WEBVTT - What's Wright - Best Of - Lakers-Wolves predictions, Luka Doncic will “light up” Gobert + Nick’s NBA Awards

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the best of the week for What's Right

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Right the best takes in moments from this

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>week on the show Enjoy.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Lakers have the second best odds of the West to

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>win the title right now at minus one ninety five.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Edwards says he loves the position that the time Real.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Quick hold on there the second mess odds to win

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the West to win the title minus.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Won in round one.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 4>You're fine, go ahead and h yeah.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>So Anthony Edwards says he loves where the Timberwolves are

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 2>at right now and saying I love the fact that

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 2>everybody wants the Lakers to win. That's how it's supposed

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to be. They don't want the Timberwolves to win, and

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I get that. What is the key to this series?

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, the only chance the Timberwolves have is if Julius Randall,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in his career, plays well in

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. And we've never seen that happen. So I'm

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pull it up. I'm looking down if you're

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>watching on YouTube, because I'm pulling up on my phone.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Julius Randall's playoff career is truly disastrous, and it's not

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>overstated it's not being unfair.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 4>It is what it is.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 5>It is.

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty one in the first round against the Hawks,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the famous Trey Young series. You see, Oh, he

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was eighteen eleven and four. That that's actually good on

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine percent from the field. So his first playoff

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>series ever, he was twenty nine percent from the field.

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Then two years later against Cleveland in Round one, he

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>was fourteen and six a game that was after an

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>all NBA season, on thirty three percent from the field,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and then and they won that series. And then the

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>next round against Miami he was eighteen and ten, which

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is much better on forty one percent from.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 4>The field, which is okay.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>In his playoff career is twenty eight percent from three

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and then last year obviously he was hurt for the

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and it didn't really seem like Knicks fans were

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>all that bummed about it. And so he is yet

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a single great playoff series. And even if

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you go to individual playoff games, you are hard pressed

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to find more than one good one game. One last

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>or two years ago against Miami he was really good.

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He was twenty five twelve and eight on forty four

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>percent from the field, which is about as good as

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>you can hope for from him. But in his playoff career,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and he has one other game against Miami where he

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>was twenty and nine on sixty one percent. But what's

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that joke everybody likes to make he is shooting. He's

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>shooting tour dates or whatever.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.239
<v Speaker 4>Like he's that thing.

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Three eleven.

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So in his career, in ascending order, he is

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs from the field two for fifteen, three

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen, three for fourteen, six for twenty three, four

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen, three for ten, five for sixteen, seven for twenty,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>seven for nineteen, eight for twenty one, and then five

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>games forty percent from the field or better eight for twenty,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>eight for eighteen, four for nine, and then the two

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>good games seven for thirteen and eight for thirteen.

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 4>So that's a.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen game playoff sample size. He's been good in two

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. So he's got to be what are you

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>laughing about that, I'm being to me, No, No, after

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you said that, I just I whispered, go ahead and

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>swing that rock, big dog.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't think, oh yeah, I didn't hear it.

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So for real though, So that is he's gotta

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be good for them to have a chance. And by

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, gonna be tough because he's gonna be guard

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>On the other end, He's gonna be guarding Lebron James

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So he is the absolute key now other

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>than him, I am really interested in how much can

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves, how much energy can Austin Reeves make Anthony

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Edwards expend on the defensive end, because I know there

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have been some thoughts that ant is going to try

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to guard Lebron or Luca. That's a terrible idea. Ant's

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a very good defender, but he is simply too small

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>for either one of those guys. Jaden McDaniels will spend

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time on Lebron and Luca. Julius Randall

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>will spend some time on Lebron and Luca. Nazrid might try.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Dante's not going to be able to do it. But

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>point is Anthony Edwards is going to end up matched

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>up on Austin Reeves a fair amount. Now, I don't

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>think the Lakers have anybody who can slow down Anthony Edwards. Now,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>oddly they did well against him in the regular season,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but I would just go ahead and pencil in. Uh,

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Edwards for thirty a game. He's gonna average thirty

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in this series, just so be it. Can Austin make

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>him have to defend enough and run around enough that

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he is a little tired on the offensive end at

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of these games, because you do remember that,

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I listen, I get it. You had to trade Luka

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Doncic because he's an out of shape alcoholic. I understand Nico,

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was Anthony Edwards, who might as well be

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>chiseled out of granted, who said he was exhausted in

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the conference finals last year, not Luca. And so now

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of time off and it's round one

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of days between the games. But

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>how much energy can you make Ant expend on the

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>defensive end? And then the only other real the only

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>way for in my opinion, for the Timberwls to have

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a real chance, is if Luca's three is not falling,

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Because if Luca's three is falling, then what you are

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see is Lebron really picking and choosing his

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>spots in the first three quarters of these games and

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>then taking over in the fourth, something he has not

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>had the luxury of doing much at all in his

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>whole career, but certainly in his Lakers career. But you

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>saw it in that Lakers MAVs game where Lebron you know,

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hand off the joystick for the first three quarters and

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>then best player on the court in the fourth quarter.

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You've seen it a few times this year, and so

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Julius Randall's gotta be good for them to have a chance.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Nas Reed's going to be super important. And I haven't

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned Rude go Beart because here's the thing. I

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>think Rudy's in a really rough spot here. It's not

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>just that Luca has tortured him on multiple continents. It's

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not just that Luca hit the biggest shot of his

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>career over him, but it's also that the Lakers want

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to play small. His offensive limitations will allow them to

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>play small, because they're not going to be able to

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just you know, dump the ball down to go bear

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and be like, hey, you have Dorian Finney Smith or

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Hachimura on you give us that sweet baby hook

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you've got. That's not going to be a thing.

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 6>And defensively, we have seen if you play five out it,

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 6>Rudy really really struggles and so I would guess that

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 6>Ant is awesome and it doesn't matter all that much

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 6>in this series.

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And I said it to you guys on Tuesday. I'll

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>say it again. The Lakers minus a game and a

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>half at plus one point twenty, I think is probably

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>my favorite bet of this round of the playoffs.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>All right, what else you have.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 3>On this series? Do you think this could be the

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 3>start of a Luca Ant rivalry?

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'd love that, and I do think that they

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>have personalities that would mesh for a rivalry. I do

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>think that both of these teams, you know, they should

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>meet in the playoffs consistently moving forward. I don't look

0:09:55.320 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>at Ant yet as the caliber of play player of Luca,

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that there is much of an argument.

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 3>What demons You don't see them as the same caliber

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 3>of player. I get like that better.

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I look at Luka as a guy I expect

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to win multiple MVPs. That's that's There's only two other

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>guys in the league in that caliber, and they both

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>already have multiple. As far as prime guys, I mean,

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, in Giannis and Jokic, and I look at

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Aunt as a guy who might win one you know

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. So, like, I, if you set luca

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>career MVPs number one and a half, I would immediately

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>say over. And if you set Ant's number of career

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>MVPs at a half, I would say I needs, like,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I got to really think about this so that you

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>know that's the eight And I think it's I think

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it's an almost impossibility that Luca never wins a league MVP,

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a coin flip of Ant does

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so again, it were in the margins here, but yeah,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I do look like and I think a good evidence

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of that is if the Lakers had traded Anthony Edwards,

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Max Christi and a first round pick. I'm sorry, if

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers had traded Anthony Davis, Max Christi and a

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>first round pick for Anthony Edwards, we wouldn't two months

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>later still be like, that's the dumbest shit I've ever

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>seen in my life? Is it because they want to

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>move the team? Like the you would have legitimately, you know,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>debates on each side like okay, who got better?

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Like does it make it?

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>And I understand for the way the Timberwolves are constructed,

0:11:58.559 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't even make sense.

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, that's how I.

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So, and I really like it, but I think he

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to level up a tiny bit.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not as old as Luca, you know what I mean.

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been in the league quite as long. And so, uh,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>there is that go ahead?

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you well, were you done with the with the

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 3>first follow up?

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I was, I was gonna ask you if you see

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 2>JJ reddicks stock rising or how much you see it

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>rising this offseason?

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it depends on the playoff run. I mean, if

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they get bounced in round one, it won't. People like

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Darvin Ham made the conference finals his first year. But

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I I think it's already pretty obvious that JJ Reddick

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>has done an excellent job his first year as a

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Lakers head coach. Now we'll see how he handles the playoffs.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I know there's some in some circles there is a

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>belief that the Lakers have been kind of using a

0:12:54.840 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>playoff style defense in the regular season and to deal

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>with their lack of size, and that that might have

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>been a mistake by JJ because now they're not going

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to have an extra gear and more people have seen

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it so they can prepare for it. I'm less concerned

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>with that than others. But yeah, I think JJ's done

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>an excellent job. I think that there was a legitimate

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>argument to include him on Coach of the Year ballots

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, and so credit to JJ, who people know

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>I historically not the biggest fan of as far as

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a media presence, but he did a really good job.

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>The NBA eighty two game grind is done and now

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the real fun begins. The NBA Playoffs are here and

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's time for all the high stakes drama, clutch moments,

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and jaw dropping plays can't wait. If you're looking to

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs even more exciting, DraftKings Sportsbook has you

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>covered as an official sports betting partner of the NBA

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>from the playing games all the way through to the finals.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Now's the time to back your favorite players and teams

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:07.719
<v Speaker 1>as they chase glory all season long. Draft Games has

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>been the go to spot for NBA player props pardon me,

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't stop now. Want to make your playoff

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>experience even more intense, try placing a bet on your

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite players performance? Will they drop thirty forty more?

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Your call? Ready?

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Place your first bet? Download help me out here Download

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the DraftKings Sportsbook app, lock in your bets and make

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this playoff run unforgettable, something special for first timers. New

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings customers bet five dollars, get two one hundred dollars

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets, instantly make it a playoff run to remember.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>With DraftKings, download the DraftKings sportsbook app. Use code right

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that's code right WRIGHD for new customers to get two

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars in bonus bets when you bet just five

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>bucks only on DraftKings. The crown is your gambling problem

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>called one eight hundred gambler In New York, call eight

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>seven seven eight hope in why or text hope in why,

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>which is four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>help is available for problem gambling Call eight eight eight

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit.

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 5>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Casino and resort in Kansas twenty one plus age in

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 5>eligibility varies by jurisdiction void in Ontario. Bonus bets expire

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. For additional

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 5>terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot co slash

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 5>b ball.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>The so MVP to me is quite simple, and I

0:15:55.240 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>have been sorry, Daniel, really, I have found it unbelievable

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of people who have just decided all of

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the rules that I laid the groundwork for last year

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>no longer apply. And so for me, the only question

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for MVP is the fifth spot. One through four are

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious. Shay is the league MVP. He's thirty three

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a game on a sixty eight win team. Joker should

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>be the unanimous second place MVP guy. He's thirty a

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>game with a triple double, carrying a team that is

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>terrible defensively. Some of that's on him and just fired

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>their coach. Jiannis is third, Tatum is fourth, and if

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to say Tatum's third, Yanis is fourth, that's fine.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what Yannis has done, especially despite Dame being out,

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is remarkable, but that's a debate. And then or fifth place.

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a debate between the following Donovan Caid, Edwards

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and Lebron and I still want well, I'll talk about

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>All NBA first team because my one through five, my

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>MVP ballot is not my first team All NBA, and

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain that in a minute. But my fifth place

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>spot goes to Lebron, and it goes to Lebron because

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>despite the injury, still played seventy games. He seamlessly did

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of people thought he either wouldn't be

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>willing to or able to, which is fit with Luca.

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>People are recreating history that, oh, the Lakers were headed

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for the play in before the Luca trade. The Lakers

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>were the four seed the day Luca made his debut

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 1>with the team. They stayed even though Anthony Davis had

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>gotten hurt. They were on a winning streak when Luca

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>first got to the team. They're only real losing this

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>year happened surrounding Lebron's injury. Lebron was a Swiss Army

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>knife defensively once they got Luca, and honestly, once Ad

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>went down. They are the three seed in a loaded

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Western conference. They were only Oklahoma City was better this

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>year against the best ten teams in basketball. Lebron's been

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the through line of it all. I have in his

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>fifth place in MVP now to the top of the ballot.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So here's why I find these folks who are now

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>saying they are going to vote for Joker to be

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>so disingenuous and what they simply should say is he's

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>my favorite player. He's the best player in the league,

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so I'm voting for him. Last year, the numbers for

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Joker v. Luca were not close. I will remind you

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of them.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Last year, Luca averaged thirty four nine and nine. He

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>won the scoring title on good efficiency. He averaged thirty

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>four points, nine point two rebounds, nine point eight assists,

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>so basically thirty four nine to ten. The league MVP

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>was Nikola Jokic, who averaged seven fewer points twenty six

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half, three more rebounds twelve and a half,

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and one fewer assists nine.

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 4>And it wasn't close.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Luka got four first place votes, and the argument was

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>purely well, Jokers team won fifty seven games, Luca's team

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>won fifty, and Luca was not very good. Even though

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the team was fine defensively, Luca was not very good defensively.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Those same people now this year are saying throw those

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>rules out.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 4>And even though.

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Shay's team has won sixty eight games and Jokers team

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>won fifty, the same exact number where lucas seen won

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, I think Joker's gonna get it because I've

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>never seen an offensive season like this, And my question is,

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't you kind of see an offensive season like this

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>last year by a guy who got four first place votes? Again,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Luca last year was thirty four, nine and ten. Joker

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this year is thirty let me get yeah, twenty nine

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>point six called thirty thirteen and ten. So four or

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>fewer points four more rebounds on a team that won

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the same amount of games. And so that now you

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>might say, Nick, last year, weren't you a guy that

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:53.239
<v Speaker 1>was arguing for Luca. Wouldn't that then follow that this

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>year you should be arguing for Joker one hundred percent

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>if one of two things were won, I had an

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>actual vote and it was impacting it. So I must

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>vote with consistency or two. And this is more importantly

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and really the reasoning. I do feel like the previous

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>winner winners, but certainly in the most recent year continues

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 1>to set the precedent for the voting public because it

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is an undefined award. So last year when a guy

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with fifty wins who's playing in the four to five game,

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>who averaged thirty four to nine to ten, got four

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred votes because we said best player on

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the best team with really good stats is going to

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>run away with it to then not give Shay when

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Shay is again. It's like Shay's averaging twenty five a game.

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>He's thirty three, five and six with excellent defense on

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>a sixth win team. And the history of guys on

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>teams who have won sixty eight plus games, all of them,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>every team that has ever won sixty eight plus Steph

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>won MVP. Jordan won MVP the sixty nine win. Lakers

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>did not have the league MVP. Kareem won it in

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy two, but that is because two Lakers split votes.

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Wilt and West finished third and second. That's why the

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Lakers didn't have one. The who are the other ones?

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Dave Cowen's on the sixty eight win Celtics won MVP,

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Jordan won sixty nine games and shamefully didn't win it.

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Ninety seven of the voters got to Sickle giving it

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to him, gave it to Karl Malone. But it's just

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>folks need to just say, I like Joker the most

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>so even though his coach got fired and his defense

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>has been bad, and even though last year it was

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>about wins, this year it's about ross stats. I'm just

0:23:58.119 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna lie. I just think it's I think Shaye

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the MVP now to All NBA. So again I don't

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have an actual vote, but and I know they changed

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the rules. I want my All NBA First Team at

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the very least to be two guards, two forwards in

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a center, and I want all of my All NBA

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>teams to at least be credible teams you could roll

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>out on a basketball court. So even though I had

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Lebron as my fifth place in MVP voting, I do

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>not have him as All NBA First Team. I gave

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that to Donovan. So I want my two guards to

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>be Shayan Donovan, my two forwards Jonason Tata, my center Joker.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Second Team All NBA for me was very simple. My

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>two guards are Stepan ant Cade's technically a guard, but

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he's tall enough we can just put him in kind

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of that point forward spot. He and Lebron are second team,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and Alp Shingoon, who was the best player on a

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Rockets team that was the second seed. He is second

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Team All NBA, Third Team All NBA. With apologies to

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Tyrese Haliburton. Halliburton had his spots stolen in Game eighty two.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Demons by James Harden thirty nine to ten to lock

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up the five seed and stay out of the play in.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's Jalen Brunson, James Harden, Jalen Williams as a forward.

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Because your team wins sixty eight games, it's not just

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>one guy. Carl Anthony Towns is the other forward and

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Evan Mobley as the other center. Again, that team wants

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>what sixty four they need someone other than just Donovan.

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>My Defensive Player of the Year was not difficult for me.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Draymond really hurt himself at the end of

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the year. It is Evan Mobley, my sixth man.

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Of the the Mobley thing.

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 2>You have him in as your defensive place the year,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 2>but he's only in your third team All NBA.

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that happens sometimes. The where in hell there

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>have been years defensive Player of the Year didn't even

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>make any All NBA team. I don't think Marcus Smart

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>made an All NBA team when he won it.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't think.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Tony Allen, did Tony Allen ever

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>win Defensive Player of the Year, I don't remember, but

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:21.919
<v Speaker 1>that happened sometimes.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 4>But I think he's the defensive Player of the Year.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Six Man of the Year is Malik Beasley. Just an

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>absolute flamethrower off the bench, and I guess somewhat controversial

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>most improved. I think it's if he's a zubots I

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>almost had zubots On as my on my All NBA team.

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>He jumped his scoring by fifty percent over his career.

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>He's been great defensively, Clippers have been excellent, He's been huge.

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the most improved player, even though he's

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>old and it usually doesn't go to old guys. Clutch

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year is Lebron. Lebron's the only player

0:26:58.160 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in the league with four hundred, one hundred one hund

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth Lebron's fourth quarter plus minus and the

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Lakers record in the fourth quarter and his assistant turnover

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>ratio is better than either of the previous Clutch Player

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Year winners. And Stephan Ant and I understand

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brunson's clutch numbers are going to probably make Jalen

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Brunson win this award. That is in part because they

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>do not have clutch numbers for defense in the clutch,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>where Jalen was lacking. Obviously because of his size. I

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>think Lebron's clutch Player of the Year, Rookie of the

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Year is very very simple. Stefan Cassel is going to

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be close to unanimous. Well, Reesa Chale gets some votes,

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>and I think Coach of the Year demons is emy

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Udoka getting this Rockets team to the two seed. When

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Green's a nice player. Amon Thompson's gonna be an

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>awesome player, but he's very young. I think em Udoka

0:27:54.840 --> 0:28:00.160
<v Speaker 1>deserves Coach of the Year. So those are my ballots

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and my full NBA awards.

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 4>All right, it makes sense to everybody.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Lakers locked up the three seed and now they are

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 2>facing an in Minnesota in Round one. Luke obviously took

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 2>care of business, but against against them last year he

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 2>averaged thirty two, thirty two, nine and eight. How do

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 2>you think these teams stack up against each other?

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Are you a little worried there?

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>No, this is the ideal bracket for the Lakers. Okay, So, like, listen,

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>everything's hard in the West, and everyone wanted Memphis. But

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>once it was clear Memphis wasn't going to climb out

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of the play in part of it, then this was

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the best you could have hoped for, Like, you want

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to play the Nuggets right now? I don't Jamal Murray's back.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Joker is joker. You won't play the Clippers right now?

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Holy shit, that team looks unbelievable. The Warriors, because of

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Steph are always dangerous. So again, the best possible path

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Lakers, in my opinion, was having the thunder

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets and Clippers on the other side of the bracket.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 4>And they do.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>They are they might. By the way, also, if the

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Warriors lose tonight, they'll If the Warriors lose tonight, the

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Lakers road to the Conference finals is Timberwolves and then

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>either Rockets Grizzlies, And even if the Warriors win tonight,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>then Timberwolves in either Rockets Golden State and so aunt

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>might average thirty to a game in this series. The

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Lakers do not have anyone that can guard Anthony Edwards,

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's fine. Here are the other things that are

0:29:55.960 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. I don't know how you can incredibly play

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Rudy Gobert the amount of minutes you probably want to

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>play him. Luca just told us a week ago. He

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, what moment from your from the MAVs video

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>got you choked up the most. And it wasn't when

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they drafted him. It wasn't, you know, one of his

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>crazy buzzer beaters. It wasn't the seventy point game. It

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>was hitting the step back over Gobert in the conference finals,

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>then cursing him out in Slovenia. Luca has tortured Rudy

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Gobert on multiple continents in the Olympic Slovenia against France.

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>He's done it when Gobert was a Jazz. He did it.

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>When Gobert was a Timberwolf, he did it. So that

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is a rough spot for the Timberwolves to start with.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You then add that the Lakers are getting They no

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>longer have to deal with playoff D'Angelo Russell, which is

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a disaster, and instead get to go against playoff Julius Randall,

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a different type of disaster. That's nice. They

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have Darvin Ham with his hands in his pockets

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>or drawing up on the whiteboard contest without fouling. They've

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>got JJ who's been up for thirty nine straight hours

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to blitz Anthony Edwards.

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 4>All that's good.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You also have a series that because Luca is going

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to want to make Rudy Gobert cry. Lebron's gonna be

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 1>able to sit back the first three quarters like he

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>did in that MAVs game. So again, I think it

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is a hard fought five games for the Lakers, maybe six,

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you, guys, is my favorite round one bet.

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to my friends at DraftKings, by the way,

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like we should. I would like to can DraftKings. Can

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we start getting some boosts or something? I just if

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there's something I really like.

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>This is plus one twenty. Maybe they can throw my

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>face on it, make it plus one twenty five for

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what's right, listeners. But the Lakers minus a game and

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a half in the series, meaning is plus one twenty.

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Lakers for the series is minus two hundred.

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>So question is, do you think the Lakers are gonna

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>win the series? Yes, okay, you bet them at minus

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred you win if they win in four or five.

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Six or seven.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Or you can get them at minus a game and

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a half at plus one twenty and you win if

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they win the series in four or five or six.

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So yes, you cost yourself if it's a seven game

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Lakers win, but I think it's gonna be seven games

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think Luca is gonna light this team on fire,

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think that, uh, listen, nas Reed's gonna be

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a problem. You got credit where it's due. Jaden McDaniels

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is an excellent defensive player, but they got We saw

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Luca with a worst supporting cast, beat this team in

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>five to go to the finals last year. Now, aunt

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>said I got tired, which was odd, and ant won't

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>be tired this time. But you also have Lebron with

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>eight days off coming into it.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 2>I on the Lebron's side, are like, obviously not trying

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to speak this in the existence, but are you worried

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:45.479
<v Speaker 2>at all about his growing?

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 3>So I know that was kind of acting up last year.

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I saw it, yet so it looked like he kind

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of tweaked it in the game against Houston Game eighty one,

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he didn't seem too concerned. And this is also why

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know having eight days off is going to be

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>so incredibly useful and helpful. So no, I'm not obviously,

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if he truly reaggravates his growing, if he has to

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>miss time, then that would be a problem. But this

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>is where I remind you guys of one of the

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>single most remarkable stats in basketball history, which is Lebron

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>James teams have played in two hundred and eighty seven

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>playoff games demanse in his career two hundred and eight.

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>So teams Lebron has been on have played in two

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty seven playoff games. Of those two hundred

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and eighty seven, Lebron James has played in two hundred

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and eighty seven. He has never missed a single playoff

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:01.280
<v Speaker 1>game in his career. So yes, finger cross, knock on wood,

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever you gotta do. But also that number is so.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Bananas, it's pretty crazy.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It's three and a half full seasons. Yeah, he's played,

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>He's this will be his fifty fifth career playoff series,

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty five series. He's forty one and thirteen in his

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>career in playoff series, and so yeah, I mean, I

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you hope. Obviously he's got to stay healthy. He's done

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 1>a good job of that.

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Through his career.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>One more question before we move on to some other stuff.

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 2>So if Minnesota ends up winning this series and Ant

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 2>shows out as he moved closer to become in the face.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 5>So.

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I Ant needs to tighten up his off court life,

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>but he's got everything else. And if he were to

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>outduel Lebron and Luca in what is going to be

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the highest rated Round one series, yeah, that will. But

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I kind of look at Ant.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Here's the optimistic look of Ant.

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>He's on the Luca trajectory. Luca made an early conference

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>finals run. The next year, the team made a big

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>trade and then took a bit of a step back.

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>For Luca was Kyrie. They end up missing the playoffs.

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>For Ant, they trade Karl Anthony Towns. You know, they

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 1>end up down at the sixth line, probably bouncing round one.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And the next year for Luca they made the finals.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>So that like it's not like ANT is behind schedule

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>at all, But yes, this would scut this would Winning

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this round one series would do more for Ant's notoriety

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and facing the league stuff than winning the Round two

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>series they did last year against Denver.

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the greatest Denvers probably be super important with this year.

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Like if he won this one, if they beat the

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Lakers and then they just lost in.

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Round to correct, no, no, no, you beat the Lakers, everyone's

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>then gonna expect you to beat the Rockets or the Warriors,

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>or the Grizzlies. That's that part's definitely true.