WEBVTT - Sharp Fall In The Yuan Is Big Risk To Global Growth (Podcast)

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>So much focus recently has been the relationship between the

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>US and China. Here to talk about that is Patrick Shavannick.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>He is managing director and chief strategist as Silver Crest

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. Just back from a tour of Denmark and

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>uh Norway. Thank you so much for joining me here

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studios. So, Patrick, let's focus

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on China here because we are getting more talks that

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are continuing to fail but maybe making progress. Today. The

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>big move is in the Chinese un which is actually

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>strengthening by the most verses of dollars. Since what's going

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>on here? Are we getting some sort of progress or

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is this just sort of muddling to a new phase?

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So on the trade talks um, there wasn't a lot

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of optimism that the talks over the past couple of

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>days would lead to anything, and in fact they took

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>place amid um the the likelihood and now the reality

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of a new round of terrorists being imposed on by

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>both sides. So, uh, you know, I think I think

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are trying to figure out, um, what exactly

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>might satisfy the Trump administration if there is a deal

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to be cut here, and I think there's some disagreement

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>within the Trump administration about what what would be satisfactory.

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, some such Learric Cudlow h insists that the

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that that the trade sanctions are bargaining trip to open

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>up trade China. Others don't think so, Others such as Navarro,

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Uh, the impression that I have is that

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>he thinks, uh, tariffs are the solution that that China

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>won't move. It's kind of you know. And then and

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the actually tariffs are the way that the are the

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>way forward, you know. And honestly, we're just speaking with

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Vank of Bloomberg Technology, and he was talking about

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the US Postal Service and President trying to push the

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>agency to renegotiate it's treaty and how it charges small

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>packages to China versus the other way around, and that

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like it do feel like things are easy.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't feel like cart because it's very specific and

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it's highlighting an issue that's been simmering for a long time. Yeah. So,

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.119
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's this division within the administration and

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, where Trump falls on this

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>about whether the goal is free your trade or whether

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the goal is protectionism. And obviously, you know, if you're

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in the markets, you'd like to know the answer to

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that question. Um, But we'll only know in time. Um.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't seem like this is heading towards a

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>resolution anytime soon. You know. I want to sort of

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout there a theory that a number of big bank

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>strategists have talked about, which is that President Trump, as

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he faces more challenges at home, legally and otherwise, that

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he will aamp up the rhetoric against China and Mexico

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and other places to seem hard in his convictions and

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to his base. Does that hold water with you?

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, how much can more can you ramp

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>up the rhetoric without actually taking action that then subsequently

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>has economic impact. And so, you know, I realized that

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric and even the actions. You know, protectionism is

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>popular with a certain part of his base, but it's

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>also deeply unpopular with the business community and with markets.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And the one thing he's really got going for him

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>right now is a strong economy. And if I were him,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to do anything to mess that up.

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And if you look in the I s M surveys

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>um both manufacturing and non manufacturing, what a lot of

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>companies are saying, Hey, we have a strong economy, we

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of positive new and but boy, these

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty over tariffs, the impact on our our input costs,

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>We're losing export sales. This is the one big negative

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that we see that's making us hesitate to invest more.

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And so if that's if that's a reality now going

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>further down that path, um, you know, I don't want

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>to sound apocalyptic, like, Okay, it's going to end the

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>cycle tomorrow, but but it's it's one more thing in

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a in a cycle that's fairly mature. It's one more

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that brings you closer to the end of the cycle. Potentially.

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to wonder, you know, putting aside the trade tensions,

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>how much China itself could be the end of the

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>cycle if it mismanages soft landing, And I think that

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>people have stopped talking about that to some degree. But

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>here we had ten Cent report earnings that were highly disappointing.

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Ali Baba reported earnings that were better than expected, but

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>people still weren't that enthusiastic by the start, you know,

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>based on the stock performance because of concerns going forward

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about growth. Are are you learning anything? Are you reading

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>anything into this that makes you feel like there is

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a more substantial slowdown than people are really giving credit to.

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So I've always been quite concerned about China's economy and

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>where it was headed um and the debt issues that

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they have in the past. I always took the view

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that because China was never really a driver of global

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>growth because of its because of its surpluses, that a

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in China's economy would would not derail the global

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>economy the US anymore than the slow down in the

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Japanese economy derailed growth in the ninety nineties. Right um,

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:52.799
<v Speaker 1>because it really isn't a driver of global demands. Um.

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That said, how China responds to a slowdown could have

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a significant impact. So we've seen um, the yuan depreciate.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>There's the prospect that they could have a devaluation, either

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in response to trade friction or a deteriorating economy, that

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>would have a global impact. That would be trying to

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to exports, domestic internal problems globally, and that would

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>create significant headwinds to US growth. That's a far way off, though,

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, clearly you don't think so. Well, we've seen

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've seen the depreciation in the REM and

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>B and and I'm not saying so. I've never had

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the view that China will be forced to devalue, okay,

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think that it would either be good

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for them or necessary for them to devalue. But back

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, two years ago, there were a lot of

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>people trying to persuade them that that was in fact

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the case. And whether it is the case or not,

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they could be persuaded that this is the path that

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they should go down, particularly if it's a response to

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>trade tensions, if it's seen as a way of of

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>defanging US tarraffs by evaluating the currency, you're allowing it

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to depreciate. Um, I don't think it's a good path

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for China to go down, but it's one that they

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>could choose to go down that would have global implications.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Just real quick. I mean, perhaps the China slowdown doesn't

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have as big of an impact on global growth

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>rates to say the US, but certainly for Asia. Yes,

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it has a huge impact and it can trickle out

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>from there. Now. So if you're if you are, if

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you have over the past you know, ten years, been

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>feeding into China's investment boom, if you're Australia selling iron ore,

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or Chili selling copper, or any number of Germany selling

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>machinery to China, yes, it could have the end of

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>China's investment boom. Could have a very serious impact. Now.

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>It could also have a positive impact in the sense

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that if it helped resolve some of the overcapacity that

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>China has been creating over the years. So you know,

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing that China's investment boom is done is it

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>bit up the price of inputs and it pushed down

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the price of outputs. A reversal of that, I think

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in the long rum positive for the global economy, but

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>how you get there could be very disruptive. Patrick Shavannick,

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for drinking being with me today.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure getting your insights, and China is in

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the absolute forefront of a lot of investor's minds these days.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Shavannick, Managing Director and chief strategist, It's silver Crust

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. This has been a fascinating season for retail

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings that has definitely split the halves from the have nots,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Walmarts and the targets of the world doing

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>phenomenally while Gap and L brands fall further, with people

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>questioning why are they doing badly at a time when

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>retail sales are going so strong. Here to talk about that,

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>as well as a slew of other issues facing the

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>retail industry is Rick Healthenbine, President, chief executive Officer of

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the American Apparel and Footwear Association based in Washington, d See.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Although you know you've got a foot in Washington and

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a foot in New York. Uh Rick, thank you so

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. Um, so what do you make

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so far off the retail earning season? The earnings have

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>been fascinating. I mean, we're we're finally uh seeing some

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>relief from many years of agony. You know, we we

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we look at two thousand and eight and we compare

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>that to two thousand and seventeen. We actually have more

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>bankruptcyas in seventeen than we did in no AID. So

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to see a really good earning season like we're having

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>now is beyond encouraging. But it's really really interesting to

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 1>dig into the earnings almost companied by company, and they

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the cardinal example of who's doing well. I

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>look at Target, and I look at Nordstrom and nordstron

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating because a couple of years ago they were

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out who he is Nordstrom, and they

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>developed a very strong presence in Nordstrom rac, which has

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous millennial appeal. And then they picked up on

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>their Internet sales, which remarkably good. And to give them

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>further credit, their in store experience has been good. So

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been positive over four percent on store traffic. I think,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>so everything is going right for them. Before you move

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>on to somebody else, is there a particular person who

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is behind this strategy that has panned out in every facet. Well,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in every company there's usually a leader, but in these

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger companies, it's usually leadership by committees. So you have

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 1>to give a bunch of people credit to understand. You

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>know that the dynamics of retail have changed. The lennial

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>customer today. You're really trying to tract would prefer to

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>shop on their phone. How do you convert that? And

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>they also love stores like TJ Max. TJ Max is

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a huge favorite among millennials. Treasure Hunt. Yeah. So it's

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a combination of what works and what doesn't. And and

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest measure in brick and mortar retail is

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>foot traffic. The foot traffic is up if you have

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a strong Internet component, and if you have a mid

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>price line like as I said, norstern Rack, that's a win.

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But then again, you look at somebody like Walmart and

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know there you have to be a little careful,

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to factor out the groceries, but look at

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their online sales phenomenal. Look at targets online sales like up.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So when you take it all, you can see the

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>picture of having those retailers um who have got it,

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>really got it and it's starting to show, and it's

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>great for somebody like me. This is this is like

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>manna from heaven. I just am hopeful it's not all

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>going to implode, and when we get we'll get to

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>why it might implode in a second. I am so

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 1>concerned when I look at places like L Brand's, Victoria's

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Secrets parent company, or GAP or j C. Penny and Sears,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>which have been having a hard time for a long

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>time and are showing no signs of recovery. You have

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to wonder, if these companies are not doing well now,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>what will it take for them to revive well. Sears

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is sort of in a world of its own, and

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to comment on how to figure out

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>how to get them out of their funking, their conundrum. Uh.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>J C. Penny, on the other hand, there's hope for

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>j C. Penny. The question is can they figure out

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what works and what doesn't work. You know, we had

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Toys r US Kids ar US go out of business

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>where people are going to buy their kids clothes. That

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>used to be a strong point of J C. Penny.

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you know they can advance on that. They

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have to figure it out. But you know, then you

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>look at someone like app who reported today um Old

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Navy was very strong. Don't look at CAP look at

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Old Navy and see what works and then figure out

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>how to change the dynamic. All these companies are fighting

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>for market share, but people are buying. You know, It's funny.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>In retail, you look at three things. You look at

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment level, you look at the consumer confidence level,

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're all good, all right. So one thing that's

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not perhaps good for your industry are some of the

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>terps that have been proposed, and you've been lobbying against

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>some of them. Um, a lot of them will hit

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>your industry directly. Where are we with that? Well? I

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was at the hearings on Monday, our team testified, and uh, frankly,

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I was sitting in there what I would call the

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>peanut gallery, and it sounded a little bit like Clara

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>belhunking at Buffalo Bob. It was so sad, all these

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>really strong businesses and trade associations explaining to a panel

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of government representatives how raising tariffs would severely impact their business.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, were there any representatives from companies arguing for

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the tariffs? Yes, there were a few, and I um

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>put few in capital letters, um and and a lot

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of that place to self interest for them. You know,

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>some protectionism would help. Uh, Well, there's one gentleman tests

0:13:55.840 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>testifying actually about right now as we speak, from a

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>leather company, and uh, he's interest is to protect his business.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Um NICTO the trade organization also testified and they, you know,

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>they represent textile interests in America. So you know, I

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have to give these people credit to the extent they're

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>fighting for what they believe in. But I have to

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>say they're in the minority, but they believe what they believe.

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Most people who testified hit tears in their eyes. You're

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>really gonna hurt me. This is gonna hurt my business.

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And in this third ranch, we call it of two

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion, they've got hand bags, they've got hats, they've

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>got baseball gloves, they've got backpacks. You know, I tell

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody who listen that, you know, it's back to school season,

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you better buy two backpacks because you're twenty dollar backpacks

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be thirty next time. Do you think that there

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>will be bankruptcies as a result of some of the

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>proposed tariffs or do you think it will just be

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>uh a slower profit margins? Now, you know, the tariffs

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't gonna push people into bankruptcy. You know, be other

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>economic factors that do it, that are already in play

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the bank. The tarifs will just exacerbate the situation because

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, remember this isn't percent tariff they're talking about.

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It's twenty on top of what you're already paying. So

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're paying and you had twenty five, now we

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>got a forty five percent tariff, what's gonna happen. People

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>are gonna stop buying, They stop buying, sales go down. Um,

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad cycle. Is there any positive consequence from

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the post tariffs on retail? Wow? What a

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>what a great question? Um, two word answer. Absolutely, no

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>positive consequence except maybe at the end of the day,

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>perhaps tariffs will just go away and then people could

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>spend what they really should be spending for product. You know,

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at the economy and there was an article

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>this this week about the millennials responding to the next crash,

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know, how will they respond? It's been ten years.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll keep in mind that low quost product in last

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>recession really helped us out, helped us come back quickly,

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and you're not going to have that anymore. So if

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you're short on cash, it's going to be harder. Rick

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Calforn Byn, thank you so much for joining me today.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Rick Calvin Byn is President and chief executive officer of

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the American Apparel and Footwear Association in Washington, d C.

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>The business of car racing is massive and growing. Joining

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>us now is Mark Miles, President, chief executive officer of

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Indy Car, also the President CEO of Holman and Company,

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>which owns the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Mark, thank you so

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. I just want to start

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>with an overview. Can you give us a sense of

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the state of play of the car racing business,

0:16:56.640 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that we've seen declines in some list ownership,

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>viewership at tendership of other other sports. Yeah, there's definitely

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>headwinds in sport to some extent, in the motor sport

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to great extent. But frankly, we're delighted that over the

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>last few years since probably Indie Car has been growing

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in with respect, almost all the sort of fan metrics are.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Television ratings are up in four years, um our attendance

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is growing, our social following is up by a million

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>followers in the last year, and so we feel like

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of bucking the headwinds and and very bullish

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>about our future. Can you give a sense of why.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean you noted also that IndyCar is the highest

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>percentage of millennials of any of the major sports leagues.

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>What is it about the sport that is attractive to

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>younger people? Part of our growth is because I think

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>we kind of squandered the recent years in our past,

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we're getting our act together and getting things

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>together and forward. But inherently we think IndyCar Racing has

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot to offer. It is the fastest series out there.

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's very technical, and by that I mean on the track,

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but also in the way we go to market. For example,

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in a two hour race, we collect fifty million data

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>records and when we talked to UH companies, you're well

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>aware of that, think about how they can help us

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>UH convert that data into really interesting content for fans.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>We think there's a there's a lot to offer there

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and to continue to grow our younger audience in particular,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So UM the sport is compelling. You can start at

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the back of the grid and and win a race

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with lots of different winners, and yet we've got some

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, some stalwart competitors like Team Penskey and and

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Ganassi and Andretti, and drivers that are veteran champions. So

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got challengers, and we got UH, and we've got

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 1>established champions, and I just think there's lots and lots

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of narrative for fans to follow. So Mark, when I

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>think about what I think about car racing in the

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>United States, I think about UH, the zooming noise that

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think about, how fast they go, and the sort

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of sponsorship labels all over the cars. I also think

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>of the highly publicized crash that crashes that occasionally happen

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>from time to time, and there was a terrible crash

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just on Sunday, Indy car driver Robert Wickens being hospitalized

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>for some serious injuries after a crash at the Pocono Raceway.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>What does a crash like this do for the sport?

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it something that sets you back? How do you

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>address it? I think the sport, first of all, everybody

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>recognizes that it's it is extreme sport and it's dangerous.

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So our our obligation is to do everything we can

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to to manage the technology and to continually improve safety

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and to be a better able to minimize the effects

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>of accidents. Um. You know, psychologically, we're all human beings

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>and when a guy like Robbie Wickens has a serious injury,

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it sort of takes your breath away. But

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>he's getting great medical care. He gets great medical care

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>at the track we have. We're the one sport that

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.239
<v Speaker 1>for some years has had the same safety crews on

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the tracks, the same doctors, the same nurses that travel

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>um and so there's great continuity, a very high level

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of care. We work with our car manufacturer, that d

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Lara in italyite to improve the physical aspects of the

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>car that make it safer all the time. So it's

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a never ending process. We hope next year we'll be

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>introducing a cockpit for the first time in years and

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>will help protect the drivers from debris and around the track.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:43.440
<v Speaker 1>We just got to keep doing the best we can.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Racers sign up for it and there they insist that

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we do all that we can. But they're very resilient

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>group and it's kind of what they what they love

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah, indeed, I'm wondering. You know. One of

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the big headlines in the sports industry this year has

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>been the lead ization of sports gambling and I'm wondering

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>does that affect you at all? Well, it will, for sure,

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but to be frank at this point, it's a little

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to know, you know, sort of how high is up.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that, first of all, like all sports, will

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>do everything possible to amp up kind of the integrity

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the governance of the sport. But I do

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's a commercial side to it, and whether that's

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>making our data available, uh basically licensing it for for

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>scoring and timing um and other things that that we

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think we can be engaged in yet to be determined.

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously complicated because you're gonna have this patchwork of

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>legislation by state and we race seventeen times a year

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in a number of different states. But it certainly, you know,

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>drives fan attention to the sport, and at one level

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that that can only be a good thing. Yeah, thank

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Really interesting, especially really interesting what you

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>say about UH fans data and how that sort of

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed you to be more targeted in your approach with

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>both advertisers as well as attracting new fans. Mark Miles, President,

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>chief executive Officer of IndyCar. We really appreciate you joining

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>us He's also the president CEO of Home and Company,

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>which owns the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, i MS Productions and

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the Indiana based baking goods brand Clapper Girl. We really

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you being with us. Really interesting. Also, the Indie

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 1>car is the highest percentage of millennials of any of

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the major sports leagues. So even though you are seeing,

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, UH, the viewership of baseball, for example, decline,

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there does seem to be some growth among the younger

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>generations in the United States. One interesting thing about the

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>tip for TAT or if war tariff tension that is

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>brewing between the US and China is just how much

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of the infrastructure of trade is actually getting unleashed uh

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and sort of exposed and highlighted every day. The latest

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating looking at the universal Postal service and postal

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>rates and how they're set. Garrett Devenk joining us now

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>currently technology of Bloomberg News here in our eleven three

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>oh studios. Garrett, just walk us through what this is

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump is proposing to do in order to

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>give a competitive edge to US companies. So I think

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>from his perspective, it's not so much necessarily about giving

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it a new competitive edge to US companies, but to

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of getting rid of what he sees as an

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>uncompetitive edge for the U. S. Postal Service and US companies.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's um international treaties judge, you know, sort of

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, one country's postal service has an

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>agreement with another one, they agree to help each other out.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>These things go back, you know, for as long as

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we've had postal services, decades and hundreds of years. And

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>so we are sort of in the situation right now

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>where it's actually cheaper to send small packages, big things,

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>not but small things, letters and things up to about

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>four pounds from China to a US city that has

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to send it domestically. And that's because of the international

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>agreements between the Chinese Postal Service and the U. S.

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Postal Service. And so what Trump has said is next

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>month at the meeting of the International Postal Union, he

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>wants the US representatives to go and sort of changes

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>or pull themselves out of that agreement somehow. How big

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of a deal is this for the Amazons of the

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>world and the Ali baba Is of the world. So

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the companies that could be hurt by this any change

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are anyone who's shipping a lot of small things from

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>China to the US. So Ali Baba, although you know,

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously the bulk of its business is in China, is

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.479
<v Speaker 1>trying to grow that service in the US, so this

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>could put it definitely put a damper on their US growth.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Another company to look at is Shopify, which a lot

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of people see us as sort of shopifies this kind

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of back end provider. If you want to sell something online,

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone can set up It's like YouTube for selling online.

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's this perception that a lot of Shopify sellers

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are just sort of packaging small cheap goods from China

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and selling them and sending them internationally. Shopify kind of says, well,

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're diversifies business, but that's a stock that

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you should be watching as well. On this, how big

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>of a deal is this? I mean, are we talking

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>about a couple of cents here and there that add

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>up to uh some money but not a tremendous amount,

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>or are we talking make it a break? Well, the

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>USPS has lost billions of dollars of the last years,

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean the last several years they run and operating,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, shortfall every year to do their difficult job

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>of you know, sending packages to every single address in

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States. You know, they are sort of operating

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at loss when it comes to this kind of international shipping.

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But they also agree to step deeper into these agreements

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>with the Chinese Postal Service because they want a piece

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of that e commerce international trade pie, much of it

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>flowing from Chinese manufacturers to countries in the West, such

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>as the United States and Canada, and so they actually,

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a few different things going on here,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, from Trump's perspective, it's about you know,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 1>trying to kind of control those costs. And um, you know,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, we'll see how those discussions go in September.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So is the logic here from the US societe as

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>to why they agreed to this arrangement where it's cheaper

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to send small packages from China to the US and

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. Is a logic here that China said to

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the US Postal Service or you know, we just won't

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>do business with you otherwise if you don't accept these

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>fees were out, well someone is going to be shipping

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>those things, you know, either way. And the USPS, I

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think that they wanted to sort of they didn't want

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>someone else. They don't want a private ship or to

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>be you know, getting the bulk of that e commerce revenue.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 1>So they said, well, let's step into these agreements. You know,

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a loss in the actual um shipping them,

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, from once they arrived to the US to

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>their end destination. But then what we can do is

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we can layer on other costs. We can layer on

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>tracking costs, we can layer on premium services, we can

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>lay on rush shipping. And so they said, if we

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>can grab some of this market share, all of these

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>packages coming from China, you know, we'll we'll we'll deliver

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>them at a loss to us. But then if we

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>can sort of try to add some premium services, that's

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to make the money. And that's kind

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of has not been working out for them yet. What

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>do people in the markets say, I mean, do people

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>think that that President Trump is right on this? I mean,

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely one of those things that seems to be

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a holdover or a quirk from international treaties.

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, very few of us spend a

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of time thinking about international postal service treaties and

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the agreements between countries when it comes to the mail,

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and so it does seem to be one of those

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.479
<v Speaker 1>issues that has sort of, you know, continue to go

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on and sort of been kind of subtly controversial to

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a very few group of people. But now that President

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump obviously is very focused on trades, focused especially on

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>China and his perception that China is beating United States

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>at the international game, this has suddenly become you know,

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 1>at the forefront. Is this encouraging to technology companies that

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this is the tack that President Trump is taking, which

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is nuanced. It's actually very nuanced, and it's a perhaps

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>highlighting issues that have been long simmering. It's not necessarily

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>hit you over the head at least when it comes

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to tech in the same way that it has been

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with say other areas. Perhaps, I mean, it's it's it's

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely you know, someone definitely sort of proposed this idea

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to him and something that he's gotten interested in and

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>has sort of, you know, decided that it's something he

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk about. Companies like Amazon they are happy

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about this because you know, they would imagine anyone whose

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>business is not primarily sending things from China to other countries.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Is well, okay, this level as the playing field, you know,

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and even Shopify, which is perceived as a company that

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>handles a lot of volume from China to the US,

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>said well, you know, this will lay level the playing

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>field for our users who are in the United States

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and sending to other Americans. Really really interesting. I did

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>not know about these treaties, the international treaties that governed

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the price at which you sent packages internationally. Garrett de Bank,

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here. Garrett de Bank

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is technology reporter for Bloomberg News, joining me here in

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the eleven three oh studios in New York. Just really

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting that there is going to be this potential renegotiation

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of rates. A lot of renegotiations going on right now.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg p m L podcast.

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Abramo wits one. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.