WEBVTT - Equities in Secaucus: TXSE, PSUS, GME

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. Hello and welcome to

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the Money Stuff Podcast. You're a weekly podcast where we

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about stuff related to money. I'm Matt Levine and

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I are at the Money Stuff column for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for Bloomberg News and an

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello Katie, Hey, Matt, you're very far away.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>I know this is the first time that we've done

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>this podcast where we're in different locations.

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're at Bloomberg. I am not at Bloomberg. I'm

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in a secret that I've been in my house.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>You're in your house, and I'm in my house because

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't actually leave this building.

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about today, Katie.

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>We're going to talk about Texas at Potential Stock Exchange

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 2>coming to Dallas. We're going to talk about Bill Lackman,

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>of course, and then we're going to talk, of course

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>about Roaring Kitty, also known as Keith Gill.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's give into it Equities in Dallas.

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Equities in Dallas, the Texas Stock Exchange. That was a

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 2>big splashy report from the Wall Street Journal this week

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>that this company would like to start a new stock

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>exchange headquartered in Texas.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>It's very exciting.

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I guess it is. So there's so many ways that

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>we can attack this. Let's get on it head on.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 2>In that there's been a lot of attempts to sort

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of launch exchanges. As you go through in many columns,

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the long term stock exchange, we have the members exchange,

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>we have the investors exchange. I feel like it's kind

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>of easy to launch an exchange and get to one

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 2>to two percent share. What's interesting about this is that

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 2>this is political. This is a politicized stock exchange, even

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 2>if they're trying not to be. The introduction of Texas

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like makes it political.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean there is like this sort of movement

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in American business politics to move stuff to Texas, right,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean you see it with Elon Musk trying to

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>move his companies to Texas from Delaware. There's the sense

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that like a lot of corporate rules are set from

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, New York and Delaware, and that people who

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>don't like those rules might find a more sympathetic audience

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in Texas. I don't know that that's exactly relevant to

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this company, but yeah, they're sort of making noises about

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the listing standards. You know, most companies are listed on

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>either the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAC, and there

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>are rules about corporate governance that apply to listed companies

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and those stock exchanges. And I think the people starting

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this exchange, or at least hinting that some of those

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.239
<v Speaker 1>rules are either too onerous and expensive or they're too

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like woke and left wing, and so they will offer

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a different set of rules in Texas.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 2>The SEC still has to approve their listing rules, so

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>they can't be like too crazy and out there.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think like some of what's happening here is

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like there's this notion that Nicia and NASDAK accept the

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>listing rules. I'm like, that's not exactly true. They sort

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of do it with pressure and input and approval from

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. So Nice and nas listing rules don't differ

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>from each other all that much because it's not like

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Nicia and NASDAG are out there making crazy decisions. It's

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like kind of done in concert with the SEC. So

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>there's only so far that the Texas Stock Exchange can differ.

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>So I have a free idea for the Texas Stock Exchange.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I was waiting for your reaction.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sure they'd pay you a lot of money

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for that idea, Katie.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 2>But well you haven't heard, so let me let me

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 2>lay it on you. So, like I said, you can

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 2>get to one to two percent share. But as we've

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>seen with some of these other upstart exchanges, it's really

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>hard to attract listings. That is a nut that has

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>yet to be cracked. What the Texas Stock Exchange should

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 2>focus its efforts on is getting Musk to switch Tesla

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 2>from Nasdaq to the Test Stock Exchange and be like

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the anchor big name listing.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a really good idea. I think they should pay

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you for that idea. I mean, it is a really

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>good idea. Right. It's so hard to get listings because

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>most companies don't think that much about their listings anymore. Right, Like,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're listed on the top tier of NASDAC or

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you're listed on the top tier of Nice, it's fine.

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you're not getting that many perks from switching from

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>one to the other, and it's like an administrative hassle

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's confusing, So why would you switch? Right? Most

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>companies think about listings only really when they're going public.

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're going public. It is such a high

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pressure situation. It is so important to get it right.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you list on some untested exchange and you're

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the first company listing on that exchange, there's that small

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>potential for catastrophe, and you really really really don't want

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that when you're going public. So if you are going

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to compete for listings, you do have to start, probably

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with already public companies, and you want companies that are

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting it in doing weird stuff and not afraid of

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the like weird stigma of being the only company listed

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>on a weird new exchange with lower listing standards. And

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that all does sound like Tesla.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I feel like the risk of catastrophe isn't

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 2>necessarily going to deter Elon musk Away.

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I think the rest of the catastrophe is much

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lower for an already public company, right, Like the rest

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of catastrophe is mainly for an IPO. Right If you're

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>already public, it can only go so wrong on your

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>first day of trading, Like the worst thing that happens

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is like takes a little extra time to open you

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for trading. But yes, also I agree that even if

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>there were a risk of catastrophe. Elon Musk would say, great,

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>sign me up. So I think it's a good idea, Yeah,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not to step on your territory. But like, I don't

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think that the other listings that they would want to

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>compete for are for ETFs, right, because I assume that,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're an ETF is sure you have

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ETFs. It's a little bit less higher

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>stakes each time to like pick a listing exchange and

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I assume they're angling for that product. I don't know.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you take a look, I mean at their

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>various press releases that's in there that they do plan

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>to compete on exchange traded product listings through lower fees

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>ETF listings. This is, you know, something that I'm actually

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 2>reporting out right now. But I am curious how much

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>of a business and how bigger of a business that

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>might become for exchanges because you think about the current

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 2>IPO market and there's very little going on relative to

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the halcyon days of like twenty twenty one

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 2>or whenever the last big rush was. But I mean

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 2>there are hundreds of ETFs that launch and list every

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 2>single year, and I mean those ETFs. They pay an

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 2>initial listing fee and then they pay annual listing fees,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>so I mean that continues to hum along. It was

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 2>just so fascinating to see that press release that that

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 2>specifically is an area that they want to target, because

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 2>right now it's NASI, it's NASDAC, it's also Cibo, and

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Cibo for example, has.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Been taking bath Exchange is not a major listening venue

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for public companies, but it is for ets right. Yeah,

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the easiest space to compete in.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>It's the second biggest venue, so we'll see. But aside

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 2>from just listing fees, which I mean, who knows. But

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to transaction volume, you think about black

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Rocks Bitcoin ETF, which is now, since it launched in January,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>the biggest bitcoin ETF in the world. It does a

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>lot in trading volume, it's listed on Nasdaq. I mean,

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 2>it's done much better than some of the recent IPOs

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 2>from this year. So you have to imagine the ETF business,

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the ETP business for these exchanges. It's a nice cushion

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 2>from what's going on in IPO land.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and if you're starting from scratch, it does seem

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like an easier thing to pursue. Now do you think

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, as you said, it's like a lot

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of exchanges have started and gotten to like one to

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>two percent of market share and then kind of plateau there.

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>My impression is that's not the worst business, because the

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>economics of exchanges are very weird. And one thing that

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of happens is that if you are a big

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>broker or a big electronic market maker, you're sort of

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>obligated to connect to every exchange because you have obligations

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to get your clients the best execution, and so you

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>have to know whatever exchange is doing. So even if

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you sort of say, I don't think the Texas Stock

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Exchange is ever going to have almost ever going to

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have the best price on any stock, you can't be

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sure of that. So you have to like connect and

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>check their prices before you trade somewhere else. And so

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you're paying them for like connections and for data fees,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and so anyone who's like a certified official national stock

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>exchange can get some revenue from just like charging for data.

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's this interestingly regulatorily protected business model that when

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you start an exchange and you go out and pitch investors,

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to like tell a story about how you

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>know we're going to be the anti woke exchange. But

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like some exime, once you have the exchange, that doesn't

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>matter what you do. You can just collect the data fees.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Sounds pretty good, so.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>As you actually intend to like displays nice and Nasdaq

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>as like one of the major listening venues, which I

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>think is much much much harder to do.

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I feel like I've done a good

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 2>job of not exposing my bias thus far.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't say one other thing about the Texas

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange. Two other things. When is the phrase equities

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas, which of course comes from liars poker, where

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it is used as an insult because the worst trainees

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in the solive and training program were sent to trade equities, And.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I missed that reference is.

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh did you?

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, let me tell you.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I had a reader email me literally. I wrote the

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>newsletter about the stock Exchange and the section header was

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>equities in Dallas and someone replied saying, I can't believe

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the section header for the Texas Stock Exchange wasn't equities

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas. I was like, wait, it was just read it.

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>People were so keen to come up with that joke

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on their own, that they were like emailing me that

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>joke after I already read it. I didn't come up

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with my own either, but someone else told me. But anyway,

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Equities in Dallas like a Great Wall Street insult, which

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>is now like the actual business model of the Texas

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it will soon be a compliment. Perhaps.

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I think Dallas has sort of self consciously reclaimed its

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.319
<v Speaker 1>statue as a financial center and been like, no, no,

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not Equities in Dallas anymore. Now it's good. But

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I want to say about this exchange

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is that I wrote that, you know, it's all electronic, right,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>No one really stands on the floor of stock exchange

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>except like TV reporters now. But you know, I wrote

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>that their computer for trading stocks would be in Texas,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and they actually told me no, they will have a

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>data center and somewhere in Dallas. But they also have

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a data center.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 2>In Secaucus, as they should.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>As they should because all US stock exchanges sort of

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be in northern New Jersey because it is

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all this interlinked web of trading venues where like everyone

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>trades on every venue and you sometimes have to do

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage trades where like a stock is trading at one

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>price on BATS and another price on NASDAIK, and so

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to do the trade between them. To do that,

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to move data. And it takes longer to

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>move data over long distances than it does over short distances.

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And this business is so like competitive and so focused

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on speed that people locate their computers in the data

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>center with the extan computers. And the idea of sending

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>your data all the way to Dallas would be weird.

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>It would be so far away, it would takes so

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>long for your data to get there. So of course

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Stock Exchange will actually have computers in secaucas

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>next to all the other stock exchanges computers.

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I love that that the beating heart that's a financial

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>world is in northern New Jersey.

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Incas right, It's like suburban Northern New Jersey is like

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>where everything is.

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 2>I just my brain like is cooked. I can I

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 2>can feel it like sizzling and frying.

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, because now we're going to talk about Bill Lackman.

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Bill Lackman, Bill Ackman, There's a lot to talk about

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>with Bill Lackman.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>There usually is, but now we're talking about his closed

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>end fund. We're among other things.

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the only thing I was referring to. I am

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 2>so excited to talk about his closed down fund plans,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 2>specifically in the US. And then there's also the IPO.

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, they go together, right, Yeah, he's got a

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff gone up.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Where do you want to start? Perhaps the IPO, I

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So they're link so basically starting last week of

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the Welsher Journal reported and then there's been some good

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Plomberg flo up. There's this package of Bill Lackman news.

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>So Bill Lackman runs Pershing Square Capital Management, which is

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund firm, has been a hedgehund firm. Now

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>most of its money is in the form of a

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>closed end fund in Europe called Pushing Square Holdings runs

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen billion dollars, not all of which, most of

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>which is in Persian car holdings. US investors they kind

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of can buy Pershing Square Holdings, but not really. It's

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>like bad for taxes and they can't market it. So

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly European investors. But Bill Lackman is in New

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>York and the fund mostly invests in the US. Companies,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and so he wants to open a closed end fund

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in the US that would do the same thing. It

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>would buy US companies, but it would be much more

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>convenient for US investors and he could market it to

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>US investors. But then last week the journal reported that

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>he's also planning an IPO of the management company of

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Pushing Square, so the management company itself would go public,

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>probably like at the end of next year or something.

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And in the lead up to that, he sold the stake.

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>He sold like ten percent of the management company to

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>some private investors for a billion dollars, so valuing the

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>management company at ten billion dollars, which is really quite

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>rich for a hedgehome firm that manages eighteen billion dollars.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>To value the management company at ten billion is pretty rich.

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>But then also Bloomberg reported that he's planning to raise

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for the US closed und fund,

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>which helps explain the valuation of the management company. He's like, oh,

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going to run like a lot more money. But

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, that's a sort of ambitious target

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to raise. So that's kind of where the news is.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, starting with the ten and a half

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar valuation. That's something close to sixty percent of

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 2>its assets. And according to the Wall Street Journal, they

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 2>reported that Acman told investors to compare Pershing Square to

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Brookfield Asset Management, Blue Oul, et cetera. But then you

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 2>take a look at how they're valued. And this is

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>something that Aaron Brown pointed out in Bloomberg Opinion that

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>typically they have market capitalizations that are like fifteen to

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>eighteen percent of their assets. So I mean, comparing them

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 2>to that peer group, it's still quite rich. But I

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 2>guess if you are planning to quadruple assets or something,

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>it makes a little bit more sense.

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like my doneb math is like you can

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>charge some fees on your assets, right, and like what

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of fees can you charge your Blue Ol or

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Pushing Square or somebody like that. You can charge you

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do one or two percent of assets, right, you know,

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little more if you're making big performance fees.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're charging one or two percent of assets,

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you capitalize that at like ten times, then the value

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of the managing company is ten to twenty percent of

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>assets under management. So sixty percent is really big, right,

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're charging six percent of assets per year,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>then you can get that kind of valuation. But then

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're judging six percent of who would

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>pay you six percent of ethsets to run their money?

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean I think that the idea is

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're comparing them to these other asset managers, but

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you're baking in a lot of growth in the very

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>near future, which is ambitious, right, Blue Owl and Brookfield

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>also want to grow assets under management, but like Pushing

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Square is gonna double assets under management in like six months. Okay,

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe I do think I think that's like a little

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>bit fascinating about Pushing Square's business model, and like why

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they think they can get a premium valuation is it's

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so simple, right, Like they have one investing team, they

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>buy like twelve stocks, they hold them for the long term.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>They're all like liquid public US stocks, so that there's

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>plenty of capacity. And so like Blue Owl, you're paying

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot for a lot of people that go out

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>on the road and like find companies and try to

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>make direct loans to them, manage the credit risk, and

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like the loans are constantly like maturing. You have to

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>find new loans. Your money is in funds that have

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a limited life, and so you have to like go

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>raise new funds and all this stuff. And Bill Ackman

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is like, I just have like this one permanent fund

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>or two permanent funds now, and I buy twelve stocks

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and like that's it. That's the whole business.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's really I love that. I'm fascinated with this

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 2>investing style just because it is so simple.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Say I'm exaggerating a little bit. He has made a

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of money doing like asymmetric derivative trades, where like

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he'll pay like a little bit of money for CDX

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>indexes like just before COVID hits, and like make one

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred times his money on these derivative trades. So he's

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>like putting some of that into the product too. So

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a little hedge funny, but from day to day

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it kind of looks like buying twelve stocks.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I tend to think of those as

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 2>just hedges and thus don't think of them very much,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 2>but maybe I should be thinking about them more.

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, they are hedges, but like you know, if you

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>buy the S and P five hundred, you're not getting

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>those hedges, right, This is true. What you're getting here

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is exposure to large cab us stocks plus some hedging

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for bad situations, which is like you know, which is

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a hedgehun product.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I do really just find the simplicity, though, really appealing,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's something that's coming a little bit back in vogue.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>If you think about what's really hot in the ETF

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>world where I live, you have all these income products,

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>these very options overlay products, and then you have just

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 2>super concentrated equity ETFs that are launching with greater and

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 2>greater frequency because I don't know, it feels like a

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 2>while we swung into at least in the ETF world,

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>like these basically closet indexing type active funds. Now people

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 2>are just going super active because they found out that's

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 2>actually a really hard way to beat the benchmark. But

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean it kind of always mixes my brain up

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit that, like, you have a hedge fund

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>that is going public, and I know there's a few

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 2>examples of that, but if you're an equity investor in pershing,

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you're just buying a stock with a

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 2>ton of key Man risk and that doesn't make a

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 2>ton of sense to me.

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>You definitely are. I mean, it's interesting because like you're

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>making two baths, right, What is the business model of

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Pershing compared to other hedgehunt firms? Is very appealing because

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>all their money is really locked up, you know. It's

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the Pershing Squareholdings closed on fund in Europe and then

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>this anticipated fund in the US, which are permanent capital vehicles,

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like the money can't go away and their revenue comes

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>mostly from management fees. Right, So, like investors are very

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>nervous about paying for incentive fees for hedge funds because

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>like the fund has a bad year, it doesn't earn

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 1>any incentive fees, right. Like, if you're buying a management

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>company that makes a lot of money on incentive fees,

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you value those at kind of a low multiple because

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't be sure they're going to be consistent from

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>your dear Krishan Square is like you're gonna make all

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>its money on like two percent management fees. So it's

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>very consistent revenue on very locked up money. So on

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, it's like a very safe bet, right.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing you're buying is like Bill Ackman

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>as a person, right, and you're buying like his ability

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to go raise twenty five million dollars, which again, is

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like really ambitious. Right again, Like every other investment firm

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>would love to double their assets next year, but like

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ackman is selling his ability to double his assets

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to investors, right, And I agree, it's a lot of

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>keymand risk. It's like there's like kind of a memestock

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>vibe to it, where like you're buying this guy who

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is like a financial celebrity, who's on Twitter, who's on television,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>his personal life is in the news, you know, like

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a guy who has a lot of retail appeal and

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>who's like very explicitly marketing that as part of the

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>business proposition. So yeah, like that's what people are investing in,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is like his ability to like monetize that celebrity to

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>raise a lot of money. But yeah, like what if

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he gets bored? His number two is not the same celebrity.

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>If you're not getting like a super institutional asset manager,

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you're getting like kind of one guy, yeah, which again

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is cheap compared to like you know, you're picking twelve stocks.

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>That sort of cost structure is fairly lean, but like

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you are relying a lot on him continuing to do

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>it and his celebrity continuing to work.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit more about close end funds,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 2>the close end funds specifically, you mentioned the European one.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>The European one is really interesting because it's actually done

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 2>super well. It's returned fifty percent over the past year.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 2>But the discount, it's trading a twenty five percent discount,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 2>and I have to say, I don't super understand why.

0:19:57.640 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you look at some of these UNI

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 2>ceas and other ones, I sort of get it with

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 2>performance like this, I don't quite understand why it's trading

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>it's such a big discount.

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't fully understand the European tax situation. I've been

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>told there is some tax overhang and that's part of

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the discount. I'm not sure if that's true. I think

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that the traditional explanation for closed them fund discounts is

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>often fees. Right, Like you know again, it has like

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a fairly small portfolio of fairly long term holdings and

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.239
<v Speaker 1>fairly liquid stocks. If you look at that portfolio, you

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>could replicate it. You just buy the twelve stocks. You

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>would get the discount buying those twelve stocks, but you

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>also wouldn't pay Pershing Square any fees for owning the

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve stocks, right, you just own the twelve stocks directly,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So the fees eat into the value of the fund

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and explain part of the discount. The other thing that

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I think sort of explains the discount is just investors inventation. Like,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>as I said, it is hard to buy Pershing Square

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>holdings if you're a US retail investor. It's got some

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>weird tax attributes and they can't market it, and it's

0:20:58.640 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>just like you know, you can like find on your own,

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a thing that a lot of US

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>investors buy, and it's otherwise like very US centric, Right,

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like a guy who's a celebrity in the US,

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>who tweets in the US and who invests in US companies,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So like who's going to buy Pershing Square holdings in Europe?

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>It's like open to European investors, but it's otherwise targeted

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>very much to the US. So I think that's part

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of it, is like it's just not the most attractive product.

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And clearly pushing squares hope is that when they do,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of the same product. Pushing square US

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is not that different from pushing scare holdings, but when

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>they do that product in the US, and like market

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it very heavily to US investors. They will get a

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of US investors, and it will not trade at a discount.

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>If you ask them, I think they will hope that

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it will trade it a premium because people will be

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so excited to Bill Ackman manage their money that they'll

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>pay more than the net ass and value for the fund.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 2>But we'll see, it'd be great to ask Bill Ackman that.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 2>But to that point, I do wonder once the US

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 2>fund launches, who would buy the European fund other than

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Europeans of course. I mean, if you think about the

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>difference in the fees. Right now, the European one charges

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 2>a one point five percent management fee and a sixteen

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 2>percent performance fee. You think about what the US one

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to charge, and it's just a two percent

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>management fee. So it's free for the first year. Yeah,

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>so it's clear what the better product is.

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, like, part of the reason I think

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that they originally did this fund in Europe is that

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you can't really charge performance fees on a publicly listed

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>goes on fund in the US, and so that's why

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this will not charge performance fees. But also like you

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>think about it with the IPO, like, performance fees are

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>bad for public investors in the management company, right, Like

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't describe a lout of value to those performance

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>fees because they fluctuate. So if you're thinking about taking

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>your management company public, you're less excited about the performance

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>fees and you're more willing to just sort of do

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it for a flat two percent because that's what investors

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:47.719
<v Speaker 1>will pay for.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 2>So if you think about the actual Pershing Square IPO,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's not happening for a while, but the

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>US closed fund could become a reality pretty soon, like

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>in the next couple months or so.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you, as a kind of seroquas and funds,

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think they will raise twenty five billion dollars?

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Actually, there was an interesting lot of money.

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of money. But I mean Bloombery Intelligence

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 2>had to report out this week and didn't downplay that

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:16.719
<v Speaker 2>number at all. I mean, you think about the size

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>of some of the most retail friendly ETFs, and I

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 2>think twenty five billion could be possible. Yeah, I mean

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 2>think about Kathy Wood for example. She doesn't manage that

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 2>much money now, but I mean she got in the

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 2>forty billion dollar range. Also, for all the shade that

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>we just threw on the European Clothes End Fund, it

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.439
<v Speaker 2>has fifteen point three billion dollars in Europe, so I

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 2>guess twenty five billion dollars in the US. Putting it

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>through that lens looks very realistic.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think that's right. I mean, manage

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, and he has a good track record,

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, why I shouldn't be able to raise

0:23:50.800 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars? So I want to do a

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>weird transition here, Yeah, do it. At some point in

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the last few months, people started sending me Instagram ads

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bill Ackman's investing masterclass or his investing newsletter or

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>something where you'd sign up and it's like, I'm Bill Ackman.

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I picked all these great stocks, and I can teach

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you how to pick all these great stacks. People kept

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>sending me these being like, look at what Bill Ackman

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is saying. These are obviously fake, Like these are completely

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously fake, Like.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 2>His eyes were yees.

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>No, no, they were real pictures of Bill Ackman taken

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Internet and used to market a fake Bill

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Ackman newsletter product. I didn't click on them, so I

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the product is. I don't know like

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>what the scam is exactly. But someone is like, I'm

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>going to like pretend that Bill Ackman is starting an

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>investing newsletter. I'm gonna get people to send me their

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>credit card to like sign up for this newsletter. And

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>they bought Instagram ads, saying I always thought these were

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like super obvious fakes. I think I actually saw it

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like they were served to me on Instagram. But then

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>people send them to me, but they're just they're fake.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>This week I have gotten several people sending me Instagram

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>ads for Keith Gill oh right kiddy starting an investing

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>masterclass or newsletter or what have you. I'm also fairly

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>confident those are a fake. And the reason I'm confident

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>those are fake is that anyone, almost anyone, not literally anyone,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.719
<v Speaker 1>but almost anyone who's selling you an investing class or

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 1>like a stock picking newsletter, you should ask the question,

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>if they're so good at picking stocks, why aren't they

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>just making a lot of money picking stocks? Why do

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they need my forty nine ninety five for this investing newsletter?

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And like Bill Ackman, Yeah, it's like a billionaire running

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a hedge funt. He doesn't need your forty nine ninety five.

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>That's why you know that Bill Ackman investing ads are fake.

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But Keith gil he has like three hundred million dollars

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>trading game stop stock. He does not need your money.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>He is not starting an investing newsletter. He is, however,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>going on YouTube to do a live stream to talk

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>about Gamstop at noon on Friday, June seventh, which is

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately after we record this podcast, before we release this podcast.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So for the time you hear this, Keith gill will

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have said something newsworthy that we haven't talked about.

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 2>So here's an instance where time just really becomes a concept.

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know, right this podcast is meant to

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>feel timeless and unchanging, but in fact we're recording it

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>before Keith gill s has some stuff on YouTube and

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>releasing it afterwards.

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, all we can definitively say about the.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That was a transition. Now we're talking about Keith kill.

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 2>That was actually I throwd at that needle quite while

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:42.679
<v Speaker 2>I was a little nervous.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting, like there's the two that I've seen,

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like fake investing newsletters have been Blackman and Keith kill.

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there was one for Warren Buffett years ago and

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I just missed it. But those are the guys.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, those are the guys to do it. I'm really

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 2>interested to see the Keith Gill live stream at twelve pm.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 2>All we can totally say about it right now is

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 2>that it will put to bed whether or not the

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 2>posts that we've been getting from Roaring Kitty have actually

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 2>been Keith Gill, whether it truly has been him posting, can.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You think a step back? So I don't know, Keith

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Gill should be interested. Yeah, we've said one it before,

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's the guy who started the GameStop frenzy in

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like January twenty twenty one. He was like a guy

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>who got long game stop and said I like the stock,

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and he would do these like four hour YouTube videos

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.719
<v Speaker 1>about why he thought GameStop was an undervalued business. And

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>then when GameStop had a huge rally in January twenty

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, he was like the sort of patron saint

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of that and got a lot of media attention. And

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 1>then last month he tweeted some weird stuff he treated

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>like a cartoon, and then he treated some video clips

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and GameStop stock came just roaring back a huge rally.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Then he like posted on Redda his trade account back

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one. He would like periodically post his

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>game stop positions and how much money he had made

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and how he was holding them. And he posted that

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>last week, and it was hundreds of millions of dollars

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of game stop stocking options. And at one point Bloomberg

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>calculated that he had a portfolio worth like three hundred

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>million dollars of game Stop And so he's back, as

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you say, he's gonna do a video thing where we'll

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>see him, and unless AI has advanced tremendously, we will

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>know if Keith Gill has actually been on this account,

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>which I think we already do. Like I think there

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>were a lot of rumors when he came back, because

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he was just tweeting inscrutable stuff. They were rumors that

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>like someone had like bought or hacked his account and

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>someone else was doing this and it wasn't really him,

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and this was all like some sort of weird fake out.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that now we know that's not true.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Because there was a Wall Street Journal story about e

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Trade getting increasingly nervous about his trading because they worry

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that it's market manipulation. And if he trade is worried

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>A had his trading, they do KYC. They know who

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is trading it, right, And so if they know what

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>his portfolio looks like and he's posting that portfolio, then

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like that means this is all real, this is actually

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>his Twitter actually has read it, and now we'll see

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>him tomorrow on YouTube.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Can I tell you how tired I was when I

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 2>saw those headlines that you Trade might kick him off.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I know it's just conspiracy theory fodder. It's reasonable that

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 2>people would make conspiracy theories out of that, Like didn't

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 2>anyone at e Trade watch dumb money?

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean to be clear, Like that's the debate

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they're having. They're like, on the one hand, we worried

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's committing market untilation. On the other hand, we're

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>going to get so much flak if we kick him

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>off for a platform. So I mean like, ordinarily, if

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you're like some guy, some retail trader might be committing

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>market reutilation, but we're not sure that the charges would stick,

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You're like, yeah, who cares kick him off? What does

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it hurt you? But you don't want to skate too

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>close to the regulatory line if you're a big broker dealer.

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>But with Keith Gill, if you kick him off, it's

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a real firestarman. So I think you

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>know so far they haven't. By the way, the controversy

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>about him being a market manipulator, I find it's a

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>little strange.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, I was just going to say, I'm so

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 2>drilled and grateful to be doing this podcast with you,

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 2>because on Twitter after he posted some of those screenshots,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I saw a few different tweets to the effect of

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I won't be saying how I feel about this until

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Matt Levin tells me how to feel. So tell us

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 2>how you feel about market manipulation and whether Keith Gill

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 2>is manipulating markets.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love him, like how many I said.

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I love it?

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder I want to quote a few things.

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>There's another journal article about like the gist of it

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is like everyone is running around like chickens with their

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>heads cut off because they don't know if this is

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>market maniplation and they don't know like what the rules are.

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So they quote Matt Staller, who's a sort of left

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>wing journalist and market analyst, saying this is obviously market manipulation.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe we're even having this conversation. If market

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>manipulation law doesn't handle this, then what's it for?

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Which is like, what is it for?

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like to me, like market inguilation is like

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if you move a stock by doing something deceptive. And

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing about Keith kill is that he's definitely moving stock.

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely like when he tweets, the price of game

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>slop stock goes up, and it's definitely like not for

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>any fundamental reason, you know, it's definitely like his fans

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and his followers are buying the stock because he's tweeting

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. But none of them were deceived, right, none

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of them are being lied to. There's no deception guy on.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it's manipulation. I think it's just

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>this mysterious new thing. It's like coordination, right, Like people

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>are having fun with their friends. There's like the social

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>elements to like all buying game Stop together, and when

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Keith Gill tweets, that's the thing that makes everyone like

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>go buy the game Stop together. It is strange. It

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is a way of moving stock prices that has nothing

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with the fundamental value of the cash flows.

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But marketmunification laws about using deceptive devices, and there's no

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>deception going on here. It's weird if you're like a

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>fundamental investor who wants to buy game Stop at a

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>reasonable price or wants to be able to short game

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Stop if he gets too high and or worried about

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>being blown up, you know, it's like bad for market efficiency.

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But the stock market rules are not about market efficiency.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>They're about honesty, and like usually those things kind of

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>work together, and so if you're not lying about a stock,

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the stock will probably come to the correct price. But

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Keith Gill has discovered this mysterious new thing where like

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you cannot lie about a stock but still make the

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>price not be correct. So I don't know. I don't

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's market mutilation, but I understand why people get

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>mad about it.

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I also from that same article, I want to quote

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>another complaint. So Jake Clayton, who's through the chairman of

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the sec the Journal, says that he suggested in an

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>interview that Gil should publicly answer questions about his trading.

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Such questions include is he working with anyone else? How

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>did Gil an individual investor finance his purchases of game

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Stop shares? Has he hedged any of his bets on

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>game Stop? And what are his ultimate intentions? And it's like, yeah,

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand why you want to hear all that, but

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he actually doesn't have any obligation to do that. There

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>are actual disclosure rules about who has to disclose what

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about a stock, and he hasn't triggered any of those

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>disclosure rules. He's not an institutional investor, he's not above

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the stock. He's like getting there, you know,

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>He's just like a guy buying stock. There's no rule

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that says he has to answer your questions about his intentions.

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like driving people crazy because it is not covered

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>by the rules, and everyone has this intuition that there's

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>something wrong about it. But it's technically fun boy. Is

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that not legal advice?

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, in his own words, he just likes

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>the stock.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, he hasn't said maybe he'll say that on this

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>YouTube lave Ship. Yeah he said that like two years ago,

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know if he likes the stock now, if.

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 2>His intentions have changed. I'm curious to see how many

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 2>more headlines like this week get because after he posted

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>on Reddit that screenshot that showed his stake, Bloomberg News

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 2>reported that Andrew Left, the founder of sitch On Research,

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 2>pleased a new short bet against Game Stop, immediately just

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 2>went back and shorted it. I have to imagine he's

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 2>having a pretty lousy end to his week.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I'll tell you, if you're shorting game Stop, now,

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not like a fundamental bet, that's not like, oh,

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like I've looked at the you know, business model, and

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is overpriced, right, if you're shooting

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>game Stop fundamentally, what you're betting on, I think is

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that Keith Gill will get diminishing marginal returns for his tweet, right,

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Like what you're betting is like oh yeah, like when

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he first treated that, everyone's like, oh excited he's back.

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>When he treated his profits, everyone's like, oh he's excited.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>He's back. And if this YouTube video does even better

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:11.959
<v Speaker 1>than the treats, then like, yeah, Drew Left is gonna

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>get blown up. Although I think he's said that he's

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>scaling back his short bets on Campstop, he's going to count.

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, like you know, if Keith Gill continues to

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have this wild power to move the stock every time

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he does some stuff. He'll keep doing more stuff, and

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the stock will keep going up and the short sellers

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>will lose a lot of money. But I think there

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>has to be some sort of bet on fatigue here

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, well, you know, like eventually people will

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>stop doing this.

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's right, but I mean so

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 2>at two points there, the first one on diminishing returns,

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 2>that makes a lot of sense to me. And yet

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I still keep getting surprised, and it still keeps popping

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 2>double digits out of nowhere. And I probably would have

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 2>said that in like twenty twenty one as well. And

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 2>here we are in the Year of our Lord twenty

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. To your point, yeah, go on, no, you

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 2>go no, I won't know.

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>He's doning a great job. I don't want to use

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the word manipulate because I just it's not recopilation. But

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>he's did a great job of slow rolling this out

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to like maximize impact. He like did that weird treat

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and the stock jumped, and then like he waited a

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>while doing other weird tweets where you're like, is it

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is it? What is he saying, what does it mean?

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And then he revealed his position, which is enormous and

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>people were very excited about that and that moveless talk,

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and now he's going to go on YouTube and like

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>he was originally like more than anything else, like a

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube guy, like he would do these long, in depth

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>discussions of game stop and so he'd come back in

0:35:28.480 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>other formats, and now he's finally rolling out that. You're like,

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 1>if he were you know, designing this to maximize his impact,

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>he's done a nice job of tripping it out and

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>also like it's maximized as impact, but also like kind

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 1>of maximizing pain for short sellers because I like Keith

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>gilld tweets and the stock gaps up and you're a

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>short seller and you're like, ah, this can't last, and

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 1>you short it and then like the next day he

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>does like another thing. He's done a nice job of

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.840
<v Speaker 1>making life hard for short sellers. I don't know, you

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>want to take a step back to appreciate like he

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>made almost three hundred million dollars basically trading one stock.

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not in video, like the company hasn't

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>done anything in the last three years, but in the

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>last like three years, he went from kind of like zero,

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>from like regular kind of middle class person amount of

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.720
<v Speaker 1>money in the stock market to three hundred million dollars

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on one stock through some combination of being really media

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>savvy and being really like stock market savvy and kind

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of being legally savvy. And it's just amazing, No wonder,

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>he has a fan base. Our friend Mary Child said

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>to me that he's the first self made person in

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the history of the world. Like that's kind of true.

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Like he's really kind of gone from nothing to like

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>immense wealth through a very odd in particular set of skills,

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and like, you know, no wonder people are interested in

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing what it's trading.

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Does you know? Again, we're recording all of this before

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.240
<v Speaker 2>the live stream, So I hope that he doesn't reveal

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 2>himself to just be a villain and in the pocket

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 2>of someone tomorrow on the live stream after you said

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 2>all those nice things.

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Look, there's all sorts of ways this could end a dability, right,

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Like how could you go to this kind of the

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>case that his three hundred million dollar wealth has been

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>extracted from you know, his fans the stock market, like

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>someone's on the other side of those trades and like

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>where does this ultimately end up? Right? I mean, like

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the last Game Stop rally, a lot of people lost

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, a lot of people made a

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, including Keith Kill. If you piled into

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Game Stop stock at the top and then lost a

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, Like, maybe it's not completely irrational for

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 1>you to blame Keith Kill for that. Maybe, like in

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>some people's eyes he is a villain, but like, I

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, he's made a lot of money Amazon

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and Cleverness, I think. And that was The Money Stuff Podcast.

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levian and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot com, and.

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 2>You can find me on Bloomberg TV every day between

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 2>ten to eleven am Eastern.

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>email to money Pod at Bloomberg dot net ask us

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a question. We might answer it on the air.

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Ana Maserakus and

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Moses Adam.

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Brandon. Francis Nenham is our executive producer.

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 2>And Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts.

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>back next week with more stuff