WEBVTT - Is recycling a complete scam? (PART 1)

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>What's up nst heads. So, this right here is part

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>one of a two part episode. The second part is

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>out now as well, but this is the one you

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>should listen to first. It is part one, so enjoy

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and make sure you tap into part two to finish

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the story and without further ado. Part one of two

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Big Truths and Big Lies about recycling. I'm Manny,

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah, this is Devin and this is no such

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>thing the show where you settle our dumb arguments and

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>yours by actually doing the research. This week, does recycling

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>even work? If it turns out to be the case

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is not really doing anything, I'm gonna be

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>writing a very strongly worded letter.

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I No, There's no no such thing.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>No touch, thank.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Touch, thanks.

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Touch, thank.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 5>Thank so.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>This week is a topic that we've been thinking about

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and a listener of ours also had

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the same question recently. Liz asked this, does recycling do

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>anything or does it just make us feel better when

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we put things into the bin and send it away.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those topics that for years I've

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>thought about, and you know, every few months I feel

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like I would see a news story a headline come

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>by that said basically like the truth about recycling, and

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't read them until now. Yeah, now we're doing

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a podcast about it. Before we get into that, I

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>want to introduce our special guest co host and someone

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>who actually worked on one of these pieces that I

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>skipped over years ago, is our fourth Mic Naima Raza.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 6>Hi, guys, nice to see you.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Mind introducing yourself.

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 7>I do a podcast called Smart Girl Dumb Questions, which

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm realizing there's no such thing as a.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 6>Ormo.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 7>But yes, years ago, I did write or actually it

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 7>was a video with The New York Times the Great

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 7>Recycling Con. I can't claim to be a recycling expert,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 7>and I can't say that that has changed my behavior as.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Much as it should have. So yeah, so don't spoil anything. Yeah,

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that later.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 6>Except for the word con.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 5>I do have that out.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, that's just that's a New York Times editorializing. Yeah,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to begin, how do we all feel about recycling?

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 5>Well, how do we feel about it? Yeah?

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Like emotionally, yeah, I mean do you do you enjoy it?

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Do you do it?

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't even have any guilt about not doing it.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 5>No, I do I do it. I think.

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 8>I think I try to recycle too many things. I

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 8>feel like most of the things i'm quote unquote recycling

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 8>or putting in a recycling man probably don't get recycled,

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 8>but in my mind I have to do it.

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 5>Everyone. Once in the blue, I'll.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 8>Get like a plastic container from like a takeout place

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 8>and throw it in the regular garbage and I feel,

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 8>you know, like you just killed really shouldn't do that.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 5>But recycling is annoying.

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 8>The most annoying thing about recycling is that the recycling

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 8>can is never as big as the garbage can. But

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 8>then the recycling stuff takes up so much more space,

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 8>so it's like, yeah, so it's like a big inconvenience

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 8>in like your home, all right, And then you're like,

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 8>why am I even like does this even work?

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And how when you're sorting, how are you sorting? How

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>much sorting are you doing? Just recycling bin for everything.

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 5>I have one recycling bin for everything.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 8>My apartment building does not short in anything, so I'm

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 8>not shorting stuffcause y'all all short stuff. So that's when

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 8>you go downstairs to put into the bins. There's just

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 8>recycling bins' just supposed to be cardboard and paper supposed

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 8>to be separated from the plastic. But they don't do that,

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 8>so I'm not doing it either. Yeah, somebody, somebody will

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 8>figure it out at some.

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 5>Point or not.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 8>Job creating your job exactly, I'm creating a shorter but

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 8>I try to, you know, I try to fold up

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 8>my boxes and do that sort of thing. I guess

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 8>my overall emotion around recycling is I I think it's fake.

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it is actually happening, But I do

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 8>do it because I feel like I don't want to

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 8>be you know, you're not going to be the one

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 8>who's I'm not problem exactly. I'm doing what I'm supposed

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 8>to do. If down the line y'all aren't doing what

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 8>y'all supposed to do, that's on you. But we talked

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 8>about my big recycling. Beef is a weird recycling stuff, right,

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 8>So I use brit of filters. I don't know, mostly

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 8>just because it's like a water container in my fridge.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 8>I don't believe it actually does anything, but.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 5>I was I was looking.

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the filtering.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 8>Exactly, but I was gett you know, it was time

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 8>to replace the filter. So I'm looking at the filter,

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 8>they'd be like, can I recycle this? And then I

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 8>read the box and it's like, oh, you can recycle

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 8>it if you put it in a box and ship

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 8>it to wherever and then we'll recycle it for you.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 8>And I was like, this is the dumbest thing I've

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 8>ever seen. I have to ship something so you can

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 8>recycle it. Doesn't that offset the whole purpose of recycling?

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>If not overc It's like, it's not like a drop

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>off location.

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 5>No, it's like in New York City.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 8>You gotta you gotta mail it off, mail off my

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 8>filter to get recycled. I think the carbon footprint of

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 8>me mailing it offsets me recycling, and they.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Don't send you a new one or something. It's not.

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 6>For me recycling.

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 7>What about when you have like takeout and you're rinsing

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 7>the things to recycle them, when you're using so much

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 7>water and you're like, does this thing even recycle? I

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 7>gott to rinse it because you can't put your dirty

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 7>debris in that.

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you gotta clean it up.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I was dealing with this just last night because Monday

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is garbage and recycling, and my basic view is that, Like,

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a good citizen, but they make

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it too difficult. Every week I'm pulling up bag. Yeah,

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and so I just found myself doing this last night

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, this is terribles. I don't want

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this anymore. The drop off location for my

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Brita filter is the garbage can. I'm not doing any

0:05:55.839 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>extra work. I think the government should make it a

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit easier.

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 7>But if they gave you a replaceable filter for free,

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 7>if you recycled yours, what do you recycle it?

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Like? Would I ship it and you get a replacement.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 6>As opposed to spending nine dollars?

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm also not good with money. I'll just buy like

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I should just that would be the smart thing to do.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but I'm a timers money guy to yah where

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 8>I'm like, oh, I got it, like print a label

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 8>and like I'll s throw it out.

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The British should come with a package that you mail

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>it out, and it should come with two so that

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>way you you know you always have one immediate.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 7>All right, Chief Strategy Britt is listening, and you know

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 7>I don't need to do this anymore.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll the sponsor I'm very aligned with you all where

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>it's like I separate, I put the things in the bin.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>My garbage areat my building is not separated at all.

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's just like it's going with God. From the

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>little headlines I taken in. Yeah, I don't think this

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is going anywhere. At some point I thought, Okay, they're

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>sending it to China, and maybe China's doing it.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 5>Mm hmm.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know this with absolutely zero knowledge about what

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>happens after I do my recycling.

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, but it does make me feel better about buying

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 7>glass bottles of coke.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 6>You have a plastic bottle coke there.

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't taste as good and doesn't recycle as well apparently.

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 7>But but here's an anti feminist moment, which is to say,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 7>I actually, really, when I'm in a relationship, don't deal

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 7>with recycling or trash. I feel like those are man

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 7>duties in a home.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to saying the case in.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 8>My home, right, Yeah, well, like I'm not getting canceled.

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be canceled by my wife.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 6>He doesn't want to get canceled from his new Brida job.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Job. And then I think we should also say this

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>varies right like city by city and state by state,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>like in New York, I mean, are super like I've

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>gotten in trouble multiple times for recycling something incorrectly, and

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>then my super will be like, look, if you keep

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>doing this, we're gonna get fine.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, buildings are supposed to get fine for cycling correct.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So now I'm recycling so that he doesn't get fined,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily to save the earth. I remember there's also

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>some stuff where you're supposed to put all their cycling

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in a clear bag for slack bags for.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 5>The trash so they can sort through it.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, I've heard other people say their

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>buildings are definitely on them about this, and then it

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously varies so much where it's like this can't be

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that big of an issue if and a lot of

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>buildings aren't doing.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 7>This, But in other countries all over the world, like

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 7>it's very in the UK they will actually find you

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 7>if you if you don't compost, like they'll find you

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 7>as the owner and or the unit.

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 6>And in Europe, I mean, they're.

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 7>Just they're much like I think, they're just much better

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 7>about these kinds of common good.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Problems and separate bins and stuff to.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 7>I've noticed even in Australia's like there's a water shortage,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 7>showers are going to be like six minutes. Imagine telling

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 7>Americans they can only shower for six minutes.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Don't tell me that we've already for three amount of

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>time than we do.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Three, not for water, not for water, not for.

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 7>For antibacterial reasons, yeah, and just health washing away your

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 7>naturally like what you need versus what you want.

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Go away to put it like that shower thing just

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>comes up every episode. It sounds like we're all aligned.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's do a vote. Does anyone here think recycling works?

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And I would like to believe it's doing something, But

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in your heart of hearts, uh, you know, I throw

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this out. What's happening? You gotta be doing something right.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>They're putting it in a different place than your garbage,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is what I think is happening.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 5>I think a very small percentage of stuff. Actually.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 8>I think in the beginning, when we were like in

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 8>elementary school, when we were recycling, I feel like that

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 8>was the golden age.

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 5>I think feel like they were really psychling.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's because you were in middle school?

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 5>No, I think that they were actually doing stuff back then.

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 9>Around down to the c I feel like where he

0:09:58.640 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 9>was doing.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 5>The issue now.

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 8>Back then, not everything was recyclable, and we weren't, you know,

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 8>like we had a limited amount of things that we

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 8>were recycling. Now every single thing is recyclable. Yeah, which

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 8>there's just too much stuff. We're not using this much.

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid, it really felt like just

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like soda cans.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 6>In Santa Claus was a live guys.

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I have to say, I don't know that

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 7>the technology has gotten worse with time.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 8>No, I'm not saying it's gotten worse. I think we

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 8>just have more things that we're trying to recycle.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 7>We used to, like recycle those plastic bags from Zachermarkets

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 7>and stuff. I think it existed, we just weren't the

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 7>ones consuming them and we didn't. I feel like it

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 7>works with glass and aluminium, but when it comes to plastic,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 7>I think it's like I forget the number and I

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 7>don't want to scoop it.

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel, Yeah, my guess is material by material,

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>there's a variance. But I think kind of what I

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>guess what Devin is saying is because there's so many

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>things we're expected to try to recycle, and I think

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that complicates matters even more.

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 7>But when you're when we're kids, I do think I

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 7>thought recycling was magic. Like I thought, if you have sneakers,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 7>they will one day become a basketball court, you know,

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 7>or like if you have a plastic bag one day

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 7>become a park that and like everything was beautiful because

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 7>Captain Planet.

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You just put it in and it comes out something new.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But I will say this for the purposes of this episode.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>If it turns out to be the case that this

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is not really doing anything, I'm going to be writing

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a very strongly worded letter like we are doing so

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>much work to or Mudania, all right, why we're well,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're doing so much work at home. I

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>would be devastated to find out that it's not really

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>doing anything.

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 8>But what if we find out I think this episode,

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 8>outside of the laundry episode, has the biggest chance to

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 8>change my personal behavior. Yeah, because if it turns out

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 8>it's not doing anything, then I'm not reciting what do anymore?

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Throwing the garbage, It's all going to be in the

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>black bag. Yeah, they're not gonna be black check.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Maybe you should over your ears for the rest, will

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 7>you stop buying stuff.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 6>That's I think, like, that's.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Gonna be my story when my super comes around, I'm

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, actually, I don't purchase anything to recycle.

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why you're not seeing any recycling.

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm a real environmentalist who writes strongly worded letters.

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, on Tuesdays.

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, why don't we answer some of these questions after

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the break, we're gonna hear from an advocate against the

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>big plastic industry.

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 8>Oh all right, fellas, I need you to help me

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 8>with a problem that I got. You know, usually we're

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 8>the ones helping other people with their problems. But I'm

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 8>about to go abroad and I'm going to watch Met games. Noah,

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 8>how can I watch them?

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 5>That's a tough one.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe get a really large telescope.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that's the best way to do it. Manny,

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 5>do you have any solutions on how I can watch

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 5>Mets games?

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You broad I think I've got a slightly more practical

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>solution for you, Devin. If you use nor VPN, you'll

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to change the location of your laptop's IP

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>address and watch the content with no problem. What about

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>my privacy online? I'm worried someone's watching me. First of all,

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>no one is watching you, Noah, but in case someone

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>was watching you, NordVPN provides you with privacy online, leaving

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>no digital footprint by hiding your IP address. It's like

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>wearing an invisibility cloak while you're surfing the web.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 5>Sounds comfy.

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 8>So many I've heard about these VPNs and how they're

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 8>super slow?

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 5>How do I make sure my internet is not throttling?

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>If you want to use a VPN without slowing down

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>your internet, Devin, You're gonna want to use NordVPN because

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>whenever I use it, I don't see any buffering or

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>lagging while I'm streaming my favorite content.

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 5>How do I get NordVPN, Devin?

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>If you or our listeners want to get the best

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>discount off of your NordVPN plan, go to NordVPN dot

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>com slash nst. Our link will also give you four

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>extra months on the two year plan, and there's no

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>risk because Nord has a thirty day money back guarantee.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>The link is in the show notes. That's NordVPN dot

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>com slash nst We are back. I'm Manny, Noah, am

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I allowed to say my name is now you are, yeah,

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and we are figuring out the truth behind recycling. Wow,

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is it a lie? I spoke. I spoke to someone

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>who's done a lot of work on this.

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 10>So my name is Davis Allen. I'm an environmental historian

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 10>by training. I work as an investigative researcher at the

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 10>Center for Climate Integrity, where we provide support for communities

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 10>that are holding big oil accountable through litigation.

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So Davis Allen has working on this for years. His

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>group has put out a bunch of really in depth

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>reports investigating plastics and recycling and kind of some of

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the what they would say are lies of the big

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>oil industry. We're mainly focusing on plastics recycling for the

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>purpose of this. The main kind of thesis is that

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>recycling as we know it is basically essentially a pr

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>campaign made by and sponsored by big oil. Plastics come

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>from oil, and basically this is a way that they

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>can kind of clean up their image by saying, Hey,

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just like trash. It's going to be reused

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and make.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 5>You feel better.

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But throwing the stuff in the garbage.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 7>Who do you think packed for all those ads used

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 7>to as a kid when you're a hunky doory recycling.

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>All we check the credits to Captain Planet.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It's green heartbreaking. If there's something sinister behind Captain Planet,

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think they're well, yeah, I will

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>look at that. Quick side note here, I did look

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>into it, and Captain Planet is innocent, so don't worry

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>about that.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 6>Greenwashing. Greenwashing.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't know about this, so first I opened

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>up with a big one. I asked Davis. One of

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the most common misconceptions about recycling that it does anything,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>it works, Yeah, that exists.

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 10>I think the biggest misconception really is the idea that

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 10>because of recycling, a disposable consumer economy is not a

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 10>major environmental problem, because it perpetuates a feeling among people

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 10>using these products that there isn't really a major environmental

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 10>impact because whatever the product is just getting cycled back

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 10>through system and turning into a new product. And that's

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 10>unfortunately just not how recycling works. In the vast majority

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 10>of cases. There are some materials that are recycled, it

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 10>are much more efficiently recycled, so something like aluminum, a

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 10>much higher percentage of the aluminum actually gets turned into

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 10>a new illuminim product. But even in that kind of

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 10>case where ninety nine percent of the material is getting

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 10>turned into a UKN or whatever, there are still a

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 10>lot of environmental costs in that process that make it

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 10>far less efficient than some kind of reusable approach. So basically,

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 10>I think the biggest misconception is that the whole idea

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 10>of a circle being not a problem when really any

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 10>disposable product is ultimately more of a straight line where

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 10>you're having a lot of environmental costs in that process.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>So basically there's a misconception that recycling is offsetting some

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of the more gross things we do with consumer products.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, it's just like what like a drop

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in the bucket compared to Yeah, and basically like kind

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of what Naima was saying, where we have this image

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>from middle school where it's like you put the thing

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in the bin and then it comes out as a

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 1>new product. Totally you don't lose anything. Yeah, just like

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>this perfect one to one replacement. That's just not true

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>based on the costs and other factors of actually doing

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the recycling.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 10>So the biggest problem with things not getting recycled is

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 10>just that it doesn't make a whole lot of sense

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 10>to recycle the vast majority of plastics, recycled plastic, once

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.719
<v Speaker 10>you have it as a new sort of material, a

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 10>new raw form of plastic to be turned into something

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 10>is pretty low quality. It's well suited for things like

0:18:56.280 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 10>trash cans, ironically, recycling bins, plastic crate that holds the

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 10>materials that are getting shipped, things like that, but it's

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 10>not the kind of plastic that is useful.

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 3>For most applications.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 10>The reality is, when we're using all these plastic products,

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 10>they have pretty particular specifications for what they need it

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 10>to be able to do, and recycled plastic doesn't meet

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 10>most of those specifications.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's basically how recycling does or doesn't work these days.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 5>It's a scam.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 6>Way did this story from the New York Times. It

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 6>was like twenty nineteen.

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 7>But it's like the cost of making a new plastic

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 7>bag from like a plastic bag is much higher than

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 7>just making a new plastic bag, So why would a

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 7>company then make a plastic bag from an old plastic

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 7>bag or whatever the case may be in sir, So, yeah,

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 7>it enables consumption because we feel so virtuous, we have

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 7>like a little halo. This guy is going to take

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 7>the halo off our head.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Truly. Yeah, Ask what are plastics and where do they

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>come from?

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? That I don't know.

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 2>Actually, plastics come from many different raw materials. Some of

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the materials are natural like water and air. Some are

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 2>growing things like corn and potatoes. Others are minerals such

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 2>as oil, coal, and limestone. From these various raw materials,

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>chemists derive many different chemicals, which, when combined properly, will

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 2>form plastics.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 10>There's often the misconception that plastic is one thing. In reality,

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 10>there are thousands of different chemicals that make up plastics,

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 10>So they're really an extremely broad category of materials that

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 10>happen to share some key characteristics. I'll say, in particular,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 10>the vast majority, something like ninety nine percent currently are

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 10>made of fossil fuels, and they're engineered to address lots

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 10>of particular use cases. But yeah, there are a really wide,

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 10>diverse group of materials.

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 6>But they just make it like they create it in

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 6>a lab.

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, from oil downstream stuff that they don't need

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 7>to like pump into the vehicle.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yes, this is a dream of the future. Get

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>out of such dreams has come all that we call progress.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So in the years ahead, dreams like this and many

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 2>more will become realities.

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So now we're going to kind of go back and

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>do a little history lesson on plastics becoming disposable. So

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I was curious, like when did people even start to

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>care about single use plastics and waste. Disposable plastics were

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>introduced post World War Two. Before that, plastic was largely

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>seen as a more durable material, so products like radios.

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Then the plastics industry realized they would make more money

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if they made disposable ducks instead of one as you

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>buy and keep for twenty years. Yeah yeah, so again

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 1>please yeah. So a lot of that is packaging and

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>other single use items. So like before that, grocery stories,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing had bulk things and you would

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>go fill up a bag and then take it away

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>instead of individually wrapped pieces. The industry exploded and it

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>totally changed our consumer economy. Things that had no packaging

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>previously now did. Here's one example of that shift.

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 10>In the report, we talk about an instance in the

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 10>fifties in which many infants choked on plastic dry cleaner

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 10>bags were killed by plastic dry cleaner bags in a

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 10>single year. And that was a particularly interesting example where

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 10>you see in a one moment in time it go

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 10>from a durable concept of plastics to a disposable one,

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 10>because you literally had DuPont, who was making the bags,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 10>telling people you can keep this bag, you can do

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 10>all kinds of things with it, you can cover your

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 10>sofa with it or whatever. And then the plastics industry

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 10>launched this public relations campaign to try to counteract the

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 10>terrible publicity from all of these children dying. Their pr

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 10>campaign was you've got to throw these things away. They

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 10>blamed the mothers explicitly of the children who had died

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 10>for not throwing away the plastics after they had told

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 10>them you can keep using them. So that's a particularly

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 10>interesting example where you see that transition. But the public

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 10>backlash against disposable plastics really began, especially around nineteen seventy.

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 11>Good Evening, a unique day in American history, is ending,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 11>a day set aside for a nationwide outpouring of mankind

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 11>seeking its own survival. Birthday, a day dedicated to enlisting

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 11>all the citizens of a boutiful country and the common

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 11>cause of saving light from the deadly byproducts of that

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 11>body the fouled skies, the filthy waters, the litterardary.

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 10>The first Earth Day was a catalyst for so many

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 10>environmental movements, but it was especially significant for the plastic system,

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 10>where people recognize this stuff is ending up in the environment,

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 10>and it was a first backlash against disposable plastics. That

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 10>was a catalyst for the industry trying to figure out,

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 10>what are we going to do? How are we going

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 10>to resolve this new public relations nightmare, And they initially

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 10>go to landfilling and incideration and then just looking into recycling.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Right from the beginning.

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 10>We have docks from the early nineteen seventies where the

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 10>Society of the Plastics Industry, which was working on behalf

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 10>of all the big plastic producers, was trying to figure

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 10>out is recycling feasible? Basically, is recycling something that could

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 10>offer solution. They didn't really promote it early on because

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 10>their initial finding was no, it's not.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 3>A good solution for plastics.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 10>So it really only came later that they began to

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 10>promote it as a solution.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So in short, it's basically like Earth they happens, people

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>are like, hey, this seems pretty bad. Then they're like, okay,

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll just burn it all and everyone's like cool. And

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>then after like twenty years, people are like, oh, maybe

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>burning stuff isn't so good, and then they're like, okay,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>we can we'll recycle. And that's kind of lines up

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>with us growing up with all this recycling propaganda.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, nineties prime.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 7>Recycling that the baby story is so much bad, I'm

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 7>sure as a new father.

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh my god. I mean every day I'm like,

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>am I gonna kill this baby by accident? I can't believe.

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So what do the even dry cleaning bags, like the

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bags or seed would come back in? Yeah, big ones.

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 8>But y'all remember when we were younger, it was a

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 8>big thing of our parents being like, never put a

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 8>plastic bag over your head. Yeah, I'm assuming it's because

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 8>of this that story are their stories?

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Wow?

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean I can't believe, like this industry is just

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 7>like surviving and writing like baby killings.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Development in the industry is a like a pr move. Yeah,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, fix some previous mistake. Okay, So we heard

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot about what plastic is, how we got so

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>much of it, and how we landed where we are today.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>As far as recycling being a big sort of solution

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to deal with it. After the break, Davis is going

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to tell us why he thinks big recycling is basically

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy made up to guilt trip little people like

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you and me to take responsibility for a disposable consumption

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>culture that's mostly.

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 10>Out of our control.

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So now we're going to dive into Davis's main piesis

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that recycling is a way to push a narrative of

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>guilt onto us, the consumer, rather than looking towards the

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>big oil companies actually producing and profiting from all of

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>this plastic waste. And remember this is just part one.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>In part two, we'll visit a recycling plant to see

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>how recycling actually works on the ground, and here from

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the pro recycling side, But for now, more of my

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Davis Allen from the Center for Climate Integrity.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It seems basically they landed on like we can basically

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>guilt people and the public into blaming themselves for plastic waste.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>If that's true, can you talk about how we got

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to the kind of that point from where we are

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>in the early seventies there.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 3>I think that is true.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 10>I think that's the exact trajectory of what happened really,

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 10>they knew that recycling was not viable for the vast

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 10>majority of plastics, and they knew that it wasn't a solution.

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 10>Even when plastics can be recycled, that process degrades the quality,

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 10>and so it's not something that can keep happening over

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 10>and over again like with some other materials. It's something

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 10>that represents a very limited strategy to deal with plastic,

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 10>especially when we are knowingly producing so much plastic that

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 10>is meant to be used once and then end up

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 10>in the waste system. So they understood all of those problems.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 10>They were very open internally within the industry recognizing that

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 10>these things would prevent plastic recycling from existing on a

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 10>wide scale and certainly solving the problem of the plastic

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 10>waste crisis even at that early stage. But shifting the

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:54.719
<v Speaker 10>blame to individual consumers was a really effective way of

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 10>taking attention off of the producers, off of the industry

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 10>that was producing and all the plastic, and creating a

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 10>personal responsibility narrative in which people felt it was their

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 10>job to solve this problem. That process of shifting blame

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 10>to the consumers was so effective because people want to

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 10>do right by the environment, right they want to behave

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 10>in a way that feels sustainable and feels in alignment

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 10>with their values and things, and the recycling campaigns really

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 10>tapped directly into that impulse and took advantage of them

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 10>to make it seem like an individual person putting their

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 10>plastic item in the bin was resolving the deeper contradiction that,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:55.719
<v Speaker 10>of course, recycling can do nothing to address. Whether they

0:29:55.760 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 10>were targeting local municipalities convincing them to set up recycling

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 10>programs that they knew would not be economically sustainable, whether

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 10>they were creating sponsored materials for classrooms to basically advertise

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 10>recycling to kids. As somebody who grew up in the nineties,

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 10>I remember vividly being in elementary school and consuming all

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 10>kinds of stuff telling me about the value of recycling,

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 10>and I ate it up. And it has been a

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 10>really weird feeling to go back and see this stuff

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 10>as an adult and realize that it was made by

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 10>DuPont or the American Plastics Council, or any number of

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 10>different companies and groups, and was, yeah, again explicitly targeting

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 10>that impulse to take care of the environment and to

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 10>do our best. I've been amazed in my own experience.

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 10>Since we published this report, so many people come up

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 10>to me, and I feel are basically like confessing their

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 10>plastic use to me and telling me how bad they

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 10>feel about using plastics.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 3>And I'm like, none of us can avoid using plastics.

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 10>They have made it virtually impossible to not rely upon

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 10>plastics every day. You know, the vast majority of these

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 10>things don't need to be plastic, but it remains a

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 10>really effective business model to make people feel bad about

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 10>it while also continuing to produce endless amounts of it.

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, rereading the report made me feel better

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's like, Okay, well, this is kind of it's

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not all my fault, you know, you know, backwards away,

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like, okay, like, I know I don't

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>soar it perfectly, but it's out of my hands.

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 10>I think that should be the takeaway really. Of course,

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 10>it's incredibly demoralizing to you realize how we have been

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 10>lied to and manipulated and all of these things. But

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 10>at the same time, it's, yeah, you see how this

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 10>stuff happens. You see the way that they were talking

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 10>to each other at industry conferences and things. This is

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 10>not the fault of the people using the plastic in

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:06.080
<v Speaker 10>the vast majority of cases, and there's just nothing you

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 10>can really do. And that doesn't mean that we shouldn't

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 10>do anything, we should just give up and become nihilists

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 10>about it.

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 3>In my own.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 10>Life, I have still adjusted some of my behaviors and

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 10>I like try to reduce my plastic.

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Usage in various ways. But I also recognize that's mostly

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 3>for me.

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 10>That's mostly because of the way that it makes me

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 10>feel about it, not the fact that it actually is

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 10>contributing very much. Because these companies are making just ungodly

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 10>amounts of plastic and we're not part of that in

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 10>any way. The recycling thing is a distraction. It's not

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 10>anything to do with the actual problem.

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there you go.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 6>That's a good word. That's a better word than colin. Actually, yeah,

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 6>that's a really good over here.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I feel like that's you see that

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>so much, especially with any climate related things, Like think

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about flying, It's like, okay, I could not take a

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 1>flight my two flights a year that I take. Meanwhile,

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you know it's like people in charge of these things

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>are flying every day.

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the carbon off sets, you can just buy carbon

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 7>off sets that seems like a distraction too.

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you're probably, yeah, and it's.

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 6>Like someone making money. Why I'm paying more money to offset?

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 5>Like why me.

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Someoney tell you to you know, not use your air conditioner.

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, okay, I can see the argument here. But

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>also there's all these gigantic buildings in Manhattan that are

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.479
<v Speaker 1>running twenty four seven. It's like, maybe we should start

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>with someone else.

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 7>But that's different even because like by not I mean

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 7>like I actually do do those some of those things,

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 7>because I feel like, okay, if if everyone were to

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 7>do this action, then this thing would be This is

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 7>like even if you do this action, this action is dumb,

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 7>so you're just wasting your time.

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 6>Action is nice, which, to be.

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 7>Clear, you should still recycle, especially blast aluminium, especially plastic

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 7>bottles that are of the recycling kind. But yeah, like

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 7>I but it's actually just like wasting my time and

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 7>making me feel good and letting me continue to purchase,

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 7>which is so bad.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:11.479
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean there's no real way to avoid plastics efficiently.

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 7>Although like, do you what we think if we made

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 7>like a plastic free town, it would be a really

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 7>like people would want to move there, Like I should

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 7>we do that, Like, I think some people want to

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 7>live in a plastic free zone for their health and

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 7>well being and for their virtuosity.

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 6>You could like create a little plastic neighborhood.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the bigger questions is just like how much

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we quote unquote recycle actually gets recycled, So

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be the recycling rate is the term they

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>used to study this.

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 5>So first give.

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's a definition of recycling rate, and then what the

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>actual recycling rate is for the United States.

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 10>A recycling rate is the percentage of plastic that is

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 10>entering the waste system that is getting recycled i e.

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 10>In our case, mostly almost all mechanically recycled, so that

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 10>means grinding and shredding the plastic down into small bits

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 10>and cycling it through a system in which it gets

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:21.919
<v Speaker 10>basically melted down and turned into a new plastic product. Yeah,

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 10>it's the percentage of the plastic entering the waste stream.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 10>So it's not new plastic that's being produced, because we

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 10>don't want to count durable plastics against that recycling rate.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 10>It's only plastic that's entering the waste stream.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>For plastics, what's the current recycling rate in the US.

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 10>For plastics, the recycling rate is close to five to

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 10>six percent. The highest the plastics recycling rate has ever

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 10>been was nine percent. But at that point it was

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 10>a little bit deceptive because it counted a lot of

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 10>plastics that were being shipped to China to be recycled.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 10>But there's a lot of plastic being shipped to China

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 10>that was never going to get recycled. They have the

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 10>same sort of economic limitations that we do, and that

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.320
<v Speaker 10>number was deceptively high for a bit.

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's more like it's not recycled, but it's more

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>out of our hands.

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 10>It provided a very easy way for us to pretend

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 10>that things are being recycled in the same way that

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 10>people talk about wish cycling on like an individual level,

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 10>putting something in the bin thinking maybe it'll get recycled.

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 10>We were doing that as a country, you know, engaging

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 10>in some pretty major waste imperialism.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 3>And we still do.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 10>It's just not to China anymore, because China decided that

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 10>they don't want to accept our trash anymore. The rate

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 10>currently in the United States is probably around five or

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:50.959
<v Speaker 10>six percent.

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And Davis went on to tell me that certain plastic

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>products have a higher recycling rate. So a pet bottle,

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>think of a typical soda bottle, is recycled at around

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty three percent, which is on the higher end of things,

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 1>whereas other types like polypropylene aka plastic number five might

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>be as low as one percent or even less.

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 6>Wait, I'm so confused.

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 7>They wanted to make up a number of how much

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 7>they were recycling, and the highest they could make up.

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 6>Was nine percent.

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>That's like that that's like basically giving yourself, like all

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the advantages of being like okay, well let's say this

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and thet'll say.

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 7>That, but like nine percent is the highest they could

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 7>eke out, Like if you're going to tell lie, it

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 7>would be like ninety nine percent.

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Before you played that clip, all I was asking for

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was ten percent recyclable rate, meaning I recycle is actually

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get recycled. I couldn't even get ten percent.

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 7>Well that's not you know, that depends on like the

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:56.760
<v Speaker 7>average math of what you consume. The plastics are fewer

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 7>than and some of the plastics are thirty three percent.

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these water bottles do some service for

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the country. I can't believe that five, five to six

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>percent every numbers Ye crazy. Yeah. When I heard that,

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I was pretty shocked. It's just like it's so it's

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like I can't believe how much time we've spent thinking

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. Yeah, and then you know, Davis mentions the

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>incineration some countries counting thats recycling to well, we got

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>rid of it, we turned it into dicycling, it into toxic.

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 5>I actually felt.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 7>Sad for the plastic as he was talking about it,

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 7>like it was pretty dehumanizing, plasticizing, like they.

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 6>Crush it and they do this.

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And you asked me earlier about if doing this interview

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 1>changed my habits. Yes, and the answer is no, But

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>did you think about changing him? Not really, I mean

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>changing your habits would not do anything, I guess it.

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 7>I kind of knew that when your answer to reading

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 7>the report was like, oh, thank god, it's not my problem.

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 6>I like that confession.

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I like I like reasonable items when I can. But

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember I'm a small man and you know, a

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>big world. That's my knock off from your show.

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 7>World. You know what, I think you can use this

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 7>like reduce reuse. Recycle is like in dating, so you

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 7>should reduce the number of people you date.

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 6>You can reuse your you can go.

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 7>Back to your accents, great classes, emergency, and then you

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 7>should recycle them because like I try it so much.

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 7>When like it doesn't work out, well, I'll be like, oh,

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, but I have a friend that I think

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:40.479
<v Speaker 7>and people don't.

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 6>People don't like that.

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, you yourself will say hey, I know for me,

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:47.720
<v Speaker 8>but like I should date my friends.

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 7>I say, like, it doesn't seem like this will be

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.439
<v Speaker 7>the thing, but I have a friend because I like it's.

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Kind of nice because it's like it's still a stamp

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of approval.

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a standard approval, but I don't think people

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 7>like it. But like, but and it's also like, actually

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 7>might work out because you friend is kind of I've

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 7>always thought the idea that you can't date like your

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 7>friend's access is kind of screwed up because your friend

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 7>is like like you with a tweak, Like maybe that

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 7>tweak is what's needed to make your.

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Probably someone who was upset the person that you were

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that to you're breaking up with the guy your friend.

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 6>I already said it. I waited like two extra like that.

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 7>I was like, I had this thought, but I thought

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 7>I was, like they should be together, So.

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Take it away. From the We're gonna away from.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 7>Takeaways branded on men single men?

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay it in the dating world, Yeah, I mean I

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>bet the efficiency rate would be way higher than five.

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm telling you reduced for youse recycle your men that

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 7>And you know what the thing is, because like plastic

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 7>gets less good when you recycle it, but like men

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 7>get more good after we did.

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 5>That's true because you make them better.

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 7>We make everybody gets better after a relationship men, women, whatever, Like.

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if everybody ran through.

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 6>That's the idea, learn something.

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 7>Hopefully there should be like a cooling pod exit crazy

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 7>ex girlfriend ratio come to anyway.

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's it for part one. Now scroll down

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and click on part two to hear the rest. In

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>part two, we hear more about what happens with the

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>plastic when we put it in the bin. We'll go

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on a field trip to a recycling center to see

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 1>what's going on.

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:28.720
<v Speaker 5>It looked like some shit out of like future.

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and talk to a representative there to see if

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>recycling is actually a total scam or not.

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 4>So there's the statistic that everyone loves to like run

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 4>at me with their hands flailing in the air only

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 4>nine percent of plastic gets recycled, So I just want

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 4>to explain that statistic because it's a bit misunderstood.

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 1>This is just the beginnings such thing as a production

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>of Kaleidoscope content. Our executive producers are Kate Osborne and

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Mangesh Hatakader. This show is created by Mandy Fidel, Noah

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Friedman and Devin jose Femine. Credit song by Manny Fidell,

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>mixing by Steve Bone. Thank you so much to our

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 1>guests Naim Moraza and Davis Allen. Make sure you check

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>out Niama podcast. It's called Smart Girl Dumb Questions. It's

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>very funny, very smart and very good. You can go

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to Climate Integrity dot org to see the record. Davis

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>has been working on a Visit No Such Thing dot

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>show to subscribe to our newsletter for links to research

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:22.919
<v Speaker 1>in more. And lastly, we want to hear from you.

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>We made a survey to get feedback about what you

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like about the show, which you don't like about the show.

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 5>And a lot more.

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find the link in our show notes and

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>on our newsletter, so please let us know what you think.

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>And lastly, don't forget to jump into part two as

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:40.919
<v Speaker 1>soon as you can. Thanks nos nos noss.

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:41.880
<v Speaker 4>No such things.