WEBVTT - Nvidia's New Chip and Elon Musk's Reported Drug Use

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>From Bahart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed lud Love.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline heinep Rumberg's Worldhie quarters in New York, and

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology and Ed ces.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It kicks off from Las Vegas and Video. It's already

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 2>unveiling new chips at the annual Tech event. Details ahead

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 2>on the company's AI ambitions.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 3>And the Elon Musk's reported drug use is a new

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 3>headache for the boards of Tesla and SpaceX. We discuss

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the legal risks and Musk's response.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 2>Us Instacart, it will begin showing advertisements on its high

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 2>tech shopping carts in the latest addition to the company's

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 2>growing ad business. Our exclusive interview with the CEO como the.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street Journal reporting some historic drug use by Elon Musk,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 3>according to anonymous sources, that is worrying board members and

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>staff at Tesla and SpaceX. Bloomberg's Max Chafkin, who's a

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 3>member of the Elon Musk Inc. Pod, is going to

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>come on and break down what is a very complicated

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 3>story If Tesla is the proxy for elon Musk sentiment,

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 3>it is hired by six tens of one percent. Really

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>big movement in semiconductors. Look particularly at Nvidia up almost

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 3>five percent, but semiconductors broadly having a pretty good morning.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, the socks was pretty downtrodden in the final

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>trading days of twenty twenty three. It's somewhat of a rebound,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>but in the last hour some news. Nvidia announced new

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 3>products to help the personal computer industry lower consumers with AIPCS,

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>which will let gamers, designers, and other computer users make

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>better use of AI on personal machines. I want to

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 3>bring in bloombergs Ian King, who's been tracking the keynote

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>at CEES and the details. What are these chips that

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about in.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean these are real, just updates to its

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 4>existing range of chips. What it's done is put in

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 4>a few more new components that are going to help

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 4>with the AI processing, some new cores, some better memory bandwidth,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 4>and it's also adjust the prices, made the prices a

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 4>little bit more attractive as well.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Just an update in Yet, the stock rally is hard.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>We're back at a all time high for in video

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>shares best days since August the twenty first, twenty twenty three.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Is it just that we needed a moon music shift?

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Is it just because AI actually is everything to this

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>particular company?

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, clearly, I think the last thing you

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 4>said is the answer there. Clearly AI has been an

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 4>enormous benefit for this company. Already, it's proved materially that

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 4>this is real, that this is about actual sales and

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 4>actual deployment. Again, in video comes out here and says, hey,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 4>don't forget about us. This AIPC, that Intel, that AMD

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 4>has been talking about. We can do this too, and

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 4>actually we think we're better than they are, so again

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>likely to press the right kind of button with investors,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and we're seeing that reaction.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting the timing though. It's a ces keynote adjacent

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>CES because it's virtual. I'm about to get on a

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 3>plane and go to Vegas hopefully. The story within video

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>was the H one hundred. You know, a GPU that

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>goes into a server design, that goes into a data center,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 3>you build your large language models. This seems like in

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 3>video reminding everyone, hey, we're actually pretty good at PC.

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Is it going to be important business?

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>For them.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean up until about a year ago, it was

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 4>their biggest It was the one thing we talked about.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 4>G Force was their main product.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 5>The PC was what they were.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 4>That's where the volume is right, So it isn't going

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 4>to stay an important business for them right now, all

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 4>the profits, all of the major games are from the

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 4>data center. But yeah, of course they used to open

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 4>CS every year with Hey, this bright, new shiny thing,

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 4>and this is them reminding people, hey, we're still here

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>as well. You really need to pay attention to us

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 4>this market.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm reading too much into it. I mean last year,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 3>part of the story among many was kind of Jensen

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Kuang the leather jacket wearing next Elon musk type. Maybe

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>today all days we won't make that comparison. But their

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 3>momentum hasn't really stopped. You know, the stock is boring,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it. Karen mentioned a fresh record high. What

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 3>is the story from Nvidia going into twenty twenty four.

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they have a whole host of new products,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 4>which we saw some of announced today and Jensen said, look,

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 4>we are actually going to speed up the cadence of

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 4>new products that we announce. The story is will that

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 4>cadence keep them ahead of what Intel, what AMD and

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 4>everybody else says they're going to do in that space.

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Can they keep themselves that must have technology provider for

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 4>that particular area.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>We see it one more than a trillion dollar valuations.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>That stands one point two seven trillion dollar market caps.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 2>So for now, investors still remain. Ever, please with Nvidia inking,

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>we thank you so much for breaking down what they're

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 2>saying ahead of CES, and let's just stick with the

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 2>overall value of generative AI, not just the individual companies,

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>but the economy more broadly and how it's going to

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 2>be interweaved into basically every single industry group. Paul dog

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>As he does that with US EX Center Chief Technology

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>and Innovation Officer. And Paul, you've done the numbers, you've

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 2>crunched them. I want to go into how you get

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 2>the numbers, but talk to us to what the overall

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>economic impact AI, generative AI you think is going to have.

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 6>Well, well, I come to you hear from our Las

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 6>Vegas and CES which you were just talking about, where

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 6>AI is the theme here and as you said, our

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 6>role in this is we help companies deploy technology solutions

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 6>and generate AI clearly is the hot ticket right now.

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Ninety five percent.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 6>Of executives tell us they're going to increase spending on

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 6>technology as they go into twenty twenty four, and ninety

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 6>seven percent of executives believe generative AI is transformative for

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 6>the business that they're doing. And based on the research

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 6>that we've done, we see that impact forty four percent

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 6>of all of the working hours across industries globally, and

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 6>that adds up to about eight to ten trillion dollars

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 6>of economic value over the next several years as companies

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 6>adopt generative AI.

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 5>So it's a big impact.

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 6>I believe of all the waves I've tracked over my career,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 6>all the technology waves, and this is a very much

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 6>of a wave driven industry, as you know, this is

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 6>the biggest one I believe in terms of the transformation

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 6>that it will drive for us as individuals, in terms

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 6>of how we work and live, and in terms of

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 6>businesses and how they and how they drive their technology.

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 2>Eight to ten trillion. How does that assert itself? What

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of value are you seeing is that by freeing

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 2>up individuals? Is it about ability to preserve the bottom

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 2>line for companies doing more and less? What is it

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 2>that drives that money.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's an exciting thing about the generative AI and

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 6>the technology we're seeing now, the related technologies. We talk

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 6>about this as an inflection point in the nature of technology.

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Technology has been it's been kind of the nuts and

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 6>bolts and the plumbing, you know, the cloud and PCs

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 6>and such, has been about the infrastructure. GENERATAI is about

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 6>human capability. It's about looking in the mirror and seeing

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 6>technology that does things kind of like what we do,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 6>and that's why it's so transformative.

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 5>So yes, it's about productivity.

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 6>As you said, we believe it does drive tremendous productivity.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 6>For example, in a large telecommunications organization we applied generative

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 6>AI and customer service drove thirty percent productivity and sixty

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 6>percent increase in customer satisfaction as a result. So it's

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 6>about productivity and the outcomes as well. But the interesting

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 6>thing about generative AI is also can drive creativity and

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 6>new ways of doing things. We're using it in our

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 6>digital agency business that we call Centre Song to create

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 6>new advertising campaigns, more creative, more personalized than what you

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 6>could have done before. And one final really unexpected maybe

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 6>benefit of generative AI.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Is a benefit for the individual.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 6>We did an implementation for our sales organization and accenture

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 6>a pilot of Generali how Well. One of the interesting

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 6>findings was, yes it produced better results, Yes it produced

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 6>better productivity, but it also increased people's satisfaction and their

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 6>feeling of balance and the work they were doing because

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 6>it took away some of the tasks they didn't want

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 6>to do. There's a lot in this, and it's the

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 6>early stages, but a lot for us to understand as

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 6>we look toward how we're going to drive that big value.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>And so that sort of goes counterweight to some of

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>the anxiety I think that have been across many an

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>industry group, but I also think consultants and lawyers about

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 2>what it really means about white collar jobs in the future. Paul,

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 2>do you think them will erode jobs?

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, I think there's it's going to change jobs.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 6>That's the way to think about it. It's not about

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 6>AI taking over our jobs. And I think we've gotten

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 6>that narrative wrong. There's been a lot of fear about

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 6>AI coming for all the jobs, and I think that's

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 6>kind of backwards. I think this is about how we

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 6>can enhance what we as people do in how in

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 6>how we do things, and we talk about things like human.

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 5>In the loop on jobs. Again, that's backwards.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 6>It's really about more about how can a person have

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 6>a wing and help them be more productive. So I

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 6>think the key thing is how do you bring along

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 6>your workforce.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 5>That they're able to use these new tools.

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 6>How does that customer service agent I talked about do

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 6>their new job. In another example, in the energy industry,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 6>we've deployed generative AI as a worker safety assistant to

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 6>help people do their work more safely, more cognizant of

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 6>regulations and policy as well as their own personal safety.

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 6>And these types of things are going to help people

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.719
<v Speaker 6>and make jobs more interesting. And in fact, one of

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 6>one piece of data from research that we're releasing right

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 6>now talks about the fact that ninety five percent of

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 6>workers are actually excited about how generative AI can change

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 6>the nature of the work that they're doing.

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul, you're a tech guy.

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm jumping on a plane very soon to head out

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 3>to Vegas to join you. AI is clearly the overarching

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>theme across the keynotes, the exhibitors, whatever. But that's across healthcare,

0:09:53.840 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 3>auto motive, software, consumer electronics, big box retail markets. Of

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the speakers, give me just one example the thing that

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>you think has the most substance coming out of CEES

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 3>this year.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think the thing that's really exciting is is

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 6>I think the shift from a year of experimentation and

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 6>education around AI to moving into twenty twenty four as

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 6>the year when companies look to drive value at scale

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 6>with it. That's why you see the senior executives from Walmart,

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 6>from best Buy, from Siemens and other companies, from Eccentric

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 6>and other.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 5>Companies talking here.

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 6>And it's about that shift to value and driving the value.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 6>And that's where I think you're going to start to see,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 6>is you CES really at the convergence showing thousands of

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 6>companies and new innovations around these technologies and organizations understanding

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 6>how they use that to transform. And I think that's

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 6>the real interesting point we're at with CES this year.

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.119
<v Speaker 3>All Right, I see you out there, Paul Dotos at Accentia,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for your time, Cara, what.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>You got well?

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Coming up? Instacrat expanding its ad business with high tech

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>shopping cartsass of course going to be available to be

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 2>interacting with it ces, I'm sure. Meanwhile, let's just look

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 2>at the shares of what's happening with Apple as well.

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 2>We know it's key when it comes to driving the

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 2>points move on some of these key benchmarks. Interestingly, a

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 2>bit of a bounce back on Apple today. We're at

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 2>one point eight percent. Of course, now's that more broadly

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 2>on the higher side. Vision pro it goes on sale

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 2>February second. Now, but remember Bloomberg Intelligence out with a

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 2>great piece just saying, look, the addition that you're going

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 2>to get in sales increase one point seventy five billion

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>dollars to be added to an annual revenue. Well, that's

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>not nearly enough to make up for some of the

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 2>consumer weakness going on in China. And that's what Jeffreys

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 2>highlights today. Jeffrey's out with a note saying they see

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 2>that in December sales in China fell some thirty percent

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>according to their numbers. Fascinating. We continue to digest. This

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Technology in sicart. We'll show advertisements on the

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 2>high tech shopping carts that it currently sells the grocery stores.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 2>The latest edition to the company is growing ads business

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>and a sign of investment in products outside of grocery delivery.

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I sat down for an exclusive conversation about it with

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Fiji Simum. Take a listen.

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 7>We have a lot of interest from retailers.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 8>Now you can see Caper cards deployed at Kroger, Wake Firm,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 8>Good Food, Holding, Sobse, Schnarks, and many more from Santa

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 8>Monica all the way to Manhattan. And we think in

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 8>four we're going to have thousands of carts deployed. And

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 8>the reason they're really excited to deploy these carts in

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 8>store is because customers love them.

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 7>We have a net promote or score of.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 8>Above seventy, which is very high, and we hear over

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 8>and over from customers how fun the shopping journey becomes

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 8>when you're using the cards, and how convenient it is.

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 8>So we really believe it's going to be the future

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:54.560
<v Speaker 8>of grocery shopping.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Future for US shopping. How international can this get you?

0:12:57.800 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course, someone who is French and I know that

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Caper was already having exposure to Spain and to France,

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>for example.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.359
<v Speaker 8>We certainly want to make that something that goes international

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 8>as well. We're very focused on the US because that's

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 8>obviously your core market, but we do have interest from

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 8>international retailers as well, so we're bullish on the international

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 8>strategy as well.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 2>And all of this paint the picture for the direction

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 2>of travel for Instacart, because is this trying to ensure

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that you're not just purely an online play for retailers consumers,

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 2>but also you've really managed to draw in higher margins

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>through advertising. How much you're trying to broaden out what

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 2>instacart really is to an investor and indeed, of course

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the retailer and a consumer.

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, when I joined Instacart, to me, was obvious that

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 8>we weren't just or three delivery AUP. We were already

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 8>a company that was building technology to help retailers with

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 8>this big digital transformation happening, and we were doing that

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 8>primarily through e commerce obviously, and so we skip up

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 8>we're really expanding into building technologies for the store because

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 8>what we believe is that customers are not going to

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 8>shop just online of just in stalls.

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 7>They are going to shop omni channels.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 8>And the retailers who really create the best, most similar

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 8>omni channel experience all the retailers that are going to

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 8>gain an edge, and instagrat is giving them this edge, and.

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Does it give you an edge versus who analysts might

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>say are your competitors. There is worry from some analysts

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 2>that Uber, door Dash are going to eaten on some

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 2>of your market share, that Amazon and Walmart are so

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>good at omni channel as well. How does this carve

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 2>you a niche?

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, we already are very clear category leader in grocery

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 8>and in grocery delivery, and here like this, this launch

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 8>really proves that we have a completely different strategy from

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 8>these players. Our strategy is to enable retailers with all

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 8>of the technologies they need to run their business, and

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 8>that applies online and that's why we have you know,

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 8>the vast majority of retailers already on our platform, well

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 8>above any competitor, but also now helping them with their

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 8>store and helping them with creating a new revenue line

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 8>for them because as we launch advertising on keeper cars,

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 8>we are sharing revenue with retailers and therefore you know,

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 8>helping them grow their business both online and in store.

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 8>That's a completely different strategy from some of the marketplace

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned, where these marketplaces are really just about growing

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 8>their marketplace and in fact, in some cases even competing

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 8>with retailers. We don't do that with labor retailers.

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Fijisima of instacar and Instacar or Maple Barrows, however, we

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>want to discuss it carding out two point three percent

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>on the trading day at the moment and our explicit

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>conversation with the CEO.

0:15:53.000 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 3>That okay, it's time for talking tech. And first up

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 3>in the news Sony planning to call off its ten

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar merger pact of its India unit was Z

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Entertainment that according to sources, the move caps two years

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>of drama and delay in creating a ten billion dollar

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 3>media giant, and the standoff has been over whether Z's

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 3>CEO would eventually lead the merged entity. And Microsoft has

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 3>picked longtime executive d Templeton to join open AI's board

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>as a non voting observer. That according to Bloomberg sources,

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Templeton has worked at Microsoft for more than twenty five

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>years and it's the company's vice president for Technology and Research,

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Partnerships and Operations. Plus Elon Musk's reported drug use by

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street Journal is worrying Tesla and SpaceX's board.

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Members of Wall Street Journal cited anonymous sources and witnesses.

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Now they've got a big decision whether to do anything

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>about it with Elon Musk and the financial or legal

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 3>risk the reporting could pose to those companies.

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Carroc dive deeper into that story, pretty serious allegations, and

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>again this quandary left for the board members, as you say, ed,

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 2>and it's a familiar on what to do, if anything

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 2>about Mask, about legal financial repercussions of course, and what

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 2>it means for his companies that he manages. Well, we're

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 2>pleased to have an expert with us, Max Chafkin, business

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>economist and one of the members of Elon Inc. Podcast

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 2>which has taken Broombay by storm. Look reports by the

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 2>journal that Musk has been using LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms,

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 2>often at private parties. You know, Musk himself has come

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>out on his own social media platform, what do you say?

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>What did you make?

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 9>Well, he's he's sort of swung in various directions. At

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 9>some times he said, well, whatever I'm taking, I should

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 9>continue taking it, basically pointing to the performance and also

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 9>the fact that a lot of this stuff, or at

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 9>least some of it, has happened more or less in

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 9>the open you know, he smoked marijuana on Joe Rogan's podcast.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 9>He has said he has a prescription for ketamine, which is,

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 9>you know, a party drug. He said he's using it,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 9>you know, to treat depression. But he's also said that

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 9>SpaceX has been required to drug test him as part

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 9>of the Joe Rogan fallout thing, and he said he's

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 9>never failed a drug test. So he's sort of essentially saying,

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 9>number one, this is overblown. Number two, the companies are

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 9>doing great, so you know, what's the big deal.

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 3>The thing is that either the Wall Street Journal report

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 3>is accurate, right Max, its cites anonymous sources, or it's not.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 3>And this was the post that caught my eye. Elon

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 3>must saying that following that Joe Rogan appearance twenty eighteen,

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 3>at NASA's request, he agreed to random drug testing of

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 3>a period of three years. We've asked the comment from

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>NASA and from SpaceX, but if the drug testing took place,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 3>we'd have more to go on with this story.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, the Journal's article mentions the fact that

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 9>he was drug tested. It also notes that, you know,

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 9>some of the drugs they're talking about are not traditionally

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 9>at least according to the Wall Street Journal, in that

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 9>kind of drug test, So we're talking about psychedelics, that

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 9>is the allegation, in addition to some of the things

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 9>Caroline just mentioned. So again it's not totally clear what

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 9>he would be testing positive for. And I don't think

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 9>it's hugely surprising that he's been drug tested, because of

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 9>course a lot of government contractors drug test employees.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Less than a minute max. But this comes down to

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 2>ultimately a board who's some warrior just too close to him.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think with Elon Musk, you know, there's the

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 9>conversation around drug tests, and then there's the bigger conversation

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 9>around sort of the erratic behavior, and sometimes we're talking

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 9>about drugs. I think what we're really speaking about is

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 9>the fact that he tweets weird stuff sometimes in the.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Middle of the night.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 9>And I think in general, as long as the companies

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 9>have done well, boards have been okay with it, investors

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 9>have been okay with it.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And the real question is.

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 9>When Tesla or SpaceX or one of these other companies

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 9>hits a rough patch, what happens then I think that

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 9>will be if and when that happens, that will be when.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 3>The rubber needs a road and it's not concerning tester

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 3>investors right now with the stock in positive territy, blion

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Bergs Max Chafkin, thank you very much. Welcome back to

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology. Ed love loow here in San Francisco.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 2>ALN hired in New York. Let's get you a check

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 2>on these markets, because we're back in rally mode for

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the day, at least in certainly across tech, but across

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the broader indices today bit of an everything rally across

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the United States. And I'm going to the individual names

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 2>first and foremost. So let's stick into what's happening in video.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Of course, this is at a record high, leading the

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 2>charge in terms of points being added to the Nasdaq

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 2>and the Nasdaq one hundred video launches, well, should we

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 2>just say updates. It's AIPC chips and the market likest

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 2>ahead of CEES. We're up more than four percent, so

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 2>a new record high for a video. Look at what's

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>happening in the world of Twilio though, also riding high,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.479
<v Speaker 2>and this is as it's co founder Jeff Railson is

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 2>having to move stage left. Basically he's having to step

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 2>down from the company and back off because many had

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 2>felt that he's really too synonymous with just spending too

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>much and not really focusing on non profitability. But his

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 2>right hand man for the past few years is basically

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 2>taking over, so many questioning whether that really is going

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 2>to exert any sort of change in leadership. This is,

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 2>of course, activist investors at play when it comes to

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Twilio Apple. On the upside as well, after it would

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 2>have been five straight days of losses, Apple managed to

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>regain some ground, vision pro goes and sell February. The

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 2>second also extraordinary story regarding the iPhone and how that's

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 2>been entangled with the disaster on that Boeing seventy seven

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Max nine. We'll dig into that a little bit later,

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 2>but notable on a day that Jeffrey's analysts are saying

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 2>like they could be seeing a sell off in terms

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 2>of revenue, in terms of consumer demand lacking by thirty

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 2>percent year on year in China. So we dig into

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 2>all of that in a moment, but let's look at

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 2>some of the big benchmarks and what's happening in terms

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 2>of overall mood music. Because ed we are riding high,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and that's that one hundred one point three percent not

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 2>happening in China though, the Golden Dragon inex of course,

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 2>this being the Nazda Golden Dragon. On the downside, despite

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>more ammunition being fed into the Chinese economy in terms

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 2>of well, the overall amount of money that banks have

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>to hold, their ability to lend eased up but not

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 2>helping so far. And Bitcoin we end there up two

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 2>point four percent. We're back above forty five thousand dollars.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 2>As we anticipate the spot Bitcoin ETF being signed off.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 3>Do we think ed Bitcoin spot ETF watched day? I

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 3>don't know what day. It's been months, black Rock Arc,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 3>several other perspective issuers of ETFs filed amended forms this

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 3>morning and what's seen by analysts as a final push

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to offer the investment products. Joining us now is Sunny Singh,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 3>co founder and CEO of Bluega. Blueger offers software tools

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 3>that allow users to manage their crypto portfolio but also

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 3>use new crypto products. You are watching this closely. It

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 3>will impact your business and your world. That news the

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 3>updated forms, we have more information on fee structure which

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 3>we can dig into. It seems like the weight might

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 3>soon be over.

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean we've been waiting for five years, so

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 10>I think we're getting close. Whether or not they approve

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 10>it this Wednesday or in the next three or sixty days,

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 10>it's going to happen.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>The question is then when does it go live? Does

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>sec the way the.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 10>S one funds and all that stuff, I don't think

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 10>so I think they're kind of back against the wall.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're in a given and.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 10>You'll see an ETF goal live Q one, Q two maybe.

0:22:57.840 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 10>But the big question Gains I think, is going to

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 10>do and say, okay, we'll give your bitcoin ETF, but

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 10>we're not going to give you as ethereum and all

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 10>those ones. He's already said that we think, you know,

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 10>bitcoin is definitely not a security, but all the other

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 10>ones we think are security.

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 3>So he's not going to give it on those ones.

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 3>We think you've been waiting five years. I've been waiting

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>slightly less. Howro would point out there are others in

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 3>the market that have been waiting much longer than five years.

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 3>The other kind of data that we're getting now is

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 3>the proposed fee structure. So if you think about Bluega

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 3>and your customers accessing, what is a new product in

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 3>the market, Why is the fee structure or fee proposed

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 3>by the issuers important.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think I don't think the fees are going

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 10>to be ask super as important as people think, right,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 10>So I think like big pension funds like Kalpers and

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 10>all them are going to probably go with the black

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 10>rock and nutritional bigger ones as well. It's a smaller

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 10>retail people who already had access to GBTC, which has

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 10>had much higher feeso than like a bit wise we'll

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 10>propose and all that kind of stuff. So I think

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 10>the more retail investors will go off to the smaller

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 10>fee ones, where the black Rocks and the bigger ones

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 10>will get the higher big institutional investors.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Actually, and what's interesting is many would say they don't

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 2>want to make kingmakers is to perhaps what happened with

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 2>the futures ETF prior times. They're trying to ensure that, well,

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 2>this is gonna be a bit of a race to marketing.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 2>I would have thought to ensure that you get your

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 2>name out there associated with a spot bitcoin ETF. But

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 2>all of this attracts how much money, Sonny, have you

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 2>put much research to it? How much of a change

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 2>does this make to the ability to interact with bitcoin.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be pretty exciting.

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 10>And everyone relates back to what happened with the gold

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 10>ETF when it was launched and all that, right, and

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 10>if you do the same comparisons, you're going to see

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 10>huge buying pressure that could happen in the crypto space.

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.640
<v Speaker 10>And again you're going to see institutional family office things

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 10>like that, they're not going to put ten percent of

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 10>their money into these bitcoin ETFs, but maybeer point five

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 10>one percent, two percent, which is a lot when you

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 10>think about it in perspective. And again, there's only nineteen

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 10>million bitcoin in existence, it's a finite supply, right, and

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 10>with the having coming in April, you're going to start

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 10>having an increasing supplying pressure with an increased buying pressure

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 10>unlike what we've never seen before in crypto, along with

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 10>lower interest rates.

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe by the end of the year, you really have

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a perfect storm.

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 10>Is what we think could be a price catalyst to

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 10>get bitcoin over one hundred thousand by the end of

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 10>the year.

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 2>What's so interesting is when you read between the lines,

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 2>it feels like Gary Gensler really does not want to

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 2>do this. He just put out a tweet, well, a post,

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 2>a thread of posts and this time really talking about

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>how investments in crypto assets could also can be exceptionally

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>risky and off a volatile and number of major platforms

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and crypto assets have become insolvent and or lost value.

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Investments in crypto assets continue to be subject to significant risk.

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's doing this through clenched teeth. If he

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>does it at all, sunny, what if it doesn't happen

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 2>on January the tenth, But what if we don't, we're

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 2>not able to trade it immediately.

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So again, I think it will happen the next

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 10>thirty sixty days. But a bigger question is when does

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 10>it go live? And how long can he delay it

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 10>from going live? And I think, you know, April May

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 10>June time frame is realistic for it to be live.

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I think past that he.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 10>Runs legal risk and all that, and I think again,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 10>in his mind, he's going to the compromise, like I'm

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 10>going to give you the bitcoin ETF, but I'm not

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 10>going to give you soana ethereum kran Exedger. We'll deal

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 10>with all that next year, and then the crypto community

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 10>will be happy, just in the bitcoin win out the

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 10>door for the ETF.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Sonny, you mentioned the harving as a key event future

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 3>catalyst for bitcoin in twenty twenty four. Many other guests

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 3>last week also referenced that, And my question is what

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 3>is your kind of big picture bitcoin cool for twenty

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty four. Because we started this conversation a few weeks

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 3>ago with the absolute belief that what was driving the

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 3>trading in bitcoin or the price activity was anticipation of

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 3>spot ETF. Actually there's plenty of evidence that there's a

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 3>lot more to it than that.

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 10>I think the having is actually a bigger catalyst to that,

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 10>and so they're having alone would normally propel bitcoin to

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 10>an all time high, probably each in the four years

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 10>it happens, right, And what happens is in April when

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 10>the having happens, and normally the dug event nothing happens.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The price actually goes down a little bit.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 10>And then six months later when you really see as

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 10>it's stilled through the system, the effects of it, right,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 10>and combine that with the bitcoin ETF, we think again,

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 10>the price would you go from forty five fifty thousand

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 10>three months from now and six months from now to

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 10>one hundred real fast? Once it gets the sixty, we

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 10>think the it's queen slate to one hundred and when

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 10>it hits one hundred thousand for bitcoin, it becomes a

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 10>two trillion dollar market cap currency and then the media

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 10>and all that the frenzy will be huge by the

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 10>end of the year.

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So again we think Q.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 10>Three, Q four, you're going to see a lot of

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 10>excitement the price of bitcoin. Q two under having not

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 10>so much.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 2>Beluuga, You're you're saying that you're cunning through the noise,

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 2>basically helping people understand which projects are the ones, the

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 2>safest products to be and interacting with investing in Ultimately

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin is that an investment, a store of value? Many

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 2>want to see for crypto purpose, real deployment, a change,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>fixing a problem. When does that actually become more nuanced

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 2>or clear to an investor base.

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what we're hoping.

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 10>We hope end of the year we start seeing more payments, products,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 10>lending products, taking products. Again, we believe the mission of

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 10>bitcoin and crypto is not just buy and hold. It's

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 10>buy and hold, stake, play, earned use, lend, pay, etc.

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 10>There's a lot of things that can be done with

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 10>bitcoin besides the speculation, as well as crypto in general.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 10>We're seeing the launch of web three games happen, crypto payments,

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 10>crypto lending products. So there is again there's four hundred

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 10>million people in the warld of crypto and only about

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 10>ten percent our power users.

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Doing things besides just buy and holding.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 10>I'll go up with weiogle is to get the other

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 10>ninety three hundred and fifty million to start using crypto

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 10>in the right way.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a much more out there than just buy and hold.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Sunny saying, going to have some time with you co

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>found a CEO of Beluga. Stay well. Meanwhile, coming up, look,

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>we'll have all the latest in the world of health tech.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>This is of course, it's the JP Morgan Health Conference.

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 2>It kicks off in San Francisco. But then we've got

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 2>something else to look out for ahead of it.

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, some news crossing in the last few minutes. Du Lingo,

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 3>the language learning software company, is cutting ten percent of

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 3>its contractor workforce, a spokesperson telling Bloomberg that ten percent

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 3>of contractors were off boarded because the company wants to

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 3>focus more work on AI driving its development and growth.

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Nine billion dollar market cap company. No sharp reaction in

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 3>trading to those headlines. The stock was already up the

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 3>now three point eight percent higher. This is Bloomberg Technology,

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 3>all right. There's been a lot of M and A

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 3>news in the world of biotech today, with Harpoon Therapeutics

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 3>near a deal to be acquired by drug maker Merck

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 3>and Co. At about seven hundred million dollar value. Meanwhile,

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Johnson and Johnson will pay two billion dollars in cash

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 3>to acquire Ambricks buy a Farmer gaining a developer of

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 3>widely sought therapies that target tumors with lethal drugs. I

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 3>want to break it all down with VJ Pandey found

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 3>a founding general partner of Nderies and Horowitz by a

0:29:55.560 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 3>health tech group. Interesting timing is jphit Morgan's healthcare conference.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 3>The annual one is on here in SF. I've covered

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 3>a few of those. You've been to a few of those.

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 3>It is interesting though that there is some m and

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 3>a here in call it biopharmer biotech healthcare. What's your

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of tea leave read of that?

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Well it's GPM, right, so there's going to be fireworks.

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 11>That's what we're all kind of looking for, you know,

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 11>sort of in the inside baseball. Clearly the ideal window

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 11>has been closed for a while or it has been

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 11>barely open, and so M and A will be a

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 11>natural consequence of that. And so I think we were

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 11>starting to see a little bit that this year, probably

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 11>maybe a little more than last year. But I think

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 11>probably the big, big sort of fireworks come maybe in

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 11>a year.

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Right. My experience of JP Morgan's Healthcare Conference is kind

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 3>of similar to CS other tech conferences, and that it's

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 3>the one time of the year where everyone's in one place. Yes,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 3>you can take a lot of meetings. I call it

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 3>speed dating. But you raise an interesting point. M and

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 3>A is one other exit strategy for a VC like you.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 3>You look at your portfolio right now in twenty twenty

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 3>four d you see some exit opportunity down that route.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, I mean A. But also the IPA

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 11>window may open. I think interest rates may go down.

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 11>We expect that. So maybe by the end of the

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.479
<v Speaker 11>year Q two, Q three, Q four, that window may

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 11>be open. I think people are preparing for that. The

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 11>market has to be there.

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Of course, you think people are, you know people are.

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 11>I've seen that people.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Are good little prodding that and at vj AI has

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 2>been almost what dictated the companies that couldn't get out

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the gate. Last year, a lot of them had AI

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 2>within their very business model, or they tried to amp

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 2>up the fact that it was a player on AI

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>as well as also profitability. But is AI going to

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 2>be a dictator of which biotech companies come forward or

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 2>is it actually just been solving a real problem with

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 2>profitability as it stands.

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>So right now?

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 11>The thing about AI is that I think last year

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 11>was the year where AI was really further developed, and

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 11>this year is where it really starts to get implemented,

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 11>both in life sciences and healthcare more broadly. And that's

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 11>something that incumbents would love to do, but it's hard.

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 11>It's really fundamentally changing the way that company works, and

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 11>so startups will be a way to do that. And

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 11>that's been the history of all technological revolutions.

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is many on the more optimistic side of

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 2>use and practicality and necessity of AI talk up the

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 2>impact on healthcare as a real reason that we shouldn't

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 2>hold back innovation here for fear of it being a

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 2>step too far and we shouldn't regulate it for real perspective.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 2>How is that ongoing conversation going generative AI and the

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 2>impact on healthcare being safe.

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know, I don't think it's a question about

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 11>not regulating it, because healthcare and life sciences are already regulated, right,

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 11>So the question is do we need any more regulation?

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 11>And given the challenges that we're facing in terms of

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 11>curing diseases treating patients, the opportunity here is for really

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 11>fundingly advance our space, and we already have a regulatory

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 11>framework to make sure that can be done safely.

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 3>One of the big stories toward the end of the

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 3>year Karen and I covered with Crisper and the developments there.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 3>For example, we refer to health tech biotech as a

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 3>blanket term, but within that there is so much And

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 3>I wondered if you have a clear area of excitement

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty four, a very specific technology or issue

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 3>that you think will be challenged or tackled.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think.

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 11>You know, we've talked about AI, and I think what's

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 11>happening right now is that AI is coming to bear

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 11>at a time where biology also is fundamentally changing. Biology

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 11>is becoming much more of an engineering discipline, and Crisper

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 11>is one example of that, but there's many examples, especially

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 11>with all these new modalities and so a combination of

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 11>being able to engineer biology and gather huge amounts of

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 11>data is coming at the same time that we have

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 11>AI to use that data. That combination is something that

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 11>I think we're going to see as the sort of

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 11>key power of pushing this industry for the next decade.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Bench captalysts are long term, long duration investors have long

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 3>time horizons. But what's your strategy for twenty twenty four?

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 3>What types of company will you invest in?

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so I think we're going to see some advances

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:58.959
<v Speaker 11>in AI. But actually the reality is that even if

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 11>AI doesn't advance any more than is to date, the

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 11>implementation of AI is going to change our field. That

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 11>we're moving from an area where it's sort of bespoken

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 11>artis into a true industrial revolution, and that industrialization is

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 11>a huge change itself. And so the implementation of AI

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 11>is going to dominate twenty four and we're looking to

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 11>see not just who can innovate in the space, but

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 11>who can actually.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Put it to work.

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 2>And to that point, you think of a portfolio company

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 2>like a benchling, which is ultimately allowing R and D

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 2>to be shared stop some of the limitations and in

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 2>the paperwork and individual siloed particular labs have and an

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 2>ability to actually share your learnings and drive it forward.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 2>When you are looking at your portfolio companies, have they

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 2>done enough, do you think, in this environment to ensure

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 2>that they're focusing on growth, not at any cost, but

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the right cost.

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 11>I think the growth is something where it's always a

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 11>key part of a startup, but I think right now

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 11>the opportunity is that a lot of these startups in

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 11>life sciences and healthcare have been on a different curve,

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 11>and I think as they become tech companies and AI

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 11>is a very natural way for them to become a

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 11>tech company, the growth will come along for the ride.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 11>And that's actually probably the excitement here is that typically

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 11>we don't think of healthcare as a tech problem, and

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 11>as people start to refocus and think of it in

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 11>that way, we're going to have advances that will come.

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Much more rapidly. J.

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 2>Pande, I hope you'll come on when we do we'll

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 2>get all those advances. We thank you so much for

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 2>setting us up for of course that. JP Morgan Conference

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 2>general partner over Andresen Horowitz. Great to have you on

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the show. Going viral and extraordinary story of how Apple's

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 2>promise for sturdy iPhones may have been kept after one

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 2>was reportedly found intact after falling sixteen thousand free from

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 2>that Alaska Airlines flight twelve eighty two this weekend. Now,

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 2>according to a user post on x, the phone was

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 2>in airplane mode and still had hours of battery life remaining. Now,

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Flight twelve eighty two was forced to turn by minutes

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 2>after takeoff from Portland, Oregon, when a fuselage panel blew

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 2>off the plane and sucked shirts and clearly phones out

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>and luckily no people head.

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with high altitude CARRA and get a different

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 3>take on tech in aviation because United Launch Alliance's long

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 3>awaited Vulcan rocket headed into space after launching from Florida's

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Cape canaverl early this morning. About fifty minutes after liftoff,

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the rocket deployed a robotic lunar lander, and if all

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 3>goes well with the mission, it could be the first

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 3>privately made lander to successfully land on the Moon.

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 2>Karen mean, while coming back down to Earth, let's look

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 2>at Twilio shares. Actually, well, they're doing well on the

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 2>back of what is the founder Jeff Lawson stepping down

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 2>a CEO giving up his board seat. Even now this

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 2>we are going to dig into with Brody Ford joining

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 2>us for more, because investors clearly wanted this, they have

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>been pushing for. This is an activist who found their

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 2>moment because Jeff Lawson as founder finally gave up voting

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 2>rights right right.

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.319
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, when you start a company, oftentimes you have these

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 12>really high powered shares. Jeff started this company in two

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 12>thousand and eight and those shares expired last year.

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 5>What does that mean? Means you can vote him out.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 12>And so activist investors who were upset with a long

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 12>trend of slow in growth and wanted to mix up

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 12>have been kind of privately speaking to him. A lot

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 12>of investors I hear from say they wanted to switch up,

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 12>and I think this was expected. I think this came

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 12>sooner than many folks anticipated though.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so Jeff Lawson out, Kazema, Ship Chandler in. What

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.720
<v Speaker 3>do we know about the new CEO that's coming in Brody?

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 12>So the thing to know about him is he's pretty

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 12>much been lost in his right hand man.

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 5>He was CFO.

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 12>He led their largest business units like ninety percent of revenues.

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 12>So I mean he is seen as more of a

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 12>financial operations type than the founder evangelist type. But at

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 12>the same time, I've seen some folks say, hey, if

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 12>we wanted to check James, why didn't we go for

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 12>an external CEO. So that's the pro and knock on

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 12>him is that he's an internal choice.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 2>We'll see how it continues to evolve with the investor base.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 2>For now, a little bit of push up higher on

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 2>the shares Brady Ford breaking all down would be appreciated

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 2>him for it. Meanwhile, and well, I'm glad you're in

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the seat today in SF, but you're about to take

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 2>a flight yourself.

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yes, not on a Boeing seven three seven Max nine.

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 3>But all being well, I'll be off to CS in

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Las Vegas. And we have a Tech daily out that

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the old kind of wacky gadget side of CS is

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 3>still there. Big focus this year on AI gadgets, But

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 3>as is always the case, look at the names on

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 3>the screen. It's also a chance for Corporate America to say, hey,

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 3>we know about AI as well.

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everyone's a tech company, right, Loreal a tech company

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 2>obviously a key keynote. I mean, we've for long had

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it that car companies have been tech companies, but is

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>this the ultimate proof point that now tech is a

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 2>horizontal not a vertical.

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean it's the everyone is a tech company

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of line. One of the other key notes is

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 3>Walmart and Doug McMillan wright big box retailer, but with

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:07.320
<v Speaker 3>an increasing e commerce presence. They are exhibiting at cees

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 3>on the show and floor for the first time. So

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of what I'm interested in. If it's AI everything,

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 3>what does that really look like if you are a

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 3>lorrial whose CEO we will speak to, or indeed, some

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 3>of the chip companies right some familiar names to us,

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>like Christiana Marman of qualcom Rene hasse arm their stories

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 3>were AI in twenty twenty three, so what's new.

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 2>What's new is also what the competitors are up to

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 2>in today is a day where in video leaders are

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 2>charged in terms of the overall and NASDAT benchmark because

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 2>they do an iteration on a chip for PC AI.

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 2>But it's notable that really AI has got to be

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 2>within your business model if you're going to lead in

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 2>this environment.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and don't get me wrong, I like the weird

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 3>stuff as well. Right, the robots that can mimic your handwriting,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 3>high tech toilets and bidets. Those are all things will

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 3>be checking out this week.

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Just not on camera, right the bday in the Twitter,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 2>not on camera. Thanks that does it with this addition

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of Bluebotechnology, Thank you.

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>To everyone that checks out the podcast.

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Wherever you get your podcasts, we post them on the

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg platforms, but also onto Apple, Spotify, and iHeart. As

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Cary said, I'm off to catch a flight from SF

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 3>in New York City. This is Bloomberg Technology.