican Party gave Fox the first two debates, not Newsmax, 166 00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:00,880 Speaker 2: not Rumbled, not some far right internet stream. Republican Party 167 00:08:00,960 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 2: still went back to Fox, so that alliance is still 168 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 2: very real and very strong and frankly, very profitable for 169 00:08:06,760 --> 00:08:07,560 Speaker 2: Lachlin and Rupert. 170 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 1: Brian, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate you 171 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:11,679 Speaker 1: giving us a few minutes of your time. Brian Stelter. 172 00:08:11,760 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 1: He's a Walter Schorenstein Fellow at Harvard University and a 173 00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 1: former chief media correspondent at CNN. Also a former media 174 00:08:18,640 --> 00:08:20,400 Speaker 1: reporter with The New York Times, so it certainly has 175 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:23,080 Speaker 1: the chops to give us his perspective