WEBVTT - NVIDIA: At the Heart of the AI Boom

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:20.236 --> 0:00:21.836
<v Speaker 2>Just a quick note at the start of the show.

0:00:21.916 --> 0:00:24.396
<v Speaker 2>We are very eager to hear what you think of

0:00:24.396 --> 0:00:26.796
<v Speaker 2>the show and how we can make it better, how

0:00:26.836 --> 0:00:29.316
<v Speaker 2>we can make a show that you like more than

0:00:29.476 --> 0:00:30.236
<v Speaker 2>the show we're making.

0:00:30.236 --> 0:00:30.436
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:00:30.516 --> 0:00:32.236
<v Speaker 2>Tell us what we should do, more of what we

0:00:32.276 --> 0:00:35.596
<v Speaker 2>should do, less of what we should do, wildly differently.

0:00:35.956 --> 0:00:41.196
<v Speaker 2>Email us at problem at pushkin dot fm. Again problem

0:00:41.436 --> 0:00:45.916
<v Speaker 2>at pushkin dot fm. I'm looking forward to reading every email.

0:00:47.476 --> 0:00:53.716
<v Speaker 2>Artificial intelligence feels very abstract, feels very ephemeral, feels more

0:00:53.796 --> 0:00:57.556
<v Speaker 2>like an idea than a thing. But there is in

0:00:57.596 --> 0:01:01.956
<v Speaker 2>fact a thing there. AI is rooted in the physical world.

0:01:02.476 --> 0:01:05.996
<v Speaker 2>The thing or things are these little pieces of silicon

0:01:06.156 --> 0:01:12.716
<v Speaker 2>and metal called graphics processing units GPUs. These GPUs are expensive.

0:01:12.996 --> 0:01:15.836
<v Speaker 2>They cost thousands of dollars each. If you want to

0:01:15.836 --> 0:01:17.876
<v Speaker 2>build a state of the art AI model, you have

0:01:17.916 --> 0:01:22.116
<v Speaker 2>to buy tens of thousands of these GPUs, and most

0:01:22.156 --> 0:01:26.236
<v Speaker 2>of the GPUs come from a single company, in Vidia,

0:01:26.676 --> 0:01:30.236
<v Speaker 2>which is why in just the past few years Nvidia

0:01:30.316 --> 0:01:34.556
<v Speaker 2>has become one of the most valuable, most important companies.

0:01:34.236 --> 0:01:34.796
<v Speaker 1>In the world.

0:01:40.996 --> 0:01:43.796
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jacob Goldstein, and this is what's your problem. My

0:01:43.876 --> 0:01:47.236
<v Speaker 2>guest today is take him. He's a staff writer at

0:01:47.276 --> 0:01:50.116
<v Speaker 2>Baron's and the author of a new book about in Nvidia.

0:01:50.156 --> 0:01:54.156
<v Speaker 2>The books called The Nvidia Way. The book, of course,

0:01:54.196 --> 0:01:57.076
<v Speaker 2>points up being a lot about Jensen Wong, who co

0:01:57.156 --> 0:02:00.596
<v Speaker 2>founded the company back in nineteen ninety three and who

0:02:00.636 --> 0:02:04.716
<v Speaker 2>is still the CEO and who is really a wild

0:02:04.836 --> 0:02:08.436
<v Speaker 2>kind of terrifying, brilliant figure. And Tay and I talk

0:02:08.516 --> 0:02:12.076
<v Speaker 2>a lot about Jensen later in the interview, but we

0:02:12.116 --> 0:02:16.236
<v Speaker 2>started with this moment in two thousand and one that

0:02:16.316 --> 0:02:19.836
<v Speaker 2>led from Nvidia being a company that made graphics cards

0:02:19.876 --> 0:02:23.516
<v Speaker 2>that let people play video games on computers to becoming

0:02:23.556 --> 0:02:29.556
<v Speaker 2>this key company at the center of the AI revolution today.

0:02:30.716 --> 0:02:33.276
<v Speaker 2>So you write about this moment in two thousand and

0:02:33.356 --> 0:02:37.476
<v Speaker 2>one when a researcher, right, an academic at the University

0:02:37.476 --> 0:02:41.516
<v Speaker 2>of North Carolina, realizes he can basically like hack these

0:02:41.556 --> 0:02:44.316
<v Speaker 2>graphics cards, right, this hardware that's just made to make

0:02:44.356 --> 0:02:48.036
<v Speaker 2>pretty graphics on the computer to help in his research,

0:02:48.076 --> 0:02:50.516
<v Speaker 2>which is like not at all about graphics, right, It's

0:02:50.556 --> 0:02:54.396
<v Speaker 2>like modeling the weather or something. And it seems like

0:02:54.636 --> 0:02:58.556
<v Speaker 2>this moment is a big winds up being a big

0:02:58.636 --> 0:03:02.076
<v Speaker 2>turning point in the history of technology. Really tell me

0:03:02.116 --> 0:03:02.836
<v Speaker 2>about that moment.

0:03:03.236 --> 0:03:05.756
<v Speaker 1>The key moment was with Mark Harris, where he was

0:03:05.756 --> 0:03:09.796
<v Speaker 1>a researcher at the University of North Carolina, and him

0:03:09.876 --> 0:03:12.756
<v Speaker 1>and a lot a bunch of other academics realized there's

0:03:12.796 --> 0:03:16.436
<v Speaker 1>all this computing power that you can hack the algorithm

0:03:16.836 --> 0:03:21.156
<v Speaker 1>to use that computing power to model thermodynamics of fluids

0:03:21.196 --> 0:03:23.076
<v Speaker 1>inside clouds, which was his thesis.

0:03:23.436 --> 0:03:26.556
<v Speaker 2>And he realized that worked better than the CPU than

0:03:26.596 --> 0:03:28.876
<v Speaker 2>just sort of doing it the traditional way through the computes.

0:03:28.996 --> 0:03:32.716
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and a GPU has all these different cores that

0:03:32.836 --> 0:03:36.156
<v Speaker 1>run in parallel, and the CPU only typically has four

0:03:36.196 --> 0:03:39.556
<v Speaker 1>to eight cores, and GPUs have hundreds of thousands of cores.

0:03:39.996 --> 0:03:43.356
<v Speaker 2>What's a CPU better at than a GPU? Like, why

0:03:43.396 --> 0:03:45.756
<v Speaker 2>would you have four to eight when you could have thousands?

0:03:46.196 --> 0:03:50.436
<v Speaker 1>Well, it could run more complicated pieces of instructions and software,

0:03:50.676 --> 0:03:54.356
<v Speaker 1>and GPUs typically break down into much simpler tasks. But

0:03:54.396 --> 0:03:57.476
<v Speaker 1>the difference is you could run all those tasks across

0:03:57.476 --> 0:04:02.916
<v Speaker 1>a thousands So for certain workloads like AI, it's so

0:04:03.036 --> 0:04:06.396
<v Speaker 1>much faster than a CPU, which has to do things

0:04:06.556 --> 0:04:09.836
<v Speaker 1>kind of one after another serially. And Mark Harris and

0:04:09.836 --> 0:04:14.036
<v Speaker 1>all these academics started hacking into the graphics algorithms and

0:04:14.876 --> 0:04:18.876
<v Speaker 1>using that power to do all this scientific high performance computing.

0:04:19.316 --> 0:04:23.236
<v Speaker 1>And Mark Harris started a website and congregated all these

0:04:23.516 --> 0:04:26.676
<v Speaker 1>researchers and everyone's sharing the knowledge, sharing the tricks that

0:04:26.796 --> 0:04:30.356
<v Speaker 1>actually hack into this. So Nvidia sees this, they're seeing

0:04:30.436 --> 0:04:33.836
<v Speaker 1>people use this to do model stock options, the model

0:04:33.916 --> 0:04:36.876
<v Speaker 1>weather and saying, wow, this is actually really interesting.

0:04:37.436 --> 0:04:40.156
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's like your dream if you're a company. Right,

0:04:40.196 --> 0:04:42.236
<v Speaker 2>It's like, oh, there's all these other things you could

0:04:42.276 --> 0:04:44.196
<v Speaker 2>do with this thing we're already.

0:04:43.796 --> 0:04:47.236
<v Speaker 1>Making exactly so, and Jensen kind of had the foresight

0:04:47.356 --> 0:04:49.236
<v Speaker 1>to see this, Wow, this is a really big deal.

0:04:49.476 --> 0:04:51.956
<v Speaker 1>We should invest in this. So they wind up hiring

0:04:51.996 --> 0:04:56.156
<v Speaker 1>Mark Harris and look at all the things that all

0:04:56.196 --> 0:04:59.196
<v Speaker 1>these researchers are doing. And this is the beginning of

0:04:59.276 --> 0:05:03.756
<v Speaker 1>development Kuda, which is a programming platform for general purpose

0:05:04.076 --> 0:05:05.036
<v Speaker 1>GPU computing.

0:05:05.476 --> 0:05:07.436
<v Speaker 2>And just to be clear, Kuda is like, it's a

0:05:07.436 --> 0:05:11.436
<v Speaker 2>programming language, but in this case they're programming what used

0:05:11.476 --> 0:05:13.276
<v Speaker 2>to be just the thing for graphics, but it turns

0:05:13.276 --> 0:05:15.396
<v Speaker 2>out to be good for these other things. And that

0:05:15.956 --> 0:05:18.956
<v Speaker 2>language it's in video's own language. Right, This is I

0:05:18.956 --> 0:05:20.676
<v Speaker 2>feel like, going to be important in the sort of

0:05:20.716 --> 0:05:23.876
<v Speaker 2>business story for why and video is so dominant today, right,

0:05:23.956 --> 0:05:27.716
<v Speaker 2>Like they write this language, they own the language, and

0:05:27.756 --> 0:05:30.116
<v Speaker 2>it's written just to work with their chips, is that right?

0:05:30.276 --> 0:05:33.876
<v Speaker 1>Yes, no one else can use this. It's extensions on

0:05:33.876 --> 0:05:37.636
<v Speaker 1>a programming language that makes parallel computing easier for programmers

0:05:37.676 --> 0:05:43.156
<v Speaker 1>to make. So Jensen just invests in this, and he

0:05:43.676 --> 0:05:46.916
<v Speaker 1>actually thinks longer term than the average CEO. So most

0:05:46.956 --> 0:05:49.716
<v Speaker 1>CEOs looking out maybe the next quarter, maybe a year

0:05:49.836 --> 0:05:53.996
<v Speaker 1>or two. Jensen thinks in five, ten, fifteen year increments.

0:05:54.636 --> 0:05:57.916
<v Speaker 1>So he's always looking out, what's the next big computing shift,

0:05:57.956 --> 0:06:01.636
<v Speaker 1>what's the next big technology phase. So he saw KUDA

0:06:01.756 --> 0:06:04.476
<v Speaker 1>as the main thing where eventually his GPUs, you have

0:06:04.556 --> 0:06:07.676
<v Speaker 1>all this latent, enormous computing power will be able to

0:06:08.076 --> 0:06:13.636
<v Speaker 1>be used for science research, all these other simulation things.

0:06:14.196 --> 0:06:16.636
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't give up even when Wall Street wents

0:06:16.676 --> 0:06:18.796
<v Speaker 1>down on his next day, Why you wasting all this

0:06:18.916 --> 0:06:22.636
<v Speaker 1>die space is crushing your gross profit margins? He said, no,

0:06:22.796 --> 0:06:25.196
<v Speaker 1>this is the future computing. I'm going to invest in

0:06:25.236 --> 0:06:28.196
<v Speaker 1>it and it will work out someday.

0:06:28.596 --> 0:06:30.596
<v Speaker 2>And when you say wasting all this die space, like

0:06:30.676 --> 0:06:33.036
<v Speaker 2>de space is like space on the chip, right, Like

0:06:33.076 --> 0:06:37.356
<v Speaker 2>he's making a physical thing and to commit to Kuda

0:06:37.436 --> 0:06:40.196
<v Speaker 2>to have this dedicated programming language, you actually have to

0:06:40.316 --> 0:06:43.196
<v Speaker 2>give up space on the chip. So that's it's costly, right,

0:06:43.236 --> 0:06:47.636
<v Speaker 2>Their margins go down. They're not optimizing for profits at

0:06:47.636 --> 0:06:48.156
<v Speaker 2>that moment.

0:06:48.276 --> 0:06:51.716
<v Speaker 1>It's literal circuits called Kuda cores. Their hardware circuits are

0:06:51.756 --> 0:06:56.996
<v Speaker 1>optimized to run the Kuda language. So even internally executives

0:06:56.996 --> 0:07:00.996
<v Speaker 1>are like, why are we spending all this money allocating

0:07:01.036 --> 0:07:03.876
<v Speaker 1>dye space for something that people really aren't using that much,

0:07:03.996 --> 0:07:07.516
<v Speaker 1>that isn't generating revenue. But Jensen saw this as a future.

0:07:07.716 --> 0:07:10.676
<v Speaker 1>I actually kind of bring up the analogy of read

0:07:10.716 --> 0:07:14.676
<v Speaker 1>Hastings and Netflix. So when he started Netflix, you know,

0:07:14.676 --> 0:07:18.196
<v Speaker 1>the technology wasn't ready, consumers didn't really have broadband, but

0:07:18.276 --> 0:07:22.156
<v Speaker 1>he had this intuitive sense that someday video will be

0:07:22.156 --> 0:07:24.476
<v Speaker 1>streamed over the Internet and that was the future, and

0:07:24.556 --> 0:07:27.116
<v Speaker 1>it makes it's so obvious now, but back then it wasn't.

0:07:27.796 --> 0:07:32.396
<v Speaker 1>So Hastings positioned Netflix. He made money with DVD rentals

0:07:32.396 --> 0:07:35.436
<v Speaker 1>for a while and just stayed on top of the technology,

0:07:35.516 --> 0:07:38.196
<v Speaker 1>kept on investing in investing, and when the technology was

0:07:38.236 --> 0:07:42.836
<v Speaker 1>good enough, that's when he really pivoted Netflix to dominate

0:07:42.836 --> 0:07:49.196
<v Speaker 1>Internet stream Jensen did this multiple times with three D graphics,

0:07:49.236 --> 0:07:52.116
<v Speaker 1>video game graphics. He knew that someday PC video games

0:07:52.156 --> 0:07:56.756
<v Speaker 1>would be a big market programmable GPUs, Kuda and later

0:07:56.876 --> 0:08:00.676
<v Speaker 1>with AI on these full stack data center AI servers.

0:08:00.916 --> 0:08:03.036
<v Speaker 1>He just sees the future and is willing to keep

0:08:03.076 --> 0:08:06.756
<v Speaker 1>investing even if it's five ten years out. And Kuda

0:08:06.956 --> 0:08:10.036
<v Speaker 1>started in two thousand and six. I mean, things got

0:08:10.036 --> 0:08:12.836
<v Speaker 1>incrementally better for the next ten years, but it didn't

0:08:12.876 --> 0:08:15.156
<v Speaker 1>really take off till twenty twenty two.

0:08:16.236 --> 0:08:19.436
<v Speaker 2>Till chat GPT. Basically twenty twenty two is chatchipt That's

0:08:19.476 --> 0:08:21.436
<v Speaker 2>when in video goes totally bonker.

0:08:21.556 --> 0:08:23.836
<v Speaker 1>And that was the power of the large language model

0:08:23.876 --> 0:08:27.036
<v Speaker 1>of AI and all that stuff. And he's investing throughout

0:08:27.036 --> 0:08:28.956
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing for ten fifteen years.

0:08:29.036 --> 0:08:31.316
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so there is a moment. There's a moment in

0:08:31.356 --> 0:08:33.116
<v Speaker 2>the middle there. I do obviously want to get to

0:08:33.156 --> 0:08:35.156
<v Speaker 2>the chat GPT moment and the present, but there is

0:08:35.196 --> 0:08:38.116
<v Speaker 2>one more moment I feel like in the in the middle,

0:08:38.156 --> 0:08:40.116
<v Speaker 2>that is where in video is in the center of it.

0:08:40.156 --> 0:08:43.076
<v Speaker 2>And that's twenty twelve, right, So you have early you know,

0:08:43.076 --> 0:08:46.276
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and one, people realize, oh, you can pack

0:08:46.316 --> 0:08:48.996
<v Speaker 2>the GPU to do other things. Andybody's like, oh, that's interesting,

0:08:49.076 --> 0:08:51.276
<v Speaker 2>let's build a whole programming language. So people didn't do that,

0:08:51.716 --> 0:08:56.356
<v Speaker 2>And then in twenty twelve, you have this moment that

0:08:56.516 --> 0:09:01.476
<v Speaker 2>really seems like the birth of modern AI. Right, this

0:09:01.516 --> 0:09:06.516
<v Speaker 2>moment when when this AI model called alex net sort

0:09:06.556 --> 0:09:09.836
<v Speaker 2>of emerges into the world and everybody in the AI

0:09:09.916 --> 0:09:14.116
<v Speaker 2>world is like, oh my god, AI is here, right,

0:09:14.556 --> 0:09:15.676
<v Speaker 2>tell me about that moment.

0:09:16.236 --> 0:09:19.836
<v Speaker 1>So alex Nett was a program that was created by

0:09:19.876 --> 0:09:24.516
<v Speaker 1>two researchers at the University of Toronto and they competed

0:09:24.516 --> 0:09:28.796
<v Speaker 1>in this competition called image net, which basically fed images

0:09:28.836 --> 0:09:31.396
<v Speaker 1>into the model, and they were able to recognize and

0:09:31.436 --> 0:09:35.436
<v Speaker 1>category rise image much more effectively than any other model

0:09:35.436 --> 0:09:38.876
<v Speaker 1>in the past. And the breakthrough was they used GPUs

0:09:38.916 --> 0:09:40.116
<v Speaker 1>for the first time and.

0:09:40.116 --> 0:09:42.036
<v Speaker 2>It was like just a few, right, Like they were

0:09:42.076 --> 0:09:44.676
<v Speaker 2>grad students and they got their hands on like a

0:09:44.716 --> 0:09:47.396
<v Speaker 2>few in video GPUs and had them like running on

0:09:47.476 --> 0:09:48.836
<v Speaker 2>servers in the hallway or something.

0:09:48.916 --> 0:09:52.396
<v Speaker 1>Yes, right, and these are video game GPUs. To be clear,

0:09:52.636 --> 0:09:56.076
<v Speaker 1>this isn't some enterprise complicated. They literally went to a

0:09:56.116 --> 0:09:59.116
<v Speaker 1>store and bought a bunch of video game GPUs and

0:09:59.236 --> 0:10:02.036
<v Speaker 1>it turned out to be very effective where they could

0:10:02.076 --> 0:10:06.676
<v Speaker 1>do the power and effectiveness of two thousand CPUs on

0:10:06.676 --> 0:10:07.916
<v Speaker 1>only twelve GPUs.

0:10:08.276 --> 0:10:11.116
<v Speaker 2>And to be clear or that kind of vision AI,

0:10:11.996 --> 0:10:16.436
<v Speaker 2>it's machine learning. It's the same basic technology as is

0:10:16.516 --> 0:10:19.036
<v Speaker 2>used in large language models. Right, it's it's modern AI.

0:10:19.316 --> 0:10:23.436
<v Speaker 2>And so that moment is this moment when it's like, oh,

0:10:23.516 --> 0:10:29.756
<v Speaker 2>holy shit, GPUs are one hundred x better than CPUs

0:10:29.956 --> 0:10:33.196
<v Speaker 2>for AI. Yes, that's interesting, that's useful to know.

0:10:33.956 --> 0:10:38.196
<v Speaker 1>So it was a combination of GPUs data and algorithms

0:10:38.276 --> 0:10:41.796
<v Speaker 1>that kind of combusted at that perfect moment. And then

0:10:41.916 --> 0:10:44.556
<v Speaker 1>Jensen saw this and it's like this is a big

0:10:44.596 --> 0:10:48.076
<v Speaker 1>deal and someday AI is going to be huge and

0:10:48.156 --> 0:10:50.476
<v Speaker 1>we need to invest big in this. So on top

0:10:50.516 --> 0:10:54.316
<v Speaker 1>of KUDA, he invests in all these AI libraries that

0:10:54.836 --> 0:10:59.476
<v Speaker 1>effectively managed the GPUs to do AI workloads the most

0:10:59.516 --> 0:11:02.636
<v Speaker 1>in the most effective manner. And he invested in libraries,

0:11:02.796 --> 0:11:07.116
<v Speaker 1>invested in software, he invested in researchers, and allocated a

0:11:07.116 --> 0:11:10.876
<v Speaker 1>lot of employees to this project starting in around twenty thirteen.

0:11:11.436 --> 0:11:14.676
<v Speaker 2>And so that's that's more of the like it's not

0:11:15.196 --> 0:11:18.636
<v Speaker 2>just the chip, right, it's like the chip that is

0:11:18.836 --> 0:11:23.396
<v Speaker 2>optimized to be not only efficient on the hardware level.

0:11:23.396 --> 0:11:25.356
<v Speaker 2>But like there's all this software. So if you are

0:11:25.876 --> 0:11:28.516
<v Speaker 2>if you are building AI, if you're if you're writing

0:11:28.556 --> 0:11:31.716
<v Speaker 2>code for AI, like they make it really easy for

0:11:31.756 --> 0:11:34.196
<v Speaker 2>you to do it on in video GPUs.

0:11:34.236 --> 0:11:37.156
<v Speaker 1>So it's all the math libraries, it's all the AI

0:11:37.236 --> 0:11:41.436
<v Speaker 1>frameworks work the best on in video GPUs. And they

0:11:41.476 --> 0:11:44.756
<v Speaker 1>added these things called tensor cores similar to krudercres. They

0:11:44.756 --> 0:11:49.236
<v Speaker 1>actually added hardware circuitry inside the GPUs that are optimized

0:11:49.276 --> 0:11:53.076
<v Speaker 1>to run AI training and workloads and all the all

0:11:53.116 --> 0:11:55.916
<v Speaker 1>the software that you're running. And this is over again,

0:11:56.116 --> 0:12:00.156
<v Speaker 1>this is over another nine eight years where they're building

0:12:00.156 --> 0:12:03.236
<v Speaker 1>all the software and hardware circuitry to run deep learning

0:12:03.276 --> 0:12:06.076
<v Speaker 1>AI the best.

0:12:06.556 --> 0:12:11.236
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's time. It's twot twenty two. Twenty twenty two,

0:12:12.396 --> 0:12:16.796
<v Speaker 2>chat GPT comes out. What's that mean for in video?

0:12:17.316 --> 0:12:21.676
<v Speaker 1>So actually check chip takes off and it's it takes

0:12:21.676 --> 0:12:25.116
<v Speaker 1>about two quarters for the whole world to realize this

0:12:25.196 --> 0:12:29.356
<v Speaker 1>is a big deal. This, this model of natural language

0:12:29.356 --> 0:12:34.956
<v Speaker 1>processing where the computer actually understands what you're asking, and

0:12:35.076 --> 0:12:40.436
<v Speaker 1>that ability to draw insights and be effective with all

0:12:40.476 --> 0:12:44.996
<v Speaker 1>that natural language stuff just just blows people away, and

0:12:45.196 --> 0:12:48.636
<v Speaker 1>companies and startups realize we have a new AI boom here,

0:12:48.756 --> 0:12:54.476
<v Speaker 1>because it really unleashes a wave of capabilities that wasn't

0:12:55.076 --> 0:12:58.516
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doable before. So about six months later, that's when

0:12:59.196 --> 0:13:01.916
<v Speaker 1>the big bang I call it for Nvidia happens when

0:13:01.916 --> 0:13:06.436
<v Speaker 1>they say, oh my gosh, we're gonna we're gonna beat

0:13:06.516 --> 0:13:09.116
<v Speaker 1>our numbers that the street expects by four billion up.

0:13:10.036 --> 0:13:12.276
<v Speaker 1>And the stock went up like one hundred and seventy

0:13:12.316 --> 0:13:15.396
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in value because the world realized.

0:13:15.036 --> 0:13:17.556
<v Speaker 2>In like a day. Yes, right, there was one day,

0:13:17.636 --> 0:13:21.516
<v Speaker 2>and it was spring of twenty twenty three. Way talking

0:13:21.556 --> 0:13:21.956
<v Speaker 2>about and.

0:13:21.916 --> 0:13:25.316
<v Speaker 1>This is three, this is three weeks after I had

0:13:25.396 --> 0:13:28.436
<v Speaker 1>the meeting with the book publisher who asked me if

0:13:28.476 --> 0:13:30.996
<v Speaker 1>I could do a book on video. So literally I started.

0:13:30.756 --> 0:13:33.436
<v Speaker 2>Also good timing for you, good timing for a video,

0:13:33.516 --> 0:13:37.356
<v Speaker 2>Good timing for you, And and right, no, I remember

0:13:37.396 --> 0:13:40.876
<v Speaker 2>that day. And and there was a question then of like,

0:13:40.956 --> 0:13:42.956
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, is this a one off? Are they

0:13:42.996 --> 0:13:44.156
<v Speaker 2>going to keep growing this way?

0:13:44.236 --> 0:13:44.396
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:13:44.436 --> 0:13:48.316
<v Speaker 2>Basically what they said was we sold way way more

0:13:48.436 --> 0:13:51.996
<v Speaker 2>GPUs than we thought we were gonna. Right, that's that's

0:13:52.036 --> 0:13:54.516
<v Speaker 2>what That's the basic thing they reported in their earnings

0:13:54.596 --> 0:13:58.156
<v Speaker 2>report and the subtext is this is the world and

0:13:58.196 --> 0:14:02.036
<v Speaker 2>in particular, like big tech companies with lots of money realizing, oh,

0:14:02.196 --> 0:14:05.596
<v Speaker 2>we've got to get into this AI game more than

0:14:05.636 --> 0:14:07.316
<v Speaker 2>we have been and to do that, we got to

0:14:07.356 --> 0:14:11.436
<v Speaker 2>buy a lot of really expensive GPUs from video.

0:14:11.796 --> 0:14:16.876
<v Speaker 1>And Jensen is really smart at selling this stuff. Like,

0:14:17.396 --> 0:14:22.356
<v Speaker 1>he's very smart because every company, every company CEO, every startup,

0:14:22.956 --> 0:14:26.156
<v Speaker 1>they saw this risk as the extential for them because

0:14:26.476 --> 0:14:30.996
<v Speaker 1>if your competitor comes out with the AI featured offering

0:14:31.236 --> 0:14:34.156
<v Speaker 1>that's much better than what you have today, that that

0:14:34.276 --> 0:14:37.996
<v Speaker 1>isn't advantaged by the AI models, Yeah, that competitor could

0:14:38.876 --> 0:14:41.996
<v Speaker 1>could drive you out of business. So Jensen was very

0:14:41.996 --> 0:14:46.196
<v Speaker 1>smart as at selling to people that you need to

0:14:46.316 --> 0:14:47.316
<v Speaker 1>get on board.

0:14:47.156 --> 0:14:52.196
<v Speaker 2>At making everybody scared of losing. Yes, well, and in particular, right,

0:14:52.276 --> 0:14:55.116
<v Speaker 2>I mean there is a small number of very large,

0:14:55.276 --> 0:15:00.156
<v Speaker 2>very rich tech companies that are a very big part

0:15:00.156 --> 0:15:03.036
<v Speaker 2>of in videos revenue. Right, it's like whatever the ones

0:15:03.116 --> 0:15:09.756
<v Speaker 2>you quld think of, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Yes, I mean,

0:15:09.756 --> 0:15:12.356
<v Speaker 2>I guess open ai sort of is kind of connected

0:15:12.396 --> 0:15:15.676
<v Speaker 2>with Like those companies are buying a huge share of

0:15:15.796 --> 0:15:19.556
<v Speaker 2>these GPUs, right, They account for a big, big chunk

0:15:19.596 --> 0:15:22.276
<v Speaker 2>of in videos revenue. Yes, and those are good companies

0:15:22.276 --> 0:15:24.436
<v Speaker 2>they have as customers because they're super rich, right, they

0:15:24.436 --> 0:15:26.356
<v Speaker 2>can afford to pay you tens of billions of dollars

0:15:26.436 --> 0:15:27.156
<v Speaker 2>for your GPUs.

0:15:27.516 --> 0:15:31.636
<v Speaker 1>But that's being said, they're reselling that GPU power to

0:15:32.036 --> 0:15:36.316
<v Speaker 1>companies and startups, right, so startups are buying that GPU

0:15:36.356 --> 0:15:38.636
<v Speaker 1>competing capacity from these.

0:15:38.596 --> 0:15:41.116
<v Speaker 2>GNT tech companies. Yeah, that's a good point, right. So

0:15:41.116 --> 0:15:43.276
<v Speaker 2>they're in a way not the end customer. They're the

0:15:43.316 --> 0:15:45.636
<v Speaker 2>sort of intermediate kind of service providers.

0:15:45.676 --> 0:15:49.516
<v Speaker 1>But they also use that for their own internal systems too,

0:15:49.596 --> 0:15:52.476
<v Speaker 1>like Meta uses a ton of GP power to make

0:15:52.516 --> 0:15:57.516
<v Speaker 1>their advertising algorithms more effective and to pick the videos

0:15:57.516 --> 0:15:58.396
<v Speaker 1>like tech talk does.

0:15:58.796 --> 0:16:01.996
<v Speaker 2>And obviously Google Search is now becoming more and more

0:16:02.076 --> 0:16:04.716
<v Speaker 2>AI driven, and there's Gemini, which is right, I mean,

0:16:04.756 --> 0:16:07.436
<v Speaker 2>there's there's more direct use of AI by all of

0:16:07.476 --> 0:16:12.076
<v Speaker 2>the big tech companies as well. So there's another piece

0:16:12.156 --> 0:16:14.396
<v Speaker 2>of this which is interesting. I mean, because there's one

0:16:14.476 --> 0:16:16.636
<v Speaker 2>universe wherever it's like, oh, we got to get it

0:16:16.676 --> 0:16:19.636
<v Speaker 2>on AI, and they all buy the GPUs and then

0:16:19.676 --> 0:16:21.996
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of it. It's like a step function where

0:16:22.036 --> 0:16:25.476
<v Speaker 2>like there's this momentary rush where everybody buys the GPUs

0:16:25.516 --> 0:16:27.756
<v Speaker 2>and then whatever. They just upgrade every couple of years,

0:16:27.796 --> 0:16:31.796
<v Speaker 2>and it's more like a regular tech hardware business, which

0:16:31.836 --> 0:16:34.436
<v Speaker 2>is like good but not amazing. But there's another piece

0:16:34.476 --> 0:16:37.316
<v Speaker 2>of it that has been a huge deal for end video,

0:16:37.356 --> 0:16:40.476
<v Speaker 2>and that's the scaling law or the scaling hypothesis. Let's

0:16:40.476 --> 0:16:42.796
<v Speaker 2>talk about that. What's the what's the scaling hypothesis.

0:16:42.836 --> 0:16:45.276
<v Speaker 1>So the scaling hypothesis, similar to what I said before,

0:16:45.556 --> 0:16:48.876
<v Speaker 1>is the combination of computing power. The more computing power

0:16:48.916 --> 0:16:53.436
<v Speaker 1>you add, the more data you increase, and the better

0:16:53.916 --> 0:16:57.076
<v Speaker 1>ways you figure out software algorithms for each of these

0:16:57.116 --> 0:17:00.516
<v Speaker 1>three buckets. If you increase it, the AI model becomes

0:17:00.556 --> 0:17:02.716
<v Speaker 1>more capable and more effective.

0:17:02.636 --> 0:17:05.516
<v Speaker 2>And like, just to be clear, like even if the

0:17:05.556 --> 0:17:08.676
<v Speaker 2>algorithms aren't getting that much better, right, Like my understanding is,

0:17:08.716 --> 0:17:11.956
<v Speaker 2>and this is kind of a new idea. It's like, oh,

0:17:12.036 --> 0:17:16.196
<v Speaker 2>if we can just have more data and more computing

0:17:16.276 --> 0:17:18.276
<v Speaker 2>power will get better results.

0:17:18.396 --> 0:17:21.436
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so it's great if you have all three doing

0:17:21.556 --> 0:17:25.756
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically showing up. But for this time period,

0:17:26.196 --> 0:17:28.716
<v Speaker 1>the last few years, the scaling law has really taken

0:17:28.796 --> 0:17:34.956
<v Speaker 1>off and companies are literally ten xing their compute power,

0:17:34.996 --> 0:17:40.316
<v Speaker 1>and these AI clusters going from sixteen thousand GPUs now

0:17:40.356 --> 0:17:42.676
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred thousand gps and now people are saying

0:17:42.676 --> 0:17:46.516
<v Speaker 1>they're going to build one million GPU clusters in the

0:17:46.556 --> 0:17:47.836
<v Speaker 1>next two three years.

0:17:47.556 --> 0:17:51.396
<v Speaker 2>And in videos selling most of those GPUs.

0:17:51.476 --> 0:17:53.676
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So if you go from sixteen thousand to one

0:17:53.716 --> 0:17:55.436
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand GPUs in a couple of.

0:17:55.476 --> 0:17:57.116
<v Speaker 2>Years, that's a good business to do.

0:17:57.556 --> 0:18:00.836
<v Speaker 1>If you're increasing the scale of the hardware by ten

0:18:01.156 --> 0:18:04.196
<v Speaker 1>ten x every couple of years. And the exciting thing

0:18:04.236 --> 0:18:07.516
<v Speaker 1>for Nvidia is that, like what I argue is that

0:18:08.076 --> 0:18:09.996
<v Speaker 1>this thing is going to this trend is going to

0:18:09.996 --> 0:18:13.196
<v Speaker 1>continue in the next few years because you have the

0:18:13.236 --> 0:18:17.156
<v Speaker 1>scaling laws. Then you have this thing called multimodal where

0:18:17.236 --> 0:18:19.796
<v Speaker 1>they're using this GPUs not just for texts like in

0:18:19.876 --> 0:18:24.676
<v Speaker 1>chat TPT, you're using it for video and images generating

0:18:24.716 --> 0:18:28.956
<v Speaker 1>those things. And now there's these two other two other

0:18:29.076 --> 0:18:31.716
<v Speaker 1>waves of demand that are happening. There's this thing called

0:18:31.796 --> 0:18:35.876
<v Speaker 1>AI agents where these AI models can do multi step

0:18:35.956 --> 0:18:36.756
<v Speaker 1>tasks for you.

0:18:37.156 --> 0:18:40.356
<v Speaker 2>Right, you could be like book me a ticket to

0:18:40.436 --> 0:18:44.676
<v Speaker 2>San Diego some weekend in June whenever it's the best deal, yes,

0:18:44.716 --> 0:18:45.756
<v Speaker 2>and then it does that.

0:18:45.876 --> 0:18:49.156
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to happen in the next twelve months. Yes,

0:18:49.596 --> 0:18:52.516
<v Speaker 1>these AI agents will eventually, in the next year or

0:18:52.516 --> 0:18:56.796
<v Speaker 1>two be able to do all that tedious work automatically

0:18:56.916 --> 0:18:59.716
<v Speaker 1>and probably with less errors than an actual human being.

0:19:00.236 --> 0:19:03.636
<v Speaker 1>So AI agents multimodal. And now there's this thing called

0:19:03.676 --> 0:19:07.516
<v Speaker 1>test time compute, where the AI models, instead of just

0:19:07.756 --> 0:19:11.556
<v Speaker 1>spinning back an instant apply, can actually think about what's

0:19:11.596 --> 0:19:14.556
<v Speaker 1>the best way to respond to your question and spend

0:19:14.596 --> 0:19:16.716
<v Speaker 1>more time thinking about it and then give you a

0:19:16.796 --> 0:19:20.556
<v Speaker 1>higher quality answer. So there's all these things that all

0:19:20.596 --> 0:19:25.636
<v Speaker 1>of these test time compute, AI agents, multi modal. These

0:19:25.636 --> 0:19:29.036
<v Speaker 1>are all things that need more computing power, they need

0:19:29.116 --> 0:19:31.436
<v Speaker 1>more GPUs, and these are all things that are going

0:19:31.516 --> 0:19:33.756
<v Speaker 1>to drive in video's revenue in the next couple of years.

0:19:37.076 --> 0:19:38.756
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back in a minute and we will talk,

0:19:38.796 --> 0:19:42.756
<v Speaker 2>among other things, about Jensen Wong, one of the most

0:19:42.836 --> 0:19:46.556
<v Speaker 2>successful entrepreneurs of the twenty first century and a man

0:19:46.596 --> 0:19:49.476
<v Speaker 2>who once told the colleague that he wakes up every morning,

0:19:50.036 --> 0:19:53.396
<v Speaker 2>looks in the mirror and says to himself, you suck.

0:19:59.236 --> 0:20:01.316
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about Jensen a little bit. I

0:20:01.356 --> 0:20:04.076
<v Speaker 2>mean your book. You know, he is obviously the main

0:20:04.316 --> 0:20:06.516
<v Speaker 2>character in the history of Nvidio is the main character

0:20:06.516 --> 0:20:09.836
<v Speaker 2>in your book. He's been the CEO of n Video

0:20:09.876 --> 0:20:12.276
<v Speaker 2>for more than thirty years, which is like longer than

0:20:12.276 --> 0:20:14.516
<v Speaker 2>Bill Gates with the CEO of Microsoft, longer than any

0:20:14.876 --> 0:20:17.476
<v Speaker 2>you know, almost anybody in the s and p. Five

0:20:17.516 --> 0:20:20.556
<v Speaker 2>hundred has been a CEO at this point. His childhood

0:20:20.596 --> 0:20:22.756
<v Speaker 2>is quite interesting, right, Like, tell me just a little

0:20:22.796 --> 0:20:23.876
<v Speaker 2>bit about his childhood.

0:20:25.276 --> 0:20:28.956
<v Speaker 1>He was born in Taiwan, and they moved around a

0:20:28.956 --> 0:20:33.316
<v Speaker 1>little bit to Thailand, and his father came to training

0:20:33.356 --> 0:20:36.556
<v Speaker 1>in New York and fell in love with America. This

0:20:36.636 --> 0:20:41.596
<v Speaker 1>is like the great American dream story. And the mother

0:20:41.676 --> 0:20:46.636
<v Speaker 1>and father started teaching Jensen's brother English ten words a day,

0:20:47.276 --> 0:20:49.236
<v Speaker 1>and they sent him to his aunt and uncle when

0:20:49.236 --> 0:20:52.076
<v Speaker 1>he was about age eight or nine, and the aunt

0:20:52.196 --> 0:20:55.716
<v Speaker 1>and uncle and the families. The funny thing is they

0:20:55.756 --> 0:20:58.916
<v Speaker 1>sent him to a reform school in Kentucky by mistake,

0:21:00.036 --> 0:21:02.916
<v Speaker 1>thinking that he will get a great education at this

0:21:02.996 --> 0:21:04.676
<v Speaker 1>boarding school in Kentucky, which.

0:21:04.516 --> 0:21:06.676
<v Speaker 2>He just thought it was a boarding school, yes.

0:21:06.676 --> 0:21:09.196
<v Speaker 1>But it turned out to be a school for troubled.

0:21:08.876 --> 0:21:12.956
<v Speaker 2>Kids, huh, which Jensen was not. He was just like

0:21:13.036 --> 0:21:15.636
<v Speaker 2>a smart kid with ambitious for him parents.

0:21:15.756 --> 0:21:18.916
<v Speaker 1>Yes, But he talks about how his time at Oneita

0:21:18.956 --> 0:21:21.836
<v Speaker 1>Baptist and student Kentucky was formational for him.

0:21:21.996 --> 0:21:23.076
<v Speaker 2>What was it like for him?

0:21:23.836 --> 0:21:26.956
<v Speaker 1>It was hard at the beginning, but he started befriending people.

0:21:27.996 --> 0:21:32.196
<v Speaker 1>He started playing chess with the janitor, and he just

0:21:32.276 --> 0:21:35.876
<v Speaker 1>learned how to deal with other people much better. And

0:21:36.436 --> 0:21:39.036
<v Speaker 1>he talks about how he learned his street fighter.

0:21:38.756 --> 0:21:41.356
<v Speaker 2>Mentality because he was literally fighting.

0:21:42.636 --> 0:21:45.716
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I mean there were bullies and all that stuff,

0:21:45.436 --> 0:21:47.556
<v Speaker 1>but he just learned how to deal with people and

0:21:48.436 --> 0:21:53.076
<v Speaker 1>the rough and tumble of kids back then. Eventually his

0:21:53.196 --> 0:21:58.476
<v Speaker 1>parents came from abroad and they settled in Oregon, and

0:21:58.676 --> 0:22:02.996
<v Speaker 1>he learned his work ethic from working at Denny's. He

0:22:03.076 --> 0:22:06.956
<v Speaker 1>talks about how he washed more dishes and cleaned more

0:22:06.996 --> 0:22:11.596
<v Speaker 1>bathrooms than any CEO in the history of CEOs. He

0:22:11.636 --> 0:22:14.236
<v Speaker 1>says he Denny's helped them in terms of social skills

0:22:14.636 --> 0:22:18.156
<v Speaker 1>and dealing with time pressure and dealing with customers. But

0:22:19.836 --> 0:22:22.796
<v Speaker 1>it's the work ethic that really sets him apart. So

0:22:22.916 --> 0:22:25.916
<v Speaker 1>even at the beginning, he was working from nine am

0:22:26.036 --> 0:22:29.756
<v Speaker 1>to midnight, and he just set a culture where Nvidia

0:22:29.756 --> 0:22:31.956
<v Speaker 1>employees work really hard.

0:22:32.356 --> 0:22:34.956
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like at the beginning that's common, right,

0:22:35.076 --> 0:22:38.276
<v Speaker 2>Like that is the classic startup story. But the classic

0:22:38.276 --> 0:22:41.636
<v Speaker 2>startup stories you do that for five years and then

0:22:42.116 --> 0:22:44.596
<v Speaker 2>either you get giant and you hire a grown up

0:22:44.676 --> 0:22:47.476
<v Speaker 2>CEO and you you know, go start your blimp company

0:22:47.556 --> 0:22:51.596
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, or you sell or whatever. He's still doing that,

0:22:51.876 --> 0:22:55.436
<v Speaker 2>right He's sixty years old and like wildly rich and

0:22:55.836 --> 0:22:57.516
<v Speaker 2>and he's still working that much.

0:22:57.556 --> 0:23:02.196
<v Speaker 1>He's working all weekend. He's working Saturday Sunday. When he

0:23:02.236 --> 0:23:04.916
<v Speaker 1>talks about when he goes to a movie, he doesn't

0:23:04.956 --> 0:23:07.836
<v Speaker 1>remember the movie because he's thinking about work. He finds

0:23:07.916 --> 0:23:11.236
<v Speaker 1>work relaxing and fund This is what drives him. He

0:23:11.436 --> 0:23:12.156
<v Speaker 1>loves working.

0:23:12.596 --> 0:23:15.036
<v Speaker 2>There's a moment, you know, you don't you don't write

0:23:15.076 --> 0:23:17.156
<v Speaker 2>about his personal life at all. Once he sort of

0:23:17.196 --> 0:23:21.276
<v Speaker 2>grows up and starts in video. You know, reasonably because

0:23:21.276 --> 0:23:23.796
<v Speaker 2>the book's about in video, and so I just assumed

0:23:23.796 --> 0:23:25.876
<v Speaker 2>he just worked all the time and didn't have a family.

0:23:25.956 --> 0:23:28.236
<v Speaker 2>And the I think the only time in the book

0:23:28.476 --> 0:23:31.276
<v Speaker 2>that his family comes up is there's this scene where

0:23:31.276 --> 0:23:35.436
<v Speaker 2>he's on vacation and he's talking to some senior manager

0:23:35.436 --> 0:23:36.796
<v Speaker 2>at a video on the phone and they're like, what

0:23:36.836 --> 0:23:38.676
<v Speaker 2>are you doing. He's like, I'm sitting here on the

0:23:38.676 --> 0:23:42.276
<v Speaker 2>balcony watching my kids play in the sand and writing emails.

0:23:42.316 --> 0:23:44.436
<v Speaker 2>And it's like, like, if it's a movie, the kids

0:23:44.476 --> 0:23:47.396
<v Speaker 2>are never on stage, right, you just hear them off stage.

0:23:47.436 --> 0:23:50.436
<v Speaker 2>At that moment, You're like, oh, he has kids, Like

0:23:50.636 --> 0:23:53.516
<v Speaker 2>that was that was a weird moment to me reading

0:23:53.556 --> 0:23:54.596
<v Speaker 2>that line.

0:23:54.796 --> 0:23:58.756
<v Speaker 1>So both executives told me they hate it when Jensen

0:23:59.516 --> 0:24:03.356
<v Speaker 1>so called goes on vacation because he winds up giving

0:24:03.396 --> 0:24:06.676
<v Speaker 1>them more directives and orders and more stuff to do

0:24:06.716 --> 0:24:09.076
<v Speaker 1>when he's not on vacation because he's emailing in them

0:24:09.356 --> 0:24:13.276
<v Speaker 1>do this, do that, and they they actually yell at him,

0:24:13.436 --> 0:24:15.676
<v Speaker 1>So play with your kids. He's like, no, I could

0:24:15.716 --> 0:24:19.316
<v Speaker 1>get real work done when I'm on vacation by doing

0:24:19.356 --> 0:24:23.716
<v Speaker 1>his emails. I mean, so it shows you his obsessions.

0:24:23.756 --> 0:24:28.196
<v Speaker 1>He's constantly thinking, he's constantly worried about what's happening at video.

0:24:28.596 --> 0:24:34.436
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's interesting, right, Like he's not a balanced person, like,

0:24:34.676 --> 0:24:39.436
<v Speaker 2>which is why to some extent he has built the

0:24:39.436 --> 0:24:40.636
<v Speaker 2>thing that he has built.

0:24:40.476 --> 0:24:46.516
<v Speaker 1>Right, He's completely obsessed with winning and he's extremely competitive.

0:24:46.956 --> 0:24:49.916
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a few other specific moments that really stood

0:24:49.916 --> 0:24:54.556
<v Speaker 2>out to me. There's one where I think this, I

0:24:54.596 --> 0:24:57.076
<v Speaker 2>think a salesperson told you this where they had just

0:24:57.156 --> 0:25:00.756
<v Speaker 2>had a great quarter they sold a ton of GPUs,

0:25:01.396 --> 0:25:04.236
<v Speaker 2>and the sales guy's talking to Jensen about how great

0:25:04.276 --> 0:25:08.476
<v Speaker 2>they're doing, and Jensen says to the sales guy about Jensen,

0:25:08.516 --> 0:25:11.636
<v Speaker 2>about himself. Jensen says, I look in the mirror every

0:25:11.676 --> 0:25:13.796
<v Speaker 2>morning and say you suck.

0:25:14.516 --> 0:25:18.476
<v Speaker 1>So he he's almost like a self psychologist. He knows

0:25:18.836 --> 0:25:21.676
<v Speaker 1>if you start thinking that you're you're the best and

0:25:21.756 --> 0:25:24.676
<v Speaker 1>your your hot stuff, you might get complacent, you start

0:25:24.756 --> 0:25:26.956
<v Speaker 1>resting on your laurels, you might not work as hard enough.

0:25:27.116 --> 0:25:29.596
<v Speaker 1>So he he sees that, oh, we just had a

0:25:29.636 --> 0:25:33.236
<v Speaker 1>blowout quarter. What's the risk here? The risk is me

0:25:33.316 --> 0:25:36.156
<v Speaker 1>gain complacent. So I'm gonna look myself in the mirror

0:25:36.196 --> 0:25:37.916
<v Speaker 1>and say you suck and psych myself out.

0:25:38.196 --> 0:25:41.836
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's that's that's one reading of it. That's

0:25:41.876 --> 0:25:44.276
<v Speaker 2>the like ten dimensional chest reading of it. I mean

0:25:44.276 --> 0:25:48.596
<v Speaker 2>there's another reading of it, which is like he's messed

0:25:48.676 --> 0:25:51.396
<v Speaker 2>up in a way that makes him super driven and successful.

0:25:51.916 --> 0:25:52.676
<v Speaker 1>But it works.

0:25:52.956 --> 0:25:55.956
<v Speaker 2>He actually definitely works. We can agree that it works.

0:25:56.076 --> 0:25:59.556
<v Speaker 1>Like he does the opposite too, So when things are

0:25:59.676 --> 0:26:01.916
<v Speaker 1>really intimidating and he feels like, oh my gosh, how

0:26:01.916 --> 0:26:04.236
<v Speaker 1>am I going to do this, he tells himself, how

0:26:04.276 --> 0:26:06.876
<v Speaker 1>hard can it be? How hard can it be? So

0:26:06.916 --> 0:26:09.836
<v Speaker 1>he does it on both both ends in the spectrum

0:26:09.956 --> 0:26:14.356
<v Speaker 1>where he cites himself out when he feels intimidated, and

0:26:14.636 --> 0:26:16.596
<v Speaker 1>when he feels like he's on top of the world,

0:26:16.716 --> 0:26:19.116
<v Speaker 1>he tries to bring himself down back the earth.

0:26:19.996 --> 0:26:23.556
<v Speaker 2>So the one other big piece of the Jensen Wong

0:26:23.596 --> 0:26:25.796
<v Speaker 2>experience that we haven't talked about is the way he

0:26:26.116 --> 0:26:30.636
<v Speaker 2>treats the people who work for him. Right, I want

0:26:30.636 --> 0:26:32.596
<v Speaker 2>to talk about a particular scene because I think it

0:26:32.916 --> 0:26:34.476
<v Speaker 2>puts a finer point on it. A scene from the

0:26:34.516 --> 0:26:37.196
<v Speaker 2>book where it's like a company wide meeting and it's

0:26:37.196 --> 0:26:40.076
<v Speaker 2>on like zoom or whatever, and he's yelling at a

0:26:40.116 --> 0:26:42.556
<v Speaker 2>guy in the meeting. He's yelling at him, and then

0:26:42.596 --> 0:26:45.516
<v Speaker 2>on top of that, he keeps telling the person filming

0:26:45.596 --> 0:26:49.196
<v Speaker 2>the meeting to zoom in on the guy he's yelling at.

0:26:49.516 --> 0:26:52.316
<v Speaker 1>I had multiple sources tell me that it was the

0:26:52.316 --> 0:26:53.956
<v Speaker 1>most humiliating thing they've ever seen.

0:26:53.996 --> 0:26:58.316
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's that seems like bullying, like why zoom

0:26:58.356 --> 0:27:01.076
<v Speaker 2>in on the guy? Like what lesson is added by that?

0:27:01.436 --> 0:27:05.636
<v Speaker 1>So he keeps on saying to mister Rayfield, you got

0:27:05.636 --> 0:27:08.436
<v Speaker 1>to get this chip back on track. The chip that

0:27:08.476 --> 0:27:11.836
<v Speaker 1>heels in charge was behind schedule, and he kept us

0:27:12.596 --> 0:27:16.076
<v Speaker 1>pointing to him, zooming in his face and telling him,

0:27:16.196 --> 0:27:17.756
<v Speaker 1>You've got to get this. This is not how you

0:27:17.836 --> 0:27:20.036
<v Speaker 1>run a business. You need to get this chip back

0:27:20.076 --> 0:27:23.596
<v Speaker 1>on track. And this kind of like high standard demanding

0:27:23.636 --> 0:27:28.716
<v Speaker 1>attitude I think is effective. It drives people. If you

0:27:28.836 --> 0:27:32.036
<v Speaker 1>get dressed down by Jensen, the next time, you're going

0:27:32.116 --> 0:27:35.396
<v Speaker 1>to work ten times more to make sure that you

0:27:35.436 --> 0:27:36.196
<v Speaker 1>do a better job.

0:27:36.756 --> 0:27:39.036
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I don't want the world to be that way,

0:27:39.076 --> 0:27:41.156
<v Speaker 2>but it is that way, you know what I mean, Like,

0:27:41.196 --> 0:27:44.076
<v Speaker 2>maybe I want to believe that, like there's a kinder

0:27:44.116 --> 0:27:47.796
<v Speaker 2>world where people could do equally good work. But maybe

0:27:47.836 --> 0:27:48.636
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong.

0:27:49.276 --> 0:27:51.916
<v Speaker 1>And Steve Jobs was the same way. Yeah, I mean

0:27:52.156 --> 0:27:55.196
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't all sure, It wasn't all sunshine and rainbows.

0:27:55.476 --> 0:27:59.396
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I mean the Isaacson book was really clear, right,

0:27:59.436 --> 0:28:01.956
<v Speaker 2>the Isaacson biography of Steve Jobs. He did not seem

0:28:02.036 --> 0:28:04.236
<v Speaker 2>like a good person in that book. He seemed like

0:28:04.596 --> 0:28:07.876
<v Speaker 2>really good at building amazing products, but like not like

0:28:07.956 --> 0:28:10.356
<v Speaker 2>a good human being by the sort of standard way

0:28:10.436 --> 0:28:11.956
<v Speaker 2>we think of what makes a good person.

0:28:12.156 --> 0:28:14.876
<v Speaker 1>But I think the key point that we also have

0:28:14.956 --> 0:28:17.036
<v Speaker 1>to think about is people at Nvidia stay.

0:28:17.676 --> 0:28:18.956
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's really interesting.

0:28:19.276 --> 0:28:21.276
<v Speaker 1>The turnover is like one of the lowest in the

0:28:21.276 --> 0:28:23.756
<v Speaker 1>industry at only three percent compared to the average of

0:28:23.756 --> 0:28:24.796
<v Speaker 1>thirteen to fifteen percent.

0:28:24.876 --> 0:28:27.476
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, certainly in the last few years. People stay because

0:28:27.916 --> 0:28:29.876
<v Speaker 2>you get rich if you stay, and you lose your

0:28:29.916 --> 0:28:31.836
<v Speaker 2>equity if you leave. But is that number true if

0:28:31.836 --> 0:28:34.196
<v Speaker 2>you go back to when the stock was flat.

0:28:34.316 --> 0:28:36.236
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the numbers, but a lot of the

0:28:36.276 --> 0:28:40.436
<v Speaker 1>senior executives have been there more so than any other company. Yeah,

0:28:40.476 --> 0:28:42.236
<v Speaker 1>fifteen twenty twenty five years.

0:28:42.316 --> 0:28:43.236
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's it.

0:28:43.676 --> 0:28:46.756
<v Speaker 1>You don't really hear other than one instance of people

0:28:46.916 --> 0:28:50.356
<v Speaker 1>leaving to become a CEO of a different company. Uh huh.

0:28:50.556 --> 0:28:53.476
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of it is people realize that

0:28:53.636 --> 0:28:58.316
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia or the Gensen way of doing things is super effective,

0:28:58.356 --> 0:29:01.796
<v Speaker 1>so people want to be on the winning team. So

0:29:02.076 --> 0:29:05.156
<v Speaker 1>in one sense, he draws people hard, he dresses them down.

0:29:05.436 --> 0:29:08.916
<v Speaker 1>He's very blunt and direct. But he compensates people. No

0:29:08.916 --> 0:29:13.396
<v Speaker 1>one ever, hardly anyone complains about compensation. If you're effective

0:29:13.796 --> 0:29:16.196
<v Speaker 1>and you do a good job, he will like double

0:29:16.236 --> 0:29:20.956
<v Speaker 1>your stock compensation on the spot. So there's this meritocracy

0:29:21.036 --> 0:29:25.596
<v Speaker 1>that people really adore. And if you see an effective

0:29:25.676 --> 0:29:30.556
<v Speaker 1>leadership a culture that's based on meritocracy, if you're a

0:29:30.556 --> 0:29:33.036
<v Speaker 1>top engineer, you stay at that company.

0:29:33.276 --> 0:29:37.996
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, So you interviewed Jenson as as you were

0:29:38.036 --> 0:29:41.596
<v Speaker 2>working on the book. Was it scary to interview him?

0:29:42.356 --> 0:29:46.636
<v Speaker 1>He was intimidating in the meeting, he he at he

0:29:46.676 --> 0:29:48.556
<v Speaker 1>didn't yell at me, but a couple of times he's saying,

0:29:48.716 --> 0:29:52.196
<v Speaker 1>you don't get nvidio in this line of questioning, and

0:29:52.876 --> 0:29:55.596
<v Speaker 1>I it takes a while to get used to it,

0:29:55.596 --> 0:29:58.596
<v Speaker 1>but you appreciate it because you see where the other

0:29:58.636 --> 0:30:02.556
<v Speaker 1>person is. Like when someone is blunt and direct like Jensen,

0:30:02.836 --> 0:30:05.556
<v Speaker 1>you know where that where he is at all times,

0:30:05.596 --> 0:30:09.516
<v Speaker 1>and then you could work at improving yourself. So he

0:30:09.596 --> 0:30:12.156
<v Speaker 1>talks about how what are you optimizing for? Are you

0:30:12.196 --> 0:30:16.956
<v Speaker 1>optimizing for a person's feelings or optimizing for what's good

0:30:16.956 --> 0:30:19.076
<v Speaker 1>for the company. So that's why he doesn't do one

0:30:19.116 --> 0:30:22.996
<v Speaker 1>on one meetings or career coaching. Typically at a large company,

0:30:23.276 --> 0:30:26.516
<v Speaker 1>when someone's doing poorly, the CEO will take them aside

0:30:26.516 --> 0:30:28.476
<v Speaker 1>and say, Bob, you need to do this.

0:30:28.556 --> 0:30:31.316
<v Speaker 2>You need if it's a person's.

0:30:30.756 --> 0:30:34.476
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Jensen's like, why is Bob the only one that

0:30:34.516 --> 0:30:37.556
<v Speaker 1>gets a learning here? If I am blunt and direct

0:30:37.916 --> 0:30:41.476
<v Speaker 1>and show Bob what he's doing incorrectly, like that person

0:30:41.556 --> 0:30:46.556
<v Speaker 1>at that meeting, everyone in the room can learn. All

0:30:46.556 --> 0:30:49.116
<v Speaker 1>the employees up and down the ladder can learn. So

0:30:49.316 --> 0:30:53.076
<v Speaker 1>that's his philosophy is everyone should learn from their mistakes

0:30:53.156 --> 0:30:55.356
<v Speaker 1>and everyone should know where they are at all times.

0:30:56.556 --> 0:30:58.876
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, so you write in the book that

0:31:00.036 --> 0:31:03.876
<v Speaker 2>in video really is like an extension of Jensen, right.

0:31:03.956 --> 0:31:06.196
<v Speaker 2>I think he used the metaphor of like the formula

0:31:06.236 --> 0:31:09.436
<v Speaker 2>one card that's like optimized for him as the driver.

0:31:12.676 --> 0:31:20.516
<v Speaker 2>So and he's in his sixties, which is not old

0:31:20.556 --> 0:31:25.156
<v Speaker 2>old but definitely not young. Like, is he gonna run

0:31:25.156 --> 0:31:27.036
<v Speaker 2>in video for another twenty years? What's going to happen?

0:31:27.356 --> 0:31:29.716
<v Speaker 2>Like there's no obvious successor, Like where does that go?

0:31:31.076 --> 0:31:36.116
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's no one else at in video.

0:31:36.156 --> 0:31:39.356
<v Speaker 1>I think that can run in video as effectively as Jensen.

0:31:39.756 --> 0:31:42.276
<v Speaker 1>And he loves the company so much. He loves what

0:31:42.316 --> 0:31:46.236
<v Speaker 1>he's doing. They're having enormous impact with this AI wave,

0:31:46.316 --> 0:31:49.956
<v Speaker 1>and he's so excited about the potential for curing cancer

0:31:50.036 --> 0:31:54.156
<v Speaker 1>and digital biology, the potential for robots, the potential for

0:31:54.516 --> 0:31:59.316
<v Speaker 1>AI to kind of disrupt education and help kids learn better.

0:32:00.076 --> 0:32:03.076
<v Speaker 1>That I don't see him leaving anytime soon. He loves

0:32:03.076 --> 0:32:06.596
<v Speaker 1>his job so much and he can't argue that he's

0:32:06.596 --> 0:32:10.956
<v Speaker 1>being ineffective. So I don't think for the next few

0:32:11.036 --> 0:32:13.556
<v Speaker 1>years there's anyone that's going to take over for him.

0:32:13.796 --> 0:32:15.956
<v Speaker 1>Someday Nvidia is going to have to come up with

0:32:15.996 --> 0:32:18.836
<v Speaker 1>a new CEO or a successor to Jensen, and that's

0:32:18.876 --> 0:32:22.956
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big question mark. It's that next

0:32:22.996 --> 0:32:26.396
<v Speaker 1>person going to be as effective as Jensen in terms

0:32:26.436 --> 0:32:28.676
<v Speaker 1>of being able to have the technical skill and the

0:32:28.676 --> 0:32:33.636
<v Speaker 1>compency to steer in video in the right direction. Well,

0:32:33.716 --> 0:32:37.156
<v Speaker 1>they have his business genius of coming up with all

0:32:37.196 --> 0:32:39.756
<v Speaker 1>these new strategies that he does time and time again.

0:32:40.836 --> 0:32:42.116
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a huge question Marke.

0:32:44.796 --> 0:32:49.796
<v Speaker 2>I mean people also talk about limits to scaling right

0:32:51.316 --> 0:32:54.996
<v Speaker 2>in AI. We were talking earlier about how part of

0:32:55.076 --> 0:32:57.996
<v Speaker 2>in video's wild growth over the last couple of years

0:32:57.996 --> 0:33:03.116
<v Speaker 2>has come from this fact that that you can just

0:33:03.316 --> 0:33:07.836
<v Speaker 2>add more GPUs basically and get better results. More GPUs,

0:33:07.836 --> 0:33:13.036
<v Speaker 2>more data, and you know, people talk about a running

0:33:13.036 --> 0:33:17.596
<v Speaker 2>out of data because like they're basically, as I understand it,

0:33:17.996 --> 0:33:20.996
<v Speaker 2>training on the whole Internet right now, which is like, Okay,

0:33:21.036 --> 0:33:25.316
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot of data. I mean, is that it

0:33:25.316 --> 0:33:27.316
<v Speaker 2>seems like nobody knows, right. It seems like they are

0:33:27.356 --> 0:33:29.716
<v Speaker 2>smart people who say, no, no, we'll have synthetic data

0:33:29.796 --> 0:33:32.156
<v Speaker 2>blah blah blah, we won't hit a sort of scaling wall.

0:33:32.196 --> 0:33:34.436
<v Speaker 2>And then there are people who make the other argument.

0:33:34.476 --> 0:33:36.316
<v Speaker 2>I certainly don't know, but does that seem right, Like

0:33:36.436 --> 0:33:38.276
<v Speaker 2>is that an open question right now? And is that

0:33:38.316 --> 0:33:39.796
<v Speaker 2>a meaningful question for nvideo?

0:33:40.516 --> 0:33:43.836
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an open question. But like I said,

0:33:44.156 --> 0:33:49.236
<v Speaker 1>there's the multimodal stuff, there's AI agents, and then there's

0:33:49.316 --> 0:33:51.436
<v Speaker 1>proprietary data inside companies.

0:33:51.756 --> 0:33:52.476
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

0:33:52.516 --> 0:33:57.516
<v Speaker 1>So all these corporations have data going back decades. Companies

0:33:57.516 --> 0:34:00.316
<v Speaker 1>are going to use the power of these AI computing

0:34:00.356 --> 0:34:05.116
<v Speaker 1>systems to go through all their data internally, all their

0:34:05.116 --> 0:34:10.276
<v Speaker 1>proprietary data, and have all that knowledge at employees fingertips.

0:34:10.916 --> 0:34:15.196
<v Speaker 1>So an employee can ask what's the best way to

0:34:15.276 --> 0:34:18.196
<v Speaker 1>do this, and the AI computer is going to be

0:34:18.196 --> 0:34:21.436
<v Speaker 1>able to go back thirty years of data and figure

0:34:21.476 --> 0:34:24.116
<v Speaker 1>out the best piece of insight to help that employee.

0:34:24.156 --> 0:34:25.756
<v Speaker 1>And that's not really being done today.

0:34:26.836 --> 0:34:30.836
<v Speaker 2>So Nvidia designs their chips their gips, but they don't

0:34:30.836 --> 0:34:33.876
<v Speaker 2>actually manufacture them, right Is it right that they're made

0:34:33.916 --> 0:34:36.676
<v Speaker 2>in Taiwan, where most cutting its chips are made now?

0:34:36.836 --> 0:34:41.076
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So TESMC actually makes and manufacturers in videos chips

0:34:41.436 --> 0:34:44.636
<v Speaker 1>ever since the late nineteen nineties, and they're the best

0:34:44.676 --> 0:34:48.236
<v Speaker 1>at doing this all. A lot of the fabulist chip

0:34:48.276 --> 0:34:52.916
<v Speaker 1>designers in California use TSMC, and Video uses them too.

0:34:53.516 --> 0:34:57.556
<v Speaker 2>And so I mean it is really interesting to me

0:34:58.036 --> 0:35:02.796
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of people that Taiwan is this incredibly

0:35:03.116 --> 0:35:07.196
<v Speaker 2>fraught geopolitical place. Right, China says Taiwan is part of China.

0:35:07.716 --> 0:35:10.556
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan says no, we are not part of China, and

0:35:10.796 --> 0:35:13.436
<v Speaker 2>that Taiwan is the only place in the world that

0:35:13.596 --> 0:35:17.636
<v Speaker 2>makes like the most important physical thing in the world

0:35:17.716 --> 0:35:21.596
<v Speaker 2>of technology today. Right, it makes like that's wild, Like

0:35:21.636 --> 0:35:23.356
<v Speaker 2>what do you make of that? And how does that

0:35:23.396 --> 0:35:24.636
<v Speaker 2>fit with the in video story?

0:35:25.036 --> 0:35:29.156
<v Speaker 1>I think eventually Nvidia chips will be made in the

0:35:29.276 --> 0:35:32.396
<v Speaker 1>US TSMC. I mean, that's all part of this Chips

0:35:32.436 --> 0:35:35.036
<v Speaker 1>Act that the Biden administration has posed.

0:35:35.156 --> 0:35:39.636
<v Speaker 2>So this this plant that TSMC is building in Arizona, Like,

0:35:39.836 --> 0:35:44.836
<v Speaker 2>is that advanced enough to make like frontier in Nvidia chips?

0:35:45.196 --> 0:35:48.236
<v Speaker 1>So the CSMC factories in the US are always going

0:35:48.276 --> 0:35:52.396
<v Speaker 1>to be one or two generations behind the factories in Taiwan.

0:35:53.316 --> 0:35:57.396
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean Nvidia can't use the factories in

0:35:57.436 --> 0:36:00.316
<v Speaker 1>the US if they're one or two generations behind for

0:36:00.396 --> 0:36:03.796
<v Speaker 1>their older chips. So I think that will eventually happen.

0:36:04.356 --> 0:36:07.556
<v Speaker 2>It seems wild to me, Like, I mean, it seems

0:36:07.716 --> 0:36:11.756
<v Speaker 2>very possible that China will try and make Taiwan be

0:36:11.796 --> 0:36:13.916
<v Speaker 2>part of China, right, and and like we have all

0:36:13.956 --> 0:36:16.676
<v Speaker 2>these export controls to try and keep China from getting

0:36:16.676 --> 0:36:19.956
<v Speaker 2>cutting edge chips. Like it's a really interesting, complicated dynamic.

0:36:21.076 --> 0:36:24.396
<v Speaker 1>I think people make a big issue at this, But

0:36:24.436 --> 0:36:28.036
<v Speaker 1>I think if it happens, like in Vidio, chips are

0:36:28.076 --> 0:36:30.596
<v Speaker 1>not going to be the main issue. It will cost

0:36:30.676 --> 0:36:34.196
<v Speaker 1>a global calamity where you know, we won't be able

0:36:34.236 --> 0:36:40.916
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade our cars, at laptops, nearly every computing device,

0:36:41.316 --> 0:36:45.436
<v Speaker 1>every appliance will not work if we don't have access

0:36:45.476 --> 0:36:47.236
<v Speaker 1>to Taiwan chips.

0:36:47.756 --> 0:36:50.836
<v Speaker 2>I mean, presumably we could do some like sub Manhattan

0:36:50.876 --> 0:36:55.556
<v Speaker 2>Project scale Manhattan project to get a state of the

0:36:55.676 --> 0:36:59.516
<v Speaker 2>art TSMC factory somewhere that is not Taiwan, right, Like.

0:37:00.436 --> 0:37:02.556
<v Speaker 1>We're doing some of that now, but it's not going

0:37:02.596 --> 0:37:05.276
<v Speaker 1>to be able to it's going to be ten twenty

0:37:06.196 --> 0:37:07.676
<v Speaker 1>of the capacity we need.

0:37:08.396 --> 0:37:11.116
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the capacity, right, it takes a long time, Like

0:37:11.116 --> 0:37:15.636
<v Speaker 2>the fabs are wildly complicated to build, and they cost

0:37:15.716 --> 0:37:17.596
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars and they take years, so you couldn't

0:37:17.676 --> 0:37:18.116
<v Speaker 2>just do it.

0:37:18.156 --> 0:37:20.396
<v Speaker 1>They cost ten to twenty billion dollars to build and

0:37:20.476 --> 0:37:23.036
<v Speaker 1>three to four years over three to four years, So

0:37:23.076 --> 0:37:27.076
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that can happen overnight. And if something happens,

0:37:27.076 --> 0:37:29.596
<v Speaker 1>like it's just gonna be so terrible and it'll be

0:37:29.636 --> 0:37:33.556
<v Speaker 1>like a depression. So I just hopefully it doesn't happen,

0:37:33.676 --> 0:37:36.836
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's not gonna The question isn't gonna

0:37:36.836 --> 0:37:38.756
<v Speaker 1>be about in videotips. The question is gonna be about

0:37:38.756 --> 0:37:39.756
<v Speaker 1>the global economy of that.

0:37:40.076 --> 0:37:43.156
<v Speaker 2>So what do you think is the biggest risk for

0:37:43.356 --> 0:37:46.156
<v Speaker 2>video in the like five year timeframe?

0:37:48.236 --> 0:37:49.196
<v Speaker 1>It's really tough to say.

0:37:49.236 --> 0:37:49.356
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:37:49.396 --> 0:37:51.556
<v Speaker 1>I mean I see the next few years with all

0:37:51.596 --> 0:37:55.756
<v Speaker 1>the different AI innovations and all the progress. But again,

0:37:56.156 --> 0:38:00.076
<v Speaker 1>just like every big computing shift, what's the next big thing?

0:38:00.116 --> 0:38:03.756
<v Speaker 1>Could it be quantum computing? It can be like who knows, five, ten,

0:38:04.076 --> 0:38:07.956
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years from now? And every from the pcach with

0:38:08.116 --> 0:38:11.996
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Intel it's called Wintel. And then it went

0:38:12.036 --> 0:38:17.196
<v Speaker 1>to smartphones where Apple dominated with the iPhone, and now

0:38:17.436 --> 0:38:21.676
<v Speaker 1>in Vidia is dominating. In terms of the AI computing shift,

0:38:21.916 --> 0:38:25.276
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be another shift, and right now we're at

0:38:25.316 --> 0:38:29.756
<v Speaker 1>the early stages of the AI computing movement. In five

0:38:29.836 --> 0:38:32.356
<v Speaker 1>ten years, there might be the next big thing that

0:38:32.676 --> 0:38:36.676
<v Speaker 1>I can't can't even foresee right now. And is Nvidia

0:38:37.036 --> 0:38:41.476
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to see that coming? If Jensen's around,

0:38:41.516 --> 0:38:44.796
<v Speaker 1>I think he will. But if Jensen's not there, you know,

0:38:44.996 --> 0:38:49.076
<v Speaker 1>then just like every other computer, major computer company in history,

0:38:49.276 --> 0:38:53.356
<v Speaker 1>say IBM, it's very easy to get disrupted in the

0:38:53.396 --> 0:38:57.716
<v Speaker 1>technology industry.

0:38:58.716 --> 0:39:05.396
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back in a minute with the Lightning round.

0:39:09.876 --> 0:39:12.276
<v Speaker 2>I want to finish with the Lightning round, which is

0:39:12.316 --> 0:39:15.716
<v Speaker 2>going to be considerably more random and digressive than the

0:39:15.756 --> 0:39:20.676
<v Speaker 2>conversation to this point. I want to talk about video

0:39:20.716 --> 0:39:26.236
<v Speaker 2>games and your experience with video games. What was the

0:39:26.236 --> 0:39:28.876
<v Speaker 2>first video game you ever loved?

0:39:30.196 --> 0:39:32.556
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the first VAM I've ever tried, which

0:39:32.676 --> 0:39:34.956
<v Speaker 1>was Combat for the Datar twenty six hundred.

0:39:35.196 --> 0:39:35.756
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:39:36.076 --> 0:39:39.156
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's literally I remember coming home and my

0:39:39.276 --> 0:39:42.556
<v Speaker 1>dad buying the Autari twenty six hundred connected to a

0:39:42.596 --> 0:39:46.276
<v Speaker 1>black and white TV and being to use that joystick

0:39:46.356 --> 0:39:49.876
<v Speaker 1>to control the little tank going around the screen. That

0:39:49.956 --> 0:39:52.676
<v Speaker 1>was an amazing moment. It was an incredible moment that

0:39:52.756 --> 0:39:56.156
<v Speaker 1>this was possible. At the home, I had.

0:39:56.036 --> 0:39:59.756
<v Speaker 2>An Atari twenty six hundred. I remember the joystick. I

0:39:59.836 --> 0:40:02.836
<v Speaker 2>remember Demon Attack, so kind of second tier game, but

0:40:02.876 --> 0:40:07.116
<v Speaker 2>I got really into it. What's the game you spent

0:40:07.156 --> 0:40:08.116
<v Speaker 2>the most hours on?

0:40:11.316 --> 0:40:14.396
<v Speaker 1>Probably this game called Lemmings. I don't know if you

0:40:14.596 --> 0:40:18.756
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a puzzle strategy game where you control lemmings

0:40:19.036 --> 0:40:23.076
<v Speaker 1>and you guide them across a maze to get.

0:40:23.276 --> 0:40:26.236
<v Speaker 2>The little creatures that are famed for jumping off cliffs,

0:40:26.236 --> 0:40:27.756
<v Speaker 2>which maybe they don't actually do.

0:40:27.916 --> 0:40:31.076
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if you guide them the wrong way, they'll fall

0:40:31.076 --> 0:40:33.196
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff and to their death, and they make

0:40:33.276 --> 0:40:37.716
<v Speaker 1>this cute sound like oh no, so so. I played

0:40:37.956 --> 0:40:39.116
<v Speaker 1>so many hours of.

0:40:38.996 --> 0:40:42.556
<v Speaker 2>That game, one thousand hours.

0:40:43.636 --> 0:40:45.716
<v Speaker 1>Probably hundreds of hours. I want to say a thousand.

0:40:45.956 --> 0:40:50.676
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. What's your most proud video game accomplishment?

0:40:52.756 --> 0:40:56.596
<v Speaker 1>I still remember playing the Legend of Zelda, the first

0:40:56.596 --> 0:40:59.836
<v Speaker 1>one for the Nintendo Entertainment System and beating that game

0:41:00.316 --> 0:41:04.916
<v Speaker 1>and just like pumping my fists in the air. I

0:41:05.076 --> 0:41:06.956
<v Speaker 1>was over young man. Yeah.

0:41:07.436 --> 0:41:12.276
<v Speaker 2>What is the most exciting video game innovation that's going

0:41:12.316 --> 0:41:14.556
<v Speaker 2>to happen in the next few years?

0:41:15.796 --> 0:41:18.836
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is a little technical, but I think DLSS

0:41:19.036 --> 0:41:21.956
<v Speaker 1>from the video is going to get even more powerful,

0:41:22.196 --> 0:41:26.436
<v Speaker 1>which is this upscaling technology the gents actually invented in

0:41:26.476 --> 0:41:31.196
<v Speaker 1>a meeting where they fill in the details using AI,

0:41:31.916 --> 0:41:35.836
<v Speaker 1>so the frame rates are able to go much faster

0:41:35.956 --> 0:41:36.356
<v Speaker 1>and better.

0:41:36.836 --> 0:41:39.196
<v Speaker 2>So it's basically like interpolation. It's sort of doing what

0:41:39.276 --> 0:41:42.316
<v Speaker 2>AI AI always does, yes, fort.

0:41:41.716 --> 0:41:44.596
<v Speaker 1>But that's really effective. People can't tell the difference between

0:41:44.636 --> 0:41:47.916
<v Speaker 1>the real thing and the interpolated AI graphics, so that

0:41:48.596 --> 0:41:52.596
<v Speaker 1>will allow as this technology get better, that will allow

0:41:52.796 --> 0:41:56.236
<v Speaker 1>the graphics to be more for the realistic, and the

0:41:56.316 --> 0:41:59.636
<v Speaker 1>physics and the rate tracing better than ever before.

0:42:01.436 --> 0:42:03.356
<v Speaker 2>What game are you most excited to play in twenty

0:42:03.436 --> 0:42:03.956
<v Speaker 2>twenty five?

0:42:05.596 --> 0:42:07.876
<v Speaker 1>I mean Grand Theft Auto six if it comes out,

0:42:07.956 --> 0:42:08.956
<v Speaker 1>but it might get delayed.

0:42:08.956 --> 0:42:13.356
<v Speaker 2>Next here, Okay, let's do a few non video game questions.

0:42:13.916 --> 0:42:19.436
<v Speaker 2>What's your favorite tech book besides the one you wrote.

0:42:22.036 --> 0:42:24.516
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's still a tech book, The Innovator's Dilemma,

0:42:24.556 --> 0:42:26.756
<v Speaker 1>which is actually one of Jens's here books. It talks

0:42:26.796 --> 0:42:32.436
<v Speaker 1>about how companies get disrupted by startups and people underneath them.

0:42:33.036 --> 0:42:36.876
<v Speaker 1>It really goes into in depth about how the distrived industry.

0:42:37.396 --> 0:42:41.196
<v Speaker 1>Every successive generation that distribes there was a new market

0:42:41.276 --> 0:42:45.956
<v Speaker 1>leader because they couldn't disrupt themselves to the new or

0:42:45.996 --> 0:42:46.756
<v Speaker 1>smaller format.

0:42:46.956 --> 0:42:49.596
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to me, the really interesting insight of that

0:42:49.716 --> 0:42:56.716
<v Speaker 2>book is the innovator is actually making a crappier product, right,

0:42:56.796 --> 0:42:59.636
<v Speaker 2>Like that's the surprise. It's not exactly like they come

0:42:59.676 --> 0:43:02.236
<v Speaker 2>along and do something better. They go to the crappy

0:43:02.356 --> 0:43:05.076
<v Speaker 2>end of the market and they make a cheap product

0:43:05.716 --> 0:43:09.036
<v Speaker 2>and it's not better than the thing the market leaders

0:43:09.276 --> 0:43:11.236
<v Speaker 2>and the market lader' is like, oh that, who cares

0:43:11.236 --> 0:43:15.396
<v Speaker 2>about that? That's just some low market, some low margin thing,

0:43:16.036 --> 0:43:19.316
<v Speaker 2>and the innovator comes up from below. Like that to

0:43:19.356 --> 0:43:22.436
<v Speaker 2>me is the really key insight of that book.

0:43:22.516 --> 0:43:25.476
<v Speaker 1>And they scale the volumes, and once you have the volume,

0:43:25.556 --> 0:43:28.796
<v Speaker 1>it pretty much becomes game over for the incumbent because

0:43:28.876 --> 0:43:32.276
<v Speaker 1>they can't match that scale and the economies of scale

0:43:32.276 --> 0:43:33.076
<v Speaker 1>that comes with that.

0:43:36.076 --> 0:43:37.596
<v Speaker 2>Defend pineapple on pizza.

0:43:39.116 --> 0:43:42.116
<v Speaker 1>It just tastes good. I love it. I don't know

0:43:42.156 --> 0:43:44.556
<v Speaker 1>if you saw my tweets on it. I actually like

0:43:44.636 --> 0:43:45.516
<v Speaker 1>pineapple on pizza.

0:43:46.076 --> 0:43:50.996
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think it was Instagram. I think it was Instagram.

0:43:51.116 --> 0:43:52.756
<v Speaker 2>What's the best deal you ever got at Costco?

0:43:55.436 --> 0:43:57.516
<v Speaker 1>It's still the hot dog and you can't beat the dollar.

0:43:57.516 --> 0:44:08.276
<v Speaker 2>Fishbee Take Him is the author of the Nvidia Way.

0:44:09.316 --> 0:44:12.556
<v Speaker 2>Today's show was produced by Gabriel Hunter Chang. It was

0:44:12.836 --> 0:44:16.276
<v Speaker 2>edited by Lyddy Jean Kott and engineered by Sarah Bruguer.

0:44:16.796 --> 0:44:20.316
<v Speaker 2>You can email us at problem at Pushkin dot FM.

0:44:20.476 --> 0:44:22.796
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jacob Goldstein and we'll be back next week with

0:44:22.876 --> 0:44:32.876
<v Speaker 2>another episode of What's Your Problem.