WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week - September 1st, 2023

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 2>And we may not have an overall recession, we're having

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 2>a rolling recession. To kind of roll looks pretty strongly.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It is when it comes to jobs, the financial stories

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that shape our world.

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Three major regional bank failures send shockwaves through the banking system.

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>We're all trying to figure out what to make of

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>generative AI.

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Through the eyes of the most influential voices.

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome down, Doctor Paul Krugman, Ryan moynihan, Bank of America,

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 2>deebro Lair of the Paulson Institute, well then Hubbard of

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the Columbia Business School.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:33.560
<v Speaker 2>It is all about the regulation for China, for banks,

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>for drugs, and certainly for crypto. This is Bloomberg Wall

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Street Week. I'm David Weston. This week special contributor Larry

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Summers of Harvard on the jobs numbers out on the

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>eve of Labor Day.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 3>I still think the road to a soft landing is

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 3>a very difficult one, but this was a step down

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>that road.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 2>Chipwar author Chris Miller, on which chips matter in our

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>race with China.

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Holding China back has taken on more prominence in recent.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Years and former cars are Steve Rattner of will A

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Advisors on what's at stake in the Joya W's battle

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 2>with automakers, including a potential strike of one hundred and

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand workers.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 5>This is certainly the most the highest likely good of

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 5>the strike in a number of years, and probably more

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 5>than fifty percent.

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 6>Global.

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street spent this last week of summer focused on regulation,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 2>at least for those not getting a few remaining days

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>at the beach. Regulation was certainly high on the agenda

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>for Commerce Secretary Romando on her China visit this week,

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 2>telling authorities there that regulatory uncertainty is driving investment away.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 7>I hear about, you know, unfairness, arbitrary decisions, a lack

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 7>of due process, raids on their businesses that don't want

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 7>to explain, tens of millions of dollars in fines for

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 7>reasons that aren't clear. And as long as that is

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 7>happening on the ground, that makes it very risky for

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 7>you as businesses to do business.

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 8>Yes.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Back in Washington, President Biden proudly unveiled new regulations to

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 2>start negotiations with drug companies over prices for a list

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 2>of popular pharmaceuticals.

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 8>In January of twenty twenty six, the new prices will

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 8>go into effect. We're not stopping there. Next year, medicaires

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 8>will select more drugs for negotiations, so more America get

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 8>more savors on life saving medications they need deserve.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 2>While across town, the fdiic imposed new demands on regional

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>banks holding long term debt, even though the banks themselves

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>don't see the need.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 9>I see this as a real debate between the banking

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 9>industry and the regulators. And the regulators are rightfully on

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 9>course to ensure a resilient banking system when you look

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 9>at the history of the last fifty years. But the

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 9>bank industry is correct and say look at the last

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 9>ten years and low losses are half at the prior level.

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 2>And a federal appeals court down in Atlanta pushed the

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>SEC a big step closer to approving cryptocurrency ETFs, something

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>companies like a Gray Scale have been pursuing for a

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 2>good long time.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 10>We purposely decided to set up shop in the US,

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 10>make use of existing rules and regulations, and it's our

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 10>intention to continue to do so right enabling investors to

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 10>access this innovative asset class, but in a way that

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 10>feels traditional, familiar, and again within those regulatory constraint to

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 10>say that they're often used to.

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 2>What all, those regulations did not get in the way

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>of the jobs marker, at least not this month, as

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the US added another one hundred and eighty seven thousand jobs.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>The revisions to last month took that number down some

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 2>and unemployment went up from three point five to three

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>point eight percent, but simply because more people were coming

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 2>into the workforce, the markets were entirely sure what to

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>make of the numbers, ending the day a bit mixed,

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 2>but for the week overall it was all good, with

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>the S and P five hundred and up two and

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>a half percent, ending the week at forty five to fifteen.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 2>That's fifteen points above the median number where our Bloomberg

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 2>ls think will end up the year. Well, the NATSUK

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 2>was up three point twenty five percent and the ten

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>year yield lost six basis points to end up just

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>over four point one point seven. To help us make

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>sense of all this, we welcome now Peter Borish. He's

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 2>chairman and CEO of Computer Trading Corporation. Peter thank you

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 2>so much for being on Wall Street week. Welcome.

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 11>So it's pleasure of bulls.

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 2>A lot of bulls about equities right now. You have

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 2>some doubts about it. Why do you have some doubts, Peter, Well,

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 2>when you look at.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 11>The strength of the markets, in particularly the interest rate market,

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 11>and as well as what the FED GDP now came

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 11>out today with growth over five percent, it's hard to

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 11>think that the Fed is going to pause right here.

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 11>And in fact, our thinking is that the Fed may raise,

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 11>it may hold on. I don't think it's going to

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 11>raise again the rest of this year, but there's very

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 11>low probability that the Fed cuts between now and election day,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 11>and the yield curve itself, which as we know has

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.679
<v Speaker 11>been inverted, is likely to move back towards its normal state.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 11>And if you think about that, if you have four

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 11>percent nominal growth, then the FED now was over five

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 11>and then you have two percent real interest rates, you

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 11>could see that the ten year, which is at four

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 11>seventeen as you just showed, could easily go towards where

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 11>the FED funds rate is, which is five and a

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 11>half to six percent, by the middle of the next year.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 2>And those higher rates are just about never good for

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>accuracies now, But there are other issues out there as well.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 2>We have a looming possible strike with you, maybe a

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 2>government shutdown. But what are the risks in the fourth

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 2>quarter for the economy?

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 11>Well, if we have a government shutdown and you know

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 11>that Congress comes back in next week, and think about

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 11>all the spending that needs to take place. You had

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 11>the hurricane in Florida, you had the tragedy in Hawaii.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 11>If all of that is shut down, that could really

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 11>significantly slow the economy. But it's temporar, so the FED

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 11>is not likely to do anything or go off course.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 11>That could then be very challenging for equity markets because

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 11>with government spending going down, aggregate demand will be reduced

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 11>in proportion and that will hurt stocks.

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 2>So, Peter, what does that tell you as an investor?

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Where do you run to hide if in fact we

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 2>have some of these risks out there.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 11>Well of the great places to hide, of course, is

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 11>in short term treasuries because they're paying a high yield,

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 11>they're safe. It keeps you out of the whole debate

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 11>of you know, are they going to raise is the

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 11>yield career going to move? And I always say, the

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 11>hardest thing in life is to rebalance a portfolio. And

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 11>if you've had a great run this year, particularly in

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 11>some of the tech names going back and rewaiting your

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 11>portfolio to where your weights should be as an investor

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 11>is something to do. It's always a challenge to do

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 11>that because everybody thinks that it's going to continue to

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.479
<v Speaker 11>go higher. But with volatility goes up, those stocks that

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 11>have gone up the most are also likely to be

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 11>the most volable.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 2>So with volatility, if in fact does go up, Peter,

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>does that mean you want to be as short term

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>as you can across the board, whether it's cash or

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>short term bombs, whether it's something else.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 11>I think you want to go shorter term because that's

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 11>the nature of volatility and uncertainty. And from that cut

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 11>type of perspective, when you look at the breakout of energy,

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 11>when you look at the strength of the dollar, these

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 11>things are all telling you that the US economy is

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 11>far stronger relative to the rest of the world, and

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:48.239
<v Speaker 11>that's going to continue to put pressure on rates, particularly

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 11>on the longer end, and that will likely add to

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 11>stress in the equity market.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Peter. One last one here, China. China's the news just

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 2>about every single day. The economy is not going as

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>well as President you would like it, keep trying to

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.679
<v Speaker 2>do something to show it up. How does that affect

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the United States economy? And for that mare US investors, Well.

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 11>China is kind of exporting deflation. You could see that

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 11>in the relative value of the wand versus the dollar,

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 11>and in markets all marginal demand matters. If China is

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 11>not supplying that in their case being the largest or

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 11>the second largest economy, depending on how you measure it,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 11>that will then put stress on prices, and that in

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 11>itself is a little deflationary, which is ironic right. Higher

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 11>energy prices where demand is an elastic, causes some substitution effect.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 11>A stronger dollar is also deflationary, and that too could

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 11>be a stress point for profit margins for companies as

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 11>we go into fourth quarter earnings in October.

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 2>Peter, really great to have you please come back for

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 2>wall streaming. That's Peter Borsh of computer trading. And as

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 2>we get into this Labor Day weekend in the United States,

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>we turned to Lewis Rockeiser remind us about what this

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 2>weekend looked like back in nineteen eighty nine, a time

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 2>like now when the dollar was strong, but when consumer

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 2>debt was on the way down rather than on the

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 2>way up.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 12>Indeed, this Labor Day week found all the financial markets

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 12>laboring a bit themselves, while bonds encouraged by a husky dollar,

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 12>and the late report on lower consumer debt finished with

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 12>a gain. Stocks went down for the first time in

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 12>ten weeks.

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>This is Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. We're joined

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 2>once again by our very special contributor here in Wall

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Street Week. He is Larry Summers of Harvard. So, Larry,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 2>you have been concerned about inflation for some time now,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>and you suggested that maybe we need to see a

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>little looser labor market if we're going to get our

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 2>arms right. Given the jobs numbers that came out on Friday,

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 2>are you feeling a little more sanguine about inflation today?

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I think these were good numbers. The economy still looks strong,

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 3>with reasonably robust employment growth slightly greater than expected. Hours

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 3>per week ticked up, which is another favorable indicator. Yes,

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the unemployment rate went up but it was driven by

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the fact that more people want to be working and

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 3>have been pulled into the labor force, and that all

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 3>happened with wage growth slightly less than was expected. So

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a mistake to make definite judgments based

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 3>on one number. But this is certainly a favorable set

0:10:54.960 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 3>of numbers, which should please policymakers both on Constitutional you

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>and on Pennsylvania Avenue. I still think the road to

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>a soft landing is a very difficult one, but this

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 3>was a step down down that road.

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 2>So let me pick up an analogy, and you've used

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 2>on this program before about trying to land the plane.

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Given these numbers, is at least it look like that

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we're on the right glide path. Not saying we'll succeed,

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 2>but we're at least on the right path.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 3>These numbers are consistent with very optimistic scenarios. I don't

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 3>think they determine that they're in a very optimistic scenario.

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>But there are all sorts of things that could have

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 3>been alarm bells in today's numbers that didn't ring. And

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that alarm bell that didn't ring, like Sherlock Holmes proverbial

0:11:54.240 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 3>dog that didn't bark, is a meaningful that should be recognized,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, David, as I look to the wage picture, though,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 3>I do see and I think it's very hard for

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 3>anybody to evaluate the significance of this. A degree of

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 3>labor restiveness in our country, potential strike activity that.

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 13>We have not seen in a very long time.

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 3>The Hollywood writers are getting attention, joined by the actors.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 9>There was a.

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Quite strong wage settlement that was probably not consistent with

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 3>two percent inflation at UPS a few weeks ago. And

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 3>of course the big thing out there is the talks

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>between the automobile companies and the auto workers. That's traditionally

0:12:56.080 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 3>been a major template in the economy. The union is

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 3>very ambitious in what it is asking for, and there's

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of a lot of workers left behind

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 3>and the companies have done well. So one can understand

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 3>the union being very ambitious. But how that works through,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 3>both in terms of potential disruption to the economy if

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 3>there's a strike and in terms of inflation pressures is

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be something people need to watch over the

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 3>next month.

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn to the international fraud if we could. We

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 2>were all focused on j Pol and Jackson Hole last week,

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 2>but there were it was the meeting of the Bricks,

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>so called Bricks, where they added another six countries. So

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 2>this organization, originally it wasn't an organization at all. It

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>was sort of something developed by Goldman Sachs for investment pursoes.

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 2>Now it takes on a life of its own. It's

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a wide range of economies. They've added all the way

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 2>from Argentina on the one hand, to sid Arabia and another.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Is this a potential economic threat or challenge at least

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>to the United States?

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>I think right now it's a symptom of our failure.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a symptom of the sin of bipartisan economic nationalism

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 3>in our country. We are not able to sustain support

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 3>for trade agreements. We have great difficulties sustaining support for

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 3>contribution to international organizations. We have lagged in our boldness

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>in putting forth proposals to address global challenges. And so

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 3>it's natural that the FORUA where we're seen as leaders

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>start to recede, and there starts to be a demand

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 3>for other forums. And so I think if we want

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 3>to address this, we are going to have to move

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 3>away from the economic nationalism that was so central to

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 3>President Trump, that was really the essence of what he said,

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 3>don't cooperate with other nations, just compete with other nations.

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 3>But that, frankly, has been maintained in the last while,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 3>with our emphasis on various kinds of import restrictions, our

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 3>emphasis on By America policies, our reluctance to introduce trade.

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Larry, thank you so very much for being back

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>with us, as Larry Summers of Harvard our special contributor

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>here on Wall Street Week. Commerce Secretary Romando spent part

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 2>of the week in Beijing trying to build a foundation

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 2>for future US China relations, an important part of which

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll center on semiconductors, to say us through what is

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>at stake and what the realistic options may be. We're

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>welcome now, Associate Professor of International History at tuft's Fletcher School,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Chris Miller. Doctor Miller is the author of Chip War,

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 2>The Fight for the World's most Critical Technology. So, Professor,

0:15:58.240 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us. I've learned what I

0:15:59.920 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>know know about chips mainly from your book, so thank

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you very much for that. Let me start with the

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 2>most basic question. If we talk about a race between

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the United States and China right now in high tech,

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 2>particularly involving these semiconductor these chips. Who's ahead and how far?

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, today there's an international coalition of the US, Japan,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 4>the Netherlands, and Taiwan, all of whom produce technologies that

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 4>are necessary for advanced chip making. The most advanced chips

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 4>themselves are actually manufactured largely in Taiwan, which is multiple

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 4>generations ahead, almost a decade ahead of the capabilities that

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 4>the leading Chinese firms have.

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>When we talk about chips, one of the things that

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>secuar Armando emphasized, and we've heard it before from the

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 2>adminstration emphasizes this week was we want to separate national

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 2>security concerns from basic commercial concerns in our competition with China.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that doable when we're talking about these very very

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 2>high end, cutting edge chips.

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, there are certain types of chips that are only

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.479
<v Speaker 4>used in civilian or old to use the military applications.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 4>But when you're looking at the chips that are used

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 4>for training AI systems, they're used in both. The exact

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 4>same type of chip that can train a car to

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 4>drive autonomously can also be used to train a drone

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 4>to fly autonomously. There's just no technological way of differentiating.

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 4>And that's why the US controls on the transfer of

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 4>AI chips to China are going to have both a

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 4>military but also a civilian and commercial impact.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 2>So far, we've been talking about export restrictions, other restrictions

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>to keep China from catching up. What about attempts to

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 2>really build up the capability of the United States and

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 2>other Western countries. And let's talk specifically about the Chips

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and Science Act, because that was built of something that

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 2>we needed to do so that we had our own

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 2>home grown How realistic is that we can, through the

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Chips and Science Act and other activities, build up our

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>capacity here to match, for example, what we're seeing with

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 2>TSMC over in Taiwan.

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, the US is never going to be independent in

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 4>semiconductors because the supply chain is just too and related

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 4>with Taiwan, with Japan, with Europe. But the goal of

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 4>the Chips and Science Act is to put more money

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 4>behind equalizing the cost of producing chips in the US

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 4>relative to other places in Asia.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Chris, thank you so much for being this really

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 2>appreciated best. Professor Chris Miller of the Fletcher School at

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Tufts coming up as the US heads into labor day.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 2>The auto industry heads toward a standoff in two weeks

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 2>with the three major automakers. We go over the bidding

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and the likelihood of a major strike. With the man

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 2>who ran President Obama's successful effort to remake the auto industry,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Rattner of Willet.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 5>Advisors, Hi'm a great believer in unions. While when you

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 5>start talking about work goals, then you start cutting into productivity.

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 2>That's next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:18:53.520 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 2>The most pro union president in American history, that's what

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden proudly calls himself.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 8>I made a commitment I'd be the most pro union

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 8>president of American history. I'm keeping that problem.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 2>And this summer he's getting the chance to prove it,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>as a series of labor disputes have hit the country

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>in rapid sequence, starting with the threatened strike of UPS

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 2>workers avoided when management agreed to a very large pay raise.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 12>First year.

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Analysts eight ya Hearts out UPS drivers could make one

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 5>hundred and seventy thousand dollars a year in annual paying

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 5>benefits thanks to a new five year contrent.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Added to the ongoing strike by Hollywood writers who were

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>followed out the door by the actors, with the prospect

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>of it going well into the ball.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 6>All of our members know that they are fighting for

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 6>something that is existential for them. This is about the

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 6>future of being able to be an actor in this industry.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 6>It's about making sure AI doesn't take away their jobs.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And now we have what may be the biggest one

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 2>of all is the un AW is threatened to strike

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 2>forward and perhaps others unless its demands are met. With

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a deadline looming not long after Labor Day.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 14>We have a potentially massive auto strike on the horizon.

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 14>You have the head of the United Autoworkers Union is

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 14>now threatening to strike against gm Ford and Stilantis, the

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 14>Big Three, unless workers get a forty six percent raise,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 14>a return to traditional pensions, and a thirty two hour

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 14>work week.

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 2>Liz Schuler, the head of the afavel Cio, says there

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 2>are larger issues at stake for the workers.

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 15>It's about workers feeling taken for granted, having sacrificed through

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 15>a pandemic, workers feeling disrespected knowing that they have sacrificed

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 15>for these companies, and yet the in an era of

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 15>record profits, that these companies can't find just a little

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 15>bit more to take care of the people who are

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 15>making them successful.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 2>But employers like UPS warned that accommodating all the union

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 2>demands can only hurt their performance.

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 5>Looking at expense in the US sect, the union wage

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 5>rate increases, including in our new labor agreements in the

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 5>first year, are higher than we originally planned.

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 2>However, it all comes out. The one thing that's for

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 2>sure is that taking the uaw's one hundred and fifty

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 2>thousand employees out of the jobs market would pose a

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>major problem for the US economy.

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>We have our auto sector coming back strong.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 2>We have deep investments in this transition to electric vehicles,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 2>so we want to continue those trends going to take

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 2>us through where we are on the UAW negotiations. Welcome

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 2>now someone who knows the US auto industry like few others.

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Ratner headed President Obama's Task Force on the Auto

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 2>industry in two thousand and nine, leading to its restructuring,

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 2>and many would say it's salvation. He is chairman and

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Will and Advisors, which invests the personal and

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 2>philanthropic assets of Michael Bloomberg, who of course is our

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 2>founder and majority shareolder Steve, thanks so much for being

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>back with us. You do know these things so terribly well.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Give us your sense for a distance. I understand you

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 2>in the negotiations, But what is separating the two sides

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in UW on the one hand and the big three

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 2>automakers on the other.

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 5>I would say, roughly, there's something the size of the

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 5>Pacific coach. This is really a scary situation. We've had many,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 5>many labor negotiations between the autoworkers and the UAW of

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 5>over the decades. We've had some strikes, unfortunately, but some

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 5>of them probably were inevitable or even perhaps necessary. This

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:27.719
<v Speaker 5>situation is really scary for a number of reasons. First,

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 5>you have a very very activist, a new UAW leader

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 5>who I do not know personally, but who has said,

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 5>you know, very very inflammatory things. Didn't do the traditional

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 5>GM or autoworker initial handshake, which you know is just symbolic.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't have to do that, but has based it.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 5>But more importantly, has put out a set of demands publicly,

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 5>which is unusual in itself, that are an utter laundry

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 5>lists from everything from a thirty two hour week to

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 5>a four hour week, to more holidays, more job restrictions,

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 5>to restoration, to find benefitsion, pension pensions, just a long,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 5>long list of stuff that is just beyond the pale

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 5>in terms of any auto company's stability to meet it.

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, one of the things that Sean Fain and I

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 2>guess his name of the head of the UAW has

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 2>said is they need to make up for some lost time.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 2>There has been a lot of inflation, as we know,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 2>they were operating under a labor contract that really didn't

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>allow that inflation to take into account. Can you separate

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 2>at what is truly making up for lost time catching

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 2>up with where they should be, maybe advancing a bit

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 2>as opponent to opposed to fundamentally changing the business model

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 2>for the auto companies.

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that when you talk about asking for

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 5>pay increases, and they've asked for very large pay increases

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 5>as well, that sort of falls into the loss making

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 5>up for lost time category, although I would acknowledge that,

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 5>or I would note that they did get fairly substantial

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 5>profit sharing bonuses as solving the auto companies being more profitable,

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 5>they have had wage increases and so on. So it's

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 5>not like they took massive pay cuts in recent years

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 5>during this inflationary period. But the bigger thing of concern

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 5>to me is everything around the actual pay level, and

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 5>it includes It includes things like that the number of

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 5>hours work, more overtime, kicks in, how many holidays you get,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 5>how many personal days off you get, things like that.

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 5>But here's David, the thing that is the scariest of

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 5>all to me, which is work roles. I'm a great

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 5>believer in unions, O a great believer in the right

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 5>and the ability of unions to bargains for higher compensation

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 5>and for certain kinds of other benefits, healthcare, things like

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 5>that that we all know are important now for workers

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 5>to have. Well, when you start talking about work roles,

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 5>then you start cutting into productivity, and then we start

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 5>going down a silpery slope We've been down before with

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 5>bad effects. When we got involved with the auto sector

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.479
<v Speaker 5>at a general mode. In particular, I remember there were

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 5>something like three hundred job classifications of general motives. If

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 5>you were an electrician, you couldn't touch a pie a

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 5>piece of plumbing. If you were a truck guy, you

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 5>couldn't you couldn't do something else. And so on and

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 5>so forth, and it makes for a highly inefficient production

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 5>process and works. So that get true ultimately of everybody,

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 5>and the unions have come back now and asked for

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 5>the reinstitution of some, happily not all of the kinds

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 5>of work rules that we had before two thousand and nine,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 5>and that kind of rolling back of this sort of

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 5>wholesale rolling back of the clock is a very dangerous

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 5>place to be. But let me say one other thing. You,

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 5>in terms of all of these wage settlements and negotiations

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 5>see going on, whether it's UPS, whether it's in the

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 5>auto industry, whether it's whatever, you have to really separate

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 5>in a way. I know the sudden sound necessarily completely fair,

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 5>but you have to separate the so called trainable sectors

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 5>from the untradeable, non trading sectors like services. Paying the

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 5>UPS workers more absolutely contributes to inflation. It affects every

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 5>American ships something by UPS and obviously benefits the UPS workers.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Doing something similar in a tradable sector by which we

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 5>general need goods that can be traded across borders, you

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 5>do run into international competitive misions if we and this

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 5>was part of what ailed the industry back in two

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 5>thousand and nine. If you were the yin and the

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 5>yang of this is that you raise wages too much,

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 5>then production will flow somewhere else, most notably in Mexico,

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 5>which has had a disproportionate share of production increases in

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 5>the last fifteen years. Or it will flow from the north,

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 5>from the unionized black plants in the north to the

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 5>non umuonized plants in the South that are operated by

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 5>a lot of the flying companies that are coming here.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 5>And that does save jobs in America, but they're much

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 5>less renative jobs, and they're located in places in the

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 5>country that perhaps don't even need the jobs as much.

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 5>So there's a lot of complexity to what is a

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 5>fair and appropriate level of wages once you start getting

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 5>into these tradeable sectors.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 2>How big apartment is that As the auto industry looks,

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>both workers and employers look forward to a very different

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 2>world with electric vehicles.

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's definitely a complicating factor. Electric car plants electric

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 5>cars in general require many few man hours that of

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 5>labor to make because I'm sure you know a fewer

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 5>movie quirts and so forth, and so in the long run,

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 5>it does raise the question of the leveling extent of

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 5>auto jobs that we're going to need in this country

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 5>anywhere else for that matter. It's not all gonna be

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 5>done by robots, don't get me wrong, But is there

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 5>going to be some cap with some lessening of the

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 5>number of jobs we need? And then you have these

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 5>new and I think you're speaking particularly a Ford which

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 5>has these strength venture battery plans. Should they be unionized

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 5>or not be unionized? And again I would come back

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 5>to the same sort of Transted trade offs that if

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 5>you unionize them, if you impose the same kinds of restrictions, requirements,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 5>and so forth on those plants that we do on

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 5>traditional assembly plants, then a lot of those jobs may

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 5>not end up coming here. Whatever number of jobs there

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 5>are in the electric battery area, some of them will

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 5>not come here because it'll just become too expensive to

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 5>make the stuff here. So there's going to be compromising

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 5>on both sides. We have to find happy media.

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Steve, always so great to have

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 2>you on Wall Street Week. That's Steve Ratner of Willett

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Advisors coming up. It's not just the auto industry that's

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 2>going through labor strife this summer. We'll talk with the

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 2>dean of the Cornell School of Industrial and Labor Relations,

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Alexander Colvin. Take us through the apparent shift and why

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it is happening.

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 13>Now, technology and changes and how it affects work, it

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 13>being one of the real central drivers of change.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 2>That's next time Wall Street Week on Bloomberg.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. As we

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 2>approach Labor Day in the United States, it's not just

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>the car companies contending with labor unrest. We've also dodged

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>the strike bullet with UPS and we're well into a

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 2>prolonged walkout by directors and actors in Hollywood. For a

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 2>broader perspective on labor management relations, we welcome now Alexander Colvin.

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>He's dean at the Cornell School of the Industrial and

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Labor Relations. So, Dean, thank you so much for being

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 2>with us. You do give us a broader perspective. Is

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>it just our imagination or is there a shift going

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 2>on right now and the relative balance between labor and management.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 13>I think there really is a shift going on, and

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 13>it's a function of labor having a bit more power

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 13>right now. The labor market's tight, and so that always

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 13>gives labor unions more power. But I also think there's

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 13>something within the labor movement. There's been more organizing, more

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 13>activism towards strikes, and so all these things are combining

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 13>to give labor some more power than it's had for

0:29:59.320 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 13>a while.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 2>So you pointed out that the labor market has been tight,

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 2>we are starting to get a little bit of indication.

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe there's some loosening that jolts numbers. This week, we're

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit looser than expected. As sooner or later,

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the labor mark will adjust itself, I assume, And so

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the question is what will be left, if anything, of

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>this shift at that point, or is this just a

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 2>relatively short cycle.

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 13>We always see the ups and downs the labor market.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 13>There is a cyclicality to it over time, and that

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 13>affects labor's barring power. But I do think there could

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 13>be some lasting effects of this period. Labor's catching up

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 13>after having fallen behind for a period. So I think

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 13>they are looking to use the power they have right

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 13>now to lock in some gains to really catch up

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 13>to where they fell behind for quite a while, particularly

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 13>on issues like wages.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, doctor Cauflin, thank you so much for being this's

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 2>always good to talk to. That's act to our Alexander

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Colvin of the Cornell School of Industrial and Labor Relation. Finally,

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>one more thought. Sports are as necessary to divert the

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 2>mind as the body, so wrote English author and bookseller

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 2>John Dunton in seventeen oh seven. And this summer we've

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 2>had plenty to divert both our minds and our bodies,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 2>even if New York fans haven't had much to cheer

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 2>about when it comes to their baseball teams. This week

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 2>we had the return of gymnastics legend Simone Biles, winning

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a record eighth national title, ten years after she won

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 2>her first at the age of sixteen.

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 13>We're proud of Simone.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it looks she's proven the outest shadow of

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 5>a doubt that she's maybe the top gymnast ever in

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 5>the history of the sport.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And another legend, Lionel Messi, debuted for his Inter Miami

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 2>team and scored a spectacular goal in the eighty ninth minute.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Even if you wouldn't talk about it with reporters after the.

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 12>Match, Honestly, the messy moment has sort of bridged that gap,

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 12>and now soccer is front of mind for the general

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 12>public here in the United States.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>If gymnastics in football, and by the way, are we

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 2>still calling it soccer in the United States. Well, in

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 2>any event, if all that isn't enough, others are trying

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>to add some more exotic fare to our list of diversions,

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>like anaak Jane working on bringing cricket to the wilds

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 2>of Texas.

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 5>We're putting in great infrastructure and getting the top players

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 5>in the world to come here and play.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 2>But not everyone has gotten with the program of helping

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>us find our favorite sports diversions, like President Maduro of Venezuela,

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 2>who picked this summer to go after pickleball because of

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 2>concern it was getting too popular in his very troubled

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 2>country and was taking up too much space. Unfortunately, this summer,

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 2>we've also seen a return of questions about the participation

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>of women at the highest levels of our sports. When

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the head of Spain's national football federation, Luis Rubialis, snatched

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>defeat from the jaws of victory after his country's team

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 2>won the Women's World Cup, and he decided to celebrate

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 2>by placing his hands behind the head of a star player,

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Jennifer Hermoso, and kissing her full on the lips. So

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's only fitting that we end our sports summer

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 2>on two high notes. Over ninety two thousand fans gathered

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 2>to watch a women's volleyball match, a record for any

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>women's sporting event.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 12>Ever, I think the biggest thing is women's sports are

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 12>a big deal.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Here and this week the greats of tennis gathered once

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>again at the US Opened in Flushing, Queens, celebrating on

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>opening night a true sports milestone. Turning to the woman

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 2>who led the charge, tennis legend Billy Jean King, who

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 2>told a crowd that included former First Lady Michelle Obama, quote,

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 2>We're here to celebrate a moment fifty years ago that

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>changed our sports and all sports forever. Equal prize money

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 2>at the US Open. Sometimes sports is much more than

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>just a diversion that does it. For this episode of

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Week, I'm David Weston. This is Bloomberg. See

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 2>you next week.