WEBVTT - Future Shock: Part II

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas. This

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is a part two. In our previous episode, we kicked

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 1>off the idea of Future Shock. We talked about this

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>groundbreaking um book by Alvin Toughlin and his wife Heidi

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and we really broke down what the book is,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>what the resulting documentary is, what the the idea of

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Future Shock is all about. We're going to rehatch a

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit here, but this is definitely a situation where

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't listen to part one, you really should

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to part one before you jumped in with parts Yeah,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>because we are using Future Shock as as kind of

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>time capsule um of the twentieth century fear and anxiety

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>about change, the malaise about future, of fretting that has

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>now followed us into the twenty one century. So we're

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at sort of like this time caps is quaint

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>um in this kind of retro futurist way, but it's

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>also really humbling because many of the concerns are prescient

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and thoughtful. So let's launch right into him because one

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that the Toddlers talk about, and what

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they got right, I think, in at least in my mind,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is some of the reproductive technology, or what they call

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>birth technology. UM Now Toddler says. Dr E. S. E.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Half As, an internationally respected biologists at Washington State University,

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>has publicly suggested, on the basis of his own establishing

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>work on reproduction, that within a mere ten to fifteen years,

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a woman will be able to buy a tiny, frozen embryo,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>take it to her doctor, have it implanted in her uterus,

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>carry it for nine months, and then give birth to

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it as though it had been conceived in her own body. Now,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, this was what Yeah, what are

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you talking? I remember the time magazine covers were they

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>were shocking and start is it really had a lot

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of future shock to them. Yeah. And now he takes

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this idea and he says, okay, so that that's an idea,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and he basically says, at some point it may be

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>possible to do away with the female uterus altogether. Babies

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>will be conceived and nurtured and raised maturity outside of

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>human body. Now, George Davarsky, writing for Ionine in an

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>article titled how to Build an Artificial roomb um. This

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was published in He says it were still a couple

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of decades away from this, but um there has been

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the development of an artificial endometrium and that's been created

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>from real tissue. And he says that depending on the

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>technology is available, of placenta could either develop naturally on

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that endometrial wall, or it could take the form of

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>an external device that performs some of the same functions.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>For instance, a dialysis machine could actually help with waste disposal.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And then he says, you add a little bit of

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>synthetic ambiotic fluid, you regulate the temperature, you create some

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>sororeal stimulation for the baby, and add a few microbes

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and boom, we'll be there. Well, even that as complex

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of that sound also it's kind of an oversimplification, I think.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I I I researched the the artificial womb notion a

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>little while ago, and I remember being struck by just

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>how it's It's a far more complex event that's happening here.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>It's not as simple as just squired the right fluids

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>into the baby vote and uh, and the right kind

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of creature will emerged later he didn't like my car

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>wash analogy, just kind of spirt some stuff. They emerge

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. Uh, no, you're right. The environment

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the womb is completely specialized, right. Um, So of

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>course it would take a lot of work to even

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>get to that point where you could do it. But hey,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say that steps are being made in that direction. Um.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that that Toffler or the

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Topplers really picked up here is that this would change families.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>This would change the face of families. This would change

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the way that people decided to have children or become parents.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And he said that he thought he expected a lot

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of people in future to remain childless or make that decision,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and that would allow them to both have robust careers

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and to sort of navigate life in an easier way

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to people who were saddled with a lot

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of children. Because again, but at the same time, here

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing birth control in place, and this is giving

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>women a lot more power and options in terms of

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>regulating their own careers and making decisions. And so he

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>does say, hey, there could be a compromise here, There

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>could be the postponement of children and He says that

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of just being childless, people could decide that they

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>could freeze those embryos and then later on she's to

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>become parents. Now, he's correct in this sense that a

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have delayed parenthood. If you look at

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this historically, people are choosing to have children in their

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>thirties in their early forties as opposed to what we

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>would think of as the childbearing years in the twenties.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And of course there have been implications in this, but

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he takes us a step further and says, hey, why

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:10.799
<v Speaker 1>even worry about doing this while you're having your career.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Why not become parents when you retire. Well, yeah, that's

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's an idea too. We have. I don't know that

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that that vision exactly pan out, but we

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do see later in later stages of of of parenthood. Sure. Sure,

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm thinking about is at this point, the

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Tolfers don't even know about bio gerontology or Aubrey de Gray,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>who is saying, hey, guys, we got it. We've got

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we have got the mechanics to begin to preserve the

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>human body. I can't say it in a different way,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or maintain the human body in a way that will

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>extend our lives. And so if if the two could meet,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you know, in the near future, you would see

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that people are beginning to have children in their sixties

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>or the seventies. Yeah, but that also kind of sounds

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>like you're you end up pushing the deadline out, and

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>then people still wait until right up to the deadline

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to do things. So would you say, oh, now I

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have more time to to enter the family stage of

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>my life, we would say, would you say, oh, well,

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>this is great for my career, and I'll just push

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>off the child thing just a little longer. It's possible.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>But I just I really think that this analysis is

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. Um and the Toddlers also talk about childless marriage,

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>professional parenthood, which was sort of like seeding your parenthood

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to someone else post retirement, child rearing, corporate families, communes,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>geriatric group marriages. Okay, And then he said they talked

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about homosexual family units, polygamy. Than they say, these then

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are a few of the family forms and practices with

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>which innovative minorities will experiment in the decades ahead. Well,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you definitely see a lot of that. I do feel

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like the definition of family has has changed a lot

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>over the past few decades, and even even the definition

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of a child and parenting, you know, I mean, because

0:06:58.000 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you have so many different models there. Now you have

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>again to their point that you have the test two babies,

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>you have the virtual fertilization, you have surrogate months, you

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>have adopted parenting, and I mean even something as simple

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>as adoptive parenting has really come a long way as

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>as this because back back in the year the seventies

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and before, there was still that idea that you would

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>adopt a child and then maybe never tell them that

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they were adopted. And we have a we have a

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>far more advanced and uh and I think, you know,

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>more truthful and healthy um idea of what adoptive parenting

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is now and how that fits into this into our

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>new and evolving idea of what a family is. You know.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Some of that I think plays into this idea of

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>how we regard um one another at different stages in

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>our lives, because and in the book they were talking

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about how before the seventies, it was either that you

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>were a child or you were an adult. There was

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>no teenager, there was no becoming an adult or acknowledging

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that there are different stages, so I think they're to

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that point. There's a lot more insitivity to how children

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are developing, and as a result, people are thinking more about,

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, how to form their minds as opposed to

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>like you're you, you're termed eighteen, your your men now right,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>go out? And oh yeah, I mean so Like even

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>time I watch an episode of mad Men, I often

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>reflect on men in in my life, my you know,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad and my grandfather, you know, various uncles and

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as Don Draper's example, and think about like

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>those past ideas of you know, you're no longer a

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>child and now you're a man, and how how that

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that model doesn't really apply so much anymore, Like there's

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>no against so many of us figure out a way

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>way to uh sustain our childhood indefinitely and to put

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>off some imagined transformation into a man and definitely. And

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>also that model of what a man was culturally and

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>say the nineteen sixties us is, I feel, rather than

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of us would want to be. That's

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, don't don't look your family members

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in the eye kind of a thing like work all day,

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>support the family and not be there like so many

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of those models you see in in like old films.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>They just like nobody even wants that anymore. It's so stifling. Yeah, yeah,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:18.839
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what they say in here, And

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they say that that one of the things about having

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more fractured society is that you have more freedoms. Is

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that people begin to really embrace individuality in a way

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that allows them to express themselves in a way that

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't been able to before. Just to bring the

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>discussion back around to reproductive technology and future shock, I

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>ran across this wonderful quote from Ray Kurtz Flow in

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand twelve Wired interview. He said, people actually

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>adjust to the reality of their technology amazingly quickly. Is

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>descriptions of technologies just around the corner that they find daunting.

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>But when there's a new treatment for a disease that

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>works better, people can wax philosophically. Oh, I don't know

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if we really to extend longevity. But when it actually

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to curing curing a disease or treating it better,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it's adopted without hesitation. The only question is does it

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>really work. The same thing with social networks or wikis

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or Wikipedia, all these things, we eagerly adopt them. The

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>only question is that do they really help us. When

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it becomes clear that they do, we adopt them very readily.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>They quickly become a part of our everyday world so

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that we can't do without them. That's true. I've read

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>um study. I believe that is the sixty plus group

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that are really sort of the biggest users of their

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>smartphones because they're beginning to see that there is a

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>huge UM. I mean, this isn't a lifesaving thing, but

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this is something that can really simplify their lives in

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>some ways. And so then you begin to get this

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of well maybe it's you know, necessity is the

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>mother of adoption, um, rather than invention. Yeah, and you

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>see in some cases that kind of skipping of a technology,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, like uh, you see like a various older

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>people in our lives that may have never figured out

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly how to program a VCR back when that was

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>a thing, but now they're just complete masters of their

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>smartphone because the technologies farm are relevant to their existence. Well,

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so much easier to yeah, yes, true with Surrey in

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>your life right now, Another topic that Toffler touches on

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of a disposable society. He says, quote,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we develop a throwaway mentality to match our throwaway products.

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>This mentality produces, among other things, instead of radically altered

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>values with respect to property. But the spread of disposability

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>through society also implies decreased durations in man thing relationships.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's man thing, not man thing the comic book character.

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're wondering, instead of being linked with a single

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>object over a relatively long span of time, we were

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>linked for brief periods with the succession of objects that supplanted. Um.

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>This is this is one of those those ideas that

0:11:55.520 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he brings out that at once rings true. Like there's

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this that totally rings true. There are

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.239
<v Speaker 1>some of the finer details of it that don't necessarily

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>hold up all the way. But but I feel like

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for the most part he got this one right. Um.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Because one idea that instantly comes to mind here is furniture. Uh,

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>you know you mentioned Ikia in the last episode. Like not,

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>not only is Ikia a model of build it yourself furniture,

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but it isn't a model of furniture that no one's

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>buying expecting it to be passed on to their grandchildren.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The previous model was, you know, you spent, you put

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money into a well crafted piece of

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 1>furniture and that is part of your heritage. And now

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we we really don't expect most of our furniture in

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the last you know, in the next week. Yeah, there

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>is definitely a huge aspect of our society that is disposable.

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But I'm also thinking about, um, the fact that we

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to just kind of hoard a little bit, and

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's that part of materialism which allows us

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that, to just keep a mass more and

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>more things. Oh yeah, for instance, self storage units. I

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>believe we've touched on this before, but um, the latest

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>stats from the Self Self Storage Association, they say that

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>they are now over forty eight thousand, five hundred primary

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>self storage facilities in the United States as of the

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>year in two thousand thirteen, and then there are another

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>four thousand secondary facilities. Primary facilities are ones who are

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>basically all they do are the main thing they do.

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>In storage facilities, secondary there's some other primary business at hand.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>But the self storage rentable space in the US alone

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is now two point three billion square feet. That's approximately

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and ten million square meters uh. And they

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>say that that figure represents more than seventy eight square

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>miles of rentable self storage space under one roof, an

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>area more than three times the size of Manhattan Island.

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of crazy. And I think that that's

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>part and personal of a disposable society, or creating goods

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that are so cheaply made or so easy to buy

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or so uh cost effective that you can either dispose

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of them where you just can buying more and more

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of the junk. You know, It's true, it's kind of

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like both both sides of it. Yes, we're it's a

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>disposable culture, but we're not quite so disposable that we're

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>going to throw all of that old disposable stuff away.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>We need to put that somewhere because we might need

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it again. Like we're still clinging to some of those

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of post depression ideas and and and the old

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>fashioned ideas that we need to hold onto the things

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we own. We need to hold onto well crafted materials

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because they are their usefulness will continue in the decades ahead.

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>We're still holding onto some of those ideas, but we're

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>holding onto it with disposable materials, and so we're kind

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of getting the worst of both worlds. And then you

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have some people in extreme cases who are have huge

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>amounts of anxiety connected to those things because their their

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>own sorts of uh psychological states are playing out in

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of objects. And of course I'm saying hoarding here,

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>which is closely related to obsessive compulsive disorder. But this

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>was also making me think about um our relationships be

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>has the top us also point out that in the

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>future UM people will be so mobile and spread out

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so much um that we will begin to have very

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>surface relationships, disposable relationships, will have what they call the

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>nine to five or the workday relationships, where you know

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you're having these relationships through coworkers, but it's not necessarily

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>going deeper than that. And that we've begun to move

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>away from family in terms of social bonds and more

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>toward one another in in these very superficial ways. Yeah,

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like you do see a lot of

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that in life. Yeah, although if you want to play

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Devil's after get here, you could say that people maybe

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit more isolated because Uh. Technology has

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>put us in that position. And you know, a Facebook

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>front is different than a face to face friend. But

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they would say that communities have sprung up uh in

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the void, right, and that there is a connection that

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>people feel, even if it is as abstract as an

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>avatar that you create to communicate with another person. There's

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful moment in the documentary version of Future Shock

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>where a little girl has has taken her doll back

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to the shop UH and exchanges it for a new,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>shinier doll, and then the store owner throws the old

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>doll and the garbage and the music is very ominous

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and then UH. And then Orson Welles tells us even

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>friends don't last in this future UM, which which was

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, again very much overstating the case there. But

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>again you do see shades of that in our modern society.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You do do. And they also talked about simulated environments,

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea that we would begin to create these um

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>environments that we would move through in a more abstract way. UM.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But we haven't seen that completely yet. We we know

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that the Internet of everything is on the horizon. We

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>know that nearly every surface can become interactive, but We're

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>not quite there yet. But on the other hand, simulated

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>environments in the form of video games still remain a

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>very big business. People are putting themselves in these environments.

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Not quite in the virtual reality UH idea that became

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>prevalent in the in the nineteen eighties and and and

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>part of the nineties. But still they are immersing themselves

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in a virtual world uh an unreal world and spending

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time and energy there. But I am

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>still waiting for that travel lodge of Remember that report

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we saw from futurists Ian Pearson who said, like, one

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>day you can go that travel lodge and you can

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>call up any sort of background environment that you want.

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You could have your sheets outfitted with sensors that might

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>interact with someone else. You could have contacts active contact

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>lenses that would put retinal images on your eyes and

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>into your brain, so that you could be staring at someone,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>but they could be completely different than than than who

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you are actually staring at and transforming your reality into

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>this artificial reality. Yeah, and that was definitely a study

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that gave me a little future shock, Like maybe not

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like the crippling level of future shock, but very much

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that that in all level of future shock where you

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>really have to think, wow, things could in the future

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>significantly change in a way that it shakes culture itself. Yeah.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about that model too, that changes

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the economic model too, because everything in that that that

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>space is for sale too. I mean, if you like

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the dresser, you can just go tap on it or

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>scan it and that could be delivered to you in

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>one hour via a drone. Yeah, thank you Amazon. On

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the subject of a disposable culture, something we're talking about

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>recently in our very own break room here, how stuff

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>works cups because we have one of those k cup machines,

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they're Curi Curig. We put a little the little plastic

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>cup in and then you pop it and it shoots

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>hot water through there and makes you a cup of coffee.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>And then what do you do with the little plastic

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>cup You throw it away? Right. Well, it's become quite popular.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Just in our office. According to a survey by the

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>National Coffee Association, nearly one in five adults drink single

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>cup brewed coffee yesterday, so it makes it the second

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>most popular way to brew coffee, right after your normal

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>hum Mr coffee type coffee machine. Sadly, my method to

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>eropress hasn't quite made his way to the top yet.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>But but here's where he gets the Erroopress is a

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>wonderful device, even though it is sometimes mistaken for either

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a drug paraphernalia or some sort of a sexual device.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But still it's a wonderful way to make coffee. According

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to Seattle Times, uh U S consumers bought one thirty

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars worth of coffee pods in two thousand

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>eight four October, three point one billion for them last year,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>and that was compared to six billion uh for roasted

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>coffee and two point five billion in instant coffee. This

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is all from two thousand fourteen Mother Jones article Your

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>coffee POD's dirty secret and where it gets really dirty

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>is we can consider this. In two thousand thirteen, Green

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Mountain produced eight point three billion cake cups, enough to

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>wrap around the equator of the planet ten point five times,

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>do we, liamb You will not quit telling me that's

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>that until I quite using the cake cups, will you.

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I know they're fast, I know they're a little faster

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>than the other machine, but but yeah, ten point five

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>times around the uh The the equator of the point.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Now we should mention that that Kurig just released a

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>sustainability report announcing that the company plans to make all

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>their coffee pods recyclable by So there's a silver lining

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the right. So if you can see the lining beyond

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the belt of k cups that are now orbiting the plant,

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So in six years I can feel good about having

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a cup. Yeah, there you go, all right, or just

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>get the little my mom has one and she uses

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a little uh disposable or not disposable, but the little

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>reusable thing you get like a little cake cup. Yeah,

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and just fill it with you just put coffee grounds

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in there and kind of treat it like a you know,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>a grown ups coffee maker. All right, Yeah, it can

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>be done. You don't have to you don't have to

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.239
<v Speaker 1>abandon your device. You just a little convenient it is.

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It is, alright, So again something that the Dolfers could

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>not have anticipated. We're gonna take a quick break and

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>when we get back, we're going to talk about what

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>else they didn't anticipate. All right, we're back. Before we

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>get it into the next section, I do want to

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>mention real quick that another area that I feel like

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they maybe not got right, but are getting right, Like

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>they're they've successfully forecast some of what's happening in the world.

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>As they mentioned possible technological backlash h quote protests against

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the ravages of irresponsibility used technology, and they said that

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they could crystallize in a pathological form a future phobic

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>fascism with scientists quote substituting for Jews and concentration camps.

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's an extreme vision of what the future could hold.

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But I instantly thought of, for instance, the the German

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>backlash against nuclear power, current backlash against in as a

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>spine of all the anxiety surrounding heart bleed. I feel

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>like we we are seeing seeds of maybe not the

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>extreme vision of where this could had, but we see

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of those currents already in our

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>culture well. And again I think that speaks to the

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 1>topplers pointing out that we don't have the structure in place,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and that they're saying this in the seventies. Is two

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fourteen, and we still have not caught up

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>with the technology in terms of how to manage it.

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Um from from different sectors, whether or not it is

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>from the government or from private corporations. Um. But let's

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some things that they didn't anticipate. Um.

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things I'm thinking about is the

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>way our memory systems would change. Indeed, the way that

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we think has been completely changed by our technology. Yeah. Now,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>another thing that didn't come up much is this idea

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're pretty adaptable, and with a aptibility comes creativity.

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>There's an article from I O nine and it's by

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Jane Anders, and she writes it in terms of

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>culture shock, not necessarily future shock, that researchers William Maddox

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Dlinsky have done a lot of work showing

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that people who had a multi cultural experience, like living

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>in a foreign country for several months, they score higher

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>on various tests of creativity. And she said that you

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>could assume that people who have overcome future shock would

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.479
<v Speaker 1>similarly score higher on those tests, because what is future

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>shock but uncertainty about what's going on in anxiety. As

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a result, if you are dumped into a place that

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you are not familiar with, where the language is completely

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.400
<v Speaker 1>foreign to you, and the systems are different systems where

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you operate just day to day, then it's sort of

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Yeah, I mean, it's very much a

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>situation of worldview, you know, this which which you often

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>encounter when you're discussing religion. In the way that we

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we view ourselves within a cosmology, you know, we have

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this bubble around us, and in that bubble, within that

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bubble or ideas about who we are, how we fit

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in with the universe, what makes sense, what the rules are,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>who who is the us in the sentence, and who

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>are the others? Certainly religion can be a part of that,

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>but technology as well. I mean, technology is part of

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>your worldview, and if you are ever forced to step

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>outside of it like that, I feel like stepping outside

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of your worldview is is a vital, uh means of

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>gaining a larger understanding about what it is to be

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>human and what it what it is to exist on

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this planet. Yeah, I mean that's stepping out of your

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>normal cy bias. Yeah, stepping out of what you take

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for granted as the normal world and realizing, hey, there

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are other equally valid ways of looking at the universe.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>They're equally valid ways of dealing with day to day

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>life and they and they may involve drastically different technology.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>They may involve significantly less technology. Another thing that they

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't anticipate is that there would emerge out of this

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of future shock, or are all these different different

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>systems that were coming online a kind of retail homogeny

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>um and researcher Shigahiro Oyshi with the University of Virginia

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>writes about the idea that greater mobility is partly responsible

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>for the rise in the number of chain stores. So

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>no matter where you go, you see the same handful

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.199
<v Speaker 1>of shops and restaurants, and this is reassuring in an

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>age where people are moving around a lot. And actually,

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want more on this, you can see the

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>article why Americans love chain stores in Atlantic cities. Yeah,

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you do fall into that situation where there's going to

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be a part of any certainly American city that looks

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>just like it's uh, the same colony of commercialism in

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>another city. No matter what the actual environment is, no

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>matter what the actual cortial cultural demographics are, you're gonna

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>find that same strip mall land spreading out around the

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>earthen center like some sort of a mold. So ultimately,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, what can we still

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>learn from future shock, Why is this, Why is this

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>still relevant? You've got to use technology to build a decent,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>democratic and humane society, right, Yeah, certainly. I mean most

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of our really scary ideas of technology affecting the future,

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>uh tend to involve a loss of rights, the loss

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of humanity, and some sort of totalitarian flavoring to the

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>ice cream. But we we've also seen plenty of examples

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of say social media being used in the last few years,

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>where the technology is at least being used with the

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>intention of pushing um freedom. Yeah, and you do see

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>also in developing countries where this becomes really important. Um,

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter is used there in a way that

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not used you know, say and and Sudan. It's

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>being used there in the way that's not being used

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and is able to report things

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>in a way that people did not know what was

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>going on. So it's really important that way. But I

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>was just thinking that in terms of struct sure that

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>something like the city of Portland, Oregon or Portlandia is

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a great example. It's a microcosm and it doesn't barely

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>cover the issues that we're talking about today. But here's

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the city that in the nineteen seventies, was like, man,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what do we want to look like in twenty years?

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>And they actually invested a ton of money in their

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>transit system and in other ways that they thought would help, uh,

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy and the people grow there and then well

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and behold it becomes this grand city to to live

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in and everybody flocks to it. And in the same way,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you feel like you you hear this all

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the time, like you're we're going to invest in the future,

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's just lip service because a lot of it

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is just maintaining, um this this sort of same structures

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and power structures that have been in play. Yeah, there's

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>a again in Future Shock, there's the overall theme of

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the future is coming? Are you ready for it? And

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the sort of a physical example of that

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that I that I encountered my previous job where I

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>worked at a newspaper out in Covington, Georgia, which is uh,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>significantly outside the perimeter. But Atlanta is a big urban sprawl,

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so communities to sprawl outward like the like a blob,

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>like a big urban amiba. And there's a city between

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Covington and Atlanta called Conyers, and Conyers was always sort

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of this example of this is what happens when you

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>were not ready for the future to expand into your area,

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of an area where this urban expansion,

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this urban sprawl has just completely uh overflown everything, and

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it covers both the infrastructure, I mean the streets, and

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>then just also a personal identity of the town. So

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember there being a lot of talk like how

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna how is this town going to meet

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the future? We're gonna be washed over as well. Well.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Now think about something like a city like Beijing, how

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is that city going to meet the future? Because that city,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in many ways is a snapshot of what many large

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>cities in the world will look like in twenty thirty years.

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Because we know that we're migrating more and more and

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>more to cities, so we've got larger populations, and so

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>then it really becomes very important as to how you're

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>going to manage that and use technology in a way

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that helps support everybody as opposed to creating a greater

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>divide in wealth. Yeah. Yeah, Well, indeed, some of the

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>larger Chinese cities are a great example of like what

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>what can we learn from these cities? What have they

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>done right? What are they doing wrong? How are their

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.479
<v Speaker 1>steps to correct matters? Now? What should we learn from

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all these examples? And finally another issue that the top

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:25.719
<v Speaker 1>wars of course at the point out and I mentioned

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that this briefly talking about protests against technology revolting against technology.

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is the fact that we need to

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>realize when technologies are too dangerous, When or when is

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>our approach to it or handling of it, uh just

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>too much? When should we back off? Because certainly we

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be afraid of technology, we shouldn't be afraid of

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the future, we shouldn't bar any doors. But arguably we

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>need to have an understanding of what the risk are

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well. I think some of it too is

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like why would technology be dangerous? Well, it would be

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>dangerous because it would infringe, some people would say, on

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>your rights as a person. It would be dangerous because

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be used in nefarious ways. And we see

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that again with the n essay and accumulation of data

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to try to get a foothold in the world scene

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of staving off any sort of threats that

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States might think it has against it. Now,

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Toffler has a book called War and Anti War, and

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he says that in terms of war and these power

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>structures and danger, he says that the thesis is very

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>simple of his book, the way you make war is

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the way you make wealth. If you change the way

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you make wealth, you inevitably change the way you make war.

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>And if you change the way you make war, you

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>ought to be thinking about changing the way you make peace.

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>So I thought this is very interesting to to put

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it that way, because a lot of the strife that

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we feel is because there's a bunch of people douking

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it out power wise and trying to either accumulate wealth

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>or stature, or arms or all the above. Indeed, all right,

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>so there you have it, future shock, what they got right,

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what they got wrong, some of the various bits in between,

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And certainly there's a lot of room for discussion here

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>regarding those those bits and pieces that haven't been accounted

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for yet, some of these predictions that haven't come true,

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>but they haven't come true yet. Some of these problems

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that with technology that we're not really having to grapple

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>with now, but perhaps we're gonna have to grapple with them,

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>uh in the next ten years. In the next twenty years,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And wouldn't would be great to see a suite of

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 1>studies about future shock in places like Japan or other

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>places in Asia where you have a more robust AI presence,

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, to really try to put actual figures

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to this idea of anxiety. Yeah, you know, it would

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. Indeed, I mean they really should be just

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>straight up future shock studies. I like it all right,

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna close this one out. As usual, We'll

0:31:56.920 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com for

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>all of our podcast episodes, are blog episodes, are videos,

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>links out to our social media accounts like Twitter, Facebook, Tumbler,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus, YouTube, Mind Stuff Show that is our name.

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Now you can follow us on YouTube, subscribe to our channel,

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>stay up to date on the video content that we're

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>pumping out. And yet there is still another way to

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with it. Yeah, please email us at

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>well over the Mind at Discovery dot com for more

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics. Is it how

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com