WEBVTT - Segregation Forever

0:00:07.590 --> 0:00:13.470
<v Speaker 1>On January 14, 1963, newly elected Alabama Governor George Wallace

0:00:13.550 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>stood on the steps of the state capitol building in Montgomery,

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.940
<v Speaker 1>and he pledged to make good on his most important

0:00:20.300 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>campaign promise.

0:00:23.570 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I draw the line in the dust and toss the

0:00:26.700 --> 0:00:31.500
<v Speaker 2>gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now,

0:00:31.940 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever.

0:00:42.570 --> 0:00:47.670
<v Speaker 1>The tyranny in question here was the federal government's insistence

0:00:47.830 --> 0:00:53.770
<v Speaker 1>on enforcing federal desegregation mandates. On the day he was

0:00:53.810 --> 0:00:58.610
<v Speaker 1>sworn in as governor in January of 1963, Alabama remained

0:00:58.670 --> 0:01:03.690
<v Speaker 1>entirely segregated, by law and by practice. And he swore

0:01:03.710 --> 0:01:06.130
<v Speaker 1>to the good, God-fearing white folks of Alabama that he

0:01:06.170 --> 0:01:10.900
<v Speaker 1>would keep it that way. He was wrong, of course.

0:01:12.459 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Just a few months later, as he stood in the

0:01:14.580 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>doorway of the University of Alabama, intending to physically block

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the entry of the school's first two black students... He blinked.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>President Kennedy federalized the National Guard. And when a general

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>asked George Wallace to move, he did. He stood down.

0:01:37.220 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>He'd said, segregation forever. But he was wrong. Wasn't he?

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Last week, the United States Department of Justice announced they

0:01:49.100 --> 0:01:53.690
<v Speaker 1>were dismissing more than 50 desegregation cases. involving school districts

0:01:53.710 --> 0:01:58.690
<v Speaker 1>all over the country. Last week, as in a week ago.

0:01:59.650 --> 0:02:02.050
<v Speaker 1>A week ago today, if you're listening to this on

0:02:02.070 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the day it showed up on your podcast feed. Last week,

0:02:06.020 --> 0:02:11.700
<v Speaker 1>as in the week before this one, here in 2026.

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.870
<v Speaker 1>Harmeet Dhillon, the current Assistant Attorney General at the DOJ's

0:02:16.889 --> 0:02:21.030
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Division and former personal attorney for right-wing provocateur

0:02:21.090 --> 0:02:24.330
<v Speaker 1>Andy Ngo, announced the decision in a press release on

0:02:24.389 --> 0:02:31.139
<v Speaker 1>September 24, 2026. The Department of Justice proudly declared that

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the administration is, quote, ending prolonged federal oversight of these

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>school districts because the effort does not reflect the reality

0:02:39.870 --> 0:02:45.930
<v Speaker 1>of those classrooms today. This bulk dismissal of desegregation cases

0:02:46.470 --> 0:02:50.109
<v Speaker 1>is part of the administration's ongoing efforts to undermine justice

0:02:50.740 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Anything they feel falls under the banner of diversity, equity,

0:02:54.380 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and inclusion. I guess there's nothing more DEI than a

0:03:00.100 --> 0:03:06.220
<v Speaker 1>court order saying you can't keep doing school segregation. So

0:03:06.260 --> 0:03:09.350
<v Speaker 1>before we finish our story about the secret plans of

0:03:09.389 --> 0:03:13.730
<v Speaker 1>a reclusive segregationist millionaire to undermine civil rights, before we

0:03:13.750 --> 0:03:17.210
<v Speaker 1>get back to talking about the eugenicist pioneer fund's involvement

0:03:17.250 --> 0:03:20.430
<v Speaker 1>in the legal fight against desegregation, before we pick up

0:03:20.830 --> 0:03:25.790
<v Speaker 1>where we left off last week in 1963. Come with

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>me on a brief detour through current events, here in

0:03:29.500 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the endless 1963 we all seem to have gotten trapped in.

0:03:37.900 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Molly Conger, and this is Weird Little Guys. School

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:05.340
<v Speaker 1>segregation still exists. It doesn't look exactly like it did

0:04:05.380 --> 0:04:09.190
<v Speaker 1>in 1950. It's not exactly the same kind of segregation

0:04:09.270 --> 0:04:13.590
<v Speaker 1>schools had in the 50s. But in the year 2026,

0:04:13.590 --> 0:04:17.510
<v Speaker 1>in the United States of America, there are still school

0:04:17.550 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>districts where school boards have repeatedly, for decades... failed to

0:04:22.940 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>prove that they are making a good-faith effort to comply

0:04:26.339 --> 0:04:29.589
<v Speaker 1>with the desegregation plan a judge gave them in the 1960s.

0:04:32.089 --> 0:04:36.690
<v Speaker 1>On this show, we deal mostly with the past. It's easier,

0:04:37.230 --> 0:04:41.460
<v Speaker 1>I think. There are more stories to tell, more source material,

0:04:42.300 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>fewer guys who are still alive to send me a

0:04:44.580 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>nasty email because they heard their own actions described accurately, etc.

0:04:50.660 --> 0:04:54.790
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, It's easier because those stories are over.

0:04:54.810 --> 0:04:59.169
<v Speaker 1>I don't write a lot of happy endings, but the

0:04:59.190 --> 0:05:04.859
<v Speaker 1>stories end. It turns out they don't. History doesn't really

0:05:04.890 --> 0:05:09.539
<v Speaker 1>work that way. Because over and over again, I find

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.460
<v Speaker 1>myself weaving in and out of the past. I'm happy

0:05:14.500 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>enough rolling around in the ugly muck of our collective past,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.310
<v Speaker 1>but then suddenly I'm dragged against my will, into some

0:05:21.589 --> 0:05:27.430
<v Speaker 1>unavoidably relevant current event. Remember last year, when I was

0:05:27.670 --> 0:05:30.729
<v Speaker 1>buried in my research about white supremacist terror in South

0:05:30.810 --> 0:05:34.130
<v Speaker 1>Africa under apartheid, when I had to interrupt the series

0:05:34.810 --> 0:05:39.860
<v Speaker 1>to talk about how, unfortunately, that history was deeply intertwined

0:05:40.339 --> 0:05:43.780
<v Speaker 1>with the Trump administration's announcement that they would only be

0:05:44.260 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>admitting white South Africans for refugee resettlement. I didn't plan that.

0:05:51.500 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It literally just happened while I was writing. Or two

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago, when I was chugging along writing that long

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.420
<v Speaker 1>series about a strange little Klansman with some questionable connections

0:06:04.460 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Oklahoma City bombing and he finally landed himself

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.659
<v Speaker 1>in federal prison when he mailed a bomb to the

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>diversity office in Scottsdale, Arizona. I hadn't planned on updating

0:06:14.820 --> 0:06:17.670
<v Speaker 1>that story just a few weeks after I finished it.

0:06:19.100 --> 0:06:22.270
<v Speaker 1>But I had to because the same diversity office that

0:06:22.370 --> 0:06:26.180
<v Speaker 1>Klansman mailed a bomb to in 2012 was forced to

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>close in 2025, after the city council bowed to pressure

0:06:30.420 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Trump administration to end DEI initiatives. These things

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.020
<v Speaker 1>keep happening not because God is punishing me personally by

0:06:42.100 --> 0:06:46.260
<v Speaker 1>complicating my writing process, but because the stories I write

0:06:47.060 --> 0:06:52.659
<v Speaker 1>aren't ever over. And they aren't ever just about some strange,

0:06:52.860 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>isolated incident of a man behaving badly. It's all one long,

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>messy story. It's a many-headed hydra that refuses to die.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.630
<v Speaker 1>So I shouldn't have been surprised when the present intruded

0:07:07.670 --> 0:07:11.710
<v Speaker 1>on my story from the past again. I was gathering

0:07:11.750 --> 0:07:15.750
<v Speaker 1>background material for the episode you'll hear next week when

0:07:15.790 --> 0:07:19.830
<v Speaker 1>I saw this story. If you've been keeping up We've

0:07:19.850 --> 0:07:22.650
<v Speaker 1>been exploring the history of the Pioneer Fund, that private

0:07:22.730 --> 0:07:26.830
<v Speaker 1>charitable foundation started in the 1930s by an amateur eugenicist

0:07:26.870 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>who wanted to obscure his involvement in the dissemination of

0:07:29.300 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Nazi propaganda. And through the mid-20th century, it grew to

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:37.300
<v Speaker 1>be the most significant financial backer of a wide variety

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of pseudoscience that's still used today by racists who want

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>their bigotry to have a respectable veneer of intellectual objectivity.

0:07:46.140 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And we entered that story via current events, too. because

0:07:49.860 --> 0:07:53.310
<v Speaker 1>there's been a recent outbreak of public discourse about race science,

0:07:54.410 --> 0:07:58.550
<v Speaker 1>almost all of which traces back to this one dead

0:07:58.670 --> 0:08:02.970
<v Speaker 1>racist's money. And the portion of that story we've been

0:08:03.010 --> 0:08:06.820
<v Speaker 1>living in lately is the Fund's investment in segregation during

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.980
<v Speaker 1>the 1960s. We're about to get to the part of

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.540
<v Speaker 1>the story where the race scientists actually go to court.

0:08:14.420 --> 0:08:16.780
<v Speaker 1>In last week's episode, I talked a little bit about

0:08:16.820 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the legal landscape after the 1954 Supreme Court decision in

0:08:20.620 --> 0:08:24.210
<v Speaker 1>Brown v. Board of Education. Black families had to take

0:08:24.250 --> 0:08:27.230
<v Speaker 1>their local school districts to court to get enforcement on

0:08:27.270 --> 0:08:31.570
<v Speaker 1>the court's decision. And the end result in somewhere between

0:08:31.570 --> 0:08:36.780
<v Speaker 1>700 and 1,000 of those individual lawsuits were federal court

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:42.260
<v Speaker 1>orders requiring those districts to follow a court-approved desegregation plan.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.790
<v Speaker 1>And that almost always came with federal supervision from the

0:08:46.809 --> 0:08:51.860
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice to ensure the plan was followed. That's

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>as much as I thought we'd need in the way

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.939
<v Speaker 1>of legal background. And then the DOJ intruded on my process.

0:09:01.110 --> 0:09:03.670
<v Speaker 1>It's not the first time Parmeet Dhillon has ruined my day,

0:09:03.690 --> 0:09:06.130
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure it won't be the last. And honestly,

0:09:06.150 --> 0:09:08.850
<v Speaker 1>at the rate things are going, God willing, it only

0:09:08.910 --> 0:09:11.790
<v Speaker 1>ever happens through my computer screen because things seem to

0:09:11.809 --> 0:09:15.750
<v Speaker 1>be getting a lot worse. But there she was, in

0:09:15.790 --> 0:09:20.970
<v Speaker 1>the present day, unraveling the civil rights victories I'm about

0:09:21.010 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about. The DOJ press release last week

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>announced that they'd closed out more than 50 of the

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>civil rights era cases where school districts were still under

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:38.830
<v Speaker 1>federal supervision. And all of the remaining cases are currently

0:09:38.890 --> 0:09:42.890
<v Speaker 1>under review. with the heavy implication that they'll all be

0:09:42.929 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>dismissed as soon as they can finish the paperwork. They

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.380
<v Speaker 1>make it sound like it's truly absurd that those cases

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>would even still be open at all, that it's wasteful

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>at best for anyone to commit resources to asking or

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.700
<v Speaker 1>answering questions. about whether a school district is upholding its

0:10:02.790 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>obligation to provide children of all races with equal access

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:11.660
<v Speaker 1>to a public school education. Dillon calls these court orders

0:10:11.700 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that she's wiping off the books outdated and onerous. And

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:22.030
<v Speaker 1>she uses the language of federal control rather than supervision,

0:10:23.030 --> 0:10:25.689
<v Speaker 1>which is very reminiscent of the way white supremacists in

0:10:25.710 --> 0:10:30.510
<v Speaker 1>the South gnashed their teeth about federal intervention in the 1960s.

0:10:31.950 --> 0:10:35.460
<v Speaker 1>And come to think of it, in the 1860s, it's

0:10:35.500 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of a recurring theme. But that's all you really

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>get from the press release. These cases are very old,

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.260
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of them, and we made

0:10:47.309 --> 0:10:51.859
<v Speaker 1>them go away. When Dillon announced the dismissal of the

0:10:51.900 --> 0:10:57.230
<v Speaker 1>desegregation case against Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana last year, that press

0:10:57.250 --> 0:11:03.810
<v Speaker 1>release called it the writing of a historical wrong. And

0:11:04.429 --> 0:11:07.670
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about segregation, to be clear, because that

0:11:08.429 --> 0:11:12.670
<v Speaker 1>was a historical wrong that was being righted by the

0:11:12.730 --> 0:11:17.569
<v Speaker 1>desegregation order. She's calling the order itself the historical wrong.

0:11:19.020 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>And Dillon is quoted as saying, no longer will the

0:11:22.420 --> 0:11:25.970
<v Speaker 1>Plaquemines Parish School Board have to devote precious local resources

0:11:26.150 --> 0:11:30.370
<v Speaker 1>over an integration issue that ended two generations ago. This

0:11:30.429 --> 0:11:34.770
<v Speaker 1>is a prime example of neglect by past administrations. And

0:11:34.809 --> 0:11:41.709
<v Speaker 1>now we're getting America refocused on our bright future. There

0:11:41.730 --> 0:11:48.260
<v Speaker 1>it is. This administration is obsessed with sanitizing our nation's past.

0:11:49.860 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Remember earlier this summer, we talked about the president's obsession

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>with removing unpleasant history from national park signs and brochures.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>He signed an executive order calling any historical fact that

0:12:01.750 --> 0:12:07.090
<v Speaker 1>casts America in a negative light divisive, revisionist, and said

0:12:07.170 --> 0:12:10.810
<v Speaker 1>any mention of the historical existence of bigotry or wrongdoing

0:12:10.830 --> 0:12:16.510
<v Speaker 1>of any kind is a distorted narrative driven by harmful ideology.

0:12:18.790 --> 0:12:22.459
<v Speaker 1>So if we just stop talking about the reality of segregation,

0:12:22.500 --> 0:12:26.020
<v Speaker 1>if you take slavery off the infographics of the National Park, well,

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.620
<v Speaker 1>it's like it never happened. That's all it takes to

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.260
<v Speaker 1>make America great again. Just imagine it always was. As

0:12:33.300 --> 0:12:35.970
<v Speaker 1>you bulldoze your way through decades of progress in order

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.250
<v Speaker 1>to reinstate the very same system of racial discrimination, those

0:12:39.330 --> 0:12:44.910
<v Speaker 1>court orders were put in place to correct. But in

0:12:44.950 --> 0:12:48.309
<v Speaker 1>the interest of fairness, let's give the DOJ the benefit

0:12:48.350 --> 0:12:52.490
<v Speaker 1>of the doubt for a second They said they reviewed

0:12:52.530 --> 0:12:57.370
<v Speaker 1>these cases before closing them out. Those desegregation orders were

0:12:57.429 --> 0:13:00.610
<v Speaker 1>not actually intended to be in place permanently. The goal

0:13:00.670 --> 0:13:05.150
<v Speaker 1>is not to punish these school districts forever. They're supposed

0:13:05.190 --> 0:13:08.630
<v Speaker 1>to correct a problem. The goal has always been for

0:13:08.650 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the problem to be corrected, to ensure full compliance with

0:13:13.150 --> 0:13:17.940
<v Speaker 1>the order, and then the case can be resolved. So

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.490
<v Speaker 1>if that's what happened here, that's good news. It would

0:13:22.510 --> 0:13:25.990
<v Speaker 1>mean all those school districts finally made really great progress

0:13:26.070 --> 0:13:29.370
<v Speaker 1>on racial equity and they finally got caught up to

0:13:29.410 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>where the Supreme Court said they were supposed to be

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>70 years ago. Right?

0:13:36.059 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe. Maybe.

0:13:51.230 --> 0:13:55.330
<v Speaker 1>For school districts operating under these desegregation orders, there is

0:13:55.370 --> 0:14:00.859
<v Speaker 1>a finish line. It's called unitary status, meaning they've proven

0:14:00.890 --> 0:14:03.939
<v Speaker 1>to the court that they have fully transitioned to a unitary,

0:14:04.380 --> 0:14:10.740
<v Speaker 1>non-racial school system, rather than separating things by race. Once

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.970
<v Speaker 1>the court-ordered plan is in place, districts have to come

0:14:14.020 --> 0:14:17.349
<v Speaker 1>back to the court to show they're making progress. There's

0:14:17.370 --> 0:14:21.220
<v Speaker 1>a lot of paperwork involved. and in school districts where

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.900
<v Speaker 1>discrimination continues to run rampant, the existing court order provides

0:14:25.940 --> 0:14:28.540
<v Speaker 1>a more straightforward path for students and their families who

0:14:28.570 --> 0:14:31.350
<v Speaker 1>are being harmed to bring their issues before the court.

0:14:32.750 --> 0:14:36.970
<v Speaker 1>If a district feels they've truly achieved unitary status, they

0:14:36.990 --> 0:14:39.210
<v Speaker 1>can file a motion to be released from the order

0:14:39.790 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and end the federal supervision. There's a lot more to

0:14:43.630 --> 0:14:45.780
<v Speaker 1>it than that, but that is the gist of it.

0:14:47.940 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could tell you exactly how many times

0:14:51.270 --> 0:14:57.859
<v Speaker 1>this has happened. We don't totally know. It's shocking how

0:14:57.980 --> 0:15:02.540
<v Speaker 1>squishy the numbers are on this. A study published in

0:15:02.580 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management in 2012 claims

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to have conducted the first and perhaps only truly comprehensive

0:15:11.020 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>accounting of the number of districts placed under these orders.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.900
<v Speaker 1>They arrived at their data set by combining prior smaller

0:15:18.950 --> 0:15:22.490
<v Speaker 1>studies Data from the DOJ, data from reports by the U.S.

0:15:22.510 --> 0:15:25.870
<v Speaker 1>Commission on Civil Rights, reports by various state-level civil rights

0:15:25.970 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>oversight bodies, data compiled by civil rights researchers at UCLA

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and Harvard, and primary source material from the courts. No

0:15:34.780 --> 0:15:38.610
<v Speaker 1>single source of information contained all of the data points

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.350
<v Speaker 1>they collected. And a lot of these sources contained information

0:15:42.390 --> 0:15:46.690
<v Speaker 1>that turned out not to be correct. It's hard to

0:15:46.810 --> 0:15:51.630
<v Speaker 1>understand how or why the Department of Justice itself didn't

0:15:51.670 --> 0:15:55.460
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of central repository of the cases they

0:15:55.520 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>were involved in and allegedly keeping track of, but it

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like they did not. Even in my own search

0:16:04.340 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for some other source for these numbers, I found a

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:13.500
<v Speaker 1>variety of conflicting assertions across different DOJ publications. So, for

0:16:13.540 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>simplicity's sake, and because they're probably the only correct ones,

0:16:17.870 --> 0:16:21.090
<v Speaker 1>we'll use the numbers from this 2012 paper by sociologist

0:16:21.150 --> 0:16:28.710
<v Speaker 1>Sean Reardon. Reardon's research found that 1,071 school districts listed

0:16:28.770 --> 0:16:32.210
<v Speaker 1>across the source material as having been, at some time,

0:16:33.030 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>under a desegregation order. But of those, he was only

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.740
<v Speaker 1>able to confirm the existence of such an order for

0:16:40.740 --> 0:16:46.830
<v Speaker 1>755 districts. The paper's analysis is focused primarily on the

0:16:46.870 --> 0:16:52.310
<v Speaker 1>school districts where, as of 1990, enrollment exceeded 2,000 students

0:16:52.830 --> 0:16:57.910
<v Speaker 1>and the court order was still active. So in 1990,

0:16:57.910 --> 0:17:02.490
<v Speaker 1>there were 483 school districts in the United States still

0:17:02.590 --> 0:17:09.170
<v Speaker 1>under federal supervision for their desegregation plan. By 2009, that

0:17:09.230 --> 0:17:14.310
<v Speaker 1>number had dropped to 268. And This study leaves off there,

0:17:14.869 --> 0:17:17.540
<v Speaker 1>but a now-deleted page on the website for the DOJ's

0:17:17.580 --> 0:17:23.580
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Division listed active cases in 132 school districts

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:28.820
<v Speaker 1>in 2024. And those districts were mostly in Georgia, Alabama,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:35.830
<v Speaker 1>and Mississippi. And since his inauguration in January of 2025,

0:17:35.830 --> 0:17:39.810
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration has been very vocal about their complete

0:17:39.950 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>abandonment of any enforcement on the issue. And in the

0:17:44.420 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>disastrous haphazard attack on publicly funded programs that was Doge,

0:17:49.100 --> 0:17:51.980
<v Speaker 1>they managed to eliminate millions of dollars in grant funding

0:17:52.180 --> 0:17:56.110
<v Speaker 1>to the equity assistance centers that provided the technical help

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.310
<v Speaker 1>to school districts who were actually still trying to comply

0:18:00.369 --> 0:18:05.949
<v Speaker 1>with those orders. Those federally funded organizations were originally called

0:18:06.710 --> 0:18:10.699
<v Speaker 1>integration assistance centers, and they were established by the 1964

0:18:10.700 --> 0:18:16.350
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Act. Earlier this year, the Department of Education

0:18:16.470 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>announced their intention to completely eliminate equity assistance centers. But

0:18:22.780 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>look at those numbers. 483 in 1990, down to 268

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:26.860
<v Speaker 1>in 2009, down to 132 in 2024. Long before Trump

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was trying to outlaw public memory of America's racist past,

0:18:41.590 --> 0:18:48.410
<v Speaker 1>school districts were successfully achieving unitary status. And again, we

0:18:48.470 --> 0:18:52.790
<v Speaker 1>want them to. The goal is for these cases to resolve.

0:18:52.830 --> 0:18:57.330
<v Speaker 1>We don't want this open forever. If the cases can

0:18:57.369 --> 0:19:01.910
<v Speaker 1>be closed, that's good. So between 1990 and 2009, the

0:19:01.950 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>number dropped by about half, and 2009 to 2024, it's

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:13.190
<v Speaker 1>cut in about half again. The Trump administration is speedrunning

0:19:13.210 --> 0:19:16.500
<v Speaker 1>making that number zero, but the rate of case closure

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>has been accelerating since the 90s. And a 2007 report

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from the U.S. Civil Rights Commission says the DOJ has

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:29.340
<v Speaker 1>been actively pursuing resolution in these cases since 2000. So

0:19:29.380 --> 0:19:33.260
<v Speaker 1>the policy of seeking to close these cases is not new.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.060
<v Speaker 1>And in the first decade of the 2000s, the DOJ

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>staffed up a department that was actively reviewing these cases.

0:19:41.430 --> 0:19:42.930
<v Speaker 1>and they were able to resolve 180 of them between

0:19:42.930 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>2000 and 2007 alone. What I'm not saying, but I

0:19:50.140 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>am not trying to convince you of here, is that

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.100
<v Speaker 1>everything was good before, and it's only bad now, that

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration is somehow uniquely evil, and that prior

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:05.140
<v Speaker 1>administrations always had everyone's best interests at heart, and Everyone

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>at the Department of Justice was pure of heart in

0:20:07.300 --> 0:20:10.460
<v Speaker 1>their commitments to civil rights before Harmeet Dhillon came along.

0:20:12.180 --> 0:20:15.740
<v Speaker 1>I'm not telling you that every single one of those

0:20:15.830 --> 0:20:20.910
<v Speaker 1>case closures prior to 2025 represents the best and highest

0:20:21.010 --> 0:20:23.510
<v Speaker 1>good possible for the children in those school districts. I

0:20:23.550 --> 0:20:27.450
<v Speaker 1>don't know that. And that's probably not true. But I

0:20:27.510 --> 0:20:30.730
<v Speaker 1>haven't read those cases, and they are immensely complicated records

0:20:30.780 --> 0:20:36.060
<v Speaker 1>spanning decades. I'm not saying it was always good before.

0:20:36.460 --> 0:20:40.659
<v Speaker 1>What I'm saying is the rules changed. The policy has

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.460
<v Speaker 1>always been to seek case closure, but the rules for

0:20:44.619 --> 0:20:52.170
<v Speaker 1>closing those cases went from extremely complex to non-existent. Prior

0:20:52.190 --> 0:20:55.619
<v Speaker 1>to 2025, when a school district came before a judge

0:20:55.820 --> 0:21:00.250
<v Speaker 1>asking for unitary status, they had to demonstrate not only

0:21:00.290 --> 0:21:04.290
<v Speaker 1>that they fully complied with their specific court-ordered desegregation plan,

0:21:05.210 --> 0:21:09.060
<v Speaker 1>but that they fulfilled their affirmative duty to take whatever

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>steps were necessary to convert to a unitary system. A

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>1968 Supreme Court decision in Green v. County School Board

0:21:19.740 --> 0:21:24.530
<v Speaker 1>of New Kent County established some specific criteria, giving those

0:21:24.570 --> 0:21:29.540
<v Speaker 1>criteria the name Green Factors. School districts have to come

0:21:29.580 --> 0:21:32.460
<v Speaker 1>back before the judge and show what they've done to

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:37.900
<v Speaker 1>meet each of these green factors. Are their student populations desegregated?

0:21:38.460 --> 0:21:38.980
<v Speaker 2>Obviously.

0:21:40.220 --> 0:21:43.580
<v Speaker 1>But it's more than that. What does their staff look like?

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:50.449
<v Speaker 1>Their faculty? Their administration? What about extracurricular activities, transportation, facilities?

0:21:51.810 --> 0:21:56.010
<v Speaker 1>It's not just having kids of all colors in the classrooms.

0:21:56.109 --> 0:22:01.580
<v Speaker 1>It's the whole system. In Greene, the court was clear.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.190
<v Speaker 1>Segregation affects every facet of the school system, top to bottom.

0:22:07.910 --> 0:22:11.170
<v Speaker 1>Every bit of the operation of the school system. So

0:22:11.250 --> 0:22:16.830
<v Speaker 1>desegregation has to, too. A trio of Supreme Court decisions

0:22:16.869 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the 90s made it a lot easier to be

0:22:19.580 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>deemed in compliance. But the Greene factors are still the standard.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.060
<v Speaker 1>You have to show you've done everything within reason to comply.

0:22:30.350 --> 0:22:33.050
<v Speaker 1>When the DOJ was reviewing cases in the early 2000s,

0:22:33.730 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they worked with districts to resolve cases that could be resolved.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.820
<v Speaker 1>That 2007 report by the Civil Rights Commission said in

0:22:41.859 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>some of these cases, the districts had already long been

0:22:45.740 --> 0:22:49.830
<v Speaker 1>in compliance. They just hadn't sought closure of their cases

0:22:49.940 --> 0:22:55.129
<v Speaker 1>for a variety of reasons. Sometimes they didn't know how.

0:22:55.670 --> 0:22:57.729
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have the resources to do it. They didn't

0:22:57.750 --> 0:22:59.510
<v Speaker 1>want to spend the money to go back to court.

0:23:00.420 --> 0:23:03.859
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe they thought achieving unitary status would result in

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:08.660
<v Speaker 1>bad publicity or hurt feelings in the community. In some cases,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.340
<v Speaker 1>districts feared losing certain types of funding they were eligible

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:16.850
<v Speaker 1>for as part of their compliance plan. And in a

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:23.810
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases, it was just inertia. What Trump's DOJ

0:23:23.869 --> 0:23:28.449
<v Speaker 1>is doing is just closing them. They are filing motions

0:23:28.490 --> 0:23:32.980
<v Speaker 1>for dismissal with the courts. Without a hearing. They aren't

0:23:33.300 --> 0:23:37.030
<v Speaker 1>asking the districts to produce anything. No evidence is entered

0:23:37.090 --> 0:23:40.310
<v Speaker 1>onto the record. There's no conversation about it. They're just

0:23:40.790 --> 0:23:44.770
<v Speaker 1>closing the file folder and sliding it off the desk

0:23:44.850 --> 0:23:49.050
<v Speaker 1>into the trash can. For this most recent batch of

0:23:49.109 --> 0:23:52.930
<v Speaker 1>requests for dismissal, it's too early to say what was

0:23:52.950 --> 0:23:57.169
<v Speaker 1>going to happen in those 50 or 60 cases. We

0:23:57.190 --> 0:24:00.740
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet. I mean, the press released doesn't even

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:05.020
<v Speaker 1>name the districts involved. They've put their request for dismissal

0:24:05.060 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on the record, but there's probably no response from a

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.900
<v Speaker 1>judge in most of these cases yet. But they have

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>done this before, so we have some data points to

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>look at. In late 2025, the DOJ joined in a

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.740
<v Speaker 1>motion by the Louisiana Attorney General's office to dismiss the

0:24:24.780 --> 0:24:30.210
<v Speaker 1>desegregation case in Concordia Parish. Several, including cases in Louisiana

0:24:30.250 --> 0:24:33.710
<v Speaker 1>have been closed in this manner. The Louisiana Attorney General

0:24:33.790 --> 0:24:36.209
<v Speaker 1>asked the court to dismiss the case and the DOJ

0:24:36.250 --> 0:24:39.790
<v Speaker 1>joins in. As a party in the case, they're saying, yeah,

0:24:40.230 --> 0:24:42.930
<v Speaker 1>we talked about it. We agree. Go ahead and close this.

0:24:43.130 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>We don't need to argue about it anymore. After this

0:24:47.380 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>motion was filed, the NAACP filed a motion to intervene,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>but they were denied. And the Fifth Circuit Court of

0:24:54.940 --> 0:24:58.530
<v Speaker 1>Appeals wrote that there was no need for the NAACP

0:24:58.550 --> 0:25:01.350
<v Speaker 1>to intervene on behalf of Black children in Concordia Parish

0:25:01.390 --> 0:25:06.730
<v Speaker 1>because those children's interests were already represented. Their interests are

0:25:06.770 --> 0:25:10.310
<v Speaker 1>represented by the United States government because the United States

0:25:10.330 --> 0:25:15.859
<v Speaker 1>government has an interest in enforcing federal rules and regulations

0:25:16.020 --> 0:25:21.100
<v Speaker 1>and their own desegregation orders. And as such, the interests

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:25.939
<v Speaker 1>of those children are already adequately represented. Any interest the

0:25:25.980 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>NAACP would be trying to protect in their intervention, well,

0:25:29.700 --> 0:25:36.290
<v Speaker 1>the government's got it. Ordinarily, that would be true. The

0:25:36.350 --> 0:25:41.070
<v Speaker 1>DOJ's Civil Rights Division is supposed to be on the

0:25:41.150 --> 0:25:45.889
<v Speaker 1>side of civil rights. And for the first 60 years

0:25:45.950 --> 0:25:51.890
<v Speaker 1>of litigation in this case, that was true. But now

0:25:51.950 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>everything is upside down. And the federal government has switched teams,

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.540
<v Speaker 1>but the court is still treating these parties as adversaries,

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:03.180
<v Speaker 1>even though they have teamed up to destroy the desegregation order.

0:26:18.330 --> 0:26:21.730
<v Speaker 1>The hiccup in the Concordia case, though, is that the

0:26:21.750 --> 0:26:27.430
<v Speaker 1>judge said no. Normally, if two opposing parties in a

0:26:27.490 --> 0:26:31.910
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit enter into a joint stipulation of dismissal, there's nothing

0:26:31.970 --> 0:26:35.190
<v Speaker 1>more for the court to do. These people aren't suing

0:26:35.230 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>each other anymore. The case is over. But Judge D. Drell,

0:26:40.420 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>an 80-year-old George W. Bush appointee, said, no, I don't

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:51.899
<v Speaker 1>accept this. Dismissal denied. Because the court isn't required to

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>accept a stipulation of dismissal in cases where protection of

0:26:55.540 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>others or public policy are at issue. Drell wrote that

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.899
<v Speaker 1>as much as he would love to end a 60-year-old case,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.940
<v Speaker 1>Brown v. Board of Education requires the court to reach

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.940
<v Speaker 1>a conclusion based on facts on the record. The case

0:27:12.140 --> 0:27:14.980
<v Speaker 1>cannot be closed without some kind of evidence being entered

0:27:15.020 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that justifies that decision. He scheduled an evidentiary hearing to

0:27:21.220 --> 0:27:25.239
<v Speaker 1>make the parties put their argument on the record. They

0:27:25.260 --> 0:27:28.670
<v Speaker 1>appealed his decision. And the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

0:27:28.950 --> 0:27:32.609
<v Speaker 1>vacated his ruling earlier this month, ruling that the case

0:27:32.670 --> 0:27:35.649
<v Speaker 1>was dismissed as soon as the parties themselves decided that

0:27:35.690 --> 0:27:40.669
<v Speaker 1>it was, thus making Judge Drell's ruling moot. There was

0:27:41.020 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>no live case left for him to have an opinion on.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.260
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you what that might mean for any

0:27:48.300 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>other cases, but I do hope other judges try to

0:27:52.420 --> 0:27:57.830
<v Speaker 1>refuse these dismissals. According to a statement from the NAACP

0:27:57.890 --> 0:28:01.369
<v Speaker 1>Legal Defense Fund, the Justice Department's withdrawal from some of

0:28:01.410 --> 0:28:06.290
<v Speaker 1>these cases doesn't mean litigation stops. In cases where the

0:28:06.390 --> 0:28:10.389
<v Speaker 1>NAACP is already involved, they're not backing down.

0:28:11.890 --> 0:28:12.150
<v Speaker 2>In St.

0:28:12.190 --> 0:28:15.730
<v Speaker 1>Mary Parish in Louisiana, for example, the NAACP is still

0:28:15.780 --> 0:28:22.500
<v Speaker 1>planning to go to trial later this fall. DOJ be damned. Today,

0:28:23.100 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>If you go to the homepage for the Civil Rights

0:28:24.859 --> 0:28:28.460
<v Speaker 1>Division of the Department of Justice, you'll see a rotating

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:32.490
<v Speaker 1>carousel of fresh press releases. There'll be something different by

0:28:32.530 --> 0:28:34.970
<v Speaker 1>the time you hear this, but I'm looking at it

0:28:35.010 --> 0:28:40.110
<v Speaker 1>right now, and Minnesota is doing unlawful DEI. The DOJ

0:28:40.150 --> 0:28:42.970
<v Speaker 1>is suing California to stop a gun law. The DOJ

0:28:43.020 --> 0:28:45.700
<v Speaker 1>is suing New York to stop a law that protects

0:28:45.780 --> 0:28:51.140
<v Speaker 1>the rights of transgender people in hospice care. I chose

0:28:51.180 --> 0:28:53.430
<v Speaker 1>a date at random. and went to the Wayback Machine

0:28:53.470 --> 0:28:56.130
<v Speaker 1>and looked at what that page looked like two and

0:28:56.150 --> 0:28:59.730
<v Speaker 1>a half years ago. Back in February of 2024, the

0:28:59.900 --> 0:29:02.500
<v Speaker 1>Civil Rights Division sent a warning letter to a city

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:07.060
<v Speaker 1>that was unconstitutionally jailing residents for unpaid fines. There was

0:29:07.100 --> 0:29:10.230
<v Speaker 1>a press release about a report finding prison conditions in

0:29:10.250 --> 0:29:13.990
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi unconstitutional. A man was convicted of a hate crime

0:29:14.830 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for murdering a transgender woman. And the DOJ was interested

0:29:18.500 --> 0:29:21.380
<v Speaker 1>in intervening in a case that sought to reduce unnecessary

0:29:21.420 --> 0:29:26.790
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement escalation in mental health emergencies. I mean, it's

0:29:26.810 --> 0:29:31.190
<v Speaker 1>hard to make me feel nostalgic for the Biden administration,

0:29:31.210 --> 0:29:35.830
<v Speaker 1>but God damn, what a comparison. At least the Civil

0:29:35.870 --> 0:29:41.500
<v Speaker 1>Rights Division was talking about civil rights and not whatever

0:29:41.660 --> 0:29:46.940
<v Speaker 1>bizarro world upside-down shit they've got going on now. On

0:29:46.980 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that same homepage, what used to be a single link

0:29:50.700 --> 0:29:55.770
<v Speaker 1>labeled simply Report a Violation now takes up half the page.

0:29:57.010 --> 0:29:59.670
<v Speaker 1>Each button still goes to the same link. It's all

0:29:59.710 --> 0:30:02.530
<v Speaker 1>this same online form where you can file a complaint

0:30:02.570 --> 0:30:05.970
<v Speaker 1>with the Civil Rights Division about a possible civil rights violation.

0:30:07.550 --> 0:30:11.590
<v Speaker 1>But now the homepage offers you this huge menu of

0:30:11.690 --> 0:30:14.570
<v Speaker 1>very specific scenarios you might need to report to the

0:30:14.590 --> 0:30:19.700
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice. Things like, have you been affected by DEI?

0:30:20.540 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you have evidence of non-citizens voting? Have you been

0:30:23.980 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>sterilized by transgender hormones? Do you want to report vandalism

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.260
<v Speaker 1>of a crisis pregnancy center? Does your state or local

0:30:31.300 --> 0:30:36.180
<v Speaker 1>government have an affirmative action plan? None of these things

0:30:37.380 --> 0:30:40.820
<v Speaker 1>are civil rights violations. These aren't the things the Civil

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Rights Division of the Department of Justice should be concerning

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>itself with. This is a culture war snitch line. It's

0:30:48.140 --> 0:30:52.950
<v Speaker 1>bullshit demanding to be taken seriously, undermining the very idea

0:30:53.290 --> 0:30:58.060
<v Speaker 1>of the government's interest in protecting our civil rights. It's

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.300
<v Speaker 1>no wonder three-quarters of the attorneys in the Civil Rights

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Division quit last year. Like I said, it's too early

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.310
<v Speaker 1>to tell what happens next in these cases. But we'll

0:31:11.380 --> 0:31:14.350
<v Speaker 1>end today where we began, so we can pick back

0:31:14.430 --> 0:31:23.090
<v Speaker 1>up here next week. It's 1963. It's always, somehow, a

0:31:23.110 --> 0:31:30.250
<v Speaker 1>little bit 1963. 1963. On August 28th, 1963, more than

0:31:30.290 --> 0:31:34.370
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a million people marched in Washington, D.C.

0:31:35.710 --> 0:31:38.910
<v Speaker 1>They'd arrived on charter buses, crowded train cars, and packed

0:31:38.950 --> 0:31:41.950
<v Speaker 1>into station wagons with friends and neighbors. They'd come from

0:31:42.150 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>every corner of the country to march for civil rights.

0:31:47.660 --> 0:31:50.540
<v Speaker 1>This march had been two years in the making, intended

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.300
<v Speaker 1>to coincide with the 100th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation.

0:31:55.800 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>A century had passed since the end of chattel slavery

0:31:59.270 --> 0:32:01.670
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, but Black people in America were

0:32:01.770 --> 0:32:09.550
<v Speaker 1>still not truly free. 1963 had been a violent year

0:32:09.770 --> 0:32:13.190
<v Speaker 1>in the struggle for civil rights. Americans tuned in to

0:32:13.230 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the evening news to see footage of schoolchildren being mauled

0:32:16.500 --> 0:32:21.620
<v Speaker 1>by police dogs in Birmingham, Alabama. Police in Danville, Virginia

0:32:21.740 --> 0:32:26.110
<v Speaker 1>deputized a mob of vigilantes. authorizing them to beat scores

0:32:26.170 --> 0:32:31.460
<v Speaker 1>of demonstrators so badly that 65 people were hospitalized. Jailers

0:32:31.500 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in Winona, Mississippi beat voting rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:39.980
<v Speaker 1>so badly that she never quite recovered. After arresting 500

0:32:39.980 --> 0:32:45.570
<v Speaker 1>protesters at a sit-in, deputies in Gadsden, Alabama tortured their prisoners,

0:32:45.670 --> 0:32:51.910
<v Speaker 1>many of whom were children, with cattle prods. Earlier that summer,

0:32:52.670 --> 0:32:56.250
<v Speaker 1>President Kennedy promised the nation that civil rights legislation was coming.

0:32:58.350 --> 0:33:02.130
<v Speaker 1>That very night, just hours after the president finished speaking,

0:33:02.210 --> 0:33:05.580
<v Speaker 1>a Klansman shot and killed Medgar Evers in his own

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.540
<v Speaker 1>driveway in Jackson, Mississippi, promises were not going to be enough.

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>The march had demands.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:22.580
<v Speaker 3>We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind

0:33:22.740 --> 0:33:28.710
<v Speaker 3>America of the fierce urgency of now. This is no

0:33:28.790 --> 0:33:33.970
<v Speaker 3>time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or

0:33:34.010 --> 0:33:43.890
<v Speaker 3>to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the

0:33:43.950 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 3>time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is

0:33:50.420 --> 0:33:54.950
<v Speaker 3>the time The rise from the dark and desolate valley

0:33:55.310 --> 0:33:59.510
<v Speaker 3>of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now

0:33:59.610 --> 0:34:00.370
<v Speaker 3>is the time.

0:34:07.470 --> 0:34:10.430
<v Speaker 1>A quarter of a million people heard Dr. Martin Luther

0:34:10.450 --> 0:34:12.380
<v Speaker 1>King Jr. give that speech from the steps of the

0:34:12.410 --> 0:34:17.020
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln Memorial. And somewhere in that crowd was a teenage

0:34:17.060 --> 0:34:21.589
<v Speaker 1>boy named Ralph Stell. In the summer of 1963, he

0:34:21.850 --> 0:34:24.250
<v Speaker 1>stood in that crowd, listening to Dr. King give what

0:34:24.270 --> 0:34:28.049
<v Speaker 1>would become the famous I Have a Dream speech. And

0:34:28.110 --> 0:34:31.509
<v Speaker 1>Ralph Stell had to have faith in that dream. The

0:34:31.530 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>dream that one day all men are created equal would

0:34:34.140 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>actually mean something. Two years earlier, when he was just

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.580
<v Speaker 1>16 years old, Ralph Stell had lent his name to

0:34:41.620 --> 0:34:46.660
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit that would, eventually, desegregate schools in Savannah, Georgia.

0:34:48.750 --> 0:34:50.930
<v Speaker 1>But as he stood there on that afternoon in August

0:34:50.969 --> 0:34:56.100
<v Speaker 1>of 1963, his case was lost. It had dragged on

0:34:56.219 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>so long that he was just weeks from graduation by

0:34:58.620 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the time the case went to trial. And shortly after

0:35:01.380 --> 0:35:04.340
<v Speaker 1>he graduated from his segregated school, a federal judge in

0:35:04.390 --> 0:35:07.129
<v Speaker 1>Georgia ruled against him.

0:35:08.989 --> 0:35:09.250
<v Speaker 3>Dr.

0:35:09.290 --> 0:35:13.010
<v Speaker 1>King's words echoed out over the reflecting pool, promising Ralph

0:35:13.030 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Stell and hundreds of thousands of other marchers that one day...

0:35:18.450 --> 0:35:21.430
<v Speaker 1>They'd be free. He just had to cling to that

0:35:21.510 --> 0:35:30.569
<v Speaker 1>faith and keep fighting. On appeal, justice did prevail in

0:35:30.620 --> 0:35:35.510
<v Speaker 1>Stell v. Savannah Chatham County Board of Education. Ralph Stell

0:35:36.170 --> 0:35:38.710
<v Speaker 1>never saw the inside of an integrated classroom in Georgia.

0:35:39.950 --> 0:35:42.570
<v Speaker 1>And he was a grandfather. By the time the Department

0:35:42.590 --> 0:35:45.489
<v Speaker 1>of Justice felt Savannah had truly honored its obligation to

0:35:45.530 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Black students and released them from federal supervision in 1994,

0:35:48.989 --> 0:35:54.180
<v Speaker 1>but in the end, he won. His case put down

0:35:54.219 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>an organized, well-funded attempt to use junk science to force

0:35:57.700 --> 0:36:00.540
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court to reconsider Brown v. Board of Education.

0:36:03.300 --> 0:36:07.380
<v Speaker 1>Next week, we'll go back to 1963 and take a

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.180
<v Speaker 1>look at how Wycliffe Draper's Pioneer Fund used scientific racism...

0:36:11.210 --> 0:36:14.830
<v Speaker 1>to try to re-litigate the Brown decision, and how they

0:36:14.850 --> 0:36:18.990
<v Speaker 1>lost that fight. As for the rest of this story,

0:36:20.150 --> 0:36:24.690
<v Speaker 1>the one still unfolding today, we'll all just have to

0:36:24.730 --> 0:36:25.129
<v Speaker 1>have faith.

0:36:27.989 --> 0:36:28.250
<v Speaker 2>Dr.

0:36:28.290 --> 0:36:31.430
<v Speaker 1>King knew in 1963 that the fight was far from over,

0:36:32.390 --> 0:36:35.730
<v Speaker 1>and his dream isn't dead. We just all have to

0:36:35.770 --> 0:36:56.850
<v Speaker 1>keep dreaming it, here in the eternal 1963. 1963. weird

0:36:56.870 --> 0:36:58.890
<v Speaker 1>little guys is a production of cool zone media and

0:36:58.950 --> 0:37:02.029
<v Speaker 1>iheart radio it's researched written and recorded by me molly

0:37:02.050 --> 0:37:05.580
<v Speaker 1>conger our executive producers are sophie lichterman and robert evans

0:37:06.020 --> 0:37:08.380
<v Speaker 1>the show is edited by the wildly talented rory gagan

0:37:08.820 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the theme music was composed by brad dickert you can

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.020
<v Speaker 1>email me at weird little guys podcast at gmail.com i

0:37:14.060 --> 0:37:16.020
<v Speaker 1>will definitely read it but i probably won't answer it

0:37:16.060 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing personal You can exchange conspiracy theories about the

0:37:19.500 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>show with other listeners on the Weird Little Guys subreddit.

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.029
<v Speaker 1>Just don't post anything that's going to make you one

0:37:25.050 --> 0:37:25.950
<v Speaker 1>of my Weird Little Guys.