WEBVTT - May 2025 MLB Futures Forecast (Ep. 699)

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, and welcome into the Betting Pros podcast. It's

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>time to place your bets for the MLB's future markets.

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Seth Wilcock, and today I am joined

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>by some sensational baseball betters to revisit the MLB future odds,

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>including the host of Leading Off and a guy who

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>has a litany of big league players on speed dial,

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Chris Welsh, Akad Welsh Welsh. Thanks for taking time of

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>your busy, important schedule to be here with us today.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 1>How are you.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing great.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 3>You am very busy schedule hanging out with my dear

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.639
<v Speaker 3>friend Jackson Merrill, or last night hanging out with very

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 3>dear friend Clayton Kershaw. Anyone on the backfields becomes a

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 3>very very good friend of mine all around the baseball world.

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>We're glad to talk, hopefully not about those guys, but

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>some good bets.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Also joining us is the top arm in our

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball bullpen, Joe Rico. Joe, Great to see you.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>How are things north of the border as summer approaches?

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for going pretty well, Seth. Great to do with

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 4>this show with you guys. I've been looking forward to it.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Some interesting players are going to be discussing today, I

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 4>get to mention one of my favor a couple of

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 4>my favorite players actually, so I'm not going to.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 5>Keep the people waiting. Let's just dive into it.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, as Joe and Welsh mentioned today's show, it

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>does look like this. We'll revisit the fallowing betting markets,

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>MVP CY young season win totals, to make the playoffs,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>division winners, World series winners, and of course our favorite

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>long shot futures. And before we get going, big shout

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to everyone who's joining us either on the Betting Pros

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel or the audio feed. The easiest way support

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>us is give this video a thumbs up if you

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoy this type of content and subscribe if you're new,

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and also make sure you're checking out the Fantasy Pros

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>MLB YouTube channel. Well, you guys have been busy, to

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>say the least, over there on that channel this year.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Just as the lead, a lot of content out there

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>on the Fantasy Pro side. You can see behind me

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 3>on there, but make sure check out twelve pm Eastern

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Monday through Friday, we are on the live Met and

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Joe piece of PA for leading off where we do

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>do some bets every single day for everybody, and then

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 3>we got lots of other content for the fantasy side.

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>But we got your betting covered and we got it

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 3>right here.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go ahead and jump into the MVP

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>picks in the L. In the NL, you can actually

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>get show hey Otani add a better number plus two

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five then you could preseason. And we also have

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 1>some new challengers in the mix, including Kyle Tucker plus

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.119
<v Speaker 1>four twenty five, Corby and Carrol your guy Welsh plus

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>six fifty and for Neando Tatis Junior plus seven to

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty as the only MVP candidates below ten to one.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>On the AL side of things, the books are saying

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>us all but over right now, with Aaron Judge moving

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>from plus three to ten as a favorite preseason to

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>minus nine hundred after a blazing hot start. Welsh with

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this said, you already had a Bobbywitt Junior ticket in

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>your back pocket. So are you staying in the AL

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>or you're going elsewhere with your MVP value.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna talk about the NL here, though, I will

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 3>say this, if de Penning, what type of better you are?

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 3>If you're going to be like value, If you're looking

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>for what is my best potential value ROI return on investment?

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>The al is ripe for it.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Anything could happen, Judge could pair back, there could be

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 3>an injury, and then all of a sudden, pretty much

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>anybody you get on the ticket is going to start

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 3>probably getting you into a cash out period. So a

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>guy like Bobby Witt, who's the power, has been kind

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>of down, but the batting average is still up. The

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 3>offense is just starting to pick up. For the Royals,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 3>it's probably not a bad time anybody you can get

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 3>more than ten to one, which is the entire al

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 3>makes sense. Where I'm going to go, though, is I

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 3>got to go to show Heyo Tani and I think

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 3>that this is boring. I'm not as much of a like,

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>go and get me the coolest, funnest twelve to one

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 3>type of odds and let's see what happens.

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at this.

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going this is the best odds that we

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>are going to see, and we have seen on show

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Heyo Tani. If he starts pitching, that's going to open

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 3>up the market. It's still the Dodgers. There's a lot

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>of guys competing. But when you're getting close to three

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 3>to one on a show Heyo Tani ticket. I mean,

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>I guess it's closer to two to one either way.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Plus money on Otani, it's got to be a bet.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's an easy one to jump into.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Ten homers, ten stolen bases. He's hitting a most three hundred.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 3>RBIs have been really low this season. That's going to

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>pick up. And just if we're you know, looking at

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 3>the profile of Otani, it's ridiculous. It's top like two

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>percent tel across the league in his hitting metrics, So

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 3>I expect the homers to fly. He's still going to

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>be stealing bases and those RBI numbers are going to

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>come up. And as the Dodgers keep winning games, Bam,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>it's a nice little two to one ticket. If I

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>were playing it a little bit higher, I think the

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>NL is ripe with some fun bets. Okay, A Rico's

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>got a good one. Corbyn Carroll does stand out to me.

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>HOMERSM is sad, Yes, I got Corbyn. Carroll's like right

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>above me in a jersey, So there's a little bit

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 3>of that. But at five and a half to one,

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Corbyn's been putting.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Up an MVP like season.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm not even sure that that's debatable. He's

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 3>changed his swing, He's changed his approach. He no longer

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 3>has some of those bad holes that he had in

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 3>his swing. He's up to two eighty eight. He just

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 3>went through a little bad spell. But the hitting profile

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 3>also looks phenomenal. Ten homers, big homers, stolen bases have

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 3>been light. I think those are going to pick up

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:52.559
<v Speaker 3>Diamondbacks win games.

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 2>He is crucial to that actual piece of being an MVP.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 3>But I'm a little bit worried about the ups and downs.

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 3>But if you want a good price, I think Corbin Carolyn,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 3>what he could do for this Diamondback teams at five

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 3>and a half to one is kind of a fun play.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 3>But Shoe Heyo Tani at a little over two to one.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 3>That is my smash play on MVP betting.

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe, you're going with a different horse in this MVP

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>race for the NL. Who is it?

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Welsh mentioned him, Fernando Tattis junior. Now the line

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 4>that you mentioned, Seth is different than the one that

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 4>I saw. You're better because the one that I saw

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 4>was plus five hundred plus six hundred. But you said

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 4>it was plus seven hundred plus seven to fifty, So

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 4>it might be a better line out there if you

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 4>want to be shopping around the books. But Frando Tattists

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Junior is kind of reminding me of what Ronald Acunya

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Junior did a couple of years ago. You know, there

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 4>had been some doubt with both of them about what

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 4>they're going to look like off of some relatively big injuries,

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 4>and then they're coming in and destroying the world. Now,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 4>not quite to the same level as what Acuna was

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.239
<v Speaker 4>doing a couple of years ago, but through thirty four games,

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Tattis has eight homers, eight steals in a three twenty

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 4>one batting average with a career best one to sixty

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 4>four WRC plus. And you've seen kind of some of

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 4>those Acunya type of things. He's striking out last, he's walking,

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 4>or he's still making incredible contact fifty five percent hard

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 4>hit in the sixteen percent barrel rate. He's kind of

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 4>looking like he's on his way to maybe not quite

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 4>forty forty but forty thirty, forty thirty five maybe. And

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 4>I think that considering the odds you're getting, it is

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 4>a worthwhile bet to place is he the most likely

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 4>to win MVP. I think it's gonna be either him,

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Kyle Tucker Otawani. One of those guys is more than

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 4>likely to get it. But I think you're getting the

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 4>longest odds with tatis. That does make it a really

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 4>appealing bet considering he has essentially been doing what the

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 4>other guy's been doing. You're just getting longer odds on him,

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 4>and he's a guy who has the pat agree. We've

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>seen him put up massive seasons in the past, the

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 4>forty two homer season in twenty twenty one, his MVP

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 4>worthy twenty twenty three, The numbers weren't quite there, but

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 4>we've seen this kind of season from him before. It

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 4>does seem like a couple of years remove now from

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 4>all the shoulder problems and the ped worries, that he

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 4>is finally having his true breakout season, and it wouldn't

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.119
<v Speaker 4>surprise me at all to see him take home MVP

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 4>this year.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, SHO, do you have any concern with Tatusa's injury

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>history and that maybe that pops back up this season.

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>That would be maybe the only thing that could possibly

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>deter betters maybe from going away from this five to

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one or plus seven to fifty number whatever, you're getting

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it out there as sure.

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but I would say, like I think all

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 3>these guys have there's some injury works. If Carol's had

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 3>the shoulder injuries, obviously, if Hotani starts pitching again, I

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 3>think there's something that's weird. There a weird thing that's

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 3>happened too, is you know, I'm talking to Tani. I

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 3>give you maybe there's a little bit of Carrol and

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>then you got Tatis. You also have a divisional fight.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 3>The inn A West is really tough. Yes, you could

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 3>have whoever just puts themselves at the top. If the

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 3>if the Padres pushed themselves above the Dodgers somehow for

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>the season, Fernando Tatis is going to be the guy

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>that everyone's staring at. So where you finish in the

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>division could be really important to it. And you know,

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 3>just slightly, we haven't talked about Kyle Tucker. Kyle Tucker

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>is performing at this level as well. He deserves to

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 3>be in it. We're gonna have to watch where the

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Cubs go. The Cubs really a struggling rotation, and if

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>they start to lose some games and lose a little

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 3>bit of traction in that divis to the Brewers, it

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 3>might hold him back. But yeah, I think there's a

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of injury worries across the board. And that's why,

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 3>by the way, I don't get too caught in to like, hey,

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 3>this is like the coolest value. Unfortunately in this betting

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 3>market of MVP, Judge and O'tani are just walking in

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 3>as not just like yes books odds on favorite, but

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 3>like they've already got the advantage. So it's like, if

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 3>they're performing at their level, it's going to take so

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 3>much more for another guy to take it. That's why

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 3>when you're getting plus you know, two to one money

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>on Otani, when you're looking at Judge being like minus

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>a thousand, Yeah, at this point, like it just makes

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot of sense.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>But injury worries.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>You got to play this all in and shop around

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 3>on the books. You said, we already found some cool

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 3>thing about betting pros is you can get all the

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>lines of all the books in one place. You can

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>go in and you can find the right books that

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 3>also might let you pay out a little bit more

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>throughout the season if you do those long odd ones

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and you want to cash out mid season. So shop

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>all your lines over on betting pros for MVP or

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 3>any of the other markets.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 2>We're about to talk about.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Fandal is definitely my favorite place to place future

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>bets because they're always so aggressive in hedging and trying

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to get you cash buying out.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So moving to the cy Young market. In the AL,

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the favorites remained very similar to what we saw preseason.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Reigning Al Cy Young winner Tarique Scuball for the Tigers,

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>He's moved from plus three to fifty down to plus

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>two thirty. Garrett Crochet for the Red Sox, he went

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>from plus five to fifty down to three to one. However,

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>we did see Cole Reagan's injury see him be replaced

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>by the Yankees Max Freed at plus five fifty and

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Astros Hunter Brown also plus five fifty. In

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the NL, your betting favorites are still Pittsburgh's Paul Skien.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>He's moved from three to one down to plus two

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to seventy. Kind of getting shit. I don't want to

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>say shelled lately, but definitely some up and down performances

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>from Skiens, but the Dodgers Yoshi Nobu Yamamito to the Reds,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Green plus four to fifty. These are two other

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>guys who've kind of joined this conversation. Joe, are you

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing any newfound value for who could be the best

0:09:58.920 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>pitcher in baseball?

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm sticking with my guns from the preseason, and I've

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 4>been kind of tied to this player for a while,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 4>and I've been pretty impressed with the early return. So

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm sticking with my guns and going with Jacob de

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Grom here getting at sixteen to one. You know, I

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 4>know there are mixed opinions on Jacob de Gram, but

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 4>what we've seen through seven starts is a two to

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 4>sixty one era, a one zero zero whip. He's got

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 4>a couple of wins already. Things are going well. The

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 4>strikeouts haven't been quite where we'd expect them to be

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 4>for Jacob de Grom. In thirty eight innings he has

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 4>thirty six strikeouts, but those are starting to come along

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit. I've mentioned this on a few different

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 4>vetting pros and Fantasy pro shows that de Gram is

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of learning how to pitch again at a lower velocity.

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 4>Instead of going ninety eight, ninety nine, one hundred, he's

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 4>trying to sit more in the ninety six ninety seven

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 4>range and limit his injury risk, and so far that.

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Is working out.

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Now, I think that is going to continue to work out,

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 4>and as he continues to work at this level, he

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 4>is going to improve. De Gram has been a max

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 4>effort guy for his entire career, and I think that

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 4>adjustment period is why we saw couple of shakier starts

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 4>to begin the season. But now he seems pretty locked in,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 4>and I think we're going to continue to see these

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 4>ratios at this same kind of level. He's going to

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 4>have a mid twes era, maybe that whip dips below one.

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>And I think considering the name value, considering the way

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 4>that people this is not a statistical thing, but I

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 4>think people kind of feel bad for Jacob de Gram

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 4>a little bit that his whole career has kind of

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 4>been his whole career, but the majority of his thirty's

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 4>have kind of been cut out due to injury. If

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 4>he's able to throw one hundred and seventy innings this

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 4>year and give you a two four ERA and a

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 4>one zero zero whip, I think there's gonna be a

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of voters who are going to be partial towards him,

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 4>not just because of that. The numbers will also be great,

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I think, but there will also be part of that

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 4>narrative that you need in these awards. Sometimes of de

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Gram is one of the best pitchers you've ever seen.

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 4>He hasn't been able to stay healthy, but we can

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 4>give him kind of one last hurrah here by sending

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 4>him off with this third SiO.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 3>One thing I want to throw out why you might

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>not want to feel too bad for Jacob deGrom. I

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 3>think of this story my good Fernino Sarahs just told

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 3>I think it was on foul Territory a month or

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 3>so back about when he was a young reporter. He

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 3>went into a locker room to interview Jacob de Gram

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 3>and he said, oh, hey, do you have some time?

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 3>And he's like, nope. And then Jacob de Gram sat

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 3>down in a chair with a bag of chips and

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 3>individually pulled out chips and stared at eno while he

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 3>said he was too busy. So I don't think we

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 3>feel too bad for Jacob d Gram.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, do you also like a long shot

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like a Rico's going or do you like maybe one

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of these heavier favorites.

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so in this smart. I'm still kind of boring.

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna throw that out here for it. You know,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>people want like the big numbers. But I will say this,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 3>if you're in a favorites market, I think it is

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>actually a really cool idea to find something like this.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>So for example, Trek Scuble in the AL, if I

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 3>were betting it, I think that's the play right now. Okay,

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I will say I kind of like Max Freed. Max

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Freed's already got six wins right now. He might end

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 3>up pushing eighteen nineteen wins and that I think he's

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 3>a sneaky one. But that wasn't my point. Jacob de

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Gram Jacob Gram at sixteen to one, betting a nice

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 3>odds on favorite with a good stack and then having

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 3>a sixteen to one if it does bounce like that,

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you're in the right market, you can

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 3>buy out. It's a fun hedge in the cy Young place,

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 3>so same thing in the NL. I'm kind of boring.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm still on schemes. Even those skeens has been relatively

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 3>like underwhelming overall. He's still got a two seven seven era.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 3>That's great, but he has more losses than wins right now.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 3>His K percentage is down. He was thirty three percent

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 3>last year, He's only twenty four percent this year. Cap

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 3>per nine has been down and things are inflated a

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 3>little bit though, because he has got this weird thing

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 3>against the Cardinals. He's given up fifteen earned runs as

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>we are recording this. Seven of those earned runs have

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 3>come against the Saint Louis Cardinals. They just own him,

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know really necessarily what at the end

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>of the day that means, but there's some sometimes you know,

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 3>teams just own a certain player, So if you know

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Zach Allen is doing that with any New York based team.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 3>But what I'm getting at is here, even in the struggles,

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>even though Cardinals have kind of hit him up, CA

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 3>percentage is down a bit, he has a better expected

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>era than actual era right now, and the win should

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 3>start stacking up. And he is still the most electric

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 3>pitcher in baseball, and you're getting like almost three to

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>one odds. So I think that's a really, really good play.

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>But I think another guy that you could take a

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 3>look at if you want to go to a higher market,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>and I think this one is a little misplaced, is

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wheeler. Zach Wheeler's got a three three five VRA

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 3>right now through eight starts, only three wins to one loss,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 3>but as one of the best expected the rays in

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 3>baseball at two three six, So that's a full run

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 3>lower expected batting average on a monster of a team

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>with the Phillies tons of runs support, and he has

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 3>been one of the best pitchers in baseball eleven to one.

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So if I'm going to play that head, if this

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 3>is what you like to do in this pitching market,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I think Skeins is the play. You know, if he

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 3>were if he had five wins and one loss and

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 3>you know the Semira, but with like a ten k

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>per nine, he would be minus like two fifty right now.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 3>I think Chris Sale's really struggling. He's bouncing back, but

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 3>it's going to take a long time for a to

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 3>bounce back. I think this is good value, and I

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>think Zach Wheeler would be a hedge play at eleven

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 3>to one that I would put in for Cy Young.

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Awesome some Pennsylvania based pitchers there for the Welsh in

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cy Young markets. Before we continue, don't forget to

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>try out our Betting Pros Betting Systems tool, which is

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>designed to help you find winning strategies and make smarter bets.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Customize your betting systems by sport, bet type, and timeframe

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to find the best opportunities using real time data and

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>expert analysis, track the performance of different betting systems over time,

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and optimize your bets to increase your chance of success.

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Download the bank Pros app today or go to bangpros

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash systems to elevate your betting strategy and

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>start making smarter bets today. All right, let's go ahead

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and move into the heavier juice markets, like the season

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>win totals or that to make the playoffs. Well, you

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>already have a three to one ticket on the Reds

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs. How are you feeling about that?

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And what's your current favorite value for these markets?

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>How am I feeling about that one?

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm I'm not like loving it because they're like halfway

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>through the division, Cubs are kind of coming back brew

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, listen, they're four back totally in the division.

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 3>They're right there with the Brewers to make the playoffs.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 3>They're still a decent shot if one of those guys

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 3>bounce back. So I would say I'm kind of middling

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>on that. The Cardinals I think are going to taper

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 3>back in Pittsburgh, so I mean like they're they're competitive

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 3>in it. But when looking at this, I don't see

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of tickets for like still to make the playoffs.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 2>But you can.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's there's definitely a few that are still

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 3>out there, but you're not going to find these big,

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>crazy odds unless you want to play like a you know,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>a Pirates or something like that. But one that really

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 3>stood out to me is the Boston Red Sox. I

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 3>think this was over on I want to say this

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.239
<v Speaker 3>might have been on DK, but to make the playoffs.

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 3>They're one of the few plus money plays out there.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Plus one oh five for the Red Sox to make

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. And you know, it's been competitive to a

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 3>degree in the AL I mean the Ale Central, between Detroit, Cleveland,

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 3>and Kansas City, they've all been monsters. They've got better

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 3>records than anybody. By the way, all three of those

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 3>teams have a better record than any team in the

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Ale East right now, which is crazy.

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 2>But here's the deal.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I think you can play this to win the division.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I think it's still three to one for the Red Sox,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 3>but just to make the playoff the Red Sox, it's

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 3>plus money. They are two and a half game back

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>on the Yankees right now. They're up on Tampa. Toronto

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>and Baltimore are both kind of faltering. Tampa I don't

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 3>think can hold to it, and I think Boston just

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 3>hasn't even gotten going yet. I mean, Garrett Crochet is

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 3>still kind of finding his legs. There's getting a few

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 3>guys healthy. I mean, they've got to get Bueller back

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 3>gi Alito. I think they're going to be aggressive in

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 3>the trade market, and I like them to still win

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 3>the division pinning whatever price you can get, but to

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 3>make the playoffs at plus money, I am not going

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 3>to count out the Red Sox that have got a

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of great arms in the bullpen.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>They're led by Garrett Crochet, They've.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Got a bevy of minor league talent that they can

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 3>use in trade assets, and they've got an offense that's

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>centered around Alex Bregman, who is like, you know.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>It's pseudo MVP.

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:55.959
<v Speaker 3>Like if the Red Sox are playing a little bit

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 3>better and Judge wasn't there, like I think he would

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 3>be an interesting ticket. So I think plus money for

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the Reds and make the playoff right now is a

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 3>really great bet to make in May.

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe, you were riding with the Twins in the preseason

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs at even money. Are you still

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>holding out hope for that to cash or are you

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>looking maybe to potentially hedge elsewhere in the al Central.

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 4>No, I do like that Twins bet, and I'm going

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 4>to talk about it a little bit later on. But

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>the one that I'm going to focus in on right

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 4>now is the Detroit Tigers under ninety one and a

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 4>half wins. This one, for me, I think they're just

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 4>off to an unsustainably hot start. And if I go

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 4>back to last season, I was looking at where they

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 4>were in the standings at the end of August. They

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 4>were a five hundred team and they had a really

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 4>hot September that rode them into the playoffs. And they

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 4>have started off the season incredibly well. But I think

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of overperformers. Spencer Torkelson has a one

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 4>to fifty WRC plus. I like Spencer Torkleson, but that

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 4>number is not going to stick. Havevi Baiez a one

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 4>thirty nine WRC plus one thirty eight for Glaber Torres,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 4>one thirty for Zach McKinstry, one twenty eight for Dylan Dingler.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 4>They're overperformed offensively. This was an eighty six win team

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 4>last year that so far has been one of the

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 4>best teams in baseball, and it just doesn't feel all

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 4>that sustainable. As a team, they've been a top five offense.

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Does anybody think that's going to continue, because I really don't,

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 4>And I think you're seeing this number now set about

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 4>five or six wins above where they were last year.

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're five or six wins better than

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 4>last year. I think they're exactly about where they were.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 4>If you factor in that, there may be a little

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>bit better than they all maybe spread out some of

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 4>those wins throughout the season as opposed to just stockpiling

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 4>them in September like they did last year. But I

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 4>think this is a maybe a five hundred team, maybe

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 4>a slightly above five hundred team. Wow, their bullpen is

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 4>not really that impressive. Yes, Scooble is fantastic, But outside

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 4>of Schooble, I don't really know how much I trust

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the rotation. I like Jack Flaherty, but

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how much I can actually trust him.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Reese Olsen, Jackson, Joe Casey, Maiz. There is some potential

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 4>in the starting rotation, but overall, it really comes back

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 4>to the offense overperforming. Specifically, you see guys like hove

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 4>baias forty percent above league average at this point of

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 4>the season, it tells you how early things still are.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 4>So I think the Tigers under ninety one and a half.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Look for the highest number you can find and take

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 4>the under, usually at about minus one to ten. I

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 4>don't think they're a ninety plus win team.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, do you also see maybe some regression coming for Detroit.

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 2>I think there's some regression in play.

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if I think that they're just like

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 3>a five hundred team, But also if I don't know,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 3>if we're doing this every month, if we come back

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 3>in June, I'm not going to be surprised if they're

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 3>third in this division and Cleveland City have jumped over them.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think I think Kansas City's kind of

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 3>a sleeping sleeping Giants, a little dramatic, like they just

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 3>their offense was just so bad and they're starting to

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 3>click free.

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Jack cagleiwan just give them to the majors.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.239
<v Speaker 3>Maybe make a move or two, but I think their

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 3>rotations solid. They get a great bullpen. I think Kansas

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 3>City's gonna bounce back. Cleveland. You just can never count

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 3>them out and they're going to keep rocking. So I

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 3>won't be surprised if Detroit is third in this division,

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 3>but it's still gonna be relatively tight.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, before we keep it going, I just wanted to

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>remind everyone that Fantasy Pros is now live on Twitch.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Since opening day, Joe Pisapia and Chris Welsh have been

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>here every weekday at twelve pm Eastern Time for leading

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>off your daily dose of all things baseball, from news, notes, bets,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and fantasy advice. It's all in one place. Ask questions,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>get insight, and interact live falls now on Twitch dot tv,

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 1>slash Fantasy Pros and never miss a stream. A bigger

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>line of exclusive interactive live content is on the way

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and well, from Luchador mass to Mario Brothers Themes. You

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>guys do a little bit of everything, and you have

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun doing it. So I love every

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>day I get to go in and edit some of

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>these episodes that you guys do and they're just fantastic.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>They're law fun man.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you say it nicely, but we are stupid. Embrace

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 3>stupid when we possibly can try to have some fun

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 3>with baseball. Baseball can be a very mind numbing sports sometime,

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>especially for people here on betting pros, you know that

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 3>are just kind of like wrapping their heads and kind

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 3>of getting around baseball betting. And we try to put

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 3>as much fun into baseball as possible when you know,

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 3>you get way over your head with everything that is MLB.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and overrun leading off too. They do their daily

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>best bets and their home run calls. So if you

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are looking for more MLB betting advice making, make

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>sure you're checking out leading off. Let's go ahead, though,

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to the to win the division odds,

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>where there were some incredibly short odds to begin this

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>season that some look like pretty good bets.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>The Dodgers they're still right around that minus four to

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>ten mark to win the NL West. The Chicago Cubs

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>went from plus one twenty five to win the NL

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Central to now minus two to twenty five. The Yankees

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>they were at plus one sixty to win their division.

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>They're now down to minus one thirty five to win

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the Al East Joe in a market of such juiced odds,

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything a bit longer that might wet

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the whistle of baseball betters.

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, to kind of go back to what I was

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 4>mentioning earlier, what you brought up, the Minnesota Twins.

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Are still very interesting team to me.

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 4>It hasn't been a great start to the season, for sure,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 4>and I think a lot of that does come down

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 4>to their offense underperforming. This is a team that had

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 4>a one oh seven WRC plus as a team last

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 4>year and they're down at ninety five right now, So

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 4>that is something that I don't really expect to continue

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 4>at that pace.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 5>You got some guys who are underperforming.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 4>They just got Royce Lewis back, which I hope you

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 4>never know with Royce Lewis, but I hope he's able

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 4>to actually stay healthy for a while and give them

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 4>some production. But you had Byron Buxton who's been doing

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 4>very well, Carlos care has kind of been underperforming. The

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 4>offense hasn't been all that impressive. But I just come

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 4>back to this pitching more often than not, and especially

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 4>when you got David Festa and Zebbie Matthews still waiting

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 4>to come up. But Ryan Ober Pablo Lopez has been

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 4>fantastic the bullpen. I'm a big fan of their Penn

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 4>Griffin Jacks got off to a bad start, but he

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 4>has kind of turned things around, you know. Joan Duran

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 4>is still doing him doing his things.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 5>But I think it comes down to the weakness of

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 5>the division overall.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 4>Kansas City is, like well said, they're a better team

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 4>than what they have played to so far, but I'm

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 4>not sure exactly how great they're going to be this season.

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 4>The offense, maybe once they get jacked the things will change,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 4>but it hasn't been a great offense. They're pitching is eh,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 4>a little bit iffy, especially with the Cole Reagan's not

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 4>injury like he was heard, he's kind of we're not

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 4>really sure we're exactly on his health status because he

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 4>had a good game the other night. He's kind of

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 4>bounced back and forth. But the White Sox stink. The

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 4>Tigers I think are overperforming. The Guardians I think are okay.

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 4>But this is a winnable division essentially, is what I'm saying.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 4>And I think the Twins are thirteenth or fourteenth in

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 4>terms of team wins above replacement to this point of

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 4>the season, but they have really underperformed in terms of

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.399
<v Speaker 4>the results. So I think you're getting them at plus

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 4>twelve hundred. Again, shop that line around, maybe you'll get

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 4>an even better line. But the key point here is

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 4>it is a very winnable division at plus twelve hundred.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a solid bet to make on a

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Twins team that last year was a very good team

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 4>and just ended up disappointing at the end, but I

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 4>don't expect that to continue this season.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rico doubling down on the Minnesota Twins. I don't

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>hate that twelve to one number at all to win

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the Central What about you, Welsh? Is there a team

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>out there that might still have some value in this

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>market after we're about a month into the season so far.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I mentioned like the Red Sox. You know

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 3>they're decent. You're gonna get good plus money on them

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>to win a division. But I'm not picking them because

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 3>the standout to me is at almost three to one

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the Texas Rangers. The Texas Rangers for the AL West.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 3>The AL West right now is filled up at the

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 3>top with the Seattle Mariners and the Athletics. The Sacramento

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Athletics right now are above them either Texas team. To

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 3>be honest with you, as a play if you wanted

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 3>to go with the Astros. But here's the deal. The

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 3>offense for the Mariners has definitely clicked. I think they're overperforming.

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 3>They're built around there pitching. Kirby's going to be back,

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 3>and Logan Gilbert looks like it's not like too serious,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 3>but it could be about a month. All of that

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 3>to say, for them to be leading the division with

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 3>those type of injuries works really well for them. But

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they're overperforming. I do not believe the Athletics

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 3>in that ballpark and that pitching that they're going to

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 3>hold through. Great story, it's super fun. Win total was

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 3>a great bet for you this year. I think we

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 3>even might have had that on Fantasy Fest when we

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 3>had Derek Cardi. I think that might have been one

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 3>of his bets if I remember the a's on the wins.

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 3>But with the Rangers, this is a this is like

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 3>a favorite. This is a minus money favorite that's out

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 3>there that they have been massively underperforming. For perspective too,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.719
<v Speaker 3>they just went three and seven in their last ten games.

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 3>They're only three and a half games behind in the division.

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Even in those struggles. Wow, you've had Marcus Simeon struggling,

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 3>Jake Berger was sent down. They just brought back Evan Carter,

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 3>and they're dealing with the rotation stuff. They're built around

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Jacob de Grom and Evaldi. They've got to be aggressive

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 3>in the trade market. I want to see them bring

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 3>in someone for the bullpen. Bringing to Ryan Helsley, I

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 3>think that's going to really lock them in. And we're

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 3>just waiting for these bats to start coming alive, because

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 3>from top to bottom it's a killer offense.

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>So to be three and.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>A half games back in the division in May and

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 3>get almost three to one odds, I'm taking it all day.

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I think this is like the most smashing in my

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 3>face play. It doesn't have the great like twelve to

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 3>one odds can buy it down and stuff as time

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 3>goes on. But if you're looking for a straight play

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 3>for a team to win the division, I think the

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Astros are a little bit behind offensively. In general, pitching

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 3>is a hunter. Brown's been amazing, but taking a step back.

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Texas Rangers absolutely jump out to me. At almost three

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 3>to one as a bet to win the division.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Welsh liking Texas. As we approach the dog

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>days of summer, Let's go ahead and move into the

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>World Series odds, which have seen some serious movement in

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>recent weeks at DraftKings, specifically where the Dodgers have gone

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>from plus two ninety down to plus two to fifty,

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the Mets now in the conversation at plus eight fifty,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Yankees have actually grown from plus eight fifty

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>to now nine to one. Welsh, is there any value

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>out there that we're not talking about right now for

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a team to potentially win it all?

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Kind of kind of double down on where I was

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 3>in the preseason and kind of like a Rico was saying,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Dodgers are kind of the play. But if you're looking

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 3>for value, I'm gonna go back to the Boston Red Sox.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Oh.

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, they have been weird. It's been weird to

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 2>start this season.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 3>Crochet is at his like little tiny moments and Walker

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Bueler got hurt in the offense wasn't clicking and then

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 3>obviously they just lost Tristan Costas. That feels like a

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 3>death sentence.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 2>I will say this.

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 3>If they hold on to this hole, we're gonna play

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Abraham Toro and Rome Gonzalez at first base.

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 6>Thing.

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna riot and freak out because.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 3>They have too many good players that are out there

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 3>that you put Devers at first and bring Roman Anthony

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 3>up or make a trade. I think this team is

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 3>too talented. While I think this division is very gettable.

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 3>The Yankees have been playing up, but they have suffered

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 3>some major injuries, had some offensive woes. Max Fried has

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 3>held them up, but there are some warts on that team.

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Where the Boston Red Sox I think they have held

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 3>their own. I think they can bounce back, and they're

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 3>led by a powerful top end of the offense and

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 3>a great top end of the rotation, and I think

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Garrett Croche can really hold them through.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So I think they have the pieces.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 3>It's like you got defense, you got pitching, you got bullpen,

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 3>you got offense. You just need them all to click.

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 3>It's very early in the season, twenty to one, twenty

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 3>to one at this point, so you're looking for some

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 3>value on there. If they end up taking say here's

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the other thing, if you're wanting to buy out. If

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 3>they end up taking back this Division. It's gonna cut

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 3>in half. It's gonna slice in half. You're gonna be

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 3>looking at like nine to one or eight to one,

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 3>and there's gonna be buyout opportunities if you want so.

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the Dodgers is an easy play. But my

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>hedge play would be the Boston Red Sox.

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Joe, you already had a preseason Dodgers ticket out

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>there around that plus two ninety mark. Are you sticking

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>with them or is there a different hedge that you

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>may be like?

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean there's a couple teams that are like

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Mets are looking good and you could maybe.

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Play around a little bit, But it's the Dodgers.

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the Dodgers have faced so much already in

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 4>terms of guys missing time. They just brought up Land

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 4>and Knak, who I figured we'd see at some point,

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 4>but I didn't think he'd be in the rotation necessarily

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 4>at this point of the season. But Edmund's on the

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 4>eel ta Oscar Hernandez. If you look at the pitching injuries,

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 4>it's ridiculous with Glass now Kershaw, Snell, and yet they're

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty four and twelve right, They're they're just too I

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 4>don't know if we use this term in the preseason show,

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 4>but they're almost too big to fail. They're almost they're

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 4>almost too good and too deep that even if they

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 4>have six injuries like they have right now, it doesn't

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 4>really matter. They're just so so deep. The bulpin is strong.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 4>There are like ten or twelve vibe pitchers on the

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 4>depth chart. The lineup has three MVPs. It's just they're

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 4>too good and you're getting him at plus two thirty

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 4>plus two fifty. Maybe in some places I would hammer

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 4>that all day.

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we'll go ahead and round out the program with

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy's favorite futures long shot, starting with you, Joe,

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>who is in fact revisiting the World Series market.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so if you are gonna go deep, then I

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 4>think the Atlanta Braves are somewhat interesting here. And a

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of it comes down to pitching wins championships a

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 4>lot of the time, and they have a three headed monster,

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 4>or they will have a three headed monster by the

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 4>time the playoffs come around. With Sale with Schwellenbach and

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 4>hopefully with Spencer Stryder. Now I know that it hasn't

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 4>been exactly all smooth sailing for him so far.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 5>This season.

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 4>I think that by the time we're looking at September October,

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 4>he should be healthy. And this lineup is also a

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 4>team that you know, I know that they have kind

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 4>of disappointed to this to this point of the season,

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 4>but when you're looking at Riley Ozuna, Olsen, Alby's, Mike Harris,

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 4>with ron To Kunya soon to be back, I think

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 4>that this team does have enough juice to push their

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 4>way to the World Series should they get into the playoffs. Now,

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a tricky division. There's a lot of good teams

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 4>in that division. Right now, they're seventeen and eighteen, but

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 4>they're only five games back, and I think that once

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 4>they get Strider back, once they get a COONa back,

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 4>we're going to start to see this team perform like

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 4>we've seen them perform outside of the last year and

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 4>a half or so, and they're a ninety five plus

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 4>win team when all is going well. But I really

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 4>think it comes down to their strength of pitching. Once

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 4>we get into the postseason. You really only need three,

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 4>maybe four starting pitchers once you get into October, and

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 4>they have about as good of a big three as you're.

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Going to find.

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.959
<v Speaker 4>And then Grant Holmes. There's no slouch himself there as

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 4>the fourth guy. Like, they're really deep on all sides

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 4>of the ball right now. Alex Radugo leading off might

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 4>make some people say, what are you talking about?

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 5>They're not.

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 4>But once they get a Conya back, once they get

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Strider back, I think that the wheels are going to

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 4>be up on this team.

0:31:52.760 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So hoping for health is Joe Rico with the

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Braves World Series call at fifteen to one. Welsh, you

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>gave us a very interesting Garrett Crochet to lead the

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>MLB in strikeouts at ten to one to begin the season.

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you maybe have another one of these season long

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>player props we should be getting invested with?

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, what if I told you there's a player

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 3>that hit ninety eight homers between twenty twenty three and

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four. What if I told you if this

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 3>player hit over fifty homers last year? Still intrigued?

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe?

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Now what if I told you that player you can

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 3>get eight to one odds.

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>To lead the league in home runs? Wow, Shoeo Tani.

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 3>DK's got it right there. Eight to one for sho

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Hao Tani to lead the league in homers. The two

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 3>current leaders are guys that struggle to hit two forty

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 3>or two fifty, and Kyle Schwarber and Kyle Raley obviously

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 3>number three at eleven. Those two guys are tied with

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 3>twelve homers. The next guy up is Aaron Judge, who

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 3>is like far and beyond the top leae. It's like,

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's minus money or it's like plus one

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred or whatever. It's there's no value em betting Aaron Judge.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 3>But number four in the league is shoe Hayo Tani

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 3>who's already got ten homers and hasn't really even gotten

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 3>going hit fifty four last year, and you can get

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 3>eight to one odds on it. Is Judge going to

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 3>take it?

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 2>It's very likely, But.

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to bet Corvin Carroll who's got ten homers.

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to bet Spencer Torkal Center James would

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 3>even if you want all the crazy odds. I want

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 3>a high batting average player. Aaron Judge qualifies that that

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 3>guy might be a triple crown guy right now, and

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 3>that's why it's so exciting, and the odds are up

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 3>even though he doesn't have you know, eighteen homers or

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 3>something right now, guy's hitting four hundred, but Otani, that stadium,

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that lineup, and that bat would just hit fifty four.

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 3>You want value, you want a long shot eight to

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 3>one for him to lead the league in homers. Seems

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 3>like a pretty pretty fun bet.

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 5>I like it.

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Joe, Is that a fun one

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>for you?

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 5>I do.

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 4>I wonder what it would look like if you're just

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 4>betting him to lead the National League in homers.

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 5>This probably wouldn't be as appealing of a number.

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't bet it's in.

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Probably really like two to one. Maybe you could probably

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 3>get like two to one or something along those.

0:33:58.320 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Anything where you're kind of betting against Judge is interesting,

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Like if there is a bet where it's like the

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 4>field versus Aaron Judge for MVP or for home runs

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 4>or you know, batting title, it might be wise. And

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure what specific books will offer it, especially

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 4>at this point of the season, but if you can

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 4>take the field in a lot of those markets, I

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 4>think it's definitely interesting, and Otani being the main one.

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 4>If you are taking the field for the home run race.

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I know Kyle Rawley's interesting, Alonzo's interesting, but like you mentioned,

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Otani is going to be hitting three hundred or close

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 4>to it, where those guys have a risk. I know

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Alonzo's a three forty right now, but he's not going

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 4>to maintain that pace. You could easily see Otani lead

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 4>the league in homers. If Judge misses a week or two,

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 4>a couple of weeks, then I wouldn't surprise me at all.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, gentlemen, great analysis tonight. That is going to

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>do it for us on the Betting Pros Podcast. Thanks

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for watching. As always, the best freeway support

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>us is to give this video a thumbs up if

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this type of content. Also subscribe to the

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>channel if you're new, and make sure you're downloading that

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros app and seeking your sportsbooks today. Hey for

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Welsh and Joe Rico, I'm Seth Wilcock. Take care

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of y'all.

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 6>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros Podcast. If you

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 6>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 6>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 6>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 6>channel at YouTube dot com. Slash betting pros