WEBVTT - Europe Breaks Up With Natural Gas

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the bienn F podcast. Today is all about natural gas

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and what we can expect as we look ahead to

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this winter. In the Northern Hemisphere, gas prices remain very

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>elevated and security of supply is uncertain. Europe has been

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>hit particularly hard by the reduced supply coming from Russia,

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and in all honesty, some demand reduction is going to

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>be needed. While there may be enough gas to get

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>through this upcoming winter, there's a lot to consider when

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we think about what might happen to the supply and

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>demand balance in the months and years ahead. So today

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I sit down with Stefan Ulrich and Arun Tora, who

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>are both European gas specialists at bienn e F, and

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>they're going to talk about our winter gas outlook. We

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>do these twice a year, once for the summer and

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.319
<v Speaker 1>once for the winter. As a reminder, bienni F does

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.639
<v Speaker 1>not provide investment or strategy advice, and our complete disclaimer

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>can be found at the very end of the show.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And now let's jump into the conversation with Stefan and

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron and think about what might happen as we look

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>forward to this winter and natural gas. Stefan, thank you

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, and Aaron Yea, thank you. Dana happy

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>to be here. So we are here to talk about

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>while the outlook for natural gas as we head into

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this winter in the Northern Hemisphere, and we do both

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a winter and a summer gas outlook every single year,

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and the both of you we do these globally, but

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys focus specifically on the European part of this outlook,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is really where I think the I guess

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the crux of the attention is globally right now is

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>on Europe specifically. So we will come to that and

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about those dynamics. But before we dive

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in there, could you please provide some perspective on why

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>before the whole world was looking at gas prices, we

0:01:52.960 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>were writing and researching winter and summer gas outlooks. Fundamentally,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>your gas year is split into two parts, your winter

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>where you withdraw gas from storage, and your summer where

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you put gas into storage. Most gas consumption is in

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Northern Hemisphere, so that works as a kind of

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like a global picture. So as a BNF Global Gas

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>research team, what we do is at the start of

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>each of those seasons in the winter, so that starts

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>from October, so in September and the summer. So that's

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a forecast we produced in March for April looking for

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the year ahead for those two seasons. In many ways,

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>these are like our regular monthly publications we put out,

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>so we have our global Energy Outlook, we have the

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>US Gas Monthly and the European Gas Monthly. But these

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are just where we really crunch some of the numbers

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and a bit more details, sit together as a team

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and decide what the story is for the global gas

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>markets over the coming twelve months. So the disruption specifically

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in Europe really took off this summer, even though the

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>crunch time is really approaching right now in the winter.

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So as we think about that, so Western Europe, what

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>really happened was it lost almost all of its pipe

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>supply from Russia. Can you really talk about why this

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>is so important to the supply for Europe generally and

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>what this does to the gas balance. So that pipe

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>supply or Russian pipe supply and makes up around the

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>third of your total European gas supply. So it's a

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>market which have lost the very large chunk around thirty

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>percent at the moment of its total supply, and for

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of commodities markets, that would be quite a

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>hard shock to balance. Fundamentally, this is a story which

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>has been building over time. Russian gas supplies didn't really

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>flow to the levels expected and have gradually decreased coming

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to the summer, where you've only got a dribble, so

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>around ten of their historical levels remaining. So Russian gas

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>was the third of the supply to Europe. But how

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about the rest of Russia's gas? Where else are they

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>selling to and no longer supplying to Europe? Has that

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>been problematic for them? Yeah, it's it's been problematic for them.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So the thing is about pipeline gas. Those pipelines run

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to fixed locations and so you can't really send that

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>gas to other locations unless you have a pipeline heading

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>from the same source to a different location, which when

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>it comes to a lot of Russian gas production that

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't currently So a lot of that gas which would

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be or historically has been sent to Europe is now

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is now lost to the global market, which is why

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this then also this has a very big impact on

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>your global gas balance. When it comes to regards to

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Russian sales, high prices had largely offset their lowest sales

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>volumes untill around the summer of this year, when you've

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>actually increasingly seen Russian gas revenues for on a year

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>on year basis, of course pipeline gas to Europe and

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the only gas Russia cells. It still has pipeline sales

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>to China which are ramping up, but it also of

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>course sells all energy Aaron, can you quantify those cells

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and really highlight where they've been flowing. Yeah, thank you, Stephan.

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>In particular Russian llergy exports into Western Europe, so markets

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>such as Spain, Netherlands, France, they have they have increasingly

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>been importing higher volumes of llergy from Russia, even countries

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that typically didn't import Russian energies. So you're looking at

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>countries such as Belgium, they are now increasing their appetite

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>for Russian energy and this is primarily coming from the

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Yamal facility. So it's quite interesting, you know, when we

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about the complete, well not complete, almost complete collapse

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of Russian supply into Western Europe, we're still importing quite

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a significant amount of energy and just quickly explained why

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this supply was shut off. This was not due to

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>sanctions imposed by Europe on Russia. This was a decision

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>made by Russia proactively correct That depends on who you're

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>talking to write. But we read a piece back in

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.679
<v Speaker 1>September one called unpacking putin statements right, which was really

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>looking at some of the what we have to say,

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>rather weak arguments Russia was using to justify why flows

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to Europe had not returned to previous highs and actually

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>kept on falling. There is of course a debate about

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the nord Stream two pipeline and whether this reduction in

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>flows could be viewed in retaliation to some of the

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>political movements around that. And then, of course, though since

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the war in Ukraine, Russian flows have fallen further and

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>further as the excuses have mounted. Only one turbine was

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>left operational on the nord Stream pipeline, with I think

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a total of seven turbines at that facility or the

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>upstream facility being found with technical issues. That's really surprising

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>for a company with the performance record and the operational

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>record of gas Prom. Gas Prom of course, then use

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctions as a shield, claiming that they could not repair

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>these turbines given sanctions, So of course it depends on

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>who you ask. But in a lot of our pieces,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we've highlighted how weak some of the arguments have been

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the gas Prom and Russia have put forward. And the

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>best example of that is how gas Prom still has

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>available pipeline capacity through the Ukraine which it is not

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>using currently and has not been using for quite a

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.799
<v Speaker 1>few months now, despite now sending less than its contractual

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>obligations to a lot of its European customers. Let's then

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.679
<v Speaker 1>think about what this reductions apply to Europe has really

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>done to gas prices, because we all acknowledge that, you know,

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>gas is an important part of the energy system. It's

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>an important part for heating for homes, it's an important

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>part for manufacturing. It really touches so so many parts

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. And one of the primary reasons why

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>people have said that it is linked to in many

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>respects this high inflationary period that we're in right now.

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So what has been happening with Russian gas prices? Because

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that it is definitely more than gas traders

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that are keeping a close eye on gas prices at

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the moment. So the European gas market is largely liberalized, right,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>your price is set by that marginal supply source. And

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>with the decline and Russian gas, Europe has to import

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more energy, but specifically spot llergy, so liquid

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>natural gas coming to us from ships instead of through

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>these pipelines historically in Europe exactly. But also you know

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of your buyers globally who import energy like that,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they're signed up to these long term fixed price contracts

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>which are set generally as a proportion of the oil price,

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot more stable. What Europe has to

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>do is capture an exorbitantly large share of the global

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>spot market, right. So that's in competition with Asian buyers.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, Aaron, do you want to add in there

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>about just what pushes and just how that competition is

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>unfolding and pushing both European and global energy prices to

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>these record high levels. So the situation you find itself

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that it now needs to replace, as

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Stefan mentioned, a large proportion of its baseline or baseload

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>gas supply. In order to offset this, they have to

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>attract energy and that is via the global spot market.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>As Stefan mentioned, a large proportion of energy volumes is

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>tied under long term agreements. That's around seventy of the

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>total llenergy supply. And how long is a long term

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>agreement anywhere between fifteen and twenty five years, and they're

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 1>having negotiations to bring in some shorter to medium term

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>contracts ten to twelve years, but they haven't really gained

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>much traction. And how much of the market is actually

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>already tied up in these long term agreements. So you

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>got four hundred in two million metric tons of available

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>leergy supply se that is locked up in long term agreements.

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So Europe is now battling for that remaining thirty in

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>which of its own supply is all on the spot market.

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's incredible competition, and it only takes a brief

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>cold spell in markets such as China Japan, and then

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we could see a substantial amount of llergy being displaced

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to other markets and that will have a big impact

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>on how Europe restocks through the winter. In terms of prices,

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what Europe has have to do is have to maintain

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a premium over Asian lergy prices that is the Japan

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Korean market, and then this constant competition to try and

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>import spot ellen g has meant that the TTF has

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>had to be priced that significant premium, and this kind

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>of disrupts the forward curve as well, because all though

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>prices have fallen from its significant highs due to mild

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>weather and the fact that Europe has restopped sufficiently through

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the first month of the gas winter, there's always that

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>need to import energy and that is going to keep

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>prices high. We're in the first month of the gas winter.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>How closely are you guys watching the weather every morning? Yeah?

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Very It's a it's a daily ritual for us. So

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been incredibly mild in Europe and I think that's

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>one factor which is why are October demand to date,

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're recording this on the October. So through October

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>demand has come in around below your five year average,

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but only half of that is due to the weather,

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>or approximately half. I think it could even be a

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>bit less. Your weather is incredibly important when it comes

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to your winter gas demand. I think your rangeing outcomes

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten years is around ten billion cubic

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>meters either side, which is, you know, around of your

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>storage capacity. And this has to do with the fact

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that so much gas is used for residential heat or

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess buildings generally exactly, So thirty of your winter

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>gas demand is residential household heating, at another ten for

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>commercial buildings. Right of your winter load is gas is

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just for heating. And this is what makes it your

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>gas demand so seasonal. Your gas demand in peak winter

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>is about four times higher than your gas demand in

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 1>your low points of your summer, because when you get

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>into December January, right, you have that really big proportion

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>of heating demand. So yeah, whether it really impacts how

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the balance evolves and how demanded supply shape up. So

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in two scenarios, either a mild winter or a particularly

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>cold winter, is there enough in the gas stores in

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Europe to make it through this winter? Yeah, I think

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we argue that that's definitely the case. Our latest forecast

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for European storage inventory evolution over the course of this

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>winter suggests that European storage is in the smaller smaller

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>region of Europe we cover will be around full. So

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that's around thirty billion cubic meters, and that is enough

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to absorb even the coldest of the last thirty winters

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or the remainder of the winter because we're not forecasting

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>from November on pretty comfortably. So whether variation is important,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think for us what's increasingly important is also

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>your demand destruction variation, which the market is still incredibly

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>uncertain about. So let's talk about demand destruction. The European

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Union is set a target for reducing gas demand. What

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is that and where did that come from? So, as

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Aaron highlighted, there is not enough l energy to entirely

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>replace Russian gas. You know, even if we attract really

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>high proportion of this global spot share, you know, we

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>can only replace around six really of the Russian gas

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>volumes we usually got. Means that the market still has

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work to do to balance upside from

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>other supply sources, especially now when you're increasingly thinking on

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a year on your basis is really limited, right, So

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the demand side of the balance has to shift in

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>order for us to have enough gas in storage. So yeah,

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why this policy was put in place. It was

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>from that realization of the fact that without changing our

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>gas consumption, we still forecast that we would run out

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of gas and storage and an average winter by the

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>end of March. So can you elaborate a little bit

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>on what demand destruction looks like and is this come

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in the form of rationing, does it come in the

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>form of you know, conservation. I'm even thinking a little

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bit about actually this summer and how there are many

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world that actually suffered from severe droughts

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and there was a lot of discussion around water rationing.

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is the same conversation around electricity use and

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>home heat. Yeah, it's exactly that, right. So the worst

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>case scenario, which is a scenario which our forecast really

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think will avoid, is rang where government steps in and

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>forcibly allocates a resource. Right, But exactly as you point out,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>before you get to that stage, in many cases you

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have campaigns to reduce consumption. You know, your classic UK

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>summer host pipe band being the best example of that.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>So talking about this target of fifteen percent, which the

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>EU set, that's cross sectoral right, So it's fift of

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>our total gas consumption. When we think about the fact,

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>as highlighted that in the winter, almost of your gas

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>demand is used in buildings or so called local distribution

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>zone that's smaller gas pipe networks which we commercial residential buildings,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it becomes pretty apparent that we have to cut demand

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in that sector in order to meet these targets, right,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we can't just let industry and power demand do all

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of the work there. So, you know, governments are balancing

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this really hard political question of protecting consumers from high

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>prices and not wanting to part us on higher energy

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>prices to consumers, while still needing to encourage demand reduction

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and us all to be a bit more sensible with

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>how we heat our homes and the energy we consume.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very important point. That's definite makes

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that governments must strike this fine balance because as soon

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as you start to intervene with stuff such as a

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>price cap, you start to disrupt market dynamics in terms

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of letting the price do the work. So up to

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this point, high prices have allowed sufficient demand structure to

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>take place. But as soon as a gas price cap,

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>as soon as that's implemented, you can start to see

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>some of these things. Let's say, this demand structure not

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>playing out as we have seen. So, for example, if

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we start to cap the price of gas and you know,

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>demand picks up elsewhere, do we lose that energy supplied

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that we were able to import because of the price

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of wholesale gas. Another point being the fact that if

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you cap the price of gas, such as what happened

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in Spain, you could actually increase demand in the power

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>sector because you could start to see incremental cult to

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>gas switching once again. And when you start to play

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>around with price mechanics, then you're not really letting the

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>market do the work, and the market should balance based

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>off price. So I think it is a very fine

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>balance on how much the government does intervene. Now for

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a very short break, stay with us. Well, there's the

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>industry end of things, and then there is the individuals

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>who in some respects you're seeing you know, residential individual

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>homes paying multiples of what they are paying last year,

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and not everyone can afford. That is their discussion around

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>keeping industry and individuals separate. In terms of how this

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is implemented, I think it's worth coming back to, like

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>how pricing works for residential consumers and also for large

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>parts of your industrial consumer base, to understand that link

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>with the wholesale market, because I think that's also critical

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to understand why we went so high, but also why

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we're coming off now in terms of your prices gas

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>demand for wholesale consumers is often set through a variety

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of tariff structures which are not directly related to your

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wholesale price of gas right there, based on like an

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>average price your wholesale importer has had to pay over

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, say, you know, there's often extra fees or subsidies,

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which means that the price a wholesale consumer pays is

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>generally quite lag compared to your wholesale price movements. When

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we come to that really explains why it's really hard

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for the market to calibrate at the moment. Because we've

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>said that the market needs demand destruction, but a lot

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of the sectors where you had to reduce that demand

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>only saw an increase in prices well after your wholesale

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>prices had already gone up by multiples of ten in

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a year, right from the summer of the summer of one.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Now we're in a situation where your average wholesale price

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last year is probably like twenty times roughly,

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>let's say over the summer. And of course, then, as

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you rightly point out, no residential consumer or customer or

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>small business can really deal with that. So coming back

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to what governments now face, right you're facing between balancing

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>this book of where some of your importers and the

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 1>people who supply downstream gas have to pay wholesale prices

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>which are up by multiples, you know, in the tens, twenties,

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>thirties even higher, and residential gas consumers of course cannot

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.159
<v Speaker 1>pay that multiple. So yeah, there was a bound to

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>be struck here, and many governments have put in price caps.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, across the perimeter of countries we cover in

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>northwest Europe, including the UK, your average residential price is

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going to increase somewhere from sevent to two pad to

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>levels over the course of this winter, so still a

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>very substantial price increase. But for some consumers that's that's

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>not the case, right. You know, we have a lot

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of chat in the London office that for some of

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>us here, because we might live in a well insulated

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>new building block, our energy prices are actually going to

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>be going down this winter, which is really comes back

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to how difficult some of these policy decisions are and

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>how they need to really keep a very close eye

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and on that link between what's happening on your residential

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer side and how that affects your wholesale price evolution.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's getting through this winter, which is definitely front

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of mind, but fundamentally, unless something changes, we're going to

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>be in the same situation next winter as well. So

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>then this brings me to this question around as we

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>look forward, and as we look at a lot of

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>net zero targets that many companies and countries have out to.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of discussion about actually phasing out

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>natural gas at some point and building enough of various

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>other forms of capacity in order to at least dramatically

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>reduce the dependence upon this flexible capacity which in many

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>respects has been supporting wind and soul. Where do you

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>see the conversation right now moving towards installing more renewables

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to create domestic supply or the other thing

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're also seeing, which is in your already referenced this,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, switching between coal and gas and this almost

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>coal renaissance, and also this discussion now that's re emerging

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>around nuclear and things that provide baseload energy. I think

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it helps me to think about this by splitting those

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>things into three different baskets. I think, given how quickly

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Russian flows have declined in the short term, we really

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>need some of this emergency demand destruction for the medium terms.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So for me, that kind of means out to now,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I think to see how Europe's approaching and thinking about this,

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>or at least hoping to do this. The document that

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and the policy that needs to be looked at is

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the European Commissions Repower You Plan. So this was a

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>plan released in March two in response to the Russian invasion,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was supposed to change European energy consumption so

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that we would be rid of our alliance on Russian

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>natural gas. When I like talk about this plan, I

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>used the phrase really like turbo charging. The energy transition.

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>The bulk of demand reduction and the bulk of what

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>offsets this lost Russian supply is electrification, insulation, switching to hydrogen.

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's around seventy of the targeted demand reduction, right,

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>so a thirty percent reduction in our European gas consumption.

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>By However, it's important to highlight that that plan also

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>included two things which I grouped into a bucket which

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I called of kind of have referred to previously as compromises,

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>which includes measures such as potentially extending the life of

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>some cold plants reevaluating some of the decisions we've made

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>on nuclear as you point out, data which will be

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>needed realistically by and the fundamental reason for that is

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that some of these decorganization measures such as hydrogen development

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, won't take place before and substantial quantities. And

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>then the third bucket, which becomes even more critical and

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely necessary given how quickly Russian flows have fallen, is

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>outright demand destruction and reduction of consumption. Right. So the

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>European Commission admitted that high prices and outlook for sustained

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>high prices would have caused some demand reduction, but it

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was only really in the region of around billion cubic

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>meters if I remember correctly. You know, I think this

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>year we're looking at our forecast of being around sixty

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>billion cubic meters. Yeah, for for repower you and the

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>European Commission Medium time Plan, it's it's very heavy on

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that decorganization piece, which tied into the long term strategy, right,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's tied into the long term strategy of decobonization, And

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these policies are actually only acceleration of

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>things which were all ready discussed. And fifty five, which

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>was the European unions checkpoint to net zero. So we've

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>seen prices quite high recently, and then they have since

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>we first made our outlook for this winter period. What

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is the medium term outlook for prices in Europe and

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what do we think is going to happen among all

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of this volatility. So if we look at the wholesale

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>natural gas benchmark in Europe, this is the TTF. If

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we look at the forward curve out until about we

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>can see elevated prices persisting. And this is predominantly due

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that, as we mentioned earlier on that

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>it needs to replace a lot of this Russian gas

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>with expensive lergy. Expensive llergy due to the fact that

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it's procured on the spot market and it needs to

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>outcompete other buyers on a global basis. Structurally, we don't

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>really see a large increase in lique faction capacity until

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Qatar's mega expansion comes online. This is around This will

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>add another seventy two point five million tons per annum,

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is a huge boost in energy supply, but

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a long way to get there. So in the meantime,

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Europe has to import a lot of llenergy from North America,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>US supply into Western Europe typically accounts for around thirty

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>five of Europe's overall llergy share, and outside of this

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>they're procuring llenergy from Qatar and Algeria. The only difficult

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>thing is the fact that, as Stephan mentioned in regards

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to Europe's decarbonization strategy, despite Europe, you know, building out

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>llergy import capacity, they are still reluctant to sign long

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>term agreements. This is because for them, signing long term

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>agreements kind of signals to the rest of the world

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we're still pinned to gas and we're

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not really decarbonizing as we intended to. Let's say this year,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, Western European markets that we cover in our perimeter,

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna lose around eight point five million tons of

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 1>llergy from long some contracts expiring. This then further exposes

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>us to the spot market once again, and then the

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>US again will look to deliver volumes into into Europe.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 1>So the US is a major beneficiary of high global

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>gas prices because they also source markets in Asia. But

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>when Asian demand lowers, as we've seen this year, they

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of just shift their supply into Europe. But then

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>once again, it all depends on you know, it's just

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>constant battle that will have to take place over the

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>next two seasons. Well, and we're talking a lot about

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>battles for and consumers in terms of pricing and then

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>policies that are being passed along. But really the willingness

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to pay these higher prices at a country level comes

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>down to some wealthier and potentially less wealthy nations. How

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is that emerging and are there countries that are essentially

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>being forced out of the market. Yes, certainly. I mean

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>some of the emerging markets in Asia, such as Pakistan

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and Bangladesh, they are unable to procure lergy at prices

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 1>north of thirty five dollars MMB. To you, what this

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>does is the fact that this strains their power supply

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>margins and they've had to implement rolling blackouts. Even countries

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>such as India, which you know has seem to be

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>climbing the global scales in terms of economic powerhouses, they

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are even struggling to procure llenergy at sufficient rates at

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>these high prices. So you know, when Europe's importing such

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>high volumes of llergy, they're actually taking away supply from

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>these other markets as well. So it's not just a

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>European energy crisis, it really is a global supply crisis. Yeah.

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, as Aaron pointed out earlier, right, this is

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not just the theme for the short term, it also

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>continues into the medium term. I think that's a great

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 1>chart from our medium term llergy outlook, which compares our

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>forecast for year on year, so from the previous year

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to this year, and you can see that South Asian

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>llen G flows I think it declined by twenty two

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>million tons in our scenario, right, So that's quite a

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of gas which we now expect not to be

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>flowing to South Asia in fundamentally because Europe needs that

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>gas and will probably outbid for it. So not even

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in the not just in the short term, but in

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the medium term. You're seeing this really have ripple effects

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>on energy policy globally. So you would already referenced that

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>there are new leng production facilities there are potentially going

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to be coming online parts of the Middle East. But

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>between now and then there are existing exporters like the

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>United States. Do you see any movement in terms of

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>increased supply in order to meet all of this global demand?

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the fundamental reason for why we

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.959
<v Speaker 1>expect llergy prices to remain elevated and why we expect

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this competition for llergy on the global scale to to

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>remain hot is the fundamental fact that supply editions between

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>now and then are rather limited. So between now and then,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the global LLENG market isn't really going to get a

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>lot looser unless buyers manage or other buyers, So you're

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at places like Japan and Career and potentially some

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>more price sensitive markets start consuming and demanding a lot

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>less l en G. Additional point to flag here is

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that in our medium term outlook we highlight a low

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>case scenario for which takes a lot of the Russian projects,

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>which was your second biggest source of energy capacity additions,

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>out of our balances. So again this is an issue

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>with sanctions and project partners not wanting to get involved

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in Russian up scene gas projects. Returning a bit more

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>short term, this is a real fundamental problem for Europe

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is that apart from l en G, there is very

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>limited short term supply upside, and we've used a lot

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of that already when it comes to thinking about Norwegian

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>flows increasing slightly because they're reducing some of the oil

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>production to push out more gas. I guess the one

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>source of supply close to home, which is starting to

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>produce more gas. Again as North Africa, you've seen some contracts,

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>especially with Italian developers developing new production and of Africa,

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and you've really seen a big tic up and flows

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>from North Africa to Europe. But again there's a there's

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty marginal volumes when it comes to the overall

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>picture of things. So this is another reason why I

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people are focusing on the demand

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than the supply side of the equation. So we've

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about the willingness or maybe put better, the ability

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay of wealthier nations versus developing nations in terms

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of this really high gas price that we're experiencing in

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the moment, as well as individual retail consumers. But what industries,

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking of you know, different manufacturing industries that

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>are very dependent upon natural gas for their production. What

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>industries are under the most strain. You're completely right, Dana,

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and as you kind of pointed to, it's the most

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>energy intensive industries particularly, I think you'll fertilize the production

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>which relies on gas not just for its energy consumption,

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>but also as a feedstock. You've really seen substantial cuts

0:29:56.280 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to European production in that space, but also chemicals production.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>More generally, other industries steal. Given the link with power prices,

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>aluminium producers are really under threat in Europe, and realization

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of this is really causing governments to take energy prices

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for industrials more seriously because they realized that this could

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really have long term complications for the industrial future and

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the industrial development of Europe if they don't step in

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and helps support industries through this difficult period. So let's

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>fast forward not that far into the future. You'd reference

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that the gas here is split into you've got winter

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and summer. We arrive at summer. What things are you watching?

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Summer in large ways is just a repeat of the winter. Right.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>It's about replacing Russian gas. But what makes this more

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult is that a lot of your upsides year on

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>year have already been utilized a right, so you're losing

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Russian gas, but you've already pressed a lot of the

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.479
<v Speaker 1>levers that you have to replace that gas. So this

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>really drives an opinion in the market that you know,

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the twenty four could be the real test and this

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>winter where we actually had significant volumes of Russian gas

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to help refill European storages is a bit less challenging,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think for us when we look at it fundamentally,

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>because demand is lower in the summer. It comes down

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to the variation we potentially see in the global energy market.

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And you're completely right there, Stephen, and just looking at

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Asian demand and how that recovers, that could significantly displace

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of spot energy volumes that you know we

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>really need during the summer for the injection period. So

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just keeping an eye globally and how the demand picture

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>from the allergy side develops. It's about that composition again,

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't aren't like you know, our base case forecasters for

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Europe to roughly pull sevent of your global spot supply,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know that relies on the outbidding Asia for

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>these volumes if it chooses not to. If it chooses

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is a weird word to use from market, but you know,

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>should TTF prices or European energy prices fall below those

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>j k M levels, then you know you could see

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>greater proportion of that supply heading to Asia, really taking

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>away the gas we need to inject into storage this summer.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've been living in the UK for a long

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>time now and I think one of the cliches about

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK is that people are really obsessed with the weather.

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of conversation about whether or not the

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>sun is shining or it's raining, and what the temperature is.

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that this plays well on the British

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>obsession with the weather. We will be probably all checking

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>now every morning after listening to this podcast, seeing what's

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in store this next winter. Stefan Aaron, thank you very

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us today and talking to us about

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the winter gas outlook and what we need to be

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>considering as we think about prices and policy and you know,

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>really what's happening in global gas markets. Thanks a lot, Dana,

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:52.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Today's episode of Switched On was edited by

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Rex Warner of gray Stoke Media. Bloomberg any F is

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP and its affiliates.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>This recording does not constitut, nor should it be construed

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>as investment advice, investment recommendations, or recommendation as to an

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>investment or other strategy. Bloomberg an F should not be

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>considered as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any of its affiliates makes

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the information contained in this recording, and any liability

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of this recording is expressly disclaimed