WEBVTT - 2023 WNBA Playoff Preview, A'ja vs. Stewie & Anonymous Player Poll

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a Japanese way to get headache out.

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Long sleeve teachers roll them up and then tie up

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>on my head head like this, were it tight? Okay

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 2>like this, So now your headache is gone because this

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 2>give you a new headache.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the No Dunks podcast, probably a

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the Athletic Podcast Network. It's September twelfth, twenty

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. I'm your host for today, Trey Kirby. We

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>got Jerome in the yard making the magic happen. And

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to be joined today by a national women's

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>basketball staff writer for The Athletic, one of the co

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>hosts of the Athletic Women's Basketball Show alongside Xenakada and

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Sabrina Merchant. We got Ben Pickman on the show. Ben,

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what's up man?

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing super well, Super excited to hear.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I can't wait to w with you. Thank you

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>to everybody here in the stream team joining us live today.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to everybody listening to the podcast a little bit later,

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>like subscribe, comment, email, engage with us, make this show

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a big time hit. Ben. Before we get into the playoffs,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you a little bit about

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the regular season in the WNBA longest regular season we've

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>ever had. We've got super teams in the w now,

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, highest scoring season in WNBA history

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. Has this been as awesome of a regular

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>season as it seems like to me?

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>It has been, you know, extended games, extended season means

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot more records have fallen, a lot more incredible

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 3>scoring performances. Scoring has been up, as you mentioned, a

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 3>ton of triple doubles, some history in that category. All

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>throughout the league, the super teams have been as good

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>as advertised, even though New York did take a little

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 3>bit of time to get going, you know, and you know,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the bottom of the league, the middle of league has

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 3>been super competitive too, just kind of topsy turvy. A

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 3>lot has come down to the end of the regular

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>season and it sets up for a really playoffs.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I thought the last week was really exciting

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>because a few teams were really trying to qualify for

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs down the stretch, two teams I pull for.

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Canvas Parker fan first and foremost, but then

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the Sky and the Dream were like going down to

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the last games of the season to see if they

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>were gonna make. It kind of reminds me, honestly of

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a Formula One season where we've got two teams really

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>fighting for the title, a couple of good teams, and

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>then a whole bunch of mid carters who you don't

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly know what you're gonna get from game to game.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>But it made for an exciting season, man, and I'm

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>hyped for the playoffs to come around. Did you have

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a favorite game, a favorite moment from the regular season

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>this year?

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there were a few memorable ones. I'm based

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>in Brooklyn, so I've been around the Liberty a lot.

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 3>I've seen a lot of Liberty games in person. I

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 3>mean Brianna Shurts her first home game when she set

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>a franchise record and career high forty five points against

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 3>the Fever, Like, that's how you kick off a tenure

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 3>with a franchise with a bang, right, Like it was

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 3>an unbelievable performance. It was like, oh, man, now we

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>are finally getting to watch Dewey in person. That was super,

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 3>super exciting. All Star was a great weekend, super successful,

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 3>ton of fun events there. Anytime you're around the aces

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and just seeing them in person, that is a treat.

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 3>So those are some of the highlights for me.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was lucky. I got to see the Aces

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>play here in Atlanta twice, including Asia Wilson's fifty three

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>point game. It was on a Tuesday, a school night.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I got a second grader and a third grader and

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I kept them in the arena until the final final

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>buzzer sounded because we couldn't miss a basket. Man, that's

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the most points I've ever seen in any basketball game.

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>That was so awesome to see the fans, the Atlanta

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>fans getting hype to see Asia Wilson go to the

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>line and knock down free throws for the fifty and

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty first point before she went on to fifty three.

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>That was incredible.

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a treat for not only you but also

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 3>your family and keep it him out on the score.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Good for you on that exactly. You know, you don't

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>learn everything you need to know from books. I'm watching.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, this is history class right here. You'll probably

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>never see a game this exciting again, So drink it

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in while you can. Those fun times. The man, Asia

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Wilson an absolute bucket. But we got the playoffs starting

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow Wednesday, night, So let's take a quick look at

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the bracket here at the end of the regular season,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Aces are taking on the Chicago Sky in the

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one versus eight matchup. Would be awesome if Candas Parker

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was healthy for that one, but does not seem to

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be the case. The team you covered, Ben, the New

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>York Liberty take on the Washington Mystics, who do seem

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to be getting healthy at just the right time for

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. In the three six matchup, we've got the

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Connecticut Sun, a surprisingly great team this year, taken on

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Links, who I'm very confused by. And then

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we got the Dallas Wings versus the Atlanta Dream. I'm

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>hoping to get to a game in that four or

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>five matchup then, But first question I've got for you.

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned how there's been two great teams this year,

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>two super teams in the Aces and the Liberty. The

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Aces finished the season thirty four and six, first in offense,

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>first in defense, but maybe a rocky or second half

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of the season after starting twenty four and two, they

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>finished ten and four to end the regular season. Meanwhile,

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the Liberty, they finished thirty two and eight on the year,

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>second in offense third in defense. They won eight of

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>their last nine games fourteen of their last sixteen to

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>challenge for the one seed at the end of the

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>regular season. Are we destined to see these two teams

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in the finals or is there anybody who could knock

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>one of these two teams off?

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it feels easy and maybe a little anti

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 3>climactic to open this show and say that it feels

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 3>like we're almost destined to have the Aces and the

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Liberty meet in the finals. But it certainly does feel

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 3>that way. You know, these two teams have been the

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>two best teams in the WNBA all season long. Oftentimes

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>it is by a significant margin. Or we've certainly seen

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, New York most recently they blew out the

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Connecticut Sun and seem to put some distance between you know,

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the two and the three in this matchup. You know,

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 3>certainly there's some other teams Connecticut can challenge Dallas. I

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>think is an interesting dark hose in the postseason. And

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, we've certainly learned last year in this playoff format,

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.559
<v Speaker 3>there are no guarantees. We thought we were gonna get

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>a Chicago Sky appearance in the finals. We didn't in

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 3>the end, Connecticut beats them in the Semis in five games,

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 3>five thrilling games, rather, but it definitely does seem like

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>we are on this collision course to get Las Vegas

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 3>and New York and frankly, I think for a lot

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 3>of people that is okay, these are the two best

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 3>teams talent wise, it's maybe two of the two best

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 3>coaches in the league, two great fan bases, two great

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>in arena experiences. So you know, if you're a fan

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 3>of the other ten teams, of course you want your

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 3>team to make it or the other six in the playoffs.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 3>But it does seem like nationally we're gonna get a

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Liberty Aces final, or that's what I'm thinking we're going

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 3>to get in the end.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's been a spicy matchup as well. I

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think they somehow ended up playing four times against each

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>other just in August. I don't know how the schedule

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>worked out that way, but it made it exciting to

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>see these two teams kind of like gearing up for

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, assuming they're going to take on each other. Obviously,

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the Liberty took down the Aces and the Commissioner's Cup

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Championship game, I saw them celebrating like they had just

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>won the WNB title. Stewe was saying afterwards, this is

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>our first piece of hardware. What's the biggest weakness for

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the Aces, Because, like I said, first in offense, first

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in defense. I know they're missing Candas Parker and I

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't really seen an update on her return at all,

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so I'm assuming she's out for the playoffs. But how

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>do you beat the Aces?

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it still seems like on the Candace Parker

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 3>front that she is going to be out indefinitely, and

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>as a result, just their depth has been a little

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>bit more tested. Right Kea Stokes has slid into the

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>starting lineup, and she is a very good defensive center,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 3>but she doesn't have the same impact nearly on the

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>offensive end of the floor. And someone like Stokes, who

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>was a valuable bench contributor at the start of the year,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>has been a valuable contributor for them in the past.

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, she slides into the starting lineup and the

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 3>bench gets even thinner, and so that is one real

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.559
<v Speaker 3>differentiating factor in my mind, between New York and Las Vegas.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>New York has a little bit more punch off the bench,

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 3>not only scoring marine johannas the French guard she can be.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Becky Hammond described her as just like a gun. She

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 3>just comes into the game. She'll fire off eight straight points.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Boom boom, boom, boom boom. Becky made that sound. They

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 3>played a couple weeks back here in New York and

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 3>then she checks out of the game, has done her damage,

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 3>and that is her night. And New York just has

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 3>other places and pieces that they plug into the lineup

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>that I don't think Las Vegas has. So it's two

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>stellar starting lineups, you know, some of the best players

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>in the world. But the depth is really something I

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 3>think at this point is worth watching. It wasn't. It

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't make a difference for Las Vegas during last year's

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 3>playoffs they still had a short bench, but I think

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 3>it might this time around, especially when they played New York.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Is Marien Johannah the coolest player in the league?

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think she might be. Certainly, she

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 3>does some of the most unexpected things of anyone in

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 3>the league. You know, Chelsea Gray herself might be the

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>best highlot machine. You know, She's thrown some incredible passes

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:43.599
<v Speaker 3>this year. The one early in the year that was

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 3>a no look that I think went super super viral

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 3>my colleagues. Sabrina wrote about it and just all the

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 3>Aces players reacting about how they were so surprised that

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Chelsea did it. But marine on a nightly basis, especially

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>on a per minute basis, you know, I don't know

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 3>how we would really quantify that staff, but you know,

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 3>she just checked in and it's like, here's a one

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 3>legged three, here's a no look pass, here's a you know,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 3>a dribble underneath the hoop and scoop around, and you know,

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 3>throw some pass from an angle you've never seen before.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Like she is so so exciting, especially considering how much

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 3>or how little she plays in a game.

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sure she's thrown a regular pass at some point,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think I've seen one hundred percent behind the

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>back passes or something that's gonna end up in a

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>highlight reel I mentioned. The Liberty really turned it on

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the season. You follow the

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>team quite closely, You're really close to Barclay Center. What

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>changed for New York for them to go on this

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>run in the second half of the season.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a few things. I mean, I think

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>just going back to the start of the season. Not surprisingly,

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 3>it took Brianna Store the least amount of time to

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of settle into her role. She immediately she did

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 3>everything for New York and almost was over extending herself

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 3>or was asked to score, rebound facilitate at the start

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 3>of the year because some of the other pieces they

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>brought in just hadn't started to fit yet. Then Corney

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Vandersloute started to kind of acclimate and I think fgured

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 3>out how to play better alongside Sabrina and Yunescu, who's

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 3>come on super, super strong, especially in the second half

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of the year, just record breaking three point numbers. And

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 3>then it was John Kula Jones and you know she's

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 3>a former League MVP won it with Connecticut. Was equally

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 3>one of these high profile acquisitions. Was going to come

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 3>in and both anchor New York's defense and also play

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 3>a huge role on offense. She was a little bit

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 3>slow at the start of the year, coming off a

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 3>foot injury. She eased her way back into training camp,

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 3>didn't practice a ton back in camp. Was kind of

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 3>seemed to be on a little bit of a minute

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 3>restriction early on in the year. Was a little slow

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>on defense, wasn't really fitting in spacing wise on offense,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and she's come on super, super strong, especially in the

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 3>month of August. She's just been a double double machine.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Sandy Broundello actually tasked her after one loss at the

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 3>end of July to just get a double double every night.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 3>That she hasn't done that exactly, but she's oftentimes come

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 3>really really close or gotten doubles in a vast majority

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 3>of their games. And so now that she is really

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 3>settling in it, just the pieces have started to fit

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 3>much better. It took a full season, and I guess

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 3>we should have expected it to take bunch of time.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 3>But now that we're here in September with the postseason,

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the pieces do really fit together really nicely, and that

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 3>is a big reason why New York is where they are.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not surprised it took a bit longer for

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>John Quell Jones to get going. We've seen it time

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and time again in the NBA when a big three

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>comes together, the third person is always kind of the

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>one figure out where their shots are going to come

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for and trying to figure out a way to go

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>from having the ball all the time to being you know,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe more of a one point five option or something

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. But she John Qwell Jones, was absolutely dominant

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in that Commissioner's Cup game. I thought she just ran

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>wild inside and you could really feel the absence of

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Canvas Parker in that game, in particular for the Aces.

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, John Quell Jones seems to be a major

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>X factor if those two teams meet. But that's going

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to be weeks from now. You mentioned it a little bit.

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the Connecticut Sun would have a chance against either

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>of these two teams, if I'm not mistaken. They've made

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>two finals and two semi finals the last four seasons.

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>How does this team take the next step to get

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>past this this sort of wall that they keep running into.

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're running into good teams. They keep losing

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to good teams. They did make finals a couple of times,

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but they just seem maybe one piece away something like that.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 3>It's funny that you use the wall analogy because Alyssa Thomas,

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>when you think about her, she is like running into

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 3>a wall or playing against a wall, you know, because

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 3>of her strength or physicality, and she just you run

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 3>into her and you immediately bounce back the way you

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 3>would if you were running into a wall. But for me,

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 3>it's all about guard play for them, right Like Alyssa

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Thomas is gonna get her She's gonna create, she's gonna

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 3>push the ball in transition, she's gonna get steals, she's

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna score on offense. But it seems like from a

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>just from a backcourt. If you look at the backcourt

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that Connecticut has Tiffany Hayes, you know she is at

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the latter stages of her career. She can certainly still

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 3>show flashes of getting to the rim of creating offense

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 3>for herself. She's done that a few times throughout the

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 3>regular season. But you know, I think she twenty games

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 3>this season when she scored between zero and nine points.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is a former All Star. She's turning

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty four years old during this postseason. But if she

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 3>can explode during the playoffs, I think Connecticut's ceiling is

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 3>a little bit higher. Nietzchecha Heideman another one of their

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 3>guards in the backcourt. She played really well during last

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 3>year's postseason and especially in some of the biggest games,

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 3>their Game three first round elimination game against Dallas, Game

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 3>five against the Chicago Sky. She played really well. I

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 3>think she had fourteen in that one. The contest in

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the finals when Connecticut beat Las Vegas, she also had

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 3>double digit scoring. So it's just can Connecticut's backcourt give

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 3>them enough of a boost to you know, help Alissa

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Thomas to help the want to bonn her out. Those

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>are two players, two all star players who will be

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 3>reliable for Connecticut. But especially when you compare you know,

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 3>the Connecticut backcourt to Las Vegas Chelsea Gray, Kelsey Plumb,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Young, when you compare them to Courtney van der

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Sloot to Sabrina Yescu, that there is a difference there, frankly,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 3>between what Connecticut has and what New York has. That

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 3>might just be the difference for now and until that

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 3>is upgraded. For Connecticut, I think their ceiling kind of

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 3>is what it is at least is currently constituted.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, third best team is still pretty good as far

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>as as far as the standings go. I gotta ask you,

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess now, because I can't imagine they're going to

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have a long run in the playoffs. Is there any

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>chance the Sky can win a game in this series

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>against the ass.

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Sky play really, really hard, They're super competitive.

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Becky Hammond has actually talked about how they've given, uh,

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, Las Vegas some trouble this year, and certainly

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 3>someone like Marina Maybray can go off. Kalia Copper, We've

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 3>seen it in big moments. We've seen her star. I

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>would bet not like you know, my guess, Las Vegas

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 3>is going to come out and just bring it like

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>they have been waiting all year for this postseason run.

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, it is the area championship winning team we

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 3>certainly know in other sports. Not that Las Vegas was

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 3>complacent because we saw them become the number one seed

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 3>get off to a historic start in the regular season,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 3>but the playoffs are a different animal. I would expect

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 3>them to come out really fast at the start of

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the postseason on Wednesday night and continue to roll from

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 3>their Chicago. I think they can keep these games competitive,

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but I just don't know if they have the talent

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 3>frankly to match up with the Aces for a series.

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because they traded or let all of their talent

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>from the championship team in twenty twenty one walk away

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>basically the last season, and then they traded three first

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>round picks basically to bring in Marina maybriy, Was this

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a good season for the Sky? Like I said, they

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>made it into the playoffs the very last week of

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the season, they finished below five hundred, and now they've

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>got their next three first round picks going out. That

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem right to me.

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, it's definitely a weird season for the

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Chicago Sky. I mean I think you know, we did

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 3>a poll a round table among us as a staff

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 3>on the Athletic Online and we asked for what our

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>biggest surprise was, and for me, it was James Wade's

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 3>resignation mid season. Like I think all the other things

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 3>aside that have been on court and court, if you

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>were going to tell a fan of the Sky and

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe a fan of the WNBA or anyone who follows

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 3>the league, like James Wade, the coach and general manager

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>of the team is going to resign abruptly in mid

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 3>July to take a job as an assistant coach with

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 3>the Toronto Raptors. I think that was the biggest surprise,

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 3>at least in my opinion, of the whole year. Certainly,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 3>he made a big swing from Marina Maybrew, who is

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 3>a really, really good player mind you, and she had

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 3>a good year, but he traded all those picks and

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 3>then he kind of left mid season, so it's certainly

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 3>an accomplishment. They played really hard down the second half

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 3>of the year. Getting in the playoffs is no small feat.

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 3>They continue to bring it on a nightly basis. They

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 3>did not quit despite the coaching change. But I don't

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 3>know if it was a good season. It certainly was

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 3>a noteworthy season, a surprising season, a strange season, maybe

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 3>one of the strangest in the whole league.

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Frankly, Yeah, when the GM trades away all of the

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>future and then leaves months into the future, that was

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty weird. Wighed out one in Wayne Wade now a

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>part of the Chicago Sky So at least I'm feeling

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty confident about that. But uh, yeah, I was. It's

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>tough to go from winning a championship almost getting back

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to now scraping into the playoffs and not exactly knowing

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>where the next bit of help is going to come from.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But at least Colia Kapfer signed an extension, so that's

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>good because she is awesome to watch. Moving on, what

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think is going to be the most exciting

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>first round? Series in the WNBA playoffs.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 3>To me, it is dream wings. I just think there's

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 3>a lot of talent. That's the four or five series.

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 3>It's just two teams that have very interesting, kind of

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>up and coming rosters, a lot of young roster talent

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 3>on both sides. You know, Ryan Howard, Alisha Gray kind

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 3>of in Atlanta, they're back in the postseason for the

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 3>first time since twenty eighteen. And then you have Dallas.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Right Satu Sabili might win most improved players she's had,

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, the best year of her young career. Arique Ogombawalle,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 3>you know, one of the best bucket getters in the

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 3>w and Dallas, I think just interest places one of

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the most interesting styles, can shape shift like few other

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 3>teams in the WNBA. Their front court is really their

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 3>strength or one of the things that really makes them

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 3>so unique. I mentioned Satusaboli, but they have Tierra McCowan

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 3>who's one of the best low post players on both

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 3>ends in the league. Natasha Howard, a former Defensive Player

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 3>of the Year. Also in that front court. Off the bench,

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>they have Awa Kwir who's one of the most kind

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 3>of intriguing young players. Another big who's super versatile, provides

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 3>some rim protection, can also stretch on the perimeter. And

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 3>Colonie Brown, who is another force, who's one of them,

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>in my opinion, on the short list of players for

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>most Improved. So they just throw big bodies at teams

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 3>and can really frustrate them. We saw them frustrate Atlanta

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 3>during their regular season that way. Dallas won all three

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 3>games in Atlanta, who is already a little bit mid

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 3>range happy, took more mid range shots against the Wings

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 3>than they did on average. I believe it was four

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.239
<v Speaker 3>or five more on average. And so we'll see how

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta chooses to attack Dallas. Can they get to the rim,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 3>can they create But for me, these are just two

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 3>teams that have expectations, that have young talent, and it's

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 3>just a nutrition and clash of style. So that is

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 3>a series I have mine on. Maybe you have that

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 3>as well, being in Atlanta, or you're at least hoping

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 3>to get a game, you said, and see him in person.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. I was really happy to see Atlanta

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>work their way up to the five seed because if

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they were playing Las Vegas or New York, I'm thinking,

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>ain't no way there's going to be a playoff game

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta. For those that don't know the WNBA

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>playoff format, in the first round goes the higher seeded

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>team gets the first two games at home, and then

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>if the lower seeded team wins one of those two games,

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>the closeout Game three is in the lower seeded arena.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So it would be a huge game if the Dream

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>can somehow get the series back here. But I don't know.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you mentioned Atlanta zero to three versus Dallas this

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>season and then they got absolutely smoked on Sunday in

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the season finale. I guess the game didn't totally mean

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>all that much, but not exactly how you want to

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be going in to the playoffs against this team, but

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>at least they're back for the first time since twenty eighteen.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Make a prediction for me, though, Ben, Do you think

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to go to a Game three in Atlanta?

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so.

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Well, shows over, get out of here, man.

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I hate to hear that we'll see. Hopefully it turns out.

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I will be excited to see those, and hopefully it

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>turns out that there's a game here in Atlanta. I

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>did want to ask you about Sun versus Links. How

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>are the Links tenth in the league in point differential,

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>tenth in the league in net rating, and still a

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>sixth seed in the playoffs. This is a team I

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>can't figure out. Well.

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Partly it's because I think throughout the whole season, the

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 3>middle of the WNBA has been so bunged that frankly,

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 3>it has come down to a couple possessions here, a

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 3>couple possessions there. You know, the margins and the eventual

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 3>seating really didn't shake out the way it did until

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the final week, final ten days of the regular season. Minnesota,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, could have very well seen themselves on the

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 3>outside looking in, but played pretty well down the stretch

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 3>of the season. They also do have one of the five,

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 3>six seven best players in the league, Nafisakllier, and she

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>had another great regular season. And because they have an

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>anchor like that who can again create her own shot,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 3>can facilitate, can shoot it from the perimeter, can rim

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>protect it. You know, I think I had her on

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 3>one of my All defensive teams as well as on

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>my All WNBA first team because they have a player

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 3>of that caliber. When things break down, she is able

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 3>to bail them out and I think overcome some of

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 3>those statistical the notes you had, and again there really

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 3>was not a lot separating Minnesota and Chicago, and frankly

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 3>the Los Angeles Sparks, who find themselves on the outside

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 3>looking in, right, these two teams really did jockey for position.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 3>So for me, it's just about fee and about making

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 3>plays in big moments, and that's something that she has done.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 3>She did show Reeve one of the best coaches as well,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 3>So I don't expect, though you measured, you throw out

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 3>some of the measurable stray You know they're playing Connecticut.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Connecticut was significantly the third best team by a significant

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 3>margin compared to Dallas, and was closer I think, to

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 3>the upper echelon group, so I also expect to sweep

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 3>in that one.

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Frankly probably, I think the only playoff team we haven't

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>touched on yet is the Washington Mystics, and they're taken

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on the New York Liberty and the first round. Any

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>chance of an upset there. I see. The Mystics are

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>fourth in defense on the year. They've obviously got Alena

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Deladon back healthy. Ariel Atkins's play in Shakira Austin. I

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>know is a question mark right now. But they just

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>beat the Liberty on a buzzer beater, so that's got

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to give them a little confidence going in. Is that

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>any any sort of upset threat coming from Washington?

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I think it like maybe the Juicy a series or

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 3>the series with the most drama kind of storylines. You know,

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 3>if you were to tell someone preseason that Washington was

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 3>going to play New York in the first round, I

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 3>think people would be pretty surprised and something would have happened,

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 3>and something did happen. Washington dealt with a lot of

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 3>injuries and that caused them to stumble down the standings

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 3>a little bit during the regular season. The mystics are

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 3>not short on confidence. I think that is Foreshore guaranteed,

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 3>no matter who was on the court. We saw after

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 3>they after they beat New York this past Sunday, you know,

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Natasha Cloud waved to the crowd almost to say bye bye,

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 3>bye bye, but the irony of course being that she's

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 3>coming back because Washington is playing in New York on

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Friday and then will play again on the following Tuesday,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 3>per Game two. So you know, it's it is a

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 3>It is a team that has really frustrated New York

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 3>throughout the regular season. They played early in the year,

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 3>the first game of the season, Washington beat New York handily,

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 3>and then they won Washington did the last day of

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the season. But across their four matchups, New York is,

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, a great three point shooting team. I think

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 3>they shot something thirty seven, thirty eight, thirty nine percent

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 3>during the year. They both took less threes when they

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 3>played Washington, they shot it I think five or six

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 3>a percentage points worse. And they also average I think

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 3>five more turnovers per game, and a lot of that

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 3>is just because of Washington's back Where you mentioned aaronl Atkins,

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 3>Natasha Cloud, Britney Sykes, these are three players from the

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 3>guard position who can frustrate anyone they play. These are

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 3>All League defenders in the past. Some might make an

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 3>All League a defensive team again this year. So their

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 3>ability to put some of the clamps on New York's

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 3>perimeter players and just be really switchable on the perimeter

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 3>is one of their biggest advantages. The injury stuff is

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a question. New York is still the most talented team.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not crazy to pick the Mystics to

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 3>upset the Liberty. Do I think it will happen. I don't.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I think the talent of the Liberty is supreme, and

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I frankly think they took them a little while. I'm

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 3>not sure how motivated they were exactly for Sunday's game,

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to give them some truth serum considering

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 3>how early they fell behind by double digits early in

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 3>that one. But it certainly is an intriguing series. I

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 3>could see both games, or all three games coming down

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 3>to the final couple minutes, but I do expect New

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 3>York to still pull it out.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Maybe it's a classic hustlers move where you let

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>them get a little bit of confidence before you crush

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>them when it really matters. But yeah, let's see that

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>bracket again real quick. Jerome WNBA playoffs start tomorrow night, Wednesday,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 1>September thirteenth. We're starting with The Aces and the Sky

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and the Sun and the Links. The other two series

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>start on Friday of this week. I believe all those

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>are on ABC or ESPN or one of their associated networks.

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I want to ask you about, Ben

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the athletics. Anonymous player poll, Big

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Time MVP race in the WNBA this season basically a

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>three player race between Asia Wilson and Brianna Stewart, who

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked about quite a bit, also Alyssa Thomas. This

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>has been an awesome race, all three of these players

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>putting up historic numbers, but somehow not a toxic debate

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about all of these players. It seems that everybody's making

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>solid cases for whoever they're pulling for, while also respecting

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the cases of everybody else. How would your ballot go

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're submitting?

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I would first say, sometimes WNBA twitter can

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 3>get a little tense, So you know, I'm not going

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 3>to say it was fully without just clean, healthy together.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it was certainly tense at times. You know,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 3>this debate, this also this MVP race. Rather, it was

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 3>really a matter of preference for a lot of people

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 3>of do you look at best player on best team,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 3>do you look at best player and maybe those are

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 3>the same people, or do you look at most valuable

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 3>for me? In the end, on this one, I actually

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 3>slightly leaned Alyssa Thomas. Both Brienna Stewart and Asia Wilson

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 3>had historic seasons, and you know, as our poll suggested,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 3>and I think just from watching the games, I think

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Stewie and Asia are the two best players just in

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the league, and they will battle out for MVP after MVP.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 3>But the nature of Alyssa thomas seasons just the amount

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 3>of triple doubleish she racked up, but more importantly just

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 3>the on off splits related to her and Stewie in Asia, right,

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 3>there's so much talent around both on the Liberty and

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the Aces that I did kind of struggle to parse through.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 3>You know that those on off numbers, right, I think

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Asia was if you took her off the team, in

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the minute she was removed, the net rating of the

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Aces was still like the fourth best in the WHO League.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 3>If you took Stewie off, they would be the fifth

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 3>best team. I think Alyssa Thomas, if you took her

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 3>off the court for Connecticut, they were like a minus

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 3>twenty three per one hundred possessions. There was like a

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty point difference in terms of net rating with her

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 3>on the floor. And she was like she I think

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 3>was second in the WNBA in minutes, Like she had

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 3>to literally do everything for the Connecticut Sun, and she

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 3>did it at such a supremely high level that in

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 3>this conversation, in this moment, I actually leaned with the

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of most valuable. I did rest on that word,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 3>which you know you can certainly quibble with, and I

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 3>don't necessarily always think is the right thing to do,

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 3>But I just found the numbers to be pretty stark.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 3>There is so much talent around the Aces, on the

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 3>Aces and on the Liberty, Connecticut's roster just doesn't match up.

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 3>And she really did carry them their other all star,

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Brianna Jones, she tore her achilles early in the season,

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Connecticut had to reinvent itself and leaned even more heavily

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 3>into Alissa Thomas, and they were planning heading into the year,

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 3>and so just a magnitude of her year, how special

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:06.479
<v Speaker 3>she was, I actually went that direction. I don't know

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 3>if you disagree agree. I don't really think you can

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 3>go wrong with any choice.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Frankly, though, exactly right. There's like the three classic cases

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for the MVVP. Like you're saying, best player on best team,

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>which would be Asia Wilson probably who I would choose,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just because I think she's the best player, even though

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Athletics anonymous player poll and WNBA players think

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's Brianna Stewart, So that's another great case for her.

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And then, like you're saying, the literal definition of valuable,

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to argue against Alyssa Thomas thirty points per

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred possessions better when she's on the floor, that's

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty influential. And like you're saying, they lost their second

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>best player as well, so for her to go to

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that level I think is incredible. I also feel like

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the WNBA does a pretty good job of spreading the

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>wealth for these awards. I don't think we've had back

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to back WNBA MVP since the first two seasons in

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the league when Cynthia Cooper won for the comments. So

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I could see it going not to Asia Wilson and

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe bucking that trend of the best player in the

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on the best team getting the MVP. We know those

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>three will be one, two, three in some order. Who's

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>coming in fourth and fifth because there are other spots

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I like, if he's a Collier's case, I

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 3>think she will, you know, find her name up there.

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Neka Gumikay also super deserving. I think those were the

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 3>final two players on my ballot. Someone like Satusaboli for

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 3>the Wings, I think will receive some votes and then

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe like an ancillary piece or not so ancillary, because

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 3>these are incredible players and we're talking MVP baalt But

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 3>like Jackie Young, you know, she had a great year.

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be shocked if she got some votes. But

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 3>I do really think when the voting comes out, it

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 3>will be pretty bunched up between one, two and three,

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 3>and then down ballot, I think it will be a

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 3>little bit more distance. Much like, frankly, the WNBA regular season,

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 3>right there was a big gap between one to two

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 3>and Connecticut was third, but you know, was pretty consistently

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the third best team throughout the entire year, and then

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 3>four through twelve was much more bunch together. I think

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 3>we'll see something similar, frankly, in MVP voting when it's released.

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Awesome stuff. Ben, If you've got an opinion out there

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on who should be WNBA MVP, let us know down

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in the comments, let us know here in the chat.

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>We're going to take a quick break here and when

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we will talk about the athletics. WNBA

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Anonymous player poll some good stuff back with no donks

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>talking to the Athletics, Ben Pickman. Ben, you just collaborated

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>with your co host Sabrina Merchant on an anonymous player poll,

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>asking a bunch of tough questions to all of the

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>WNBA players. So I wanted to pick your brain on

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the most interesting stuff. We've referenced it a

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of times already big question who is the best

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>player in the NBA? And the voting shook out a

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>little surprising to me, if I'm being quite honest, Ben,

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Brianna Stewart fifty four percent of the vote, Asia Wilson

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty one percent of the vote. No surprise those two

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>came in at the top. Yakaguo McKay came in with

0:30:57.680 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of the vote, and then a couple other

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>players got a vote as well. Were you surprised to

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>see the gap that big between Breonna Stewart and Asia

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Wilson almost two to one vote for Stewie.

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, I was a little bit frankly, I will say,

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 3>just for context, we talked to just under fifty players,

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 3>so around a third of the league, so we certainly

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't talk to all one hundred and forty four or

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 3>a little more or a little less, depending on who

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 3>was in it at a given time. I mean, I

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 3>do think part of it was just Brianna Stewart and

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 3>just on a nightly basis, you know, she was incredible.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 3>But I guess I really don't have a reason as

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 3>to why I think that difference was what it was that.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, maybe it was just personal preference for a

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 3>player playing against Stewie when we talked to them. You know,

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 3>we we talked to at least two or three players

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 3>on every team, so we certainly spread it out. We

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 3>were you know, we tried diligently as we conducted the

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 3>survey to not just have a concentration of players, you know,

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 3>certain questions. You were not allowed to pick players on

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 3>your own team, and we were clear about that when

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that was the context. So honestly, Trey, I wish I

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 3>had a better reason. You know, I think I think

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 3>All Star voting will be a little bit closer than

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 3>one our pole suggested in the end. But and Asia

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 3>might even be MVP. But maybe it was just the

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 3>personal preference of the players we talked with. I really

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 3>don't have a good explanation for you on that one.

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, Stewey scored forty what four times, I think this season,

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So I guess there's a good chance you may have

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>talked to the players she lit up after those games,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>which would probably influence the voting. Like I mentioned, Gua McKay,

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Alyssa Thomas, and Jewel Lloyd all got votes for best

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>player in the league, Yaka came in third, and then

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Alyssa and Jewel also got a vote. Do you think

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there's anybody else who would be deserving of showing up

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in the other category at the very least?

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if he's a Collier, I think would be

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 3>the other name. I think she's one of the players.

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:55.959
<v Speaker 3>If you were, you know, starting a team, it wouldn't

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 3>be unreasonable to want to start a franchise around her.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 3>We certainly see Minnesota right now building a franchise around her.

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 3>But no, I mean, I think those are really the

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 3>players you would target, the players that gms would target,

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the players that fans would target, would be would be

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 3>the stars you mentioned.

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's the best player now. But another question

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I really liked that y'all asked was who will be

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the best player in the league in five years? Asia Wilson.

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>She did come in first in the voting here but

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>not by all that much. Thirty one percent of the

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>vote going for the Aces Asia Wilson, followed by twenty

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>seven zero point six percent for Elijah Boston. The rookie

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Indiana Fever. Jackie Young got some votes, Satu

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Sabai got some votes, as you mentioned, and then a

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of other players as well. What's the ceiling

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>for a Leah Boston. I know she's gonna win Rookie

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Year pretty easily. This year, the Fever had

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a chance maybe of making the playoffs if things went

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>their way more in clutch time. What's the ceiling for

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a Leah because she seems like she's the best prospects

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to Asia Wilson.

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think the ceiling is what this

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 3>pole suggests. This ceiling might be that she could be

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 3>the best player in the league in five years. If

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 3>it even takes five years, I think she can be

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 3>that good. We saw her impact almost from the jump

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 3>from her very first game, from her first few games

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 3>with Indiana this year, that franchise took a ton of

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.320
<v Speaker 3>step forwards on court, off court. I think they're investing

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 3>more than maybe they have in the past, and you know,

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 3>they have a real identity. You can see they put

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 3>out a lot more then these things matter, like a

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 3>lot more social content, a lot more stuff on social media,

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 3>more personality. They've really started to build around her on

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 3>all facets, the way you would expect a team to

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.720
<v Speaker 3>build around their franchise player in so many different ways.

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 3>And so I think the ceiling is, you know what

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 3>that pole suggests. I do want to if you know,

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 3>you want to go back to that graphic or flash

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 3>it up or I can talk through it again, you

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 3>know that graphic. I think this question is one of

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 3>the most interesting we did in the whole pole, and

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 3>I just want to highlight two things on it. One,

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 3>you know the other Brianna Steart is an other on

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 3>this question, but she was the best player on the other.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think one of the reasons they jumped out

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 3>to me is that I think there is this perception

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that she's so much older than Asia Wilson, when there's

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 3>really just a two year gap between the two. And

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 3>so to see this kind of stark discrepancy between best

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>player right now and who some players think will be

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the best player in five years, when Asia and Stewie

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 3>are pretty close to contemporaries, or much more contemporaries than

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 3>say Asia and Aliah Boston are. I think that was

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 3>one thing that kind of surprised me as we were

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 3>doing the poll was just how few people frankly said

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Brianna Stewart. And again maybe that's because of her achilles

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 3>injury also a couple of years back, and Asia obviously

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 3>hasn't had a significant injury like that yet. The other

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 3>thing is no college players, right, No Caitlin Clark, no

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Angel Reese, no Camera Brink. You know we have there's

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 3>gonna be an incredible influx of talent coming into the

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 3>WNBA over the next couple of years. You could have

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 3>set a college player for this question, we would have

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 3>accepted it. No one went that route. I think a

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 3>couple of people pondered it, thought about it. Maybe there

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 3>is a college player I should go to, or there's

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 3>so many choices, but nobody went that route, which I

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 3>think was super interesting because a year ago at this time,

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Aliah Boston was playing in college, so things happened really fast.

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 3>They think it will be super interesting in three years time.

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Say if we ask this question again just to see

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 3>what people.

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Say, Oh yeah, in three years time, do you think

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Aliah Boston will still be the choice. I mean, she'll

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>be halfway through her five years at that point.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 3>She might be and honestly, she might be the best

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 3>player in the league of that choice, I think, or

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe it will be thirty thirty thirty Stuart Wilson Aliah Boston.

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll have to see it, wouldn't be shocked.

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Caitlin Clark also, who really knows.

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we shall see. You mentioned that on some of

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>these questions you had to tell the players they can't

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>include anybody on their own team, and that is the

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>case for most underrated player in the league, which has

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a funny result because other came out as the champion.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.439
<v Speaker 1>So who's your choice here as the most underrated player

0:36:58.480 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in the league.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think this was tough because there is

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 3>a media angle to it, or like a public perception angle,

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 3>and I think Jackie Young, who was the player who

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 3>received the most votes, with a singular player that received

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 3>the most votes, like, I think she is still undercovered,

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 3>under discussed, maybe publicly, and that is why a lot

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 3>of players you know, ended up saying her, you know,

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 3>you don't see a ton of you know, tweets or

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 3>big talk shows or segments about Jackie Young, but cheers

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 3>someone who most improved Player, All Stars starter. You know,

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 3>she probably make first or second team this year, one

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 3>of the five to ten best players twelve best players

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 3>in the league. But because she is a little bit

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 3>more quiet as an outward personality, I think maybe doesn't

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 3>get the coverage she deserves. But she also was a

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 3>number one pick herself in twenty nineteen, and she just

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 3>had this kind of steady growth, this steady improvement year

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 3>over year. Now she is one of the best players

0:37:53.320 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 3>in the league. But I don't think she's kind of

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 3>talked about in that same group. So that answer didn't

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 3>surprise me. But Benija Laney another candidate who received a

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 3>bunch of votes, she has been super important for the

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Liberty this year. She's really the Swiss Army knife defender

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 3>for them. She's far more than just a kind of

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 3>three and D wing. And when she can create offense,

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 3>when she can score the basketball, she makes New York

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 3>even more dangerous. They're starting five and their depth. She

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 3>often guards best players on their team, you know, on

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 3>a team of super teams. I think she often is

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 3>forgotten a little bit, but she just signed an extension

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:28.879
<v Speaker 3>with New York to keep her there for the next

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 3>couple of years as well. So she's a little bit underrated,

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think, especially as the postseason comes, she's a

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 3>player to keep your eye on as you're watching New

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 3>York because she'll play a big role in everything they

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 3>do in all the success that they may have.

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, kind of similar scenarios for Jackie Young and Benijua

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Lay being maybe the fourth player after the big threes

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>on their teams, which is crazy to say, like you're

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>saying for Jackie Young, she was a number one pick.

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>She's gonna finish top twenty in points and assists and

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>basically was fifty forty ninety this season and she's the

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>number four option and that tells you how stacked a

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>team like the Aces. Are a couple of things that

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>stood out to me that I like to see Cheyenne

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Parker getting votes for most underrated player in the league.

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Played a few played a handful of seasons in the

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>w but really turned it on this year for the

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Dream giving them an interior presence. She made All Star

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for the first time. I love watching her play. And

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thing that kind of surprised me is no

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>votes for Chelsea Gray Finals MVP the point God, like

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you're saying she's got highlights time and time again. I

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was a little surprised that she didn't get any votes

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>just because she seems impossible to play against and a

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed clutch basket when it comes down to it.

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but she just created a lot of highlights. And

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of this is just the perception

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and people tend to know Chelsea Gray's name, so you know,

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe that was part of true. But yeah, I mean,

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe Chelsea on another team if she is

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the clear one A option, whereas you know in Las

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 3>Vegas she can be one A, she can be you know,

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 3>two A, two three A, or four A depending on

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 3>who is on the court. You know, maybe she's a

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 3>little bit underrated considering how good she is. But I mean,

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 3>we see a lot of Chelsea Gray. But I think

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 3>the Shrian Parker is another good show too.

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I noticed you didn't ask most overrated player. That caused

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a ton of waves in the NBA when the question

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>was asked and Trey Dung came back as the most

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>overrated player in the league. Who do you think would

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have won that vote.

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I will I will bite my tongue on that, but

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I will say a lot of players also bit their tongues.

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 3>It was something we set out to ask a little

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 3>bit on. We set out to ask a little bit

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 3>about that, and a lot of players really did not

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 3>take to that question. I will say some had thought

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 3>about it, some did not take to it. I think

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 3>it's one. Frankly, it's like it is a tough one.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 3>If you're not getting a fair sample on like to

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 3>just run. And that was something we wrestled with as

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 3>we were putting this both together.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I will say, all right, fair enough, moving on another

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>great question, which organization would you most like to play for?

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>And the Las Vegas Aces won this one pretty handily,

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>taking home twenty seven percent of the vote. The next

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>highest finishing team the Washington Mystics and Los Angeles Sparks,

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>both at twenty percent. What makes the Aces such a

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>special organization? They've been great since they joined the WNBA.

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 3>It's talent, but it's also investment. They have a sixty

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 3>four thousand square foot brand new practice facility that has

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 3>every amenity that you would want, every kind of recovery

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 3>tub and chamber, and food and you know, own beautiful

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 3>lockers and a practice court that you can access at

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 3>any time. It's just overall investment. I think it is

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a big reason why a lot of players chose them,

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Certainly playing in Las Vegas and it's fun and games

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 3>are fun, and the game ops are great, and they

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 3>do a lot of things to engage the fans. The

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 3>crowds are really into it. But you know, I don't

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 3>think it's a coincidence that some of the franchises that

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 3>were most said or in pole were some of the

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 3>ones that have owners who have invested or have success.

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Washington a big thing. You know, they certainly

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 3>have used some of the Mystics facilities, amenities and have

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 3>access to the monumental Sports Group Los Angeles. A ton

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 3>of people said them frankly, they have a little less

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 3>investment than some of the other teams on the list,

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 3>but whether you know, playing in La playing in Staples

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 3>or Crypto dot com playing in that arena and the

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 3>kind of appeal there, though they don't have their own

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 3>practice facility like some of the others. And then New

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 3>York Location continued investment in the franchise, but Las Vegas

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 3>stands out because of the talent, the ownership, their commitment

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 3>to the product. I think that's pretty clear, and I

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 3>think it's not really a surprise that we saw them

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 3>at this point in this point. I think that was

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 3>the answer we were expecting and it's the answer we heard. Yeah,

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I see these sky crept in there with ten percent

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 3>of the vote. You think that's the Dwayne Wade effect. Yeah,

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 3>that's actually a really good point. I think it definitely

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 3>could be. I think it could be because they're another

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 3>team that you know, they don't historically have the same

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 3>level of investment as say New York right now or

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Las Vegas, or maybe even a Washington or someone like

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Indiana who might be able to draw from some of

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 3>the NBA facilities or the NBA ownership groups. Yeah, Dwayne

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:15.959
<v Speaker 3>Wade effect is a really good one. I think also

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 3>playing in Chicago is still appealing, and we certainly saw

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 3>during those finals runs, the final run that they had

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 3>that crowd is great, Like they get really into it,

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 3>they're super supportive of the team, and yeah, maybe things

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 3>are starting to change for Chicago. I think for a

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 3>lot of players's personal preference to whether location where they're from,

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 3>little factors like that that maybe they we wish they

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't factor in as much, but their answers so.

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>So beeah, exactly right. I mean, you play forty games,

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of games, but there's three hundred and

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five other nights out there that you gotta worry

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>about as well.

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Summers in Chicago not bad.

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Summer's in Chicago not bad. But winters in Chicago, yeah,

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they are bad. As it turns out. Change in lands

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:00.960
<v Speaker 1>here a little bit. This is actual from a different survey.

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ESPN also ask some WNBA players the biggest issue facing

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the WNBA, and they came back with fifty three percent

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of the vote saying that travel is the biggest issue

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in the WNBA. I know, y'all just did a big

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>episode on the travel problem in the WNBA on The

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Athletic Women's Basketball Show. Do you agree this is the

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>biggest question that the w has to figure out going forward?

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I do. I also think it is one that is

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 3>really central to the upcoming collective bargaining agreements. And not

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 3>to get too in the weeds and get too nerdy here,

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 3>but I think it is one thing that the league

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 3>recognizes is going to have to change or players really

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 3>want to change. And I think it is something that

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.399
<v Speaker 3>will change in the next two or three years when

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the new CBA gets renegotiated and eventually comes into effect.

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we see players on a nightly basis, especially

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:54.320
<v Speaker 3>in this extended forty game season, talk about flight delays,

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 3>talk about travel issues. It's something that I think a

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:59.439
<v Speaker 3>lot of people don't realize is there are so few

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 3>off days the WNBA because the day after a game,

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 3>a team is flying from one arena to the other.

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 3>And as anyone who travels commercially for fun, travels for work,

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 3>goes on trips during the summer recognizes, you know, a

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.359
<v Speaker 3>travel day is not the same thing as an off

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 3>day getting in an airport, flying commercial, waiting in long lines.

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, we did this big report in mid August

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 3>that I recommend people checking out. I talked to Kathy Engelbert,

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the commissioner, I talked to the WNBPA had Terry Jackson

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:30.280
<v Speaker 3>and more than a dozen players about just small little

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 3>solutions that they would want to see on the travel problem.

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, A very simple one that some players talk

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 3>about is lounges, just having lounge access consistently. Delta American

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Airlines United, being able to rest there, to recharge, to

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 3>separate from the general public, like that is something that

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:51.959
<v Speaker 3>WNBA players don't even have when they fly commercial. The WNBPA,

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 3>they did launch this partnership with Priority Pass, which is

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 3>a kind of, I guess, a service that provides some

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 3>lounge access, but it's a mostly international service, so you know,

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 3>there are some markets in which teams could take advantage

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 3>of it, but not that many, and so you know,

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.800
<v Speaker 3>travel is going to continue to be a big topic

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 3>of discussion. One other thing I would say on it

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 3>before you know, this is a long topic and we

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 3>talked a lot about it. As you mentioned Trey on

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 3>the podcast, is the w NBPA, all they really want

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 3>is choice and optionality, Like that is the big thing

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:23.959
<v Speaker 3>they are pushing for. They're not necessarily right now saying

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 3>we want charters on every flights. They just want teams

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 3>to have the ability to charter as much as they can.

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you want to charter three flights, five flights,

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 3>eight flights, whatever. Teams don't even have that choice right now,

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 3>and that is something that they really want to see

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 3>going forward. So I do expect some change on that though,

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm going forward.

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>When is the CBA up and when the negotiations take place.

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 3>It will be basically two or three years is when

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 3>the opt out is and it all will coincide with

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 3>a new media deal coming into effect. So you know,

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 3>I think the league is saying, if we can get

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 3>a new media rights deal that creates this influx of money,

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 3>basically months later we're going to see is when the

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 3>CBA would be renegotiated or accepted or could be. I guess,

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, they can always amend things and agree earlier

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 3>or later depending on what happens, But the timeline between

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the CBA and the media rights deal are aligned. And

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 3>so I think, you know, assuming the NBA the WNBA

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:21.720
<v Speaker 3>gets a deal that they want, I think the players

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 3>will see some charter changes if they want. One other

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 3>thing that I think will be really interesting to this

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 3>audience in particular, is you know, the NBA doesn't actually

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 3>require charter flights. Like if you go through their CBA

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:34.840
<v Speaker 3>passed and the new one, there's nothing in there that

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 3>says teams have to fly charter. Teams are just given

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the option to fly charter. It's just become the standard,

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 3>and every team does it. And if an NBA team

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:47.800
<v Speaker 3>didn't fly charter, you know I better. I think anyone

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:49.879
<v Speaker 3>would suggest they're not going to get the same level

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 3>of free agents buy out guys are not signing with

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 3>teams that are flying commercial at this point anything like that,

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Whereas in the w NBA CBA the way it's currently written,

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 3>teams are really restricted. You're not allowed to book charter flights.

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Teams are not allowed to do that. You have to

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 3>fly economy plus and if a player even wants to

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 3>fly first class, they have to pay out of pocket

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 3>to do that. So that's just one really interesting kind

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.359
<v Speaker 3>of CBA nuance. Again, we're getting into the weeds here

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 3>late in this episode, but you know, I think it

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 3>just speaks to again the WNBA just wanting the players,

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 3>wanting some choice as they look for this to change

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:26.000
<v Speaker 3>going forward.

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an easy ask, just being able to

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>do it, and like you're saying, that would separate organizations. Furthermore,

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the teams that are willing to take charters, that are

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>willing to invest that money, are going to be able

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to lure even better players. So hopefully that comes about

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in the next CBA, which said will be a couple

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of years. I assume that's the earliest that the league

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>could also address something from the Athletic Player Poll, which

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is expansion. You asked players if they would rather expand

0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:57.240
<v Speaker 1>via teams or if they would rather expand via roster spots,

0:48:57.320 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>though they're not necessarily mutually exclusive. Eight percent of the

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>vote went for expanding rosters, forty two percent went towards

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>adding more teams, Which do you think is more likely?

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think either of these happen next time around?

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.760
<v Speaker 3>I definitely do. I think we'd see movement on both fronts,

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 3>and as you mentioned, they aren't mutually exclusive, and I

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 3>think roster spots is something that I think players hope.

0:49:19.480 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 3>Why doesn't it happen before CBA negotiation because I don't

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 3>even think it would take that a full CVA renegotiation

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:28.279
<v Speaker 3>to expand roster sizes. You know, one thing that is

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:31.400
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a misconception is the WNBA. It often,

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 3>you know, calls itself the one forty four, and you

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 3>know there's some symbolic significance to that, or there's kind

0:49:37.960 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 3>of power of the activism all the off court, you know,

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 3>power that the players have kind of in speaking to

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 3>social issues and political issues and using their voice. That's

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 3>part of the one forty four collective. But on a

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 3>WNBA season, across the league, at a given point, there's

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 3>almost never one hundred and forty four players signed. Many

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 3>teams only roster eleven players, sometimes even ten players. There's

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 3>something called emerge and sy hardship contracts, which is a

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.919
<v Speaker 3>big thing in the WNBA and just makes things very

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:08.799
<v Speaker 3>messy in players kind of coming in on and off

0:50:08.880 --> 0:50:11.799
<v Speaker 3>rosters at any given point, and so just expanding it

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 3>to fourteen fifteen players, maybe it's two players who don't

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 3>dress four games but can then be activated. You know,

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 3>that can be twenty four more jobs, thirty six more

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 3>jobs immediately. A lot of players in our poll, you know,

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 3>when we asked this question, they said, you know, before

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 3>we expand to more markets, can you just treat us

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 3>better they treat the players you have better, make their

0:50:34.040 --> 0:50:36.919
<v Speaker 3>experiences more positive. That was a common refrain we had,

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:39.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, tend to those people in your house before

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.560
<v Speaker 3>building a whole new house. Was to paraphrase one of

0:50:42.560 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 3>the remarks from a player. And I think that's a

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 3>super fair refrain, and I don't think there's a reason

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.640
<v Speaker 3>that there couldn't be you know, more spots right now.

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 3>I always tell people when they're getting into the WNBA

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 3>or comparing a little bit the NBA and the w

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 3>IS watch garbage time in the WNBA, because even in

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a thirty point blowout game, teams, you know, front runners

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 3>for the sixth player of the year, the seventh best

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 3>player on a team, they still have to play garbage time.

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:10.439
<v Speaker 3>It gets a thirty five point game and they're still

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 3>in the game, whereas in an NBA game you never

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:16.360
<v Speaker 3>see that, right, Like it really is, the concept of

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 3>empty a your bench does not really exist in the WNBA.

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 3>More roster spots would change that problem, but it also

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 3>would have a much more have much more effects obviously

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 3>than just that.

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because at the start of the season it was

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a big controversy that all of these young players were

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to break into the league right and there just

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.839
<v Speaker 1>weren't enough roster spots to the point where number one

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>overall picks are getting waived a couple of seasons into

0:51:39.600 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>their careers, which is something like you're saying, you wouldn't

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>see in the NBA. So adding you know, thirty more

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:48.240
<v Speaker 1>jobs would have a big time effect.

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 3>I think yeah, And look, I think first round picks

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 3>you usually get maybe a one season in which it

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 3>feels pretty safe, and some in recent years we seen

0:51:57.600 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 3>haven't even made it through that. But generally I think

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:02.319
<v Speaker 3>a first year for a first round pick is safe.

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 3>But by year two, when that preseason, that training camp

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 3>comes around, like you are fighting for your job just

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 3>like any other player. We see it with second round picks,

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:12.359
<v Speaker 3>third round picks right off the bat. I think it's

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:16.240
<v Speaker 3>like why in our business sometimes doing WNBA draft grades

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 3>like feels kind of silly because it's like, what are

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 3>we really evaluating here? What are we really grading? Like

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:25.760
<v Speaker 3>what chance do these players really have of making the team.

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:28.319
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of it's a sad thing to say, but

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 3>it is a little bit of the reality that one rookie,

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe two will make a roster on occasion,

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:38.200
<v Speaker 3>three will make a roster if that and sometimes don't

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:40.359
<v Speaker 3>even have first round picks. It just makes you know

0:52:40.400 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 3>it is really hard for rookies to break in. Expanding

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the rosters with help player development, and again, it would

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:49.760
<v Speaker 3>alleviate a lot of problems. You said too, train well.

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned fixing the house that you're in before building

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:56.719
<v Speaker 1>a new house. If the WNBA decides to build a

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 1>new house, which city is the next to get a team?

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think the front runners. A lot of

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 3>people expect Toronto, which we saw a preseason game this

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:10.920
<v Speaker 3>year between Minnesota and Chicago, sellout crowd, amazing atmosphere. I

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 3>think they just put out a w NBA branded court.

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 3>I forget where in the city it is, but you know,

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 3>if you can someone search on Twitter, it is a

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:21.759
<v Speaker 3>super super cool looking court. I think that city is

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:24.280
<v Speaker 3>primed and ready to go. I think the Bay Area

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 3>is also another front runner. You know, maybe it's affiliated

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:29.959
<v Speaker 3>with the folks that own the Golden State Warriors. Maybe

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 3>it isn't, but that is another market that I think

0:53:32.280 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 3>is clamoring for WNBA team that I think a w

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 3>NBA team would definitely succeed in.

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Awesome stuff. We will wait and see what actually ends

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>up happening with travel, with expanding roster spots, with expanding

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire league in general. We're gonna head to tweet

0:53:51.120 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of the night tweet O the night Wow tweeted the

0:54:01.120 --> 0:54:02.719
<v Speaker 1>night Post and then I call it what you want.

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Ben brought us something special. So walk me through what

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we got here from Ryan Howard.

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Really, it is kind of the tweet of the season,

0:54:09.960 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 3>and you know, the exchange of the season. It is

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 3>going back to a game earlier in the year when

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta and New York played each other. Atlanta blew out

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 3>New York on this I think it was June twenty third,

0:54:22.640 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 3>was the night of the game, a thirty point game

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:26.919
<v Speaker 3>in Atlanta, and Ryan Howard tweets out July twenty seven,

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:29.720
<v Speaker 3>she has marked her calendar because that was the next

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 3>time that New York and Atlanta. We're gonna play. Like

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.720
<v Speaker 3>any good Twitter story, this is a multi part drama.

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:38.280
<v Speaker 3>So if you go to the next tweet, the next screen,

0:54:38.480 --> 0:54:41.360
<v Speaker 3>you can see on July twenty seventh, these two teams

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:44.719
<v Speaker 3>played the New York Liberty on their official account. They

0:54:44.800 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 3>certainly knew that Ryan Howard marked her calendar. And as

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:50.319
<v Speaker 3>they said, like we said before, business is business. The

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 3>New York Liberty handled Ryan Howard and the Atlanta Dream

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 3>that night. They actually did it twice. They you know,

0:54:56.920 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 3>did that kind of polo graphic thing that you often

0:54:59.000 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 3>see a site like Clench. I don't even know how

0:55:01.080 --> 0:55:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to describe that. The little screenshot in the tweet. Another

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 3>tweet to reference Ryan Howard's Then Ryan said, you know,

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:11.439
<v Speaker 3>she kind of acknowledged that New York got the last laugh,

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:13.839
<v Speaker 3>and you know she said, no, it's cute like she's

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 3>gonna redeem herself going forward. You know this is a

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 3>three part play. She didn't have the opportunity to redeem herself.

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 3>These teams won't meet in the postseason, I believe. I'm

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 3>not sure. I guess I'm pretty sure or I feel

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 3>very likely saying that they will not meet in the postseason.

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure how the math breaks out. I think

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 3>they're on other sides of the draw entirely. But it

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 3>will wait until next year to see if there's a

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:36.320
<v Speaker 3>fourth act of this play, if there's any future resolution.

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Clearly no love lost between Ryan Howard and the New

0:55:39.120 --> 0:55:41.800
<v Speaker 3>York Liberty and the New York Liberty social media staff

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 3>because they also got engaged in this fun not just

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 3>a players.

0:55:47.480 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Well. I don't know when Game one of the WNBA

0:55:50.000 --> 0:55:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Finals is scheduled, but I'd love to see a Ryan

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Howard tweet calling out the New York Liberty I'll see

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you in the finals.

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Maybe she'll be wearing an Aces jersey sitting courtside.

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Who knows well this one backfired. But I do know

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Howard is good with callout tweets because she went

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to some Hawks games and she said, Trey Young, when

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>do you come into a dream game? He showed up

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to a dream game in Las Vegas, if I'm not mistaken,

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas or Los Angeles, and she's like, that's nice.

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:21.319
<v Speaker 1>How about a home game? And then he ended up

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:24.319
<v Speaker 1>showing up at a home game as well. So you know,

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it works and sometimes you get beat by the

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Liberty unfortunately. Yeah.

0:56:29.520 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 3>But who's spiciest tweeter. It's Sidney Colson. Yeah, she would

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 3>be the MVP of the whole season. I would recommend

0:56:37.440 --> 0:56:40.640
<v Speaker 3>following Sidney Colson. She is a part time comic. Las

0:56:40.760 --> 0:56:44.359
<v Speaker 3>Vegas Aces guard one of their reserves, but she is

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 3>unafraid about tweeting tons of sarcasm at her humor at

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 3>her teammates. I think on the night that Asia scored

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:53.760
<v Speaker 3>fifty three, she was like, fifty four would have been nice.

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.200
<v Speaker 3>The whole team pranked her at the start of the

0:56:56.280 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 3>year and pretended that she had been cut. Becky Hammond

0:56:59.560 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 3>even got it involved in the prank. I mean, she

0:57:02.320 --> 0:57:05.319
<v Speaker 3>is tweeting out her teammates, poking fun at them. She

0:57:05.520 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 3>is fully spicy, she is fully getting in the mix.

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 3>She is lighting up on WNB Twitter, not afraid to engage.

0:57:12.400 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 3>She might be the single player who is the MVP

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 3>of WNB Twitter, and that might not just be for

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:18.480
<v Speaker 3>this year, but in recent years too.

0:57:20.000 --> 0:57:22.640
<v Speaker 1>What was it like on Emoji Day for you, when

0:57:22.680 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Brianna Stewart was just tweeting out random strings of emojis

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and everybody was trying to crack the code.

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 3>It was pretty crazy, Like I certainly didn't know what

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 3>they meant. And it was one of the things that

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:33.560
<v Speaker 3>when I first sat down with Stewie in New York

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 3>at the start of the season, we did an interview

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 3>during training camp as the training camp was ending, and

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I had actually printed out all those tweets I recommend

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 3>people reading this story on the Athletic and I just

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 3>said to codey's for me, and she at certain points

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 3>was like, I'm not really sure what this one meant,

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Like I genuinely don't know. I think I was discussing

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 3>with people and I kind of respected it, like, you know,

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 3>some of them made sense, some of them. She was

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 3>trying to explain and then some were both at a loss,

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:02.400
<v Speaker 3>And I think that was kind of the fun of it,

0:58:02.640 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, certainly good for the drama. I think we'll

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:07.520
<v Speaker 3>see something similar this year. She harkened back to Blake

0:58:07.560 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Griffin and DeAndre Jordan and Chris Paul and that the

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 3>famous what Clippers rockets locking in the house? Where's the chair?

0:58:14.200 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 3>All the playing stuff? That was her inspiration, which I

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 3>also thought was such a great callback for some Twitter

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 3>emoji offseason battle.

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, very relatable. I mean, you and I are podcasters.

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of times where we know exactly what

0:58:28.880 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to say, and a lot of times where

0:58:30.600 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we're just talking and some stuff is just coming out.

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It even happens to Brianna Stewart, which I suppose is

0:58:36.360 --> 0:58:39.000
<v Speaker 1>good to know. Ben, thanks so much for joining me.

0:58:39.320 --> 0:58:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Tell me a little bit about the Athletic Women's Basketball Show.

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I know y'all are just a couple of episodes in,

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 1>but I've really been enjoying it so far.

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thanks a lot. It's certainly been a ton of

0:58:48.200 --> 0:58:50.960
<v Speaker 3>fun so far. Basically, twice a week, we're gonna talk

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:53.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot about the WNBA, much like we did today.

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 3>It will be on court stories, what's going on around

0:58:57.280 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 3>the league in terms of games, pre viewne playoffs, pre

0:58:59.440 --> 0:59:01.680
<v Speaker 3>vieune matchup. It will also be something we do in

0:59:01.680 --> 0:59:04.960
<v Speaker 3>the college season, previewing the on court, the on core game,

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 3>what's going on. We'll also talk topics, travel, expansion, pay, inequity, nil,

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:12.360
<v Speaker 3>things like that. Last year I was lucky enough to

0:59:12.400 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 3>go abroad. I visited a ton of w NBA players overseas.

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 3>That's something I think we may be able to do

0:59:19.160 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 3>or we may be doing again this year. And so

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk a little bit about the WNB

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 3>off season, overseas, international basketball, which is a really important

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:28.760
<v Speaker 3>part of the professional game. I think our hope is

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 3>to just both educate, to inform, to entertain all different breasts,

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:35.600
<v Speaker 3>not just be on court, not just be topics, not

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 3>just be America. We'll sprinkle in the international flair. As

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I said, we hope it's just a place that you listen,

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:44.320
<v Speaker 3>you learn, we talk about women's basketball. It will be.

0:59:44.320 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 3>It's been a ton of fun to do and I

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 3>think it will continue to just be a really enjoyable thing.

0:59:48.400 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 3>So we hope people continue to follow a long subscribe

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 3>follow like give us feedback, and yeah, looking forward to it.

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I definitely will be. Y'all are going to be covering

0:59:57.360 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>college basketball as well, right because I have to. This

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most anticipated NCAA women's seasons that's

1:00:03.680 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>ever been.

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, super exciting women's season in college coming up,

1:00:08.160 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 3>a ton of talent, and yeah, we'll be doing it

1:00:09.880 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 3>throughout college twice a week then as well, so Ryan,

1:00:12.520 --> 1:00:14.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, finish the WNBA season with us. We kind

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of started it as the postseason crunch time was going,

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:20.280
<v Speaker 3>and we'll flow right into the college season, so no

1:00:20.360 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 3>breaks for us.

1:00:22.160 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Should be awesome. Make sure to check that out. It's

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>called The Athletics Women's Basketball Show. You can find it

1:00:27.080 --> 1:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Athletic app. You can find it anywhere you

1:00:29.320 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>get podcasts. Ben, thank you so much for coming on,

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but no, thank you for saying that the dream are

1:00:34.880 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get swept. I will hold that against you

1:00:38.080 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>until the next time we talk, which maybe we'll have

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to do something for the finals or something like that

1:00:42.280 --> 1:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on.

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I think you should just tweet out the date

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>you want me to come back. Mark it on your

1:00:47.320 --> 1:00:50.840
<v Speaker 3>own by Howard, and I'll come back to it when

1:00:50.920 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 3>that time comes.

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it. We will have to talk then. As

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for No Dunk's Task is back tomorrow with a new

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>episode of No on the Athletic Baseball Show Feed and US.

1:01:03.240 --> 1:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>No Dunks guys will be back next week at the latest,

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>if anything happens in the NBA, because the biggest news

1:01:10.240 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>right now is Boban coming back to the Rockets. Did

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a take on that one, Ben, Boban's.

1:01:15.560 --> 1:01:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Back pretty surprising, honestly pretty surprising. But I'm excited to

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 3>see that his NBA career is not over. Maybe his

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>acting career also not over. We'll see about that.

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right. Until then, Clipper Brows, you heard

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it here first, have a great time, turn up, love

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Awesome, all right, embrace the day people. We're

1:01:34.960 --> 1:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>back soon.