WEBVTT - The Practice Babies 

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Missed in History Class, a production

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. Hello, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy B. Wilson and I'm Holly Fry. Before we

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>start today's episode proper, we have kind of a I

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>think special thing coming up. It's unlikely at this point

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to do any touring this year.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>That we had some things on the calendar that had

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>been scheduled that we're you know, one off appearances in

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>places those have been canceled. I think the only one

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that we actually announced on the show was we were

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>planning in July five show at the Adams National Historical

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Park in Quincy, Massachusetts, UM that has been canceled. One

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of our favorite things about these appearances is getting to

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to people who listen to the show and answer

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>questions about the show. So we were thinking, since we're

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>not getting to do any kind of touring this year UM,

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>that we would have a Q and A episode with

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with questions submitted by listeners. So we are going to

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 1>be taking questions specifically for a Q and A episode

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>up until June twelve, UM, and then we will record

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>an episode based on those questions shortly after that. And

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>put it out as an episode of the show. So

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>if you have questions for us about episodes that you've heard,

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>or about how we do the show, or just random

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>things that you're curious about, send them along. We're at

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>History Podcast at I heart radio dot com. Um. We

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of course we'll still be having questions for listener mail

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>parts of the episodes and stuff like that. This week

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a special thing that will put out as an episode

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the show. Uh So I kind of excited about that.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And now on to to today's actual episode. I learned

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>about these practice babies when researching the episode that we

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>just had about home economics, and my response was, like,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>what practice babies? When I was in school, home at

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>classes had parenting lessons that I'm putting in quotation marks

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that were about looking after a decorated egg or a

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sack of flour. At my school, this was not really

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>about parenting, though. It was more about trying to discourage

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>teen pregnancy by trying to simulate the stresses of having

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>an infant using an egg with a face drawn on it.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Um practice babies, though we're not eggs. They were living,

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>breathing babies cared for by college seniors who were temporarily

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>living in home ec practice houses, and in most cases

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the babies came from orphanages or child welfare agencies, and

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>then after their time as a practice baby was over,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in most cases, they were usually adopted. This whole idea

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>tends to elicit pretty strong emotional reactions, especially from folks

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>who are part of the adoption triad or people who

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>have some experience with foster care or institutions for children,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and the reasons why most of these babies were in

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>institutions in the first place are definitely bubbling. But as

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with the incubator side shows that we talked about on

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the show late last year, this is a case where

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>something that seems just clearly unethical and bizarre by today's

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>standards at the time was actually probably doing more help

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>than harm, and something we should note before we get

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>started in talking about this. The history of adoption in

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>North America includes a long established pattern of placing Native

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>American First Nations and other indigenous children with white families

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>as a tool for assimilation and cultural eradication, and it

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is possible that this happened in practice baby programs at

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>some point, but that is also not really documented. If

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that was part of this story, at least not in

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the material that we had access to. Another important thing

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to note is that throughout the decades that we're talking

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>about today, children of color were removed from their families,

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in place and institutions more often than white children were.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And there were definitely hull MAK and I mixed programs

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that had practice houses at schools for black students, as

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>well as home programs that were racially integrated, But overwhelmingly

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the documentation that's available to us is centered on programs

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>where the babies and their caregivers were or appeared to

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>be white. So since we're going to be talking about

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>some social issues related to adoption, we would be remiss

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to not mention all this and kind of pretend that

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it didn't exist. But based on the information that we

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have issues that are specific to indigenous communities and to

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>transracial adoption seemed to be outside the scope of today's episode.

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>The trend of practice babies as part of a home

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>economics practicum ran alongside the development of home economics as

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a field. It was something we just covered in our

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>earlier episode on the Bureau of Home Economics, but it

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>also ran alongside changes to orphanages and to adoption and

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>foster care. In the United States, most of the nation's

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>orphanages were built in the nineteenth century as immigration in

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>an urbanization, and other social and economic factors led to

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge increase and how many children were experiencing homelessness.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Orphanages were attempts to move these children out of poor

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>houses and prisons and other facilities that were really designed

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>for adults. Many of these children did have at least

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>one living parent, but for a variety of reasons, the

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 1>family couldn't or didn't care for them at home. Poverty

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was also seen as a valid reason to remove children

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from their parents custody conditions. In nineteenth century orphanages often

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>were not much better than the prisons and workhouses that

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they were replacing. At best, they tended to offer very

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>little in the way of care, education, entertainment, and stimulation.

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>By the early twentieth century, the United States was trying

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to move away from orphanages and to focus more on

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>placing children with foster families. The nation also started to

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>move away from using poverty alone as a reason to

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>institutionalized children, but it wasn't until the nineteen forties that

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the number of children living in orphanages really started to

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>drop in terms of changes to the foster care and

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>adoption systems. Really, for all of human history there have

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>been babies and children who were raised by somebody other

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>than their birth parents, So fostering and adoption have always

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>been part of the human experience, but in terms of

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>formal laws and processes, these didn't really start to develop

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States until the middle of the nineteenth century.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The first modern adoption law in the United States was

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>passed in Massachusetts in eighteen fifty one. Other states followed,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>with the details of these laws really varying from state

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to state. Research into outcomes for children who had been

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>fostered or adopted didn't really start until after the first

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>practice baby programs were established. The first major outcome study,

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>titled How Foster Children Turned Out, was published in nineteen

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, and it wasn't really until the nineteen sixties

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that people started doing major research into connections between adoption

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and foster care and mental and emotional health. And by

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the time that work was being done, the last practice

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>baby programs were already ending. There was some research into

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>how being a practice baby affected children's emotional and mental

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>health and development, and we'll talk about the specifics of

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that research later on in the show, But especially in

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the later years of these programs, those kinds of studies

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>became a lot harder to carry out, in part because

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of an increasing focus on keeping adoption records completely sealed,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of practice baby programs didn't fall up

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on children's later lives, not because they just didn't care

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>about the children's future well being, but because that information

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>about the families they had been placed with and where

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>they were now that was sealed. A lot of this

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>has to do with stigma, especially within the white middle class.

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Becoming pregnant out of wedlock was increasingly stigmatized from the

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties through the nineteen fifties and six teas. By

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the twentieth century. If someone was pregnant

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and unmarried, they were likely to spend their last months

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of pregnancy somewhere out of sight, like in a maternity

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>home or living with a relative from out of town,

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and then to be pressured, coerced, or outright forced into

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>an adoption. Infertility was also stigmatized, so sealed adoption records,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>which were often inaccessible even to the children involved, allowed

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved in the whole process to keep all of

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this secret. Of course, this is not at all how

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's recommended to handle adoptions today, and this practice made

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it incredibly hard for people who were adopted as babies

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to get any information at all about their birth family

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or their health history. So the babies who were part

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of these home economics programs generally had some kind of

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>trauma in their backgrounds before becoming a practice baby. Maybe

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>their parents had died and they were placed in an orphanage,

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>or their parents were alive but just financially could not

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>care for them. Many were born to unmarried parents who

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>had little to no say in the adoption decision. In

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>article in the Journal of Home Economics, Catherine h Read,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>head of the Department of Family Life in the School

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of Home Economics at Oregon State College, stressed that babies

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>should be placed in practice houses only if these kinds

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of circumstances suggested that it would be in their best interests.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>College programs generally kept these babies identities confidential. Students generally

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>knew them by first names only, although they often gave

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>them temporary last names that varied from school to school.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>So for example, babies at Cornell University were giving the

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>last name Domicon, which was short for Domestic Economy. Eastern

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Illinois State Teachers College had two teaching houses, and babies

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>were given last names for which house they were living

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in north or South. Since everything was confidential, students didn't

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>generally meet the babies families or follow up with them

0:09:58.040 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>later on in their life. And we're going to talk

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>more about these practice houses and the babies in them

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>after we first have a sponsor break. Broadly speaking, home

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>economics programs in the United States had two types of

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>houses that were part of their instruction and practice. At

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the high school level, there were cottages where students could

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>learn and practice, but where they did not generally live

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>full time. These were everything from converted classroom spaces inside

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the school building which had been made to look like

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>little homes, or a standalone cottage that the school either

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>owned or rented. Colleges, on the other hand, had houses

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or apartments where upper level students actually lived for a time.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>In the words of Dr Louise Stanley, chief of the

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Home Economics, quote, it is a house in

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>which groups of students organized as a family group live

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for varying periods and apply their home economic training to

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the solution of the different housekeeping and homemaking problems as

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they arise. Stanley recommended that each state college have at

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>least two practice houses, one outfitted like a home in

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 1>a city or town and the other replicating a house

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in a rural district. The first documented practice houses were

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.359
<v Speaker 1>built in nineteen o four. One was at Stout Institute

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in Wisconsin, and the other was at the Tuskegee Institute

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in Alabama. By nine twenty, there were seventies seven practice

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>houses at colleges and universities around the United States, as

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>well as some number of apartments that served the same purpose.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Some schools bought or rented an existing property, and others

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>had a practice house custom built. For example, at the

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Hampton Institute, the funding for the house came from a

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>gift for the school, and the structure itself was built

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>by the school's trade school students. The exact details of

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a student's time in a practice house could vary, but

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in general it tended to involve six to eight senior

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 1>who usually lived in the house for six to ten weeks.

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>Faculty or sometimes graduate students were on hand to instruct, supervise,

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and evaluate the students who were expected to cook, clean,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>serve meals, make budgets, and just generally manage the household.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And in the words of Alba Bates, head of the

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>School of Home Economics at North Dakota Agricultural College, quote,

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the big thing which we expect of the students and

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>upon which we check them is their family relationships, such

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:32.359
<v Speaker 1>as the spirit of cooperation, helpfulness, generosity, kindness, and tolerance

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of the mistakes of others. At some schools, these family

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>relationships practiced in the house involved caring for a baby.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>This infant care was usually described as mothercraft, and mothercraft

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>as a specialization was something that was introduced into American

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>home economics programs following the establishment of the first mothercraft

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>schools in England that happened in nineteen fourteen. As had

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>been the case with homemaking in general, the home economics

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>movement can that her child rearing to be a worthy

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>vocation that deserved study and refinement. Home economics approached homemaking

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>through science and mothercraft did the same with parenting. The

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>mothercraft approach was very precise and regulated, with parents trying

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to establish set schedules for babies with regular times for meals,

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>bass play, and sleep, and a diet that was carefully

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>measured and managed. By the late nineteen teens, it was

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>generally agreed that practical study of mothercraft was critical to

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a home economics degree. Raising children was a huge part

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of a typical homemaker's work, so home economics programs that

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>had no hands on experience with childcare were just incomplete.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't just about completeness for its own sake, though.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>A ninety article in the Journal of Home Economics noted

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that under the Smith Hughes Act, vocational contact was required

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for people who were going to teach home economics, So

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if you were going to teach mothercraft, you had to

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have some vocational contact in childcare in your own education

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in order to be able to do so. Schools approached

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>this hands on component in several ways. Some had daycare

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>centers and preschools on or near campus, which were staffed

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>partly or entirely by home economics students. Others brought infants

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and older children from the community to campus for supervised

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>play and workshops, or they arranged for groups of students

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to observe and interact with babies and children in their

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>own homes out in the community, and some, as we've said,

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>brought babies to live full time in their practice houses.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>The same nineteen twenty article outlined the first documented practice

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>baby program in the United States, which took place at

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the University of Minnesota in nineteen eighteen and nineteen nineteen.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>The university's to home management houses each had one child

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in residence in the spring and summer quarters, and although

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it became common to place children in practice houses as

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>young as possible, and this pilot program the babies were

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Russell aged thirteen months and Earl aged twenty one months,

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>both of whom had been living in baby homes since

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>they were born. In this program, each student in the

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>practice houses acted as a so called baby manager. For

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>one week. She was on duty with the baby's care

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>between six and eight each morning and four thirty to

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>six each night. The baby manager was generally in charge

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and was responsible for the baby's laundry and for keeping

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>up with documentation, including recording all of the day's tasks

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and monitoring the baby's progress. The other three or four

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>students rotated through the rest of the day's childcare tasks,

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>depending on how their own class schedules and commitments worked out.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>There was one brief window each weekday when all of

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the students were in the same class, at which point

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a faculty member or a home X student who wasn't

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>living in the house would come and fill in. Both

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Russell and Earl arrived at the university with some health

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>issues that were associated with their time in the baby home.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Both of them were described as listless and underweight, with

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>anemia and ricketts. Russell also had exema, but at the

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>end of their two quarters in the practice houses, they

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>had gained weight, they were showing fewer signs of nervousness

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and distress. Students reported that the babies became more active

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and more engaged. Their rickets had been resolved, and Russell's

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>exema was also under control. The A doctor who examined

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>both babies at the end of their time at the

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>university noted quote, the improvement in the condition of these

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>children speaks highly for your cooperative motherhood. Other programs followed

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>from there pretty quickly. Survey found that of the seventy

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>seven practice houses operating in the US, sixteen had a

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>child in residence. By the time these programs were phased

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>out about fifty colleges had brought babies into their practice houses.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Although this episode and our earlier one on the Department

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of Home Economics has focused on the United States, there

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>were practice houses with practice babies elsewhere as well. For example,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the University of Manitoba had thirty three practice babies in

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>its home economics houses between the years nineteen thirty and

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty. The details of exactly how these programs worked

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>varied from school to school. For example, by the mid

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties, Iowa State College had six practice houses for

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>home economics students. Babies stayed in one of the houses

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>for a quarter, and each group of eight students lived

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the practice house for half of a quarter. Each

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>student had primary care of the baby for about four

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to five consecutive days, so by the end of each quarter,

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>each baby had been cared for by sixteen women in sequence.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>From the beginning, there was some debate within the home

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>economics field about whether this was an effective way to

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>teach mothercraft and whether having so many caregivers could harm

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the babies in some way, But in the nineteen fifties,

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>public opinions started to shift as well. In nineteen fifty four,

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Estern Illinois State Teachers College became the focus of a

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>huge national controversy surrounding a practice baby known as David North,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>who was only the second baby brought to the school.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ruth Schmallhausen had been hired at the college's Home

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Economics department in nineteen fifty and the school's first practice

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>houses came into use in nineteen fifty two. They had

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>actually been authorized before World War Two, but because of

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the war, they were delayed. When the schools started looking

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>for practice babies, Smallhousen went to Dr Roman Haremsky of

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Illinois State Child Welfare Division for help. However, Harensky

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>had some concerns about this program's potential impact on the children,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and he refused to be involved in this, so Schmallhausen

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>worked directly with families in the community. Eastern Illinois State

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Teachers Colleges first practice baby was Margaret Anne North, whose

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>mother had been referred to the school by the Salvation

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Army Home in Chicago. Margaret Anne's time as a p

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>actus baby seemed to have passed without raising any eyebrows,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but in nineteen the college brought in David North, who

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>had been born pre term and whose mother was unmarried.

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>She had arranged for the school to take care of

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>him temporarily so that she could return to work, also

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:21.360
<v Speaker 1>arranging for visitation rights and regular updates about his progress. However,

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 1>after an article about the program ran in a local newspaper,

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Haramsky was livid, both because of his concerns about it

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and because the school had done all this without his involvement.

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>He was also concerned that there was no father figure

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>involved in baby David's life. He ordered Child Welfare Services

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to investigate. During all this, David's pediatrician, Dr William Kahite commented, quote,

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the infant boy is in excellent physical condition. He has

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>received physical care which is far superior to that given

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the best Foundling homes and in most American homes. Furthermore,

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>he has loved, which is the basic fact in the

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>healthy developmental environment. This child has benefited tremendously from the

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>good start he is receiving and will show it for

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>years to come. On January twelfth, ninety four, this became

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>a national news story, with most of the coverage about

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it being pretty negative. Reporting focused on the evolving fields

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>of psychiatry and mental health. And on concerns that women

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>were abandoning their so called natural role as wives and

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>mothers in order to join the workforce. Time magazine ran

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>an article about this with a photo of two students

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>feeding David, together with the caption quote David North and

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>mother's heaven knows how many neuroses. Ultimately, Child Welfare Services

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>found that since this had been arranged privately between David's

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>mother and the school and there was no adoption involved,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't within their jurisdiction to intervene. Eventually, the furor

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>died down and David finished his time as a practice baby,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>and then a new practice ba be Amy Norse, arrived

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in the fall of n with no public outcry. The

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>furor over David North was tied to an evolving understanding

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of how an infant's early life affected their later mental

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and emotional health and development, which is one part of

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>why this practice ended. You will get more into that

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>research after a sponsor break. As we noted earlier, opinions

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>were divided about how best to teach practical mothercraft in

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>American home economics schools. I mean that that debate went

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>all the way back to when this subject was first introduced.

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>People questioned whether bringing babies into practice houses was the

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>most practical or effective way to teach, and they questioned

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>whether it was harmful or exploitive. Along with things like

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>budgets and logistics and other practical issues. These concerns were

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the reasons why not every home economics program

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>sought out babies for its practice homes. Articles and primary

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>source documents from these programs are full of anecdotes about

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the experience from the students and teachers points of view,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and not all of them are positive. Some students talked

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>about feeling overwhelmed or even terrified when they were expected

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to care for a baby. In articles about her novel

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>The Irresistible Henry House, author Lisa Grinwald mentioned getting an

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>email from one home economics graduate who quit her program saying, quote,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't treat children this way. But other anecdotes are

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>more positive and documents from the time students described the

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>programs as beneficial to their education, everything from giving them

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>practical mothering experience to strengthening their connection to their own mothers,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to the baby's presence in the practice house transforming other

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>domestic work from a drudgery to a joy. A nine

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>article in Successful Farming quotes an instructor from the University

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of Minnesota as observed ring that the program allowed students

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to do kind of a trial run of the often

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>frazzled first few weeks of parenthood in a more controlled

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>setting with some experienced supervision. Anecdotally, the program could be

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>beneficial for the babies as well. Archival documents from programs

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>all over North America described babies brought into the programs

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from institutions where they had been deprived, babies who were malnourished,

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>with conditions like anemia and ricketts as we mentioned earlier,

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>who just weren't very active or expressive, and who seemed

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>disconnected from the people around them, and then after their

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>time in the practice house, the babies were placed with

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>adoptive families, now apparently happy and healthy. There are numerous

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>reports of former practice babies being particularly sought after by

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>families who wanted to adopt because they were considered to

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 1>have been treated with the most up to date and

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated care. In the nineteen fifties, though, the general concerns

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that babies might be harmed by all this started to

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>be reflected in some psychological research. Most notably, psychologist Henry

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Harlow did a series of experiments with baby reesless monkeys

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineteen fifties. He separated the monkeys from

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>their mothers and then placed them in enclosures with sort

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of surrogate mothers, one of them made out of wire

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and the other covered in a soft terry cloth. He

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of observations from this setup, like if

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a monkey was in an enclosure with both types of

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>quote mothers and Harlow put a scary wind up toy

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in there, the monkey would go to the soft mother

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for comfort, not the wiry one. This was true even

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>if the wire mother dispensed milk and the soft mother didn't.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And the monkeys that had no soft mother in their

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>enclosure behaved differently than the ones who did. They would

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>scream or throw themselves on the floor if something scary happened,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>while monkeys with a terry cloth mother seemed more resilient

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and able to soothe themselves. Harlow's work folded into a

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>body of research that increasing He suggested that a person's

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>experience and infancy, including love, comfort, security, and stability, affected them.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Later on, some of this research involved children who had

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>been raised in institutional settings where they were truly deprived

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of care and affection, and it quickly became accepted that

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>an infant whose early months were severely deprived would show

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 1>signs like listlessness, poor sleep, and failure to maintain weight,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>even with a diet that seemed like it would be sufficient,

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so just a general failure to thrive. And older children

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>issues included an inability to make close friendships or other

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>strong relationships, lack of concentration, and a range of mood

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and behavioral disorders that came to be called attachment disorder. Naturally,

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>people started to wonder whether these conclusions could also apply

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to practice baby programs. In general, practice babies got plenty

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 1>of care, but that was from multiple people rather than

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>one primary caregiver with whom the baby could develop a

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>strong attachment. The first formal studies into this question actually

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>started before Harlowe's research with monkeys, and December of nineteen

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty three, a paper was published in the Journal of

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Experimental Education, the Tailing the Welfare of Practice Babies at

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts Hall

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Management Houses. Critics had questioned whether the children there could

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>quote develop the necessary feeling of security under such circumstances,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and the American Vocational Association had appointed a committee to investigate.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>This committee carried out an eight month study of the

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>three children who had been practiced babies at the college

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>between nineteen and nineteen nine, and then the four children

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 1>who were there in nine nineteen thirty. They compared them

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to other children who were within two weeks of the

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>same age and the same sex, and had been living

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in a boarding home or an orphanage. They also compared

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>all of these children into control groups. These were children

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of the same age and sex who had been raised

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with their birth families in professional and non professional households.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>The assessors conducted a range of physical, mental, and psychological

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>assessments and had parents and caregivers fill out questionnaires. They

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>concluded that the practice babies as a group excelled in intelligence,

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>motor development, language development, adaptive behavior, and personal social behavior.

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>They performed slightly better than both control groups in their

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>motor development and slightly better than the children from non

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>professional homes in their personal social behavior. They were slightly

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>behind the control groups and language development and adaptive behavior,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but they quote compared favorably in physical health and emotional stability.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The researchers only had seven children to evaluate, and some

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of the measurements involved were really pretty subjective, but overall quote,

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>an analysis of the investigator's notes gave no evidence that

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the home management house children suffered emotionally because of their

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>apparently complex social situation. They compared very favorably with the

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>control groups and emotional stability, they were less timid in

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the presence of strangers, They cried less during the medical examinations.

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>There was less thumbsucking and nail biting among them. The

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>home management house children were noticeably superior in physical health.

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>No ailments of any kind were registered against them. While

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the investigations were in progress, more research was conducted starting

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen fifties. Fully possible there was other research

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the interim, but the nineteen fifties research was what

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I found doing this. In nineteen fifty five, Iowa State

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>College and the Iowa Children's Home Society got a grant

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Elizabeth McCormick Memorial Fund to conduct a longitudinal

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>study into how quote, non continuous mothering and home management

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>houses affected babies personalities. They studied about forty baybies who

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>had lived in the Whole Economics houses, following up with

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>babies who had already been through the program, and also

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>doing baseline assessments of new babies as they came in.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>The practice babies were Group A and had lived in

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the home management house for about twelve weeks during their

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>first six months of life. Group B were infants of

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the same agent sex who had spent a comparable amount

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of time in foster care before being adopted. Groups were

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>also the same agent sex and had lived with their

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>birth families since being born. Because they wanted to study

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.719
<v Speaker 1>only the effects of non continuous mothering and they didn't

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>want it to be influenced by other possible contributing factors,

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this team excluded children who had congenital disabilities or who

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>had been born prematurely, and then they did a battery

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of tests when the babies were six months, nine months,

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, eighteen months, and twenty four months old. In

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty one, the team published non Continuous Mothering in

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Infancy and Development in Later Childhood in the journal Child Development.

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Lead author D. Bruce Gardner referenced the ongoing longitudinal study

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as efforts to track down older children who

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>had been previously living in these management homes. Of sixty

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>two children between the ages of nine and seventeen who

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>had been through the program, twenty nine were still living

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa. That was Group A. They compared those twenty

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>nine children to children living in the same communities who

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>were of the same age and sex but had been

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>raised in their birth family Group B. They also factored

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in things like socioeconomic status, parents, education, and the children's

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>intelligence when making these comparisons. Then, the researchers administered a

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>number of tests, including the California Test of Personality and

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Iowa Every Pupil Test of Basic Skills, to these

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>two groups of children, and they found little to no

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>difference between the two groups. The difference between their quote

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>personal adjustment scores was close enough to the threshold of

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>significant that it was noted as something that should not

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be were looked, but it also was something that they

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>couldn't really say was conclusive. They also had a separate

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>psychologist conduct a study to evaluate whether the children's responses

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to frustrations were healthy or mature. In the twenty nine

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>older children, the response from the child in Group A

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>was considered healthier twelve times, and in group B seventeen times.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So there was a slight difference in favor of the

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>children who had been raised in their birth families, but

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>again not one that met the threshold of significance the

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>overall conclusion quote In none of these variables could differences

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be attributed to the factor of discontinuity of mothering in

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>early childhood. Tracking down the final results of that longitudinal

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>study proved to be a little trickier. I spent a

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of time going through old journals um looking for

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like a final comprehensive result. In nineteen sixty four, Physical

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Status and Non Continuous Mothering was published in the Journal

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of Home Economics, and that discussed only of the children's

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>physical measurements. That particular paper found no differences between the

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>two groups that could be attributed to their their time

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in a in a Practice baby program, but other papers

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>summarizing the work characterized it as showing no meaningful differences

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that would suggest that the non continuous mothering was harmful

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to the babies. So again, these are small studies looking

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>only at children who lived at Iowa State College, usually

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for twelve weeks, usually in their first six months of life.

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So you can't necessarily apply these findings to other programs,

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>which may have kept children for longer or shorter periods,

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:41.479
<v Speaker 1>or earlier or later in their life. At the same time,

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>all this research and the general concerns about whether these

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.239
<v Speaker 1>babies would have been better off in a home with

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>just one mother were informed by perceptions of how families

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and motherhood should work and specifically what women should be.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The idea that children should live in a small family

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>unit with one parent being their primary caregiver, and that

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>parents specifically being their mother was seen as the normal

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>standard that families should aspire to, but that is definitely

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>not universal. For example, research into societies that are more

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>communal or more likely to have large, extended families with

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>many family members all contributing to a baby's care, that

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>research doesn't suggest that those other types of families cause

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>attachment disorders. As this research was happening the same societal

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>changes that were shifting the field of home economics, we're

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>also leading to the end of practice houses and practice babies.

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>In addition to changing expectations related to gender and work,

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>ideas around parenting were also changing. There was a move

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>away from the strictly measured, scheduled, very scientific idea of

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>mothercraft to a more relaxed and intuitive model illustrated by

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin's Box. The Common Sense Book of Baby and Childcare,

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>which was first published in eight It's first chapter, which

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is called Trust Yourself, starts off quote you know more

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>than you think you do. So we know very little

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about the adult lives of people who spent part of

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>their infancy in a practice house. Because of confidentiality rules

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and sealed adoption records and attitudes about adoption in previous decades.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>It's possible that there are people living today who were

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in these practice baby programs and don't actually know about it. However,

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen nineties, the stories of two different former

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>practice babies made headlines. One was Donald Aldinger, whose reunion

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with at least four home X students at Cedarcrest College

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in Allentown, Pennsylvania was covered in The Morning Call in

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen three. Aldinger had been declared abandoned shortly after his

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty six births because his mother was incarcerated for

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.359
<v Speaker 1>vagrancy at the time. He was known as Donnie. At

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>the cedar Crest practice house, Aldinger was placed with a

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>foster family at the age of thirteen months and raised

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on a dairy farm with many many other foster children

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>who came and win Aldinger was there until the age

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of seventeen. After meeting some of his practice mothers, he

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>was quoted as saying, for the first time in my life,

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like everybody else who had a family. Articles

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>about his experience, framens is like having reconnected with somebody

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in a generally positive experience. Shirley Kirkman's story, published in

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Oregon in is almost the opposite. Kirkman had been a

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 1>practice baby in the nineteen thirties at Oregon State College

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>before being adopted. She described this home as a lonely

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one with her mother quote chili and her father addicted

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to alcohol. In terms of her time in the practice house,

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>she was quoted as saying, quote, I'm sure I got

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>excellent care. That's not the hurtful part. It's that I

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 1>was used. Kirkman had thirty four students involved in her care,

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and she described her experiences as an infant as leaving

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>her una to love and quote dead inside. In addition

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to the book The Irresistible Henry House, which we mentioned earlier,

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>there's another work of fiction about this that's related, which

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is Carol Shields The Republic of Love. And if you're

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>still interested in more, there is also a play which

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is called Borrowed Babies, and that was written by Jennifer Blackmer.

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:25.320
<v Speaker 1>In a weird twist of googling, UM, I learned about

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this play by trying to figure out whether my grandmother's

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>home mech program had a practice house, which it did.

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it did while she was in

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>school there because the article that I found talking about

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the practice out there was from the forties and she graduated.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.879
<v Speaker 1>UM and the uh that uh that college had put

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on a performance of this show, and like that was

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>how I wound up finding it by about them by

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>coincidence doing a performance of this show. So that is

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the practice Babies, I uh. I. A lot of articles,

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like just popular articles, not necessarily academic articles that have

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>been written about it in the last ten years have

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a just a horrified tone and describe it with words

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like dystopian um. And there's a lot of reason to

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be upset about conditions during a lot of this period,

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like so many of these children were living in experiences

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that that were truly deprived and that there's so many

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 1>stories of people being forced into adoption because they were

0:37:32.239 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not married, um, and all of that to me is

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more troubling than the practice house component of it. Anyway,

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I also have a listener mail. Fabulous listener mail is

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>from Jess. Jess says, Hi, Holly and Tracy, thank you

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.479
<v Speaker 1>for doing an episode about bees and beekeeping. I'm headed

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:54.840
<v Speaker 1>into my second season of beekeeping and I'm up to

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>four hives this year, all of which are the Langstroth type.

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm working with a couple of low goal farmers to

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>place hives as the years go on to better help

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>their crops out. I'm anticipating getting upwards of a hundred

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 1>pounds of honey this year. Once we all have offices

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to go to again, I'll have to send you some honey.

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I did have one possible correction in relation to the

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 1>use of smokers and hives. While they may have been

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>intended to disburse the bees initially, it's not that effective

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in doing so. Primarily, using smoking hives interrupts their ability

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to communicate since they use pheromones to do that. Basically,

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>if one bee is anxious about a keeper being in

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the hive, it prevents that from spreading through the hive,

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 1>keeping the bees calm and easy to work with and around.

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I laughed about the privacy wall the bees made, but

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it is possible that they may have done that. Bees

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 1>create a product called properis, which is basically be glue.

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It is a sticky, water resistant residue that bees can

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and do cote the inside of their hive with to

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:55.240
<v Speaker 1>help prevent water from getting in. Thanks again for keeping

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>me entertained. I've attached some pictures and a video of

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>dropping a new hive this year after a split, which

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is the manual version of a swarm. Thanks Jess, Thank

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for sending this note, Jess. UM. One

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I did not get into detail

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>about in that episode was that while today most of

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that are used in smokers are not considered

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to be harmful to bees and it does have a

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>pacifying effect UM, earlier in history some of the things

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>that people have burned when dealing with bees UM have

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>been things that were a lot more harmful UM, and

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in some cases we're were things that when burned, would

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like really irritate or even kill the bees, which is

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of course not done today. UM. And as I as

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to UH to like narrow down the

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>immense history of beekeeping. That was one of the things

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that I did not really get into you as much.

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I could not specifically say whether when I was talking

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about using smoke to drive the bees out, UM, whether

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that was correct or not. Because I've rented that textbook

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and it has gone back, it is no longer something

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I can go back to to check the deals without

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>renting it again. UM. If physical libraries were open, I

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>could have gotten a physical copy from UH from a

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>fancy university library, but couldnt anyway. So UH, that is

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>a little tidbit about the smoking and the beeves. UM.

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>If you'd like to write to us, whether it's just

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for basic listener or mail, or if if you're interested

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in having a question in a in a Q and

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a episode that we're planning in the relatively near future.

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So just a note. We're a history podcast at I

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>heart radio dot com and then we're also all over

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>social media at missed in History. That is where you'll

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>find our Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and Instagram. And you can

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our show on the I heart radio app

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and Apple podcasts and anywhere else you'd like to get podcasts.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Missed in History Class is a production of

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I heart Radio. For more podcasts from I heart Radio,

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.