WEBVTT - Are Bank Jobs at Risk From Technology?

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Pimp Fox.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>There was a story that caught my eye yesterday about

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>expectations for technology and robots to come in and throughout

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all the humans. Speak from Pandit, who ran City Group

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 1>during the financial crisis, said that technological developments could result

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>in a thirty percent decline of banking jobs in the

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>next five years. That is soon, and that is a lot.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That is thousands and thousands of people. So here to

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>give us some context, perspective and perhaps uh an alternative

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>view is Kevin McPartland, who is a principal market structure

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and technology analysts with Greenwich Associates, which is based in Connecticut. Um, Kevin,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>so what's your take on this? I would love to

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>get your sort of in the ground observation. Does this

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>seem realistic? Sure? Yeah, I'm gonna I think I'm gonna

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>side with Jamie Diamond on this one. This isn't about

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a loss of jobs, but really a change in jobs.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, we saw this, I think

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in the first dot com bubble back in thousand, when

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you electronic trading was really starting to take over and

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the trading desk makeup was starting to change. It wasn't

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that you were losing jobs. It was that you were

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>taking what maybe before we're business school traders and replacing

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>them with you know, computer science PhD s. Now. Obviously,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>technology and the markets have evolved quite a bit since then, UM,

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're in I think we're going through

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a similar transition where it's not just also in this

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>time around, it's not just about the skill set of

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the people in those jobs, but where those jobs are.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Some of those jobs maybe that we're at banks, the

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>banks that are looking to increasingly outsource UM, you know,

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>pieces of their technology infrastructure, UM too, you know, sometimes

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>large firms that often UM startups as well. That we're

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>just going to see some jobs shift around, right, more

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>so than seeing these jobs just you know, disappear into

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>thin air and have the robots take them. Kevin, let's

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>let's focus if we can, on retail banking for for

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just a minute. I mean, is that the area that

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see the biggest job losses? I mean,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I really think it's across the board. There's no question

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the industry is being disrupted. Um, you know, everything from

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you call for an issue on your

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>credit card and you're talking to an automated voice. Um,

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but right down to the institutional trading desk, right where

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, less traders covering more clients, and they're

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>able to do that because they have you know, more

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated technology in front of them that allows them to

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>service those customers. And those customers also have more self

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>service technology than they did. So I really do think

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>this spans the gamut from you know, retail all the

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>way through to the institutional markets. So when you talk

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>about the disruption that's already happening, what do you see

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>as the biggest technological development that will result in a

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>mass shift in banking jobs over the next five years?

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I I so, I think it's a back end phenomenon

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that we don't really see, right, It's not the There's

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cool stuff that's going on that's on

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the screens, that's on your phone. But our ability to

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>process data and analyze data, just the compute power that's available. Um.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's a whole host of technologies that have made

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that possible. That's what we didn't have five or ten

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It's so so much compute power. Right. The

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, with Apple's announced me yesterday that

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they can do um, that amazing face scanning and within

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a chip that's in your phone. UM. To think about

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that on on an institutional scale, with an Amazon or

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a Microsoft or Google data center. UM, there's just so

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>much that computers can do with that power. UM that

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't available or affordable five or ten years ago.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's just talk about you're saying the shift in jobs.

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk about that back end stuff, I

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>think about Bank of New York, Melon, I think of

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>some of these you know, classic processing focused firms that

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>are big, have a lot of people. Are they going

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to go bankrupt? No? No, I think they they'll you know,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>their business model and they're the economics of the business

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>will have to change as they you know, continue to uh.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>If we if we call it outsource more and more

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>functions to computers. UM, they'll be able to then take

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the people that they do have and push them further

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>upstreaming to get their you know, their customers, facing their

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>their their new business, their innovation. They'll be able to

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have people more focused on those UM I guess you

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>would call them like neck up tasks, where the computers

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>can automate more, you know, more of what can be automated.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Which I think that process is going on for arguably

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>for decades. We're just continuing to move down that spectrum more,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>more and more complicated things can be automated. Kevin, I

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>got one question for you, and it's only a word Equifax.

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's you know, there's always going to be uh,

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, where where there's technology, the technology was still

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>developed by humans. There always can be issues and there's

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>always going to be some bad apples in the world.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the industry is resilient and continues to uh,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, continue, So you don't think it's gonna be

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a problem. You don't think it's gonna you know, you

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think some smart banker is going to say, you

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>know what, maybe we've been a little overboard with all

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this technology and maybe we just ought to have people

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>dealing with each other. You know what, it's a it's

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a it's a good point. So there's always going to

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>be a relationship component where people will trust people. Um.

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we've also all become more comfortable with

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>technology over the last ten years. Right, You're you're comfortable

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>putting all of your banking information to paying your bills

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>online and ten years ago you probably weren't, Thanks very much,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin McPartland. He is the principal Market structure and Technology

0:05:49.440 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>at Greenwich Associates. Well, the rebuilding in Texas as well

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as in Florida continues, and here to tell us more

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>about the people that will do a lot of the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding is our own pressant. Gopaul Prashant joins us from

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>our Boston bureau home to Bloomberg one oh six one Boston,

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Newburyport thirteen thirty in Metro West and the South Shore Pressant.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Always a pleasure and maybe just to start off by

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>describing this industry which really sort of favors mom and

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>pop outfits, uh that are really expected to make a

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>decent amount of money because there's a lot of clean

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up to go around. Well, it's it's kind of an

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>industry that's sort of floorat of the radar. I don't

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think people even realized it was an industry. UM. But

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have uh, you have various sizes of companies.

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, the largest company in the space is a

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>company called belfour out of Michigan. And and they do

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this reconstruction work around the globe. And I know they

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>they've they're expecting record revenues this year at one point

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>seven billions. So it's a it's a pretty large company.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Um And and then you have a mid sized players

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like the one I wrote about, UM, a company called

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Cavalry Construction. Uh. You know, the name is pretty appropriate.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>They they mark they kind of ride into areas where

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they're hurricanes and other storms around the South and rebuild

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>homes and businesses. Um and and then you have sort

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of smaller players. Many of them are sort of shady.

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So it could be people who just show up your

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>door with a pickup truck after a storm. Uh. And

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, in some cases they might steal from you

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>or or uh take a down payment and then leave.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So not all of them are like that, of course,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but there's they're they're various kinds of these companies. So

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>how expensive is it bresciant to rebuild your home after

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten flooded. And what's the process of, say a

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Michigan based company, of going down to Houston, getting enough

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>workers and flooding the zone, getting in there and uh

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and reconstructing things quickly. Well, okay, so let me take

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>these two things. So in terms of the cost um

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it varies, so that the cavalry construction charges six to

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars a square foot for the first step of

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the process, which is to um, you know, pull out

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the soggy wood and dry wall and um uh and

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and and everything else in the house, rip it all out,

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>bring in fans into human fires, treat for mold um.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So that so for a three thousand square foot house,

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that alone would cost you about twenty four thou dollars um.

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>And then to reconstruct a house of that size it

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>would be about hift um for But you know, of

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>course they're doing you know, houses up to twenty million,

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and those larger and more expensive houses are going to

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>get much more expensive finish is and that will be

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>very costly. And so that's one part of it. And

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the US about the company's the company from Michigan. So

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>how do they go go about this day. I think

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>they have even people that they sent to Texas. You know,

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>they they have employees UM and so they sent I

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think at least that many there, and they have I

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>think they're to start with in Florida. I think they

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to have uh fiveing or and forty, doubling

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the size of their existing force in Florida. They have

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>people all over the country in the world, so there

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are already people in place, and they bringing additional people.

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>For Sean, maybe you could speak about the the the

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>additional people that might not be available because of either

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>immigration laws or immigration fears, or just the disposition of

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. Yeah, that's a that's a tough issue because

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>we we've had a kind of a labor shortage and

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>construction for quite some time now, and uh so this

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>is just sort of exact surbating that in places like

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>UH Florida and Texas, UH and and Texas. UM. You know,

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these companies, including the ones reconstructing houses

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and also home builders UH and others who need construction

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>workers are are struggling to find people. And that's it's

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>getting worse because of uh, sort of the crackdown on

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>undocumented workers. Many of them are sort of uh, you know,

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in hiding. Uh. What I've heard is in some cases,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>if you have a family, or say a husband and

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>wife and kids, um, one of them on one of

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the parents will stop working and stay at home with

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the kids just in case the other, you know, the

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>other one is uh is deported. So someone's home with

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the kids. So there's a lot of a lot of fear. Um.

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Texas in particular, there there's a bill in place that

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>uh scaring people um uh immigration bill. So so there's uh,

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of reasons why this could the the uh,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the shortage could really slow down the reconstruction, and it

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>will also potentially make it more who pays for this. Uh.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 1>So in the case of flooding, it's pretty much we

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have a we have National flood insurance, and so it's

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>those premiums um and I think they're they're gonna have

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to they're subsizing that with taxpayers uh and UM. So

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>there's that, and then you have homeowners dipping into their pockets.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the bulk of it in Texas because

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the Houston area, for example, only fourteen

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>percent of people have flood insurance of homeowners, so the

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bulk of these victims probably also do not have flood insurance,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to have to figure something out. Shan.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Then there's also the whole interest ructure and economy that

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to be put in place in order to support

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the workers once they arrive at the places where they're

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do all this reconstruction. Yeah, you can if

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, it's a it's a pretty uh

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>difficult situation because it's there's a housing shortage. So a

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the homes, you know, tens of thousands of apartments,

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the exact number of a hundred and

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.599
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand houses or something like that were damaged and

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in Texas as a result of the storm. So there's

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a shortage of housing that just got a lot worse. Uh.

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And then you bring in all these people to kind

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>of reconstruct, and they need a place to live. Uh.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So you can imagine that houses that were not flooded

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>or properties that were not flooded, those those uh, it's

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a lot more expensive to live there. So

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is gonna be an ongoing issue. I

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta say, whoever got into this business is a genius,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sure that they will only get busier, uh,

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's only going to get more lucrative. Or any

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>of the real big property companies getting in on this.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, I haven't heard about it yet. UM, I

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised. Uh. You know, it's a pretty It's

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>still there's some big players, but there aren't that many.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>This company, bell for UH just keeps buying up smaller players,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there were some regional ones that they've

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>purchased and they're you know, so they're not that many

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>very large companies, right. Preshanko Paul, thank you so much

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Really a fabulous story and really interesting

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious to see how many people actually shell

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>out for for full renovations and making sure it's all okay.

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Praushanko Poul. He covers real estate for US. He is

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>based in Boston, UH and he is a Bloomberg News

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>reporter on Lisa Brown Waits along with Pim Fox. Yesterday,

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan chief executive officer Jamie Diamond spoke at an

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>investor conference in New York. He said that bitcoin bitcoin

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>won't end well. It's a quote fraud and quote worse

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>than tulip bulbs. Talking about the uh most well known

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>example of a bubble in financial markets to discuss, I

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Leonel Laurant. He's a columnist covering

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>finance and markets for Bloomberg goad Fly based in London. Leonella,

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you wrote a column saying that perhaps Jamie Diamond is

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>onto something and the bitcoin very much won't end well

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and will end up kind of blowing up. Can you

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>explain your argument here? Yes, I think that even though

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Diamond's words may have got everybody excited and keen to

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>point out how wrong and maybe even you know, outdated,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>his view is. I think his point is basically that

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a market mania like tulips, and that ultimately

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this is going to eat itself and collapse on it

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>so and before any regulator gets involved. And my view

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and I look at bitcoin but also other sort of

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>hyped up millennial alternative asset classes like marijuana stocks as well,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and I just think that the amount of supply that's

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>coming in and excitement around it maybe doesn't quite match

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the demand that we see on the ground. And I

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>think that is reason enough to at least be skeptical

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>about this idea that you can just keep growing exponentially. So, Lena,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can you give us a little more example what you

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>mean about supply. I know that you pinpointed the fact

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that even though bitcoin has attracted a lot of investor money,

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually use it to buy that much more

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in stores or common places of of buying stuff. So

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is that what you're talking about or is it something else? So?

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something else for me. There's a there's

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of issues in terms of supply. I mean,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>first of all, there are new coins being created all

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the time. Uh the I think there's something like eight

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred cryptocurrencies you can track now on on coin cap

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and um, what's what's happening? There is essentially more and

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>more new increasingly, Uh, you know, volatile and potentially risky

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>currencies are being created. Bitcoin itself recently split into effectively

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with a new currency called bitcoin Cash that was supposed

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to improve upon the original. I mean that that alone

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>has been enough to actually have investors questioning just how

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>unique and valuable the If you just look at the technology,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>pind it, how unique and valuable it is I mean,

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>if you have hundreds of this type of currency and

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't really pinpoint any increase in consumer adoption, right

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>because analysts will tell you that since there's been a

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>huge boom in trading bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, but maybe

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>not at all an increase in using it on the ground,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that's enough for people to think, well, if there's a

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's a heck of a lot of supply and

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of actual on the ground adoption, isn't

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that a disconnect? In times of the investment thesis? Leonel,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to just play Devil's advocate and separate these

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>two issues for just a moment. Let's start with bitcoin,

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, there are new stocks that come onto

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the market all the time. Some of them are traded

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>on exchanges that we know about, some of them are

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>traded on exchanges that you don't want to know about.

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>New bonds are created all the time, new asset classes,

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>new investment instruments are created all the time. And you

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>only have to ask someone who bought a commercial mortgage

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>backed security what it's like to buy something that's new

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have a ready market. We understand that, but

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't this a challenge to the way that banks operate,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And doesn't it make sense that Jamie Diamond would say this,

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So you use a couple of interesting points. Do see

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea that new coins and they call themselves initial

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>coin offerings, I think in a nodes to initial price offerings, right,

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the people who come up with these new

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>coins want to be seen as new companies and I

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>p s in their own right. Um, I honestly see

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this as much more speculative. I mean, if you look

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at the prospectus of an i P O, if you

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the attempts to actually make some claim to

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>maximize shareholder value for a for a for a stock,

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see that happening on on the on

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the tokens, on on the I c O s. Hold

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on a second, because there's a difference between some of

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the new cryptocurrencies that are coming out through initial coin

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>offerings and Bitcoin. For one, there actually is a critical

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>mass with Bitcoin, and there is an established following and

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>miners and everything else. So it's not quite the same

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>as an i c O tied to a company that

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is a startup that no one's heard of. So I

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>guess I have to wonder, you know, is that you

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>know there will be a winner from the cryptocurrency boom,

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and there could very well be one cryptocurrency that gets

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>adopted and becomes the thing, and I think that that

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>could be the bet really with bitcoin now, I think

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>we're maybe delving too much into the technology itself and

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>whether it's and whether it serves a purpose and the price.

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the main reason why we are talking about

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this today is that it is now trading around four

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars and slightly below, and at the start of

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the year it was one thousand dollars. I think that

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>if this was just a question of saying, do you

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of bitcoin, do you like the code

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>behind it? Do you see a community behind it? That's

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>one thing the main reason why people are betting on it,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>speculating on it, playing it. I mean, I'm sorry. I

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's got to be the fact that that the

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>price has gone up so much again some of like

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a fift increase in transaction volumes, but very little increase

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in consumer adoption on the ground. To me, that spells speculation,

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't spell the kind of quote unquote good

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>speculation where you think that something is going to be

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>worth something for a fundamental reason. And to your other point,

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>excuse me about about the bagging industry and whether Jamie

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Diamond has a vested interest. Well, okay, maybe, but I

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>also feel like I think people people know that. I mean,

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>there are there are plenty of bankers out there who

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>might change their mind, who might even say, well, um,

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was very dismissive of it a few

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Now I'm not really going to take a view. Um,

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, I think it's totally okay, and it's good

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to change your mind. I think that the fact that

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't doesn't necessarily mean that this is just because

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>he's he feels it's a threat to backs. I mean,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we've got to leave it there. A line on Lauren,

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much our Bloomberg gad Fly columns. Great column.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Check it out on Bloomberg dot com. By one get

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one free. Yes, this applies to the iPhone eight and

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>eight plus, among other phones from eight T and T

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>now A T and T hasn't said whether the deal

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>will be extended to Apple's most expensive phone ever, that's

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the nearly one thousand dollars I Phone ten. Here to

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>tell us more is Shira Ovid are Bloomberg gad Fly

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>columnists knowing all things technology and Apple? Shira, have you

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>already set aside a little fun to purchase your new

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>iPhone ten? I have not, I will confess, although I

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>did walk by the Fifth Avenue Apple store this morning

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and there were a couple of dudes and lawn chairs

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>on the sidewalk. Maybe they were just hanging out on

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the sidewalk, or maybe they were already starting a line

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>for the new phones. Can I just before we get

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>into any real substance, iPhone X is really iPhone ten? Well,

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean yes, doesn't that kind of why? Why the

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>naming conventions are a little bit confusing now? Right? So

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the UM properly, the non fancy new iPhones should be

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>called the seven s, but they called them eight, and

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>then the iPhone ten. It's the letter X, but they

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>pronounced it ten. Romanumer. It's the tant anniversary edition of

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone. UM. Apple is gonna have a hard time

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>convincing people to call it the iPhone ten rather than

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone X, And just to annoy them, I'm going

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to call it the iPhone X. Okay, Well, that's got

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is there's more free publicity for Apple, because of course

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't get enough. Yeah, right, exactly, you can end

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>up talking about them. We'll talk about what's inside the phone,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what what can you expect. Let's say, before we get

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to the the iPhone ten, let's talk about the iPhone

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 1>eight in the eight plus. What is so great about

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>those phones that they bother to bring them out as

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>new editions. Well, look, i mean the Apple does what

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it does every year, which is it It upgrades the

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>current edition of the phone with more features and functions.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So the processor is faster, the battery life is longer.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>They have a glass back now, which some people like

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for aesthetic and other reasons. They'll be able to charge

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>wirelessly through these magnetic chargers, which again some people like.

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Um So you know, there there's upgrades to them, although

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they are certainly more modest upgrades than the higher priced

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>UM iPhone X as I'm calling it. Well, the post

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>phone reveal is is proving to be somewhat of a

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>hang over. The shares are down a little more than

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>one percent, and I'm wondering how much this is just uh,

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the excitement just coming down. I mean,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>literally there was so much enthusiasm and the shares have

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>risen so much, and how much is this a bit

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of skepticism about this transformation that's going on from the

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>phone becoming the primary point of technology, skipping over the PC,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>skipping over the laptop, uh, and how well this will

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be adopted. So there's a couple of things happening in

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the stock price. You're right that the share price. Apple

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>share price has gone up significantly this year forty percent

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>plus before this week, and a lot of that is

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on on anticipation that these new phone models will kind

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of unleash this new sales cycle and kind of really

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>spike Apples revenor growth to a level it hasn't been

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of a few years. UM. The other

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>issue is that the iPhone tan iPhone X model is

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>coming out quite late. Um, it's not going to go

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>on sale officially until November three, which is pretty unusually

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>late for a new iPhone model, in an indication that

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a very limited supply of these phones. They're

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to make, they have expensive, complicated components, uh, and

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's gonna push some sales into later quarters. I

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think that was reflected in the share price. But to

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>your broader point about the iPhone, Look, these smartphones are

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the center of people's digital lives in many countries around

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the world, and in places like China and Africa. You're

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about a generation that sort of skipped over the

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>personal computer as the center of people's work and home

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>digital lives, and now the smartphone has become that. So

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean a thousand dollars for something that people spend

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>hours on every day. You know, you start to amortize

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the cost over the amount of time you spend. These

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>look less like luxury items and more like must have. Sure.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I noticed was that if you

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>were to be able, I know it comes available. I

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>guess the next month on pre order. This is for

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone ten. If you're looking for those iPods AirPods,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I beg your pardon the air pods right the the

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>wireless your phones? Yeah? Um, thank you. Uh, they're not

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>They're not included in the box. You don't get that.

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You don't get the fast charger. Um. You do get

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the lightning cable, but you don't get a USBC. Um.

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>What what is Apple thinking? Why don't they put all

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the latest stuff into their latest, you know, anniversary phones.

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to. They don't have to. Well they

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>do have, um, they do include headphones with the new iPhones.

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>They're just not the wireless heads right your pods right

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>there yours? Um, but yes they don't have to. I mean, look,

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple's not dumb. They want you to buy all of

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>their all of their things. And as someone who has

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>been to the Apple store and gritted my teeth to

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>pay eighty dollars for a new laptop charger, I mean,

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>these people are not morons. Right. There's getting high margins

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on these accessory sales, and there's no reason for them

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to include that with your already thousand dollar iPhone. It

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is an amazing experience to go to an Apple store

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and see a line extending down the center of the

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.719
<v Speaker 1>store with people with like thousand dollar items in their

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>hands buying them like groceries. I mean, it is just

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 1>really truly a remarkable marketing feat that they have accomplished. Um,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Shara Ovida, thank you so much and keep on keeping

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>on with that iPhone X. I'll look to you to

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>be the rebel. Shara Ovida is a Bloomberg Gadfly columnist

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>focusing on all things technology and my fellow skeptic. I

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>love talking with Shia always. Thanks for listening to the

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. H