WEBVTT - Can Labour Dial Back the Doom with the Investment Summit?

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Earlier this year, before the election, the Labor Party seemed

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>to be all in on its mission to be party

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>of business. We've covered in a lot on this podcast

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the amount of courting of business people, investors, time spent

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>by the new Chancellor or the shadow Chancellor, their ritro routes.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Here in the City of London, everyone seemed to be

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>convinced that Labor was different than it was going to

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>be a pro business administration. But now cut to just

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>three months after the party's landslide victory, questions are emerging

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 2>about how committed the party is to its pro growth pledge.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>This week, We're going to take stock of Labour's progress

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>to win back the support of corporate Britain and ask

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>what's at stake if the city's leaders are losing faith

0:00:55.400 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>in Labour's commitment. Welcome to the City of London, The

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>City of London, mind gad between the financial hearts of

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the country.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.279
<v Speaker 3>The City, the City.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to In the City, Clear of the Doors, Pea.

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to another episode of In the City. I'm David Merritt,

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm Alegri Stratton and I'm Francine Lackwall. Later in the show,

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>we're going to hear from Richard Harrington. He's the former

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>government minister who published a review into foreign direct investment

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 2>in November of last year. His review made recommendations about

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 2>how the UK could attract more cross border investment, and

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get his thoughts on whether the Labor

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>government is taking his suggestions on board and what more

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>could be done to tackle the barriers to investment. But

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>before that, with us in the studio is Bloomberg Radio

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>host Karen Hepka, who has authored a piece on how

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 2>how the city is now viewing the Labor Party's first

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred days.

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to the.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Podcast, Karen, Thanks for having me.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>So you spend your days talking to business people, interviewing

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>them modern radio. How has the mood shifted from you know,

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>before this year when everyone was thinking, hey, Labor is

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>really making efforts to be seen as a pro business party,

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>to what they've actually done and what's happened since they

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>won power.

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I spent the last few weeks sort of

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to ascertain that with a few key players. So

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>people like Anne Glover from Amadeus Capital Management. She's key

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in that investment scene in the UK. People like Lloyd

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Lee from you Capital working on one of the biggest

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>regeneration projects in London. Phoenix Group their CIO. You know

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they if you recall, at their heart of the mansion

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>House Accord trying to get pension funds to invest more

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in the city. Spent a few weeks talking to them.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think surface level there is trepidation, there is anticipation

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>about the budget. Mostly everybody agrees that in the first

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred days, which is what I was looking at,

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>actually nothing much has happened on the economic front. I

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>think quite a lot of other things have happened.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the things that labourhood trumpeted a

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 2>lot to business was we're going to bring back stability

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to Britain. We've had weeks of headlines of freebies for

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 2>government termoil reports of all those inviting. Do business people

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 2>feel frustrated by that ongoing sense of chales.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there was such huge desperation for some new

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>direction in the UK after fourteen years of increasingly erratic

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>government that yes, I think there was a huge moment

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of relief. The fact that Labour has this huge mandate

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and a five year term I was talking about a

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>ten year term. That's why I think there's a lot

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of anxiety. There is not just a huge amount going

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on geopolitically, but also domestically. And I think that the

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>people that I spoke to talked about the government having

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to learn on the job and how it's very difficult

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to do that in just the space of three months,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's immensely difficult. I think it's put even more

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on the tone and the content of the budget.

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Basically that there have been all of these strands that

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they've talked about, infrastructure spending, the National Wealth Fund, gb Energy,

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>all that is a good damn payment, but nothing's actually

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>been done. That's kind of top level.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I wonder rather when you speak to you know, Blackstone,

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 4>black Rock, Golden Sex, I'm not sure they're aware of

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 4>who the chief of staff of Kerestarmer is. I mean,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 4>it's been a hundred days, but I wonder whether it

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 4>really impacts you know, you know, someone saying, look, I

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 4>want to put one hundred million, I want to put

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 4>two hundred million in this country. I think they're probably

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 4>waiting more for the budget, to see the non arm,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 4>to see the taxes and where they land on this.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>The issue though, also is that the timing of the

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Business Summit has been has been mistimed. Right. Everybody pretty

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>much was in unanimity that the Investment Summit should come

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 1>after the budget, and that's happening.

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>That's just because that's happening next week, this big summit

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 2>where the government is trying to pull in huge names

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 2>from business all around the world to come and sort

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 2>of celebrate habritains over the business. But it's happening in

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 2>this sort of gray zone before we know what the policies.

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Are going to be.

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And weirdly, of course, it was a success from the

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>conservative era right that the Toys did that two years

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in a row. It did bring in big announcements and

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>also big global investors at least to have the conversation

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 1>without the UK.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, and we had everyone at the time. You

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 4>had a number of sovereign wealth funds also from the

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Middle East that showed up last year. It was very

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 4>well done. It was well prepared.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 5>This year.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 4>When we speak to a lot of Wall Street titans,

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 4>a lot of them can't be there because of boards,

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 4>so they won't say it's because the budget is two

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 4>weeks afterwards. But timing makes a little sense if you're

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 4>going to put a lot of money in this country.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And we've talked quite pessimistically about the UK.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 2>But the other weird.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Dichotomy the numbers are not that bad, and that there

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>should be more kind of optimism. We understand what the

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>issue for Britain is, right growth and the lack of investment.

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows the exact recipe for how to boost economic

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>growth in Britain, but we know that you know what

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the various levers are. It is the difficulty what do

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you do on day one a one?

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 5>You know, in the first few days their emphasis on

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 5>planning reform was manner from heaven. That was what the

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 5>city wanted to hear, wasn't it. And we should remember

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:14.479
<v Speaker 5>that that they made a lot of kind of the

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 5>right noises early on.

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 4>But also they just need to make sure that they

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 4>have growth right. So I imagine that every lens they're looking

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 4>at is like, okay, I can get twenty millis you know,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 4>private equity carried interest? Does that lead if you make

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 4>that higher, does it lead to extra growth or does

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 4>it lower growth? I don't really know the answer to that.

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Like what you were saying is that this budget is

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 4>tricky because they need to show the world that they're

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 4>open for business, get money in, but actually it's understanding

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 4>what can be taxed and not hurting growth because at

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 4>the end of the day, it's not the time. I mean,

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 4>they can get money in, but they really need to

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 4>grow the GDP of this country.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 5>The thing that has emerged in the last week ten days,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 5>which I think she's they've let emerge because they realized

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 5>that they were in a massive hole of kind of

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, you've been too pessimistic, which is this borrowing

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 5>to invest? Yes, I don't know, but I suspect that

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 5>was a kind of pull down from shelf, not in

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 5>case of emergency, but in case everybody's grumpy and you

0:07:08.040 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 5>need something to kind of shift the narrative.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think the people that I speak to,

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, they are all saying, we are standing ready

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like females, we are standing ready to put the money

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in there, but we've got to understand the direction. I

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>think there's even more emphasis on the budget and on

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>getting that right. And also I kind of just wonder

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>when she does stand up. You were saying, as the

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>first female chancellor in like eight hundred years in the UK.

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Can she actually deliver tonally that shift you know that

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we are hope of a business that we're going for great,

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>She's got to come up with some great phrases, you know,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to galvanize the nation.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Right, Thanks so much, Carolina. Thanks now, as promised, Richard

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Harrington joins us. Lord Harrington is a former government minister

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 4>who published a review into foreign direct investment in November

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 4>of last year. We're happy to have them with us

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 4>to check in on the recommendation he laid out nearly

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 4>a year ago and whether the Labor government has taken

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.119
<v Speaker 4>any on board. Richard, welcome back to in the city.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. It's a pleasure to be here. And of

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>course the review itself was launched here at Bloomberg. I

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 3>felt very optimistic about it. Jeremy Hunt was very much

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 3>behind it and they're opposition now. The government were so

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 3>although a.

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Year's gone by, Richard behind it well.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 3>The new government was behind it in opposition and very

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 3>much in favor of it now. And we're expecting an

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 3>announcement on the subject because it's all about stuff which

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people think is quite boring because it's

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 3>not the most glamorous sun headline stuff. But it's reorganizing

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 3>the government in a much more favorable modern way for

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 3>inward investment.

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>And we've got the Investment Summit happening next week and

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:52.599
<v Speaker 2>some people are saying, well, the timing of that's a

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>bit strange. You know, everyone's really just waiting for the budget.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a lot of nervousness about what sort

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 2>of measures might be there in terms of wealth, you know,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 2>coupital gains, all these things. But what is your outlook

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 2>for the investments on me? Are you saying we're going

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 2>to actually get some substantive announcements ahead of it that

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 2>are going to really attract investment.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, you know, everyone that's not involved

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 3>in something is always slacking it off. I mean, it's

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 3>normal in polity. But actually I think it's a very

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 3>good time to have the summit. Yes, there will be

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 3>some tax questions and things like that because people are

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>waiting to see what changes are, but decisions are not

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 3>made on the day. This is not something where someone

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 3>will arrive in the morning not thinking they're going to invest,

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and leave in the afternoon and think, oh, I'm going

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 3>to invest now, or I'm not. It isn't that so

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the fact it's before the budget is not relevant.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 3>But the government with a lot of effort of put

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 3>together a large group of very senior investment people from

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 3>all over the world. I'm assuming so because these are

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the people that were there last year. They were the

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>top people from banks, from multinationals, from sovereign wealth funds,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. And it's a big show piece for the country.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 3>So don't criticize them for the timing at all. I'm

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>sure it will be a success because these things have

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the right kind of people in the room. But it's

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 3>not a question of yes or no, because a lot

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 3>of it just helps create the environment that we need,

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and I do feel an announcement on that day will

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 3>be very important towards investment.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 4>What is the environment that you know global investors need? So,

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 4>is it again on paper cutting out the red tape

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 4>so that if a blackstoner of black Rock wants to

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 4>put two million pounds on where they can do it

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 4>in twenty four hours, or is it actually just making

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 4>sure that the new government, then a lot of people

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 4>are still getting to know, are really pro business.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, the answer is both. That's a classic politicians answer

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 3>isn't it. But very briefly, the former I found in

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 3>the and we interviewed about two hundred companies, sovereign wealth funds,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 3>pension funds, et cetera. And the course of review, and

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 3>if I just go through what the obstacles were, and

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 3>then we can decide whether investments some it's going to help.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 3>First of all, lack of consistency in policy investors, be

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 3>their sovereign wealth funds or indeed companies, they want stability

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 3>of policy and a very reason to believe that a

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 3>new government, hopefully there for four or five years, irrespect

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 3>to what parts of the art, will bring some stability.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>But beyond that, we've got a series of obstacles which

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.199
<v Speaker 3>were first of all money. There were pots and challenges

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>and funds all over the place. Companies get very frustrated

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>by this. What they really want to know is if

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the government's partnering up with me in any way, this

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 3>is what we need, You've done all the due diligence,

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 3>have either got it or I haven't. Then there's a

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>whole series of other obstacles, such as connections to the grid,

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 3>planning skills. There's a lot of things like visas, etc.

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 3>So by having a new organization which has been rumored

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 3>to be called invest UK and what it would be called,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't really matter. Bringing together all of the different

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 3>groups in government that do this into one unit I

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>think would help a lot, providing it has the power

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and the power of the Prime Minister to make sure

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 3>that the whoever runs this as Investment Minister and the

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 3>OFIB behind it has real clout to give an offer

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 3>to a company saying yes, here's a site we've found

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 3>with planning permission for you. It will be connected to

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 3>the grid. If you want visas, you'll get them within

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>fourteen days because you're investing so much money. And we're

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 3>going to actually have a skills academy near you because

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>we know you'll need thousands of new engineers or whatever

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 3>it is.

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Richard, this doesn't sound revolutionary. I mean it's just common sense.

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a revolutionary person. Well, thank you very much.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 3>It is common sense. I think the Investment Summit itself

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 3>is it's a different matter. You know, that is a

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 3>great summit, and it's just a good opportuittunity for the

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 3>government to say, actually we accepted the Harrington Review. The

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 3>previous government did it wasn't fully implemented because there was

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 3>a general election. So to give you an example, Jeremy

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Hunt convened a Government Investment Committee, which is all the

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>main sectors of states. The first meeting had to be

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 3>canceled because the election was called. I mean, but I

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 3>hope they will say, yes, we accepted in opposition the review.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 3>We're now formally accepting it, and here's our plans and

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 3>that for example, we're going to have a greatly enhanced

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Office for Investment, which will have instead of reactive powers,

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>that is, someone comes to us with a possible investment

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and we scurry around, We're going to spread through our

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 3>trade commissioners all over the world. We're going to identify

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 3>what sectors we want to entice people and companies to

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>come here, what we're going to do to help them

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 3>and sort out all of these obstacles for them. Other

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>countries do, Other countries do.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 4>But so what the UK is very good at, is

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 4>it at least meeting number ten is very good at

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 4>meeting with a lot of these chief executives that want

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 4>to invest. I would say people are still trying to

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 4>get to know this government. They don't really one hundred

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 4>percent know what they stand for.

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 2>In this long wait, in what we hear and what

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.479
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking to. Karen Hepca from Bloomboth Radiation's interviewing investors'

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>private eputy companies. Everyone is really nervous.

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot of talk before the election, Rachel

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 2>reospend a lot of time in the city saying we

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>are pro business. Now there's been this long period for

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the budget, reading headlines about changes to capital gains, carried interest.

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 2>What was this week was about a potential exit tax

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to leave. All of this stuff is

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 2>creating a lot of uncertainty in nerves and people saying

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>do we really want to invest in Britain? So the

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Coman seemed to be creating that uncertainty rather than dealing

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>with it.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Aren't. Well, yes, you're right, and the investment summit is

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 3>a good, very good opportunity that have the right people

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 3>in the room and the right people listening externally to

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>say very clear and I'm sure in the ChIL A's speech,

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 3>not that I've seen it, but I'm sure she'll be

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 3>reassuring companies and perspective investors precisely to get over those

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 3>hurdles and it's time that from the investment point of view,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the government controlled the narrative instead of allowing all these

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 3>rumors to come out. Having said that, you know, investors

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 3>are nervous. Generally, the world's in a difficult position. I'm

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 3>sure other countries. It's not that other countries are brilliant.

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, if I if I had five quid for

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 3>everyone that told me that they had Macron's mobile on

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 3>speed dial because he'd given it to them at some investment, yeah,

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Actually I'm a little bit disappointed.

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 3>But the truth is, I'm being sarcastic about President Macron,

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>but I'm sure he networks very well, but it's the

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 3>delivery that matters. Delivery sounds boring all this organizational stuff,

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 3>but what has happened in the past, We've had it

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>very good investment ministers. Take Dominic Johnson, who had the

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 3>job for the last government, who's a very talented salesman.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 3>That was his professional life as well. They raise expectations

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 3>by doing a really good pitch, but the actual delivery

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 3>behind it was disappointed, disappointing, and that's why the government's

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 3>really trying to get to grips with this.

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean you can't be all things to all people.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 4>So what kind of investors would you want to attract?

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Is it sovereign wealth fund? Is it for private public partnerships?

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 4>Is it infrastructure?

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 4>What is this? What is the industrial plan for this country?

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, the government, I hope, will also be announcing that

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the third, so one string, is the new National Wealth Fund,

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>The second is reorganizing the investment part of government, and

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the third is Industrial strategy. And I believe the government

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 3>will be announcing the chairman of the Industrial Strategy Council,

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 3>something which Greg Clark and I set up under Andy Haldane.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it was in twenty sixteen. Unfortunately, for some reason,

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Boris decided to abandon it. But I'm sure they will

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 3>bring this back. They're pledged to do it. And what

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 3>that will do because it's people think oh industrial, that

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 3>means it's sort of banging pots and pans and factories,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.479
<v Speaker 3>But it's a business investment strategy. It's saying, look, we

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>are we can't do everything exactly is the point you made,

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 3>because you know we're too small, don't have the money.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 3>But what we can do is identify as a strategy

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 3>where we think we've got a competitive advantage. For example,

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 3>it might be in in I don't know, wing manufacturer

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 3>for aircraft. We good at that. What do we need

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 3>to do to attract other companies in that field, suppliers

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 3>for the supply chain and everything else. So it sets

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 3>out a strategy for where we can succeed and with

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>what resources we have got, what we're going to put

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 3>into it. And then the machinery, which I hope will

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 3>be the beefed up Office for Investment, which I hope

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>will be announced, then provides the implementation of that. So

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I think I think the industrial strategy or government investment strategy,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter what it's called, is very important.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just in general, I'm sensing a lot of

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>timism here that we are going to make progress with

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 2>this government on a lot of the things that you

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>put in your report that you've recommended, and a sense

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 2>of continuity on the business environment, and that is, you know,

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that's odds with some of some of the nerves that

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 2>we're hearing around the city, like what does the company

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 2>need to do next week to really put to rest

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>all of those concerns.

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Growth is the big thing for the government. It's the

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 3>only way for the government to be able to invest

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 3>spend the kind of money they want on public services.

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 3>No secret there. They can't put up taxes much because

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.719
<v Speaker 3>they're very high. It's got to be growth and a

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 3>combination of Jonathan Reynold's the Business Secretary and Rachel Reaves

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the chance too. I've got a lot of time for

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 3>both of them. Makes me optimistic, but they have to

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 3>reset the agenda and just a press release say are great,

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 3>we want growth, etc. Investors are sophisticated people.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, they overdid the doom mungering a bit, didn't they.

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 2>They did I've crushed a bit of confidence or yeah.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn't approve of that, but it's exactly what the

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 3>coalition did in twenty ten. It's blaming everything on your predecessor,

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 3>isn't it like that? But the reality is now people

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.719
<v Speaker 3>are looking for more than just the superficial messaging. And

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 3>if there are detailed plans for the Wealth Fund, for

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 3>an industrial strategy, and for reorganizing the whole investment area,

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 3>then I think investors will really come back into this country.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Richard, what about pensions? What would you do with pensions

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 4>and pension reforms? I mean, you know, there's an issue

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 4>that not enough investors, retail investors, but even pensions take

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 4>enough risk.

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 3>You know. I think what Jeremy Hunt started was a

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 3>good thing in the mansion House compact. But in the end,

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the only way pension funds are going to invest here

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 3>more of their money is by having tax breaks on

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 3>investing in UK companies. And I think that's quite a

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 3>legitimate tool for countries to do. Other countries do it.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>There's slightly more carrot than stick in a way, is it.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, you can try the stick, but in the end

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>they look at the numbers and if there's a big

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 3>advantage for them for investing in UK companies, they won't

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 3>do it out of philanthropy or charity because they've got

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.919
<v Speaker 3>the fiduciary duty to their beneficiaries that people that have

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 3>the pensions. So I would strongly incent them to do that.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 3>But I also think I again I have a bit

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 3>of a plug for myself. But when I was Pensions Minister,

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 3>we did the auto enrollment scheme, which is bringing more

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 3>money in and I think if they increase the amount

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 3>that employers have to put into that and the employees

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>have to put into that, that will have a lot

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 3>more funds. But they do need more incentive to get

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 3>them to invest in the UK.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Talking about the climate, though again broadly, I mean the

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>bond market is starting to twitch a little bit about

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 2>some of the messaging from the government. We've seen the

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 2>spreads for UK debt widening over Europe, interest rates creeping up.

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 2>That has all sorts of consequences. Of of course, we've been

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 2>here before when they were talks about big fiscal expansion

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 2>under list trust. I don't think anyone's predicting that sort

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 2>of crush again. But do you think we should be

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit nervous or that the markets are starting

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 2>to take note of things like the suggestion that Reeves

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>will change the accounting rules so that she can borrow

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 2>a lot more money.

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it may well frighten Rachel Reeves off from

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 3>doing some more of the more radical.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Thing fifty six billion because of fears.

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Of what happened with quality quality. And I'm sure she

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:20.200
<v Speaker 3>and her advisors we're doing everything they can to calm

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the markets. But the reality is that you know, a

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 3>lot of stuff like investment in infrastructure is excluded. You know,

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 3>it's treated as capital expensure, but a lot of things aren't.

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 3>For example, housing, which is very important part of growth.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Money to housing associations is treated as basically it's a

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 3>current expenditure. The asset side of it's not taken into

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 3>consideration in public sector financing. So I don't think changing those.

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Rules that sensible to change.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I don't why didn't she see that?

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Do it when he was chancellor or.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Next time is here. You'll have to ask him.

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 4>I have no idea, and that's a promise. We will

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 4>definitely ask him.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>You should. I don't know the answer to that question, seriously,

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 3>but this has been mooted as part of the government's

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 3>housing strategy, and I don't I can't believe that will

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 3>spook the markets because really, quite clearly real estate is

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 3>an asset. So if it's sensible like that, if it's

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 3>just an excuse for more public expenditure, then it would

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 3>spook the markets experts of it. But you've seen it

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 3>in front of it, the infrastructure investment for us that

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 3>would have your support, says that's a good use of

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 3>changing the count was giving you some headroom borrow more

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 3>investing infrastructure. The more that public accounting rules are like

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>corporate accounting rules, where an asset is an asset. A

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 3>liability is a liability, and they're not all on the

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 3>P and L. To me, not an accountant, I was

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 3>in business for thirty years. However, it's a very sensible

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 3>thing to do.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 4>What about the PFI, I mean, for those listening, this

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 4>is a private finance initiatives which are these basically long

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 4>term contracts.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 3>They are, and I'm sure the government is looking on

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>ways to bring them back a new modern version of it.

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Of course, like so many things in politics, in the end,

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the media, the populist media, brought down the last loot

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 3>of PFIs because it picked out things where light bulbs

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 3>had to be paid for for thirty years at ten

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 3>times the price on Amazon. But I'm sure there'll be

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 3>a big adjustment. But the reality of doing off balance

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 3>sheet accounting and bringing in private funds, I don't know

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>why anyone could think there's a better way, and to me,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>that is the ideal way to expand the infrastructure in

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 3>the country. The tweaking and the rules of course have

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to be worked out in detail, and that's really beyond

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 3>my scope to do so.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's got to be appealing to the private

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:35.479
<v Speaker 2>sector as well. Hasn't that mean, if you look at

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 2>like the Thameswater situation, investors are very cautious about somehow

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>parting into that that mess, I suppose you can call it.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Does Britain have the right conditions to set these public

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 2>private partships up.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 3>As long as they learn from their mistakes. I mean,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, the whole Thames Water thing came about because

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 3>of an ill thought out phony privatization in the past,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 3>where I think Investment Bank has probably amboozled ministers and

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 3>civil servants into doing stuff they didn't quite understand. If

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 3>anyone's listening to this that was involved in that, it's

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 3>not personal. That's what I'd have done if I was

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 3>on millions of pounds worth of bonuses.

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 4>You would have done that.

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 3>I would if I was the head of Gold and

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 3>Sachs or JP Morgan or something. But I wasn't, so

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 3>don't worry about that. But I'm sure a modern version

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 3>of a way of working out partnerships quite seriously, just

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 3>as the industrial strategy, the sector deals wed with aerospace,

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:34.479
<v Speaker 3>automotives etc. Have brought in a lot of investment. You know,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not an option. Some people on the right wing

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>of the Conservative Party think that it's if you just

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 3>reduced taxes, that's enough. Government shouldn't get involved in in help.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 3>But the world is not like that. We have to

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:51.199
<v Speaker 3>have partnerships been government business and quite what the mechanism

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 3>is has to be worked out.

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 4>Richard, thank you so much for joining us.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Great pleasure, anytime.

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Love That was great, awesome, Thanks for listening to this

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>week's In the City from Bloomberg. This episode was hosted

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 2>by me, David Merritt, Francin Laqua, and Allegra Stratton. It

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 2>was produced by Somersadi, with production support and sound design

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 2>by Moses Adam Brendan Francis Nenham is our executive producer

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and Saide Bauman is Head of Podcasts. Special thanks to

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Richard Harrington and Karen Hepka, and please do subscribe, rate,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>and review wherever you listen to podcasts.