WEBVTT - Selects: How Personality Tests Work

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, it's me Josham. For this week's Select, I've

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>chosen our August twenty seventeen episode on personality tests. It

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the vast majority of them, maybe all

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of them, are scientifically faulty to at least some degree,

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and some of them are just outright made up. This

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>can be a real problem if they're being used to

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>diagnose you with a mental illness, or hire or fire

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you or put you in jail, and that actually happens.

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So dig into this deceptively interesting episode and enjoy it.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm an EENFP.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 2>production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Charles w Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry over there, and this

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is Stuff you Should Know.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, just a couple of.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 4>It.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Jay says, I don't remember what I am. We've taken

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it before. How Stuff Works hosted it years back. Do

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you remember.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we had, like many companies do, as you'll see,

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 5>we had when we were under Discovery's tender wing. They

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 5>paid for someone to come to our office and administer

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 5>the Myers Briggs personality test.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>At gunpoint.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't remember, but I'm pretty sure I was

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 5>an E N F P.

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I I don't remember what I was. I'll probably say

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like three different things as we go through this one.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 5>Like, just looking at it again, I'm pretty sure I

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 5>was an E N F P. Okay, P stands for

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 5>pisces right where.

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's see extroverted intuitive. Okay, what is the F

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>stand for? Feeling pooper?

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Is a spoiler? Yeah, feeling pooper.

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're what we're talking about. It sounds like we're

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>saying strings of letters. They actually do make sense if

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you're familiar with what Chuck just said, the Myers Briggs

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>type inventory, which if you are in corporate America and

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>have been a part of corporate America for more than

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>probably three years, there's probably a pretty good likelihood that

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you've taken the Myers Briggs type inventory for sure. Like

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really widespread.

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love it.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I saw something like thirteen percent of companies in America

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>use it. It's a lot.

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was it eighty nine of the Fortune one

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 5>hundred use it.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, And then I saw another stat It was from

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one though, So I'm not sure how current.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It is well sixteen years old, right, but they said

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that the uh, I think British companies somewhere between ten

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and forty percent of British companies use them, right, So

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's who knows. It's pretty wild, guess it

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds like but.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if they have their own It's.

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>No, the Myers Briggs Test. They don't call it a test,

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>as we'll see. Sure, but the test is, it's worldwide,

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it's translated into tons of different languages. They and no,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the Myers Briggs Test. And there's tons of knockoffs.

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, there's tons of personality tests in general, which

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>really is the larger umbrella the Myers Briggs Test falls under.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's probably the most famous of all time, at

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.839
<v Speaker 1>least as far as pop culture goes.

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and we're going to hit on everything from Rorshak

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 5>to the Myers Briggs.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure, but we're going to hit on them.

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 5>But the MBT I definitely is more of the focus

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>of this one because of its ubiquity.

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, because most people know it, and because it's one

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the overlooked pastimes in the United States to take

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>pot shots at the Myers Briggs type inventory. Sure, it's fun.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 5>So categorizing one's personality is nothing new, and that's what

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 5>these tests aim to do for various reasons, which we'll

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 5>go over later. But going back, and this was a

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 5>Grabster article, correct, that's right, so you know it's good. Yeah,

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 5>And Grabster was just at our show in Toronto. Yeah,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 5>he was for the second time.

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>He stood up and like, did that victory shake?

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 6>Did he do that?

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 3>He did. No, I'm a big fan of that. That's

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 3>old school.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh it is. It's a good way to go. It

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like you should be wearing those dolphin shorts just

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>having crossed the finish line and you doing that.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it's nothing new trying to categorize personalities. Way

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 5>back in the day, I know, on our Grave Robbing

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 5>Live Grave Robbing episode, we talked about the four humors

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 5>and we talked about him before before medical science was

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 5>kind of a real thing.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>It was an early attempt.

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they talked about the four fluids or the four

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 5>humors black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, and blood, uh and

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 5>and imbalance in those will cause disease. But they were

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 5>also this is something I didn't know. These are also

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 5>linked to corresponding personality types.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, So like the word melancholy in English, it's

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>an adaptation of the Greek words I believe for black bile.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>There it is, and melancholy personalities were associated with an

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>overabundance of black bile. And basically your melancholy you're you're

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a depressed person or you're very reserved or quiet. And

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>for thousands of years people thought guy's got a lot

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of black bile. Yeah, that explains his personality. The other

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ones are pretty pretty interesting too, like phlegmatic.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Uh, phlegmatic.

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen flegmatic. I've heard flagmatic. Really, I've seen it too.

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 3>So like when you cough something up, do you call

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>it flegum?

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes depends if it had like a lot of extra

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>chunks in it, it's flag Oh gosh. But phlegmatic, I say, phlegmatic.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>That's very laid back. Did you know that?

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, Yeah, because I looked all these up. Oh okay,

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 5>because sanguine is one of my favorite words. Yeah, and

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 5>that's this is Hippocrates, by the way. He kind of

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 5>further refined these concepts of the temperament. So melancholic, phlegmatic, sanguine,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 5>and what is it choleric.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Here coleric, Yeah, choleric, coloric. Choleric is like irritable and

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>short and terse and Kurt.

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is, there's something weird here, right if

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you are a thinking human being, yes, who is not

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.559
<v Speaker 1>in a vegetative state right now?

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Correct?

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>And for all we know at this point in medical science,

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe even if you are in a vegetative state, you're

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>probably thinking, Uh, it doesn't seem like anyone I've ever

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>met is just phlegmatic or just choleric, or just sanguine

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>or just melancholy. Sometimes I'm all four of those things.

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I go through those things all four in a day,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>depending on how weird the day is.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I go through all four of those within the

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 3>course of one happy hour.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Sure, okay, Right, And that's kind of the point here,

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's also the basis of any criticism from this

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>moment in the podcast here on out, is that this

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>whole thing that started back with the Four Humors and

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>continues on to this day in the guise of personality tests, yeah,

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>is an attempt to take a human personality and say

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you're this, Yeah, you're this one type, You're this type,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this is your type, this is what you're like, right,

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>And the human personality is just too complex, too squishy,

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>too jelly like to be boxed into one thing like that.

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and we'll get into all criticisms, but that definitely

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 5>is the leading criticism.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>That is. Well, we'll save that.

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay. That was a tease.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 3>It was a good tease.

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a phlegmatic one.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 5>All these classifications, though, that we talk about now, are

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 5>or most of them at least are drive lai at

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 5>the feet of one man. When Carl Jung, Yeah, who

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 5>wrote a book called psychological types.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you say it? Though in in German?

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's oh where is it? Let me see there it is.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't even begin to do it.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Psycho psycho sorry, psychologic yesh, psychologic ish typing.

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not fair.

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 3>It's so tiny. That was the problem because you.

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah, I do ten point I don't like to

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>waste paper.

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Well you know me.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You do like sixteen point times new Roman.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Paper, and I don't want to waste it. But I

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 5>also have to do my job. Sure, maybe I should

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 5>go double sided, but then my highlighter it gets in

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 5>the way.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it would be a problem, man, everything would

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>be highlighting, you might as well just dip the whole

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>page in yellow wink or something.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 5>So anyway, Jung wrote this book, that book in nineteen

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 5>twenty one and at German and had it translated to

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 5>English a couple of years.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Later, and he created these four categories sensation, intuition, thinking,

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and feeling.

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 5>Right, So those were his four that kind of most

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 5>of these modern tests are based on in some way

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 5>or another.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, And.

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>It's really almost impossible that I guess we could just

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>save all the criticisms for the end and just pile

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>them on. But it's really tough to talk about this

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>stuff and not like, as you present one fact, talk

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>about the problem with that fact as it relates to

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>modern incarnation. What do you think we should do? Should

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>we just save them, like you say, because I can

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>buite my time?

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's say them, okay, and then you can just like.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even try like I'm not I'm not going

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>crop circle here. I'm just saying like, there's just there's

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>just a lot wrong with this. But even before Young

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>who created these the concept of the modern concept i

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>should say, personality types, and he created the idea of introvert,

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>an extrovert, which say what you will about you, and

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of psychologists have a lot to say about him. Yeah,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the nicest things to say, but introversion and

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>extra extraversion is so widely accepted inside and out of

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the field of psychology that I mean, if that were

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>his only contribution to the field, that's that's enough to

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>engrave it on your tombstone for sure.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 5>And each of those four psychological types he was talking

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 5>about are modified by whether or not you're introverted or extroverted.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, so they all kind of work together to buch

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 3>you in.

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That was like the right, that was the main thing

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is how you how you approach life is introvert, extrovert,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and everything else was like a sub It's kind of

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a sub section of that or something.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 5>And one of the issues with this, and I don't

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 5>think this is part of the criticism, but.

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, I thought we were saving him.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 5>He was This was based on his ideas. It wasn't

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 5>like he had all this research and all this data.

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 5>He was a deep thinker, and he sat around and

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 5>thought of these things.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly, And then he wrote entire books based on them. Yeah,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but he's a very well respected psychoanalyst, and he was

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>part of the early movement for psychoanalysis. With Freud, they

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>were colleagues. La Jung was much younger, but they eventually said,

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't like you anymore. We're parting ways. But as

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>psychoanalysis was really kind of establishing itself, and if you

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>want to know more about that background in the origin

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of psychoanalysis, go listen to her how pr works the

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>live show. Yeah, we talked a lot about that. But

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>as this was going on and it was starting to

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of dominate the field of psychology, there was a

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>whole other movement, a parallel movement that said, you know what,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>we think all that's a little mushy. We like the

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>idea of being able to quantify psychology. And so even

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>before you there were guys like Alfred Binet, who was

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the indirect fathers of the Intelligence test IQ test,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a pair of researchers named Gray and Wheelwright, and plenty

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of others who wanted to say, no, no, no, no, you

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>can study psychology. You can study things like the human personality,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can typify and you can add numbers, you

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>can quantify this stuff and in doing so, we will

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>prove psychology as a science as well. So this whole

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>movement to typify people and put them into convenient, almost

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>numerical categories came out of this urgent need to establish

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a scientific basis for psychology.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and Jung he kind of laid the table for this.

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 5>And many years later, although not that many, there was

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 5>a woman named Katherine Cook Briggs and she was working

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 5>on this with her daughter, one Isabelle Briggs Myers. I

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 5>think you see where this is going. And this is

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 5>post World War two when they women were kind of

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 5>for the first time really going into the workforce in

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 5>full and en mass, and so they thought, well, maybe

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 5>we can put together some personality types to find out

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 5>what kind of jobs these women might be suited for,

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 5>what types of jobs they might enjoy. So they started

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 5>working together on this, and as legend has it, the

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 5>mom Katherine Briggs Cook Briggs, she was doing her thing

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 5>and then saw Jung's works and said, I got to

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 5>start over.

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This is the stuff She had already been working on

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a personality test. Yeah, but apparently, according to the legend,

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>through her work into the fire said I'm starting from scratch.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 3>Because she's dramatic.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>She was a voracious reader, especially of the psychology, the

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>new psychology books that were coming out of Europe.

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Right, she didn't read Young She did well eventually, but yeah,

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 5>and then seems like it kind of came along later.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, so, yeah, there's a there's kind of a weird

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>discrepancy in the history. And I don't know if it's

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just that hasn't been covered right or if there is

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a weird discrepancy, but supposedly she initiated it, and so

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it would have been contemporary or shortly after Jung's Psychology

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or Personality Types was translated into English in nineteen twenty three.

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But it was her daughter Isabelle who really took it

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and ran with it because of World War Two in

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the need for women in the workplace.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 5>Correct, so they you know, kind of kept some of

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 5>young stuff built on that it kind of striped some

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 5>of it away, most notably a lot of the unconscious stuff.

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 5>They might have thought that was a little too weird

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 5>for you know, the modern American workforce. Yeah, so what

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 5>they ended up coming up with was the the MBTI

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 5>Myers Briggs Type Indicator, right, very famously.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and they had a publishing arrangement with one group

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember what they were called, but they thought

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it didn't do very well. And then in nineteen seventy

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>five they went with another publisher CPP and they're the

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>current publishers of the Myers Briggs Yeah type indicator. And

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>since then that's when it's ubiquity, like just really spread

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>was starting in the seventies and now it's just it's

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>basically married to corporate America.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Should we take a break, sure, go get married to

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 3>corporate America.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as if we aren't already.

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 5>All right, we'll come back and we'll talk a little

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 5>bit about personality tests in general and then focus in

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 5>a little more on the n B T I.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 6>As W.

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 4>S k as all right, So.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 5>Personality tests is just there are many many ways you

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 5>can get evaluated psychologically by a professional.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 3>This is just one way.

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And you get your head measured with calibers. Back in

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the day they did that, give you a bunch of

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>drugs and see what you do. There's a lot of ways.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 5>But these tests generally, as Grabster points out, falls into

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 5>a couple of types, projective and objective. Projective tests or

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 5>things like the roar shack test where you're shown something

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 5>some kind of stimulus and it's open to interpretation, and

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 5>you tell them what you think about it, and someone

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 5>sits back very quietly and taps on a pad of

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 5>paper and makes an evaluation. And then objective are more

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 5>like these personality tests. They're standardized assessments that people use,

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 5>and while it's subjective what you put down, they are

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 5>then evaluated again by a professional.

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately that objective name is a bit of a

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>misnomer because on the end of it, it's still interpreted

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>by a person. Yeah, which is therefore makes it subjective, right,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and which, depending on who you ask, is the fatal

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>flaw of all personality tests.

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 5>It should be the good song from the seventies had

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 5>a little parenthetical at the end of the title, right,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 5>it should just say subjective also right in parentheses.

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Baby.

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 3>So the big five are and this is the Big five.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 5>I get the feeling or the psycho logical tests that

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 5>that legit psychologists are more in favor of over something

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 5>like the MBT.

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 3>I is that right?

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not just there's tests to suss out the

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Big five. The Big five are the personality types of

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the field of psychology has come up with.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, but the tests that you utilize that, right,

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 5>they kind of think are more legit than the MBT.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, there's not a psychologist alive who uses the

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the MBTI and the regular practice. Oh I bet there

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>are not that not that are speaking up.

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 3>I guarantee you there's someone out there.

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure it's a free wheeling type.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Or is she?

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 5>The Big five are extraversion, agreeableness, openness to experience, conscientiousness,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 5>and neuroticism. Right, sounds like it could be like a

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 5>dating site thing that you fill out.

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It's funny, every time I see or hear the word neuroticism,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a bell goes off in my head, like.

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Thing, just a silent bell. I don't know what that means.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't either, but it draws my attention to.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So some of these tests, I mean, it depends on

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 3>what it is that.

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 5>They might not all call them by those exact words,

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 5>but they're generally using they call them, you know, like

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 5>I said, the Big five.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I I was looking into that Big five

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and this site I can't remember what it was called,

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>but they were basically they were going over it like

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>extraversion is again just part of the scientific literature at

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this point. Agreeableness is like whether you're how sympathetic or

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>kind or affectionate you are? Conscientiousness is are you organized?

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you thorough? Are you the type who shows up

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>on time? That kind of thing, neuroticism, which is some

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:48.439
<v Speaker 1>kind sometimes called emotional stability. How tense are you? How moody?

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>How anxious? And then like openness to experience? Right, yeah,

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>they sometimes call that intellect slash imagination. Do you have

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>wide interests? Are you an imaginative person? Are you insightful?

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And the site really went to a lot of pains

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to point out that what you would call these things

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the big five personality traits are as far as a

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>psychologist is concerned, just one dimension of you, the human being,

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and that to get a clearer picture of you, they

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>would also need to study your motivations, your emotions, your attitudes,

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>your abilities, your self concepts, your social roles, autobiographical memories,

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>your life stories. Now, if you start to put all

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 1>these things together, then you can start to kind of

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>approximate the person's personality. But it would just it takes

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of study of an individual and these different

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>components that make up their personality to get a clear picture.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there are any psychologists walking around

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>saying the big five personality types or like the beginning

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and end of a personality. It's just if you put

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>them together, you have just a sketch of somebody's personality

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and you should go much deeper. Or if you're analyzing someone.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think I used to think this stuff was

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 5>a lot neaterer when I was younger, and now it

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 5>kind of gives me a little anxiety. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 5>Like I just I don't know as far as doing

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 5>this to myself, and I still enjoy therapy, like that's different.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 5>But I don't know, because every single one of these

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 5>I like my answer would be, well, it depends.

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think. I think also though, and I don't

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>mean to speak for you, but one of the issues

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that that comes up for me is if somebody goes

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to you and says, you know you you you rate

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty high on the spectrum of neuroticism, Like that's obviously

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna obsess about that kind of stuff, especially if

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they're right.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 3>It can make you neurotic.

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's a boundary that somebody has just established

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.199
<v Speaker 1>for you. That you may need feel the need to

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>stay in because that's the boundary that you're bound by,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>whether you are or not.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 3>Like this is my box, right that I'll live in it.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That would be the reason it raises anxiety for me.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, my whole thing.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Like I said, though, it is just depends every single

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 5>question that I would get asked. Well, not everyone. Sometimes

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm pretty like set on something, but usually I'd say

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. It depends on the scenario. Right, Am

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 5>I more prone in a crowd to do X or Y?

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 5>Maybe right?

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not? Depends on my mood.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So one with these other personality tests, and the whole

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>field in psychology of studying traits personality traits in a

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 1>quantitative way is called psychometrics. So with these tests, the

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated ones, if they had a test taker like you,

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they're designed to get around that. So they're going to

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>ask a bunch of different questions about the same thing,

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but in different ways, coming from different directions, so that eventually,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>if you put all of them together and run them

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>through statistical analysis, they're actually going to come up with

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>your genuine answer, which is kind of one way or another.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>The other way that they get around this that kind

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of hemming and hauling, I guess is by placing it

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>on a spectrum, you're not being lumped into one category

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>or another. It's here's one end of the spectrum, here's

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum, and based on your answers,

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you fall somewhere around the middle, like almost everybody does.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>If you look at psychometric tests, a legitimate psychometric test

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to basically look like a bell curve where

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>most people are going to be distributed toward the middle.

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think what that's why gives me anxiety. It's like,

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 5>what's the point? Don't box me in?

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think the second half of this is a

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 5>lot of what's the point? Yeah, you know, So looking

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 5>speaking on these tests to see if it's actually if

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 5>there is a point, if it's a valid thing to do.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 5>There are a couple of measures that one must look

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 5>at and that psychologists do look at is it valid

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 5>and is it reliable? Valid in this that it really

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 5>is a pretty good reflection of Josh or Chuck or whoever,

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 5>and is it reliable. So if we take this test

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow or a different test, that's just you know, maybe

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 5>different questions, will it reproduce the same result?

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's a big deal.

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.239
<v Speaker 5>Like if you're talking science and you're trying to have

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 5>a foundation that says, no, this is science. It's not

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 5>just a bunch of questions and hippie dippy questions that

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 5>we're asking. If you really want real data and science

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 5>behind it, you have to be able to reproduce it.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the other things too, that these tests are

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>designed to do is to weed out fakers. Right, we'll

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot more about the Minnesota Multi Phasic Personality Inventory,

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the big ones. Yes, probably the

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>most taken personality test in the world, and it has

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of built in mechanisms and apparently is really

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>good at detecting people who are faking they're faking a

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>mental illness or who are trying to pretend that they

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't suffering from a mental illness. Yeah, it's really good

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>at detecting that because it's so exhaustive and using statistical analysis.

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>If somebody is skewed really far one way or skewed

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>really far the other, they're just immediately exposed as gaming

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the test as best they can.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 5>And one way they do that, which is in its

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 5>own way, its own little psychology experiment at least, is

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 5>by telling you if we have ways right, like, you

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 5>will be rooted out and we will know exactly. So

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 5>they tell people that beforehand, so you're more inclined to

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 5>just be like, all right, we'll screw it.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell the truth, right, especially when they're sitting there

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like clearing the air out of a syringe.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 3>That's creepy.

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 5>It is, all right, So let's get back to CPP

0:25:55.880 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 5>in the MBTI, the consulting Psychological Psychologists PRESS and the

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Myers Briggs.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 3>We'll just keep calling it a test, even though they

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>say it's not a.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Test, it's a type inventory.

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so we'll just go ahead and break down the

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 5>deal here there are. The object is to sort you

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 5>into one of sixteen different types personality types, based on

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 5>which side of four pairs or dichotomies that you're going

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 5>to fall on. And those are at the very base.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 5>You're either introverted or extroverted, like we said, HE or I,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 5>sensing or intuition S and N. And these words they

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 5>sound a little confusing, like what the heck does a

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 5>sensing person mean? It means you, like the big data

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 5>empirical data and a lot of information.

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, whereas intuition is like you just go with your gut,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's how you prefer to be correct. Right.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 5>The next we have thinking and feeling. Thinking being more

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 5>focused on logic, that's a logic with the tea sure

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 5>and objectivity. And then if you're feeling, you're going to

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 5>be more interested in relationships and harmony among your group.

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Those two are pretty straightforward, Yeah, I think so. And

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>then lastly there's judging and perceiving. Those are that's a dichotomy.

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Judging is where you prefer schedules, you prefer decisiveness, that's

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>how you kind of approach life, and perceiving is where

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you're just kind of like whatever, Yeah, I'm not too

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>worried about it. Yeah, that's almost kind of like the

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>difference between the type A and type B personalities, which,

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was made up by a pair of

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>cardiologists really whose work was later secretly funded by the

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>tobacco industry who are looking for anything to explain heart

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>attacks besides smoking, so they funded type A and type

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 1>B personality research for years. Interesting, Yeah, it really is.

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>There's a just as an aside, there's a really interesting price,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, price nomics.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Article on type and type.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just look it up. I don't remember the name.

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 5>So when you sit down to take one of these

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 5>not tests with a series of questions that you answer,

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 5>I think.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>They call them instruments, by the way, psychometric instruments, which.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Are basically a series of questions on a.

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Piece of paper that sounds like a test.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 5>They will say things like ed has some good examples

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 5>here when you go on a trip, do you want

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 5>everything planned out in advance or would you rather just

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 5>take each day as it comes, do whatever you feel like?

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 5>Pretty straightforward kind of stuff, right, And then they also

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 5>have things like word pairs, just to see literally what

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 5>word you like better, like compassion, foresight, Like which word

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 5>do you like better?

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Carrots or fruit?

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Fruit?

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Fruit? Yeah, that's just prettier, it is. So I'm looking

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>back here, I just want to say, so.

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I think you're trying to figure out what you were.

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think e n FP. Maybe I think.

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 3>That's what I was. We weren't the same thing.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember you. Me and I got the same thing.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>She found an old email, but she forgot to tell

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 1>me what we were. Oh really, I really, I don't know.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Problem is would we still be the same today?

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I think, if I'm not mistaken, didn't we

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 5>have this up on a big board in the office

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 5>for a while, So yeah, it seems like a Jerry's nodding.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 5>That seems like a breach of protocol. Sure like privacy.

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well again, being forced a gunpoint to do it

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was just from the start.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I remember it was kind of fun. I had a

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 3>fun day.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that as well.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 5>So it's gonna cost you if you just do this

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 5>as a single individual, not meaning not married, but just

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 5>a person, about fifty bucks, although they.

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Should charge more if you're married. It's more complex.

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Test fifty bucks. If you want an hour feedback, that'll

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 5>cost you an extra hundred. And if you want a

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 5>career report all typed up, that'll be sixteen ninety five. Yeah,

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 5>and if you this is fifteen hundred dollars for a

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 5>on site training classes at like what we had.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is a this is not very well explained.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>If you want to administer the Myers Briggs personality or

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>type inventory, yeah, you can get certified four day training course.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, and you pay fifteen hundred to sixteen hundred dollars.

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's what that is.

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Cannot legally administer this test or you're infringing on their copyright,

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>right unless you are certified by CPP to do this.

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 3>We should do it with one another on the air

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and risk a lawsuit.

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, well you probably got a suit already with

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that one question you asked out loud.

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Which one? Oh, just the one?

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when you go on a trip, do you want

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>everything planned out in advance?

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 3>I just made that up. Oh good job, goodcha, I

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 3>got that from Travelocity.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Nice. Okay, yeah, that little gnome whispered it in your.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Ear, that's right.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But so you you would go and get certified, and

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>then now you can go around to businesses and say, hey,

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>do you want to know more about your employees? You

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>want to know who's good at what? Let me come

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>give the Myers Briggs type inventory to your your employees

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and it will be wonderful.

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's how the whole process goes. You pay to

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>become certified, and then you go become something of an

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>evangelist for the Myers Briggs test and you sell the test.

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You basically become a salesman as well. It's a it's

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>very interesting dynamic that they have going.

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 5>That is, it's a good word dynamic. They want to

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 5>point out that the person taking the test is the expert,

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 5>and they also use this metaphor of handedness, which I

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 5>didn't fully understand. They say things like, it feels more

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 5>comfortable to sign your name with your domino hand, but

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.959
<v Speaker 5>technically you can sign with your non dominant and if

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 5>you need to right. I'm not sure what they're trying

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 5>to prove that.

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to say that despite the MBTI, pigeonholing you

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>fully in one category or another rather than on a spectrum.

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>They're saying that category that it's pigeonholing you into is

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>actually just your preference. It's not you specifically, it's just.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Your inclined pretension.

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you tend to be an extrovert, but of course

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody likes their own personal alone time, So yeah, you're

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be an introvert once in a while, but

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you're an extrovert more than other times.

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, because I can't sign my name with my left hand.

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 5>That I didn't like that analogy because it literally I

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 5>can barely hold a pin with my left hand.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm seeing you're doing it right now.

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that was pretty bad.

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 3>If I try to do it.

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 5>It would look like a a three year old with

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 5>arthritis has tried to like scribble it.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Out mine mine looks like umm.

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 6>You d M.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's my signature with my left hand.

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 3>And they do they do try and point out. Like

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 3>you said that.

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 5>It's interesting because they box you in. But at the

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 5>same time they're saying, but you know, like.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 3>You said, this is just predisposition.

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 5>Don't don't really think of it about you being this

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 5>type of person, even though you are an A E

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 5>N F B. Right, like you said, it was earlier,

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 5>it was almost numbered. I mean it is this letter.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a different way of quantifying it. Yeah, but

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>without numbers, you want to take a break and then

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>come back and and maybe do a little criticism.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, as why why.

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 2>S K.

0:33:53.920 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 6>You should know?

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Chuck? Like I said, it's kind of a

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>pastime in the United States to to tee off on

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Myers Briggs type inventory.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is not us here, this is now, this.

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Is us talking about other people. Team.

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 5>It's widely been criticized over the years from psychologists and

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 5>uh well amateur.

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 3>No, nothing's like us.

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 3>One of the big criticisms is.

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 5>That companies use this stuff and hiring and firing and promoting.

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>But even the Myers Briggs people cpp say, like, don't

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>do that.

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.479
<v Speaker 5>Well I know, but they say that, but then don't

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 5>go to an office and get hired by a corporation

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 5>to administer.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It, right or go sell your services you know? Yeah, yeah,

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I agreed, And that's part of the problem. To me,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that is more the corporation's fault. Well, like, if you

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have an HR person who's like a die hard believer

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in the MBTI and will hire or fire somebody based

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>on their MBTI type, fire that person because you have

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a real dumb dumb on your hands and they should

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not be responsible for people's livelihoods. Even I don't think

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>they would put it quite in those terms, But even

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the Myers Briggs people say like, you shouldn't use this

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>for hiring or firing, and yet yes, some people do,

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>some people swear by this. The impression that I have

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>is that the Myers Briggs people tend to think of

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this as more like a team building exercise or 're

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like a certified MBTI administrator can come to your place,

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 1>get all your employees together and they find out like

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>all their personality types and by the way, there's not

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a single negative personality type and all personality types are equal. Sure,

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>so everybody gets a participant ribbon in the form of

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>their personality type. But at the same time, and this

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the crux, at the same time, everybody's

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>finding out like, oh, you're a little different than me,

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a little different than you, and we all

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>have differences in different perspectives, so let's celebrate that, and

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>let's respect to one another's differences. And there is the

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 1>actual point from what I understand, of the Myers Briggs

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>type inventory and taking it in a corporate setting.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 5>That's what stands out to me as what happened with

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 5>us was I remember it kind of being a fun

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 5>day and we're like TUTSI rolls. Yeah, we held goofed

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 5>off and had a good time. And the person leading it,

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 5>if they're good at what they do, which this person was,

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 5>is always you know, it's always kind of a fun

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 5>person and cracking jokes and they don't take it too serious.

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 5>None of us took it too seriously, and we all

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 5>had a good time and it was very much like

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 5>a team building thing.

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, So as long as there's like a wink wink,

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>nudge nudge kind of thing, and that the people who

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>take it actually take it seriously or taken off to

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the side by their hr rep to say like, no,

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a little less serious, then you're taking it.

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Then it's fine. But yes, once you start deciding people's

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>fate based on this, then you have real problems because

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just about anybody will tell you the Myers Briggs

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>type inventory is based at best on some shaky science,

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>if at all, if you go back to the very beginning,

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>it's based on the theories of Carl Jung, which have

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>never been based on science. There are basically personal observations

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>by Jung, and the psychology community has disavowed Jung in

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>large part, so therefore anything based on his teachings and

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>theories is by proxy disavowed as well. But if that

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>weren't enough, psychology, you as a field loves going after

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the Myers Briggs type inventory just loves it as totally

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>baseless scientifically all.

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 5>Right, So we've got shouldn't use it to hire and

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 5>fire in corporations or gift promotions. We have not based

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 5>on real science and scientific data. These four dichotomies are

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 5>problematic in and of themselves because everyone is on a spectrum.

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:34.320
<v Speaker 5>You can't say, like, you know, you answered these ten questions,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 5>you're either.

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 3>This or you're that.

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 5>Right, And when one of the rebuttals because I think

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 5>ED interviewed someone from CPP, right, Yeah, one of the

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 5>rebuttals about being a non repeatable experiment of sorts is like, hey, yesterday.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I was an e NFP and today I'm this.

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 5>They'll say, well, you know what, if you have different answers,

0:38:57.480 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 5>that means you were sort of on the cusp right

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 5>there in that center line on some of these questions,

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:05.720
<v Speaker 5>and you might have just leapt over to that other side,

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.839
<v Speaker 5>which means you're basically kind of down the center. Yet

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 5>they don't have a categorization for down the center.

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because depending on as inputs it, you could answer

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all twenty four questions on the feeling side and you're

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get the same result as somebody who answered

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:26.359
<v Speaker 1>eleven questions for thinking and thirteen questions for feeling. Right,

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing, You're still both in f in that respect.

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And I saw elsewhere it put like if the Myers

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Briggs test measured height, you would either be tall or short. Yeah,

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you could say well, actually I'm right there in the middle,

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and they'd be like, well that's short, right, Or for you,

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>it's short. For the guy who is the same exact height, they're.

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 3>Tall, right.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 5>And trust me, nobody this five' ten likes to be considered, short.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 5>RIGHT i can say that from.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Experience because you're. Not you're in your Average.

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm, average, Right so being.

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Average the fact that there isn't a spectrum is one

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing that really makes it in stark contrast of

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>other much more widely accepted psychometric. Instruments for, sure.

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 3>It also points out to the grabster that They're the construction.

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 5>Of the instrument itself is problematic because, one like we talked,

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 5>about it's self. Reporting anytime you're self, reporting there's going

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 5>to be some weird bias in, there, sure just almost

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 5>impossible to. Avoid and the other one is that he

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 5>says a couple of these dichademies are, entangled WHICH i

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 5>never really thought about, that but that's a pretty good.

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Point so.

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:46.720
<v Speaker 5>Judging perceiving scale or correlated with answers on the sensing intuition,

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 5>scale and if you, like those should be separated out for.

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 3>Sure for. SURE i don't know why they.

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>DON'T i don't, either you, know because they've really put

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work into.

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:03.400
<v Speaker 5>This, yeah it's not baked in stone from the nineteen

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 5>forties and fifties and, sixties is.

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>It, no it's. Not and even while they were creating

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it was an, ongoing exhaustive process That Missus briggs And

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Missus myers engaged.

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 5>In, yeah we don't want to Give they spent decades on. This,

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 5>yes it wasn't like something they threw.

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Together.

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>No the problem is is they they did it. Backwards

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they came up with the personality types and then set

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>about creating the test that would detect these personality. Types

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>rather than going out and testing, people seeing what personality

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>types emerged and then figuring out a test to find

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that and other, people they did it. Backwards that's a good.

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Point it was based on young but it was not

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>for lack of. Trying Like as a matter of, fact

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the first things they did after they started

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to really establish the tests was they managed to administer

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it to like five Thousand George Washington university medical, students

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and they took those results and tracked the students to

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>see what fields of medicine they went. In they like

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 1>really worked on. THIS i read an article in The

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington post where THIS i Think Isabelle myers's son remembers

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>their vacations were basically like fact finding missions all around the,

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>country like they would go administer a, test like everything

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was about this. Test AND i worked on it for a.

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Decades so, yeah the problem is it was just it's

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 1>just not based on. Science they didn't follow the scientific.

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Method so, science so science kind of poo poos THE.

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>MBT i but, wait, wait, wait get back, here because

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these criticisms fall just as easily on

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>every other psychometric test.

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 6>Around.

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah and that's one of the things THAT i

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 5>can't remember who was interviewed in, Here but in one

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 5>of those other articles you sent one of The MYERS

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 5>i don't know if it was or maybe it was

0:42:55.360 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 5>a roar shack defender, said you, know like, everyone, yeah

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 5>it Was. Rorschak like everyone's always picking On, rorshak, right

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 5>when all of these psychological tests, are you, know subject to, criticism.

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They, are you, KNOW i think it's really easy for

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to tee off On rorshak as, well BECAUSE i mean

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking ink. Plots, man it is the epitome of

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>subjective self. Reporting you're, SAYING, i let's see in this,

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>ONE i see mom's. Boobs, yeah mom's boobs in that one,

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Too dad's, boobs right, right exactly. So and then from

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was strictly up to Initially, rorshak WHO i

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think came up with this test in nineteen, fifteen ninety.

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Seventeen what it's the Name, HERMAN i think so he's

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:46.520
<v Speaker 1>A swiss. Psychiatrist her it. Was it was initially up

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to him and then later on his followers to interpret,

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 1>this which is basically like interpreting. Dreams, yeah and so,

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 1>subjective totally subjective from beginning. That and then IN i

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>think nineteen se seventy, five a guy At Bowling Green State,

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:08.359
<v Speaker 1>university which is right outside Of, toledo came up with

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this a really exhaustive interpretive test that sought to quantify rorschak.

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 5>Answers, Yeah John, Exner and it was a test called

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 5>The Comprehensive system one hundred and forty. Components and in

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:28.800
<v Speaker 5>this article you, sent they said That rorschak was probably

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 5>going away had it not been For exner's accompaniment with

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.280
<v Speaker 5>this other, process.

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Right and even, today he's got an institute In asheville

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that's dedicated to The rorschach. Test, Right, so one Thing

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:47.320
<v Speaker 1>i've noticed from researching this is each of these personality

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>inventories has like its adherence and its, detractors and just

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 1>judging from the, outside it looks a lot like colts

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>gathered around their various. Idols. Right there's like the origin

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>figurehead who came up with, it and everybody worships, them

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and he's attacked by these other followers who have a

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>very similar. Figurehead they came up with something very, similar

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's just different enough that there's a huge chasm

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>between the two and there's a lot of dogma surrounding.

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It but The rorschach test in particular is apparently well

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>known to give wildly inaccurate.

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 3>RESULTS i took one, today did you? Online how'd you?

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 5>DO i got two out of, ten which MEANS i

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:33.840
<v Speaker 5>was only two two away whatever that means from being

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 5>labeled like a.

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Psychotic, so, yeah there was this four out of. TEN

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 3>i think there's This oh, REALLY i think that's what it. Said,

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 3>yeah that's. CLOSE i mean this is an online.

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 5>TEST i don't know if it's, like how true it

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 5>was to the ORIGINAL i got, it or it may

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 5>be the, Original.

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah it could. Be and then they have an algorithm

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that runs the.

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 5>ANALYSIS i kept seeing all kinds of things WHEN i

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 5>looked at, it And i've never done an ink plot.

0:45:55.880 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 5>TEST i would, say, oh that looks like a, bat

0:45:58.080 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 5>and then they was, like, no it's like two. Bunnies

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.320
<v Speaker 5>and then now it looks like a Cool Marti gras.

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Mask did they move to?

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 3>You did you see?

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.439
<v Speaker 5>Colors, well some of them were, Colored oh, okay most

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 5>of them were, black and they had A the ONE

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 5>i took had a one and a. Two, like what

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 5>do you? See and what's like a secondary thing that you?

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>See so you, know supposedly people who are supporters of

0:46:20.640 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>The rorschak tests, say, no, man there's we don't know

0:46:23.600 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>how it's. Working but if you see movement in The

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>rorschach ink, blots it's suggestive of depression or something like.

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>That and they, say statistically it's. Correlated but LIKE i was,

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>saying it's also notorious for giving incorrect.

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Results, yeah like saying you have a mental. Illness, right.

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay so there was this study in two thousand that

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>was given to like one hundred mentally sound elementary school

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>kids and some like high percentage of them came back

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>as borderline psychotic because of The rorschak, test, Right and

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's hilarious to hear stories like, That Like i'm laughing

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>inside right. Now but the problem is is you're at

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the very least being labeled as. Psychotic, sure not a

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>label you want in. Society and it was because of

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this ink blot test that's one hundred years. Old and then,

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>secondly these tests are also being submitted and accepted as

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence in criminal. Trials that's the biggest part child custody.

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Cases, YES i mean they're still given real weight and

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 5>lives are changed and ruined based on looking at one

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 5>hundred year old ink. Blots, yes and a person's subjective

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:35.440
<v Speaker 5>analysis of.

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>That that's not. Okay, No This.

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 5>Howard garb in this one article you. Sent he's a

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 5>co author Of What's wrong with A rorshak and he

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:45.799
<v Speaker 5>is head of psycho or at least at the time

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.319
<v Speaker 5>of this, article he may still be head of psychological

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 5>testing for The Air. Force he said that even With

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 5>exner's comprehensive, system he, said only ten percent of his

0:47:55.280 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 5>system even meets the most basic scientific, standards and they

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 5>did the examine data of over thirty Different rorschak, studies

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 5>and he said they all have a tendency to label

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 5>healthy people mentally.

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:08.919
<v Speaker 3>Ill.

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Right and if you're trying to get custody of your

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:13.840
<v Speaker 5>kid or if you are on, trial is a? Criminal,

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:17.160
<v Speaker 5>like it's just that's the last thing you. Need, yeah

0:48:17.480 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 5>is someboddy subjective opinion of is it a bunny or

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:21.200
<v Speaker 5>is it a?

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Bat?

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh he, said a? Bat take that, kid you know?

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Quick kids LIKE i like.

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Bunnies the.

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Another one that we have to talk about is THE

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Mmpi now THE mmpi dash. TOO i think as of

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve they revised it. Dramatic yeah is this?

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.360
<v Speaker 3>One is that? Right it has over five hundred? Questions?

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Wow some of them originally were about like your bowel, movements,

0:48:47.200 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>okay really nutso questions that supposedly really got to the

0:48:54.040 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>heart of whether you were mentally disturbed or.

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Not.

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Right. Yeah and it was created at The University minnesota

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:05.799
<v Speaker 1>in the forties by a psychiatrist and a, NEUROLOGIST i,

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>believe and they hit upon a pretty clever. Idea they,

0:49:09.800 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>said we're not going to interpret the results right and,

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>say you, Know, oh this person said that they do

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like smashing something, Sometimes.

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah and that means.

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:22.479
<v Speaker 1>This, instead we're going to come up with this test

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of like five hundred and four, questions and we're going

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to give it to the patient or the family and

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:34.760
<v Speaker 1>staff of a mental hospital who we're sure or, sane

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to take their answers and they're going

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to become our control, group our. Baseline so then anybody

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:43.959
<v Speaker 1>who takes this, test we're going to compare the test

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 1>taker's answers to the sane control group's, answers and you,

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:50.720
<v Speaker 1>know depending on how it relates to the same control,

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>group they're either mentally ill or.

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Not you better have gotten that control, group. Right, well

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 3>that's the thing to begin.

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>With so a group of like family and friends In,

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 1>minnesota is the picture of sanity throughout the world is

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the basis of this. Test that's a huge problem with

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it to begin. With, yeah but apparently a lot of people, say, like,

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:12.359
<v Speaker 1>no it it really. Has it does a pretty good

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:17.479
<v Speaker 1>job of sussening it sussing out mental. Illness it's also

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 1>really good at detecting faker faking one way or the.

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Other but it's it's too invasive and when companies use

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it for hiring and, firing it's way too invasive and

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.800
<v Speaker 1>apparently lawsuits have been filed against companies for using.

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 5>It, WELL i think that most people are far more

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 5>troubled than they ever let on in. Life, sure and

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 5>part of success in life comes down to how good

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 5>you are at covering that up or hiding, it or

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 5>dealing with it and processing it in terms with. It

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:06.320
<v Speaker 5>it's just to find a core group that are quote unquote,

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 5>sane normal.

0:51:08.040 --> 0:51:12.360
<v Speaker 3>People it's just you're starting off with a.

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 5>Problem, yeah you ask me a faulty, premise, Right, yeah

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:19.839
<v Speaker 5>there's no. Way, like everyone has their. Issues they're deep

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 5>dark things that their brain that they don't want anyone to.

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Know sometimes even the people closest to them don't even.

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Know, yeah and actually you're in agreement with. THIS a

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 1>sociologist Named William white who criticized THE mmpi as a

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>tool that helped to create and perpetuate the oppressive group

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think of mid century organization man where it's basically, like

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>here's what we think is. Normal anything outside of that is,

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.239
<v Speaker 1>abnormal and we're not going to hire you because you

0:51:50.280 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>don't fit into this picture of, normalcy which is basically

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>white crew Cut minnesota from the. Forties, right that's the

0:51:57.400 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>picture of. Normalcy that's highly.

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:02.239
<v Speaker 5>Debatable the other THING i thought was interesting is a

0:52:02.239 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 5>lot of skeptics and critics point to things like THE

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 5>mbti and saying this is just like astrology is really

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:13.760
<v Speaker 5>no different than reading your, horoscope because it's all positive.

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Psychology at the end of A Myers briggs non, test

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 5>no one walks away feeling. Bad usually it's all sort

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:26.359
<v Speaker 5>of positive wording and like like this is what you.

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Are you're just, this so kind of don't worry about

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 5>it the same way you read your horoscope in any given.

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 5>DAY i, mean how many horoscopes say like today you

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:40.319
<v Speaker 5>will be prone to depression and wonder what it's all.

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.320
<v Speaker 1>About, right maybe you should work on your core character

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because people don't like being around you that. Much you

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.960
<v Speaker 1>don't hear that kind of. Stuff but that taps into

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what's called The forror. Effect. Flrr there is a psychiatrist

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Named Bertram.

0:52:54.800 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Forrror, oh this is so. Interesting he will take.

0:52:57.680 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It it's pretty.

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:01.800
<v Speaker 5>Interesting, WELL i, mean basically did he give the Same

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:04.439
<v Speaker 5>he had people take these tests and then gave all

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 5>of the people the exact same, assessment but telling everyone

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 5>it was tailored for them their own personality. Assessment AND

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 5>i think the people who just thought it was favorable were,

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 5>like this is.

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Great well it was. Favorable he actually called it from daily.

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 5>Horoscopes well, yeah but what were they responding positively? To,

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:23.919
<v Speaker 5>well it was whether or not they wanted to feel

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 5>that way about.

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 1>This it was a positive. Assessment there was nothing negative in,

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 1>there so it was all positive stuff like you have

0:53:30.040 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of unused, potential that kind of, stuff stuff

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people wanted to identify. With, Right so the more flattering it,

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>was the more likely the people were to, say this

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is an accurate assessment of.

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Me oh, okay so just ac the fact that it was.

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.879
<v Speaker 1>The same one given to the entire. Class he took

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 1>their answers and threw them out and, said here's your.

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Assessment they're the same one for. Everybody that's about. Right

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it got like an eighty five percent accuracy from the

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>class as a.

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Whole, well that's WHAT i.

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 5>Wondered it was about the fifteen percent where those people

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:57.399
<v Speaker 5>just super honest.

0:53:57.239 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe and like no this really.

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 1>No people actually don't like being around. Me i'm using

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>all of my potential and they still don't like.

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Me, yeah that's WHAT i couldn't figure. Out BUT i

0:54:06.600 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 3>guess that makes.

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 5>Sense there are people out there that ARE i THINK

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 5>i would be one of those that would be, like

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 5>this is all.

0:54:11.200 --> 0:54:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah i'm not like. That sure you got anything?

0:54:15.680 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 1>ELSE i think. Not this is a good.

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 3>One we've been wanting to do this for a.

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:23.879
<v Speaker 1>While, yeah this is a special request by me and.

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Others if you want to know more about personality, tests

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 1>well you can go take them. Online they're kind of.

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Huge right, now find out what kind of hobbit you.

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>ARE i don't know.

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 3>What blocks do you live?

0:54:38.640 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>In, yeah and in the, meantime you can type personality

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 1>tests in the search bar at housetiffworks dot. Com and

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>SINCE i said, that it's time for listener.

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 5>Mail the only thing that should live in a box

0:54:51.480 --> 0:54:56.520
<v Speaker 5>is temporary housing for a pet frog.

0:54:57.239 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 1>That's not, bad or the stuff you find in a

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>tree hole That Boo radley left for.

0:55:01.600 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 3>You, yeah live in the.

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Box, hey, guys feel compelled to write you today to

0:55:06.880 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 5>tell you how GRATEFUL i am for your show and

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 5>praise your good. Work recently became a listener And i'm

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 5>working my way through the entire. ARCHIVE i think a

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 5>lot of folks might be able to relate to, this

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 5>until RECENTLY i found OUT i found it really hard

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:21.719
<v Speaker 5>to relax and suffer with. Anxiety two months, AGO i

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:24.840
<v Speaker 5>read an article basically pointing out how our obsession with

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 5>being productive and associated guilt is a modern. PHENOMENON i

0:55:30.000 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 5>think that for, sure you know. Yep ALTHOUGH i had

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:35.400
<v Speaker 5>heard this, before something really clicked to my. Head SO

0:55:35.440 --> 0:55:39.040
<v Speaker 5>i decided to abandon guilt and embrace, relaxation taking control

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 5>of my own stress. Levels you guys have been a

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 5>big part of. THIS i have taken the time to

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:48.279
<v Speaker 5>slowly potter around my flat gopher walks while listening and

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:50.880
<v Speaker 5>learning to your fascinating, podcasts and they've lifted my. MOOD

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 5>i feel mentally healthier THAN.

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I ever have. Before.

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 5>Nice although the content of what you discussed might not

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 5>always be, positive the way in which you explain them

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:02.360
<v Speaker 5>and your own views revive my hope in humanity.

0:56:02.080 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 1>That is ridiculously. Flattered isn't that?

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Nice?

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:06.239
<v Speaker 5>YEAH i GUESS i should also mention that a big

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:09.920
<v Speaker 5>part of my tackling anxiety levels has been to abandon

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:11.320
<v Speaker 5>watching television.

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And fistfuls of psychotropic.

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.600
<v Speaker 5>DRUG i would be really interested to know if there's

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 5>been any research conducted into the EFFECT tv has upon our.

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:19.799
<v Speaker 3>Lives, Oh i'm sure there has. Been.

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 5>SURE i haven't owned A tv for many, years but

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:25.480
<v Speaker 5>my partner has since subscribed to an online provider AND

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:27.760
<v Speaker 5>i realized how WATCHING tv has not helped my. ANXIETY

0:56:27.800 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 5>i also remember reading that AFTER TVs became mainstream In,

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 5>bhutan their crime rate went up something like seven.

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:38.839
<v Speaker 3>Percent might prove an interesting topic for a future. Show.

0:56:38.960 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, anyway sincerely, grateful keep it. UP i am now

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 5>recommending your shows to as many people AS i. Can

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:45.440
<v Speaker 5>big love from THE.

0:56:45.560 --> 0:56:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Uk.

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Mac thanks a, Lot, mac that was. Great we hear

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of people actually say that we help

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:54.959
<v Speaker 1>them with their. Anxiety no idea, how but it doesn't,

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>matter so thank.

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 3>You. Yep.

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah if you want to get in touch of, this

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Like mac, did you can and send us an email

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.839
<v Speaker 1>To stuff podcast at iHeartRadio dot.

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Com stuff You Should know is a production Of. iHeartRadio

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:13.760
<v Speaker 2>for more podcasts Myheart, radio visit The iHeartRadio, App Apple,

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 2>podcasts or wherever you listen to your favorite.

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Shows