1 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:06,040 Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio. 2 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:13,640 Speaker 2: Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind listener Mail. 3 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:15,400 Speaker 2: My name is Robert Lamb. 4 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:19,120 Speaker 3: And I am Joe McCormick. And on listener Mail episodes, 5 00:00:19,160 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 3: we read back some of the messages that you have 6 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:24,400 Speaker 3: sent into the Stuff to Blow your Mind email address. 7 00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:26,960 Speaker 3: If you've never gotten in touch before and you would 8 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,240 Speaker 3: like to, why not give it a try this week? 9 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:32,479 Speaker 3: You can write us at contact at stuff to Blow 10 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 3: your Mind dot com. We appreciate messages of all types, 11 00:00:36,200 --> 00:00:38,760 Speaker 3: especially if you have something to add to a topic 12 00:00:38,800 --> 00:00:41,680 Speaker 3: we've recently talked about on the show. If you have 13 00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:44,920 Speaker 3: just something interesting you want to share with us, whether 14 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,879 Speaker 3: even if it's totally random, that's always fine. If you 15 00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:51,320 Speaker 3: have corrections, if you have comments, if you have questions, 16 00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:53,840 Speaker 3: if you want to suggest a topic for the future, 17 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:57,000 Speaker 3: or suggest a movie for Weird House Cinema, whatever it is, 18 00:00:57,120 --> 00:01:00,080 Speaker 3: send it our way contact at stuff to Blow your 19 00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:03,080 Speaker 3: dot com. And if you write in, there is a 20 00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 3: chance that your message may be featured on a future 21 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:07,440 Speaker 3: listener Mail episode like this one. 22 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:09,639 Speaker 2: That's right, We read all of it. We don't always 23 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:12,200 Speaker 2: have time to respond directly to it and not everything 24 00:01:12,360 --> 00:01:16,479 Speaker 2: gets onto the podcast, obviously, but we will read anything 25 00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:17,039 Speaker 2: you said us. 26 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:21,199 Speaker 3: A very weird house heavy batch this time, which is fine, 27 00:01:21,280 --> 00:01:24,919 Speaker 3: so be it. But I think first maybe we should 28 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,679 Speaker 3: get into some responses to our episodes of Star Trek Week. 29 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,560 Speaker 2: That's right, We're just coming off of Star Trek Week, 30 00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:34,840 Speaker 2: the first Star Trek Week celebrated here on stuff to 31 00:01:34,840 --> 00:01:38,039 Speaker 2: blow your mind. But if folks loved it, we'll come 32 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:39,119 Speaker 2: back and do it again next year. 33 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 3: All right, rob do you mind if I do this 34 00:01:41,240 --> 00:01:42,319 Speaker 3: one from Elena? 35 00:01:42,680 --> 00:01:46,600 Speaker 2: Yes, Elena, that you do mind? Well, I do mind, 36 00:01:46,600 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 2: but I'm swallowing my feelings on this one. 37 00:01:51,200 --> 00:02:01,600 Speaker 3: Right, Okay, This is from Elena. Subject line Turkish Star Trek. Hello, 38 00:02:01,720 --> 00:02:04,600 Speaker 3: Robert and Joe. I just listened to the episode about 39 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 3: the Star Trek Salt Monster, one of the most memorable 40 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 3: monster designs in the show in my opinion, and the 41 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:15,600 Speaker 3: creepy moths. This is referencing the first of two core 42 00:02:15,639 --> 00:02:18,440 Speaker 3: episodes we did during Star Trek Week, where we talked 43 00:02:18,440 --> 00:02:21,520 Speaker 3: about the first ever episode of Star Trek, the first 44 00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:24,959 Speaker 3: one ever on TV called The Man Trap, which was 45 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:28,120 Speaker 3: about a salt vampire, a shape shifting creature that sucked 46 00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:31,359 Speaker 3: the salt out of your body through with like suckers 47 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,000 Speaker 3: that attached to the face, and that, of course led 48 00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:37,680 Speaker 3: us to a biology conversation about moths that in various 49 00:02:37,720 --> 00:02:41,160 Speaker 3: ways will parasitize you for salt, will suck salt from 50 00:02:41,200 --> 00:02:44,560 Speaker 3: your tears or even from your blood. So Elena goes 51 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:47,919 Speaker 3: on to say it immediately reminded me of oh Mayer 52 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:52,359 Speaker 3: the Tourist in Star Trek, a nineteen seventy three Turkish film. 53 00:02:52,720 --> 00:02:56,160 Speaker 3: It's a parody movie that takes major plot inspiration from 54 00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:59,400 Speaker 3: the Man Trap episode years ago. I managed to watch 55 00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:02,040 Speaker 3: it with English subtitles and it was a fun experience. 56 00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 3: I also recall scenes borrowed from other notable episodes, like 57 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 3: a fight scene between Kirk and what was supposed to 58 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:12,919 Speaker 3: be the Gorn Rob. I dug up some screenshots from 59 00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:16,160 Speaker 3: Omer the Tourist in Star Trek. I attached them in 60 00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:19,520 Speaker 3: the outline for you to see. Here, we have a 61 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:22,240 Speaker 3: I think this is supposed to be Spock in a 62 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:25,200 Speaker 3: yellow shirt, but he does have the pointy years in 63 00:03:25,360 --> 00:03:28,040 Speaker 3: Spock's hair, so I think that's him. We got some 64 00:03:28,320 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 3: like muscly shirtless guy in a speedo. I don't know 65 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 3: what that's supposed to be. The poster appears to have 66 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:35,720 Speaker 3: Godzilla on it. I don't know if that's a mashup 67 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:36,960 Speaker 3: of Godzilla and Gorn. 68 00:03:37,360 --> 00:03:39,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, some sort of fire breathing reptile. 69 00:03:40,040 --> 00:03:42,640 Speaker 3: And also some characters standing around in what might be 70 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:48,400 Speaker 3: Roman ruins that they're using as a set here. Yeah, yeah, 71 00:03:48,440 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 3: that's an interesting choice. But also having some Star Trek 72 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,480 Speaker 3: uniforms in colors that I don't remember from the show, 73 00:03:54,560 --> 00:03:56,320 Speaker 3: like we've got a you know, you've got your red 74 00:03:56,360 --> 00:03:58,840 Speaker 3: shirts and you've got your yellow shirts. Here we have 75 00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 3: a brown shirt and then kind of a teal green skirt. 76 00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:06,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, this looks interesting. I have to 77 00:04:06,240 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 2: admit this one was not on my radar. I'm familiar 78 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 2: by reputation with like Turkish Star Wars and some other 79 00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:19,839 Speaker 2: b cinema examples from Turkish film, and there are a 80 00:04:19,839 --> 00:04:24,440 Speaker 2: few Turkish movies that are still on the list for 81 00:04:24,520 --> 00:04:27,159 Speaker 2: Weird House Cinema. Oh yeah, but we haven't really gotten 82 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:29,479 Speaker 2: around to them just yet. We'll have to remedy that 83 00:04:29,560 --> 00:04:30,320 Speaker 2: in the months ahead. 84 00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:33,680 Speaker 3: Elena says. Since it was released before Star Trek the 85 00:04:33,720 --> 00:04:37,680 Speaker 3: Motion Picture, it's technically the first movie set in the 86 00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:41,560 Speaker 3: Star Trek universe. Amazing. This is probably too strange even 87 00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:45,039 Speaker 3: for weird house cinema. Oh, Elena, you should listen this Friday, 88 00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:47,719 Speaker 3: by the way, but I wanted to share this oddity 89 00:04:47,920 --> 00:04:50,440 Speaker 3: from Turkish cinema anyway, Elena. 90 00:04:50,680 --> 00:04:53,159 Speaker 2: This is exactly the sort of weird house cinema listener 91 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:56,039 Speaker 2: mail I like to receive. Yeah, clue me in about 92 00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:59,279 Speaker 2: something weird out there that was totally not on my radar. 93 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:01,040 Speaker 3: Exactly. Thank you so much. 94 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:04,800 Speaker 2: All right. We also heard from Jared Jared Wrightson and 95 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:07,320 Speaker 2: says thank you for Star Trek week. Listening to the 96 00:05:07,360 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 2: episodes really brought back memories of sitting around the TV 97 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:12,680 Speaker 2: watching Star Trek with my dad, both the original series 98 00:05:12,839 --> 00:05:15,839 Speaker 2: and the next generation. Sadly, he passed away due to 99 00:05:15,839 --> 00:05:18,560 Speaker 2: complications of COVID in twenty twenty, but this week's episode 100 00:05:18,600 --> 00:05:21,479 Speaker 2: brought back some great memories of him. My dad was 101 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:24,479 Speaker 2: a diehard Trekie, so much so that I did not 102 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:27,039 Speaker 2: watch a Star Wars movie until I was an adult, 103 00:05:27,120 --> 00:05:29,920 Speaker 2: as it was considered not as good in our house. 104 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:33,280 Speaker 2: I think his love for Star Trek was influenced by 105 00:05:33,279 --> 00:05:36,480 Speaker 2: his love of other non sci fi shows such as 106 00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:40,360 Speaker 2: westerns and cereals. Such as Bonanza and gun Smoke. Something 107 00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:43,080 Speaker 2: about the portrayal of flawed characters coming together to do 108 00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:45,680 Speaker 2: what was right struck a chord with him and for me, 109 00:05:45,880 --> 00:05:48,520 Speaker 2: really formed a perspective on life that I did not 110 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:52,440 Speaker 2: fully recognize until adulthood. As an adult, I have learned 111 00:05:52,480 --> 00:05:55,520 Speaker 2: what a cultural stepping stone Star Trek truly was, and 112 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:58,480 Speaker 2: knowing when and where my father grew up in rural Appalachia, 113 00:05:58,839 --> 00:06:01,760 Speaker 2: watching shows like Star Trek would have been considered progressive 114 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:04,799 Speaker 2: for the time and place, with different ethnicities being portrayed 115 00:06:04,839 --> 00:06:07,839 Speaker 2: and given rank and importance on the crew. Star Trek's 116 00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:10,240 Speaker 2: decision to step in that direction help the generation of 117 00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 2: TV watchers become more accepting of others, even if they 118 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:16,960 Speaker 2: were aliens. Thanks again, Live Long and prosper Jared. 119 00:06:16,960 --> 00:06:19,520 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think this is a common reception experience that 120 00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:22,280 Speaker 3: the people report, even outside of not just being in 121 00:06:22,360 --> 00:06:23,920 Speaker 3: rural Appalachia, I mean all over. 122 00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:27,960 Speaker 2: I think, yeah, absolutely. And also the connection to Westerns 123 00:06:27,800 --> 00:06:30,280 Speaker 2: is definitely worth noting as well. I don't know how 124 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:34,400 Speaker 2: much we stress that in our episodes during Star Trek Week, 125 00:06:34,480 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 2: but Star Trek does come out of the world of 126 00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:40,160 Speaker 2: TV Westerns in many respects. I mean a lot of 127 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:43,560 Speaker 2: the players, of course, were in westerns. Many of the 128 00:06:43,640 --> 00:06:46,680 Speaker 2: Riders had worked in westerns, and a good bit of 129 00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:49,160 Speaker 2: that Western DNA as president in the show. 130 00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:51,520 Speaker 3: I think you can say that about Star Wars as well. 131 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:55,240 Speaker 3: I mean, yeah, yeah, some ways, it's got some gunslinger 132 00:06:55,279 --> 00:06:56,039 Speaker 3: stuff in there. 133 00:06:56,240 --> 00:07:00,240 Speaker 2: I mean, really, the TV and film westerns cap a 134 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:02,960 Speaker 2: huge shadow. I mean, you hear folks like John Carpenter 135 00:07:03,000 --> 00:07:05,040 Speaker 2: for instance, Yeah, you know, very few of his films 136 00:07:05,080 --> 00:07:07,560 Speaker 2: are one hundred percent Westerns. I think he has like 137 00:07:07,920 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 2: what one full blown Western in the filmography, but he 138 00:07:12,160 --> 00:07:17,040 Speaker 2: credits Westerns like across his filmography for being a heavy 139 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 2: influence on at least the sort of the form and 140 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:20,800 Speaker 2: function of the pictures. 141 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:22,920 Speaker 3: That's right. I think for a lot of the directors 142 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:27,680 Speaker 3: working in roughly that generation growing up with Westerns, it 143 00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 3: was just it was an influence on all of them, 144 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:32,400 Speaker 3: even if it wasn't totally their thing. So it's kind 145 00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 3: of like, even if you're not a diehard Star Wars 146 00:07:35,120 --> 00:07:38,560 Speaker 3: or Star Trek fan, you know, most people making films 147 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:41,920 Speaker 3: coming up nowadays have some of that influence on their childhood, 148 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:45,280 Speaker 3: right right, all right. This next message is from Bert 149 00:07:50,520 --> 00:07:53,160 Speaker 3: Bert says, Hey, Robert and Joe love the show. It 150 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 3: keeps the long drives between job sites interesting. If you 151 00:07:56,840 --> 00:07:59,200 Speaker 3: think I have some worthwhile thoughts here, I'd be honored 152 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:01,760 Speaker 3: if you include it in one of your listener mail episodes. 153 00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:06,080 Speaker 3: I was listening to the Transporters and Consciousness Star Trek 154 00:08:06,080 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 3: episode and I thought that the swamp Man thought experiment 155 00:08:10,000 --> 00:08:13,080 Speaker 3: was interesting but flawed. A quick refresher. This is the 156 00:08:13,480 --> 00:08:18,520 Speaker 3: thought experiment by the philosopher Donald Davidson, which was saying, Okay, 157 00:08:18,560 --> 00:08:20,720 Speaker 3: imagine I go out walking in a swamp. I get 158 00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:24,559 Speaker 3: struck by lightning. My body is completely obliterated, there's nothing left, 159 00:08:24,760 --> 00:08:28,120 Speaker 3: and just by coincidence, a tree nearby is also struck 160 00:08:28,120 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 3: by lightning, and it gets turned into an exact atom 161 00:08:31,560 --> 00:08:34,600 Speaker 3: for Adam replica of my body, and it can go 162 00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:37,640 Speaker 3: about my business and do everything I do. It acts 163 00:08:37,679 --> 00:08:41,000 Speaker 3: exactly as I would in every scenario. It's a perfect 164 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:44,679 Speaker 3: copy of me. But Davidson's argument was, despite the fact 165 00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:47,520 Speaker 3: that swamp man is a perfect copy of me and 166 00:08:47,640 --> 00:08:50,720 Speaker 3: can behave exactly as I would, it actually does not 167 00:08:50,920 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 3: have thoughts and the signifiers of its mental activity that 168 00:08:55,360 --> 00:08:58,199 Speaker 3: it thinks, you know when it thinks about a dog. 169 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:01,439 Speaker 3: This is not really about adult because it has never 170 00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:05,120 Speaker 3: met a dog. So it was interrogating the idea of 171 00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 3: what the aboutness of our thoughts really is. So Bert's 172 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:13,640 Speaker 3: response continues, the Swampman copy might never have experienced a 173 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:17,600 Speaker 3: dog or the original version's friend John, but it has 174 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:20,600 Speaker 3: all of the memories from the original. It has the 175 00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 3: memories of the experience, the memories of interactions with other minds, 176 00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:27,600 Speaker 3: the memories of petting the dog. It has the knowledge 177 00:09:27,640 --> 00:09:31,120 Speaker 3: and the feeling of what the experiences were like. Without 178 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:33,680 Speaker 3: that knowledge, it would not have the image or concept 179 00:09:33,720 --> 00:09:36,440 Speaker 3: of what a dog or a friend is. So the 180 00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:40,800 Speaker 3: recreated Swampman or Spock or McCoy is created a thinking 181 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:43,640 Speaker 3: being with the full knowledge and experience of what the 182 00:09:43,679 --> 00:09:47,440 Speaker 3: original new and experienced. Yeah, Bert, I think this is 183 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:49,319 Speaker 3: a common response, and this is what a lot of 184 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 3: Davidson's critics would argue. And this is sort of along 185 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:54,640 Speaker 3: the lines of what Daniel Dinnett was arguing in response 186 00:09:54,679 --> 00:09:57,959 Speaker 3: to the idea. But Bert goes on to say, there 187 00:09:58,040 --> 00:10:01,280 Speaker 3: is a second flaw. If this Sampman did not have 188 00:10:01,400 --> 00:10:03,920 Speaker 3: the connections to understand what a dog or a friend 189 00:10:04,040 --> 00:10:05,959 Speaker 3: or a coffee cup is then he would not be 190 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:09,560 Speaker 3: able to speak intelligently. He might call a dog a rocket, 191 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:13,200 Speaker 3: or a friend a dandelion, but it's extremely unlikely he 192 00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 3: could formulate a legible sentence. I think Davidson and Dinnett 193 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:20,480 Speaker 3: we're both off the mark on this one. Both Davidson, 194 00:10:20,600 --> 00:10:23,720 Speaker 3: Swampman and Dinnet's objections to it are much more applicable 195 00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:27,559 Speaker 3: to large language model ais. An AI can be programmed 196 00:10:27,559 --> 00:10:31,680 Speaker 3: with definitions and with photos describing to it what things are, 197 00:10:32,360 --> 00:10:37,640 Speaker 3: but it will have no actual experience, not even secondhand experience. 198 00:10:37,920 --> 00:10:41,800 Speaker 3: It can know, but until it actually has the experience, 199 00:10:42,040 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 3: it cannot truly understand. But as Dinnet points out, if 200 00:10:46,040 --> 00:10:48,200 Speaker 3: it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and 201 00:10:48,240 --> 00:10:50,880 Speaker 3: looks like a duck, most people would say it's a duck, 202 00:10:51,360 --> 00:10:55,200 Speaker 3: which changes the question from is an AI thinking before 203 00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:59,439 Speaker 3: it experiences? To are there any differences between what an 204 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 3: aides before it experiences and what it does after? It 205 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:07,800 Speaker 3: also adds the question if there are, do the differences matter? 206 00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 3: That's probably more than long enough for one email. Hope 207 00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:12,680 Speaker 3: you found it interesting, bert. 208 00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 2: Oh, Yes, absolutely, thanks for writing in Bertie. We touched 209 00:11:17,200 --> 00:11:21,560 Speaker 2: on how this philosophical discussion may or may not apply 210 00:11:21,640 --> 00:11:24,400 Speaker 2: to AI a little bit in the episode, but you know, clearly, 211 00:11:24,440 --> 00:11:27,720 Speaker 2: as you point out here, you can really go into 212 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:29,240 Speaker 2: the deep end on this one as well. 213 00:11:29,559 --> 00:11:34,360 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think this is actually a very good question. Clearly, 214 00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:40,720 Speaker 3: we learn from experience, and is there some quality, some 215 00:11:40,880 --> 00:11:45,080 Speaker 3: important quality to the nature of our experience which enables 216 00:11:45,160 --> 00:11:48,920 Speaker 3: us to learn and understand which cannot really be achieved 217 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:54,640 Speaker 3: by feeding a machine like discrete, separate little images that 218 00:11:54,679 --> 00:11:57,280 Speaker 3: are not actually part of a continuous experience like we 219 00:11:57,360 --> 00:12:02,000 Speaker 3: believe we have so like our experience of seeing and 220 00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:05,120 Speaker 3: interacting with dogs throughout our life, is there something actually 221 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:10,199 Speaker 3: importantly different about that than just like having a large 222 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:13,760 Speaker 3: language model associate the word dog and other words in 223 00:12:13,800 --> 00:12:16,679 Speaker 3: a cloud around the word dog with lots, you know, 224 00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:20,600 Speaker 3: millions of different pictures of dogs. Is there actually something 225 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:23,960 Speaker 3: importantly different there in those two different kinds of learning. 226 00:12:25,000 --> 00:12:27,040 Speaker 3: I don't know exactly what it would be, but it 227 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:30,640 Speaker 3: strikes me as totally plausible that there's something important missing 228 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:33,760 Speaker 3: that contributes to what we mean when we say understanding 229 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:38,080 Speaker 3: that's missing from the training model of these AIS, but 230 00:12:38,200 --> 00:12:41,280 Speaker 3: is present in the human beings experience of the world. 231 00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:44,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, I mean we have skin in the game, 232 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:50,000 Speaker 2: and there are different ways to interpret how that applies. 233 00:12:55,760 --> 00:12:57,520 Speaker 2: All right, up, next we go. We got a very 234 00:12:57,600 --> 00:13:01,199 Speaker 2: nice email from Alec, who writes in and says, Hi, 235 00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:04,040 Speaker 2: Robert Joe at all. My name is Olt. I'm a 236 00:13:04,080 --> 00:13:07,680 Speaker 2: grad student at U Chicago studying the evolution and mechanics 237 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:11,200 Speaker 2: of the mammal middle ear. I am defending later this 238 00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:13,640 Speaker 2: fall and have been doing a lot of reflecting on 239 00:13:13,679 --> 00:13:16,040 Speaker 2: the things that have kept my love of science alive, 240 00:13:16,160 --> 00:13:19,960 Speaker 2: and thus wanted to extend my deep gratitude for your show. 241 00:13:20,160 --> 00:13:22,160 Speaker 2: I have been listening since I was an undergrad, and 242 00:13:22,200 --> 00:13:25,240 Speaker 2: your topics and the way you approach your topics, particularly 243 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:28,760 Speaker 2: your deep dives into how fictional organisms would function based 244 00:13:28,760 --> 00:13:32,520 Speaker 2: on real biology, have always kept my basic curiosity and 245 00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:36,520 Speaker 2: need to learn alive, even against grad school burnout. I 246 00:13:36,559 --> 00:13:39,199 Speaker 2: don't think it is an exaggeration to say the stuff 247 00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:41,360 Speaker 2: to Blow your mind podcast has played a pivotal role 248 00:13:41,400 --> 00:13:44,040 Speaker 2: in my development as a scientist. Thank you for the 249 00:13:44,040 --> 00:13:47,360 Speaker 2: great work you do. Cheers Alec. At ps. Have you 250 00:13:47,400 --> 00:13:51,240 Speaker 2: considered an episode on why elves, vulcans, etc. Have powenty 251 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:54,920 Speaker 2: years from the folklore perspective. Where does that originate from 252 00:13:54,960 --> 00:13:58,040 Speaker 2: a biological perspective? What's the adaptive significance? 253 00:13:58,559 --> 00:14:00,840 Speaker 3: Great questions? Has this come up on the show before? 254 00:14:01,120 --> 00:14:02,559 Speaker 3: I would be surprised if it hadn't. 255 00:14:03,360 --> 00:14:06,760 Speaker 2: I was actually researching this a little bit prior to 256 00:14:06,760 --> 00:14:09,160 Speaker 2: Star Trek week because I was considering it as a topic. 257 00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:12,559 Speaker 2: So may come back to this sooner rather than later. 258 00:14:13,679 --> 00:14:16,120 Speaker 3: But also, Alex, thank you so much for the message. 259 00:14:16,160 --> 00:14:20,040 Speaker 3: This kind of stuff, it feels so nice, warms my heart. It. Yeah, 260 00:14:20,280 --> 00:14:22,480 Speaker 3: it really really does mean a lot to hear things 261 00:14:22,520 --> 00:14:25,720 Speaker 3: like this, So thank you so much, and best of 262 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:37,600 Speaker 3: luck with your thesis or dissertation defense. All right, this 263 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:40,520 Speaker 3: next message, let's do some of the responses to our 264 00:14:40,560 --> 00:14:45,960 Speaker 3: Saint Swithin episode. This one comes from Francois subject line 265 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:50,600 Speaker 3: about Saint Swithin's revenge and apologies in advance. I'm gonna 266 00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:53,640 Speaker 3: have to read some French in this one. My pronunciation, 267 00:14:53,720 --> 00:14:55,640 Speaker 3: I'm sure is going to be abysmal, but I'll do 268 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:59,200 Speaker 3: my best, Francois says, Dear Robert and Joe, I just 269 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:02,040 Speaker 3: listened to your podcas cast about Saint Swithin, and when 270 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:05,280 Speaker 3: you read the saying Saint Swithin's day. If thou dost 271 00:15:05,360 --> 00:15:08,960 Speaker 3: reign for forty days, it will remain Saint Swithin's day. 272 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:11,840 Speaker 3: If thou be fair for forty days, twill reign ne 273 00:15:12,040 --> 00:15:17,280 Speaker 3: mere and Francois says, I thought, oh, it is an 274 00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:22,600 Speaker 3: Irish Saint Medard. Imagine my delight when you referenced our 275 00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 3: Saint Medard. This is easily the second most used meteorological 276 00:15:26,600 --> 00:15:29,880 Speaker 3: saying in France. However, the version you used is different 277 00:15:29,920 --> 00:15:32,160 Speaker 3: from the one I know, and because I heard it 278 00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:36,640 Speaker 3: multiple times on TV, it is the official version. It 279 00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:41,560 Speaker 3: says see plu a la Saint Medard il pluvera forty 280 00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:46,280 Speaker 3: jour plutard a muang ke la sam Barnabie luis coup 281 00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:52,480 Speaker 3: le erb sioux lapide and so Francois here has a translation, 282 00:15:52,680 --> 00:15:55,720 Speaker 3: which is, if it rains on Saint Medardas day, it 283 00:15:55,760 --> 00:15:59,760 Speaker 3: will rain forty days later, unless Saint Barnabas pulls the 284 00:15:59,800 --> 00:16:04,400 Speaker 3: r from below his feet, literally cuts the grass beneath 285 00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:08,920 Speaker 3: his feet. Francois says, this side steps the issue of 286 00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:12,160 Speaker 3: forty days of uninterrupted rain. Oh yeah, as we discussed 287 00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:16,000 Speaker 3: in the episode, that that's totally very implausible and that's 288 00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:20,000 Speaker 3: basically never gonna happen. It side steps the issue of 289 00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 3: forty days of uninterrupted rain. It just says that if 290 00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:26,120 Speaker 3: it rains on the eighth of June, it will rain 291 00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:30,760 Speaker 3: on the eleventh or eighteenth of July, a much likelier coincidence. 292 00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:33,960 Speaker 3: I must admit that I found the version you used 293 00:16:34,200 --> 00:16:38,160 Speaker 3: is the one on Catholic dot net. In English, in 294 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:41,800 Speaker 3: case you wonder, the most used meteorological saying in France 295 00:16:42,040 --> 00:16:47,920 Speaker 3: is Noel albacon paquet autisson meaning Christmas on the balcony, 296 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:52,680 Speaker 3: Easter by the fire, often nowadays parodied as a niege, 297 00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:58,000 Speaker 3: and November Noel and December meaning snow in November, Christmas 298 00:16:58,480 --> 00:17:02,720 Speaker 3: in December. Thank you for your podcast, best regards, Francois 299 00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:07,600 Speaker 3: and then final ps, still awaiting your take on Podawn, which, 300 00:17:08,080 --> 00:17:11,000 Speaker 3: by the way, that's the French title of Donkey Skin 301 00:17:11,160 --> 00:17:13,840 Speaker 3: with Catherine Deneuve. We will get there eventually. It's on 302 00:17:13,920 --> 00:17:15,160 Speaker 3: the list, Yes. 303 00:17:15,440 --> 00:17:18,400 Speaker 2: I am. I have to say. It looks like as 304 00:17:18,440 --> 00:17:22,280 Speaker 2: of this Friday we will already be diving into our 305 00:17:22,359 --> 00:17:26,679 Speaker 2: horror selections for October. But usually our pattern is that 306 00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:28,760 Speaker 2: once we get out of October, it's time for a 307 00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:32,439 Speaker 2: little palate cleansing, so maybe a little fantasy and definitely 308 00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:35,199 Speaker 2: a little noir. So I don't know, maybe that'll be 309 00:17:35,200 --> 00:17:36,280 Speaker 2: the time of donkey skin. 310 00:17:36,560 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 3: M Yeah, but I like your parody saying about December, 311 00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 3: if I understand it correctly, by the way I mean. 312 00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:44,760 Speaker 3: It is often a joke we have around here in 313 00:17:44,800 --> 00:17:47,000 Speaker 3: the American Southeast that like, yeah, it's going to be 314 00:17:47,040 --> 00:17:49,159 Speaker 3: hot on Christmas Day, which it sometimes is. 315 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:52,000 Speaker 2: All Right, This next one comes to us from Hugh. 316 00:17:57,359 --> 00:18:01,000 Speaker 2: Hugh says Robert, Joe and JJ. Hello there. It's been 317 00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:02,680 Speaker 2: a while since I've written. You guys have been doing 318 00:18:02,720 --> 00:18:04,919 Speaker 2: such a great job that I have had few questions 319 00:18:05,160 --> 00:18:08,359 Speaker 2: and little of use to add. Your recent episode on 320 00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:11,560 Speaker 2: Saint Swiven made me think of that an exploration of 321 00:18:11,600 --> 00:18:14,719 Speaker 2: the history of sainthood might be an interesting subject. It 322 00:18:14,720 --> 00:18:16,680 Speaker 2: turns out that during the early Middle Ages there were 323 00:18:16,680 --> 00:18:20,280 Speaker 2: many many local, regional, and magical saints chosen by communities 324 00:18:20,400 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 2: large and small. The official saint was part of the 325 00:18:22,920 --> 00:18:26,320 Speaker 2: Church's move to homogenize doctrine and consolidate power during the 326 00:18:26,359 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 2: Late Middle Ages. In early modern times, this is all 327 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:31,919 Speaker 2: as far as I can remember, you understand, but you 328 00:18:31,960 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 2: get the idea keep up the good work here. 329 00:18:34,680 --> 00:18:37,399 Speaker 3: Oh that's interesting, So, Hugh, if I understand you, right, 330 00:18:37,480 --> 00:18:41,160 Speaker 3: the idea is that sainthood begins as a more grassroots 331 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:44,800 Speaker 3: or organic phenomenon, and then later there's the idea of 332 00:18:45,640 --> 00:18:48,520 Speaker 3: the church should really be, you know, having a system 333 00:18:48,640 --> 00:18:51,880 Speaker 3: to decide who is and isn't a saint, which would 334 00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:54,160 Speaker 3: play into Saint Swithin by the way, because as we discussed, 335 00:18:54,200 --> 00:18:57,000 Speaker 3: he's called Saint Swithin, but he was never actually officially 336 00:18:57,040 --> 00:19:00,359 Speaker 3: canonized by the Catholic Church and not an official Catholics. 337 00:19:00,800 --> 00:19:04,520 Speaker 2: Right right, Yeah, yeah, So it's certainly a fascinating topic. 338 00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:06,520 Speaker 2: It would just be a matter of figuring out the 339 00:19:06,560 --> 00:19:10,399 Speaker 2: exact sort of the exact form the question takes. I 340 00:19:10,440 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 2: guess for treatment on stuff to blow your mind, but 341 00:19:13,520 --> 00:19:16,280 Speaker 2: I'm always fascinated by this sort of topic. So yeah, 342 00:19:16,320 --> 00:19:17,280 Speaker 2: well I've put it on the list. 343 00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:20,800 Speaker 3: I mean, we could look at it in a larger sense, 344 00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:25,159 Speaker 3: going just beyond the Catholic thing of like who is holy? 345 00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 3: Like why do we decide that certain people are holy? Yeah? 346 00:19:29,800 --> 00:19:31,920 Speaker 2: And then what's left of the real person once we've 347 00:19:31,920 --> 00:19:35,200 Speaker 2: made them holy? Yeah. We got into that a little 348 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:39,720 Speaker 2: bit and two previous episodes where we talked about saints. Yeah, 349 00:19:39,760 --> 00:19:42,760 Speaker 2: so yeah, this is this topic probably has legs. 350 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:46,199 Speaker 3: All right. This next message comes from Kieran. Kieran says, Hi, 351 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:48,880 Speaker 3: Joe and Rob, this is Kieran from New Zealand. With 352 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:52,000 Speaker 3: all this talk of Wallace. This is in response in 353 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:55,040 Speaker 3: part by the way to our episode episodes on Alfred 354 00:19:55,119 --> 00:19:59,439 Speaker 3: Russell Wallace and the Wallace line. Kieran says, with all 355 00:19:59,440 --> 00:20:02,360 Speaker 3: this talk of my mind immediately jumped to a potential 356 00:20:02,440 --> 00:20:05,159 Speaker 3: candidate for weird house cinema, and that is the fantastic 357 00:20:05,200 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 3: two thousand and six film called The Fall. In the film, 358 00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:13,840 Speaker 3: it features a fictional Wallace and his monkey sidekick named Darwin. 359 00:20:14,920 --> 00:20:18,160 Speaker 3: Now one quick note, I had I looked this movie up, 360 00:20:18,200 --> 00:20:21,160 Speaker 3: and Kieran, I don't. I hesitate to correct you because 361 00:20:21,200 --> 00:20:23,480 Speaker 3: you've seen the film and I haven't. But when I 362 00:20:23,520 --> 00:20:25,119 Speaker 3: looked it up, it seems to me like it might 363 00:20:25,160 --> 00:20:27,679 Speaker 3: be the other way around, that there's a Darwin character 364 00:20:27,720 --> 00:20:31,000 Speaker 3: with a monkey named Wallace. But again I haven't seen it, 365 00:20:31,040 --> 00:20:34,760 Speaker 3: so maybe there's something I'm missing. Anyway, Kieran continues Wallace 366 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:38,000 Speaker 3: and Darwin feature and story in a story within the 367 00:20:38,080 --> 00:20:40,800 Speaker 3: story in the film, though not main characters. They play 368 00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:43,760 Speaker 3: an important part in the events of the imaginary story 369 00:20:43,800 --> 00:20:46,320 Speaker 3: featured in the film. It's honestly one of the most 370 00:20:46,440 --> 00:20:50,840 Speaker 3: visually beautiful films I've ever seen, A criminally underrated masterpiece 371 00:20:50,920 --> 00:20:54,920 Speaker 3: with plenty of interesting content to fulfill the weird house quota. 372 00:20:55,359 --> 00:20:59,080 Speaker 3: Is this by the same director of The Cell with 373 00:20:59,600 --> 00:21:01,399 Speaker 3: Jennifer Lopez and Vincent and Afrio. 374 00:21:01,680 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 2: It absolutely is. Yes, Tarsian Tarsi singh. I think he 375 00:21:06,119 --> 00:21:09,159 Speaker 2: just goes by Tarsan. Yeah, and I have I have 376 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:11,640 Speaker 2: seen The Fall. It's I have not seen it since 377 00:21:11,680 --> 00:21:15,879 Speaker 2: it came out. It had a young Lee Pace in 378 00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 2: it before Lee Pace got completely ripped. A great actor. 379 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:23,920 Speaker 2: Lipace a big fan and enjoying really enjoying him on 380 00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:29,320 Speaker 2: foundation of late. But yeah, the Fall, I remember, like 381 00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:32,679 Speaker 2: The Cell being just a you know, a visual treat, 382 00:21:33,280 --> 00:21:35,479 Speaker 2: but I don't remember much about the plot. It's just 383 00:21:35,640 --> 00:21:36,920 Speaker 2: been too long since i've seen it. 384 00:21:37,800 --> 00:21:41,439 Speaker 3: Well, I'll have to check it out. Thanks for the recommendation, and. 385 00:21:41,440 --> 00:21:45,840 Speaker 2: It's very possible we might come back and do The Cell. Yeah, 386 00:21:45,960 --> 00:21:48,880 Speaker 2: The Cell is one I do remember getting very excited 387 00:21:48,920 --> 00:21:52,160 Speaker 2: for when it came out, and and certainly the visuals 388 00:21:52,160 --> 00:21:53,560 Speaker 2: did not disappoint at the time. 389 00:21:53,960 --> 00:21:56,640 Speaker 3: If I recall correctly, that was one of the movies 390 00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:59,439 Speaker 3: that Roger Ebert really went out on a limb for. 391 00:21:59,600 --> 00:22:02,199 Speaker 3: He was like, this is awesome. You've got to see it. 392 00:22:02,840 --> 00:22:05,159 Speaker 2: Sure enough to sell four stars. 393 00:22:06,520 --> 00:22:10,160 Speaker 3: All right, let's see. Karing goes on to say, one 394 00:22:10,160 --> 00:22:12,399 Speaker 3: of the things I also love about Weird House is 395 00:22:12,440 --> 00:22:15,280 Speaker 3: how both of you have an immense talent for unpacking 396 00:22:15,280 --> 00:22:19,080 Speaker 3: a film and succinctly describing its concepts and themes. Therefore, 397 00:22:19,080 --> 00:22:21,480 Speaker 3: another film I would love to hear given the Weird 398 00:22:21,480 --> 00:22:24,720 Speaker 3: House treatment is a childhood favorite of mine. It's Terry 399 00:22:24,760 --> 00:22:29,080 Speaker 3: Gilliams The Adventures of Baron Munchausen. Many consider this film 400 00:22:29,119 --> 00:22:32,680 Speaker 3: to be an utter folly in the gilliam film catalog, 401 00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:35,000 Speaker 3: but I have a serious soft spot for this one. 402 00:22:35,560 --> 00:22:40,119 Speaker 3: It too, can be considered visually to be a ravishing spectacle, 403 00:22:40,160 --> 00:22:44,800 Speaker 3: full of amazing practical effects, brilliant sets, puppetry, costumes, and 404 00:22:44,960 --> 00:22:47,920 Speaker 3: so much more that leaves one thinking, how on earth 405 00:22:47,960 --> 00:22:50,920 Speaker 3: did they manage to get all this shot? This must 406 00:22:50,960 --> 00:22:53,879 Speaker 3: have been a nightmare to film, which apparently it was. 407 00:22:54,440 --> 00:22:57,280 Speaker 3: There's also an interesting tension I am sure you would 408 00:22:57,280 --> 00:23:02,240 Speaker 3: both like between the black and white childhood idea of myth, imagination, heroism, 409 00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 3: and fantasy, and the adult gray world of reason, rationality, bureaucracy, 410 00:23:07,680 --> 00:23:11,680 Speaker 3: political expediency, and so forth. I really feel you would 411 00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:14,480 Speaker 3: both do an excellent job at unpacking this film with 412 00:23:14,520 --> 00:23:18,159 Speaker 3: its warts and all, discussing its production, themes, story, and 413 00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:21,280 Speaker 3: the rollicking good time it truly is. Thanks so much 414 00:23:21,280 --> 00:23:24,400 Speaker 3: for your excellent show, your gifts for science communication, your 415 00:23:24,400 --> 00:23:27,400 Speaker 3: respect for differing worldviews, and your love of pop culture 416 00:23:27,520 --> 00:23:32,360 Speaker 3: always keeps the show fun. Keep up the good work, Yours, sincerely, Kieran. Well, 417 00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:34,200 Speaker 3: thank you so much for all the kind words. Kieran, 418 00:23:34,960 --> 00:23:37,560 Speaker 3: It's been a long time since I've seen Baron Munchausen. 419 00:23:37,600 --> 00:23:42,119 Speaker 3: I remember back when I saw it, I both found 420 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:46,920 Speaker 3: it difficult to watch and also really respected it, and 421 00:23:47,359 --> 00:23:49,600 Speaker 3: I think I had that thought about it more than 422 00:23:49,640 --> 00:23:52,280 Speaker 3: one Terry Gilliam film. It was some Gillian films I 423 00:23:52,359 --> 00:23:56,159 Speaker 3: just straight up love, but this one I remember thinking 424 00:23:56,240 --> 00:24:00,119 Speaker 3: it had some parts that were not the most gripping, 425 00:24:00,160 --> 00:24:04,680 Speaker 3: but also it had a lot of just weird integrity, 426 00:24:05,680 --> 00:24:10,440 Speaker 3: strange performances, like when it like Robin William This plays 427 00:24:10,480 --> 00:24:12,840 Speaker 3: the Man in the Moon on it and he's so 428 00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:16,520 Speaker 3: weird in it, and yeah, I don't know, there's been 429 00:24:16,520 --> 00:24:18,440 Speaker 3: a lot that I've forgotten about it by this point, 430 00:24:18,440 --> 00:24:20,320 Speaker 3: but I would like to go back and revisit it totally. 431 00:24:20,560 --> 00:24:23,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, we've never done a Terry Gilliam film for Weird 432 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:26,680 Speaker 2: House Cinema, and it's of course he's on my mind 433 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:29,639 Speaker 2: anytime we're coming up with selections. But I guess I 434 00:24:29,920 --> 00:24:32,080 Speaker 2: kind of have a certain amount of decision fatigue when 435 00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:35,120 Speaker 2: it comes to him, because he's made so many iconically 436 00:24:35,160 --> 00:24:38,960 Speaker 2: weird films like do I go with Brazil? Do I 437 00:24:39,000 --> 00:24:42,360 Speaker 2: go with Time Bandits? Do I go with this selection? 438 00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:46,800 Speaker 2: Do I maybe go a little further back, or do 439 00:24:46,880 --> 00:24:48,600 Speaker 2: I know, take a chance on one of the more 440 00:24:48,640 --> 00:24:51,200 Speaker 2: recent pictures, you know, because there's going to be something. 441 00:24:51,200 --> 00:24:53,480 Speaker 2: He's one of those directors where even in his quote 442 00:24:53,520 --> 00:24:56,679 Speaker 2: unquote lesser works, there's going to be something to talk about. 443 00:24:57,040 --> 00:24:59,879 Speaker 2: There's going to be some nugget of absolute gold in there. 444 00:25:00,320 --> 00:25:04,360 Speaker 2: So yeah, for that reason, never actually selected something from 445 00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:08,359 Speaker 2: his filmography. Jabberwakee, that's another one. 446 00:25:08,880 --> 00:25:10,800 Speaker 3: I saw that one when I was way too young. 447 00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:13,679 Speaker 3: I did not I did not fully get the vision 448 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:17,600 Speaker 3: I think at the time. But yeah, I think when 449 00:25:17,600 --> 00:25:19,919 Speaker 3: I saw that, I had also seen Monty Python in 450 00:25:19,960 --> 00:25:21,800 Speaker 3: The Holy Grail when I was really too young to 451 00:25:21,880 --> 00:25:24,879 Speaker 3: have seen that, and I was like, I just wanted 452 00:25:24,880 --> 00:25:28,120 Speaker 3: another movie like that, and Jabberwaukee was like weirder than 453 00:25:28,320 --> 00:25:29,320 Speaker 3: what I was bargaining for. 454 00:25:29,880 --> 00:25:31,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, when you talk about the vision with 455 00:25:31,880 --> 00:25:35,480 Speaker 2: Terry Gilliam, it's always a mad vision, So I think 456 00:25:35,520 --> 00:25:37,280 Speaker 2: it's always going to be a little bit challenging one 457 00:25:37,280 --> 00:25:37,840 Speaker 2: way or another. 458 00:25:38,200 --> 00:25:40,000 Speaker 3: All Right, you want to do some straight up weird 459 00:25:40,040 --> 00:25:40,760 Speaker 3: house messages. 460 00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:44,119 Speaker 2: Sure, Sure, let's see what do we have here. This 461 00:25:44,160 --> 00:25:48,240 Speaker 2: one comes to us from Scott subject line mor Locke perspective. 462 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:51,399 Speaker 2: This is, of course a response to our episode on 463 00:25:51,440 --> 00:25:59,560 Speaker 2: the nineteen sixty film adaptation of The Time Machine. Hi, 464 00:25:59,640 --> 00:26:02,840 Speaker 2: Robert Joe. You'll doubtless here from many people on this, 465 00:26:03,040 --> 00:26:05,639 Speaker 2: but there is a story of the time traveler's adventures 466 00:26:05,800 --> 00:26:10,040 Speaker 2: from the Morlocks perspective. David Lake's nineteen eighty one novel 467 00:26:10,359 --> 00:26:13,000 Speaker 2: The Man Who Loved Morlocks. It's been a while since 468 00:26:13,040 --> 00:26:16,200 Speaker 2: I read it, but must confess it didn't seem highly memorable, 469 00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:20,040 Speaker 2: in part because the Morlocks weren't presented as sufficiently alien 470 00:26:20,119 --> 00:26:22,920 Speaker 2: in their psychology and culture as I would have expected 471 00:26:22,920 --> 00:26:26,399 Speaker 2: from post humans after eight hundred thousand years of evolution. Instead, 472 00:26:26,440 --> 00:26:28,760 Speaker 2: they seem more or less like very normal human beings 473 00:26:28,800 --> 00:26:32,280 Speaker 2: who had simply been misunderstood by a plundering traveler. But 474 00:26:32,359 --> 00:26:35,920 Speaker 2: perhaps other readers have different and more positive reviews. 475 00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:40,280 Speaker 3: Scott, Yeah, you know, I'm actually of two minds about 476 00:26:40,280 --> 00:26:43,760 Speaker 3: the idea of taking, you know, doing a whole treatment 477 00:26:43,800 --> 00:26:47,160 Speaker 3: of a story where you flip the hero villain dynamic. 478 00:26:47,920 --> 00:26:50,120 Speaker 3: You know, there's like that classic example we've talked about 479 00:26:50,119 --> 00:26:52,159 Speaker 3: on the show before. I've actually not read this novel, 480 00:26:52,200 --> 00:26:56,399 Speaker 3: but there's that famous take on Lord of the Rings 481 00:26:56,440 --> 00:26:58,439 Speaker 3: which flips it all around, which is like from the 482 00:26:58,600 --> 00:27:01,679 Speaker 3: Orc's perspective, and the org are actually like nice people 483 00:27:01,720 --> 00:27:04,119 Speaker 3: who are just like trying to live in peace, and 484 00:27:04,160 --> 00:27:07,560 Speaker 3: they are being brutally assaulted by the wizards and the elves, 485 00:27:07,640 --> 00:27:11,800 Speaker 3: and so it's the kind of thing where that can 486 00:27:11,960 --> 00:27:15,600 Speaker 3: be really interesting if you have an interesting take on it. 487 00:27:16,119 --> 00:27:18,360 Speaker 3: But it could also be too easy, right you could 488 00:27:18,440 --> 00:27:20,720 Speaker 3: just say, like I'm just gonna flip everything and then 489 00:27:21,240 --> 00:27:23,520 Speaker 3: maybe not bring a lot of imagination to it. It 490 00:27:23,680 --> 00:27:26,040 Speaker 3: literally is just flipping everything. I'm not acute, by the way, 491 00:27:26,080 --> 00:27:29,000 Speaker 3: I haven't read this book, so I'm not accusing David 492 00:27:29,080 --> 00:27:31,560 Speaker 3: Lake of doing that. I don't have an opinion on it, 493 00:27:31,640 --> 00:27:36,720 Speaker 3: but I can see how a hero hero villain flipping 494 00:27:36,760 --> 00:27:40,959 Speaker 3: novel could easily be actually kind of unremarkable or uninteresting. 495 00:27:41,560 --> 00:27:44,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, you would have to play it just right, and 496 00:27:44,040 --> 00:27:46,320 Speaker 2: and they're different. It also comes down to like, exactly 497 00:27:46,320 --> 00:27:48,040 Speaker 2: what sort of story are you trying to tell? What 498 00:27:48,080 --> 00:27:50,479 Speaker 2: sort of points are you trying to make about the 499 00:27:50,520 --> 00:27:54,200 Speaker 2: more locks or or the other factions or characters in 500 00:27:54,280 --> 00:27:57,320 Speaker 2: the narrative. So yeah, yeah, I was not familiar with 501 00:27:57,359 --> 00:28:01,080 Speaker 2: this book though, or really this particular author. I noticed 502 00:28:01,119 --> 00:28:03,800 Speaker 2: that he also wrote another book, The Truth about Weena, 503 00:28:03,880 --> 00:28:05,040 Speaker 2: from nineteen ninety eight. 504 00:28:06,280 --> 00:28:08,800 Speaker 3: I wonder if that's a Is that a sequel to the. 505 00:28:09,160 --> 00:28:11,000 Speaker 2: I guess so, or at least it's you know, it's 506 00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:12,880 Speaker 2: within the time Machine universe. 507 00:28:13,200 --> 00:28:16,040 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I may have already said this a minute ago, 508 00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:17,600 Speaker 3: But the more I'm thinking about it, the more it's 509 00:28:17,640 --> 00:28:19,720 Speaker 3: just like, for a story to work this way, you 510 00:28:19,760 --> 00:28:22,000 Speaker 3: have to find some way to make it original. It 511 00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:24,760 Speaker 3: can't just be the same story. But actually the bad 512 00:28:24,760 --> 00:28:27,120 Speaker 3: guys are the good guys, you know, it would need 513 00:28:27,160 --> 00:28:29,440 Speaker 3: to bring something new or creative. 514 00:28:29,840 --> 00:28:31,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, we can all think of stellar examples 515 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:34,399 Speaker 2: of this. For example, one that we've mentioned on the 516 00:28:34,400 --> 00:28:37,199 Speaker 2: show many times is John Gardner's Grindle, which tells the 517 00:28:37,200 --> 00:28:40,520 Speaker 2: story of Bailwil from the monstrous perspective. But yeah, like 518 00:28:40,560 --> 00:28:45,280 Speaker 2: that's an excellent treatment, an excellent use of this basic 519 00:28:45,360 --> 00:28:50,080 Speaker 2: flip the script method. So not every not every flipping 520 00:28:50,120 --> 00:28:52,760 Speaker 2: of the script is going to be as good as Grindle. 521 00:28:53,040 --> 00:28:55,960 Speaker 3: And it's basically a new story. It's yeah, just yeah, 522 00:28:56,080 --> 00:28:59,480 Speaker 3: all right. This next message is from Matt subject line 523 00:28:59,520 --> 00:29:08,600 Speaker 3: of Vertue. Hey, Robin, Joe, Matt here, just listen to 524 00:29:08,600 --> 00:29:11,520 Speaker 3: your Vault episode on Black Sabbath. And I was wondering 525 00:29:11,960 --> 00:29:14,680 Speaker 3: if you have seen the twenty twenty three Oh, by 526 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:17,200 Speaker 3: the way, that's the Mario Bava film Black Sabbath, not 527 00:29:17,240 --> 00:29:20,000 Speaker 3: the band, though the band got their name from the 528 00:29:20,000 --> 00:29:23,640 Speaker 3: title of the film, seeing it on a marquee, but yes, 529 00:29:24,440 --> 00:29:26,560 Speaker 3: let's see, Matt says, I was wondering if you have 530 00:29:26,680 --> 00:29:30,000 Speaker 3: seen the twenty twenty three French horror film The Verduolac, 531 00:29:30,320 --> 00:29:33,840 Speaker 3: directed by Adrian bo. It is a weird and creepy 532 00:29:33,920 --> 00:29:38,000 Speaker 3: new adaptation of Alexei Tolstoy's story. I loved the Black 533 00:29:38,040 --> 00:29:41,120 Speaker 3: Sabbath vignette, but it's interesting to see the story through 534 00:29:41,160 --> 00:29:44,520 Speaker 3: the lens of a modern filmmaker. I was particularly weirded 535 00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:47,560 Speaker 3: out by the use of vampire folklore regarding the chewing 536 00:29:47,640 --> 00:29:50,920 Speaker 3: of garments on a different Black Sabbath topic. I have 537 00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:53,960 Speaker 3: seen two different versions, both of which I believe were 538 00:29:54,040 --> 00:29:56,959 Speaker 3: dubbed into English. It's been some years since I watched it, 539 00:29:57,040 --> 00:30:00,000 Speaker 3: but I think the alternate version of the telephone, which 540 00:30:00,120 --> 00:30:02,960 Speaker 3: is one of the segments in the movie, the more 541 00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:08,200 Speaker 3: jallowy one with less supernatural elements. Matt says it removed 542 00:30:08,280 --> 00:30:11,560 Speaker 3: all reference to lesbian relationships and had the phone calls 543 00:30:11,600 --> 00:30:15,440 Speaker 3: coming from the main character's dead husband. I imagine that 544 00:30:15,480 --> 00:30:19,320 Speaker 3: would be the American International Pictures release. Anyway, I love 545 00:30:19,400 --> 00:30:23,280 Speaker 3: the show and look forward to future episodes. Matt oh Man, 546 00:30:23,320 --> 00:30:27,320 Speaker 3: I can't imagine a bowdlerized version of Black Sabbath. That 547 00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:27,960 Speaker 3: seems wrong. 548 00:30:28,480 --> 00:30:35,160 Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely. Now, as for this twenty twenty three film, yes, well, no, 549 00:30:35,160 --> 00:30:37,840 Speaker 2: no one. Yes, no, I have not seen it, but yes, 550 00:30:37,880 --> 00:30:40,280 Speaker 2: I'm familiar with it because this one has been eyeing 551 00:30:40,320 --> 00:30:43,520 Speaker 2: me from the shelves at Video Drum here in Atlanta 552 00:30:43,600 --> 00:30:48,600 Speaker 2: for a while. It looks like a unique treatment on 553 00:30:48,640 --> 00:30:52,480 Speaker 2: the vampire legend with live action and what I believe 554 00:30:52,560 --> 00:30:55,920 Speaker 2: puppetry or stop motion, one or both of the two 555 00:30:56,120 --> 00:30:58,200 Speaker 2: used to depict the titular monster. 556 00:30:58,640 --> 00:31:02,160 Speaker 3: I have not seen it, but I'm very interested. JJ 557 00:31:02,320 --> 00:31:04,480 Speaker 3: has seen it, by the way. I remembered that because 558 00:31:04,520 --> 00:31:06,480 Speaker 3: he had brought it up with me in the past. 559 00:31:06,520 --> 00:31:08,680 Speaker 3: But JJ just confirmed he thinks it would be a 560 00:31:08,680 --> 00:31:11,480 Speaker 3: good weird house movie. So that's a couple of votes 561 00:31:11,480 --> 00:31:12,040 Speaker 3: in its favor. 562 00:31:12,360 --> 00:31:22,200 Speaker 2: Excellent, all right. The next one comes to us from 563 00:31:22,280 --> 00:31:24,840 Speaker 2: Doug and in this one, he's writing in response to 564 00:31:24,880 --> 00:31:27,440 Speaker 2: our Weird House Cinema episode on Willy Wonka and the 565 00:31:27,480 --> 00:31:30,360 Speaker 2: Chocolate Factory. He says, cap this podcast on a whim 566 00:31:30,400 --> 00:31:33,080 Speaker 2: and absolutely loved it. Willy Wonka in the Chocolate Factory 567 00:31:33,120 --> 00:31:35,640 Speaker 2: is one of my most favorite films. I used to 568 00:31:35,640 --> 00:31:39,080 Speaker 2: torture my children with on movie nights. They're all grown now, 569 00:31:39,120 --> 00:31:41,440 Speaker 2: and I hope to share it with the grandkids someday. 570 00:31:42,160 --> 00:31:44,600 Speaker 2: And although the film is over fifty years old, it 571 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:47,520 Speaker 2: seems much of its content is still relatable. Candy and 572 00:31:47,560 --> 00:31:50,560 Speaker 2: imagination never go out of style. The over the top 573 00:31:50,560 --> 00:31:53,160 Speaker 2: performance of Gene Wilder and the dream like songs are 574 00:31:53,200 --> 00:31:55,880 Speaker 2: timeless masterpieces. This is one of the few movies I 575 00:31:55,960 --> 00:31:59,000 Speaker 2: keep on DVD to have accessible. Hopefully we don't lose 576 00:31:59,080 --> 00:32:00,320 Speaker 2: DVD players too, so. 577 00:32:00,960 --> 00:32:04,600 Speaker 3: The market for them is has already greatly narrowed. But 578 00:32:04,680 --> 00:32:08,640 Speaker 3: you can still, to my relief, watch films on disc 579 00:32:08,680 --> 00:32:11,480 Speaker 3: and you can still get new players. I hope that's 580 00:32:11,480 --> 00:32:14,360 Speaker 3: something that comes back. I hope we just haven't like 581 00:32:14,480 --> 00:32:16,720 Speaker 3: given up and let the streamers fully win. 582 00:32:17,520 --> 00:32:19,640 Speaker 2: No, absolutely, and I think once I think most of 583 00:32:19,680 --> 00:32:22,520 Speaker 2: you are beginning to realize, if you're not already one 584 00:32:22,560 --> 00:32:25,440 Speaker 2: hundred percent on board of this already, that having access 585 00:32:25,480 --> 00:32:29,000 Speaker 2: to physical media means you have access to your media 586 00:32:29,520 --> 00:32:32,520 Speaker 2: that you can count on long term. And that's why 587 00:32:32,560 --> 00:32:34,640 Speaker 2: if you have some sort of a video store in 588 00:32:34,680 --> 00:32:39,360 Speaker 2: your cities, like certainly support and chaerish it because there 589 00:32:39,360 --> 00:32:43,080 Speaker 2: can and and beyond that as well also your libraries, 590 00:32:43,640 --> 00:32:46,440 Speaker 2: whatever disks are available to your libraries. This this is 591 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:51,320 Speaker 2: absolutely worth worth supporting and getting behind, because yeah, otherwise 592 00:32:51,360 --> 00:32:53,640 Speaker 2: it's just completely up in the air, like, well, will 593 00:32:53,640 --> 00:32:56,640 Speaker 2: this film be available streaming next week, next month? You 594 00:32:56,680 --> 00:32:58,719 Speaker 2: don't know, And then if it is, what version will 595 00:32:58,800 --> 00:33:04,000 Speaker 2: it be in what voices in the world might influence 596 00:33:04,280 --> 00:33:06,840 Speaker 2: what cut of a film you get to see later on. 597 00:33:07,600 --> 00:33:11,840 Speaker 2: So yeah, these are all excellent reasons to look after 598 00:33:11,920 --> 00:33:14,120 Speaker 2: your films and make sure you have access to them, 599 00:33:14,160 --> 00:33:15,280 Speaker 2: to them the way you want them. 600 00:33:15,480 --> 00:33:18,000 Speaker 3: Yeah. Here here by the way, if you want to 601 00:33:18,000 --> 00:33:21,640 Speaker 3: write in and let us know about your local video 602 00:33:21,720 --> 00:33:24,000 Speaker 3: rental store. If you've got something like a video drome 603 00:33:24,160 --> 00:33:26,680 Speaker 3: or like a future shock video in your hometown and 604 00:33:26,720 --> 00:33:28,080 Speaker 3: you want to write in and tell us about it 605 00:33:28,160 --> 00:33:31,040 Speaker 3: what you love about it, please do contact at stuff 606 00:33:31,080 --> 00:33:32,400 Speaker 3: to Blow your Mind dot com. 607 00:33:32,840 --> 00:33:37,000 Speaker 2: Absolutely anyway. Doug continues here and says, when Charlie and 608 00:33:37,040 --> 00:33:39,320 Speaker 2: the Chocolate Factory came out, I was excited to see 609 00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:43,400 Speaker 2: a modernization of Willy Wonka, Tim Burton and Johnny Depp. 610 00:33:43,440 --> 00:33:44,600 Speaker 2: What a perfect combination. 611 00:33:45,360 --> 00:33:45,880 Speaker 3: Or was it? 612 00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:49,080 Speaker 2: I don't know. It was filled with imagination and depths 613 00:33:49,120 --> 00:33:51,600 Speaker 2: over the top performance, but it lacked the connection with 614 00:33:51,640 --> 00:33:54,840 Speaker 2: the audience, and maybe I wasn't the right audience. I 615 00:33:54,840 --> 00:33:57,320 Speaker 2: don't know. It never connected with me. Thank you so 616 00:33:57,400 --> 00:33:59,840 Speaker 2: much for the imaginative distraction. It was fun going down 617 00:33:59,880 --> 00:34:03,840 Speaker 2: the road today, Doug. Yeah, it sounds like Doug was 618 00:34:04,120 --> 00:34:05,840 Speaker 2: pretty much in the same boat as we were with 619 00:34:05,880 --> 00:34:09,239 Speaker 2: the Tim Burton Willy Wonka picture. Like, you know, was 620 00:34:09,280 --> 00:34:13,040 Speaker 2: it creative that certainly that it has some really neat 621 00:34:13,520 --> 00:34:18,080 Speaker 2: sets and costumes and so forth. Yeah, absolutely, But yeah, 622 00:34:18,120 --> 00:34:20,680 Speaker 2: I can also say it didn't really stick with me 623 00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:22,680 Speaker 2: in the same way that the original did. 624 00:34:23,120 --> 00:34:26,120 Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah, I mean I can totally love a Burton 625 00:34:26,640 --> 00:34:29,360 Speaker 3: depth collab. I mean, the movie ed Wood is a 626 00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:32,759 Speaker 3: long time one of my favorites. This is great, but yeah, 627 00:34:32,840 --> 00:34:35,280 Speaker 3: this one never never looked like something I could endure. 628 00:34:37,200 --> 00:34:40,600 Speaker 3: All right, This next message is from Bert. Oh I 629 00:34:40,600 --> 00:34:42,440 Speaker 3: didn't check to see Is this the same bird as 630 00:34:42,440 --> 00:34:45,120 Speaker 3: our previous Burt message or a different Bert. I'm not sure, 631 00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:47,720 Speaker 3: but this is also about Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, 632 00:34:48,880 --> 00:34:52,000 Speaker 3: or actually it's about Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory 633 00:34:52,000 --> 00:34:59,799 Speaker 3: because it's the movie. Bert says, there was so much 634 00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:01,640 Speaker 3: I wanted to say as you went through the movie, 635 00:35:01,640 --> 00:35:04,360 Speaker 3: but I was driving and couldn't take notes. So Bert, 636 00:35:04,360 --> 00:35:07,239 Speaker 3: I'm glad you didn't, so I will limit myself to 637 00:35:07,280 --> 00:35:10,640 Speaker 3: two observations. First, I think all of the children actually 638 00:35:10,680 --> 00:35:15,080 Speaker 3: suffer from the same problem obsession. Augustas Gloup is obsessed 639 00:35:15,120 --> 00:35:19,160 Speaker 3: with food, Veruk Assault is obsessed with herself, Violet Beauregard 640 00:35:19,239 --> 00:35:22,440 Speaker 3: is obsessed with gum Man gum That is a pretty 641 00:35:22,520 --> 00:35:27,280 Speaker 3: narrow obsession, and Mike TV is obsessed with TV only 642 00:35:27,400 --> 00:35:31,759 Speaker 3: Charlie doesn't have any obsessions. The second observation I'd like 643 00:35:31,840 --> 00:35:34,160 Speaker 3: to make is I love your take on Willy Wonka 644 00:35:34,239 --> 00:35:38,960 Speaker 3: as a proto supernatural character, possibly with supernatural enemies, he 645 00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:42,400 Speaker 3: has to contend with sort of a mister Rourke of 646 00:35:42,440 --> 00:35:45,280 Speaker 3: the candy world. I think that's referring to the Ricardo 647 00:35:45,360 --> 00:35:49,160 Speaker 3: Montlebond character on Fantasy Island who can make your fantasies 648 00:35:49,200 --> 00:35:52,880 Speaker 3: come true, has a supernatural kind of quality, a mister 649 00:35:53,000 --> 00:35:55,600 Speaker 3: Rourke of the candy world. Just as we eventually learned 650 00:35:55,640 --> 00:35:59,239 Speaker 3: that mister Rourke is a direct opponent of Satan, we 651 00:35:59,280 --> 00:36:02,799 Speaker 3: could possibly learned that in the future that Slugworth is 652 00:36:02,880 --> 00:36:07,360 Speaker 3: actually the Evil County counterpart to Willy Wonka. Oh, like 653 00:36:07,760 --> 00:36:11,440 Speaker 3: a demonic candy maker of the rival company. Yeah, I 654 00:36:11,440 --> 00:36:13,439 Speaker 3: guess not the Slugworth we see in the movie, because 655 00:36:13,480 --> 00:36:16,520 Speaker 3: that was a counterfeit slug Worth that was actually a 656 00:36:16,560 --> 00:36:20,360 Speaker 3: servant of the Lord opposing as a demon. But Bert 657 00:36:20,400 --> 00:36:22,560 Speaker 3: finishes by saying I'm not an author, but I may 658 00:36:22,640 --> 00:36:24,080 Speaker 3: have to try to write that story. 659 00:36:25,200 --> 00:36:25,480 Speaker 2: Bert. 660 00:36:25,560 --> 00:36:28,480 Speaker 3: Go for it, man, Yeah, nothing to stop you. 661 00:36:29,000 --> 00:36:32,600 Speaker 2: Slug Worth does show up in the recent Wonka film, 662 00:36:32,640 --> 00:36:36,279 Speaker 2: twenty twenty three's Wonka. Oh, and you know they don't 663 00:36:36,280 --> 00:36:39,640 Speaker 2: really play up the magical mystical aspects of this character, 664 00:36:39,760 --> 00:36:44,320 Speaker 2: but he is played by the excellent Patterson Joseph. So again, 665 00:36:44,880 --> 00:36:46,960 Speaker 2: you know, I wouldn't say that twenty twenty three's Wonka 666 00:36:47,000 --> 00:36:50,240 Speaker 2: is on the same level as the original Willy Wonka 667 00:36:50,480 --> 00:36:52,759 Speaker 2: picture for me personally, but I thought it was a 668 00:36:52,760 --> 00:36:53,279 Speaker 2: lot of fun. 669 00:36:53,680 --> 00:36:55,440 Speaker 3: I haven't seen it, can't comment. 670 00:36:55,880 --> 00:36:57,640 Speaker 2: All right, This next one comes to us from Amy, 671 00:36:57,719 --> 00:37:00,600 Speaker 2: and this one is going to be a correction. And 672 00:37:00,800 --> 00:37:03,239 Speaker 2: I just want to note here that JJ and I 673 00:37:03,280 --> 00:37:06,239 Speaker 2: have already gone back to our episode and plugged in 674 00:37:07,200 --> 00:37:09,959 Speaker 2: a little note about this. So the correction is also 675 00:37:10,080 --> 00:37:18,319 Speaker 2: present in the Weird House Cinema episode moving forward. So 676 00:37:18,440 --> 00:37:21,160 Speaker 2: Amy says, hi, guys, I listened to you every single morning, 677 00:37:21,160 --> 00:37:22,760 Speaker 2: and I was delighted to hear you do WILLI walcome 678 00:37:22,800 --> 00:37:25,319 Speaker 2: the chocolate factory on Weird House? And I never want 679 00:37:25,360 --> 00:37:27,000 Speaker 2: to be a nitpicker, but I wanted to let you 680 00:37:27,040 --> 00:37:30,839 Speaker 2: know before you get the will actually people talking about 681 00:37:30,880 --> 00:37:34,600 Speaker 2: Gene Wilder, you mentioned Blazing Saddles best comedy ever and 682 00:37:34,760 --> 00:37:37,640 Speaker 2: said it quote would lead to four more films with 683 00:37:37,719 --> 00:37:41,440 Speaker 2: Richard Pryor. Richard Pryor was set to star in Blazing Saddles, 684 00:37:41,600 --> 00:37:44,840 Speaker 2: but he was too spicy for the producers. Cleveland Little 685 00:37:44,880 --> 00:37:47,560 Speaker 2: replaced him and hit it out of the park. Thank 686 00:37:47,600 --> 00:37:50,560 Speaker 2: you for attending Mike cleveland Little fan Club meeting. Love 687 00:37:50,600 --> 00:37:51,080 Speaker 2: you guys. 688 00:37:51,360 --> 00:37:54,600 Speaker 3: Amy. Yeah, so, I did not know that Richard Pryor 689 00:37:54,640 --> 00:37:56,759 Speaker 3: had been in the running to play the lead in 690 00:37:56,840 --> 00:37:59,440 Speaker 3: Blazing Saddles. He was one of the screenwriters on the movie, 691 00:37:59,600 --> 00:38:03,960 Speaker 3: but apparently he was also Melbrooks's original choice to play 692 00:38:04,120 --> 00:38:07,400 Speaker 3: the lead the character of bart. Brooks himself has claimed 693 00:38:07,400 --> 00:38:09,680 Speaker 3: in multiple accounts that even though he wanted prior for 694 00:38:09,719 --> 00:38:13,160 Speaker 3: the role, the executives at Warner Brothers would not allow 695 00:38:13,200 --> 00:38:15,960 Speaker 3: it because they said he was uninsurable due to previous 696 00:38:16,080 --> 00:38:19,319 Speaker 3: drug arrests. I don't know if that story is true. 697 00:38:19,320 --> 00:38:21,719 Speaker 3: It had like it's never been confirmed by anybody on 698 00:38:21,719 --> 00:38:24,360 Speaker 3: the Warner Brothers side, but that's what Melbrooks always said. 699 00:38:24,920 --> 00:38:27,879 Speaker 3: Though apparently after he was ruled out for the role, 700 00:38:27,920 --> 00:38:30,120 Speaker 3: prior did recommend Cleveland Little. 701 00:38:29,800 --> 00:38:32,560 Speaker 2: For the role. Yeah, yeah, and true enough, he's great 702 00:38:32,600 --> 00:38:34,960 Speaker 2: in it. Yeah, real quick. I want to throw in 703 00:38:35,000 --> 00:38:38,080 Speaker 2: a note here that, of course, the Willywalk episode of 704 00:38:38,080 --> 00:38:40,800 Speaker 2: Weird House I dedicated to my mom, who had passed 705 00:38:40,800 --> 00:38:43,680 Speaker 2: away the month before. A number of you heard that 706 00:38:43,760 --> 00:38:46,480 Speaker 2: and wrote in with some very nice comments, and I 707 00:38:46,520 --> 00:38:48,200 Speaker 2: just want to just want to say I appreciate it. 708 00:38:48,800 --> 00:38:50,480 Speaker 2: All right, Joe, I'm going to pass it back to you. 709 00:38:50,520 --> 00:38:53,480 Speaker 2: Here we have an excellent one from Lindsay here. Lindsay's 710 00:38:54,080 --> 00:38:57,000 Speaker 2: listener mail writing is kind of like a work of poetry, 711 00:38:57,040 --> 00:38:58,360 Speaker 2: a little stream of consciousness. 712 00:38:58,360 --> 00:39:08,520 Speaker 3: Here Lindsey says, hey, y'all think about Grizzly too. Weird 713 00:39:08,560 --> 00:39:12,040 Speaker 3: stuff around it. Shot in nineteen eighty three, finally released 714 00:39:12,040 --> 00:39:16,000 Speaker 3: in twenty twenty. Shot in Hungary, portraying a nineteen eighty 715 00:39:16,040 --> 00:39:19,760 Speaker 3: three music festival in a US national park. Evil promoter 716 00:39:19,920 --> 00:39:24,320 Speaker 3: played by Louise Fletcher, very young, George Clooney, Charlie Sheen, 717 00:39:24,440 --> 00:39:29,240 Speaker 3: Laura Dern, John ry S Davies as a French frontier trapper, 718 00:39:29,760 --> 00:39:34,400 Speaker 3: bad accent, fringe, buckskin single shot twelve Gage with native decorations, 719 00:39:34,880 --> 00:39:38,880 Speaker 3: A bunch of other eighties character actor names awful film errors, 720 00:39:38,880 --> 00:39:42,480 Speaker 3: showing a cartridge flying as a bullet kickstarting an entirely 721 00:39:42,520 --> 00:39:47,480 Speaker 3: different motorcycle from when he was riding National Park jeep 722 00:39:47,520 --> 00:39:50,960 Speaker 3: with government plates, several brit bands, and what I think 723 00:39:51,080 --> 00:39:54,719 Speaker 3: was a Hungarian rock band singing in Hungarian. I have 724 00:39:54,760 --> 00:39:57,040 Speaker 3: a pretty high tolerance for weird, but this one was 725 00:39:57,160 --> 00:40:00,360 Speaker 3: off the charts. Has to be a twisted story behind it, 726 00:40:00,440 --> 00:40:04,520 Speaker 3: somewhere right on Lindsey WHOA. 727 00:40:05,280 --> 00:40:10,880 Speaker 2: Will color me intrigued interested putting it on the list exactly? 728 00:40:11,680 --> 00:40:13,520 Speaker 2: All right? Here's another one. This one comes to us 729 00:40:13,520 --> 00:40:16,480 Speaker 2: from Ian and says, dear Robin Joe, I wanted to 730 00:40:16,480 --> 00:40:18,680 Speaker 2: write in to suggest a movie for weird house Cinema, 731 00:40:18,719 --> 00:40:22,600 Speaker 2: The Adventures of Buckeroo Bonzai Across the Eighth Dimension. Somehow 732 00:40:22,719 --> 00:40:25,120 Speaker 2: I had managed to never hear of this movie, despite 733 00:40:25,160 --> 00:40:27,879 Speaker 2: being a child of the eighties and it apparently being 734 00:40:27,920 --> 00:40:30,799 Speaker 2: a cult classic from that era, until my wife and 735 00:40:30,840 --> 00:40:33,040 Speaker 2: I stumbled across it on Amazon Prime the other day, 736 00:40:33,080 --> 00:40:35,760 Speaker 2: and boy was it a treat. You have Peter Weller 737 00:40:35,920 --> 00:40:39,520 Speaker 2: and Jeff Goldbloom battling rubber suit aliens from another dimension 738 00:40:39,600 --> 00:40:42,840 Speaker 2: led by an evil John Lithgow It's campy and janki 739 00:40:42,920 --> 00:40:45,440 Speaker 2: and borderline nonsensical, and a joy from the start to 740 00:40:45,480 --> 00:40:48,400 Speaker 2: the finish. The one thing that disappointed me about the 741 00:40:48,440 --> 00:40:52,360 Speaker 2: movie was that the sequel promised and the credits never materialized. 742 00:40:52,800 --> 00:40:55,560 Speaker 2: Though Buckeroo Bonzai against the World of Crime does sound 743 00:40:55,600 --> 00:40:58,799 Speaker 2: like a step down from fighting trans dimensional aliens, that 744 00:40:59,040 --> 00:41:01,359 Speaker 2: travesty aside. I would love to hear y'all discuss it. 745 00:41:01,400 --> 00:41:04,200 Speaker 2: Your thoughts are always a treat. Thanks for the great show, 746 00:41:04,400 --> 00:41:05,320 Speaker 2: Ian I. 747 00:41:05,400 --> 00:41:08,680 Speaker 3: This is a wonderful suggestion. John Smallberry's must be heard. 748 00:41:10,360 --> 00:41:12,360 Speaker 2: And I also have to say I do in general 749 00:41:12,480 --> 00:41:16,120 Speaker 2: love love slash hate it. It's a it's a mix 750 00:41:16,160 --> 00:41:17,960 Speaker 2: of feelings. When you have a film set up a 751 00:41:18,000 --> 00:41:20,839 Speaker 2: sequel that sounds really cool and it never happens, Yeah 752 00:41:21,960 --> 00:41:24,960 Speaker 2: every time. It's like when you do that, you create 753 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:28,560 Speaker 2: an alternate timeline where that movie exists and we can 754 00:41:28,600 --> 00:41:31,759 Speaker 2: only dream what ourselves are like in that timeline. 755 00:41:32,800 --> 00:41:34,840 Speaker 3: Can I can I offer a counter opinion though this 756 00:41:34,960 --> 00:41:36,719 Speaker 3: maybe this is the love half of your love hate 757 00:41:36,719 --> 00:41:40,200 Speaker 3: relationship with this. I have come, as I've gotten older, 758 00:41:40,320 --> 00:41:44,439 Speaker 3: more and more to appreciate all the different varieties of 759 00:41:44,960 --> 00:41:49,359 Speaker 3: something leaving you wanting more. I think that's actually a 760 00:41:49,400 --> 00:41:52,239 Speaker 3: good thing. And I when I was younger, I would 761 00:41:52,280 --> 00:41:55,600 Speaker 3: be more inclined to be upset that there could have 762 00:41:55,680 --> 00:41:58,719 Speaker 3: been more that we didn't get, and now to kind 763 00:41:58,760 --> 00:42:02,240 Speaker 3: of feel positive, feel kind of like love and gratefulness 764 00:42:02,280 --> 00:42:04,759 Speaker 3: when all there is is enough to make me want 765 00:42:04,840 --> 00:42:08,400 Speaker 3: more instead of there being more that isn't what I want. 766 00:42:09,120 --> 00:42:11,759 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I mean that's isn't that always the case 767 00:42:11,760 --> 00:42:12,439 Speaker 2: with life? Right? 768 00:42:12,520 --> 00:42:13,160 Speaker 3: Yeah? 769 00:42:13,200 --> 00:42:16,560 Speaker 2: We have to have to be glad that it happened, 770 00:42:17,040 --> 00:42:20,000 Speaker 2: not sad that it's over, and so forth, be happy 771 00:42:20,080 --> 00:42:22,760 Speaker 2: with the film you got, and yeah, be be glad 772 00:42:22,760 --> 00:42:25,040 Speaker 2: that it left while people were still wanting it to stay. 773 00:42:26,120 --> 00:42:28,920 Speaker 2: But of course the counter argument there is, oh, well, 774 00:42:29,200 --> 00:42:31,760 Speaker 2: I guess you didn't need aliens. I guess you didn't 775 00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:35,320 Speaker 2: need terminator too. I guess you didn't need scanners to 776 00:42:36,280 --> 00:42:38,759 Speaker 2: Well maybe we didn't need scanners too, But at any rate, 777 00:42:39,719 --> 00:42:42,719 Speaker 2: there needed scanner cop We did did we do We 778 00:42:42,719 --> 00:42:43,600 Speaker 2: didn't do scanner cop? 779 00:42:43,880 --> 00:42:45,319 Speaker 3: No, we didn't do it. On the show I said 780 00:42:45,320 --> 00:42:46,359 Speaker 3: we needed scanner, we. 781 00:42:46,320 --> 00:42:50,239 Speaker 2: Needed scanner cop and scanners too. Was the the the 782 00:42:50,239 --> 00:42:56,040 Speaker 2: the the bridge? So yeah, I mean it all works 783 00:42:56,040 --> 00:42:56,839 Speaker 2: out in the wash for. 784 00:42:56,800 --> 00:43:00,640 Speaker 3: Sure, all right, Well, so you want me to do 785 00:43:00,680 --> 00:43:04,440 Speaker 3: this last one from Jeff? Sure, all right, Jeff says 786 00:43:04,680 --> 00:43:08,040 Speaker 3: a subject line bad to the Bones, and note, by 787 00:43:08,040 --> 00:43:09,799 Speaker 3: the way, this came up probably in response to our 788 00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:11,839 Speaker 3: episode on Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger, because 789 00:43:11,840 --> 00:43:14,839 Speaker 3: it's about Ray Harry Housen. That movie has a bunch 790 00:43:14,880 --> 00:43:17,960 Speaker 3: of great stop motion effects by Ray Harry Housen, including 791 00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:20,560 Speaker 3: some skeleton ghouls which are raised up out of a 792 00:43:20,600 --> 00:43:23,200 Speaker 3: bonfire by the Witch Queens and Obia. They're sent to 793 00:43:23,200 --> 00:43:26,560 Speaker 3: destroy Sindbad, which leads to a cool sword fight scene. 794 00:43:26,640 --> 00:43:28,719 Speaker 3: Sinbad has to think quick and find a way to 795 00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:32,160 Speaker 3: destroy the skeletons, which are impervious to being stabbed obviously 796 00:43:32,200 --> 00:43:36,160 Speaker 3: because they're kind of skeletons. And I think that sent 797 00:43:36,280 --> 00:43:39,120 Speaker 3: us on a good tangent about skeleton warriors and various 798 00:43:39,120 --> 00:43:40,920 Speaker 3: things you always end up finding some in your D 799 00:43:40,960 --> 00:43:45,200 Speaker 3: and D. Right, Yeah, well that's exactly what this emails about. 800 00:43:50,560 --> 00:43:53,880 Speaker 3: Jeff says, greetings, Joe and Rob, regarding the recent discussion 801 00:43:53,960 --> 00:43:56,840 Speaker 3: of Clackety Harry House and skeletons. In my first D 802 00:43:56,880 --> 00:43:59,960 Speaker 3: and D campaign as a kid, we received a standard 803 00:44:00,080 --> 00:44:03,759 Speaker 3: issue in assigned mission to collect a magical something or 804 00:44:03,840 --> 00:44:07,080 Speaker 3: other from a nearby dungeon. We had spent days creating 805 00:44:07,160 --> 00:44:11,240 Speaker 3: characters with cool powers like talking to squirrels and creating 806 00:44:11,280 --> 00:44:14,360 Speaker 3: sparkly light shows, but we didn't pay enough attention to 807 00:44:14,440 --> 00:44:18,640 Speaker 3: including the required party beefcake Rob. Is this a standard 808 00:44:18,719 --> 00:44:20,800 Speaker 3: D and D term or is this is this a 809 00:44:20,880 --> 00:44:24,840 Speaker 3: Jeff ism here? I assume Jeff is referring to like 810 00:44:24,920 --> 00:44:26,840 Speaker 3: a tank character or something. 811 00:44:27,360 --> 00:44:30,320 Speaker 2: Ah, yeah, this is not terminology we use at our table, 812 00:44:30,360 --> 00:44:34,799 Speaker 2: but my table is not exactly maybe a great snapshot 813 00:44:34,800 --> 00:44:36,800 Speaker 2: of what all gamers are doing and talking about. 814 00:44:37,080 --> 00:44:40,839 Speaker 3: Yeah, anyway, what I could be wrong, but what I 815 00:44:40,840 --> 00:44:43,680 Speaker 3: imagine Jeff means there is like, yes, a damage dealing 816 00:44:43,719 --> 00:44:48,640 Speaker 3: and absorbing character, a fighter or something. Yeah yeah, tank, yeah, 817 00:44:48,760 --> 00:44:51,240 Speaker 3: Jeff says. By the time we got to the dungeon entrance, 818 00:44:51,280 --> 00:44:53,880 Speaker 3: we had already had the crap kicked out of us 819 00:44:53,880 --> 00:44:57,160 Speaker 3: by some dumb creatures who were not impressed with ventriloquism 820 00:44:57,280 --> 00:44:59,400 Speaker 3: or the ability to pick pockets. 821 00:44:59,360 --> 00:44:59,920 Speaker 2: Some low roll. 822 00:45:00,560 --> 00:45:04,480 Speaker 3: Yeah. As we approached, a bunch of skeletons came charging 823 00:45:04,520 --> 00:45:07,000 Speaker 3: out at us like ants from a disturbed ant hill. 824 00:45:07,440 --> 00:45:10,399 Speaker 3: The cleric, happy to finally get something fun to do 825 00:45:10,800 --> 00:45:15,160 Speaker 3: did a turn undead on them, but due to our 826 00:45:15,200 --> 00:45:18,000 Speaker 3: low level, it didn't destroy them, but it did make 827 00:45:18,040 --> 00:45:20,600 Speaker 3: them flee, and for the first time none of us 828 00:45:20,719 --> 00:45:24,640 Speaker 3: got hurt. Rob Can you do a quick Encyclopedia entry 829 00:45:24,640 --> 00:45:28,080 Speaker 3: on turn undead? That's it's a cleric ability. 830 00:45:28,239 --> 00:45:32,000 Speaker 2: Yes, yes, we have pretty standard ability of good holy 831 00:45:32,120 --> 00:45:36,919 Speaker 2: characters to just make lower level undead, you know, drop 832 00:45:36,960 --> 00:45:39,480 Speaker 2: and run or drop. In general, it can and at 833 00:45:39,480 --> 00:45:43,040 Speaker 2: some point it can ramp up to being destroyed undead. 834 00:45:44,000 --> 00:45:46,239 Speaker 2: I never play a cleric though, so I don't have 835 00:45:46,280 --> 00:45:49,480 Speaker 2: a lot of like hands on experience with it. 836 00:45:49,800 --> 00:45:52,560 Speaker 3: But so, like the standard effect is that you get 837 00:45:52,600 --> 00:45:55,400 Speaker 3: some zombies or skeletons or whatever, you do turn undead 838 00:45:55,440 --> 00:45:57,720 Speaker 3: on them and they like drop their weapons and run away. 839 00:45:58,000 --> 00:46:00,920 Speaker 2: Yeah you can do, yeah they run away, or again 840 00:46:00,960 --> 00:46:03,880 Speaker 2: you just destroy them, like, yeah, they just can't stand 841 00:46:03,920 --> 00:46:07,800 Speaker 2: against the Cross or the Pentagram or whatever kind of 842 00:46:08,239 --> 00:46:10,960 Speaker 2: holy item and deity you represent. 843 00:46:10,719 --> 00:46:14,400 Speaker 3: Okay, Jeff goes on. We discovered the dungeon was infested 844 00:46:14,440 --> 00:46:17,239 Speaker 3: with skeletons, so we worked out a plan to quietly enter, 845 00:46:17,400 --> 00:46:20,560 Speaker 3: make a bunch of noise, run screaming back outside to 846 00:46:20,680 --> 00:46:24,560 Speaker 3: draw out the skeletons, have the cleric turn them and repeat. 847 00:46:25,080 --> 00:46:28,520 Speaker 3: Because turn on dead was an ability and not a spell, 848 00:46:28,840 --> 00:46:31,239 Speaker 3: we could do that all day, which we did so, 849 00:46:31,360 --> 00:46:33,880 Speaker 3: meaning you have a limited number of spell slots that 850 00:46:33,920 --> 00:46:35,719 Speaker 3: you would use up if it were a spell, but 851 00:46:35,840 --> 00:46:38,040 Speaker 3: it's not like that. You can just keep doing it 852 00:46:38,080 --> 00:46:42,239 Speaker 3: over and over. And I like this because this is 853 00:46:42,280 --> 00:46:44,880 Speaker 3: like a video game cheese strategy, but you're doing it 854 00:46:44,920 --> 00:46:48,040 Speaker 3: in a tabletop setting, which Finn, you know, when I'm 855 00:46:48,040 --> 00:46:52,040 Speaker 3: playing like a single player video game, I do. I 856 00:46:52,040 --> 00:46:53,759 Speaker 3: don't know if I want to admit this, but I 857 00:46:53,800 --> 00:46:57,279 Speaker 3: often find myself just figuring out little like cheese strategies, 858 00:46:57,320 --> 00:46:59,240 Speaker 3: like how do I get the enemies to just funnel 859 00:46:59,320 --> 00:47:01,920 Speaker 3: into like a near corridor where I can fight them 860 00:47:01,920 --> 00:47:06,520 Speaker 3: more easily, And you know that just happens. Sometimes you 861 00:47:06,600 --> 00:47:10,080 Speaker 3: find your way into like trying to find easier ways 862 00:47:10,120 --> 00:47:11,960 Speaker 3: to get through encounters, even if it's not what the 863 00:47:12,000 --> 00:47:14,719 Speaker 3: game developers probably intended, because they wanted you to have 864 00:47:14,760 --> 00:47:18,200 Speaker 3: a more kind of like challenging and thrilling way of 865 00:47:18,200 --> 00:47:20,000 Speaker 3: getting through. I don't know, we just tend to want 866 00:47:20,040 --> 00:47:21,560 Speaker 3: to find an easier way to do something. 867 00:47:21,800 --> 00:47:25,040 Speaker 2: I guess it works in real life exactly. Of course, 868 00:47:25,040 --> 00:47:27,440 Speaker 2: we're going to solve problems in a virtual world the 869 00:47:27,480 --> 00:47:27,879 Speaker 2: same way. 870 00:47:28,320 --> 00:47:31,320 Speaker 3: But I don't really have that problem in tabletop ore like, 871 00:47:31,360 --> 00:47:33,680 Speaker 3: I'm not usually looking for a cheese strategy when I'm 872 00:47:33,680 --> 00:47:35,200 Speaker 3: playing D and D with my friends. 873 00:47:35,760 --> 00:47:39,719 Speaker 2: Well, D and D is special, and by DND, I'm 874 00:47:39,760 --> 00:47:42,719 Speaker 2: just referring to all social role playing games like this 875 00:47:43,200 --> 00:47:45,600 Speaker 2: and that it is social. So on one hand, you 876 00:47:45,719 --> 00:47:49,400 Speaker 2: are trying to beat, defeat an enemy, or overcome a 877 00:47:49,440 --> 00:47:52,920 Speaker 2: particular challenger in an and or system, but you're also 878 00:47:53,800 --> 00:47:57,719 Speaker 2: in theory and hopefully trying to collectively tell a really 879 00:47:57,719 --> 00:48:01,200 Speaker 2: good story with your friends. So if you go just 880 00:48:01,239 --> 00:48:06,080 Speaker 2: total cheese mode, you might be ignoring the storytelling or 881 00:48:06,120 --> 00:48:10,360 Speaker 2: ignoring the friends, the latter being the worse of the 882 00:48:10,400 --> 00:48:13,080 Speaker 2: two to ignore. So yeah, it has to be just 883 00:48:13,120 --> 00:48:13,800 Speaker 2: the right balance. 884 00:48:14,000 --> 00:48:16,400 Speaker 3: So Jeff goes on to explain the result of this 885 00:48:16,520 --> 00:48:19,719 Speaker 3: turn on dead cheese strategy. We were then able to 886 00:48:19,760 --> 00:48:22,920 Speaker 3: move through the dungeons slowly and cautiously, on the lookout 887 00:48:22,960 --> 00:48:26,000 Speaker 3: for traps and curses, without constant fear of attack and 888 00:48:26,080 --> 00:48:30,200 Speaker 3: completely lacking in dramatic tension. There you go. We eventually 889 00:48:30,200 --> 00:48:33,359 Speaker 3: found the loot and headed back for our reward. If 890 00:48:33,360 --> 00:48:36,239 Speaker 3: you've ever DMD a party of rule hacking players like that, 891 00:48:36,280 --> 00:48:38,759 Speaker 3: you can probably see where this is going. We got 892 00:48:38,800 --> 00:48:41,480 Speaker 3: back to town, which was in chaos and burning to 893 00:48:41,520 --> 00:48:44,240 Speaker 3: the ground as the civilians had been slaughtered by wave 894 00:48:44,280 --> 00:48:47,640 Speaker 3: after wave of violent skeletons who had been driven from 895 00:48:47,719 --> 00:48:50,759 Speaker 3: their home looking for revenge on the living. So we 896 00:48:50,920 --> 00:48:54,080 Speaker 3: didn't get the reward or very many experience points, but 897 00:48:54,160 --> 00:48:57,160 Speaker 3: we did certainly gain real life wisdom from an experience. 898 00:48:57,480 --> 00:49:01,359 Speaker 3: Don't f with the module there you go. I mean, 899 00:49:01,480 --> 00:49:03,479 Speaker 3: I think that's exactly what you were saying. Ron getting 900 00:49:03,520 --> 00:49:07,080 Speaker 3: in the way of the spirit of the storytelling sometimes exerts. 901 00:49:07,360 --> 00:49:12,200 Speaker 3: Sometimes it invites a kind of karmic reaction from the DM. 902 00:49:12,640 --> 00:49:14,440 Speaker 2: Yeah, but I mean, I don't know, it's like it's 903 00:49:14,440 --> 00:49:17,000 Speaker 2: totally about the table and what the whole vibe is. 904 00:49:17,040 --> 00:49:19,319 Speaker 2: Like maybe that's exactly what needs to be happened. And 905 00:49:19,320 --> 00:49:22,640 Speaker 2: it was the greatest gaming experience of all time for 906 00:49:22,719 --> 00:49:24,799 Speaker 2: everybody because that's what they were in the mood for. 907 00:49:24,920 --> 00:49:27,799 Speaker 2: So there's you know, there's no ones that way that 908 00:49:27,880 --> 00:49:29,160 Speaker 2: it needs to be for everybody. 909 00:49:29,520 --> 00:49:33,239 Speaker 3: Yeah, and then Jeff has a very nice note at 910 00:49:33,280 --> 00:49:35,520 Speaker 3: the end. Jeff says on a personal note, I wanted 911 00:49:35,520 --> 00:49:37,919 Speaker 3: to extend my deepest sympathies to Rob in his time 912 00:49:37,960 --> 00:49:40,799 Speaker 3: of loss. We all owe his mother a great debt, 913 00:49:40,880 --> 00:49:43,360 Speaker 3: both for taking on one of the world's most important 914 00:49:43,360 --> 00:49:47,560 Speaker 3: occupations referring to teaching, and for raising Rob, whose hard 915 00:49:47,560 --> 00:49:49,919 Speaker 3: work does so much to soothe people going through tough 916 00:49:49,960 --> 00:49:52,320 Speaker 3: times or just trying to make their way through the 917 00:49:52,400 --> 00:49:54,920 Speaker 3: daily grind. Props to mom for making the world a 918 00:49:54,960 --> 00:49:55,520 Speaker 3: better place. 919 00:49:55,960 --> 00:49:58,120 Speaker 2: Jeff, Oh, thank you, Jeff, that's very sweet. 920 00:49:58,160 --> 00:49:58,759 Speaker 3: I appreciate it. 921 00:49:59,440 --> 00:50:03,279 Speaker 2: And again heard from numerous other listeners out there, and 922 00:50:04,120 --> 00:50:07,879 Speaker 2: you know I appreciate all your kind words. All right, Well, 923 00:50:07,960 --> 00:50:09,640 Speaker 2: at this point, I guess it's time to go ahead 924 00:50:09,680 --> 00:50:13,000 Speaker 2: and close up the old mailbag for today, but we 925 00:50:13,040 --> 00:50:16,120 Speaker 2: will be back later. Once again, we are on the 926 00:50:16,160 --> 00:50:20,040 Speaker 2: cusp of diving into October. I know it, we're only 927 00:50:20,080 --> 00:50:22,840 Speaker 2: halfway through September, but that's where we are. It's about 928 00:50:22,880 --> 00:50:25,879 Speaker 2: to be October everyone, So that's going to be all 929 00:50:25,920 --> 00:50:30,879 Speaker 2: sorts of cool October topics, October weird house cinema selections. 930 00:50:31,480 --> 00:50:33,520 Speaker 2: On that note, like, we're putting together the list now, 931 00:50:33,600 --> 00:50:36,600 Speaker 2: so if you are just really gung ho for a 932 00:50:36,640 --> 00:50:42,360 Speaker 2: particular October weird House cinema selection, or certainly a particular 933 00:50:42,480 --> 00:50:44,719 Speaker 2: core episode of stuff to blow your mind or things 934 00:50:44,719 --> 00:50:47,759 Speaker 2: to feature on the Monster fact or the artifact. Now 935 00:50:47,920 --> 00:50:50,280 Speaker 2: is definitely the time to go ahead and start pestering 936 00:50:50,360 --> 00:50:53,360 Speaker 2: us with those suggestions, because we're putting the list together 937 00:50:53,440 --> 00:50:53,920 Speaker 2: right now. 938 00:50:54,080 --> 00:50:57,360 Speaker 3: Can I say what the October weird house vibe is? 939 00:50:57,400 --> 00:51:01,120 Speaker 3: I think, without us ever making this explain or doing 940 00:51:01,120 --> 00:51:05,080 Speaker 3: this on purpose, I think during October we lean more 941 00:51:05,239 --> 00:51:10,080 Speaker 3: toward classic supernatural horror more so than we do in 942 00:51:10,160 --> 00:51:12,120 Speaker 3: other times of the year, where we might go more 943 00:51:12,200 --> 00:51:16,759 Speaker 3: kind of sci fi or fantasy, or throughout the rest 944 00:51:16,760 --> 00:51:18,880 Speaker 3: of the year. I feel like it's more common that 945 00:51:18,960 --> 00:51:20,960 Speaker 3: the horror we do has a kind of sci fi 946 00:51:21,040 --> 00:51:23,440 Speaker 3: flavor to it, or might be one of these other 947 00:51:23,480 --> 00:51:26,719 Speaker 3: subgenres body horror or something like that. But in October 948 00:51:27,320 --> 00:51:30,480 Speaker 3: that's the time for like witches and ghosts and vampires, 949 00:51:30,560 --> 00:51:33,600 Speaker 3: that sort of thing. Do you have the same feeling, Yeah? 950 00:51:33,719 --> 00:51:36,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, And it's again, we don't have like a list 951 00:51:37,040 --> 00:51:40,719 Speaker 2: that we check off physically every time, but that does 952 00:51:40,719 --> 00:51:41,879 Speaker 2: seem to be how it works out. 953 00:51:41,960 --> 00:51:44,839 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, So we're not trying to be rigid about that. 954 00:51:44,960 --> 00:51:47,440 Speaker 3: But I think that is the general vibe if y'all 955 00:51:47,440 --> 00:51:50,320 Speaker 3: are making suggestions, which again are totally welcome. 956 00:51:50,520 --> 00:51:52,759 Speaker 2: Definitely a time for gothic car that's for sure. 957 00:51:52,840 --> 00:51:55,920 Speaker 3: Yeah, especially if it's gothic horror that gets really weird. 958 00:51:56,080 --> 00:51:56,960 Speaker 3: That's a sweet spot. 959 00:51:57,200 --> 00:52:00,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, we'll inevitably do a film that has one of 960 00:52:00,680 --> 00:52:03,960 Speaker 2: the big names of horror films of yesteryear, like a 961 00:52:04,040 --> 00:52:07,160 Speaker 2: Vincent Price or Christopher Lee or Cushing and so forth. 962 00:52:07,320 --> 00:52:11,759 Speaker 2: So certainly if there's a film featuring any of those individuals, like, yeah, 963 00:52:11,880 --> 00:52:14,239 Speaker 2: let us know which one you think should be on 964 00:52:14,280 --> 00:52:16,920 Speaker 2: our play. Just a reminder to everyone out there that 965 00:52:17,000 --> 00:52:18,880 Speaker 2: Stuff to Blow Your Mind is primarily a science and 966 00:52:18,920 --> 00:52:22,080 Speaker 2: culture podcast. Core episodes in Tuesdays and Thursdays, short form 967 00:52:22,120 --> 00:52:24,560 Speaker 2: episodes on Wednesdays and on Fridays. That's the time to 968 00:52:24,600 --> 00:52:26,719 Speaker 2: set aside most serious concerns and just talk about a 969 00:52:26,719 --> 00:52:28,320 Speaker 2: weird film on Weird House Cinema. 970 00:52:28,560 --> 00:52:32,400 Speaker 3: Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway. 971 00:52:32,560 --> 00:52:34,080 Speaker 3: If you would like to get in touch with us 972 00:52:34,080 --> 00:52:36,680 Speaker 3: with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest 973 00:52:36,680 --> 00:52:38,839 Speaker 3: a topic for the future, or just to say hello, 974 00:52:38,960 --> 00:52:41,680 Speaker 3: you can email us at contact at Stuff to Blow 975 00:52:41,680 --> 00:52:49,239 Speaker 3: your Mind dot com. 976 00:52:49,360 --> 00:52:52,319 Speaker 1: Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For 977 00:52:52,400 --> 00:52:55,200 Speaker 1: more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, 978 00:52:55,320 --> 00:52:58,080 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.