WEBVTT - Surveillance: Inflation Is A Concern, Moynihan Says

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brown Witz Jailey. We bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg Termament. We

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are joined by the Chairman of CEGO of Bank of America.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>He's Mr Brian moynihan. Brian, thank you so much for

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>your time today. So the FETE is made it official

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>more or less. We need to pay attention to inflation

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and not clear exactly what we're doing, but we need

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to it. And they didn't move anything

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>except some dots on some plots. But where they did

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>they get it right? Are they reacting in the right

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>way at the right time or is it too much? Well?

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that first, David, good to see you again.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Let me uh. I think there's three key points. The

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>first point is about the virus, the vaccines and the variants.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>The second points about the dot plots, but what is

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the underlying FED predictions of economy, And the third points

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>about thinking about this FED and where they we're nineteen.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>So first point, if you have the three VS virus

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>variants and vaccines, you really have to listen that they

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>need to see the whole that they were trying to

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>fill between physical, physical stimulus and accommodation was to put

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy back to where it was and with the

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>same growth characteristics are frankly even better growth characteristics. And

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look around the world, central banks are gonna

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>struggles to win. This virus is behind him because at

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, is that is the determined here.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about India, think about what they

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>went through over the last several weeks, think about in

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the UK delaying uh the full of reopening because of

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the variants. That's the variant question. You think about the

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>US vaccines through half the population you can see and

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty open and the questions with the variance effect

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>us to pay attention to the vaccine path. The second

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>question was the dots, as you said, dot plots, and

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>there's great debate whether he's add value at this point

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>when they're put in there, it put in for a

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>different purpose. But leaving that debate aside, the question is

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS economic projections. This year seven. Next year in

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the mid threes, the street actually is seven percent. Matches

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>have fed this year, but next year Bank America security

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is and our team there and it's a great team

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is at five in the streets at high fours. If

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you believe the street in Bank of America are more

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>right as you move through the year. The reality is

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy is growing much fashion it was, with much

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>more fiscal stimus still to be spent in the customers accounts,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>much more opportunity for the economy around out and grow.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's something people should pay attention to because last

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>year this time this year's rate of growth was half

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of what it's turned out to be predicted to be.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So if those economic growth predictions move, those dot plots

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>will become uninteresting because I'll have to move because things

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>will be moving faster. And the third things, think about

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen, same fed, same chairs, different somewhat different people,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>the same research department. They were sitting there mid two

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand to two percent plus FED funds rate two percent,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>plush ten tenure Treasury rate. Economic projective forward growth was

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>two percent. Unemployment in the threes. Think about that. Where

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we are now, We've got three times the growth rate

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>projected next year, even two times the growth rate projected

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a FED unemployment rate projection in the low threes by

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty three, high threes by next year,

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>in low force bid force. This year there was a

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>full employment and what was the only thing concerning them

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and nine team was wage growth. And you're seeing wage growth,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>so that'll be interesting. Tug A wars that seeing normalized.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So Brian absolutely right. We're have a remarkable story and

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the bounce back of the economy and the growth. But

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>what about inflation, because they also have taken way up

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the FED the projection on the PCU deflate or three

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>point four percent core is three point o percent. What

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing? You have your tentacles in to so

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>many consumers as well as small businesses more than anybody else.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Are your customers seeing feeling real pressure from from price increases? Well,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>ye know. The great debate is yea, what is temporary?

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>What is transitory? As at SFP, as toom Mus talk

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>about this morning, these terms are used to try to

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>signal what they think right now. The firm belief I

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.559
<v Speaker 1>think by the FET is most of this is transitory.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll see But the question is what about the stickier things.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Wage growth becomes sticky, and you're seeing that come back,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and as unemployment rates come down and you're seeing you know,

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the pick up employement. We'll see what the new claims

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>are this morning, but you're seeing unemploy the employment market titan.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>If you ask our small business customers last fall, their

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>number one issue pandemic, pandemic, pandemic. This spring, number one

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>issue getting people to work and supply chains, that's a

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>whole different place. And that means inflation and characteristics are

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>out there to be filled. But is it temporary? Is

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it transitory? Um? And there'll be a great debate about that,

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 1>But I think it still comes down to what you

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>think next year's projection for for economic growth is and

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>what you see in wage growth leading into that, as

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to whether the stickier parts of this will happen. Now.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>The route is in our customers accounts. They still have

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty five sevent stiments dollars in those accounts. The average

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>balance for people two to five thousand dollars of average

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>balunc accounts are up three times and sitting there ready

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to be spent. You're seeing their spending growth year to

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>date through the last through the fourteenth of June versus nineteen,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not eighteen, but not twenty nineteen, meaning the no normal

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>year growth that's very strong. So it's all set up

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that inflation could happen. That would be the great debate.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think we have to get further into the

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>question of what is transitory. So, Brian, the one thing

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that seems clear after the FETE has spoken is that

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we are changing sort of the dynamic. We were on

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a loosening phase. We're not going to start tightening. It's

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not clear when or how how fast we're gonna start tightening.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>What does that due to Bank of America's business at

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>its core? And let's start if we could with trading.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've heard from a couple of your rivals

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>here the trading is down the second quarter. Were you

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in the second quarter? But could this cause volatility of

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>the tightening that could help your trading? Well, let's go

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the You know, our economics for economist projections

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are that the economy this quarter will be about the

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>same size that was heading into the pandemic, which means

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're sort of restored differently constituted with shortages and supply, labor,

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>unemployment not where we want. Spending that's migrated from panic

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of do it yourself and now to go

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>out and eat and things, restaurants spending up dramatically. Travel

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>back to what is all that means economy continues to

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>grow In terms of trading, you know, there's always a

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>seasonality between the first quarter and the second quarter, and

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we're no different than other people. But the reality, if

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you really think about it, is vaulatility helps a trading group,

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>but frankly, from a bank American perspective, you'd rather have

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy growing at a solid rate, unemployment down because

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>any day that means great for the core business. That

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>means great for the UH capital, for markets formation activity,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>less emergency and more normalized. And also it means great

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for loan demand and loan demand were stings start to

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>pick up slowly as we moved through the months of April, April,

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>May and June, which is better than it was obviously

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>last fall or coming into their early spring. So so Brian,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>if ironers that you correctly sounded like you're sort of

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>along with your rivals. They are on trading the Siddon quarter,

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>which should come down am I understanding that correctly? If

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the market moves, you know, we all maintain our market

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>share kind of moves together. So there's nuances that will know,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into but when we get to the earnings

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and figure out what happens the last few weeks here,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we're not gonna be a heck of

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot different from other people. So that I raised

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the question of Okay, what does it due to the

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of your business, particularly if we're into a tightening phase,

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>as I say, it doesn't know, don't know how long

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>it will take tightening phase. What does that do to

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>things like net interest margin? Well, that interest margin, the

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>deposit bounces are huge, and that's due to the amount

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of physical stimulus that went in the system and amount

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of monetary accommodation, so that deposit bounces are high. The loans.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The good thing about the business is half our money

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>comes from spread deposits and loans, and you're starting to

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>see those loans stabilize as we came to the first

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>quarter and start to grow this quarter at a modest pace.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But our credit card balances, you know, fell from ninety

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars and seventy billion dollars, and that's those are

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of things indicate the cut are still getting

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the game. Our middle market draw rate onlines

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>went from the forties to the low thirties. That's lower

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>than we've ever seen it. It's stabilized there and starting

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to move out, you know. So I think we're in

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the what I call the twist of both rates and

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>economy that you're seeing economy normalized in rates move up.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Rates moving up helps our business, but if they're moving

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>up the wrong reason, it doesn't help our business. So

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the good good thing for Bank America is when the

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>US economy and the world economies are growing on a

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fundamental basis. As we look forward, richeld moving up. But

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>let's be frank, it's pretty modest still as a practical matter.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And and let's also be honest, the Fed continues to

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>buy those bonds, which means there's more stimulus coming to

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. Is there demand for the loans, because the

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 1>problem doesn't seem to be the interest rates, it's more

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>whether's demand. Are you seeing demand from your customers? We are,

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing as we came to this quarter. Uh so,

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>our small business originations in two thousand, twenty one May.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We're about our small business originations in two thousand, nineteen May,

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's it's finally crossed over in various areas and

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Now again, it's still not where it was.

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>We we fell from nine hundred eighty billion dollars loans

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>down to nine hundred billion dollars loans and it's moving

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>up from there. But but the reality is that loan

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>growth is actually the core business. That means the core

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in the line economy is going well and we expect

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that to continue. And if you think from the first

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>quarter to the fourth quarter, you'll see that growth and

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>deposits continue. You'll see that growth and loans continue, and

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's good for banking generally and US in particular. But

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, we are in the

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>part of the process where you're seeing companies need to hire,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>need to get goods to sell, need to get goods

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to manufacturer. And that's because a seven percent growth rate

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on an economy that is the size of American economy

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is unprecedented and we haven't seen that in our lifetime.

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>So think about that online activity that will be good

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for Bank of americaud be good for America and that's

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>what we gotta get focused on. Brian, give us a

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>sense of how the pandemic want to change your business

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>where it comes to digital. As I understand, you picked

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>up a lot more digital users. Where is Bank of

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>America right now? Well, the three things that happened in

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of digital in the pandemic. Number one, consumer adoption

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>continued to go and by necessity it rounded out. What

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>do you mean by that? We continue to grow consumer

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>digital customers to forty point four million active digital customers today.

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>But what happened is the amount of sales went from

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>moving up to and now it's settling in in a

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>high fifties six. That is very good because that means

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>there's efficiency and effective as a reach of the market.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 1>But the important the second important thing was what it

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>happened happened internally our ability to interact with customers, Our

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>ability to relate to customers. Think about it, four or

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>five quarters of record investment banking fees and customers couldn't

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>We couldn't go see the customers do the to the

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.599
<v Speaker 1>pandemic restrictions, So that ability to operate differently, UH is

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>really important. And the third thing is it went to

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>various businesses. So our wealth management business adoption rates went

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>through the roof. In our commercial businesses, the cash pro mobile,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers of users went up dramatically, an amount of

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>activity went up dramatically, and so you're seeing it round

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>out through all the businesses that the adoption of digital

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. It usage of digital is important and that

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gives us more flexibility to continue to manage expense as

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>while we're not company, we'll talk about those expenses. Does

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean, as a practical matter, you could see your

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>number of retail establishments go down. I think here's something like, Yeah,

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been coming down for years based on customer behavior,

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>so it will continue to will continue to shape it.

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday, the day before, we open to Kentucky for

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the first time in our history. So think about that.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're opening new markets. We Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Minneapolis, UH, Denver,

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Salt Lake City UH, and then now Kentucky. I'm trying

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to think where else we've gone. All have been open

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of the last three or four years while we're shaping

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the distribution franchise and more markets have been in for

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>two hundred years due to the fact that you know,

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the customer behavior changes, so we watched that carefully. In

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>long term, we've had six thousand branches the high point

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>and now we're forties. During that time, the customer satisfaction

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>has gone up, which means the digital and other means

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>of operating have replaced that activity. And that's a relentless

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>trend which we're continue to work up. Brian, you've talked

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about the bounce back and consumer spending that you're seeing,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and goodness knows, you have contacted a lot of consumers.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got some of your rivals like City changing their

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>credit standards on credit cards. We have JP Morgan really

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>beefing up on marketing. Tell me what the competition of

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>our credit cards and what Bank of America is doing well.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>We've always taken a position to our credit card business

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about our core customers and getting a customer in

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the wallet and getting it used by those customers through

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the rewards systems that have so we have the only

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>all company rewards. If you have a performed rewards, you

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get rewarded for your cards and your accounts of all types,

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and you get lower rates on your auto loans and

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff that so preferred rewards, the holistic rewards programs we

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>focus on. The number one thing is the Great Bank

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of America capabilities delivered to you, and the car is

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>part of that. And so you're seeing that card origination

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>picked back up. It fell probably by seventy percent. It's

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>back now at about lower than it was, and that's

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>good for good news. Now they've got a bar on

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>them and then they got to pay us for bar

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and on them, which which takes some time. But the

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>roality is it's a it's a great business and we

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>like it, but it's part of our core consumer business

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>checking accounts, sorry of cards, auto loans, homeowns, be straightforward

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>about it, serve those customers well on The team under

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>de Nathan Asia does a great job with it. Finally, Brian,

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I know you said that you're hoping to get most

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of your people back into the offices by I think

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>at mid September you've talked about are you going to

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>require them to be vaccinated? Have you decided? Right now

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we're moving people back who are vaccinated, which we our

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>team under Sherry Bronstein's leadership, our HR team has done

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a fabulous job for us in terms of managing through this, uh,

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>not not with any playbook, but doing it because before

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>nobody had this happened. They've done a great job. So

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we build a vaccine tool three or four months ago

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and capture voluntary capture. We have seventy plus thousand people

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's worth concentrating getting them back to work because

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that allows people to move about under the CDC guidelines

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>with out masks and things like that. As more people

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated, we keep bringing more back. We've got a

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of work to get those back. But the view

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>is after labor Day, our view is all the vaccinate

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>teammates were back and we'll be able to operate Fairlure

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>normally and we'll then start to make provisions for the

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>other teammates as we moved through the fall. Okay, Brian,

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so very much for your time. That's Brian moynan.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>He is the chairman and CEO of Bank of America.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>David Rosenberg joining us from Rosenberg Research. Thrill that you

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>could join us. David Rosenberg slices and dices inflation dynamics.

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Truly like no one I know. David. We had Goldman Saxon,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>He and you are so much on the same page

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of a slide of GDP back to something normal. At

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>some point, if we get a hot seest sub three

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>g d P, what does that do to Rosenberg inflation? Well, look,

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that if the economy slows down, especially with

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal withdrawal, we're going to be sing in the

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>second half of the year. I think what happens in

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>traditional economic terms is the output gap starts to widen again. Uh,

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to bring this in platient run up. We've

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>seen reverse course and should ultimately be very good news

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for a long duration assets. So that's really what the

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>story there is. But let's say Tom, it was really

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I think less about the dots. The dots have no

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>predicted powers. Historically, there was the fat taking this year's

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth from six and a half to seven percent.

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>As you know, when you look at what's baked in

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>already for the first half of the year, the Feds

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>telling you that they're expecting fourth quarter growth to be

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>close to five which is up materially from what they're

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in plicit before. What do you have into two thousand

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, though, they've got to get to two rate

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>increases the year on and so much of it depends

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>on that level of GDP. Do we get back to

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a potential GDP two percent? Do we go under three percent?

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>What's your guestamate, Well, you know, look the FEDS over

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>three percent. Uh. A lot of it depends on the

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>fiscal backdrop. Um. But I think the fiscal drawal is

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>so enormous um that you're gonna have to have. I mean,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED is I implicitly assuming that private sector demand

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be over six percent next year. I

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>am nowhere close to that. I think the economy is

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna slow back below trend um starting probably in the

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>third or fourth quarter of this year. UM. So I'm

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>back the low potential growth for next year. Uh and

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>uh And as a result of me, that reinforces my

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>view that inflation is going to come back down more.

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>The people thinking, David, do you think that the FED

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is committing an error here? Uh? Well, it's too early

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to say that. UM. You know, it's situational and everything

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is really about you know, now moving from moving from

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>three um. And so it's still a few years down

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the road to say that Fed's going to make a mistake.

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they haven't really done anything. I mean, they're

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about talking about tapering, which is maybe happening earlier.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The people pot but they haven't done anything, and they

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>just you know, laid say. I guess that will it

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be Will it be a mistake? Should they follow through

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>on the median dot plot projection there of hiking rates twice? Well,

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it probably will be. But you know that's

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>based on that's based on my assumptions. Uh, And even

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>on the fom s take a look, there's still a

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>wide range of opinions. People look at the median dot plot.

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody has centered on the media. So I say

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>that they haven't made a mistake yet. I thought that

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>it was surprisingly either less stubbish um than uh. You

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>know that I was certainly thinking about. But they haven't.

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>They haven't done anything yet. I mean, look when you

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>look at the dots. When they were first introduced by

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Bernankei in early two thousand and twelve, the funds rate

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>was pressing against zero. For the next two years, the

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>dot plot showed, you know, point seven five they were

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna hike rate three times. So we know with hindsight

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>they never did that, and I guess that they race

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>rates three times. It would have been a mistake, but

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>they never carried through the dots. So to say that

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they made a mistake way too premature to say that

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, did you so don't see the inflation right

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in your notes you talk about uh cp I gets

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>all the attention, and that's up, but the index is

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>not accelerating. And if the Fed is even thinking about

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>raising rates, why would you like gold here? Well, look,

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been banging my fist on gold for for months. Um,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you know I've got dramatically over sold at the lows

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>several months ago, it's backed up and now it's rolling

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>over again. I mean a lot of the gold analysts

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>are saying we can correct all the way down in

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the context of what could still be a secular bowlt

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>market and gold nothing moves on the straight line. But

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you folks are talking earlier about the backup

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>or less negative results in real rates. Well, golds caught

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a time warm relationship with real rates, and the real

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>rates back up here and the dollar continues to strengthen,

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>then it's such as gold enditing price in US dollars

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to take it on the chin, including most

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices. Uh So, for the time being. As long

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>as real rates back up here are the dollars that's

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>broke above the Twitter day moving average, BOLD is going

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to remain under some near turned downward pressure. So to

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>say that I'm bullets on gold right now because they've

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>been affected, or bullog gold right now, I'd be saying,

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that the near term rests similar to the downside.

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>David Rosenberg, thank you so much, greatly appreciate it. This

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>morning he's with Rosenberg Research. A little much more for

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Mr Rosenberg in the coming days as he writes on inflation.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Alan Ruskin with the Standard Deutsche Banker Chief international Strategist,

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Alan I, I look at where we are right now.

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>That what an interesting press conference yesterday, and I've really

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>got to ask you about this phrase substantial further progress.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>We're making a joke about it, but on a theoretical basis,

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the textbooks you've used, what is substantial fur

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>their progress? How do you define that? Well, Tom, I

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>think what you saw yesterday was that the dual mandate

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is so important and at it's both uh, the progress

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you make on the inflation side, but also you know,

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of course the progress you make on the employment labor

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>market side, and the market up until now has been

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>emphasizing the labor market and the lack of progress there.

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>But I think what you finally saw was recognition from

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED on the importance of the other side of

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the dual mandate, the inflation side. So um, you know,

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it really depends on what you're looking at on the

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>labor market side. I think even there, Chairman Power was

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>very optimistic when he starts to speak about the longer

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>term view on the labor market, and when you look

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at the Fed's forecasts on the labor market, including an

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate of three point eight percent at the end

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of two around four and a half percent at the

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>end of this year, those are very you know, consistent

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with substantial progress. The substantial progress could be a green

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>light for other central banks given your international preview. Did

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>he green light other central banks yesterday to begin to

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>nudge read so up as they choose. I don't think

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>other central banks are using this flexible average inflation targeting regime,

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly not in a religious way that the FED seemed

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>to be up until yesterday, So I think there's no

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of green lighting per se. I think the FED

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was standing out is really looking like the ultra Dvish

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>central bank within the G ten group. UM, I don't

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>think it really changes things materially. What you are, however,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing is that some of the central banks that were

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>leaning to be more on the hawkish side, like the

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Norgious Bank on our signaling that they will raise rates,

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not not just a taper, but actually raise rates in September.

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So you do have, you know, some central banks that

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.959
<v Speaker 1>are well ahead of the Federal Reserve. There were before

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and they are after After yesterday, we have seen

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>more central banks start to raise rates than cut rates.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there have been eighty four central bank actions

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>globally this year. At the beginning of the year, Um,

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>there were more cuts and now we're seeing that skewed

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>towards hikes. Um. When are we going to see though

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the big ones follow or or is that the way

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be? Is the easy be really gonna

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>wait until after the Fed? Look, I think the big

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>ones are, you know, holding back for the most part.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the e c B is also you know,

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously said they're not going to taper through Q three.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>There also on this you know, this attempt to look

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>at things and see how things are going to change.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>The Bank of Japan is not looking at things for

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next three or four years really in

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a way, so they're very much on hold. The Bank

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 1>of England maybe is a little bit more hawkish than

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the other central banks. But I think when you look

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>at global markets, it's a federal reserve. I mean, we

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>just saw it yesterday that, um, you know, it's what

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the federal Reserve does that's going to dictate I think

0:22:56.680 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>going all asset prices. Lisa a great piece out yesterday

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Opinion about the financial risk that we're seeing

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>rate risk intertwined uh with credit risk, And today I

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>saw a story on private equity. They've been pumping more

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>leverage loans onto the books of their companies than they

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>have in the last fourteen years because of these low rates.

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Is this a dangerous situation certainly for someone like myself

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>intends to emphasize the assets cycle is ultimately driving the

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>business cycle. Um, there's plenty of signs of a bullians really,

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think the Fed has been very restrained, just

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 1>to put it charitably, in terms of the way they've

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>spoken about, you know, the ideas of bubbles of bubble letts, etcetera.

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think you know the the example you cite

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>on the leverage loan side. I think one could just

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>look in terms of just some of the more orthodox measures,

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious being, you know, just equity p ratios,

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just say that, yes, there are dangerous signs there, and

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not obviously just as surprises, but now

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>where we've seen it in consumer prices, I mean the

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>danger is upon us really in a sense. So, um,

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that the whose action and I think the

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>FED did the minimum yesterday, So I want to talk

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the market reaction. We did get

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an immediate knee jerk increase in rates as the FED

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>took a more hawkish till makes sense today you're getting

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>some buying people coming in and seeing some opportunity. At

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what point does the international aspect of the bond market,

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that if the US does tighten, they look

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>better on a relative basis, their yields are higher, the

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>dollar strengthens, people go into these bonds and yields go lower.

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.959
<v Speaker 1>How much without the rest of the world moving, does

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the balance of motion and go to the lower when

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to bond yields even with a more hawkish FED.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Well these I mean, you know, we just have to

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think back to Q one, where the bond market was

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>very much in the frame and the bears were, you know,

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>very much taking up the running and quarter two has

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>been very very different, and the dynamic there's different because

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on the supply side, the Federal Reserve, you know, it's

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously been holding huge treasury balances that the Treasury has

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>now been running down, so the net issuance, particularly the

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>last couple of months is going to be negative. So

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that supply side has been very helpful for the bond market.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And then on the demand side, obviously got the Federal

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Reserve dominance sort of taking down, you know, it's close

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>to say, sixty percent of issuance quarter by quarter, but

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>on top of that over the last few months, but

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we really have got good data for March

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and April. Foreigners stepped up their game as well. So

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>our foreigners do seem to be interested in US bonds

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and Treasury bonds in particular when you see heels above

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>one point five percent. So previously I thought, look here

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the ten you can easily get to two and a

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>half percent. You know two's tens to fifty basis points

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is not unusual, but I think what you're seeing in

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this low yield environment is that and this will restrain

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the bond market. But Corter two has been a special

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the issuance science. I think there's definitely a

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>danger that when we get past this rundown of treasury

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>cash balances, bond heels are going to start backing up

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in a more material way. That's really interesting basically waiting

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for the taper to actually begin. Just to sort of

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>wrap this all together, Did anything change about your investing

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.680
<v Speaker 1>thesis after yesterday's FED meeting? Yeah, I think things did

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>change because the FED has really been you know, ultra

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>ultra dovish, really and you know, I still think they're dovish.

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I still think, you know, there's an argument that there

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>should be finishing tapering at the time when they're starting

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 1>to talk about tapering, so you know, we're still you know,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>dealing with an ultra dovish FED. But I think they're

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>catching up with the market. And the key element is

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>is the FED behind the curve or not or certainly

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>behind the market, because you know, if they lag behind

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the market, then for example, in the FX arena, the

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar will tend to be weak if they catch up,

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and certainly if they're ahead of them pocket then the

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>doll is strong. So you know, we're at that cusps

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>really when we're making up on mind just exactly where

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the fit fits in relation to the marketplace. Ellen Russ

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>can thank you so much, greatly, greatly appreciated this morning

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with Deutsche Bank there John Gollob writes two and three

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>page notes that are massively sector dependent and data dependent,

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and we're thrilled that he joins us this morning in

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>his optimism. John Gollob, I like what you say about

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>high sales growth companies. It's a struggle. It's a it's

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a yin yang kind of thing there. Tell me about

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the substantial further progress of high sales growth companies. Well,

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we've seen is that the market has

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>been a value driven market and growth is lagged. But

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at kind of growth on steroids, these

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>are companies with higher sales growth, not just higher earnings growth.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>They're really doing quite poorly and they remain expense of

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>So think about some of these more speculative companies. We

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>think that they're going to going to lag in the

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>current environment. And we continue to believe that even with

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS saying what they did yesterday that the value

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>cyclical trade is gonna work in the market's gonna be strong.

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And what's great here in radio you can't see it

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but galu But you know, forget about having the fancy

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>bookcase behind you. Lisa Gollub's got Henry Kissingers Magisterial World

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Order behind him. That was my book of the Years

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>million years ago, with two really pressian chapters on America.

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Still true today. So what's the world order going forward?

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna have that tone behind your head when

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to a potential hawk ish FED doesn't kill

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>off some of the transformation that we've seen in equity markets,

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like increase in meme trading, like the increase in spac issuance. Well,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>let's let's put this in perspective. We know there's inflation everywhere.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We had a five percent inflation prints on CPI, a

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>six post persition of inflation prints on PPI, and the

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>FIT was acknowledging it, and they said, okay, we may

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have to raise rates in two years from now. At

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty three, expectations of sixty basis points

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and and and in a market that or economy that

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is on fire, if they didn't acknowledge, um, what we're

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>all seeing, I think they would have lost credibility. So yeah,

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they took a little bit of our

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>candy away. We were incrementally unhappy. We're one percent of

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>all off of all time eyes. But I don't think

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that that we're really changing this. This is still zero money.

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And and unfortunately, I think that some of the specular

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>trades are going to continue to work because it is

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>still a very combinative environment. All Right, we'll go from

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the speculative to I guess the more stable companies here, John,

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about evaluations in this market, there was

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>an argument being made last year and into this year

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>here that a lot of the highest valuations were actually

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>assigned to some of the highest growth companies, at least

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on a revenue basis. Here. Is that still the case

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>going forward? It is? And that was actually the point

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of that note that that Tom was mentioning, is that

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the market's expensive, but it's not the average company that's

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that's out of whack. It's really the stuff at the

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>very top from evaluation perspective, and a lot of these

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>things are very speculative in nature. Um those stocks we

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>think are going to be vulnerable, and which is probably

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for investors who do the fundamental work

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and focus on the underlying earnings and cashitlows and all

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that boring stuff. John John from Coventry emails and he says,

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>did you guys stop talking and ask him what SPX

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is gonna do? What's your standard reports target? Out one year?

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>We have you know, we have the highest UM target

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>according to Bloomberg Survey at fort hundred. That's a little

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>bit less than ten percent. That's pretty bullish. We think

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that earnings are gonna be about two hundred UM, which

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know that that's a that's a big you know

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's a big number. But companies are beating really

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>really strongly. Hopping at this is great. John sending more

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>questions Lucy Jonathan. There's a question of how far we

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>can project this into the future. Are we still bringing

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the returns of the future to the present or is

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>this something that's sustainable with ten percent returns foreseeable for

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a number of years out for the SMP you know,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that was one of the challenges with the

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>FED report that you were seeing a more of a

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>dispersion of what the FED governors were seeing because there's

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>just so many unknowns on how this reopening is going

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to do. The real question is when do we get

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to normal, because then you would expect, you know, your

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>typical eight percent return. I don't think we're gonna get

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to normal from an equity perspective until the early to

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>mid part of three. At that point in time, the

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.479
<v Speaker 1>Fed's probably already moved. At that point in time, GDP

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.479
<v Speaker 1>is already growing at two percent, back in line with

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>normal history. Between now and then, I think stocks continue

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to be on fire and value continues to win. You

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have been killing it. Look at twelve trailing market returns.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Folks to know that John got all the credit. Sweez

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>has just absolutely nailed it there with a bold call

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>out to SPX. I'll triangulate and find out what that

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>means for the dal Jones industrial average. Eric Adams joins

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>us semoral candidate in the June primary. And this has

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a national I should point out really a national view

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as what we see. I was thunderstruck, Eric,

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know where you came in on this.

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But in the debate transcript, I looked at once again

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the fancy suit and Ties have a middle class definition

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred and thirty seven thousand income per year,

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and one of the candidates said, wait a minute, it's

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>more like fifty four thousand a year. Explain to me

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>if you are mayor where your middle class is define

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>middle class in your New York City. Well, and that's

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a that's a moving target. As I stated during the debate,

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>when you looked at the United Ways report of New

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Yorkers have a sufficiency deficit. So if you have a

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>family of four and you're making a hundred and fifty

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a year and you're living in Park Slope,

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you are challenging to actually make ends meet. And there

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are many parts of the city where based on your income,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.479
<v Speaker 1>your family, your rent, and dealing with everything from student

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>loans to tuition. You know, it's a very difficult time

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for middle class New Yorkers. And we have decimated the

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>middle class in the city and if not throughout the

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>entire country. Part of the decimation of the middle class

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>is their fear of crime. Certainly, we've learned at Bloomberg

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in the last number of weeks, crime is front and center. Uh,

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of people talking. Eric Adams, I would

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>suggest war the blue was a police officer. I want

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you to provide the distinction of your approach to NYPD

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>versus the candidates who don't have your public service. And

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question because many of the candidates refused

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this real issue of crime. They wanted

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>to look at public safety through the eyes of a

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bumper sticker or slogan. Unless we clear the prerequisite to

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>prosperity is public safety and justice. We're not going to

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>recover as a city or country if we don't get

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this crime under control. No one is going to come

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>here as a tourist, a multi billion dollar industry if

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you have three year children shot in Times Square, no

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one wants to ride out subways to get back into

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the office spaces if you're slash or shove to the

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>subway system on the subway tracks. And so my goal

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is number one, get gun violence under control. We want

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to put in place a plain closed anti gun unit

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>there zero and or gun and gang violence, use out

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>gun suppression unit to really collaborate together with our other

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>agencies to identify who's using the guns, stopping guns from

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>coming into our city, and then we must deal with

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>our street homeless problem, really dealing with the mental health

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>illnesses that we're facing. We're losing the quality of life.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>No one is going to stay in the city or

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>building the city if we're viewed as a city that's

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not seen. Uh. Certainly so, uh, Mr Adams. Obviously a

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>prerequisite to that prosperity is public safety. So is education here.

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks want to know how what's your

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>approach gonna be with regards to the public school systems here,

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>with regards to staffing, and more importantly, with reguards to

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the prosperity of our children. Well said? Well said? Listen,

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:45.720
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you the biggest embarrassment in this city,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>uh is how we treat our children in education. Education

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is not K through twelve. That's wrong. The neurologists and

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>pediatricians would tell you. Education is pregnancy through profession. We

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>must make sure that every area of a vacation is

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>handled right, everything from nutrition on when mothers are pregnant

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to the time that we give them the right too

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>they need and brain development. But also are the real embarrassment.

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Sixty five of black and brown children never reach proficiency

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the department education in the city. So one, we

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>must return the joy of learning in our schools. We

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>must look into internships. Externships, leaning too, vocational trainings allowed

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the business community, our tech and other industries to be

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the curriculum that we develop in our school systems.

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>And then we must get technology in our schools, access

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to WiFi and all the twos our children need. And finally,

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>our fundation not be based solely on what happens in

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a school building. We need to look at the issues

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>around the schools as well. Is your vision centered around

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the public school system? Mr Adams? My business is surrounding

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>lifted up excellence. If that needs charter schools, public school

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>private schools, let's duplicate successful schools in our city and

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>go across the country to do so. I got forty

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>five seconds, Eric, How are you gonna cut costs? How

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>are you going to manage costs in a city where

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>costs are unmanageable? I'll city is dysfunctional as cities across

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>America's Americas, they are number one. We're going to reign

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in a three to five percent of cutting all of

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>our agencies. There's a lot of fat. We have a

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion dollar increase in our budget. Uh, there's just

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>too much waste and mismanagement. And we're not going to

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hurt those communities that were hardest hit during COVID and

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>even pre COVID. UH. This city is manageable. Taxpayers are

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>doing their dollars of doing the right things by paying

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 1>their taxes. It's time for us to do the right

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>thing with government by using those dollars correctly. We're too expensive,

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>too bureaucratic, and too difficult to do business in this city.

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to change day one. He is from Brooklyn.

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Eric Adams, thank you so much for joining us twenty

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>seven at the mayoral effort here with that very unique voting.

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.240
<v Speaker 1>us live weekdays from seven to ten a m Eastern

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance Podcast on

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. This is Bloomberg