WEBVTT - Mini Crush #2

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Welcome to Movie Crush Charles W. Chuck Bryant

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>here with nol say hello, no Chuck uh and I

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>said say hello, no hello no right here in pot

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>City Market at our home studio in Atlanta, Georgia, and

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome to episode two of the shorter mini episodes. I

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>think we should have probably had of a name at

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this point, so just ignore this part. I want to

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>welcome everyone, though. Uh. One thing I'm gonna do with

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the onset of each episode is recap what you heard

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the week before on the interview, so um, hopefully you

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>heard on Friday. Um, wonderful Tony Hale live at San

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Francisco's Sketch Vest. Could not have gone better with so

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>much fun. Big thanks to Tony Hale for that, and

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys enjoyed that live version and look

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for more of those in the future. I'm not gonna

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna hit the road quite like I do

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>with stuff you should know, but every now and then

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna try and get some shows together in some

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>smaller rooms a lot of fun. Uh. This week we

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to do a few different segments. Oh. Also

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>want to preview upcoming Oscar Show. If you aren't on

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook page, you might not have seen this. But

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I had the idea to get some recording gear taken

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>home with me, break out some wine, and sit down

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>with my lovely wife Emily, and do a pre Oscar

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>show where we kind of go over the nominees and

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>what we're expecting and what we saw and what we

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>liked and didn't like, and then we're gonna record a

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>post Oscar special. So I would reckon that. The Oscars

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>are in March fourth, So the Monday before that Sunday,

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll do the pre show and then if all goes well,

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the morning after, or let's be real, the afternoon after

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on the next Monday, the fifth, we'll do our post

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Oscars wrap up. You guys gonna place bets unlike who

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the winner is, have your picks and then like argue

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>about it and maybe see who the winner is. There

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>may be some arguing and was a once you get

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>into the penut grease. Yeah, people have seemed pretty excited

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about this. They're like Emily plus y and plus Chuck

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>equals fun. Every time we're gonna put Ruby to bed

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and they'll probably dogs barking at some point, but I'm

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.799
<v Speaker 1>just gonna leave all that stuff in because give you

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a peek behind the curtain. So look forward to that.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And like I said in the first shorter episode, we

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>are are calling for people on Facebook to interact here

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's where most of these segments are coming from.

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And everyone's really pretty excited about all this stuff, and

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that makes me excited. And I can Knowll is awake,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>so that means he's excited. And this week we're gonna

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>do a few different segments. We're gonna to start off

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>like we usually do with social studies. So so this

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>week I put out the question, um, what is your

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>favorite romantic comedy? And this is a romantic comedies are

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>tough because a lot of times they wouldn't necessarily qualify

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>as great film or great cinema. Not to get too snooty,

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>but people love them and that's kind of what the

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>show is about. It's not um, it's it's not a

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>snotty look at the deepest films on the planet. Sometimes

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they're just movies we love. And romantic comedies, you know,

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>there's there's some good ones out there. And I'm gonna

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and chime in with mine and This was

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>tough because I thought about going with some offbeat romantic

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>comedies like this movie Happy Accidents, which is wonderful with

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Vincent Dinafrio and Marissa Tomay that had a weird sci

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>fi angle, or or on that same note, one called

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Safety Not Guaranteed um that also had a weird sort

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of side five angle at the time traveling one with

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Aubrey Plaza. Yes, but there are romantic comedies and that

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>did love those movies. But I'm gonna go super tradition here,

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna throw out one of the all time

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>greats When Harry met Sally. Uh, just one of the best.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>The great Nora Ephron just wrote the ship out of

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that movie, one of the best romantic comedy scripts of

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>all time. And um just wonderfully acted by Billy Crystal

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and Meg Ryan and Bruno Kirby and the wonderful late

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Carrie Fisher. Just a really good, solid, solid movie, tells

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a great love story. It's just sappy and sweet and

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all the right ways. Not seen it? Oh another hole? Really? Yeah? Uh?

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Are you a little cynical romantic comedies? My girlfriend is

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>really into them, so I've kind of gotten a little

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of schooling and rom coms of of late, but

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>no they're not. There've never been something I sought out.

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Um is Harold and Maudo romantic comedy. See that's the problem, right,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's almost the term of like a derision. Almost agreed,

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it a weird way. I think Harold and

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>maud Is was definitely supposed to be a sort of

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>romantic comedy. That's probably. I'm not alone. I'm saying probably,

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that's one of my favorite movies at the time. So

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>how Ashby, Great al Ashby, So that's mine, That's Knolls,

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And let's take through some of these on Facebook. Karrie Bernstein,

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So I married an ax murderer. So funny and so

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>realistic in human and roses in behavior. Sure that counts

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>stranger than fiction. From Caleb Omar Elizondo, great name. A

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people put this one. They said, I love

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it when comedy actors play more serious roles. And Will

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Ferrell was amazing playing off Maggie Gyllenhall agreed. A bunch

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of people said, love Actually, I have not seen that movie.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>That's the one with like the signs right where it comes. Yeah,

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's troupe almost it's so it's like he comes

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to the door and doesn't say anything and just holds

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>up these signs that's say different like romantic kind of

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>tongue and shape stuff. And I forget the actor that

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>played um, the main dude and walking dead. Um what

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>tankes his name? He's an English actor, Anye he's the sheriff.

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I can remember the actor's name I Love Actually was

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Grant. Am I thinking he's in that too, But

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the part where he he walks

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>up to the door and like holds up these signs.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's actually a cut of it that makes it

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>look like a horror movie. There's a bunch of those,

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>like for different stuff, but that one is particularly good.

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>If you want to check I Love Actually as a

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>horror movie. That's a fun one. Oh I will and

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>no no trust me. A lot of people love this movie.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm in the in the rare company of Noel

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and I neither one of us having seen it, but

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Trish Wallace's Love Actually. When the planes hit the twin towers,

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, none of the phone calls

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>were from people on board, were messages of hate or revenge.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They were all messages of love. That must be a

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>quote from the movie No Idea. There was a nine

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven angle to love. Actually, I don't know. Uh Kuby

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>don Kuby Cubs one of our good old friends, she

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>says when I hear him at Sally rewatch it every

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>year and it's a perfect combination of funny and sweet,

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and the secondary characters Bruno, Kirby and carry Fisher make

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole movie for me hilarious, agreed, Gobs. Matt Jones

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>says Shaun of the Dead probably more for us Brits,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but the mix of horror, comedy, romance and British pub

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>culture was awesome. Also very quotable, Heather Miller. We had

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of these for Nodding Hill. So Heather Miller says,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Grant's best movie for sure. Everything feels authentic and

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel forced like most romcoms do. Did you

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>see that one? You don't see any romantic comedies And

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm kind of getting roped in more and

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>more lately. But Tyler Murphy Murph, one of another one

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of our good old faithful listeners, says, Sleepless in Seattle,

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>there isn't anything more cute yet more hilarious than your

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>kid trying to hook you up with someone by calling

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a radio talk show without you knowing. I have seen that.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw that in the theater. Actually, I've never seen

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that all the way through. That was like right, and

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>then you got mail was like the next next one. Yeah,

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I saw both of those in the theater. Don't remember

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>much about them, but well, the classic pairing of Tom

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Hanks and Meg Ryan. Uh. And I see if I

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>can find it someone. Oh, here, it is right here. Uh.

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Jason Wortham, I agree, sir, Joe Versus the Volcano. It's

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite all time movies, and I think

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the great underrated movies of all time. We've

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>said it before over the years and stuff you should know,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>but Jason, I totally agree, he says, in part because

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>repeating themes, overt symbolism, and a unique comic comedic tone

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>make it much more than a run of the mill

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>rom com. Also because a pagoda, he says, You're corrects

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are on all accounts. That's great, Oh, Vanessa Lopez. Also

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>with Joe Versus Volcano, I'll beat quirkiness and a pagoda

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>who knew a pagoda all these fans. Another for nodding

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Hill from carry O'Neil. Another for when Harry met Sally

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Zaliga. I believe it's how you pronounced that name,

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Um Joe herndon five d Days of Summer. I think

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it accurately portrays the way some young men can literally

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>torture themselves after they get their hearts ripped out by

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>someone they thought were a perfect match. I like that one. Yeah,

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I remember that one. It's a good one. I actually

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>worked with Mark Webb, the director of that movie. He

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was a music video guy, and he may still be

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>doing some of that. But when I was at PA

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles and Emily was just my friend at

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that point, she was a producer and produced music videos,

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and I worked a lot of jobs with her and Mark.

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We worked on probably five or six Mark Web jobs

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>on music videos. And then he did this movie and

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we were both like what. And then he did the

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Spider Man movie. We're like what. So congratulations to Mark

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for up in your anti in your career. People give

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it so much ship, But I really like Garden State.

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it in years, but I quite enjoyed

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that when it came out, and then it just became

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this like trope of like hipsterd um awfulness kind of. Yeah,

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we may need to do a special segment on Garden

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>State at one point, because I really liked it when

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it came out, but I also have been a victim

0:09:55.600 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think to the ah the recategorization of that movie

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>over the years as being awful. We'll also spawned the

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>whole manic pixie dream girl troupe, which is problematic in

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and of itself, sort of a bummer, you know, with

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>for those you don't know what that is. That's the

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of the notion that the little girl in the movie,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and I say little girl because that's usually how it's portrayed,

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is like this little little sort of pixie sue girl

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>who's only there to serve the romantic whims of the

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>man and to change him in some way. He's a

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>quirky way, he's he's in the duld rooms, and she

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>lifts him up out of his sadness and he becomes

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole person, right while she has not much of

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a character arc of her right exactly. And and guy,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we never need to hear that Shin's song ever again

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>because of that movie. Great song, but yeah, kind of

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>corny when I look back on it. And boy, Zach Brath,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he's taken a beating over the years because of that movie.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel bad for him a little bit.

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>But should I I don't know. I mean, I thought

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Scrubs was wonderful. I really like that show a lot.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It's really fun. It's it's it's really really fun show.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And he's a new talented guy. He has. Have you

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>seen the new one about the podcast? You posted that

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was just like, you can we have jumped?

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>You said it, You said that our industry is officially

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>jumped the show if you guys haven't seen it. Zach

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Brath is coming out with a new show where he

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>plays uh. I think it's a story of gimblet if

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, where he plays a dude who starts

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>his own podcast network against all odds and it, oh god,

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>it looks bad. It looks really bad, fledgling rags to

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>riches podcasting, and it had to be Zach Brath of course,

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like anyone else. And well it's still look bad no

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>matter what. Uh, let me see here, does rushmore count

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>from Edwin Forrest Glenn. There's romance and there's certainly comedy.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Um it is a in a way, not the traditional

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.839
<v Speaker 1>rom com, because when you say rom com, it definitely

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>brings to mind certain types of things. It takes the

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>boxes a little bit when you have like a rom com.

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, yeah, it sort of I guess Wes Anderson's

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>version of a rom com. Tyler Watts, I love you man.

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>It can be difficult in this culture for men to

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>have close relationships with other men. This movie shows how

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>rewarding it can be. Uh and not care what the

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>culture of toxic masculinity dictates. That's a good point, Tyler.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And I actually like that movie because you can put

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Rudd and Jason Siegel and anything, and I'll watch it.

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Love those dudes. All right, let me take through a

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>few more of these. Uh Sweet Home Alabama from Melanie Kaufman.

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>The relationships feel real. There are no pointless misunderstandings to

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>further the plot. It all seems to happen naturally. All right.

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll buy that, and we'll finish up here with Susie Buttress,

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty Woman. It's problematic now in many ways, but I

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>still enjoy watching it for the strong character of Vivian

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>achieving her dreams. Yeah, you know, looking at movies the

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>current lens, these past movies, it's and be tough. Uh.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of movies are problematic now some of them know, well, yeah,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>what can you do? All right? So that's social studies

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>for the week. Uh, And now we will move on

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to a new, brand new segment called recommended Viewing. For

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>recommended viewing, what I'm gonna do is go through a

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>recommendation for a foreign film, a documentary, and an independent film,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>because I love those types of movies and not everyone does.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So maybe broaden your horizons a bit um, always looking

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for recommendations from you about these two. So uh, for

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>foreign film, which I will call Not Born in the USA,

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>City of Lost Children from the writing directing team of

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Juneau and Caro of Amili fame. That was the movie

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of put them on the mainstream map. But

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>before Emily they did City Lost Children starring Ron Pearlman

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>and a whole host of FRENCHIESE And it's about this

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>creepy old guy who is aging prematurely because he can't

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>dream any longer, so he steals. He invents a machine

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>where he steals the dreams of children. Have you seen it?

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I love him great love. People dog on it a

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit because I mean it is kind of like

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a fairytale. He kind of you know, idealized yet dark

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>tim burtony kind of thing, and I think some people

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little overwraw, but I adore it. And

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Delicatessen too, which came before it, similar quirky vibe kind

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of went balls to the walls with on Emily, but like, yeah,

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they're fantastic. I love those guys well, and it's funny

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>when you see Emily such a sweet story and like

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Delicatessen and City Bells Children were so not Yeah, I

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>guess what I mean is like just the quirk factor

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that was like up to it to the roof for Emily.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Kind of it was all that and none of the

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>darkness or much much less of it. What have those

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>guys done lately? Well, they did one of the alien movies,

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Alien Resurrection, and they kind of split up, like I think. Actually,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>there was another movie that one of them did on

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>their own, um about like a wartime movie. I can't

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>remember what it's called now, but um but one of

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>them did one of the Aliens, right, correct? Do you

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think it was alien resurrection? Interesting? All right, So I'm

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna move on. I think Noel might be looking that up.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna move on to my documentary recommendation. And

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this is one of my favorite documentaries of all time,

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if not my favorite, and it is the Great Vernon,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Florida from um Errol Morris, one of, you know, one

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the best there is, and it was I think

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>his second documentary after Gates of Evan, and I would

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>recommend All Vernon. I'm sorry, all Aeron Morris Docks. Vernon,

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Florida is a story of Vernon, Florida. It is this

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>um small town in the Florida Panhandle and not on

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the beach. You move inland from the beach on the

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Panhandle and you get some read Florida going on there.

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And the whole idea of this movie was there was

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>an insurance scam going on in this town where people

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>were cutting off limbs to claim insurance, like literally cutting

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>off hands and feet so they could claim insurance money.

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Errol Morris heard about this went down there and it

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>ended up not being about that. I'm not sure. I

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>think no one would talk about it. Maybe but he

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>ended up just being like, Wow, I gotta stay in

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>this town because these people are a story unto themselves.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Florida man cuts off limb for insurance money. Have you

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>seen No, I just know about Florida man down there.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I cannot say what's stronger words for you, especially to

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>see burn in Florida. As soon as you can, I will.

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I've only seen the thin blue line. That's the only

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>one I've seen of his. I've man, well, while we're

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on Errol Morrison after burning Florida fast, cheap and out

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of control is unbelievable and what I would say, you

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>should go two seconds. But vernon Florida is great. Um,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's seen it three slow moving, but he just

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>does the Errol Morris thing and sets the camera up

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and talks to these people who, Uh. I don't want

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to disparage them in anyway. Just watch it. Uh. There

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>are a bunch of different characters, from the local sheriff

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to the turkey Hunter. Uh. Turkey Hunter is one of

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>the most beloved characters I've ever seen on on a

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>film screen, and weirdly, my friend Mike in real life

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Mike Anderson ended up kind of making friends with the

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Turkey Hunter by calling the guy and he just looked

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>him up and called him and was gonna do a

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>little follow up documentary on him, and he sadly passed

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>away while they were kind of talking about this, but

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>he would play me voice messages from this dude. And

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 1>if you're a fan of Vernon, Florida, then you know,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to actually get on the phone with the Turkey Hunter

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>is quite a treat. So go check that out. And

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>then finally my independent film recommendation, I'm going with one

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>from just a few years ago called The Spectacular Now

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>and it is a romantic Uh it's not a romantic comedy.

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>It's a romance movie. Uh. Filmed entirely in Athens, Georgia.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember I lived there actually when that was happening.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I remember that local Athens filmmaker. His name is James

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>pon Sult And it starred I was well. It was

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>written by Scott new Stat new Statter and Michael Webber,

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but it starred Miles Teller and Shane Woodley. Bree Larson

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>had a part, Jennifer Jason Lee and Bob Odin Kirk

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>were great in supporting roles. But it's really just a great,

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>great coming of age romance, so so real, one of

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the most real movies about teenage love that I've ever seen.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Miles Teller plays kind of a uh, straight up party

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>guy in his senior year. Um, super popular, clearly has

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>an alcohol problem even at that young age. And he

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>meets a nice girl in Shine Woodley, Um, but a

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>different kind of nice girl. And there are no tropes,

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>there are no uh, there's no schmaltz. It's just really

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>real and very sweet, and I just couldn't recommend it more.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's called The Spectacular now and I'm not sure if

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you can stream this, but I hope you can. And

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you said you did not see it at all. I

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have not seen it. No. I just remember when I

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was in production and it was on the shelf of

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the local video store. R I P. Vision Video. By

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, they're all gone now in Athens, you know

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the right. I did not, but that was definitely the

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>cool spot to work. Yeah, how all the band folks

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>worked a vision like that was best recommendations. And I

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>worked at the downtown Vision Video and I think I've

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 1>told the story on the show, but it was the

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>cool video store in Athens. So where my eyes were

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>really opened two different kinds of movies thanks to the

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>dudes that worked there. And uh yeah I read that

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they were closing down very sad. Anyway, check it out

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>spectacular now and now we move on to our final segments.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>As always, stream this and comment card. And this week

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just now finishing up with my wife. We're a

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>little late on this, but we're watching The Handmad's Tale

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on Hulu. Did you see it? I started, um it,

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tough, and it was not in the mood

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for something quite that. Yeah. It is obviously the story

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>from the great novel by Margaret Atwood. It is a

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>dystopian ah drama h slash. It's almost a horror movie

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, or a horror you know tale. Uh.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a very tough thing to watch. It's not the

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing you watch you're like, oh this, you know,

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to watching it every night. But it's

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so good and well made that it's almost required viewing,

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I think see in this day and age. Uh, it's

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:05.479
<v Speaker 1>amazing that this book was written in the mid nineteen eighties,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>although I guess it was written during the height of

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War and the Reagan administration, so that's probably

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>where that came from. But all these years later, it's

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it seemed more relevant than ever. Starring Elizabeth Moss, Samira Wiley,

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Fines, and Yvon Strahovsky, among many others. It is depressing,

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and like Noel said, it's a tough watch. Ultimately, it

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>is a great show, though, And um, I believe they're

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>furthering the story with the season two. Um, and I

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>just read last night. Sadly, Margaret Outwood isn't really making

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>any much dough on this. She had sold the film

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>rights back in the either eighties or early nineties and

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>they made a pretty dumb, bad movie version of the

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Handmade s Tale. But when you sell I mean she

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>signed the paper, but when you sell the rights like that,

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't for like a few years or if they

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>make this it's wherever I think. I heard an interview

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with her NPR though, where like, the sales of that

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>book are up so much because of it, and she's

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously getting residuals. Yeah, she said the book sales are up,

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>which is good, and that she did get paid some

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as a consultant on the on the TV show, but

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not some big windfall of cash for her. Do

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you know if it's like, are they expanding on the

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:21.239
<v Speaker 1>book because it seems to stretch it out as much

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as they have. It couldn't be exactly time read the

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>long book. But if they're doing a season two, I'm

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that it's um that they're expanding on. But yeah,

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:33.719
<v Speaker 1>tough show, but ultimately, um, like I said, worth worth watching.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Then finally, we're gonna finish up with a comic card

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>segment where I read through some of these emails called

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>from Facebook, so they're not really emails, but you know

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. This is from Jonas Billy Utt. Do

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you have any deep thoughts on the film versus digital debate? Well, Jonas,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I do. I'm gonna getting old thoughts in a minute too.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Um here's my thing. When it first started out, I

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of a film purist thought, now stick

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with film, it's richer, it looks better. I do have

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit of nostalgia for that clickity click in the

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>world of the projector in the background. Um. However, things

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have progressed such that digital is looks amazing all of

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>even movies shot on film, that there aren't a ton

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>these days are being shown in theaters and on television

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>digitally anyway, So I say digital is the way to go.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>For sure. It has opened up, Um, it's opened up

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>filmmaking so many more people that would not have that access, because,

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, if you're a small, little indie filmmaker,

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the days of spending tens of thousands of dollars on

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>cans of film and transfer and develop developing this film

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and processing it, it's just it made it very cost prohibitive.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And now you can go shoot a movie on your iPhone,

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>which uh Steven Soderberg did and saw the trailer for

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that thing. Yeah. I think the guy that did the

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that movie, the Florida Project that made Big Splash down here,

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Um his first movie. I think it's called Tangerine shot

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on knife. I haven't seen that. I've heard great thing.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I haven't even seen either of those, but I know

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 1>he shot Florida Project on film. So it's an interesting

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like dichotomy there or whatever, you know. But anything to

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>me that broadens filmmaking and democratizes it so people that

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>normally could not make movies can make movies, I am

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>all about it. I am glad that there are people

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that are going out there and shooting film still that

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>uh have deep pockets backing them. That's kind of cool.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I don't think there is any debate any longer.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Digital is just fine. I think for me, it makes

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>me really appreciate the craft of like those movies that

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>were shot and edited entirely on film, because you your

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.239
<v Speaker 1>choices are so much more limited. It's like you have

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to get it, get the shot, get the take, and

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>then cut it by hand or splice it with like

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>on on a block or whatever. Today it's like, you know,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>we can shoot iNFiNiT it takes and you know, pick

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>our selects and make you know, so many different versions

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of things. So it really makes me appreciate the way

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>things used to be done. But that being said, the

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>medium isn't limiting the way you behave. I mean, people

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that worked on film still maybe just do one or

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 1>two takes and on digital and and you still have

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that like artistry in that craft. But it just kind

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of makes me think back and like how amazing was

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>it that like The Godfather, you know, it was all

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>shot on film and edited by hand, and the sounds

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>every all that stuff blows my mind. But digital is

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>so adaptable when you can make it look however you

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>want because you wanted to look really clean like video,

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>or you can make it look like film. You know,

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of options there, which I think is

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>ultimately super cool. Yeah, I'm with you for sure. And

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the notion of you know, twenty four little pictures in

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a second, Um, it's just I kind of romanticize a

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And my my friend, uh, Scotty Appolito, who

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 1>named movie Crush big shout out, one of my best friends.

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>He's a cameraman here in town and a director of photography,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and he will uh he certainly loves digital, but being

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on set, he does poop poo the fact that there

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of um directors now that he doesn't

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like probably are the most talented people because they're

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>just like, set up five cameras and shoot it all

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>forever and we'll figure it out later. It's not a

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>great approach, um, Like you said, the to have to

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>make choices like that's really what you test your metal

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>as a filmmaker. I think, Um, but ultimately I do

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good thing. It's the same in music

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>with like recording to tape, versus recording digital. It's like,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>when you're recording on tape, your take is your take,

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that's it. And when you're recording on digital you can

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>do just splice things together and do infinite takes and

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>all that. So it's like now in the same way

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the film, Like when people record in studio, a lot

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of times they'll record some stuff on tape, like drums,

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll record it on tape, and then everything else they'll

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>record in pro tools on digital or whatever. So it's

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>like a hybrid of the two. You know. It's interesting,

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. All right, So thanks Jonas for that great question. Um,

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Colin made all here's your question. Any thoughts on the

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>potential Tarantino star Trek movie And did you see Colossal?

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll go backwards here. I did not see Colossal yet,

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but I've heard it's really really great and I can't

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>wait to see it. Um. For those you don't know,

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the uh Ann Hathaway movie that kind of flew

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.160
<v Speaker 1>under the radar. Um and the premise sounds really kind

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of nuts that there's this, um, this giant monster terrorizing

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>some other part of the world that she is seeing

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>on television on the news and somehow she links up

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and is able to control that monster. It sounds nutty.

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird concept, did you know. I just I

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:46.959
<v Speaker 1>heard the concept alone just kind of made me, you know,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>turn my head. That's that's's an interesting one. Never heard

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>anything quite like that. Yeah, but I mean all the

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>reviews are just off the chart, so I definitely want

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to see it. Um. As far as Tarantino Star Trek movie,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone knows my stance on Tarantino, which is

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I loved him, um and now I'm a little wary

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of him. I think his movies are way too long

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>now and pretty indulgent, um with the scripts. Having said that,

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I will still see anything Tarantino puts out because I

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like I should and have to. H he is

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the essential filmmakers of our day. Um, but

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you know his past few movies, I just haven't loved.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>As far as Star Trek goes, I am not. I've

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>never been a Star Trek dude. Didn't watch the TV show.

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I've only seen a couple of the various iterations of

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the films over the years. Um that we're fine, But

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>as a non Star Trek person, it's hard to really

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>get super into it. So I don't really have a

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>take as far as no, you can't do that to

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek because I don't. It's not a beloved thing

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think it is a very interesting idea

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to see what Tarantino would do with any any iconic

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>property and franchise like this. Um, he's never done sci

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 1>fi at all? Of course, do you think he's just

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>getting bored or do you think he just like really

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just had a bang up idea that he just like,

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I've got to do this, this has to be done.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I never knew that he was a treky. That's interesting. No,

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, but is this literally going to be a

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek movie where they're having these long Tarantino asked

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>digressions about uh food menus. Star Trek is a talkie show,

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean? Not a whole lot of

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>action on like next Gear. People are gonna dang me

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for that. I'm sure there's way more. I don't really

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't watch the show, but it always seemed to

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>me to be a bit more of like a people

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>having conversations in space. You know, maybe it'll work. I

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know, Well I will I will

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly check that out. Um, I'm a Star Wars guy,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>not that you have to be one or the other,

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>but obviously way into Star Wars. So Tarantino did a

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars movie, I would be super worried. Actually. Yeah. Finally,

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Simon Workman, this is Simon. Oh do you really he's

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>We met him. Actually we went for car stuff. We

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>went to Ohio and uh, he took us out to

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>dinner and yeah, he gave us to each a bag

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of coffee from the coffee roaster. He works out. He

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>just got his like PhD in Sherlock Holmes mythos or

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever the thing. Yeah, yeah, it's like the the um

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like things like the poisons and like remedies that are

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in Sherlock Holmes. He wrote like his doctoral thesis on

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that that sounds like a rap l a PhD in

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Sherlock Holmes. Yeah, he's a cool guy. Hi, Hi, Simon.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Well that's awesome. Um, there's a great question too, al,

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So you think about this while I answer, what do

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you think is the best use of a song in

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a movie? So not what he's asking about is the

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>best music que essentially, Uh, and if you're not down

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with the lingo music que is when you know something

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>happens in the movie and that song turns on. Um,

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so he's not talking about just the soundtrack. This is tough,

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but I have a few I want to lay out there.

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I really thought about this long and hard last night. Um.

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>We we just talked about it with the Dave Willis

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>episode on Bottle Rocket two thousand man the Rolling Stone

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>song and Bottle Rocket at the end when they're they've

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>done the break in at the at the warehouse. Just

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the great music cues of all times. UM,

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>really really good one. I'm also gonna go with These

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Days from the Royal Tannon Bombs, great great music cue

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>when it ramps into that SlowMo Gwyneth Paltrow gets off

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the bus and that sweet song by Velvet Underground and Nico,

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>or maybe that was just Nico. That's just nice. I

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think he wrote that song. I don't Jackson Brown. I

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>did not know that. Yeah, there are a lot of

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>great versions of that song, including Jackson Brown and Greg

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Allman has a really great, great version, but for my money,

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Nico's is the best. And that's a great music queue. Uh.

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>And then a few more here. Uh. The Triumvirate from

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Boogie Nights, the Sister Christian Jesse's Girl loof Balloons sequence

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and Boogie Nights. We're throwing the firecrack and like that

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is the tensest shit I've ever seen in my life.

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So great Alfred Molina, what a great, great scene. And

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that's like a triple music queue just nailed by p T. Anderson.

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Um tiny dancer and almost famous little schmalsey yea with

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a sing along in the bus. But I buy you

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>know why those those that one similar to the Boogie

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Nights one, and that the music is in the scene.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like interacted with you know what I mean. Like

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like on the soundtrack, like the character

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is singing the song. It's playing on the stereo. They're

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>singing in in the in the bus or whatever. I like.

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I like that. That's like music as a character, almost,

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you know. Absolutely. Um. I just bought my own John tickets.

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Was farewell to her, by the way, I can't wait.

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh Layla and Goodfellas from Derek and the Domino's Air

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Clapton's Band. Such a great great music que and good Fellas.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I have a more favorite one from Good Fellas it's

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>when they're being chased by the helicopter and it's Harry

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Nelson jump into the fire. That's amazing. That is well,

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Martin Scorsese is one of the all time great mus

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>master artists, big time of all time. Uh. And then

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>finally um from Fight Club at the very end, Where's

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>My Mind by the Pixies, just a great song. And

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>when I first saw a Fight Club in the theater

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it I was one of those dudes. It blew my mind. Uh.

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And at the very end when they come back together

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and those buildings are exploding and they had that great

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.959
<v Speaker 1>shot from behind and Where's my Mind starts, It's just

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>fucking fantastic. I have friends to say that one doesn't

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>hold up, but I loved it so much. Club or

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Club. So I have some friends that just don't.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>They say it's a little they give them the machismo

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of it is a little Colin of its day for sure,

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But I will still watch it and enjoy it. I hadn't.

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know the Pixies. So I heard that song

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, what the fund is this? I

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>have to find what this is immediately, And then I

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>got all the Pixies because of that song. Awesome, it's amazing,

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>very cool. All right, thank you Simon Workman and hello

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>again from NOL. But uh, that wraps it up for

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this week everyone, So as always, you wanna let you

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>know about this Friday show so you can watch it

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this week. Ben Acker on Miller's Crossing, Ben as as

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you will as you will find as one of my

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>good friends out in Los Angeles, and uh we had

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a long, long conversation about one of my favorite movies

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of all time, Miller's Crossing, And the only reason Ben

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't talk for eight hours about this because

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to go to dinner and continue talking about

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller's Crossing. We should have just kept the microphones going

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. But look forward to Ben Acker on

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Miller's Crossing Coen Brothers movie. Check it out this week

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>so you can crush out on Friday with us. Thanks

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Noel for everything, yeah man, and we will see you

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>all next week.