Speaker 1: Thinking sideways. I don't never stories of things simply don't
Speaker 1: know the answer too well. Hi, there, welcome the Thing
Speaker 1: Sideways the podcast. I'm Joe run by I'm Steve. Okay,
Speaker 1: tonight we're giving you a quick update on Alasian flight
Speaker 1: through seventy and that's why we're talking so fast. So
Speaker 1: without any further ado, let's get right into the story. Okay,
Speaker 1: just kidding, folks. Yeah, this is a So this is
Speaker 1: a real quick little update, little bonus episode for you guys. Uh.
Speaker 1: Since we posted our episode about m AS three seventy,
Speaker 1: there have been a few developments we wanted to bring
Speaker 1: you guys up to data on if you were to
Speaker 1: wear them. Uh. First development, Australian company named Geo Residence
Speaker 1: claims that they have found a jet liner. The day
Speaker 1: have been goal. Where's that It's to the east of India. Yeah,
Speaker 1: uh so anyway they say nobody is Uh. The Australian
Speaker 1: government has actually said they don't take their claim seriously.
Speaker 1: Nobody else has actually bothered to go out and have
Speaker 1: a look seed find that it's there and it's it
Speaker 1: really is. Actually, it seems like unlikely that it's in
Speaker 1: that spot because they kept flying for a long a
Speaker 1: much longer period of time than it would have taken
Speaker 1: for the plane to get to the Bay of Bengal.
Speaker 1: So they may or may not have found it. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's likely. Well, yeah, nobody's really taking it seriously.
Speaker 1: And what are they basing this discovery on. Yeah, is
Speaker 1: it's photographs that they they're looking at. I think that. Well,
Speaker 1: that their mission is to find stuff on the ocean floor,
Speaker 1: usually minerals, and apparently one of the ways they do
Speaker 1: it is by sniffing the air above above the above
Speaker 1: the sea, and they can they can get traces of
Speaker 1: various various things like elements and things like that. And
Speaker 1: apparently they found traces of things like that you would
Speaker 1: expect to find in a plane crash site, like traces
Speaker 1: of jet fuel or at least thee the odor of
Speaker 1: jet fuel trade is aluminum. They're using person pretty much
Speaker 1: using and not. Yeah, and so anyway, I'm I don't
Speaker 1: know exactly how their technology works, and they might not.
Speaker 1: They probably don't want to like fill everybody in on
Speaker 1: all the dirty little details of how their tech works.
Speaker 1: But they claimed that they found it, and they're standing
Speaker 1: by their claim. They claimed that they found this or
Speaker 1: that they found a plane crash. Well, that's true, they
Speaker 1: found a play crash. It sounds like that's what they're saying. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's that's development number one, development number two. Now, I
Speaker 1: know everybody has heard about this. They decided that the
Speaker 1: plane took the southern route. And the reason they've decided
Speaker 1: that is the company that owns the satellite that did
Speaker 1: all the pinging on the plane in Marseille, yeah or
Speaker 1: in Marsett excuse me, uh, They analyze their satellite data
Speaker 1: and they announced that they were highly confident that m. A.
Speaker 1: Street seventies flew south and not north. Because remember, at first,
Speaker 1: there was just a series of pings that went from
Speaker 1: the satellite down to the plane. The plane replied back,
Speaker 1: and as as time went by, the return time of
Speaker 1: the and grew longer. And so that's how they knew
Speaker 1: that it was arcing away from the satellite, and but
Speaker 1: they didn't know what direction the pain was coming from,
Speaker 1: so it could either have been north or south. And
Speaker 1: then they ad anounced that they had figured it out
Speaker 1: and analyze their data, and we'll talk a little bit
Speaker 1: more about how they figured that out in a bit. Okay,
Speaker 1: and there's been another development. The third development is that
Speaker 1: there is a private intelligence organization called LEGNAT, which stands
Speaker 1: from Langley Intelligence Group Network, and these guys have claimed,
Speaker 1: they claimed in late March that they have intelligence that
Speaker 1: indicates that the plane landed on in Pakistan and Langley
Speaker 1: that would be the CIA headquarters. Uh, not necessarily, I mean,
Speaker 1: anybody can. It might be it might be former intelligence
Speaker 1: operators for the work for that work at Langley, or
Speaker 1: it might just be that they could have they appropriated
Speaker 1: the name because no, there's no law to stop them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but apparently, I mean there are there are private intelligence
Speaker 1: services like Stratford is one that comes to mind that
Speaker 1: are actually high the competent, and you know they're entirely private,
Speaker 1: their non governmental and so these guys, I think are
Speaker 1: a long line. So they're saying that it's been landed somewhere. Yeah,
Speaker 1: apparently they're apparently. Their strongest indicator for this is uh
Speaker 1: and some engineers at Boeing who have confided and the
Speaker 1: Boeing believes that it's on the ground in Pakistan, which
Speaker 1: makes me think that you know, and that you know,
Speaker 1: when you think about seven seventy seven is a big
Speaker 1: plane it would be really easy to hide an extra
Speaker 1: transponder or two on that thing and not bother to
Speaker 1: tell the airplane company about it. So and so, if
Speaker 1: somebody was going to hijack a plane and take the
Speaker 1: crew hostage, take the plane somewhere, and then the first
Speaker 1: thing that they would do if they wanted to hide
Speaker 1: the plane is they would tell They would force the
Speaker 1: crew to tell them where every single switch for every transponder,
Speaker 1: every communication device on the plane is so they can
Speaker 1: shut everything off. So having having a device on the
Speaker 1: plane that the crew is not aware of would actually
Speaker 1: be kind of a good thing. Yeah, but it seems
Speaker 1: like the sort of thing that Boeing would have, I mean,
Speaker 1: let some people know about you would think that they yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean we would have said, hey, US government, we
Speaker 1: did we have this hidden thing and we know where
Speaker 1: it is. Well, yeah, no, that's that's true. But you
Speaker 1: don't know that the U. S. Government isn't aware of this.
Speaker 1: I guess that's true. They could be doing some covert
Speaker 1: something or another. Yeah. So anyway, those are three developments.
Speaker 1: Um as you as you know, if you listen to
Speaker 1: our previous episode, we concluded Team Team Sideways said, is
Speaker 1: we concluded that the plane had flown north and was
Speaker 1: in the hands of terrorists who are going to come
Speaker 1: back and read some nuclear death on somebody. I thought
Speaker 1: I thought it was aliens. Yeah, no, I don't remember
Speaker 1: agreeing to that. Now. I don't think we agree to
Speaker 1: that one. Okay, I thought it was I meant I
Speaker 1: meant the nuclear thing. Yeah, agree. I I didn't agree
Speaker 1: to the alien either. But slipping out of time, Yeah yeah,
Speaker 1: that was what about the black hole? And that's that
Speaker 1: wasn't that wasn't no? Right, Yeah, that was a total sport. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So okay, um, so now I'm going to get back
Speaker 1: to in mare SAT and their announcement. They were they
Speaker 1: were conclusively sure that it would had gone south. And
Speaker 1: I don't know if any of you know this. Actually,
Speaker 1: until recently, I didn't know this. I didn't know how
Speaker 1: they figured that out. I just sort of, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: they're the experts. What the hell? Right, So here's what happened.
Speaker 1: Here's there. They have a satellite over the Indian Ocean.
Speaker 1: It's at sixty east zero degrees north because it's on
Speaker 1: the equator, and it's in a geostationary orbit, which means
Speaker 1: that it's at two two hundred thirty six miles above
Speaker 1: sea level, and at that at that height you're in
Speaker 1: an orbit that's that's exactly the same speed as the rotation,
Speaker 1: so you appear to have synchronous then, yeah, it's geosynchronous.
Speaker 1: That's that's cool. I didn't I guess I didn't realize
Speaker 1: that was the thing that we did, although it makes
Speaker 1: sense that of course, like we would do that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the closer, the closer to objects are orbiting each other,
Speaker 1: the closer they are, the faster they're moving around, and
Speaker 1: then the farther out the slower. Yeah. So that's that's
Speaker 1: a sweet spot, right, A very popular spot to put satellites.
Speaker 1: There is this natural phenomenon called precession. And what that
Speaker 1: is is you can put a geo ship, a geosynchrome
Speaker 1: Is satellite into orbit and it's it's near to perfect
Speaker 1: in this positioning. But over time, the pull of the
Speaker 1: of the Sun to pull the Moon, solar wind, magnetic
Speaker 1: variations in the Earth's crust will pull that thing out
Speaker 1: of orbit over the equator, so its position is degraded. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it has. And so so this thing is now one
Speaker 1: point six six degrees off the equator, so it goes.
Speaker 1: So that means during the course of a day, it
Speaker 1: goes as far as one point six six degrees north
Speaker 1: and then it starts going back down. It crosses the
Speaker 1: equator again and goes one point six six degrees south
Speaker 1: of the equator, and that would make it easier for
Speaker 1: them to figure out if things had gone or her south. Right, Yeah, exactly,
Speaker 1: That's that's how they use it. There's a here's a
Speaker 1: diagram of the of these things. So, yeah, I saw that. Okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: So anyway, so it makes total sense. Yeah, And so
Speaker 1: that's how they were able to figure it out because
Speaker 1: this thing at a certain point was during the flight
Speaker 1: was moving north, and then for for the latter two
Speaker 1: thirds of the flight, until they lost contact with the plane,
Speaker 1: it was moving south at gaining speed. But this thing
Speaker 1: doesn't really move fast in the north south direction. The
Speaker 1: fastest it goes it's maybe thirty Now we've talked about
Speaker 1: the Doppler effect, and we all know what that is.
Speaker 1: I'll talk real quick though. The Doppler effect is is
Speaker 1: what happens when you can press waves. So it happens
Speaker 1: with sound waves. Imagine a locomotive going by you blowing
Speaker 1: its horns yeah, and when it goes past you, suddenly
Speaker 1: it drops. It drops in frequency because it's moving away
Speaker 1: from you. So the sound waves lengthen out. There's a
Speaker 1: great episode of Big Bang Theory in which Sheldon dresses
Speaker 1: up like the Doppler effect. It's amazing, look at it.
Speaker 1: If it's amazing, Yeah, on the Doppler effect, I them.
Speaker 1: So that happens with light, happens with radio waves everything.
Speaker 1: So when the satellite pings the plane, it gets a
Speaker 1: ping back, and then if the plane is moving away
Speaker 1: from the satellite, then it changes the radio frequency of
Speaker 1: the return ping and then yeah, so if it's yeah, so,
Speaker 1: if it's moving towards it, the frequency will slowly increase.
Speaker 1: If it's moving away, it slowly decreases. Correct, Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: But they tracked the graph, the actual data, the actual
Speaker 1: shifts in frequency that the experienced of the pings graft
Speaker 1: all that. Then they drew up on knowing the speed
Speaker 1: in the direction of the satellite. They basically drew two
Speaker 1: theoretical curves on the same graph of what the ships
Speaker 1: would look like if it had gone north and what
Speaker 1: the ships would look like if it had gone south.
Speaker 1: And they found that though, and they found that the
Speaker 1: actual data that they got on that graph correlated very
Speaker 1: strongly with the other projected track, and so that's why
Speaker 1: they concluded with such confidence that um that have gone south. Well,
Speaker 1: it turns out there are some people that have been
Speaker 1: trying to make sense of the graph. And so we're
Speaker 1: not talking about just like, yeah, who's with a website, right,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about just like weird thinking sideways exactly
Speaker 1: what we're talking about people who actually know what they're
Speaker 1: talking about everything though, don't don't lie, don't Okay, I
Speaker 1: don't graph anything. Yeah, and so thanks for outing me there, Kevin,
Speaker 1: appreciate that. Okay. So so some of these guys, I'm
Speaker 1: named four of them here. Michael Exner as a founder
Speaker 1: of a company called American Mobile Satellite Corporation. So this
Speaker 1: guy probably knows a bit about satellites and stuff. Duncan
Speaker 1: Steals a physicist who currently is working at NASA Flash
Speaker 1: porn Star. Uh No, actually, do you guys recognize the
Speaker 1: name Duncan Steel. It does sound really familiar. He was
Speaker 1: one of the main guys that was in that story
Speaker 1: that we talked about that We've talked about him before.
Speaker 1: Was he the same guy the same guy. I thought.
Speaker 1: I just recognized his name from like romance novels. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna steal. Yeah, that's Danielle Steel. But I also
Speaker 1: made that mistake in that episode. Yeah, we're gonna need
Speaker 1: to like like look this guy up at his wiki
Speaker 1: page and see it's the same dude. It's pretty positive
Speaker 1: it's the same dude. Yeah, because I went to his website. Yeah. Wow, Okay,
Speaker 1: the web doesn't lie. The web never lies yet. Okay, next,
Speaker 1: next guy in line, Tim Ferrar. It was a satellite
Speaker 1: technology consultant, and a guy named Ari Schulman was editor
Speaker 1: of The New Atlantis. And I have no idea. I
Speaker 1: didn't bother to go find out what that meg is about.
Speaker 1: But he wrote a long, very interesting article where he
Speaker 1: summarized some of the some of the problems that they've
Speaker 1: had with figuring out in mar Set's data. And so
Speaker 1: here's some of the problems. I was gonna say, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I was gonna ask had you were you going to
Speaker 1: go into those problems because I found it really interesting
Speaker 1: when I read the articles about it. Yeah, the problems
Speaker 1: that that they have with the graph. Okay, number one,
Speaker 1: the first ping if you look at the graph. It
Speaker 1: was taken when the plane was on the ground. It
Speaker 1: shows a shift of minus eighty five hurts. So according
Speaker 1: to their calculations, and this involves like this involves like
Speaker 1: three dimensional trigonometry and stuff, which is why I didn't
Speaker 1: actually sit down and try to try to replicate. I
Speaker 1: looked at Yeah, exactly, I'll take their word for it. So,
Speaker 1: according to one of these guys, the plane would have
Speaker 1: had to be moving about fifty miles an hour relative
Speaker 1: to the satellite to produce that kind of a shift.
Speaker 1: So that doesn't make any sense in Marsett because that's
Speaker 1: when they're loading baggage. Plane stop moving. Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: at that time they were. They were at the gate,
Speaker 1: and they might have just left the gate, but they
Speaker 1: weren't yet taxing to the runway. According to the according
Speaker 1: to their logs, they say that the frequency shifts are
Speaker 1: higher at the beginning of the graph and including that
Speaker 1: fifty miles an hour at that's sitting at the starting gate.
Speaker 1: They're lower at the other end. So the shift at
Speaker 1: the last ping on their graph shows a plane moving
Speaker 1: away from the satellite at a hundred three miles an hour.
Speaker 1: But they produced a map which we've all seen. It's
Speaker 1: a map of the globe that shows these two different
Speaker 1: arcs that the plane can take. And uh, that map
Speaker 1: shows a plane receiving it two seventy two miles per
Speaker 1: hour relative to the satellite. So that makes no sense. Well,
Speaker 1: in their their whole basis is that when in Marsette
Speaker 1: did all their math, they didn't they said, well, the
Speaker 1: satellite doesn't move, so we know where it's at. They
Speaker 1: didn't take into consideration the fact that the satellite is
Speaker 1: actually moving up and down north and south. And when
Speaker 1: these guys, when I was reading it, these guys did
Speaker 1: the math and they said, well, if you factor in
Speaker 1: the fact that at this point it should have been
Speaker 1: at the peak of its northbound arc, and you factor
Speaker 1: that in, oh, wait, the plane is moving it one
Speaker 1: mile an hour in the in the very first pain
Speaker 1: that's eleven minutes before take off, So that actually makes
Speaker 1: more sense. That's how they got to their their arc
Speaker 1: of the trajectory of where this plane would have gone. Well,
Speaker 1: actually they took it a step further in more set
Speaker 1: mr Set based their their their calculations on the fact
Speaker 1: that the satellite was moving and uh, and so that's
Speaker 1: how they figured that out that that the satellite was so. So, say,
Speaker 1: for example, if the plane is going south and the
Speaker 1: satellite is moving south, then what that means is that
Speaker 1: a ping back from the plane that is going south
Speaker 1: is going to be at a higher frequency than the
Speaker 1: paying back from the plane going north. Yeah, and that's
Speaker 1: how So that's how m R Set figured that out.
Speaker 1: What they didn't take into account, apparently, is that the
Speaker 1: satellite is also moving relative to the ground receiving station
Speaker 1: that is sending its data to ore is so yeah,
Speaker 1: and so they paying the plane, they get back a
Speaker 1: shifted radio ping and and then they retransmit that to
Speaker 1: the ground station which is also moving relative to the satellite. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's yeah, it is. And the ground sat the receiving
Speaker 1: station is in Perth, Australia, and it's southwest, a long
Speaker 1: way southwest from the satellite. And so then so the
Speaker 1: fact that they didn't take that into account through there
Speaker 1: to all their stuff. It actually is two moving points
Speaker 1: in space, not one moving point. Do they have updated graph?
Speaker 1: Then in Marsette does not These guys did Michael Exner,
Speaker 1: the founder of American Mobile Satellite Corporation, did the calcus
Speaker 1: on what exactly what exactly the shift would have been
Speaker 1: between the satellite and the ground station, and then he
Speaker 1: basically plotted that, subtracted it from the actual data, and
Speaker 1: plotted a different graph that actually matches reality far, far
Speaker 1: better than in Marsett's graph. Smart people. Yeah, and then
Speaker 1: this one, like you said, does have the plane. They
Speaker 1: practically at zero at the beginning, which is where out
Speaker 1: of being Yeah hopefully, Yeah, I hope. So okay, As
Speaker 1: I said that, listen to the problems. The first thing,
Speaker 1: they were moving fast. The shifts are higher, but they
Speaker 1: solved that problem and they're higher at the beginning and
Speaker 1: lower at the end. Uh. And another big problem. What
Speaker 1: it is and I'm going to hold up this graph
Speaker 1: to the microphone so our listeners can see this. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: another big problem. What that is is, Uh, they fixed that,
Speaker 1: but that still doesn't settle the issue of whether the
Speaker 1: plane went north or south, because these guys have said
Speaker 1: in Marsett's projected or predicted tracks for the point in
Speaker 1: north and south make absolutely no sense. If you look
Speaker 1: at and we'll post we'll post a copy this on
Speaker 1: online for our wonderful listeners. But if you look at
Speaker 1: this and those of us in the room. If those
Speaker 1: of you in the room, you can see this if
Speaker 1: you look at this at at nineteen forty and we're
Speaker 1: talking time here, uh, there were there was a pink
Speaker 1: set out and this is the actual the green light
Speaker 1: as the actual recorded pin. And this is the north
Speaker 1: course what what the ship would have been for the
Speaker 1: north course, and this is what it would have been
Speaker 1: for the south course. But at that time at y
Speaker 1: the satellite had reached its northernmost point and was about
Speaker 1: to start going back south again, which means that relative
Speaker 1: to the plane is either the north or the south plane,
Speaker 1: the satellite wasn't effectively was not moving. It was state. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it was at that point not really moving. So what
Speaker 1: they're what what people are puzzled about on it's the
Speaker 1: predicted tracks that in Marcette put on that graph is
Speaker 1: those points should be together, they should be like, you know,
Speaker 1: the same spot. I also think when I see correlations
Speaker 1: like this on a map that are so close, when
Speaker 1: they're like, oh, yeah, this is what we projected it
Speaker 1: would have been, and this is what it actually is,
Speaker 1: so like obviously this is where it went. I just
Speaker 1: kind of called bunk on it, Like I just don't
Speaker 1: necessarily I can't. I just can't quite Yeah, I can't
Speaker 1: quite get there. Yeah. Well there's some other head scratches
Speaker 1: about the whole thing. Um, after this, after the satellite
Speaker 1: started moving southward, then those two lines should should like
Speaker 1: assume the south that the satellite turned around started going
Speaker 1: south and imagine for a moment that it's moving consistently
Speaker 1: the same speed as a moves on that line. Right,
Speaker 1: So at that point, those two lines should be parallel.
Speaker 1: And other words, the shift should be the same no
Speaker 1: matter what for the north and the south. It should
Speaker 1: it should stay the same because the satellite is moving
Speaker 1: at the same rate. However, of course, the satellite is
Speaker 1: not staying at the same speed. It's picking up speeds
Speaker 1: and move southward. What that means is that those lines
Speaker 1: should move apart as time goes by. Now look at
Speaker 1: the graph and what do you see? They're parallel? No,
Speaker 1: they're not. They're parallel for a bit. And then look
Speaker 1: look what happens. They cross the north south lines the
Speaker 1: north the predicted north south track lines across. Now, how
Speaker 1: can this happen when the satellite is moving southward? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's an issue. Uh huh. Yeah, So seeing it's front
Speaker 1: with problems. Yeah, I'm not even that good at graph things,
Speaker 1: and it sort of jumps out at you. Huh yeah.
Speaker 1: So yeah, So anyway, these guys have been I've been
Speaker 1: trying to get information from in mar Set about this,
Speaker 1: and they're not divulging what their methodology was for arriving
Speaker 1: at any of this stuff. Yeah, it's probably you know,
Speaker 1: we just pulled guess. We know what we're doing. I
Speaker 1: kind of know what we're doing, so we just guessed,
Speaker 1: put some points on a graph, made it look legit. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we had our intern Billy work on that. He's good
Speaker 1: with graphs and colors. He's good at making Excel graph exactly. So, um,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's a head scratcher why in Marsett won't
Speaker 1: just tell us why why they came up with that
Speaker 1: particular prediction. And uh as Ari Shulman, the guy who
Speaker 1: wrote this article that I'm I'm taking a little bit
Speaker 1: of this front actually a lot, thanks, sorry. So what
Speaker 1: he says is, since they won't say how they arrived
Speaker 1: at their estimates and I'm totally paraphrasing here of the
Speaker 1: frequency shifts from the north and south predicted paths, their
Speaker 1: argument basically is trust us, and so in other words,
Speaker 1: there's no reason to believe they're correct about the flight
Speaker 1: heading south. I guess, you know, I can this leave
Speaker 1: le lends a little credence to the whole like Pakistan
Speaker 1: idea to me or the like actual abduction of it
Speaker 1: at some point, and we're sad as saying, oh, we
Speaker 1: can't tell you how we came up with these things,
Speaker 1: but just trust us. Just trust us. And you know,
Speaker 1: somebody from Boeing supposedly said like, well, we think it's
Speaker 1: in Pakistan. You know, at some point you kind of
Speaker 1: have to say, there's enough weird information flying around that
Speaker 1: this isn't just coincidence and incompetence anymore. This might actually
Speaker 1: be people and you Again, I say, I am not
Speaker 1: the conspiracy, not either, but at some point you kind
Speaker 1: of have to look at all of the incompetence that's
Speaker 1: been happening around this whole thing. And I wouldn't call
Speaker 1: it incompetence, but but misdirection maybe I don't know, errors.
Speaker 1: I guess is probably you kind of have to take
Speaker 1: that step back and say, Okay, is it possible that
Speaker 1: all of these people who are like professionals who really
Speaker 1: should know what they're doing, are making these blunders, or
Speaker 1: is it more likely that they're lying to us they're
Speaker 1: not that they're not supposed to actually tell us what
Speaker 1: they know. Yeah, I think that probably is it, which
Speaker 1: leads to, you know, a whole lot of questions supposing
Speaker 1: it isn't in Pakistan, perhaps our government, the Chinese government,
Speaker 1: the Malaysian government are negotiating with these terrorists for the
Speaker 1: lives of those two people who are on the plane. Well,
Speaker 1: or you just don't want Pakistan to know. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, the people who have it, if if the
Speaker 1: organization has it, you don't want people to say like, oh,
Speaker 1: we know you have it. You know, if you're gonna
Speaker 1: try and organize a rescue or cobart operation or anything
Speaker 1: like that, you're not going to be like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: we know they have it. Yeah, that is that is ideal.
Speaker 1: You know, if you if you are head of a
Speaker 1: head of a state and somebody commits an act of war,
Speaker 1: which this is, and you don't want to respond to
Speaker 1: that provocation, Uh, what do you do? Well, the best
Speaker 1: thing to do to avoid losing face is to play dumb,
Speaker 1: is to just pretend like you don't know anything about it.
Speaker 1: So you tell, Tell, Tell the boys in n R said,
Speaker 1: they come up with this idea, and you say, fine,
Speaker 1: just cook the books a little bit so we can
Speaker 1: say that went south and we don't have to go,
Speaker 1: you know, beat the bushes up and up in Pakistan.
Speaker 1: And I will say that if if this is a
Speaker 1: deliberate misdirection, we've sunk a lot. I mean just the U. S.
Speaker 1: Navy alone has sunk a lot of millions of dollars
Speaker 1: already into a lot of this search your perth. You know.
Speaker 1: So if I would say that, you know, I would
Speaker 1: be really angry. Well to know that we had just
Speaker 1: been like, oh, you know, we knew it was in Pakistan,
Speaker 1: or we knew it was you know where ever else
Speaker 1: this whole time, but we just felt like we need
Speaker 1: to save face. Yeah, yeah, and and and obviously, and
Speaker 1: that's that's the thing that's the head scratcher too, is
Speaker 1: is that if you get caught, I mean, if you
Speaker 1: get caught, it's the end for you. It's really the end,
Speaker 1: because I mean, think about all the families who who
Speaker 1: have been thinking for all this time that they're loved
Speaker 1: ones are dead. Yeah, so you better have a really
Speaker 1: good story when you get busted. Yeah. Anyway, Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: the whole thing is just inexplicable, and it still might
Speaker 1: have gone south. That says these guys are saying. They're
Speaker 1: not claiming that it went north, they're just claiming I
Speaker 1: didn't go And I swear that I saw a map
Speaker 1: that they had drawn where it took from its original
Speaker 1: launch point. It took a very southwesterly route, So it's
Speaker 1: it's not heading towards Australia at all. It was heading
Speaker 1: way away from it, in the opposite direction. And so
Speaker 1: it would explain why no wreckage has been found, because
Speaker 1: it is, you know, thousands of miles in the opposite direction.
Speaker 1: And this is again their their map is still saying
Speaker 1: it went south, but it didn't go southeast. It went
Speaker 1: southwest relative to where it started from. Yeah, it's yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: So anyway, I would say to judgment by the fact
Speaker 1: that not a single bit of debris has been found,
Speaker 1: you know, not not the tiniest little oil slick in
Speaker 1: the surface of the water. It kind of makes you wonder. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So anyway, that's about it. You guys have anywhere to
Speaker 1: add anywhere and where? Yeah? Yeah, probably a black hole.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, So anyway, folks, we just wanted to bring
Speaker 1: you guys up to date on all the latest. Alright, folks,
Speaker 1: so if you would like to send us an email,
Speaker 1: our our email address is Thinking Sideways Podcast at gmail
Speaker 1: dot com. You can also follow us and of course
Speaker 1: like us, like us a lot on Facebook. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: our our web page is of course Thinking Sideways podcast
Speaker 1: dot com. You can find us on iTunes. In fact,
Speaker 1: that's probably how you found us. But if you didn't
Speaker 1: find us that way, well, now you know you can
Speaker 1: find us on iTunes, so please stop give us a review.
Speaker 1: We like reviews, especially good reviews. We much actually kind
Speaker 1: of prefer those. Uh. And of course Stitcher if you
Speaker 1: don't have time to download it to your to your iPod,
Speaker 1: you can just stream us on the go. And that's it.
Speaker 1: So for Thinking Sideways. This has been a very special episode.
Speaker 1: The update on MH three seventy. Hope you guys learned something,
Speaker 1: See you later, Bye everybud, Bye guys,