WEBVTT - FDA Grants Full Approval of Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on the Bloomberg Radio or watch us

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. Searched Bloomberg clovel News. Let's get to Dr

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Seth Letterman, the CEO of and the co founder of

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Photonics Pharmaceuticals, also the chairman. He joins us once again

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Massachusetts. Dr Letterman, It's great to

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. How are you great to

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>be with you again? Um, well, it's a great day

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to be speaking to you about COVID vaccine. Yeah, a

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of news when it comes to COVID vaccines. We

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just heard from President Biden encouraging everybody who has not

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>yet gotten a vaccine to go out there and get it.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with the President that this continues to

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be a pandemic of the unvaccinated? Absolutely, President Biden is

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a tough act to follow. I thought he had a

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>clear message and I agree with him that by and large,

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the particularly fueled by the delta variant, this is a

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>epidemic or pandemic of the unvaccinated in the United States

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. And so Dr Lettiman, we heard from President

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden that FDA approval it's the gold standard. But I'm

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>curious to hear your take that you know, now that

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we do have full authorization, it's finally here. Do you

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think this will actually lead to meaningfully more vaccinations? Well,

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope so. First of all, I think it's a

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>sign of a great achievement for Fire in their partner

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>by Intech to get their vaccine to this point. And

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think many people believe that Madonna is not far

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>behind or in an unusual situation where the Surgeon General

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all Um is kind of tipping his uh, you know,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>tipping his cards on some of these approvals coming up.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the m and A technology that

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they developed and rapidly deployed has two shown great promise

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very exciting time. But on the other hand,

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is also an announcement by the CDC,

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 1>FDA and a bunch of other groups, the White House,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>COVID Task Force, etcetera, that booster shots are going to

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>be recommended and that they're going to be starting on September.

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So at the same time where this is a great

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>advance and a recognition of what's happened so far, I

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>think there's also been a concession that these vaccines are

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>providing only temporary protection, not durable protection. We'll talk to you,

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.119
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about where you are with the type

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of protection that you're developing right now at Tonics Pharmaceuticals.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>What is the vaccine against COVID that you're working on,

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and what's the latest on the timeline for when it

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>could actually be something that's used on us. Thank you.

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>We're developing a live virus vaccine and it's based on

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>a novel platform that we developed. But live virus vaccines

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>are the oldest type of vaccine technology, and even an

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Operation Warp Speed there were four pillars of Operation Warp Speed,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>where you know, one of them was a highly successful

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Arna vaccines, but the other The fourth that they never

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>really got to was live virus vaccines. Merke was developing

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>two of them, but then in January of this year

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>abandoned those programs. So we're developing a live virus vaccine

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>against COVID nineteen. Because traditionally, live virus vaccines have provided

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>durable immunity, meaning years, decades, even lifelong. And when President

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden mentioned some of the great successes in the history

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of vaccination, he specifically mentioned smallpox, measles, mumps rebella, and polio.

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are live virus vaccines. So we don't know all

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why live virus vaccines provide such durable immunity,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but many people believe it's because they stimulate T cell immunity,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and a particular type of T cell immunity that has

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this long durability. So hypothetically, speaking with a live virus vaccine,

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>would a booster shot be needed for that type of

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccine versus, you know, an m R and a based vaccine. Well,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we won't know for COVID until we get into human trials,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>but for smallpox there is no booster required, and measles

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>monster rebella typically is lifelong um so they do last

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, but again it's something that will

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out when when is the timeline for

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>human trials. Thanks we expect to be in human trials

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>from the first half of next year. The thing that's

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>holding us back is that it's more difficult to make

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the high quality of live virus vaccine necessary to do

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>human trials. And that's really the advantage of the m

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>R and A vaccines. Since they are completely synthetic, you

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>can rapidly manufacture them. And again, hats off to Fiser

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and by In Tech for what they've done. They've really

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>delivered a solid blow to give us some breathing room

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with this pandemic for the vaccinated anyway. But live virus

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are harder to develop, but when they're developed, they

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>can be easier to manufacture, easier to store, easier to transport,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and typically are one shot vaccines. And so Dr Lettterman,

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to the topic of boosters,

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and in the notes you sent over, you made the

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>point that you know we would be better protected by

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>vaccinating the unvaccinated here in the US and around the world.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>But I got to ask, what about for those who

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get vaccinated. If you assume that there's

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a certain percentage of the population that will

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>never willingly take the vaccine. Uh, in that situation, what

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>would what? What do we do? Well? It's an excellent question,

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and it seems to be uh hodgepodge of reasons why

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>people are reluctant. Hopefully, the President said, Hopefully the FDA

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>approval will allay some of their concerns. I know at

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>least some of them feel like they don't want to

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be um, you know, the subject of tests or something.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point, as the President said, two

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>million Americans have been vaccinated, so I think we're beyond

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the test stage. But I think that brings up another

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>potential weakness of the m R and A vaccines that

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know whether they block forward transmission. Forward

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>transmission means that if someone is infected, are they able

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to transmit it to someone else? And for the big

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccine successes that we've had in history, smallpox, for example,

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it really does block forward transmission, and that was one

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why this concept of herd immunity was

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so important. But we really don't know for the delta

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>variant whether vaccinated people will be less infectious. Yeah, that's certainly.

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>That's certainly what remains to be seen as Dr Seth Letterman,

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the co founder, a chief executive officer and chairman of

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Tonics Pharmaceuticals. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>pregnant women with COVID nineteen, they are fifteen times more

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>likely to die, fourteen times more likely to need to

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be intubated, and twenty two times more likely to have

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>preterm birth than those who are uninfected. That's according to

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a study published this month by j A n A Network.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Open Joinning's now is Shira Stein, healthcare reporter at Bloomberg.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Lash joins us on the phone from Washington, d C. Shere.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have you with us. The part that

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get to in your story is the fact

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that fewer than three quarters of pregnant people are vaccinated.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're than one quarter, I should say seventy pregnant

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>people are unvaccinated. Why is that so low? Yeah, it's

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty shocking statistic. I think it's really because of

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that none of the vaccine clinical trials, of

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the three vaccines in the US that are authorized and approved,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>none of them included pregnant people in their trials. Um.

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty common in clinical trials. Not to say that

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing, um, but it's pretty common. And

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so pregnant people didn't have any data to rely on

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>around safety or efficacy until after the vaccines were publicly

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>available and when people who decided that it was worth

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>it for them to try and see how until we

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>got more data, and so for for months, we didn't

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have data on how this vacts, how any of these

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>vaccines worked in pregnant people, and so where do we

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>stand now? Because sure, pregnant people were excluded from the

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine trials, sounds like that's pretty common, But do we

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>actually have data now now that you know the vaccines

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>have been available widely for months now, have they actually

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>run trials that include pregnant people? Um. So it's not

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a trial so much as it is like data from

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in the real world. But yes, absolutely, UM,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccines are safe and effective for pregnant people. They do

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not cause miscarriages as there is, or fertility issues as

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>there is the misinformation about that around UM, and as

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the as we saw and as I reported, there is

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>there if you get COVID and you are pregnant, you

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are in a really really bad spot if you are unvaccinated,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about that. Yeah, So what I

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>found speaking to doctors across the country in places like

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Texas at Florida, but also places like Los Angeles and Seattle, Washington,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>was that they are seeing, with this latest surge in

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>cases from Delta, a new trend of pregnant people who

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>are getting really sick, who are needing to be intipated

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and put on a ventilator, who are having to deliver

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>their babies early, and some who are dying UM and

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>some who are having to spend months in the hospital.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just really awful. These are largely unvaccinated

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>pregnant individuals, and um they're largely young and healthy age

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like eighteen to thirty. So it's pretty shocking to hear this.

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've been hearing a lot about kids and

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and COVID in hospitals right now, but this is another problem,

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is pregnant people and getting COVID. So, I mean, those

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are terrifying stories, and I'm curious, I mean, is there

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>is that because pregnant people are more at risk than

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.599
<v Speaker 1>a normal unvaccinated person, or is there any reason to

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that you're more at risk to become more seriously

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ill if you are also pregnant. Yeah, so pregnant. Being

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>pregnant tends to suppress one's immune system, so that could

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. Um, what I the doctors I

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>spoke to, you think that it's not so much a

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that you are more likely to get COVID if

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you're pregnant, more so that it's a compounding of factors.

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, your immune system is not as good, you're around, um,

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>a number of people having to go to the doctor. Um,

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's a number of factors that could

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lead to it. And if you do get get COVID,

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>then you're more likely to have severe illness. Based on

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>your reporting, I know you spoke to a lot of

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>people who were vaccinated and weren't vaccinated. What did they

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>give you for the reasons they ultimately did decide to

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>get best vaccinated who are pregnant and those holdouts who

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>who decided not to. Yeah, I mean I actually had

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a really hard time talking to some of the people

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>who have remained unvaccinated. UM. But what I what I

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>can say is people are just really nervous because of

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the lack of information that there was. They're also, the

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.719
<v Speaker 1>CDC did not wreck men that pregnant people get the

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>vaccine until a few weeks ago. UM. Two of the

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>major medical societies for pregnan individuals, the Market College of

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Obstetrician and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>they recommended it about a month ago. So it's just

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>this is just a really recent thing. Some doctors still

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't sure about recommending it to their patients. You know,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm beating stories about people saying, well, I talked to

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>one doctor and my doctor said it was good for

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>me to get but my sister's doctor said she shouldn't.

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's just a lot of confusion

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>out there. I don't think it's you know, people being

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote anti vaxers so much as it is that

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>they are just genuinely nervous because of the lack of

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>information because their doctors aren't sure what to tell them. Yeah,

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the confusion will continue to persist. When it

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to boosters and to what extent, Like, you know,

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody got a shot before they got pregnant, you've got

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>fully vaccinated, do they get a booster? Right? That's that's

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the question, and I think a question that many people

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>will have moving forward. It is a fantastic piece. It's

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason that it's a the most read in the

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal right now, it's called Pregnant, unvaccinated and intubated

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Doctors alarmed by rise that Shira Stein, healthcare reporter for

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Law, joining us on the phone from Washington. D

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>c Uh, Katie. I think the question remains that, you know,

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the science continues to change. So the CDC coming out

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and actually saying that this is helpful, uh, that women

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>need to do this, then that's a very important move there.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the bidding

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>war over a maker of airplane wheels and fire detection

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>systems may herald a fresh wave of consolidation in the

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>aerospace sector, so writes Brooke Sutherland, deals in Industrials columnists

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg opinion. Brooke story will be featured in the

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. You can read

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it now on the Bloomberg and at bloomberg dot com

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>slash business Week. Also joining us is Joel Webber, editor

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Business Week. He's on the remote from Massachusetts.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So Joel, the big question is bigger is better back

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to aerospace and navy ation. Well, I'm

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be honest, this isn't a space that I watched

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that closely. I'm glad you picked up on it. Um

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the uh, but that was what kind of jumped out

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>at me from from brookes story, is like, you know,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a place that we have seen a whole

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of action, and then all of a sudden we

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>have and and it's not everyday companies, right Brooke? Who

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are what kind of players are we talking about here? Sure?

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So Megga makes um they're they're well known for their wheels, breaks,

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>fire detection systems, things like that. Um, this is sort

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of a perennial takeover target. It often comes up in

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>m and A speculation, but we've never really seen any

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>deal get this far, and now it has not one

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but two suitors. The first is Parker Hanisons, which has

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>been aggressively expanding its aerospace business over the past couple

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of years, trying to get out of some of its

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>more traditional heavy duty industrial markets that tend to be

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more economically volatile um. And the other

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is trans Time, which is also an aerospace supplier and

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>has a reputation for being particularly aggressive on pricing when

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the parts that itsels and parts and

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>services to airplane makers. And so it's going to be

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting bidding war too to watch how it

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>plays out, which you're right, I mean, just the fact

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that we have a bidding war at all is notable

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>for a sector that's been particularly beaten down by COVID. Yeah,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>pro I want to talk about that the timing of

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this bidding war, because it feels like the industry at

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>large is in a really weird place as we try

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to emerge from this pandemic. It is, and it's certainly

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to look at it right now when you have

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the headlines of it, the airlines warning about, you know,

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not quite seeing the demand they were hoping to see

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in August, the people canceling bookings, or you know, maybe

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>just not making bookings at all. But um. At the

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, those in the aerospace sector that

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>weren't in the same position as Boeing, which you know,

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was dealing with the seven thirty seven Max crisis, actually

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheep looked pretty good. Um. You know, they

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>were able to at the debt markets when they needed it.

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they're really coming out of this in

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong position financially, and I think they're preparing

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for the next leg. And you know, one of the

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>things that's been really interesting is this bad as this

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>downturn had been for the aerostas sector, we're already starting

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about getting back to a moment in time

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>where we're not worried about not having enough passengers but

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>worried about having enough planes. Um. And that's really where

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the industry was before the pandemic hit. I mean, there

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>was a mad rushed by all of the airlines to

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>try to get planes, trying to get the capacity so

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that they could fly passengers where they wanted to go. UM.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, against that that job, it does make

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>sense to consolidate. You have you know a number of

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of midsized players but you also have a lot

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of very large players that have been doing a lot

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of deals, perhaps in this notable being Raytheon which acquired

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Rockwell collins Um also merged with raytheon the defense contractor,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and so as you have other suppliers getting bigger um

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously as a duopoly as well, but in your airbus

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense to try to be as big as

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you possibly can beat yourself, Hey, Brooke, When it comes

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to this industry, the thing is is these companies, the

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>airplane the airlines have to make these orders years and

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>years in advance of when they expect to actually have

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that need, that capacity, they actually expect to have delivery

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of those aircraft. What are they? What are we hearing

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>from the from Airbus and from Boeing right now about

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the way that airlines are canceling or actually ordering new

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>planes and when are those going to be delivered? And

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are they all E three twenties and seven thirty seven maxes?

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>What about alternative fuels take us into it. Yeah, no,

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>So it's uh, we're starting to see you know, more

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>actual orders men ancelations, which is a nice positive trend um,

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly for Boeing. They've really seen a ton of order

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>activities from the US airlines that's really been the driver

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of their purchases. Today, there was a massive order from

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>United Airlines for Boeing Jets Southwest also topped up at

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>seven seven max order. And then Airbus had not seen

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as many cancelations as Bulling because they were in the

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>um beneficial position of not having one of their planes

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>grounded for nearly two years, which meant that the airlines

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>have less selexibility to cancel their orders, and so they're

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>being a lot more aggressive and looking at their production

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>schedule and they think they can get back above their

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>pre COVID pace by three. So that gets to that

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>point you know, I was talking about, we're moving door

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to future where the airlines. Airlines are gonna be wanting

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>these airplanes um that maybe they thought they didn't need

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months ago, but they will see find

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>themselves in the position where they do it, and the

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>planemakers and their suppliers are really going to have to

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>ramp up capacity relatively quickly to meet that neat um.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And then as you play that out further down the road,

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>everybody is very concerned about the carbon footprint um of

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all aspects of the economy of a particularly air travel,

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of discussion about you know, using

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>UM sustainable aviation fuels or even moving into sort of

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>next generation engine technology. I don't know if we're there

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>yet UM in terms of you know, hydro gender batteries

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that for for large airplane, but certainly

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they want to make as many changes as they can

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that are realistic right now. And you need money to

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. You need a bigger balance sheet, you need

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>research and development dollars, and so that's another key driver

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for the consolidation thing. So what standing between this Megat

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>deal in a finish line broke because it's uh, it's

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>not clear if it's actually going to be a slam

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>dunk or not, right I mean, And it's not price

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because both the buyers are offering very attractive valuations. They're

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>above MEGASU pre pandemic high UM, We're talking about you know,

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty meat evaluations here. So price is not going to

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be the issue. But it's going to be more down

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to the UK government UM, which has been particularly prickly

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>lately about takeovers, especially when they involved key domestic assets

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>that have a link to national security. So Mega is

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>also a defense supplier UM and this is happening in

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>concert with another takeover of the UK defense supplier, Ultra Electronics,

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a difficult backdrop right now to try

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to do a aerospace and defense takeover in the UK.

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>And so Parker Hannafon has made some pretty strong commitments

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to the UK government in terms of keeping the headquarters,

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>keeping head count in engineering and manufacturing flat. They pledged

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up R and D spending pretty significantly over

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the next five years, which you know, those are meaningful commitments,

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't heard yet from trans Dynast it's willing

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to match that or perhaps go a little bit further.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>But I think that that is the biggest issue in

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this deal and probably what will determine who ultimately wins

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>this sitting more well, there you have at brook Sutherland,

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Deals and industrials columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, joining us on

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. Also with us Joel Weber,

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg Business Week, on the remote from Massachusetts.

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You can read brooks story. It's featured in the upcoming

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. You can read it

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot Com and of course, at the Bloomberg terminal.

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Also go to Bloomberg dot com slash of Business Week.

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Big Day, the best of Bloomberg's in

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>depth original reporting from around the globe. Well, we actually

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure we do as the economy. What covers is

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the data kind of broken down a bit.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It's fun to becoming more and more expensively to be

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at the shifting billion dollars for the red entry levels.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>There's been ways of immigration that have taste a lot

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of resistance, a lot of color behind the scenes in

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a great untold story. How did Bezos really come out

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>on top? It's the cover, says Jeff Wins. He always

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to win the Big Take on Bloomberg Radio. Today's

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Big Take, the very best of Bloomberg's in depth original

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>reporting front around the globe every day, is by Rich Miller,

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>economics reporter for Bloomberg News. He joins us on the

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>phone from Washington, d C. It's all about FED Chair

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Powell's policy revolution and how it was blindsided by

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the COVID nineteen crisis. Rich Miller writes that when FED

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>chair chair Jerome Powell rolled out a new motus up

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Rundy for running military policy at Jackson Hole. A year ago,

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy was just coming out of a pandemic driven

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>nose dive. That was after a decade of disappointingly slow

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>growth with inflation stubbornly below target. Well, times have changed,

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>rich What was the mL he rolled out a year ago?

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And where are we now? Well, I mean it's as

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>you say, times change. Where where at an inflation rate

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>at least by the Fed's measure, which is two times

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>higher than than than they liked it four percent instead

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 1>of two We're at an economy that's growing at at

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at rates that we haven't seen for decades. And um

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>uh we've got um, we've still got a monetary policy

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>setting that's the same as it was a year ago.

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's raising questions about whether the Fed is it's

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be uh too slow to try to rain

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.639
<v Speaker 1>things in and then we're going to either get you know,

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>housing bubble or some sort of financial bubble or or

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a return of something like we saw in

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties with inflation starting to creep higher. So

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Richard feels like the FEED is in a tricky spot

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know, if they wait too long and stick

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to the framework, you know, they could risk what you

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned that we could enter a multitude of different bubbles.

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But it feels like it would be difficult to back

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>away from the framework without losing some sort of credibility. So,

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what don't you expect the Fed to do here?

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that they'll stick it out or do

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you think that they'll lift probably earlier than they might

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have wanted to. It's a tough question, but it is

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a key question. Um. I think for the first part,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna they're starting and we're starting to hear that already,

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is that their rhetoric is going to start to turn

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a little more hawk is I mean, and the aim

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of that is to keep inflation expectations in check. Um.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>They seem to be well and check in the treasury market,

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>because we have yields well down from where they were

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year, but consumers seem a little bit

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>more worried and uh um, so they want to keep

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>those So you're starting to see the rhetoric shift, and

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I would expect that Chair Powell will give us a

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of more insight, um, not too much but

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more insight into their plans for beginning the

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>taper when he speaks at the end of this week

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>at the Virtue. It's a virtual Jackson Hole again this

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>year clause of COVID. I think that's an entirely news

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>story on its own that we learned about late last week,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that the delta varian is running so

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>rampant that this thing that they thought would be virtual

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>or wouldn't be virtual, would be for a second year

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in a row, rich would be virtual. I wonder about

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the feds dual mandate here and to what extent the

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Fed is willing to let the economy run hot in

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>order to satisfy its other mandate, which is to get

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>maximum employment. Like how hot is the FED gonna gonna

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>let the economy run hot? Uh? Well, right now, you know,

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>uh uh, they're focusing not so much on how high

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the inflation rate is, but for how long it's gonna last,

0:24:56.440 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, stay there? Right. So their their story that

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 1>this is our story and we're sticking to it, is

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, uh uh, the inflation we're seeing is transitory.

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So um. I think though that argument may get a

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>little stale as we get into next year, and so

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know that maybe the time when when you

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>might see them getting a little more worried, or they

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>may turn out to be right and you know, inflation

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>will settle back down. You know, we've already seen you

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>know some you know, subsiding and inflation on some of

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the areas like rental car prices that have proven most troublesome.

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 1>So but I would think if if you're still seeing

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty uh inflation, like three percent or more at the

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>end of this year, uh, they might get start getting

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>more worried and so rich. This is something I think

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about a lot, and it's kind of impossible to answer.

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But if the FED had known this pandemic was coming,

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if they had known the trillions of dollars of fiscal

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>stimulus were on the way, do you think they would

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>have committed to this new average inflation targeting framework. I think, well,

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>they were going off what they saw of a history

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of decades right of of you know, this whole secular

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>stagnation story of of Larry Summers that you know, we

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we we for decades we've seen um uh low inflation,

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates, and slow growth. And you know, ever

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>since they introduced their inflation target in two thousand twelve,

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they've basically been short. So they were going on that.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, you could argue that maybe they

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 1>went a bridge too far in the forward guidance they gave.

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you know, not only did they have the framework,

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>but they have the forward guidance, and they say, well,

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect the raised rates until we hit two

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>percent inflation. Rich Rich Miller, We're gonna have to leave it.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Their economics reporter at Bloomberg News running us on the

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>phone from a Watchington d C. You can read riches

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>story and more like it from Bloomberg's The Big Take

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com and of course on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week, and this is Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Broom the journal. Yeah, but you let me drive.

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, honey, please, I'll do the

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>riding rivals. I want to drive. Just drive, baby, good

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>questions driving the drive to the close community. Thanks, we'll

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.199
<v Speaker 1>drive us dawn on Bloomberg Radio, and we're driving to

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the closed with it just over ten minutes away from

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the market close on this Monday, August Stocks in the Green,

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the dal higher by more than seven tenths of one percent,

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>d higher by more than nine tenths of one percent,

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAC higher by one point six three percent. Let's

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>get right into it with Mitch Rubin, chief investment officer

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and a managing partner at River Park is joining us

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from New York City, matche It's great

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>to have you on the show today. UH shares of

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>US equities are rallying today on the news that the

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>fiser by on Tech has been approved by US regulators,

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>fully approved. Are you surprised to see an equity market

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>reactions such as this considering that this was this was expected?

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's We're in this strange time where I

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>think people have this large perspective of risk on versus

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>risk off. August is a light trading month, so small

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>amounts of move of news can move the market. I

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>think right now, the biggest thing on people's head, you know, headlines,

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is are we going to have another shutdown? And I

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think the more people think the vaccine is becoming more

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.959
<v Speaker 1>accepted than uh, we're more likely to fight back against delta,

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's positive for the market and for equities and optimism.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's not surprising to see a decent sized move.

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we're gonna have another shutdown? Yeah? I

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't think we're gonna have a full backdown. Could

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>we have another spike a COVID that causes people to

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>be worried? Uh, certainly. I mean, I think the difference

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>now with where we were back in April when we

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>were seeing shutdowns is we know so much more about

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the virus in the way it's spread, and about vaccines,

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and we also know how to work in an environment

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's hybrid, right, an environment that the virus is

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.959
<v Speaker 1>running rampant, but also one that still requires us too

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and many people actually physically be in the office. Yeah.

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's a society conversation and there's

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a markets and economy conversation. I think the markets and

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>economy conversation is the virus isn't a particularly important economic event.

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>It's been our reaction to uh, the virus in in

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>shutting down certain businesses and what is going to be

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>our change in day to day life? And I think

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what the market is as a forward looking

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mechanism is saying, Okay, we're beginning to think beyond the

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>virus as disrupting corporate or nings, and how do we

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>think about, you know, what we're willing to pay for

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>stock or for equities for the next few years. I

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>think in the near term, we're all hyper focused on

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what does life look like for the next few months

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and years, and when do we go back to work

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and when do we feel safe? And I think that

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>disconnect is troubling a lot of people because the markets

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>seem quite forward looking and optimistic, and we're we're all

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>still anxious and nervous and not quite sure what the

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>new normal looks like for day to day life. And

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>so if we think about, you know, where we are.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>August is supposed to be a pretty volatile month. You're

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>supposed to see, you know, over the past five years

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>about a one point six per cent gain for the

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred. But if we think about the August

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've had so far, we've actually seen the VIX

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>move lower, We've seen the SMP outperform, uh you know,

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it's five year average. I mean, where does that leave

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>us as we head into September? Are we have we

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>just stored up volatility or can we continue to grind

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>higher here and can that disconnect you're talking about persist. Yeah,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I think what people may be

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>using a slightly broader lens um. I think most people

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are surprised when you tell them, hey, hey, open your

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 1>eyes for a second. The S and P fives up

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty this year. And despite all the conversation about growth

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and value in different things. You know, growth stocks are

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>up eighteen and a half percent. Value stocks are up.

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Using just some of the large cap indices, most stocks

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have done quite well. Uh And and the economy in

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>general is strong. Interest rates are low, earnings have come

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in very strong. I think if it continues to be

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the case that that businesses do well, uh and interest

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>rates stay low, stocks are reasonably priced, fonds are not

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>offering much yield. It certainly is our opinion that the

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>market still has an upward bias to it. I think

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the bigger question as we get it later into the

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>year and the next year, is will the markets begin

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to have more dispersion and it won't be just risk on,

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>risk off, but which businesses are prepared for a host

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>COVID kind of digital first future and which aren't. And

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>as you get into and twenty three not every company

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to have an earnings growth compared to a

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>shutdown yere in. And it's our perspective that stock picking

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and which businesses you own is going to matter a

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>lot more than do you own equities or are you

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in cash or box? Yeah, well, I'd love to get

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>into positioning a little bit more. And how uh you

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>know you are you know, orienting your portfolio in this environment,

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>because if I look at the river Park Long Short

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Opportunity Fund, you know, I've seen tech names like Amazon

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft. I also see the I Shares Russell two

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand e t F, a small caps e t F.

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Can you walk me through some of your top holdings. Yeah, so,

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so we run both a large growth fund which is

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>fully invested in equities all the time, and then we

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>also run a long short fund, which is really a

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>traditional hedge fund but offered in a mutual fund wrapper.

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're referring to in the long short

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fund is that some of our bigger longs, which definitely

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in some of those high growth TEX stocks, but but

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a good um diversified book of of other growth businesses

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and other industries. Some of the industries you're pointing to

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>or some of our short positions. So we we hedge

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>out our longs, sometimes with market indexes where we think

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>our long book will outperform the market as a whole,

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>but more often with just individual shorts. And so um,

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we are short a little bit of the small cap

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>index just as a hedge against our long book. Um.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the belief we have is that a

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>select group of equities, even though the markets had a

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>good run, are still incredibly well positioned and reasonably valued

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for the future. But there are a lot of businesses

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>whose future is less certain as we get post COVID. Uh,

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And that is an really interesting time to be selective.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And whether it's a select group of longs and not

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole market, we're actually owning a long short run

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>which has the ability to protect capital on the downside. Well,

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about that. And some of

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the shorts that that you like. Peloton shares are actually

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lower on the day today because a price cut at Oppenheimer. Um.

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Why do you say that Peloton is not a sustainable

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>volume of business post COVID and that it's too expensive? Yeah,

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean we the way we invest is what do

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>we believe the business has the potential to earn three,

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>four or five years from now, and how is it

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:20.280
<v Speaker 1>value today? And Peloton is a business, it's a great product.

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>It obviously was the right in the right place at

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the right time. But as we look to the future,

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe people are regularly replacing their exercise bife.

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>These are relatively expensive pieces of equipment generally exercise uh um,

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, stay at home exercises, going fads, and people

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>buy one thing and then a few years later they

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>buy another. And Peloton is being priced as if the

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>business they did during the shutdown was going to be

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>perpetual and growing off that base. And so we don't

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't necessarily think it's a poor business. We just

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>think at thirty billion of market gap um, the level

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>of business they did in two thousand twenty might be

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the peak level of business they ever do. And if

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we're right that people either won't replace their bikes regularly

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>over time where they move away from that fat towards another,

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that the business is just overvalued um. Which isn't to say, again,

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 1>we don't necessarily think they're going to miss the next

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>quarter or whether today's downgrad was right. We just think

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>relative to the things were long, Platon is more likely

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to be lower in market top three years from now

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>than higher does report later this week. Yeah, it's really

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>quickly curious to hear about your thoughts on healthcare. We

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have just about twenty seconds. Yeah. I think healthcare, like

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of other industries, is going through massive innovation.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:42.439
<v Speaker 1>And I think those businesses that are looking to use

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the combination of data, um and science in the future

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to make us all um uh treat things earlier, whether

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's detecting cancer earlier or or doing surgery with robotics

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and things like that, we think that's fascinating place to

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>invest in our business. So is that are gonna be

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot? We're gonna have to leave it their Mitroub

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment Officer and managing partner at River Park Funds.

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube. Search to

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News