WEBVTT - NBA Reaction: LeBron x Lakers drama, Suns & Thunder MEGA deals + Nick Wright's MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What Driving the Gred Episode three forty seven.

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This episode of What Driving the Grid is brought to

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you by Boost Mobile. A ton to do today. We

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.159
<v Speaker 1>are not on TV today and tomorrow because of the

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Euro Soccer tournament, so we will be This will be

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the only place that I'll be on the air today

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and then a little schedule adjustment next week. Instead of

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday Pod, we will do a Monday Pod. The reason

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>for that well, I will explain in just a moment.

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Demand's a great to see you, you know, the approaching

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>weekend birthday major plans anything, just probably just locate with

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the friends.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, nothing, nothing too crazy. Yeah, maybe okay Saturday or something.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's also the late twenties birthdays are they all

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of run together? Twenty five is something and third

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is something. But twenty six, twenty seven, twenty eight, twenty

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>nine maybe a little something because you feel like that's

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>my last year in their twenties. Yeah. But yeah, so

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this is if we were to power rank birthdays, twenty

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>seven is pretty bad, like not bad, but it's just

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it doesn't make very very low on

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the totem pole. And for your birthdays up to this point,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it like as far as excitement level going into it,

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it might be dead last. Like I'm not trying to

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>rain on your like, just there's not a lot of buzz,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of you know, not a lot of

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, discussion of this coming birthday reminder like the

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>pod or subscribe to the pod, like the YouTube page,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the YouTube page. Rate review all that. I

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>did promise a major personal announcement professional announcement that's coming momentarily.

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But before we get to that, straight the voicemail brought

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to you by our friends at let me turn this

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so you guys can see it, our friends at boost Mobile.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Nikola jokicch not signing his extension yet. This is to me,

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll just do it very quickly. Actually, a non story

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that is pure. It is not about don't worry Daniel,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lack of faith in the franchise or anything like that.

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>It is simply he can make more money waiting one year,

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>so it makes sense for him to wait one year. Also,

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Shaye and Angel Reese named the NBA two K cover athletes.

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:35.679
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say I'm a little confused about the

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Angel Rey's piece of this, and it has nothing to

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>do with Angel Rees versus the FISA, Collier versus Caitlin

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Clark versus Asia Wilson, has to do with the the

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>legitimate question of like the physical video game is going

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to have Shae on the cover. So when they're like

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Angel Reese is on the it is she. There is

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>not a w NBA two K game, it is it

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is layered inside, so like there's you people are going

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to buy a physical video game with

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that cop with that cover.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure that's how I worked in previous there's

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>because I feel like there was a year that, like Kobe,

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 2>they had like a Kobe version, like a Lebron version

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>It's just like different covers, I'm pretty sure.

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So I thought it was just like a digital

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like the news, like the Sports Illustrated cover athlete, when

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't go physically buy a Sports Illustrated anymore like that.

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>It was just an internet image. I didn't know you

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>could get pardon me, the physical media and one of

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>them would have Angel on the cover. Okay, all right,

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>well that's that is more interesting to me and cooler

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for her. And she actually has been playing really well

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>as of late, and by the way, smart of two

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>k to be like, you know what, let's just stir

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the pod a little bit. Let's just do that, and

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>then you know what I mean, be like, hey, why

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>are you mad at us? And also Joe Burrow said

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>after his house got robbed, he is no longer buying

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the Batmobile, which is a sick headline. Thank you as

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>always to our friends at boost Mobile for straight to

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>voicemail brought to you by Boost Mobile. All right, demonse,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to the actual show, I promised on

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday that I was going to have an announcement off

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>the top of the show today And for some of you,

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you will find this to be incredibly cool.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>For some of you you will not care at all.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And for some folks probably less so. Folks that are

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>listening or watching this right now live on YouTube. But

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>who are going to see this announcement on social media

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>or if it gets reported in other outlets. I think

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>some people will probably be mad, and I will address

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that on the back end of this. But next week

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:15.239
<v Speaker 1>I am going back to Vegas because for the World

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Series of Poker Main Event, Final Table, I will be

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>a part of the broadcast on Poker go and so

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>let me talk about what this means for me for

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Then let me talk about the responsibility that

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this is, and then we will get into the sports.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>For me, this is this will be one of the

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>five coolest moments of my professional career, full stop. This

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is a true dream. This is something that I have

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>been trying to set the table for for the better

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>part of ten years. If I'm being totally honest and

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>really put real effort into a strategy to make this

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a possibility over the last five years. Some people know,

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>some people don't that I about four years ago, played

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Phil Helm youth heads up in a poker tournament for

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars. It was It was an unbelievable experience.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I almost won. It was great. I actually thought I

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>handled myself quite well. It created a few hilarious, you know,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>viral clips even if you're not super into poker. But

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>when you remove all that from it, it still was

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>me putting down fifty thousand dollars when I'm a huge underdog,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think some people thought that that was maybe

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>fool either foolish of me or man Nick must have

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>way more money than I thought. And the answer was neither.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that I had more money than you thought,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't that I thought I was a favorite.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It was that that to me was an investment and

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>getting more involved on a real level with the poker world.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, if I handled myself well, if I

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>continued to develop my relationships with people like Phil and

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and the legendary Nick Shulman, and not that those

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>guys aren't legendary, but Nick's just having an unbelievable summer,

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and Brent Hanks at Poker Go and Jeff Platten, those guys,

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Ali and Jeanne, that maybe one day I could add

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>not just some types of poker broadcasting to what I do,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>but maybe be able to call the poker version of

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. Well, I guess I could say the

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>poker version of the World Series, because it is called

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the World Series of Poker main event, and the fact

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to be able to so last year

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I went out there and called the final table of

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the two hundred and fifty K, which was probably not

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>probably it was the biggest buy in and you know,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the hardest tournament of the summer. But the main

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>event is the main event, and it is a poker

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>tournament unlike any other poker tournament that exists in the world.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>It is still the most prestigious. It is still the

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>white Whale for every poker player who's ever lived, And

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>it is a lifelong dream of mine to be a

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>part of that broadcast. And the fact that I will,

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't you know, Brent Hanks is going to

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously be a part of it. Jeff Platt will be

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a part of it, I would imagine, and I hope

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>desperately that Nick Shulman, who, in addition to being my

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>buddy and in my opinion right now, the single greatest

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>poker player alive, he is going to be a part

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. The voice of poker worldwide, Al Najad is

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be a part of it. And I'm sure others.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>If you've been watching the World Series of Poker, I'm

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>sure you are wondering, as Jared Blesnik, who has been

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely unbelievable on comms for the World Series so far

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, is he going to be a part of it?

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>My answer is I hope so. And now if you're

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>if you are seeing this and you're not seeing it

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>because you're watching What's Right with Nick right on YouTube,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>or you're not listening to us on iTunes or Spotify.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>You're see this because it is embedded in a pokernews

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com article or somebody shared it on Twitter, and

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>your reaction is, You've got to be kidding me. It's

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the main event, final table, and they're gonna put some

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>hot take sports guy on there, and it's not going

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to be given the gravity, or this person is not

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>going to take this as seriously as we in the

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>poker community would like. All I can say to you is,

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I give you my word. Nobody will take this more

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>seriously than me, and I will as far as treating

0:10:54.360 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>this event with the gravity and the professionalism that it

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly deserves. I I can promise you I will not

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>let the poker world down. Now will that mean you

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like the commentary, or that, if I'm being totally honest,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm good at it, or any of those other things.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll see. So I cannot promise you that

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll do great. I know that if I don't, all

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>be heartbroken, because but you know, such as life, sometimes

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you know something's not your thing, and so and

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I I've done a fair amount of poker commentary before,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but nothing like this, and it will just for me.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 2>This is.

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The There are a few things professionally that are on

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the list. I've been incredibly lucky and I've been able

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to do a lot of the list that I would

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>have had twenty years ago. As far as Pie in

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the Sky, everything works out perfectly. Goals if I were

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to if you were to ask me ten years ago

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>five that I was like, I had not done and

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was not tracking to do, but I still, you know,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted like to keep available to me. They would have

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>been in no particular order, to be a part of

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>an Olympics, to at least one time be the third

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>man in a booth for an NFL and an NBA game,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to at least one time do red Zone that Sunday

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>follow me do the games, which might sound silly to people,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but I just think I am with respect to the

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>great Andrews Siliano and the great Scott Hansen, I actually

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>think I'd be the best in the world at that

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that one. I would not be worried people would be like, oh,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not good. I actually think there's no one in

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the world that'd be better at that than me, but

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>set out aside. And then the fifth and again in

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>no order, would be to broadcast the World Series of

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Poker Main Event, Final Table. And so it is close

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to as cool as it gets for me, and I

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>am overwhelmingly excited to do it. So that's the announcement.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>It will They are long days. That is a lot

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the streams are you know, ten, twelve, fourteen hours

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at times, which is why a lot of people will

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be involved. And let me just say one other thing.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned this person already, but I cannot thank Maries

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Candani and Brent Hanks and Carrie Kats and Jeff Platt

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and all the people at Poker Go, and I mentioned

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Ali and Nick obviously enough for trusting me with this

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and letting me do this. And hopefully this isn't like

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy camp type thing. This is something where people

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are watching the broadcast and they're like, Nick added something

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that was good, we enjoyed that, Like there that is again,

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll be I will feel I'll be crestfallen if the

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>poker world watches this and it's like, man, Nick kind

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of screwed that up. It could happen. I don't think

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it will, but that's the major announcement. Sorry for the

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>self you know, focus there. But that's why the show

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>next week will be Monday instead of Tuesday, because Tuesday

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll be in Vegas. And while they did tell me

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I could do the show from Vegas like I did before,

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to be zeroed locked in on the task

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>at hand. All right, demons, good to see you. And

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, for the second straight Vegas trip, your

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>mom and I are both going to Vegas and night,

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and we are going to be there like she is

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>going to Vegas Saturday and leaving Tuesday night and I

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>am going to Vegas Monday night and leaving Wednesday night.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And so we might we might not even cross paths.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>You might ask, well, you know what, I don't know.

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>That's just how it happens. I guess. One argument is

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>because you know, Deanna and one of us being here.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The other argument is like, I don't know, like maybe

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>she likes Vegas more without me.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Who knows.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get all right, let's get to the

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>sports at hand here.

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Uh so Aiden is getting settled in in La getting

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>all comfy and all that. Luca sent him a welcome message,

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, welcome to La DeAndre Aiden decided to play

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>with you next year. Lebron James not said anything to

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>him though. Is there something to read into here?

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not nothing? Yeah, uh so this DeAndre did this

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>interview two days ago, I think one whatever it was

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the interview that he did, we played a piece of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on the TV show yesterday, and we did not play

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this piece because it was a radio interview in l

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and I, you know, I hadn't. I didn't know that

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>this was said. So credit to whomever clipped this and

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>act you know, posted it, because I didn't. I hadn't

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>listened to the full fifteen minute or whatever radio interview

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it was, and so I had only seen kind of

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>what had made mainstream, so to speak. But I saw

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>this and I was like, oh, well that's something. So

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and the reason it's something is because it is either

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>how do I phrase this properly, Lebron's going to be there, Well,

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not that is so that is by no means like, oh,

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>lock it in because of that this, but it certainly

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>added a little more fuel to the idea that Lebron

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>James might not be a Laker next year, that it's

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that So if famously or I shouldn't. I don't know

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>if it's famous, but at least to me, it is.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Lebron when he announced he was going back to Cleveland

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and he did it with Lee Jenkins. In an SI article,

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he listed all the guys he was excited to be

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>playing with with the Caps, and he had not listed

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick from a week prior, Andrew Wiggins.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And one way to read that was the article was

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>written before the draft, or that he was you know,

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he was only thinking about or including the active veterans.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>And another way to it was Lebron expected that they

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>would be trading Wiggins as part of getting a veteran

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 1>win now guy, and that is exactly and so he

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>did not want to include Andrew Wiggins when he did

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>not think he was ever going to be playing with

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wiggins, which is exactly what they did. So here

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>are before I give my opinion on what I think

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this actually is, let's lay out all of the available

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>options for this, and we can, you know, put a

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>percentage on each of them at the end. Option one

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>busy guy forgot. Let's like again, like these are not

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>power ranked in order. I'm just saying, if we want

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to lay out all of the possibilities. Right, Option one,

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>busy guy forgot. I guess Option two is not that

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Busy didn't, but has some feud with DeAndre eight and

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know about and he's furious about this trade.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say, of all these, that's probably the least likely.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if there was a DeAndre eight and Lebron beef,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we would have known about it. Right Option three, he

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>did and DeAndre didn't see the text. Deandre's wrong. He

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>because he said Luca texted him and Lebron didn't so

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>at night and he didn't say anyone talked to him

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>on the phone. They missed the text. Got so many

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>texts that you know, when the news broke that he

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>got a text from a number that he didn't have,

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>it was like, yo, congrats man, let's get it and

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>he was like, okay, whatever, and it turns out that's

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James. Again, these are not power ranked in order.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to lay out all of the available possibilities.

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Those first three, by the way, slim to very very slim,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>but they're on the possibilities all right. Now. The more

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>salacious ones, uh that Lebron does not want to tell

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Ayton excited to play with you when he does

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>not know if he will be playing with him. And

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>then the last option is Lebron wants to expect to

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be playing with DeAndre Ayton, but wants to keep maximum

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the Lakers to make every move possible to

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>make their team better going into this year, and the

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>only leverage he has over them right now is the

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>specter of, well, maybe I don't think I'm going to

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>be on this team. That to me, those are the

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>those five possibilities cover you know, ninety nine percent of

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the call it one hundred percent of what the reason

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>could be. Here's how I would apply the likelihood of

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>each my first draft pick of that would be Lebron

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's going to be on the Lakers, did not

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>reach out to DeAndre because he had a feeling it

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>would be become public that he had not yet reached

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>out to DeAndre, and wants to keep the pressure on

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Rob Polenka to continue to improve the roster, which, if

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>we're being honest, they have had a underwhelming off season.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>On that note, if I may, then I'll get back

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to the percentage's parts because Brew and I got into

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday. Going into this off season, we felt like

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers it was an absolute lock and mandatory that

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they upgrade the center position. They did do that, and

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>they did that in an interesting way where they didn't

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>have to give up assets, where it didn't cost them

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, and the talent upside is quite high.

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>But it's also a guy who's six years into his

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>career has been unreliable and not that mature and really

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>alienated teammates and coaches.

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 2>So I really think Lebron James is like, man, y'all

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>got DeAndre and that's not the center I wanted.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not texting him. I'm not welcome the team.

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh so you oh so you think, oh I should

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>have included that one. I guess it's good that Lebron is.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is pissed that it was a yeah, oh so

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. Actually, so the reason I didn't even think

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>of that, but that's obvious. I definitely should have. I

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>guess that's kind of that, you know in the Oh, yeah,

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So here's the reason that I'm I don't

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>put a pin in that real quick, and let me

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>finish this other thought. Then we'll get to that one,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's good. I'm glad you mentioned that one. So

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>they did get a center, and we can argue about

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 1>if it was their best option, if it was the

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>best of bad options, whatever it is. But the rest

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of the roster not only remained basically unchanged, but got

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to touch worse because switching out Dorian Finney Smith for

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Jake Lauravia is at the very least in the short

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>term of downgrade and so there would be real frustration there.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So I would put Lebron expects to be a Laker

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 1>but wants to keep the screws on the Lakers to

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to make moves as the reason for him not

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>reaching out. I would put that at s sixty five percent.

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the biggest percentage here. I would

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>put Lebron didn't reach out because he does not think

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be a Laker next year at twenty percent.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a one in five shot right

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>now that Lebron thinks, yeah, I'm not going to be

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on the team. Now, that's not that's that's not huge,

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's not nothing. It's you know, more likely than

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rolling a single die and rolling a six or any

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>number on the die, any particular number on the die,

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So sixty five percent he's trying to keep the pressure

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>on him. Twenty percent he he doesn't think he's going

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to be there. I will give Demonse's he you know

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this is not the player he wanted and therefore he

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't reach out at five percent. I will certainly massively

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>upgrade Demonse's theory if we found out he did reach

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>out to Jake Laavia, if like he was like, yo, man,

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>let's get it, then then your likelihood is way way higher.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I will put it at busy guy just didn't do

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it at five percent, and that leaves what oh, that

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>leaves five more percent left, and I will put it

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>at he did reach out DeAndre Ayton didn't have the

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>number saved and did not know it was Lebron who

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>was like, why is this person texting me with a

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>crown at four percent, and I will put there is

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a long standing maybe base maybe out of loyalty to

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 1>his buddy Chris Paul DeAndre Ayton beef at one. So

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's how I handicap this whole thing. It's not

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing though, that's my takeaway. It's not nothing, and I

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I am interested in the next time, could you know,

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because you know what's also not nothing? Demonse if we're

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>doing the not nothing meter. The Lakers who sent out

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of press releases about a bunch of offseason moves.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>The Lakers not sending out a press release about Lebron

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>opting into his player option. That's also not nothing. Now

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>does that mean it's everything? Of course? No, no, no no.

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>This press releases come from the team, like your official

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>press release is released by the team and sent to

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>all NBA media. The most you want to know, the

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>most famous NBA press release ever. Hold on, I gotta,

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta. I want to quote it to you exactly.

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>This is an all time one. So uh, pat Riley,

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>who's never my My light just fell? Do I still look? Okay?

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope? So the so pat Riley un official in

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Miami Heat letterhead sent out to the league, league comes

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and everyone covering the league after Danny Ainge took a

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>shot at pat Riley. So this is so here. Let

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>me give you the background. Danny Ainge till Boston is

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen, Danny Ange to Boston radio station WI that

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James had no call to challenge officials for failing

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to classify fouls assessed Kirk Heinrich and Taj Gibson as flagrant.

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>He said, quote, I think the referees got the calls right.

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was a hard foul. I think

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the one involving Lebron against Boozer that was a flagrant.

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the officials got it right. I think that

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's almost embarrassing that Lebron would complain about officiating. And

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>so Danny Ainge, who was running the Celtics, comments on

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the radio about something that was happening between the Heat

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Bulls. So pat Riley has the Miami Heat

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Press office type up an official press release that reads,

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and I quote, Danny Ainge needs to shut the fuck

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>up and manage his own team. He was the biggest

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>whiner going when he was playing. And I know that

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>because I coached against him. End of statement, at all time.

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>At all time, all take the fine, but I've never

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>liked this guy. I coached against him. We now play

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>against him. And I quote, Danny Ainge needs to shut

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the fuck up and manage his own team. He was

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest whiner going when he was playing. And I

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>know that because I coached against him. Oh my goodness, gracious,

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Danny ains then again, I don't know why we're doing this.

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Aine then replies, I stand by what I said. That's all.

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about pat Riley. He can say whatever

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.959
<v Speaker 1>he wants. But this is just Danny Ainge talking. This

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't a press release. This is Danny Ainge. And then

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Aine added, I don't want to mess up his Armani

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>suits and all that hair goop. It would be way

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>too expensive for me. And so, I mean, that's so

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that. I Meany's just such a legend. I mean,

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>he's just such a I remember when that came out

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I didn't even know that was

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like a loud like in official communications. I guess, you

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>know what a simpler time when I remember being somewhat scandalized.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, he cursed he's a basketball team president. Little

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>did I know that years later, you know, the people

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.760
<v Speaker 1>running the world would regularly be like, they don't know

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what the f that this? That like, Yeah, lots of

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>change in a dozen years, all right, folks. Insane. For

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time ever, full blown all women's boxing megavent

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>going down in New York City, two title fights same night,

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you're like me and you love the action

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>drafting Sports Book is where it's at. Talking Katie Taylor

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>against Amanda Serrano, the third The Trilogy fight. I didn't

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>even mention this to you guys when I was talking

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>about this before, or I went to one of the

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>first two of these that was also in New York City.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>This The Trilogy is in New York City as well.

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>They are absolute legends. Katie's putting her super lightweight belt

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on the line and you know Serrano is bringing the heat.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And don't sleep on the Comaine Alisha the bomb Bomb

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Gardner with explosive powers taken on the undefeated WBA interim

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>champ Jennifer Miranda. That one's going to be fireworks. If

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you never bet with DraftKings, super simple, pick who you

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>think's gonna win. Truly that easy. Check this out. If

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>your New DraftKings throw down five bucks and boom, you

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>get five dollars, You get one hundred fifty dollars pardon

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>me in bonus bets instantly. It's really that simple. If

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>your New DraftKings bet five bucks, get one hundred fifty

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets instantly download DraftKings sportsbook Gap now

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>use promo code right. That's code right WRIGHD for new

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>customers to get one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>instantly when you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings.

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The Crown is yours.

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 4>called eight seven seven eight open wire text hope and

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 4>wy AT four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 4>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 4>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 4>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothill

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 4>ca A Cinnamon Resorting Kansas twenty one on over agent.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Eligibility varies by jurisdiction VOYD and Ontario. Bet must win

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 4>to receive reward minimum minus five hundred odds required. Bonus

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 4>bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue.

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 4>In four additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 4>dot co slash audio.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, demonte A couple extensions in the NBA I

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>found pretty noteworthy. Let's get to both of them. We'll

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>start in Phoenix.

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the Suns have locked up Devin Booker with

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a record two year extension through twenty thirty. Yeah, so

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 2>they might have fleeced the future Suns, but they have

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Devin Booker at least, right is there? What's their situation now?

0:33:56.400 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing I and this also sorry to

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as brew once said to me, he's like, Nick,

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>everything isn't about Lebron, and it's like, well, in the NBA,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it kind of is the just you know, Devin Booker

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>another player objectively not as good as current Lebron James,

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 1>who makes more money than Lebron James. Right now, forget

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the extension and nobody cares. Nobody's like, oh my god,

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you just can't win. If you're paying Devin Booker fifty

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 1>three million, now, they can't win. But nobody blames Devin

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Booker for that.

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 3>But the.

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Two year, one hundred and thirty three million is the

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>projected extension him approaching, Devin Booker approaching becoming a million

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar a game player in his age thirty three season.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So Devin Booker now is on the books for five years.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's like if they if his contract was starting right now,

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>let me do this math real quick. One ten one

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy one, one seventy one plus one thirty three, three

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 1>h four. He's on the books now for the next

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>five years, five years, three hundred and four million, an

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>average of sixty million a year. The year by year

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>salaries are fifty three, fifty seven, sixty one, sixty four,

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine.

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Would you say two years for what.

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>The did? I? I said two for one thirty three

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>two years. I So that's I I think it is.

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>These are So what is this is a little bit

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of a media note. I suppose the modern sports media,

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to transaction reporting, is always going to

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>report the maximum pop possible money that a deal could be,

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is like, let me see if I can

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>even find it. Well, so it this is these deals.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>He is getting a percentage of the cap. Essentially with

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>these max deals are you're like, you're guarante if you

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>sign the TRUEMAX, you know you are guaranteed in this

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>year this percentage of the cap and thirty five percent

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you know. Plus essentially it is an estimate of what

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the cap will be. And then there also might be

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 1>a few small ish incentives. So this will be at

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>least one thirty three I guess it could be one

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>forty five. My point is the the reporting on all

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys deals always report the top end instead of

0:36:57.239 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the bottom end because it's not a lot of actual reporting.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It's receiving mass text messages from agents, and the agents

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>want the biggest number possible out there, So the somewhere

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>between one thirty three and one five over the next

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. I didn't mean to contradict what you

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had said. I just was looking at it. I was

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from spotrack rather than the ESPN article

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and the reporting. But regardless, here is the the question

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that I have for anyone, uh, just kind of a

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>thought exercise. Really, does if the Suns were to want

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to trade Devin Booker, does this make him more or

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>less attractive to a team? And by that, I mean

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>does the fact that you have him locked up for

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>five more years? Uh? And you know so, they obviously

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.959
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be trading him anytime soon, so call it four

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>more years and you don't have to worry about him leaving.

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>How does that counteract the fact that Devin Booker will

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>be making again the most money any player in the

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 1>league's allowed to make. And the answer might be no,

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker is an All NBA player. He's worth the max.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You pay him the max. Got it? But do we

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>think that if like, is there reason to believe that

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>if Devin Booker is the best player on your team,

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be a contending team. Now again, these

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are actual questions, because the argument might be he literally

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>was in the finals a few years ago. My counterpoint

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to that would be, I don't think he the best

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>player on that team. I think Chris Paul was. But regardless,

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe you know that certainly is arguable that he

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>was and there was the best player. So it's Devin

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Booker's awesome. You just need to build the right stuff

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>around him. Maybe the counterpoint to the counterpoint is in

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the new era of the second apron NBA, how easy

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>is that to do? Now again, I would top of

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>my head, what is Devin Booker the thirteenth best player

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA? You know, at best ninth, at worst fifteenth,

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in there. Those guys already as far as like

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>building around him, you mean previously he's had start around him.

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Hit the he and Durant thing not working is a

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 1>knock on both of them. Pretty significantly, you know what

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and how badly it went. I put more

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>of that on the the general dysfunction of the team

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that, oh and this is funny in

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>a second, the general dysfunction of the team and the

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that it was just a terribly built roster. So

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't kill him because he individually played

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:36.439
<v Speaker 1>well and he has wanted to be there, and he's

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of done right by them. But bigger picture, de Monsey,

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think the Suns are as absolutely stuck as

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>you can get, and I don't see any realistic way

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for them to dig themselves out. And I don't know

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that Devin book Maybe Devin Booker, if they ended up

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>deciding to finally accept defeat in Phoenix and tear it down,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you would get a massive haul for him, But

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that would be enough to dig themselves

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.439
<v Speaker 1>out of the hole that mattishbia is built for them,

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has doug for them. I'm happy for Booker, and Booker,

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, has been for a guy that was I

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>think he was the eleventh pick of the draft. I

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>know it was the end of the lottery. I'm not sure.

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I know he wasn't in the single digits for him

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 1>now ten years into his career, two just be his

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thirteenth pick of the draft. Thank you be every single

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>year twenty five plus a night on good not great

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>efficiency and to get this type of money is a

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>hell of an accomplishment. It is. He is a guy

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that twice in his career has made the All NBA team,

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>once third team and then the one you know. In

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, the year coming off the finals, Berth

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>was All NBA First Team, and he's been good in

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. I do think because of the new really

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate realities of the CBA, we are in a weird

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>spot where a guy like that getting the MAX doesn't

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>feel as clean as it once did. Like listen, if

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>he's the thirteenth best player in basketball, he's worth the MAX.

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Those guys always have been since we've had a MAX.

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Because the new CBA is so punitive and can make

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it so hard to you know, keep teams together. It is,

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it just feels it feels to me. Tell me if

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>you think this unfair demantse that if Devin Booker is

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ever going to forget win a championship beyond a perennial contender.

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>He's going to need to be the team's say it again.

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 3>He needs to not be a max player.

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>No, I think he's gonna he's just gonna be a

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>max player like that. I think that he needs to

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be the team's second best guy. Yeah, I think that's

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like do I yeah, uh, I don't. I think he's awesome.

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I also think if he's your best player, it's going

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to be very, very difficult to be a perennial contender.

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And I know if you're not. I don't know if

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>there are a ton of Devin Booker fans, but like,

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>not that people dislike him, but if you are a

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Devin Booker fan, you're probably like, dude, we made the

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 1>finals and then the next year we had the best

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>record in basketball and got clocked by Luca. Like stuff happens,

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and that Maybe that's correct. Maybe I'm being a little

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 1>too harsh. I just feel like I feel like he is,

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a fair tick beneath Tatum, and Tatum was

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:37.399
<v Speaker 1>able to do it with this unbelievable, you know, very

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>well put together team around him. I don't see how

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Booker's ever going to be in that position. And if

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he were he's not quite as good as Tatum, you

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, And so like the So that's

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>not that he couldn't have you know, had if you

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 1>had put him with if you had flip flopped him

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 1>in Tatum. I think the Sons are a little better

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Celtics are a little worse. But

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics are still contenders with him as their best player.

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that's what I'm saying. If he's your

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>best player, you need him an awesome situation, right, and

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:15.919
<v Speaker 1>if he's your if he's your second best player, you're great.

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And I just don't know what Phoenix gonna do. All right,

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the other contract.

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, chet has joined SGA and shining, signing a big extension.

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 2>JADAU is bound to come soon, but teams with three

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 2>max players in the past have struggled and even now

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to stay competitive and keep competing and staying together.

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this could be a good thing for

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 2>OKC or is or is it a bad thing for him?

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Well? Listen, I hate the fact that in the new NBA,

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>whenever somebody signs a deal, you're like, oh, second apron

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>clock is ticking, like better keep winning now, because you're

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to break it down. I don't like that.

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>That is not to me as much of a concern

0:45:55.560 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for Oklahoma City because Chet's contract won't kick in for

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>another year. Jadub Who's gonna get this big extension, his

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>contract won't kick in for another year. And Shay's on

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>his second contract, but the new one, the third contract

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that Shay just signed, which is the huge one, that

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that won't kick in for another couple of years. So listen,

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>will this mean that a year from now they probably

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>have to expect Trey Dort or lose Hartenstein something like that. Yes,

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 1>should the Thunders still be in good shape? Yes? Did

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Chet just prove to us, if I'm your third best player,

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>you can be the best team in the league and

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>win a championship. Absolutely? Would I have paid him right now? No,

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have wanted to see another year because I

0:46:53.800 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Chet is probably underrated. Not probably, he is

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely underrated if you just look at the box score stuff,

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>because his biggest valued OKAC is on the defensive end.

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>He does provide you know, a guy who's taller than

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>seven feet that can shoot threes as well as he does,

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and seems to be totally comfortable in that role, doesn't

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>mind that he is. You know, they expected Chet to

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>be the second best player and Jada to be the

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>third best player. That has totally flipped and I don't

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>see it flipping back. And Chet's been totally fine with

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it and be selfless. I give him a lot of

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>credit for that. But the way this can go sideways

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>on OKAC is and you can be like, well, this

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is the case for every team is if one of

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:56.800
<v Speaker 1>those three guys misses a bunch of time with injury

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and your tied to him, and Chet is definitively a

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 1>significant injury risk, and you're laughing because you think this

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>is purely my I don't trust the super skinny guys thing.

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but kind of falling back on that little bit.

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:22.799
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, except except he has missed. He's been in

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the NBA for three years. He's missed half of the

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:34.800
<v Speaker 1>time because of two kind of nondescript moments that resulted

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in catastrophic injury for him. Before he played his first

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>NBA game. He's playing in that summer league, not even

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>summer league, that basically pick up game against Lebron and

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>his foot gets broken and then this year he falls

0:48:51.080 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>down and breaks his hip like that, that is that's concerning.

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just I I I don't think it would

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have been unreasonable for Oklahoma City to say to Chet,

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we love you, man, and we appreciate everything you've done,

0:49:09.719 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but we need to see another healthy season like you're

0:49:15.280 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>thus far. It has been rookie year out with injury,

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Year two fully healthy the whole way. Year three missed

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty games with injury.

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 2>It would have made a lot more sense for them

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to be hastier with extending Jado of over chat, that

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't that does make sense given.

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Well listen and I'm and I'm sure this is just

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a Jadob's gonna get extended momentarily, you know what I mean?

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Like that, that to me is a no doubter, and

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I understand people that probably I think there are some

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 1>people in the league maybe that believe Chet's upside still

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is higher than Jadob's because of his height, because of

0:49:57.520 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea behind him, because he was a

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>top two pick of the draft and could have gone

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 1>number one. But I I would I would have waited.

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's a disaster. I don't think like, oh,

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>my god, what are they thinking? But I personally would

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>have waited. That's how I would have done it. They

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>decided not to happy for Chet. He's a champion, you

0:50:23.920 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 1>know the I'm gonna say one other thing about the

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Chet thing, which is not necessarily like I don't know

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>if it's smart analysis, but it is just kind of

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>how I look at it. If we look at the

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:44.320
<v Speaker 1>three drafts his draft, in the draft before him, in

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the draft after him, where do we think he is

0:50:48.000 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>going to stack up amongst those players? So the draft

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:59.600
<v Speaker 1>after him, there's Wimby, who I would expect not a

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Wimby already is better than Chet, and I like that

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to me is pretty clear, and Wimby has best player

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:11.879
<v Speaker 1>in the league upside. I I don't know where you

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>stand on this, demonsee. If you were to ask me

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 1>who is going to be the better player over the

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>next decade, I would take Amen Thompson over Chet Rockets Thompson.

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that do you agree or disagree?

0:51:30.000 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I like what I've seen from Thompson.

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>This is I mean, I I think he has needs

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a shot, which, by the way, is why you might

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>be like no, and his he's you know, his biggest

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>value right now is defense, and some would argue Chet's

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a better defender right now just because of the size.

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But I personally would have Am and Thompson over Brandon

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Miller's put up numbers. But we haven't been able to

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 1>see Brandon Miller on you know, a competitive team yet,

0:51:58.880 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>so you would have to probably slot Chat ahead of him.

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:05.839
<v Speaker 1>But to me, they're similar. I think Powlo's clearly better

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>than Chet, so I would put Pollo who was the

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>number one pick, and j dub who's on the same team,

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.360
<v Speaker 1>also better than Chet. So there's four and then the

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:18.239
<v Speaker 1>draft before who are the guys I'm looking at it?

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Cade I feel is better than Chet, and not I

0:52:22.840 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>feel I know is better than Chet. And the other

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>two guys in the discussion are Shingoon and Mobiley. I

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 1>personally think both those guys are better than Chet. So

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that's seven guys. So here's the only reason I bring

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>it up. When we get back to the max contract

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:49.439
<v Speaker 1>thing like if of your little mini miniature and I'll

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 1>put I'll slot Chat ahead again of Scottie Barnes of

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Dyson Daniels. I think that one's probably pretty obvious of

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Miller. If you're the eighth best guy of your

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:09.839
<v Speaker 1>draft in the two draft surrounding you getting paid the max. Like,

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>it could get tricky, that's all. That's the That's the

0:53:14.280 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>only point I would make there, Not that it will

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it just it could get tricky on you, all right.

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:23.880
<v Speaker 1>This is a message that applies to ninety nine percent

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of you listening right now, because that's how many of

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you can be covered by fast and reliable service on

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the boost Mobile network with ninety nine percent nationwide coverage.

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't think you deserve a deal, listen up.

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You've got another thing coming right now. When you switch

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>to boost Mobile, you can get iPhone fifteen with dynamic

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>island and a forty eight megapixel main camera for ninety

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>nine ninety nine. That's ninety nine dollars and ninety nine

0:53:50.520 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>cents for iPhone fifteen on a nationwide five G network.

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>This may only apply to ninety nine percent of you,

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:00.879
<v Speaker 1>but I'm one hundred percent positive Boost Mobile just gave

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>all of us a really good deal in store off

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>for thirty five dollars. Device setup fee may apply, requires

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:13.320
<v Speaker 1>credit qualification, ID verification and activation on sixty dollars plans,

0:54:13.640 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Taxes extra five G speeds not available in all areas.

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, demons, let's uh jump you know we'll stay

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>where we're at. Uh. Let's go to the free post

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>free agency stuff quickly.

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 2>So the smoke is clearing from all these NBA offseason moves.

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:36.759
<v Speaker 2>The Rockets are building around Katie. The Bucks pulled off

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:39.720
<v Speaker 2>some moves to keep you Honess happy or unhappy, depending

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.760
<v Speaker 2>on who you ask, And now the Nuggets just got deeper.

0:54:43.120 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Who's whose off seasons did you like the most? And

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 2>who's you like the least?

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>The least is the Pelicans because they've traded away next

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:57.759
<v Speaker 1>year's pick. I just hate it so much. Here are

0:54:57.760 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the teams who I really do like what the did

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this offseason. I like what the Knicks we're able to

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do with limited flexibility. And I like Mike Brown as

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a coach, so I like what they did. I like

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the magic adding Desmond Baye and saying screw it, we're

0:55:15.280 --> 0:55:17.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna go for it. So I like what they did.

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought that he basically manifesting Norman Powell on the

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:28.040
<v Speaker 1>team without giving up anything of significant value was a

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:31.959
<v Speaker 1>pat Riley master stroke. So I like what they did.

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I love the Hawks offseason, from the player acquisition to

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>most notably getting that extra pick from New Orleans. I

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think the Hawks really positioned themselves quite well. I love

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>what Denver did. Love it, especially now that Valanchounas is

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:54.319
<v Speaker 1>coming over and they guaranteed a second year. I guess

0:55:54.320 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>so now he's gonna come over. So I really like

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what Denver did, and I od they love what Houston

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 1>did in adding Durant, and I thought not over paying

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 1>for him at all and keeping the full flexibility. The

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee thing we've talked about a bit, and he is interesting.

0:56:14.120 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But Jannis was on a stream with one of my

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:21.760
<v Speaker 1>new friends, I show speed. They could just call him speedy.

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>They just call him speed. I know what.

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:28.320
<v Speaker 3>They called.

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>What do they not call him speedy? Am I corny

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for that? You can laugh at me.

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay, that's fine. I don't know.

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm honestly like a shame that I know

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 2>like what they're calling him. But yeah, it's great, dude,

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I really I think.

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He's spent a lot of time with him. Yeah, him

0:56:50.000 --> 0:56:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and Kai. They spent a little time with Kai as well.

0:56:54.760 --> 0:56:57.839
<v Speaker 1>And hold on, there's I don't want to leave this

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 1>other kid out uh, and I want to get his

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:04.759
<v Speaker 1>name right because I kept getting it wrong. Uh. And

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:07.799
<v Speaker 1>so I spent time with him Kai and ty Lil

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>uh Hello, and they were all they were all super

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 1>dope Kai Kai in particular. But regardless, Yannis is doing

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a like a stream with speed, like as we speak

0:57:25.520 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 1>in Greece, and the producers have said, I need to

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to this, to this sid where he said he'll

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>probably stay in Milwaukee. They said, I need to listen

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to it and judge it from there. So let's do it.

0:57:37.920 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>So you've seen in Milwaukee, Uh, probably probably we'll see

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:54.560
<v Speaker 1>see probably a lot more woke. Yeah, mm hmmm. I

0:57:54.600 --> 0:57:58.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think Yannis was ready for that question. I'll be

0:57:58.840 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>honest to Speed for being like, let's just get let

0:58:02.160 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, let me just throw it at you. And

0:58:04.160 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that was like real, that's a real something I'm bad at.

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're like interviewing someone just quick to the point questions,

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 1>not over talking the way a lot of people would do.

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>That is give him a lot of time to know

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's coming in your long wind set up, be like, well, y' honest,

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:28.240
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of speculation, you know about your future.

0:58:29.000 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee made some moves this offseason. They you know, waved

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and stretched Damian Lowe. They brought in Miles Turner. Do

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you think you've done enough to compete for a championship?

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And will you be a Milwaukee Buck?

0:58:43.160 --> 0:58:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Nick? Sure?

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:47.440
<v Speaker 1>That gives him all the time to credit to Speed

0:58:47.480 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for its being like so you say in Milwaukee.

0:58:49.440 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't. He's also not in the media like that.

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's obviously correct like that supports he exactly,

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:55.760
<v Speaker 2>He's just shooting.

0:58:55.560 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Which I think probably worked in his favor. Before we

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 1>get to the Joe Burrow thing, the producers tell me,

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>uh Anna Sabolenka just lost, so American Amanda on a Samova,

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:17.360
<v Speaker 1>pardon me, will play in the Wimbledon finals. And I

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 1>saw that earlier and then I laughed because I have

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a buddy. I don't want to say who it is

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know. I don't want to put his

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:29.959
<v Speaker 1>business out there. But someone you guys would know, who

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>texted me yesterday. So I need some advice. I parlayed

0:59:35.360 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Sabolenka with three four, with three of the four remaining

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 1>semi finalists to win at all. So if I cash,

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:45.880
<v Speaker 1>this is what he wrote, If I cash out all

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of my bets the cat. The pay on the cash

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:51.520
<v Speaker 1>out for all of the bets is forty eight hundred bucks.

0:59:52.000 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>He's like, but if Sabolenka wins and Joker wins, I

0:59:56.640 --> 1:00:00.760
<v Speaker 1>win eleven thousand, and Center wins, I win six, and

1:00:00.880 --> 1:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Alcarez wins, I win ten thousand. So he's texting me

1:00:06.520 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to ask me if he should cash out, cash out

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and guarantee five grand basically, which is a hedge against

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Sablenka losing. But if Sablenka wins, he was almost guaranteed,

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, six till eleven thousand, and I text back,

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm gonna say, Let that ride. And

1:00:25.760 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he writes back, but if Sablenka loses, I lose all

1:00:30.600 --> 1:00:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the bets and I'm up right now, I can lock

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in being up a lot. And I wrote back, cashing

1:00:39.640 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>out is for cowards. And Sabolenka lost a few, you

1:00:42.480 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>know an hour ago. Well listen, I mean he wins something,

1:00:47.640 --> 1:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>you lose them. You don't cash out bets. They don't

1:00:50.480 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>offer you the cash out because it's what's smart for you.

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:58.479
<v Speaker 1>You don't just I stand by the advice. I feel

1:00:58.520 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>badly about it, though, I'm gonna I'm about to send

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>him the yikes emoji. Hold on, I mean, I don't

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>know if he's gonna be in the mood for it,

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna text him the yikes. There we go.

1:01:12.600 --> 1:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>He then wrote in reply to me, saying, let it ride.

1:01:16.800 --> 1:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>This is what my heart says. But Sablenka was in

1:01:20.080 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>deep bleep the last two matches. Lol, we don't listen

1:01:25.000 --> 1:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to me. What do you want from me? All right,

1:01:26.920 --> 1:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>let's do Joe Burrow real quick and then move on.

1:01:29.560 --> 1:01:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Uh So we saw Spags called Burrow the second best

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in the NFL on season two of the Quarterback

1:01:35.800 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Season two off Quarterback.

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 3>That was back in September, and then obviously.

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>There's been a quarterback since then that has beaten Malmes

1:01:42.360 --> 1:01:43.760
<v Speaker 2>on the biggest stage possible.

1:01:44.000 --> 1:01:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Mind you burrowed and you made the playoffs last year.

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Has Burrow lost his.

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Crowd as being the most the biggest threat to Malmes?

1:01:51.760 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think that right that, right now, the second

1:01:57.080 --> 1:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback in football is Josh Allen, And I think

1:02:02.240 --> 1:02:09.479
<v Speaker 1>that you'll like this take Demante. I think I said

1:02:09.520 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>on the show the other day that even if this

1:02:13.440 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be my personal rankings. If because what you hear

1:02:18.760 --> 1:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time is because Randy Moss and out a

1:02:21.360 --> 1:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>tweet that was, like, the top four is Mahomes, Josh, Lamar,

1:02:25.320 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and Joe who's number five? And that seems to be

1:02:28.880 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody's top four those four guys, And what I said

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on the show was, if we are going to be fair,

1:02:39.760 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that it has to be at this point

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>either like a locked in top three that Burrow is

1:02:49.360 --> 1:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>not a part of, or a locked in top five

1:02:53.760 --> 1:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that Burrow and Hurts are a part of. Because that Patrick,

1:03:01.320 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Lamar, they if they're healthy, they and even if

1:03:07.640 --> 1:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they're both Josh and Patrick are always healthy, and Lamar

1:03:12.000 --> 1:03:13.919
<v Speaker 1>has been held the last couple of years. Their teams

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are in the playoffs. Every year they've won at least

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>one in Josh's case and multiple in Patrick and Lamar's

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>case league MVPs. They're the best three quarterbacks in football.

1:03:25.760 --> 1:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>If we are going to put Joe Burrow in that

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>tier based on the fact that he has these unbelievable

1:03:33.680 --> 1:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers and he once beat Patrick in the playoffs, then

1:03:40.000 --> 1:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the counter to that is, well, then the other guy

1:03:43.480 --> 1:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>who beat Patrick in the playoffs, who's active who doesn't

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>have these unbelievable numbers but has this unstoppable play and

1:03:52.800 --> 1:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that whose team he's always available and his team wins.

1:03:57.320 --> 1:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>You've get like that's the flip side to the Joe

1:03:59.360 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Burrow coin where Joe lax and team success, Jalen lacks

1:04:04.080 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>an individual you know, raw passing numbers. So I think

1:04:09.880 --> 1:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the top three quarterbacks is what should be locked at

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this point. And Patrick won, Josh two, Lamar three, and

1:04:19.000 --> 1:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>then we can argue after. But if you are saying

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that the top four, it's just not fair to say

1:04:26.400 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe belongs in that group with those other guys, but

1:04:29.800 --> 1:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Jalen doesn't when he's made the playoffs twice in his career,

1:04:35.240 --> 1:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I disagree with Spags at this moment. Now,

1:04:40.400 --> 1:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think here's what I would question about Spags in

1:04:42.720 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that moment from quarterback. Did he say the same thing

1:04:45.720 --> 1:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to Josh Allen after the conference championship game? Is that

1:04:49.160 --> 1:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of his go to line with Like did he

1:04:51.160 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>walk off fields like, hey man, aside from our guy,

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you're the best I am? I am a little curious

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>about that. But also like Josh stock rose based on

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this year because he won a league MVP people thought

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bills weren't gonna be great, you know, and the

1:05:10.440 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I believed in the Bills, but other people didn't. They

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>made it, they beat Lamar, they won a conference championship game,

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>or they sorry, they got to a conference championship.

1:05:19.160 --> 1:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>So this next year, it'll be very easy to power

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:24.680
<v Speaker 2>rank these quarterback Right now, I think it's a little

1:05:24.680 --> 1:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>difficult given how the past few years have gone. After

1:05:28.200 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 2>next year, I feel like it'll be a lot more clear,

1:05:30.440 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Like will Jalen Hurts repeat what happens with Patrick Mahomes

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Joe Burrow if you don't make the playoffs again, like

1:05:35.560 --> 1:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>you're definitely not.

1:05:36.400 --> 1:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>There was Josh Allen going to be sure?

1:05:39.520 --> 1:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean there are there are scenarios where it

1:05:42.520 --> 1:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes easier. There's also scenarios where it becomes way messier,

1:05:47.400 --> 1:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like the the that Jaden

1:05:52.560 --> 1:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>has a monster individual year numbers like you did last year,

1:05:57.400 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but the defense isn't as good. Jalen has a great

1:06:01.960 --> 1:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm just painting a weird scenario. They open up the

1:06:05.120 --> 1:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>offense and Jalen Hurts actually puts up crazy good numbers,

1:06:08.360 --> 1:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but they lose their first playoff game. You know what?

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Burrow. Burrow puts up the exact year

1:06:19.720 --> 1:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>he had last year, the most like it's a carbon

1:06:23.400 --> 1:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>copy year. The offense is one of the best in football.

1:06:26.920 --> 1:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He's unbelievable. He has all these great numbers. The team

1:06:30.560 --> 1:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>wins nine games to the defense is terrible, like the

1:06:33.720 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there are things that could make it complicated. All right,

1:06:38.640 --> 1:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>let's do some listener questions.

1:06:40.880 --> 1:06:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh uh, Curtis asks who will have the better stat

1:06:44.640 --> 1:06:46.800
<v Speaker 2>line tonight, Bronnie James or Cooper Flag.

1:06:48.280 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh. I think the Cooper Flags the way way way better.

1:06:51.920 --> 1:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bet Like, listen, Cooper, I know that Brownie's in year two.

1:06:56.560 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Flag's better player than Bronnie. I think that's the

1:07:01.200 --> 1:07:04.800
<v Speaker 1>undeniable by any stretch. Bronnie also coming off a rough

1:07:04.840 --> 1:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>summer league game. He was good in the first one,

1:07:07.000 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>tough in the second one. Uh. Now there's a chance

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that for Flag, you know, a little first summer league game, jitters,

1:07:13.720 --> 1:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think he'll be good. I think he'll be

1:07:15.600 --> 1:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>really good.

1:07:17.200 --> 1:07:17.560
<v Speaker 3>All right.

1:07:17.720 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Next the Collins uh Collins eleven ass Nick's any tips

1:07:22.520 --> 1:07:24.680
<v Speaker 2>for book sales to improve your poker game?

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So the let me look up book books or sites.

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you wrote all right, So for it depends

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>on how nerdy you want to get with it. Uh now,

1:07:38.320 --> 1:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>full disclosure, I'm a part you know, in my owners

1:07:43.680 --> 1:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>too strong investor in this company. But Octopi Poker to

1:07:48.760 --> 1:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>me is the best poker site as far as if

1:07:53.040 --> 1:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to do like GTO stuff and training and

1:07:55.480 --> 1:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. If you're as far as books, I

1:07:58.680 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>think that Modernoker Theory by Michael Assavado is a really

1:08:03.640 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>good book if you're trying to again do the GTO stuff,

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're just trying to you know, not worried about

1:08:12.600 --> 1:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>GTO but just avoid you know, cataclysmic mistakes or learn

1:08:17.880 --> 1:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the basics. I think Daniel Negranu's YouTube page that has

1:08:23.360 --> 1:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of basically like tutorials on how to play

1:08:26.160 --> 1:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this game or how to play these spots at a

1:08:28.960 --> 1:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, easy to access level. It's the poker version

1:08:33.400 --> 1:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>demanse of what the videos I had you watch on

1:08:37.280 --> 1:08:39.479
<v Speaker 1>our way to go golfing? Oh my gosh, we never

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about this. Demonte golfed, Yeah, Demonte golfed it the

1:08:44.920 --> 1:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Royal Hawaiian Golf Club, one of the most beautiful places

1:08:48.120 --> 1:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I've ever been to. And this is a major announcement

1:08:51.479 --> 1:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for the listeners. Demanse new found respect for golf.

1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Definitely new found respect. It's it's tough. I mean, dude,

1:09:02.960 --> 1:09:05.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what you call these, like your cuticles

1:09:05.200 --> 1:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. These things were bleeding on my

1:09:07.920 --> 1:09:09.200
<v Speaker 3>finger after we were done.

1:09:09.720 --> 1:09:11.799
<v Speaker 1>That's why people sometimes wear gloves.

1:09:12.240 --> 1:09:14.640
<v Speaker 2>He didn't wear gloves, I mean. And being able to

1:09:14.640 --> 1:09:17.040
<v Speaker 2>play there at for the first time I also thought.

1:09:16.960 --> 1:09:17.679
<v Speaker 3>Was super cool.

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was really cool. Yeah, it's amazing, I mean,

1:09:21.800 --> 1:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Demanse and I just so, I'm a bad golfer. Demante

1:09:24.920 --> 1:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>literally had never played ever in his life. And the

1:09:28.880 --> 1:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>driving range was closed, so we couldn't warm up, couldn't practice,

1:09:32.080 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>no lessons, So I just booked the last possible allowable

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>tea time, four thirty in the afternoon. That way, no

1:09:39.320 --> 1:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>one would be behind us and we could just hack

1:09:42.200 --> 1:09:47.519
<v Speaker 1>around out there. Demanse hit one really good shot, I

1:09:47.640 --> 1:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hit three. Yeah, I hit three really good shots, and

1:09:53.760 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>then everything else was just a cataclysm. But it was

1:09:57.200 --> 1:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so much fun. And obviously do it next time. It

1:10:00.400 --> 1:10:02.879
<v Speaker 1>was great, all right, great.

1:10:03.960 --> 1:10:06.559
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, no go ahead, Daniel The Daniel E question

1:10:06.840 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 2>on your is it possible? Lebron didn't welcome Aiden to

1:10:09.439 --> 1:10:11.519
<v Speaker 2>La because he wants to make sure everyone knows that

1:10:11.560 --> 1:10:14.320
<v Speaker 2>it's Luca's team now kind of.

1:10:14.400 --> 1:10:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the friendliest way to look at it. Maybe,

1:10:18.240 --> 1:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe the I didn't I did not think

1:10:22.000 --> 1:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of that. Maybe I should have included that in the

1:10:24.280 --> 1:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>actual possibilities. I didn't think of that. But that's that's

1:10:27.320 --> 1:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe the friendly, the kindest way to look at it,

1:10:29.600 --> 1:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, Like rate, subscribe, review, no TV show today

1:10:33.240 --> 1:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>or tomorrow. Check out the Poker Go live streams of

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the World Series of Poker Main Event which is going

1:10:40.640 --> 1:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on all weekend, and then I will be on the

1:10:43.280 --> 1:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>call Tuesday and Wednesday of the main event Final Table.

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Next podcast will be Monday, not Tuesday, because I'll be traveling,

1:10:51.920 --> 1:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, what's right? Great job to Monday, Great job volume, DraftKings,

1:10:55.080 --> 1:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Blue Duck and our friends of Boostmobile and everybody else.

1:10:59.280 --> 1:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Talk to you guys later.

1:11:00.080 --> 1:11:00.479
<v Speaker 3>What's right,