WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Target, Home Depot, Retail Earnings 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.119
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies. One person's

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 2>cast is another person's animal spirits.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>our viewer.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>If the economy is slowing down, there.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Is the possibility of the death spiral.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Both partum competing and AI are going to power the future.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 3>People are just buying everything with tex.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio, YouTube and

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Originals.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Lisa Matteo filling in on

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and at the global markets.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Each and every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 5>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 5>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Today you'll look at why retailer Target is naming an

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 2>insider as its next chief executive officer.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 5>Plus well look at why the Danish drug maker Novo

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Nordisk is slashing the cause of its weight loss drug ozempic.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 2>First, we begin with the earning from TJX companies.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 5>This week, the off price retailer raised its full year

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 5>guidance and reported second quarter earnings that beat analyst projections.

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 5>It's a sign that shoppers are currently turning toward discounters

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 5>due to economic uncertainty.

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>For more.

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Guest hosts, Alexis Christophers and I were joined by Mary

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Ross Gilbert Bloomberg Intelligence senior retail equity analysts. First asked

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Mary for her take on the company's results.

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 6>TJX is hitting it out of the park. This is

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 6>a company that just executes seamlessly and consistently, something in

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 6>retail that's very, very difficult to do. They saw strength

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 6>across all categories, across all income groups, all age groups,

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 6>and they know how to get the merchandise right by store,

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 6>by region, so they have a terrific planning and allocation.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 6>They sort of emphasize that and another key point because

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 6>they raise their guidance not only for sales but also

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 6>on the margin side. And there was such a huge

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 6>fear with terraffs. They only source probably less than ten

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 6>percent of their sales come for their merchandise is something

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 6>they directly source. They were able to buy better, which

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 6>means they got better deals. That means there's so much

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 6>availability out there, and it's something we've observed in our

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 6>channel checks and when you look at the shopping halls

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 6>on television, on a YouTube and you see the incredible

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 6>brands that are available, and they really are across good,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 6>better and best. So you can get anything from Puma, Audi, Doos,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 6>Nike all the way up to Eve, Saint Laurent and Gucci.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 6>So it's and TJX really really wins across all that,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 6>so strength across you know, all their channels and internationally,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 6>I mean Canada was a nine percent comp sales.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 7>I want to ask about a possible headwind though, because

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 7>it seems like they're firing on all cylinders. But I

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 7>know that TJX mentioned in the past about a key demographic,

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 7>the Hispanic customer. They were concerned that maybe immigration policy

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 7>was going to keep them home or not spend as much.

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 7>Did they mention anything about that.

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 6>I don't think they saw any weakness as a result

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 6>of that. I know it's been a big concern not

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 6>only for TJX, as you brought up Alexai, but also

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 6>for Ross and for Burlington, and probably even more so

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 6>for Burlington because they really skew to a lower income

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 6>consumer and they're due to report next week, and so

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 6>we should learn more on that.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Mary, I always think the job of a retail animals

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 2>like you was really tough because not only do you

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 2>have to do the regular stuff as an analyst, like

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>get the earnings estimates kind of right and on the

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>financial analysis, but you kind of have to have an

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 2>opinion on like who's good at picking out the right

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 2>fashion to even put in the store in the first place.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>What is TJX doing so well? Do you think?

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, they have.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 6>The most amazing buying team, and so they spend they

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 6>have sort of like a buying academy where they teach

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 6>their buyers. You know, they have to go through you know,

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 6>I think it's like three years, maybe even up to

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 6>seven years of work that they do with these buyers.

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 6>So the pricing that they work on and the product

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 6>that they're buying is really something that is steeped in

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 6>experience history. They also invest in systems, you know, so

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 6>that means technology logistics to make sure that they can

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 6>get this all right. Because you can imagine that if

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 6>they're shipping multiple merchandise, you got to have fresh drops

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 6>because these customers will shop multiple times a week because

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 6>it's that freshness that brings them in. So yes, TJX

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 6>is the leader. They're the largest in the world. I mean,

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 6>they'll probably hit sixty billion in revenue this year, up

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 6>from fifty six billion last year. And they keep increasing

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 6>the number of potential store openings they see. Previously they

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 6>said we think we have another twelve hundred stores to open.

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Now they're saying it's another eighteen hundred stores to open

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 6>around the country, just around the globe in their existing markets.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 6>So yes, this company really has the expertise in doing

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 6>it right. Is there a digital strategy here because I

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 6>remember I'm sure you do too, Mary, when you would

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 6>go online to try to find out what tjmax had

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 6>and there was nothing there because you always had to

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 6>go in the store to find out what they had.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 6>I think they had to step up their game right

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 6>because of Amazon and others online. But what is the

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 6>digital strategy, if anything, at Tjmax and TJX. That's a

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 6>good question. So actually TJX has a digital strategy. It's

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 6>across all their brands except for home goods, and so

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 6>it's about I think it's I think it's just under

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 6>five percent of sales. So it's very small. But they

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 6>also saw strength in this quarter on their e comm business.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 6>So they do have an e comm business. You can

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 6>go on it and you can shop anything you want

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 6>on there. Now you can't say that you want to

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 6>shop by brand, but you can select. Let's say, let's

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 6>say that you want to just buy the ultra luxe

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, merchandise that they have there, and you'll see

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 6>Christian de or sunglasses. You'll see you know, like I mentioned,

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, on the handbag size Balan Chiaga. So you

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 6>will be able to find what you want on the

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 6>high end, also on the low end, but you'll have

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 6>to do it by price points, by sorting that way,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 6>because they're not allowed to necessarily have that ability to

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 6>sort by brands. So you will see they have a

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 6>robust online business, you know, and it's around the globe. Now,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 6>the key is that they're a key differentiated in that regard.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 6>Remember that it's still very small, and that the vast

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 6>majority of their sales, you know, more like ninety six

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 6>percent or so, are being generated in store, but nobody

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 6>else in off price other.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 7>Than the rack.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 6>The Nordstorm rack has e commerce capabilities all the rest

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 6>it's strictly a bricks and mortar model.

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Our thanks to Mary Ross, Gilbert Bloomberg Intelligence senior retail

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 5>equity analyst. We move next to news from the cosmetics

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 5>company es Day Lauder. This week, the company issued a

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 5>weak profit outlook for its fiscal year. S Day Lauder

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 5>said it was weighed down by sluggish demand for high

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 5>end goods and an escalating trade war for more guestos.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Alexis, Christopherus and I were joined by Debate and Bloomberg

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence luxury goods analysts. We first asked deb what she

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>took away from s day latter's earnings.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 8>They're doing well out of the US improve in there.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 8>Numbers for the full year are still done, but you

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 8>could see sequential improvement by end of year, and also

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 8>somewhat less soft in China. But for them where they

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 8>still have so much exposure in Asia and still particularly

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 8>in travel retail, inventories to me still look stuffed, even

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 8>though if I think about travel retail overall, it's fifteen

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 8>percent of their business now it was near thirty percent

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 8>four years ago, and they're losing about four points of

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 8>growth annually. For me, when I look at the inventory

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 8>data over two hundred days versus one ninety, it still

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 8>says that there's risk there for me. So they need

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 8>to write size Asia. They need to do more in

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 8>getting out of main stores in the US. They're doing

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 8>a lot positively on things like Amazon Beauty and in

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 8>Asia on TikTok, but it's all moving onlines. It's the

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 8>third of their business online, a lot going on, a

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 8>lot of cost savings, cost cutting, and very low on margin.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 8>You know, and that the company has actually taken away.

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 8>Quarterly guidance and forecast for EPs on the full year

0:08:55.640 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 8>are six cents below the two sixteen is expected by

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.599
<v Speaker 8>consensus two ten on guidance at the top end is

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 8>already a little bit below. So shares a week again

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 8>on the back of a couple of years of underperformance.

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 7>You no, dev definitely has you just laid out a

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 7>few tough years for this legacy brand. But explain to

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 7>me why there were some upgrades recently. I was surprised

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 7>to see Deutsche Bank HSBC upgrading from whole to buy.

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 7>You got JPM upgrading to overweight. What do they see

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 7>here that maybe others on Wall Street are not.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 8>I think, especially as we've headed through the last couple

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 8>of quarters, you can see that there are share gains,

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 8>market share gains in some categories in some countries, so

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 8>Japan positively, some parts of China by the end positively,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 8>some categories in the US positively as well. And there

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 8>are very easy comps that they will cycle through in

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 8>the next year ahead, and certainly under the CEO and

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 8>the CFO, there feels just a lot more entum and

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 8>energy to come. So I think that's what the market

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 8>are buying into, as well as the underperformance that we've seen.

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 8>But we must remember in terms of them being competitive

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 8>and what they're doing, they talk about a solid double

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 8>digital just the EBIT margin, you know, this will will

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 8>back their investment and then being in front of the consumer,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 8>their innovation pipeline and others. They're only eight percent of

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 8>the end of fiscal twenty twenty five and they say

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 8>they get to a double double digitald just a EBIT

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 8>margin over the next few years. That to me says

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 8>they're still a bumpy ride. So I understand why why

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 8>those quarterly numbers have gone right.

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, deb sde Lauder said, the terriff's going to cost

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>them about one hundred million dollars to profitability this year.

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you what are some of the luxury companies,

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the brands that you follow. Are they taking these terriff

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 2>costs into their p and L or they're trying to

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 2>pass them along to customers.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 8>What's been the strategy for Yeah, and certainly for the

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 8>very high end. We saw even at the beginning of

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 8>the year pre tariff announcements. The very high end like

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 8>MS would say, because the wage costs and others, we'll

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 8>be looking at five to six percent price increases, start

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 8>to passing those through the beginning of the year, and

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 8>then in May when the spring summer collections came through.

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 8>They then have commented generally for the luxury space, and

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 8>from the work we've done that some may need up

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 8>to four five percent price to be passed through, and

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 8>the plan is that they pass most of it through.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 8>I don't think very much of it goes up put

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 8>down the supply chain, and it's going to be done

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 8>gradually in some categories rather than you know, some completely

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 8>pass it through more visibly than others. And some will

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 8>struggle more. And then we heard the news from Switzerland

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 8>with the thirty nine percent tariff, So companies like Swatch

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 8>for US will find it difficult. Companies like I still

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 8>it's not every brand that is resonating with the consumer

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 8>will find it difficult in some brands in some categories.

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 8>So that's why I think we wait quart by quarter

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 8>and across the rest of the year to see what

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 8>companies do need to take a little bit of that

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 8>on board. But most of them are finding cost cutting

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 8>as part of that, and certainly on the gross we

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.599
<v Speaker 8>did see for full years forty basis points improvement on

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 8>gross margin for US to order with a little bit

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 8>of that tariff impact mixed in there, and that they're

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 8>expecting further gross margin improvement in twenty twenty six.

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 5>All right, thanks a Debic and Bloomberg Intelligence Luxury goods analysts.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Coming up, I'll look at earnings from the world's largest

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 5>home improvement retailer, home Depot.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 5>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via Bi go on the terminal.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lis Matheo and I'm Paul Sweeney. This is Bloomberg.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg and tell Legends with Paul Sweeney

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Lisa Matteo filling in on

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Intelligence. We moved next to news from the merchandise

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 5>retailer Target.

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 2>This week, Target named insider Michael Fidelki as its next

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 2>chief executive officer. Shares of Target fell after the appointment,

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>indicating that Wall Street had been hoping for an outsider

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 2>to take over the company's leadership.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 5>This all comes after the company reported second quarter earnings

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 5>that only narrowly surpass analysts expectations. Target also maintained its

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 5>outlook for the full year after slashing it a few

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 5>months back.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>For more guest hosts, Alexis Christopheros and I were joined

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 2>by Jen bartashis Bloomberg Intelligence senior retail analyst. We first

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>asked Jen for her take on the new CEO and

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 2>whether Target should have gone with an outsider.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 9>It's an interesting choice, and I think there are investors.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 9>For a little while now, I've been interested in seeing

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 9>a CEO change Brian Cornell has done a great job

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 9>during his tenure, at least initially in terms of really

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 9>driving growth for Target. But an internal choice really implies

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.599
<v Speaker 9>much of the same strategy, and I think there was

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 9>some hopes that there would be something a little different

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 9>and maybe shake things up and bring something new to

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 9>the company.

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 7>You know, I'm wondering if Target is going through an

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 7>existential crisis right for this identity crisis because you feel like,

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 7>I don't know about upon and the last time you

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 7>went into a Target, Sure, but you feel like they've

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 7>lost their mojo, Jennifer, because the last time I was

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 7>in there, the store shelves were not stocked very well,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 7>felt disorganized, couldn't find a sales associate to help me.

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 7>What does this new CEO have to do to help

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 7>this company get back on track. Well, you know, it's

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 7>very interesting. He's highlighted three priorities, but they're not really

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 7>new priorities. But if they can bring focus to it,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 7>maybe that will help. And that's you know, re energizing

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 7>the assortment, bringing back some of that style and you

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 7>know value that people crave. It's about having a very good,

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 7>consistent in store execution. And experience, which is what you

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 7>were actually.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 9>Just talking about, having things in stock, having you know

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 9>you associates available. And then the third is an acceleration

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 9>in the deployment of technology to maybe you know, make

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 9>processes faster, improve efficiency, that sort of thing. So we'll

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 9>see if that, you know, if that happens. But it's

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 9>really about getting back to what is it that consumers

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 9>loved about Target and how do you get them back

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 9>in that frame of mind so that they come to

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 9>stores and spend there.

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're the expitt here, like I don't have a

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 2>sense of what people go to Target for. What do

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 2>you think they go to Target for?

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, what they traditionally have gone to Target for was

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 9>that sense of discovery. Right, you had a couple of

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 9>things on your list, you got in and you were inspired.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 9>You saw home decoration items that you just were like, oh,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 9>that would look great in my living room. Or you

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 9>would go through apparel and you would see something very

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 9>stylish and you know value that you thought, oh, that's

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 9>a great thing to add to my basket. And so

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 9>that's what's a little bit missing. And part of that

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 9>may be because of just the rise in digital orders.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 9>It's a less conducive to those impromptu purchases. But it's

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 9>also inspired by the assortment and by what people experience

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 9>when they're in the stores, and that's really where they

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 9>have to focus to get that magic back.

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 7>And Jennifer correct me if I'm wrong. I think Target

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 7>has more exposure to tariffs than say, Walmart because of

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 7>its mix of products. It doesn't have as much exposure

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 7>to groceries as Walmart does, but it gets a lot

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 7>of its products from overseas places that are getting hit

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 7>by these tariffs. How did that play out in this

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 7>quarter and how will it play out going forward.

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's a great question, and it is one of

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 9>the things that's sort of been bogging down Target ever

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 9>since we've had very high food inflation. The willingness to

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 9>spend on discretionary categories has been a little bit more limited.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 9>And that's really the area that Target has always excelled,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 9>things like apparel and electronics and toys and home decor

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 9>and so you know, right now, the company is saying

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 9>they're doing a pretty good job of mitigating tariffs, but

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 9>they are more exposed because of the merchandise mix that

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 9>they have. They said they've done some right sizing. They've

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 9>they've paid off kind of the one time cancellation charges

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 9>they had while they were waiting on the terra verdicts.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 9>We'll see what unfolds in third quarter, and especially because

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 9>it's back to school, which is a really important quarter

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 9>for Target.

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 2>What's always well? I guess what's recently in the last

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>ten fifteen years really amazed me about Walmart is it

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 2>how's effective their digital strategy was, and they actually went

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 2>toe to toe with Amazon, and I think they more

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>than hold their own, not just about Target in their

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>digital strategy. How's that performing?

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 9>Overall? Target's digital strategy has been doing pretty well. They've

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 9>done a They've made a conscious decision to not go

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 9>head to head with Walmart and Target. So, for example,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 9>in their marketplace, it's not just an endless aisle of sellers.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 9>They have a very close criteria of who they let

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 9>onto their platform and that's worked well for them because

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 9>it helps keep the product selection closer to what people

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 9>expect from Target. Their digital sales were up in terms

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 9>of same star sales this quarter, well uppaced the visit

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 9>visits to stores, and so they've been executing pretty well there.

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 9>It's just a matter of how do they marry the

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 9>two parts of the business to grow simultaneously.

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 5>Aur Thanks to Jen Bartashi's Bloomberg Intelligence Senior retail analyst.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 2>We move next to news from the world's largest home

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>improvem in retail or home Depot.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 5>This week, Home Depot said sales return to growth in

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 5>the second quarter. This comes as shoppers invested in smaller

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 5>projects such as lighting and gardening.

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 3>For more.

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Lisa and I were joined by Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 2>US home building analyst.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 5>We first asked Drew for his take on Home Depot's earnings.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 10>It was actually a pretty much inline quarter for home Depot.

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 10>Today comps up about one little shy consensus, but if

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 10>you back out some of the four X impact, it

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 10>was pretty much in line. Now. Of course, growth isn't

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 10>as strong as you would like to see, and a

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 10>lot of that, as you mentioned, has to do with

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 10>where rates are, both rates on home equity loans and

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 10>mortgage rates. You have to remember, housing turnover is at

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 10>the lowest level since the financial crisis, and what we've

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 10>heard consistently from Home Depot over the last quarters is

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 10>that consumers are pulling back on big ticket discretionary categories,

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 10>So think of things like kitchen and bathroom models are

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 10>flooring And the reason is because these tend to be

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 10>financed with that and with rates where they are, and

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 10>consumers with the expectation that rates are going to pull back,

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 10>they're taking a wait and see approach and deciding to

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 10>opt for their smaller ticket to projects instead.

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Drew, What what does home depots say about terr risk

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 2>for them? How did they quantify for the street?

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, good question obviously on you know, top of mind

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 10>for a lot of investors. So home Depot has done

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 10>well to diversify that are sourcing over the last several years.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 10>They get about fifty percent of their products from the US,

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 10>so they are in pretty good shape from that regard.

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 10>We would estimate, you know, products coming from China somewhere

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 10>around fifteen to twenty percent. And there's a couple of

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 10>ways that they're going to manage this. One, given the

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 10>scale that they have, they're able to push back against suppliers.

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 10>The second they continue to diversify their supply chain. On

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 10>their last quarter call, they mentioned that no single country

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 10>outside of the US will be more than ten percent

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 10>of sourcing. And then lastly, I think We're going to

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 10>start to see some selective price increases coming through in

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 10>the next several quarters. Now, they've done a little bit

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 10>of pre buy on the inventory side to make sure

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 10>that they had some of that lower cost product on

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 10>the shelves for consumers. But I think, you know, as

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 10>we get to the end of this year and into

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 10>next year, you're going to start to see a little

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 10>bit of pricing. Now, we wouldn't expect it to be

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 10>to be widespread or significant. Remember, home Depot sales about

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 10>thirty to forty thousand products on their shelves, so they

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 10>tend to take a portfolio approach and manage pricing really

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 10>across the entire project, rather than raising prices across the board.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 5>Sure, so are you telling me my next home Depot

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 5>run is going to be more expensive? It's going to

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 5>cost me more, Drew, I have painting, I have a

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 5>deck to build, I have things to do. I mean

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 5>you're saying this could take effect pretty soon.

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 10>Well maybe not your next trip back, Okay, the next couple.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 10>Maybe Looking more towards the end of this year or

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 10>into the next year, we would expect to see prices

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 10>up marginally.

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 5>So I need to rush now, well, if consumers are

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 5>putting off those big projects, what are they focusing on?

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 5>I mean, is it the smaller ones or are they

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 5>just canceling projects altogether.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it tends to be more maintenance repair oriented, you know.

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 10>So there's there's projects around the house where things break

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 10>and you have to fix them immediately, or replacement products

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 10>for appliances and things of that nature. And again, what

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 10>we're not seeing is the big ticket discretionary of things

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 10>like like kitchen and bess that require financing.

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence US home building analyst.

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 5>We move next to the medical device industry.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 2>This week, the medical device company Medtronic reported profit that

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 2>beat analyst expectations. The company also lifted its full year

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>earnings guidance.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 5>This came after Medtronic announced that it will expand it's

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 5>bored after Elliott Investment Management became one of its biggest investors.

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.360
<v Speaker 2>For more, Lisa and I were joined by Matt Hendrickson

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence senior medtech analysts as Matt to bring.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Us up to date on what is happening at Metronic.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 11>With the Elliott Management news, they reported that they have

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 11>a significant stake in the stock and they're going to

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 11>plan to bring on two new border directors. These are

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 11>previous medtech CEOs from back in history and basically they're

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 11>looking to revitalize growth.

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 3>And capture efficiencies too.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 11>As they quoted in the earnings call built oxygen for

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 11>future growth. And so one of the things we saw

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 11>in the quarter in the earnings today, there were some

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 11>areas that had strong growth, strong momentum, but in their

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 11>diversified portfolio, there are other areas that kind of, let's say,

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 11>needed some tweaking.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 5>But when it comes to this the board, who were

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 5>some of the additions that are that are coming in

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 5>because of Elliot and has Elliott the schools, the size

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 5>of the state.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 11>As I've seen now, I have not seen a actual

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 11>size of what the steak is. Some of these the

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 11>board directors, they were former CEOs at den Supply so

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 11>some medtech companies. They were also previously at Beckman, Dickinson

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 11>other ones. They are able to come in with more

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 11>of an operational background and so being able to drive

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 11>kind of that efficiency, to be able to create the savings,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 11>to be able to invest into their R and D programs.

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Right for the folks in front of the terminal with

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>tickers M D T. Then you type in the A

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>n R function, get the analyst rating. Street doesn't know

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 2>what to do with this stuff. Seventeen buy, sixteen holds

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>in one sell. What's what's the confusion out there about

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 2>this name?

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 11>Then everybody needs medicals, everyone needs medical devices. Metronic has

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 11>invested a lot of money into these home run type products,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 11>polse field ablation, renal de innervation. All these products are

0:23:55.920 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 11>trying to disrupt a current market. Either if it's atual fibrillation, hypertension,

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 11>if you get if you hit a home run like

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 11>you're doing with pulsteril ablation, it is going to drive

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 11>us pulse field ablation. It's basically a way to ablate

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 11>an area that's being affected by autral fibrillation without using

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 11>heat or without freezing, so that prevents kind of the

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 11>damage to the tissue. If you hit home runs like that,

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 11>you're gonna have key growth drivers. Other products like renal

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 11>deinnervation is taking longer for that growth to develop. So analysts,

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 11>including myself, see all these products in the pipeline get

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 11>very excited about the potential for that growth to accelerate.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 3>From let's say the four to five percent.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 11>They're currently at to six percent, and then we're just

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 11>still waiting for that execution of those commercialization of the.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 3>Products to get to that higher growth.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 11>Some analysts, as you see in the A and R,

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 11>they are more bullish on when that will come up.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 11>Others are starting to say, wait a minute, We've seen

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 11>this story before, and so they are waiting. It's a

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 11>wait and see story for those analysts.

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 5>I noticed when we talk with tariffs, they scaled back

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 5>the impact of TERRAFF, so they lifted their full year guidance.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Are you seeing that more from other companies in this space?

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 11>Yes, I would say the majority of the companies that

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 11>reported so far. Metronic always reports because their July fiscal

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 11>quarter end. All the companies that reported their June fiscal

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 11>end had a similar thing where they cut it by

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 11>roughly half of what they had predicted in the first quarter.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Matt henrickson Bloomberg Intelligence, senior metech allist.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Coming up, we'll look at sustainable aviation fuel and how

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 5>it's breaking records. From twenty twenty four.

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies in one

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 5>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go on the terminal.

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm Lisa Matteo and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:25:55.400 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence with Paul Sweeney on bloom Radio.

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 5>I'm Poul Swiney and I'm Lisa Mateo filling in on

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Intelligence. We move next to news in the drug

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 5>and pharmaceutical space. This week, the Danish drug maker Novo

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 5>Nordis announced it's slashing the cost of ozempic for cash

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 5>paying patients.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 2>The company said patients can now get ozempic for four

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ninety nine dollars a month, that's about half

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 2>of its US list price through Novo's cash pay pharmacy

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Novo Care.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 5>Nova is also partnering with the healthcare company Gutarex to

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 5>offer ozempic for the same price as pharmacies across the US.

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 5>And this all comes after Novo's weightlaws drug we go

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 5>Vy received FDA approval to treat a serious form of

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 5>liver disease.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 2>For more, Lisa and I were joined by Madison Muller

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Health reporter, We first asked Madison for her take

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 2>on Nova's recent breakthrough with wegov.

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 12>Nova artists got approval for regov, which is its weight

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 12>loss drug to treat a liver disease called MASH.

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 13>And this sort of is a we've seen over the

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 13>last couple of years.

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 12>So many studies come out to show the potential health

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 12>benefits of these weight laws drugs beyond just you know,

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 12>the producing the number on the scale. And we knew

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 12>from studies that there was some benefit to the liver

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 12>from taking these drugs, and so Nova was able to

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 12>notch and approval for that, which helps one with insurance coverage.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 12>Wigov and then Eli Lilly's drug zet Bound are still

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 12>not super widely covered by insurance companies for weight loss,

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 12>but having some of these other health benefits shown and

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 12>proven in studies helps them convince ensures that they are

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 12>worth covering, and so this gives them an edge against Lily.

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 12>Lily's drug, Zetbound is not approved yet for this indication,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 12>and so it gives them sort of a leg up there,

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 12>and then it also gets I mean, it sort of

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:47.400
<v Speaker 12>is another benefit for Novo because they've been struggling over

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 12>the last year, just with zet Bound sort of making

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 12>waves in the market and taking market share from Wigov.

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 13>This gives them a leg up there as well.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 12>And just with the tumultuousness of the last few weeks

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 12>they had a CEO ouster and a few other moving pieces.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 12>So this is good news for them and we'll we'll

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 12>see well, but it will maybe help them gain back

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 12>some market share.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 2>One of the issues for these weight loss drugs is

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the cost, and if you're not covered by insurance, they

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 2>really are expensive. So by slashing the cost of a

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 2>zempic in half, does a company believe that's going to

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 2>open up a big new vein of new customers.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 10>Maybe.

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 12>So it's interesting because if patients are on ozempic, they

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 12>are usually on it. It's you know, type two diabetes

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 12>treatment and usually that's covered by insurance diabetes.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>But does it have a side benefit I guess, of

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 2>weight loss?

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 13>Yes?

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 12>So, I mean there are two different drugs, right, There's ozembic,

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 12>which is the diabetes drug Wigov. They both use the

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 12>exact same active ingredient, which is semiglue tide.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 13>Wigov is a higher dose version.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 12>If you're on ozempic, it's lower doses, so it's not

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 12>quite as strong, but there is that weight loss side

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 12>effect on both drugs.

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 13>Previously, Novo actually.

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 12>Did cut the cost of wigo V down to about

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 12>the same price five hundred dollars a month back in March,

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 12>and now they are doing the same for ozempic. But

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 12>it's interesting because the question of whether or not this

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 12>is going to expand access for more patients sort of

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 12>remains to be seen, because again, if you have ozempic,

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 12>you usually are covered by insurance for it.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 5>Now something I also said, there are partnering in this article,

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 5>it's said with good Rx to offer ozempic we go

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 5>before the same price as pharmacies. But didn't Novo try

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 5>the partnership thing with Hymns and hers and that didn't

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 5>work out so well.

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, yeah, So Hyms was one of several partners that

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 12>Novo has sort of worked with over the last couple

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 12>of months again to really make waves and get into

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 12>this market or gain back market share because it's really

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 12>lost ground to Eli Lilly. Hyms was one of the

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 12>companies that they've partnered with. They've partnered with a couple

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 12>of other telehealth companies as well as CVS to make

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 12>this cash pay price more widely available. But this is

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 12>the first time that they're dropping the price of ozempic

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 12>as well. So this partnership with good Rx, you know,

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 12>any patient is essentially a coupon, like any patient who

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 12>goes to a pharmacy uses good rx is going to

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 12>be able to get this cash pay price for ozempic.

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 2>And Wigov mentioned that the hymns and hers those compound drugs,

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 2>how effective are they vis a v the golp ones

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 2>them themselves, because that would be a if I were

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 2>like Novo Nordics, I spent all this money to develop,

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 2>but that would be a bummup recease.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 12>Yes, and that's a really good question actually, that question

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 12>of how effective are these drugs, because that's the problem

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 12>is we don't know. There are studies that drug makers

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 12>are required to do. They have to go through a

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 12>length the FDA approval process to prove that their medications

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 12>are safe and effective. Compounded drugs don't go through that

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 12>same approval process, so there's no actual studies showing how

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 12>effective those medications are. And it's a little bit of

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 12>a gamble. I mean, we've seen patients losing weight on

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 12>these compounded medications, and we haven't seen a tremendous amount

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 12>of side effects that are really different from the branded medications.

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 12>So the problem is just more that we don't actually

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 12>have a lot of visibility into that compounded market and

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 12>don't know how those drugs stack up to the branded medications.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 5>Where does this all put Eli Lilly then, I mean,

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 5>they already had the setback with the weight loss pill,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 5>so now we're hearing all this about Nova. Where does

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 5>this put them?

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 13>Yeah?

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean it's been it's interesting, like the two companies.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 12>I think last year it was just they were so

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 12>red hot and there was like nothing that expectations were

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 12>sky high. There was really nothing that seemingly could bring

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 12>them down. But now we're seeing a couple of stumbles

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 12>and I think that that, you know, shows again how

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 12>high the expectations are for this market.

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 13>There's just no room for failure. But we'll see what

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 13>happens next to Lily.

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 2>When is the pill going to be available day year?

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 12>Sometime twenty twenty six, So they said that they're planning

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 12>to file for FDA approval by the end of the

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 12>year and then hopefully launch next year.

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 5>Our thanks to Madison Mueller Bloomberg Health Reporter.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg and EF

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 2>previously known as New Energy Finance.

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 5>They're the DM at Bloomberg that tracks and analyzes the

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 5>energy transition from commodities to power transport industries. This week

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 5>we took a look at sustainable aviation fuel and how

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 5>it's breaking records from twenty twenty four.

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>For more, Lisa and I were joined by Anna Davies BNF,

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 2>head of Renewable Fuels.

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 5>We first asked Anna to explain the reason behind the

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 5>record breaking use of sustainable aviation fuel.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 4>There has been an influx in attention and growth in

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 4>the sustainable aviation fuel market. And this is basically a

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 4>market to produce a jet fuel molecule but not use

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 4>fossil fuels, so usually they use biofuels instead of fossil fuels.

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 4>So something like used cooking oil out of a fryer.

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 4>You can clean it, purify it, upgrade it, and then

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 4>you can make a hydrocarbon molecule like jet fuel from

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 4>that oil. And it's a way to decarbonize a sector

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 4>like aviation, which another if you don't have these fuels,

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 4>it's very hard to decarbonize because there's no real alternative

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 4>to jet fuel, and jet fuel is so carbon emissions.

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 2>How efficient is this jet fuel? This renewable jet fuel,

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>so it.

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Is almost identical to fossil jet fuel. So in terms

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 4>of it works the same way you burn it in

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 4>an aircraft engine. It releases CO two like fossil jet

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 4>fuel does. But the main thing is that it's from

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 4>a plant or some other renewable source, and so if

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 4>you think of agriculture, they absorb carbon dioxide for a photosynthesis,

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 4>and so therefore you can think of it as sort

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 4>of a net CO two neutralish technology because it at

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 4>least absorbs some CO two in the growing of the fuels.

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 5>So are there any challenges with renewable jet fuel.

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of challenges, and the main challenge. The

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 4>main challenge is cost. It's very costly. So the cheapest

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 4>way to make these fuels is kind of what I've

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 4>been describing. You take an oil like use cooking oil.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 4>That alone is at least two to four times the

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 4>cost of fossil jet fuel. And that one is tough

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 4>because there's only so much used cooking oil out there.

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 4>You can use other oils like soybean oil, but that

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 4>has fewer emission benefits associated with it because then you're

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 4>growing soybeans to cultivate for their oil, so you have

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 4>land issues, you have you know, all the pesticides and

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 4>fertilizers and emissions that come from agriculture with that.

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Who makes this stuff?

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 4>It is mostly the oil refineries these days. Because they

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 4>can utilize existing oil refineries and upgrade them to handle

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 4>a biooil similar to a fossil oil, the process for

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 4>making it becomes quite similar. So your largest producers there

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 4>are things like Neste or here in the US, Phillip

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 4>sixty six and Valero have some pretty big operations.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Now, you talked about twenty twenty five numbers, so how

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 5>do you compare that to twenty twenty four Like it

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 5>was a significant, significant jump.

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so this was a really big well, twenty twenty

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 4>five numbers so far is on track to double twenty

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 4>twenty four numbers of production of this fuel in the US.

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Twenty twenty four was a quadrupling of twenty twenty three volumes,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 4>So these are really growing at a quick rate. That

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 4>set is growing for a very small number. So even

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 4>with this quadrupling and doubling, we're still at less than

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 4>half of one percent of all US fossil jet fuel

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 4>or less of all US fuel.

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>So it seems to me this is probably one of

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>those supplying demand situations. I need demand to ramp up

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 2>production to bring down the unit costs here, So what

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 2>are the are the airlines committed to taking this fuel?

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 4>This is definitely a chicken and egg scenario. The airlines

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 4>have targets in place. A lot of them want to

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 4>have ten percent of their fuel being sustainable aviation fuel

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 4>by twenty thirty, But these are just targets. There's no

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 4>real ramifications if they don't meet it. Some countries like

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 4>the EU and UK are setting very strict mandates. So

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 4>both of those regions have two percent mandates for saff

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.399
<v Speaker 4>use in twenty twenty five, and that increases over time

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 4>and there are penalties associated with it if they don't

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 4>meet that. Here in the US, we're definitely taking the

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 4>incentive approach by offering tax incentives or other policy incentives

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 4>to try and encourage production. There's no strict target.

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 5>Now, what about looking longer term? Is the outlook for

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 5>this as as it's been on this trajectory you're saying,

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:03.760
<v Speaker 5>but does it can it continue.

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 4>This, So that is a really good question. The countries

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 4>like the EU and UK have very ambitious targets. The

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 4>EU wants to see seventy percent of all jet fuel

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 4>be made from sustainable aviation fuel by twenty fifty. We

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 4>have benf think that that's going to be very hard

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 4>to achieve. Just to produce that quantity of these fuels,

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 4>where would you get the feedstock from?

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 10>What?

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Who would shoulder the cost of that? So we anticipate

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 4>it will probably be closer to the ten percent by

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifty twenty thirties. Another time, there's a lot of targets.

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 4>Like I said, airlines have ten percent by twenty thirty.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 4>We don't think that will be achieved either, just because

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 4>a lot of projects have been delayed or canceled in

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 4>recent years, especially as interest rates are high, policies have

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 4>been changing. There's a lot of uncertainty, especially here in

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 4>the US where a lot of these facilities are being planned.

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 4>So there's been a lot of slow down and delay

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 4>in this industry. And the twenty thirty might be a

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 4>time where we see really ambitious targets and not enough supply.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 8>To meet it.

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 2>We reticent to asked this question, but how has this

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 2>current administration impacted the adoption of a.

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 4>These aviation fuels. Yes, you can't talk about aviation feel

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 4>without talking about policy. This current administration, aviation feel is

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 4>something that they've permitted. They've allowed policies. There was a

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 4>tax incentive and the Inflation Reduction Act to continue. They've

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 4>done a few tweaks though that really changed the game

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 4>for the industry. The first is that they are really

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 4>promoting domestic production ahead of decarbonization, so things like US

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 4>crops now fare better relatively than say imported use cooking oil,

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 4>the other challenges. They've sort of shifted the incentives a bit,

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 4>so now it's a lot cheaper to produce the counterpart,

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 4>which is road field renewable diesel for trucking, than it

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 4>is for stable aviation field. They're produced in the same method.

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 4>It's a taed costlier to make jet fuel over diesel,

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 4>just by the mechanics of how to produce. So the

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Inflation Reduction Act offered more of a tax credit for

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 4>jet fuel, making the economics kind of more on par.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 4>They've sort of reduced that leg up, so we expect

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 4>more diesel less jet fuel in the coming years.

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Anna Davies BNEF, head of Renewable Fuels.

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 2>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.840
<v Speaker 5>And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi Go

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 5>on the terminal.

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lisa Matteo and I'm Paul Sweeney. Stay with us.

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Today's top stories and global business headlines are coming up

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 2>right now