WEBVTT - The Alphabet and the Goddess, Part 1

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Joe,

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>quick question here, who is your favorite goddess? Oh? Man, Well,

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it depends on if you ask me while I've just

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>been listening to some some Stevie Nicks jams. If I'm

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>going to go into the Fleetwood Mac kind of Rhiannon territory. Uh.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>But if not, I think I'm going to stick with

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>something that. Actually I wonder if there's a linguistic relationship

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>between Rhiannon and the one I'm about to talk about,

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of a cognate the Sumerian goddess in Anna.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>You're familiar with in Anna, but she's the one who

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>rings like a bell through the night. No, no, no,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's also Rhiannon. But in Nana does sort of take

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to the sky like a bird in flight, and I

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>don't maybe sometimes she promises you haven't. She is definitely

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the darkness and she rules her life like a fine skylark.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>But let's not get sidetracked. In Nana has hymns of

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>her own that we can sing and I think we

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>actually should read some in a second here. So in

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Nana is a Sumerian goddess. She is also known as

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the Acadian Ishtar. I think that they're This is believed

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the same goddess, essentially across a different stream

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of tradition, and the deep history of the Mesopotamian goddess

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>has lots of different things associated with it. So in

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>some sense, Nana is the goddess of the storehouse, meaning

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that she rules over the stores of things like dates

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and meat and grain. But she's also a goddess of

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>fertility and sex and war and slaughter. So she's got

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>all of this interesting stuff gathered up under her feathers.

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I said feathers. I don't think

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>she's a bird under her dark wings. That's a different

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a different song. But it's interesting because all the

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>things that she is encompassing here. Um, this, this is

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the domains that we would cover in a vast pantheon

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of gods and goddess is from other traditions, all wrapped

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>up into one. Yeah, And to give a sense of

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the power of Ananna, I if Robert, if you will comply,

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we should have a reading of some excellent

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ancient texts. Let's do it trivia question. In fact, I

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this until this episode. Who do who do

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you think is the earliest named author in all of

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>world literature? M hmmm, well it certainly it would probably

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>tie to this time period, but I had no idea

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>who the individual would be. Well, very often we find

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>ancient texts and carvings things, you know, marks made in

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>clay and cune of form and stuff. We don't know

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>who the author is. It doesn't say like you know,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Jeff wrote this clay tablet inscription. But a strong contender

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>for the title of the earliest named author in all

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of world literature is in Headuwana, a twenty third century

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>b c. E. Mesopotamian high priestess and poet twenty third

0:02:55.200 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>century b c. Forty three hundred years ago. This priestess

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and poet she was the daughter of the Akkadian king

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Sargon the Great, and she's named as the author of

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>a collection of hymns and poems, many of which are

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>devoted to the praise of the Sumerian goddess in Hannah.

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think we should read some selections from Inhduanas

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>him the Exultation of Anna. And this is from a

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>translation that I found on the electronic text Corpus of

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Sumerian Literature based out of the University of Oxford. Now

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the poem is way too long to read in its entirety,

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but I put together some abridged selections. So here we go.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>On the Exultation of Anna, Lady of all the divine powers,

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>resplendent light, righteous woman, clothed in radiance, beloved of On

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and Rak, Mistress of Heaven, with the great pectoral jewels.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>She loves the good head dress, befitting the office of

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>ain priestess. Like a dragon, you have deposited venom on

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the foreign lands, Lady who rides upon a beast whose

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>words are spoken at the holy command of On the

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>great rights are yours? Who can fathom them? Destroyer of

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the foreign lands, you confer strength on the storm, beloved

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of Inlil. You have made awesome terror way upon the land.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Because of you, the threshold of tears is opened, and

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>people walk along the path of the House of Great

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Lamentations in the van of battle. All is struck down

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>before you. With your strength, My lady, teeth can crush flint.

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You charge forward like a charging storm, My lady, the

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>great an Una gods fly from you to the ruined

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>mounds like scudding bats. They dare not stand before your

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>terrible gaze. They dare not confront your terrible countenance. Who

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>can cool your raging heart? Your malevolent anger is too

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>great to cool, Lady Supreme over the foreign lands, who

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>can take anything from your province. Blood is poured into

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>their rivers because of you, and their people must drink it.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a section that's talking about if a

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>city has not acknowledged itself to be hers, if the

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>city doesn't say I belong to an Anna. Quote, it's

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a woman no longer speaks affectionately with her husband at

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>dead of night. She no longer takes counsel with him,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and she no longer reveals to him the pure thoughts

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of her heart. I in head to Anna, will recite

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>a prayer to you. To you Holy in Anna, I

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>shall give free vent to my tears like sweet beer.

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Be it known that you are lofty as the heavens.

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Be it known that you were broad as the earth.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Be it known that you destroy the rebel lands. Be

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it known that you roar at the foreign lands. Be

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>it known that you crush heads. Be it known that

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you devour corpses like a dog. Be it known that

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>your gaze is terrible. Be it known that you lift

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>your terrible gaze. Be it known that you have flashing eyes.

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Be it known that you are unshakable and unyielding. Be

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it known that you always stand triumphant. The light was

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>sweet for her, Delight extended over her. She was full

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of fairest beauty, like the light of the rising moon.

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>She exuded delight. Robert, how would you even begin to

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>characterize this awesome mixture of brutal, merciless conquest and all

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>these statements about radiants and beauty. Oh, I mean, well,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.119
<v Speaker 1>but she's not to be trifled with, and she's really

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>on on on par with the sun in terms of

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>just beautiful, radiant. But but but also with all this

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>destructive potential. I think it's fun. It talks about delight.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a poem with delight in it. And also

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they will make you drink the blood. Yeah, I mean

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that The best I can think is the sun. It

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is delightful to stand in the sun, but you will

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and can be burned by the sun as well. I

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>mean it is, there's just a primal and vital energy

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to her. Now. She in many ways I think here

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is described as having the qualities of a storm god

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like Baal or mar Duke or Yahwe or Zeus or

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>thor you know, these these storm war gods where the

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>sky weather deity tends to be so ceated with conquest

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and power and killing um. But she's also embodied, as

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, resplendence and delight, and she has all these

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>other qualities we see in in other stories about her.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>That she's associated with stores of grain that are necessary

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for survival, that she's associated with sex and fertility and happiness.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And so how does it end up that you've got

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this one deity who's got all these different qualities gathered

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>underneath her. Yeah, and then what is taken away from

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>her over the centuries to follow. That's a good question,

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. Uh. In thinking about my own favorite goddess,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>my mind instantly turned to Fetis because I've been interested

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in mythic sea creatures of late, and we've talked about

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the Iliad quite a bit of late. So I I

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thought to Thetis, who through really throughout the history of

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>written language. She's most well known as the mother of Achilles, Uh,

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the nearly invincible warrior of the Iliad.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And she's commonly described as an immortal near it. And

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>she begot Achilles through her union with the mortal Pelias,

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>king of the Mermaidans. And to protect her mortal son,

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>she dipped him by the heel and the river sticks.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>And she also commissioned Hephaestus to forge his armor and arms.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>And she petitions Zeus himself on her son's behalf. Now,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Thetis never strikes me as as someone you want to

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>cross or mess with, especially as as far as the

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>welfare of her son is concerned. She commands a fair

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of power and influence in the Greek pantheon. And

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and she herself as the daughter of the sea god Nereus,

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and her brother in law is Poseidon. And yet there

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is something reduced about her. Uh. This this this being

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that is that that was worshiped as a goddess. Uh

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to be somewhat diminished in the Iliad and in

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>other works. It's like she's been reduced to a supporting

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>role when she once was the star. Yeah, and so

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I I researched this a little bit and I can't

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>ram it ran across a pay per titled The Wrath

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of Fetus by Laura M. Slatkin from Columbia University and

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>was published in the journal Transactions of the American Philological Association.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And she points out that in the Iliad, she's quote

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a subsidiary deity who is characterized by helplessness and by

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>impotent grief, and yet she persuades Zeus to set in

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>motion the in the events of the Iliad, and in

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Mighty Achilles invokes her name above all others. He asks

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>her to pretention Zeus and remind the king of the

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>gods that she is the one who saved Zeus when

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>all the other Olympians wanted to bind him, and to

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>be bound, Slatkin points out, is the doom of a god.

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And Thetis does nothing short of saving the cosmos and

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>maintaining cosmic equilibrium by preventing Zeus from going down like

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Zeus's own father Cronus. So that's kind of funny to

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>suggest that you would be saving the cosmos by saving Zeus,

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because like, of what good is Zeus? Zeus is just trash? Yeah,

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>but it but he's the trash we know, right, You

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>can imagine a situation was like, oh man, these gods,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>gods are crazy, but at least we kind of have

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>worked out, you know, what their their mad passions are.

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't need another revolution so that the other Olympians

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>will rule the roost. I mean, Zeus mostly just does

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>bad stuff. Yeah, but it's true, it's true. Well, there's something.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's almost like we make excuses for him

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>as this like bad tempered, criminal, violent male deity, or

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we're just like, oh, boys will be boys. What a rascal?

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Are we still talking about mythology or not talking about

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>current events? No? No, no, I mean I think that well,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something to be said about that, and

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that will tie into today's episode. So fetis were also

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>told in the writings of the Greek poet pindar Uh

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was destined to birth of son more mighty than his father,

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's why her her original suitors Zeus and Beside,

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>both abandoned her love and forced her against her will

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to marry Immortal instead. Uh So, think of that. There's

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>tremendous power in thetis, like she was faded to birth

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>this this child greater than its father. So if she

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>had born the son of Zeus or Poseidon, that would

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>have been a rival to the King of the gods. Right,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>but the King of the gods. If the King of

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the gods has a son who's too powerful, he asked

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to fear, he will be dethroned. Right, So maker Mary immortal,

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so at least her mighty son will be mighty, and

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>more or less the mortal realm, and certainly at Kells

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is mortal. That's kind of the that's the whole theme,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and this immortal mother and the son that is doomed

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to die, and sola Can points out that this was

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>an established trope because Thetis has a lot in common

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>with Eos, the god, the goddess of the dawn, and

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the mother of Memnon, who we've discussed on the show before,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and the Colossi of Memnon episode. Yeah, the established role

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of an immortal mother looking after her mortal son who

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is doomed to die, and the Iliagist sticks to Fetus

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.479
<v Speaker 1>in this one role, but still invoking the established mythological

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>role of the old Indo European don goddess. Interesting. So

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Thetis was certainly worshiped as a sea goddess in her time.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But this goes beyond the mere limiting of a mighty

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>deity to a supporting role in the iliot Uh. Slatkin

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>points out that the Laconian traditions identified her as a

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>primordial creatrix, so she she is quote not simply a

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>cosmic force, but the cosmic force. She not only has

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 1>power in the sea, but is the generative principle of

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Well, that seems to go along with the

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>nature of the sea and creation myths, right, Like when

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you have the sea, you've got the waters. First, there

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>is like the darkness and the waters, and then you've

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>got creation coming out of that. The water is almost

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of symbolize a primordial chaos from which some kind

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of order can be wrought. And you see that in

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>other creation myths too, like in the Tiamat creation myth

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>where mar Duke slays Tamat, the sea monster, you know,

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the who re presents the water being yeah, and then

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>uses her body to make the world. So we've already

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>established this this trend where we see a a often

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a primordial like all powerful cosmic goddess who is then

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>reduced over time made a minor role in a story

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of warring men or a or a minor deity that

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is that is overpowered by masculine deities. What what happened

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and what potentially is still happening in our culture? Yeah,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And on one hand, that kind of male dominant, misogynist

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>rewriting of cultural ideas and mythology and stuff like that,

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems so common that you might not even stop

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to ask why things are that way, right, I mean,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like, well, that's always what happens in culture.

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, men think they're better than women, and they

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>want to rewrite all of the cultural stories and everything

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to downplay women's roles and make themselves feel more important.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>And and some people just say, well that, yeah, that's

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>just how it is. But why wouldn't that be an

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing to have an explanation for why that is

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>such a trend. And that's what we're gonna be talking

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>about in today's episode. We're gonna talk about one hypothesis,

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>one fascinating hypothesis for why this has come to pass.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And this was presented in the book The Alphabet Versus

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Goddess The Conflict between Word and Image by American

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>surgeon author and inventor Leonard Schlaine, who lived n seven

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>through two thousand and nine. Yeah, so, in the late

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>nineties when this book was written, Schlaine was the chief

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of laparoscopic surgery at California Medical Center in San Francisco,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and apparently he worked at least to some degree in

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>performing surgeries on the arteries supplying blood to the hemispheres

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of the brain. And just a fun bit of trivia

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that really has nothing to do with our episode today,

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but his daughter Kimberly is married to the actor Albert Brooks,

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and his daughter Tiffany as a noted filmmaker and founded

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Webby Awards. Stuff About Your Mind incidentally, is a

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Webby Award winning podcast. I don't see that as a

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>conflict of interest, but I just thought I pointed out

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but wait a minute, Albert Brooks, Hanks Scorpio, Yeah, Hank

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Scorpio himself is connected to this episode. Now, before we

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>lay out sh Lane's central claim and discuss some of

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>his arguments, I definitely want to say that this is

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>an idea we're discussing because it's interesting and because it

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>raises questions worth investigating, and not because we're endorsing it

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>as correct. I'd say this is going to be more

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in in bicameral mind kind of territory, where this is

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a book that brings up a lot of interesting questions,

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>takes us to a lot of interesting places, but ultimately

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be saying we think that this

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>guy has the right idea. And in many cases I

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think that I'll go ahead and say that I'm not

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>convinced by his core thesis, and I've got a lot

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of criticisms about his approach to argumentation. But at the

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>same time, I think a lot of peripheral arguments and

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>observations that come up in this book merrit individual analysis, right.

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And then he's using he to build this hypothesis. He's

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>using uh, he's using science, and he's using history. He's

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>using a number of just fascinating cultural examples. So he

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is uh. Even if we ultimately are not won over

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>by the hypothesis, uh, he supports it with so much

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>fascinating information, and it really does force you to at

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>least re examine some of these things that we've taken

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for for granted, like just the absence of or that,

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, the absence of goddesses from our

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>our our major world religions. Okay, so let's start with

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Schlane's central claim and then back up and and run

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>through his argument. What do we have a quote here

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that will help us get to the heart of Schlane's

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>claim from the beginning? We do. We have at least

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of quotes here, and and certainly he was

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he was a great writer, so his words capture at best,

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>he writes quote, there exists ample evidence that any society

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>acquiring the written word experiences explosive changes. For the most part,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>these changes can be characterized as progress. But one pernicious

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of fact of literacy has gone largely unnoticed. Writing subliminally

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>fosters a patriarchal outlook. Writing of any kind, but especially

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it's alphabetic form, diminishes feminine values and within them women's

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>power in the culture. WHOA. Now, that is a far

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>reaching and radical hypothesis and something that, if it were true,

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>would have profound implications for the whole world. Indeed, and

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's kind of the heart of his hypothesis here. Yeah,

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So whenever you've got these big kind of hypotheses like this, uh,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>radical claims about something very fundamental about like say, the

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 1>role of gender egalitarianism or the lack thereof in the world,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and explaining it through something as widespread as the idea

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of literacy. You definitely it makes your ears prick up right,

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want to know what this was about.

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got another quote that expresses part of the core

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of his idea. It's quote, literacy has promoted the subjugation

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of women by men throughout all but the very recent

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>history of the West. Misogyny and patriarchy rise and fall

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>with the fortunes of the alphabetic written word. Another nice

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>summary from from later in the book is quote the alphabet,

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>through its emphasis on linearity and sequence, caused the left

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>side of the brain of those who learned it to hypertrophy,

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>resulting in a marked cerebral dominance of one lobe over

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the other. Metaphorically, the mind listed to one side as

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>one carrying an unevenly distributed load. So we're talking about

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 1>like a major, lasting influence on the way the human

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.160
<v Speaker 1>brain works. Yeah. Now, Schlan talks. He tells a story

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in his book, and he talks about how he first

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>began to form this thesis when he was touring Greece

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with this great antiquities guide who kept going to sit

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>after sight and explaining, okay, what was once here was

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a shrine to a goddess, female goddess, but then later

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it was rededicated to a male god. It's kind of

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>an odd pattern to just see happening over and over

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>in one place after another. If the if the tendency

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is generally toward male dominance in the culture and patriarchy

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>and misogyny, why did you have all these female goddesses

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, and why did the changeover in power

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to male dominated pantheon's occur? And so Schlan started to

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>wonder what what would cause all that? Yeah, because basically

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we do have a wealth of goddesses in the polytheistic tradition,

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but we see most of them fall out of favor

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>over time. They're either reduced to minor deities or demi gods,

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>or or certainly they are just the the feminine at best. Really,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they're the feminine aspect of the same god that also

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>has a masculine aspect as well, while the male gods

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to climb up the hierarchy. Because really, outside of

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Hindu Shaktism, which focuses on the feminine aspects of the

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>gods and the cosmos. Can you think of any widespread

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>goddess movements outside of WICCA and the neo pagan goddess

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>movement that is also rather modern. Well, the key is widespread.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>If you go into beliefs held by smaller numbers of people,

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll get into all kinds of things with

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>with female deities and and even uh, you know, matriarchal

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>kinds of pantheons. But the big religions of the world,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've really just got a few that are

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>representing the vast majority of humankind, right, and those tend

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the big monotheisms. And then you've also got

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Hinduism and Buddhism, right. So as a sort of an

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>inform formal survey of sorts, I reached out to the

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>folks and the discussion module which is which is the

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>official stuff to Blow your Mind Facebook group, which you

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>should all join if you want to engage in meaningful

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation with other listeners and and also your hosts here.

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>But I said, hey, what are what are some goddesses

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>or divine females that are displayed in your homes? Uh?

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And I and I also open this up to sort

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>of hyper real religious examples as well, which will say so,

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just a quick list of some of the uh goddesses

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that were mentioned. I this wonder Woman, the Virgin Mary

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Desire of the Endless, which is a character from the

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Sandman comic book. Um, somebody mentioned sort of an abstract

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>feminist goddess tattoo, uh Freya, Princess Leiah Calisi from Game

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones, um Mucha's Claire de Lune painting. And also

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Marlene Dietrich who was an actor, right, yeah, uh Tara.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, here is a quote from listeners sorry, who says,

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I have several white Taras in my house. She's a

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Tibetan Buddhist deity thought to help curb ego driven thoughts

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and action. So I thought this was interesting beginning. I

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>had to ask because I was looking around my own

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>living room and I realized, well, we have several depictions

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of various gods, but they are all masculine. Why do

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I not have any images of a goddess in here

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>as well? I'm gonna have to fix that. Yeah, what's

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong with your living room? Man? I know I've got

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got I've got to balance it. And that brings

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>us back to uh to Schlane's are here, how did

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>this unbalancing occur? Yes, And another side of the theory,

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, would be how come we see goddesses diminished

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>throughout the world for the last few thousand years? But

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>now you've got all kinds of people who say, yeah,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I've got wonder woman, she's a goddess. Where did that

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>come from? She Len has an answer for that too, Again,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily something we're going to agree with him on,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>but it's an interesting thing to consider. All right. Well,

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're gonna take a quick break and

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we come back. We will jump into she Lene's hypothesis.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you. All right, we're back. Now we're

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.640
<v Speaker 1>about to get into Leonard Slaine's hypothesis about what happened

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with the decline of female lead pantheons of goddess based

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>religions and lead to male dominated religious ideas and cultures

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>in history. And so he's got a framework that he

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>uses throughout the book to sort of describe these associated

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>ideas of types of thinking, sort of perceptual modes, hemispheres

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of the brain, and a gender identity that are all

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of grouped together into these hemispheres, and I think

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 1>this grouping could be kind of problematic. We'll talk about it.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But what is his basic basic division of the two

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>perceptual modes. All right, so you have the feminine outlook,

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>which is holistic, simultaneous, synthetic, and uh and it involves

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>concrete worldviews. So this is sort of the perceptual mode

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>that sees sees things by gestalt, sees everything at once,

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that goes by intuition, that works uh more with concrete

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>images and objects very much bound in image. And then

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you have the masculine outlook, which is linear, sequential, reductionist,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and abstract in its worldview. Okay, so this is more

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>based on non visual information and uh, sequential analysis of things. Yeah,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the feminine is, hey, give me a picture, and then

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the masculine outlook is I'd rather have those thousand words. Now,

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of people you're listening to this

0:23:55.320 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and saying, like, I'm not loving the like gender associations

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there with the different types of points of view, And

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fair point to make. Slain himself

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is aware of the fact that these generalizations could be problematic,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and he writes, quote every individual is generously endowed with

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>all the features of both, right. Yeah. He frequently brings

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>up the Yen yang Uh symbol from Taoism as as

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of balance between the two. Yeah. So Slain

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is obviously aware of the fact that these perceptual modes

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do not always correspond to the literal divisions of biological

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>sex or of gender identity. But nevertheless he uses these

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>concepts by by these terms male and female to describe them,

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think sometimes throughout the book this leads to

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>trouble because it continually suggests a blurring of the distinction

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>between for example, the quote male perceptual mode, which female

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>primates are perfectly capable of using and even favoring and

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>confusing that perceptual mode with literal males of the species.

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.479
<v Speaker 1>So this, I think, this book is, for one thing,

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be vulnerable to a lot of criticisms of

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>over generalization with all kinds of things, actually, but gender

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be one of them. Yes, So let's

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some of the the key sources that

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ground his idea. Because he didn't you know, he's very

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>upfront about this. He didn't just dream all of this up.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>He was basing Uh, he's basing it on the foundation

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>established by other thinkers. Okay, so he points to a

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 1>few of these. First of all, there's Robert Logan's the

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet Effect, from which states that quote, a medium of

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>communication is not merely a passive conduit for the transmission

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of information, but rather an active force in creating new

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>social patterns and new perceptual realities. There's an intrinsic impact

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to the use of an alphabet, and the literate worldview

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is different from one where information comes exclusively via oral communication. Okay,

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>this sounds very parallel to another author that he quotes frequently,

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 1>which is Marshall McLuhan. Uh. The the idea that the

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.479
<v Speaker 1>medium is the message, right in some way, that the

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>medium through which information is conveyed actually does change the

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>way your brain works. Yeah, I mean I instantly think

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, the classic bit of writing advice,

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>or I guess just storytelling advice in general, show don't

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you know it is that is in effect image

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>versus word. But in any case, when you're doing that

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as a writer, you're using words. True. Yeah, so it

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>does get get a little complicated. He also points to

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the work of anthropologist Claude Levi Strauss, who touches on

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the downside of the power of literacy that it brought

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>with it hierarchical societies and slavery. So while one might

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>think to the current state of Western women and credit

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>their rising status to higher levels of education, Schlane argues

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>based on this that that men and women lived in

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>greater balance in nonliterate agricultural societies, and that we see

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>some examples of this in preliterately at grarians cultures, um

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, from from relatively recent times. Okay, So his

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>proposition here is that we might actually be very surprised

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>at how much gender egalitarianism we would find if we

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>went back in history at times before the written word. Right.

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>He says that quote images are primarily mental reproductions of

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the central world of vision. So he points out that

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the brain uses the human brain uses wholeness, uh, simultaneity

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and synthesis to observe the world and to gain meaning

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>from alphabetic writing, the brain is forced to depend on

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>sequence analysis and abstraction. In other words, the way that

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>you take in uh, you know, an open field is

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>different from the way you read a paragraph about what

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that open field looks like. And so he's saying that

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>this ultimately shapes the mind of men and women in

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a way that leads to more patriarchy and culture. Yeah,

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>he says, it affects the inner, outer, and supernatural realms

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of the mind. And uh, yeah, he points back to

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a time when the goddess, in all her forms, was

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the principal deity. And there's that. There's this wonderful quote

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that I keep coming back to. Uh. From the book,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>he says, from the outer rim of history. We begin

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn her name Insumer. She was in Nanna in Egypt.

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>She was Isis in Canaan. Her name was Ashera in Syria.

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>She was known as as Tarta in Greece Demeter, and

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in Cyprus Aphrodite. Whatever her supplicants called her, they all

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>recognized her as the creatrix of life, nurturer of young,

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>protector of children, and the source of milk, herds, vegetables,

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and grain. Since she presided over the great mystery of birth,

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>people of this period presumed she must also hold sway

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>over that great bedevil er of human thought, death. I

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>brought you into this world, I can take you out.

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense, right, Yeah, And again this this this

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>gets back to our just our ideas of these primordial

0:28:55.680 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>feminine deities. Meanwhile, uh, these his deities, he says, they

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.479
<v Speaker 1>tended to have male consorts who, in these concerts might

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>be gods of the hunt, you know, representing the the

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the the hunter gatherer balance of life. But he was

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>generally a temporary lover to be cast aside, or if

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>not that, a son, So she was not. It wasn't

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>even like a king and queen scenario. So when does

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Slane propose that this transition from the female empowering female

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>deity lead religions transitioned into the more patriarchal, male dominated religions. Well,

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>he points out that around fIF BC you had hundreds

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of goddess based religions enveloping the Mediterranean basin. But by

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the fifth century CE you these have been almost completely eradicated,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and by that time women were prohibited from he says,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>conducting a single major Western sacrament. So something is occurring

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>during this time that that that depletes the power of

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the goddess and allows the masculine gods and ultimately the

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the male abstrac abstraction of the one God in Abrahamic

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>tradition to rise so obviously it's not going to be

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so easy to prove that the cause of this change

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>was the alphabet literacy. So how's he going to go

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>about it? Well, he argues that this is ultimately left

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to quote the court of what archaeologists call competitive plausibility. Yeah,

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that the historical sciences often have

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to resort to. Write. You're a historian, you're an archaeologist.

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't run the experiment of replaying history to figure

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 1>out what happened. So you have to sort of construct

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a model and see what model best fits the existing evidence,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and then even more important than that, what accommodates new

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>evidence that gets discovered. Yeah. So, first of all, in

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the book, Schlane spends a lot of time assembling an

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>overview of human evolution with a focus on gender relations.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So he takes us from the scent dependent ground to

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the vision dependent life in the trees. He takes us

0:30:57.000 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>from packs of male chimps feasting on their kills and

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>sharing with only females and heat, to the emergence of

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>estrus free humans who are thus unshackled from the alpha

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>male structure. Uh human physiology, he points out, increasingly ends

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>up demanding fragile young and a birthing process that that

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>incapacitates the female. Prolonged childhood ends up meaning that the

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>females can't participate in the hunt as much and often

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have to stay closer to home, and they need support

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>from the males and from each other. And then on

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 1>top of that, the infant's brain is incomplete. Uh, and

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>language comes in to fill the gaps, and it also

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:42.719
<v Speaker 1>enables learning lessons to take place outside of genetic change.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Now that's an interesting idea that the fact that humans

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are born with maybe fewer instincts about how to behave

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>properly and and fill their role within the human society

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 1>than other social animals come born with. And there's but

0:31:57.080 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that humans have this this card they can play, which

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is the language card. You can transmit a lot of

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>information from one generation to the next through speech. Quote,

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>using speech, one number of a clan learning a lesson

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that would enhance survival could pass it on to the

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>others within hours instead of eons. And he said, this

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this is another bit that I just absolutely love. He says,

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the new corporate brain called culture hovered like a friendly

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>poltergeist over each tribe of hunter gatherers. Isn't it funny

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that culture can be like a person. It's almost like

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a person who's not there. It's the invisible queen of

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>your society, right, That culture is a thing that has preferences.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a thing that tells you what to do and

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>how to act. It's a thing that tells you what's

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 1>beautiful and what's not, what's tasty and what's not. It's

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>almost sort of like you have this invisible parent who's

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a corporeal parent is assembled from the parts of many

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>other parents that came in generations before. Yeah, and it's uh.

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>He points out that all this probably begins as gesture

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>based communication, uh, you know, as well as um the

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>visual features of the faith, various expressions. But then these

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we end up incorporating vocal communication to free up those

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hands and the eyes because if you're only speaking in

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>sign language, you can't it diminishes your ability to work

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a tool. At the same time, you have to look

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at the other person. But if you as you can

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>communicate in the dark, Yeah, it also gives you the

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>chance the ability to do it in the dark. So

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>uh language, vocal language begins to take over. Uh. And

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not only the relay of information here, but complex

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>discussion and strategy. All of that becomes possible as well,

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you end up having the situation where the

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>hunter gatherer divide grows for these early humans, and there

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>are ramifications on the way that males and females both

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>experience the world, he argues. He says that you know,

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hunting demands cold bloodedness, tinged with cruelty, but if you're

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a nurture that requires an emotional generosity combined with warmth, uh,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we see this emergence of of different roles, which leads

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>males and females to respond differently emotionally to the same stimuli,

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 1>different worldviews, different ways of surviving, essentially redesigning the human

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>nervous system in the process. So he's saying that even

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>though men and women are born with these kind of

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>very potent brains that could do whatever they want, the

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>roles that they tend to assume within the group force

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>them to favor one kind of emotional state versus the other.

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You can have the state that's usually assumed by the males,

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>which is this cold, cruel hunter state of mind, or

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you can have this state that's more often assumed by

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the females, which is the intuitive, emotional, nurturing and educating

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 1>side right. And of course, all this takes place within

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a bilobed brain, something that all vertebrates, beginning with fish,

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>actually possess. The human brain lobes look symmetrical, but they're

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>functionally different, what we call hemispheric lateralization, and other vertebrates

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>have this as well, but it's most striking in humans.

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>And then you have in between all of this, you

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have the neuronal fibers that are called the corpus colossum,

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the connect and integrate the two lobes. Each controls the

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>movement of the opposite side. They work in close congress

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>with each other. And we've discussed a lot of this

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show before. With all things brain region related,

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we've learned a lot about function through dysfunctions, specifically injury

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 1>and disease affecting specific regions of the brain, and in

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>recent decades we've learned even more through magnetic stimulation. But

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 1>essentially it comes down to this divide right brain, you

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>have nonverbal emotional states, dream, spirituality, music, balance, altered states

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness, metaphor and holistic views and just a quick

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>reminder that Julian Jaynes and his bi cameral mind hypothesis, Uh,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the source of the voices. And then with

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the left brain, we have doing, we have action, we

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have language, and we have the the complex meshing of

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>competing emotions. And he describes metaphor as quote the right

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>brains unique contribution to the left brains language capability. Now,

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if we're to recall some of the interesting thoughts of

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Julian James, James had this whole idea that our very

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>consciousness itself is built on the possibility of metaphor. I

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he's correct about that, but it's certainly

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>true that metaphor undergird's our entire structure of language. There

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>are very few ways of talking that do not involve metaphors.

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, most of our abstract words are actually based

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 1>off of metaphors for concrete tasks. Yeah, Slaine. He argues

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 1>that metaphors essentially bring plasticity to language, and they translate

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>emotion into language, birthing poetry, mythology, and more. And then

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>he to get back to the gender divide here. He

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>says that in in females and again I want to

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.160
<v Speaker 1>remind everybody that this is a um this is a

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:52.839
<v Speaker 1>book from the nineties, so just bear than in mind

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of on the science here. But but he argued that

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that in females we see ten to thirty three pc

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>more neuronal fibers in the forward part of the corpus colossum,

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and that means greater integration, better communication of emotions, increased

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>global awareness, field perception, and the understanding of offspring moods.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>And they're also generally more adept at multitasking. That's the

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.919
<v Speaker 1>other part of the argument. Males, on the other hand,

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they become more adapted shutting down their feelings for you know,

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>improved hunting ability. So the fact that there's more tissue

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>connecting the hemispheres on average and the female brain tends

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to mean that the brain has a more balanced approach,

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 1>whereas the male brain, if it on average has less

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 1>tissue connecting the two hemispheres, it can tend to be

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>more uh, an isolated kind of left brain approach to things. Right.

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 1>But then again, the argument here too is also that

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that that male and female brains can ultimately do the

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>same things, because he points out that in a hunter

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>gatherer society, each hemisphere of the brain is executing tasks

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 1>for which it is best suited. But you still have

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to have versatility in case of injury or death. Right,

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>what happens if the hunter is sick? Uh, then maybe

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the the gatherers have to do a little hunting, or

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. So each sex of the human species has

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to assume the principal labors of the other.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's not saying that only men can be hunters

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and only women can be nurtures. He's saying the opposite.

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>But this cultures are generally arranged so that men do

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the hunting tasks and women do the nurturing tasks. And

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.359
<v Speaker 1>then he talks of a fair bit about eyeballs. All right,

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we will address the eyeball question when we get back.

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank Okay, we're back. It's time for eyeballs now. I

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is actually one of the most interesting little

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 1>side tangents in the book. Uh. It only takes a

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of pages, but he puts forward this interesting idea

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>about the differing role of light sensitive cells called rods

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and cones in the retina and how this may have

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>actually shaped our cognition. I've never read any thoughts along

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>these lines before, but I thought this was one of

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting actions of the book. So you've got

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>these different cells in your retina, you've got rods, you've

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>got cones. And rods are extremely light sensitive, Schlin writes, quote,

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 1>like trip wires, they detect the slightest movement in a

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>visual field, distributed evenly throughout the periphery of each retina.

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>They see in dim light and appreciate the totality of

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the visual field, seeing images as gestalts. So rods are

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>for kind of all at once. Perception is how you

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>get a general sense of a field of vision. Cones, meanwhile,

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are concentrated densely in the middle of the retina, called

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the macula. And cones have two main functions. One of

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>them is that they pick out differences in color, and

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the other is that they intensify clarity in the in

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the vision, so he writes, quote, concentrating

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.080
<v Speaker 1>on one aspect of reality at a time. Cones view

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the visual field as if through a tunnel. Like rods,

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Cones report to both hemispheres, but the left hemisphere is

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 1>metaphorically best suited to p process their input. So while

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you've got rods that are used for this all at

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>once perception of a general field of vision. Cones are

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>used for focus analysis and sequential processing. Now, biologically, rods

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>are older than cones. All vertebrates have rods. Cones are

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:20.319
<v Speaker 1>only possessed in abundance by a few animals. Schlan points

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>out that cones are mainly present in predatory animals like

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>predatory predatory birds and predatory mammals, and especially in the

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 1>in the human primate um because they allow you to

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>focus on something and to see where it's going and

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to scrutinize. So the cones isolate elements of the field

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of vision then look at them one at a time,

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is better served by the sequential analytic function

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the left part of the brain. So to quote

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one of Schlene's most interesting smaller hypotheses in the book, quote,

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the focusing ability of the phobious centralis creates the illusion

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>of time passing because the image is seen within this

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>new auro circle of the eye can only be processed

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 1>one at a time. Because macular vision examined what was

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and then moved on to what is, it forced the

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>emerging human brain to consider the possibility of what might

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>come next. So Schlan argues that the abundance of cones

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in the human eye, paired with left brain analytical thinking,

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>helped give rise to the human sense of time and

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>our tendency for mental time travel into the past and future,

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 1>something that other animals only have these sort of rare

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>little inklings of though there are some inklings, and we've

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about that in the past with birds and other animals. Um.

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think that's an interesting thing to consider,

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we've got these eyes that focus on

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing at a time, and how that affects our

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 1>perception of reality. Could that actually generate time as we

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>know it? Yeah? Yeah, this is this is definitely an

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting portion of the book. He also talks about hands

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a good bit. Yeah. He in that specifically this is

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 1>tying in with the predominance of right handedness in human beings. Uh.

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>He points out to the left hand, controlled by the

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 1>right brain, is more protective than the right. This is

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>the hand that's going to hold a baby. Meanwhile, what's

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the right hand doing the attacking hand? Right? Yeah, again,

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>except in people who are reversed and are of course

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>left handed. Um. So, in all of this, males come

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to embodied death. Females come to embody life, but eventually

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>men come to identify their own role in reproduction as well.

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And again, the female goddess reigns supreme. Is this master

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of life and death, realizing when there's a dependency between

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the two that I have to kill to eat, I

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>have to consume life in order in order to live.

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And h. Layne writes that the goddess reign supreme and

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 1>then the Kurgan culture rides in on its horses and

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>represses it, replacing her with their sky god. Uh and UH.

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 1>What he says is interesting about this in this very

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>early example is uh, is that in other aces we

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>see a more primitive of two colliding cultures absorbing the

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>more advanced culture. So you have got these agricultural, more

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>technologically advanced societies that are invaded by these horse riding

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Kurgan people's, and you would expect them to adopt the

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>more advanced agricultural technology of the societies they invaded, right,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, very much like when the when the Mongols

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 1>invade China and then essentially become Chinese culturally. But that's

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not what we see here. And of course the question

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is why, all right, so Schlaine can't be the first

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 1>person to offer a hypothesis on what caused the demise

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of goddess culture. Uh. And so I know he referenced,

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.959
<v Speaker 1>he references Claude levy Strauss a good bit. Does levy

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Strauss have a have an argument that he counters? Yeah?

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So the the Levee Strauss argument is that the essentially

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>bride bartering kicked kicked things off, so men came to

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 1>realize that they had a role in reproduction. And then women,

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of course can procreate earlier than men, so they become

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a commodity, and eventually all femininity is is treated as

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>such a commodity. But Chlane opposes as he says that

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't explain the quote dramatic zigzagging from masculine to

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:16.840
<v Speaker 1>feminine and then back to masculine principles that occurred before, during,

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and after the first five thousand years of agriculture. And

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>then another argument, you have anthropologist Sherry Ortner who credits

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the tendency to align the masculine with culture and the

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>feminine with nature. This is definitely a tendency you see

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in in literature all throughout the ancient world. Yeah, and

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>what do. What do cultures do? Will they rise up

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world by advancing their culture, and in doing

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so they are mastering nature. They are overpowering nature, and

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the exact language for that is even more severe.

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Butch Lane opposed this and says, well, it doesn't account

0:44:52.239 --> 0:44:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for the female imagery that is predominant throughout these different mythologies. Meanwhile,

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you have Frederick Engels who are us that the goddess

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>perished due to the rise of private property. Of course

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>he did, and he argues that this this becomes a

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>thing as nomadic hunter gatherers. Uh, you know, give way

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to agriculture so you can own land, and then it

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>follows that you can own women. Now, sh Leane opposes this,

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 1>neans is that it doesn't explained the fall of the goddess.

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>He points to the work of William Irwin Thompson and

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Jane Jacobs who argue that hunters were so reduced in

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:28.359
<v Speaker 1>status during the agricultural revolution that they turned to conquest

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and this led to the fall of goddess cultures, which

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I think is an interesting especially an interesting idea, especially

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in light of of so many discussions going on in

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>our culture today about what happens when when roles and

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>peoples who traditionally felt more empowered, uh feel less empowered.

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here is that you've got all these

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>people with these hunting instincts, especially predominantly men, with hunting

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>instincts that are not really very necessary anymore. Like, you know,

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 1>we've got plenty of grain, we don't we don't need

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to hunt, and in fact, there aren't even all that

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>many animals around for you to hunt anymore. So what

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do. Well, maybe you just turn your

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hunting instinct on people and you say, I'm going to

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>become a warrior now instead. Yeah, the rise of the

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>warrior class. Now. Meanwhile, feminist historian Gerda Learner she blames

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the form flames all of this on the formation of

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the archaic states. So the idea here is that you had,

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>through the necessity of centralized power, you end up resurrecting

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the role of the alpha male. You need some sort

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of decision maker at the heart of it. And Lennon

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Learner also argus argues that slavery ties into all of

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this because slaves would have been of little use during

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in hunter gatherer culture. But when you have agriculture. This

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:55.399
<v Speaker 1>gives slaves value, and so the former hunters they they

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>turn first people into slaves and then women, specifically into

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>subservient people. Now, Shelen opposes this. He says that it

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't account for the numerous goddess based societies that thrived

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>during this period. And he says, you know why we're there,

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>slave owning archaic states built around goddesses then, and so

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Slaine argues that, yes, there's a change going on here,

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's a change coming from within and it all

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:23.759
<v Speaker 1>ties in to the hidden cost of literacy. Okay, well,

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we should end our first part there, and

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:27.399
<v Speaker 1>in the next episode, we're gonna look at a little

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of the historical evidence that Slane uses to support

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 1>his hypothesis, and we're going to discuss some criticisms of

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the argument, both criticisms of reviewers and some critical thoughts

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of our own. In the meantime, be sure to head

0:47:39.200 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it over the Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 1>That is the mothership. That's what we will find all

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, as well

0:47:45.040 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>as links out to our various social media accounts. And

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll always remind everyone, Hey, if you want to support

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the show. A great way to do it is to

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>rate and review wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks as

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producers Alex Williams and Terry Harrison.

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:00.680
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to give us feedback on this episode or any other,

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to share your thoughts, to share topics you think we

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe should cover in the future, or just just to

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>say hi, you can email us at blow the Mind

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com for more on this

0:48:23.000 --> 0:48:25.479
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics. Does it how stuff works

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 1>dot com