WEBVTT - Apple Chooses Alibaba For China AI, Elon Musk Continues OpenAI Feud

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York. Come Caroline Hyde and.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jackie Devalas in San Francisco.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 5>Apple's iPhones will use Ali Baba's AI technology or the

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 5>partnership help Apple revive iPhone sales in China. Plus Reddit

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 5>shares fool as user growth underwhelms. We talk with the

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 5>COO about Google's algorithm.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 2>And its in house AI and.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 5>The feud between Elon Musk and Open Ai.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>It continues with Musk saying he.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Would drop his bid for the startup if it halts

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 5>its for profit restructuring. Drip feed News This coming as

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 5>reports that yes, Ali Baba is going to be lending

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 5>it's AI general to AI technology for Apple.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence in China, crucial in terms.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 5>Of market share for this all important geography.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 2>But will it remain exclusive?

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 5>There is so much to talk with Bloomberg's round Vastelica

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 5>about it, about the importance of China. But this is

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 5>Josi for was the chairman of Ali Baba, confirming previous

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 5>reporting out there that Apple is getting its first general

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 5>to AI partnership in China.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 6>Hey, thanks for having me, So this is a big development.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 6>China is obviously a major market for Apple. I think

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 6>they got about seventeen percent of their revenue from the

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 6>Greater China region in their most recent fiscal year. They

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 6>have been seeing a little bit of struggle there in

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 6>terms of sales. They're seeing increased competition from companies like Huawei.

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 6>So the idea that they can get sort of really

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 6>strong AI features onto devices there in China, that has

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 6>seen as a real opportunity for them to kind of

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 6>prove their fortunes there and that would help with overall growth,

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 6>which is something that investors have been looking for for

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 6>quite a while.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about some of the mechanics behind the manufacturing.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about the tariff risk. How are investors thinking

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 3>about this potential risk as it relates to Apple.

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 6>So Apple's really in sort of the crosshairs here because

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 6>it does have such a major manufacturing hub out of

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 6>China that we have seen tariff levy I think was

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 6>tim percent tariffs China retaliated. It also has some kind

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 6>of probe looking at Apple app store policy. So there's

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 6>certainly a lot of questions here. We don't know how

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 6>long tariffs might be in place for. We don't know

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 6>if there's going to be an escalation. We don't know

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 6>if Apple might get some kind of exemption the way

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 6>it did during the first Trump term. So far, it

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 6>seems like people aren't seen too significant an impact to

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 6>earnings from this. But this is something that could clearly

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 6>escalate and become a much bigger issue very quickly.

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 5>And certainly we've seen the ramifications on the stock price

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 5>from investigations coming from China from a regulatory perspective, and

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 5>certainly Germany also looking into it.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 2>On the day as well. Ryan point us forward.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 5>From how this baks into evaluation and Apple, as we say,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 5>over the last five days, we're up two point seven percent.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, recent performance has been pretty good.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 7>Overall.

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 6>It has been an underperformer this year because of the

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 6>early concerns about how strong iPhone sixteen demand was, and

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 6>you know, the overall kind of geopolitical environments. You know,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 6>the stock does have a pretty high multiple given the

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 6>fact that the growth is not what you're seeing in

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 6>some of the other mag seven names. But people do

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 6>consider it a pretty defensive and sort of safe haven

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 6>kind of company, just because it's cash flow is enormous.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 6>It spends billions of dollars on buybacks. It hasn't been

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 6>planning a ton of capbex into AI, which has become

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:41.839
<v Speaker 6>a concern for some of the other stocks. So there's

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 6>certainly still reasons to recommend it, you know, services growth.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 6>You can kind of go down a list of issues

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 6>like that, but do you think overall, I mean, people

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 6>have been looking for a more pronounced growth inflection from

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 6>the company, and when you have all these concerns about

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 6>tariffs and China and so forth like that, that does

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 6>make that a little bit harder in the near term.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Ryan West delica, thanks for joining us. Meanwhile, shares

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 3>of Intel are rising and on track for its biggest

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>one week jump in twenty five years.

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>This as a report from Baar says.

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 3>That the company could be in talks to work with

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a TSMC on a potential project for more. Bloomberg's Ian

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>King joins us now Ian Intel has had a turbulent

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 3>couple months. It's CEO being ousted. How much does Intel

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 3>need a project like this.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 8>I think in general, we've seen the stock go up

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 8>over the last few days. There's been a lot of speculation.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 8>What investors want is something to happen from the outside

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 8>that could help Intel, because they've seen over the last

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 8>couple of years that it really hasn't been able to

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 8>change the direction of its fortunes. So, whether it's JD.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 8>Van's talking in Europe about hey, we need to do

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 8>a made in America, whether it's speculation in Asia about

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 8>it potentially getting help from partner, from partners who are

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 8>currently competitors and less as are just looking for something,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, give me a sign, give me a spark.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 5>Talking of spark and signs coming at the moment from Apple,

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 5>I just want to return to some breaking news to

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Tim Cook is indeed posting about the next member of

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 5>the Apple family coming on February the nineteenth. Throughout one

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 5>point two percent. Much has been reported about the latest

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 5>cheaper se revamp coming from our own Mark German previously,

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 5>but at the moment, all the statement coming from Tim

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 5>Cook is we are awaiting the newest member of the

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 5>family of Apple. And you go to the ex post

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 5>from Tim Cook, the CEO of that business.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>In sticking more with.

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 5>What's occurring on the manufacturing side of things and what's happening.

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>With Intel, we know that maybe they'll look at.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Outsourcing manufacturing doing deals with TSMC, But more broadly, how

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 5>in line with this is what pat originally wanted or

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 5>how much of is a distinction from previous leadership.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's we have to be careful here

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 8>to point to there being a lot of speculation. We

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 8>don't actually know the much is happening right now. What

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 8>we really need is big customers. If they get the

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 8>big customers with huge orders that give them a lot

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 8>of volume to fill those factories, then the plan is on.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 8>Then what Gelsinger tried to put in place is actually

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 8>paying off. Until we see, you know, Apple or Nvidia

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.599
<v Speaker 8>or somebody else like that putting lots and lots of

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 8>chips into Intel's factories, the plan is not really going anywhere.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 5>In King and all things Intel, which might say, has

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 5>been on quite the crescendo in the last three weeks

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 5>in terms of its share price. Let's give to Nooon

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 5>breaking News SpaceX. We understand in South Africa the talks

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 5>are stalling over tensions with Elon Musk and with President Trump,

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX and South Africa. The negotiators intend to restart talks later.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 5>This all about space X's adoption and its satellite use

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 5>in South Africa.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Will have more on that as and when we get it.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 5>But coming up, we'll be joined by Reddit COO Gen

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Wong to break down the company's earnings. That's coming next.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 5>This is bloom meg Technology. Just look at Reddit right

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 5>now shares our dam that's after fourth quarter user growth

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 5>missed Wall Streets expectations that we're having in the worst days.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 5>It's November, the twenty second Reddit itself saying user growth

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 5>was indeed impacted last quarter after Google made a change

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 5>to its algorithm that impacted search traffic. Let's begin. Reddit

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 5>COEO Gen Wong joins us now and just talk to

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 5>us about how this quarter is currently looking in terms

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 5>of the reaction to Google's overall algorithm change and how

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 5>you drive your own fortunes when it comes to the

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 5>use and adoption.

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Is staying with Reddit.

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for having me, Good morning. Q four was a

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 9>really strong quarter for us.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 10>We saw daily active users growth thirty nine percent ear year,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 10>the revenue grow seventy one percent year. Every year so

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 10>I think in terms of growth, we're probably top of

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 10>the market in terms of both of those. Start to

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 10>find a company that's growing as fast for the things

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 10>that we control. In terms of making the product better,

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 10>making it easier, helping people find communities faster.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 9>We're really happy with our work.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 10>Our work is working, and that's been consistent over the

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 10>last four quarters, and there's a lot more there. We're

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 10>still early in that process. In late Q four we

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 10>did see that there were some changes in Google that

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 10>sort of came and went. We've seen recovery since then

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 10>and we're off to a really good start and the

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 10>work that we're doing again continues to bear fruit and

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 10>making Reddit more extensible. Reddit is an opportunity, as an

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 10>opportunity to address everybody. The whole world needs community and

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 10>has passions and interests and can be on Reddit. So

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 10>we make redit easier, more accessible, help people find their

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 10>communities faster. That's when it becomes extend incible to everybody

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 10>in the world. So our tam is really everybody. We're

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 10>just early in that journey, so we feel very good

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 10>about our roadmap and our opportunity.

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Jen Reddit has a licensing agreement with Google and in

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the earnings call yesterday, the company called that relationship symbiotics.

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 3>So the faster that users can find Reddit on a

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Google search, the more engaged they can be on your website,

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>and then in turn, the better data that Google is

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 3>able to glean. Have you had conversations with Google about

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe cutting you some slack or at least giving you,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 3>guys a heads up next time there's an algorithm.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 10>Change the way that Google work, you know, Google Google

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 10>the way the algorithm work is there proprietary work. The

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 10>conversations we've had are around obviously the Reddit data and

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 10>how that can be used for training and for in

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 10>their you know, search generative products. There's no question that

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 10>it's a symbiotic relationship in that. What happened when next year,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 10>I think in searches demonstrates this. So Reddit has become

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 10>the sixth most search term in US in Google.

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 9>I mean, that's incredible.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 10>That means people are intentionally searching for Reddit. They're typing

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 10>in a query what's the best backpack Reddit? Because they

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 10>are trying to navigate to the recommendations and the trove

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 10>of human intelligence on Reddit, and because Reddit has the

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 10>best answers on the internet, and Google is a place

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 10>where people go for broad based questions. It's a really

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 10>symbiotic relationship, and that helps reveal the corpus of information

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 10>that Reddit has to users who are searching the broad

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 10>based Internet. So in that sense, you know, it's been

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 10>a very fruitful partnership.

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 4>But if it's getting harder for users.

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 3>To find a Reddit link via Google Search, do you

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.599
<v Speaker 3>see this kind of algorithm change or similar ones in

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the future straining that relationship.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 10>We've been beneficiaries of the open Internet, and again, when

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 10>people are intentionally navigating to Reddit, that tells us that

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 10>they are trying to access that information on red the recommendations,

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 10>the advice. So I think we're really important because we're

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 10>actually what users are seeking, right, they're actively searching for us.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 9>The way we think about it is this whole process of.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 10>Data licensing is really I think revealed how important reddits

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 10>content is, and we also have an opportunity to build

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 10>our own products around our corpus of information. You see

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 10>this with us testing something called Reddit Answers, which is

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 10>a chat based search that reveals recommendations on Reddit.

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 9>Again what's the best backpack.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 10>But it gives you a search result that is specific

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 10>to Reddit that shows answers and opinions across every subreddit

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 10>a really different experience from broad based internet search, and

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 10>I think we have an opportunity to continue to build

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 10>our own products around our corpus of information in addition

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 10>to being in sort of broad based search on the Internet.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 5>So speak to those analysts or investors with some anxiety

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 5>about the dependence on Google. How much is Reddit ass

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 5>boosting the engagement that you control.

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 10>Reddit answers is early right now, it's it's in a

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 10>beta test, But we like what we're seeing there.

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 9>I think the thesis of people wanting.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 10>To come and be able to search Reddit and see

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 10>what is happening across opinions across all communities, that thesis,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 10>I think.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 9>Is born out, and so we're excited about what we

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 9>see there.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 10>We are investing in search search of Reddit, and there's

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 10>an opportunity for us that will continue to be building out.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 10>When I think about the opportunity here, it's it's it's enormous, right,

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 10>I mean recommendations and advice. We have twenty years of

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 10>conversations on every topic on the planet, and so it's

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 10>core to our mission to empower communities and make their

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 10>knowledge accessible both to all.

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 3>That's red at COO. Jen Wong, thanks so much for

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 3>joining us. We also caught up with the CEO of

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Lyft yesterday on the heels of the company's earnings. We

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 3>discussed his outlook on autonomous vehicles and competition with the

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 3>likes of Weaimo, and he says Lift's market share in

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco has not.

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Moved to a listen.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 11>In San Francisco, it's flat.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 12>Interesting is even as they increase in San Francisco, our

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 12>share has been flat now, So that suggests that the

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 12>market is expanding, maybe suggests that they're taking some share from.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 11>The other guys. I don't know.

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 12>In Phoenix, we're actually growing faster than ever, so we

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 12>grow about fifteen percent nationwide in Phoenix. It's a little

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 12>north of that. So that also even and Wyn was

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 12>quite active there. So it's a great profit. It's great technology,

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 12>but I think a lot of people come and they

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 12>use it, and they like it, and then they come

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 12>back to traditional ride share and.

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 11>Use this both.

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Your competitor, Uber said it would quote hopefully partner with

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's on autonomous vehicles. They said that last year has

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 3>lived had any conversations with Elon Musk or Tesla about

0:13:58.679 --> 0:13:59.719
<v Speaker 3>a potential partnership.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 12>You know, I don't talk about individual things like that.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 12>I think, you know, there's this sort of danger of

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 12>kind of trying to win the press release and announcement war,

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 12>and we try to win the service war. That's kind

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 12>of our thing. So I want to say not. I

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 12>think it's I think that'll be all kinds of partnerships,

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 12>I really do, and the ones that happen, we'll kind of.

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 11>Have to see.

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>The incoming Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has proposed that a

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>federal level law should kind of supersede this patchwork of

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 3>state by state rules for autonomous vehicles. Do you think

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 3>this new administration would help lift's ambitions in autonomous vehicles?

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 11>I do, I do.

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 11>The safe by state thing is really hard.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 12>I mean, it's you understand, you want to do some

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 12>local experimentation in different states are different, they have different cultures,

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 12>they have different geographies, different weather and.

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 11>So on and so forth.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 12>But an overall sort of safety, you know, kind of

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 12>framework and general autonomous vehicle framework I think would be

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 12>very helpful in helping this industry move a little bit

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 12>faster and frankly, keep up with the way the rest.

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 11>Of the world is going.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 3>That was Lift CEO David Risher. We're also watching shares

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 3>of Coinbase. Shares are up over six percent because it's

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 3>a key beneficiary of President Trump's promise to usher in

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 3>a new era for the cryptospace.

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 4>The exchange is.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Reporting fourth quarter results after the belt today, and Wall

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Street is expecting to see a boost in trading volumes

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 3>on the back of bitcoins gains.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Blue Origin, Jeff Bezos' rocket company, is cutting ten percent

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 5>of its workforce to cut costs, to trim manager ranks,

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 5>and to focus on ramping.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Up rocket launches.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 5>That the surprise round of layoffs comes about a month

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 5>after Blue Origin debuted its flagship New Glen Rocket Swing

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.479
<v Speaker 5>years of delays and development setbacks.

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Jackie startup K two Space has raised one hundred and

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 3>ten million dollars in a series speed funding ground led

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>by light Speed Ventures and Ultimeter Capital. The company, created

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 3>by former SpaceX engineers, is developing.

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 4>A platform to launch multiple.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Satellites into orbit at higher speed and lower costs than

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>currently available. Joining us now is K two Space CEO

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Karen Kundred. Thank you so much for joining us. Walk

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 3>us through about what your platform actually does. It's essentially

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 3>almost like a bus for satellites. How are you able

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 3>to do this at a cheaper price?

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 13>So we're building a platform that is ten times more

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 13>powerful than existing platforms.

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 11>Today.

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 13>When it comes to applications in space, almost every application

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 13>ties back to power. So my brother and I kind

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 13>of started the company on the contrarian bet.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 11>We decided to go the opposite direction.

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 13>Of the market that was going smaller and lower power

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 13>with their satellites and redesign the satellite. From the reaction,

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 13>weill up to build a platform that is higher power,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 13>higher capability, while still being able to multi manifest into

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:42.239
<v Speaker 13>launch vehicles to do constellations.

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 5>The market has come to your contrariant bet because SpaceX

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 5>is starship just the innovation in terms of bigger and

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 5>bigger rockets being able to pay take these bigger and

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 5>bigger payloads. I'm interested in ultimately what the manufacturing therefore

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 5>is needed in the United States because you're vertically integrated exactly.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, all launch players like SpaceX and Blue Origin are

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 13>moving the market larger. We kind of equate it to

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 13>we're moving from an era of launch constraint in space

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 13>to launch abundance. It's almost as if we're operating in

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 13>the age of dial up internet and moving to broadband,

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 13>and our company was started under this premise of like

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 13>what happens at this new age of broadband where we

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 13>can do things differently. For us, it's vertical integration, it's

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 13>rebuilding the satellite. We're building about seventy five percent of

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 13>the satellite in the house, and that allows us to

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 13>do a lot of unique things to optimize the platform

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 13>for the launch future that we see coming, not necessarily

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 13>the launch vehicles of the past.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 3>You've already brought in millions of dollars worth of contracts,

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 3>both coming from the public sector but also commercial contracts.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 3>We've heard a lot about the DoD getting inside Silicon

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Valley trying to scoop up some of those startup ideas.

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 4>But talk to us about your commercial.

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 3>Partnerships, because there's a lot of space companies out there

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 13>The interesting thing about going higher power, when you tex

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 13>the amount of power, you also dramatically increase the throughput

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 13>per satellite. So our commercial customers are mainly commercial operators

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 13>that are beaming data down from space that see the

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 13>potential when you have ten times the amount of power

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 13>to fundamentally change the unit economics of their business. Higher

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 13>power means more throughput while maintaining the low cost means

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 13>that they're actually able to deploy even more satellites with

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 13>even more capacity on orbit in a way they never

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 13>could before.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 3>So are these like SpaceX, Blue Origin those kind of players.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 13>SpaceX and Blue Origin are two of the players, but

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 13>there's a bunch of others out there as well that

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 13>are also thinking about how to better operate their constellations

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 13>on orbit.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 5>What's so interesting is the government side of things as well, Karen,

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 5>And you've got John Plum, of course, who used to

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 5>be in government, former Assistance Sectuary of Defense for Space

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 5>policy in house now. But how is it liaising with

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 5>the current administration that we've just had breaking news that

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 5>a deal with Starling over in South Africa is in

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 5>jeopardy because of relationships between Elon Musk and President Trump.

0:18:57.960 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>How are you finding relationships?

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we were pretty excited to bring John on the team.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 13>He's the former Assistant Secretary of Defense for space policy.

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 13>When we first briefed him, he kind of saw what

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 13>was possible with this completely new platform at the end

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 13>of the day, we believe that if we build a

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 13>platform that is as differentiated as what we claim it

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 13>to be, our work with the national security and commercial

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 13>customers will come regardless of the political environment. What I

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 13>will say is that the existing administration has clearly shown

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 13>that they believe space is the next frontier, an important

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 13>place to have investment, and we're pretty excited to continue

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 13>to service our national security customers.

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 3>You know news today that Blue Origin is cutting ten

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 3>percent of its workforce. Are you worried at all that

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 3>that signals a broader slow down in the space in

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 3>any way?

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's you know, we have a lot of friends

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 13>that work over there. We're pretty sad to see hear

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 13>about that, and you know, we'll be trying to hire

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 13>ourselves people that may be leading from that company. I

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 13>think layoffs and investment are always a part of the

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 13>national natural capital cycle when it comes to any business.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 13>You don't like to see it, but sometimes that happens,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 13>and so I don't think it's a nicative of a

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 13>broader trend. I mean, we raised we were preempted on

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 13>our Series A thirteen months ago. We were preempted again

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.400
<v Speaker 13>on our Series B two months ago, we've raised about

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 13>one hundred and eighty million dollars in venture capital.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 11>Today we're not seeing that.

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 13>What we see is if we're truly building something that's different,

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 13>with the differentiated team that's going after it, the capital

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 13>is there to fund our vision.

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so potentially hiring up some of that talent that

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 5>has to be pushed out.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Talk about next steps?

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 5>Where next do we see K two space? You've just

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 5>this month, well I think it was in January in fact,

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 5>flying several technology demonstrations using SpaceX.

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 2>What's the next key marker?

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so we just finished up our first successful in

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 13>space mission, so, as we like to say, we're now

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 13>a real space company.

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 11>And yeah, we were pretty excited to.

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 13>Have that because, as I said, we're kind of resetting

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 13>the entire supply chain, so we had to fly a

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 13>bunch of the components that we built from scratch to

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 13>start buying down risk on the full platform.

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 11>We're now shifting gears.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 13>We're moving towards the full satellite platform mission that's called Gravitas,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 13>that's launching fund of twenty twenty six. We want a

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 13>thirty million dollars contract back in December from the Department

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 13>of Defense to fly a number of national security payloads,

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 13>and our goals is to basically showcase this differentiated platform

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 13>and buy down the entire risk of the platform. We're

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 13>going to fly to the harshest environments. We're going to

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 13>test the platform. We're going to show what happens when

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 13>you have twenty kilo lots of power, and we're really

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 13>going to prove out this completely new capability to our customer.

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Set Leo moo Leeos Karen Kunjam, We thank you so much,

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Ceo KTI Space, It's great having time with you. Welcome

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 5>back to LUMAT Technology and Caroline Hyder.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 3>New York, and I'm Jackie Devalas in San Francisco.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 5>Quick check on these markets and in fact single names, Jackie,

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 5>there are still earnings coming thick and fast, the good,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 5>the bad, the ugly.

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 5>App Lovin up twenty eight percent, not forty percent growth

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 5>in terms of their previous year revenue, but they're also

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 5>selling off their game development unit for nine hundred million

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 5>dollars to private company.

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 2>The investors love it.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 5>We're up twenty eight percent, trade desk down thirty one percent,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 5>a rare miss for the advertising focused business. And this is,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 5>as Fundamental said, they disappointed themselves in terms of their

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 5>own growth in.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 2>The previous years.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 5>So investors really trying to take on board what this

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 5>means in terms of sentiment for advertising and trade desk.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, Data Dog also under.

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 5>Pressure up eight percent, down eight percent. This is they too,

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 5>see an underwhelming forecast in particular, and really trying to

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 5>see from an analyst and investment perspective, this is just

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 5>conservative if actually the cloud trend is going to be

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 5>good for them in the long term, and indeed some

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 5>of the generative AI adoption for the software company move

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 5>on to generative AI story of the day, Apple because finally.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll get some Apple intelligence into China.

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 5>Because it seems though Joe Sai over of course, that

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Ali Barber is confirming that, yes, the reports are true.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 2>We are going to be teaming up with Apple.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 5>We're going to be giving them access to our generative

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 5>AI models, and you're going to get Apple intelligence in China.

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 5>The first of these deals when it remained exclusive for long, Jackie,

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 5>what you.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Got Elon Musk's bid to buy open Ai is being

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 3>used against the tech billionaire. Lawyers for Lawyers for Sam

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Altman argue that the offer ultimately contradicts Musk's arguments that

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 3>open Ai cannot be transferred away for private gain. In

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 3>response to open eyes filing, Tesla CEO told the court

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 3>he'd drop his bid for open Ai if the company

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 3>halts it's restructuring for more. Bloomberg's Rachel Metz joins us. Now, Rachel,

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>does this feud risk slowing down Open Eye's progress?

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 14>That is the possibility, at least as far as the

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 14>progress toward the restructuring. It certainly puts more attention on

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 14>what's happening there, and they're in the middle of what

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 14>is no matter what going to be a submen lengthy process.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 14>And it certainly, you know, with the court battle of

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 14>that open Ai an Eland must have, this puts.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.239
<v Speaker 9>Like one more It's like one more way to come

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 9>up the works.

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 5>And I think we've got to remember the context, the

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 5>complex context to all of this. Fifteen Elong Sam other

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 5>founders make a not for profit twenty nineteen. It becomes

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 5>in part a for profit with a cap for profit

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 5>that the nonprofit controls. And now well that might reverse

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 5>as to who controls whom.

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 14>It's very complicated, and you can see how that structure

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 14>itself also makes it hard to even understand if you

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 14>are putting in a bid for this for the startup

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 14>portion of the company, and that's in its assets, like

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 14>what exactly are you buying?

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 9>How much should it be valued at?

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 14>So, yeah, it is overall just a very complicated situation.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 14>And then if you put in a feud there, yeah,

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 14>you're making You're making things ultra complicated.

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Wow, the media and spectators are here for it, Rachel Metz.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate your time and giving us the context. Meanwhile,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 5>Adobe sticking with generator of AI is a mean to

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 5>convince skeptical investors that it can compete with AI startups

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 5>such as open Ai. The company introduced a new product

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 5>that charges around fifty cents per AI generated video now.

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 5>It also launched new subscriptions for its fly ai models.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 2>For more.

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 5>We joined by Blue Merg's Brodie Ford. Interesting that we

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:05.239
<v Speaker 5>get the price point here.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely so Adobe, it's really existential for them in the

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 15>pre AI era, if you needed to edit some photos

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 15>and videos, you needed Adobe. The big question for the

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 15>last two years has been once generative AI becomes more commonplace,

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 15>do you still need Adobe? And it seems investors change

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 15>their mind every six months, and so today what is

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 15>so interesting is that we are getting you know, it's

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 15>going to be about fifty cents a pop to make

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 15>AI videos. That's pretty competitive with some of the startup rivals,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 15>which is meaningful because the startup rivals don't have to

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 15>report every quarter, they can eat some costs a little longer.

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 15>So it's interesting to see them price what I would

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 15>think as somewhat aggressively.

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Here, Bertie, let's talk about the product itself. How does

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 3>it compare with what's already on the market, because open

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Ai and even Runway also have competing products.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 15>I thought it was pretty cool, right, and I tried

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 15>it out yesterday and I found it to be a

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 15>pretty effective product that worked well. I mean, and what

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 15>Adobe has always said is not that we are going

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 15>to have the number one best model visually, but that

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 15>we're going to have really great controls. You're going to

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 15>be able to integrate it with the software you already use,

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 15>You're going to keep it in the ecosystem in general,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 15>especially for enterprises, they don't want to have a bunch

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 15>of bespoke models coming in with potential security risks, and

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 15>so ADOBEA has really tried to make sure that it

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 15>integrates well into existing environments. And you know, I was

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 15>impressed with some of those manual tools and trying get out.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Yesterday, Body Ford across the Adobe News.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 11>We appreciate it.

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring you some macro news. Government news here. Robert F.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Kennedy Junior has indeed been confirmed as a new head

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 5>of the US Department of Health and Human Services. Is

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 5>approved with a fifty two to forty eight vote after

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty tense confirmation hearings. And we'll now of course have

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 5>influence of the FDA, the CDC, and the federal insurance programs.

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 5>Morgan Stanley boosting the latest debt offering of.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Elon musk X. Now the bank will.

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 5>Upsize it's offering from the market to three billion dollars

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 5>to four point seven billion dollars or due to strong

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 5>investor demand.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Jackie.

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Here's what some of Bloomberg's TV guests had to say

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 3>about Deep Seek at the Paris AI summit taking place

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 3>earlier this week.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 6>I feel so confident about our research shroadmap and also

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 6>our product droadmap.

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 11>That you know, Deep Seak will do whatever Deep Seak's

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 11>going to do.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 16>Other people do whatever they're going to do and we're

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 16>just going to try to like build.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 11>The best technology we can and get into people's hands.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 7>It's a very impressive model, or very impressive piece of work.

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 7>I think the team is probably the best team that

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 7>I've seen come out of China. So that said, I

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 7>think a lot of the claims are exaggerated and a

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 7>little bit misleading.

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>A lot of the key things from deep Seak are

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 3>reducing the cost of innovation, but also raising this question

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 3>of data control.

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 17>If you have potentially mutal strained resources, you can make

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 17>a better job then if you have your men's resources

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 17>and stop thinking about what to do efficiently.

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I think there's been a lot of excitement, but we'll

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 3>have to see if it material. Let's get to the

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure question in the age of deep Seek with today's

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 3>VC Spotlight with Angene mitta general partner at Andresen Horowitz

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 3>on Jenay. Where does this leave the conversation around how

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 3>much infrastructure we actually need? What were you hearing on

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 3>the sidelines of the Pear Summit.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 18>I heard that we are in the era of infrastructure independence. Basically,

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 18>I think most large nation state leaders have realized that

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 18>modern AI models have risen to the level of general

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 18>purpose technologies.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 11>The history of.

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 18>Humanity, We've had maybe twenty twenty two of these, electricity,

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 18>the printing press, and when that happens, leaders start realizing

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 18>that that technology becomes critical.

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 11>To national progress.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 18>And so that's what I heard from President Macron and

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 18>Prime Minister Modi. The summit was co hosted by France

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 18>and India, and I also heard from JD. Vance at

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 18>the summit that the United States believes that now staying

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 18>at the frontier of AI infrastructure and making sure that

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 18>open source is competitive. American open source is competitive, Allied

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 18>open sources competitive with the best models coming out of

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 18>any country, including China.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, speaking of China, when we have the biggest players,

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 3>China and the US with kind of different values competing

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 3>against each other. You've talked about what you call joint

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 3>ventures between nations that perhaps don't have the resources on

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>their own to compete in AI.

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us about that.

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, So one of the atomic units of AI is

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 18>the data center, right, because if you sort of look

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 18>at the history or the ingredients of how we got

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 18>the current deep learning wave, there's really three or four

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 18>of them. There's compute, there's data, there's algorithms, and there's regulation,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 18>and so when it comes to compute, the idea is

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 18>that there are only some regions that have enough compute

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 18>and access to the power that's cost competitive to stay

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 18>at the frontier. I call these hypercenters. We clearly have

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 18>at least two hyper centers now in the world today.

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 18>We've got America and we've got China, and I think

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 18>every other major nation is now hitting a reckoning point

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 18>where they're trying to figure out do they build, do

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 18>they buy, or do they partner? And so I think

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 18>I'm quite bullish on the US and her allies teaming

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 18>up across what we call the infrastructure stack. Right, so

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 18>when you at the lowest level, you've got chips, and

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 18>then you get into models, and then you've got applications,

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 18>And I think it's going to be much more likely

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 18>that countries that aren't hyper centers today pick which hyper

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 18>center they matches their value system the most, and then

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 18>they work on joint mentors across the stack, because I

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 18>think it's it's quite unlikely that people reinvent the chip

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 18>stack for them. They're much more likely to partner with

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 18>a country that does match their value system and I

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 18>think clearly in France, America, France and India we're teaming up.

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 2>You're on mis Trile's board.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 5>We were hearing from after a little bit ago CEO

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 5>of Miss Trial and so as France got it right now,

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 5>is that going to become a center in some way

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 5>they're committing to their own infrastructure build out or they

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 5>ultimately have to depend on the US at least CHIPS

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 5>for example.

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 18>So the zeitgeist has definitely changed. I think from the

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 18>last two summits, you know, the first that was in

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 18>Seoul and the last one which was in Bletchley Park

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 18>in the UK, the overarching theme was one of pessimism.

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 18>You know, AI is really risky, We've got to think

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 18>about the downside. And instead, what I heard this time

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 18>from leaders across the EU, by the way, not just France,

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 18>was the idea of optimism that AI actually can unlock

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 18>massive growth for Europe and for America. And I think

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 18>that France is in the middle of figuring out how

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 18>to accelerate its infrastructure. I think they have a huge

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 18>headstart when it comes to nucleared option, but when it

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 18>comes to data center construction, they're clearly behind the United States,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.239
<v Speaker 18>and they're happy to accelerate permitting and construction, and at

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 18>the same time they're happy to work with American chip

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 18>companies like Nvidia to actually rack and stack frontier chips

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 18>in these data centers. So I think you're going to

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 18>see over the long term Europe start to accelerate. But

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 18>in the short term, I think they're going to partner

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 18>with folks like America.

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 5>And the administration is cool with that because you have

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 5>close proximity to the administration with A sixteen and Z

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 5>and at the same time doesn't see relations are at

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 5>their highest moment right now.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 18>Well, look, the best thing about this administration is they

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 18>share everything very publicly. I think JD was very clear

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 18>in his speech at in Europe that we're putting America

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 18>first and we will partner and help our allies too.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 18>And you know, NATO is a huge priority for America,

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 18>and so I think we'll just continue seeing more investments

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 18>in NATO alliances.

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 3>And Jason Horowitz was an early investor in on open AI,

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 3>and you're also on the board of Mistral. I'm just

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 3>curious what do you make of this feud between elon

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Musk and open AI. Does it have broader implications for

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the progress for other players in the space.

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 18>Definitely, you know, ultimately where the frontier goes has implications

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 18>for all of us. But I think the important thing

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 18>to focus on is that, you know, just a year ago,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 18>there were lots of folks who are confidently testifying in

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 18>front of Congress that America was so far ahead of

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 18>China that China could never catch up. And I think

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 18>what we're seeing is one the gap between.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 11>Open source and closed source has narrowed.

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 18>That's something those of us in the open source community

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 18>have been paying attention have known for a while, but

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 18>more importantly that the gap between America and China has

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.240
<v Speaker 18>narrowed as well. It's incredibly fast. You know, one, which

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 18>is one of the most cutting edge models from open Ei,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 18>came out on December fifth, and barely a month and

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 18>a half later is when deep Scar one came out

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 18>January twenty fifth, and it's comparable. And so I think

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 18>the more important dynamic to pay attention to is that

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 18>that gap has closed, especially between America and any adversarial

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 18>nations that aren't in our alliances like NATO.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 3>What about Elon Musk's influence in Washington, do you think

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 3>that could have broader implications for other AI players in

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 3>the space.

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 18>Oh absolutely, you know, I think Elon is an important voice.

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 18>But I think the reality is that we are reaching

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 18>a state of disequilibrium in AI infrastructure where a lot

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 18>of basic assumptions that people had taken for granted are

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 18>being revisited, like the gap narrowing bit in open and

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 18>closed between America and other countries. And so I think

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 18>there are a number of voices, especially in the open

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 18>source community obviously, you know, you just played a great

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 18>clip from Arthur Mensh, who was.

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 11>The CEO of Mistral. I think there are other.

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 18>Important voices like Jon Stoyka, who's a professor at UC

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 18>Berkeley who has been leading an effort called ELMSIS that

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 18>works on AI model evaluations. And I think those kinds

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 18>of voices are also becoming much more important to nation

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 18>state leaders. So I'm just really glad that at the

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 18>highest levels frontier AI and especially open source HEREA is

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 18>getting a lot of attention, Tony.

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 5>It's getting a lot of politicization as well.

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 2>And how comfortable and uncomfortable does that make you know?

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 5>I've sat down with David Ulovitch a couple of weeks

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 5>ago we were talking about American dynamism within this new administration. Then,

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 5>of course there's a relatively politicized hire rightly along wrongly

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 5>whether it was politicized of course, mister Penny becoming a

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 5>deal partner. Of course, mister Penny, twenty six year old

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 5>was well known for having had an incident on the

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 5>subway here in New York and ultimately led to the

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 5>death as someone who's homeless.

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 2>And there was a read on that higher. How are

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 2>you feeling.

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 5>About the cultural impact and the perspective of the culture

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 5>at a sixteen Z this has.

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, look taking a step back.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 18>I think one of the things that's always said a

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 18>sixteen z apart is just how strongly the firm believes

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 18>in its values, right, and so in the case of

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 18>open source AI, for example, I think the firm is

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:20.399
<v Speaker 18>taken a very clear position that.

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 11>We believe open source.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 18>The history of computing infrastructure is shown that open source

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 18>is critical to unlocking massive amounts of productivity for humanity

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 18>and for society. You know, when you look at storage, networking, compute,

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 18>and so on. I think a lot of the productivity

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 18>we've seen from software comes from a value system and

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 18>a philosophy and a belief that democratizing access to the

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 18>best technology, put in control of that technology in the

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 18>hands of the biggest companies and organizations is what pushes

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 18>technology forward.

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 11>And so you know, while I'm not.

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 18>An expert on American dynamism, and I'm sure you can

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 18>get better opinions from my partner David on that, I

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 18>think the more important thing to notice is that the

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 18>firm just stands by its values and its philosophy is

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 18>very aggressively.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for articulating that. As NITA, it's great to have

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 5>some time with you on the future of AI and

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 5>regulation and throughout General partner Andrewsen and Horowitz Jackie.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Coming up by Now pay Later firm Klarna has added

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 3>to JP Morgan's payment platform. Clarna CEO joined us to

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 3>discuss what it means for the startups future.

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 5>Robin Hood reported revenue that more than doubled as the

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 5>online trading firm was buoyed by crypto market transactions around

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 5>the US presidential election. Here's what CEO just had to

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 5>say on Bloomberg's open interest.

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 17>They can listen a lot of people focus on crypto

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 17>and we're certainly going to be in a more innovation

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 17>friendly environment in crypto. I think that's going to be

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 17>a tailwind for our business as one of the few

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 17>scaled players in both crypto and traditional financial assets.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Buy now, pay later provider Klarna has been added to

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan's payment platform. The Swedish spin tech company has

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 3>been expanding partnership deals in recent months, and it's targeting

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 3>a USIPO later this year. The company CEO Sebastian Schimankowski

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 3>joins US. Now, Okay, let's talk about this partnership because

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a major US bank, and I want you to

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 3>quantify the upside of this for for US. How much

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 3>of a boost in revenue does this mean for Klarna?

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 16>Well, you know, time will tell, but I mean, obviously

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 16>from our perspective, JP Morgan is one of the you know,

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:41.439
<v Speaker 16>it is probably the largest payments company in the world.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 16>They actually do two trillion dollars worth of volume, and

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 16>so for Klona that does one hundred billion dollar on

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 16>an annual basis. You know, even if we if we're

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 16>super successful with them and can get five to ten

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 16>percent of that volume on the time, that's obviously a

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 16>massive opportunity so we'll find out. It's always you know,

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 16>big orkanship like this. You announce them and then it

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 16>takes some times because there are systems, integrations, promotions and

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 16>stuff like that. But we're very, very excited about it

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 16>and super proud of the fact that Tip Morgan decided

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 16>to work with us.

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 5>But they might decide to work with other by now

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 5>high later players.

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that an issue the competition?

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 16>No, I mean I think, look, they work with both Visa,

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 16>MasterCard and Amex, and I think like the next generation

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 16>of companies that you see on the screen here, they

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 16>are kind of the next generation. We think of ourselves

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 16>as a third party network, and I think there will

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 16>obviously be others as well, so there will be others,

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 16>but we're very happy to be first to announce this

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 16>partnership with them.

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 5>And let's talk about that third party focus and these partnerships, Sebastian,

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 5>because I know you can't talk too much about an IPO.

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 5>You've got a lot of investors to convince of the

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 5>ultimate valuation of your company. When you're signing up merchants

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 5>but not having a direct relationship, just tell us about

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 5>the value that that has.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 16>No, for sure, I mean Klana have historically signed up

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 16>merchants directly, and that's brought us to about six hundred

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 16>thousand versions. Then took a closer look at like, I mean,

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 16>maybe the most successful expansion of a third party network

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 16>was Amis in the last two three decades, which went

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 16>from you know, being something you only used at restaurants

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 16>and hotels to being, you know, something you can use everywhere.

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 16>And so it's all about acceptance points. And we realize

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 16>that that's not going to happen by our own machine.

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 16>That can only happen to these amazing partnerships with Stripe

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 16>and the Addings of the world and the world Pace

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 16>and the Jping Mormons of the world and so forth.

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.399
<v Speaker 16>So so we're super happy about this. It gives us,

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 16>you know, access to millions and millions of immersions to

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 16>make Klana acceptable. I mean in the US, still a

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 16>lot of people that associate us primarily with binapulator, but

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 16>like thirty percent, thirty percent of our volume is paying

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 16>fold the full amount.

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 11>We offer all types of payment forms.

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 16>So we think about ourselves as a third party network,

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.240
<v Speaker 16>and Visa Mascot and the others need some competition.

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's stay in the US for a minute Sebastian because

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 3>here the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau its features in question.

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 3>Now that it's kind of come within striking distance of

0:39:56.680 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Elon musk Stoge, is this a good thing for Klarina?

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.720
<v Speaker 16>Well, I mean, look, I think we are based in Europe,

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 16>where there's very tough regulation, much tougher in any ways.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 16>I mean, it was actually funny the only thing Trump

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 16>said that was for more regulation was to cut credit

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 16>card interest rate fees, which to me kind of make

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 16>sense because you know, a lot of markets we operate

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 16>in Europe, you will see like max interest rate card

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:25.399
<v Speaker 16>can be like at sixteen percent or eighteen percent, right,

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.439
<v Speaker 16>while in US is very very different. So I think

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 16>you could expect from this administration to go quite some

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 16>tough challenges to the banks. But I think the best

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 16>way is going to be more competition, and to some degree,

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 16>you know, less regulation can help to accelerate more competition

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 16>and to go after those success profits that we've seen

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 16>in the banking industry. So I think that the you know,

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 16>we are have always operated according to regulatory requirements, but

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 16>also in addition to that, we have always said that,

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 16>like the ethical standards are extremely important for us and

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 16>to make sure that we provide services that are priced

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.919
<v Speaker 16>reasonably for consumers, that we don't charge too high interest

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 16>or too high fees and so forth, and that's going

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 16>to continue being an objective for us, either CFPB is

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 16>present or not.

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, real quickly, Sebastian, what about crypto You

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 3>called it a decentralized Ponzi scheme in twenty twenty two.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Has that changed? Is Karna planning?

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah?

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 4>Please?

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 11>I was happy you brought that up.

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 16>Well, I actually this this weekend after thanks to my

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 16>board member Andrew from Sequoia, I met with a few

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 16>very interesting crypto companies and after listening to them and

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.920
<v Speaker 16>what's happening with crypto, stable coins, bitcoins, I did a

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 16>small tweet this weekend that said that like, okay, I

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 16>give up, it's time to explore crypto for Klana. And

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 16>I thought that, like everyone would be just sighing and

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 16>thinking it was the most boring news ever because it

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 16>feels like we're the last large fintech in the world

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 16>to say that. But I had over a million views,

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 16>so people are super engaged. The whole community open up

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 16>and I got like one thousands ideas of what we're

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 16>going to do so, I'm excited about that.

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 11>Now happy you know sometimes you're wrong.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Come back and talk with AI with us as well.

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 5>Soon we've run out of time, plan to CEO Sebastian

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 5>showing Kowski.

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for the time.

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 5>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology, Jackie,

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 5>don't forget your audience can go and check.

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Out our podcast.

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 5>You can find on the terminal as well as online

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 5>on Apple, Spotify.

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And iHeart. This is Bloomberg Technology.