WEBVTT - Book of Souls

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 2>It was a painful game. I don't know if I

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed watching it. It was really stressful.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Had the experience the entire game of being like, well,

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Knicks are going to win this.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I felt that way too.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I said jokingly, but not I was like, well, we

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't right where they want them. MIxS were down like

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or whatever.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I knew that they were going to win in my

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>long tenure of watching basketball for two weeks, because that's

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>how they started every game. But I was watching with

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>my dad who was having a heart attack like the

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 2>entire time, so he was not as confident.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But I was also so tired. Yeah, I'm not cut

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out for late night sports. Why I love the World Cup? Yeah,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>because actually I prefer the World Cup in other parts

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>of the world, even not going to any games, And

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather it be in like Asia and have games

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>out of like eight in the morning New York times,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>because like then I can watch the games.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, you're you're a rare bird.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Like there are games in this World Cup that are

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>at like nine pm.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 2>It's it's too late.

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:09.639
<v Speaker 1>They start at midnight and like never.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know if I have the emotional energy

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 2>to like get invested in another sport that I so

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 2>casually follow, you know, I feel like.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>The World Cup is extremely great for not getting very invested. Yeah,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you can watch two countries you've never thought about play

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.839
<v Speaker 1>each other and it's just fun. It's just like there's

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>no stakes. I mean there's stakes, are that that's true.

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I just think basketball is the perfect sport for someone

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.279
<v Speaker 2>who doesn't follow it to watch it because it's super fast,

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>they score a ton, They're all like kind of concentrated together.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>You always know where the basketball is, whereas you know, soccer,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>it's bigger and they don't score as much.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I hear you, But as a crotchity old man, I

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate the way that soccer works where they start

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the clock and then they play soccer, yeah, and then

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they finish the half for the game, whereas like in bascowball,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>when there's five minutes of eighteen seconds of game time left,

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you're like, yeah, another two hours.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, I gotta go to bed, go to the

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 2>bathroom again.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>This is a real sports podcast. You're hosted by and

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for people who don't really go out attention to sports.

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>We talked the other day about my very slight desire

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to coach little league. Yes, and I got an email

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>from a reader being like, please coach little league. He's like,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 1>I do some administration for our league. And like the

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>dads who are like, I must coach little league like

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>need to be balanced.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Other dads are like, yeah, yes, sure you've got you need.

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You need some low commitment little league catches.

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 2>That's good. Yeah. Remind everyone that they should be having fun.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Right yeah, sportsmanship. Hello, and welcome to The Money Stuff Podcast,

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>your weekly podcasts where youre talking about stuff related to money.

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levian, r at the Money Stuff column.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>For Bloomberg Opinion, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I think you're just not talking about.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm spacexed out, even though I will say, as we're

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>recording this on fed Day, by the way, we're going

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 2>to miss the starting minutes of Kevin Worrish at the

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 2>podium for the first time. Not that I don't think

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you care. I care a little bit. SpaceX is a

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit lower today on this Wednesday the line hasn't

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>moved in that direction before, and its short life is

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a publicly listed equity. But we don't have to talk.

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>About I feel like I have a lot of like

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>ill formed thoughts about it's not gying up. Who cares?

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I tweeted something about SpaceX today.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It's funny that tweeting is now business.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true, that's true. I tweeted on X or

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>post it on X owned by the parent company SpaceX.

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Would the discovery of aliens be bullish or bearish for

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX's valuation.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of fun to think about.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I've joked that, like their medium term plan is like

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>data centers in space to run like Enterprise ai yah,

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>but their long term plan is to like colonize the

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>universe and sell spice to alien civilizations. So I'm gonna

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be with bullish. But you know, obviously, if like the

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>aliens have better spacefaring technology and also like robustly developed

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>capital markets, then like you don't need to don one

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX when you can know and you know that's intergalactic

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>space conglomerate.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 2>I do think it would introduce some shortly volatility as

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 2>we sort through those questions.

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>But possibly long with volatility.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true anyways, SpaceX So, I mean it's like,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>which hedge fund ish do you want to talk about?

0:04:58.640 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what do you want to talking about?

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean we could talk about Ken Griffin.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>First in The New Yorker by Carrie Cernowitz, who's the

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>guy I know in his book I've blurped, and he

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>was photographed for that story. But oh yeah, Jeff Brown,

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>who photographed me for my no kidding, I very cool

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>publicity stills like me slept in a chair the past

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>time during the start issue. Ye, Jeff Fron's a genius

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and photographed and it's a profile of what makes Ken

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Griffin tick.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed it. I have to say my attention

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 2>span is so shot.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.119
<v Speaker 1>This was the most I've never read article.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. I couldn't quite get there. I do make

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 2>it through money stuff, but I made it probably three

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>fourths the way through. That's why I asked to push

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>to two TE. I was wondering at what point Ken

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Griffin's eyes would come up, and they came up pretty quickly.

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Here's the sentence in particular, Griffin's blue eyes are unsettlingly bright.

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Colleagues debate half in jest about whether he lacks the

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>normal need to blink.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>I love that I just made a joke today about

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>hedgehund managers not having time to blink. Now this market moves,

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's evolved to keep his eyes up in all

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he might like that joke, right. But yeah, No,

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>it was a great profile. There were a lot of

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 2>interesting things. I like when I'm reading a thing that

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I know that we're going to talk about, and then

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I find the angle while i'm reading it, then I

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 2>know that you're going to want to.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Talk about behind the scenes, Yeah, is making presses? What

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>am I going to want to talk about?

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk You do my part for me,

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>the quality of earning?

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, you did right about that too, right. My

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>stick for a while has been that I think people

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>have this view of what a hedgehund manager is, or

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>what a hedgehund is, that it's like an investing firm,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And my view is that these multistat funds are much

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.559
<v Speaker 1>more more like what investment banks were twenty years ago,

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're not the best thought of as like

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>making investment decisions, but rather as like running businesses that

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>provide services to the market. Some of those services are

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like making prices more efficient, they're like long short equity trading.

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But some of those services are liquidity services, and like

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the dispersion trade in the index ARB

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>trades are really like just real liquidity provision services that

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>used to be done by bank center now being done

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>by these hedge ones. And what is pleasing in this

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>article is like that thesis has sort of been enshrined.

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>In The New Yorker, carry Sernovis writes about ken Griffin

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>being in college at Cabot House, which is also where

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I lived in college. He and I are among the

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>illustrious cabin house Alonia. Ken Griffin was like doing options trades,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, well, I've made money on these

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>options trades, but like the market maker on the other

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>side explaining all of the options trades, I should do that.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So I eventually started a market maker. But also he

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>had like the more holistic view of like I want

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to hire earnings quality even in my regular trading. So

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>he got into like a convert our business that used

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to be done by banks and is now like convert harvest,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>just the standard hedge fund trade. So he got into

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>these businesses that are repeatable liquidity provision, almost like fee

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for service businesses, where like you do stuff that gets

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a steady return because you're providing a service to the market,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>rather than like picking the stock that'll go up.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I thought that was an interesting anecdote in sort

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 2>of explaining the starting point of his thinking, because I

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>can connect that story easily into why he started a

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>market maker eventually, Yes, but.

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>He even started a marketmaker, initially started a hedge fund

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that did trades that sort of had that shape of

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like being repeatable businesses rather than being like stock picking.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I did think it's interesting that when Starner Woods

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of asked him, like, who are your heroes, Ken

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Griffin didn't really have anyone to name.

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because like there are a lot of hegemon managers,

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ackman being perhaps the most prominent among them.

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Who also has piercing blue eyes or.

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Hazel a matter of some controversy. He would be the

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>first to tell you that he wants to be Warren Buffett, right,

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's like a lot of hedgemo matters like that,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and like that is the opposite of what Ken Griffin's approaches, right,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Like he is not like I'm going to pick good

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses and on their stocks forever. He is like, I'm

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have a high quality earnings. I'm gonna have

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>recurring earnings every quarter, you know. And so that model

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like the sort of like big swing headshow manager the

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Gary mentioned George Soros as a as a

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>name of you know who other hedge matters have admired. Like,

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not what he's trying to do, right, He's trying

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to build high quality of earnings and repeatable business.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there was a great one here from Lloyd Blankfine,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the former CEO of Goldman, who told Cernawitz that he

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 2>still can't figure out who mentored him to who he

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 2>has a debt because I mean Griffin also, I mean

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>he started Todel so early, like.

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>In like the cable House, Yeah more or less, I

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>mean not literally, but like he started the stuff he

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>was doing at cabin House grew very quickly into being

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>said at all.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no real time to like find a mentor if

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 2>you just start out the gate. Also, it's also a

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 2>very different model from like a Bridgewater for example. Oh yeah,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>oh yeah.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, two important things about Ken Griffin. One is that

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>he owns all the houses. Also, all the constitutions, yes,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>all the dinosaurs, Yeah, all the art. If you're in

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the business of like generating billions of dollars of profits

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>from doing financial trades, like, I appreciate people who are

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>like I mean to like turn that as rapidly as

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>possible into tangible wealth. Yeah, Like all this stuff feels

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhat imaginary, but a stegosaurus that's real.

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, the the profile does go into you know, he

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 2>had a really rough time during the financial crisis and

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>made the decision at that point that he wanted to

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 2>have non financial assets. Yeah, from that point on.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You out of market making businesses into stegosaurus constitutions.

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that cartis and a lot of pieces he does

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 2>have on loan to actual museums, which is cool versus

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>just sitting in the various basements of his billion and

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 2>a half dollar real estate portfolio.

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Right. I don't know if he has a dinosaur at

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>any of his houses. If I had a billion dollar

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>collection of stuff, I would probably want a stegosaurus in

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>my living room because that is very cool. Like I

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get that having it at a museum is also also cool.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 2>It might just because I'm sick, but I did get

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>the shivers thinking about that. Like here's a dinosaurs. This

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 2>is something that was a live once a long time ago,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and now I own it. I have a lot of

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>a live horses. Yeah, right, alive being.

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, key right, totally different collecting impulse. The other thing

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>about cityl yeah kindo, friends saidst is no one is

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a tough place to work. Yeah, And the story gets

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>into things like someone someone calls it a highway wreck

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of human bodies, not meaning that the bodies have been wrecked,

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but rather that the people get fired a lot when

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they like transition, turnover, a lot of turnover. Someone kept

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a book of souls about all their friends who go

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and again it's like it's like there's something about like

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>quality of earnings, right, It's like it's like if you

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think about hedgehns generating alpha, there are alphas that are

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>just repeatable forever because you're providing a service. But there's

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff that's like yeah, like people didn't

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>notice it, and then you notice it. You made a

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>little money, and then like people notice it and it

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>stops making money, and so there's a real like you know,

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>constant churn as signals the kay when the cigneal partner

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>says in the story, it's not about a portfolio, it's

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>about a business that can recreate great portfolios again and again,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which is like you think about like what a person does,

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like often a person is good at finding your particular portfolio,

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.319
<v Speaker 1>and like if you need to totally recreate the portfolios,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>then that means getting only people. So another hedge fund

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is yeah, Bridge Wader.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, capacity constraints, tensions between GPS and LPs.

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say this, but you shouldn't. The

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Bridge Order had this reputation for a while, okay, forgetting

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a load of mid single digit returns,

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>being very stable, leading with its reputations being the biggest

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund in the world and being you know sort

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of like not a like taking big swings, making lots

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of money kind of place, right, And that reputation was

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>not entirely a positive thing.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>They were going to talk about their other reputation, Oh sure, sure.

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Sure, they had a reputation for being very interpersonally weird.

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're actually got a name drop in the New

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Yorker profile about Ray Dalio being a pregnant woman cry.

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, like it being just so ostentatiously weird personally,

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>but like they were doing all of that and like

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>doing all that ruthless self examination and like struggle sessions

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or they all got in a room and berated each other. Well,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>their performance is like kind of mediocre. Yes, it, take

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a step back and do a struggle session about that.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It wasn't in service of like improving their returns, right,

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 2>it was just like it was just its own thing. Yeah,

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>like a weird social experience exactly.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>If you talk about that to a like an investor,

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>an alligator, like that sounds bad, right. It's like, no,

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I want a good return rather than a bad return.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'd rather be in a good fund that generates

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>high returns than in like a giant fund that doesn't.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But as a business matter, it's nice to run a

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>giant fund that has very sticky capital for a variety

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of reasons and that generates steady, you know, mediocre returns

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>because it's a business matter. You're charging management fees, and

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it is nice to have a very predictable recurring management

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>fee revenue. And so arguably it was a good business

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for Bridgewater to be running as much money as possible

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and like, yeah, I have an okay returns. Yeah, but

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>they moved on from that, and so Bloomberg's Emma Parmer

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are pretty singing and Lionoda I have a story about

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>how basically near Bardea, who's like the I was gonna

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>say new CEO. He's not that new, but he's a

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>guy who took over when Ray Dalio kind of retired

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>from from Bridgewater. He has been trying to make it

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a smaller, more focused, higher performance fund.

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think it's.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Operating a little bit more like a hedge fund than it.

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Used to, which makes sense.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Which makes sense because like when it was Ray Dalio's baby,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it was just like a strange, giant institution. But now

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like the guy, you got a round a hedge fund,

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And so one thing that means is the performance is better.

0:15:58.080 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Another thing it means is that they've returned capital to

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>investors because they don't think they have the capacity to

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 1>run as much money as they used to run. And

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the third thing it means they sold stakes to in

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>their general partner. They sold stakes in the management company

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to a bunch of investors, including like some people who

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like swapped out hedge fund steaks into management company steaks,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>which is a very strange signal. But anyway, those people

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>are now disappointed because they were like I was signing

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>up for a steady stream of management fees on this

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>giant pool of capital, and now I'm getting good but

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>variable performance fees on a smaller pool of capital. And

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not what I wanted. I wanted like a high

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>quality of earnings, you know.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, it's great reporting Bloomberg saying that two of

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the firms seven institutional owners have sold their shares back

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>to Bridgewater at a discount to their purchase price.

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, because like when you buy the thing and it's like,

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the stream of management fees on a giant

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>pool of money, like then it goes down when it

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>has a smaller pool of money.

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they're not alone. There's a third the Teacher

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Retirement System of Texas. It's also looking to sell. It's

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 2>already slashed its value of its holding by nine percent

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 2>last year. So that's the rub, right, Like you would

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>think before you think of like really think about it.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>That Okay, it makes sense the new CEO would come

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 2>in and be like, we need to improve returns. We

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>are way too big. We're constrained by how big we are.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's improve this. But even though I mean, twenty twenty

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 2>five was a great year for their pure Alpha fund,

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>which had been sort of having a middling decade or so.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>But I guess the anxiety there is that, in addition

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to your earning less on the big pool of money,

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>that there's no guarantee that they're going to be able

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 2>to replicate their twenty twenty five.

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, it's a quality earnings think, right, Like outside investors

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>love management fees because they are the same every year,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and they don't like performance fees because who knows what

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>performance will be next year. I think that most people

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>who like work at hedge funds think like you were saying,

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>like what you would expect, which is like, of course,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>our job is to make the returns good, right, right?

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Of course, our job is to make as much money

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>as possible for our clients. Yes, And if you don't

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>have outside money at your GP, if you don't have

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>outside money at the imagement company, like you just sort

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of think that now you might not think that you

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>might like in your secret evil heart, think I'm just

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna like gather as much capital as I can and

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>charge two percent fees and who cares about their performance?

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But like you don't say that out loud. Inside that

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't even really think it, right, like like

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that's like a that's like a that's like an insulting

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>thing you might say about someone else. But you wouldn't

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like do that because like your whole life is devoted

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to like having the best possible performance and like winning

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>at the edge fund game and all this, and so

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>it would be very embarrassing and like psychologically damaging to

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>sit there and be like, yeah, I just gather assets.

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worry about performance. But once you have outside

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>capital at the management company, then like those people to

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>gather assets and charge two percent fees.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they can say that out loud.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it's a different or they can give you

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the they can that's for their money back. If you

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. If you own your own hedgehund from

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you are thinking like a hedgphone manager. But once you

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>have outside capital, you're like, you know, steward of shareholder

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>value and you're becoming a asset accumulator. And this, by

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, has some relevance to the publicly traded aults managers,

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>who you know, why is private credit so big because

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you can charge fees on them capital I was wont

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to briefly Bi Blackman, who I don't think I've ever

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>actually written about this, but we've talked about on the podcast.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>When he took his management company public, he had this

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>structure that he thought and I think is really interesting,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>which is where basically, like the company the management company,

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and thus the shareholders get a preferred return on the

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>incentive fees. So like, they get the incentive fees in

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the first like, let's say five percent of performance, so

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I like Pershing Square funds go up five percent a

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>year the management company, the shareholders get the performance fees

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>on that, and then the rest, like if they go

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>up thirty percent a year, the other twenty five percent

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the employees get that. So basically the employees get the

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>like upper tail performance fees and the shareholders get the

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like preferred performance fees. So they've turned the performance fees

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>into something more like a management fee that is a

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit more stable, a little bit more high quality

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of earnings, and so they're giving that to their public

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>shaholders well, they take the like juicy upside options for

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the hedge on managers, which I think is a good

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>way to like, yeah, split this and like give the

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>public shareholders what they want, which is steady returns, and

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>give the actual hedge on management employees the incentives to

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>make returns go up. Yeah, possibly Bridgewater should it on that.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I will say, you make the point and money

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 2>stuff that the employees probably care more about returns, Like

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's more exciting to work.

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>It's not necessarily true, right, like if yeah, if you

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just get a bigger check for running a giant pull

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of assets, then like a good big check. But I

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's I think it's true. I think most of

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>them would rather have higher time. Then they go beat

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>their hedgehund friends and we're up thirty five percent this year.

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like great, Yeah, it's good.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 2>Well. Bloomberg reported that it looks like Bridgewater employees are

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>on board with this sort of reset. Apparently, the hedge

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 2>fund recently offered current and former staffers a chance to

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 2>sell their shares back to the company. In all but

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 2>four said no, according to people familiar with the matter.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 2>So I mean it has the backing of the people

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 2>who actually work there.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>There's like ten market structure. Sick guys who listen to

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>this podcast or read my newsletter and you know what

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>market structure cechos don't like.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 2>Tell me right, NMS, Well, what a wonderful week that

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 2>they've been having.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So like twenty years ago, the SEC two and created

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>rules that say that if a stock is available for

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>sale at a lower price on one stock exchange, you

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>can't buy it at a higher price on another stocking change.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's not a correct summary of the rule, and

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>like there's like a technical error there that people will

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>complain about. It's essentially useful summary of the rule. Basically,

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like there's like twelve stock exchanges now are fourteen.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of stock exchanges, and the SEC twenty

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago created what's called a National Market System or NMS,

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>where essentially all those stocking changes are linked and like

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>whichever exchange offers the best price, like you trade there.

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure that that seemed very intuitive and sensible.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>It does, right, I mean I had to really read

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>hence and search for the unintended consequences because at first blush,

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>that seems reasonable, right, and so like brokers have a.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Best execution requirement, so Burger's supposed to get their clients

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the best price for stock, and so separate from that,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>but obviously related to that, is like this Raygani Mass

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>rule that says, you know, if it's available at a

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>low price, you got to buy it at a low

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>price and not at a high price. And so this

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is like a sensible rule, and everyone's like, sure, yeah,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. And that's not true. People objected at

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the time, but that's a long time yo, But I

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.479
<v Speaker 1>think that since then, many people have decided that there

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>are some unintended consequence, that there are some unintended consequences

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of it that are bad. And one of them, which

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we maybe talked about in this podcast, is

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that like if I start a stock exchange, every hyper insistrator,

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>every broker has to connect to my stock exchange because like,

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>what if I have the lower price, he might I

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>might never have the lower price, but like they don't

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>know that until they pay me a lot for a

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>data feed and like a fast connection and all this stuff.

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>So it like essentially subsidizes the creation of weird new

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>stock exchanges. So you put all these were new stock exchanges,

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the Texas Stock Exchange, and I've written

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>about all of them. Like, some of what's going on

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>here is like marketing positioning, like really thinking you've got

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a better mouse shrap. But some of it is just

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like you start a stock exchange and every trader is like, okay,

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we got to connect to your stock exchange. How much

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you charge in? So there is some inefficiencies there.

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was interesting to me. I mean, I have

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 2>to admit I haven't spent a lot of time thinking

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 2>about Reagan MS, but I mean looking at this proposal,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>there is that feeling there that there are too many

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>stock exchanges that you know, the.

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Calls that out specifically, yeah, exactly fewer stock exchanges to a.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Casual person, you just think it's so top heavy, the

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 2>exchanges that you don't really think about like the little guys.

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Right in a world where it was just competitive, a

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>burger might say, look, I'm sad it's my best execution

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>obligations by sending orders to a big liquid exchange for

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>most of the orders. And if like somewhere there's one

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>share available at a penny better price, like it doesn't matter,

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm doing the best I can for my clients,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'm saving on connection fees and everything. That's like

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a reasonable judgment to make. But in a

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>world of reage n MS, you sort of have to

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>send the orders wherever you know the best order is,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you all those smaller exchanges just kind of

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>continue bopping along, whereas like in a more competitive world,

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe like more volume would be consolidated at the biggest exchanges.

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Reagan ms also became very controversial around the flashboys ix

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>situation because basically AX launched an exchange with like a

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of speed bump situation more or less just called

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the speed bump, so we'll keep calling it. A few

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 1>don't and a lot of people are like, well, how

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:48.159
<v Speaker 1>can I be forced to connect to this thing that

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>delays quotes? And basically, I guess it sees like it's fine,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>but every decision that an exchange makes is more fraud

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and controversial when you have to route to that exchange

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and you have to trade on that exchange, And so

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of rag animss might just make it a

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit easier for exchange just to like do different things,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>because if you don't like it, you don't have to

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>trade there. I do want to say that the other

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that is like going on with this is crypto

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Crypto really doesn't like the trade through rules, no, because

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it just does not work with crypto and market structure.

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>For one, thing, like the funding mechanisms are different, where

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>like stock exchange trades settle t plus one, and so

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you could do a trade on whichever exchange has the

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>best price and then settle out the next day. Crypto,

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>like if you're pre funding trades, if you're like doing

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>trades on a blockchain, like it is harder to do

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that if you're forced to execute wherever the best price is.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And then also like crypto is just slower in regular markets,

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like crypto operates on block time, where like you know,

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>blockchain does a batch of trends actions every six seconds

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>or every second or whatever the lifetime the lifetime f

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>equity market structure, and so it's very hard to think

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>about how a crypto exchange could be held to these rules.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Now you might say crypto exchanges aren't held to these rules,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but everyone wants to tokenize thoughts. Everyone's list stocks on

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>crypto exchanges, and if you list stocks on crypto exchanges,

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to get around regain MS and the simplest

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>way to do that is to get rid of these rules.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was definitely the reaction on crypto Twitter. And

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a great piece out by Scott Patterson on the

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg terminal and he does quote Alex Thorn, who's you

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 2>know at Galaxy and Alex Thorn, I think he tweeted

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 2>something to the effect of this is one of the

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 2>biggest unlocks yet for tokenized stocks, right, so it's all happening.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's all happening.

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Tokenization is one of those things that's been on my

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 2>list to take seriously and like really like do some

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 2>homework on for a while now, and I keep hoping

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>that maybe when I'm on attorney leave, I'm going to

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 2>get serious about it, which is really naive. I think

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 2>it's been on.

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>My list of things to not take seriously. I've made

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>fun of it. Tokenization is to think some of it

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is like market structure stuff, where like crypto people would love, love,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>love to just list all the stocks on coinbase rather

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>than listening on the stock exchange. But then some of

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>it is like genuinely getting around US registration requirements and

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like listing all the private stocks on coinbase, so that

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>like you can go public without going public. I will

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>say that like that was how I interpreted tokenization for

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a long time, because it's like what everyone said, and

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's what's happening. Like, I think that

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>has been kind of like pushed back a little bit.

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone's like, no, you can't really like just list

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>tokens on robinhood of like you know, anthropic stock that's

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not allowed. No, But the other stuff, the market structure stuff,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>They're like, well, let's list stocks on crypto exchange is happening,

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is part of that.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know. I feel like getting rid as

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>a trade through rule would suggest that maybe I should

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 2>take tokenization seriously. Alex Thorn says this is one of

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the biggest unlocks yet for toke my stocks. Probably yeah,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 2>but I mean that's a future problem. I'm here for

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>five more weeks.

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levine and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>You can find my work by subscribing to the Money

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV every

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>day on the close between three and five pm Eastern.

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net. Ask us a

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>question and we might answer it on the air.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamazerakis, Moses Onam,

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and Alexis Hot.

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Amy Keen is our executive producer. Thanks for listening to

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be back next week with

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:07.719
<v Speaker 1>more stuff. MHM.