WEBVTT - Oaktree Capital's Howard Marks Talks Private Equity and Real Estate

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, because we've been talking

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>about that mounting concern about how big government spending has

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>going to create this issue here to markets, potentially upending them,

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>making the job more challenging for central banks. Of course,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>as Jerome Powell, the FED Chair, has two days of

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>testimony ahead in Congress, all in the middle of a

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>weakening labor market here in the United States.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>It's the perfect storm.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We are now joined by oak Tree Capital Management co

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>founder and co chairman Howard Marks to talk all about it.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking about the fiscal issues, right, We've been

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about the monetary conundrum that's been happening for now

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>well over a year for the FED Chair. If you

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think about the potential for fiscal to really upend how

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>investors think these days, how much is the government dot

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>loads in the US and abroad really changing the calculus?

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, Sonali, I think it's unfortunate that the US

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 3>behaves like a country that has a credit card with

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 3>no credit limit, where the bill never comes. I mean,

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 3>nobody can think that's a good idea. You would think

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>that there has to be a point at which our

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 3>dead or our deficits become too much reckoned as a

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 3>percentage of GDP. Usually nobody will tell you that point

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>doesn't exist. Nobody will tell you where it is. So

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 3>nobody's exercising fiscal discipline in Washington these days.

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Last year we had.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>A deficit in the trillions in a period of prosperity,

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>not supposed to happen.

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>All very unfortunate. But A nobody can tell.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 3>You when it becomes a problem, and b nobody can

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>tell you what to do with it. You can't eliminate

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the US from your portfolios. People who've said to do

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>that in past years are now looking pretty bad.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 4>I was going to say, if you had followed that advice,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>you'd be in a world hurt right now in terms

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 4>of relative performance. And you said, the new one can

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 4>tell you where that point is. But that's exactly what

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to ask you. Where do you think that

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 4>point is? Is it something that we're approaching If you

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 4>don't want to exactly pinpoint.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 3>It, I don't want to exactly pinpoint it. I want

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 3>to say that I'm among the people who can't tell

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 3>you where it is, you know, one of the many. Yeah,

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, I think every time I come on this

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg, I quote Mark Twain who said, it ain't

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 3>what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 3>what you know for certain that just ain't true. I

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 3>certainly don't know.

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I wonder what kind of opportunities you're finding. I'm

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 5>always interested on the distress side about how sort of

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 5>target rich the environment is. I think that says a

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 5>lot about our economy. All the econo surprises that we

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 5>see are to the downside lately and rates remain high.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Does that make this interesting for you? Well, I think

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>it is interested.

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.519
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we went through a really slow period from

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 3>nine when the FED took the Fed funds rate to

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 3>zero to stimulate the economy, to twenty one when they

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 3>started to decided to lift it to fight inflation. And

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 3>in that thirteen year period there was very little distress

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 3>because it was a very benign environment for companies. Now,

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>as you know, the interest rates are higher. That gives

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>us more of an opportunity. And importantly, there were a

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of leverage transactions done in the period I described,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 3>where companies were burdened with capital structures debt structures that

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 3>did not anticipate a five hundred basis point or four

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>hundred base point increase in rates.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, to put it.

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 3>In short, it was it was a great time to

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 3>be a borrower because rates came down and.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Business was prosperous.

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 3>But right now, and I think going into the future,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>leveraged companies will not be able to renew their leverage

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 3>as easily and the cost of doing so will be higher.

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 3>So that gives us better opportunities than we've been seeing.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>And you know, just to put it in brief for

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 3>your listeners, six years ago, you had an idea, You

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 3>went at the bank, you described that, they said, fine,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 3>we'll give you nine hundred million dollars at five percent.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 3>Now it's time to renew your debt. You go in,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 3>you describe it again, and they say, good, we'll give

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 3>you five hundred million dollars at nine percent.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think most of that pain is going

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>to come? Because there's a private equity universe that's clearly

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>grappling with that refinancing pain. There's a commercial real estate market,

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and equity investors seem to be ignoring any leverage that

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 1>might be under the system.

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Still, what should they be one reaching out for?

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, clearly now it'll be in highly levered situations, and

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>you name two of them, private equity and real estate leverage.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 3>The use of debt to amplify your returns. It has

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 3>been the lifeblood of these two asset classes and they've

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 3>done extremely well as a result. It was very, very

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 3>salutary for them. But that's where the pain will come

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 3>in the future. And you know, you can't increase a

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 3>company's debt service costs markedly without affecting his returns. And

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 3>in certain sectors of the real estate world, mainly retail

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 3>and office, there are fundamental questions. So you put that together,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 3>we think you'll see some disruption which will give us

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>and people like us opportunity. You know, this has been

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a really tough period for lenders, which is what we are,

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 3>and a really tough period for bargain hunters.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 4>Right well, I want to talk a bit more about

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 4>the business of lending and what's going on in the

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 4>private credit industry. Of course, a month or two ago

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 4>we saw Plural Site back by Vista basically transfer its

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 4>assets into a different subsidiary to obtain more financing from

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 4>its sponsor. Let's become a little bit of a battle cry,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 4>you see lenders basically asking for plural site protection. Right now,

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 4>I won't ask you specifically about what happened with that episode,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 4>but how do you see this evolving in the industry.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that we're going to see more creditor

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 4>on creditor violence as some have been calling it.

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, people tend to do what they can

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 3>to enhance their position financially. Most people will stick to

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 3>what they can do legally. Some people will stick to

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 3>what they can do ethically. I don't know, there's some

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 3>question about what that means, but you know, people, if

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 3>there's an opening, people will take it. For the most part,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 3>there is an opening for what you call credit or

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 3>credit of violence. That is proactive, proactive efforts to enhance

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>your situation financially at the expense of somebody else.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 3>The important point is that it's up to lenders to

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 3>study the documentation well enough to prevent it.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 5>Are you getting Are you active in office space right now?

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 5>Because it seems like the perfect storm for anybody who

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 5>has the financing. We talked to Ego Namdar, a real

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 5>state investor a couple of days ago, who is getting

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 5>like seventy percent off really big important office buildings in

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 5>New York, the capital of the world, Like, how can

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 5>that not come back?

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, the question, Matt is very simple. You're getting let's

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>say you're getting seventy off.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that enough?

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the mere fact that the price of

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>something is down doesn't make it a bye. It has

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>to be that the price is down more than it

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 3>should be given the fundamentals.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think it's going to be up to.

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>The experts, people who've made their life in that world

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>and with success, to make that assessment.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think that.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>If there is a bunch of real estate funds formed

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 3>this year, somebody who puts all their money into office

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 3>and somebody who puts none of their money into office,

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>one of them will be the best performer.

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I just don't know which one.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have these struggles that are still

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>under the surface, we are just about, you know, five

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>days away really from bank earnings, and the question is

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is we enter this era where they're about to meet

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>new capital rules as well? Are there still just tremendous

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>stresses under the system that people are not noticing.

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's the it's the small to mid size banks,

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the community and regional banks that are that are heavily

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 3>weighted toward real estate loans. The biggest banks over two

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty billion in assets don't have much of

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 3>a concentration.

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 2>They're not at risk.

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>But some of the smaller banks, you know, I think

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 3>on average, the banks under two hundred and fifty billion

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>in assets, loans on real estate make up one hundred

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 3>and sixty percent of their regulatory capital. So some of

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 3>them will find pain, especially the ones who lent above

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 3>average and concentrated in regions that are troubled and so forth.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 3>So you know, I don't think it's a systemic risk

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 3>that's going to put us in the sink, but I

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 3>do think that you'll see some companies in trouble, and

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, one by one the authorities may have to

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 3>bail them out, and may well.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 4>Do so, all right, Howard, Unfortunately we have to leave

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 4>it there. Great to have you, of course on our

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 4>launch day are big banks, of course, to Howard. Marxie

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 4>is the co founder and co chairman of oak Tree Capital.