WEBVTT - Trump Administration is Soft on White Collar Crime

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Law with June Grassoe from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You may remember back in six when Prett Barrara, then

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the U S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York,

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>issued a warning to Wall Street Today, tomorrow, next week,

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the week after cribbleged Wall Street insiders who are considering

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>breaking the law will have to ask themselves an important

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>question is law enforcement listening? A slew of insider trading

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>convictions followed cementing Barrara's nickname as the Sheriff of Wall Street.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>But the sheriff is gone and the Trump administration is

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently not interested in filling the position. The prosecution of

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>white collar crime has hidden all time low during the

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, down thirty for Trump's first three years in

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>office from the average under President Barack Obama, according to

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>data from Syracuse University. Joining me is John Coffee, a

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>professor Columbia Law School. His new book is Corporate Crime

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and Punishment, The Crisis of Under Enforcement. Jack, how would

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you characterize the drop in the white color crime numbers. Well,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the enforcement. Generally. You can look at

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of dependants who are prosecuted way down. You

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>can look at the fines that are imposed on corporations

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>down by sevent You can look at new policies that

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>say you don't have to do much to get credit

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for a compliance plan. It used to be, for example,

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 1>that the Anti Trust pass in price fixing would only

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>grant your leniency if you made a complete, in total

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>confession and you were the first to confess. That's all

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>been thrown out recently by the Trump administration. And as

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>long as you adopt a reasonably credible compliance plan, you

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.559
<v Speaker 1>can get very substantial sentencing leniency, even for a crime

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>like price fixing, which is extremely hard to detect. I

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can give you examples on all kinds of areas in

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of the numbers or in terms of the policy changes.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But the government is going much much easier and softer,

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>both criminally and civilly against corporations to commit on lawcal conduct.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Do we blame the president for this or is it

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>someone lower down in the chain? Well, that's a good question, man.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I would tell you the first thing about organizational behavior

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>corporations or other organizations is that the critical variable is

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>tone at the top. And the United States governed today,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the tone set by the top by the president is

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that law compliance isn't that important. It's a minor virtue

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>at best, and don't get yourself hung up on it.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Get the job done. So I think that there is

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 1>an implicit signal from the top which lower levels always

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>copy that law compliance is not the government's first concern.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at a few different areas of white color crime,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>starting with securities fraud cases. Well, we're saying them go

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>down and understand, for the last six months there has

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>been the COVID nineteen crisis and most court houses are shut.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>So I do know that there are a number of cases,

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>some of which I've worked with the prosecution on, which

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are delayed until the courts can reopen. That will create

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>something of a statistical artifact. But in general, I think

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the government is reallocating troops away from securities fraud, any

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>trust fraud, to things the government cares more about, such

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>as immigration cases, alleged terrorism cases, other cases that they

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>are concerned with the first three years of the Trump administration.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>This comes from data assembled by a group of Syracuse

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>University with the number of white color dependence during the

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>first three years spelled by that's a real decline because

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>there had been a significant increase for a while under

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration. Now, the Justice Department has criticized that

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>tract data, saying it routinely differs from other reporting, for example,

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>from the U. S. Attorney's Office, And they say that

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the Department hasn't eased up on white collar crime. Well, actually,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the government's official statistics are only slightly different TRACK, which

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>stands for Transactional Report Access Clearing Out. It's a watchdog

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at Justice Department, and they're not loved by Justice.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>No one loves to be watched. They say the number

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of dependents is down by and the studies by the

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>attorneys say it's down by not a huge difference. So

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is it that the FBI is not investigating these crimes anymore,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they're just letting it go by. Well, I would say

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>most of US attorneys use the FBI or other enforcement agencies,

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but they've got to allocate their own manpower. If at

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>one point in time you had twenty people in the

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>securities fraud Unit in the Southern District and you were

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to reduce it to ten, you're going to cut the

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>manpower that can prosecute these cases by fifty percent, and

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>there will be a decline, So it could be part

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the FBI, but I think it's more the manpower

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>and what they're given is their priority. Some observers say

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>that though there's a downturn in white collar prosecutions, there's

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>an optick in immigration prosecutions. Well, I agree with that,

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but that's because you're allocating the truths differently if you

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>take your man power. Let's suppose the U. S Attorney

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>has a hundred lawyers under his command, and when he

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>started he had twenty five with him in white collar crime,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>and after two years he shifts well with them out

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and puts them over in immigration or terrorism cases. Are

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>organized crime cases, you're going to have a consequent declimb

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because there are less people they're investigating, and you only

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>prosecute what you investigate. What about money laundering, Well, there

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>has been a decline of money laundering cases. Money laundering

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is unique because the prosecution can charge that pretty much

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>when it wants. It's a very easy crime to allege

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>if you found other felonies, and by eliminating money learning prosecutions,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>you are again being more lenient on incorporation and why

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well that's speculative. It could well be the Trump administration

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>believes that the stock market is the most important achievement

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they have and they don't want to prosecute public corporations.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And because the market go down, that's all speculative. What

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you is they've changed their requirements and

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it is now much easier to get leniency. At the

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>end of the Obama administration, they were somewhat embarrassed by

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that no one at a senior level at

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a Wall Street firm was prosecuted during the two thousand

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>eight or because of the two thousand eight What I

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>can tell you is they've changed their requirements and it

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is now much easier to get leniency. At the end

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>of the Obama administration, they were somewhat embarrassed by the

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that no one at a senior level at a

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street firm was prosecuted during the two thousand eight

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or because of the two thousand and eight crisis. So

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>they adopted something called the Yates Memorandum, named after Sally Yates,

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>who was the Deputy Attorney General, and it said we're

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>no longer to give you a deferred prosecution agreement, which

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is a probation like discharge unless you do a complete

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>study and identify absolutely everyone who was involved, so we'll

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>know who the officers are that we can prosecute. And

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this was an all or nothing policy, identify everyone. Well,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration comes in and they change it and

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they say, you only have to identify people who are

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>substantially involved in the crime. What does that mean. It

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>means if there's an investigation by a private law firm

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>hired by the company to see what happened and make

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a report to the government, they can say, well, the

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>only people who paid the bribe for these assistant vice

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>presidents overseas, and while maybe the CEO and maybe the

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>chief financial officer knew something about this, they weren't substantially involved.

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's a very easy rationalization by which you can

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>exclude the most senior people and thereby make sure that

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>justice will stop at a half white point. It's a

0:07:55.600 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>significant change that the Trump administration put into effectively unwanted

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Eighth Memorandum. They've done this in other areas too.

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>For the last seventy years, the US government has had

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a special policy towards any trust price fixing. Any trust

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>price fixing is very hard to detect, but it always

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>involves the conspiracy. One firm can't do it alone. And

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so the positive for seventy years is we will give

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you leniency, but only if you make a complete confession,

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and you are the first to confess. The business community

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>always disliked that, but companies did make those complete confessions

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>and god immunity for themselves and their officers. Well, the

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has abolished that. They will now say that

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>while you can still get complete credit, will give you

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>substantial sentencing leniency, great credit if you just adopt a

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>credible compliance plan, not the substantial watering down. It means

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that price fixing cases are less likely to begin with

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>corporate confessions. We can go through half a dozen of

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>these things. Just to give you one more. It used

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to be that there were deferred execution agreements, and the

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>defense bar wanted more. So they pushed for something called

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>non prosecution agreements, under which no court is involved. You

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 1>just agree with the prosecution that they won't prosecute you.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>And now they've gone one step further. There's something called

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>declinations with discouragement. And here the government sort of salute you,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>y say, we think your cooperation was so terrific, so

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>wonderful that we're going to decline to prosecute you. We

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>will require you to pay back the ill, not gains

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to discoorge them. But that's sort of a lesser disposition,

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>which the government salute you for your cooperation. That's new

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>with Trump. I can give you two or three more,

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but you're getting the picture. Yes, Absolutely, cracking down on

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>financial fraud led to reforms and increase corporate compliance. What

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is this, uh, non prosecution leading to Well, again, there

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>were two steps to bird prosecution. Non prosecution, which has

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>been around for six or seven years and not not

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>unique to Trump, but Trump is using it much more.

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a lesser disposition under which you don't have to

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>admit guilt, you don't have any public document, you have

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>no court or judge involved, and both of those things

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mean a little bit more accountability. Uh. It used to

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>be under deferred prosecution agreements, it was normal that the

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>government would require you to put to appoint a monitor,

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>some outside expert who would review the area of misbehavior

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and constantly surveil and tell the government who found that

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>there was any sign of continuing activity, that anyone illegal

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>conduct or suspicious conduct. The Trump administration has said monitors

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>are no longer required, and they are disappearing. I don't

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>think there ever were a perfect solution, but there were

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>one more little step that's gone. I'm wondering, is there

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>any effect to be seen yet our corporations engaging in

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>more criminal behavior because there's no enforcement. No, of course,

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>no one's going to confess to that. No one's going

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to say, of course, we're engaging a more criminal behavior.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>But they think the government's behaving much more reasonably. And

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>when dependants think the prosecutor is being reasonable, I think

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it means it's a very light touch and we're not

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>getting the harder attitude that we saw at various points

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>back under the Obama administration. Now, how much is dependent

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>on who the U. S. Attorney is in the Southern District,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly where there's a lot of white color prosecutions, because

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, you remember pret Berrara, the sheriff, so called

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Sheriff of Wall Street, who cracked down on insider trading.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Nothing did. We don't see anything like that anymore. He

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>deserves great credit. But actually there's been a long tradition

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in the Southern district. In fact, other use attorneys call

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>them the sovereign District in New York because they always

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>resisted main justice and followed their own very aggressive policies.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But note that the last two duly appointed House Attorneys,

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>both Preeperhara and his Republican successor, have been fired by

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. That's a pretty strong signal that you can't

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>remain into and you can't go your own way. No,

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know any place else where the government has

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>fired two successive U S attorneys. One of the former

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors in the Antitrust and Fraud Division said that a

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of this non enforcement is because veterans. Veteran attorneys

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have left that division, and then there are younger lawyers

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there who really don't know yet how to put a

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>case together. Do you think that's a valid explanation. I

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>can't reject it. I don't know that do we have

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in the people in the Justice Department with the Usttorney's Office,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they usually get the very best people, Supreme Court perks

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and the others. But it takes a while to learn

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>your job. You can't do it fully on day one.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>But notice if they are leaving, why are they leaving?

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It might be they have been demoralized by the new policies,

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the new restraints, and the lack of commitment to strong enforcement.

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.479
<v Speaker 1>I would think I wouldn't personally as a young aggressive

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>U S attorney or says new attorney, I don't think

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy working under the Trump leadership, and I

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>might find other employment. What is the message of your book, Well,

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we need to be more aggressive in different ways. The

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>number one problem is we don't have the resources to

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>adequately investigate all these cases. That's the principal reason why

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>people that Leahmen and other firms were not investigated. They

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>weren't just not prosecuted, they weren't investigated. And I think

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we've got to both get more resources and find ways

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to make the corporation much more eager to settle. Today,

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a system under which we sort of trade up.

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>We start at the lowest level and find the lowest

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>person and hope you'll implicate the next person, and we

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>climb the ladder with everybody turning on the person above them.

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>That works to a degree, but it never gets you

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to the very top. I think one of the things

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we have to do is to start at the top

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and tell the board of directors or its art committee

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that they have to take control of this investor asient

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and its decisions, and we will threaten you with the

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>equivalent of a bankrupting penalty unless you identify for us

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 1>who were the responsible officers, going back to identify everyone.

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think you have to negotiate from both levels,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>from the top down in the bottom up, trying to

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>get the entity to identify their responsible officers. I'm a

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>believer that we really have to get individuals held responsible

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and prosecuting. The corporation is a very second bad substitute.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned before the financial crisis, where you know,

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>people kept saying and what are we going to see

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>people in handcuffs who are really responsible? And we never did.

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Has there been a time in our history when's the

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>last time prosecutors have gotten to the top? Go back

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and think of and Run and Worldcome two thousand one

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to two th three. The CEOs of both of those

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>firms we went to prison, and the CEO of World

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Come was only released after twenty five years. He was

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>terminally ill about a couple of months ago. So we

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have often prosecuted senior executives and around the world common

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it does other companies and their CEO is criminally prosecuted

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in jail. And that's the same thing during the Savings

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank crisis. Bank in the nineteen eighties, something like the

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>five hundred senior bank officers went to prison for failures

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of small stating banks that took ridiculous risks. And in

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the details, the problem is the very large corporation. It's

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be a massive inqueror before you can get

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>all the data. Sometimes thousands of people are involved in

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a broad policy, and that is forbidding to the government.

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the resources, and we've got to find

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ways to give them resources. One of the things I propose,

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>which the SEC won't like at all, is the SEC

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is also resource constraint, and sometimes they should hire private

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>law firms, very good private law firms on a contingency

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the basis to sue the dependence because the SEC and

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>have enough manpower. But if you told a Planets law

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>firm that they could handle this case under the direction

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of the SEC und the total control of the SEC,

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and they would get twenty five percent the recovery as

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>their contingent fee, I think that would solve some of

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the resource constraints that we are now facing. That's just

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples. There are others. Thanks Jack. That's

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>professor John Coffee at Columbia Law School. His new book

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is entitled Corporate Crime and Punishment, The Crisis of under Enforcement.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is facing a battle over a set of

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>executive actions he issued on Saturday, providing economic relief measures

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, including weekly federal unemployment payments, student loan relief,

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and efforts to protect tenants from eviction. With those actions,

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is Trump trying to rest core powers away from Congress

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>after weeks of discussions over a second pandemic rescue package stalled.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is Matt Dalla, a professor at Washington University's

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Graduate School of Political Management. Our President Trump's orders unprecedented

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in our history, Well, they're highly unusual. I wouldn't say

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're totally unprecedented in that, you know, Trump himself

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>has created a kind of precedent for them. So for example,

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>when he is hued at one of his first executive

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>orders out of Blue with the travel band early on

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>into the so called Muslim Band, that was an executive

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>order that actually he had to revise multiple times. And

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's so chaoff at airports across the country. I think

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that there are also uh, He's also set a precedent

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>when is a failure to reach an accommodation with Congress

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>on his wall. After weeks of trying to negotiate and

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>then failing to reach an agreement, he issued an emergency

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>declaration and tried to repurpose the money from the Defense

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Department in other places to build the wall. So, you know,

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>even though the circumstances are a bit different, I think

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that what he's done with these four, both memos and

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>executive orders, are of a piece of how he has

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 1>issued orders during his administration. But yes, before Trump, I

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, as controversial as executive orders has been,

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump has has really pushed the boundaries of

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>them in ways that are highly a circumspect and unusual,

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and the courts haven't stopped him. The Supreme Court ended

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>up approving the final Muslim ban, and and the Supreme

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Court has let Trump continue to use military funds to

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>build the wall until that lawsuit reaches them. And we

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they'll do with that suit. Yeah, so

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't we don't know what they're gonna do with

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>shoot over the wall and It's true the Supreme Court

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>did a pold but it was a much revised band

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and it took quite a long time for it to

0:18:57.880 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>work its way to the courts. And I think the

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Muggle band had to be revised at least a couple

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>of times. And remember it also evoked this withering descent

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>from Justice Sonia. So the Mayor too, I believe, likened

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it to the treatment of Japanese Americans during World War two,

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of a religious discrimination. Letting that stand. So you know,

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>these are highly controversial and looks the executive orders having

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>controversial in the past. I do think what Trump has done,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in particular with the executive order about building the wall

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in the national emergency, and also with these recent orders

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and memos, is to start to infringe on the congressional

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>power of the purse. And Congress has the constitutional authority

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to appropriate money, and the Trump has begun to, I think,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>infringe on that when he's been unable to reach these fields.

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Has Congress over the decades, not just during Trump, has

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Congress been giving more and more authority to the executive

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>by seating more of its authority. Is that how we

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>got to this point? Well, yeah, that's a that's a

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>big and complicated question. But in an era of nuclear weaponry,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and after two world wars, and during the Cold War,

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and then after nine eleven, certainly on matters of national

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>security and foreign policy, the trend for many decades has

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>been to seed to the president a much much greater

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>authority and and even to the extent where Congress has

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>voted on whether or not authorize a war, it has

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>not been a formal declaration of war as the Constitution demands.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>It's been a resolution, you know, a resolution, for example,

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to authorize the Youth of Force Interact in two thousand,

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>in two four, after nine eleven, the resolution to authorize

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a Youth of Force against Terrorism, which I believe it's

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>still enforced and has been used to justify all sorts

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of military activities overseas. The other point I would make

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is it in a narror of partisan polarization, when Congress

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>has been unable to reach deals, and when Congress's approval

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>ratings are maybe at fifteen percent or sometimes even in

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the single digits, presidents have, you know, as Barack Obama said,

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>after being frustrated repeatedly by Republicans in Congress, he's got

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a phone and a pen, and the pat of course

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>refers to using executive orders and other executive actions. So Congress,

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>by defaults in a way, by being unable to enact

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or pass major legislation, has seeded I think, uh much

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of it unwittingly seated much of this authority to uh

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to presidents and has opened the door for the kind

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of misshif I think that uh, and and what I

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>think many are you unconstitutional actions by President plump. Republican

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Senator Ben Says said the pen and phone theory of

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>executive lawmaking is unconstitutional slap, but he was one of

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 1>very few Republicans to criticize this move. And so what

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>are the Republicans saying by letting the president go ahead

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with moving military funds to a board a wall, and

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>here redirecting funds from FEMA. The first thing is that

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the height of hypocrisy, right that the Republicans spent

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>many years railing a President Obama for acting like a

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>king and issuing these sorts of unconstitutional orders that were

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>supposedly destroying freedom and individual liberty. I think what we're

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>seeing though, now, of course, is the shoes on the

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>other foot, and and in particular, the Republicans are headed

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 1>into a very trust election year. The president is on

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the ballot, and I think most Republicans at the federal

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>level feel like politically they have no choice, right that

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that their faith and really the power that they have

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in Washington and in the country. Uh and to point

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justices for example, that all that is riding

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>on this election. And you know what, they come out

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>like Ben Fast did and start criticizing Trump. I think

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that they worry that the party is going to be

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>even further divided and it will depress their votes. Then

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's Fast. Interestingly, who's up for re election. I believe

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>in November he's already won his primer, and you know,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have a even close to competitive race, so

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's a little bit more politically free to

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>issue a criticism. But yeah, I mean Republicans have really

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 1>and you can say that about you know, a hundred

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and one different issues over the past four years where

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have just kind of washed their hands up. What

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>they have said is there are their principles and seated

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the stage and the policies and programs the Trump even

0:23:55.320 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>if it violates their own beliefs, we're President Obama's executive

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>orders substantially similar to President Trump's. In other words, did

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he ever divert money in executive orders from one project

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to another, Not that I'm aware of, Not in the

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>way that Trump is using. Uh. These orders. Now, you know,

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>almost alt executive orders require almost by definition, the use

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of some funds, because of course you're telling federal agency

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to prioritize one issue over another. So, for example, when

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>President Obama think his first executive order, one of his

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>first was to authorize the closure one ton of obey.

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Now that never happened, but certainly there was some funding involved, right,

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and getting the federal government to focus on that project.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Same thing one President Obama issued the DOCTA order. You're

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>telling the immigration services in the federal government to focus

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on particular priorities and find being closed as a result

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>of that. What I think makes Trump's orders different is that, uh,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and again with both the border wall and the avlates

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>executive orders, is that after leaks of negotiations with Congress

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>then failed over the power of the purse, which is

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>constitutional powers that Congress has, Trump has issued an order

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to circumvent that and to change vending policy, and to

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>appropriate essentially new funds for purposes not authorized by Congress,

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and also in this case, to change tax law unilaterally

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and in a way not authorized by Congress. So, you know,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>these are I think there's a reason why so many

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>constitutional scholars are looking at this and saying that this

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is dubious. Transactions are dubious at best. And you know

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>President Obama is I would say most aggressive executive orders

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>had to do with immigration, one of them DOCTA for

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>the children who came to the country as undocumented immigrants,

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the other with a more sweeping executive order.

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>One of those withstood scrutiny in the courts, the other

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>did not. But I don't think President Obama or other

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>presidents have explicitly with their orders tried to stop invent

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the power of the person that Congress enjoyed. Well, when

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>he was announcing these orders, President Trump said basically, well,

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be sued on this. I think the

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>question is who would sue to stop these Well, yeah,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that's what's That's always the question in these things, right,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>who's going to do the stopping? And also how long

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>will the stop and take? Even if the Democrats and

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Congress don't to. It's conceivable that some state and state

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>attorney general will to because in this unemployment order or

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>memo that Trump has issued, he has requiring the states

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, to shift in a hundred dollars to make

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.199
<v Speaker 1>it to four hundred dollars a week for people who

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>are unemployment. And the States are saying, look, you know,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>work and too bankrupt. We can't take on this added

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>expenditure at a time when we're going to have to

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>make these major cuts. So you could see the states doing.

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You could see nonprofit organizations that um in part to

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>send Congress or or see their jobs. Is sort of

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>promoting the separation of powers. Trying to sue and the course,

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for course tapped aside who has standing, just as the

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>court had to decide this question in the emoluments cases

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>where President Trump was being sued about his properties and

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>whether his government was unconstitutionally essentially accepting payments from foreign entities.

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:41.959
<v Speaker 1>The problem that that I think the Democrats have, of course,

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's been true with any number of cases with

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Trump visit. You know, the courses we've seen are slow,

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're often divided, and even in this case of

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:57.199
<v Speaker 1>some tastes which have still never been revealed. So you know,

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we see the limits, uh, the from both Congress and

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the courts, I think in uh in this instance as well.

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>At a press conference yesterday, Trump said that he was

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>going to issue an executive order to ensure that insurance

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>covers pre existing conditions, even though it was pointed out

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that that is already part of the law known as

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Obamacare that his administration is fighting. So I'm wondering if

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>all these things are just for show and he doesn't

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>really care if it goes through or not. Yeah, well,

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>let's yeah, I mean, let's just kind of cut to

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the chase, right. Um, Both that order right that he's

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>going to use to protect pre existing conditions, and the

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>other orders in demos about payroll taxes and unemployee insurance.

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these are essentially efforts to call on people

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and to think that he's actually doing something, um, and

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to create the illusion that he is taking action now

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in the preexisting order prexisting conditions. Um. I mean it's

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>absurd on its face because he aspects his entire presidency

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>basically trying to abolish Obamacare and abolish that provision, which

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is at the heart of Obamacare. And you know, remember

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>he tried a couple of times through Congress to um

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to enact a law or well basically told defined and

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>abolish Obamacare and to abolish the prexisting conditions. And his

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>administration is still supporting a lawsuits uh, that would do

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly that. And so that executive order is really I think, um,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's gonna affect to reality. Uh. And then

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on these other orders, yeah, I mean this unemployment bump

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that he says that he's going to give, Um, the

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>states are already saying it's unworkable. And apparently what he

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>has done is he's trying to create a new kind

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of program. The funds apparently would only laugh for five

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks for people. Well, um, but it may take weeks

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>for months to kind of stand up the program. And uh.

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And the states, I think that it's just for a

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of states at least, think that it's just unworkable, right,

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's not it's not feasible. Uh. And and so

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it is unclear whether any money that he says he's

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna give to people are ever going to reach their hands.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.239
<v Speaker 1>But it is a way of trying to cover up

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the reality that you know, Democrats have to fill in

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the House to continue the six hundred dollar a week

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 1>supplemental unemployment insurance for people across the country hit by

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic UM. The Republicans and Democrats failed to reach

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>an agreement. The Senate Republicans couldn't past their own bill,

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and so Trump, I think, is trying to kind of

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>cover up for that and cover up for this, you know,

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>real political weakness that he has heading into the fall elections. Okay, cool, Well,

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>before I let you go, what are executive order is

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be used for? We've seen a lot of

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>misuse over the years. What are they supposed to be

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>used for? Well, look, there's no one definition. UM. Historically

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they have been used for issues such as promoting UM

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>uh uh anti discrimination, putting an anti discrimination clauses, fighting

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>racial discrimination in federal contracting UM, setting up for example,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the Fair Employment Practices a Commission during World War Two

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>for promoting a formative action UH and empty in the

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties, in particular with respect to federal contracting and

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>federal hiring. There has been also executive orders abridging civil liberties,

0:31:55.600 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>directing creating security measures in the Departments, State, and the

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>National Security apparatus. Uh. We have seen executive orders around

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>public health, so stem cells research, which was a controversial issue,

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and remember President George W. Bush I think it was

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the first order he signed, or one of them, executive

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>orders limiting stem cell research, and Barack Obama listed those

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>restrictions as soon as he got in the office. They

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>are also generally a way the I mean more broadly,

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a way that the president can use these orders

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to attempt to tell the federal agencies and federal bureaucracy

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that the president runs uh how to prioritize the works

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that they do, and also how to interpret the laws

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that Congress has passed. So there are but there are

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>also significant limits on them. And what we have seen,

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>UH is that executive orders are also pretty easy once

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the other party gets in the past to overturn unless

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they're very popular. So President Obama used an executive order

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to create the h Deferred Action program for Dreamers, and

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>President Trump presended that So, um, you know, they tend

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to lead to a far more chaostic approach to governing,

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to UH and and they're also vulnerable

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to being overturned by opponents once they get in the office.

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>That's Matt Dalek of Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management.

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for this edition of the Bloomberg Law Show.

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm June Grasso. Thanks so much for listening. Catch us

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>every weeknight at ten pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio.