WEBVTT - Musk Sells More Tesla Shares, Senate TikTok Concerns

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And Caroline Hyde of Blue Mug's World take quarters in

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>New York, and this is blow Mug technology coming up.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>In the next hour, Elon marsk Kioff loads another three

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars worth of Tesla shares. How so,

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>after he assured that he was done getting rid of

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Tesla stock. How this could be reflecting the pressure on

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the finances of Twitter. Plus, the US Senate has voted

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>unanimously to ban TikTok from all government issued phones and devices. Again,

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>details on the real impact for the Chinese own platform

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and former President Donald Trump, he's a major announcement just

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>weeks after it's declaring a third presidential run. Instead, he's

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>talking digital trading cards in an n f T market.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Details on that one a little bit later in the hour,

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>but first let's go even more micro. She teased us there.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>She told us about Tesla because of course we know

0:00:58.120 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the song has been under pressure, and maybe a little

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more of the evidence as to why. Because Elon

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>masks the biggest holder Tesla's stock, has been selling yet

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>more three point six billion dollars worth in fact of shares,

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>bringing the total amount he's offloaded since late last year

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Thomas forty billion, next Billy lips and pleased to say

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's here for more and it's interesting really. Of course,

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we were just wondering why it was under pressure, many

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>feeling perhaps a retail investor, which is such an important

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>buyer for Tesla, was a little bit worried about his

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>distraction about his recent other purchases. But now it seems

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to be lay clear that maybe the setting pressure is

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>coming from him himself. Exactly when you look at where

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the market was trading Monday and Tuesday, broadly moving higher

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla, the biggest drag on the SMP five hundred

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Nasdaq one hundred in those two days. Again,

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of a bit of sounding an alarm

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.279
<v Speaker 1>for investors. It's still those concerns about what is Ellen

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on, where is his head at. Obviously SpaceX has

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>been successful, Tesla has been a roaring success, but did

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>he bite off more than you could chew? With Twitter

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in particular, again with massive debtloads, how does that impact

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental business of Tesla again, even how large of

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a stake he has, and whether or not he's going

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to continue to sell shares. As you mentioned at the

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>top of the hour that he did say earlier in

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the year that he was done selling and then three

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion is not done selling now, you don't.

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Mousque himself could be a bit of a macro economic commentator,

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's sort of made a few should we say,

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>trails breadcrumbs for us saying, look, you should be worried

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>about debt right now. If you're seeing the rates go

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>up from the Fed, what about his debt? What about Twitch?

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Is debt? Well, that's the thing, and that's kind of

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to your point. Interest rates are going higher when you

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>look at Twitter, when you look at that take out

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that does come with massive debt load, that does come

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with pretty high interest rates that are going to continue

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>need to be paid. So that's the main question is

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>is Elan selling these shares to buy some of that debt?

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Is he doing it to invest more on Twitter? Is

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>he doing that to you know, help cover some of

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>those interest payments. No one really knows. It's I don't

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>think anyone really kind of understands what he loves doing

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>other than Elon. But there are so many questions just

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>given how tied these companies can be, given where they

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>are right now, where they're trading, and again with this

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>selling pressure that we've seen so far this week for

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Tesla stock in particular. Many call him an entrepreneur or visionary,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he seems to have to be an investment banker at

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the moment as well, I would seem we thank you,

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>as always, Bailey lip shots on the money when it

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>comes to all things Tesla. Meanwhile, let's again turn to

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>those broader tech valuations. Let's again turn to the macro

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that Ellen himself has been commenting on. Let's talk to

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Brune morning consult economic analyst, just here to give

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>us basically you'll read, at the moment, we've had the

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of England all hiking

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>rates to the tune of half a percentage point. They're

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>all well part from the Bank of England maybe sounding

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty hawkish about where rates have to go to tackle inflation.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Give our audience, who is so aware of the macro

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>implications on their holdings what this means in terms of

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>overall desire to be buying stocks right now. So good evening,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me on. Uh yeah, with the US,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at least with the Fed this week, I don't think

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a rise was really with the amount that they

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>raised rates this week. Everyone was really expecting about a

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>half point increase. But what I think where people were

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>paying a little more attention and we're a little surprised,

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was with how firm they were with their language about

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their intent to continue raising rates and where they expected

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>rates to be over the next year. I think with

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the two consecutive months of positive inflation surprises, some were

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking that that message would be softened a little bit,

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't see too much sign of that this

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>week so far. When we got the Federal res of

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>rate high, we also got updated perspective and where they

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>see the economy going, where they see what are called

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>terminal rates going, how high investment they overrule at the

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Federals of think rates will hit five point one percent overall.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>What are the implications of that from your perspective on

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the labor market, in particular, what we're already seeing cracks

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>from the technology perspective, certainly heading into three the labor

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>market is something to watch closely, and I'm sure the

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>FED will be watching it very closely. It is one

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>factor that could potentially affect the trajectory of the rate increases.

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Potentially have them change their their path, especially if unemployment

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>were to pick up significantly, which we really haven't seen

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>so far. Now. One question is how much of that

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the fact that labor force participation

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>has remained pretty low, And that's kind of an open

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>question where where should labor force partition participation be after

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. But if we continue to see unemployment stay

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>so low, then that that gives them a little more

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>leeway to continue with the rate increases. Some of the

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>nerve business in the market today, and I think in

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>many ways we were tuned to the market being, oh, well,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>bad news is good news. The Federal Reserve will have

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 1>to pump on the brakes. We therefore buy stocks today.

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>There was just bad news ultimately in the economy when

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it came to retail sales. I know you look a

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.559
<v Speaker 1>lot at the consumer, Kayla, just talk to us about

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>how resilient they are when many are looking at e

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>commerce in particular or on the show. That's another thing

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to really keep an eye on. And each month I

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>really look at three sort of indicators for consumers spending.

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Um we have at morning Consoled our own spending data

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that we get to look at the first week of

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the month, then middle of the month today we get

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>retail sales, which is much more goods focused, uh. And

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>then at the end of the month, of course, we

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>have personal consumption expenditures, which is really the broadest measure UM.

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But two out of the three this month so far

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have shown a pretty strong negative signal for November um

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>actual decreases in spending in both real and nominal terms,

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a bit of a reversal from what we've

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>seen in October certainly, and really in two overall, which

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was that consumer spending has been holding up pretty well.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge part of growth overall, so to the

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>extent that it does so in three, that's also an

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>important thing to keep an eye on. But as consumers

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>work their way through some of the savings they'd accumulated

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic, it's it's unclear how long that that

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>boost is gonna last. Kata. It really does feel a

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>really extraordinary time to be trying to read the tea

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>leaves of this U S economy, this global economy. On

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>so many ways. We feel the resilience. We see the

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>jobs data just showing there is still tightness there, but

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>everywhere else we look, it feels like softening. Can you

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of give us a grade on the health of

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the U. S economy right now? Where is your where's

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>your head up? That's a great question. I'd probably give

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it a bee. I think I think we're seeing a

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of mixed signals. But I mean, it's it's hard

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to give it a grade because there just is so

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>much uncertainty. Um, there's a lot of moving parts, as

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>there always are, but there's certainly some things that I

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>look at as kind of like an hour glass running out,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And the question is is inflation, which is now heading

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction, is that going to kind of

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fix itself before we run out of time with savings,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>before we run out of time with this strong, healthy

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>labor market. So there's these competing forces and it's it's

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>unclear really who's going to win out in the in

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the next year. Well, I love how you gave us

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the key data that you keep an eye on.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for that, Caleb and Moe and come

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Selt economic analysts there for your macro perspective. So the U. S.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Senate voted to band TikTok from all government issue phones

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and other devices. This is of course, the Biden administration

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is still considering restrictions on the Chinese own platform. Joining

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>us with the inside tracks Bloomberg, Alex Berrinka, and just

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>talk us through the impact of the Senate vote. It's

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>happened once before in a previous time. Just talk to

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>us about whether this really matters. Yeah, it matters to

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the extent that this is kind of continued pressure on

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this national security review. Of course, this bill would have

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:41.599
<v Speaker 1>to pass in the House and be signed by the

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>President to come into action. But Caroline, I think there's

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>another point of context this week, um that just like

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>underpins the momentum against TikTok in Congress right now, that

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>bill passed. At the same time, Marco Rubio and some

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>colleagues in the House representatives also introduced a bill that

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 1>advance TikTok outright. So Congress seems to be getting a

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit impatient, or at least these very vocal members

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>who have been anti TikTok are getting a little bit

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>impatient with this national security review that's going on under

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration. Um with TikTok to try to kind

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of come to an agreement of how to get TikTok

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to work in the United States in a way that

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>makes folks who care about national security, who are worried

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>about the Chinese government's influence on TikTok's parent company, Byte Dance,

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 1>how to make sure that it's operating here in a

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>way that's really safe for US users and their data.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So this vocal group that we've heard throughout the past

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>few months at markar Rubio, Josh Holly Um in Congress

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>being really loud, are now really ticking action, Caroline, And

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where I think there's a little bit of an

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>inflection point here, Um for some of this momentum against TikTok.

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Just talk us through that. And it's interesting because we

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>went to our own audience. I know that you'll often,

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm very pleased to say, joining some of our Twitter spaces,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the conversation you're very active on Twitter and week on

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>to our own audience on Twitter, asking them via the

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology Handle whether they think this might soon impact

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>their own phone, their own use of TikTok can actually

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>did think that the ban is coming to their phone next?

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>What all the ways in which TikTok itself is trying

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to navigate these waters and trying and to ensure that

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>they're regulated, but perhaps regulate in a way that means

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they're still on our phone. So aside from making kind

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of promises that data will not get into the hands

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese government, they're working on some things behind

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the scenes with US touch company Oracle to basically migrate

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the data from US users Onto service in

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the Onto servers in the US. So they say that

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>that plus some auditing by Oracle on their content moderation policies,

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>they expect that's enough to keep the data safe. Now

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>that process, that review has kind of come to the standstill.

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg has reported that's because of the Department of Justice

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>saying that the current state of the agreement is not

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>up to snuff with them. So obviously there are some folks,

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>since some of these really important agencies involved in this review,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say it's not enough. We also heard FBI Director

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Ray come out in recent weeks saying that, um, you know,

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite there yet. So um, that's what TikTok

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>has promised they would do. Um, whether or not that

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>ends up being at the end result. Again, these voices

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of pushing against this process is not a good

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sign for that ideal situation for TikTok. We thank you always, Alex.

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a great newsletter that you put out all

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>things TikTok bound today, and we thank you for just

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>walking up through some of your thinking Alex Bernka there. Meanwhile,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the administration's impact on sort of technology elsewhere,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to M and A because Microsoft

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>president Brad Smith he says the company has a solution

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to resolve issues surrounding its potential acquisition of Activision Blizzard

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and still expects that the deal will go through in

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>three He spoke with Bloomberg's Jennifer Zavasaja in Washington, d C.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, these are decisions are

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>made under laws, not just under people, and the laws,

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>whether you're talking to the United States and the United

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom of the European Union, are very clear. It's all

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>about whether an acquisition will promote competition. And in our view,

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>we're competing with Sony Microsoft Xbox. If you put it

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>head to head with Sony PlayStation, we have SEV we

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have we're the small entrance. They have two hundred and

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty six exclusive titles we have fifty nine. We need

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 1>some more first party games in order to be a

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>healthier and stronger competitor, and we need to do it,

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>of course, in a way that doesn't impede competition along

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the way. All of these concerns have basically focused on

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>one title, a great title to game, Call of Duty.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But we've said we're prepared to commit contractually. We're prepared

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to commit under a consent to career and undertaking that

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that will be available for Sony in comparable terms to

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Xbox for the next decade. So I look at this

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, this will be good for competition, and we

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>have a solution to the one problem that seems to

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>bother people the most. And my only real complaint or

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>concerned if you will, about where we are in Washington,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>d C. Is that we have the Federal Trade Commission

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>vote to block this without giving us even a single

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>meeting at which to sit down with the FTC staff

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and talk about the consent to create proposal and solution

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we had put on the table. I don't think that

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>is appropriate. I don't think that's right. I don't think

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we should have governments rejecting potential solutions without at least

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>first having a real conversation about them. That's not a

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>recipe that will advance competition. So what happens next then, well,

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.719
<v Speaker 1>we have a process in Washington, d c. And it's

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>called lawyers get to go argue before a judge under

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the law, an administrative law judge. And this still goes

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>forward in other countries. It has a long ways to go.

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. Look, nobody ever has a crystal ball in

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>which you can predict the future with a certainty. But

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>when I look at what this acquisition will bring, I

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think it will bring good things to the marketplace. It

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be good in our view for people who

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>develop games, consumers who play games. That's, after all, the

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>real focus of what competition law is all about. Anticipating

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the deal to go through in or well, we have

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a period of time. We originally said when we announced

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>this in January of this year that we were looking

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>at it in three and that's still the way we

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>look at it. Microsoft president Brad Smith, along with our

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>own Jennifer coming up about two hundred companies based in

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>China and Indein and Hong Kong. They may no longer

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>be facing a threat of being booted off American stock exchanges.

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>More on wine next this It's a COVID story familiar

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and China is not immune. As restrictions ease,

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cases rise and workers call in sick. Half the currency

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>traders of one Chinese bank in Beijing called in sick

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. Soaring absentee is UM is slowing down the

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>process of executing and confirming trades, aggravating the usual seasonal

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>dipping activity scene at the end of the year. The

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>sudden uptick and traders staying homesick is seen as one

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons for a drop, and on shore you

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't all. The spot volumes to levels not seen since April.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>There are signs of normality in China, with people returning

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to the streets and public transport, and signs of disruption

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>as well, with long lines outside hospitals and people struggling

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to find medicine. The road out of lockdowns was never

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be smooth. Financial institutions have been largely left

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to themselves in terms of navigating that road, with little

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>official guidance from authorities. Bloomberg understands suddenly Anders are retaining

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the split team's approach used over the past three years,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but most just advising workers who feel sick to stay home,

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and that advice is heated. Short staffing and slowdowns are

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>becoming part of the new COVID normal in China. Paul

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Allen Bloomberg, let's stay on China now because well maybe

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trading style a bit, but actually some stocks rallied today

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>because the throat of being delisted off the US stock exchanges.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of easy for some big names, in particular Alibaba,

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>JD dot Com, joining s Nasma most Yushan Chen, who

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>covers the Chinese markets covers some of these names, and

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason they rallied is because we've got an update

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as to whether or not or they would be delisted,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and it looks as though it's a threat diminishing somewhat. Yes,

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure, So I would say this is a very

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>important step for resolving this long standing induspriute. Ordered to

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>industry goes from the US and China, and Master even

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>described us to me as early Christmas gift because they

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>saw like dealisting was like the biggest concern as they

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>see for the Chinese ado names from Ali Baba to

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>j D dot Com and what p C a O

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>b S update today bas C A O B being

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>uh ultimately what the suit of authority. It's like the

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>auditing watchdog on the U S side. So they put

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out a statement abouts they now finally was able to

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>get the full auditing access of this Chinese company. And

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the first time in the history because before Beijium

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>was like trying to deny the access for national security concerns.

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>So Beijing and remember Beijing and Washington reach out like

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a preliminary deal during the summertime, but then PCLBS and

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff to do a run of inspection check just to

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>make sure this company delivered. Was they promised right? So

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>this is an update after the inspection and the market

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>has been waiting on it for a while and it's

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a positive outcome. So for sure that the starts like

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Ali Babai and j D dot com or like rallying

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and at one point at three point five percent, it's

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like Balcoli. The overall market is slamps. We see today

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 1>among the tech names. Very briefly is that it though

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>we were don't know we risk free CHRISTI presents abound

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>no I was saying probably we are not there yet

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>because p C A or b is going to restart

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the clock for three years. They will continued to keep

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies under check, right for more years to to

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>calm and sec also want you know, hes to war auditing.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Our expection works to be done. But overall it's moving

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>towards are very I would say positive direction. Right certainly

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that was just not me today. Thank you always appressive

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>these things heation chann bring that there will be companies

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I think continuously uh some dayots for companies that maybe

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have two many people dim Laying off talent is an

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for other companies to actually need more tech talent.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Blombag Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in New York.

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And that, of course is Nicholas Enstrom, founder of Skype

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as you know, and also the CEO of the European

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>venture capital firm Atomico. Talking about tech layoffs and let's

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about that because well, the wave of mass

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>tech layoffs is spark perhaps and nextodus of tech talent

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>to other sectors. Millennium management Global headed talent acquisition. That's

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>John Telarco is here to talk about, well, how alternative

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>asset management and particularly his Giant with fifty eight billion

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets on the management So I mean perhaps

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a leading destination and these sorts of workers. Just talk

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to us, John about how many tech related roles you've

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>hired for this here and how many more you've still

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>got to fill. I'm happy to Caroline, thanks for having me.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be here. You know, we've put two

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>four technologists. I think the number is to work this

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 1>year with a hundred openings still listed or a hundred

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>plus on our career site. Uh. In twenty five years

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of me running technology talent acquisition programs, I've only seen

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a few of these disruptions, but I'm happy to say

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Millennium can be a welcome destination for those finding themselves

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>on the job market. So talk to us about in

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>your shop and others. And I'm sure if rivals might

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be doing something similar at the moment. What kind of

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.239
<v Speaker 1>candidates are you looking for? What type of roles are

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you filling? Great question? At first, it starts across all levels,

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>whether you're beginning your career or whether you're want to

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be in a senior global position. We're recruiting across all

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of those levels. We also recruit across all of those

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>technical competencies that I personally think are so attractive, not

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>only software engineering and full stack engineering, but security engineering

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and cloud engineering, and these these roles that involve unbelievable

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>amounts of data within this industry, that that make things

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>really really excited, exciting and so um over sort of

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a fairly typical technology stack. We seek those individuals that

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 1>can solve problems that have grit, that are scrappy across

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a wider range of opportunities. Okay, so I can see

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>if I was a technologist coming perhaps upended by the

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that I've just been let go by one of

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the big technology companies, I think I can get intellectual

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>stimulation with Millennium. What about culture because many would say,

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>perhaps uh in an uninformed or naive way, but certainly

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I would go well, finance on one heart side, you know,

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>hard working, long hours perhaps in the office, technology more

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>softer culture. What are you having to decide and educate

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>people about in terms of your culture. Well, I'm really

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>happy you said that, because, in my opinion, what we

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>offer in the aggregate is really powerful and it's really special.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not only that technology opportunity, it's not only the

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>connection to our businesses. It's not only the impact you

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>can provide, it's the respect for the individual and the

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>collaboration on site, and the fact that that respect and

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the way we go about working with each other is

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>extremely positive. And I would love the chance to sort

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of talk to those who may think that would be otherwise. Okay,

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so let's just think about being in the office sort

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>not if I'm used to a hybrid culture, indeed a

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>completely fully remote one. How are you thinking about where

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the talent is that you can hire? So, first of all,

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>from a location perspective, globally, we're building out Miami, Dublin,

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Tel Aviv, Bangalore, and Miami is going to be a

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>big tech club for us. We also traditional opportunity in

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>New York and London and Singapore. But we're also making

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>sure that we are are very very focused on making

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, this talent. Knowing there's some flexibility in our

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>model right we are. We're enjoying returning to the office.

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>That collaboration is really important to us. We can be

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>flexible as well as well as global location flexibility. When

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you say Miami, I immediately think of crypto and is

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>does it matter which sector, which part of technology because basically,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>as SAMI technologies horizontal, it's not vertical anymore. But does

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it matter what type of company these people are coming from?

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>In short notes, the technology skills aligne those cultural attributes.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The sort of degree of problem solving. Of course, that's

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting to us. But whether it's tech sector, crypto or

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>existing sector or any other talent that's interested in what

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>we're doing, the domain is not a prerequisite. I've had

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of conversations with people in finance, particularly those who

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are trying to hire talent, about the need for diversity

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in the need for pipeline I am. I imagine technology

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fights that good fight too, and worried about its own

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>pipeline and showing that they have diversity in the workplace.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>How are you thinking about that when you're starting to

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>hide these technologies. It's a great question. It's extremely important

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to us. UM. We've seen really great activity in terms

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of females in the technology space and going into universities

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>at a greater rates and coming out of those programs

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at greater rates. UM and and cultural and racial diversity

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>incredibly important to us. It's all about diversity of thought,

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and we get that from all those different pockets, so

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>heavy focus on all of that, whether it's through affinity networks,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>through paid for programs, just through making sure we're out

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in those right pot it's with UH, with with folks

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that help us as third parties to identify where those

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>talent that talent may sit. It's really important to us

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and and it's going to make us better. What are

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which you're having to be creative in

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the way you hire, Because, as I said, I'm pretty

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>sure Millennium, you're out here talking about this, but so

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.479
<v Speaker 1>prevent how it's some other big asset managers, alternative managers

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are doing something similar. How do you set yourself apart?

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>How are you looking for alternative types of people to

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>come to you? So at Millennium, in my opinion and

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>specific to my organization, I think we do a really

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>good job of casting a really wide net we need

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>we need the best talent. So, whether it's having strategic

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>relationships with search firms, whether it's using LinkedIn, whether it's

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>using our vast employee network, whether it's thinking about where

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>these pools of talent maybe that could be attractive to us,

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and then advertising accordingly to those pools of talent there's

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing that you could probably think of that we don't do.

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We we want to get the very best talent, and

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>so there's nothing in terms of a strategy we wouldn't try. John,

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>create us time. If you come back, give us up

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to speed with how it's going, John, Millennium Management Global

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>headed talent acquisition. There. Meanwhile, we want to stick with

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this theme, this issue because well, actually the move of

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>tech talent to other sectors is not the only impact

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>these latest layofs. In fact, immigrants found themselves in perhaps

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a more precarious situation. H one B visas, for one,

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is an example. I think of that ticking clock attached

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>to when you lose your roll, Please to say to

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>talk us through it, maybe release some anxiety or not.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>As Sophie al Con it's an immigration lawyer based in

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Mountain View, California. You specialize in securing visas for tech

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>workers and talk to us, Sophie, I personally anecdotal evidence.

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Finally got my green cards sort of euphoria. There is

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>an element though that before that there was a worry.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, my husband or on H one B visa,

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he was nervous to a certain extent. How are you

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>seeing H one B visas and temporary talent being affected

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>by these layoffs. Well, thank you Caroline for having me

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and huge congratulations to you on your green card. That's

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>wonderful and it's such an important mile stone in the

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.719
<v Speaker 1>life journey of any immigrant who is trying to create

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>something in the United States. Uh, people in tech. We

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just saw the numbers on the slide the layoffs in November,

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>over fifty thousand. I'm estimating that probably twenty of the

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>laid off tech workers are on some sort of non

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>immigrant work visa such as H one B or L

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>one or OH one. They haven't gotten a green card

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>yet and they're somewhere in the process, and so what

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that means for them is they have this sixty day

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>grace period and if they can't find another job and

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>get their papers filed in time or figure out another status,

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>they have to leave the United States. Thousands of people,

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>probably five ten, maybe more. Nobody really has the numbers,

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but well it could easily be ten to fifteen thousand

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of the world's most brilliant people poised to cause brain

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for their brain drain in the United States. So how

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are companies being foultful about this? Some on that foultful.

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>They just got to get rid of people. I'm sure

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>some are out there thinking, Okay, how can I if

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you were working here in an immigrant visa, how can

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I protect you in some way? What are the ways

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>companies are dealing with it? Well, when the layoffs started

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in November, like with Twitter for example, they were just

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>across the board layoffs last day of employment. The word

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is cessation in the legal regulations. Uh. Some people will

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to get paychecks into January, but there are sixty

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>day clock started ticking in November. Fortunately, uh, some employers

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have started waking up to this immigration reality. And even

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if they have to make this difficult decision based on

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>economics to lay people off, I am starting to see

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>more compassion in the layoff process for nonimmigrants, with employment

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>lawyers creating different options, like, hey, instead of a severance package,

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>how about we agree to keep you working and keep

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you on payroll into this date in the future, and

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>then your sixty days will start then. But look, you

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can start looking for a job now and that will

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>try to help you get through the holidays and the

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>hiring freezes and have a better chance of finding your

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>next role. So you can stay here in the United

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>States with your family. So I am I am seeing

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>compassion around the holidays, but I think it's still a

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>big problem for thousands of people. Now, I'm not saying

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that social media and putting one's videos out there often

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>stirs a lot of compassion. And interestingly, I did do

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>previously kind of a TikTok on the impacts on H

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>one B visa holders, and a lot of the responses

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>were good, you know, a few more jobs for those

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>who actually American. How are you seeing that evolving? How

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>are we thinking about the repercussions of this set of layoffs?

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Would it ever mean that people companies are more reticent

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to go through the H one B visa process because

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to leave people in the sort of

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>precarious situation of the off the night layoffs. So it's

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>economically very complicated, and certainly the whole H one B

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>process and visas an immigration is a lightning rod for

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>controversy in this country. Employers are still economically incentivized to

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>hire immigrants for a variety of economic structural reasons. Um politically,

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>when this comes up, there's always questions about well our

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 1>H one B holders taking jobs away from Americans, or

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>are American companies abusing H one B holders. So these

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>are all very important discussions to have at a a

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>national level. I hope that immigration will continue. There's a

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>story by the Washington Post just a few hours ago

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that due to the immigration slowed down over the

0:29:55.840 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>last two years, one point seven million immigrants haven't and

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>able to come into the country, which is part of

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>why we also have a shortage of available workers with

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the skill sets that we need. But from a holistic

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>economic level for the country, immigrants are are critical. They're brilliant.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They pay full tuition to get masters and other PhDs

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>from US colleges and universities. They have deep stem knowledge,

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>including artific artificial intelligence, which is so critical to creating startups,

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>paying taxes, creating jobs for Americans, and technology powers are

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>national security and so we really have to think as

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a country if we want the next Apple, Google, and

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX to be founded in the United States or elsewhere.

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Because those are some of the ramifications of these policies

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Musk and self, an immigrant to the

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>U s sophilcan thank you, alcohol, immigration will founder and CEO.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We need making it clear which big companies have been

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>founded by those who came in some sort of a visa. Meanwhile,

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>coming up with the cops of f t X spooking

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>some crypto trade is what will this mean for digital assets?

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Draws closer thes Blomberg. Crypto of course in the spotlight

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>amid the f t X scandal bearious traders. They're signing that. Look,

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto losses are likely to continue into next year too.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now is Michael's fine managing partner of quantitative

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>trading firm Dexterity Capital, who can give us a really

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>broad perspective, not only Michael. I'm sure we're getting into

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the nitty gritty of future regulation and all that good stuff,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but talk to us about just trading at the moment

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in the crypto space. Our institution is just pulling back. Yeah,

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really quiet time in cryptocurrency right now.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And for traders like us who are high frequency and

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>little latency, we depend on a lot of volumes, so

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing that. And you know, over the course

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the past eighteen months, a lot of traditional shops

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like the Hudson River Tradings or Citadels of the world

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>have come into crypto, and I think they were doing

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>great for a bit, but now they're found finding there's

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>not that much to go around anymore, and maybe they'll

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be thinking twice about whether they want to stick around

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>next year. Okay, so talk to us about what you

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>need with trading volumes. What is necessary to build back

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>those trading volumes. Obviously a little bit of desire to

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>get in, a bit more of a bullish sentiment, maybe

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>stocks to move, but is there something more within crypto

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>itself that needs to come back to bring back the

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>trading volumes. The number one thing we need is trust.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>People have to feel safe, especially retail investors and institutional

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>traders like us, that if we're on an exchange, our

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>our money is going to stay there and that we

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>can continue to trade successfully. That's the most important thing.

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think adjunct to trust, we need proper regulation

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that guys like us have been crying

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>out for for a long time. Unfortunately, this big disaster

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>had to happen before you know, DC really started to

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>take notice. Let's go first back to trust. There is

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of nervousness out there. Fathers, the crypto

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>world will call it fear uncertainty, and and a lot

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of that still surround some of the exchanges, whether it

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>be the lending that might have been done on Genesis,

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's what's happening over with finance what you're hearing

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>from these exchanges and other lending protocols, and they're like,

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>are you building trust and you're feeling more confident around

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it or not. I think we're taking steps towards trust,

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing exchanges in particular doing more to create

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 1>transparency to say, hey, this is where our reserves are

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can go and verify on the blockchain that

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we actually have these assets. And that's a good first step,

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but we need to do more. I think we need

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to see full audits of exchanges, and we need them

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to be accountable to regulators who can get inside the

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>building and see what's actually happening with the balance sheets

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and with the assets. Okay, so talk to us about regulators,

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's almost a bit of a squabble here in

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the US about who's going to be the key, whether

0:33:57.640 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going the SEC, where it's going to be the CFTC.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But for as a bit of a European I look

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>at what's happening in Europe and they're already getting through

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>some of this regulation and putting it into action. What

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>do you make of what's happening globally? Yeah, and I

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think Europe's been very smart that you wants to capture

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this cryptocurrency market because long term they

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>see a future there. So the legislation like MICA is

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>a big help. It lays out exactly what the definitions

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of particular types of cryptocurrency assets are, whether it's a

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>utility token, a security or e money. And they're also

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>setting out requirements for a crypto service provider is like

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>exchanges and custodians and brokers, so that again retail can

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>feel safe and regulators can be sure that everyone's house

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is in order. Okay, that's got really interesting echo for

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>me to what happened with GDPR, what happened with data,

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Europe just get there faster, which is

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of extraordinary given their well they're not one country,

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there are a grouping of different countries of very much

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>diverse thought. Is this going to keep on happening? Is

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to lead the charge? And is that ultimately

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of a good thing for them setting regulation elsewhere.

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good thing for them the charge

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>if they can. I think the US is now going

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to want to come in and do what they can.

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But one thing I admire about the European process is

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they've worked with the industry leaders to make sense of

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.959
<v Speaker 1>this very complex and new technology. I think it's hard

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>for regulators to wrap their heads around exactly how this

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>all works and what the risks are. And I think

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that's why in the US, the CFTC SEC, they've been

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit slower to get around this really hard problem.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So I do hope in the US still engage with

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders. Michael Great to have some time any of

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Dexterity Capital managing partner Michael Sufi. So how do you

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>like to watch a movie? Are you in the theater?

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Because I have a fashion for you? Are you watching

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it at home? Is perhaps a debate because we're not

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sure how basically movies are being affected, and not all

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of them are the same. Of course, back in two

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine, just think about Avatar. It was a

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>hit film. It's watershed event for Imax, in particular because

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to this day it remains the highest grossing film in

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Imax history. Now, the release of the long awaited sequel

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Avatar The Way of Water has underlined what investors see

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>as a strong case for shares of the movie theater chains.

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Because this at a time when movie going seems to

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of lost its luster, IMAX shares have fallen less

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>than the rest of its rivals, falling only four two

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>compared to think like the drop that we see here

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>in cinema in the blue AMC. I don't need to

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>tell you down by two thirds sixty six per cent.

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But Imax, of course, kind of benefits from an environment

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that split between smaller films and increasingly go director streaming

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, and the blockbusters, the ones you want

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to go and see in a theater. You want to

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>be eating your popcorn, you want to have an immersive experience.

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>So the release Friday of the new Avatar could prove

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 1>to be the year's most foremost example of the latter. Still,

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>according to blue Bug data, year to day US box

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>office receipts there are third lower than levels seen back

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nine. Of course, that's the last pre COVID year,

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and very different if you think about how airlines have

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>recovered to above levels not the same when you're going,

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to the movies in the cinema. Such a change,

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>such a way in which Disney plus Netflix has up

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>ended the way in which we consume that maybe something

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like an avatar, you just can't can't experience it in

0:37:21.160 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>your home movie experience. You've got to go, you've got

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to get to a theater, you've gotta put on your

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>glasses or whatever way in which you want to consume. Meanwhile,

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>well bear the thought, and that does it for this

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Technology. Don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>You can find it on the terminal if you're lucky

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to have one, as well as online on Apple,

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify. An I Heart from New York and wishing

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>add a wonderful time off in London. At the moment,

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we listen as a Bloomberg