WEBVTT - Tech’s Biggest Acquisition Stories

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff looks dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Pelett

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm an editor at how Stuff works dot com.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me, as always a senior writer, Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Dallaway said she would buy the flowers herself. All right,

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>then today we're gonna talk a little bit about some

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of the big tech acquisition stories that we've had in

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the past. And this is prompted by a recent as

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of the recording of this podcast acquisition that made the news,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in the last week. Really, I think

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>one of the funny things about tech acquisitions is there,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way, there's kind of two versions of tech acquisitions.

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>To me, um, there are things like the uh, the

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>acquisition that you were just talking about, the Facebook purchase

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of Instagram for one billion dollars um and this is

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of this is a big deal for a number

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. It kind of struck me as funny, this

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>this deal. We'll get into that a second. I want

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to finish my thought um and and but in this case,

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a situation where both companies are well known. Um.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Instagram has a lot of buzz going on about it

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>right now. Plus you know everybody knows Facebook is UM.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>But then there are these other tech acquisitions where it's

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>something like infrastructure. You know, some big company and it's

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a big company, but it's somebody who makes something that

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>people don't rush out and buy off store shelves. UM

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>gets acquired by somebody else who's sort of in the

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>same vain. And you know, this is the kind of

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thing that investors talk about but is not common UM.

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And that was one of those things that kind of

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>struck me as I started doing research for this podcast.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Is you've got the big names, and you go so

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and so acquired such and such, Oh my gosh, what

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is this gonna mean? And then you have somebody else

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>who goes, wow, that was a billion dollar purchase. Okay, yeah,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so um yeah, But the big news the week that

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this is the Facebook acquisition of Instagram for

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollars, a princely sum to be sure. UM.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's might actually be that might actually be a

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>kingly sum at that point. UM. I got got promoted.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, the uh And and for those who don't know,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just so that we can get this uh all on

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the table. Instagram is a photo app used to be

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>iOS exclusive and then opened up recently for Android. I

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have it on my Android phone. I as well have

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it on my Android phone. And it is both an

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>app that allows you to take photos and apply different

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>filters to those photos so that you can make a

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>good photo suddenly look really bad or uh, that's just

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>me making some editorial comments. Well, no, I mean it's

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to the idea is that you grunge it up

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>so it looks appears as though we're taken on an

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>older camera or maybe it's a former paper photo that's

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>gotten stepped on and rubbed in the dirt. I mean

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's done on purpose. Yeah, it's it's it's kind

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of it's kind to be bad distressed if you will.

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it does. It gives it gives things a

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>neat little twist really um, and it's made a lot

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of iOS fans happy that they can it can do

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>some some very simple filters, color filters on top of

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.119
<v Speaker 1>their photos that give it an appearance as if it's

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>been edited, uh, you know, by someone who's fairly skilled

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in photo editing. But it's all you're doing is just

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>choosing a filter. It's really really simple, very easy interface

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and um uh. And it's also not just an app

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>lets you take photos, but lets you share them as well.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's got a social aspect to it where you

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>can follow people on Instagram and then you can see

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as they up owd more photos, as they take more

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>photos using Instagram, you can see them in a feed,

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So that way you can kind of keep up with

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in that person's life. And that is

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the key I think to this, to this acquisition. That's

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>why Facebook was interested in Instagram. Because Facebook is all

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>about you know, social and photos as well, but it's

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>mobile interface has not been widely regarded as being easy

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>to use or good if we want to if we

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>want to really boil it down. I mean, I personally

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have any problem with the Facebook mobile interface, but

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people who use Facebook even

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>more extensively than I do, which is hard for me

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to imagine, but they find that it's just not as

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>robust as they would like. And part of that is

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the photo functions. Now I use a lot of other

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>apps that will allow me to automatically push a photo

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>to various social networks, including Twitter or Facebook. So for

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>me it wasn't as big a deal. But for people

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>who don't use that or don't have that option, Instagram

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>gave them the ability to take a photo, put this

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>filter on, share it with uh the social network, and

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>now with Facebook's purchase, they're gonna be able to share

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it with Facebook itself. Or maybe Facebook will just integrate

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Instagram's UH functionality into its own mobile apps. Well, from

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>what I've read, the whole idea is to leave Instagram

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of on its own um, and Facebook actually has

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a reasonably good track record of doing that. I remember,

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>um being a fan of friend feed when Facebook acquired

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that uh some time ago, and they said, um, oh, well,

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty much gonna leave it alone. We just want

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to incorporate some of this technology into Facebook as well,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and that we wanted to get these guys for their

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>expertise and add some of this functionality Facebook and a

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people on friend feed were going, well, this

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is the end, This is the end. And really they

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't mess with it uh um as much. But uh,

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but It is kind of funny because different companies have

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>different takes on it. Um. Jonathan and I first started

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about this podcast as being our take on Instagram,

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's kind of been um done in

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much every tech channel. Why they were doing it

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and all these things and what happens if you don't

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like it. There are a lot of Facebook uh, people

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>who don't like Facebook taking over Instagram because they, um,

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they just said, well, they're gonna ruin it,

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of like they didn't like the Facebook Spotify partnership. Yeah, yeah, um,

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.119
<v Speaker 1>And there have been lots of well, if you don't

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>want to use Instagram anymore, here are some alternatives. I

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>installed a couple of them, like stream Zoo and pixeler

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>oh Matic and some of those, and they sort of

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>do the same kinds of things. There are all sorts

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of alternatives if you don't want to use Instagram anymore.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think I felt like this would

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>be an opportunity to talk about some of these these

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions in the past, because um, they've all take different

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>kinds of turns. Um. Some have been very hands off,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>some have been very hands on, some have succeeded, some

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>have flopped miserably. Um, so we wanted to talk about

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the big ones and uh, and we've got

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch here. I wanna I wanna credit someone

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get too far into this, because a lot

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of the pretty much all the information I pulled I

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>pulled from a spreadsheet that a Wired writer named Andy

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Bayou created. He created this amazing spreadsheet where he he

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>just sort of uh trolled the Internet, not in the negative,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you stink kind of way, but rather the right getting

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all the information you can for info about various big

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>tech acquisitions. And these are the ones that are really

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind that that get the notice of users because

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the recognizable brand names. But he pulled them all together,

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and he went so far as to even compare how

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>much the reported acquisition amount was versus how many users

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the service that was acquired, how many users it had. Uh,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he broke down what the cost per user was based

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on that information, and even how many employees the service had,

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and what the cost per employee was. Because when you

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>think about it, these acquisitions, some of them like Instagram

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a billion dollars, Instagram did not have a lot

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of employees. Uh, that thirteen employees according according to Andy's research,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>so thirteen employees and a billion bucks. He estimated that

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that was about seventy seven million dollars per employee. Now

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that each employee of Instagram is is

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>taking home a cool seventy seven million, because the CEO

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and the head of Instagram are taking down about half

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars together. So that's so about fifty of

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that purchase price went to the uh, the guys in

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>charge of Instagram. But still you're thinking, that's like winning

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the lottery. You know, you're working, you're working for this,

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you're working in a small, tight group, and you get

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>acquired for a massive amount of money. That's kind of

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>like that was the dream of the whole dot com

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>bust too. There are a lot of companies that were

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>starting up that we're trying to be really small and

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>nimble and get acquired by bigger companies. And some of

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the some of the stories we have, some of the

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>um the acquisitions we can talk about happened before the

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com crash, including a couple from Yahoo that I

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about. So back in nineteen Yahoo made

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>two really big acquisitions. The first was in January of

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>when Yahoo purchased geo Cities. Now, geo Cities was sort

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>of a place where you could build your own web

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>page and it was laid out like a city, like

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>they had neighborhoods and everything, and and it was kind

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of a uh it was kind of like the place

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 1>where people would build a website before there were really

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>social networks. Yeah. Yeah, Now, UM, maybe some of you

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>don't remember necessarily what what the World Wide Web was like.

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say the Internet, but let's go stick

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Worldwide Web. Um, back in in the mid

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to late nineties. Um, people didn't necessarily uh intend to

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>go I mean, and the Internet was still sort of

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a new concept for people, and they wanted to know

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 1>what can you do with this? I mean, emails a

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>fairly reasonably easy concept to understand, um, and you know,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>there were others. There were more difficult things like using

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>net for example, um, and then databases that weren't the

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>most intuitive. Yeah, as far as user interfaces are concerned. So,

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at the time, geo Cities was kind of

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a neat deal because it allowed people to create their

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>own websites without having to learn how to code HTML.

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And there weren't a lot of tools, um, you know,

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>things like a WordPress dot com or blogger or you

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>know the journaling sites, which is I think sort of

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of Geo cities pages were like. Or

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>even wizzy Wig editors, yeah exact, which is grain Weaver

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>or before that go live, so even even page mails

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that and Whizzywig. Just in case you don't know,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is what you see is what you get where the

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>edit that you're making on the screen, you what you're

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at on the screen, and your edit mode is

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you can be reasonably confident that's what's going to show

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>up if you were to navigate there through a browser.

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Back in the old days, we had to do everything

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>by code. Yeah, well I should clarify too, because I

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was using some Whizzywig editors back in the late nineties.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>But they for the most part, they were They came

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in two flavors, um fairly trustworthy, but very expensive, uh

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>like like like a couple of hundreds of dollars or

0:11:58.400 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you could you could buy um, there were a couple

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>of them that were you know, in the forty fifty

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar range, but they inserted junk code and the pages

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>would break depending on what browser you were using or

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sometimes not depending on what browser you're using. Um, and

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>they were just and you'd have to do this and

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>upload it to a server. Not everyone is comfortable with

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>FTP and knowing how to do this, and Geo Cities

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a pioneer in this space. Hey, throw

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this content out there and make new friends in your neighborhood. Okay,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So the acquisition went for reported about all three point

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>five seven billion dollars. Three point five seven billion dollars people,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's three point five seven times more than the

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Instagram acquisition. And those were in you know, that was

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen years rounding off earlier, So that was that

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>was significant. So here's the problem is that Geo Cities

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that was probably right at the peak of geo City's popularity.

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh and then before too much longer, there was a

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>shift in the way people use the web. Because before

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the dot com crash, a lot of the websites on

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the web were very static. So you would build a

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>web page and it would pretty much stay that way

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for months at a time. You wouldn't necessarily add new

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>material because it was kind of a pain to do it,

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and really most people weren't thinking of the web in

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>that sense. They were thinking of the web kind of

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like a book. You would go you would read a

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>web page, and just like if you were to read

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a book, you wouldn't go back necessarily unless you just

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>truly enjoyed the web page. But there wouldn't be any

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>new material there because it wasn't dynamic. But that began

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to change right around the same time that Yahoo made

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this purchase. And of course today Geo Cities no longer exists.

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's a three point five seven billion dollar purchase

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that eventually fizzled out. Now, it stayed around for a while.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it it's not like it died immediately

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>after y'all who purchased it, and y'ah who got more

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>community oriented as a result of it. Yeah, I wouldn't

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>say that that it was a complete failure on Yahoo's

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>part inasmuch as, um, the idea really of g O

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>c d s really did propel things forward in the

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>social space. Um. But yeah, in a way, you go, Okay, well,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they spend a lot of money and then the service

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>shutdown in that in that regard, you know, strictly on

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>that place. Then yeah, I know that whenever you look

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>at at yeah Who as an analyst today, because Yahoo

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is a company that has has been struggling over the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years. Um, and you start looking back

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on deals like this, it's very easy to point fingers.

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But it's even easier to point a finger at Yeah Whose.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Other purchase in Broadcast dot Com, which was a an

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>internet radio company. Broadcast dot Com was so back in

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. Uh, there were there were a couple of

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>people who were thinking about the possibility of broadcasting radio

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>over the Internet, and I, you know, started looking into

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>what they would need to do in order to do that,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and eventually this company began m the company that would

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>become Broadcast dot Com. And Uh, I had a fellow

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually leading it named Mark Cuban. I feel like I've

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>heard that name somewhere. Yeah, you might have anyway. Cuban

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>he uh he was leading Broadcast dot Com, and yah

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Who approached to purchase the company for a amazing five

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion dollars. And when I say amazing, there

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of reasons for that. First of all,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a whole lot of money. But second of all,

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the company had about According to Andy, over

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at Wired had about five hundred and twenty thousand active users,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so just over half a million active users five point

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>seven billion dollars to essentially acquire those half million users.

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Keeping in mind that, you know, the idea was that

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>these services would be rolled out into other parts of

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo and become a bigger role. But um but still,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if you were to break that down as Andy did,

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I like to call him Andy Uh, as Andy did

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for for the purposes of his article, he determined that

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that means that they spent almost eleven thousand dollars per

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>user buying that that company. And um uh so that's

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's just it's crazy how how much money

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that is. I mean, it's for per user. Like you

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>could have walked up to each person and said, if

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I give you ten grand, will you come to my

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>side every day? The person yes, And that might have

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>been more effective because the broadcast dot com features they

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>did get rolled out into some other Yahoo features. But

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>most of that stuff no longer exists either, not as

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>not as it did then. No, it got incorporated into

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>other things. It's it's essentially lost now, like it's it's

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so buried in other other products that you can't even

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>recognize it anymore. And I think the Yahoo Broadcast acquisition

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>by many is regarded as the biggest mistake and acquisitions ever.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's up against some pretty stiff competition. Well, it

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>did give the Dallas Mavericks another shot, since Mark Cuban

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>bought them and has spent a lot of money on them,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gotten quite good. But yeah, five point seven billion

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars for that company, and um uh, I should add

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that there's something else we need to talk about, just

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>very very briefly. I'm just I just want to address this.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Some people may be thinking, hey, what about oh, well

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and Time Warner. That was that was that was often

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about the worst deal in tech ever. But we

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>should point out that was a merger. That was not

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>an acquisition. It was a merger and it was a

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of a tech non tech thing because

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it merged if you will, the uh digital

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>world with the um old media world O L D

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>E Media. Um Uh. But you know, if you if

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, though, they were yeah, who was

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>at least thinking ahead, uh, the idea of streaming media,

0:17:54.160 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of social websites. They were able to identify

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>by these things, but they were you know, pre dot

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>com bubble bursting, uh situations too, because this was the

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, which was right before the bubble burst. It's

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely frustrating in a way because you look at what

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Yah Who was doing and you think they were moving

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. It was just it was just

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>slightly the wrong. It was bye bye by the end

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the number of like a year and a half if

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it had been a year and a half later after

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble had burst, And y'all who assuming that,

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah Who had been able to weather the dot com

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bubble well enough. And I mean the company is still

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>around today. So even after making these massive deals, um,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>they might not have had to spend as much, and

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they might have might have been able to invest in

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>similar products that would have been more attuned to the

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and I hate to use this buzzword web two point

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>oh approach to the way the web works. Well, should

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we stick with Yahoo down? Sure we can talk a

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more. Yeah, they they've made some other purchases

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that actually did quite well for them, or at least

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are still very popular or like Flicker, Yes, that's you

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>know the photo sharing and photo album uh database site,

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and Flicker I think is one of the more popular

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>ones that's out there. Yeah. Um, although I did read

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in uh in my research that some people have been

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>upset that Yeahoo didn't really do anything with Flicker, like

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they were expecting them to take it the next step

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and Flicker sort of stayed the same red much. That's true,

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't changed much. And and as other social networks

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook and Google Plus have become more popular and

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>even Twitter, a lot of that photos sharing and photo

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>storage stuff has been offloaded onto those so sites like

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Flicker and also Google's Picasa, which never I don't think

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it was ever anywhere near as popular as Flicker was. Um,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>but Google's Picasa also have have sort of taken ahead.

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess Google Picasa less so because that is what

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus uses as its foundation form for photos photo

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>bucket one of the two. Yeah. Well, as a contrast,

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking when yeah, who was spending billions of dollars

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>for these acquisitions in two thousand five, And I would

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>argue that Flicker in a way, it's probably way more

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>popular than either of those two products, where that they

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>acquired for multibillions of dollars. Um Flicker was acquired for

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty million, but that's a big change, much more modest

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>acquisition compared to the billions of dollars they spent just

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a few years earlier. And I think, yeah, I think

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.239
<v Speaker 1>that was much more wisely spent in that case. And

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the the acquisition the same year of Delicious for thirty

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, to which I think was done again with

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the best of intentions. Link sharing sites are still popular.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they were in ways for runners to Twitter,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>because they were supposed to be social link sharing sites.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But I use mind more for Hey, I wanna save

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this because I'm gonna look at it later, let me

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>say this, And I don't really want to share it

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with anybody because it's you know, I just want to

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>remember to read it. Yeah. There there are a couple

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of these links sharing sites that are on these acquisitions

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that what we can talk about and and and a

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of them have kind of faded a way. There's

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>still there's still I think Reddit is really the only

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>one that I habitually go to now. I don't I

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>don't tend to use dig anymore, and I don't don't

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>really use stumble Upon and I don't really use Delicious

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so well. Delicious was one of the early sites like this,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think Yahoo had intended to make something big

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>out of it, but they ended up, uh planning on

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>shutting it down until people complained about that so much

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that they found someone to uh to let it go to. Um.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So another one of those things that just sort of,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, pass right on through. So why don't we

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about some other Is there another company would like

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to move to from Yahoo? Or do you want to necessarily?

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>How about we talked about eBay because eBay's also made

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>some pretty big acquisitions in the past. One of them

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was in two thousand two and eBay bought PayPal. Yeah,

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the most synergistic of all of these, if

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you'll pardon the corpse speak, right, Yeah, it's the one

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>that fit the best into what eBay does. I mean PayPal. Obviously,

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have a service that allows you

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to set up an account to purchase things online, and

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>you have a site that is all about selling things online,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>then there is clearly some uh some complementary overlap going

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>on there. And uh so eBay bought PayPal for about

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>one point three billion dollars um, and uh, it sounds

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of of money. I mean, there's a

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. But there were over fifteen million users

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of of PayPal, so there was already a big established

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>user base. There is much different from broadcast dot com.

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>We only had the half million, so that purchase actually

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>seemed like it was a pretty good idea, you know.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And there are plenty of people who still use PayPal now. Granted,

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>PayPal over the last couple of years has had a

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of controversial news stories pop up, generally about There's

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>been some about PayPal offering money, not offering money, but

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>PayPal uh administering over payments to illegal sites or sites

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that are selling uh what pirated stuff or um uh

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. And then there's also uh, some

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>other arguments about PayPal requiring people to go through some

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy steps in order to get money back. Like

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>you've heard the story about the violin, right, So a

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>guy purchased a violin, purchases an antique violin, and uh

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it is truly an antique violin for a couple of

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars, as I recall, and then in is, for

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>some reason or another unsatisfied with the purchase and wants

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the money back, but PayPal says that in order to

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>get the money back, they have to have proof that

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:13.239
<v Speaker 1>he destroyed the violin. He has to actually break it

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>because PayPal doesn't want to refund money, and then have

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the guy just keep the violin anyway, and then he

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>has the violin and the money. So the guy goes

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and takes pictures of the destroyed antique violin. So something

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people would argue has a lot

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of intrinsic value in it and should not have been

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>destroyed was destroyed because of this, this procedure, this whole

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>this policy that PayPal had, and uh so that's an

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>example of some of the bad press PayPal has had

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past couple of years. But still it's again

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a very popular way of of processing transactions on online now.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>eBay also made some other acquisitions over the last few years,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand five, eBay purchase Skype, the VOIPE client

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>voice over Internet Protocol client for two point six billion dollars.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And this was one that had people scratching their heads, yeah,

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>because the question was why would an online auction site

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>purchase a voipe company? And there were there was some

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>talk of possibly incorporating it into the auction uh uh.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>The auction features itself so that potential buyers could speak

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>with sellers while they were considering bidding on on objects,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but that never really happened. And um also, eBay eventually

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>started to move a little further away from the whole

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>auction model and move more toward almost like an online

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>retail center, so more like Amazon than it used to be.

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they still do the auctions as well, but

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily their primary focus anymore. So Skype uh

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>seemed like it might have been a good idea to

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>eBay or really on. But I think a lot of

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>people now think of the eBay purchase of Skype as

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the big mistakes in tech acquisitions. And eventually

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>eBay sold Skype off. Now, first they just sold off

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>the controlling interest to a group of investors and then

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>eventually divested themselves of pretty much all of their interest

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in Skype to a little company that you might have

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>heard of. It started off in a garage. It's called

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>um oh, they like conquistadores Microsoft. That's it, alright. So yeah,

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>just just to provide some context, um, when eBay acquired

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Skype in two thousand five. It's spent two point six

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. But when when um, Microsoft bought it in uh,

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>skypes value had increased. Microsoft was willing to pay eight

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>point five billion dollars. eBay did well with that auction,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes it did, I think. I think actually Microsoft sniped

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the that that at the very last second. Yes they are,

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, as a power seller, we gotta think

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>about it. I mean, Skype is a very popular voice

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>over Internet Protocol UH service, right, and and that's a

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>very valuable asset to have, and Microsoft had to be

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>worried about other companies possibly jumping in there. I can

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think of two right off the top of my head

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that would have been very interested in Skype. Facebook is

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>one and Google is the other. Yeah, yeah, definitely so

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>um and possibly somebody else named after a fruit. Um

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>commodore is not named. Uh. There was one other acquisition

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the eb eBay made, and this kind of ties into

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>what we were talking about with Delicious and Yahoo earlier,

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>which was stumble Upon, another discovery site, and they bought

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it for a seventy five million dollars and um, yeah

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that's another one that kind of I mean, it still exists. Yeah,

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>they haven't. I don't. I wouldn't say they've necessarily mismanaged

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it or anything, but it hasn't. It's sort of neither

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>taken off nor bombed. It's just sort of still there. Yeah.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's sometimes where you you encounter multiple companies

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to compete in the same space, and you might

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>have one or two front runners and then everyone else

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is just kind of there. And this is one of

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>those cases. So where where we want to go from here? Well,

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's funny because as we've been talking, you know,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we had quite a list of these, um, some that

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I collected and some that you collected, and um, these

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are all kind of juicy. So we can you know,

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about should we talk about the pound Gorilla? Sure?

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Um being Google? Yes? Um, I was like, yes, Google

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>has a pretty good track record of well there, there's

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>some companies that are more a quiz ative than others.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that acquisitive acquisitive. Um, yeah, I got to

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>use that degree in English for something. Um. Yeah, so

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>uh you know they've they've they pick up more than

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say just about any other tech company. Um,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know they're there, they tend to be

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>more uh, let's say, flamboyant purchases, like, for example, Blogger

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand three, which they picked up for

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars UM. This was that was a good time.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>This was an example of a good purchase at a

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>good time, because that was right as the blog thing

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>began to take off among I would say the masses,

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>when it became kind of a phenomenon, Do do? Do do do?

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have if he hadn't um and you know,

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:51.479
<v Speaker 1>they added they continue to add other Google is good

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at picking out services that complement existing services and and

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and companies they think that will fit well within their portfolio,

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like picasa um in two thousand four, which they acquired

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for five million UM. You know, Dodgeball in two thousand

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>five was also on Mr Bo's list. I don't know

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>him well enough to call him Andy, so yeah, Dodgeball,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Dodgeball and another service, Jaiku, which they purchased in two

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven for twelve million. These are these are good

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>ones to point out because these are failures really for Google.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I as I don't know that if I don't know

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>how Google portrays them, right, but I know that you

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>know from the outside, they look like failures because you've

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>got Dodgeball, which the location is sharing. It was a

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>location sharing application company. And in fact, the people who

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>were behind Dodgeball eventually left Google and found it a

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>different company called four Square. Wait, don't you play that

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with it? No, it's different kind of four Square, not

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the game but the the check in service. So Dodgeball

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>never really went anywhere, and in fact, the people behind

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Dodgeball were very frustrated by which is why they went

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>on eventually to to found four Square, because that was

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>probably something closer to what they had imagined when they

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>started Dodgeball than what it turned out to be. Jaiku

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is a short messaging service kind of sharing a model,

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like oh there's another company that does this. Um,

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>oh that's right Twitter. Yeah, so Jaiku was Google's well,

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Jaiku was Jaiku's answer to Twitter, but Google purchased Jaiku

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and then or Haiku if you prefer. But that never

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>really went anywhere either. It had it had its you know,

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>dedicated users who loved it, but it never really grew

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>like Twitter did. Twitter exploded and jaik who sat there?

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And so that, um, Jaiku's no more? Right? Yeah, I

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>went the other day actually before we discussed this, and

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it is gone. But perhaps perhaps one of Google's

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>most famous, perhaps the most famous acquisition and Google has

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>made besides a Motorola mobility, which were not really covering

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in this, uh, is YouTube two thousand six one point

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>six five billion dollars. Yeah, and that's a that's a

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of clams. But then YouTube had YouTube had a

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of users, like over over thirty four million active

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>users when at the time of the purchase, and it

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>was you know, Google was looking ahead saying in a way,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.719
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is also kind of a search engine. Yes, it is.

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>People go onto YouTube and they they will they might

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, browse around, but often you go in and

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you PLoP your cursor in the search bar and you

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>type in some stuff and you hope that the videos

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that come up and pertain to what you were typing

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in and so, um, it made sense in that in

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that respect. And uh, in fact, eventually, you know, Google

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>had its own Google Video service for a while and

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.959
<v Speaker 1>then they eventually got rid of that, and so YouTube

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is just the whole Google Video thing now. But it's

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>uh that that's one that was very controversial for a

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.719
<v Speaker 1>while because while the one point six five billion dollars

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the largest amount of money spent on a tech company,

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't that they didn't have a lot of users.

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>There was another problem, which was just that YouTube really

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't making a whole lot of money. Like it's hard

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to make money when you're dealing with a service that's

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that big. Well, YouTube has another thing that's uh

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>playing against it and making money, which is um that

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it requires I was gonna say boatloads, let's go with

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe shiploads of bandwidth and and not only that but servers. Yeah,

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of physical machines are required

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep YouTube going. And video video is resource intensive. Um,

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it takes it uses a lot of data, and especially

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>now that they've got h D High definition video takes

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>up even more space. So you've got lots of hardware,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>using lots of electricity and lots of bandwidth. And somebody's

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>got to pay for that if you're going to keep

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this stuff up, and if you if the users aren't

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>paying for it, then the company is. And uh, you know,

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I I a startup may not have been able to

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>handle paying for it at the way that YouTube has grown,

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but Google can and they can sell ads alongside it, yeah,

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>and which they do, and yeah, it's it's you know,

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we talked about in our YouTube podcast, we talked about

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>how uh these the company ends up seeing something like

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours of material uploaded every minute on YouTube.

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>It's probably even more than that by now. Ah So

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about that level of of uploads and

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that quantity that's coming in, you need to

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>have a nice, big company behind you to make sure

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's a foundation, a solid foundation there. And uh,

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, YouTube is definitely one of those things that

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>have has just become increasingly popular over the years. So

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you could say that it's a great acqu position in

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the sense that if it were to go away, that

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>would be bad. But it's probably still one of the

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>ones that that vexes Google the most in that balancing

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the revenue issues versus the maintenance and overhead issues. Plus

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they're all the lawsuits that are related to YouTube that

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have to do with intellectual property theft, where you've got

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>all these companies that are accusing Google and YouTube of

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>harboring pirates and allowing people to upload pirate ID or

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or at least uh unlicensed copies of content to YouTube,

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and uh so we've been seeing a lot of that

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in the news recently too, about the the stories about

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the court cases involving whether or not YouTube knowingly harbored

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>material that violated intellectual property rights, or if if the

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>company was acting in the best interests of both its

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>users and intellectual property rights owners. I requiring people to

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>take down videos or taking down the videos for them

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that violated those policies, there's it's a big mess right now. Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>So I wanted to talk about the the uh, some

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of the acquisitions that we don't necessarily think about as

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>being exciting. One of those is, uh, what happened just

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:25.439
<v Speaker 1>last year when we're recording this, Uh, Texas Instruments bought

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>National Semiconductor. That fails to excite me. Yeah, exactly. This

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>is not the kind of thing that, um, you know,

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>if if Apple bought Facebook. I mean, I'm just saying, like,

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>two big names that lots of people are interested in.

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.240
<v Speaker 1>People love and hate both of these companies, Texas Instruments

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 1>and National Semiconductor. That's that's big news. That's a big deal.

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Six point five billion dollars. That's a lot of money.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't make the same kinds of headlines as

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>too popular. Uh, you know companies that make the news

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>every day and people will spend money on, and it

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>lacks that emotional investment that comes from these other deals

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that are not as big when you look at it

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>from a monetary standpoint, but they seem to be bigger

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 1>because they are impacting stuff that we interact with on

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 1>a daily basis. Yeah. Then there was two thousand nine

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>when Oracle bought Sun Microsystems number seven point four billion. Um,

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that was that was huge news for anyone who knew

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. Yeah, like there were engineers who

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>were freaking out. Yeah, absolutely absolutely. Well, Uh that that

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>calls into question a lot of other stuff too. Um.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Larry Ellison, head of Oracle, is another one of those.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a character. That's a really nice way to put it.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to do an episode on Larry Ellison,

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think half of it will be bleeped out

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and those will just be the quotes. Yeah exactly. Um,

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he's yeah, he's he's definitely a character. And a lot

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of people who are fans of Sun, the traditional Sun

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Microsystems company, we're very upset that Oracle was was buying

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for a number of reasons, but there was a lot

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of technology behind that to some of it open source

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>UM that they were really afraid that Oracle was going

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to to do away with UM. I remember Hewlett Packard

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>buying Compact in two thousand one for twenty three point

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars. I was a little I was a

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>little stunned by that one. And then we got stunned

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>again when when HP talked about spinning off it's uh,

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's PC business. Well then, of course, you know, Hewlett

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Packard bought three Com for two point seven billion back

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine, which ended up being a big

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 1>mech UM and it didn't really it wasn't a thing

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people. UM, you know, UM trying

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 1>to look for something else that people might have been

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>interested in, and I do have. When j D s

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Unifhase bought SDL in two thousand four, almost forty one billion,

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a big chunk of change. But again, and it's

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge tech acquisition, but it's not the kind of

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>thing that for a lot of us, those of us

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>who listen to this tech podcast, UM, you know, are

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>more interested in sort of the uh tech end people thing,

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, it affects a lot of people, but it's

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.399
<v Speaker 1>on the back end of things. Yeah yeah, And so

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of us are going, well, okay, yeah, that's interesting.

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of money, but how does that affect me?

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And for a lot of us, it's it's not something

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>that that we notice or touch on a daily basis. Yeah,

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So I did wanna we'll close this out really quickly

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>here and I didn't wanna say that, Um, we have

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about news Core in MySpace, because this is

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>another one of those, uh, those moves that at the

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>time seemed like it made sense, but as it played out,

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:43.919
<v Speaker 1>it just did not work. And that was that. News

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Core is the parent company of Fox News, among other companies,

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh. News Core purchased MySpace in two thousand five

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for five eight million dollars. Now, at the time my

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Space was that seemed like a steel. It was incredibly popular.

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It was the online social network, and it was the

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>place where you would go if you wanted your eyes

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to bleed and listen to terrible music, because that's what

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone seemed to do with their profiles. But that was

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>user behavior, not the fault of the service itself, and

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>then Facebook came around, and most people, I think at

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>the time, maybe not most people, but a lot of

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>people at the time bet on my Space beating out

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook because it had a headstart. Facebook was was only

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 1>open to college students when it first started, and it

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>just you know, it seemed like it was it's it

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't seem as feature rich as my Space did. So

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>how could my Space lose to Facebook? Very effectively? Is

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that turned out. So news Corps sold my

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Space off uh Inn for thirty five million dollars to

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Specific Media, which was a group of investors. So from

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.720
<v Speaker 1>five million when they purchased it to thirty five million

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 1>when they sold it, that's not a success story. And

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, news Coore did try a couple of times

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to revitalize my Space. You know, they tried to make

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it more of a music discovery kind of social network,

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but by then I think it was too late because

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>my Space was one of those places where bands, a

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of bands had made their web presence known. They

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>used them because I had great tools. If you were

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a band and you wanted to share some of your

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>music and build up a fan base, it was a

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>good resource. But there are other resources online now that

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.200
<v Speaker 1>do that just as well or better in some cases.

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it just was too little, too late, and

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so news Corpse sold it off for million, eating that loss.

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 1>And uh and we'll see what specific media does with it,

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>if anything, or if they just end up cannibalizing it

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and turning it into something else. Honestly, we don't know

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. And uh, just one last little note how

0:41:56.960 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. We were I heard that we

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>were acquired several years ago by Discovery Communications, So you know,

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 1>we were part of another company for a while and

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we're acquired back shortly after I joined UM, within a

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>year that I joined, I think, or maybe a year

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half, UM two months for me. Yeah, so

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we we ended up getting acquired by Discovery Communications and

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>now we are part of that company. So uh yeah,

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>it's UM. And it was interesting. You know, it was

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.439
<v Speaker 1>a it was a different culture, but it was very

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>complimentary to what we already had. So I think as

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>far as transitions go, ours was probably one of the

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>smoothest I've ever seen. I've seen other companies where, you know,

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they get acquired by another one and one culture ends

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up dominating over the other. And it can be messy. Yeah. Well,

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>reading a lot of the transcriptions of these um these

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.879
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions too, you can tell that some of them were

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>like oil and water and others were less. Yes, some

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of them went together, like like wine and cheese, because

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I always wine and never have each cheese. And on

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that note, we're going to wrap this up. If you

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 1>guys have any topics you would like us to tackle

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in future podcasts, like how bloopers work, so you can

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you can write in, you can send in a note

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>to our email address that's tech stuff at Discovery dot com,

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:26.240
<v Speaker 1>or let us know on Facebook or Twitter are handled.

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>There is tech stuff hs W and Chris and I

0:43:29.719 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again or really soon for more

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on this and thousands of other topics. Is it how

0:43:36.719 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>staff works dot com? Brought to you by the reinvented

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve camera. It's ready. Are you