WEBVTT - The Argument Against Relative Performance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Hello, it's Meren sumsat

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>web here. This week our guest is John Warren, co

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>founder of Telworth Investments and manager of the TM Telworth

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>UK Select Funder. He's got eighteen years of investment experience,

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's not why we asked him on. He runs

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>an absolute return fund, which is something that John and

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I find particularly interesting. So we talk about the way

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that works. But before we get to that very exciting conversation,

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>as we always do, we start with what I think

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>most of you consider to be the best part of

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the show, a conversation with money to Silve newsletter author

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>John Steppek, John, let's talk and I'll tell you what.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your absolutely favorite subject.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>New high after new high after new high.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Who wouldn't want to hold the buddsy one hundred exactly?

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>And we've got another new high today as we're recording.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>In fact, actually I may need double check this, but

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 3>Simon French over at paneers Gordon the other day tweeted

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 3>out to me saying that if the food see manages

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to close a new record high twelve times in a

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>row within a month, this will be like the first

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 3>time that's happened since I don't know, years and years

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 3>and years. So that's very exciting.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 2>What's making it happen. What's making it happen.

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>John, the fact that fund managers are essentially held animals,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 3>and they've seen something hit and you high in the

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>suddenly like, oh my god, there's a bandwagon in this movie.

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>After interrupted briefly, we don't we don't call them herd animals.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 1>We don't call them. Oh yes, investor, Well we had

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this conversation before momentum investors.

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 3>That's the politically correct.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So finally global investors have noticed that the UK

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is cheap, that Brexit has not been the end of

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the world, and that there are some really great companies

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in the UK and they can have a significantly lesson

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they can buy companies elsewhere. But even after all these

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>new highs, I think the UK is still in nineteen

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>percent discounty global pays.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, Still it's still cheap, and it is. It

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>is interesting because I had a quick looks. So my

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 3>go to for all of these things is the Bank

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>of America Global Fund Manager Survey. It's actually really good

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 3>sentiment indicator and it comes out every month. So I

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 3>look back at the January one for this year, and

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the UK's been at the bottom for ages, and the

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 3>January one it was rock bottom. Fund Global fund managers

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>said that they were more underway the UK relative to

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 3>history than any other asset class, and it's like twenty

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 3>one different asset classes, so big, big underweight, as in

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 3>they don't like it compared to the benchmark. And then

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I looked at the same one for last month and

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 3>it's basically been the same, you know, February, March, April May.

0:02:56.400 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 3>That's actually changed that they've actually moved some money into

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>UK stocks and they're now ever so slightly just above

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 3>average compared to the last twenty years. So that's been

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 3>a real kind of there has been a real sentiment

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 3>shift in a fairly short period of time, and it

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 3>has pretty much coincided with a new record high. And

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>to be fair, also they kind of move to value

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>because people have started to get a bit kind of

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 3>started to think that actually interest rates are going to

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 3>be higher for longer. Some maybe or the growth stuff

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 3>as in't necessarily the thing you stick with anymore. But yeah,

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>but I do think mostly it's actually momentum as well,

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 3>we just bought something moving and you don't want to

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 3>be left behind.

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>John, He respects. Nobody has want to see respect fund managers.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He's all over there absolutely right.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Listen.

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting note of the note of the note

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>from various banks, brothers, et cetera telling us what we've

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>been telling you for a long time now, that the

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>UK is cheap and you should buy it. But I

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>don't point you to one in particular, which is from

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our podcast regular James Ferguson, and he has written a

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>note and I will do a little summary of it

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and stick it on John's Money to Sold newsletter for

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you at some point. And his it's called it's called

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Union Jack in the box. Right. You know this is

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not and this is not an ordinary ball market. This

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is a British ball market, right. And his argument is

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>that as slightly different to our argument, to be honest,

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.679
<v Speaker 1>it is that inflation is absolutely out of the picture.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>He says that as far as he can see, there

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is very little inflationary pressure left. There's an eighteen month

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>contraction in nominal money supply, two yearstagnation of GDPETE. There

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely no excuse for base rates to be knocking

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>around to this sixteen year high of five point two

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent. So he thinks that once inflation is out

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of the picture, and he thinks it, everybody will realize

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that soon rates have a quoting here ample scope to

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>be cut a long way, alleviating the pressure on both

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>indebted retail and commercial property owners, stimulating productive bank growth,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and all without threatening a real acceleration in prices anti closures.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>No wonder, the foot year is just broken out to

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a new six year high, and so he's looking not

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>just at the cheapness, but at the fact that he

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>expects interest rates to fall quite fast soon. And I

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>did ask him about that and he said, there's just

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>no reason for them to stay.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Hi.

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I still feel as if I think you did, John,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that that central bankers might be taking the opportunity to

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.559
<v Speaker 1>try and normalize the idea that rach should knock around

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>four percent one percent, and therefore the fall is going

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to be slightly slower than a lot of other things.

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've got a huge amounty respect for James

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 3>because he's one of the few people that we in

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>order to explicitly got the two thousand and eight crisis

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>right and was one a book deflation even after all

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 3>the money printing, so we knows we was talking about I.

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Despite all that, I still struggle. We see that Hartman,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 3>and it also depends, I mean, it depends partly what

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 3>he means by a fast drop in interest rates. I've

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 3>read some of the note, but not the whole thing.

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 3>And you know, if he means it will get to

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 3>four quicker than everyone's expecting, then that's one thing. But

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't Again, I'm on the camp that says that

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:13.159
<v Speaker 3>rates don't go below three percent effectively ever again, you know,

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>as a for a very long time. So I'd be

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>curious to know a bit more about exactly what he's expecting.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll give him a call.

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll give him a call.

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll stick it in the newsletter. But he keeps using

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the word substantially. The NBC has very clear part of

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the courage substantially reduniate bank lending, et cetera, et cetera.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>His only concern, of course, is the incoming labor government

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Bank of England.

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Will they work together and.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Keep policy relatively tight, unleashing the private sector to go

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>for growth, or will they not? I think we can

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>probably get see answer to that, but we'll come back

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that maybe in six months or so. Right down, anything

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>else you want to say about this wonderful billmarket, No, I.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Think everyone should just sit back and enjoy it.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Now, before we get on to the conversation with John,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to point you to something we talk about

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>during it that we didn't define and we should have.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We talk about Sonya, and he talks about wanting to

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>outperform Sonya, and a lot of you are going to

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>be looking at that and you're going to be thinking, well,

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what earth is Sonya? And what it is is an

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>interest rate benchmark. It's the average price that banks paid

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to borrow stirring from each other overnight. So it's just

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a standard, straightforward measure of basic interest rates. And if

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you are going to attempt to outperform that, you're just

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be making more than you would in cash,

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>which seems like a good way to run a fund,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>right John.

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>It's the deplacement to libel because people may it here

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>to libel.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Ah, Okay, good point.

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to this in our conversation after our

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>conversation with John. Welcome to Maren Talks Money the podcast

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>In which people who know the market is explain the markets.

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm marrin Sumset Web. Here's my conversation with John Warren,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>who launched Tellworth Investments in October twenty seventeen. Before lad,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he worked at Casinos Capital Ubs an investor. We begin

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the conversation with John explaining why the fund he runs

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Tmtelworth's Select just different to a standard fund.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 6>The Tailworth fund that I run, the UK Select Fund,

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 6>is an absolute return fund. So what we are trying

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 6>to achieve is very consistent, low volatile returns for our investors,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 6>and we achieve that by being both long and short shares.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 6>We do that by being neutral to the market, so

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 6>we're not trying to take a big directional bet on

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 6>the market and basically be stock pickers. So we want

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 6>to buy stocks that are going up and be short

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 6>of stocks that are going down, and make consistent returns

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 6>with a very low volatility and importantly as well not

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 6>be correlated to the direction of the market or changes

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 6>in economic conditions or interest rate cycles, which is clearly

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 6>a big area for dat debate at the moment, and

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 6>really just we are targeting eight to ten percent returns

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 6>a year on a consistent basis. That's what we're trying

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 6>to achieve for our investors.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's an extraordinary thing. Eight to ten percent a year. Now,

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>when you say absolute return, of course, we're all immediately

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>thrilled because one of our big ripes me and John,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>one of our big rights of the fund management industry

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>as a whole is benchmarking is the idea that returns

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>are always relative to something the returns of something else.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You're never judging yourself in absolute returns how much money

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have you actually made for people year by year by year.

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It's about, well, you know, I have performed this benchmark

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>by zero point five percent, or I have performed that

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>benchmark by one and a half percent, or.

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Whatever it is. And we always look at it and

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 2>we think, well, hang, onlydic.

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>If you are judging yourself relative to something, it's got

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to be quite hard to outperform it over the long

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>term because you're always looking at it and going, oh god,

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm scared I'm gonna underperform it. Therefore, you

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>do end up investing in a way that is much

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>closer to the benchmark you're tracking than then you should.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Right looking at active.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Active shares that the extent to which your fund is

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>different from the indexit tracks, and so often you're still

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at at fairly low percentages of funds being genuinely

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>different to their benchmarks.

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 2>And I always think that maybe one.

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Of the great mistakes that this industry has ever made

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is being relative.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 6>I'd agree. And what are people trying to achieve with

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 6>their savings and what are savings products trying to do?

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 6>In investment products trying to do?

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 6>You're trying to grow your wealth over time. That's surely

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 6>that what everyone is trying to achieve. It's certainly what

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 6>I try and achieve with my personal wealth and with

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 6>my investors' funds. In the in the fund. Clearly, if

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 6>you are long only, there is always some elements of

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 6>directional direction of them underlying market you're investing in that's

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 6>going to dominate returns. So very hard to make absolute

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 6>returns if the market has a big bear crash, for example.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 6>What we do, though, is by making sure that we're

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 6>not taking that market. By having positions both sides, it

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 6>means that we are generally should be expected to make

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 6>returns irrespective of what's going on in the border economy.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 6>In the border markets, so we benchmark to cash, so

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 6>we have to outperform cash, so we use Sonya for that.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 6>So clearly that wasn't much of a challenge for many years.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 6>It's more of a challenge now, but we benchmark against that,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 6>so we expect to make a return in excess of

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 6>the cash return. And like I say, targeting eight to.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Ten, do you think all fund managers should do that?

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I always think that it will be polite

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of fund managers to tell us they're going to make

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>us cash plus three for example.

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 6>I think it would be a nice thing to hope,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 6>and I think most people judge their wealth managers with

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 6>that if you're looking at an overall portfolio. I think

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 6>it's quite hard, though, if you're investing in a niche

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 6>specialist fund to expect to be able to beat the

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 6>direction of that fund. But I guess a lot of

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 6>it comes down to your time horizon, doesn't it. And

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 6>unfortunately many people now look at quarterly performance or half

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 6>yearly performance. If you're looking over a five to ten

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 6>year of view, then I would think that's a perfectly

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 6>acceptable thing to expect to ask.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, anyone charging you one and a half

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 7>percent or one percent or even eighty basis points a

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 7>year for their special skill should be able to give

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 7>you cash plus three percentage points over a five year period.

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 6>I think once you're getting into longer term periods, that's

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 6>an absolutely fair, fair requirement.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good with the established new rules for the fund

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>management industry. Anyone who can find a reason to disagree

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with us, hate Melton John, Please, I know expect.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 6>I expect some colleagues will be getting in touch suit shortly.

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 2>They always do. Okay, So here we are. You're invest

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>in the UK market.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I know that for you, it's not about direction of

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the market itself, because as you just said, you're short

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're long, and you're trying to be neutral. But

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless it feelds like I'm intensative here because you know,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you can have the wrong feelings. But it feels like

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>something is changing in the UK market. That thing people

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>are beginning to get interested.

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 2>The big banks, the ubs is, etc.

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The brokers are beginning to change their view and suddenly say, well,

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if not the market we eight most in the world.

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 2>It's one of our favorite markets.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Because it's cheap and it's interesting. There's a sense there

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>might be some foreign buyers coming in with seeing new

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>eyes and the footst forty one hundred over and over

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and the other and the other areas doing well too.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Might even be some interest in mid and small caps

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>coming through. Are you buying it that there's a turn here?

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 6>It definitely feels like there has been a change in

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 6>the sentiment into the UK market. I think that's come

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.479
<v Speaker 6>from a few reasons, one of which is just performance. Unfortunately,

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 6>the market is a momentum chasing market in so many

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 6>ways now, and the performance that the market has had

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 6>is attracting some more plows of funds. I think one

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.719
<v Speaker 6>of the areas which has been much talked about on

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 6>this podcast is the lack of equity inflows into the

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 6>UK market that has been ongoing for a long long time. Interestingly, though,

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 6>overseas investors have actually been met buyers of the UK

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 6>for a period now, and the very noticeable factor as

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 6>well has been the increase in M and A. So

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 6>we always thought one of the big catalysts for the

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 6>UK market sentiment change would be a footy one hundred bid.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 6>We've had that with the approach for Anglos from BHP.

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 6>Clearly that hasn't actually come to any formal agreement yet,

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 6>but just the fact that a business of that size

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 6>is attracting M and A, and we've seen a lot

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 6>of it further down the market caps as well. We

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 6>invest a lot in the MidCap part of the market

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 6>as well as the large cap part of the market,

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 6>and we've seen lots of bid interest, so the trade

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 6>buyers coming in seeing value in these companies at meaningful premiums,

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 6>and the overall that just the valuation of the UK

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 6>market is very very attractive on both an absolute and

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 6>I hate to say it, Marian, but a relative basis

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 6>as well. So when you're looking at the UK market

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 6>relative to particularly the US, I think we're a second percentile,

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 6>so you know, a two in one hundred year valuation

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 6>cheapness against the US market.

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're happy to look at relative off we've already

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>looked at absolutely so with ubernapps terms, and then it's

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>also extremely cheap in relative terms.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Then I think that's excellent news.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But you said that foreign bius have been met bias

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit of time now, but.

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Domestic buiers consistently are not.

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And one of the other things we say we always

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>say on this podcast to our listeners, particularly those who

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are UK based investors, if you don't buy these stocks

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody else?

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Will? We see that in the L and A Right,

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>what is it do you think that might make UK

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 2>investors start buying again?

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Will they dive into thisum momentum? Or they do they

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>need something like the britt Eye Cerel something like that

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to make them stop with the domestic self loathing which

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we see not just in not just.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>An investment, right, we see that across the board. What

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 2>might make them return to us?

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, like I say, unfortunately, some of it is fomo,

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 6>so some of it is just needs to be the

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 6>fear of missing out. We also have some long only

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 6>funds that tell us. One of my colleagues pull Marriage,

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 6>was seeing an investor only the other week and that

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 6>investor said, well, I'm very happy to miss the first

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 6>twenty five percent of a move. So sometimes that's the

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 6>way that people want to move, and unfortunately people are

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 6>trend followers and that may well be the case that

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 6>we need that just that performance. I think changes from

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 6>pension reforms, from the brit Isser, all of these things

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 6>are great sentiment helpers. And actually I think the other

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 6>point that we probably need to see is just people

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 6>actually starting to look at value again and understanding what

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 6>valuations mean in investing. The market has been very driven

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 6>by momentum, earnings upgrades and almost wanting to buy growth

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 6>at any cost. But at some point valuation does matter

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 6>and that's what corporates are telling you. That's why they're

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 6>buying these companies. And as we see interest rates hopefully

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 6>started to move down in the UK, it seems like

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 6>the UK economy is slightly different now from the US

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 6>quite possible. We don't see rate cuts in the US,

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 6>but we probably will see them in the UK. We

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 6>think we probably get one in June, and that may

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 6>well just bring people back to the UK a little

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 6>bit as well.

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 5>They will get one and do even with those rather

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 5>than nice GDP now as we had the other day,

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>showing that actually things are so badly.

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Economy is barreling along rather pleasantly.

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 6>I think so, And the signaling from the NPC I

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 6>thought last week was probably that we do still get

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 6>one in June. I don't think it matters too much

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 6>whether we get one in June or slightly later in

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 6>the year. The main thing is that I think there's

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 6>a very clear signaling now in the UK market that

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 6>rates have peaked and the next move will be downwards.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 6>And when you look at the correlations of the Footsy

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 6>two to fifty, particularly to rate expectations, and it's very strong.

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 6>So if we start as those rate expectations come down,

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 6>we see the Footsie two fifty starting to form really

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 6>quite strongly. So I think that boats quite well for

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 6>the domestic parts of the market, and maybe a broadening

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 6>out of this rally that we've seen, which has actually

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 6>been pretty narrow so far. It's been very driven by banks,

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 6>miners and oils, and we would see that broadening out

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 6>more into the Footsy two fifty as those expectations of

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 6>rate cuts start getting priced into the market.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's let's talk about where you're actually invested there. Now,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you say that your your market neutral and you're set

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>in neutral way of no specific adherence to any any favoraus,

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sectors or anything like that. So your pure stock pick

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>is so where are you? Where are you finding the value?

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>What is interesting?

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 6>We do think the banks have been interesting for a while.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 6>We were a bit early into it into last year,

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 6>but we still think that West Has is a fantastic business.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 6>It's got great opportunities. It's now growing its tangible and

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 6>asset value. You've got the structural hedge which will have

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 6>some meaningful impact on the on the P and L

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 6>this year.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Stop stop, go back structural hedge.

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 6>So this is basically the way banks manage their balance sheets,

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 6>so how they fund themselves, and that means that as

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 6>interest rates expectations change and come down, that hedge starts

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 6>paying them money. In simple terms, so we think at

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 6>Thatwest it's about three hundred million pounds of profit a

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 6>year generated from essentially the balance sheet where they have

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 6>a fixed leg and a variable leg on their balance sheet.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 6>It's been a big negative impact on the P and

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 6>L while rates go up, and it becomes supportive to

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 6>the P and L as rates fall.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so if rates don't fall, if.

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 6>Rates don't fall, it will have a net zero benefit

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 6>to that. You know, we won't impact. But as time

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 6>moves on, you have some of that old leg of

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 6>the P and L which was funded at very low

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 6>rates that starts to roll off. So even if rates

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 6>don't fall, just the passage of time benefits the balance

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 6>sheet as well.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 2>So now with other banks, yeah.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 6>We are also think that One Savings Bank is interesting.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 6>This is a buy to let lender. It's had its issues,

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 6>It's definitely had its issues with expectations management. Its interest

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 6>margin has been its net interest margin has been under

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 6>some pressure. But these are just very, very cheap equities now.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 6>So One Savings Bank is trading on a pee of

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 6>less than five times, it has a you know, it

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 6>will be returning some cash through dividends as well, and

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 6>so we just think there's just incredible value and we

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 6>have to be patient. I think it's very important to

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 6>say that. Sometimes when we tell people that we're along

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 6>short investors, they think hedge funds trading. All you're doing

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 6>is taking short term bets. Now, we're very happy to

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 6>take long term views on these businesses, and as long

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 6>as we have that balance within the portfolio, we can

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 6>take that long term view.

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, I accept that you're not looking at sectors.

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other groups of stocks that feature prominently

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 1>in their portfolio?

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 6>Yes, so airlines and tour operators is a part of

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 6>the portfolio. We were quite encouraged. We own we own

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 6>Jet two, we own easy Jet, we also own Ryanair.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 6>We think that's the sector that's in really good health

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 6>at the moment. It's one thing that it seems that

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 6>the UK consumer is not prepared to give up on

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 6>is there summer holiday and until this weekend you can

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 6>see certainly see why with the weather we've had so far.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 6>One of the areas we like to look at a

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 6>lot when we're analyzing businesses in industries is the supply side,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 6>and the supply side of the package holiday industry has

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 6>changed a lot. We've seen some quite big exits. Obviously,

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 6>Thomas Cook going bankrupt a few years ago has made

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 6>big changes to that industry. But also the other area

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 6>of supply side is in the supply of planes, and

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 6>it's been well publicized that Boeing and Airbus as well

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 6>now are having some problems delivering new planes. That means

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 6>that a lot of these airlines have some real pricing

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 6>power now because capacity is not coming back into the

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 6>sector as quickly as people might have expected, and therefore

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.479
<v Speaker 6>they're getting good pricing. So unfortunately, although everyone is going

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 6>on holiday, it's costing you all a bit more this year,

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 6>but that is very good for the profits of the

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 6>airline companies. Fuel prices have also come down as well,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 6>so we like the dynamics of that industry. Again, the

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 6>valuations they are really attractive. You know, jet to seven

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 6>and a half times earnings. I think for the forecast,

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's longer term average P has been twelve.

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 6>This is a business that's grown revenues at twenty percent

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 6>over the last decade and profits at thirty trading on

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 6>seven and a half times earnings. So you know, we

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 6>really see there's both good drivers for the P and

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 6>L and also a very attractive evaluation metrics. Across the

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 6>airline sector, there's.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>No sense at all that people are translating there in

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>tense anxiety about climate change into their some holiday plans.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Is that it definitely isn't impacting consumer behavior at all.

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Is there any long term risk to holiday companies and

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>airline companies around saying regulation on the extent to which

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>one can fly or not fly and constantly seeing stories

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in the newspapers about her won't be long before we're

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>all limited to four long haul flights in a lifetime.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 6>Let's hope not. But look, I guess there's always longer

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 6>term risks for companies. The one thing I would say

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 6>is that we're paying seven and a half times earning.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 6>So it's a bit like when you look back at

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 6>the tobacco companies. Clearly everyone has taken the view that

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 6>tobacco is not good for us, not good for anyone,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 6>and they've been heavily regulated. But you know, when you're

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 6>paying very low valuations for these for these types of shares,

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 6>the shares can still do a really good job for you.

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 6>And that's what we would see.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And also, if you're one of the incumbents, you're set pretty.

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Fair well, exactly. And that's the thing. It stops new

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 6>new entrants coming in and wanting to try and compete

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 6>away those attractive margins that you're seeing.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's also the case in energy, because no one's

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.479
<v Speaker 1>going to go out now and sort of set and

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 1>your oil company.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 6>Are there, no, And you know, again, oil isn't a

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 6>sector that we play a lot in a bit like

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 6>the miners. What we're trying to do is as stock pickers,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 6>what we want to be able to do is analyze

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 6>in actual company and value of value like that. What

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 6>we don't want to have to do is make these

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 6>big macro calls. By being market neutral and factor neutral,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 6>what it means is that we don't have to spend

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 6>our time worrying about what the next GDP figure is

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 6>or what the next interest rate cut is. What we

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 6>can do is have a balanced portfolio in the way

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 6>that you have with an oil company. Clearly, the most

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 6>important thing for how that share price performs is what's

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 6>happening with the oil price, and frankly, we don't really

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 6>have a clue, so we'd rather not make that decision.

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 2>All the evidence tells us that nobody has a cluience.

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't be alone there, You don't only be alone

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and in missing it exactly. So what have you added recently,

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what's come what's come out recently, and what's coming in recently?

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 6>I would say the most recent edition would be a

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 6>business called Dowlay actually, which is another stock that very

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 6>much falls into that value bucket. So Dowlay was a

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 6>spin out for Melrose. It's an automotive supplier, so not

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 6>particularly trendy, I guess in that, you know, and maybe

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 6>if we're getting into ESG world, you can can we

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 6>can talk about that. But they are a leading producer

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 6>of drive trains, so these are the parts of them

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 6>that actually changed the engines down through the wheel. So

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 6>you have a drive train that comes down the middle

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 6>of the car and that puts the power from the

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 6>engine into the wheel. They're the leading provider of that

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 6>in the world pretty much. That have some good products

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 6>for electric vehicles as well. But this is a business

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 6>that has really just been completely lost in the UK midcaps.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 6>Like I say, it's spun out of Melrose, So the

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 6>shares got put into the hands of Meloe shareholders, who

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't think really wanted to hold a UK MidCap

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 6>auto supplier. So that's been They've been sold heavily and

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 6>now these shares are trading on ap of five times

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 6>with a decent balance sheet in an industry that you know,

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 6>they are growing revenues, growing profits, when we just think

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 6>that's you know, just too cheap. What we've been watching

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 6>there has been we've been watching the shareholder register and

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 6>how that's evolved, and we've seen a huge churn in

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 6>that and we think that that's pretty much at the

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 6>end and on that valuation, we've decided that was an

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 6>interesting time to come into the stock.

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>It does see ridiculously cheap, doesn't it. Are you seeing

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that kind of price in the smaller

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>MidCap sectors at the moment, and particularly in midcaps.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 6>In midcaps, I mean, there are a lot of stocks.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 6>I mean, we did some analysis at the start of

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 6>the year and I'm afraid we haven't updated it since,

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 6>but we looked at the footsy two fifty. So in

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 6>the footsy two there's one hundred or at the start

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 6>of the year, obviously is a few less now, but

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 6>there are one hundred and sixty seven trading companies. So

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 6>if you take out the investment trusts, et cetera, one

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 6>hundred and sixty seven now a third of those were

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 6>on a free cash flow yield greater than thirteen percent.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 6>There's really really strong cash flows and the market's just

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 6>ignoring them. People often thought, don't they that profits are

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 6>show and cash is you know, cash, cash is the king,

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 6>and if you've got that genuine cash flow coming through

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 6>in these companies, it's very hard to doubt that those

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 6>those valuation metrics are for real. So, yeah, we see

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 6>a lot of a lot of great opportunities in the

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 6>medcap space, but also in the footy one hundred as well.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 6>Like we've been talking about that, you know, the banks

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 6>and the airlines are still very, very cheap yeah, and Marks.

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 2>And Dispensers, is it still one of your top holding? Yes,

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I feel like I feel like in my career.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Now I've been I've seen Marks and Spencers go around

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and so many circles.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>It's getting ridiculous.

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And so many times when people have looked at Marks

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Dispensers and gone on, my goodness, are so cheap.

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 2>It's so cheap. It's so cheap. And and here we are, here,

0:26:58.200 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 2>we are still cheap.

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 6>I'm not sure myself as well how many times I've

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 6>brought into a new market expenses recovery plan, but this

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 6>one actually seems to be working, so yes, it's marketing

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 6>expenses is actually the biggest position in the fund at

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.160
<v Speaker 6>the moment, single stock position. Yeah, we think it's it's actually,

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, the transition plan is working really well. The

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 6>things we have looked at, particularly given US encouragement, is

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 6>the full price mix. So that's improved from being in

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 6>the sixty percent to eighty percent. So that's how many

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 6>of their sales they're managing to sell at full price

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 6>rather than having to discount.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 2>And so what's normal in the retail CITA.

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 6>The best players in the industry will achieve ninety so

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 6>next and Indo text will be in the nineties, so

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 6>they're still a bit further to go and we would

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 6>hope them to get there, but sixty was pretty awful

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 6>again when you know, looking at the supply side. The

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 6>one thing that's has been quite a lot of exit

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 6>in clothing in the UK market. There's been lots of closures.

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Probably the most important one for the sector was Debenham's closing.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 6>They were the most disruptive in terms of that discounting

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 6>on the high street, so that's probably helped them, but

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 6>also better ranging. But interestingly, even with that move in

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 6>full price sales, the gross margin hasn't really improved yet.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 6>Part of that was clearly cost inflation, but also that

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 6>implies to us they're becoming much more cost competitive, which

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 6>is clearly important in the economy at the moment where

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 6>consumers have been a little bit under pressure, So we

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 6>think that's really interesting. The food business has always been good,

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 6>there's a big opportunity for them in homewares and beauty

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 6>products where they don't push anywhere near their weight, and

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 6>the balance sheet is much better as well. So yeah,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 6>we really like Maske expenses and as I say, it's

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 6>the biggest long position in the fund of the moment

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 6>as the two.

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>The other two that I'm quite interested in. Your top

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>holdings are the London Stock Exchange. Tell us about that

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit.

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 6>London Stock Exchange is a really interesting business. We think

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 6>it's one where there is lots of m and a

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 6>opportunity for them. You know, we've seen consolidation in that space.

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 6>Is also transferred transformed its profitability a lot into data

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 6>products as well, so the Footzie and the Rustle indexes.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 6>And as a small business, we know how much we

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 6>have to pay for these products. And there's definitely been

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 6>strong inflation in there been a good performer for us,

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 6>and it's actually been one we have been reducing because

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 6>we do see that valuation as being pretty full now.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So okay, so you reduce of that on a valuation basis.

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that how the shorts work as well your shorts

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to make your market neutrality.

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 2>You've got longs and you've got shorts.

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The shorts are they companies that you think are lousy

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>companies or are they companies that you think are just

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a little too pricey even if they're high quality.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>How did that work?

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 6>It could be a combination of both. So generally we

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 6>have about forty positions on both sides, so we have

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 6>about forty longs and about forty shorts. So clearly, trying

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 6>to find forty companies in the UK market that we

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 6>think are going to go bust is probably unlikely. So

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 6>we can't just be short bad businesses. Also, as I said,

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 6>we want to be factor neutral as well, so if

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 6>we're looking at the quality factor, we have to be short.

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 6>If we're long quality businesses, we need to be short

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 6>some quality businesses as well. So we have to accept

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 6>the fact that we're going to have to be short

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 6>businesses that we think are really good businesses where we

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 6>just don't think the valuations are right or we think

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 6>there's some risk out there. It's a tricky skill. Not

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 6>many fur managers have done it successfully over the years,

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 6>because you really need to have that ability to separate

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 6>businesses and share prices and accept the fact that you

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 6>can be a good business but you can be trading

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 6>at the wrong valuation. And unfortunately we are a UK

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 6>only fund here. We do a little bit in Ireland

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 6>and a very small amount in Europe, but that means

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 6>unfortunately we can't be short lots of the very highly

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 6>overvalued businesses in the US.

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>So it's pretty brutal stuff. Then the way that you work,

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, and there's an.

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Ordinary firm manager that says to meander around the bay

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>finding something kind of like. But pretty much every time

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you find something that you like, you also have to

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>find something you're prepared short.

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Exactly, and it is and it's hard work, and it's

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 6>we need lots of ideas, but also sometimes it's accepting

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 6>the fact that some of the shorts will not make

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 6>you absolute returns. So you know, at the moment the

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 6>last over the last month or two, it's been pretty

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 6>hard to make absolute returns on your shorts because the

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 6>market is going up very strongly. But as long as

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 6>we can pick longs that go up by more than

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 6>our shorts than clearly we are we can make good

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 6>returns for our investors.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but it's harder for you when the market is rising.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's say that we're.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, you and I, because we're bound to be right,

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>said the UK market being in recovery and the momentum

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>leading to more momentum, because the hardest John and I

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>discussed last week all fund managers are really momentum managers.

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter what they tell you. Oh i'm value,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 2>i'm quality, I'm this, I'm that. Now, you're all momentum, right.

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So as it gets going, it'll get going more the

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>market goes up and it becomes hard for you. You

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you're harder for you to consistently outperform other funds. Although

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe in relative but for the moment, let's

0:31:56.840 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about was relative to other funds. As the market covers,

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that becomes more difficult for you, not not easier. Surely,

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if everything's going up.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 6>It makes it more difficult to make absolute returns on

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 6>our short book. That's correct. But clearly what we need

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 6>to do is make sure that our lungs are going

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 6>up by more than our shorts and when the market

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 6>is performing very strongly, we are not going to make

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 6>you the same amount of money as a long only fund,

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 6>but what we will do is protect your capital much

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 6>better and hopefully make you returns when the market is falling.

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 6>So it is that we don't sell this fund as

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 6>a UK equity fund. So most people that invest in

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 6>this fund are not buying it because they think the

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 6>UK equity market is going up. They might be buying

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 6>it because they think the UK equity market is going

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 6>down and therefore they want the ability to have that

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 6>absolute return. What they're saying is this plays a part

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 6>in my portfolio of where we can get that consistency

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 6>of return and uncorrelateable to turns, So it's not correlated

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 6>to equity markets or bond markets, and it's producing that

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 6>type of return stream. But yes, I mean, you know,

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 6>is always hard. Most of the market is always positive,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 6>most analysts are always positive on stocks, So you have

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 6>to be prepared to be cynical. You have to be

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.239
<v Speaker 6>prepared to go against what most people are telling you

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 6>about that company, and usually the company managements as well,

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 6>because clearly company management teams always want to tell you

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 6>how great things are. They don't want to highlight the

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 6>bad bits. So that's definitely a skill that you have

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 6>to develop for running a strategy like this.

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Strategically speaking, for a retail investor, if you are thinking

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 5>about how to constructure your portfolio, and perhaps you have

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 5>a fairly big passive component to your portfolio, this is

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 5>the kind of active fund that it makes sense to

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 5>hold alongside a passive portfolio.

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.959
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense absolutely.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 6>I think these funds are not very well understood by investors.

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 6>I think sometimes people are scared of them. I think

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 6>sometimes the regulate it scared of them as well. To

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 6>be honest with you, with the risk ratings we get

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 6>sometimes on these funds because we do shorts companies and

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 6>we use we use CfDS in the fund, so that

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 6>makes the regulator sort of a bit concerned about this

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 6>product and can put quite high risk ratings. But actually

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 6>when you look at the return profiles, these are incredibly

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 6>low risk funds. And we spend a lot of time

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 6>as fund managers managing the risk of this product to

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 6>make sure that we're not taking market risk, that we're

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 6>not taking interest rate risk, we're not taking domestic risk

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 6>as well, so we don't want to be sort of

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:29.439
<v Speaker 6>just long the domestic economy as well. So I think

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 6>they hold it a really they can play a really

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 6>important part in an overall investor's portfolio for that sort

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.919
<v Speaker 6>of ballast of something that's trying to achieve. And when

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 6>most people think what's an acceptable return on my investments

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 6>over the years, as we say long term returns, people

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 6>might usually assume us sort five or six. So if

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 6>we can generate eight or ten in any market environment.

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 6>We think that's a really attractive income stream.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Makes we'd all say that, of course, do you worry

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that passive is getting is getting.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 2>A little too much?

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>That you know, the beginning of the drive towards passive,

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we were all blother thrill that the idea that you

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>could get a perfectly adequate.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Long term investment at an incredibly low cost.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>But now that more and more of the assets under

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>management are passively managed, do you.

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Think that affects the market? All? Of course, there any

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 2>long term problem.

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 6>I think it does, and I think that that the

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 6>industry needs to have a look at this at some

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 6>point and see where is the tipping point that we're

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 6>not getting proper price discovery. And I think you know

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 6>that is always a good risk that passive is. You know,

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 6>you're just mentioning about how every investor is a momentum investor. Well,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 6>passive is the ultimate momentum and I think it brings

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 6>real risk and the idea that well, I'm passive to

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 6>the market, therefore I'm reducing risk just isn't the case,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 6>and particularly not when we're at stages right now where

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 6>the mags seventh for example, is taking up so much

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 6>of these global indices that you're actually taking a lot

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 6>of risk that you probably don't realize you're taking by

0:35:57.360 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 6>being passive. And as I say, one of the reasons

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 6>why I think that's so the valuation argument is not

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 6>being looked at, and the valuation attractions of certain markets

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 6>and certain stocks isn't being taken into account. It's because

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 6>the passives aren't looking at that. The passage just look

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 6>at a weight and buy it. So it definitely brings risk.

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 6>I think it was highlighted very strongly last year with

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 6>Silicon Valley Bank. I read some statistics that there was

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 6>one quite vocal short in that stock, but no one

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 6>listened to him. But I think seven out of the

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 6>top ten shareholders were all passive investors. And as they

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 6>said that if you look for the problems, you could

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 6>have seen them. But passive investors aren't looking for problems,

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 6>and that means you get very bad by discovery, and

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 6>that means that you get some big issues coming into markets.

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>You have a price discovery problem potentially also a governance problem.

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, Oh that's depressing.

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Sorry you carry on.

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 6>No, I was going to say, well, I do think

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 6>there's a sick clelement to these things. And clearly the

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 6>market has moved strongly into passives and that's been partly

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 6>driven by a regulator as well who's very focused on cost,

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 6>not just on investment outcomes. So I think a more

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 6>balanced approach on that will will help as well. And

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, maybe it needs a bit of a bear

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 6>market or you know, a bit of a correction in

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 6>some of these really big stocks and these really big

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, the areas of crowding in the market need

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 6>to have a correction that they will then shake out

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 6>and make people understand that cheapness of the investment product,

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 6>just so the cost of its investing is not the

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 6>only Is there any thing you should be solving for

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 6>in portfolios.

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>When you look around the world, which I know you're

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>very focused on the UK, but I'm sure you're saving

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>an eye for the rest of the world. Are there

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are any other markets that you find interesting from a

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>valuation point of view? I'm guessing you wouldn't touch see

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you after the barge pole.

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.959
<v Speaker 6>No, I wouldn't. I mean, the KPE of the US

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 6>market is thirty three times, so the KP is the

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:58.359
<v Speaker 6>long term pe. So the ten year pe that's at

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 6>thirty three times, which I think is only been above

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 6>that twice in its history. So no, I think the

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 6>US looks like it's valued for perfection to me, with

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 6>margins pretty much at peaks. So I think there's a

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 6>lot of risk in the US market. I do think

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 6>China might be getting interesting again. I mean a very

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 6>uneducated view, so please, you know I'm a UK stock specialist,

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 6>so please don't on global markets.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 2>We're interested in your instincts.

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 6>So I think that you know, China has looked is

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 6>starting to look interesting again, and maybe a few more

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 6>of the emerging markets could be you know, Japan has

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 6>clearly been had a good run. I think that the

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 6>Japan is maybe a good indication of what could happen

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 6>in the UK. You know, the valuation has got to

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 6>extreme levels in it rallyed quite hard, and I think

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 6>that we could be entering a period for the UK

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 6>market a little bit like the rally we've seen in

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 6>Japan over the last eighteen months.

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure the jab may's been thrilled to be

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>locked in with emerging markets.

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.919
<v Speaker 6>Sorry, yeah, I was thinking in China in that sense,

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 6>but you're correct to pull me up on that, so

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 6>thank you.

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Now the final question.

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>If I were to not allow you to hold any

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>small caps, any mid camps, any large caps, in fact,

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no, he's at all. But for a ten year period,

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:17.959
<v Speaker 1>you had to either hold bitcoin or gold and nothing else.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Which would it be.

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 6>I listened to this podcast, so I know this question

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 6>was coming, and I really wanted to try and find

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 6>a reason why I could say bitcoin, because no one

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 6>else seems to say say bitcoin, but I can't. Unfortunately,

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 6>so I can't find a compelling reason to own bitcoin

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 6>anything that has the volatility that it has, and being

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 6>an investor that looks at volatility, that can't be any

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 6>store of value. So unfortunate, I'm going to have to

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 6>go with the huge consensus and say gold.

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:45.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's disappointing.

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, I know, but I'd like to think we as

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 6>a long short investor, we like being contrarian at times,

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 6>so I wanted to try and find that. Unfortunately, I

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 6>couldn't find a good reason.

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Had you got any gold?

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 6>Yes, in my personal investments, I have a bit of

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 6>explosure to gold. I also have a little bit of

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 6>explosure to bitcoin as well. I must say I must

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 6>admit so, but that is very much as a trading position,

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.280
<v Speaker 6>as a not as a long term investment.

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well that you know that is interesting in itself.

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 1>So this is just the first time we have had

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>anybody on the podcast who has admitted to being a

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin trailer on the side. So you've given us something, yes, exactly,

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much.

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Really enjoyed talking to you.

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 6>Thanks very much, Marian.

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 2>John.

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that John John John too many John's.

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that John is really interesting and I think

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>also worth saying before we really go into talking about

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>what he said, is that the performance of this fund

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>has been excellent. It's very small fund, and the small

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>funds that are easier to make out perform than big funds.

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I get that. But nonetheless, last five years he's up

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty four percent for one hundred over that time thirty

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>three percent, but still you know, rising fast now, right,

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so we've massively outperformed the index he would use, which

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 1>would be the investment station targeted and FLETE return index.

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think although honestly, as we discussed in that conversation,

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he's not interested in the index. He's interested in making

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>slightly more Hopefully, Brother a lot more than you will

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on catch.

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I thought, I mean, I thought it was

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 3>really interesting. I think the lesters all have enjoyed the

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 3>fact that this has actually been quite a good tippy

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 3>one sliced talk about individual companies.

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not easy to get fund managers to

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:28.359
<v Speaker 1>do that, you know, I'm always trying to get them

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to come on, give us your top holdings, tell us

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>your top tip, what would old for ten years or whatever?

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But mostly I think, you know, the compliance environment has changed,

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and in the old days it was quite easy to

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>get fund managers just to sort of pour out a

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>list of tips, but now they're rather more circum circumspect

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>about it. Well, most of them are. John John being

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the exception to the rule there, Thank you, John is.

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Staff Because the top ten holdings obviously are public information,

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:53.840
<v Speaker 3>so you know, they should be able to come on

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 3>and like feel free to talk enthusiastically about them, yeah.

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And explain why they hold them. But mostly, as they said,

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it's quite hard to get them to do it, isn't it.

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I did think the stuff about absolutely turn was really

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 3>interesting because being able to go short is actually one

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 3>of the few ways the active managers can properly differentiate

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 3>themselves from passively. You can't do that with a passive fund.

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 3>And even the most kind of like active retail investor

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 3>is going to struggle to an extent to run you know,

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 3>unless you're really kind of like doing a lot of

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 3>CfDS and spread bit and things like that, you're going

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 3>to struggle to run a long shot portfolio the way

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 3>a kind of fund manager can. So it's interesting say

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 3>that sector is I mean, I know, absolutely turn got

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 3>a bad name for itself because the returns were absolutely

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 3>awful as opposed to actually beating interest rates, you know

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 3>whatever about a decade.

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's true that they were awful, and it

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 1>was all a bit, you know, all a bit awkward

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>back then, But the truth is still a more honest

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>way to run money. And even if you even if

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you are a long only manager, it's still more honest,

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I think, to compare yourself to what we would get

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>if we struck our money in the bank, and to

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:15.280
<v Speaker 1>work to outperform inflation rather than to outperform other fund managers,

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>because that's what's really all we care about, you and

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I right, and our listeners I think too, they're not

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.439
<v Speaker 1>interested in being in having your money in the best

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>performing fund manager. That would be nice. Of course, what

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we're interested in is protecting our capital, protecting the purchasing

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>power of our capital, and hopefully increasing the purchasing pawer

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of our capital. But first of all, mainly the thing

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that we want is, you know, don't reduce the value

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of our capital. I'm saving this up from my retirement.

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I need my money to be a time machine.

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I need it to be able to buy the same

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff in the future or more than it does now,

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>not less. So let's work on that basis. And so

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think that even though there been periods in

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the past when this has not worked, and periods in

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the past when people have treated absolute return as hedge

0:43:56.080 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>fund as opposed to cautious absolutely return, it's still honest

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and valuable way of running money.

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, you're right. I mean, making a consistent

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 3>real return is what you really want from your mind.

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.759
<v Speaker 3>And obviously, yeah, you do eventually get to a point,

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 3>hopefully where actually capital preservation is more important than capital growth.

0:44:19.040 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 3>So there's also I mean, that's another conversation as well.

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 2>But well, it's one of those things, isn't it. People,

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Or if you are. There's a risk things.

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:29.360
<v Speaker 1>When you sign up to a wealth manager or a

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>fund etca, which which risk level are you? And if

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you're at the top risk level, you're supposed to accept

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>that it's possible that you might need a lot of

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>your money. But no one signing up for those things

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>really believe that to do they I don't know what

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>really signing up to risk level five things themselves. I

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>might use might lose forty percent of my money and

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with that.

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Exactly thinks that, Yeah, I mean, the risk question is

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 3>is daft. I mean, you're where you're invested as an

0:44:53.800 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 3>overall as an allocation level should broadly be based on

0:44:56.520 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 3>your time horizon and not on any imaginary facity for

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 3>temporary losses. Because that's the other thing. They're not actually

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 3>asking you a YOKI will losing forty percent of money.

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 3>They're asking a you OK if we spreadsheet we send

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 3>you every month sometimes says you've lost forty percent of

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 3>your money, but at the end of that it won't

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 3>be forty percent because the whole point of taking the

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 3>you know the maximum risk is that you know it's

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 3>a bumpier ride along the way, but you make more

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 3>by the end of the twenty years or whatever it is.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think that that whole concept at risk is very,

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 3>very confused, and I mean, I appreciate it's it's a

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 3>confusing subject, but that's the kind of thing that people,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:40.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, IFAs and things like that should be explained

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 3>to people.

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So really, really, instead of just taking a home like that,

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you should have a full psychiatric assessment, absolutely to make

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sure that you have a kind of person. Yeah, you

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>can deal with the stress of that kind of fluctuation exactly.

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 3>You can get your prozac alongside your asse.

0:45:57.880 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we get out a whole new layer of

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 1>complicated compliance too, investing by insisting that everyone has some

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of analysis done before they're.

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Allowed to take five Yep, I'm I'm sure that. Yeah,

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I said, think of the bit of the complaints industry

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:15.400
<v Speaker 3>would thank you for that. I'm not sure the stry.

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, sir, I've gone off topic, John, I've gone

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 1>off topic. Told me what else you found interesting about

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:21.719
<v Speaker 1>this conversation.

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was all very interested the well you

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 3>liked it.

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 2>Because he was his pro the.

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 1>UK market just like, yeah, he thinks the turn is

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in and he's talking about trade by trade bias, seeing

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 1>value that really quite impressive premiums, and he's saying, you know,

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this is this is trying to on absolute levels. And

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>although who's a bit embarrassed to say the word relative,

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say on a relative basis as well, So

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's very pro all the things that were pro.

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So we like that.

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 3>It's massive coinformation bias basically, I know loved that. And

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the other thing I thought was interesting was the shortened element,

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 3>this idea that he's got and I must have met.

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 3>There was a part, I mean, it was kind of train.

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 3>It was struggling with that a bet and that I'm

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 3>thinking were everything you buy a stock, you're going to

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 3>have to shine. Wen't is short even if you don't

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 3>think you know that are any that are great shortened candidates?

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 3>But I guess that's how you make it market neutral.

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, you know, you own the really good ones,

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and even if they aren't any bad ones, you know

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you sell the less good ones.

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:27.960
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that's quite interesting.

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We talked a little bit in here about about ESG

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and about people not following through on their beliefs on

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>climate change, et cetera with their consumer performance and that,

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we looked easy Jet and Ryan Air

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>except they like and that made me think again about

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the divestment that we've been though I mentioned earlier. You know,

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>how how you get there is that we don't have

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>very many miners or oil companies. But if you were

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>ESG minded, and if you were climate change minded, then

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't want to hold any of these things, either,

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.239
<v Speaker 1>would you. And once you start not holding easy Jet

0:47:57.239 --> 0:48:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and not holding Ryan Air and then not holding anything

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that creates jet fuel or anything that has a shop

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the airport or anything like that, why do you.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 3>End it's the fundamental issue, isn't it. It's kind of

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 3>like the fund management industry in the SG side of

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 3>things is the you know, I think this is where,

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:17.280
<v Speaker 3>even at a more fundamental level, is kind of green

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 3>washing anyway, because an awful lot of the harder core

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 3>arguments like you know, no one should fly again, you

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 3>should never die in and out of the ground, are

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 3>essentially anti capitalist, and you can you know, I don't

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 3>mind if you think that. I think you're stupid if

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 3>you think that, But it's fine, you know, that's a

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:44.319
<v Speaker 3>valid you know, kind of it's your opinion. But at

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:46.120
<v Speaker 3>the same time, in that case, you just wouldn't invest

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:49.600
<v Speaker 3>in anything at all, because you know, you're propping up

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.479
<v Speaker 3>the market, you're propping up the system that you're trying

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 3>to you know, unravel or destroy. So I think there's

0:48:55.600 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 3>a very fundamental conflict, which is I guess coming more

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 3>to light now anyway. But yeah, so not I get

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:07.520
<v Speaker 3>that's the other reason why I think in a talk

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:10.479
<v Speaker 3>a bit of this stuff at one level it's both

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 3>incredibly superficial and kind of pointless in the way because

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 3>it's almost like two groups of people completely talking past

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 3>one another, and the people in the middle who kind

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 3>of like know they have to save for their pension,

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 3>but they want their pension to be doing nice stuff

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:31.799
<v Speaker 3>and inverted comments because they're somewhat scared of money. It's

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 3>a whole different thing. I mean, in fact, that goes

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:37.799
<v Speaker 3>back to the psychiatric evaluation. Maybe because people get shed

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:39.280
<v Speaker 3>your taboos about money.

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, Okay, this is going to be quite a

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 4>long psychiatric session for everybody. Yeah, fund management, fay, they're

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 4>going to gout massively, and so wealth management.

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And faith we're all going to have to go shopping

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to get over it. I love that he's got Marks

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Responses in the top ten, and as I said to

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>him during our conversation, I don't know how many cycles

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of Marks and Spenses is cheap. Marx Suspensive, Oh my god,

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Mark Suspense is awful, cell Max Suspenses. I've been through

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in my my quite a long career, actually, but I

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 1>do I do think that right now, Mark Suspensis does

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>look like they've finally got the hang of this retail thing. Yeah.

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Actually I agree. Yeah, I feel exactly the same way

0:50:17.840 --> 0:50:20.439
<v Speaker 3>as you. I had kind of got to the point

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 3>where I was like, I'm never believing in the Mark

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Suspenser's turn the round story again.

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 6>But it does.

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Then you went to the food hole, and then you went.

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:33.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've still got to see I still think

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 3>why not just spend that off, split the manty two things,

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 3>and then you've got, uh, you've got a clothing unit

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 3>that occasionally performs, and you've got a food unit that

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 3>is like, you know, a massive challenge. It likes waitros

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and all the rest of it.

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't want them to do that because they

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:54.120
<v Speaker 1>might move the two areas to different sites. And I

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like to buy nikas and food at the same time.

0:50:57.520 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think you'll find this a lot of other people

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>out there who do as well. A non started John

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:02.879
<v Speaker 1>as a non starter.

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>And this of course is why we said I said

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning, and I'll say again this is not

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just a bullmarket, it's a British bullmarket.

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Good right, that's good. That's good.

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Maren Talks Money. We'll

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be back next week in the meantime. If you like

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>our show, rate review and subscribe wherever you listen to

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:32.839
<v Speaker 1>your podcast, and keep sending questions or comments to Merron

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Money at Bloomberg dot net. This episode was hosted by

0:51:35.960 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>me Maren Sunset Web. It was produced by some Sidy Adriginal,

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>editing by Moses and and special thanks to John Warren

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and to John da