1 00:00:05,720 --> 00:00:07,720 Speaker 1: Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name 2 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,959 Speaker 1: is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday. 3 00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: Time to go into the vault for a classic episode 4 00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:17,480 Speaker 1: of the show. This one originally aired March twelve, and 5 00:00:17,720 --> 00:00:20,160 Speaker 1: this one was the first in a two part series 6 00:00:20,200 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 1: we did about whether or not invertebrates like insects and 7 00:00:23,840 --> 00:00:27,360 Speaker 1: worms and creatures like that, can feel emotions. I thought 8 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:29,920 Speaker 1: this was a cool question. Yeah, this one will really 9 00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:32,280 Speaker 1: change the way you think about all the creepy crawleys 10 00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:34,520 Speaker 1: in the world around you. All right, let's go ahead 11 00:00:34,560 --> 00:00:40,240 Speaker 1: and dive into part one, Welcome to Stuff to Blow 12 00:00:40,280 --> 00:00:49,680 Speaker 1: Your Mind production of My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to 13 00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:51,840 Speaker 1: Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb 14 00:00:52,080 --> 00:00:54,080 Speaker 1: and I'm Joe McCormick. And today is going to be 15 00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:56,360 Speaker 1: the first and a couple of episodes that we wanted 16 00:00:56,400 --> 00:01:01,120 Speaker 1: to do on the subject of invertebrate emotions. And strangely enough, 17 00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 1: I got interested in this subject the other day after 18 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:06,800 Speaker 1: I was reading a poem, not a scientific paper. I 19 00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:10,840 Speaker 1: was reading a poem by the American modernist poet Marianne Moore, 20 00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:12,880 Speaker 1: who I like a lot. She she writes a lot 21 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:16,680 Speaker 1: about like fish and you know, marine organisms. She lived 22 00:01:16,680 --> 00:01:20,120 Speaker 1: from eight seven to nineteen seventy two. And uh, if 23 00:01:20,160 --> 00:01:22,000 Speaker 1: it's okay with you, Robert, I wanted to start off 24 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:24,759 Speaker 1: this episode just by reading this poem that I encountered 25 00:01:24,760 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 1: the other day. Okay. It is called the paper Nautilus 26 00:01:28,920 --> 00:01:33,679 Speaker 1: for authorities whose hopes are shaped by mercenaries, writers, entrapped 27 00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:37,760 Speaker 1: by tea time fame, and by commuters comforts. Not for these, 28 00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:42,240 Speaker 1: the paper Nautilus constructs her thin glass shell, giving her 29 00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:46,679 Speaker 1: perishable souvenir of hope, a dull white outside and smooth 30 00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:50,640 Speaker 1: edged inner surface. Glossy is the sea. The watchful maker 31 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:53,960 Speaker 1: of it guards it day and night. She scarcely eats 32 00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:57,560 Speaker 1: until her eggs are hatched, buried eight fold in her 33 00:01:57,600 --> 00:02:01,080 Speaker 1: eight arms, for she is in a sense that devil fish. 34 00:02:01,120 --> 00:02:05,160 Speaker 1: Her glass ram's horn cradled freight is hid but not crushed, 35 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:09,240 Speaker 1: as hercules bitten by a crab loyal to the hydra, 36 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:13,959 Speaker 1: was hindered to succeed. The intensively watched eggs coming from 37 00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:17,280 Speaker 1: the shell free it when they are freed, leaving its 38 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:21,000 Speaker 1: wasp nest flaws of white on white and close laid 39 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,320 Speaker 1: ionic kite enfolds, like the lines in the mane of 40 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:28,679 Speaker 1: a Parthenon horse, around which the arms had wound themselves, 41 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:31,960 Speaker 1: as if they knew Love is the only fortress strong 42 00:02:32,080 --> 00:02:35,679 Speaker 1: enough to trust to. Oh that's nice. I like that 43 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:38,519 Speaker 1: last part especially me too. I mean, I love the 44 00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:42,600 Speaker 1: way it moves from um this, uh this direct, almost 45 00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:46,600 Speaker 1: clinical description of the actual biology of the paper nautilus 46 00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:48,880 Speaker 1: and how it builds its shell and all that, and 47 00:02:48,919 --> 00:02:52,320 Speaker 1: goes from that to these classical illusions, and then ultimately 48 00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:54,920 Speaker 1: ends on this powerfully emotional note that kind of gives 49 00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:58,919 Speaker 1: me a shiver. Uh So. The late American poet Anthony Hate, 50 00:02:58,960 --> 00:03:01,160 Speaker 1: writing about More, said that one of the things he 51 00:03:01,240 --> 00:03:04,080 Speaker 1: liked most about our poems was that they had quote 52 00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:08,799 Speaker 1: a capacity for pure praise that has absolutely biblical awe 53 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:10,960 Speaker 1: in it. And I think you kind of see that here. 54 00:03:11,000 --> 00:03:13,480 Speaker 1: I like that quality a lot too. It captures in 55 00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:18,040 Speaker 1: language some of the overwhelming, almost religious kind of power 56 00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:21,160 Speaker 1: I feel when looking at some animals, especially animals that 57 00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:24,080 Speaker 1: live in the ocean. But also the poem really just 58 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:27,280 Speaker 1: has a very worthy subject. The paper nautilus, also known 59 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:32,120 Speaker 1: as the argonaut, is a remarkable species and the shell 60 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:34,080 Speaker 1: that has talked about in the poem the egg case 61 00:03:34,240 --> 00:03:38,360 Speaker 1: is a genuinely gorgeous wonder of evolution. Yeah, this is 62 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:43,120 Speaker 1: quite a remarkable critter. So the argonaut. Uh, first of 63 00:03:43,160 --> 00:03:45,560 Speaker 1: let's just talk about the name. This is of course 64 00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:48,960 Speaker 1: a reference to Greek mythology, and we we recently talked 65 00:03:48,960 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 1: about this on our other show Invention, right, the myth 66 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:55,560 Speaker 1: of Jason and the Argonauts. Right, Yeah, because they argonaut 67 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:58,440 Speaker 1: just means sailors of the Argo, the Argo being the 68 00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:01,600 Speaker 1: ship built by Argus and the ship upon which Jason 69 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 1: sails in his quest to find the Golden fleece, which 70 00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:08,640 Speaker 1: itself was a sacred pelt of a winged ram. But 71 00:04:08,720 --> 00:04:11,720 Speaker 1: the argonaut we're talking about here is again the paper nautilus, 72 00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:16,880 Speaker 1: a member of the genus Argonata. So their octopods cephalopods, 73 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:19,320 Speaker 1: and there as many as fifty three species that have 74 00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:23,920 Speaker 1: been described. They have this delicate calcite shell, hence the nickname. 75 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 1: And these shells were once thought to be pilfered like 76 00:04:26,480 --> 00:04:28,680 Speaker 1: the shells of a hermit crab. There was a question 77 00:04:28,680 --> 00:04:30,640 Speaker 1: of where did they acquire these things? Well, they must 78 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:33,240 Speaker 1: have they must have stolen them. Uh, they must be 79 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,160 Speaker 1: using them, right, and they wouldn't be the only octopus 80 00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:38,279 Speaker 1: that finds a shell or some kind of you know, 81 00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:40,479 Speaker 1: a coconut or something and picks it up and uses 82 00:04:40,520 --> 00:04:44,760 Speaker 1: it right uh and and this was also Another contributing 83 00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:47,960 Speaker 1: factor to this interpretation is the fact that the the 84 00:04:48,080 --> 00:04:52,800 Speaker 1: argonaut is not physically attached to the shell, like when 85 00:04:52,839 --> 00:04:56,240 Speaker 1: a specimen is examined. The creature can be removed from 86 00:04:56,279 --> 00:05:00,200 Speaker 1: the shell with ease, though it typically expires if that 87 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:03,400 Speaker 1: is done to it. So, um, we've known about them. 88 00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 1: For these creatures for thousands of years. They pop up 89 00:05:06,080 --> 00:05:09,400 Speaker 1: an art from three thousand b C, according to Mark 90 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:12,440 Speaker 1: Carnal writing for The Guardian, But we did not know 91 00:05:12,480 --> 00:05:15,440 Speaker 1: how they made their egg shells until the nineteenth century. 92 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:18,200 Speaker 1: So this is what happens. The female, and only the 93 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:23,800 Speaker 1: female secretes the shells via specialized arms and the resulting 94 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:29,359 Speaker 1: shell it's essentially a flotation device that resembles the shell 95 00:05:29,880 --> 00:05:34,239 Speaker 1: of extinct ammonites. They lay their eggs inside of these shells. 96 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:37,839 Speaker 1: They retreat inside. Sometimes you'll you'll you'll find the detached 97 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:43,000 Speaker 1: reproductive arm of a male a hectocotalis, and then she'll 98 00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:46,120 Speaker 1: use she'll use the shell though to control her buoyancy 99 00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:49,120 Speaker 1: in the water. There's so many interesting things going on here. 100 00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:51,400 Speaker 1: I mean, number one is just the implied history of 101 00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:54,159 Speaker 1: mating that at some point a male octopus came along 102 00:05:54,480 --> 00:05:57,000 Speaker 1: and made it by what tearing off one of its 103 00:05:57,000 --> 00:06:00,280 Speaker 1: own arms and giving it to her. Yeah, basically it 104 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:05,680 Speaker 1: is like a detachable sexual organ, uh that then she keeps. 105 00:06:06,279 --> 00:06:08,240 Speaker 1: But yeah, the other thing about this shell that's so 106 00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:10,320 Speaker 1: fascinating is when we think of shells, we think of 107 00:06:10,360 --> 00:06:13,640 Speaker 1: just pure defense. We think of the hard shelter that 108 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:15,560 Speaker 1: has grown out of the animal that the animal may 109 00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:18,120 Speaker 1: retreat into. Right, But they're in the common name the 110 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:22,000 Speaker 1: paper nautilus. It implies that the shell is very delicate. Yeah, 111 00:06:22,040 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 1: it is not a defensive structure, at least not in 112 00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:26,840 Speaker 1: the same way that a true shell is. I mean 113 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:29,360 Speaker 1: it is you can't argue that it is protective for 114 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 1: the young that reside within it, because it is a 115 00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:35,800 Speaker 1: very slim barrier between them and the open ocean, and 116 00:06:35,839 --> 00:06:39,039 Speaker 1: you know, keeps them close to the female. But mainly 117 00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:42,760 Speaker 1: it is the means by which this particular type of 118 00:06:42,760 --> 00:06:46,560 Speaker 1: octopod returned to the open sea as its skin had 119 00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 1: largely evolved for sea floor life and left the open 120 00:06:49,880 --> 00:06:53,599 Speaker 1: waters to the squid. Okay, so the octopus is generally 121 00:06:53,640 --> 00:06:55,719 Speaker 1: going to be found uh, I don't know, along the 122 00:06:55,720 --> 00:06:58,640 Speaker 1: bottom or maybe hiding along along a reef or something 123 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:00,560 Speaker 1: like that. But this one just takes out to the 124 00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:04,000 Speaker 1: open waters with a flotation device of its own, making 125 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:07,080 Speaker 1: like one way. And this is you know, an elaborate 126 00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 1: and probably a little poetiquet to think of it. But 127 00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:12,800 Speaker 1: you can think of the squid as the angel, and 128 00:07:12,840 --> 00:07:15,800 Speaker 1: the octopus is the fallen angels, has lost its wings. 129 00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:20,720 Speaker 1: But this particular octopod has I guess Miltonian aspirations and 130 00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:23,800 Speaker 1: or or is or is you know, lined up with 131 00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:26,160 Speaker 1: the thinking of data lists and icarus, and it is 132 00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:29,440 Speaker 1: building its own shell that will that in this case, 133 00:07:29,440 --> 00:07:32,920 Speaker 1: will will allow it to ascend up in the water 134 00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: towards the surface. Now there's another thing I want to 135 00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:39,040 Speaker 1: throw in as a when you get into the sexual 136 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:42,280 Speaker 1: dimorphism here, the females are up to six hundred times 137 00:07:42,320 --> 00:07:45,120 Speaker 1: the weight of the males. Uh. And again the males 138 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:48,800 Speaker 1: do not engage in this kind of shell construction and growth. 139 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:51,600 Speaker 1: But a great deal of mystery remains about how the 140 00:07:51,720 --> 00:07:55,480 Speaker 1: argonaut lives its life and and indeed how they even evolved. 141 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:59,240 Speaker 1: Uh Neil Monks and Sea phil Palmer authors at the 142 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:02,800 Speaker 1: two thousand two Mathonian book Ammonites. They have suggested that 143 00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:07,040 Speaker 1: these ancient octopuses might have depended on the discarded shells 144 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: of ammonites in prehistoric times and use their abilities to 145 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:15,000 Speaker 1: mend the shells. So the idea might be that originally 146 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:17,760 Speaker 1: they stole shells from a now extinct animal and then 147 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:20,960 Speaker 1: use these uh uh these abilities to to patch them 148 00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:23,440 Speaker 1: up and make them fit, to customize them a little bit, 149 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:26,160 Speaker 1: but still largely depend on the stolen shell. Interesting. I 150 00:08:26,160 --> 00:08:28,480 Speaker 1: mean there is a physical similarity. If you haven't seen 151 00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:31,600 Speaker 1: ammonite shells, that they tend to be spiral shaped. There 152 00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:34,280 Speaker 1: at some point in the past. I talked about our 153 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:37,600 Speaker 1: recent trip to Lime Regis in uh in the UK, 154 00:08:37,880 --> 00:08:41,280 Speaker 1: where on the beach you can find fossils of ammonites 155 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:43,920 Speaker 1: from you know, hundreds of millions of years ago, and 156 00:08:43,960 --> 00:08:48,160 Speaker 1: there are these colossal serial killer spirals etched into the rocks. 157 00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:50,120 Speaker 1: It's very very cool. But yeah, at some point the 158 00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 1: ammonites disappeared, so they they went extinct in the Cretaceous 159 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:57,280 Speaker 1: Paleogene extinction event. And so what do you do if 160 00:08:57,280 --> 00:08:59,360 Speaker 1: you depend upon that shell. So the idea here is 161 00:08:59,440 --> 00:09:03,240 Speaker 1: that the ancient paper nautilus is we then had to 162 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:07,240 Speaker 1: use their mending skills to just create a shell of 163 00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:09,480 Speaker 1: their own in order to do the same sort of 164 00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:11,719 Speaker 1: things that they did previously. So what they what they 165 00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:15,200 Speaker 1: once used to repair, they had to create from scratch. Yes, 166 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:18,679 Speaker 1: that's that's at least one one theory that's out there. 167 00:09:18,679 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 1: It's also highly possible that we're just talking about covergent 168 00:09:21,840 --> 00:09:25,960 Speaker 1: evolution here and the paper nautilus is eggshell just happens 169 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,520 Speaker 1: to resemble that of an ammonite. Sure, but it really 170 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:31,120 Speaker 1: does look similar. But then again, you can see other 171 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:34,240 Speaker 1: signs of similar types of possible convergent evolution. I mean 172 00:09:34,280 --> 00:09:36,800 Speaker 1: the nautilus, not the paper nautilus, but the animal just 173 00:09:36,920 --> 00:09:40,000 Speaker 1: normally called the nautilus is like the marine mollusk that 174 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:43,160 Speaker 1: has a shell that sort of resembles an ammonite shell. Also, yeah, 175 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:47,400 Speaker 1: absolutely still a fascinating creature and also definitely a creature 176 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:51,800 Speaker 1: worthy of poetic consideration. Speaking and speaking of poetry, they 177 00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:55,359 Speaker 1: also show up in in other works of literature, including 178 00:09:55,640 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 1: twenty thousand Leagues under the Sea by Jules Verne uh 179 00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:02,120 Speaker 1: there's a there's a set action in it where they are, uh, 180 00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:06,480 Speaker 1: they're they're aboard the nautilus, the submarine, and they are 181 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:10,160 Speaker 1: they've come up to the surface and they observe these creatures. 182 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:13,320 Speaker 1: They observed the paper nautilus, the argonaut in action. So 183 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 1: here's a quote from the book. Quote. Now, it was 184 00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:19,640 Speaker 1: a school of argonauts then voyaging on the surface of 185 00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:22,120 Speaker 1: the ocean. We could count several hundred of them. They 186 00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:25,680 Speaker 1: belong to that species of argonaut, covered with protuberances and 187 00:10:25,760 --> 00:10:29,959 Speaker 1: exclusive to the seas near India. These graceful mollusks were 188 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:33,600 Speaker 1: swimming backwards by means of their locomotive tubes, sucking water 189 00:10:33,679 --> 00:10:36,360 Speaker 1: into these tubes and then expelling it. Six of their 190 00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:39,160 Speaker 1: eight tentacles were long, thin and floated on the water, 191 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:42,079 Speaker 1: while the other two were rounded into palms and spread 192 00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 1: to the wind like light sails. I could see perfectly. 193 00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 1: They're undulating spiral shaped shells, which Cuvier aptly compared to 194 00:10:49,559 --> 00:10:53,240 Speaker 1: an elegant cockle boat. It's an actual boat. Indeed, it 195 00:10:53,280 --> 00:10:56,800 Speaker 1: transports the animal that secretes it without the animal sticking 196 00:10:56,840 --> 00:10:59,240 Speaker 1: to it. The argonaut is free to leave its shell, 197 00:10:59,400 --> 00:11:02,800 Speaker 1: I told seal, But it never does not, unlike Captain 198 00:11:02,840 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 1: Nemo Conseil, replied sage Lee, which is why he should 199 00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 1: have christened it his ship the Argonaut. Oh that's good, 200 00:11:09,880 --> 00:11:12,280 Speaker 1: it's a shell of his own design. Yeah. So now 201 00:11:12,280 --> 00:11:15,679 Speaker 1: they're also referring in this passage to this um this 202 00:11:15,920 --> 00:11:18,440 Speaker 1: myth or this outdated idea that they could use their 203 00:11:18,559 --> 00:11:21,079 Speaker 1: arms as sails and sail across the top of the water, 204 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:24,120 Speaker 1: and that the shell is like actually a boat, and 205 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 1: it really in some sense as it is, because it 206 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 1: aids the creature in it's in its buoyancy. But anyway, 207 00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:33,840 Speaker 1: that's just a fun little literary usage of the argonaut, 208 00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:36,400 Speaker 1: and it also alludes to that fact that yes, it 209 00:11:36,440 --> 00:11:39,600 Speaker 1: can it can technically leave the shell, because it doesn't 210 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:42,640 Speaker 1: actually grow that the shell. It kind of makes it. 211 00:11:43,800 --> 00:11:45,880 Speaker 1: But if if you were to remove the species from 212 00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:48,800 Speaker 1: its shell, it typically dies. This is such a cool animal. 213 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:51,040 Speaker 1: And I like the idea that Jules Verne was like 214 00:11:51,080 --> 00:11:55,640 Speaker 1: halfway through writing twenty Leagues and he discovered this animal, 215 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:57,560 Speaker 1: and he's like, oh, I should have gone back and 216 00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:00,800 Speaker 1: named it the Argonaut from the beginning, but that'd take 217 00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:03,040 Speaker 1: too much revision. I'll just plow ahead and I'll have 218 00:12:03,080 --> 00:12:05,400 Speaker 1: a character acknowledge like it really would have been better 219 00:12:05,440 --> 00:12:08,040 Speaker 1: if it was called this other thing. But anyway, I 220 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:10,160 Speaker 1: wanted to come back to the ending of the poem 221 00:12:10,200 --> 00:12:12,880 Speaker 1: by Marianne Moore. This powerful ending is what got me 222 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:15,600 Speaker 1: really thinking about the subject for today's episode and the 223 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:20,080 Speaker 1: next one. This idea of this eight armed cephalopod clutching 224 00:12:20,120 --> 00:12:22,680 Speaker 1: at its egg case, as if each of its arms 225 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:25,840 Speaker 1: knew that love is the only fortress strong enough to 226 00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:30,240 Speaker 1: trust too. Does the paper nautilus feel love? Do the 227 00:12:30,320 --> 00:12:34,400 Speaker 1: coiled arms of the argonauts simply clutch or do they embrace? 228 00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:37,640 Speaker 1: Do they hug with all the emotional impact you know, 229 00:12:37,679 --> 00:12:40,600 Speaker 1: the baggage that comes with that. I think most everyone 230 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:42,680 Speaker 1: would probably. I think the gut response that people are 231 00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:45,720 Speaker 1: generally gonna have is no, You're gonna think no, a 232 00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:50,359 Speaker 1: a paper nautilus is not going to be capable of 233 00:12:50,360 --> 00:12:53,600 Speaker 1: of love. Love is what humans do. And you know, 234 00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:57,800 Speaker 1: maybe specific animals that we live closely with that we 235 00:12:57,880 --> 00:13:01,920 Speaker 1: anthropomorphizes enough into, but not the not the octopi, not 236 00:13:02,040 --> 00:13:05,080 Speaker 1: the not the the world of invertebrates. Well, I don't know. 237 00:13:05,160 --> 00:13:07,840 Speaker 1: It's I mean, people would I think you'd encounter a 238 00:13:07,840 --> 00:13:11,320 Speaker 1: lot of divergent opinion about that. On one hand, you 239 00:13:11,320 --> 00:13:13,320 Speaker 1: can say, yeah, I mean, of course you're gonna have 240 00:13:13,320 --> 00:13:16,320 Speaker 1: a problem of if you believe that an octopus can love, 241 00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:19,000 Speaker 1: I mean, how could you prove that? Uh? And so, 242 00:13:19,160 --> 00:13:21,240 Speaker 1: And we'll address questions like that as we move on. 243 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:26,000 Speaker 1: But more broadly, I guess, can you can you imagine 244 00:13:26,600 --> 00:13:30,920 Speaker 1: invertebrates in general feeling anything analogous to the kind of plain, 245 00:13:31,160 --> 00:13:34,440 Speaker 1: familiar emotions that we name in poems. You know, does 246 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:38,440 Speaker 1: a does a crab feel feared? Does a bumblebee feel hate? Uh? 247 00:13:38,480 --> 00:13:43,280 Speaker 1: Does a snail feel discussed or jealousy or joy? Or 248 00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:45,760 Speaker 1: you know? Is it as you're sort of suggesting folly 249 00:13:45,840 --> 00:13:49,400 Speaker 1: to meaningfully apply these words outside of humans, and maybe 250 00:13:49,440 --> 00:13:52,560 Speaker 1: they're more closely related vertebrate relatives. Well. But then the 251 00:13:52,600 --> 00:13:54,120 Speaker 1: other side to look at it, and this is something 252 00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:56,600 Speaker 1: we'll continue to discuss as well, is that you bring 253 00:13:56,720 --> 00:13:59,640 Speaker 1: up poetry, and poetry is very much a part of 254 00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:02,200 Speaker 1: the and I love poetry, but it is part of 255 00:14:02,240 --> 00:14:06,199 Speaker 1: the cult of human emotion indefinitely places things like love 256 00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:10,080 Speaker 1: on a golden pedestal. And and so there's kind of 257 00:14:10,440 --> 00:14:12,200 Speaker 1: a push and pull here when we look to the 258 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:15,960 Speaker 1: world of animals. We have to be willing to throw 259 00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:19,560 Speaker 1: our emotions off of that golden pedestal and and look 260 00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:23,040 Speaker 1: at what they really are from uh, you know, psychological 261 00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:26,120 Speaker 1: and even biological standpoint. And at the same time we 262 00:14:26,160 --> 00:14:28,040 Speaker 1: have to be able to look to the animal world 263 00:14:28,440 --> 00:14:33,920 Speaker 1: and be willing to attribute these, uh these knockdown emotions 264 00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:36,000 Speaker 1: to them as well. Well, yeah, I mean that that's 265 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:37,640 Speaker 1: the other side of it. I mean, some people I 266 00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:40,800 Speaker 1: think would say you're being stingy if you say that 267 00:14:40,800 --> 00:14:43,000 Speaker 1: that an argonaut can't love. But then I think there 268 00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:45,880 Speaker 1: are also people who would say, like, you're really, you know, 269 00:14:46,040 --> 00:14:49,240 Speaker 1: degrading my feeling of my relationships and and my love 270 00:14:49,280 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 1: if you say that an octopus can do the same thing. Right, 271 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:54,600 Speaker 1: So it gets it gets complicated, and there's plenty of 272 00:14:54,720 --> 00:14:57,000 Speaker 1: room to be piste off on both sides. So hopefully 273 00:14:57,000 --> 00:14:59,400 Speaker 1: we'll piss everyone off as we proceed here. Well, maybe 274 00:14:59,440 --> 00:15:00,920 Speaker 1: we should take a break and then when we come 275 00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:03,840 Speaker 1: back we can try to address the thorny, difficult question 276 00:15:03,880 --> 00:15:11,160 Speaker 1: of what our emotions. Alright, we're back, So to proceed here, 277 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,960 Speaker 1: we're going to have to take a quick stab an 278 00:15:14,120 --> 00:15:19,200 Speaker 1: exceedingly huge and complicated question which is what our emotions. 279 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:22,480 Speaker 1: Obviously this is something we can't answer adequately in a 280 00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:25,280 Speaker 1: subsection of one episode, but we'll do our best to 281 00:15:25,600 --> 00:15:28,160 Speaker 1: try to hint at the broad picture of what this 282 00:15:28,240 --> 00:15:31,640 Speaker 1: question entails. Yeah, it can be so tricky to even 283 00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:34,840 Speaker 1: contemplate this because because one of the big things is 284 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:40,120 Speaker 1: that emotions are the tumultuous see that we're constantly immersed 285 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:42,440 Speaker 1: in and where we feel cast about in, you know. 286 00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:44,920 Speaker 1: And this is again this gets into poetry as well, Right, 287 00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:48,880 Speaker 1: how many poems are about you know, the mailstorm of emotion, 288 00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:51,520 Speaker 1: you know, and and and how we just feel like 289 00:15:51,520 --> 00:15:53,640 Speaker 1: we're just a victim to them. Well, yeah, I mean 290 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:56,200 Speaker 1: we we often think of emotions as being something that's 291 00:15:56,240 --> 00:15:59,440 Speaker 1: inside us, but it's almost more apt to think of 292 00:15:59,520 --> 00:16:02,160 Speaker 1: us as being inside them. Like we can't see the 293 00:16:02,200 --> 00:16:05,240 Speaker 1: whole thing, We don't have perspective. We're it's more like 294 00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:07,280 Speaker 1: a c on which we are floating. I think that's 295 00:16:07,320 --> 00:16:10,200 Speaker 1: a great metaphor. And yet at the same time we 296 00:16:10,280 --> 00:16:13,880 Speaker 1: are the sea, you know, Like we often fall into this, uh, 297 00:16:13,920 --> 00:16:15,880 Speaker 1: into this model that I think is largely what you 298 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: see in the work of some of the you know, 299 00:16:17,720 --> 00:16:21,360 Speaker 1: the classic philosophers of logic and emotion, and then like 300 00:16:21,480 --> 00:16:23,840 Speaker 1: logic is the domain of you know, logic and reason 301 00:16:24,160 --> 00:16:26,880 Speaker 1: on one hand, and then they're the enemies of passion 302 00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:30,240 Speaker 1: that uh, that that tear us apart, the Apollo and 303 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:33,120 Speaker 1: Dionysus model exactly. Yeah, and so it's easy to fall 304 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:34,920 Speaker 1: back on that. It's just baked into so much of 305 00:16:34,920 --> 00:16:38,120 Speaker 1: our culture. Yeah, And and just in general, emotion is 306 00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:40,240 Speaker 1: just something we're too close to. I sometimes feel I 307 00:16:40,360 --> 00:16:43,440 Speaker 1: feel that emotion is like a cantalope, you know, like 308 00:16:43,440 --> 00:16:45,520 Speaker 1: when you buy a cantalope. When you cut, you don't 309 00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:47,080 Speaker 1: know what it's gonna be. You cut into it, though, 310 00:16:47,320 --> 00:16:50,400 Speaker 1: and when it's great, there's nothing else like it. It's amazing, 311 00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,600 Speaker 1: And when it's bad, it's just the worst. I don't 312 00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:55,480 Speaker 1: know if I feel this way about candleop I feel 313 00:16:55,520 --> 00:17:00,080 Speaker 1: this way about tomatoes. Yeah, tom tomato. My favorite food 314 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:02,560 Speaker 1: in the world is a really good ripe summer tomato. 315 00:17:02,680 --> 00:17:05,920 Speaker 1: And there's nothing worse than a meli offseason tomato. Yes, 316 00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:09,160 Speaker 1: the tomato is also a great example of human emotion. 317 00:17:09,720 --> 00:17:13,280 Speaker 1: And I think a lot of our meditative and monastic 318 00:17:13,280 --> 00:17:16,640 Speaker 1: traditions are ultimately aimed at fostering as much as possible, 319 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:20,320 Speaker 1: a dependable honeydew melon mental state, something where you know, 320 00:17:20,359 --> 00:17:22,760 Speaker 1: you cut into it and it's not gonna be just 321 00:17:22,800 --> 00:17:25,160 Speaker 1: it's not gonna knock your socks off, but it's also 322 00:17:25,280 --> 00:17:27,720 Speaker 1: not going to discuss you. It's going to be a nice, pleasant, 323 00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:31,119 Speaker 1: dependable experience right there in the middle, calming the seas, 324 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:36,399 Speaker 1: eliminating the highs and lows, creating equanimity. So this is 325 00:17:36,440 --> 00:17:38,640 Speaker 1: this is where we are. You know, we're feeling creatures 326 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:40,960 Speaker 1: for better or worse. But we've always tried to figure 327 00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:44,280 Speaker 1: out emotions. We've tried to figure it out for for ages. 328 00:17:44,320 --> 00:17:49,080 Speaker 1: The greatest thinkers, philosophers, artists, scientist sages, uh, you know, 329 00:17:49,160 --> 00:17:53,760 Speaker 1: religious leaders throughout history have contemplated their nature and formulated 330 00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:56,840 Speaker 1: various theories. And we could easily do a multi part 331 00:17:56,880 --> 00:17:59,359 Speaker 1: series on the question of human emotions. But the short 332 00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:03,680 Speaker 1: view is that we have basically three ways of considering them. 333 00:18:03,720 --> 00:18:06,440 Speaker 1: First of all, there's the idea of emotions as feelings. 334 00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:09,160 Speaker 1: The way they feel is what they are, so it's 335 00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:13,080 Speaker 1: a subjective state. And in that sense, the only emotion 336 00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:16,440 Speaker 1: you can ever really know is your own, like you 337 00:18:16,760 --> 00:18:19,679 Speaker 1: cannot share in anybody else's. You can think you do, 338 00:18:19,880 --> 00:18:22,320 Speaker 1: but you can't know for sure. I mean, does somebody 339 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:25,680 Speaker 1: else's sadness feel like yours does? To somebody else's happiness 340 00:18:25,720 --> 00:18:29,359 Speaker 1: feel like yours does? It's it's you. You are trapped 341 00:18:29,400 --> 00:18:31,480 Speaker 1: with your subjectivity here, right, And then when you get 342 00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:33,760 Speaker 1: into theory of mind, I mean, I mean, that's a 343 00:18:33,760 --> 00:18:37,439 Speaker 1: whole issue there and itself, like, to what what degree 344 00:18:37,480 --> 00:18:40,399 Speaker 1: do we attribute the same level of emotional investment to others? 345 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:43,400 Speaker 1: And in what cases are we attributing too much emotion 346 00:18:43,440 --> 00:18:46,520 Speaker 1: to this individual and less emotion to this individual based 347 00:18:46,560 --> 00:18:48,879 Speaker 1: on a whole host of reasons. Well so, but if 348 00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,800 Speaker 1: emotion is just subjectivity, it seems hopeless that you could 349 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:54,440 Speaker 1: ever try to study it in animals. Right, If it's 350 00:18:54,520 --> 00:18:59,080 Speaker 1: just a subjective experience, we have no access to it whatsoever. Right, 351 00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:01,480 Speaker 1: And and that would be the danger, right if it 352 00:19:01,520 --> 00:19:05,600 Speaker 1: was just perpetually tied up in the other human concepts 353 00:19:05,600 --> 00:19:10,280 Speaker 1: of say, like consciousness and u uh in theory of mind, etcetera. 354 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:12,600 Speaker 1: But then we have these other two categories. First of all, 355 00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:18,720 Speaker 1: emotions as evaluations. Emotions are evaluations of the primary circumstances 356 00:19:18,760 --> 00:19:21,640 Speaker 1: that we're dealing with. So, you know, a huge tie 357 00:19:21,720 --> 00:19:25,960 Speaker 1: to the environmental stimuli, situational stimuli all around us. So 358 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:29,920 Speaker 1: emotions are ways of reacting to the world that their 359 00:19:30,080 --> 00:19:34,360 Speaker 1: internal states that signal a certain response to what you're 360 00:19:34,359 --> 00:19:37,240 Speaker 1: seeing or dealing with. Right, you go through a haunted 361 00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:41,720 Speaker 1: attraction around Halloween and you you feel something like fear 362 00:19:41,920 --> 00:19:44,960 Speaker 1: or that sort of related safe feeling of fear, whatever, 363 00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:47,520 Speaker 1: however you want to categorize it. Uh, that is a 364 00:19:47,560 --> 00:19:50,800 Speaker 1: product of the environment you thrust yourself into, all right, 365 00:19:50,880 --> 00:19:54,320 Speaker 1: And if these are internal states that are products of 366 00:19:54,320 --> 00:19:57,239 Speaker 1: evaluating an environment, you could then start to look at 367 00:19:57,240 --> 00:20:00,440 Speaker 1: patterns about what the what the features of those internal 368 00:20:00,440 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 1: states are, what do they do to the brain, what 369 00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:04,920 Speaker 1: do they cause? How do they cause you to react? 370 00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:06,640 Speaker 1: And I guess that would bring us to the next 371 00:20:06,640 --> 00:20:09,520 Speaker 1: way of looking at it. Right, Yes, emotions as motivations. 372 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:14,280 Speaker 1: Emotions as primarily motivating states. So basically this would be 373 00:20:14,280 --> 00:20:17,159 Speaker 1: a situation of where I am angry and therefore I 374 00:20:17,280 --> 00:20:19,919 Speaker 1: strike out at somebody. It causes you to act in 375 00:20:19,920 --> 00:20:23,560 Speaker 1: a certain way. So there's a lot more to it 376 00:20:23,600 --> 00:20:25,520 Speaker 1: than this, but these are those sort of the three 377 00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:28,959 Speaker 1: basic pillars that are often discussed. So seemingly, you know 378 00:20:29,000 --> 00:20:32,119 Speaker 1: we can strike because we are angry. We're angry because 379 00:20:32,119 --> 00:20:35,159 Speaker 1: we strike, and then we also just feel angry, and 380 00:20:35,200 --> 00:20:38,120 Speaker 1: it all becomes this kind of cat's cradle of um 381 00:20:38,160 --> 00:20:42,600 Speaker 1: of physiology, behavior, and situational context. Another way to think 382 00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:45,280 Speaker 1: of emotions is this UH. This is a definition that 383 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:50,040 Speaker 1: is often used conscious mental reactions that we subjectively experience, 384 00:20:50,440 --> 00:20:53,160 Speaker 1: and these strong feelings are typically directed towards a specific 385 00:20:53,240 --> 00:20:57,480 Speaker 1: object or person, resulting in or caused by UH or 386 00:20:57,560 --> 00:21:02,080 Speaker 1: certainly accompanied by physiological and aavioral change. However, as we'll 387 00:21:02,119 --> 00:21:05,760 Speaker 1: discussing these episodes, throwing consciousness into it rather complicates things 388 00:21:05,920 --> 00:21:08,560 Speaker 1: when we look to other animals, because while emotions are 389 00:21:08,560 --> 00:21:13,159 Speaker 1: certainly tied up in the human conscious experience, is consciousness 390 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: really required to have emotion? I think there is an 391 00:21:15,760 --> 00:21:18,720 Speaker 1: extremely strong argument that it is not. Well, you can 392 00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:24,520 Speaker 1: certainly imagine, say a robot that models emotional states without 393 00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:28,600 Speaker 1: being conscious, right, right, And so you don't know if 394 00:21:28,640 --> 00:21:30,800 Speaker 1: that's the case for any other animals. You don't know 395 00:21:30,960 --> 00:21:34,520 Speaker 1: to what extent they're subjectively feeling emotions like you and 396 00:21:34,560 --> 00:21:39,760 Speaker 1: I do, or like you presumably do. The robot could 397 00:21:39,760 --> 00:21:42,840 Speaker 1: still act angry, and it would still do all the 398 00:21:42,920 --> 00:21:45,280 Speaker 1: things that an angry person would do, or a robot 399 00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:48,679 Speaker 1: could act sad and still have all the reactions a 400 00:21:48,720 --> 00:21:51,400 Speaker 1: sad person would have. Like if again, if you're coming 401 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:55,640 Speaker 1: back to emotions as evaluations, you could consider a screensaver 402 00:21:56,000 --> 00:21:57,919 Speaker 1: on a This is a very simple model of it, 403 00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:00,879 Speaker 1: but a screensaver on a computer s marine is a 404 00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:04,320 Speaker 1: response to um to what's going on in the world, 405 00:22:04,359 --> 00:22:07,080 Speaker 1: Like nobody's using the keyboard right now, somebody's away from 406 00:22:07,119 --> 00:22:11,960 Speaker 1: the machine, so a relaxed date comes into place. There 407 00:22:12,040 --> 00:22:14,159 Speaker 1: is a paper we're gonna look at later in the episode. Well, 408 00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:15,760 Speaker 1: we'll come back to it in a bit, but it's 409 00:22:15,760 --> 00:22:19,280 Speaker 1: by a Clint J. Perry and Luigi Baccia Donna that 410 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:22,600 Speaker 1: tried to put together all all of these disparate ways 411 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:25,640 Speaker 1: of looking at emotion into a single definition that could 412 00:22:25,640 --> 00:22:29,640 Speaker 1: be used for objective research purposes, and it comes out 413 00:22:29,840 --> 00:22:32,440 Speaker 1: with something that will really make your heart burn. Is 414 00:22:32,520 --> 00:22:37,080 Speaker 1: just you know, full of feeling. Quote. Emotions are transient 415 00:22:37,240 --> 00:22:44,399 Speaker 1: central states comprising subjective, cognitive, behavioral, and physiological phenomena that 416 00:22:44,440 --> 00:22:48,480 Speaker 1: are triggered by appraisal of certain types of environmental stimuli. 417 00:22:49,480 --> 00:22:51,160 Speaker 1: On one hand, I think that's great because it really 418 00:22:51,200 --> 00:22:54,040 Speaker 1: does capture all the things you'd be looking for if 419 00:22:54,040 --> 00:22:56,760 Speaker 1: you're trying to study emotions in a scientific way. On 420 00:22:56,840 --> 00:22:59,720 Speaker 1: the other hand, that just sounds hilarious. I think that's 421 00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:02,640 Speaker 1: that's sentence is a great It is a great example 422 00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:04,960 Speaker 1: of why you need those three categories, because if you 423 00:23:05,040 --> 00:23:06,960 Speaker 1: run it all together there it just sounds it's a 424 00:23:06,960 --> 00:23:09,919 Speaker 1: little overwhelming. But if you break it down into three definite, 425 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:13,680 Speaker 1: definite categories of consideration, I feel like it. It makes 426 00:23:13,720 --> 00:23:15,600 Speaker 1: a lot more sense, at least to me. Yeah, well, 427 00:23:15,680 --> 00:23:18,840 Speaker 1: we'll come back to another pretty similar way of breaking 428 00:23:18,840 --> 00:23:20,560 Speaker 1: it down when we actually look at the study. But 429 00:23:20,680 --> 00:23:22,720 Speaker 1: first I wanted to come back to the eight armed 430 00:23:22,720 --> 00:23:25,000 Speaker 1: world where we started, So we started off talking about 431 00:23:25,000 --> 00:23:28,119 Speaker 1: the paper Nautilus, the also known as the argonaut, this 432 00:23:28,280 --> 00:23:32,720 Speaker 1: great octopus that that builds a fortress of love. I 433 00:23:32,760 --> 00:23:35,879 Speaker 1: think the octopus world is a great place to start 434 00:23:35,920 --> 00:23:39,399 Speaker 1: if we're looking for what would be the clearest, easiest 435 00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:44,000 Speaker 1: examples to find of something that really, at least intuitively 436 00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:48,720 Speaker 1: looks like emotions in the invertebrate world. Because of course 437 00:23:48,800 --> 00:23:51,040 Speaker 1: it's it's long been a debate about whether thoughts and 438 00:23:51,080 --> 00:23:53,920 Speaker 1: emotions can be said to exist in animals other than humans. 439 00:23:53,960 --> 00:23:56,320 Speaker 1: You know, a lot of scientists would take issue with 440 00:23:56,359 --> 00:23:59,480 Speaker 1: saying that there are emotions in any non human animals 441 00:23:59,520 --> 00:24:02,000 Speaker 1: because they would say, well, if we use human terms 442 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:05,520 Speaker 1: like happy and sad, that's just anthropomorphic projection. There's no 443 00:24:05,560 --> 00:24:08,640 Speaker 1: way to prove it, and so forth. But I really 444 00:24:08,680 --> 00:24:12,080 Speaker 1: think intuitively most people are comfortable with the idea that 445 00:24:12,400 --> 00:24:16,040 Speaker 1: some analogs to human emotions exist in other animals with 446 00:24:16,080 --> 00:24:20,720 Speaker 1: complex brains, like mammals and birds. Yeah. I mean again, 447 00:24:20,760 --> 00:24:24,040 Speaker 1: I think part of the whole exercise is is casting 448 00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:28,119 Speaker 1: emotions down from that golden pedestal, casting away the poetry 449 00:24:28,600 --> 00:24:31,960 Speaker 1: and and thinking again about what they actually are. And 450 00:24:32,160 --> 00:24:36,680 Speaker 1: certainly it's I imagine that a duck is not It 451 00:24:36,720 --> 00:24:40,560 Speaker 1: never finds itself feeling sad about being sad or something, 452 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:44,199 Speaker 1: so you know, conscious as the human model, but something 453 00:24:44,280 --> 00:24:47,960 Speaker 1: like sadness that we feel, you, you can certainly imagine 454 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:50,120 Speaker 1: it in a duck or a cat or or any 455 00:24:50,160 --> 00:24:53,280 Speaker 1: of these. Certainly, these these higher organisms that come to mind. 456 00:24:53,440 --> 00:24:55,679 Speaker 1: I mean, it's really easy to see things that at 457 00:24:55,720 --> 00:24:59,439 Speaker 1: least really intuitively look like emotions, whether we're interpreting them 458 00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:02,960 Speaker 1: right or not. In social animals like dogs, it's really 459 00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:05,040 Speaker 1: hard for me not to look at my dog and 460 00:25:05,280 --> 00:25:08,320 Speaker 1: think my dog is happy right now, or my dog 461 00:25:08,400 --> 00:25:11,560 Speaker 1: is angry or something right. I mean, with all the 462 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:14,600 Speaker 1: complexities to come with with with making those kind of 463 00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 1: statements about an animal, because again we can know, we 464 00:25:18,119 --> 00:25:22,160 Speaker 1: can never deny the power of anthropomorphism exactly. But one 465 00:25:22,160 --> 00:25:23,760 Speaker 1: of the first places I wanted to go here with 466 00:25:23,800 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 1: invertebrates is that I think what I just said about 467 00:25:26,600 --> 00:25:30,760 Speaker 1: my dog, this powerful intuitive sense of my you know, 468 00:25:30,880 --> 00:25:33,920 Speaker 1: day to day experience with a canine, that this animal 469 00:25:34,040 --> 00:25:36,720 Speaker 1: does feel emotions that are in some way similar to 470 00:25:36,760 --> 00:25:38,919 Speaker 1: the emotions I feel. If you wanted to look for 471 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:42,480 Speaker 1: this pattern of intuition outside of our relationships with mammals, 472 00:25:42,760 --> 00:25:44,879 Speaker 1: I think the octopus is a great place to start. 473 00:25:44,920 --> 00:25:47,399 Speaker 1: So a couple of years ago, one of the books 474 00:25:47,440 --> 00:25:49,960 Speaker 1: that I recommended in our summer reading episode was a 475 00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:53,760 Speaker 1: book by an author named Si Montgomery called The Soul 476 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:55,879 Speaker 1: of an Octopus, which is sort of a cross between 477 00:25:55,920 --> 00:25:59,960 Speaker 1: a zoology book about the octopus and a memoir about 478 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:03,800 Speaker 1: the author's personal experiences with octopus minds and the people 479 00:26:03,840 --> 00:26:06,920 Speaker 1: who study and care for octopuses. And that book really 480 00:26:07,280 --> 00:26:09,520 Speaker 1: it still sticks with me today, and one of the 481 00:26:09,560 --> 00:26:12,520 Speaker 1: main reasons is that she presents in it all of 482 00:26:12,560 --> 00:26:17,879 Speaker 1: these anecdotes that look like genuinely powerful emotional connections and 483 00:26:17,960 --> 00:26:24,560 Speaker 1: interactions between humans and cephalopods. It reflects this steady, unshakable 484 00:26:24,600 --> 00:26:28,159 Speaker 1: sensation that many people who work with octopuses get, which is, 485 00:26:28,200 --> 00:26:32,400 Speaker 1: on one hand they see this strange alien kind of intelligence, 486 00:26:32,440 --> 00:26:34,760 Speaker 1: but on the other hand, they see a very familiar 487 00:26:34,840 --> 00:26:38,480 Speaker 1: human kind of intelligence and even emotion at work. Of course, 488 00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:41,560 Speaker 1: again with all the caveats that these impressions, you know, 489 00:26:41,600 --> 00:26:44,800 Speaker 1: they could be anthropomorphic projection. I think it's at least 490 00:26:44,800 --> 00:26:47,479 Speaker 1: worth looking at the types of encounters that lead to 491 00:26:47,520 --> 00:26:51,320 Speaker 1: this sort of thinking, whether the thinking is correct or not. Yeah, yeah, 492 00:26:51,320 --> 00:26:53,760 Speaker 1: I agree that the octopus is a great example to 493 00:26:53,800 --> 00:26:56,920 Speaker 1: look to because it checks off so many opposite boxes. 494 00:26:57,400 --> 00:26:59,880 Speaker 1: You know, it is it is a It is a solid, 495 00:27:00,080 --> 00:27:04,080 Speaker 1: very creature that that lives in in a different environment 496 00:27:04,400 --> 00:27:07,240 Speaker 1: than we do, that has a totally different structure to 497 00:27:07,320 --> 00:27:11,879 Speaker 1: its body. It's it's like an alien compared to us. 498 00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:15,320 Speaker 1: Distributed intelligence. Also, I mean, the intelligence of an octopus 499 00:27:15,440 --> 00:27:17,800 Speaker 1: is not just central in its head, it's it's it 500 00:27:17,840 --> 00:27:20,600 Speaker 1: appears to be able to think with its arms in 501 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:23,119 Speaker 1: ways that you know, if we can do something like that, 502 00:27:23,160 --> 00:27:26,400 Speaker 1: it's in a much more limited sense. So to cite 503 00:27:26,400 --> 00:27:29,000 Speaker 1: a couple of the many anecdotes and examples that appear 504 00:27:29,040 --> 00:27:32,080 Speaker 1: in the book, the first one is that at one 505 00:27:32,119 --> 00:27:35,600 Speaker 1: point she's sharing a story from a biologist named Scott Doud. 506 00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:38,440 Speaker 1: So Doubt is working in an aquarium where one of 507 00:27:38,520 --> 00:27:42,280 Speaker 1: his jobs is taking care of a dwarf Caribbean octopus 508 00:27:42,640 --> 00:27:45,639 Speaker 1: who lives in one of the small display tanks. And 509 00:27:45,840 --> 00:27:49,400 Speaker 1: one morning Doubt comes in to find this octopuss tank 510 00:27:49,520 --> 00:27:52,960 Speaker 1: overflowing onto the floor, and the octopus itself seems to 511 00:27:53,119 --> 00:27:56,960 Speaker 1: have vanished. It's not anywhere to be seen, and eventually 512 00:27:57,000 --> 00:28:00,080 Speaker 1: he finds it. He finds that it has managed to 513 00:28:00,119 --> 00:28:04,800 Speaker 1: squeeze itself into the tiny pipe that recirculates water in 514 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:08,160 Speaker 1: the tank. This pipe is only about half an inch wide. 515 00:28:08,720 --> 00:28:11,400 Speaker 1: So obviously there's a problem because the water can't recirculate 516 00:28:11,400 --> 00:28:14,040 Speaker 1: because the octopus is clogging the pipe, and you need 517 00:28:14,119 --> 00:28:16,679 Speaker 1: to get the octopus out of the pipe. So what 518 00:28:16,720 --> 00:28:18,520 Speaker 1: do you do? I have no idea what you'd even 519 00:28:18,520 --> 00:28:20,680 Speaker 1: begin to do to get something out of an aperture 520 00:28:20,720 --> 00:28:24,240 Speaker 1: that's small without harming it. But Dowd in this moment. 521 00:28:24,280 --> 00:28:29,240 Speaker 1: He remembers having seen a National geographic special about fisherman 522 00:28:29,320 --> 00:28:33,040 Speaker 1: in Greece who were catching octopuses by setting out in 523 00:28:33,200 --> 00:28:37,000 Speaker 1: flora pots in the ocean as traps, and the octopuses 524 00:28:37,000 --> 00:28:40,680 Speaker 1: would squeeze themselves into these pots, which seemed like perfect 525 00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:43,320 Speaker 1: dens for them, only to then get hauled up to 526 00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:46,160 Speaker 1: the surface by the fisherman. But how do you get 527 00:28:46,160 --> 00:28:49,040 Speaker 1: the octopus out of the pot without breaking the pot? Well, 528 00:28:49,080 --> 00:28:52,960 Speaker 1: there was a very simple solution. These octopuses were saltwater creatures, 529 00:28:53,000 --> 00:28:57,000 Speaker 1: and the fishermen would pour fresh water into the pots. 530 00:28:57,000 --> 00:28:59,880 Speaker 1: So the octopus is obviously being you know, evolved for 531 00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:02,600 Speaker 1: saltwater environment. They don't like this at all, and they 532 00:29:02,600 --> 00:29:05,520 Speaker 1: would immediately slither out of the pot and be captured. 533 00:29:06,120 --> 00:29:08,520 Speaker 1: All right, That that makes sense. So of course Dowd 534 00:29:08,600 --> 00:29:11,160 Speaker 1: didn't want to kill and eat the dwarf octopus in 535 00:29:11,240 --> 00:29:13,480 Speaker 1: the tank, but he figured that the same process might 536 00:29:13,520 --> 00:29:16,080 Speaker 1: work to get it out of the pipe, and it did. Uh. 537 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:18,920 Speaker 1: He flushed it with fresh water and the octopus came out. 538 00:29:19,720 --> 00:29:23,600 Speaker 1: Now years later, he tried the same trick to subdue 539 00:29:23,680 --> 00:29:28,040 Speaker 1: a misbehaving female giant Pacific octopus that he's working with 540 00:29:28,080 --> 00:29:30,959 Speaker 1: and a lot of the emotional connections that people have 541 00:29:31,080 --> 00:29:34,440 Speaker 1: with octopuses in this book are with these giant Pacific octopuses. 542 00:29:34,480 --> 00:29:36,800 Speaker 1: They've they've got a lot of personality. But the story 543 00:29:36,840 --> 00:29:39,720 Speaker 1: goes that Dowd would you know, he was dealing with 544 00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:41,840 Speaker 1: this octopus. He would lift the top of the tank 545 00:29:41,920 --> 00:29:44,800 Speaker 1: up to feed it, and and she would put her 546 00:29:44,960 --> 00:29:48,640 Speaker 1: arms out and attach herself to his hands, and he 547 00:29:48,640 --> 00:29:51,280 Speaker 1: would be unable to get her to let go. And 548 00:29:51,320 --> 00:29:53,920 Speaker 1: if he managed to peel one of the creature's arms 549 00:29:53,960 --> 00:29:56,760 Speaker 1: off of him, she would just instantly wrapped two or more, 550 00:29:57,000 --> 00:29:59,280 Speaker 1: you know, around the same hand. Again, So like, how 551 00:29:59,320 --> 00:30:01,640 Speaker 1: do you get this pus off of you? Well, he 552 00:30:01,680 --> 00:30:04,640 Speaker 1: remembered his earlier experience with the tiny octopus in the 553 00:30:04,640 --> 00:30:07,240 Speaker 1: fresh water, so he got the idea to repel the 554 00:30:07,320 --> 00:30:10,200 Speaker 1: larger octopus the same way. He filled up a picture 555 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:12,720 Speaker 1: in the sink and he poured it over the octopus 556 00:30:12,720 --> 00:30:15,120 Speaker 1: clinging to his hand, and again, at first it worked. 557 00:30:15,200 --> 00:30:18,920 Speaker 1: The octopus let go of him and recoiled sharply, and 558 00:30:19,080 --> 00:30:21,360 Speaker 1: Dowd said, for a moment he was proud of himself 559 00:30:21,440 --> 00:30:25,440 Speaker 1: for having rediscovered this useful trick and outsmarted this crafty creature. 560 00:30:25,800 --> 00:30:28,320 Speaker 1: But then to read the next section from Montgomery's book, 561 00:30:29,120 --> 00:30:33,160 Speaker 1: But the octopus was incensed. Quote she got scarlet red 562 00:30:33,280 --> 00:30:36,200 Speaker 1: and really thorny. It was a heated moment. What I 563 00:30:36,240 --> 00:30:39,520 Speaker 1: didn't notice, he said, was she was blowing herself up. 564 00:30:40,120 --> 00:30:43,200 Speaker 1: She siphoned up a massive load of water and gushed 565 00:30:43,240 --> 00:30:46,600 Speaker 1: a major surge of salt water onto my face. As 566 00:30:46,600 --> 00:30:49,800 Speaker 1: he stood there, dripping, Scott noticed the octopus had the 567 00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:52,360 Speaker 1: same look on her face as I must have had 568 00:30:52,400 --> 00:30:55,600 Speaker 1: on mine when I thought I had outwitted her. Now, 569 00:30:55,640 --> 00:30:58,240 Speaker 1: which part of the octopus is the face? Now Here? Here? 570 00:30:58,280 --> 00:31:00,120 Speaker 1: You may be onto something. I don't know. How do 571 00:31:00,160 --> 00:31:04,320 Speaker 1: you find the octopus is face? I mean it's got eyes, 572 00:31:04,360 --> 00:31:07,000 Speaker 1: but they're not really front facing, are they? I mean 573 00:31:07,080 --> 00:31:10,920 Speaker 1: we can easily, I mean again, our anthropomorphic powers are 574 00:31:10,960 --> 00:31:13,960 Speaker 1: such that we can easily devise one. I believe there 575 00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:17,440 Speaker 1: was a wasn't there recently an issue with the masters 576 00:31:17,440 --> 00:31:21,280 Speaker 1: of emoticons. They made an octopus emoticon that rearranged the 577 00:31:21,320 --> 00:31:24,160 Speaker 1: anatomy to make it look more face like, and I 578 00:31:24,200 --> 00:31:28,360 Speaker 1: believe a biologist corrected them on this. Oh wait a minute, though, 579 00:31:28,560 --> 00:31:31,800 Speaker 1: I know that you find an octopus face sometimes when 580 00:31:31,800 --> 00:31:34,200 Speaker 1: you look into your environment, because when you see the 581 00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:38,560 Speaker 1: forked coat hook on the door, you see the boxer octopus. Yes, 582 00:31:38,640 --> 00:31:42,120 Speaker 1: but I see a cartoon octopus. And cartoons are human 583 00:31:42,360 --> 00:31:47,280 Speaker 1: and have faces. Cartoon animals are generally animals that have 584 00:31:47,280 --> 00:31:49,720 Speaker 1: been made human. Okay, I guess you're right about that. 585 00:31:50,400 --> 00:31:53,520 Speaker 1: But coming back to the story about about Scott doubt 586 00:31:53,520 --> 00:31:56,120 Speaker 1: in the octopus, that there is something about this kind 587 00:31:56,160 --> 00:32:01,400 Speaker 1: of apparent anger and reciprocal vengeance that feels very much 588 00:32:01,520 --> 00:32:05,080 Speaker 1: like an analog of complex human emotion. Again, maybe you know, 589 00:32:05,160 --> 00:32:08,000 Speaker 1: we're maybe we're just overreading into a single anecdote, but 590 00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:11,040 Speaker 1: the book is full of anecdotes like this where people 591 00:32:11,080 --> 00:32:15,200 Speaker 1: really feel like they're having these emotionally charged interactions with 592 00:32:15,280 --> 00:32:18,440 Speaker 1: these eight armed critters. Yeah, Like a defensive display is 593 00:32:18,520 --> 00:32:21,840 Speaker 1: essentially what we're talking about here, um and and like 594 00:32:22,000 --> 00:32:24,760 Speaker 1: that does have an emotional resonance. Like if you see 595 00:32:25,240 --> 00:32:28,800 Speaker 1: a cat with a defensive display, a horse, a dog, etcetera, 596 00:32:29,080 --> 00:32:31,680 Speaker 1: Like you know what they're about, that there's a message 597 00:32:31,680 --> 00:32:34,600 Speaker 1: they are sending. Then there is a presumed emotional state 598 00:32:34,960 --> 00:32:38,000 Speaker 1: behind it. And you know, we we we get it. 599 00:32:38,040 --> 00:32:39,280 Speaker 1: We don't even have to be able to put it 600 00:32:39,280 --> 00:32:41,880 Speaker 1: into words to to know what that state is. Yeah, 601 00:32:41,960 --> 00:32:44,120 Speaker 1: and the really interesting part is not that it was 602 00:32:44,160 --> 00:32:48,120 Speaker 1: a defensive display when something was about to happen that 603 00:32:48,160 --> 00:32:51,680 Speaker 1: the octopus didn't like. It happened after, like he poured 604 00:32:51,720 --> 00:32:53,440 Speaker 1: the fresh water on it, then it went back in 605 00:32:53,520 --> 00:32:55,920 Speaker 1: its tank. Then it puffed up and got red and 606 00:32:56,040 --> 00:32:59,360 Speaker 1: shot him back, Like isn't that much more interesting than 607 00:32:59,400 --> 00:33:02,040 Speaker 1: if he'd been coming at it with something it didn't want. 608 00:33:02,680 --> 00:33:04,120 Speaker 1: But there's another part of the book I wanted to 609 00:33:04,120 --> 00:33:07,680 Speaker 1: talk about real quick that speaks of how persuasive the 610 00:33:07,760 --> 00:33:11,520 Speaker 1: octopus's behavior was in convincing the people who worked with 611 00:33:11,560 --> 00:33:15,120 Speaker 1: them that they had character, personality, and something like an 612 00:33:15,120 --> 00:33:18,560 Speaker 1: inner life quote. The students were supposed to refer to 613 00:33:18,640 --> 00:33:21,800 Speaker 1: their animals by numbers in their research papers, but they 614 00:33:21,880 --> 00:33:27,840 Speaker 1: ended up calling them by name jet Stream, Martha, Gertrude, Henry, Bob. 615 00:33:28,320 --> 00:33:31,760 Speaker 1: Some were so friendly. A researcher named Alexa said they 616 00:33:31,760 --> 00:33:33,960 Speaker 1: would lift their arms out of the water like a 617 00:33:34,120 --> 00:33:36,880 Speaker 1: dog jumps up to greet you, or like a child 618 00:33:36,920 --> 00:33:39,560 Speaker 1: who wants to be lifted up and hugged. And then 619 00:33:39,680 --> 00:33:42,120 Speaker 1: there's a there's one more story from Alexa in there. 620 00:33:42,400 --> 00:33:45,800 Speaker 1: Uh where she says quote and then there was Windy. 621 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:49,000 Speaker 1: Alexe used her as part of her thesis presentation. It 622 00:33:49,120 --> 00:33:51,920 Speaker 1: was a formal event that was videotaped, for which Alexa 623 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:55,120 Speaker 1: wore a nice suit. As soon as the camera started rolling, 624 00:33:55,160 --> 00:33:58,880 Speaker 1: Wendy drenched the student with salt water. The octopus scurried 625 00:33:58,920 --> 00:34:00,800 Speaker 1: to the bottom of the tank, hid in the sand, 626 00:34:00,840 --> 00:34:04,600 Speaker 1: and refused to come out. Alexas convinced the whole debacle 627 00:34:04,640 --> 00:34:07,760 Speaker 1: occurred because the octopus realized in advance what was going 628 00:34:07,800 --> 00:34:11,040 Speaker 1: to happen and resolve to prevent it. It's crafty. Now. 629 00:34:11,040 --> 00:34:13,360 Speaker 1: On the other hand, I think we need to recognize 630 00:34:13,400 --> 00:34:16,319 Speaker 1: that the subjective impressions of people who work directly with 631 00:34:16,360 --> 00:34:18,640 Speaker 1: animals are probably going to be prone to all kinds 632 00:34:18,680 --> 00:34:21,680 Speaker 1: of biases. I mean, even people who work with robots 633 00:34:21,719 --> 00:34:25,400 Speaker 1: tend to attribute lots of essentially human qualities of mind 634 00:34:25,480 --> 00:34:28,440 Speaker 1: to those robots. They name the robots. They think of 635 00:34:28,480 --> 00:34:32,000 Speaker 1: the robots as having personalities and intentions apart from their 636 00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:35,080 Speaker 1: explicit programming. You know, I often think Johnny the room 637 00:34:35,120 --> 00:34:37,799 Speaker 1: Baz is being mischievous. He's chasing me around the house, 638 00:34:37,880 --> 00:34:40,759 Speaker 1: around the kitchen right now. Uh, And yeah, we're not 639 00:34:40,840 --> 00:34:43,960 Speaker 1: tempted to actually think those impressions are telling it telling 640 00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:48,440 Speaker 1: us anything real about the emotions of robots. But I mean, 641 00:34:48,480 --> 00:34:52,600 Speaker 1: to whatever extent it would be useful in dealing with 642 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:57,799 Speaker 1: robot or or more realistically, an animal. Uh, than we 643 00:34:57,840 --> 00:35:01,759 Speaker 1: see the usefulness of that anthropomorphism um like the you know, 644 00:35:01,760 --> 00:35:04,520 Speaker 1: the classic example being like, if you're dealing with an 645 00:35:04,520 --> 00:35:07,319 Speaker 1: animal that could be dangerous when it's uh, when it's 646 00:35:07,320 --> 00:35:11,439 Speaker 1: in a defensive mood, you know, uh, like it's it's 647 00:35:11,760 --> 00:35:16,239 Speaker 1: it's not so much about like the detail of the 648 00:35:16,280 --> 00:35:19,959 Speaker 1: emotion that you were you were imagining in its head, 649 00:35:20,360 --> 00:35:23,239 Speaker 1: but but it's more about the degree to which it 650 00:35:23,400 --> 00:35:26,480 Speaker 1: matches up with how it may act and then allowing 651 00:35:26,560 --> 00:35:30,600 Speaker 1: you to respond appropriately or or to not respond at all. 652 00:35:30,719 --> 00:35:34,040 Speaker 1: Like this this animal is mad, this animal is aggressive. 653 00:35:34,440 --> 00:35:36,960 Speaker 1: I should not get close to it right now, but 654 00:35:37,040 --> 00:35:38,840 Speaker 1: you know, it's it's one thing for a scientist to, 655 00:35:39,400 --> 00:35:42,960 Speaker 1: you know, to have to avoid intentionally inserting their anthropomorphic 656 00:35:43,000 --> 00:35:46,120 Speaker 1: feelings into a study. Uh, you know, but our but again, 657 00:35:46,120 --> 00:35:48,960 Speaker 1: our theory of mind powers are useful in our relationships 658 00:35:48,960 --> 00:35:52,080 Speaker 1: with animals. And I think you can you can, you 659 00:35:52,080 --> 00:35:54,680 Speaker 1: can you can state that they would be useful in 660 00:35:54,680 --> 00:35:57,719 Speaker 1: interactions with animals, even in a study, provided that you 661 00:35:57,800 --> 00:36:01,360 Speaker 1: could still separate those feelings from the data. Sure, I 662 00:36:01,360 --> 00:36:04,160 Speaker 1: mean I would say that they would be useful insofar 663 00:36:04,239 --> 00:36:08,359 Speaker 1: as they accurately predict outcomes, right, which sometimes they can. 664 00:36:08,800 --> 00:36:11,239 Speaker 1: So again, I think it's it's important for us to 665 00:36:11,239 --> 00:36:14,840 Speaker 1: be able to to take human emotions off of the 666 00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:18,279 Speaker 1: pedestal uh and and think more about what they are, 667 00:36:18,480 --> 00:36:21,560 Speaker 1: and and and stating that, Okay, um, you know, the 668 00:36:22,239 --> 00:36:24,480 Speaker 1: mind of an animal, the mind of an octopus or whatever, 669 00:36:24,520 --> 00:36:27,320 Speaker 1: you know, their mind is a vessel that cannot hold 670 00:36:27,320 --> 00:36:30,839 Speaker 1: the shape of our own emotional states. But our experience 671 00:36:30,920 --> 00:36:34,400 Speaker 1: plus theory of mind allows us to have this instantaneous, 672 00:36:34,800 --> 00:36:38,279 Speaker 1: uh you know, almost translingual understanding of the basic properties 673 00:36:38,320 --> 00:36:40,960 Speaker 1: of the other's emotional state. Yeah. I mean, I guess 674 00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:44,400 Speaker 1: anytime we're trying to study emotional states, whether that's in 675 00:36:44,520 --> 00:36:46,960 Speaker 1: animals or really even in other people, I mean, you 676 00:36:47,040 --> 00:36:50,960 Speaker 1: have to accept the subjective disconnect, that you're not necessarily 677 00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:53,960 Speaker 1: talking about the same things in terms of subjective feelings, 678 00:36:54,640 --> 00:36:56,880 Speaker 1: but that once you get into these subjective criteria that 679 00:36:56,920 --> 00:36:59,439 Speaker 1: we alluded to earlier. And I guess what we're coming 680 00:36:59,480 --> 00:37:02,080 Speaker 1: back to now, know, um, you can start to look 681 00:37:02,120 --> 00:37:06,960 Speaker 1: for behavioral and cognitive analogies. Another way of thinking about it, 682 00:37:06,960 --> 00:37:08,840 Speaker 1: to go back to my earlier metaphor of the cat's 683 00:37:08,840 --> 00:37:12,200 Speaker 1: cradle of you know, of getting some yarn and weaving 684 00:37:12,200 --> 00:37:15,359 Speaker 1: it between your your fingers and creating a pattern. Right. Uh, 685 00:37:15,760 --> 00:37:19,120 Speaker 1: you know, criss crossing array of string cast between the 686 00:37:19,160 --> 00:37:23,520 Speaker 1: fingers of two hands. Ultimately, fewer or more fingers are 687 00:37:23,520 --> 00:37:26,359 Speaker 1: not going to make it any less a cat's cradle. Right. 688 00:37:26,840 --> 00:37:29,759 Speaker 1: So if if you know, if five fingers are the 689 00:37:30,160 --> 00:37:35,080 Speaker 1: shape of human cognitive complexity, there's a certain emotional um 690 00:37:35,239 --> 00:37:38,440 Speaker 1: web that we can weave and that we're trapped in 691 00:37:38,560 --> 00:37:42,880 Speaker 1: most of the time. But you know, animals say they 692 00:37:42,920 --> 00:37:47,000 Speaker 1: just have the have three fingers to cast that web with. 693 00:37:47,120 --> 00:37:49,560 Speaker 1: I mean they're still casting the web. And then we 694 00:37:49,640 --> 00:37:52,360 Speaker 1: might easily conceive what would it be like to to 695 00:37:52,520 --> 00:37:54,880 Speaker 1: cast a cat's cradle if you had seven fingers on 696 00:37:54,920 --> 00:37:57,600 Speaker 1: each hand? Uh? It would it would be more complex, 697 00:37:57,600 --> 00:37:59,880 Speaker 1: It might be difficult for us to imagine what that 698 00:38:00,040 --> 00:38:02,799 Speaker 1: would be like cognitively, emotionally, or what have you, but 699 00:38:02,840 --> 00:38:07,040 Speaker 1: it would still be something that is relatable to that experience. Well, 700 00:38:07,080 --> 00:38:08,799 Speaker 1: maybe we should take another break and then when we 701 00:38:08,880 --> 00:38:12,239 Speaker 1: come back, we can discuss relating the human experience of 702 00:38:12,239 --> 00:38:21,360 Speaker 1: emotions to analogous uh behaviors and cognition and animals. Alright, 703 00:38:21,360 --> 00:38:24,400 Speaker 1: we're back. We've been talking about emotion. We've been talking 704 00:38:24,440 --> 00:38:27,960 Speaker 1: about emotion in animals and what exactly we would be 705 00:38:28,000 --> 00:38:31,680 Speaker 1: looking for in trying to find that emotion, especially emotion 706 00:38:31,760 --> 00:38:36,200 Speaker 1: in invertebrates. Because people are generally, I think, more comfortable 707 00:38:36,239 --> 00:38:38,840 Speaker 1: with the idea that we see something strongly analogous to 708 00:38:38,920 --> 00:38:42,040 Speaker 1: human emotions and other animals like say, you know, mammals 709 00:38:42,040 --> 00:38:45,680 Speaker 1: with complex brains, social mammals and stuff, right like not 710 00:38:45,680 --> 00:38:47,480 Speaker 1: Not only is everyone I think pretty on board with 711 00:38:47,520 --> 00:38:50,320 Speaker 1: the idea to say dogs have emotions, or even cats 712 00:38:50,320 --> 00:38:52,960 Speaker 1: have emotions, it would be it would almost be socially 713 00:38:53,040 --> 00:38:57,640 Speaker 1: dangerous to suggest otherwise. Are you saying you want to 714 00:38:57,640 --> 00:39:03,120 Speaker 1: suggest otherwise? No, you're afraid no, No, I think, especially 715 00:39:03,840 --> 00:39:06,440 Speaker 1: again going back to the idea of taking the human 716 00:39:06,480 --> 00:39:09,279 Speaker 1: poetic idea of emotion and bringing it down to a 717 00:39:09,320 --> 00:39:12,640 Speaker 1: more realistic level, stripping the poetry away from it, I 718 00:39:12,680 --> 00:39:15,879 Speaker 1: think without a doubt dogs and cats and and other 719 00:39:16,000 --> 00:39:19,000 Speaker 1: organisms we might even sometimes not not wish to think 720 00:39:19,040 --> 00:39:23,120 Speaker 1: about having emotions such as pigs and cows. Um. Uh, 721 00:39:23,160 --> 00:39:27,560 Speaker 1: you know, they definitely have emotional states. Uh. So yeah, 722 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:29,360 Speaker 1: I would not be the one to suggest that dogs 723 00:39:29,360 --> 00:39:32,319 Speaker 1: don't have emotions. And I pity the person who does 724 00:39:32,440 --> 00:39:35,120 Speaker 1: make that suggestion because they will be attacked on the street. Well, 725 00:39:35,160 --> 00:39:37,080 Speaker 1: let's see if we can start some street fights about 726 00:39:37,080 --> 00:39:40,879 Speaker 1: crowd ads. Okay, so for the next for the rest 727 00:39:40,880 --> 00:39:44,040 Speaker 1: of this episode, and then for most of the next episode. Also, 728 00:39:44,120 --> 00:39:46,160 Speaker 1: I think we're going to be looking mainly at this 729 00:39:46,239 --> 00:39:48,560 Speaker 1: one paper. It was a good paper I found published 730 00:39:48,560 --> 00:39:52,840 Speaker 1: in seventeen in the Journal of Experimental Biology by Clint J. 731 00:39:53,040 --> 00:39:57,640 Speaker 1: Perry and Luigi Battia Donna called studying Emotion in Invertebrates 732 00:39:57,640 --> 00:40:00,399 Speaker 1: What has been done, what can be measured, and what 733 00:40:00,480 --> 00:40:03,880 Speaker 1: they can provide? Uh. And so these two researchers, I 734 00:40:03,880 --> 00:40:07,440 Speaker 1: believe are both at Queen Mary University of London, And 735 00:40:07,480 --> 00:40:10,000 Speaker 1: this is not a single study but large review of 736 00:40:10,080 --> 00:40:14,560 Speaker 1: existing research on invertebrate emotions. There actually aren't that many 737 00:40:14,600 --> 00:40:18,759 Speaker 1: studies on invertebrate emotions. It's a fairly recent field, but 738 00:40:19,200 --> 00:40:21,560 Speaker 1: what is out there is at least in my mind, 739 00:40:21,760 --> 00:40:25,360 Speaker 1: very interesting. Now. The authors point out that Invertebrates have 740 00:40:25,640 --> 00:40:28,880 Speaker 1: long played a role in the history of neuroscience. It 741 00:40:28,960 --> 00:40:32,320 Speaker 1: was researching invertebrates in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries 742 00:40:32,600 --> 00:40:36,520 Speaker 1: that taught us what neurons were and how they were structured. Uh. 743 00:40:36,560 --> 00:40:41,040 Speaker 1: Insects are often believed to lack the structural neural complexity 744 00:40:41,120 --> 00:40:45,440 Speaker 1: necessary to generate complex states like emotions. That people think 745 00:40:45,480 --> 00:40:47,799 Speaker 1: their brains are just too simple, you know, when you've 746 00:40:47,840 --> 00:40:51,480 Speaker 1: got a brain that structurally simple, with you know, such 747 00:40:51,520 --> 00:40:54,000 Speaker 1: a few number of neurons, they just couldn't have a 748 00:40:54,040 --> 00:40:58,520 Speaker 1: complex state like a persistent emotional state. Uh. And their 749 00:40:58,560 --> 00:41:01,919 Speaker 1: behavior is often characterized as in terms of simple sense 750 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:05,200 Speaker 1: or emotor response. So a snail or a spider might 751 00:41:05,239 --> 00:41:08,239 Speaker 1: have an automatic response that causes it to retreat from 752 00:41:08,280 --> 00:41:11,360 Speaker 1: a hot match, but the animal isn't feeling anything that 753 00:41:11,400 --> 00:41:14,680 Speaker 1: could reasonably be called called, you know, anger or fear 754 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:19,120 Speaker 1: persistent emotional state. That that's often the view. But the 755 00:41:19,160 --> 00:41:22,520 Speaker 1: authors think this old view is due for revision due 756 00:41:22,520 --> 00:41:25,640 Speaker 1: to this growing body of research showing various invertebrates, not 757 00:41:25,719 --> 00:41:28,800 Speaker 1: just octopuses like we were just talking about, being capable 758 00:41:29,040 --> 00:41:33,560 Speaker 1: of mental phenomena previously considered unthinkable, including all kinds of 759 00:41:33,600 --> 00:41:38,760 Speaker 1: stuff concept learning, numerical cognition, cultural transmission, and so forth. 760 00:41:39,200 --> 00:41:42,359 Speaker 1: So in order to study emotion and animals, we need 761 00:41:42,400 --> 00:41:46,480 Speaker 1: to land on a definition that that makes emotions susceptible 762 00:41:46,520 --> 00:41:49,319 Speaker 1: to external detection. And that's where that definition that I 763 00:41:49,360 --> 00:41:52,200 Speaker 1: mentioned earlier in the episode comes in again. It is quote, 764 00:41:52,520 --> 00:41:59,400 Speaker 1: emotions are transient central states comprising subjective, cognitive, behavioral, and 765 00:41:59,480 --> 00:42:03,480 Speaker 1: physio ugical phenomena that are triggered by appraisal of certain 766 00:42:03,520 --> 00:42:07,640 Speaker 1: types of environmental stimuli. So something in the environment causes 767 00:42:07,680 --> 00:42:12,120 Speaker 1: it the animals. Appraisal of that thing in the environment 768 00:42:12,400 --> 00:42:18,560 Speaker 1: triggers an internal state. And these internal states have subjective, cognitive, behavioral, 769 00:42:18,600 --> 00:42:22,839 Speaker 1: and physiological effects. And when you break it down like that, uh, 770 00:42:23,520 --> 00:42:25,359 Speaker 1: I feel like you have a model then that you 771 00:42:25,400 --> 00:42:29,799 Speaker 1: can you can you can certainly, you know, informally attribute 772 00:42:29,920 --> 00:42:32,959 Speaker 1: to a wide variety of organisms, but more to the point, 773 00:42:33,239 --> 00:42:36,279 Speaker 1: you can you can potentially test for it exactly. And 774 00:42:36,480 --> 00:42:38,400 Speaker 1: well you can definitely test for like three of the 775 00:42:38,440 --> 00:42:42,440 Speaker 1: four effects. You can't test for subjective states. We don't eat. 776 00:42:42,520 --> 00:42:45,120 Speaker 1: That goes back to the three examples we had are earlier. 777 00:42:45,160 --> 00:42:47,959 Speaker 1: That feeling is what it feels like yeah, you can't 778 00:42:48,000 --> 00:42:50,880 Speaker 1: do that, but the other three you can. So, emotions 779 00:42:50,880 --> 00:42:54,120 Speaker 1: are thought to have cognitive effects. Emotions affect how you 780 00:42:54,280 --> 00:42:58,760 Speaker 1: think and how you perceive. They have behavioral effects. Emotions 781 00:42:58,760 --> 00:43:01,480 Speaker 1: affect what you do with your body, and they have 782 00:43:01,560 --> 00:43:07,360 Speaker 1: physiological effects. Emotions affect unconscious or involuntary reactions within the body. 783 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:10,759 Speaker 1: So just for example, to use fear, there is of 784 00:43:10,800 --> 00:43:13,919 Speaker 1: course the subjective experience of fear, and we can only 785 00:43:14,000 --> 00:43:16,440 Speaker 1: know this in the first person. You just assume by 786 00:43:16,440 --> 00:43:20,279 Speaker 1: analogy that everybody else feels a similar subjective experience when 787 00:43:20,280 --> 00:43:24,600 Speaker 1: they're afraid. But external observers, you know, could document cognitive 788 00:43:24,680 --> 00:43:28,960 Speaker 1: changes during fear, such as increased awareness of sensory stimulized 789 00:43:28,960 --> 00:43:32,560 Speaker 1: signaling danger. Maybe, for example, when an animal is feeling fear, 790 00:43:32,640 --> 00:43:35,800 Speaker 1: it is more likely to notice movement in its peripheral vision. 791 00:43:35,840 --> 00:43:40,080 Speaker 1: In this state, you could notice behavioral changes such as 792 00:43:40,120 --> 00:43:44,920 Speaker 1: threat displays or retreat behaviors. You could notice physiological changes 793 00:43:44,960 --> 00:43:47,839 Speaker 1: such as increased heart rate or the release of fight 794 00:43:47,920 --> 00:43:50,800 Speaker 1: or flight hormones like epinefrin or epernefer and and all that. 795 00:43:51,440 --> 00:43:55,600 Speaker 1: You can notice dilated pupils, relaxation of the bladder, etcetera. Yeah, 796 00:43:55,640 --> 00:43:58,040 Speaker 1: I mean, we to to go back to episodes that 797 00:43:58,120 --> 00:44:00,880 Speaker 1: we've we've done on human fear and like the nature 798 00:44:00,920 --> 00:44:04,960 Speaker 1: of fear. Uh, it's uh, it really changed. It kind 799 00:44:05,000 --> 00:44:07,640 Speaker 1: of changes who you are. It always makes me think 800 00:44:07,719 --> 00:44:10,359 Speaker 1: of the Hunter S. Thompson quote that you're a whole 801 00:44:10,400 --> 00:44:13,560 Speaker 1: different person when you're scared. Uh. You know, we think 802 00:44:13,600 --> 00:44:15,560 Speaker 1: we know how we're going to behave in in a 803 00:44:15,800 --> 00:44:19,759 Speaker 1: situation of real fear, but we can't always be sure 804 00:44:19,840 --> 00:44:23,920 Speaker 1: unless we have sort of you know, performed enough exercises 805 00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:26,560 Speaker 1: and fear if you will, and even then there there 806 00:44:26,600 --> 00:44:29,440 Speaker 1: may be unknowns well. Of course, so fear, like other emotions, 807 00:44:29,480 --> 00:44:34,120 Speaker 1: has cognitive and behavioral effects, in some cases very strong ones. 808 00:44:34,600 --> 00:44:37,000 Speaker 1: What is who you are, It is your how you 809 00:44:37,120 --> 00:44:39,120 Speaker 1: think and how you act. Yeah, I mean there are 810 00:44:39,160 --> 00:44:41,839 Speaker 1: studying again these are human studies, but you know, there 811 00:44:41,920 --> 00:44:45,200 Speaker 1: are studies that have looked at how fear and uncertainty 812 00:44:45,280 --> 00:44:48,720 Speaker 1: affect our politics. You know, something is you know, generally 813 00:44:48,760 --> 00:44:50,960 Speaker 1: we think of it's very very complex and nuanced and 814 00:44:51,040 --> 00:44:54,120 Speaker 1: based in ideas and very stable. Yeah, it's just based 815 00:44:54,160 --> 00:44:56,360 Speaker 1: on what we believe in a kind of permanent or 816 00:44:56,400 --> 00:44:59,920 Speaker 1: semi permanent way. But no, I mean people's political opinions 817 00:45:00,040 --> 00:45:04,000 Speaker 1: appear to fluctuate based on their their emotional states day 818 00:45:04,080 --> 00:45:06,280 Speaker 1: to day, moment to moment. Yeah, which of course should 819 00:45:06,280 --> 00:45:09,080 Speaker 1: not come as a surprise if you're you know, aware 820 00:45:09,239 --> 00:45:12,839 Speaker 1: of the degree to which emotions are manipulated by politicians. 821 00:45:12,960 --> 00:45:16,160 Speaker 1: But but but yeah, like you, you add you change 822 00:45:16,160 --> 00:45:20,600 Speaker 1: the emotional state, you change how the animal behaves and 823 00:45:20,680 --> 00:45:23,640 Speaker 1: perceives the world. Right, So I think in the time 824 00:45:23,719 --> 00:45:26,200 Speaker 1: we have left to in today's episode, we've got time 825 00:45:26,239 --> 00:45:28,799 Speaker 1: to look at the first one of these, the cognitive 826 00:45:28,960 --> 00:45:32,400 Speaker 1: tests for invertebrate emotions, and we'll have to save the 827 00:45:32,480 --> 00:45:35,080 Speaker 1: other types of tests for the next episode. But to 828 00:45:35,120 --> 00:45:37,960 Speaker 1: look at the cognitive tests, one of the things that 829 00:45:38,160 --> 00:45:42,320 Speaker 1: you can do to study emotions in uh in humans 830 00:45:42,360 --> 00:45:45,040 Speaker 1: of course, but also in other animals is something known 831 00:45:45,080 --> 00:45:48,719 Speaker 1: as a judgment bias test. So imagine what is meant 832 00:45:48,800 --> 00:45:51,760 Speaker 1: by a test phrase. Here's a test phrase. The doctor 833 00:45:51,920 --> 00:45:55,439 Speaker 1: examined little Emily's growth. Alright, well, that that just brings 834 00:45:55,480 --> 00:45:58,200 Speaker 1: to mind that the clear image of little Emily, and 835 00:45:58,239 --> 00:46:01,440 Speaker 1: like a Norman Norman Rockwell painting, be exam being examined 836 00:46:01,480 --> 00:46:04,760 Speaker 1: by the doctor, and the doctor finding this grotesque mass 837 00:46:04,960 --> 00:46:07,480 Speaker 1: on the back of her neck. Well, it turns out 838 00:46:07,880 --> 00:46:11,320 Speaker 1: so this is an ambiguous phrase. People interpret it different ways, 839 00:46:12,000 --> 00:46:15,960 Speaker 1: and at least in some studies, people with some conditions 840 00:46:16,239 --> 00:46:20,879 Speaker 1: negative emotional conditions like depression or generalized anxiety were more 841 00:46:21,040 --> 00:46:24,719 Speaker 1: likely on average to read this ambiguous statement as being like, 842 00:46:24,880 --> 00:46:27,400 Speaker 1: what you're talking about about some kind of disease growth, 843 00:46:27,960 --> 00:46:31,399 Speaker 1: People with without anxiety or depression, or people who had 844 00:46:31,480 --> 00:46:34,840 Speaker 1: formerly had these conditions and are now considered cured or 845 00:46:34,880 --> 00:46:38,440 Speaker 1: in remission were more likely to interpret it as measuring 846 00:46:38,560 --> 00:46:42,680 Speaker 1: normal growth in childhood. He as in he measured her height. Yeah. 847 00:46:42,880 --> 00:46:45,160 Speaker 1: So um so, first of all, I have to say, 848 00:46:45,239 --> 00:46:47,239 Speaker 1: so so the way that I answered it in the show, 849 00:46:47,320 --> 00:46:49,239 Speaker 1: here's also the way I responded to the text when 850 00:46:49,280 --> 00:46:51,880 Speaker 1: I read it for me to so, and it is 851 00:46:52,320 --> 00:46:54,960 Speaker 1: it is is entirely possible that that it comes from 852 00:46:55,320 --> 00:46:58,800 Speaker 1: me having just a generally anxious a depressed state. However, 853 00:46:59,040 --> 00:47:02,160 Speaker 1: I do have questions about to what degree this test 854 00:47:02,239 --> 00:47:05,960 Speaker 1: phrase is weighted, because if you simply add and development 855 00:47:06,040 --> 00:47:07,680 Speaker 1: to the end of this test phrase, granted, it makes 856 00:47:07,719 --> 00:47:10,279 Speaker 1: it more specific and it's less ambiguous, but then but 857 00:47:10,440 --> 00:47:14,680 Speaker 1: there also means there's no question if you say the 858 00:47:14,800 --> 00:47:17,759 Speaker 1: doctor examined a little Emily's growth and development, you're not 859 00:47:17,800 --> 00:47:19,759 Speaker 1: going to say, oh, he he was the doctor was 860 00:47:19,840 --> 00:47:22,080 Speaker 1: looking at not only the weird thing on her neck, 861 00:47:22,120 --> 00:47:24,960 Speaker 1: but also how she's developing. I don't know. Oh, I 862 00:47:25,040 --> 00:47:27,719 Speaker 1: feel like that would just make it not ambiguous anymore. Yeah, 863 00:47:28,400 --> 00:47:32,160 Speaker 1: it's true, but I also just it just feels it 864 00:47:32,239 --> 00:47:34,800 Speaker 1: feels manipulative that that phrase to me. So I was 865 00:47:34,840 --> 00:47:36,480 Speaker 1: looking around a little bit about this to see if 866 00:47:36,480 --> 00:47:39,279 Speaker 1: anybody else had any problems with this. Uh. And it 867 00:47:39,400 --> 00:47:42,720 Speaker 1: does seem as if the depressional link negative interpretation bias 868 00:47:43,080 --> 00:47:46,480 Speaker 1: findings are not without at least some criticism. Uh. Claire 869 00:47:46,560 --> 00:47:50,080 Speaker 1: Lawson and Colin McLeod bring it up in Depression in 870 00:47:50,160 --> 00:47:54,759 Speaker 1: the Interpretation of Ambiguity, and they pointed out that we 871 00:47:54,880 --> 00:47:57,439 Speaker 1: could be talking about more about like a depressional link 872 00:47:57,520 --> 00:48:00,440 Speaker 1: response by us reflecting an elevated ten to see for 873 00:48:00,600 --> 00:48:05,320 Speaker 1: depressives to admit or endorse negatively toned response options. So 874 00:48:05,520 --> 00:48:08,719 Speaker 1: so under this model, it's possible that depression maybe just 875 00:48:09,600 --> 00:48:11,880 Speaker 1: is affecting more like what you're likely to say to 876 00:48:11,960 --> 00:48:16,120 Speaker 1: other people rather than what you're actually likely to represent internally. Yeah, 877 00:48:16,280 --> 00:48:18,200 Speaker 1: and I guess in this we're getting into the complexity 878 00:48:18,400 --> 00:48:24,480 Speaker 1: of of language and social interaction on it, you know. Um. Also, 879 00:48:24,560 --> 00:48:28,040 Speaker 1: others have argued that interpretation biases and depression might be 880 00:48:28,280 --> 00:48:31,960 Speaker 1: limited to interpretations for the self. So unless you are 881 00:48:32,160 --> 00:48:34,880 Speaker 1: little Emily uh there, perhaps wouldn't be that much of 882 00:48:34,920 --> 00:48:37,640 Speaker 1: an impact here. Um. You know. So it's in a way, 883 00:48:37,680 --> 00:48:41,000 Speaker 1: it's kind of like self deprecating humor, you know, like 884 00:48:41,160 --> 00:48:44,600 Speaker 1: it's it's it's more about how you're feeling, and it's 885 00:48:44,640 --> 00:48:47,480 Speaker 1: about the the stuff in the world that's directly affecting you, 886 00:48:47,560 --> 00:48:50,400 Speaker 1: which makes sense because these emotional states are largely going 887 00:48:50,440 --> 00:48:53,520 Speaker 1: to be connected to you or things of value to you, 888 00:48:53,719 --> 00:48:58,719 Speaker 1: not some random little girl in a an example phrase, Well, 889 00:48:58,719 --> 00:49:00,239 Speaker 1: I wouldn't want to put too much on that one 890 00:49:00,280 --> 00:49:03,000 Speaker 1: example phrase. Maybe that's not a great example. Well it's 891 00:49:03,560 --> 00:49:05,840 Speaker 1: it's probably the better. I found a couple of phrases 892 00:49:05,880 --> 00:49:07,400 Speaker 1: as well that we're used in other studies, but that 893 00:49:07,480 --> 00:49:10,040 Speaker 1: one was still the best and one that's frequently cited. 894 00:49:10,480 --> 00:49:13,400 Speaker 1: Um elsewhere. I found a two thousand seven study published 895 00:49:13,440 --> 00:49:16,359 Speaker 1: in Cognition and Emotion from Bison and Sears, and they 896 00:49:16,400 --> 00:49:20,120 Speaker 1: found no negative interpretive bias in their studies. But that's 897 00:49:20,160 --> 00:49:22,960 Speaker 1: not to say that an emotional state won't just generally 898 00:49:23,080 --> 00:49:27,439 Speaker 1: influence how information or stimuli is received. A loving touch 899 00:49:27,680 --> 00:49:30,640 Speaker 1: may startle you and spin you around in a defensive stance, 900 00:49:30,680 --> 00:49:34,560 Speaker 1: if you are primed for a hostile physical encounter. Well, yeah, 901 00:49:34,600 --> 00:49:36,880 Speaker 1: I mean there there could be very salient criticisms that 902 00:49:36,920 --> 00:49:39,640 Speaker 1: I'm not aware of. I thought I understood like that, 903 00:49:39,760 --> 00:49:44,880 Speaker 1: it's pretty well documented within humans and animals that. Yeah, that, like, 904 00:49:45,400 --> 00:49:49,160 Speaker 1: negative mood does tend to bias perception. So when you 905 00:49:49,640 --> 00:49:53,600 Speaker 1: encounter something ambiguous, if you're feeling angry or sad, you're 906 00:49:53,640 --> 00:49:57,359 Speaker 1: more likely to interpret the ambiguous thing in a pessimistic way. Yeah, 907 00:49:57,480 --> 00:50:00,560 Speaker 1: and I think that that is definitely the case. I guess. Well, 908 00:50:00,640 --> 00:50:02,040 Speaker 1: the main thing I wanted to drive home is I 909 00:50:02,040 --> 00:50:06,080 Speaker 1: didn't want anybody to engage in this sort of exercise 910 00:50:06,160 --> 00:50:08,240 Speaker 1: with us here and have the same knee jerk reaction 911 00:50:08,320 --> 00:50:10,680 Speaker 1: that we did and then immediately assume that it means 912 00:50:10,719 --> 00:50:13,360 Speaker 1: that they have an anxiety problem or or in a 913 00:50:13,480 --> 00:50:16,240 Speaker 1: depressive state. Well, I mean, even if you did react 914 00:50:16,320 --> 00:50:18,600 Speaker 1: that way, and even if the test is generally valid, 915 00:50:18,680 --> 00:50:20,520 Speaker 1: it would just be like one answer, you'd have to 916 00:50:20,640 --> 00:50:22,839 Speaker 1: like do an average of a bunch of different things 917 00:50:22,920 --> 00:50:26,080 Speaker 1: to figure out what's you know, more likely the case? Right, Yes, 918 00:50:26,320 --> 00:50:28,359 Speaker 1: but you know we're humans and we tend to jump 919 00:50:28,400 --> 00:50:32,279 Speaker 1: to conclusions and engage in I guess, um, what is 920 00:50:32,360 --> 00:50:36,360 Speaker 1: the the X Men personality test that we've a factor 921 00:50:36,440 --> 00:50:38,239 Speaker 1: that we've discussed in the show before X Man. I 922 00:50:38,280 --> 00:50:41,200 Speaker 1: don't remember this, well, the name is eluding me at 923 00:50:41,239 --> 00:50:43,600 Speaker 1: the moment, but you know, when you you engage like 924 00:50:43,680 --> 00:50:47,520 Speaker 1: the fortune cookie scenario or the um the astrological chart 925 00:50:47,560 --> 00:50:49,880 Speaker 1: scenario where the future is read and it's just a 926 00:50:49,960 --> 00:50:52,440 Speaker 1: little piece of paper telling you something random, but you 927 00:50:52,520 --> 00:50:56,480 Speaker 1: immediately identify things about yourself in that safe release the 928 00:50:56,560 --> 00:50:59,960 Speaker 1: horror effects, yes, the Barnum effect also, know, yes, yeah, 929 00:51:00,520 --> 00:51:04,239 Speaker 1: a little something for everybody. Well, I think we we 930 00:51:04,360 --> 00:51:08,400 Speaker 1: can certainly log possible criticisms of the judgment bias effect 931 00:51:08,480 --> 00:51:11,279 Speaker 1: and keep them as an asterisk over what we're about 932 00:51:11,320 --> 00:51:13,200 Speaker 1: to read, which you know it may in some ways 933 00:51:13,239 --> 00:51:16,480 Speaker 1: be undercut by any weakness in the inherent paradigm. But 934 00:51:16,600 --> 00:51:19,799 Speaker 1: in some existing research on animals, we people have tried 935 00:51:19,840 --> 00:51:23,360 Speaker 1: to use judgment bias tests to see if there is 936 00:51:23,440 --> 00:51:27,520 Speaker 1: cognitive evidence of emotions and animals, and you can do 937 00:51:27,640 --> 00:51:30,560 Speaker 1: this in some animals, Like if you take rats and 938 00:51:30,719 --> 00:51:33,560 Speaker 1: you train them to distinguish between two different tones, say 939 00:51:33,560 --> 00:51:36,239 Speaker 1: a high pitch tone and a low pitch tone, and 940 00:51:36,360 --> 00:51:39,000 Speaker 1: then in the enclosure with the rats is a lever 941 00:51:39,200 --> 00:51:41,239 Speaker 1: that they can press. So if they press the lever 942 00:51:41,360 --> 00:51:43,520 Speaker 1: when they hear the high pitch tone, they get a 943 00:51:43,680 --> 00:51:46,640 Speaker 1: food pellet reward, but if they press the lever when 944 00:51:46,719 --> 00:51:49,560 Speaker 1: they hear the low pitch tone, they get an unpleasant 945 00:51:49,640 --> 00:51:52,640 Speaker 1: blast of white noise. So they learn and they get 946 00:51:52,719 --> 00:51:55,240 Speaker 1: good at telling the difference. When the high pitch tone plays, 947 00:51:55,640 --> 00:51:57,400 Speaker 1: they are quick to press the lever and get the 948 00:51:57,440 --> 00:52:00,319 Speaker 1: food reward. When the low pitch tone plays, they hang back. 949 00:52:00,640 --> 00:52:02,640 Speaker 1: They either take a long time to press the lever 950 00:52:02,880 --> 00:52:05,280 Speaker 1: or they don't press it at all. And it turns 951 00:52:05,320 --> 00:52:09,560 Speaker 1: out you can manipulate something like the rats mood or 952 00:52:09,680 --> 00:52:13,120 Speaker 1: emotional state you know asterisk with all the caveats that 953 00:52:13,239 --> 00:52:17,920 Speaker 1: are implied there to bias their judgments about new ambiguous stimuli. 954 00:52:18,080 --> 00:52:20,960 Speaker 1: So what happens when you play a tone in between 955 00:52:21,200 --> 00:52:23,560 Speaker 1: the two tones that the rats have been trained on. 956 00:52:24,480 --> 00:52:26,960 Speaker 1: The studies show that, say, if you tilt the rats 957 00:52:27,080 --> 00:52:30,320 Speaker 1: housing up at an angle, or if you wet the 958 00:52:30,480 --> 00:52:34,560 Speaker 1: rats betting or introduce an unfamiliar rat to the group. 959 00:52:34,920 --> 00:52:38,080 Speaker 1: When the ambiguous tone plays, the rats will be much 960 00:52:38,160 --> 00:52:41,200 Speaker 1: more avoidant of the lever in response to this this 961 00:52:41,360 --> 00:52:45,080 Speaker 1: ambiguous stimuli than rats in a control condition with normal 962 00:52:45,200 --> 00:52:48,080 Speaker 1: stable housing conditions, which are more likely to interpret the 963 00:52:48,120 --> 00:52:51,719 Speaker 1: ambiguous tone optimistically and run and press the lever. So 964 00:52:51,920 --> 00:52:54,200 Speaker 1: what this looks like again? And of course you know 965 00:52:54,480 --> 00:52:56,520 Speaker 1: we could be overreading into it, but it looks like 966 00:52:56,640 --> 00:52:59,960 Speaker 1: if you put rats in something like a bad emotion 967 00:53:00,120 --> 00:53:03,239 Speaker 1: tional state by making them uncomfortable and uneasy, they're going 968 00:53:03,320 --> 00:53:08,400 Speaker 1: to interpret unfamiliar information in a pessimistic way, whereas quote 969 00:53:08,520 --> 00:53:12,120 Speaker 1: happy rats are more likely to interpret unfamiliar information in 970 00:53:12,200 --> 00:53:15,759 Speaker 1: an optimistic way. So it's an emotional state based on 971 00:53:15,880 --> 00:53:19,680 Speaker 1: experience that is preparing the rat to deal with um, 972 00:53:20,040 --> 00:53:25,439 Speaker 1: with with incoming stimuli or or incoming environmental situations. Yeah, 973 00:53:25,600 --> 00:53:28,720 Speaker 1: I mean it looks like a quote bad mood puts 974 00:53:28,840 --> 00:53:32,080 Speaker 1: the animal in a kind of defensive posture where it's 975 00:53:32,160 --> 00:53:35,720 Speaker 1: less likely to explore an experiment and it's less likely 976 00:53:35,880 --> 00:53:38,200 Speaker 1: to to take a risk. It's more just kind of 977 00:53:38,280 --> 00:53:41,279 Speaker 1: hunkered down, right, Yeah, So it's you know, it's like 978 00:53:41,560 --> 00:53:44,759 Speaker 1: um and again, I think this helps to demystify the 979 00:53:44,880 --> 00:53:47,080 Speaker 1: human experience of some of these emotions, even though these 980 00:53:47,080 --> 00:53:50,680 Speaker 1: emotions get arguably more complex when you bring in human 981 00:53:50,800 --> 00:53:53,440 Speaker 1: language and so forth. But if every time in the 982 00:53:53,480 --> 00:53:56,080 Speaker 1: past that I've gone to a specific fast food restaurant 983 00:53:56,400 --> 00:53:59,239 Speaker 1: I have I've gotten ill, then in the future when 984 00:53:59,239 --> 00:54:02,680 Speaker 1: I go back, I'm going to be on guard against 985 00:54:02,920 --> 00:54:05,760 Speaker 1: incoming illness. Of course. Yeah, I mean that's like classical 986 00:54:05,800 --> 00:54:09,120 Speaker 1: conditioning one totally. So I mean, really, that's that's what 987 00:54:09,239 --> 00:54:12,320 Speaker 1: we're talking about here, um, you know, And I do 988 00:54:12,440 --> 00:54:16,279 Speaker 1: think it does serve to demystify something like fear, but really, 989 00:54:16,360 --> 00:54:18,120 Speaker 1: any of the emotions, even the law you know, the 990 00:54:18,200 --> 00:54:21,640 Speaker 1: loftier emotions like uh like you know, like love uh 991 00:54:21,760 --> 00:54:23,960 Speaker 1: that you know, we need to to to take bring 992 00:54:24,000 --> 00:54:25,920 Speaker 1: them to bring them down a few steps anyway, so 993 00:54:26,000 --> 00:54:30,040 Speaker 1: that we can attribute these things to animals as well. Yeah. Now, obviously, 994 00:54:30,600 --> 00:54:33,359 Speaker 1: I think, as you and I have discussed before, it's 995 00:54:33,440 --> 00:54:37,120 Speaker 1: more difficult to study some emotions than others, so you'll 996 00:54:37,160 --> 00:54:40,600 Speaker 1: find more studies on on invertebrates. We're about to get 997 00:54:40,640 --> 00:54:45,279 Speaker 1: into an invertebrate example, on things like aversion and anxiety 998 00:54:45,360 --> 00:54:48,239 Speaker 1: and fear than you will in invertebrate love, though there 999 00:54:48,320 --> 00:54:51,000 Speaker 1: are some with invertebrate positive emotions that I think are 1000 00:54:51,120 --> 00:54:53,600 Speaker 1: very interesting. We'll get to one and just it's generally 1001 00:54:53,640 --> 00:54:56,040 Speaker 1: easier to take an animal out of its natural habitat 1002 00:54:56,520 --> 00:55:00,680 Speaker 1: and study it by making it feel anxious us and afraid, 1003 00:55:01,160 --> 00:55:03,359 Speaker 1: as opposed to making it feel at home. I mean, really, 1004 00:55:03,440 --> 00:55:06,040 Speaker 1: that's one of one of the problems and some of 1005 00:55:06,120 --> 00:55:10,080 Speaker 1: these studies that have been conducted with um specifically, I 1006 00:55:10,120 --> 00:55:13,520 Speaker 1: guess I'm thinking of rats and addiction, right, Like, are 1007 00:55:13,600 --> 00:55:17,560 Speaker 1: you are you testing for the response to these substances 1008 00:55:17,719 --> 00:55:22,560 Speaker 1: under you know, ideal sort of ambiguous circumstances or is 1009 00:55:22,640 --> 00:55:25,239 Speaker 1: it within the world of a rat prison that you've 1010 00:55:25,239 --> 00:55:29,279 Speaker 1: created in a room somewhere, yeah, or is it unnatural 1011 00:55:29,400 --> 00:55:31,560 Speaker 1: within the rat prison? But the results are useful to 1012 00:55:31,680 --> 00:55:33,880 Speaker 1: us anyway, because the rats and the rat prison are 1013 00:55:33,960 --> 00:55:37,560 Speaker 1: kind of analogous to the way humans live. Now, Yeah, 1014 00:55:37,680 --> 00:55:40,600 Speaker 1: it's like I said, it's it gets complicated. But anyway 1015 00:55:40,640 --> 00:55:43,200 Speaker 1: to to move to invertebrates with the idea of the 1016 00:55:43,239 --> 00:55:46,480 Speaker 1: judgment bias test. At least three studies so far have 1017 00:55:46,600 --> 00:55:51,640 Speaker 1: shown possible evidence of the judgment bias effect in bees, bees. 1018 00:55:51,880 --> 00:55:53,720 Speaker 1: You know, this is there's another example of an animal 1019 00:55:53,800 --> 00:55:57,200 Speaker 1: that we generally don't We don't attribute a lot of 1020 00:55:57,520 --> 00:56:00,759 Speaker 1: personality to or certainly emotional states. But uh, they are, 1021 00:56:00,880 --> 00:56:04,440 Speaker 1: they're complicated organisms. They're they're they're fascinating creatures. Yes, well, 1022 00:56:04,480 --> 00:56:06,560 Speaker 1: let's take a look and see what we think. So 1023 00:56:06,960 --> 00:56:09,640 Speaker 1: the authors here site two studies Bates and at All 1024 00:56:09,719 --> 00:56:12,080 Speaker 1: in two thousand eleven and Schloons at All in two 1025 00:56:12,120 --> 00:56:16,160 Speaker 1: thousand seventeen that studied this effect, the judgment bias effect 1026 00:56:16,160 --> 00:56:19,560 Speaker 1: in honey bees or APIs malifera. So bees were trained 1027 00:56:19,600 --> 00:56:22,800 Speaker 1: on two different kinds of chemical odors that they sensed 1028 00:56:22,840 --> 00:56:26,160 Speaker 1: with their antennae, which were associated with two different sugar 1029 00:56:26,239 --> 00:56:30,000 Speaker 1: solutions that they could extend their probosis to taste. So 1030 00:56:30,120 --> 00:56:33,120 Speaker 1: when odor A was sensed, that was associated with a 1031 00:56:33,239 --> 00:56:37,040 Speaker 1: sweet sugar solution, and when odor B was sensed, that 1032 00:56:37,200 --> 00:56:40,520 Speaker 1: was associated with a bitter quinine solution, which the bees 1033 00:56:40,600 --> 00:56:43,120 Speaker 1: did not like tasting. So if you train them on 1034 00:56:43,239 --> 00:56:45,640 Speaker 1: this right, once they smell odor A, they're going to 1035 00:56:45,719 --> 00:56:47,680 Speaker 1: be like, oh, boy, sugars coming, and that you know, 1036 00:56:47,760 --> 00:56:50,399 Speaker 1: that's the condition response. When they smell odor B, they're 1037 00:56:50,400 --> 00:56:52,520 Speaker 1: going to be like, oh, that's the bitter quinine. I 1038 00:56:52,560 --> 00:56:54,600 Speaker 1: don't want any of it. They get conditioned like this, 1039 00:56:54,840 --> 00:56:58,080 Speaker 1: and then the manipulation came when the researchers would go 1040 00:56:58,280 --> 00:57:02,640 Speaker 1: and shake the bees housing vigorously for sixty seconds. And 1041 00:57:02,719 --> 00:57:05,600 Speaker 1: this was supposed to simulate a natural attack on the 1042 00:57:05,680 --> 00:57:08,440 Speaker 1: colony by a predator such as a honey badger. And 1043 00:57:08,520 --> 00:57:12,320 Speaker 1: to quote here, After the shaking manipulation, bees were tested 1044 00:57:12,400 --> 00:57:17,439 Speaker 1: with ambiguous odor mixtures intermediate between the two mixtures used 1045 00:57:17,480 --> 00:57:21,160 Speaker 1: for training. In both studies, honey bees subjected to the 1046 00:57:21,240 --> 00:57:24,560 Speaker 1: shaking were less likely to respond to the ambiguous odor 1047 00:57:24,640 --> 00:57:28,480 Speaker 1: mixture closest in ratio to the oder mixture associated with 1048 00:57:28,600 --> 00:57:33,480 Speaker 1: quinine during training, suggesting that shaking induces a negative cognitive 1049 00:57:33,520 --> 00:57:37,200 Speaker 1: bias to ambiguous odor cues. So when the odor was 1050 00:57:37,320 --> 00:57:41,200 Speaker 1: somewhere between the other two odors chemically, especially when it 1051 00:57:41,280 --> 00:57:43,960 Speaker 1: was closer to the bad odor, the bees that had 1052 00:57:44,000 --> 00:57:46,640 Speaker 1: been shaken were more likely to say I don't want 1053 00:57:46,680 --> 00:57:50,600 Speaker 1: any of that. Again, this looks like a pessimistic bias. Yeah, clearly, 1054 00:57:51,000 --> 00:57:53,400 Speaker 1: it seems like a clear case. Uh. Now, The authors 1055 00:57:53,440 --> 00:57:56,240 Speaker 1: do offer an important caveat here they say quote. However, 1056 00:57:56,360 --> 00:57:59,320 Speaker 1: it has been argued that shaking may cause bees to 1057 00:57:59,440 --> 00:58:05,919 Speaker 1: become better discriminators. Shaking increased hemolymph concentrations of octopamine, which 1058 00:58:06,000 --> 00:58:09,560 Speaker 1: can modulate sensory function. And hemo lymph again is like 1059 00:58:09,720 --> 00:58:12,320 Speaker 1: insect blood that of blood. They have hemal lymph this 1060 00:58:12,400 --> 00:58:16,760 Speaker 1: other circulatory fluid, and so it increased this uh, this 1061 00:58:17,160 --> 00:58:19,640 Speaker 1: thing called octopamine, which is similar I believe to nora 1062 00:58:19,640 --> 00:58:23,280 Speaker 1: adrenaline in mammals and humans. Uh So, remember that the 1063 00:58:23,360 --> 00:58:25,360 Speaker 1: shaking really seemed to make a difference when the odor 1064 00:58:25,480 --> 00:58:29,440 Speaker 1: was ambiguous but closer to the odor associated with the 1065 00:58:29,560 --> 00:58:32,720 Speaker 1: bitter food. So maybe shaken bees are just better at 1066 00:58:32,840 --> 00:58:36,760 Speaker 1: sensing that closeness to the bad outcome because of non 1067 00:58:36,880 --> 00:58:40,920 Speaker 1: emotional physiological reasons. That's also possible. But this isn't the 1068 00:58:41,000 --> 00:58:44,720 Speaker 1: only test of judgment bias effect in bees. Period all 1069 00:58:44,800 --> 00:58:48,560 Speaker 1: In sixteen also studied the same thing, but in the 1070 00:58:48,640 --> 00:58:53,640 Speaker 1: opposite direction, optimistic bias created by pleasure or happiness, or 1071 00:58:53,680 --> 00:58:56,200 Speaker 1: at least what you might call an analog of pleasure 1072 00:58:56,280 --> 00:58:59,640 Speaker 1: or happiness in bumble bees. So again there was a 1073 00:58:59,680 --> 00:59:02,200 Speaker 1: similar are type of setup. They would train bumble bees 1074 00:59:02,280 --> 00:59:05,520 Speaker 1: to respond to two possible visual cues. There would be 1075 00:59:05,600 --> 00:59:08,400 Speaker 1: a green card on the left that has a cup 1076 00:59:08,440 --> 00:59:11,560 Speaker 1: of sugar water solution underneath it. This is the reward queue. 1077 00:59:12,120 --> 00:59:14,640 Speaker 1: And then a blue card on the right that has 1078 00:59:14,760 --> 00:59:17,200 Speaker 1: a cup of regular water underneath it, and this is 1079 00:59:17,240 --> 00:59:20,560 Speaker 1: the control que. Trained bumble bees would learn to go 1080 00:59:20,840 --> 00:59:23,080 Speaker 1: straight to the green card on the left when it 1081 00:59:23,200 --> 00:59:25,200 Speaker 1: was present to get the sugar they you know, they 1082 00:59:25,240 --> 00:59:27,720 Speaker 1: don't bother with the blue card on the right. Now, 1083 00:59:27,800 --> 00:59:31,200 Speaker 1: what happens when you put a bluish greenish card in 1084 00:59:31,360 --> 00:59:34,520 Speaker 1: the middle of the two positions. Well, the study showed 1085 00:59:34,560 --> 00:59:36,920 Speaker 1: that if you give the bees a little bit of 1086 00:59:37,040 --> 00:59:42,000 Speaker 1: sugar reward before the test, they approached the ambiguous new 1087 00:59:42,160 --> 00:59:45,520 Speaker 1: stimulus the blue green card in the middle position faster 1088 00:59:46,040 --> 00:59:48,800 Speaker 1: than if you don't give them any sugar. And so 1089 00:59:48,920 --> 00:59:52,680 Speaker 1: the authors hearsay quote. Control experiments showed that after consumption 1090 00:59:52,720 --> 00:59:56,280 Speaker 1: of the small unexpected reward, bees did not increase their 1091 00:59:56,320 --> 00:59:59,480 Speaker 1: flight speed and we're not more likely to explore novel stimuli, 1092 00:59:59,560 --> 01:00:02,520 Speaker 1: suggest thing that the small reward did not simply increase 1093 01:00:02,560 --> 01:00:06,320 Speaker 1: the bees general activity or exploration, but was indeed due 1094 01:00:06,400 --> 01:00:11,360 Speaker 1: to changes in their decision making processes under ambiguity, thus 1095 01:00:11,480 --> 01:00:15,160 Speaker 1: resembling optimism in humans. Uh So again, there could be 1096 01:00:15,280 --> 01:00:18,040 Speaker 1: something wrong here that we're that we're missing, but at 1097 01:00:18,120 --> 01:00:21,160 Speaker 1: least it on the surface, it looks like the bees 1098 01:00:21,240 --> 01:00:26,520 Speaker 1: are just expecting better outcomes with ambiguous possibilities when they've 1099 01:00:26,560 --> 01:00:29,280 Speaker 1: had a little bit of sugary treats. Right. So, I 1100 01:00:29,560 --> 01:00:31,480 Speaker 1: think one of the big takeoffs from this is that 1101 01:00:31,600 --> 01:00:33,920 Speaker 1: it is going you have to think of emotion is 1102 01:00:33,960 --> 01:00:37,160 Speaker 1: being tied to how we navigate the world, and we 1103 01:00:37,240 --> 01:00:40,200 Speaker 1: are not the only organism that has to navigate a 1104 01:00:40,360 --> 01:00:44,440 Speaker 1: world of of changing circumstances and and because clearly the 1105 01:00:44,480 --> 01:00:46,320 Speaker 1: bee has to do that as well, and it has 1106 01:00:47,080 --> 01:00:50,400 Speaker 1: similar abilities that result or our and ore and or 1107 01:00:50,520 --> 01:00:53,320 Speaker 1: are caused by emotional states. Yeah, but I think we've 1108 01:00:53,360 --> 01:00:55,080 Speaker 1: got to call it for this first episode, and we 1109 01:00:55,160 --> 01:00:57,800 Speaker 1: can come back and explore some more research along these 1110 01:00:57,840 --> 01:01:00,680 Speaker 1: lines next time and the knee time. If you want 1111 01:01:00,680 --> 01:01:02,880 Speaker 1: to check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, 1112 01:01:03,040 --> 01:01:06,360 Speaker 1: you can find us anywhere you get a podcast these days. 1113 01:01:06,480 --> 01:01:08,760 Speaker 1: We don't even know all the places you get podcasts. Uh, 1114 01:01:09,040 --> 01:01:10,760 Speaker 1: we know a few of them. One of them is 1115 01:01:10,840 --> 01:01:13,120 Speaker 1: I heart, and if you go to stuff to Blow 1116 01:01:13,120 --> 01:01:15,240 Speaker 1: your Mind dot com, that will shoot you over to 1117 01:01:15,320 --> 01:01:18,960 Speaker 1: the I heart listing for this show. Wherever you get 1118 01:01:19,000 --> 01:01:22,480 Speaker 1: the show, just make sure you rate, review, and subscribe. 1119 01:01:22,920 --> 01:01:25,880 Speaker 1: Those are the actions you can take that help support 1120 01:01:25,920 --> 01:01:28,640 Speaker 1: the show huge thanks as always to our excellent audio 1121 01:01:28,720 --> 01:01:31,600 Speaker 1: producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get 1122 01:01:31,640 --> 01:01:33,840 Speaker 1: in touch with us with feedback on this episode or 1123 01:01:33,840 --> 01:01:36,160 Speaker 1: any other, to suggest a topic for the future, or 1124 01:01:36,240 --> 01:01:39,040 Speaker 1: just to say hello, you can email us at contact 1125 01:01:39,160 --> 01:01:49,040 Speaker 1: at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com Stuff to 1126 01:01:49,080 --> 01:01:51,600 Speaker 1: Blow your Mind. It's production of I Heart Radio. For 1127 01:01:51,720 --> 01:01:53,920 Speaker 1: more podcasts for my heart Radio because at the iHeart 1128 01:01:53,960 --> 01:01:56,680 Speaker 1: Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listening to your 1129 01:01:56,720 --> 01:02:09,800 Speaker 1: favorite shows, they foo