WEBVTT - Free The Sandwich! 

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe, Ketty Armstrong and

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Getty and he Armstrong and Eddy. I don't know that

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that happened, And Pete said he did not want that.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>He didn't even know what people were talking about. So

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll look at we'll look into it. But no, I

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have wanted that, not a second strike.

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So that's a story that's burbled up over the last

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>couple of days of So when we blasted I think

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it was the first drug boat we blasted. After we

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>blasted it, there were a couple of people clinging to

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the boat, and then, according to The Washington Post, Pete

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Hegzeth ordered those two people to be blasted again, which

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>would be a violation of all that is good and decent.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Here is a report on NBC about that. Then we'll discuss.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 3>The Washington Post, citing two sources with direct knowledge, reports

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>defend Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal directive to target

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>a boat suspected of ferrying drugs, with one source saying

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 3>the order was to quote kill everybody. But the Post

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>reports when it was discovered two people on board had

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 3>survived the strike. A Special Operations commander ordered a double tap,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 3>a second strike that killed the survivors, one source telling

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the Post the follow on strike was to clear the

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>debris of the wreckage for other boats, not to kill

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 3>the survivors.

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, these are anonymous sources from the Washington Post. They're

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the original reporting on this. Nobody has confirmed those reports

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>that I'm aware of. Yet every story I saw about

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>this today NBC, whoever I was watching that, I'll say,

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>we have not individually confirmed these reports from the Washington Post.

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Pete Heggzath says that is not what happened. That was

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 2>news to him. Trump says, if it did happen that way,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I would not have wanted it, which is interesting, But

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:06.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Who said was that Pentagon sources who said the second

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 4>strike was to clear debris, So that was acknowledging a

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 4>second strike occurred.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 4>So the only question then remaining is were their survivors

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 4>clinging to that wreckage and did the US military know

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 4>it before they fired the kill shots of people who

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 4>are obviously no military threat.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>The thing that is a war crime, and the crime

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 2>is murder. The thing I really don't know. That needs

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>to be nailed down. I haven't everybody talk about it?

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 2>How much? How many people are involved in this communication

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 2>between Pete and whoever? You know, how many people are

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>down the line from Pete to somebody else, to somebody

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 2>else to somebody else who actually pulls the trigger on

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 2>the aerial shot from the drone? I mean, I don't.

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how many people are involved there. And

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 2>then there is there any record of that communication they

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>record that is it a verbal I don't.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Know any of any questions all. Yeah, the Free press

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 4>is writing about it. According to the post mission, Commander

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Admiral Frank Mitchell, Bradley ordered the second strike specifically to

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 4>kill the two survivors, so he he would certainly be

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 4>guilty of the war crime, and depending how to direct

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 4>the order was from Pete, hegseeth he might.

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Be as well, I guess, you know, allegedly. And then.

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 4>It's worth pointing out we have Republicans joining in the Hey,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 4>we've got to figure out what happened here.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Cry It's not just you know the usual suspect, right.

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>You only open an investigation in the House of Representatives

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>if the majority of party wants it, and they've opened

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>investigations and a couple of different committees in the House

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>of Representatives because the Republican committee chairs have said, yeah,

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 2>we want to look into this. Also a Senate committee

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>looking into it. And is it just a coincidence that

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>the week before this story broke the Republican the Democrats

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>put out that video of you do not have to

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>follow illegal orders, You do not have to follow illegal

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>orders and that whole dust up. Is it just a

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.360
<v Speaker 2>coincidence that that happened right before this information came out.

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 2>That would be a hell of a coincidence.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 4>Sure seems like it because this attack allegedly happened on

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 4>September the second, So yeah, you absolutely could believe that

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 4>there were leaks and people were hearing Oh, this was

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 4>a clear war crime in the blasting the drug boats

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 4>the thing, and that's why they put out that video.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 4>It makes more sense now.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Right because it kind of seemed like it came out

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 2>of nowhere. Although would they be after this what is it?

0:04:52.360 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Admiral whoever? Yeah, of a Bradley. You know, I'm pretty

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 2>cynical about our politics today. I'm not sure how many

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 2>of these Democrats who are making a big deal out

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 2>of this, are actually concerned about these Venezuelans clinging to

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the boat versus they want a scalp in the Trump

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 2>administration to damage the Trump administration, which is more important

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>to them. So I feel like some admirable, no admirable,

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I did it. Yeah, I feel like I feel like some

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 2>admiral whose name nobody had ever heard before would be

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 2>enough for them to feel like they got a victory. Yeah.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't disagree with anything you said, but I don't

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 4>think it's appropriate to look at this story through the

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>lens of what is the motivation of Democrats, whether it

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 4>is holy or unholy? If a war crime was committed,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 4>we got to get to the bottom of it.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess I was assuming that it didn't happen

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>the way it's being portrayed in the Washington Post, and

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>we don't know that. Yeah, I don't know.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 4>No idea the fact that were you going to play

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 4>our two Congress fellas?

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't, But we can. Let's do it. Sixty three

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 2>and four back to back.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Mike Turner and Don Bacon, both Armed Services Committee guys

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 4>or House Intelligence Committee guys, both Republicans.

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Congress does not have information that that had occurred. Both

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 5>the chairman of the Center Armed Services Committee, Chairman of

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 5>the House Armed Services Committee, and ranking members have opened investigations.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, if that occurred, that.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Would be very serious, and I agree that that would

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 5>would be an illegal act.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 6>If the facts go to where the Washington Post article

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 6>takes it, well, then.

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll have to go from there.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 6>But if it was as if the article said, that

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 6>is a violation of.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 2>The law of war.

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 6>But people want a survivory, don't kill them, and they

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 6>have to pose an eminent threat. It's hard to believe

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 6>that two people on our raft trying to survive would

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 6>pose an eminent thrut.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>I would just like to have somebody point out that

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 2>if it turns out this didn't happen, how about a

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 2>little pressure on the Washington Post and not put out

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 2>this sort of crap because that happens a lot too.

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Where you get these stories with anonymous sources. They become

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>a big deal for a couple of twenty four hour

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>news cycles. Then they kind of drizzle away and nobody

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 2>ever gets packed.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Straight years during the Russia collusion hoax, please hat them shift,

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 4>you scum back.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>No kidding, And then never nobody ever circles back to say, hey,

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>that stuff that didn't turn out to be true.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 4>That's not cool, right, right, just take down the Washington Post. Sorry,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Jeff Bezos. I know you wasted a lot of money

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 4>on it, but I'm sorry. We're shutting it down. Yeah,

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 4>we'll just have to wait for the facts to come out.

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 4>It's troubling. We need to be.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Better than the worst people on earth as a country. Well,

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 2>it's getting it pretty hard to imagine either Pete or

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the guy underneath him thinking that was okay, yeah, yeah

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>it is. I mean that would be extraordinary.

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean if Pete said something to the effect to

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 4>kill them all, which I think is in the Washington

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 4>Post story. I can't remember the phrase exactly, and this

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 4>guy interpreted that to kill hopeless, helpless survivors, Yeah, that

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 4>would be an enormous error in judgment, the sort of

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 4>which results in, you know, prosecutions.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>The commander overseeing the operation from Fort Bragg in North Carolina,

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 4>this Admiral Bradley, told people on this secure conference call,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 4>according to Washington Post, that the survivors were still legitimate

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 4>targets because they could theoretically call other traffickers to retrieve

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 4>them and their cargo. According to two people, he ordered

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 4>the second strike to fulfill Hexeth's directive that everyone must

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 4>be killed.

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So, I don't know anything about this. So if you're

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 2>in that line of work, you're the sort of person

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that pulls the trigger on the drone to blast these

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>people in the boat. Are you taught all of this

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and some sort of training or are you just supposed

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to know it from watching movies? Are I don't know that.

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Would you have been taught. Now if you hit the

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 2>boat and there are survivors, they're no longer a threat,

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>so it would be illegal to kill them. Are you

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 2>actually taught that? I would hope so, but maybe maybe

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 2>are Maybe aren't. I don't know if you know anything

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 2>about this, Like you served in the military and you

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 2>got that sort of training. Let us know on the

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 2>text line or the email.

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm looking to see if we have any decisive,

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 4>knowledgeable emails. No, just a bunch of dopey comments online.

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is a Grade A scandal. If it can

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 2>be substantiated in any way, it would drive Hegzeth out

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of his job and perhaps have some sort of trial

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 2>or something.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, here's a Trump loyalist says, Joe, you're

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 4>missing a possibility. Maybe the Dems made that illegal order

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 4>video because they were going to play and to a

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 4>false story about Hegzathy.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>See that's yeah, that's a stretch.

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 4>And this from Robert So the WAHPO reports something quoting

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 4>anonymous sources. Why is that given any credibility at all,

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 4>given the history of the WAPPO with fabricating things. The

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 4>dude was just put in place. That would be the

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 4>admiral on August first Navy seal. I'm guessing he knows

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 4>the law and is not afraid of the Secretary of Defense.

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 4>This is an entire argument against a straw man to

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 4>put and keep it in the news unless there's proof

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 4>this order exists or something happened illegal. It's just people

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 4>trying to whip up news. Yeah, you know what, And

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 4>he says our media is so broken. I would agree

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 4>with you, and both Don Bacon and Mike Turner said,

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 4>if this is true, it's a serious deal. But all right,

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 4>now we're in the let's let the facts come out

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>part of the process.

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of interested. I often like what Barry McCaffrey says,

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 2>retired general. He's usually on NBC. Can we are sixty seven?

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>I'd just like to hear his stake on this.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 7>The easy question is whether or not we are allowed

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 7>to use LESO force against people clinging the wreckage. They

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 7>have submitted there's no threat to the US military forces.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>That seems to me.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 7>It needs to be investigated, need to be confirmed. It

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 7>seemed to be clearly an illegal order in a war crime.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 7>And this admiral should have, when he got allegedly got

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 7>this verbal order from the Secretary of Defense, should have

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 7>put it in writing, said we will not comply and

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 7>explained why. So that one straightforward, it's no different than

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 7>a Nazi submarine machine gunning survivors in the water of

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 7>a sunken ship in World War Two.

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 4>For which they were prosecuted at the Nuremberg trials and.

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 2>Executed man And so how fast does this stuff happened? Too?

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 2>So the first shot on the boat went How much

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 2>time was there but between the first strike and the

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>second strike, probably not a lot, I'm guessing.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the Wallpole count Is took a while for the

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 4>smoke tick clear, and that booty was surprised to see

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 4>survivors and the order was given hit him again. But again,

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 4>at this point, I feel like the entire question is, Okay,

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 4>did that stuff actually happen in the way it was described?

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 4>If so, okay, then the process begins. If not, let's

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 4>move on with our lives after kicking the hell out

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 4>of the wallpole for false stories.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Again, there needs to be better reporting on how this

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>whole thing works, and I'm surprised that's not included. That's

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons that makes me very skeptical about this,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>because if I'm the reporter receiving this information from some

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 2>anonymous source, I'm asking, Okay, how does the chain of

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>command work here? Pete talks to who, who talks to who?

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Who actually fires the rocket or the missile? Is all

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 2>of this videotaped? We've seen the video of the original

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 2>strikes on a lot of these boats. Are all of

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 2>them videotapes? So are you claiming there is a videotape

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>of this out there? Also? I would ask those questions

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 2>if I as the reporter receiving this information and include that

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>in my report and say videotape exists of this, for instance,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 2>because that would be a big deal. It's very easy

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>to get to the bottom of then whichever committee just

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>needs to say, Okay, we need to see a videotape, like

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 2>by noon today. I'm not always surprised at how long

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>it takes to answer these questions. Seems like they should

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 2>be answerable, like in an hour.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, of course, but everybody lawyer's up and drags their

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 4>feet as much as possible. I mean, you can have

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 4>the most legitimate request in the world for information from

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 4>the government, and it's just it's.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Like, you know, I don't know mining for rare earth minerals.

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you have Republican committees in theory trying to protect

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 2>a Republican administration and a Republican sect deaf and all that.

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I would think they'd all want to Yeah, let's get

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 2>the video out. This is what happened, unless something bad happened. Yeah,

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 2>interesting thoughts Texas please four one, two, nine, five KFTC.

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 2>I might want to get super involved in the AI

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 2>argument because it might be the most important thing that's

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 2>ever happened in the history of the world. Want to

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about that coming up next segment. Became aware of this.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 4>New book, A Kinder Gentler Feminism that well, the title

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 4>is actually the Dignity of Dependence, a feminist manifesto that

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Caleb Bart reviewed super interesting. We don't really have time

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 4>to get into it now, but the author, who's a woman, uh,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 4>talks about, you know, feminism got way off track, but

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 4>it got off track when it began to deny women's

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 4>essential differences from men. She observes with great acuity, depth,

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 4>and wisdom that much of feminism today seeks to make

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 4>women more like men in so far as they are

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 4>autonomous and impenetrable blah blah blah, and and just that

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 4>that's a very perverse way to look at empowering women.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>There's no make them into There's no doubt that that's true.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Though a lot of modern feminism is just if you're

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 2>anything that's not being like a woman is wrong. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>it's just crazy.

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 4>And then that reminded me of something else i'd seen,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 4>and I'd mentioned earlier in the show that in the

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 4>midst of my holiday revelry and a lovely time with

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 4>my family, I made the mistake of clicking on an

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 4>article in The New York Post, which was just a

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 4>perfect example of Internet snipy bitterness, superiority trolling.

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>The rest of it here's another good one.

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 4>This is a Vice article that came out a couple

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 4>of months ago, but now it's gone viral.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>It's about man keeping. I will quote.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Mankeeping describes the emotional labor women end up doing in

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 4>heterosexual relationships. It goes beyond remembering birthdays or coordinating social plans.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 4>It means being your partner's one person support system, managing

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 4>his stress, interpreting his moods, holding his hand through feelings.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 4>He won't share with anyone else, all of it unpaid, unacknowledged,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 4>and often unreciprocated.

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 2>What are we talking about, well man keeping?

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 4>And as Nelly Bowles writes, hmm, when I was young,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 4>it was called loving someone. Matter woman, you do a

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of that stuff for your partner, But now we

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 4>call it man keeping and we hate it.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh do we hate it? Holding his hand ew through feelings. Eh,

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 2>he won't share with anyone but you. Ooh. And it's unpaid.

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 4>This is worse than an internship.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Took the words right out of my mouth. That's that's

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>called love?

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 4>What that is a viral whatever that means? Article on

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 4>the internet that's really making the rounds. Young women can say,

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't need that this.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Man keeping good grief. Unplug the effing Internet.

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna miss buying stuff online, but I'll schlep to

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 4>the store. I'll write letters, I'll call people on the telephone.

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Unplug the Internet.

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's too late to unplug the Internet. Is it

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>too late to unplug the a dot? The idea of

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 2>AI taking over the world and destroying mankind? And probably

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>isn't too late. But we'd all have to rally together,

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 2>which I might be interested in trying to start? What

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 2>do I need? A sledgehammer, a fro bar and a gasoline?

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>What do I tell me?

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 3>And I'll bring up day tune, Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 8>Retailers are hoping to add a new spin to their

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 8>sales events, leaning into artificial intelligence. In the weeks leading

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 8>up to peak holiday spending, chat GBT maker open Ai

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 8>partnered with Walmart and Target. Over half of shoppers set

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 8>in a recent survey they plan to use AI this year.

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 8>This year, Amazon's offering its own chatbot called Rufus, where

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 8>you can take a screenshot of a shopping list and

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 8>automatically add those items to your card.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh, how exciting is that? That's not that great? All

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 2>the discussions we're having around AI are missing the main

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 2>topic which should be discussed probably constantly and maybe maybe

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 2>the number one political topic in America, if not the

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 2>top couple. As it's been pointed out by a number

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 2>of the people I've been watching and listening to and

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 2>reading over the last several weeks about AI. These chatbots

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>were all using They're like a web page as opposed

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 2>to the Internet. It's got nothing to do with what

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 2>AI is going to become or the impact it's going

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>to have on the world. The fact that chat GPT

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 2>is a cooler Google, you know that sort of thing,

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 2>and it's kind of misleading people into thinking as to

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 2>what AI actually is. So I've been on this kick

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 2>for quite a while. If you listen you know, the

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>big into AI and read about it and listen to it,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 2>let's podcast about it and everything like that. The book

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 2>that came out fairly recently I mentioned Before the Break

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 2>by Ellie Ykowski, which has gotten a lot of attention

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 2>in AI circles. It's called if Anyone builds It, Everyone Dies.

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 2>He was the one of the biggest proponents of AI

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 2>over the last several decades, one of your leading cheerleaders

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>for AI. If you ever read anything or watched a

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>show or anything like that, or any network television show

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Oprah in the afternoon, whatever, and somebody was talking about AI,

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 2>it was probably him up until recently when he decided, no,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 2>this is we can't control this. Superintelligence is absolutely going

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to happen. We're creating a beast significantly smarter than us.

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 2>How do we think that's possibly going to turn out

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 2>to our benefit? We need to stop it immediately. And

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 2>he wrote this book. If anyone builds it, everyone dies,

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and he's trying to get a whole bunch of people

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>on board to do something about this. Elon said the

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 2>other day he thinks there's a ten to twenty percent

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 2>chance that AI destroys mankind. Why in the hell would

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 2>you build anything that there's even a ten percent chance

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>that destroys all mankind? It seems crazy, that is.

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the answer is so so clear and so unimplementable.

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 4>At the point that it gets real good at curing cancer,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 4>for instance, we all love it and then stop right,

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 4>but it's unimplementable.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:13.199
<v Speaker 2>I was watching it.

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 4>I mean, for the obvious reasons, we don't have the

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 4>cooperation of everyone on Earth.

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I was watching a I'm gonna start wearing t shirts

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 2>from the doom people because I'm one of them. I'm

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 2>a doomer definitely that believes that it's all going to

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 2>go to hell. Doom Debates is a website. I've been

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 2>watching a lot. Practically everybody involved in this arguments within

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 2>sixty miles of this radio studio, and I wish we

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>could get some of them on the air, the Doom Debates,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 2>where they have some of the leading people on to

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 2>discuss various sides of it. I was watching a doom

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 2>debate between this guy, Max Tegmark, who I've mentioned a lot.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I've read a couple of his books, Life three point

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>zero and bunch of different stuff. He's an MIT scientist

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 2>with this other guy who's one of your leading AI researchers,

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 2>who thinks you know hit And the main pro argument

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>from this dude is there's just no regulating it anyway.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how the hell are you going to regulate it?

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Which he might be right about, but tech Mark and

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of others, and this is what I might

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 2>want to get involved with personally. They're trying to get

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 2>people's attention and maybe have marches or something to try

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>to alert the government. We need to come up with

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a plan. We're just screaming one thousand miles an hour

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 2>toward developing a beast or whatever you want to call

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 2>it that is absolutely going to doom humanity and nobody's

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 2>putting any brakes on it. What the freaking hell are

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 2>we doing?

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, twice already you've used the word something, And I'm

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 4>not saying that we shouldn't be trying to get people's

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 4>attention so that they're willing to do something. Then the

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 4>obvious next step is what thing.

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Welle Mark, tech Mark other people's argument, And he's been

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 2>he's been trying to lobby Congress, but there's just not

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>enough public knowledge out there will to really have any

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>any haf yet. And that's why I's wondering where maybe

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>we can come in, or I can come in or whatever,

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>get the media involved to alert people to what could happen.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Would just be to say, everybody's got to stop open

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>AI chat, gpt elon Zuckerberg, you gotta stop no more

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>until we get our heads around this and come up

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 2>with some sort of regulations. One of the points being

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 2>made is we have way more regulations on sandwiches in

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>America currently than we do on AI. It's not even close.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 2>There are Sandwich There are almost zero, almost zero regulations

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 2>on AI at this point, right, And you know, if

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you're a listener to this show, you know it's not

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>like me to want to be pro any kind of regulation.

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 2>But as he points out, you're not allowed to just

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>make any kind of drug you want to and put

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 2>it out to the people. But we have no regulations

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 2>on AI for what we're just going to unleash on humanity.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 4>Does I assume he gets to my next you know,

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 4>Devil's advocate type question is okay, if we regulate it

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 4>but China does not, then where are we?

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 2>That always gets sticky also, and that's one of the

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 2>pushbacks from people. You'd have to have some sort of

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 2>world pressured, same way we had around nuclear weapons, that

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 2>inspectors going in, or you have to announce when you're

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah, all kinds of different things. Yeah, I

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know if that's fling me. Don't know what the

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 2>questions and what the some things are. Yet does not

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 2>in any way deny that we ought to be trying

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 2>to come up with them. But boy, it's a head scratcher.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd say it's one of the arguments is that we're

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>the smartest beast on earth. Every other living organism lives

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 2>at our pleasure. It's only because we as a society,

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>and this is kind of in the modern age, that

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 2>we've decided we want to let chimpanzees live and we

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 2>should value them and not just murder them for their

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 2>teeth or whatever. Uh, it's they live at our even

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 2>though they're the second smartest beast on earth. Why would

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 2>you think that that's not going to occur when there's

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a smarter thing than us that we're not going to live.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 2>It's its pleasure, whether it wants us to be around

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 2>or not. Makes sense to me. Yeah.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've got this horrible thought that when the super

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Ai is developed, the first thing that's going to happen

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 4>is Kim Jong un is going to empty everybody's bank

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 4>accounts worldwide. It's all going to flow into the North

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 4>Korean treasury and that'll be it. That'll be plenty, can

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 4>you imagine?

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know if that. I don't think any

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 2>individual is going to have any control When all the

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 2>experts say this, no individual is going to have any

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 2>control over super AI. It will do whatever the hell

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 2>it's w it wants. It's not going to do the

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 2>bidding of the Chinese or North Korea or US or

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 2>any other human. It's going to do whatever it wants

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>and what it wants. Nobody has the slightest idea.

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 4>May I hit you with an intriguing email from our

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 4>friend jt in Livermore about the dangers from super intelligent

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 4>general AI. I think it comes down to this question.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Would an intelligence vastly superior to human intelligence basis actions

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 4>on the most base animalistic behaviors and emotions, or would

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 4>it be driven by a higher understanding and intelligent empathy.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 4>Claiming that a super AI would attack us out of

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 4>desire for self preservation, or out of paranoia, or out

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 4>of indifference to the value of life, for presupposes that

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 4>the basist emotions would be the domin drivers of the

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 4>AI's action. But don't most higher thinkers believe in empathy,

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 4>helping those less fortunate, the sanctity of life and the

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 4>beauty of life. Wouldn't a super AI be more likely

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 4>to adopt those higher forms of enlightenment rather than the

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 4>basist motivations of a selfish scared Toddler, and then, by

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 4>way of illustration, at the end of the fabulous original

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Blade Runner movie, the last Ultra Advanced Replicant has almost

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 4>every reason that killed the human that has killed all

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 4>of his friends, and that was trying to kill him,

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 4>but he chose to let Harrison Ford's characters live. The

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 4>character live because it believed in the beauty and sanctity

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 4>of life.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one would that'd be fantastic that went that direction,

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know how you count on it. The

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>example was used that when Germany started two World Wars,

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 2>they were pretty much the most sophisticated advanced society on

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 2>planet Earth, with the finest arts and writers and everything else,

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 2>and they went completely off the rails and did the

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 2>things that they did because intelligent beings are capable of

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 2>doing that and convincing themselves they're doing the right thing.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 2>And a reminder that C. S.

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Lewis, to paraphrase him, put it that the most oppressive

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 4>oppression is from people who think they're doing it for

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 4>your right. And I could easily see one power or

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 4>another deciding that, you know, all of humanity would be

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 4>a hell of a lot better off, you know, under

0:26:59.000 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 4>our boot heel.

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one example was used. So the alignment problem all

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>along has been can you align whichever AIS you're talking about?

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And I have become aware that they all use the

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>term AIS when they're talking about multiples. That is just

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the term of art. So whichever AIS you're talking about,

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>you try to align them with some sort of morals

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>or decency that your company puts in them. But the

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 2>argument was made, and I thought this was really good.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 2>We're programmed with really one alignment completely as human beings,

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 2>and that is to stay alive and pro create. Yet

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 2>we invented birth control and abortion, which seems to run

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 2>completely contrary to the one thing we were aligned to do.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And then we regularly do things that aren't like in

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 2>our best interest in terms of eating or exercising or

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of different things. We're aligned to stay alive,

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 2>but we do all kinds of things that will kill us.

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>So you don't necessarily stay on track, which would be

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the same problem with whichever AI is built to be

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 2>aligned with whatever Elon Musk or Sam Altman's goals are

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 2>for the for the supercomputer.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 4>So now that you've terrified everybody, what's the latest thinking

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 4>on timetables. Is there any predominant opinion on when you

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 4>know various terrifying end or awe inspiring bench stones are

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 4>milestones are reached. It's all over the place, but the

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 4>bench stone, it's benchmark or milestone anyway back to you.

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 2>It's all over the place. But everybody agrees that we

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 2>got here way faster than everybody thought we would to

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>where we are today, ended up arriving much faster than

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 2>most predictions. So so far it has been on the

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>forward end of things happening, as opposed to the back

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>end in terms of how fast it can happen.

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 2>They were generally arguing in the debate I was watching

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>last night somewhere in the early thirties, which is only

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>five and a half years from now, between five and

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 2>ten years from now that it will arrive. But what

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 2>do you think of the idea of trying to raise

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>public will to do this? Do you think you could

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 2>possibly do that? Convince people? And the other thing. I

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>would actually love to talk to these people about this,

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>some of the thinkers that are trying to move the masses.

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 2>If a whiff of partisanship comes into this, it's over.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Though.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 2>If Trump weighs in one way or the other on AI,

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 2>forget it, We're done. Or if some pundit, you know,

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 2>assigns being pro AI is what Trump wants or being

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 2>anti AI is Trump, it'd be like masks and vaccines

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 2>and everything else. It's over at that point, right, And

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there's any avoiding that.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 4>I just keep thinking back to the hilarious movie Don't

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Look Up, which a lot of conservatives didn't like because

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 4>it's scured conservatives, but I thought it scured lefties. Every

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 4>bit is brilliantly. I don't know that you can get

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 4>that going. I don't know that you can get people

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 4>to pay attention.

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Well like and Don't Look Up. There was a movement

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 2>toward making sure the media is going to benefit so

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 2>many people that we need to make sure the media

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>hits here. But what if it hits in the United

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 2>States and not in countries where they have you know,

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 2>more inequality, you know, all that sort of stuff, right,

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 2>which absolutely will be the topic for AI.

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 4>But metior to destroy life, the poor and minorities affected most.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, do you think there's a possibility because we have

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>to take a break here soon, do you think there's

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 2>a possibility that you could raise awareness, get people worked

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 2>up enough that you could end up with And I've

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>been against every march that's occurred since nineteen sixty eight,

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 2>but if you could, if you could get people like

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 2>in the streets and say regulate AI, let's do something

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 2>about Do you think you could even come close to that? Yeah?

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think it would probably be useless because

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 4>of the China factor, but I don't know for sure.

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 2>So far, we're way ahead of them, We're the leading

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:17.479
<v Speaker 2>edge of it.

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 4>This has to be how people felt when they saw

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 4>the mushroom clouds in the forties.

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 2>They thought this can't end. Well, yeah, and that's an

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 2>argument for c that everybody thought that would doom humanity.

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 2>But that's been in the hands of a small number

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 2>of people and human beings making the decision. What if

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the nuclear weapons didn't get to make

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 2>their own decisions of what would be best for life

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and go ahead and develop independently of human needs. Well, in,

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>come on, Japan didn't have mutually shared destruction in nineteen

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 2>forty five, right, and well they were on the receiver end.

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Anybody with any thoughts on this, I'd love to hear

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 2>it for a mailbag tomorrow or on the line or whatever.

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a hell of a topic. Anyway, we will finish

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 2>strong next waning moments of the first day back after

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a long vacation in which I gained three and a

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 2>quarter pounds. Congratulations to me, Michael, can we hear forty seven? Please?

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Why do you blame the Biden.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Administration because they let him in? Are you stupid?

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Are you a stupid person?

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 7>Because they came into on a plane along with thousands

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 7>of other people.

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 6>That shouldn't be here, And you're just asking questions because

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 6>you're a stupid person.

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I love him or hate him, He's always a gentleman.

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Donald J. Trump? Are you stupid? Are you a stupid person? Yes?

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, so that's just he's not getting more controlled. It

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 4>should be interesting going forward. I played that partly as

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 4>an excuse to bring this up again. We were talking

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 4>earlier about how so many countries around the West have

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 4>finally said openly, look, and Marco Rubio made an announcement

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 4>about it Thanksgiving week. Look, we're not going to import

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 4>people who hate our values from the third world. It's suicide.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 4>And that's unquestionably true. And if you don't understand that

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 4>you are a fool or to dopey. Now I sound

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 4>like the president to participate in the national conversation.

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 2>I hope I'm not.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Just came across this stat brace yourself. The percentage of

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 4>children born in Canada who had a foreign born mother

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 4>last year forty two point three percent.

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>No, yes, no, yes, That.

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 4>Proportion is almost exactly doubled since nineteen ninety seven. The

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 4>West is rapidly becoming not the West anymore. To support

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 4>the economy, politicians and enough the people who live here.

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 2>And I don't understand the crowd that that's automatically a

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 2>good thing. Maybe we'll discuss that tomorrow. They're idiots. What's

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to understand? They're idiots? Thought I'm strong, I'm strong. You're

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>ready with Katie Green and.

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Thought Strong.

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody and the

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 4>crew to wrap things up for the day. There is

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 4>our technical director, michae Lingelow. Michael, what's final thought?

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 6>I'm a little irritated having to work today on Cyber Monday.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 6>I was at home, you know, I wanted to decorate

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 6>for the holidays.

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 2>But here I am working on Cyber Monday, of all days,

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 2>son of them.

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 4>Katie Green are Esteemed Newswoman. As a final thought, Katie, we.

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Did Thanksgiving at someone else's house and I only regret

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>no leftover. Yes, that's the worst part of doing Thanksgiving

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>somewhere else. I mean the upside you didn't have to

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>make the meal, you don't have to clean up, but

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 2>no leftover sucks.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 4>If you have any decency, you help with the cleanup

0:34:58.080 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 4>point of order.

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Jack, do you have a final thought for Yeah, that's

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a good point to know. Leftover's thing. Yeah. I mean,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, maybe I'm better off without a

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 2>bunch of pie sitting around my house and stuffing and

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 2>everything like that, as I did gain three and a

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 2>quarter pounds.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. My final thought is also dessert related. We had

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of different pies prepared for Thanksgiving dinner, but

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 4>we had twelve people in the house and family and

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 4>all and twelve yeah, and so like, by two o'clock

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 4>the next afternoon, it was all gone.

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Damn it. It's bummed.

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 4>I could eat apple pie for breakfast every day in

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 4>my life.

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Heck, yeah, oh I may some days. It exactly Armstrong

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.879
<v Speaker 2>in Getty wrapping up another ruling four hour workday, so.

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 4>Many people will thanks a little time good Armstrong and

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Getty dot com. No shipping charged today. Free shipping at

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 4>Armstrong and Getty dot com. The Ang Swag Store. Get

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 4>your favorite Ang fan. Maybe it's you a little souvenir.

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And you're gonna be running out of time soon to

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 2>get it to them before the holiday. You know, we'll

0:35:58.080 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>see tomorrow. God bless America.

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Strong and Getty just on then this bollic.

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Easy for you to say, Signed Stegas Store Segast. That

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 4>would have been a good punch, would have been great.

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, there you go. Month is off to a

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 2>bad start. A pie, that's your problem.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty