WEBVTT - Sam Bankman-Fried Is Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Week Inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Once Crypto King, once Golden Boy, Crypto, once a modern

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 2>day JP Morgan, that one time billionaire Tim and FTX

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>co founder Sam Bankman Fried as you know by, now

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 2>sentenced to twenty five years in prison for stealing billions

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of dollars from customers, marking the final chapter in a

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>case that is both captivated and overshadowed the crypto industry

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 2>with more on.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Today sentencing in the era of crypto and finance failure

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 3>and fraud that the now thirty two year old SBF

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>was behind. We welcome into the Bloomberg Studio. Bloomberg News

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Legal anais Judent Grosso. She's also host of Bloomberg Law

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 3>weeknights at six pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg along

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 3>with Zeke Fox, Bloomberg News Financial Investigations Reporter, also the

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 3>author of Number Go Up, Inside Crypto's Wild Rise and

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 3>staggering fall. Zeke joining us on the phone from New

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>York City because Zeke traveling after being in the courtroom

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>this morning. Now that's where we want to start. Zeke,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>what was it like in the courtroom earlier today when

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Sam Bankmon freed was sentenced, and also ahead of that sentencing.

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 4>So it was packed as usual with reporters. And when

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 4>Sam walked in, he was wearing his prison jumpsuit instead

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 4>of a suit like during the trial, as his legal procedure,

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 4>and he took the opportunity to address the judge like

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 4>he did during his case. And I was watching to

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 4>see if he would just apologize and take responsibility for

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 4>what happened. For a minute, it sort of looked like

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>he might, but then he fell back on the story

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>that he's been saying since FTX failed, which is that

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 4>mistakes were made the buckstocks with me. But he's not

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 4>admitting to stealing customer money, all right, So I.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Want to bring in June Grosso June. So I am

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 2>curious that twenty five year sentence. How much did the judge,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 2>potentially Judge Kaplan use that. You know that even in

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 2>the eleventh hour, Sam makemin Free didn't come out and

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 2>said I committed a crime. How did that factor into

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 2>the sentencing? Because it could have been much worse, It

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 2>could have been a lot less potentially.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 5>So even before the sentencing, Judge Kaplan had increased the

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 5>guidelines range for Bankin Freed after finding that he had

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 5>perjured himself at his trial. And what he said at

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 5>the sentencing was when he wasn't outright lying, he was evasive,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 5>hair splitting, dodging questions and quote, I've never seen a

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 5>performance quite like that. He took that into account, and

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 5>I think that you know that weighed against Sam Bankman Freed.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 5>He also took into account you know, as Zeke said,

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 5>he didn't think that he was sorry for what he

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 5>had done. He said, he expressed expressed sorrow, but it

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 5>wasn't real to him. And you know also he had

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 5>before the sentencing expanded the guidelines too, and he found

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 5>that Sam Bankmin Freed had tampered with a witness. If

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 5>you remember, before trial, Sam was out on bail and

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 5>the judge called him back to New York and abruptly

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 5>threw him into prison despite the bail because he said

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 5>he had been tampering with a witness. So I mean

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 5>the judge had been through this whole trial watching Sam

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 5>Bankman freed, and you know, this is a very tough

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 5>sentence if you think about though, it is in line

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 5>with some of the big kind of white collar crime

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 5>we've seen. For example, Jeff Skilling at Anron, I think

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 5>he was sentenced to twenty four years and Bernie Evers

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 5>twenty five years, So it is in line with that.

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 5>But you think about state crimes. If you're committed murder

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 5>state basically you know you'll be out in fifteen years

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 5>or so. So they're making this white the white collar

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 5>crime into what.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 2>You made one hundred and fifty years.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Bernie made off that is held up as the

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 5>most extreme example of how many years of defrauding people.

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 5>So I think it was a tough It is a

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 5>tough sentence.

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 3>Is he come on back in here and give us

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 3>an idea of what Sam Beakman fried was like when

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 3>he found out that he got twenty five years. If

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 3>you saw any reaction from his parents who were in

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>the courtroom, because his mom did write a lengthy letter

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>to the judge in recent weeks about going being lenient

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 3>in the sentencing.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Sam was standing there, his hands folded. He was

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 4>pretty impassive. It was hard to know what he was thinking.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 4>His parents also did not make a big dramatic reaction,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean his mom yet she had written a pretty

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 4>moving letter about what Sam was like as a child,

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.679
<v Speaker 4>how he was different from other kids, how he wasn't

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 4>motivated by the same things as them, and how his

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 4>commitment to making the world a better place was real.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 4>And the defense talked about that that too when they

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 4>when his new lawyer gave a speech, but in the

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 4>defense said, in kind of a good one liner, he

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 4>wasn't a monster, he was a mass nerd. And you know,

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 4>if you if this was all the information you had,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 4>you know it might be kind of convincing. But the

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>problem was that this totally didn't address the fact that

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 4>during the trial, his four best friends and top lieutenants

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 4>at FTX in a row each took the stand and said, hey, no,

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 4>we committed a giant fraud on purpose. We knew it

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>was wrong, we did it anyway Sam directed us to

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 4>do it, and they presented a lot of evidence that

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 4>showed that. So whether Sam was a nerd or whether

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 4>he was actually greedy was kind of beside the point.

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 4>It's like this fraud still occurred.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, Zeke, I said, you bring up a really

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 3>good point. We're talking about Caroline Allison, Nieschad Singing Gary

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Wong right now. They're awaiting their own fate after helping

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 3>seal their former former bosses conviction for pulling off a

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 3>multi billion dollar fraud involving tens of thousands of customers. June,

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I have this dish question, and I don't know to

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>what extent you can answer it because we're kind of playing,

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, should it would have Kulda here? Yeah, but

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 3>the three individuals I just mentioned, they all pleaded guilty

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and cooperated. What if Sam Bankman Freed had pleaded guilty

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and cooperated with law enforcement? What would he be facing

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 5>As I understand, and Zeke may know better. As I understand,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 5>the prosecutors never offered him a deal. There weren't deal negotiations.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 5>So that's my understanding that he wasn't offered a deal,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 5>that they got those three and the case against him

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 5>then just built.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Zeke, was that the case that's true?

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 6>And I.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 4>You have to imagine he would have gotten a lighter

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 4>set into be just threw himself in the mercy of

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the court. But I have another interesting counterfactual. What if

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 4>all of those people got together and decided, hey, let's

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 4>let's stick to a different story. Let's say it was

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, we didn't let's not admit to fraud. Let's

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 4>all say we're not We're not guilty. Could do the

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 4>government have enough evidence from documents and otherwise to convict them.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they definitely had some evidence, but it would

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 4>have been a lot harder. All of their text messages

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 4>were set to auto delete, so the government didn't have

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of contemporary records of them, you know, agreeing

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 4>to commit some of the key acts.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Someone always flips, though, Someone always flips because you have

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 5>three people, four people, and someone is going to feel

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 5>nervous about it. And the prosecutors, you know, they ask

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 5>them questions, they bring them in, they bring them in

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 5>with their lawyers, and you know, it's it's very hard

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 5>to imagine that all three of them, all four of them,

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 5>would have kept to a story. So I think one

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 5>of them would have flipped somewhere along the way.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>See, let me ask you. I mean, the lawyers said

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>that they expect to cover more money or enough money

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>excuse me to pay back everyone in full in terms

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 2>of FTX investors. So having said that, I don't know,

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>does it speak to that, you know, they actually kind

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 2>of figured out some things and did it well in

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the crypto space, Like, how do you read that? Interpret that?

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So it is pretty wild that when ftx s failed,

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 4>there's eight billion dollars mithsay, and now the lawyers running

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 4>the bankrupt company are like, we've recovered enough money that

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 4>we think we'll be able to pay all of that

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.439
<v Speaker 4>back to the customers. And the reason, though, is not

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 4>that the money was never stolen. It's that a lot

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 4>of it comes from this huge run up in crypto prices. Basically,

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 4>when FTX filled in Alameda, they still had some crypto

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 4>and it wasn't the stuff they thought they could sell

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 4>quickly enough to satisfy the customer demand, hence the bankruptcy.

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 4>But now they've had more time and the price of

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 4>one of these tokens, in particular Solana, is up like tenfold,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 4>and if the bankruptcy estate is able to sell it

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 4>all while the market is hot, they'll make like ten

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars. It's crazy. So that's essentially it's not that

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 4>the customer money wasn't misappropriated. That he did make some

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 4>good gambles with it.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 7>It looks like or.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 4>With the help of these bankruptcy lawyers.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 5>Judge didn't believe that, by the way, talk about that.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 3>That was interesting momentary.

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 5>Because that was also what was in the defense papers, Hey,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 5>there's not really a loss here. They're going to be

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 5>paid back. And the judge said the defendant's assurance that

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 5>they'll be paid in full is misleading. It is logically flawed,

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 5>it is speculative. The judge basically everything that they threw

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 5>at him the defense, including that Sam Bankman Freed is autistic,

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 5>he twisted it around and used it against Sam Bankman Fried.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 5>So they said he's autistic, he's and he said, well,

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 5>he is autistic, but that gives him a great capacity

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 5>to do things.

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>He worries the judge Kaplin worried about what he might

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>do next.

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 5>Yet that was that was chilling to me and I

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 5>just was reading it, he said, because the defense was

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 5>arguing he has is young, he has an opportunity to

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 5>do so many things. They tried to compare him to

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Michael Milkin, and what could happen if he comes out

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 5>charitable work and the judge said, no, he just wanted power.

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 5>He was power hunger, and he said, there's a risk

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 5>that this man will be in a position to do

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 5>something very bad in the future. It's not a trivial risk,

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 5>and I was shocked by that.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting, right.

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.559
<v Speaker 3>Well, I want to talk to Zeke about that, because Zeke,

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 3>before the downfall of Sam Bankman Freed, before the fall

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of FTX, you spent some time one on one with SBF.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 3>You got to know him a little bit for a

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 3>pretty story in BusinessWeek that you recently recounted in the

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 3>Big Take podcast. Talk a little bit about what he's

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 3>maybe actually maybe it was a Spellcaster podcast. Excuse me,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 3>it was in one of the great podcasts that our

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 3>team has done.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the message.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 3>Podcast was ze talk a little bit about what his

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 3>personality was like and what really shocked you about this guy.

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 4>So one, some people after FTX failed have taken this

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 4>to mean that you know, everything about Sam was a lie,

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 4>and I actually don't think that that's true. When I

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 4>met him, what really made him seem different and interesting

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 4>was that this was a guy who he told me

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 4>this story about how when he was a teenager he

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 4>met a philosopher who convinced him that the best way

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 4>to help the world would be to get really rich

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 4>and give all the money away. I'm meeting him, it's

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 4>like nine years later, and he's worth twenty billion dollars.

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 4>And I actually think, from like all my time getting

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 4>to know him and talking to people in his circles,

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 4>this part of the story is really true, and that

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 4>actually is what motivate made him dangerous because when he

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 4>was presented with a chance to either he could justify

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 4>anything that he wanted to do by saying, hey, there's

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 4>like a real chance that if we're successful, we might

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 4>do something that could change world history. So what's a

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 4>little fraud here and there? Like we might literally save

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 4>millions of lives when we get rich enough and make

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 4>trillions of dollars. And he's a guy who thought about

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 4>the odds all the time. He's somebody who weighed the odds, like,

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 4>what are the odds I'm going to get caught? What

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 4>are the odds if I'm successful? I mean to be fair,

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 4>This is my take. Now, he did not admit to

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 4>this to say sorry today, but I think that's why

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 4>they're saying he's dangerous. Because if he has another chance

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 4>to his philosophy, in my opinion, would justify trying again.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 2>The means justify the end is basically is basically what

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 2>it is. Hey, June, I want to ask you, this

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 2>was a punitive sentencing. This was about sending a message.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it clear that Judge Kaplan did just that when

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 2>it comes to I don't know, not just crypto but

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 2>finance fraud.

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 5>I think that that was part of what this was

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 5>all about. And he said that this is about such,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, stopping people from doing this in the future.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 5>And afterwards the Manhattan US Attorney Damian Williams put out

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 5>a statement and he also said that this is a

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 5>way of warning people about this. So that's part of

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 5>a sentence. Because this is such a high profile case.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 5>It wasn't For example, Mark Mucazy got Trevor Milton four

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 5>years instead of eleven. That case was high profile, but

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 5>not like this. This was crazy. So I think that

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 5>the judge felt that he had to send a message.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Is there appeal? Can this be reduced real quickly?

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 5>There is going to be an appealed that he says,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 5>they're going to appeal the conviction and the sentence. But

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, appeals are very difficult in cases like this,

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 5>so and he has a new team, he has a

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 5>great team. But so we'll see what happens with that.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 5>And the judge also asked that to be put in

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 5>a low security prison because of his autism and that

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 5>it might be difficult for him in a regular prison,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 5>although he seems to be getting along okay at Brooklyn Correction.

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, a fascinating I guess final chapter. Perhaps I don't

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 2>know appeal yet. Well that's right, okay, so not quite

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a final chapter to both of you. Thank you so

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>much really bringing a lot of clarity and analysis to

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>the story. Bloomberg News legal alyst jun Gross, host of

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Law Weaknights at six pm Wall Street Time on

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio. To catch that and Zeke Fox immeasurable in

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>terms of his insight to on the world of crypto

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News Financial Investigations Reporter. Check out his book Number

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Go Up, Inside Cryptos, Wild Rise and Staggering Fall.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on Apple card Play and then Bright Auto with him

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Blomberg Business Act or want us live on YouTube.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 2>We just talked with Bloomberg's mat Day about Amazon's plan

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 2>to spend almost one hundred and fifty billion dollars over

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 2>I think fifteen years on data centers needed for the

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>AI Boom Data Center's tim We know one of the

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 2>real estate investment plays we've heard a lot about for years.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>More recently, the focus and concern when it comes to

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>commercial real estate has been on offices as working from home,

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 2>as we know, still sticks for many post pandemic TEMs.

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Bloomberg Readoffice Property Index down about two percent

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 3>so far this year. It lost three percent in twenty

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, but Carol dropped close to forty percent back

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty two.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, with a look at the commercial real estate space,

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>we welcome Lauren Huckfelder. She's co CEO of real estate

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Investing over at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. She joins us

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 2>right here in New York City. Lauren, welcome to Bloomberg. Hey,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>commercial real estate. We know location, location, location, but it

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 2>also can be divided into a lot of different buckets.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>You've got office, retail, You've got data centers, You've got industrial,

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>walk us through the different sectors. Where are you seeing

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 2>strength and where's the continued weakness, like perhaps office.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 8>Sure, well, first of all, thank you for having me.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 8>It's great to be here. And I would say it's

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 8>funny you use the old expression location, location, location, that

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 8>is absolutely paramount in real estate. But you know, today

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 8>we talk about dislocation, dislocation, dislocation. We have to look

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 8>at what's changing, what's being disrupted, and invest accordingly. So yes,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 8>take office, take US Commodity office in particular, and it

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 8>is absolutely being disrupted. You have a dramatic demand destruction.

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 8>We all know that people tried out working from home

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 8>in the pandemic and decided it wasn't so bad. So

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing a dramatic demand destruction. But frankly, also those

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 8>assets just don't meet modern tenant demands. They don't meet

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.239
<v Speaker 8>them from a standpoint of quality or menetization.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 6>Frankly, they don't meet their carbon reduction goals.

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 8>So these are assets that many of which will be

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 8>stranded because they simply don't have long term cash flow

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 8>growth potential.

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 6>But go to the office.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>Wait, wait, wait, can I jump in there?

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 2>So US Commodity Office you're saying it's going to be stranded.

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>So what happens and what are the financial implications, whether

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 2>it's to the owners of those properties, to the banks

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>who hold the loans on those properties. How does that

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 2>play out? And then how does that maybe make more

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 2>valuable some of the higher tier or office property.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, no, no, that's a fantastic question. Well, I'll start

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 8>with the ends. So you're seeing a massive consolidation of

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 8>demand into the best of the best assets. So perhaps

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 8>counter intuitively, the destruction of demand for more commodity space

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 8>is actually driving increased demand for the best of the best.

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 8>I'll give you an example. Take San Francisco. San Francisco

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 8>office is one of the worst markets globally, and I

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 8>can tell you even in San Francis Go we own some.

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Of the best office assets in that market.

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 8>Even today we're signing leases at rents above pre COVID levels.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 6>So to your point, it speaks to the benefits to

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 6>the best.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so let's talk about some of those benefits or

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 3>what that offers potential tenants. I mean, what exactly in

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, in this world of hybrid work that

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 3>we live in a world where AI companies are just

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 3>flourishing in the Bay Area and bringing people back to

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>the city. What is an office building? What does an

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 3>office building need to provide to attract and retain tenants

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah?

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, Look, it's amenities, it's a focus on wellness. It

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 8>is all of the bones, if you will, so big

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 8>open ceiling, heights, big open windows.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 6>But ultimately it comes.

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 8>Down to I think amenetization, wellness, and of course location.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 3>So can can buildings that don't offer those things right now?

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Can they be converted at a reasonable cost to buildings

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 3>that will soon become attractive.

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of talk about converting old office buildings

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 8>into other uses, converting it into residential, converting it into life.

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 6>Science or lab space, and the reality.

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 8>Is some assets will be converted. We've seen success stories.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 8>For example, here in New York. After September eleventh, a

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 8>lot of office buildings in Lower Manhattan were converted to

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 8>residential buildings.

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 6>But two things were different.

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 8>One, many of those office buildings had smaller floor plates,

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:45.959
<v Speaker 8>so physical structures that were more conducive to conversion. And two, frankly,

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 8>there was a government subsidy for that.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 6>And I think that the math is.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 8>Simply, even for those assets that have the right physical footprint,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 8>the math is very challenging when you get to over

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 8>hauling the mechanical systems, everything going.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 6>Up and down the building.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, one thing I wanted to ask you obviously front

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and center here coming off the unfortunate bridge collapse in Baltimore,

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and we are once again talking about supply chains, and

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 2>that is certainly an investment trend that you guys are seeing.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>You call it a second mega trend tail when driving

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 2>demand in the industrial real estate space, and it has

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 2>to do with the global supply chain. Talk to us

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 2>about that, and you guys are investing this.

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 8>Way absolutely, So I would say, in contrast to office

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 8>we love industrial real estate. We love it on a

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 8>global basis, and it's really for two reasons. The first

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 8>is e commerce. So that's very much been the story

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 8>of the last decade. So we, as all of us

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 8>started buying and increasing share of our goods online versus

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 8>in store, and frankly demanding it get to us faster

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 8>and faster. We started buying in buildings, those warehouses that

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 8>get goods to our front doors every day.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 6>And as e commerce penetration went grew by two and

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 6>a half x so too did rents.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 8>So that's been a great tailwind for US industrial real estate,

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 8>for global industrial real estate, and I think that will continue,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 8>albeit decelerate the second mega trend, and it's really at

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 8>the earlier inning. So even more exciting is the overhaul

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 8>in the global supply chain. Look, we're coming off decades

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 8>of a super smooth, super efficient global supply chain. We've

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 8>all enjoyed the disinflationary benefits of that supply chain, but

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 8>now things are changing.

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 6>You look at.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 8>What happened tragically in Baltimore this week, but I think

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 8>it's really it goes well beyond that. Among the many

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 8>things that COVID late, there was the fragility of the

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 8>global supply chain and we live it daily now.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 6>It is event driven supply shocks, so COVID certainly.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 8>Being an enormous one, but you also have what's going

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 8>on in the Panama Canal or labor disputes at the court,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 8>so event driven supply shocks, and frankly, you have the

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 8>overlay of geopolitics.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah global Hey, Lauren, we only have thirty seconds left,

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 3>but I do want to talk politics, not geopolitics. How

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 3>do investors in this space need to follow the presidential election.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Does do things change for you if Biden loses and

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump wins?

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 2>Just got about twenty seconds.

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 9>Love.

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 8>Politics affects everything, but ultimately we are focused around big,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 8>mega trends that are durable demand drivers, regardless of who's

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 8>in office.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, interesting stuff, and certainly it feels like this

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to be continuing a chapter in the real

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 2>estate state space in general. Kind of we talk about

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>in terms of how office plays its way out and

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 2>then just kind of where investors are going. Hey, Lauren,

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. Lauren Hackfelder, co CEO real Estate

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Investing and Morgan Stanley Investment Management joining us in New

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 2>York City.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business ad. You can

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>York station, Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, a salvage firm that helped contain the Deep Water

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Horizon oil spill and safely blow up part of New

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 3>York's Tappanzee Bridge, is heading to Baltimore as a first

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 3>step to what will likely become a more than two

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar rebuilding projects.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Tim, someone who knows the Baltimore area very well,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 2>haven't been born there, is well known to our Bloomberg

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>audience as he is the host of peer to peer

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Conversations on Bloomberg is Carlisle. Co founder and co chairman

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 2>David Rubinstein, who I caught up with last night to

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 2>talk about the bridge, as well as some news earlier

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in the day. We started now on the collapse of

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the Francis Scott Key Bridge. I want to start with

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>something that we have certainly been focusing on the last

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 2>twenty four hours or so, and that is what's going

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 2>going on in Baltimore. You were raised there, born there.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 2>The collapse obviously of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. How

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 2>important is this bridge to the area. What does it

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 2>mean to the people who live in and around that area.

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 9>It's an important bridge to people in this area. It's

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 9>important bridge for the country in many ways because many

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 9>important ships go through that channel there. But the bridge

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 9>itself is iconic, well known, named after a very famous person,

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 9>of course, Francis Scott Key. But it is a sad

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 9>situation that it couldn't have been prevented. Apparently the ship

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 9>lost control or lost its power, and therefore it couldn't

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 9>control where it went. Based on what I read, and

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 9>I think that at this point there's been a loss

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 9>of life. It's tragic. The governor is on top of it.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 9>He's an incredibly pessive person, and he and the Secretary

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 9>of Transportation are on top of what needs to be done.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 9>In President Biden has said that the federal government will

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 9>put up the money to fix the bridge, but it's

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 9>going to take time. So there'll have to be a

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 9>way to figure out how to get people across that area,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 9>which is otherwise you know, reached by the bridge. But

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, sad situation for the city for sure.

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 2>But I just want to ask you as someone who's

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 2>lived in the area, right, I think you know, when

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 2>we live across the country or we're not from that area,

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 2>we think, okay, it's it's another bridge, And obviously loss

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>of life first and foremost we feel bad for that.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 2>But I'm just in terms of the area and and

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 2>you growing up in that area, like how you how

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 2>you think about that bridge?

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, the bridge is one that is an important part

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 9>of the commerce of this area, important for people that

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 9>live in the area. It wasn't actually built when I

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 9>was growing up, and blomers built afterwards, but it's an

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 9>important bridge and serves a great purpose. It's just so

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 9>tragic that the ship lost power and it was in

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 9>the middle of the night and you couldn't really help

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 9>eeasibly rescue people. But Baltimore has had many challenges in

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 9>recent years. This is a challenge, but it's a challenge

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 9>that you know we can where you can't recover the

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 9>lives of people who are gone. But I think the

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 9>bridge can be rebuilt. It just takes time to build bridges,

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 9>and therefore there'll have to be some temporary measures to

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 9>get people across that area.

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 2>We certainly have heard from various government officials about that,

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 2>specifically about the time that's going to be needed to

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 2>get certainly the port up and running, but even more

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 2>importantly at the longer term time that it will take

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of getting that bridge rebuilt. Are you confident

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 2>that the government will do what it needs to get

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>that bridge rebuilt in a timely manner.

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:32.719
<v Speaker 9>I'm confident that the government as the intent to get

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 9>it done as quickly as possible, and the present United States,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 9>the governor of Maryland, the mayor, and Baltimo are all unified.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 9>It's not a political issue, just a question of you know,

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 9>it's something that it takes time to build, and you've

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 9>got to redesign the bridge, and you've got to get

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 9>structural engineers and you've got to get construction people. So

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 9>it's a multi year effort to get that rebuilt, there's

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 9>no doubt.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And as I said, we've heard from the government. Is

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 2>there something that the private sector can do? Is there

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 2>a public you know, private partnership that needs to be

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.239
<v Speaker 2>thought about in terms of getting this bridge up, up

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>and running and rebuilt.

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, typically you have public private partnerships when there's a

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 9>need to involve the private sector in some way, and

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 9>the government can help with financial support. Here, the government

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 9>is putting up all the money necessary for the rebuild.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 9>So the private sector I think can probably help the

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 9>most by raising funds for the families who lost their

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 9>loved ones in this tragic accident. And I think that's

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 9>something the federal government doesn't typically provide support for, and

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 9>so I think you'll see private sector money focused on

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 9>that for the commediate future.

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, and David, we definitely obviously appreciate you weighing

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 2>in on the collapse. I think we would be remiss

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>not to ask about some big news for you personally today,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and that is about the Baltimore Orioles. You tweated it

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 2>out about ownership. Major League Baseball's owners today unanimously approving

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you as the new controlling owner of the Baltimore Orioles

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>just before opening season begins or the season begins. Congratulations,

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 2>you've wanted this team for years. What's gone through your

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>mind now that you've got it.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 9>Well, whenever you achieve something you want, you always have

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 9>to wonder what bad things can happen, because you you know,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 9>life can always be perfect. So I'm very pleased. We

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 9>have a great team, a great investment group that I've assembled.

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 9>But you know, it's one hundred and sixty two games,

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 9>and it's you know, you're considered successful if you win

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, one hundred or so of them. So you're

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 9>going to lose a fair number of games. So we

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 9>have an opening day tomorrow. Hopefully the weather will operate

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 9>and well, we'll do well in opening day. But it's

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 9>a long season. I just pleased that I was able

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 9>to do this. I came from very modest circumstances in Baltimore.

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 9>Never dreamed that I would be able to buy the

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 9>Ortols when I was growing up. But you know, life

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 9>moves forward in strange ways, and things worked out, and

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 9>I'm happy to do this as a way to help

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 9>give back to Bottomore if it's good for having helped

0:28:58.640 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 9>me get a very good education here.

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's an obvious question. I'm assuming you

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 2>will be sitting in the owner's box tomorrow at Camden Yards.

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 9>It's an obvious question, but the answer is not obvious.

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I will be.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 9>I have some friends, relatives and others coming, but I

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 9>don't want to be there that long because I want

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 9>to move around the stadium and see what the fans think,

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 9>and because I'll be sitting in various parts of the

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 9>stadium and sitting next to average fans. That's what I

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 9>hope to do in that game and other games.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 2>That's really lovely to hear. And the other thing I'm

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 2>going to ask you is a team obviously you've thought

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 2>about for a long time. As you said, you feel

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I can hear in your voice that you know Lucky

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to have it as your team and be part of

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the ownership there. It is a young team made the

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>playoffs last year? What are your plans? How are you

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>thinking about that?

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 9>We have the best manager in the American League, as

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 9>voted by the league last year, and the best general manager.

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 9>Nobody has ever thought that my baseball expertise was quite

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 9>at the level of those two individuals. So I'm going

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 9>to rely on them on what to do, and I'll

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 9>try to be as supportive as possible from the business side,

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 9>but clearly on the player's side, you know. I mean,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 9>we have it in the hands of people that are

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 9>really experts, and my job is to kind of help

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 9>them do what they need to do.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 2>So if they say we need to spend more on

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the team payroll, would you be up for that.

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 9>I'm going to follow the advice of the people that

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 9>know what they're doing in baseball, so I you know,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 9>I'm RELI look at what they recommend. So I just

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 9>don't want to be committing to any one thing or

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 9>getting people's hopes up beyond what I can realistically do.

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 9>So I think I want to rely on Mike Elias,

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 9>who's the incredible general manager. We have in Brandon High

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 9>the great manager we have. And beyond that, I don't

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 9>think I can say more.

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Hey, listen, and I don't know what you can say

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 2>about the dispute that's been going on for a long

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 2>time with Mason. Is there anything in terms of moving

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that forward and getting some kind of resolution.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 9>I do think that it would be helpful to base

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 9>Ball generally and helpful to the Nationals and the Eros

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 9>to have some type of resolution. But obviously, when you

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 9>have something that's going on for ten years of dispute,

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 9>no one can come in overnight say I got a

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 9>solution that no, none of you thought of. So it's

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 9>something that we want to resolve. I think the Commission

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 9>of Baseball would like to see it resolve, but it's

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 9>going to take some time to dig into it. Obviously

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 9>lawyers have benefited from this over the years. But hopefully

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 9>we can get it resolved without the lawyers being too

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 9>deeply involved in and we can get it resolved before

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 9>too long. But it's beyond that. I can't really say, hey, David,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 9>one more thing.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 2>You know you talk about tomorrow, you know, being among

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the fans and walking around the stadium, and I do

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>wonder how you think about it. I know it's something

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 2>we talk about in New York a lot about the

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 2>expensive cost of taking a family affoord to go see

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a team. And how do you think about, you know,

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 2>making this you know, wonderful sport and this team, you know,

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 2>accessible to everyone.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, people in New York who want to go to

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 9>a baseball game might find it cheaper to come to

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 9>the Orioles game than to go to the Mets or

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 9>the Yankees game. So we welcome everybody in New York

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 9>to come to Baltimore, which is less expensive and a

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 9>beautiful city, charm city as it's known. So I think

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 9>the prices here are more affordable, even with the transportation.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 9>So I hope people from New York who might be listening,

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 9>we'll say, let's go to Baltimore.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm going to let all the New York fans. Hey,

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I lied one more question. You've been the chairman of

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the Kennedy Center Honors for fourteen years. You've got one

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>more year. You step down tomorrow. I know it sounds

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 2>like taking something off your plate. You've got a lot

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 2>going on, is understandable, but any thoughts about that. It's

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 2>something that I've enjoyed watching with my family, and I'm

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 2>just curious as you wrap that up and move on

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 2>to other things, how you're thinking about that.

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, the Kenny Center has been something I've chaired for

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 9>fourteen years. I'll finish at the end of December, but

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 9>then I'll become the chairman of the Kenny Center Foundation,

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 9>which is designed to help raise money for the endowment

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 9>of the Kenny Center. So I'll still be involved there

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 9>a bit, but I think it's a good time to

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 9>get somebody who's young and pressure than me, and I

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 9>have one more honors to do, and we're going to

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 9>pick the honorees in the New York Future and hopefully

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 9>everybody will think it's a great selection.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, David, thank you so much. Any celebrating tonight, we.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 9>Have the investors and Maney of the key people in

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 9>the OILS organization having a dinner tonight, and I will

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 9>host that dinner with some of my partners.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, all right, That of course is Carlile co founder

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and co chairman David Rubinstein. Conversation I had with him

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 2>last evening, obviously talking about the bridge, but also the

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 2>news yesterday that he is now the owner of the

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore Ornols. That's a big deal, John Tucker.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 7>Does that mean we get tickets? Well, we should point

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 7>how does this benefit me, John Tucker, I don't know

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 7>the answer to that question. I'm kidding.

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 2>We should point out though, Michael R. Bloomberg, of course,

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies, is also

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>part of that investor group.

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 7>I will just say it's a sight when the Yankees

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 7>here in New York go play book. Bltimore Camden Yards

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 7>is a fantastic studio.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Love.

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a great trip, by the way. Yeah, sometimes

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 7>you get more Yankee fans in Baltimore.

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Then because it's a good deal, because it's cheaper.

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 7>It's it's a great trip.

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a great trip. All right, all right, folks,

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Carol Master, timstad Vic, where to come. We're going to

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.360
<v Speaker 2>talk about the markets right here on Bloomberg.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play and then brout Auto with a

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 3>So we're going to go further with Apple, the company

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 3>in the processers of it, seems regulators around the globe.

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Here in the US, as you know, one week ago,

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 3>the US Justice Department in sixteen attorneys General suit Apple,

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 3>accusing the iPhone maker of violating anti trust laws by

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 3>blocking rivals from accessing hardware and software features on its

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 3>popular devices.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, well, our next guest believes misguided anti trust actions

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>could harm consumers and small businesses and only lead to

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 2>increased government intervention. So here to explain her view is

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Huddleston. She's Technology Policy Research Fellow at the Cato Institute,

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>adjunct professor at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School,

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>and she joins us from Washington, d C. Jennifer, good

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to have you here on Bloomberg. So let's get to it.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 2>You it sounds like you don't agree with this action

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>by the US Justice Department. Lay it out for us.

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 10>What we have is the US Justice Department trying to

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 10>very narrowly define a market in order to show a

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 10>market dominance that doesn't actually reflect the reality that most

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 10>consumers have or why Apple is a large, successful company. Instead,

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 10>what we have is a bit of a return of

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 10>a big as bad mentality the idea that certain companies,

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 10>because of their size, should be immediately subject to greater

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 10>regulatory scrutiny. But if we think about some of the

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 10>issues brought up in the complaint, things like the idea

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 10>that you get a green bubble and messaging if you

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 10>have an Android device, the reality is that many consumers

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 10>are choosing from a lot of different messaging options, not

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 10>just text message and I Message, but any array of

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 10>apps that are out there like WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 10>so on. This also makes a lot of presumptions about

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 10>what the smartphone market is. The average consumer when they're

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 10>choosing a smartphone is going to consider many many different

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 10>features beyond just the operating system. They may be thinking

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 10>about things like the camera, or the availability of certain apps,

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:36.919
<v Speaker 10>or the privacy and security features of a phone.

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Hey, one thing I do want to, just for transparency,

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 3>make clear to our audience is understand the funding of

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 3>the Cato Institute. We do this with our think tank guests.

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:47.919
<v Speaker 3>So give us an idea of where the funding comes

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 3>from for the Cato Institute, and if Apple is one

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of the companies that does support the Cato Institute, I'm.

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 10>Here to talk about my research, I don't work on

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 10>our development team. Institute is funded by a wide range

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 10>of individuals, and I can direct any questions you might

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 10>have on that to the appropriate sources, all.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, and companies though, to be fair, so we just

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 2>want to make sure the transparency is out there. Well,

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>what is it about your research says that you know

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 2>consumers would be hurt and small businesses would be hurt

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 2>by this decision.

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, when we look at what's gone on in the past,

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 10>when we have seen something that was not the consumer

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 10>welfare standard applied in anti trust, whether it was in

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 10>the US in a private prior anti trust era, or

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 10>if it was looking to Europe, what we have traditionally

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 10>seen is that that focuses more on subjective means of

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 10>measuring what is good and bad for competition, and it

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 10>really sets up for a potential government intervention against politically

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 10>disfavored companies, and it can actually take away some of

0:37:56.400 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 10>those very features that consumers enjoy, whether it's the ability

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 10>to know that an ecosystem is closed and therefore they

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 10>feel that it's more secure because they know that that's

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 10>the way that the product was designed, or whether it

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 10>is to look at other aspects of the smartphone market,

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 10>particularly for small developer for app store developers, this could

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 10>change the way that the app store works as well,

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 10>and the way that different elements that are currently available

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 10>are such that it makes it much more complicated and

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 10>in some ways could make every phone the same rather

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 10>than really allowing a wider range of options for consumers.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer, what about the take rate for Apple, that thirty

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.439
<v Speaker 3>percent fee that it takes from stuff that's purchased through

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 3>apps that are downloaded from the Apple App Store. I'm

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 3>wondering your thoughts on that and if there are any

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 3>antitrust concerns about that. Just to remind our viewers and listeners,

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 3>it's the idea that when you buy something through an

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 3>app that you downloaded through Apples App Store, whether or

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 3>not that app comes from Apple or not, Apple does

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 3>get and these are digital goods we're talking about, Apple

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.399
<v Speaker 3>does get a portion of that. That's what really set

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 3>things off with regulators, and that's where Epic Games was

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 3>coming from.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 10>And we've actually already seen that, as you largely litigated

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.799
<v Speaker 10>in the Epic Games case, in which the court found

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 10>mostly in favor of Apple's process. I think the question

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 10>there is also is that actually an antitrust concern? Is

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 10>that actually an anti competitive behavior or is that a

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 10>matter of contract law? Is this a case of companies

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 10>that can negotiate with each other over a fee the

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 10>way that we would see in an offline world. If

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 10>this was a shopping mall, for example, or Walmart, or

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 10>a department store like Nordstrom, and they were having a

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 10>negotiation with someone who went to sell something in their space,

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 10>we would say that's a contract negotiation, and different companies

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 10>may or may not like the terms of those contracts,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 10>but we would say that's a contract dispute and not

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 10>necessarily an anti trust issue.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer, what would rise to an anti trust issue in

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 3>your opinion when it comes to Apple. What would you

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 3>have to see from the company to say, Okay, this

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 3>is an instance where we need to see regulators get involved.

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 10>We would want to see something that indicated that it

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 10>was anti competitive behavior and not just the case of

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 10>having a product that responds to what consumers want and

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 10>having a product that has been very popular with consumers.

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 10>So we would be looking for things that were actually

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 10>somehow distorting the market as opposed to something that's just

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 10>a result of a company's success. We want companies to

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 10>be responding to what their consumers want and creating products

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 10>that meet those that meet those demands, and that may

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 10>mean that they're successful and that they drive innovation as

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 10>a result that other companies have to really rise to

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 10>that challenge.

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, to be fair, I mean, we talk about it

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot, right tim, We've talked about I mean, I'm

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 2>an Apple family and we've made a choice, and so

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 2>everything we do is within the Apple universe. And having

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 2>said that, we don't necessarily as consumers know that if

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Apple was more open with its platform whether or not

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 2>we might benefit from that as consumers. So it's hard

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.959
<v Speaker 2>to kind of make that case right without knowing whether

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 2>or not by opening it up and not being so

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 2>closed in terms of the Apple system, whether or not

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 2>we actually might benefit.

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 10>There is an alternative system out there in that the

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 10>Android system provides a different option, and so for people

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 10>that are looking at wanting to have that more side

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 10>loading experience, there are options out there where there's a

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 10>wider range of operating systems. Apple has really tried to

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 10>distinguish itself in the market through kind of having this

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 10>closed ecosystem that they market as better for privacy and security,

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 10>and that's part of their marketing strategy and what they

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 10>feel is their role and their competitive advantage in the market,

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 10>meaning in that would take away a company's option of

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 10>really portraying themselves as that privacy centric option.

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering what you think of the idea of an

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 3>environment being created where startups can flourish. And I think

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 3>that a lot of people would point to the anti

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 3>trust action taken against Microsoft in the nineties that essentially

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 3>hobbled Microsoft for so many years, created this foundation in

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley where a lot of startups that are now

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 3>the biggest companies in the world were actually able to

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 3>succeed and flourish. Do you think Apple and other big

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 3>companies are preventing startups from succeeding in this day and

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 3>age because of their size.

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 10>We continue to have a really flourishing ecosystem of startups

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 10>in the US, and we're very lucky that there are

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:48.360
<v Speaker 10>very low barriers to entry to start a company because

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 10>of how we've had a light touch regulatory approach to regulation.

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 10>I get concerned with some of the calls to change

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 10>antitrust law around mergers and acquisitions, not only for the

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 10>impact that could have on large companies, but for the

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 10>impact that could have on some of those small companies.

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 10>Some companies want to be the next Apple, the next Google,

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:12.240
<v Speaker 10>the next Microsoft and IPO and get really big. Others

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 10>are looking at other exit strategies where they want to

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 10>make an existing product better, or perhaps you know there's

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 10>someone who the better option is to get acquired by

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 10>a large company and continue to be a serial entrepreneur.

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 10>So what we ideally want is something that has a

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 10>wide range of exit strategies for companies of all sizes,

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 10>so that they're really focused on benefiting consumers and on

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 10>trying and failing in the marketplace.

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer, we only have fifteen seconds left, But how do

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 3>you think this plays out in court over the next

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 3>few years.

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 10>I think the next few years is key there. This

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 10>is going to be a long case. We're going to

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 10>see a lot of conversations and a lot of further

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 10>discussion on this issue.

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, really it there? Hey, listen, Thank you so much.

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Huddleston, technology policy research fellow at the Cato Institute,

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Washington, d C. And I will say

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 2>tim our own legal analysis Jennery here at our Bloomberg

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 2>intelligence team on this case, saying that you know, it's

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>probably going to be three years in the making, and

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 2>says that there is a lot that can happen in

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the technology world that might make it a very different

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:17.839
<v Speaker 2>case in that time.

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Once again, a good thing for lawyers. They always out

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:22.720
<v Speaker 3>there a we seem to win.

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>M brom.

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Journal.

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 6>How about you let me drive?

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.479
<v Speaker 11>Oh no, no, no no, who's going to drive?

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Honey?

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Please?

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 11>How do the riding gravels? Let's make I want to drive.

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 6>It's a good question that.

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe dot Com? Tim,

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>think we'll buy around it on Bloomberg Radio.

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, TikTok. Just about eighteen minutes left in

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 2>today's training session. Carol Master along with Tim stane It

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:01.839
<v Speaker 2>getting ready to wrap up the holiday shortened trading week

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:05.479
<v Speaker 2>and wrap up Tim the first quarter. That was quite

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 2>a stellar quarter if you were a bull in the

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:09.399
<v Speaker 2>equity markets here in the US.

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:11.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm really curious what Alan Zopfren has to say

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 3>about that. He's founding partner in co CEO at IQ Capital.

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 3>He joins us once again from Foster City, California. Alan,

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:17.920
<v Speaker 3>how are you.

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 11>I'm great, Tim, and Carol, how are you doing?

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 3>We're doing pretty well. Hard to believe.

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 2>We just opened up our four oh one k's and

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 2>we're like, no, okay, no.

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 3>The trick, Carrol is never looked. That's the trick, never periodically.

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:31.279
<v Speaker 4>Yes, of course you did.

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, way too much. All right, what do you think

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 3>of what's going what happened this quarter? I mean, what

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 3>how does it mesh with what you thought would happen

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:40.200
<v Speaker 3>in the first quarter of the year, And where do

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:42.959
<v Speaker 3>you think we're going in the remaining seventy five percent

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 3>of the year.

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, first of all, the equity rally surprised me, probably

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 11>as much as many investment professionals. So now we're calling

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 11>it a five oh one K or six to one

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 11>k Carol, not a one k.

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:53.400
<v Speaker 6>I like that.

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:57.479
<v Speaker 11>But you know, here's what happened in retrospect. It's easy

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:01.320
<v Speaker 11>to see it in retrospect. The market investors basically determine

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 11>the Fed pivoted its policy in mid October. And the

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:06.160
<v Speaker 11>easiest way to consider that as you look at the

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:08.960
<v Speaker 11>yield on the two year treasury. It peaked in mid

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 11>October on five and a quarter percent. It's right now

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 11>at about four point sixty two percent. Once the market

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 11>concluded the Fed had pivoted, everyone concluded it was time

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 11>to be bullshigan and put money back into the markets.

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 11>And if you look at history, markets always rally even

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:27.320
<v Speaker 11>if economic activity is weakening post the FED pivot. So

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 11>that's what we think is happen to you have a

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 11>liquidity washed market, and it goes to old adage time

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 11>in the market is better than timing the market. So,

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 11>despite my skepticism with a looming recession, sitting on our

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 11>hands and not taking steps to mak any changes ended

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 11>up being the right decision.

0:46:42.000 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, okay, so we're getting ready for the

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Powell pivot or Powelling company pivoted. But yesterday, as we've

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 2>been talking about allan, FED Governor Chris Waller saying that

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 2>recent inflation data make him hesitant to cut rates as

0:46:54.480 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 2>soon as he did a couple of months ago. And

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of interesting. So, you know, you do wonder

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.760
<v Speaker 2>and I'm curious about what Jay Powell will say ultimately

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow whether or not we're starting to get a little

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 2>bit more managed about Yeah, maybe it's three, maybe it's two,

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's one, maybe it's none. Like I don't know.

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 2>I guess we need to see and read the tea

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 2>leaves here.

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 11>You're actually a highlighting we think is a greater risk

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 11>of the market. Here's the irony. We would tell you

0:47:19.800 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 11>greater economic strength with more inflation and a higher rate

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.839
<v Speaker 11>environment is actually more problematic and scary in the short

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 11>run for markets than a slow down economically, even into

0:47:30.360 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 11>a recession. In other words, we're at a near all

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 11>time high of correlation with where yields are on what's

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 11>happening with stock prices, and so our view is the

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:40.800
<v Speaker 11>biggest new term risks of the market is not a

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 11>slow down economically. It's a pick up an inflation, a

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 11>FED that doesn't lower the Fed funds rate and people

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 11>have to unwind all their expectations about the rate cuts

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 11>and we change the valuations we're paying for these stocks.

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 11>So that is in fact the risk.

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 2>What's the balance of someone like you who watches the

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 2>markets has to come out with advice and say the

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 2>balance between growth good, a little bit of inflation good

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe versus a recession or deep recession and fallout.

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 11>Well. Stocks Historically archery actually and inflation hedge. It's only

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 11>in times of extreme inflation where stock markets tend to

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 11>fall or disinflation with recession. So we would argue, you know,

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 11>it's semantics, but whether it's one and a half to

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:30.840
<v Speaker 11>three and a half percent, inflation is completely tolerable. What

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 11>you're really looking for in the long run is, if

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 11>you think about it mathematically, stocks are giving you real

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 11>GDP growth of around four percent, inflation of another three percent,

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:42.760
<v Speaker 11>you get your two percent dividen yield. On an average,

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 11>stock share counts drop by about one percent year, more

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:49.399
<v Speaker 11>shares are repurchased or redeemed than issued, So four three

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:51.239
<v Speaker 11>two one that's a ten percent rate to return. That's

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 11>the historical rat return in the market. So inflation doesn't

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 11>prevent the four percent economic growth as long as it's

0:48:57.560 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 11>kind of in that one and a half to four

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 11>percent range. When it gets too low, it's telling you

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:03.560
<v Speaker 11>there's no growth in the economy. Or when it's way

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 11>too high, consumers can't afford to pay prices anymore. Companies

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 11>have to raise prices to point the crowd out consumption,

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 11>it leads to recession. So inflation is okay to a point,

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 11>and in this environment win it's plenty fined as long

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 11>as the pressure isn't great enough to cause rates to

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 11>go a lot higher.

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Hey, al, and I've been asking all our guests about

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:25.399
<v Speaker 3>asset allocation lately, given that we are seeing really highs

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.879
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of different asset classes. Right now, someone

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 3>comes to you with new money, how do you deploy it?

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:35.320
<v Speaker 11>Obviously, let's go back to risk Tarrant's investment time line, timeline,

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 11>age goals, objectives, income needs, tax rate. But as a generalization,

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 11>we would argue it's no different than any other time.

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 11>But we would always argue whatever you're going into dollar

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:48.759
<v Speaker 11>cost average. So if I was going to tell you

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 11>you are forty years old, you might be sixty percent

0:49:51.640 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 11>stocks and forty percent bonds. But that's sixty percent in stocks.

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 11>I'm going to take ten to twelve months to dollar

0:49:57.760 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 11>cost average.

0:49:58.560 --> 0:49:58.839
<v Speaker 9>You wins.

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 11>You're buying ten percent of the stocks every month for

0:50:01.840 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 11>ten months, and you get an average cost. You don't

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 11>put all the money in on day one, because it's

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 11>very hard emotionally to put all your money in the

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 11>stock market. In three weeks later, if the market's down,

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 11>you'll panic. So we would tell you it's status quote,

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 11>it's no different than a normal time right now, But

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 11>normal time means you tiptoe into markets. You don't put

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 11>all your eggs into the basket on the very first day.

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, So you shared with our producer Paul Brennan

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 2>ten market themes for twenty twenty four. You believe a

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 2>new bull market is underway, Allen, lower interest rates finally

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:34.759
<v Speaker 2>bring economic reacceleration. Insight, markets are evolved to what we

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:38.240
<v Speaker 2>think they resolve higher. And you say, this bull market,

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 2>this new bull market, requires a different playbook, and that

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 2>you believe interest rates and inflation will ultimately setter at

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a higher baseline level compared to the last fifteen years.

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So this is a rethink. Do we get the Fed

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:50.399
<v Speaker 2>to buy in on that rethink? You think anytime soon?

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 2>And kind of admit that, yeah, I do.

0:50:53.600 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 11>I actually think the Fed has already admitted it. But

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:59.240
<v Speaker 11>they don't want to be a Fed like Arthur Burns

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 11>in the nineteen seanies that let inflation creep back in

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 11>and created a massive recession. So what they're going to

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 11>do is they're purposely going slowly. They'd rather keep rates

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:10.800
<v Speaker 11>a little bit too high, a little too long, to

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 11>guide us into this new economic environment. Then lower rates

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 11>too quickly reads to gate inflation to cause a greater havoc.

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 11>So I do think that's the playbook, but I think

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 11>they are in fact could be methodical working us back

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 11>down in the way they tip to us back down

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 11>on the Yulker.

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Favorite investment idea somewhere where you would commit money right

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:31.279
<v Speaker 2>now and be as specific as you can.

0:51:32.280 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 11>Private credit so you can buy both in public markets

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.000
<v Speaker 11>there are vehicles as well as in the private markets.

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:41.800
<v Speaker 11>Private credit is basically a set of loans senior and

0:51:41.880 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 11>floating great issued largely than private companies, and because they're

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 11>tied to the effectively the Fed Funds rate, it's called soafer.

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 11>It's like what Libra was. Companies are you use the

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 11>investor or lending money to a bask good of businesses

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 11>that are giving you anywhere from five and a half

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 11>to seven and a half percent of the five and

0:52:01.560 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 11>a half percent Fed Funds rate.

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 2>So you're making no worry though there's a lot of

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 2>transparency concerns about that. Alan just got about twenty seconds.

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:12.040
<v Speaker 11>But if you're the senior floating rate lender on loans

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 11>that are three or four and if you go into

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 11>a pool of thousands of loans, the propensity you'll lose money,

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.320
<v Speaker 11>and that is exceptionally small. So experienced manager with a

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:24.800
<v Speaker 11>well diversified portfolio can make a very good private credit issuance.

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 11>Note it's ordinary income, so that's the challenge.

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:29.320
<v Speaker 2>It's an argument in favor we've heard a lot about,

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 2>but interesting, there's also some nervousness about the sector. Allen,

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:35.280
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much of a good holiday weekend. Alan Zaffron,

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 2>founding partner co CEO at IEQ Capital, joining us there

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 2>from California. This is Bluebird.

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. I'll a little

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of Apple, Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Listen live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 6>M