WEBVTT - Surveillance: Bright Spot Is The Consumer, Marangi Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg Tyler

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Ricks dropping bout the studio to get us up to space.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>The taker white title once again, net interest income, right,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the price action that you were talking about

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>down about one half of one percent sort of says

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>it all. This feels sort of exactly what we were expecting.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>This is all in line with all of the other banks.

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>We knew that the net interest income was going to

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>miss slightly. Of course this did, but not by a ton.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the outlook will be for Bank of America

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what they can forecast going forward now because we know

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that margins and net interest income needs to come down

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly for that full year. We've got a great top

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>blog on the bloombook term it or just sort of

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>breaking down the numbers and the commentary as these earnings

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>come through from Wall Street and won't take away just

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the consumer business taking away revenue up, netting come up,

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>credit provision staple. It's just taking over nicely, isn't it. John.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>This is my theme. I think this is a healthy consumer.

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>We heard this from City Group, we heard this from

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan. I spoke with the Wells Fargo CFO last night.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>They're saying that they are still very very much betting

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer. So despite the fact that loans are

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>growing a little bit slowly, you have some mortgages that

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>are coming in low low, You're having the credit card

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>business really BEI as standout performer both within the branded

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>cards of City Group in JP Morgan, I think the

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>consumer here is still a very very strong story and

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>something that the banks are betting on going forward. Well,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America pretty much unchanged now in the pre market.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>We have the good fortune of having Chris Marangue in

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the studio as well. CA Belly Funds Co Chief Investment Officer. Chris,

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>good morning to you your early take. Please, You've seen

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commonalities between Bank America Bank in New

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>York and the banks yesterday. That is, um the impact

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of a flat curve UH and then offset by cost

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>cuts UH, investment of technology and very large capital returns.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Big buy back from Bank of America slightly smaller one

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>from Bank and you or, but pretty impressive. Nonetheless, the

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>single line John that I saw when hearings came out,

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>it was about two thirds of the way down the

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the propaganda seven percent of shares in the

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months. That's what we call intel, Like, that's

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what Intel did. They invented we almost twenty or thirty

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago. The use of cash by these banks speaks

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>of everything Ben Bernanky talked about in the heat of

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand and eight. Well, they've had the big

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>green light from the record. Can we do a shout

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>out to Charles Peabody, I mean he called this absolutely

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>nailed this four years ago. So we've got to try

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to understand where the news hit. Where is the news hit, Chris,

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>because sure then an interest income story is going to

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>be weighing down some of these banks as the Federal

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Reserve cuts interest rates. That shouldn't be news for so

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 1>many people. The buying back plants shouldn't be news. I

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's it's in the strength of the

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>consumer franchise, the consumer business. Um. You know, again, we're

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing kind of mixed data on the economy. Industrial is

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>rolling over, but the consumer hanging in there of good

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>retail sales yesterday obviously, and the consumer has got to

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>put their spending somewhere, and they're putting it on the

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>credit card. Isn't that what's amazing about this particular regime

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in the markets, that the data is still good, that

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the earnings look okay, and the federal reserves about a

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 1>cut interest rates maybe not just once, maybe twice, maybe

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>even three times in the next twelve months. Chris, Yeah,

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So it makes you wonder what the FETE is seeing.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>And I guess the hope is that the FETE is

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>wrong if they're seeing, you know, some really dark clouds

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. Taylor, what else do you see here?

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll highlight trading revenue just because we know that we're

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at equity and fit. We do see that the

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>trading revenue was abroad match I guess across the board,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which is a good thing. Usually we've seen companies miss.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The fit came in better than expected two point one

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>versus two point oh eight billion dollars. So I like

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>FI because you did see a big bond move at

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the second quarter that helped them a

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit despite the low ball in the acquity market. Chris,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you've been in Wall Street Observer for years. Deutsche Bank

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>going through massive triage right now, What is your view

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of New York trading? As Taylor mentions Thick and the

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. It's not that it's a dinosaur. I

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>know that's too inflammatory. But is there a future for

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>these big banks to lock up capital to affect trading

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>or does it drift away? Yeah? The outlook is not

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>good and I mean you've seen that again, um in

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the earnings today for Bank of New York, which is

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously a very large custody business. Um. You know, the

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>capital is going elsewhere. UM. You know, trading is a

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>much less profitable business for a lot of reasons. UM.

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the bright spot has been certainly in

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the consumer and um, and it's not been in the

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>New York trading. You own away from the too big

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to fail banks. American Express is a large holding, but

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got many other holdings that are removed. Is that

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like a sidecar banking or do you look at it

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>almost as a separate industry from the banks. We're talking

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>about this week that the big banks have a habit

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of blowing themselves up every decade or so. I don't

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>know that. So you know, you know, one of the

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>things that we're not talking about this morning, of course,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>our credit our charge offs because they've been pretty good.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not gonna last forever. At some point that's going

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to turn over, and these companies, these banks are going

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to report losses. We try to stay away from those

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>by owning um, you know, fee based banks like the

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>trust banks for example. I've got to talk about the

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>technology sector with you as well, Chris, not just the

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>financials before we let you go. G seven finance ministers

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>meeting today to discuss the French proposal of a digital

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>tax in Washington, d C. More tech hearings. What are

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on what's going on just from a regulatory standford,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>from the tax standpoint, Not to get too cosmic at

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this hour of the morning before drinks, but you know,

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the this is a governments around the world

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to put the genie back in the bottle. They've

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>seen these tech companies disert to mediate a lot of companies,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>costing a lot of job just youate local taxing authorities

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>and now DISERTI mediating potentially the core function of government.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Which is to issue and maintain a currency. Um. So

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>they probably gone a little bit far, and the governments

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>are pushing back along a lot of vectors antitrust, um,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>privacy and obviously cryptome to these issues shape the kind

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of companies, shape the kind of ideas that you have

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on the companies that you want to own. Well, listen,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>I think we look at regulatory risk across a lot

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of different industries. Certainly in media it is the key

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>risk always will be the key risk, you know, owning

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>cable companies for example, and so that's that's probably true

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>for the for the tech companies as well, and that's

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>time we got left. Give us some ringuey gabelly media update.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You've been extraordinary in long term ownership of that, particularly

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>with the elevation of Comcast over the last decade as well.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Is the enthusiasm still there? It is. I guess what

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the media world is changing, and the way to play

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>it is to own the broadband pipes, and that's Comcast

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and Charter in the US, liberty Global outside the US.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>And then you've got to be selective on the content.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You need the scale companies Disney, or you need the

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>niches like sports content the Braves MSG. Will the tech

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>companies go after those sports rights? Are they going to

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>rip those away from the traditional vendors? So they're gonna

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they will bid for them. Whether they win

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>them or not is another question. I think the NFL

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>would like to maintain football on broadcast for the foreseeable feature.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Rank, thank you so much, appreciated. Particularly thank you

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to the Bank Analysis Taylor Riggs, thank you so much

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>as well to the Bank of America. With an erneys,

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>John Fair and I felt that we really should touch

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and what is truly a changing day for the United

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>States of Europe. Maria today, it's knee deep in this.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>She is in Shantilly. Is that how you pronounce it?

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Maria Chantilly, France Shante And this is where whipped cream

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was invented. What's important for you to know. It's Maria's

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>uh talking to us on her phone from from the castle.

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like this Gorgiosity castle where you think they do

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a fancy French film, and it's the

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>place of the gastrom the whipped cream, where they figured

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>out sugar and cream years ago. You were there with

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a French finance minister. Uh, Maria and I thought he

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>was extraordinary about the new Europe and their pushback to

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:41.359
<v Speaker 1>technology and particularly Libra. What was his tone about Facebook's

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>technical effort. I think Tom and very simple terms. They

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>hate it. They hate the idea behind uh Libra. They

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>just don't like it because they don't understand what is

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the endgame. They don't like the idea that Facebook to

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>almost vibally row the Europeans are trying to prop up

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the euro This is an issue, and also that they

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>take the scandals with the data and the privacy issues

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>very seriously. So they really don't like it. John. The bitcoin,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>if I'm thinking French now, the bitcoin has moved forced

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>standard deviations plus two the minus two in like six days.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the volatility of So Tom, you've identified

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a space, an area where there is some unity at

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the G seven today for finance ministers. It's the era

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of division that I think is going to be revealing

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>through the day between the Treasury Secretary Stephen Manuchin and

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Bruno La Maire. Maria talked to me about the digital

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>tax that the French want to implement, who it impacts,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and the pushback we could get from the United States. Today. Well,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>the French will tell you this is a country that

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is a sovereign nation, and uh, they want to go

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead with this, and they have already in fact voted

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and favor up this and the Senate. So what happened

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>unless there's an agreement and an we ce D level,

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>which is frankly what the French are hoping for, But

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't really happened as quickly as they wanted to.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>They just decided to go ahead and do it alone.

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>The Americans will do it. They think there's an almost

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>anti American bias in many of the decisions that are

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>taken in France, and that companies are punished just because

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they do well in the Europeans simply don't have that

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of technology, so that could be an issue. And

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>also the dollar. I think that the Europeans are aware

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the Trump's like the weak dollar and that could have

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>an impact on the Europe. What's a digital tax? I mean,

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>what do we tell who's taxing what when where? Well,

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this is the whole point of this thing. The French said,

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>let's just uh not being naive. We know that in

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Europe there's many low tax your dedctions like the Irish Republic,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and we know the money that gets made in France

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>ultimately goes UH Channeled or Ireland, so we don't like

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that companies and main money here will have to pay

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>taxes in this country. It is also strange because these

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>companies will tell you you don't really understand how we operate,

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and the French will tell you, well, we need to

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>raise money. This is something that the president has said

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>he wants to do. The French are very keen on

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this idea of new capitalists and mostly respondent to the

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Yellow vest and they want to go ahead with this. Okay, fine,

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>but great. What's the Irish response to this? Well, this

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>is where it gets very tricky because the Irish will

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you we don't want our situation to change because

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>jobs are on the line and we have to speak

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as one voice. We don't like the fact that the

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>French just came in and stormed the European Union with

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea and didn't actually to conscious like the Dutch

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Irish and they're against it. So you can see

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it's so problematic to get done at an EU level.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I recommend uh Maria la Capentannier like Cuisine de Vatel

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Chateau chant Oh, I love it when you speak French

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>people say toma, but if but if I can just

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>stay very quickly. Their French are actually down playing the

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>whole lavishness here, like his Amadal Macron and one his

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>ministers was caught up in his Scandalcauds of his very

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>lavish The French are pulling back from that. Well, what

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>are you telling me? They're going to McDonald's and shenti

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all the number two value meal. Well they'll tell you.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, we can just call back. Wait, wait, wait,

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to go all out. We gotta make

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>some news today, Maria. Have you ever have you ever

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>been into McDonald's. I happen many times. Thank you so much,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>John Farewn, Tom Keane. Right now with what has become

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>always an interesting and interview, but particularly across all of

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg world, has become exceptionally important. He is Mitchell Rochelle,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's not selling real estate. He's an accountant at

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>PwC where he counts the beans. Let's start with what

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven three oh Boston, one of six one FM

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in Washington care about, which is the taxes on real estate?

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Now we're on a number of quarters. What have we

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>learned about the Trump tax effect on real estate for

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>these big Democratic cities that they went after. You used

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to have a partner when you own real estate in

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>one of these states, which was the federal government, because

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you could could you could deduct your property taxes, which

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are exorbitant in some of those jurisdictions. And that partner's gone.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And when people are making the decision to buy versus rent,

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>absent that partner, they're thinking rent makes it better. What

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>have you learned in the last two quarters about what

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>people are doing when they see those that decision tree

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of cash out the door. A lot of the are

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>staying put. So if they're renting, um, they're staying in

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the in the place where they're renting. If they have

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>a starter home, they're staying in the starter home UM.

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Or they're just picking up and moving to Florida or Texas.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And and that is a force of nature we're seeing it. Mitch,

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>would love your thoughts on the economictics we've got this

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>morning as well. We had to drop an apartment building

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>outweighed by a pickup in single family projects. Is that

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>something you're seeing play out too well. But it's interesting

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>about apartment John is that's probably overbuilt. There's clearly the shift,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and I would argue that it's almost become secular. People

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are just saying I'm never gonna own um. So there.

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>That's been happening for a while. Apartment developers and reads

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and have been building apartments and they're just pumping the

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>brakes there because in some markets they're seeing rent reductions

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because they just have too much product in the market.

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that in New York City a little bit.

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>New York is an island metaphorically and in reality. So

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to tell because there's a lot of gratification

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and what's going on the market. But if you look

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at you mentioned University of Michigan, you look at ann Arbor,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>rents are dropping. My son's a student there and rents

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>have fall in. That's what he says. No, that's for

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm the guarante or in the least. No, it's not

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>all going into his venmo on the side. When you

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>when you look at real estate, we're gonna have you

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>come back here. But when you look at the national

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>picture right now, and everybody wants to know, is when

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the prices actually start going up with that enthusiasm, which

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you were we not. It ain't out there, is it. Well,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>what the problem is if you look at data nationally,

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>home prices continue to go up because of the supply

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and demand in balance. But if you're selling your home

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and if it's above a maybe a six d thousand

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar price point, it certainly doesn't feel that way because

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot less demand above that price point. The

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>starter home market's interesting. What's going on right now? You

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>have baby boomers who are selling their home and downsizing

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and competing with the millennial generation Asian buying their first

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so they're actually competing. Children are competing with their parents

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>because starter homes in Washington, starter homes in New York,

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>starter homes in Boston, and four other Sanford, good morning,

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. What's a what's the starter home? John in

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>New York? One point five million? Right? But that's on again,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this crazy island. That's the problem, isn't it. You take

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an hour car ride or train ride away, and the

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>starter home can be four hundred thousand dollars and that's

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a conventional mortgage that's very accessible, and but that could

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>be the same home that you know, a baby boomers

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>moving up and trying to get a smaller home. Mitch,

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd love you thought some more monetary policy hasn't hasn't done.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a load of mortgage refinancing activity as rights

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have dropped, blower. Have we seen any increase in purchasing now?

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>It's interestingly enough, John, I would have thought that it

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>would have fueled more. But the problem is, I've said

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>probably before on this show, you can't buy a house

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not for sale. And when existing home inventory nationally

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is four point three months, it doesn't matter how they

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>load the rates go, you just can't buy a house

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that's not Alowe, but you just said, you just said that.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I contradict myself, you know, but you just said above

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand, there's a ton of houses for sale.

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a ton of house But the problem is the

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 1>buyers that they don't have a bid that high. Right,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So the buyers are very robust in the six hundred

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and below and then the six thousand above, because

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happening is those are the people who are downsizing

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in many cases and going into that lower price point.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's come back, Mr Show with US always fascinating with

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>p WC and some of the real estate trends that

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we see nationwide. There are little jewels you can get

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>from JP Morgan. We protect the copyright of all our guests.

0:17:55.440 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>One m Feroli with two simple pages in one more

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>paragraph that is absolutely brilliant on the global ramifications, the

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>global dimensions of all this, our starred Bologna of the

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>modern federal bank. We begin with Michael farrowle looking at

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>martially and crosses of our current accounts and global interest rates.

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael is Jerome Powell's central banker to the world. Uh. Well,

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the set has always been pretty central, at least in

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the post war period. Uh. And he has been, of

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>course of the past few weeks or months more sensitive

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to global development. So the set has always been influencing

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>global developments, and more recently they've been taking I think

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>larger account of what's happening abroadect. But even without global

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>influences our start in the US, what would have come

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>down meaningfully over the past twenty years. So we're in

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a disinflation lower terminal rate mode which you canonize four

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>or five years ago. Michael, explain the global ammifications. Is

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it just as simple is there exporting disinflation and outright

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>deflation to the United States. Right, So interest rates are

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>obviously low in the US, and we often talk about

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>economists often talk about that as reflecting slower trend growth

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>due to demographics, productivity, etcetera. However, there's an important global

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dimension here, which is that the US obviously has run

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a large current account deficit over the past couple of decades,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>which means we import more financial capital, are a net

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>importer of financial capital and all else equel that's pushing

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>down interest rates in the US. So it's not just

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the saving and investment balance in the US that's influencing

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>our interest rates, but the saving and investment balance abroad,

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and those factories seem like they are almost surely pushing

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>down interest rates in the US. And Paul, you know

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the equation, I are equals g plus omega alpha over

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>are my eyes are alpha over tow. I think, what's

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>he doing with all the Greek letters in the summer, Michael,

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I was, I was sticking with the pictures, the graphs. So, Michael,

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we talk about in the globalization, the world's

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>getting smaller, but boy, you take a look at the

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>U s economy still relatively strong in the face of

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, just extraordinary weakness in Europe, deceleration in China.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the great No one's really sure. How do you

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of square that circle here? How long do you

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>expect the US to kind of remain relatively strong rest

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>versus the rest of the world. Well, I think the

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>strength has really to two factors. One is, most importantly

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>has been the consumer, which we saw yesterday, continues to

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>just power ahead right through June and probably into the

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>rest of the summer. The second factor is that government

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>has actually been pretty strong at all levels state, local,

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and federal government spending. That is so I think that

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>has those two factors that helped inflate the US. UH.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we as in Greenspan famous words, we can't

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>remain an island of prosperity forever, but we do think

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see some slowing in the second half, but

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, some of these domestic factors should keep

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>us doing all right in the second half, maybe a

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>little a little flower than Michael. What is global autarchy

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>or estimated at what are we talking about? Our tarchy

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is a a state of the world, uh, an economic

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>concept of a country that doesn't trade with the rest

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of the world. So you know, country like North Korea

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>would be considered autarchy. Okay, but it's also at the

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>margin the country the president Trump wines in that direction. Yes, yes,

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in that direction, that's called at the margin, professor. To

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the extent we close ourselves off to trade to the

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world, we're also gonna close ourselves off

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>to capital flows to the rest of the world. Just

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of arithmetic. Uh, that probably wouldn't be

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a good idea because the rest of the globe is

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>financing a lot of our investment right now. We're not

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>saving enough now, we couldn't move in a direction of

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>saving more, which would involve, at least at the policy level,

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>reducing federal deficits. But that doesn't seem to be you know,

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a big priority right now. So an absence of higher

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>domestic saving, we need for and say, I think to

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>finance our investment. We need investment to continue to you know,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>increase growth and increase living standards. So, mich I'm just

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>looking on my Bloomberg screen right now, the German tenure

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>minus point to eight eight. How much longer can negative

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates around the world, particularly in Europe, remain what's

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the solution, if there is one. I mean, in Europe

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and Japan, they're in a more difficult spot than we are, obviously.

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the solution, uh you know, probably is to

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's like when you're on antibiotics, you

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get off it before the work is done.

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I think in those countries you are seeing progress towards

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>tighter labor markets, and maybe over time and time being

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>measured in years, we could start to see that show

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>up in higher price pressures and inflation, which would invite

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually get us away from these negative interest rates. Fiscal

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>policy could probably also help, particularly in the Eurozone, where

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, they're not they're no longer moving our

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>direction of austerlity, but they're certainly not using the physical

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>space that could be there. Mica Faroli, your colleague Dr

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Casman was on with us the other day for a

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>quick phone call, and he really emphasized JP Morgaret is

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>certainly not going to go to a fifty bay fifty

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>rate cut dynamic. I don't want to get in the

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>parlor game with twenty five or fifty beeves. But what's

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>your vector. If we get a twenty five basis point cut,

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>is that that we're measured and that sets in place

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in inertial force to ever lower interest rates or can

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it actually be one and done and wait to see. Well,

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think after after the July meeting later in two

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks from today, when we are expecting a twenty five

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>basis point cut, I think it becomes more data to

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and and I think we all agree that the July

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>meeting is basically not data dependent. The FED as all

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but promise they're going to cut rates in two weeks.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the further you go in time, the

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>more the data does matter. And I think if we

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>get data like we have received over the past four weeks,

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>which have been quite stellar, that that continues for the

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>next two months, and I think September is not a

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>done deal in terms of the cut. However, if we

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>do see some of the global UH weakness we talked

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>about feed into some of the domestic measures, and then

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we probably UH stay on a meeting until we feel

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that those risks are no longer there. So, Michael, you've

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier the relatively strong consumer consumer remains resilient. Do

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>you think the consumer strength is enough to keep the

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>US economy out of a possible recession in certainly, I

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think we saw something like that play out in twenty

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen when we also had a global slowdown, somewhat different

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>in nature of a you know, the same same general idea,

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>which is the globe flowed um manufacturing sload captex was

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>even we domestically, even weaker than then it is now,

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>but the consumer kept us going. And so I think

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty recent template for how we can like

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>recession next. Michael, I hate you. I'm gonna have to

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>read every single word of US Global Dimensions of the

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Load Domestic are started as a terrific essay, clearly the

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lead for research piece of the summer. By that, I

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>mean it's exactly two pages, one paragraph long, which is

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>my kind of research piece. Michael Faroli is the Jpe Morgan,

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>always thinking outside the box. Right now, we want to

0:25:54.480 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>talk to uh Nathan Hagar right now about John Paul Stevens. Nathan, Uh,

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.239
<v Speaker 1>he is a giant of the judiciary and he has

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>died at a ripe old age. Tell us about John

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Paul Stevens. Yeah, it's a solemn occasion. Tom. In this

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>often Divided City. Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was ninety nine years old when he died yesterday. Seen

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>as a moderate conservative when first selected to join the

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>federal bench by Richard Nixon in n Seventy five years later,

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Stevens was nominated to the Supreme Court by Gerald Ford.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Judge Stevens is held in the highest esteem by his

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and the legal profession and the judiciary, and has

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>had an outstanding career in the practice and the teaching

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of law. As well as i'm the Federal Bench, I

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>am confident that he will bring both professional and personal

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>qualities of the highest order to the Supreme Court. The

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Republican President appointed him. Stevens went on to become a

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>leading liberal voice on presidential powers, individual rights, and the

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>death penalty, an issue he addressed recently in an appearance

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on the PBS News Hour My Own Thing. It took

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>quite a well to really reach the inclusion that the

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>death penalty does more harm than good. Is it terribly

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>expensive and really pointless process because it I think it

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>accomplishes very little that can't be accomplished with more humane punishment.

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Stevens also voted in the majority of the controversial Roe v.

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Wade decision on abortion, no matter he discussed as recently

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as this year. In the long run, it seems to

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>me that the abortion is a necessary procedure that will

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>be recognized and will be performed lawfully. Stevens was fond

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of writing separate opinions to make fine legal distinctions. He

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>eventually evolved into a coalition builder whose handiwork included the

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four opinion that said US courts had authority

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>over suspected terrorists held at Guantanamo Bay. Stevens retired in

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>two during the presidency of Barack Obama. At the age

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of ninety. He was the second oldest justice in US history.

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Justice Stevens has courageously served his country from the moment

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>he enlisted the day before Pearl Harbor to his long

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and distinguished tenure on the Supreme Court. During that tenure,

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>he has stood as an impartial guardian of the law.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>He's worn the judicial robe with honor and humility. In retirements,

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Stevens remained engaged in public debate. Just last year, he

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>called for the repeal of the constitution Second Amendment. Stephen

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>spoke about the push to curb gun rights with ABC

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>S George Stephanopolis, the amendment would merely prevent UH our

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>humans being made that Congress doesn't have the power to

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>do what I think is in the best public interest.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, if Congress passed a national ban

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>on individual gun ownership, that would be constitutional under your amendment.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. And following word of Justice Stevens,

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>passing the White House, issued a statement saying his work

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>will continue to shape the legal framework of our nation

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for years to come. In his passion for the law

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and for our country will not soon be forgotten. And

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a Chief Justice John Roberts says that Stevens brought kindness, humility,

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>wisdom and independence to the Supreme Court again. John Paul

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Stevens died at a hospital in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, yesterday,

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>complications following a stroke at the age of nine. And

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom and Paul really does hearken back to a different

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>time in the Supreme Court where nowadays you can see

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the divide so starkly on the High Court. UH, the

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of consensus building that Stevens aimed for UH seems

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to be at times a lost art. In Washington, Nathan

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Hager Thank you so much. Just a terrific summer there.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Of the Justices live Paul Sweeney, what's extraordinary about the

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>span of his American history? As a child, he was

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at the game where Babe Ruth pointed to center and

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>he has recollections of Ruth pointing to center field. And

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of course part of the Greatest Generation World War Two

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with enlisting. Uh oh, yeah, absolutely, but you know, yeah,

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the only equivalences I know in the modern time would

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be April Harriman. And to go back to the middle

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of the history, John Hay who was of course a

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln secretary uh and then ended up at Secretary of

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>State with Teddy Roosevelt. But uh, an extraordinary public and

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>private life of John Paul Stephen. Thanks for listening to

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You can

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.