WEBVTT - Cerebras Goes Public in Year's Biggest IPO 

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>lie from coast to coast, with Caroline Hyde in New

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>York and Vla Loow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Cisco ches jump the most since twenty eleven of the

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 3>company's earnings results will break them down. Plus, China's Jijingping

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 3>gives a warning to President Trump on Taiwan that tells

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 3>US tech CEOs China will open up more, and ai

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 3>chipmaker Cerebras raises five point five five billion dollars in

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 3>its USIPO, seizing on the surging demand for semiconductors. Will

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>be joined by the CEO later this hour. Cisco is

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 3>our top story, and it is actually rising with the

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 3>rest of the market. We're up fifteen percent, on track

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 3>for our biggest jump since twenty eleven, after the open

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 3>hit seventeen percent, putting Cisco on track for its best

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 3>day since two thousand and two.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a pretty simple story.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Hyperscala demand calendar year twenty six nine billion dollars, up

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 3>from a previous forecast of five billion dollars. Four billion

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of that will translate into actual revenues sales on the

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 3>income statement in this year.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:22.559
<v Speaker 2>There are many more.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Threads, but Cisco is finding its place in this AI

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure story. It's got out to Bloomberg Equities reporder Ryan V.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 2>Selica.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I think Ryan, the best place to start is what

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 3>has the cell side reaction been to this? What are

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 3>the analysts saying? The main thread of their enthusiasm for

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Cisco has been this morning.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Analysts are very positive and very optimistic that Cisco will

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 4>be able to continue kind of putting up these numbers

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>that we saw in this past quarter. There is a

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of optimism that Cisco is now really part of

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 4>the AI infrastructure of firmament. It showed very strong demand,

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 4>as you said, from the hype scalers, it's pointing to

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 4>very strong growth going forward. I think there's been a

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 4>growing realization this year that the sort of optical and

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 4>networking companies are a huge part of the whole data

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 4>center build out. And obviously we have seen no end

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 4>of demand and growth for data centers related to AI.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 4>And Cisco is really well positioned in that it's a

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 4>legacy company, it has a wide product suite that.

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 2>People are using here.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 4>It seems very well positioned, and it does seem like

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 4>analysts are really sort of seeing additional confirmation of this trend.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, And there's so much to pack into Bloomberg Tech today.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 3>People are saying, why you're starting on Cisco. The market's

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 3>team is looking at the equities market widely, and Cisco

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 3>is a big factor in kind of the feel good

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that's out there networking is your cables, your switches, your routers,

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 3>that all goes into real data centers, right. But the

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>other part of the story is Cisco's discipline. They're cutting

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 3>about four thousand rolls. The company kind of spin that

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>as a positive in that that sort of feel good

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 3>around AI in the market today.

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, they talked about how they are really focusing and

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 4>prioritizing AI.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned the job cuts.

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 4>It does seem like all of their investments are really

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 4>geared toward this in market in particular, So there is.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 2>A lot of optimism about that.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 4>And I would just say, as I'm sure you remember,

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Cisco is one of the major companies of the dot

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 4>com era build out. Now, it saw huge growth at

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 4>that time and it only recently surpassed its dot com

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 4>era high. So there's a certain amount of poetic justice,

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 4>I guess, and the fact that AI is a thing

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 4>that is finally bringing it back to record levels. It

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 4>does seem like it is now becoming a real part

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 4>of this technology buildout, just as it was in the

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Internet tech buildout.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Ryan, you and I were not doing this in the

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 3>dot com era, but you know here and now, Cisco

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>is a big story. Bloombers rhyme lslica on the equities desk,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Another start we're watching is Klana

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>looking at shares, also up fifteen sixteen percent. The company

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>posted just one million dollars in first coordinet income, but

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>it beat estimates, swinging from a ninety nine million dollar

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 3>loss a year ago. This in the fintech space right,

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 3>revenue jumping forty four percent to one billion dollars, driven

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>by higher interest income, growth in debit card sign ups

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 3>partnership fees. It's another one that we had to fit

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 3>in in a very busy Thursday morning. Today, all eyes

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 3>are on Cerebras, the company set to begin trading after

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 3>pricing its IPO at one hundred and eighty five dollars

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 3>a share, raising five point five five billion dollars. The

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 3>biggest USIPO of the year so far, it has been

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>mayhem in the market. So far, shares were indicated at

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 3>one point to open at four hundred dollars a share,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 3>four hundred having priced at one eighty five. I think

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 3>we're now back down at three hundred and fifty dollars

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 3>a share as of one minute past eight Pacific time

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 3>one minute past eleven am Eastern time. Bloomberg's Bailey lip

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Schultz has been my partner in tracking the chaos of

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 3>this IPO for a good few days.

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 2>Now start with the math.

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the indicated opening price well beyond one hundred.

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 2>And eighty five dollars a share. What's that telling us?

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 5>It tells us that there's untapped demand. And when you

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 5>look at a deal like this, more than twenty times

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 5>over subscribe. We reported before it even launched there was

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 5>ten billion dollars of demand. So these are huge numbers.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 5>This is the hottest stock, at least from an IPO

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 5>perspective this year bar none. The big question and you

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 5>asked me, you know, look at the market cap of

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 5>where this could open. If we're getting closer to eighty

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars, talking to folks on the buy side, they're

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 5>still saying, you know, if in Videa's worth five trillion dollars,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 5>who's to say that this company doesn't easily treat closer

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 5>to one hundred billion. I don't know what you've been

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 5>hearing about that from your.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 2>Side, yees so exactly.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 3>That brings us back to like what is Cerebras.

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 2>What does it do well?

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>It is a full stack, vertally integrated supercomputer maker right

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>and video makes largely the chips, but the server trays.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>These days, it doesn't build its own servers. Dell does that,

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 3>super Micro does that. Cerebras does the full send package.

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 3>But even at one hundred billion dollars, it's a drop

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 3>in the ocean. Why the market's so enthusiastic about its technology? Like,

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 3>what else do we know about this company's financials or

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>its customer backlog?

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 5>The big thing initially when they tried to go public

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 5>call it two years ago was concentration risks, so G

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 5>forty two was pretty much their only customer. They've expanded

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 5>that now you have open AI and others in the

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 5>big pitch ed, at least when I talked to folks

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 5>on the buyside, is how broad based can that be?

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 5>If we're dealing with a market, especially as it relates

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 5>to building some of the compute and everything that goes

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 5>into building out the AI future. If this is just

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 5>the start and we're an early innings, what does this

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 5>ultimately look like? Call it five years from now, and

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 5>the big question is back to your point earlier. If

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 5>this is just a drop in the bucket, there's a

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 5>pretty much massive potential as it relates to going forward.

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 5>Though again, all things considered, we've seen semi sconductor index

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.799
<v Speaker 5>up what thirty percent since they started this process.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 3>I would say indicated opening prices. They're on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>They're not always right.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Who knows what happened when trade starts with Bloombo's baited

0:06:59.080 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 3>at Schultz.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Please don't go far.

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Stay with Bloomberg Tech because coming up later this hour

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 3>we will speak with Cerebra CEO Andrew Feldman, and if

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 3>you're on the socials, hit me up.

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll welcome your questions.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up, China's Jujingping gives a warning to President

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump on Taiwan. We're gonna have those details next. This

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg Tech, one.

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 6>Of the most important summit in human history, and the

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 6>two the two presidents.

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 7>President, you don't Trump have such a monty relationship. This

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 7>is an incredible opportunity for us to rely on the

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 7>relationships to build up much munch partnership.

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 6>Did you get any specific customers for your chips for

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 6>the eighths two hundred we didn't really talk about. I'm

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 6>here to support the president and to represent the unity.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 3>That was in Nvidia CEO Jensen Wong speaking to reporters

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>in Beijing and telling Bloomberg the company hasn't really discussed

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the h two hundred chips during the president's trips to China.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 3>He's there to support President Trump. What was discussed though,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 3>it's Taiwan Jijingping through state news agency calling it quote

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 3>highly dangerous situation for the world's biggest economies. Let's get

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>out to bloembig Tyler Kendall, who joins us from Beijing.

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>There are many threads.

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>We also have the breaking news of the last fifteen minutes,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the President saying that Iran was discussed and that there

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 3>is some sort of agreement there.

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 2>What do we need to know? What's the latest from China?

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, at this point, as you're saying, there are a

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 8>lot of different threads that we could pull on here.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't say that the.

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 8>Overarching theme appears to be that the efforts here in

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 8>Beijing are aimed at stabilizing ties between the US and

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 8>China rather than overhauling them. If we start with the

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 8>latest news, President Trump out saying that Jijingping has pledged

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 8>not to supply with any weapons and that it's going

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 8>to help get Ran to the negotiating table. Perhaps this

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 8>will help make some progress when it comes to what

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 8>has been gridlock in those ongoing discussions, as well as

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 8>a reopening in the Strait of hermus Though we would

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 8>be remiss if we didn't point out that from the

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 8>Chinese readout, we didn't really get any indications that China

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 8>is willing to go further in terms of helping to

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 8>ease that conflict, saying instead that they had extensive dialogue

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 8>about the situation in the Middle East, but not really

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 8>giving us any firmer details there. Another point where there

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 8>appeared to be a mismatch in terms of the public

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 8>readouts from what happened behind closed doors was, as you mentioned,

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 8>that issue related to Taiwan, as Chinese President Jijingping basically

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 8>threatened that Taiwan could derail the US China relationship. That

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 8>was not mentioned when it came to the US readout

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 8>in this and in fact, we just heard from Secretary

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 8>of State Marco Rubio, who appeared to downplane, that the

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 8>concerns were raised after we really saw US officials in

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 8>recent days signal that there would not be a change

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to US policy regarding Taiwan. Now, we

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 8>can't say, though, that there was a more optimistic tone

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 8>reached when it came to the economic issues, including the

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 8>fact that Chinese President Jijingping did appear to signal a

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 8>move towards greater openness, telling tech execs in the room,

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 8>including Elon Musk, Tim Cook, Jensen Wong, who traveled with

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 8>President Trump in part quote that China's door to the

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 8>outside world will only open wider. Though despite the messaging,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 8>we haven't really seen tangible signs yet that any steps

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 8>have been taken. But Chinese state media did report that

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 8>these executives told Jijingping directly that they highly value the

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 8>Chinese market and ed as you well know, this US

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 8>business delegation includes these companies that already have high exposure

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 8>to the Chinese market, but also companies like Micron, which

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 8>have seen some of their products barred over cybersecurity concerns

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 8>here in China. We can't say at this point there's

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 8>still a lot that we are waiting for purchase agreements

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to agriculture, Boeing aircraft, or energy products

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 8>from the US. But the dialogue does continue. These pair

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 8>of leaders do have bilateral meetings going into tomorrow as well.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Tyler Kendall with everything you need to know out

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 3>of China so far in the meeting between President Trump

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and China's using ping. Thank you very much, And let's

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.719
<v Speaker 3>get the broader picture with Michelle Guide, the CEO the

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Crack Institute for Tech Diplomacy at Purdue, also served as

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Assistant Secretary of State for Global Public Affairs under the

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 3>first Trump administration. You understand how this works and you

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 3>understand what's at stake, and like here on Bloomberg Tech, right,

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to start with Taiwan because for a very

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 3>long time you've been coming on this program and we've

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>been talking about Taiwan in the context of America's dependence

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 3>on that nation for semiconductor supply. Right, I'm literally talking

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 3>about TSMC and the manufacturing footprint in China in Taiwan.

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Apologies if we learn anything new here on Taiwan. What

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 3>did you make of President G's statement? I suppose through

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the State.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 9>Agency, nothing's new here. I think the position that China

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 9>has taken on Taiwan being really important to them when

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 9>it comes to US China relations has been the case

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 9>for quite some time. We know that General Secretary Shijinping

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 9>has been pressuring the President on arm sales to Taiwan

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 9>for a while, so that's not new at all, and

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 9>neither is the United States position on maintaining the status quo.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 9>As Secretary Rubio said, there's been no change on the

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 9>US position here with regards to Taiwan. But as you

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 9>had mentioned, the ties between Taiwan United States are strong,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 9>they run deep. Some MY conductors are a critical piece

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 9>of that, and there's been a lot of collaboration with

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 9>TSMC building out here the United States increasingly more over time,

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 9>and I think ultimately the status quo hasn't changed.

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 3>A red headline on the Bloomberg terminal just before we

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 3>came on air, President Trump saying that President G offered

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 3>help on Iran and pledged not to send weapons to Iran.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 2>The President has said that.

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 3>It wouldn't be an important topic of conversation, but actually,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 3>if you look at what markets are saying and what

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>people are saying on socials, it's a key issue, particularly

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 3>on how it would have a bearing on the straight

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of hormus.

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 9>It's been one of several key issues. I think it's

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 9>not surprising that they talked about Iran. It was looming

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 9>over this entire thirty six hour summit. The fact that

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 9>you had mentioned this breaking news that presidency is going

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 9>to stop supporting the Iranian regime is a positive step

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 9>and I think one that the United States would welcome,

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 9>So again not surprising, And I think overall, the big

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 9>picture on this is, you know, this is a thirty

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 9>six hour summit on all of these agenda items and

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 9>ultimately micro movements in a much bigger picture here of

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 9>the United States and its long term view to achieve

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 9>the Golden Age of America and retain our leadership across

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 9>the world. And China is on its own path to

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 9>China rejuvenation, and the big question is who gets there first?

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 9>And did the thirty six hours in this summit helped

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 9>the United States move incrementally faster toward our vision.

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I just want to disclose the Bloomberg Tech audience that

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 3>President Trump in those comments about Iran and President G's

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 3>commitment for run that was part of a Fox News interview,

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>a clip that Bloomberg reviewed. Michelle, would you kindly draw

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 3>on your experience from participating in the first Trump administration?

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 3>What does it take to put a delegation like this

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 3>together that includes Elon Musk Jensen one, picking them up

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 3>in Alaska for the Refield stop on Air Force one,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 3>and taking the world's most important tech CEOs to China

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 3>as part of a high stakes meeting between President Trump

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>and President G.

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, these things take a lot of preparation historically and

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 9>especially in terms of what you want the meetings to

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 9>be about the readouts coming out of these meetings. However,

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 9>I will say this, this type of delegation is unprecedented,

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 9>and I think if you look at how the President

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 9>has been agile and maybe non traditional in his work,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 9>so are these tech CEOs. They move fast, and they're disruptive,

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 9>and it's easy to hop on a plane in Alaska

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 9>and go to China. So I'd say, you know, there's

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 9>a lot of planning at the same time with this administration,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 9>with these types of disruptive tech leaders, there's also a

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 9>lot of room for ad libbing and improvisation, and I

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 9>think that's what we're seeing here.

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Michelle Goad to see you at the Correct Institute for

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Tech Diplomacy at Purdue.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, we're going to get out to Napa

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Valley for our own Caroline Hyde set to speak with

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of Ericsson on the sidelines of the Spark

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Global Leadership Summit.

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>It's coming up next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Nuclear power is trying to make a comeback, but the

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 3>resources required are in short supply. From uranium mining to enrichment.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 3>The supply chain is being reshaped by geopolitics, lobbyists, rising

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 3>energy demand, new technologies. That's the focus of Bloomberg this week.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 10>Global investment in nuclear energy since twenty twenty is estimated

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 10>to be around three hundred billion dollars, with ambitious plans

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 10>in Europe, North America and Asia to revive or kickstart

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 10>their nuclear energy sectors. Every step of the supply chain,

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 10>from mining to enrichment to building reactors is highly regulated

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 10>and controlled. Because a single misstep could be catastrophic and

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 10>erode the public trust nuclear has worked decades to regain.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 11>It's a real shift from when I came of age

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 11>and everyone was worried about nuclear war because the process

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 11>of enriching uranium for a nuclear fuel the same technology

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 11>that they use for enriching uranium to make nuclear weapon.

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Catch the full episode of Primer on Bloomberg dot com

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and YouTube. Let's get over to the Spark Global Leadership

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Summit in Napo, where own Caroline Hyde is standing.

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 12>By carroc It is a tough life being hosted by

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 12>Consello here in Napa Valley, and I'm very pleased to

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 12>say I'm joined by a giant in telecoms based in Sweden.

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 12>Eriksson is a global company and bory at Com.

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Is here with me. Who is the CEO?

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 12>Tell me about the China exposure you have, You have

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 12>supply chain, that you have, consumer and competition is really

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 12>what you have from China? What did you make of

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 12>the relationship between us and China that we just said overnight?

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 13>Thanks for having me, And that's a great question to ask,

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 13>very hard to answer. Actually we like to do that

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 13>in Jennal No I know, but I think there is

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 13>You know, China is started out as I often look

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 13>at the old telecom movie from China, right, it actually

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 13>started out as being a prioritized sector in China. So

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 13>they had almost one hundred vendors if you go back

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 13>thirty years. They consolidated into really two that became fierce

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 13>competitors in the over a decade, que one Key one

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 13>One Way of course being the biggest, and they started

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 13>out being of course low cost and fairly simple. Today

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 13>they are, of course a phenomenal competitor, and it's the

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 13>one that we benchmark ourselves with and said that's.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 14>The one we need to beat.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 13>Actually, we need to win on technology, we need to

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 13>win on cost positions. So for us, the competition with

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 13>China is front and center and has been, and.

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 14>I do believe that for the rest of the world

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 14>to compete with China, you need to lead on technology.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 12>But you've been outspoken in the past sort of pushing

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 12>against this idea of sort of a focus on your

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 12>own country and banning. In Sweden they pushed out Chinese competition,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 12>and you actually at the times that that's the wrong

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 12>thing to do in the US. That is your key

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 12>markets now are the US, that Japan, there are other nations.

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 12>How do you think about the China being excluded and

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 12>should they be?

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 13>You know, the way to think about about China is

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 13>actually it's multi pronent. So if you take telecom again

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 13>scale game, they have scale in their domestic market.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 14>That's a market you need to be in.

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 13>But more importantly, what was also clear is that given

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 13>the development in China economically and use case wise youse

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 13>so data consumption grow much.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 14>Faster in China than anywhere else in the world.

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 13>That led them to lead on or demanding certain technologies

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 13>ahead of the rest of the world. So unless you're

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 13>on the same development curve as they are in China,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 13>we're not going to be able to bring those solutions globally.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 13>So if we take in our case, we have what's

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 13>called massive MIMO. Basically it's a way to increase capacity

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 13>in the radio network. They needed that earlier than in

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 13>the rest of the world, and therefore if you're not

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 13>there when that happens, you don't develop the technologies at

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 13>the same pace as they do in China. So I

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 13>think it's a much more interdependent world. You need to

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 13>think of the world as being interdependent.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 12>And you're dependent on geopolitics, tariffs, inflationary pressures, the straight

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 12>up all moves again front and center today. How are

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 12>you managing that?

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 13>You know, we actually took a decision a number of

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 13>years ago now to say that we have three home markets.

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 13>So that was recognizing the US because it's a.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 14>Front runder market.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 13>Big India in those days was big today it's starting

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 13>also to be front runder on technology Japan. Japan is

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 13>very big in telecom and also an early adopter of telecom,

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 13>so we said that's markets we need to win in

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 13>to make sure that we combat the scale of China.

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 13>So we did that. Then we said we need a

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 13>flexible supply chain in order to manage any disturbances. So

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 13>we built a factory here in the US.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 12>How big is you're manufacturing now here in the US?

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 13>We manufactured pretty in a large portion of what's supplied

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 13>to the US manufactured here in the US. So we

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 13>built that in twenty commissioned at about twenty twenty, so

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 13>we were ahead of the really supplied constraints in that

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 13>sense and the tariff issues. So we've been able to

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 13>use that manufacturing footprint. R and D footprint to actually

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 13>manage a bit of the geopolitical exposure.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 12>Now we look at the markets today and extraordinary rampire

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 12>on the back of AI. AI is the excitement in

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 12>your area as well. Look, you've got competition with Nokia,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 12>who has got a strong relation with n Video and

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 12>they've gone big into data center. Briefly, how do you

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 12>think about the AA opportunity.

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 13>We think of the AA opportunity as a massive opportunity

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 13>for us for the simple reason that AI will ultimately

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 13>move out to the physical world call it industrial AI,

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 13>physical AI, and that's going to require inference at the

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 13>edge of the network to manage the latency requirements, et cetera.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 13>And then connectivity be needed. So we will start to

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 13>enter the world where everything has to be connected. So

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 13>when everything is connected, you can't connect them with wires.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 13>It just simply doesn't work. You're going to need the

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 13>terrestrial cellular network to provide the backbone to scale AI.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 13>So I think of AI. Yes, it's going to fundamentally

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 13>change the economy. It's going to be a driver or productivity.

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 13>It's hugely positive and for us it will be a

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 13>benefit because we will see a new type of traffic

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 13>coming in.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 12>The network, I can talk to you more. I'm luckily

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 12>going to be talking to you in a panel a

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 12>little bit later here at the Spark Leadership Summit, hosted

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 12>by Cancillo, ed back to you, all right, coming.

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Up, rebrass IPO time a big conversation. This is Bloomberg.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Tech to our TV viewers and radio listeners around the world.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Were joined by Andrew Feldman Cerebres CEO Cerebrest priceless IPO.

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Andrew one hundred and eighty five dollars a share above

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 3>the top end of the marketing range. I'm looking at

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal shares indicated to open three hundred and

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 3>fifty dollars a share.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Your reaction to that.

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 15>Pretty good day? Huh?

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>How you feel? I mean, did you see this coming?

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 3>There's some mechanics to it, right, but you know, I

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 3>know you, I know you like to let's be honest,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 3>you like to talk about what's happening in AI. The

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 3>big focus on inference Cerebress is place in it. But

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 3>this is the biggest IPO of the year so far.

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, what does it mean to you and your

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 3>employees and your back is.

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 16>It's the biggest tech one of the biggest tech IPOs

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 16>in history, and it's the biggest SEMIIPO in history.

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 15>We couldn't be more proud.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 16>This is the coumbination of a decade, a work of

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 16>countless late nights and long weekends. We are enormously proud

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 16>and excited and ready to get back to work and

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 16>start working on the next, on the next great thing.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 3>Again, the market is indicating shares to open at three

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty dollars a share. Let's see where we're

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 3>at when trading starts. But you're being priced in as

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 3>a major player in this field. Now, what evidence would

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 3>you point to that you are in fact a major payer.

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 3>A lot of focus is on the concentration in the

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 3>relationship with open Ai. Tell me about some of the

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 3>other frontier labs or other names that you have some

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 3>concrete talks with.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 16>Sure in the last four months, we announced a deal

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 16>with open ai and that's north of twenty billion dollars

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 16>for seven hundred and fifty megawads of compute. We also

0:24:54.560 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 16>announced a major engagement with AWS. Our equipment would be

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 16>deployed in their data centers. I think those are obviously

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 16>the largest, but there are dozens of others that are

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 16>in what used to be a big deal in the

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 16>ten to fifty million dollar category, and so there's just

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 16>an extraordinary demand right now for fast inference. We're the fastest,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 16>not by a little bit, but by more than an

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 16>order of magnitude. You know, we're fifteen times faster than

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 16>the next nearest competitor. And as AI has become useful,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 16>everybody wants it to be fast.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 15>Nobody wants to wait.

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 3>On that, you know, twenty one x on you know

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 3>performance and also like a lot of emphasis on the

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 3>dollar PA token, right that is the metric that the

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>field cares about.

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 2>But that's on paper.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, you just talked about the AWS relationship as

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 3>an engagement. When does the word engagement end and real

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 3>revenues start to show up for you from those relationships.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 16>Sure, we signed a binding term shoot with AWS as

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 16>described in RS one, and we're working through the master agreement.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 16>I think in dealing with organizations of that size, it

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 16>takes a little time to dot all the i's and

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 16>cross the t's, but we are extremely confident that they

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 16>will be an enormous channel for us and a partner

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 16>in delivering our technology to large enterprises and medium sized

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 16>enterprises around the world. I think they are one of

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 16>the preferred cloud providers for just about every enterprise on Earth,

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 16>and so an opportunity to have your solution embedded in

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 16>their offering as part of their bedrock offering, that's a

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 16>huge win for us.

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 3>We're live on Bloomberg Television and Radio. This is a

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech takeover, and we're speaking to Andrew Feldman, the

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Crebrius, whose company just priced the IPO at

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and eighty five dollars a share and is

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 3>indicated right now, I'm looking on the Bloomberg terminal maybe

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to start trade at three hundred and fifty dollars a share. Andrew,

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I think you know this about me. Whenever we have

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 3>a big moment, to have a conversation like this, I

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 3>always go to the Bloomberg Tech audience. What do they

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 3>want to know? And actually the first question is what

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 3>was your attitude toward retail investors? Why did you not

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 3>do more for the retail investor in this big moment

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 3>for your company?

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 15>We were more than twenty five x oversubscribed.

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 16>There was a lot of hard decisions that needed to

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 16>be made, and nobody got what they wanted, and you know,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 16>we did our best.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 15>It's about all you can do.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 16>When there's twenty five times more demand for your stock

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 16>at the institutional level and at the retail level, then

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 16>there are shares to be sold.

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 15>So we're really proud of the way we chose to

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 15>do it.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 16>We thought we did it with integrity, and I think

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 16>we are very comfortable with the ending allocation.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Full stack, fully vertically integrated. And what I mean by

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 3>that is you literally build the supercomputer top to tail, right,

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 3>so in Video will do the tray, not just GPU,

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 3>but then Dell super Micro will assemble it. Dell's margins

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 3>low teens, in Video's margins mid seventies, Your margins forty

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 3>forty one percent. And what I'm trying to help the

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 3>audience understand is why that strategy of owning everything top

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 3>to sail is going to pay off in the long run.

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 3>And I would say that The other question I get

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 3>for you is what's the future outlook for margins based

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 3>on your plans?

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think a couple things.

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 16>I think we have obviously opportunities at to improve our

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 16>cost structure. You know, we did half a billion last

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 16>year in sales. That means we put two hundred and

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 16>fifty million in the supply chain. Obviously that's not an

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 16>efficient spot.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 15>As we grow, we will have.

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 16>More leverage in the supply chain and our cost of

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 16>goods will come down. I think we have an opportunity to.

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 15>To increase prices.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 16>I think the demand for for fast inference is overwhelming

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 16>this minute, and so I think in the in the

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 16>long run will be really proud of our of our

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 16>gross margins and where they will sort of wash out

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 16>as we hit scale.

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I've got a question for you from a from a

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 3>terminal client via i B. Thank you for the question.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's tuned in right now, Andrew. They want they want

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>they want the detail. And so one way that people

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>look at it is that you know, this is custom silicon,

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>but Cerebrius isn't. Isn't a chip per se. It's like

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 3>wafer level, right. Is there a reason why you can't

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 3>just sell that versus the whole server?

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, that that's a good question.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 16>For the entire seventy year history of the computer industry,

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 16>every previous effort had failed to build a chip of

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 16>the size. So for your for your audience. This chip

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 16>is the size of a dinner plate, while traditional chips

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 16>through the size of a postage stamping. And not only

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.959
<v Speaker 16>had everybody failed until we succeeded, but several tried to

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 16>copy us and have since.

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 15>Failed as well. Part of what we.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 16>Were capable of doing and able to do was that

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 16>we were able to use not just the chip, but

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 16>also our expertise in packaging and in system design to

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 16>solve some of the problems and build a truly compelling solution. Right,

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 16>you don't just get fifteen or eighteen or twenty times

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 16>faster than the competition because you built a good chip.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 16>That's one of a collection of different things that enable

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 16>that sort of performance. You can build a great chip,

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 16>and the system vendor, the ODM, can nibble away at

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 16>your performance by not delivering the right amount of power

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 16>or the right amount of IO. Right, there's a reason

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 16>why in Nvidia then sought to control the IO the

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 16>Envy link, because they didn't want others to nibble away

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 16>at their performance. And so by building the system, we're

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 16>able to optimize all parts. I mean, you could ask

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 16>the same thing about Porschow. You know, why don't you

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 16>sell just engines, right, Andrew. It turns out that that's

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 16>a nine to eleven is a beautiful car because of

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 16>the engine and everything else they put in it.

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Andrew, the team's telling me we've got to go, But

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 3>I got to ask you five point five billion dollars,

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>what do you use the proceeds for? And actually, how

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>flexible can you now be an allocating capacity to new customers.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 3>We just have thirty seconds.

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 16>Oh, I think we will use it to increase capacity.

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 16>We are excited to bring many new customers on board.

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 16>There's tremendous demand for what we're doing. I think we

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 16>can be aggressive on that front.

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Feldman, Cerebras CEO pricing the IPO one eighty five

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 3>indicated to open three hundred and fifty dollars a share.

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your time.

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, Tom Hale, the Aura CEO, discusses the

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 3>future of wearables. So you're going to go back to

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the Spark Summit next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Let's go

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 3>back to the Spark Summit where our own Caroline Hyde

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 3>is standing by.

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 12>I am the Cancello Sparks Summit right here in Napa Valley,

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 12>and with wine comes a focus on your health, and

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 12>many might be looking at their orering today is to

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 12>see how they're feeling after a day in Napa Valley.

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 12>And I'm joined by Tom hale acause, the CEO of Aura,

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 12>and with so exuberant in the market, whether it be

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 12>personally about artificial intelligence, I'm interested as to how you're

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 12>seeing your own product iterate or all about now prediction

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 12>not just assessing how I might feel on the day

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 12>or the inputs that I'm getting, but predicting how I

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 12>might in the future.

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, We've been doing AI for many years, so I

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 17>think that's most interesting is that the predictions that we

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 17>make generally are short term. You might be getting sick

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 17>in a couple of days, is coming in a couple

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 17>of days, and they're very accurate because they're short term.

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 17>But I think where this starts to get really interesting

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 17>is if you can make predictions over a longer timeframe,

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.959
<v Speaker 17>you're starting to help people understand how their behaviors can

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 17>bend the curve on their health outcomes or maybe even

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 17>ultimately on the cost of healthcare. I think this is

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 17>really disruptive but also really positive because one of the

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 17>biggest problems with healthcare is there's just simply not enough

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 17>care to be provided for everybody, and AI lowers the

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 17>cost and provides access and provides medical information. It has

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 17>to be high quality, it has to be scientifically validated,

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 17>has to be accurate and good. But that opportunity exists,

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 17>and so we're pretty excited about, Hey, how AI can

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 17>transform healthcare and the.

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 12>Moment an order RING is deemed in general wellness product,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 12>but there could be even further ways in which you

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 12>move within the medical space that requires FDA approval, particularly

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 12>for blood pressure for example. How are you thinking about

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 12>that getting the science on board?

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 17>Well, our view is that we want to be as

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 17>aligned with the FDA as possible. We want to make

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 17>sure that what we do is in the path of

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 17>scientific and medical validation that includes the FDA. So we're

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 17>working closely on multiple submissions. Blood pressure is certainly one

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 17>of them. We're currently running something called the Blood Pressure

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 17>Profile Study. That's almost three hundred thousand people who are

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 17>taking CUUGH measurements and comparing to the predictions that the

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 17>RING is making. So we all have a data set

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 17>that will support the idea that what this does is accurate, validated,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 17>clinically relevant until that time, we'll probably operate as a

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 17>wellness device, which means that we can provide insight, but

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 17>not something that's like a diagnosis.

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 14>Will stop short of that, the.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 12>FDA doesn't have someone at the top right now, Does

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 12>that affect the way and what you want with you?

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, not really.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 17>I think we're very excited to see how we can

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 17>work with CDRH, which is the division of the FDA

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 17>that focused on that. So we're working with the rank

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 17>and file that people who are focused on medical devices,

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 17>and we have a great collaboration with them.

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 12>You have a great collaboration with Apple, but you're also

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 12>kind of friend of mees in some way to derise

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 12>it that way, Well, you've taken some significant talent from them.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 17>Well, I think the interesting thing about how Apple and

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 17>Aura interact is that turns out that almost two thirds

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 17>of Aora ringwears have a second wearable, most often a

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 17>risk wearable, and most often an Apple watch. So we're

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 17>actually highly complimentary now going to the people, there's great talent.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 17>Apple is produced some of the you know, the icons

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 17>of health and hardware, and I think having some of

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 17>those people join our team has been an incredible uh

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 17>I don't know. We feel very proud of the people

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 17>who've joined us, and we've got some We've got some

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 17>great connectivity with Apple as well.

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm a long.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 17>Time independent software developer on the Apple platform, so we

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 17>have a lot of people that we, you know, have

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 17>been working with for years.

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 12>Software developers are not cheap in this age of AI.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 12>How are you thinking about your talent?

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 17>More broadly, so for us, the interesting thing is about

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 17>a year ago, people were like, wow, I.

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 14>Mean hardware is hard.

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Why are you doing hardware?

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 17>And of course the first rule of software school is

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 17>you don't do hardware. So I've obviously I missed that

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 17>that class or lessons school. But it's worked out okay

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 17>because now what people tell us is they say, we

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 17>can't believe how resilient you are to the AI disruption

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 17>to software.

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 2>It turns out haftware.

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.959
<v Speaker 17>Hardware is very very attractive right now because you can't

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 17>vibe code atoms right you can't.

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Just summon them into existence.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:15.359
<v Speaker 17>And so interestingly, I think for Aura, steering the way

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 17>we have and having always been a hardware company with

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 17>a very strong software backing, it's actually been really advantageous

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:22.439
<v Speaker 17>in investors look at us and they say, good, We're

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 17>so glad that you're not in the software space and

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 17>that you're a hardware provider.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 12>You've just been luring more investment and you've got a

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 12>bigger market cap. On the private side, I'm interested is

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.479
<v Speaker 12>to whether there's any inflationy pressures your investors are worried about.

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 12>How are you thinking about manufacturing, the stage of supply chain.

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 12>We think about home moves, we think about China today.

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I don't think we've really had seen the impact

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 17>of inflation on demand, which is good. We've certainly seen

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 17>some inflation impacts on kind of supply chain, but nothing material.

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 17>And interestingly the last year, of course, there was all

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 17>this drama about tariffs, and I think as a company

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 17>we were quite lucky. One we actually announced an intention

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 17>to have a factory built in the US, and so

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.360
<v Speaker 17>that's actually one really interesting that it's just underway. You know,

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 17>we'll let you know when it's all rolled out. But

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 17>at the same time, I think we also were able to,

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 17>because we manufacture around the globe, be very careful to

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 17>sort of manage the terror issues very effectively.

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 12>Somehow could speak to you for much longer. CEO of

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 12>or a fascinating to catch up. We hand it back

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 12>to you from the concllo's Spark summit here in napavaliad.

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 3>More interviews to come out of the Spark Summit throughout

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 3>the afternoon. Tune in for a conversation with open Ai

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 3>CFO Sarah Fryer eight thirty pm Eastern, five thirty pm Pacific.

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk is taking Grock to Wall Street. Sources tell

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg the heavyweights like Morgan Stanley and Apollo A testing

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Xai's grok chatbox as SpaceX now parent of Xai, prepares

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 3>for an IPO. Bloom Best Carmen and Royer breaks the

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 3>story wide open. No surprise that you wake up. It's

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 3>one of the most read stories on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 3>and Bloomberg dot Com. There's so much detail in the

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:10.000
<v Speaker 3>report about the Xai strategy. The players involved give us

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 3>as much of that detail as you can.

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 18>Sure, thanks for having me.

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 17>Yet.

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 18>Basically, Xai is trying to boost their corporate client roster

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 18>ahead of the IPO, and John Schalkin, who's been the

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 18>chief revenue officer the company has been really driving this strategy.

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 18>In order to do that, they've mainly gone to Wall

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 18>Street clients that have previously worked with MASK companies before.

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 18>Among them is Apollo, which helped finance XAIS access to chips.

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 18>It's Morgan Stanley, which is one of the go to

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 18>banks that has worked with MUSK for years, and it's

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 18>also Valor Equity, which is a venture capital firm that

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:50.760
<v Speaker 18>has backed MASK companies for a long time. They're testing

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 18>Rock and they're using it alongside other AI models. But

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 18>this is happening while like you know, on Thropic and

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.280
<v Speaker 18>Open AI are really trying to fight the same piece

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 18>of the pie, so the adoption is going very slowly.

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 3>No, So one real quick interesting thing is that actually

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 3>in your reporting they're not using it necessarily for work,

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 3>is that right?

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Like on desk work in those firms.

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 18>They're trying to adopt it and use it along other

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 18>AI models, but the chadbod has been falling behind on

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 18>coding and a financial implementation, which is why XAI is

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 18>trying to like really ramp that effort up, and they've

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 18>been trying to move more stuff internally to work on

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 18>training Rock for financial modeling and like boosting also like

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 18>the sales team, So they're trying to really prepare the

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 18>chadbot for that use case, but it's not really being

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 18>ready for.

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Idiot also reporting that John Shulking stepping back as chief

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 3>revenue Officer of course a partner at Valor Now and

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 3>advisor recommon story Bloomers coming.

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 2>To Royal Thank you very much.

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, coming up on the program, Alphabet is taking

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 3>the AI race the global bomb market. I'm going to

0:39:56.800 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 3>discuss that next. This is Bloomberg Tech Time now for

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Talking Tech and first STARp. Hon High, also known as

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 3>fox Conn, reported a nineteen percent jump in quarterly profit,

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 3>says the US will gradually become the company's largest AI

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 3>server production hub. The company has become a key AI

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 3>hardware player by assembling servers that house Nvidia accelerators. Plus,

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 3>China's tech leaders are facing a reality check. Ali Barba

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 3>narrowly missed revenue targets this morning as e commerce war

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 3>was blunted its cloud search, while ten Cent reported its

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 3>slowest growth in over a year, and ad Tech is

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 3>eyeing a potential four billion dollar debut in Hong Kong.

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 3>The optical connectivity specialist is reportedly seeking to raise at

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 3>least five hundred million dollars or more at evaluation of

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:51.280
<v Speaker 3>three to four billion dollars.

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 2>According to sources, Big story.

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 3>On the terminal Alphabet is taking the AI race to

0:40:56.560 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the global bomb market. After a blockbuster seventeen billion million

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 3>dollars sale at home, the Google parents now tapping the

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 3>Japanese yen market for the first time. Bloomberg's Tasos Vossas

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 3>joins us to explain Big Text move into what is

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 3>international debt? Right, So that's the evolution here, looking at

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.479
<v Speaker 3>international markets outside of its home.

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 19>Why well, at that point, you have to if you

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 19>look at issuans. This year, for example, non financial corporates

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.439
<v Speaker 19>in the US, which is the deepest, biggest credit market

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 19>in the world, forty cent out of every dollar was

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 19>raised came from the tech sector, which is which is

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 19>rather large. So you have to think in order to

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 19>avoid saturating even the biggest market in the world, you

0:41:38.320 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 19>actually have to look at every corner out there. So

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 19>hyperscalers in particular Alphabet, but also Amazon have taken steps

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 19>to diversify that. So they they've tapped every every big

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 19>market they can imagine. So it's been Euros, pound, Sterling,

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 19>it's been Swiss Franks, and now we're looking at the

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 19>yen market, so it's pretty much a global race in

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 19>order to finance this massive cap expending the way we're

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 19>going to see in the next few years.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, and then in the eurobond market, we're talking about

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 3>the second biggest credit market. Why is it different this

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 3>time around TuS US? Like we've done a lot of

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 3>breaking news on this show in corporate bonds, is there

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 3>something new here?

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 19>There is actually, and we've had mega deals in the

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 19>past where you have tens of billions of dollars being

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 19>issued in a single day. The problem with well, the

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:24.960
<v Speaker 19>difference with that is that that was a one off.

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 19>Usually it's on the back of M and A. You

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 19>have to raise massive amounts of cash or to do that.

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 19>But once you've done that, then you can just absorb

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.439
<v Speaker 19>the company we've just bought. The difference here is that

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 19>because cap expending is going to be so large in

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 19>the next few years, hundreds of billions of dollars, you

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 19>have massive deal after massive deal, which is a conundrum

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 19>that investors are facing. They want to be involved in them.

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 19>The main issue is that in other massive deals is

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 19>just around the corner. So the previous one is going

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 19>to weekend in the back of that, so that that

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 19>trend of big deal after big deal is something that

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:00.279
<v Speaker 19>we haven't seen before. Pretty much in there sure as

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 19>a gread market. Bloomberg's taslos fossos, Thank you very much.

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 19>Let's get back to Cisco before we leave today. Today's

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 19>big number nine billion dollars. That's how much the company

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 19>expects to get in orders from hyperscalers in calendar twenty six,

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 19>up from previous five billion dollar target. Suggest this company's

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 19>AI shift is showing a payoff, right Cisco, welcome to

0:43:21.840 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 19>the AI party. That's part of the story, and the

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 19>shares really reflecting that we're up fifteen percent, on track

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 19>for the best day for Cisco since twenty eleven. At

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 19>the open, seventeen percent gain put them on track for

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 19>their best day since two thousand and two. Networking routers, switches,

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 19>cables make those components the story again. Wonderful, That does

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 19>it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech, Standing by for

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 19>Cerebres to start trading, priced at one eighty five for

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 19>its IPO indicated to open three hundred and fifty dollars

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 19>per share. Check out the podcast, A stunning show to

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 19>recap Apple, Spotify, iHeart and

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 2>On Bloomberg, this is Bloomberg Tech