WEBVTT - Power Tool Demand Booms During Pandemic 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Now, I am excited

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to welcome Jim Laurie to the program, Chief executive Officer

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Black and deck Or. The stock has hit an

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>all time high and the company has boosted it's uh

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one Tools and Storage organic growth view.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I am Jim. You're probably your target retail customer looking

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for an angle grinder right now. There's nothing I love, well,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>there's very There are very few things I love more

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>than power tools. Ride motorcycles a lot, but mainly so

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that I can work on them. Um. I guess it's

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>probably home improvement though. That's been driving your business this year,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Well, that's certainly a big part of it.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we we do, uh, we do have

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>some drivers and all around the globe, and it's home improvement,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's repurposing homes. It's home starts, housing starts, and uh

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:17.559
<v Speaker 1>economic activity in general, you know, all drive the business, alright,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So Jim, give us a sense of how your business

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of was impacted during the pandemic. Take us to

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of just as you know, that quarter or two

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic, and then what it's been like since the pandemic.

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>How's your business changed. Yeah, we had a very interesting

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic situation where it was just kind of normal,

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>and then one day we woke up and UH sales

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>plummeted by We're down for four continuous weeks in US retail,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a big part of our business. So it

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit scary at that point in time,

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but we uh we kept producing. We remained continuously open,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and in May, what happened was the point of sale,

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the cash register receipts, if you will, at the retailers

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>started going positive and then it went to stratospheric levels

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of last year that we've really never

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>seen before, you know, like up e commerce was up.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It was just crazy numbers and so fortunately we had

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>made some that says we saw this these cash registered

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>receipts going up for tools, and we bought six hundred

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>million dollars worth of inventory and manufactured six hundred million

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth the extra inventory to serve that demand, and

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that that demand has just continued, you know, at different

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>varying rates. But let me give you a little insight

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>into the first quarter. Uh, you know, the total sales

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and the tools business, we're up forty organically. North America

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>was up for US, retail was up and get this,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Europe was up, and the UK and even the emerging market,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>who you wouldn't think would be doing so well, they

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>were up seventy in Latin America seventy seven percent. So

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really really broad based market strength. And when

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we cut fining you across the products. You know, power

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>tools were up fifty percent, hand tools up and outdoor

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>outdoor was up a hundred and twenty. So the headge trimmers,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the shears, the electric shears and those types of things

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>just bonanza really across the board. Well, your long term

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>growth has been strong as well, And I wonder if

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I look at your next day three to five years,

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>do you expected to pick up from the last three

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to five years. Absolutely, you know, I've been at sea

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>level exacting this company for twenty one years, and when

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I joined, we were two billion in revenue, and we'll

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>finish this year, you know, somewhere in the fifteen sixteen

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar range. Our market cap was two billion, and

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's over thirty now. So it's been a long term

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>growth story as long as I've been here, and even

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>dating back you know, before that, since our founding in

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen forty three. But in any event, we're excited about

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the post pandemic economy, and we're excited about our portfolio

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>because not only do we have I would say, the

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>construction market coming back, we see very positive outlook for

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the US economy and beyond that global growth. And then

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>specifically to Stanley Black and Ducker, we are going to

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>uh execute an option that we have to buy eight

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of a company called mt D, which is one of

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the largest gasolene powered outdoor power equipment makers of one

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>mowers and riding mowers and most types of things. And

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to that's about a three billion dollar business,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to convert that business using our technology

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and our know how in battery power, We're going to

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>convert that and electrify that. So we're gonna add billions

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of dollars of revenue, and we're gonna do great things

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for the environment. A just recal Okay, thirty seconds, Jim,

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at, uh the supply chain function on the

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal SPLC. I see you've got about more than

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty suppliers out there. Talk to us about the supply chain.

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you getting the stuff you need? We've done really

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>really well in that regard. However, it's not It has

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not been without its challenges. You can imagine, you know,

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>officially Asian and Mexican supply chain during a pandemic. It

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>does have challenges. And we you know, the three things

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that are uh mostly most scarce, I would say would

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>be batteries, semiconductors, and UH in some cases resins. And

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we're in good shape to continue this kind of growth,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>UH and this kind of run rate sales UH with

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>batteries and also semi conductors. UH. And then the next

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>next year, in the year beyond, we're gonna have to

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to get some more access to semiconductors.

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Resins were into shape, Jim, thanks so much for joining us.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Any guys reported really strong numbers last week's stock at

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>an all time high. Good time to be in the

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>tool business. Jim Laury, chief executive officer for Stanley, Black

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and Decker. We appreciate him taking some time there again

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from the at home consumer doing some work around

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the house. I guess now I want to bring in

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Phil Orlando is the chief equity market strategist and head

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of client portfolio management that Federated Hermes. They've got about

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>eighty billion dollars in equities under management firm wide, about

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars in assets under management as of a

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of the end of last year. Phil um. You know,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lots changed since the end of last year, so I'm

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>expecting that number is probably a lot higher now. But

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>how much higher can it get? I mean, have we

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>reached a point when you know, uh, the market expectations

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>are um are now high enough for or the valuations

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>are high enough to meet market expectations. Well, the market

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>is going to reflect corporate earnings and you know the

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>S and P five from the bottom of the market

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>March a year ago to where we are now. You know,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we hit a record high within the last couple of days,

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and there have been a lot of folks that have

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>been scratching their heads saying, how can the market be

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>doing this? Well, um, we had, you know, the deepest

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>recession in history, and the reason is that the equity

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>market is a forward looking discount mechanism which attempts to

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>price in what they think is going to happen six

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>or nine months later. So here we are now in

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter earning season. We're about two thirds of

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the way through. Earnings were expected to be up about

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>year on year according to facts set, They're up. Yeah, well,

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean tail this is the interesting thing. I mean,

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I have never seen companies knocked the cover um so

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>far off the ball as they had this earning season.

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, um, the last looked SMP companies are beating

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>expectations by nine percent. You know, almost all of the

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>companies out are beating the street's estimates. And yet, um,

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen stocks move a lot in the past

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>few days. Analysts are saying, thank you very much. We

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>are our investors are saying, thank you very much. We

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>expected that. You know, what what can you do for me? Now?

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Well that that's exactly the point. There's maybe one percent.

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Rally has priced in some of this gain. The second quarter.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>The quarter that just started that we're going to report

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>in July. We think the earnings are going to be

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>up another sixty Now that could represent the peak of

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the cycle in terms of rate of growth. So we

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>may continue to grind earnings up second half of this

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>year all of next year, but the corner on quarter

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>year on year pace of that increase may start to decline. UM.

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So so that's the the interesting inflection point that we're

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching right now. We still think the market's

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>going to forty five hundred, but we may get to

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>by August as opposed to December, based upon the strength

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the earnings recovery that corporate America right now is enjoying.

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Phil give us a sense of your concern about inflation,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>because we certainly are seeing inflation, uh coming into this market,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>whether you look at the soft commodities, hard commodities, oil,

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know rallying here um the Fed and Chairman Pal saying, hey,

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just transitory, don't worry about it. But I think

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a growing chatter about the concerns for inflation. What

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that night mean for the FED going forward? What are

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts we think the Fed is being there whistling

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>past the graveyard here. On inflation. We just saw the

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>core PC on Friday go from one point four year

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on year core in February one eight percent in March.

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That number is going to keep going up based upon

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this procedural base effect. As we drop off the low

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation readings from a year ago, that number is going

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to be somewhere between let's call it two and a

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>half and three over the next couple of months. Now,

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>the FED at that point is saying, don't worry about it,

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it'll plateau, it will roll over. Given the spike in

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices and the significant increase in labor costs that

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the companies are gonna have to pay in order to

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>get workers off the sidelines to take their jobs back,

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the price increases, they're going to pass those

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>labor costs on us in the form of higher consumer praises.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>All of that, in our view, is going to start

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to filter into core inflation. So so and and the

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>FED is locked in that they're not going to make

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a policy change until you know, the end of calendar

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty three at the earliest. So I think we're at

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>an inflection point on the FED here as well. At

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what point does the Fed blink and recognize that maybe

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation is a little bit of a problem here, and

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna have to change policy, either tapering or

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>moving interest rates higher earlier than the beginning of into Phil,

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>what asset class do you like if inflation is not transitory?

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do you put your money? Heard a fixed income

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>strategies morning? Tell me junk bonds. But that's a little

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>too risky for my blood. Well, and I'm not the

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>bond guy. I'm the equity guy. And and and basically

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what you want or companies that have pricing power that

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>are leveraged to this improvement of the economy. So we

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>think that the value stocks, which we've been playing since

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>last August, financials, energy industrials, UH, consumer discretionary, UH materials,

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that these are the companies that are that are producing

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the outsize games because the economy is growing so strongly

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and the valuation gap between growth and value is still

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>significant enough. But I think that the value trade ought

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to continue to work. Love it, Phil, great to get

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>your input. Really appreciate you stopping by for a bit.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Phil Orlando. There is that chief equity market strategist also

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>head of Client port folio Management over Federated Hermes and

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul as you were you were telling me this morning.

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Phil has been bullish and he's been right. He has

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>been and uh, you know it's interesting. He's got that

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that rotation trade very much uh in play here, and

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna ride that out. So it's been a good trade. Um,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of investors are feeling, you know,

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>this has got some more room to run here. As

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>long as the Fed stays on the sidelines and this

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to reopen, we can see more legs there.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Time for Bloomberg Opinion today, we're joined by Tara la Chapelle.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>She covers entertainment, telecommunications and deals for Bloomberg Opinion. And

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you, if you have an interest in media

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.479
<v Speaker 1>like I do, in the convergence of media and technology

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and cord cutting and streaming and all that cool stuff,

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Terra's work is an absolute must read. And she's out

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with another fantastic column today talking about Netflix and Terry,

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you're suggesting that Netflix, you know, they haven't really bought anything.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>They've just kind of built their company up from scratch,

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>investing in their in their business, investing in their programming,

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but you're suggesting maybe they should take a look at

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>buying an existing media company, which one and whine right,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>So I think that they should look at Discovery and

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>not just Netflix the other streaming giants you know, Apple, Um,

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe not so much. Disney doesn't really fit their family

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>friendly programming, but you know, Amazon Prime, any of them.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I think what's missing now from the streaming universe

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is reality TV programming, which you know, maybe Discoveries content

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>on you know, TLC, things like that are considered kind

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of like the lowest rung of television art, but at

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the same time, a lot of people enjoy it. And

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it also is that type of content that

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you can just turn on the TV and it's background

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>noise while you're maybe scrolling your phone or making dinner.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's really missing from streaming, and there's

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>value and being able to provide that. So I think

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>if Netflix is smart and if the other companies are smart,

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>they start to see that there's a hole there and

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it would make an awful lot of sense to fill

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because this kind of programming is not expensive to me

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and it really you know, pays dividends. Yeah, I mean

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if if Tiger King isn't the lowest rung of creating art,

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they've already gone there. Um, and that

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>program was extraordinarily successful. Right. Meanwhile, Discovery has for me,

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>at least, they've got the top Gear America, which is

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>reality programming that I absolutely love. What else is Discovery

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>got on offer they have? They have really a wide

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>um offering of of programming. Top Gear comes from Motor Trend,

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but Discovery owns that. Yeah, they have a ton um

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. Aside from Motor Trend. There's TLC with Nintie

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Day Fiance is their big show right now, and David Zaslav,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Discovery, is kind of mused before that

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like their Sunday Night Football. It airs on Sunday

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>nights and it just gets tons of viewers. And I

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think what's interesting about Nintie Day Fiance and some of

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>their other programs. They have Chopped on the Food Network,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there's Naked and Afraid on the Discovery Channel. Obviously HDTV

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>has a ton of hit programming. Um. I think what's

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>different about them is that these are franchises. Do you

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>look at something like Tiger King and some of the

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>other uh paise Netflix has made into reality shows. None

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of them have been franchises, and Discovery just kind of

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>keeps building on these brands. And it's funny because they

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>don't really have stars behind them. They're just mostly regular

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>people that they're filming in these cases and you know,

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ninety Day Fiance, they're just following around Americans who are

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to bring over their fiance's from abroad on K

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one visas. And you know, it's it's really like, you know,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>low budget programming, but it's wildly entertaining to a lot

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of people, and it appears to spin offs and extras

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and reunion shows basically gifts that keep on giving for Discovery.

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Tara, I, you know, I know Discovery

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Communications very well. And one of the key things about

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that company is that it's control shareholder is John Malone.

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about Dr Malone's feelings about Discovery

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps selling this company should should have bona Flied

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>offer come along. You know, it's funny. I think John

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Malone and David Zaslov are the two executives that are

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>always willing to kind of pitch their own companies for

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.119
<v Speaker 1>sale anytime they go out to the media or their conferences.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>They seem to always be like open to that idea,

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're almost kind of asking for offers, and I

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't I think that if they got one, they definitely

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>would consider it. I think that, you know, John Malone

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is a dealmaker at heart, and I think that he's

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, always been kind of open to selling at

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the right price, and especially now given his age and

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to kind of tidy up his portfolio, I imagine

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that they would be willing sellers. Um. I think it's

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>just a matter of when these other media companies feel

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>ready to make a big bet like this and see

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the value in it. And I think more and more

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>discoveries proving its value. In the case of Netflix, it

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't financially in the position to do major acquisitions,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's just starting to get to the point where

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they're saying they're going to be cash flow positive starting

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>next year. So maybe they now have the wherewithal to

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to think about making acquisitions, especially as they

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>see their own subscriber growth really start to slow. When

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, we used to call John Malone

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the Darth Vader of cable. I can't remember why. But

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>as you point out Tara's he's getting older and maybe

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>looking to wrap up his legacy. Here, what if Netflix

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take Discovery, is there another buyer out there who

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>would want them? I think it would make sense for

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>any of the streaming companies that are really lacking in

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind of content that we did enjoy about cable.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think of Apple TV plus, it's very focused

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>around you know, specific shows and movies with big actors

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in it, and it's kind of you know, you watch

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>it and then that's that you forget about it. I

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think they need something that keeps people coming back these

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>kinds of programs do that. Amazon Prime doesn't really have

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot there. Um. But also, you know a

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>company that always comes up when you talk about Discovery

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is Viacom CBS. UM. I don't see the logic as

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>much there, but I think it's it's a case where

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're kind of the also ransom this industry, people

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>see them, you know, they should get together and they'll

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be stronger together. So there's there's that argument. Um. But

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, Netflix, if they want to stay

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>on top, this is something that's really missing and it

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>fits really well because Discovery is also a very international

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>company and that's something that's important to Netflix. So I

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>think it probably makes the most sense for them. But

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>any of these companies should be looking at them. UM.

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, so much of the takeover speculation and the

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>industry is focused on Hollywood movie houses. I think, you know,

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really help them that much. I think something

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like this would would pay off a little bit better

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in the long run. Have you heard anything from Repastings,

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Netflix, about their willingness or appetite for

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>any type of acquisitions. Not a whole lot on that front.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And again I think maybe that has to do with

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>them just trying to get to the point where they

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>could prove to investors and the naysayers that they are

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a financially viable company and now they've gotten there. Um.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But also, you know, they get asked a lot about

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>whether they would expand into other things like gaming. UM.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I've brought up the idea of them getting into consumer products, licensing, UM.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But they haven't really been specific about what's next, which

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes you wonder what they could be thinking about.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But UM, acquisitions come up whenever a company's growth is

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>starting to slow and Netflix is now kind of a

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mature company in that sense, and so you could imagine

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're starting to have those conversations that companies like

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Disney have had, you know, for years. Tara your article

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and Matt, this is funny. When I first read TERA's

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>article this morning, said, oh, investment bankers are hitting the

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>phones today because I think Terri's kind of raises a

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions here. Yeah. Interesting, uh interesting. Al Bloomberg

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>opinion columns can sometimes spark deals, but I mean her

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>her logic isn't flawed and it's probably something, hopefully something

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>that investment bankers thought of as well. Otherwise, I think

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Tara could be in for a pretty big pay day

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if she were to switch over to the dark side.

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Tara la Chappelle there from Bloomberg Opinion. Check out her

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>work by typing O, P I N go on the

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg or look at Bloomberg dot com slash opinion. This

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. We're about halfway through this earning season. Another

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>big week. Uh. This week and another are just coming

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in very strong, and that's what this market needed. Let's

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>see how some strategists are thinking about that. Scott Wren.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior global market strategist for Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Scott,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.239
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. You know, there

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was a strong argument to be made that this first

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>quarter earning earning season really have to come in strong

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>to justify the valuation in this marketplace. Do you think

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate Americas has come through so far? Well, I really do, Paul,

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But I tell you I think really the way I

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>look at most earning season and even this one is,

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is more of a confirmation process. I mean,

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the last thing that happens in the entire earnings processes.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's reported to the streets. So the street expected

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>good earning strowth. We've certainly had that. We know we're

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>going to get some really good UH economic growth here.

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 1>So this is more of a of a confirmation step

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in my mind. But certainly this has been a really

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 1>good earning season. I always look at this from two

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>different angles. On the one hand, it Scott, you know,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>companies are doing great, they're bouncing back from to be fair,

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty low base effects. On the other hand,

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>analysts got it wrong. Um they undervalued or underbid these

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>companies earnings reports, Nearly ninety percent of SMP firms beat estimates.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>What are the analysts doing something wrong? Are they not

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>updating their expectations? Are they, you know, working from home?

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.239
<v Speaker 1>What's the story? Well, I'll tell you, Matt, this is

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>my bias I think is a strategist is a lot

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of times individual company analysts, you know there they are

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>really glued to company guidance. And if you think back

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>what's happened over the last year, uh and and really

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of earning seasons, you know, these these

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>companies are are very cautious. They don't want to give

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a very aggressive outlook. You know, that's why six in

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>any earning season season beat. But that that's the situation

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:24.359
<v Speaker 1>that guidance is very conservative. We know from economists and

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly our economists that we that we talked to with

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>our group um are expecting big things. But these companies

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to go out on a limb too far.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And then the analysts become really glued to that guidance

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and therefore you know, their way under what the actual

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>results would be too. So it's kind of an odd

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of a circle, but it happens with such regularity

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that when you have something like this pandemic, it gets

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>even worse. All right, Scott, So we've seen, um, you know,

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the rotation trade into cyclical stocks, even into smaller cap

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.679
<v Speaker 1>stocks as well, really perform well amost almost for a year. Now,

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on that allocation or or that move

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in that side of the market versus maybe the more

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>traditional growth areas. Where are you kind of focused right now? Well,

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I will say that in this particular cycle, our viue

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is that growth is going to not fade relative to

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>value as as much as maybe a normal cycle. Now

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, we're in a cycle, we're in

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a new cycle that at least we believe we are

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>where the stock markets likely to see some some some

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>multi year gains here. Um, you know, small caps as

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>people are more willing to take on risk, you know,

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to buy value, they're going to buy small caps.

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>That's certainly what's happened. So we're you know, we're leaning

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>into small caps. We we like you know, industrials, materials, um, financials,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of things. So so while all these cycles

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are different, and this one you know is odd, as

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was the last one, you know, some of these recurring

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>themes that you see value does well, small caps do well,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>things like that, cyclicals do well as the economy comes

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>out of the whole. You know, these things hold true

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>even in this cycle. So we're leaning towards we want

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>our clients to be assertive. We want them to be

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards a continuation of this recovery, not just here

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>but also abroad. We think EUROP catch up after they

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>get their act together with this vaccine, and you know,

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>we like those areas. And I think at least, um,

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the intermediate term, it's going to remain

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like that. I got my appointment by the way you

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 1>do big announcement because I'll tell you why. Because Germany

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>counts I live in Berlin, because Germany counts journalists among um,

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the third group that it gets priorities prioritized. Um, we're

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>now kicking off so I can go to press conference.

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank you, Matt. You are you are essential man

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that thank thank thank you. So yeah, I think I

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty essential in any case. UM. I was

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>just thinking, you know, Scott, you've been saying this for

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a while, that the U. S economy is going to

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>bounce back strong everyone knows it's red hot, as Warren

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Buffett said, but you don't. You don't know if we're

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a strong bounce back necessarily in Europe. Um,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>is it is it a good time to go bargain hunting,

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to go look for um, you know, the bounce back

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that is going to come. Well. I think as far

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>as the globe goes well, you know, we were also

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>overweight favorable on emerging markets. You know, China, China, Taiwan,

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, they've done well. Um. I think you know,

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>they appear to have you know, their vaccine act together,

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. Certainly, global trades pretty good, but we

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have not been favorable on a developed international, which would

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>include include you know, obviously the Eurozone, the EU, Japan,

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>those types of countries. So we don't think it's time yet,

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but um, but certainly it's something that we talked about

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>every week in the Investment Strategy Committee. But as far

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>as international goes right now, we want to lean more

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>towards UH towards emerging markets. Scott, thanks so much for

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>joining US. Senior global market strategists are in the fourth group,

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, so you'll be able to get your

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>vaccine if you come here. Scott in in June, Scott

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>ran there from Wells Fargo, Wells Fargo Investment Institute talking

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to us about how they want to play this market,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and soon, Paul just going to be consensus that um,

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the strength in the US economic bounce back is not

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to be denied. This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Yet

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>on Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Radio