WEBVTT - Matthews’ Taylor on AI in Asian Emerging Markets

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Inside Active, a podcast about active managers that

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond sound bites and headlines and looks deeper into

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>their processes, challenges and philosophies and security selection. I'm David Cohne,

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>i lead mutual fund and Active Research at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Today my co host is Marvin Chen, Senior Asia Equity

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence. Marvin, thank you for joining me

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>today as my co host.

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, David.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So, Marvin, can you tell our listeners about the BI

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Emerging Markets Equity Scorecard and what countries are currently on top?

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The Emerging Market Equity Scorecard is a scorecard where

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>you rank very emerging markets across various factors such as

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 2>prize performance, breadth, as well as fundamentals and currency and

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>commodity exposure.

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>We do this review quarterly.

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>And currently Vietnam, while technically still not an emerging market yet,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 2>sits the top of our scorecard as it ranks well

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>versus many of the emerging markets. But the broader message

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>for the scorecard is that you know, investors should focus

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 2>stay focused on Asia, with Turkey being the only non

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Asian country within the top echelon of our scorecard. Amongst

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 2>major markets, Korea sits pretty well and the first half

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 2>outperformers such as India and Taiwan have slipped a few

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 2>notches due to valuation concerns. China is still at the

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>bottomwear scorecard. It has moved up a few slots, but

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 2>challenges are There's still challenges for the outlook and more

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>policy support is needed there.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Great well, speaking of emerging markets, I'd like to welcome

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Sean Taylor, chief investment officer of Matthews Asia and portfolio

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>manager for the firm specific Tiger Fund specific your active

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>ETF for Emerging Markets Equity Fund and the ETF as

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>well in the Emerging markets ex China Active ETF. Thank

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining the podcast.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>John Pleasure, thank you for being invited.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'd like to begin by asking you how you

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>got your start in the business.

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Actually, I originally was in the military, having been brought

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 3>up abroad, and when I went to the business world

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>after business school, I was very interested in working in

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>in what I knew about, which was, you know, anything

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 3>non developed Middle East, Asia, Eastern Europe, and got the

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to go and work on an Asian desk at

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 3>James Capele, who were at the time one of the

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 3>the main sort of Asian brokers, and I sort of

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 3>got in that way, and you know, it was very

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 3>fortunate that a lot of places that I had lived

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 3>in suddenly became markets. A bit like you know, talking

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>about Vietnam Vy going from not being an emerging market

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to being one in the future. I was sort of

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, they're in the Middle East and in Eastern Europe,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 3>which was which was very interesting.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Nice. Well, you know, one of the things we wanted

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, or at least you know, definitely hear more about,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>is the Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF, which is

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the ticker simill em. Can you tell us the investment

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>process for this fund.

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we've really got four stages of it. The first

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 3>principle is we think that the value of an equity

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 3>or the value of an equity index is a simple

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 3>formula of earnings plus a dividend translated into US dollars,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and then we give it a p rerating or a

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 3>D rating. You know, we have the four stage process. One,

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 3>we think countries matter, so we have a country target

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 3>based on that formula for every market. We then rank

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 3>those countries. We take an account volatility, so we get

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, earning what's the best earnings growth, you know,

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>what's what's in the price of that earnings growth, and

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 3>we come up with a series of over neutral and underweights.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 3>And then from the bottom up basis, we're very fortunate

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 3>to Matthews to have a team of country managers, people

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 3>that are focused were you know, we run a lot

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>of single country funds and ETFs that feed up into that,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 3>and so our country teams give us the best ideas

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 3>and then the fund managers based on the fund put

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>the portfolio construction to work. We use a system called

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 3>marginal contribution of active risk, so we really beat to

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>adjust everything to make sure that we were taking you

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 3>intended positioning and we don't have any unintended overweights and underweights,

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 3>and that sets the sizes of the overweights and underweights,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>so the country level at the stock level, and that

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 3>enables us to dial up the beta and dial down

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the beta. And then finally we have an ongoing monitoring

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 3>process that happens and that that cycle that's that cycle continues.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Now we're probably a slightly differentiated thinking that countries matter,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 3>but you know, if you just look at the facts

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 3>in an example this year, that the outperformance of Asia

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 3>relative to to Latin America, the outperformance of India relative

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 3>to China, the outperformance even in Latin America of Brazil

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>relative to Mexico. So at the end of the day,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 3>we're picking stocks, but we have this country framework that

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 3>enables us to hopefully damp and risk or take the

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>opportunity of whether it's a you know, a good a

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 3>good country story. For instance, you know, we do across

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 3>many strategies have a non index overweight to Vietnam because

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, we like the growth story there. In the

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>valuations we think of a lot more upside.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you mentioned looking at countries and so

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of top down. But when you're looking at

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>individual stocks, you know, in terms of fundamental analysis, what

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do you look for, for instance, in company balance sheets?

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, obviously depends on the growth state of

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 3>the company, But what we look at is whether the

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 3>balance sheet has enough the ability to fund that country

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 3>that company going forward that it doesn't need to go

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>for external finance. So either if it's a sort of

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 3>newer growth yer company, then it has the sources in

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 3>place that it knows where it's next growth is going

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 3>to come from, so that we have going down the

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 3>road to sustainable cash flow. And then those companies that

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>are mature that you know that the balance sheet is

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 3>good and that we have good cash flow. We think

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 3>cashflow goes into earnings is the most important thing because

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 3>what we're really looking for is the sustainability of earnings

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and the sustainability of dividend streams within that.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>What about more on the qualitative side, do you look

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at management teams? You know kind of how do you

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>evaluate them?

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So one thing that we we do, and we've

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 3>it's always been the DNA of Matthews over the last

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 3>thirty years, is being on the ground. So we have

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 3>part of the team in Hong Kong, part of the

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 3>team in San Francisco, and you know, the San Francisco

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 3>side is very driven by what's happening in global tech

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 3>and using that knowledge base to you know, look at Asia.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, where are those trends being seen in Asia?

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, for instance, the whole AI build, how that's

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>seen in the supply chain in areas and then in

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong, you know where we also cover maybe couple

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the Asian markets. From here, it's really

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>been on the ground visiting companies. We have a huge

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 3>amount of fund managers traveling you know constantly and seeing companies,

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 3>and we place a really big emphasis on meeting management,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, both in the offices or on the ground

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 3>seeing the competitors and also with our you know esg team,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 3>we do a lot of engagement with companies. So we

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 3>write to them on factors and we go and see

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>them and we attend a GMS and we think that's

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>very very important because although we have this country framework

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 3>where we think we can add value at a country

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>level by selecting countries, at the end of the day

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 3>we are buying companies and so we have to get

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 3>that balance. You know, we're really looking for the right

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 3>stop for the environment. But it's very important what the

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 3>what the management is up to. I mean, we could

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>go to a management that we've seen as you know,

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 3>not up to standard that we think is changing. So

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, one of the engagement parts of engagement is

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>is you know, where we're seeing companies that are turnaround

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.359
<v Speaker 3>where they are pricing in you know, an old situation,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 3>but we do believe that you know, things are changing

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 3>and that change will affect one of the valuation that

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 3>people will pay for that company. But you know, more

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.719
<v Speaker 3>importantly the fundamentals, the cash flows. Maybe they're getting rid

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>of you know, non core activities, they're becoming more more transparent.

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 3>That dividend policy, which could have been weak, is getting

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>much stronger. They're more aware about capital management. You know,

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 3>if we see situations like that, then that's a perfect

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>story that we like to look for. That's sort of

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, I suppose a turnaround story.

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Sean, you mentioned AI and tech. I just kind

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 2>of wanted to go into the themes you know, around

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 2>markets this year. You know, AI has been a big

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 2>theme for Asia. You know, Taiwan has outperformed on the

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>back of this, but now we're seeing some volatility. What's

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 2>review Is it, you know, time to rotate out of

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 2>this theme or does this have more legs to go

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>room to run? And you know is do you think

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Southeast Asia is a shelter for kind of this tech

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>volatility that we've seen over the past month or so.

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think on the first question on AI, I

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 3>mean AI, I think is going to be a really

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 3>cool driver of Asia and emerging markets going forward, you know,

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 3>because I think at the moment, you know, it's all

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>about Ai going onto the computer and then it will

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 3>be going on to the hand said the humanoid. The

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 3>supply chain in particularly in Taiwan and even certain companies

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 3>in Malaysia, certain companies in Vietnam. You know, it's growing,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 3>and the growth is you know, the capex is there

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and the growth is there. And then you've also got

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 3>the semi side as well. So obviously career much more

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 3>affected by the semiconductor side. Short term, there is a pause.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I think, you know, we are seeing much more selectivity.

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>So actually we've lightened positions in Taiwan. We've really lightened

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 3>positions in career, much more on the domestic side of career.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 3>But in the longer run, you know, we are still

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>invested in certain Taiwanese companies, but we've been a lot

0:10:55.280 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 3>more STOP companies. Specific it's a very alpha orientated because

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 3>we do think that you know, some stop's got overvalued

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 3>in the hype, and probably the earnings will disappoint, but

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 3>certainly the theme is there, and I think it's a

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 3>really important I think it's a really important driver for

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Asia because you know, in the last five years. Probably

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>the debate has always been India's expensive, but we like it,

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and the earnings are going China's cheap, but the earnings

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 3>aren't coming through. But actually there's so much more to

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>em and you know, the sort of the extra ai

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 3>the tech supply chain in North Asia is very very important.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be a big driver of markets

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 3>going forward. And also actually the domestic demand story and

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the sort of value up story and career has worked

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty well. But Asian is probably my favorite place to

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 3>invest at the moment, and for a number of reasons.

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 3>One is it's always relative. You know, even China looks

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 3>relatively better when other markets don't look as good because

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 3>they've worked and China's still been a laggard, but Asiyan

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 3>has been a laggard. It's been a laggard because rates

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 3>in some markets have had to go up during this

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 3>this year, particularly Indonesia. The growth is coming through and

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 3>it will be the main beneficiary of interest rate policy

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 3>easing in the US. It's cheap, it's under owned, and

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 3>so you know it deserves a place on its own merit.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 3>But it's even more interesting now where you know, we've

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 3>been taking money, taking profits from the North Asian area

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 3>and India, you know, is it's still a very solid market,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 3>but it's looking quite expensive. You know, it's stead it's

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>still steadily going up, but you can't put all your

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 3>money in India in an emerging market or an asient

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 3>fund at the moment. So it's a great, great balance.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 3>And within Asian Indonesia our favorite index country, and that's

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 3>probably the most sensitive to rates coming up. It's had

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a sort of policy vacuum because

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>of the handover from Jockovy to Provoa and that the

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 3>new president will be he will take over in October,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 3>and so people are sort of wasting the cabinet and

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 3>you know the direction there, so that might cause a

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 3>bit of volatility, but you know, the growth is growth

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 3>story is very good. Rates will help that growth story.

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Vietnam and as I mentioned earlier, remains our favorite Asian market,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 3>but isn't in the index yet, so it depends on

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the degree of how much we have invested in in ETFs.

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 3>And then Philippines I think is one behind it is

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>it's a bit less liquid, but it's becoming more interesting growth,

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.319
<v Speaker 3>very cheap valuations, growth picking up Malayser has been a

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 3>very good story. It's already done pretty well this year,

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>so we're a little bit more selective there, but we

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 3>still like the market. And then Thailand, and actually Thailand's

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 3>had a pretty good run but having underperformed for a while,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 3>but it was a very sudden movement when we had

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>a change in politics. So we we're a bit worried

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 3>about the growth in Thailand. Still it's not really coming through,

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 3>but we're just you know, really seeing how this political

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>change will affect that growth there. So that's probably the

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 3>market we're less convinced about.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, Marvin's got more questions relating to countries and

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>things happening, but I just wanted to have one more

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>follow up. You mentioned valuations, you know, as part of

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the process, and in you know, the last question, I

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>guess if you could dig deeper a little bit into

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.239
<v Speaker 1>valuations as you know, what do you look at specifically

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, does it help when you're determined to

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, decide to sell the position.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, we target price everything. We target price and index,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>so we're not really top down investors in a way

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>that we just set t targets for country indexes. So

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 3>we will take MSCI India, which is essentially a collection

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 3>of all the earnings for those companies that are in

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 3>MSCI India and then all the valuations, and we set

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 3>targets at a country level, and we set every stock

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 3>we put in the portfolio, we set a target for

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 3>on a valuation and an earning spaces, and we track

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 3>those earnings all the time. It's very easy to track

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>earning's upgrades and earnings down grades, and that can obviously

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 3>sort of adjust. So you know, when we start to

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 3>reach our target prices, then that is a warning point.

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>So when we would change and now then it depends

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 3>obviously on the relative illness of how that target price

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>is relative to everything else in your portfolio and other

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 3>ideas coming in. But we have a very disciplined approach

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 3>on that. I mean, I'll give you an example. At

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the year, we increased our having been

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 3>very underway China. We increase positions in the end of

0:15:55.760 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 3>January to China because the market had really underperformed and

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>it was eight point five times earnings, and we thought

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>that there was sort of better news coming out from

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 3>the government property and actually the larger stocks in the

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>in the index when talking to the companies were you know,

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 3>we're going to have less subsidies. They were promising more

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 3>capital management in terms of higher paybacks, buybacks, and that

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 3>happened actually, and some of the larger stocks have have

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 3>done pretty well. We increased our positions there. But then

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 3>by the middle of May, the market had gone to

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>eleven and a half time's earnings, and we thought, given

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>that we hadn't seen that much of an economic recovery,

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of good news was priced in, so we

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 3>lightened up those positions, and you know, so that it

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 3>made it May, It does make a big difference. And

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 3>then when you have you know, on a on a

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 3>change of government for instance. I mean we went into

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of the year a bit more cautious on

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Mexico on valuations. Market was pricing in a very good

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 3>situation and we knew there was some election coming up.

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>But when the election came up, and you know, it

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 3>was obviously unfriendly to that, we thought to investors we

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 3>had to assign a lower pe for Mexico, you know,

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 3>depending on because of that political risk. On the other hand,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Brazil went down almost to six and a half seven

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 3>times earnings, with the sort of news on Mexico where

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 3>actually the situation wasn't as bad, and we took that

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 3>as an opportunity to increase our Brazilian exposure. And the

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 3>companies know that we had met on in Brazil. We're

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 3>not giving the same negativeness as the market, and so

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 3>we just sort there's a good upside there in our

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 3>target price that we weren't expecting Brazil to go back

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 3>to ten eleven times earnings, but certainly could go back

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 3>to sort of eight eight and a half times earnings.

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 3>And so that valuation is used really as a as

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 3>a reward risk tool, and it just it just sort

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 3>of tries to keep you safe. You look at it

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 3>every day, say what, what's what's priced? In Valuations alone

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 3>aren't aren't aren't a catalyst, but they are definitely a level.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, for instance, in China at the moment, you know,

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the valuation of China is at eight point seven times

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I think in the MSCI China, but that is you know,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 3>looking at an earnings growth of about fourteen percent. Now,

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 3>given the macro data that's come through, you've seen a

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 3>couple of seal side houses in the last twenty four

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 3>hours take the China GDP number down. You know, you

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 3>could say that, you know, if that if the fourteen

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 3>percent growth of the consensus expecting was taken down to

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 3>six or seven, then obviously China's trading on eleven times

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 3>and so isn't so cheap. So you really have to

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 3>you have to balance the valuations with what's happening on

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the earning side.

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for China, you know, you after that rally we

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 2>saw earlier in this year, we're really back at square one,

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, back at the eight nine times earnings level.

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.719
<v Speaker 2>And you're right, I agree, it all comes down to catalysts.

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Do do you guys see any catalysts on the horizon

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 2>for China.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 3>Look at the moment, we're focusing really on what are

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 3>the winners and losers from the situation in China, And

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 3>there are clear winners at a stock level, and there

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>are clear losers. They were pretty cautious on consumption. But

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 3>some of the some of the sort of e commerce

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 3>companies of the capital management are producing better earnings and

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 3>so actually within the earnings changes in China, there is

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 3>huge differentiation and that gives us a good opportunity being

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 3>on the ground. I think, you know, at the moment,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the government is probably a little bit more prepared to

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 3>see the situation declining because the word of deflation has

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 3>been sort of put up to the party and that

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 3>that's always a scary word. But I do think the

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 3>catalysts will take time. So I do think there will

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 3>be more support on the property side for China. I

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 3>do think we'll get more support on the demand side,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 3>but I do think it will take time, so I

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 3>do not see an immediate catalyst. We also have the

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 3>presidential election happening in the US, which you depending on

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 3>which party wins, could affect you know, the economic situation

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>in China to particularly around around tariffs. Interest rates coming

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>down in the US actually will be a little bit

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 3>of a benefit for China because that eases China has

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 3>been had quite tight monetary policy. Actually, if you look

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 3>at where real interest rates are nowhere near the level

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of Latin American real interest rates like Brazil or Indonesia,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>but they are relatively high, and obviously when you've got

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 3>quite a weak economy that need they need to come down.

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 3>But I think the government has always been worried about

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 3>the level of the currency. So once you start to

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 3>see the dollar stabilize a little bit or maybe even

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 3>weakend again certain countries on rates coming down. That just

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 3>gives the Chinese monetary system and ability to cut rates.

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 3>But I think the real, real catalyst of China needs

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 3>is on the fiscal side, and we wouldn't really see

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>it happening in one big, you know, in one big

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of trigger point. It will be incremental and probably

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 3>incrementally driven in the net between after the election and

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 3>going into next summer, after the Workers Council in Economic

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Workers Council in December and then the two sessions in March.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, speaking of the you know, the FED interest rate

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>cut being a benefit for China, you know, how how

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>should we be positioning for the Fed the expected rate cuts,

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, in terms of small caps versus large caps?

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, you know we've seen the India small caps

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>really outperformed this year. Is that going to be boosted

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 2>by this you know, this cutting?

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think it's it's different things to all markets,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 3>I think, I mean, I think the first thing is

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 3>is that you know, the FED cutting isn't automatically positive

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 3>for em It isn't automatically positive for EM currencies with

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a weaker dollar. It depends on the growth outlook. So

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the most benign environment for emerging markets in Asia is

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 3>when the FED is cutting, the dollar is weak, and

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 3>global growth is outpacing US growth. And so it really

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>comes down to why is the FED cutting? And so

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, if the FED is cutting and we you

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 3>knowed the US economy is not going to a recession,

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 3>and even if it does, it's a shallow recession, then

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 3>that is pretty positive for markets because it's cutting and

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 3>it's going to help growth. If it's cutting because the

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 3>US economy is going into recession, then it's actually risk off.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 3>It's positive for the dollar, it's not positive for global markets.

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Our scenario is the FED is cutting, the US economy

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>is strong. US economy, even with rate cutting and the

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 3>slowdown in the US economy, is going to grow more

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 3>than Europe and Japan, but there are certain other so

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 3>countries in emerging markets that can grow more. So overall,

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the international growth is not going to surpass US growth,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>but emerging market growth will. And then it depends then

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 3>in that scenario, what's going to do well. So anything

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>that benefits from interest rate cuts. The normal domestic story,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, Latin America, particularly Brazil, as I am, a

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 3>great benefit, but in the past it's also been the

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 3>cyclical side of North Asia, the sort of semi side,

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 3>the hardware side in Taiwan and Korea, And as we

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 3>discussed you know a few minutes ago, that area is

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 3>relatively expensive having performed, so I think we'll get a

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 3>different rally this time. So I don't think it's a

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 3>great catalyst for Taiwan and career. It might even be

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 3>a reason for money to come moreover to some of

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the more domestically driven, consumption driven markets. I think in India,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's pretty much neutral. I think India benefits

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 3>much more in my opinion, from the oil price coming down,

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 3>because that's one of the inflationary issues, but also inflation

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 3>in India very much depends on them monsoon, and that

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 3>seems to be okay. The small cap effect is not

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 3>a rate issue. It's the fact that you know, the

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 3>MSCI India about four or five years ago had roughly

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 3>seventy stocks in it. It now has roughly one hundred

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 3>and fifty stocks. And those newer stocks are more reflective

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of the new India, you know, they're more reflective of

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the cap expends, the infrastructure you know, they're moving into

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 3>two other air is the competition financials have got more competition,

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the housing policy that's changing, and so I do think

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 3>that there will be more of a still continuing to

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 3>be a structural change in India. You know, the larger

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 3>sectors in India that did incredibly well, the financials, the

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 3>IT companies, they were more a reflection they were doing

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 3>well when India wasn't doing well. They were more a

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 3>reflection of those great good conglomerates that managed to keep

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 3>costs down and grow market share in a difficult environment,

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 3>take share from other companies. That's changing now you're getting

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 3>more competition coming in, You're getting a wider nests of

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the economic growth, and so it's more of a balanced view,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 3>and I think the larger sectors probably don't do as

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 3>well going forward, although in the short term there's a

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 3>huge valuation gap between you know, mid cap and small

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 3>cap and large cap at the moment, and the area

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 3>that's the that offers the most value in India is

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 3>actually the financials, the larger banks, because they've been they've

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 3>suffered from everyone taking money out of them and putting

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 3>them into the faster growing errors. We are seeing now

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 3>with Moody three point zero, and I think this is

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 3>a really important question to look at for the next

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 3>few years. Is I think international money will really embrace

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 3>India in the next year, but they're looking at the

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 3>valuations going Actually, you know, the area I want to

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 3>buy is really expensive, so they might buy these bigger

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 3>sectors just to get exposure there. And why I'd say, well,

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.719
<v Speaker 3>we should see more international exposure to India is I

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>think what Mody three point zero did with the volatility

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 3>around the election was it showed that India was a democracy,

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 3>that there are checks and balances, and I think from

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 3>international investors given the situation over the last few years

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 3>in Russia and you know in China and other markets,

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 3>people prefer to buy democracies. And you know, you can't

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 3>really ignore the growth story of India all the fact

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 3>that it's going to be you know that it really

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 3>is the leading democracy and emerging markets, and the growth

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 3>rates probably a bit more balanced. I mean probably Underno.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 3>D one point zero and two point zero you had

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 3>a real boost on infrastructure and you know milk Od's

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 3>viewers build it make in India and it will trickle

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 3>down to consumption. But one of the problems has been

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 3>is that only a certain part of society's got wealthier

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>at the top of the property market, the stock market,

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 3>but it hasn't really filtered down into the overall economy.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 3>So it hasn't impacted GDP per capita as much. I say,

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 3>even China has over the last ten years, where you know,

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 3>the wealthy have got less wealthy, but the gdpeper capita

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 3>of the average person and has got wealthia. And so

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 3>I think now with Modi three point zero, there's going

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 3>to be a transition and a balance, and so I

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 3>think you'll see more focus on domestic demand, on consumption,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 3>on help for the population. I don't think we'll go

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 3>back to the sort of handouts that this area is

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 3>not doing well, so we're going to hand out more support,

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, because I think the Modi government really believed

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 3>that the best way of getting long term growth in

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 3>India is infrastructure, urbanization, a more efficiency, more service, more

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing jobs, and so I do think that's a transition

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 3>going point. So I do think, you know that that

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 3>mid cap small cap bias in India might remain for

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 3>a while, and it's also supported by local funds. You know,

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 3>you see the amount of local money going into the

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 3>market every month that it's incredible, it's structural, and so

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 3>that's obviously been a very very big support, and they

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 3>prefer to buy these faster.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Growing Yeah, speaking of democracies, just one last question for me.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, with the US elections and the potential for

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:10.479
<v Speaker 2>more tariffs, you know, it's not really just a China issue.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Obviously China could be more exposed to further terrifikes, but

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's really are we going to see a

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 2>more trend of deglobalization and how is that going to

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 2>impact Asia?

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I think I think in one way, we we

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 3>we've been seeing that start. I mean, I don't I

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 3>don't believe in the longer run that there'll be a huge,

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, true deglobalization because I just think, you know,

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I think COVID showed us and the transport links across

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 3>the world that the world is pretty globalized already and

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 3>you can't really undo that, and so it's really difficult

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 3>to unwind these global global trade But I think the

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 3>emphasis will change. I think the emphasis has already changed.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think when you look at the exports

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>of China, they haven't particularly gone down as a percentage

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 3>of global exports, but they've just gone different places, you know,

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 3>and you know, US imports have come from different places.

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 3>So I do think there'll be a rebalancing like that.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously, you know, trade tariffs. You know, if

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Trump's talking about sixty percent tarifs to China, you know,

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that you know, probably China is is more

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>immune to that than it was the first time around,

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 3>because it's obviously had this threat, it's preparing for it.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 3>It's probably less of an impact on the market, but

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 3>it's obviously not good news. It's inflationary. You know, it's

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 3>not good news if tariffs and other areas come up

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 3>as well, and that's something that will what we know

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 3>we'll obviously have to impact, will impact into emerging market growth.

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>It will also impact probably rates coming down quicker. You know,

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe that you know, if you've got that inflationary impact,

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, my my, my inkling would be that you know,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 3>even if Trump got in, it wouldn't be as severe

0:30:57.960 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>as the talk as it has been in the past,

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 3>but it was obviously something that is that we're that

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 3>we're aware of. And I think that in that way,

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, it makes it, you know. That's why we

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 3>really do prefer in this environment, particularly after the run

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 3>in South Korea and Taiwan, we really prefer those markets

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 3>that have really domestic demand and are very old economy

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 3>stories that you know already these economies are picking up

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 3>two years later after COVID. The banking system wasn't like

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the US or the UK or Europe, where you know,

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 3>aggregate demand was kept in check by the government. You know,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 3>aggregate demand fell in these countries. There weren't subsidies, there

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 3>wasn't much fiscal spending, so it's a slower recovery and

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 3>interest rates being cut in the US just helps that recovery.

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 3>And so that's really where we focused on the moment.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 3>There much of that area is much more immune, much

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 3>more protected from overall trade. India is much more protected

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 3>from overall trade. So that's where our biases at the moment.

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 3>And just really you know, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 3>and see.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I've got one last question before we wrap up.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>In your opinion, how is investing in emerging markets changed

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>over the last twenty or so years.

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think the most significant change, and the indexes

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 3>seem to change every couple of years is the role

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 3>of the domestic investor. So you know, you're take in

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 3>a market like India or Indonesia, you know, they are

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 3>the main investors there are domestic you know, China, actually

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the main investor is domestic. It's just not in a

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 3>very good confident mood at the moment. And that that

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 3>that is, you know, a very very important point. And

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 3>you know also from the debt markets as well. Ninety

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 3>percent of Asian debt issuance is taken up by Asian investors,

0:32:56.520 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 3>and it makes emerging markets much you know, more protected

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 3>from international capital coming in and out. And I think

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 3>that's a very very important point. So we tend to

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 3>prefer to invest in those markets overall as an entity.

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 3>And obviously it's a very differentiated market. The balance sheets

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 3>are much better, I mean, even compared to the Taper

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 3>tantrum years twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, the current account balances

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 3>of a are much better. The debt levels are lower,

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the inflation structural inflation is much lower. So they're in

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a much much better state than they were before. And

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>that's been reflected in credit ratings and sovereign ratings. And

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>then I think the opportunities are much more broader. It's

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 3>not just a China story. But obviously China has a

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 3>huge element. You know, if you've got in these domestic

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 3>stories like India, like Indonesia, like the Philippines. We still

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 3>have the cyclical commodity stories like Brazil, but now you've

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>also got the the AI and tech stories like South

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Korea and Taiwan. And I think Japan coming back into

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 3>the fold is very important as well, because there's a

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 3>lot of links between career and Taiwan and Japan in

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 3>that sort of supply chain. So yeah, I don't think

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 3>you know much much more more positive in a medium

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:23.799
<v Speaker 3>term story. But I think at the end of the day,

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 3>you've got to ask the question is em is underperformed.

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 3>For the last ten years, the US has outperformed, you know,

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 3>ten years before that, emerging markets performed. And it always

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 3>goes down to our formula. The earnings came through. So

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 3>you used to have eight to ten percent earnings twenty

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 3>years ago for ten years and that led to good returns.

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the US since the nineteen forty five,

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 3>you've had on average, you know, seven seven and a

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 3>half percent earnings growth, seven to seven and a half

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 3>nearly eight percent performance in the the US stock market.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, obviously in the last ten years with tech

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 3>with AI recovering from k best than the rest of

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 3>the world, those earnings and returns have been much better.

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 3>But you know, we foresee it the next five to

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 3>ten years in Asia, particularly where we're getting back to

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 3>that eight to ten earnings growth without any real valuation

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 3>lift supported by domestic demand, which is which is a

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 3>positive story because you know, local investors put more money

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 3>in their own markets, they take money out of their

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 3>own bond markets. You know, they buy their growth stories.

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, the outlook, we have to get through obviously

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 3>the race cycle, the election, but they're going forward there.

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 3>We do see some tremendously good opportunities across emerging markets

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 3>in Asia.

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, it'll be interesting to see what happens over the

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>next five or ten years. Sean. I really want to

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us today.

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Look, it's been a pleasure. Thank you very much for

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 3>giving me the opportunity to present.

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 1>To you in Marvid. Thank you for being my cost

0:35:59.440 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Those are great insights, Sean.

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Until our next episode, this is David Cole with Inside

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>after h