WEBVTT - A Commitment To America:  Sarah Westwood Talks to A&G

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>First before we get to our guests, Sarah Westwood, a

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>little history lesson for those of you are too young

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or were too stoned at the time to understand what

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>was going on. Back during Bill Clinton's first term, the

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrats had controlled the house. See, if you're younger, the

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>House has been going back and forth now in recent

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>years and you kind of feel like it's been that way.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Back in Bill Clinton's first term in when the Republicans

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>were running to try to take the house, the Democrats

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>had controlled the House of Representatives for forty years. Forty

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>years the demos controlled the house. There was just some

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>belief that it just always will be, you know, institution

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>run by Democrats. Nuke Gingrich, who wanted to be speaker

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of the House, came up with this contract for America,

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>partially based off a Ronald Reagan speech and some stuff

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Heritage Foundation, and I had a bunch of

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>things in it that things that we promised to do

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>if you elect us to run the House of Representatives,

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was a pretty good, uh, political I'm wanna

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>call it. It's definitely not a stunt in any way whatsoever,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but maneuver tactic whatever to like really focus people on

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.119
<v Speaker 1>what they would get out of having Republicans Control Congress. Well,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the current guy who would like to

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>be speaker of the House with the Democrats in charge,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the House for the Republicans with Democrats in charge,

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Kevin McCarthy, has put out a piece of paper of

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>his own and we're gonna discuss that with Sarah Westwood,

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>investigative reporter of The Washington examiner. Uh, Sarah, welcome to

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Armstrong Gutti show. How are you? I'm good. Thanks

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>for having me. I hope the little history lesson wasn't

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>too boring for you. Um, how how? What is Kevin

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy calling his thing? This is called the commitment to America,

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, it's sort of modeled after this contract

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for America that New Gingrich unveiled, and I think it's

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an effort by McCarthy to have a more proactive

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>message heading into the bid terms. Right. I mean, I

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>think a criticism that you've heard people like Senator Rick

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Scott over on the Senate side level of Republican leadership

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is that we are, you know, against all of these

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>things that Democrats are doing. We're running a really oppositional campaign,

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>but we don't really have a clear sense of what

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we're for these days, and so this, I think, is

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to give a sharper, clearer direction for voters as to

0:02:18.840 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>what they can expect if they elect Republicans. And you know,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's the potential for it to be

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>really smart politics, because you are sort of defining the

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Republican agenda in the in the sharpest way that they

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>have so far this election, and that could be helpful

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to some Republicans out there who are still sort of

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>struggling to find that message to run on. Sure, you'd say,

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like a power point presentation in a

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in a conference room or something. So what is he promising?

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Chicken every pot? What? What? What? What? What are some

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the whatever you called it, the good things for

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>America contract? What's in it? Sure, so one of the

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>big ones obviously fighting inflation, UH, public safety. These are

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>all sort of organized under like you side, different different

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>slide decks, if you will, and economy that's strong is

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>one category. A nation that saves, a government that's accountable.

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But also he's waiting into some of the culture war

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>issues with this plan that I think Republicans have found

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>might be in political circles defined as sort of a

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>right wing causes, but are actually really popular with both Americans, like, uh,

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>having girls sports be the domain of only girls. I

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that. I didn't know he's going to go there.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 1>He is, and so so you know, I think that

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>while some of those issues are kind of controversial, they

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are leaning into the most popular of the culture war

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ideas and a lot of that is centered around schools

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, again, I think getting all Republicans on

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the same page, growing the same direction on some of

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>these issues where Democrats have been defining the converse station,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is a really good thing for the party. However, he's

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>rolling it out on the same day the early voting

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is already starting in about five or six states today.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the final quarter of the election, and so one

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>does have to wonder if this could have been a

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>more helpful two Republicans if you'd rolled it out. Yeah,

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a real that is a real tough one

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with the modern politics and I'm sure both parties are

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure it out because I mentioned the other day,

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this past Tuesday we're seven weeks from the election seems

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>like a long time and Joe pointed out that. Well,

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>for some people they're like, you know, they're not even

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>seven days from the election. So yeah, well, when do

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you focus your message? Message, when do you make your

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>your your final argument? Uh, do you wait for the

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>massive people in most places we're going to vote that

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>day or yeah, I don't know, that's a tough one. Traditionally,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>right campaigns would wait until after Labor Day to really

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>ramp up because that's when voters started paying attention. But now,

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of these mid touring campaigns started last year.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean this campaign it drags on for a long time.

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>People are engaged a lot earlier and uh, and some,

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of new rances and some

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the key races, the primaries were much earlier, and

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so the general election campaigns have been going on for

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>months and then in both candidates have had more of

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a chance to define each other. In other ones we

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>just got the nominee, you know, in August and so

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like in New Hampshire, for example, and the general election

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>is so much more truncated. So one does have to

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder if to count for all of those nuances and

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>for the states where candidates were chosen in primaries a

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>lot earlier. A plan like this might have been more

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>helpful a lot earlier. That's the Senator Rick Scott did

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>with his plan. That angered a lot of Senate Republicans,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>but he released it much earlier so it would have

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>more of an impact and sort of failed in getting

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to line up behind the agenda. But I think

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the idea was the same. We should enter this mentoral

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>election contest now. Well, I understand, I definitely understand the

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 1>argument on the other side because most people don't pay attention.

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>The people who don't vote early don't pay attention until it's,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, gets closer to election day, so you can

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>roll out your big contract with America's sort of thing.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But if nobody's paying attention, it's not doing any good.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure over time both parties are going to

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have to figure this out. Of when you when you

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>land with your big messages. Sarah Westwood of the Washington Examiner,

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to her. I gotta jump into the Immigration Story.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Where are we on that? Is it? Is it continue

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to have legs in Washington D C, or is it

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>petering out? Or are there going to be more bus

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>loads sent to more blue city and state that are

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>sanctuaries to keep it things riled up? What do you know?

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I mean I think it's in so

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 1>incredibly effective. Uh, you know, I'm sure Greg Abbott is,

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the governor of Texas, is not happy that run to

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>sansis since one planeload and gets all the attentions that

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>habits spend doing it for months to try to get

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the same message across. Sending bust loads of immigrants Washington,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>D C, in New York City like it the benefit

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and why? This was sort of a gamble from the

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>santis because it was controversial. But why it's paying off?

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Is it now? I don't. I don't really see a

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of continuing debate about the ethics of sending those

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>specific migrants to Martha's vineyards, but the debate has moved

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on and into even mainstream media realms about the word crisis.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Democrats had been so resistant to having any

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of rational conversation about what to do with all

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the migrants coming over the border. It's sort of hid

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>behind this shield of moral superiority, like they appeared to

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>be the more welcoming people and that, you know, excluded

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>them from having to participate in a conversation about what

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to do. And now that the migrants had actually arrived

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>on their doorstep in Washington, D C, in New York City,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in Martha's vineyards, and they've turned them away, that's sort

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of invalidated the only tool they had in their arsenal

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>did not have to deal with this issue, and so

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>now they are Democrats facing harder questions. Okay, well, it's

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't want them and the border towns can't handle them.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>What should we do? And those conversations overwhelmingly favor Republicans

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and in that way I think this is an enormously

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>helpful issue for Republicans in the mid terms. Before I

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>let you go, Sarah, I'm I got a bunch of

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>TVs on here in the studio. One of them CNN,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>where you used to work, and they're running the video,

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like everybody is, of the the unruly passenger who walks

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>up behind the flight attendant and punches him in the

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>back of the head. Have you seen that video? I haven't.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was a covid thing. Is it back

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>plain violence? Play? Yeah, no, this one. So that's the

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>reason I brought it up. It's it's pretty, it's pretty unge.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>They'll run up and hit a guy in the back

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of the head when I was facing away from you.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>And come on, if you're gonna fight a flight attendant,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you gotta Square up. But anyway, do you know what

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>it was over? It was over. They didn't have any coffee.

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta say I don't you know, I don't

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>approve of it, but I got out of southwest playing

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the other day, flying out a burbank and so the

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm running late, I'm always running and I

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the starbucks line was long and I thought, you know,

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna I'll get coffee on the plane. I

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>got on the plane, they shut the doors, they announced

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no coffee on this plane. Yeah, I kind of

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>want to put something in the back of my head.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Got To admit it. So many regrets. That was rough.

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Westwood, thanks for joining us today. You always have

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the information. Appreciate it. Thank you, BET