WEBVTT - (Radio)

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look ahead

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of the top stories of the coming week from our

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>day Break anchors all around the world, and just ahead

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on the program, here come to those US inflation numbers.

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Tucker in New York. I'm killing head get

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>in London, where we're looking at the next major climate

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>summit called twenty seven in Egypt. I'm Brian Curtis in

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. We look at COVID zero in China, locking

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>down a factory of two hundred thousand workers making iPhones.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm Any Morris in Washington. We're gaging the turnout in

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the last minute scramble before the mid turns. That's all

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg eleven three

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>on New York, Bloomberg one, Washington d C, Bloomberg one

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>oh six one, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixties, San Francisco d

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>A B Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nineteen and

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot com and via

0:00:55.080 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app. Him nobody, I'm John Scer Let's

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>start today's program with the inflation. Households are watching the

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Feds certainly watching it, and we're tracking developments for you

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>right here on the Bloomberg Radio Studio with Boomberg Global

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Policy Editor Michael McKee. You have inflation in

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>your title that keeps getting longer. Um, So I guess

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about c p I that prints coming out.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>That that's become sort of like the mother of all

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>economic indicators. Lately, it was always the Job's Report, and

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>now it's the CPI again. Of course, Um, that depends

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>on how old your mother is, because back in the

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Vulgar day, don't talk about my Back in the

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Paul Vulgar days, the CPI was important as well. And

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>then we had very very low inflation for a very

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very long time, and then all of a sudden we've

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>got big inflation again. So people care about this number.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>We used to talk about a word transitory, and now

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a word. I think it's sticky. Has

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>replaced transitory, right about them retired the word transitory. Uh, sticky.

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Price inflation has been around for a long time, and

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a concept that prices change very slowly. The

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>old example that they would use in economic school is

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>restaurants would be reluctant to change their prices because they

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>would have to print all new menus and that would

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>be an expense. But of course, nowadays restaurants give you

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>message on your phone your phone, so I don't know

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>if that's a good example anymore. But there are things

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that like that that take a while to adjust, and

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the idea of sticky price inflation. And some of

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>those things have have not moved as much as the

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Fed would like. That's the question for uh next week's

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>uh CBI report is do we see some movement in

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>any of the areas that the Fed has been waiting for.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the breakdown? Well, prices won't come down, probably, but

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of the inflation numbers is the rate

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 1>of change. The rate of increases is what the Fed

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>look looks at in their arget is a two annual

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>rate of increase. In these things, Um, you don't get

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>prices going down except in crises situations. We saw some

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>prices fall at the beginning of the pandemic, and then

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>they went back up because there were shortages. What we're

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>looking for here is a decline in the month to

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>month increases. When you look at the year over year

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>because of base effects and the fact that inflation was

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>higher last year. Uh, you would see declines. But what

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fed wants to see is that right now we're

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing inflation slowing down, and for that they're looking at

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>things that have had a big impact on it. Um. Obviously,

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>energy over the recent months has has come down. Gasoline

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>prices have come down. That's helped the CPI. But now

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the basic premises it's for the month of October it

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>went up, so that should add. But things like medical

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>care as the COVID crisis has fallen out of the

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>public consciousness, used car prices on the wholesale level have

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>been falling significantly because suddenly there are cars available and

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so that should change. Airfares they think may go down,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Hotel room prices may go down. So there are areas

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that had not moved as much as the Fed thought

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>they would. That people are expecting to see some progress

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on not huge, but some progress. Okay. So the thinking

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>is with the Central Bank, short term pain i e.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Higher interest rates will lead to longer term gains. Right,

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 1>that's I mean, how much pain do I have to endure? Well,

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that depends on a lot of things that are out

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of your control, UM, like you know what you're gonna

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>pay at the gas pump and what what you're going

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to have to pay for, um, things that you buy

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the store that maybe suffering from supply chain problems.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Supply chains are getting better, so we should see goods

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>prices continue to drop. We're still seeing services prices rise

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>with the higher rates. Are are they having an impact

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that we can see, Well, it depends on the category.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Certainly they're having an impact on real estate and housing.

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage rates have gone way up and new home sales

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and existing home sales have gone way way down. Mortgage

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Bankers Association Mortgage Activity index is at a level that

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last reached, so we're seeing a definite impact there. It's

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to see what happens with other

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation sensitive things like car purchases, UH and UM, whether

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>or not people continue to use credit cards as much

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.119
<v Speaker 1>as if they have adjustable rate credit cards. We're seeing

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>some slowing in the overall economy in terms of retail sales.

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>People still have a lot of money, but they're not

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>spending as much of it UH as as they so

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing some movement on the margins was the way

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>that Powell put it this last week. So what's the

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>expectation from the consumer prices index that we're gonna be

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>going well? On a month over month basis. Economists think

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go up by seven tenths of a percent

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>in the month of October, which would bring the year

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>over year rate to eight percent, a tick down from

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>last month. But that's base effects. Now, the Fed's gonna

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>be looking at the core and that should increase by

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>five tenths which is lower than the prior month. And

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>six point six percent is the year over year estimate

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for the core rate, which would be the same as

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the prior month. Any little bit would be seen as progress.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>The real concern for the markets is if we get

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a surprise upward. Mike, always a pleasure, Bloomberg's Michael McKee

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And just to hand on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, the United

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Nations COP twenty seven Climate Summit in Egypt. On John,

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>this is Broomber. This is Bloomberg Day Break weekend, our

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>global looking ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the coming week. I'm John Tucker in New York. Up

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>later in the program, Taiwan and it's tricky business relationship

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>with China. But first world leaders, activists, diplomats and throngs

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of journalists gathering for the United Nations COP twenty seven

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Climate Summit in Egypt. And for more, let's say to London,

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg Daybreak, euro Bagger Caroline Hecker John COP

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven takes place in Chamel shak amid an energy

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>crisis and global economic upheaval that's testing the commitment of

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>many countries to cutting emissions. The world is still not

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>on track to keep global temperature rises below one and

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a half degree celsius. This, of course, is seen as

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a key threshold for averting catastrophic climate change. For more,

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Bloomberg Green in a senior climate reporter,

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Actual Ratty and Bloomberg Green reporter Lower Milan in Madrid.

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Lor I want to start with you, what is the

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>mood like? Well, I would say that based on the

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>conversations that both actually and I have had with people

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>attending over the last few days, Um, everyone's expectations are

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>really high. Um. You can think that COP meetings happen

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>every year and so many people go there, Over forty

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>five thousand registered participants UM for this one, according to

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Egyptian presidency, and everyone wants to um do the

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>best they can. They know the eyes of the world

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>will be on them for these two weeks, that climate

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>issues will be on top of the agenda, on the

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>news everywhere for these two weeks, and they just want

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they do the best they can. Yeah.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And also because the consequences of climate change are becoming

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so apparent. Actually, what is the latest research on trying

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep global warming in check? It's a two step process. Essentially,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if we go back seven years, the world was on

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.479
<v Speaker 1>track for catastrophic climate change and now it isn't quite

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that bad. But even what we have today, which is

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>three degree celsius farming, not one and a half degree

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>celsius farming, that is still in sight. And the world

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>is not cutting emissions fast enough. So we had two reports,

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>one from the United Nations and one from the International

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Energy Agency saying two things that seem opposite, but they

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>are actually quite aligned, which is we're not making enough progress,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but we are making some progress, and that we might

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to speak emissions UH and fossil fuel use

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>within this decade. A lot more just needs to be

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>done though, Okay, and this of course because energy security

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>has has become so much more important and central because

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of Russia's warren in Ukraine. Has that concern around energy

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>security scuppered some progress on climates, you know, given the

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis in Europe, it certainly has. In the short term,

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, countries are turning to whatever fields they can

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>get access to if it means burning more cold, they are,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>but scoping long term goals. That hasn't happened. If you've

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>seen what has happened in the US with the US

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>passing a climate bill called the Inflation Reduction Act, or

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe which is doubling down on deploying more renewables while

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>legislating it's green deal. Those are clear actions that if

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the world wants energy security and wants to act on

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>climate change, it needs to double down on green energy.

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But in the short term, because building out green energy

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>takes a while, people are turning to more fossil fields

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to reverse some of the progress made

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>so far. Pakistan and that the awful monsoons that have

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>killed hundreds of people, um, you know, and and submerged

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the country underwater. I mean This is perhaps one of

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the clearest examples of the sort of devastation from changing

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>weather and climate. Do you think there's going to be

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot more focused in on this idea of loss

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and damage on demands from countries that are being affected

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>now by climate change is one group in the G

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven, but there are you know, demands for richer

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>countries to pay more, to support more. Definitely, as we

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>think that the so called issue of loss and namit

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>will be the central theme and in this year's cop

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons is because this is a COP

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that's being held in Africa for the first time in

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a few years, so obviously the presidency of every cop

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>um holds certain power over which issues it wants to prioritize.

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>But also because obviously of the devastating floods in Pakistan

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year, but also another developing nations who which

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 1>are bearing the costs of climate change even though they

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>contributed very little to eat in comparison to developed nations.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>So we've just seen, for example, devastating floods in Nigeria

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, and we can expect developing nations to demand

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>reach countries to pay or to come up with a

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>system of funding that can help them recover when these

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>extreme weather events happen. Yeah, and that's for the sort

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>of developing countries. Actually. I think we had a conversation

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>when the UK hosted the last COP in Glasgow. Of course,

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>just the latest report though from the Independent Climate Change

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Committee here in the UK for two has kind of

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>underlined the issues for Britain itself on how committed we

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>are and there is, you know, still some doubt about

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>how committed Britain is in some ways to decarbonization. What

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think of that, the pressure that the UK

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is this as a G seven country. Yeah, that's certainly

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>one topic that's come up, especially through the leadership contests

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that have happened in the Conservative Party. Um, and we

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have heard from certain wings of the Conservative Party are

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>pushback against climate policies. But where things stand, the UK

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>still leads among the G seven countries on how much

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>emissions it has cut since nine more than forty UM

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and the UK has met its climate goals until twenty two.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So this year it will be the third UH carbon

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>budget as they are called here in the UK, and

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK will have met it. But you are right

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that it is going off track, especially this year. Renewable's

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>energy investments have gone down. The UK is in dire

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>straits with its financial situation, having to give a lot

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of money to energy companies to try and keep prices

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of energy low for consumers, and so questions are being asked.

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>But as you as you can see commitment from the

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>UK government. If it ravers, there is a lot of

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>backlash and that causes governments to change their mind. So

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it richis and that wasn't going to come to COP

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>now he is. Okay, Good luck to both of you.

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I hope you'll join us next week on Bloomberg Radio

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell us more. That is our Bloomberg Green Senior

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Climate Reporter actual at Ratti and from Madrid Bloomberg Green

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Reporter at Laura Milan. Thank you so much for your

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>time taking us through what to expect from COP twenty

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>seven and Climate summit in Egypt. I'm Caroline hepget here

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in London. You can catch us every weekday morning for

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>full coverage of COP twenty seven and so much more

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Daybreak. You are beginning at six am in London.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>That's one am on Wall Street. John Alright, Caroline Thanks

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>alone as the head up Bloomberg day Break Weekend Taiwan's

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>tech companies in China. I'm John Tucker. This is Bloomberg

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting live from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio in New York.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven three oh to Washington, d C, Bloomberg to Boston,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one O six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Country, Sirius XM chto one nineteen to London,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>d A B Digital Radio, and around the globe the

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Act and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg day Break Weekend, John Tucker in New York with

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>your global look aheathly top stories for investors in the

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>coming week. Time one businesses are facing more challenges in

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>China for more, Let's go to Hong Kong and Bloomberg

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Asia host Brian Curtis. John not much warning on this,

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but China lockdown the world's largest iPhone factory this past week.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a whole high complex in Chung Show, China, and

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's probably the last thing that Apple needed, never mind

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hone high or Fox Con. It brings in so many

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>issues China's COVID zero policies, Apple's efforts to diversify production,

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>other big companies and their plans as well, and also

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the changing nature of supply chains, the ever complex relationship

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that Taiwan companies have operating in mainland China, as well

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>as Taiwan China relations and US China relations. It's a big,

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>big story. Joining us now to discuss this is Samson.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Ellis Bloomberg's type a bureau chief. He's embedded with Green

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, and he's right here in our Hong

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Kong studios with us. Sam, thanks very much for coming in.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So we've we've got the local authorities. They're sterilizing the

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Fox Con campus and there have been mass walkouts. So

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a complicated moving story as we speak,

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's a it's a kind of contained bubble, right

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, you know, and as you've laid out very well,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been a bit of a week to

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>forget for for Hunghai or fox Con, and and all

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of this really stems from China's strict adherence to this

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>COVID zero policy, where you know, as soon as you

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get a few cases of COVID the local authorities come

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in and locked down a whole area, and when that

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>area happens to be where Nghai's largest iPhone plant is

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 1>in jung Gaol, then that obviously causes problems and creates

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 1>ripples that extends to Cupatina, right, and people want to

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 1>escape the restrictions, so some of them just escape and

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>actually walk out of there. Yeah, and the Chinese social

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>media has been a wash with videos of hundreds of

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not thousands of people, young people walking down roads and highways,

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>pushing large suitcases, walking, you know, sometimes tens of miles

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>home to escape the impending lockdown, or at least escaping

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the increasingly worst conditions there. You know, they're

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>worried about getting COVID themselves. In the days preceding the lockdown,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was it became increasingly difficult to get

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>food and basic supplies into the manufacturing complex, and so

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>some people were having to subsist on just bread for

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for several days. So that's why people are just fleeing

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>these plants right now. And what do we know about

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the impact on production? Fox con says they are going

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep manufacturing. It's a question of like how much

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it does lower production by and you know it couldn't

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>really couldn't come at the worst time. You know, this

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is the ramp up ahead of the holiday season, which

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is obviously peak sales season four things like your iPhones,

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and so Fox can't a really trying hard to contain this.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>They're they're offering to increase people's salaries by up to

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>thirty six percent to persuade them to stay on the

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>production lines and stop them from you know, walking out.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a a sort of lofty look

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>at things, and and let me ask you that if

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you if you take COVID zero parlor sees and the

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>changes that we saw coming out of the Party Congress,

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the further emphasis on national security and perhaps as somewhat

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of a small lessoning on pure economic interests, is two

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the year that China semi loses the West. Yeah, that's

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>an interesting question. I think, you know, the economies are

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>so bound to each other, so interconnected. People are not

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>going to stop buying iPhones all the various other gadgets

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that are largely manufactured in China. But you know, you

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>are certainly going to see companies reducing their reliance on China.

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely been this realization that maybe you know the

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>risk of over concentration in China, and so while you

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>might not see companies directly pull out of China, I

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>think what you definitely are going to see and the

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers do back this up certainly from Taiwanese investment, you know,

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and the taime Andese brands and manufactured factors are often

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the operators of the plants in China. For example, is

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that much less new Capex is going into China. I

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people would be interested in how

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>ordinary people in Taiwan. You live in Taiwan, how ordinary

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>people feel about these tensions with China. Taiwan has been

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>facing the threat of invasion by China for the last

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>seventy plus years, so they're very, very used to living

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>with this threat. I think also largely the feeling is

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know an invasion is not certainly not imminent,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and China does also still hold out hope of being

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>able to conduct this peacefully. Sam thanks very much for

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>joining us and for sharing your insights with us. Samson

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Ellis Bloomberg's Taibe Bureau achieve is with us here in

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>our Hong Kong studios. I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>along with Doug Prisner. You can catch us every weekday

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at six am in Hong

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Kong and six pm on Wall Street. John Brian, thanks

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot just ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend. A lot

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>hanging on this coming week's US mid term elections. I'm

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>John Tucker's this is this is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the coming week. I'm John Tucker in New York O.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Candid It's are scrambling to cover as much ground as

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>possible ahead of Tuesday's mid terms, and some key races

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>are close, some are just hard to predict. And for

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a look at what to expect. Let's head to our

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom in Washington and Amy Morris. Amy,

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>all right, thank you, John, big steaks for Democrats and

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in these mid terms. Joining me now to talk

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 1>about it all. White House reporter Jordan Fabian Jordan, thanks

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time with us, Thanks for having me on, Amy.

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>What has the White House and perhaps maybe the President

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>cancerned at this point? Well, they're certainly concerned about the

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>possibility that Democrats could lose control of one or both

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>chambers of Congress. That would essentially spell the end for

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>their policy agenda. And so President Biden is going around

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the country two different states to try and campaign and

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>save some of these jobs and also gubernatorial candidates trying

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to save some statehouses as well. But if you look

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at where he's going, he's going to New York, New Mexico, California.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>These are states that are traditionally blue states. So that

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>shows you the kind of trouble that Democrats are in

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that he's having to go to these uh places that

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>were thought to be safe in order to try and

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>salvage key lawmakers. And it's not just that they all

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>see their policy fall by the wayside um. They're also

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they've got to be concerned that they're gonna see sort

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of a little tit for tat when it comes to

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>investigations and subpoenas that sort of thing. Certainly, they're they're

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>very well aware of the fact that if Republicans gained

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>control of Congress, not only will there be investigations, but

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>there could be also impeachment proceedings brought against Joe Biden perhaps,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but also key cabinet secretaries like a Trinity General General

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland or the Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro my Orchis.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So they're preparing for all those possibilities. But I'm told

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>by senior White House officials and just the course of

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talking folks this week, that they think that there's a

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>strong possibility these kind of investigations could backfire on Republicans

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and that it will be viewed as overreach, especially if

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they go after Hunter Biden and some sensitive subjects like that.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So that would be something to watch next year if

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Republicans do indeed take control in Jordan. The White House

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is saying now it supports the Fed's rate hikes, it's

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>still painful for people to see their mortgage rates go up,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>things of that nature, while at the same time, the

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>One House says it is trying to fight back against inflation.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear more now, White House Press Secretary Korean Jean Pierre.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>The FED is is independent. It's an independent agency, and

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we believe the President believes that it has uh the

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it has the best monetary policies to address inflation. Now,

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Jean Pierre did take it a step further, stable and

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>steady growth with lower inflation. This is the kind of

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>economy that delivers for working families, and that's how we

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>see the work of the of the Fed. So Jordan

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>is being on the side of rising rates going to

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>wind up being a liability for the president even though

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>he's fighting inflation. How does he balance that. It's a

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>really it's a really tough balance to strike. And look,

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>if there is a recession at the end of this, Uh, yeah,

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a political fallout for for the President and

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. And you're seeing more and more Democratic lawmakers

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>actually raised concern about the size and scope of these

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>interest rate hikes. At first, there was Elizabeth Warren, but

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing other Democratic senators like John hickyl Looper from

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Colorado come out and say, hold on a second, there

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>could be some real fall out for the economy. But

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that being said, the White House has been very careful

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that the Fed is independent. We're not going

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>to ask them to slow the pace of right hikes

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>or really do anything for that matter, that we want

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>them to do. We're gonna let them do what they

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>think is best to try and whip inflation and right now,

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the FETE is signal that they're going to continue with

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this course of rate hikes, possibly you know, next month

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and in the future. And that's really sucked all the

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>air out of the room. I mean, it wasn't really

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that long ago when the big concern was abortion access

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and and it seemed to really give Democrats something of

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a boost, and it just evaporated, that's right. And you know,

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at it and you think, maybe if this

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the court really came out closer to the election, that

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that boom for Democrats would have been better time for them.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I guess enthusiasm or interest in that issue, uh,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>seemed to wane as concerns about the economy really have

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>continued and grown in voters. So if you look at

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>polls from around the summer, there are actually a couple

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of polls that that said abortion access and uh, you know,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>threats to democracy were right up there with the economy,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>which you typically don't seat that's usually the number one

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>issue for voters, but now those of ebbed and the

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>economy is front of mind, and now the president is

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of pivoting on that as well, warning of economic

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>chaos if Republicans do sweep the midterms. New Jersey Governor

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Phil Murphy told us on Balance of Power this past

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>week that a weird economy is actually making things harder

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats. It's a weird economy where we have our

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>lowest unemployment rate ever below the national average. Our revenues

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>as at the state level continue to be solid, We've

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>been upgraded by credit rating agencies would pay debt out.

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And yet at the same time, there's enormous pain at

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>that kitchen table, largely due to affordability. So how do

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>they balance that? You know, they haven't really figured it

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>out yet. Um. And you know, part of the problem

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is that if you look at Biden's record over the

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>first couple of years, he's actually gotten a lot done.

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>He's gotten the Infrastructure Bill, He's got that Inflation Induction Act,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>which is really you know, a climate and prescription and

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>drug health bill. Uh. He's got this is an agenda

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it would be great for any president.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But what they've struggled with is getting people to understand

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or explaining to people how that's going to help them

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>afford groceries and clothes and gas, and and they're they've

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to strike this balance of, you know, touting their

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>accomplishments but also acknowledging the economic pain that people are feeling.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And they really haven't figured out a message that's stuck.

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you're seeing a lot of these candidates

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:44.639
<v Speaker 1>struggle because frankly, voters are blaming this on Joe Biden,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and his approval ratings have really sunk in the past

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>few weeks because he's the guy in the White House exactly.

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>We are talking with Bloomberg White House reporter Jordan Fabian

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about the upcoming midterms and what folks might be able

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>to expect. Now you had mentioned Jordan's about how democracy

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>was an issue you for a hot minute. The President

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>still trying to keep it in the spotlight, making the

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>January six the insurrection an issue. He talked about it

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at this past week at Union Station, drawing a parallel

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>between the attack on Paul Pelosi in his home, which

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>also happened uh in this past week. He's the husband

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, also of the violence of

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the January six the insurrection, talked about that as well,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>condemning the rise in violence. He was actually kind of

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>hinting that perhaps this could be part of Donald Trump's

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>big lie of a stolen election, and that's what's whipping

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>folks are. Can't pretend it's just going to solve itself.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>There's an alarming rise in the number of our people

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in this country condoning political violence. Now, is there any

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>indication Jordan's that, um, this is mobilizing Democrats to come

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>out and vote, or maybe changing hearts and minds of

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>folks on the other side, change your hearts and minds

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, I highly doubt. Um. You know,

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this place seems to be uh something to get the

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Democratic base going, because of course they're that's front of

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>mind for them. And look, you know, these are really

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>important issues, you know, democracy. You know, the election denial

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>follow from January six. You know, this is something that

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, President you know, probably should be talking about

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in the run of the election, given the kind of

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>candidates that are running on the other side. But um,

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a matter of you know, political expediency

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and tactical decision making ahead of the mid terms, I'm

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure this is moving voters in Democrats favoritehead of

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the midterms. You know, the cost of living, Like we're

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just talking about the economy. Those are things that are

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>front of mind, and that's really imperative for Biden to

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>address in the In the closing days here, I want

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you about some of the big races

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that have been top of mind over the past well

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the past several weeks. Really, you've got Georgia's Senate race,

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You've got Pennsylvania, you've got Nevada. What are some of

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that you're gonna be watching for in the

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>next few days. Well, especially in Nevada, you know, can

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know Cortez Masto, the Democratic senator there, really harness

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Hispanic vote. I mean, that's been the key turnout

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>engine for Democrats. And you know that used to be

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a purple state and they've now you know, captured basically

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>all the statewide offices there. But uh, since the pandemic,

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>those a lot of those people work in the casinos.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>They had a really tough time during the pandemic. The

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation is really hitting Nevada hard. So, uh, you know,

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>all all these economic issues we're talking about, that that

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>really you know, if you look at Nevada, that would

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>say that's kind of the ground zero for that. But

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in in Georgia, you know, it's you have these other

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>candidates like herschel Walker who have really been you know,

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>poor candidates, and but traction has traction. You have traction

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the environment and the environment is so bad

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats. And when you say the environment, you mean

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the tone, the political and vironment. You know, people are

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>angry and upset with it with the economy and they

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want to take it out on Democrats. So is that

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be enough to propel kenn who has flaws

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>like hershel Walker to victory? And so that's what I'll

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be looking for in you know, Georgia and also in

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Arizona and in Pennsylvania. Things have really tightened up between

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Memo Oz and Fetterman. That's right. And so you look

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at uh, you look at what Joe Biden is going, right,

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>He's avoided a lot of those states we were just

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about with the key races, but his advisors believe

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that he resonates in Pennsylvania's well, Joe Biden have took

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>cottails here. Can he help really propel Fetterman, who's really

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>struggled since having that stroke and fallen behind or I

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>guess how his lead cut uh over odds? Like can

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>he could Joe Biden propel at least one vulnerable Democrat

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to victory this year? All right, we're gonna watch it

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with you. Jordan Fabian covering the White House for Bloomberg

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>News as always, Jordan, thank you so much. Thank you, Amy.

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what's going on in the nation's capital. For more

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of our political news coverage, you can tune into Balance

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of Power with David weston weekdays at noon Wall Street Time,

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and Sound On with Joe Matthew weekdays at five pm

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time here on Bloomberg Radio, and we will

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>bring you live election coverage on Bloomberg Radio and television

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night that starts at eight pm Wall Street Time.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amy Morris and this is Bloomberg John, Amy Morris

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>reporting from our Bloomberg room in Washington. Thanks Amy, and

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Join us again Monday morning at five am Wall Street

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Time for the latest on markets overseas and the news

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you need to start your day. I'm John Tucker and

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this is b