WEBVTT - What Colors Are Impossible?

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Brainstuff, a production of iHeartRadio, Hey, brain Stuff,

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Laura vogelbaumb here. Even at full function, our eyes don't

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>provide us with a complete picture of the world around us.

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of things we can't see under normal circumstances,

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like ultraviolet wavelengths or impossible colors like stiggy and blue.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Sticky and blue if you're unfamiliar, is what's called a

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>chimerical color. It's an after image. Specifically, it's the color

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you perceive when you stare at a bright yellow circle,

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>say for several seconds, and then look at a black square,

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>you'll see an after image of a deep blue circle,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a blue that's just as dark as the black against

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the black square. The color is named after the underworld's

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>river sticks. Of course, a blue that's as dark as

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>black is impossible, but our weird brains nevertheless perceive it

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>if it helps. There's actually no such thing as blue

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, or red or green or fusia. These

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>are just words we have for particular sensory experiences. Color

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>exists purely in our minds. A banana, for example, is

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>not inherently yellow. To prove it is, stumble to your

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>kitchen in the middle of the night and hold a

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>banana in front of your face. What color is it then?

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a muddy grayish black, probably definitely not bright yellow.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's because colors are not emitted from most objects.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>They are reflected. A banana is yellow because when visible

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>light hits it, the wavelengths that we call yellow are

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>what bounce back. We've talked about light and color before.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>A white light from the sun or a normal light

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>bulb is composed of wavelengths spanning the entire visible spectrum.

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You know your basic ROYGBIV, going from the longest wavelengths

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to the shortest. That's red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo,

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and violet. But when white light shines on a banana peel,

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>something frankly incredible happens. There's a natural pigment in the

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>peel called xanthophyl that's chemically programmed to absorb certain wavelengths

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of light and reflect others. The dominant wavelength reflected by

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>xanthophyl is yellow, but the yellow of that banana still

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist as such. It only starts to exist when

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the reflected light from that peel is detected by millions

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of color sensing cells in your retinas called cones. Most

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>humans have three types of cone cells, referred to as red, green,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and blue cones, or more accurately as long, medium, and

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>short cones, because each are more sensitive to wavelengths of

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>light in those ranges. The cones send a multitude of

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>electrical impulses to the brain that data is processed. Each

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:06.079
<v Speaker 1>cone can process one hundred or more different shades of color,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>giving your average human a range of a million to

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>ten million perceivable colors. Some evolutionary biologists think that this

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>trichromatic color vision evolved in primates to help us spot

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>colorful berries amongst foliage. But we know that other animals

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>perceive color differently because they evolved to have different numbers

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>or types of cones. Dogs, for example, have just two

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>types of cones, blue and yellow. They don't really perceive

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>reds and greens. Most birds have four types of cones, red, green, blue,

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and ultraviolet, meaning that they can see colors we can't.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Honeybees can see into the infrared part of the spectrum.

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Now ultraviolet and infrared light exist, we know they do.

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>We can observe them in other ways, and we know

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that what we call yellow light exists. It's the part

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of the electromagnetic spectrum with wavelengths around five hundred and

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy two five hundred and eighty nanometers or thereabouts. But

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>other colors that we perceive technically don't exist, like sticky

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and blue, or think about magenta. Magenta is what we

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>see when our brains process a combination of red and

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>blue light. But red and blue are on opposite ends

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of the visible spectrum. There is no wavelength for magenta.

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side of the coin, people with red

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>green color deficiency might not be able to cite the

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>difference between red and green apples. For them and for

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the best dog in your life, those colors don't exist.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>The moral of this color story is this, without our

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>visual system and without our brains, no color really exists.

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>It's all in the mind of the ball, which is

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>enough to make you say dude, And it leads to

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating question. Are there colors within the visible spectrum

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>that our cones and brains can't see? The so called

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>impossible colors or forbidden colors break the biological rules of perception.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get more into impossible colors, but first

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get into a quick break for a

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>word from our sponsors, and we're back. Thank you sponsors. Okay,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this, let's start by digging deeper into

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the science of color perception. Each of your eyes contains

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>roughly six million cones concentrated in the center of the retina.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>These cones come in those three different varieties types that

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>pick up on short, medium, or long wavelengths of visible light.

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>When a cone receives a strong sign in its wavelength zone,

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it sends electrical impulses to the brain. The brain's jobs

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>to combine the millions of electrical signals from each cone

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to recreate a composite image of the color that you're

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at. The brain, of course, is not a computer,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>but rather has a complex lump of highly specialized cells

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>called visual cortex that's responsible for processing the electrical signals

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>from the cones. We're still learning how these cells work

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and work together and with other regions of the brain

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to process input from the eyes. But basically the color

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>related cells are called opponent neurons, and they traditionally have

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>been separated into two basic types, red green opponent neurons

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and blue yellow opponent neurons. They're called opponents because they

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>function in a binary way. The red green opponent neuron

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>can signal either green or red, but not both simultaneou,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and the blue yellow opponent neuron can signal either blue

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>or yellow. I feel obligated to say here that recent

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>research has indicated that this explanation is actually a culturally

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>convenient oversimplification of what seems to be a three ish

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>step brain process that more precisely involves lavender lime opponent

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>neurons and salmon teele opponent neurons of five varying opponentcies

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that can combine to red versus green, and blue versus yellow.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But since I'm not a neuroscientist, oh, let's stick with

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the convenient oversimplification for today. Okay, So, opponent neurons how

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they basically work is this. When you look at a

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 1>pure yellow image, the yellow portion of the blue yellow

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>opponent neuron is excited and the blue portion is inhibited.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Switch to a pure blue image, and the blue portion

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of the opponent neuron is excited while the yellow is inhibited.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And now imagine trying to see an image that's equally

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>blue and yellow at the same time. The opponent neurons

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>can't be both excited and inhibited simultaneously. That's why bluish

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>yellow is an impossible color. The same is true for

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>reddish green. You might be saying, I know what yellow

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and blue look like together. It's green and red and

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>green make a kind of muddy brown. But that's the

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>result of mixing two colors together, not of a single

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>pigment that's equally blue yellow or red green. All the

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>way back in eighteen oh one, long before scientists knew

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about cones and neurons, English physician Thomas Young theorized that

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the human eye has three types of color receptors, blue, green,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and red. Young's trichromatic color theory was proven correctsh in

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties, when cone cells, named for their shape,

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>were to discovered to have special sensitivity to about those wavelengths.

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>The opponent color theory of perception has been around since

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen seventies, when German physiologist Edvald Herring first postulated

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>that our vision was ruled by opponent colors across from

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>each other on the color wheel, with the corset being

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>red versus green and blue versus yellow. This theory is

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>simple and intuitive enough that it's still repeated in physiology textbooks,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but in the past five to ten years, neural imaging

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>has shown that what's going on in our brains is

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>more complicated. Still, it's functional enough to roll with for today.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So taken together, trichromatic theory and opponent theory argue that

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it is impossible for the human eye and mind to

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>perceive certain colors described as red, green, or blue yellow. However,

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>as Luigi wisely told us in the nineteen ninety three

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 1>Super Mario Brothers Life live action film, nothing's impossible, improbable, unlikely,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>but never impossible. In that spirit, in the early nineteen eighties,

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>visual scientists hewet Crane and Thomas Piantinada designed an experiment

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>with the goal of tricking the brain into seeing impossible colors.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>In their experiment, subjects were instructed to stare at an

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>image of a vertical red stripe adjacent to a vertical

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>green stripe. The subject's heads were stabilized with a chin rest,

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and their eye movements were tracked by a camera. With

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>every tiny twitch of a subject's eyes, the redd and

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>green image was automatically adjusted so that the subject's gaze

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>remained fixed on the opposing colors. It turned out that

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>if people stared at adjacent opposing colors for long enough,

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the border between them would dissolve and new impossible colors

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>would emerge. The resulting colors were so new that subjects

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>had a hard time describing them. By stabilizing the image

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to track eye movements, the researchers theorized that different areas

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of the eye were being continuously bathed in different wavelengths

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of light, causing some opponent neurons to get excited and

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>others to be inhibited at the same time. But after

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>several other researchers failed to achieve the same dramatic results,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this experiment was dismissed as a parlor trick. Subjects, instead

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of seeing brand new hues of greenish red or bluish yellow,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>usually described the blended color as mud brown. Others would

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>see fields of green with pixelated red dots scattered across it.

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Impossible colors became a scientific joke. But then in twenty ten,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>biophysicists Vincent Bellick and Brian Zoe published results that they

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>believed explained why Crane and Piontinita had succeeded where others

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>had failed. They identified the combination of eye tracking and

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>luminance or brightness as being key to tricking the brain

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>into seeing impossible colors. They ran their own experiments in

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>which subjects were again strapped to a chin rest and

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>monitored by the latest retinal tracking technology, With the images

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>stabilized to these subject's eye movements. The researchers played with

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the luminance of the two opposing color stripes. When there

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>was a difference in brightness, the subject's experienced to the

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>pixelated colors reported in earlier experiments. But when the two

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>colors were exactly the same brightness, then six out of

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>seven observers saw impossible colors. Even better, two of them

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>could see the new colors in their minds for hours

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>after the experiment was over. While few of us have

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a retinal stabilizer in the basement, there are some simpler

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>exercises that can temporarily trick the brain into seeing the forbidden.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Direct is to stare at an image of two opposing

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>color squares side by side, each with a white plus

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>sign in the middle. You can find examples of this online.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>What you do is relax and cross your eyes until

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the two plus signs merge into one. I tried this

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the blue, yellow one was weird, and the red green

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one made me laughably uncomfortable. Sort of makes you wonder

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>what else is out there that we can't see yet.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is based on the article how impossible colors

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like Stiggy and Blue work on how stuffworks dot Com,

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>written by Dave Ruse. Brain Stuff is production of iHeartRadio

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in partnership with how stuffworks dot Com and is produced

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>by Tyler Klang. Four more podcasts from my heart Radio.

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows