1
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:13,160
Speaker 1: Welcome to NFL Daily, where we're not talking about last week,

2
00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:16,040
Speaker 1: but we're also probably not picking the rams anytime soon.

3
00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:21,200
Speaker 1: I'm here Greg Rosenthal with Cynthia Freeland, and yes, this

4
00:00:21,280 --> 00:00:26,360
Speaker 1: is the man Versus Model segment taking over the country

5
00:00:26,440 --> 00:00:29,760
Speaker 1: every week. The world we picked fan games.

6
00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:30,160
Speaker 2: Not just the country.

7
00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:33,000
Speaker 1: That's it is, it is global. I have appreciated everyone

8
00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:36,240
Speaker 1: that has been listening to this and hopefully not taking

9
00:00:36,360 --> 00:00:38,360
Speaker 1: all of our advice. More on that late there, because

10
00:00:38,400 --> 00:00:40,400
Speaker 1: some of it's good, some of it's bad. Yeah, let's

11
00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:42,519
Speaker 1: talk about next week very quickly. I went to zero

12
00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,360
Speaker 1: in three. That was a tough situation. Cynthia and I

13
00:00:45,479 --> 00:00:48,800
Speaker 1: were one together. Great, you weren't one and two. You're

14
00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:50,360
Speaker 1: three and three over on two and four. So I

15
00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:52,360
Speaker 1: hate starting out the season like this, but I don't care.

16
00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:56,200
Speaker 1: I am confident. This week we are picking winners and

17
00:00:56,560 --> 00:00:59,480
Speaker 1: we're gonna make it up to our listeners. I'm gonna start.

18
00:00:59,600 --> 00:01:01,639
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go first this week. Now that I'm I'm

19
00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:02,200
Speaker 1: kind of on that.

20
00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:05,120
Speaker 2: I like it. Listen, whatever gets you centered and grounded

21
00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:06,440
Speaker 2: and ready to go, let's go.

22
00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:08,280
Speaker 1: I kind of need it, like we need a good week.

23
00:01:08,280 --> 00:01:10,480
Speaker 1: I cannot see the rest another one in two week.

24
00:01:10,600 --> 00:01:13,959
Speaker 1: I feel great about the Seattle Seahawks minus four and

25
00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:16,440
Speaker 1: a half this week at home. I was really surprised

26
00:01:16,480 --> 00:01:18,600
Speaker 1: when I saw this number. The way the numbers have

27
00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:20,800
Speaker 1: been this season, I was like, Okay, this is gonna

28
00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:22,000
Speaker 1: be six and a half, this is gonna be seven.

29
00:01:22,040 --> 00:01:23,440
Speaker 1: It might even be seven a half. I would have

30
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:25,440
Speaker 1: considered it at seven and a half. Here's a few

31
00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:30,000
Speaker 1: reasons why Miami the thirtieth best pass blocking offensive line

32
00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:33,480
Speaker 1: in the league according to PFF. Like they can't protect.

33
00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:37,440
Speaker 1: They were not the same Miami Dolphins for the six

34
00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:40,399
Speaker 1: and a half quarters that tuatungue Iiloa was out there,

35
00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:43,119
Speaker 1: and that really sticks in my mind. They're twenty ninth

36
00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:46,199
Speaker 1: in a rushing efficiency, So what are they good at offensively?

37
00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:50,360
Speaker 1: Really nothing to me. What about their defensive backs? Okay,

38
00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:52,960
Speaker 1: they can at least have a good matchup. Jalen Ramsey

39
00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:54,880
Speaker 1: has not looked like the same Jalen r.

40
00:01:55,040 --> 00:01:57,480
Speaker 2: Traveling doesn't look good on him right He needs to

41
00:01:57,520 --> 00:01:58,240
Speaker 2: stay on the right.

42
00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:00,320
Speaker 1: Side, and he's coming off of an injury. And speaking

43
00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:02,600
Speaker 1: of traveling, they're going all the way across the country

44
00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:05,400
Speaker 1: to Seattle four and a half seems way too low.

45
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:08,040
Speaker 1: I love this. That's why I'm taking it first, because

46
00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:10,600
Speaker 1: I know you could take it with me, but when

47
00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:12,680
Speaker 1: we joined forces last week it did not go well.

48
00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:14,440
Speaker 1: All right, that is my first pick. I want to

49
00:02:14,480 --> 00:02:16,120
Speaker 1: hear who you have first, Cynthia.

50
00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:20,239
Speaker 2: I think there's a completely misspriced line for the Packers

51
00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:23,080
Speaker 2: when they face the Tennessee Titans. I loved the Malik

52
00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:25,960
Speaker 2: Willis like I think my check cash every time I

53
00:02:26,040 --> 00:02:28,720
Speaker 2: worked there, whatever. I thought that was very funny. However,

54
00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:32,680
Speaker 2: the opportunity here for the run game to really just

55
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:36,600
Speaker 2: exceed expectations. Whether it's Malik Willis or Jordan Love, I

56
00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:40,040
Speaker 2: don't care. Saw them last week against the Colts really

57
00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:42,359
Speaker 2: exploit the run. I don't think that it's a great

58
00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:45,480
Speaker 2: run defense. Is this not the same situation. But ultimately

59
00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:47,639
Speaker 2: in this matchup, you're going to be able to see

60
00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:48,560
Speaker 2: that run game persist.

61
00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:51,079
Speaker 1: That surprises me. So I do care a lot. If

62
00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:53,480
Speaker 1: Jordan Love plays this game, I'd probably be on the

63
00:02:53,520 --> 00:02:56,800
Speaker 1: Packer side. I like the Titans in this game, not

64
00:02:56,880 --> 00:02:58,720
Speaker 1: enough to pick them in this spot, but I like

65
00:02:58,760 --> 00:03:00,880
Speaker 1: the Titans. I picked them to w on game deview

66
00:03:01,320 --> 00:03:03,040
Speaker 1: for what it's worth, just because I like how their

67
00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:06,239
Speaker 1: defense is played so far. So your first pick is Packers.

68
00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:07,919
Speaker 1: Mine's gonna be an AFC South.

69
00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:09,639
Speaker 2: Packers and I get three points though, Yeah, okay, not

70
00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:12,280
Speaker 2: just Packers straight up, I want I am taking my

71
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:13,840
Speaker 2: three points and I'm keeping minute.

72
00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:15,760
Speaker 1: Yeah, you gotta, you gotta lock it in early. Who

73
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,800
Speaker 1: knows how it could change the Colts. I'm taking them

74
00:03:19,080 --> 00:03:22,280
Speaker 1: minus one point five this week against the Bears. I

75
00:03:22,360 --> 00:03:25,200
Speaker 1: really struggled with this this pick. I thought about the

76
00:03:25,240 --> 00:03:28,239
Speaker 1: Giants as a pick, but I'm going Colts over the Bears.

77
00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:29,920
Speaker 1: I just don't think that the Bears are that good

78
00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:31,560
Speaker 1: of a team right now. I mean, some of their

79
00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:35,800
Speaker 1: offensive numbers through two weeks are historically low, and when

80
00:03:35,800 --> 00:03:39,360
Speaker 1: I look at their defense, it's good. Is it great?

81
00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:41,800
Speaker 1: I don't know if they're really built to stop the run.

82
00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:45,080
Speaker 1: I think Matt Eberflus built a defense to be one

83
00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:47,760
Speaker 1: of the best pass defenses in the entire NFL. They're

84
00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:50,640
Speaker 1: great in the secondary, their linebackers cover, but they are

85
00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:52,720
Speaker 1: a little soft on the edges. They're a little soft

86
00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:55,080
Speaker 1: up the middle. And you play a Colts team that

87
00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:57,600
Speaker 1: has Anthony Richards and that has Jonathan Taylor, that's been

88
00:03:57,640 --> 00:04:00,880
Speaker 1: outstanding on the ground, like EPA for playt gen stats,

89
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:03,320
Speaker 1: all that stuff has the Colts as basically the second

90
00:04:03,400 --> 00:04:05,960
Speaker 1: or third best rushing team in the league against a

91
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:09,680
Speaker 1: pretty mediocre run defense. And then I just think about

92
00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:12,360
Speaker 1: sometimes logic and maybe this is where I go off

93
00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:14,680
Speaker 1: of the model and go up. But I look at

94
00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:17,200
Speaker 1: the Colts team and sometimes I just can't see them

95
00:04:17,200 --> 00:04:20,080
Speaker 1: as an OH and three team. These two teams look

96
00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:22,600
Speaker 1: like one and two type of teams to me, and

97
00:04:22,640 --> 00:04:25,599
Speaker 1: the Colts a little bit of extra juice, you know,

98
00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:28,000
Speaker 1: a little bit of extra motivation to avoid that zher

99
00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:30,599
Speaker 1: to three start. I just think the way that seasons

100
00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:33,280
Speaker 1: play out, I see them winning this game. I see

101
00:04:33,320 --> 00:04:36,719
Speaker 1: Taylor and Richardson maybe getting more rushing attempts that he

102
00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:38,760
Speaker 1: has the last few weeks in getting a win.

103
00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:40,400
Speaker 2: Against the Bears. I mean, if you said Taylor in

104
00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:41,880
Speaker 2: the fourth quarter like that, like you don't play him

105
00:04:41,880 --> 00:04:44,159
Speaker 2: in the fourth quart I don't know. I didn't understand that.

106
00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:47,640
Speaker 2: But I'm going exactly the opposite we are going, which

107
00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:50,760
Speaker 2: actually means we're guaranteed to get one of them. One

108
00:04:50,800 --> 00:04:52,680
Speaker 2: of us will be reading your fighter and this one

109
00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:55,080
Speaker 2: I'm going with the Bears. I'm taking the points. I

110
00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:58,120
Speaker 2: think the interesting part here is when I look at

111
00:04:58,160 --> 00:05:00,880
Speaker 2: you talk about defenses and you talk about vulnerability points

112
00:05:00,880 --> 00:05:04,159
Speaker 2: in the defense, I'm pretty sure that the Bears offensive

113
00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:06,560
Speaker 2: situation with Shane Waldron is going to say, hey, this

114
00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:09,839
Speaker 2: run defense. No DeForest Buckner too lot has been on

115
00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:13,160
Speaker 2: the injury report. When you're running against this team, there

116
00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:15,640
Speaker 2: are so many options. This is a like if I'm

117
00:05:15,680 --> 00:05:18,680
Speaker 2: playing in DFS leagues, I am like buying lots of

118
00:05:18,680 --> 00:05:21,359
Speaker 2: shares of DeAndre Swift because I think he's probably under

119
00:05:21,360 --> 00:05:23,680
Speaker 2: price given that he hasn't really performed very much earlier.

120
00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:26,200
Speaker 2: Like this is a situation where I know there a

121
00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:29,000
Speaker 2: line is not a source of strength yet. I know

122
00:05:29,120 --> 00:05:31,800
Speaker 2: third down is an issue still, but I think this

123
00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:34,560
Speaker 2: is like the Caleb believes this is his first passing touchdown.

124
00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:37,559
Speaker 2: You we're gonna deny the man opportunity for his first

125
00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:39,880
Speaker 2: passing touchdown. That's too many injuries.

126
00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:42,279
Speaker 1: He can get a passing touchdown. I don't think you

127
00:05:42,279 --> 00:05:44,839
Speaker 1: can get a win. My final one feel better about

128
00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:46,360
Speaker 1: this one. The cult was kind of my third pick.

129
00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:48,599
Speaker 1: Saints minus two point five.

130
00:05:48,839 --> 00:05:49,159
Speaker 2: Love it.

131
00:05:49,960 --> 00:05:54,400
Speaker 1: I really find this time of year fascinating for picking game,

132
00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:57,640
Speaker 1: because to me, it's kind of the ultimate to the

133
00:05:57,640 --> 00:06:00,640
Speaker 1: first two weeks of data tell you more, or to

134
00:06:00,760 --> 00:06:04,159
Speaker 1: the historical data tell you more. And I know because

135
00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:06,559
Speaker 1: we talked about it already on game debut. You picked

136
00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:09,640
Speaker 1: the Eagles straight up in this game, and yet to me,

137
00:06:09,760 --> 00:06:13,520
Speaker 1: the two weeks matter more. If you have an offense

138
00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:15,440
Speaker 1: as good as the Saints have been the last two weeks,

139
00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:17,000
Speaker 1: it means at the end of the season they are

140
00:06:17,000 --> 00:06:19,560
Speaker 1: going to be a high tier offense. And if you

141
00:06:19,560 --> 00:06:22,640
Speaker 1: want to look at the history this falcon, I mean

142
00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:24,200
Speaker 1: this Eagles team has been a little bit of a

143
00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:27,159
Speaker 1: mess for a while. On defense, they have really not

144
00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:30,400
Speaker 1: had answers going back to last year. They were terrible

145
00:06:30,440 --> 00:06:33,080
Speaker 1: all last year. Vic Fangio doesn't seem like they've really

146
00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:35,080
Speaker 1: figured out. And when I see like the strengths of

147
00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:37,359
Speaker 1: this Saints offense, which to me is going to be

148
00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:40,479
Speaker 1: leaning against this Eagles defense on the edges in the

149
00:06:40,600 --> 00:06:43,240
Speaker 1: running game, I think that translates very well to what

150
00:06:43,279 --> 00:06:46,520
Speaker 1: their vulnerabilities have been. And so you're at home. The

151
00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:50,200
Speaker 1: Saints are majoring in outside zone. The Eagles are flunking

152
00:06:50,279 --> 00:06:52,320
Speaker 1: right now in terms of their defense. I love the

153
00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:54,400
Speaker 1: Saints minus two point five this week.

154
00:06:54,440 --> 00:06:56,120
Speaker 2: But if I just told you that it kind of

155
00:06:56,160 --> 00:06:58,320
Speaker 2: neither one matters yet because it's not enough data for

156
00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:01,080
Speaker 2: one season. But also last season doesn't matter either, So

157
00:07:01,160 --> 00:07:02,520
Speaker 2: like what if the answer is neither anyway?

158
00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:04,560
Speaker 1: But then why does your model? I'm just curious because

159
00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:07,080
Speaker 1: we have the time here, yeah it's a podcast. Why

160
00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:11,360
Speaker 1: does your model have the Eagles winning this game outright?

161
00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:14,120
Speaker 1: When I know there must have been some inputs before

162
00:07:14,160 --> 00:07:15,880
Speaker 1: the season that the Saints team wasn't going to be

163
00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:18,920
Speaker 1: that great. But at this point, like they've shown a lot.

164
00:07:19,200 --> 00:07:22,160
Speaker 2: Well, they've shown their production has been good, but they

165
00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:24,960
Speaker 2: haven't shown a lot in terms of variabilities and plays.

166
00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:27,080
Speaker 2: They've just like run outside zone. Eighty percent of their

167
00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:29,400
Speaker 2: plays have been a run or play action. Like they've

168
00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:31,559
Speaker 2: run a lot of outside zone. So they're not showing

169
00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:34,680
Speaker 2: me a lot of different plays. That is a limiting factor.

170
00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:37,080
Speaker 2: So if something goes wrong, we don't really have any

171
00:07:37,160 --> 00:07:39,240
Speaker 2: data points to suggest that if they get into a

172
00:07:39,280 --> 00:07:42,120
Speaker 2: decent hole, that digging themselves out would be something that

173
00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:44,880
Speaker 2: would be easy to do, right or you know, we

174
00:07:44,960 --> 00:07:46,640
Speaker 2: don't know. There's a lot of We do.

175
00:07:46,600 --> 00:07:49,440
Speaker 1: Have like ten plus years of pretty tricky data on

176
00:07:49,520 --> 00:07:52,280
Speaker 1: Derek Carr. That's great, well buzzing now, so I'm not

177
00:07:52,280 --> 00:07:53,240
Speaker 1: aligating this.

178
00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:56,040
Speaker 2: So the comps like so it's like real estate, right,

179
00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:57,600
Speaker 2: Like if I'm going to go buy a house, the

180
00:07:57,680 --> 00:07:59,760
Speaker 2: price is based on the price per square foot, right,

181
00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:02,960
Speaker 2: That's the thing you look for, doppelgangers, lookalikes, things that

182
00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,080
Speaker 2: you can say, this is what compares to this. So

183
00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:08,240
Speaker 2: in historical data, when defense is configured like this, with

184
00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:10,880
Speaker 2: data like this, have faced offenses that look like this,

185
00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:14,120
Speaker 2: configured like this, that's what's happening. So it's not necessarily

186
00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:17,320
Speaker 2: like only this year's data. It's also lookalikes that are

187
00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:20,200
Speaker 2: relevant lookalikes from the past. So just say, you know, like,

188
00:08:20,200 --> 00:08:21,160
Speaker 2: that's how the model does it.

189
00:08:21,440 --> 00:08:24,280
Speaker 1: I look alike under the same team is the twenty nineteen.

190
00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:25,400
Speaker 1: They just got some magic to me.

191
00:08:25,600 --> 00:08:27,840
Speaker 2: No, I don't know. I like the Saints. Let's get

192
00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:31,680
Speaker 2: your third pick, my third pick, listen. I loved what

193
00:08:31,760 --> 00:08:34,880
Speaker 2: I saw from parts of this Raiders offense. I thought

194
00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:36,640
Speaker 2: it was a lot of fun to watch Brock powers

195
00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:40,800
Speaker 2: Davante Adams was essentially horizontal. I am still unclear if

196
00:08:40,840 --> 00:08:42,880
Speaker 2: he's subject to the same laws of gravity as the

197
00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:45,360
Speaker 2: rest of us. It is unclear, but I think this

198
00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:47,720
Speaker 2: is a really nice plus spot for them in a

199
00:08:47,760 --> 00:08:50,480
Speaker 2: game against the Panthers that are struggling, they're making some changes.

200
00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:52,040
Speaker 2: I think they're going to win by at least five

201
00:08:52,080 --> 00:08:54,959
Speaker 2: and a half points. That to me feels like an opportunity.

202
00:08:55,040 --> 00:08:58,280
Speaker 2: It is their home opener. Gardner Minshew has some really

203
00:08:58,280 --> 00:09:01,760
Speaker 2: interesting data, a little bit of like very vegasy data right,

204
00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:04,040
Speaker 2: Like there's some Boomer bust situation run down the field

205
00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:06,120
Speaker 2: very well he's been throwing down to. But I mean again,

206
00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:09,760
Speaker 2: seventeen being horizontal and brock Bauers just lighting things up.

207
00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:11,959
Speaker 2: I even think this could be a plus spot for

208
00:09:12,080 --> 00:09:14,240
Speaker 2: Jacoby Meyers, a guy who saw the end zone quite

209
00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:16,280
Speaker 2: a bit last season. So I just think this is

210
00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,439
Speaker 2: a really good opportunity for them. Especially there's no Derek

211
00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,160
Speaker 2: Brown on that defense for the Panthers. I haven't seen

212
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:24,640
Speaker 2: a lot of spark there. Maybe Andy Dalton will actually

213
00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:27,320
Speaker 2: make the offense have to do even more because if

214
00:09:27,360 --> 00:09:29,880
Speaker 2: he scores a bit right, then the score could get

215
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:32,400
Speaker 2: the score overall could get jacked up a little bit.

216
00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:35,319
Speaker 2: But I think this will be a situation where Max

217
00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:38,800
Speaker 2: Crosby against those tackles just feels like a bad idea.

218
00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:41,360
Speaker 2: So get the ball out quickly. Andy Dalton, stay with

219
00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:43,840
Speaker 2: your kind of your history of being a quick passer.

220
00:09:44,240 --> 00:09:45,600
Speaker 1: But Dold could play well.

221
00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:48,600
Speaker 2: I feel like it's a anti Dalton take at all.

222
00:09:48,840 --> 00:09:50,800
Speaker 2: It's just a pro Vegas take.

223
00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:53,040
Speaker 1: If Bryce Young was a starter. I suspect this line

224
00:09:53,080 --> 00:09:55,840
Speaker 1: would be a couple points bigger in Vegas.

225
00:09:55,880 --> 00:09:58,200
Speaker 2: In I wonder, what can we call them Vegas? It's

226
00:09:58,200 --> 00:09:59,720
Speaker 2: Cynthia Calmy would have.

227
00:09:59,679 --> 00:10:03,679
Speaker 1: Be are pretty similar to Vegas. The model computes it all,

228
00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:04,960
Speaker 1: and I'm with you. If I had to pick a

229
00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:06,520
Speaker 1: side on this, it's not what was one of my

230
00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:08,480
Speaker 1: favorite ones, just because it's so much uncertainty.

231
00:10:08,480 --> 00:10:10,240
Speaker 2: Becau Jeff Saturday has won a game in this league.

232
00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:14,760
Speaker 1: I mean that they pick the Raiders if I had to.

233
00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:16,760
Speaker 1: Now we're going to wrap up the show just with

234
00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:18,760
Speaker 1: a little something that I just wanted to point out

235
00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:20,840
Speaker 1: about last week. I'm embarrassed I went to one three.

236
00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:23,839
Speaker 1: I failed. But if you do watch this on our

237
00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:26,680
Speaker 1: YouTube show, you can see the little extra picks I

238
00:10:26,720 --> 00:10:28,439
Speaker 1: make which I throw out at the end, and I

239
00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:31,080
Speaker 1: actually have a note card I want our producer to

240
00:10:31,120 --> 00:10:34,120
Speaker 1: throw up there and you can see I circled about

241
00:10:34,160 --> 00:10:35,800
Speaker 1: five more picks and I set them on the show

242
00:10:35,880 --> 00:10:40,439
Speaker 1: New Orleans, Vikings, Bucks, Steelers, and Jags. I went four

243
00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:42,319
Speaker 1: and one on those picks. So that's two weeks in

244
00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:44,040
Speaker 1: a row. That little extra box.

245
00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:45,240
Speaker 2: What's in the box this week?

246
00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:48,280
Speaker 1: That I made something like eight and two, So those

247
00:10:48,280 --> 00:10:49,439
Speaker 1: are just a little extra ones.

248
00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:51,040
Speaker 2: I want to know the box beforehand.

249
00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:53,959
Speaker 1: Okay, I know Giants I told you before, and I'm botho.

250
00:10:54,080 --> 00:10:56,160
Speaker 1: I like Giants a lot plus six point Frae. That

251
00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:58,240
Speaker 1: one I really debated. I almost wanted to put that

252
00:10:58,320 --> 00:11:00,000
Speaker 1: in my top three. I just think the Browns are

253
00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:01,760
Speaker 1: not good enough to be favored by that much at

254
00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:04,080
Speaker 1: this point. I like the Ravens minus one, kind of

255
00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:07,080
Speaker 1: going off the whole. Can't imagine the Raves getting to

256
00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:08,440
Speaker 1: Owen three. I think they're a.

257
00:11:08,720 --> 00:11:10,480
Speaker 2: Little more math than that. But I do like the

258
00:11:10,520 --> 00:11:11,520
Speaker 2: next Craig stat and.

259
00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,000
Speaker 1: Then the Bengals minus seven. I just think they're offense.

260
00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:16,280
Speaker 1: T Higgins coming back against the worst defense in the

261
00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:18,040
Speaker 1: league of bad secondary I think they could win that

262
00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:19,680
Speaker 1: game by ten. I think it could be like thirty

263
00:11:19,679 --> 00:11:21,760
Speaker 1: three to twenty one. Washington puts up some points but.

264
00:11:21,720 --> 00:11:24,560
Speaker 2: I like, like, I like what you're like, what you're saying.

265
00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:27,599
Speaker 1: What if you want to hear more I do of Cynthia? No, no, no,

266
00:11:28,400 --> 00:11:32,640
Speaker 1: got enough of me. It's been along Oh NFL Tube channel.

267
00:11:32,800 --> 00:11:36,559
Speaker 1: You can check out Cynthia's weekly preview every week, right,

268
00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:40,840
Speaker 1: so please game show Cynthia Freeland the Numbers game and

269
00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:44,320
Speaker 1: uh yeah, it's been awesome all week. Appreciate you checking

270
00:11:44,360 --> 00:11:46,880
Speaker 1: out Man versus Model. Week three, we will be.

271
00:11:46,880 --> 00:11:50,200
Speaker 2: Back as winners. You back as winners, that's true.

272
00:11:50,240 --> 00:11:53,719
Speaker 1: And Week four, but on Sunday Night, Patrick clayban Nick

273
00:11:53,760 --> 00:11:56,800
Speaker 1: shook an eye wrapping up all the week three games

274
00:11:56,840 --> 00:11:59,199
Speaker 1: and yeah, I can brag about how smart these picks were.

275
00:11:59,280 --> 00:12:00,920
Speaker 1: Then football is back