Speaker 1: There's a former congressman from Virginia's name is Jim Moran,
Speaker 1: and he's a local weed. Hear what he said about
Speaker 1: northerns and Nordam has been ambushed by a yearbook photo.
Speaker 1: Ambushed by a yearbook photo. I think the story going
Speaker 1: around is that somebody who just repulsed at a poll,
Speaker 1: somebody went to med school with Northern, was uphold at
Speaker 1: what he had had to say about late term abortion,
Speaker 1: day of birth abortion, post birth abortion, and leaked all
Speaker 1: of this black face photo and yearbook stuff. And now
Speaker 1: Northern's defenders he was ambushed by a yearbook photo, an
Speaker 1: inanimate object that by itself cannot move or doing it.
Speaker 1: He was ambushed by this route. Northern is denying being
Speaker 1: in the racist photo, but he recalls darkening his skin
Speaker 1: in a Michael Jans Jackson dance contest in nineteen eighty four.
Speaker 1: Said he doesn't believe he is either the person in
Speaker 1: the racist photo that appeared in the eighty four yearbook,
Speaker 1: which is now hijack ambushed him, but he did once
Speaker 1: darken his face to resemble Michael Jackson during a dance
Speaker 1: contest in nineteen eighty four. In a remarkable our long
Speaker 1: news conference a governor's mansion in Richmond. Northern defended himself
Speaker 1: from the cacophony of golf or his resignation, but he
Speaker 1: acknowledged that he had made mistakes on race in his past,
Speaker 1: like when he darkened his face for the dance. He
Speaker 1: was going to do the moonwalk too. He was gonna
Speaker 1: do the moonwalk during the press conference. His wife moved
Speaker 1: there and stopped him. I believe now and then that
Speaker 1: I am not even of the people in this photo.
Speaker 1: That's not me. I'm not that person. I this is
Speaker 1: not who I am. I I apologize anybody who might
Speaker 1: have been offended by it. He had denied that he
Speaker 1: had ever worn a KKK robe and hood or been
Speaker 1: drunk enough to forget a moment like this. This is
Speaker 1: not me in that picture. That was not Ralph Northern.
Speaker 1: The interesting thing is is that that you remember the
Speaker 1: contrast this with the with the Trump Access Hollywood video
Speaker 1: when that came out, and that was strategically time that released.
Speaker 1: That was that was before a debate with Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: That was to take Trump out of the race. He
Speaker 1: survived it. Yeah, he's got a nickname. Can we say
Speaker 1: this name? There's so many parts of this story that
Speaker 1: I don't need. CNN, when they reported on this over
Speaker 1: the weekend, put an R by his name, are you
Speaker 1: aware of that seeing and portrayed the guy as a
Speaker 1: Republican Graphically, instead of a D next to his name,
Speaker 1: they had an R next to his name. And so
Speaker 1: the Access Hollywood video this was supposed to take Trump out.
Speaker 1: I was of a handful of people who knew that
Speaker 1: it wouldn't. I knew that Trump's voters wouldn't have abandoned
Speaker 1: him over this reasons I've already explained. But everybody in
Speaker 1: politics thought that was it. It was just a matter
Speaker 1: of time that Trump would resign, that his entire support
Speaker 1: group would abandon him, and many people did. The Republican
Speaker 1: Party was all over the place of Democrats. But you
Speaker 1: look at the people trying to circle the wagons around
Speaker 1: this idiot. There are people, not all of them, There
Speaker 1: are some people trying to circle the wagons and save
Speaker 1: this guy and what he has done here. You cannot
Speaker 1: ignore what he has done and what he's trying to
Speaker 1: ride out and thus defend. He finally has given up
Speaker 1: the ghost. Ralph Northern has made clear for everybody what
Speaker 1: the pro choice movement really is. It's a pro deaf movement.
Speaker 1: It is always been couched as a civil rights or
Speaker 1: human human rights or women's rights issue, a woman's right
Speaker 1: to choose. You can't tell a woman what she can
Speaker 1: or can't do with her own body. He has made
Speaker 1: it clear that the objective here is abortion. It's sick.
Speaker 1: Decent people can't understand it. Decent people, Cannada. What is
Speaker 1: the political value in amassing a bunch of supporters who
Speaker 1: want the freedom to kill babies. It's something that escapes
Speaker 1: these decent people can understand this being a political objective
Speaker 1: that you use to try to gain supporters. But that's
Speaker 1: what this guy has let known be known as the
Speaker 1: actual purpose of the pro choice so called movement. Frank Indiana, Steve,
Speaker 1: great to have you, sir, Welcome to the E I
Speaker 1: B Network. Hello, Rush. I think the reason that Governor
Speaker 1: of Virginia feels like he's been ambush or people think
Speaker 1: that he's been ambush, I think that's wrong. I think
Speaker 1: he's been rescued by having these pictures come out so
Speaker 1: that they don't have to talk about his views on abortion.
Speaker 1: Well that's an interesting take. So somebody, here's what he
Speaker 1: says about aboarding children on the day they're born or afterwards.
Speaker 1: And immediately here comes the yearbook stuff showing this guy
Speaker 1: to be a klansman, a white racist, whatever who has
Speaker 1: no sensitivity, and that then takes the other stuff off
Speaker 1: the page. But I think you're right to a certain
Speaker 1: that stuff has taken the the actual outrage of what
Speaker 1: this guy believes regarding abortion. It's no longer the focal
Speaker 1: point of the story. That's actually very true. It's still
Speaker 1: out there depending on where you go in conservative media,
Speaker 1: they have not dropped that aspect of it. More the
Speaker 1: drive bys don't even want to touch that and instead
Speaker 1: of focusing on these other things. So it's a good observation,
Speaker 1: and I'm glad you're called. And brevity is the soul
Speaker 1: of what you got it in there in a minute,
Speaker 1: that's even better, Okay, Tracy in Jackson, Michigan. High great
Speaker 1: to have you with us on the e I be network. Helo, Hey,
Speaker 1: how are you? Thank you so much for taking my call.
Speaker 1: So my my thought is this, we have socialism just
Speaker 1: everywhere in our country right now. We have the government
Speaker 1: and all these Dems who are trying to give us
Speaker 1: government ran health insurance. We have all these states who
Speaker 1: are now passing late term abortion. It makes me wonder,
Speaker 1: if all of these things continue to happen, is the
Speaker 1: next step going to be forced abortion from doctors when
Speaker 1: a mother finds out early on choes carrying a baby
Speaker 1: that's not going to be perfect, that's going to have
Speaker 1: down syndromes, bina bifida, or some other genetic abnormality. I
Speaker 1: have long thought that that was going to happen, regardless
Speaker 1: of politics. Tracy. I've I've long thought with the advancements
Speaker 1: made in genetics, that it's going to eventually, just like
Speaker 1: we with amno centesis, we can identify certain birth defects
Speaker 1: in the womb, and we give parents a choice. Uh,
Speaker 1: when we're able to identify various other things that people
Speaker 1: might consider less than perfect. Like a lot of people
Speaker 1: don't want a redheaded kid. A lot of people will
Speaker 1: tell them, I don't want a child that's going to
Speaker 1: be bullied. I don't want to be a child. So
Speaker 1: what will that be? I don't want if the doctor
Speaker 1: can someday tell you your child has the gene here
Speaker 1: that we have learned makes it very likely that he's
Speaker 1: going to be battling his weight is entirely my kid's
Speaker 1: gonna be fatly odds are you I don't want that? Well,
Speaker 1: if you don't want a child, there's certain steps we
Speaker 1: can take right now, and then they identify others. I think,
Speaker 1: I think this is going to happen long before politics
Speaker 1: got involved with it. Now you add politics to it
Speaker 1: and the I think the opportunities for this kind of
Speaker 1: selection are going to be rampant. You know what, what
Speaker 1: what what you're not supposed to say is that planned
Speaker 1: parenthood was founded for this express purpose. Everybody thinks that
Speaker 1: planned parenthood is about planning family, even at their limbog
Speaker 1: is it though people could know how many children to
Speaker 1: have and how much it cost to support them, and
Speaker 1: what it's going to take the putting planned parent that
Speaker 1: don't wonder there's nothing parenthood about planned parenthood planned parenthood.
Speaker 1: You know what, with every abortion of a black child,
Speaker 1: it ought to say Margaret Sanger for the win, because
Speaker 1: planned parenthood was about eugenics. Planned parenthood was about eliminating
Speaker 1: baby thought to be deficient because of some characteristic and
Speaker 1: back in the Margaret Sanger days, that was race. And
Speaker 1: I find it fascinating that that charter has been wholly
Speaker 1: adopted by the Democrat Party. I saw a chilling at
Speaker 1: somebody sent an email that had a still shot at
Speaker 1: like a billboard shot photo for planned parenthood, and it
Speaker 1: was three African Americans, a mother and a father, and
Speaker 1: somebody was talking about the magic and the wonders of
Speaker 1: planned parenthood. And I thought, right there, planned parenthood is
Speaker 1: a boarding African American babies, and a Democrat Party is
Speaker 1: supporting it. Book lined and thinker. Planned parenthood is one
Speaker 1: of the reasons that Democrats need open borders. Most of
Speaker 1: the people aboarded in this country or Democrats or would
Speaker 1: be Democrats, they got to be replaced. What better way
Speaker 1: to do it than with open borders and illegal immigration,
Speaker 1: which eventually will have amnesty and voting rights and so forth.
Speaker 1: Now you add the Ralph Northerm and the New York State.
Speaker 1: By the way, it's not just Ralph Northeram. You know,
Speaker 1: New York State's getting a pass, but they are identical
Speaker 1: to Ralph Northern. They beat Ralph Northern to the punch.
Speaker 1: In fact, New York State legalized everything Northerm is talking about,
Speaker 1: including abortion after a failed abortion death after and they
Speaker 1: gave it a standing ovation in the New York State Senate,
Speaker 1: and now nobody's talking about that because the Northern story
Speaker 1: has dwarfed it. But it's already begun now right now.
Speaker 1: It's it's supposedly for the health of the mother, the
Speaker 1: choice of the mother, or what have you. But it's
Speaker 1: devious where it is headed, because one thing for any
Speaker 1: of this to be happening, there has to be an
Speaker 1: accompanying decline in the appreciation of the sanctity of life.
Speaker 1: And what it means to me is that there is
Speaker 1: an accelerating decline in God in the lives of many people.
Speaker 1: If there's no God in your life, then there's no
Speaker 1: there's no stopping aberrant, murderous type behavior. If there's no God,
Speaker 1: if there's no judgmentalism, there's no built in morality, if
Speaker 1: there's no apparent price, then what obstacle is there to
Speaker 1: base depraved behavior? And this is where all of this
Speaker 1: has been already taking us since nineteen I believe. How
Speaker 1: are it in upstate New York? Great to have you high?
Speaker 1: Oh how are you doing today? Rush? I'm doing great, sir,
Speaker 1: Thank you? Yeah. Um. I was listening to the New
Speaker 1: York News as I was driving around and they recorded
Speaker 1: on a woman unfortunately that had been stabbed and killed
Speaker 1: by her boyfriend. But they also reported that her baby
Speaker 1: did not survive. Now, how can that be? That baby
Speaker 1: shouldn't even be in the equation where wait a minute, now,
Speaker 1: in the this is it's going to be fascinating in
Speaker 1: the old days. This this just to understand this. She
Speaker 1: was pregnant. Yes, how far along was she? Do you know?
Speaker 1: Five months? Five months? It wasn't that long ago. There,
Speaker 1: you're gonna be charged double homicide. Well that's not going
Speaker 1: to happen now, Well, no, that's that. I don't know.
Speaker 1: They're going to change this. If you can if you
Speaker 1: can abort a baby, what the hell am I? If
Speaker 1: you can kill a baby after it's born, then how
Speaker 1: in the hell can you be accused. I'll tell you
Speaker 1: what what it's always gonna what's gonna come down to,
Speaker 1: And this is where we are. It's gonna come down
Speaker 1: to the intent of the mother. That baby isn't anything
Speaker 1: until the mother decides that she wants to give birth
Speaker 1: to it and keep it up until that moment, and
Speaker 1: there's nothing the father can say about it. The father
Speaker 1: has absolutely zero reproductive rights. This is according to Roe
Speaker 1: versus Wade, a woman's right to choose, and so it's
Speaker 1: the determinant is going to be does the mother in
Speaker 1: this case your story, the five month pregnant woman that
Speaker 1: she want the baby. If she did, if everybody thought
Speaker 1: she was going to carry the term, then there could
Speaker 1: be double homicide here. If she didn't. No, no, If
Speaker 1: she didn't, then it may not exist. Correct. But but
Speaker 1: who's to say that, you know, five months along she
Speaker 1: wants the baby, and then all of a sudden when
Speaker 1: she's eight months along, well, maybe I don't want the baby.
Speaker 1: So how are they going to prove it? Well they
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm not a lawyer on this, but
Speaker 1: a common sense would say the last expressed act by
Speaker 1: her would indicate if she's doing things to promote the
Speaker 1: pregnancy protective baby, then you'd have to conclude that she
Speaker 1: wants to baby. Then the feminists are coming out. You
Speaker 1: don't know what might have happened in the next three months.
Speaker 1: The feminists are going to be on the war path. Look,
Speaker 1: this has already happened to I've a great example of
Speaker 1: this happened. I remember this. It's coming back to me
Speaker 1: like Crystal clear. Uh A. Yes, a woman was pregnant
Speaker 1: and she either became brained Yes, she became brain dead somehow.
Speaker 1: I don't think it was an assault, but her baby
Speaker 1: was continuing to grow even though she was brain dead.
Speaker 1: The argument ensued over whether or not life support should
Speaker 1: be removed from the mother or kept so that the
Speaker 1: baby could be born the father. They were not married.
Speaker 1: The father wanted the baby. The feminist groups said screw
Speaker 1: you and advocated for life support being taken off the mother.
Speaker 1: I don't know where. I think they were lobbying the
Speaker 1: woman's family to remove life support. They did not want
Speaker 1: that baby born, and they did not want that unmarried
Speaker 1: father getting it because that would throw ro versus weight
Speaker 1: upside down legally. And this is this is back in
Speaker 1: the nineties when this happened. It's some time ago, and
Speaker 1: I don't remember how it ended, but I remember the argument,
Speaker 1: and it was vicious. The feminist groups wanted life support
Speaker 1: removed from the mother so that the baby would die.
Speaker 1: The father wanted the baby, and and he had his
Speaker 1: group of people that were all lobbying for doctors to
Speaker 1: keep life support connected so that he because he wanted
Speaker 1: the baby, and he said they wanted the baby, Her
Speaker 1: intention was to have the baby. The feminist groups did
Speaker 1: not want any way under the sun that guy was
Speaker 1: going to get the baby, because that would have meant
Speaker 1: that men had reproductive rights and they can't permit that politically.
Speaker 1: So in a sense, it's's not exactly the scenario that
Speaker 1: you're describing, but that happened. I thought when it happened,
Speaker 1: by the way, I thought, well, this is all we need.
Speaker 1: This is this is going to illustrate exactly who the
Speaker 1: feminists are, exactly what abortion is all about. And I
Speaker 1: don't think it moved the needle at all. And probably
Speaker 1: the reason it didn't move the needle is because the
Speaker 1: drive by media didn't report this as factually and open
Speaker 1: and honestly as I just told you about the story.
Speaker 1: They they cast this in so many different confusing lights
Speaker 1: that it didn't ever create leg public opinion pro